Symptoms Have Modest Accuracy in Detecting Endoscopic and Histologic Remission in Adults With Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Outcomes in eosinophilic esophagitis: current understanding and future directions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, immune-mediated disorder that demands lifelong management due to its potential to progress to fibrosis and esophageal strictures. This review synthesizes current strategies for evaluating EoE outcomes and highlights emerging approaches aimed at reconciling the often discordant relationship between clinical symptoms and histologic findings. An updated synthesis is crucial to guide evolving clinical practices.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent literature emphasizes the multifaceted nature of EoE, revealing limitations in traditional outcome measures. Advances in patient-reported outcomes (PROs), histologic scoring systems, and endoscopic assessments have enriched our understanding of disease activity. Furthermore, the integration of functional assessments through modalities such as high-resolution manometry and EndoFLIP, along with digital data integration, has refined disease monitoring and provided nuanced insights into treatment responses and long-term progression. Additionally, emerging evidence suggests that integrating novel biomarkers may further refine disease stratification and outcomes.

SUMMARY

A multidimensional approach that combines clinical, histologic, endoscopic, and functional data is crucial for personalized management of EoE. These insights pave the way for improved therapeutic decision-making and highlight the need for standardized, comprehensive tools in both clinical practice and future research. These additional findings advocate for a shift towards precision medicine, emphasizing multidisciplinary and patient-centric approaches.

[Eosinophilic esophagitis-an underestimated food allergy?]

Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) is a chronic T2-inflammatory disease and can be figuratively referred to as atopic dermatitis of the oesophagus. It is an immune-mediated disease caused by food allergens and is histologically defined by eosinophilic infiltration and clinically characterised by symptoms of oesophageal dysfunction. In addition to reducing the currently still considerable diagnostic latency, the focus is on prioritising existing and new treatment options with the aim of ensuring effective patient care with improved quality of life in the long term.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Benign Esophageal Disorders

Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are essential tools for assessing a patient's subjective experience related to disease and health. PROs measure symptom severity and evaluate treatment efficacy across a range of conditions at a particular point in time. Although PROs focusing on esophageal symptoms and esophageal hypervigilance exist, disease-specific PROs for commonly encountered benign esophageal disorders such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), and achalasia are limited. Most GERD-specific PROs fail to address the complete spectrum of GERD presentations and those that provide daily assessment are more suited for research. Similarly, many EoE-specific PROs were designed for clinical trials. Comprehensive instruments incorporating EoE symptoms, as well as endoscopic and histologic features of active inflammation and fibrostenotic changes are needed. The psychometric properties of the Eckardt Score used for achalasia have significant limitations, stemming primarily from the dominance of dysphagia in scoring. Newer achalasia-specific PROs attempt to overcome this by capturing nuanced patient experiences. Broader symptom PROs are often used to assess esophageal symptoms across the spectrum of benign esophageal disorders, including a PRO that assesses esophageal hypervigilance and symptom-specific anxiety. Future efforts should focus on creating user-friendly PROs that comprehensively evaluate not just clinical presentation but also the disease state, which will enhance clinical symptom follow-up, quality of life assessment, and research applications. Assessments of hypervigilance and visceral anxiety will complement these applications as these measures are both a PRO and an important moderator of symptom severity and quality of life.

Insights into the natural history and disease course of eosinophilic esophagitis

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, immune-mediated disease marked by eosinophilic inflammation and esophageal dysfunction, with a significant impact on morbidity, quality of life, and health care utilization. Once considered rare, EoE has become increasingly prevalent, with global estimates exceeding 140 cases per 100,000 individuals. This rise highlights the need to better understand the natural history and disease course to inform diagnosis and management strategies. Evidence suggests that EoE is a progressive condition, such that untreated inflammation contributes to esophageal remodeling and fibrotic complications over years to decades. Patients can develop esophageal food impactions, leading to emergency department utilization and the need for emergent endoscopy. In addition, patients with fibrostenotic disease can require serial dilations. Long-term management, including dietary therapy, proton pump inhibitors, topical corticosteroids, and newer therapies such as dupilumab, demonstrate promise in altering the disease course. However, variability exists in the strength of evidence regarding each therapy's ability to halt or reverse fibrosis. Knowledge gaps persist, particularly in defining fibrosis, identifying phenotypes prone to progression, and tailoring therapies to individual patients. Addressing these gaps will require continued research into understanding fibrosis progression and how therapies alter this trajectory. These efforts are poised to significantly improve clinical care and enhance outcomes for patients with EoE.

Persistent desmoglein-1 downregulation and periostin accumulation in histologic remission of eosinophilic esophagitis

BACKGROUND

Patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) require long-lasting resolution of inflammation to prevent fibrostenosis and dysphagia. However, the dissociation between symptoms and histologic improvement suggests persistent molecular drivers despite histologic remission.

OBJECTIVE

We characterized persisting molecular alterations in pediatric patients with EoE using tissue transcriptomics and proteomics.

METHODS

Esophageal biopsy samples (n = 247) collected prospectively during 189 endoscopies from pediatric patients with EoE (n = 36, up to 11 follow-up endoscopies) and pediatric controls (n = 44, single endoscopies) were subjected to bulk transcriptomics (n = 96) and proteomics (n = 151). Intercellular junctions (desmoglein-1/3, desmoplakin, E-cadherin) and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (vimentin:E-cadherin ratio) were assessed by immunofluorescence staining.

RESULTS

Active EoE (≥15 eosinophils per high-power field [eos/hpf]), inactive EoE (<15 eos/hpf), and deep-remission EoE (0 eos/hpf) were diagnosed in 107 of 185, 78 of 185, and 41 of 185 biopsy samples, respectively. Among the dysregulated genes (up-/downregulated 310/112) and proteins (up-/downregulated 68/16) between active EoE and controls, 17 genes, and 6 proteins remained dysregulated in inactive EoE. Using persistently upregulated genes (n = 9) and proteins (n = 3) only, such as ALOX15, CXCL1, CXCL6, CTSG, CDH26, PRRX1, CLC, EPX, and periostin (POSTN), was sufficient to separate inactive EoE and deep-remission biopsy samples from control tissue. While 32 differentially expressed genes persisted in deep-remission EoE compared to controls, the proteome normalized except for persistently upregulated POSTN. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition normalized in inactive EoE, whereas desmosome recovery remained impaired as a result of desmoglein-1 downregulation.

CONCLUSION

The analysis of molecular changes shows persistent EoE-associated esophageal dysregulation despite histologic remission. These data expand our understanding of inflammatory processes and possible mechanisms that underlie tissue remodeling in EoE.

[Eosinophilic esophagitis]

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) was first described in the early 1990s. Initially a rarity, it is now the most common cause of dysphagia for solid foods in young adults. Its prevalence is estimated to be 1:2000. Mechanistically, EoE is characterized by a chronic type‑2 T‑helper cell (Th2) inflammation of the esophagus which is triggered by food allergens. It often occurs in association with other Th2-mediated diseases, such as asthma, atopic dermatitis, and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. EoE is diagnosed based on an esophagogastroduodenoscopy with biopsies of the esophageal epithelium. The diagnosis can be established when both symptoms of esophageal dysfunction (usually dysphagia) and an eosinophilic infiltration of at least 15 eosinophils per high-power field (HPF) are present. EoE can be treated with drugs, diet, and endoscopic dilatation. In terms of diet, milk elimination appears most reasonable, particularly as first choice. Drug treatment includes proton pump inhibitors (PPI), topical steroids, and the biologic agent dupilumab. Endoscopic dilatation is effective but does not treat the underlying inflammation. Therefore, it should never be used alone, but rather as an add-on therapy. In cases where clinical suspicion of EoE is strong but no or only few eosinophils are detected in esophageal biopsies, the diagnosis of an EoE variant should be considered. This review article provides a detailed discussion of the epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment, and variants of EoE.

One-food versus 4-food elimination diet for pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis: A multisite randomized trial

BACKGROUND

A 6-food elimination diet in pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is difficult to implement and may negatively affect quality of life (QoL). Less restrictive elimination diets may balance QoL and efficacy.

OBJECTIVE

We performed a multisite, randomized comparative efficacy trial of a 1-food (milk) elimination diet (1FED) versus 4-food (milk, egg, wheat, soy) elimination diet (4FED) in pediatric EoE.

METHODS

Patients aged 6 to 17 years with histologically active and symptomatic EoE were randomized 1:1 to 1FED or 4FED for 12 weeks. Primary end point was symptom improvement by Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis Symptom Score (PEESS). Secondary end points were proportion experiencing histologic remission (<15 eosinophils per high-power field); change in histologic features (histology scoring system), endoscopic severity (endoscopic reference score), transcriptome (EoE diagnostic panel), and QoL scores; and predictors of remission.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients were randomly assigned to 1FED (n = 38) and 4FED (n = 25). In 4FED versus 1FED, mean PEESS improved -25.0 versus -14.5 (P = .04), but remission rates (41% vs 44%; P = 1.00), histology scoring system (-0.25 vs -0.29; P = .77), endoscopic reference score (-1.10 vs -0.58; P = .47), and QoL scores were similar between groups. The EoE transcriptome normalized in those with histologic response to both diets. Baseline peak eosinophil count predicted remission (odds ratio, 0.975 [95% confidence interval, 0.953-0.999], P = .04; cutoff ≤42 eosinophils per high-power field). The 4FED withdrawal rate (32%) exceeded that of 1FED (11%) (P = .0496).

CONCLUSIONS

Although 4FED moderately improved symptoms compared with 1FED, the histologic, endoscopic, QoL, and transcriptomic outcomes were similar in both groups. 1FED is a reasonable first-choice therapy for pediatric EoE, given its effects, tolerability, and relative simplicity.

Meta-Analysis: Evaluating Placebo Rates Across Outcomes in Eosinophilic Oesophagitis Randomised Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

High placebo responses have limited drug development in eosinophilic oesophagitis. The optimal configuration of trial outcomes is uncertain.

AIMS

To inform more efficient future trial designs, to characterise clinical, endoscopic and histologic placebo responses in eosinophilic oesophagitis randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

We updated a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis, searching multiple databases to January 1, 2024, to identify placebo-controlled RCTs evaluating medical therapies for patients with eosinophilic oesophagitis. The primary outcome was the pooled proportion of study-defined clinical, endoscopic and histologic responders and remitters randomised to placebo, using an intention-to-treat approach and random-effects model. Sources of heterogeneity were explored using meta-regression.

RESULTS

We included 25 RCTs. The pooled proportion of clinical response was 41.0% [95% CI: 29.7%-52.8%] with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 74.9%). On meta-regression, older age and a higher probability of being randomised to placebo reduced the likelihood of clinical response to placebo. The pooled proportion of histologic remission defined as a peak eosinophil count [PEC] ≤ 6 eosinophils per high power field [HPF] or ≤ 1 eosinophil/HPF was 4.3% [95% CI: 2.6%-6.2%] (I2 = 23.6%) and 1.3% [95% CI: 0.5%-2.5%] (I2 = 0%), respectively. The standardised mean difference in the Eosinophilic Oesophagitis Endoscopic Reference Score to placebo was -0.25 [95% CI: -0.41, -0.10].

CONCLUSIONS

Over 40% of patients in eosinophilic oesophagitis trials respond clinically to placebo, and this is associated with trial design factors such as randomisation ratio and trial population. Objective endoscopic and histologic measures are associated with very low placebo responses.

Assessment of Disease Activity in Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Is It Clinically Relevant or Simply an Amusement for Experts?

Background

Since the first description of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) as clinicopathologic syndrome three decades ago, considerable progress has been made to standardize and validate instruments to assess symptom severity, quality of life, endoscopic, and histologic activity for the purpose of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. Standardized assessment of EoE activity is crucial to be able to compare the results of therapeutic interventions and bring much needed therapies to patients. This review focuses on outcome assessment of disease activity in adults with EoE.

Summary

The choice of endpoints/instruments to be used depends on the setting, which might be either an RCT, an observational study, or clinical practice. In RCTs, the choice of endpoints further depends on requirements from regional regulatory authorities. Primary endpoints chosen in RCTs typically focused on symptoms and esophageal peak eosinophil counts, although that likely will change, as therapies with new mechanism of action are explored. Validated symptom-based PRO instruments used in RCTs include the Daily Symptom Questionnaire (DSQ), the EoE activity index (EEsAI) PRO instrument, and numeric rating scales for dysphagia and pain. Histologic activity in RCT is assessed using the EoE histologic scoring system (EoEHSS) that takes into account the severity and extent of eight distinct histologic features. Endoscopic activity is assessed using the EREFS (Exudates, Rings, Edema, Furrows, Stricture) grading system. For observational studies, activity assessment is based on EEsAI PRO, epithelial peak eosinophil counts, and EREFS. In daily clinical practice, EoE activity is based on assessment of symptoms using a visual analog scale (VAS, from 0-10), peak eosinophil count, and EREFS. Several other instruments including the I-SEE, dysphagia-free days over a defined period, the dysphagia stress test, and impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP), to assess EoE severity in clinical practice are currently under evaluation.

Key Messages

EoE activity assessment based on symptom-based PRO, histology, and endoscopy has become increasingly complex and varies depending on the setting. While more stringent endpoints and daily recall PRO instruments are being used in RCTs, new instruments aimed at broader disease activity assessment and weekly recall PRO instruments are being used in observational studies and daily clinical practice.

Adaptive Behaviors, Esophageal Anxiety, and Hypervigilance Modify the Association Between Dysphagia Perception and Histological Disease Activity in Eosinophilic Esophagitis

INTRODUCTION

Adaptive behaviors at mealtime, esophageal symptom-specific anxiety and hypervigilance may affect dysphagia reporting in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), but this has not been investigated. Moreover, the relationship between such confounding factors and histological disease activity (HDA) is unclear.

METHODS

This was a prospective study on adults with EoE. Dysphagia, anxiety, and hypervigilance were assessed using specific questionnaires (i.e., modified dysphagia symptom questionnaire [mDSQ], Dysphagia Symptom Score [DSS], and Esophageal Hypervigilance and Anxiety Scale). Adaptive behaviors were assessed using the Pisa EoE Adaptation Questionnaire. Appropriate statistics was used to investigate correlation between dysphagia, anxiety, hypervigilance, adaptive behaviors, and HDA.

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients were included. Esophageal anxiety, hypervigilance, and use of adaptive behaviors were found in about 50% of patients with EoE. Esophageal anxiety and hypervigilance were significantly higher ( P = 0.03 for both), and adaptive behaviors were significantly more prevalent in histologically active EoE compared with EoE in remission (76.8% vs 25.6%, P < 0.001). As a standalone measurement, mDSQ and DSS had area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 77.7% and 75.3% for predicting HDA. Adjustments of mDSQ and DSS based on individual Esophageal Hypervigilance and Anxiety Scale scores and adaptive behaviors at mealtime significantly improved the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of mDSQ and DSS to 86.6% and 84.3%, respectively ( P < 0.05 for both).

DISCUSSION

Use of adaptive behaviors, higher esophageal anxiety and hypervigilance are associated with active EoE and represent clinical markers of HDA. Adaptive behaviors provide complementary clinical information that is not detected by symptoms alone. The assessment of adaptive behaviors, anxiety, and hypervigilance improves the correlation between clinical and HDA in EoE.

Efficacy and Safety of Budesonide Orodispersible Tablets for Eosinophilic Esophagitis up to 3 Years: An Open-Label Extension Study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Budesonide orodispersible tablets (BOT) have been shown to be safe and effective in phase III double-blind trials of induction and 48-week maintenance therapy of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). We now analyzed the long-term efficacy and safety of BOT in a 96-week open-label extension (OLE) study.

METHODS

All patients with EoE in the 48-week double-blind maintenance study were eligible to receive BOT treatment for up to 96 weeks. Dosage was 0.5 or 1.0 mg BOT, twice daily, at investigator's discretion. Clinical, histologic, endoscopic, quality of life, and safety measures were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 186 patients participated in the OLE up to 96 weeks. At week 96, 81.9% of patients had clinical remission, defined as an EoE Symptom Activity Index (EEsAI) score of ≤20 vs 77.7% at OLE baseline. A further 80.1% of patients were in histologic remission, defined as peak eosinophils per high-power field of <5, at week 96 vs 91.8% at OLE baseline. Mean EoE endoscopic reference scores (EREFS) were 1 at all time points measured. Mean EoE Quality of Life (EoE-QoL-A) Scale scores improved from 3.3 at OLE baseline to 3.5 at week 96. No new safety concerns were observed across 96 weeks of treatment. Suspected symptomatic candidiasis occurred at similar rates to prior BOT studies and was predominantly mild and resolved with treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical and histologic remission of EoE could be maintained with BOT in a large majority of patients for up to 96 weeks, and for up to 144 weeks in patients with uninterrupted BOT therapy across all trials. No additional safety concerns were identified with long-term BOT treatment (ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT02493335).

Clinical, Histologic, and Safety Outcomes With Long-term Maintenance Therapies for Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Our aim was to evaluate the outcomes of maintenance treatments for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) among observational studies (OSs) and randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Studies reporting histologic success of maintenance therapy ≥48 weeks were included. The primary outcome was histologic success rate (defined as <15/<6 eosinophils/high-power field). Risk ratios (RRs) for histologic success of maintenance therapy vs placebo or induction and drug safety were also assessed. Random effects meta-analyses with heterogeneity measured with I2 were performed. RCTs and OSs were analyzed separately.

RESULTS

In RCTs, histologic <15 eosinophils/high-power field rates were 86% (95% confidence interval [CI], 71%-96%) for corticosteroids and 79% (95% CI, 69%-87%) for biologics. Dupilumab alone accounted for 82% (95% CI, 72%-89%), whereas small molecules yielded 28%. Biologics showed higher <6 eosinophils/high-power field rates compared with corticosteroids (70% vs 59%). Clinical success was 58% (95% CI, 31%-83%) for corticosteroids and 59% (95% CI, 34%-82%) for biologics. Budesonide showed common-effect adjusted RR of 7.87 (95% CI, 4.19-14.77) of maintaining histologic remission over therapy discontinuation. In OSs, proton pump inhibitors showed 64% (95% CI, 43%-83%) histologic and 80% (95% CI, 53%-97%) clinical success, whereas corticosteroids achieved 49% (95% CI, 30%-68%) and 51% (95% CI, 18%-83%) rates, respectively. Therapy de-escalation was not associated with histologic relapse (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.72-1.51). Long-term safety was confirmed with 3% (95% CI, 1%-6%) severe adverse events in RCTs and 5% (95% CI, 2%-9%) in OSs. Treatment withdrawal rates were low (10% for RCTs, 4% for OSs). Moderate to substantial heterogeneity was observed for most outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Maintenance therapies prevent histologic relapse in the long term, without clear disadvantage of dose de-escalation from induction to maintenance phase. Low adverse events and withdrawal rates confirm long-term treatment is well-tolerated.

Nonepithelial Gene Expression Correlates With Symptom Severity in Adults With Eosinophilic Esophagitis

BACKGROUND

The mechanistic basis of the variable symptomatology seen in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) remains poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

We examined the correlation of a validated, patient-reported outcome metric with a broad spectrum of esophageal transcripts to uncover potential symptom pathogenesis.

METHODS

We extracted data from 146 adults with EoE through the Consortium of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disease Researchers. Patients were subgrouped by esophageal dilation history. We compared a validated patient-reported outcome metric, the EoE Activity Index (EEsAI), with a set of transcripts expressed in the esophagus of patients with EoE, the EoE Diagnostic Panel (EDP). We used single-cell RNA sequencing data to identify the cellular source of EEsAI-related EDP genes and further analyzed patients with mild and severe symptoms.

RESULTS

The EEsAI correlated with the EDP total score, especially in patients without recent esophageal dilation (r = -0.31; P = .003). We identified 14 EDP genes that correlated with EEsAI scores (r ≥ 0.3; P < .05). Of these, 11 were expressed in nonepithelial cells and three in epithelial cells. During histologic remission, only four of 11 nonepithelial genes (36%) versus all three epithelial genes (100%) had decreased expression to less than 50% of that in active EoE. Fibroblasts expressed five of 11 nonepithelial EEsAI-associated EDP genes (45%). A subset of nonepithelial genes (eight of 11; 73%), but not EoE-representative genes (none of four; 0%; CCL26, CAPN14, DSG1, and SPINK7), was upregulated in patients with EoE with the highest versus lowest symptom burden.

CONCLUSION

The correlation of symptoms and nonepithelial esophageal gene expression substantiates that nonepithelial cells (eg, fibroblasts) likely contribute to symptom severity.

Quality of Life Factors in Adults with Eosinophilic Oesophagitis in New Zealand

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) is an immune-mediated oesophageal disorder causing dysphagia. Patients with EoE experience reduced QoL due to symptoms; however, this has not been assessed in the New Zealand population. The aim of this study was to assess QoL in patients with EoE in New Zealand.

METHODS

This observational study recruited participants from two New Zealand hospitals. Records were reviewed to confirm diagnoses, and consenting participants completed an electronic survey, consisting of the Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire (DSQ) score and the QoL-specific EoE (EoE-QoL-A) questionnaire score. Correlation analysis examined the relationship between the DSQ and EoE-QoL-A scores. Differences in baseline variables were assessed. Univariate logistic regression assessed the association of variables with disease activity and QoL.

RESULTS

Fifty-four participants responded, and four were excluded due to incomplete surveys. The majority (76%) were male, and the median age was 47 years (IQR 42-58). The median DSQ was 49 (IQR 0-60), and the median EoE-QoL-A score was 68 (IQR 48-80). A reduced EoE-QoL-A score was associated with active disease (OR = 0.96,95% CI 0.926-0.995). Significant associations were found between disease activity and overall EoE-QoL-A score (r = -0.37, p < 0.01) as well as the sub-categories eating and diet (r = -0.54, p < 0.001), social (r = 0.30, p < 0.05), and emotional impact (r = -0.44, p < 0.01). The EOE-QoL-A score was higher in those on PPI (75 vs. 60, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

This study identified a decreased quality of life (QoL) in individuals with EoE in New Zealand, aligning with international literature. The increased DSQ scores suggest a possible gap in current management approaches. The correlation between the DSQ and QoL highlights the need for improved care models of care for EoE.

Rationale for an Eosinophilic Esophagitis Treat-to-Target Concept

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic T helper 2-mediated inflammatory disorder of the esophagus defined clinically by the presence of symptoms of esophageal dysfunction and histologically by an eosinophil-predominant infiltration. Correspondingly, treatment has aimed at controlling both symptom severity and histologic activity. However, with emerging clinical and pathophysiologic understanding of the disease, it has become increasingly apparent that other disease aspects need to be targeted as well, such as endoscopic severity and quality of life. Moreover, with the role of eosinophils having been questioned lately, histologic changes beyond eosinophil infiltration have come to attention and are captured by newly validated scores. In addition, EoE is being increasingly considered a transmural disease that cannot be assessed by simple endoscopy but needs measurement of esophageal distensibility, a surrogate marker for fibrosis. Finally, novel tools such as measurement of esophageal impedance could make it possible to assess for complete restoration of the esophageal epithelium, potentially corresponding to disease clearance. This article reviews the various outcome parameters in adult EoE management and proposes an algorithm for a treat-to-target concept, in analogy to what has been practiced in inflammatory bowel disease treatment for the last 10 years.

Odynophagia and Retrosternal Pain Are Common in Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Associated with an Increased Overall Symptom Severity

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Dysphagia is the hallmark symptom in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). However, data are limited regarding the overall prevalence and potential implications of atypical symptoms like odynophagia and retrosternal pain.

METHODS

Patients enrolled into the Swiss EoE cohort study (SEECS) were analyzed regarding the presence of odynophagia and retrosternal pain. Demographics, other EoE-related symptoms, histologic and endoscopic activity were compared between EoE-patients with vs. without odynophagia and/or retrosternal pain.

RESULTS

474 patients (75.2% male) were analyzed. In their individual course of disease 110 (23.2%) patients stated to have ever experienced odynophagia and 64 (13.5%) retrosternal pain independent of food intake, 24 (5%) patients complained about both symptoms. Patients with odynophagia consistently scored higher in symptom severity (p < 0.001), EREFS score (median 3.0 vs. 2.0, p = 0.006), histologic activity and a lower quality of life (p = 0.001) compared to patients without odynophagia. Sex, age at diagnosis, EoE-specific treatment, complications such as candida or viral esophagitis and disease duration were similar in patients with vs. without odynophagia. Also patients with retrosternal pain scored higher in symptom severity (2.0 vs. 1.0, p = 0.001 and 2.0 vs. 1.0, p < 0.001 in physician and patient questionnaire assessment, respectively). However, there was neither a difference in endoscopic/histologic disease activity nor in quality of life according to presence or absence of retrosternal pain. Due to logistic reasons, a stratification regarding the presence of concomitant dysphagia was not possible.

CONCLUSION

Odynophagia and swallowing-independent retrosternal pain are common symptoms in patients with EoE, associate with an overall higher EoE-related symptom severity and for the case of odynophagia lower quality of life. However, the influence of concomitant dysphagia and its severity remains unclear and needs to be included in future analyses.

Reducing Eosinophil Counts in Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Children Is Associated With Reduction in Later Stricture Development

INTRODUCTION

There are limited longitudinal data on the impact of chronic therapy on the natural history of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), a chronic allergic disease of the esophagus. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if patients with well-controlled EoE were less likely to develop fibrostenotic complications.

METHODS

Subjects were identified from a database of pediatric patients with EoE at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia started in 2000. Patients were then searched in adult medical records to identify patients who transitioned care. All office visits, emergency department visits, and endoscopic, histologic, and imaging reports were reviewed for the primary outcome of strictures and the secondary outcomes of food impactions and dysphagia. Cox proportional hazard regression was performed for outcomes.

RESULTS

One hundred five patients were identified with the mean follow-up of 11.4 ± 4.9 years. 52.3% (n = 55) had a period of histologic disease control defined as ≥2 consecutive endoscopies with histologic remission. These patients were less likely to develop strictures compared with patients who did not have a period of histologic control (HR 0.232; 95% CI 0.084-0.64, P = 0.005). Patients who were diagnosed at younger ages were less likely to develop strictures. Presentation with dysphagia or impaction was associated with higher rate of stricture development.

DISCUSSION

In this cohort study with > 10 years of follow-up, children with EoE with a period of histologic disease control and diagnosed at younger ages were less likely to develop esophageal strictures. While this suggests histologic remission is associated with reduction of remodeling complications, additional prospective data with long-term follow-up are needed.

Noninvasive Disease Assessment in Eosinophilic Esophagitis With Fractionated Exhaled Nitric Oxide, Blood, and Fecal Biomarkers

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory condition of the esophagus triggered by food and aeroallergens. There is a need for noninvasive biomarkers that reliably detect EoE in patients with cardinal symptoms and predict treatment response to reduce endoscopic evaluations.

STUDY

Nonasthmatic patients 18 years or above with suspected or diagnosed EoE, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and control individuals with indication for endoscopy were enrolled prospectively between November 2020 and May 2022. Participants underwent body plethysmography with fractionated exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) level measurement. Besides, serum and fecal biomarkers were measured by ELISA. A follow-up examination was scheduled after treatment initiation in patients with active EoE.

RESULTS

The median FeNO level in active EoE (20 ppb) was higher compared with GERD (15 ppb, P=0.038) and control individuals (14 ppb, P=0.046). Median FeNO did not significantly differ in EoE patients who underwent follow-up assessment after treatment response (20 ppb vs. 18 ppb, P=0.771). Serum EDN, ECP, and the absolute eosinophil blood count (AEC) were elevated in active EoE compared with control individuals but not compared with GERD except for AEC. Serum EDN, ECP and AEC decreased in EoE in remission at follow-up assessment. None of the fecal biomarkers was elevated in active EoE or during treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment of FeNO may have diagnostic value in differentiating patients with active EoE from non-EoE patients but is not a suitable marker for monitoring disease activity. Serum EDN, ECP, TARC, and AEC levels are emerging as potential candidates for monitoring disease activity in EoE.

Diagnosis and management of eosinophilic esophagitis and esophageal food impaction in adults : A position paper issued by the Austrian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (ÖGGH)

This position paper deals with an expert consensus on diagnosis and management of eosinophilic esophagitis and esophageal food impaction issued by the Austrian Eosinophilic Esophagitis Network, a working group under the patronage of the Austrian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (ÖGGH). In need of a standardized approach on the management of EoE, recommendations were made based on international guidelines and landmark studies.

Utilization and impact of esophageal string testing in children with eosinophilic esophagitis: A 1 year experience

The 1-h esophageal string test (EST) is a minimally invasive test that can be used to monitor eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) disease activity and guide treatment without endoscopy. We aimed to describe the real-world utilization and impact of EST on the care of children with EoE over the first year this was used at our center. Between 12/1/2022 and 11/30/2023, 39 ESTs were successful in 45 attempts (87% completion rate) in 31 patients. Five patients underwent multiple ESTs. Adverse events during the EST included vomiting. Reasons for failure to complete the EST (13%, n = 6) were patients could not swallow the capsule (n = 5) and vomiting (n = 1). EST was used to assess EoE without the need for endoscopy in 95% (n = 37) of cases. Treatment approach varied based on whether the EST indicated active (38.5%) or inactive (61.5%) EoE. The EST is a well-tolerated minimally invasive disease monitoring tool for patients with EoE.

Losartan Treatment Reduces Esophageal Eosinophilic Inflammation in a Subset of Eosinophilic Esophagitis

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, food antigen-driven esophageal disorder. Connective tissue disorders (CTDs) and esophageal connective tissue alterations are associated with EoE. Therefore, angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade with losartan, an accepted CTD treatment, is a potential EoE treatment.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated losartan's effects on esophageal pathology, symptoms, and safety in patients with EoE with and without a CTD in an open-label, non-placebo controlled multisite study.

METHODS

Fifteen participants with EoE, aged 5 to 23 years, underwent treatment with per-protocol titrated doses of losartan in an open-label, 16-week pilot trial. Losartan was added to standard of care therapy and 14 patients completed the study. Eosinophil counts served as the primary end point, whereas we also assessed the EoE Histology Scoring System, Endoscopic Reference Scores, EoE Diagnostic Panel, and patient-reported outcomes.

RESULTS

Esophageal eosinophilia was not reduced after losartan. The peak eosinophil count was not reduced for the proximal (median [interquartile range]: -3 [-22 to 3]; P = .49) and distal esophagus (median [interquartile range]: -18 [-39 to -1]; P = .23). There were no differences in losartan response in EoE with or without CTD (n = 7 and 8, respectively). Regardless, in a small subset of four participants esophageal eosinophilia was resolved with a concomitant reduction in EoE Histology Scoring System score and Endoscopic Reference Score. Across all subjects, the Pediatric EoE Symptom Score, Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory EoE Module, and EoE Diagnostic Panel improved after losartan (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Losartan treatment was associated with improved patient-reported outcome scores and EoE Diagnostic Panel biomarkers although without a reduction in esophageal eosinophilia overall. A subset of patients demonstrated improved histopathologic and endoscopic features that could not be tied to a specific feature predicting response to treatment.

Clinical and molecular correlates of the Index of Severity for Eosinophilic Esophagitis

BACKGROUND

The Index of Severity for Eosinophilic Esophagitis (I-SEE) is a new expert-defined clinical tool that classifies disease severity of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine whether I-SEE is associated with patient characteristics, molecular features of EoE, or both.

METHODS

We analyzed a prospective cohort of patients with EoE from the Consortium of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disease Researchers (CEGIR). Associations between I-SEE and clinical and molecular features (assessed by an EoE diagnostic panel [EDP]) were assessed.

RESULTS

In 318 patients with chronic EoE (209 adults, 109 children), median total I-SEE score was 7.0, with a higher symptoms and complications score in children than adults (4.0 vs 1.0; P < .001) and higher inflammatory and fibrostenotic features scores in adults than children (3.0 vs 1.0 and 3.0 vs 0, respectively; both P < .001). Total I-SEE score had a bimodal distribution with the inactive to moderate categories and severe category. EDP score correlated with total I-SEE score (r = -0.352, P < .001) and both inflammatory and fibrostenotic features scores (r = -0.665, P < .001; r = -0.446, P < .001, respectively), but not with symptoms and complications scores (r = 0.047, P = .408). Molecular severity increased from inactive to mild and moderate, but not severe, categories. Longitudinal changes of modified I-SEE scores and inflammatory and fibrostenotic features scores reflected histologic and molecular activity.

CONCLUSIONS

I-SEE score is associated with select clinical features across severity categories and with EoE molecular features for nonsevere categories, warranting further validation.

Optimal Assessment, Treatment, and Monitoring of Adults with Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Strategies to Improve Outcomes

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic type 2 inflammation-mediated disease characterized by an eosinophil-predominant inflammation of the esophagus and symptoms of esophageal dysfunction. Relevant treatment outcomes in the setting of EoE include the improvement of histology, symptoms, and endoscopy findings, quality of life (QoL), and the psychological burden of the disease. Established validated tools for the assessment of EoE include questionnaires on dysphagia and QoL (ie, DSQ, EEsAI, and EoE-IQ). More recently, esophageal symptom-specific anxiety and hypervigilance, assessed using the esophageal hypervigilance and anxiety scale (EHAS), have emerged as contributors to disease burden, confirming the importance of psychological aspects in EoE patients. The EoE endoscopic reference score (EREFS) is the only validated endoscopy score in EoE and can quantify mucosal disease burden. However, esophageal panometry using the functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) and high-resolution manometry (HRM) have shown potential to optimize the assessment of fibrostenotic features of EoE, providing novel insights into the pathophysiology of symptoms. There is a growing number of licenced and off-label therapeutic options in EoE, with various randomized controlled trials demonstrating the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors, topical steroids, food elimination diets, biological drugs, and esophageal dilatation. However, standardized optimal management strategies of EoE are currently lacking. In this review, we provide an overview of established and novel assessment tools in EoE including patient reported outcomes, FLIP panometry, HRM, endoscopy, and histology outcome measures to improve the outcomes of EoE patients. In addition, we summarize available therapeutic options for EoE based on the most recent evidence.

Long-term Outcome of Asymptomatic Esophageal Eosinophilia

Background/Aims

: Asymptomatic esophageal eosinophilia (aEE), characterized by eosinophil infiltration in the esophagus without clinical symptoms, has been reported as a precursor of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Nevertheless, no report exists on the long-term clinical course of the disease. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the long-term clinical course of aEE over 5 years, including the symptomatic conversion rate and the effect of treatments.

Methods

: We reviewed 28 patients with aEE who had been followed up for over 5 years with endoscopic monitoring. The basal characteristics of patients were compared with those of 58 patients diagnosed with EoE during the same period. Patients' clinicopathological findings were collected and examined.

Results

: No significant differences in basal characteristics and histopathological findings were observed between the patients with aEE and those with EoE. The median follow-up duration was 64 months. Among the 28 patients with aEE, seven were treated with proton pump inhibitor or potassium-competitive acid blocker and the remaining 21 opted for follow-up with no medication. Among the treated patients, six (85.7%) exhibited endoscopic and pathologic improvements. Among the cases followed up without medication, the findings worsened in two (9.5%), improved spontaneously in seven (33.3%), and were unchanged in 12 (57.1%), and three (14.3%) developed symptoms at a mean time of 40 months. Symptoms developed in cases where endoscopic and pathologic findings remained unchanged or worsened during follow-up.

Conclusions

: Some patients with aEE had improved findings without treatment, whereas others developed symptoms, emphasizing the importance of long-term monitoring and individualized treatment decisions.

The 1st EoETALY Consensus on the Diagnosis and Management of Eosinophilic Esophagitis-Current Treatment and Monitoring

The present document constitutes Part 2 of the EoETALY Consensus Statements guideline on the diagnosis and management of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) developed by experts in the field of EoE across Italy (i.e., EoETALY Consensus Group). Part 1 was published as a different document, and included three chapters discussing 1) definition, epidemiology, and pathogenesis; 2) clinical presentation and natural history and 3) diagnosis of EoE. The present work provides guidelines on the management of EoE in two final chapters: 4) treatment and 5) monitoring and follow-up, and also includes considerations on knowledge gaps and a proposed research agenda for the coming years. The guideline was developed through a Delphi process, with grading of the strength and quality of the evidence of the recommendations performed according to accepted GRADE criteria.This document has received the endorsement of three Italian national societies including the Italian Society of Gastroenterology (SIGE), the Italian Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility (SINGEM), and the Italian Society of Allergology, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology (SIAAIC). The guidelines also involved the contribution of members of ESEO Italia, the Italian Association of Families Against EoE.

Eosinophil Distribution in Eosinophilic Esophagitis and its Impact on Disease Activity and Response to Treatment

Although mostly accentuated in the distal esophagus, distribution of esophageal eosinophilia in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) seems to be nonuniform.1 Disease extent has been associated with disease severity and disease progression in inflammatory bowel disease.2,3 Whether the same holds true for EoE remains largely unknown. One recent EoE study looked at the distribution of eosinophilia, but without analyzing its potential association with treatment outcomes.4 Here, we characterize the different inflammatory patterns of EoE and investigate their impact on disease presentation and disease outcome, with a particular focus on therapeutic response.

Eosinophilic esophagitis: Current concepts in diagnosis and management

ABSTRACT

Eosinophilic esophagitis is an antigen-mediated chronic inflammatory disorder that has risen in incidence and prevalence over the past 2 decades. The clinical presentation is variable and consists of mainly esophageal symptoms such as dysphagia, heartburn, food impaction, and vomiting. Current management relies on dietary elimination, proton-pump inhibitors, and topical corticosteroids with different response rates and relapses after treatment discontinuation. With a better understanding of the underlying pathophysiology, many molecules emerged recently as targeted treatment including dupilumab (IL4/IL13 blocker), as the first FDA-approved biological treatment, which has changed the management paradigm.

Clinical practices and adherence to guidelines for eosinophilic esophagitis: A European survey

BACKGROUND

We aimed to assess the clinical practices and adherence to guidelines for adult Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE) patients in Europe.

METHODS

A cross-sectional web survey containing 23 questions was distributed to members of the European Consortium for Eosinophilic Diseases of the Gastrointestinal Tract (EUREOS) and the Italian Association of Hospital Gastroenterologists and digestive endoscopists (AIGO). We conducted a subgroup analysis to assess the impact of EoE expertise and practice setting on clinical practices.

RESULTS

228 physicians from 18 European countries participated. Adherence to guidelines varied from 72% to 98.6%. 83.4% of total respondents obtained ≥ 6 esophageal biopsies in suspected EoE. 42% of total respondents, 82.5% of EoE experts (vs. non-experts 33%; P < 0.0001), and 55% of academics (vs. 29.1 non-academics; P < 0.0001) routinely used the EREFS score. Regarding first-line therapy, 82.9% of total respondents prescribed proton pump inhibitors, 41.6% topical steroids, 20.6% elimination diets, and 9.2% combination therapies. Only 72% of respondents used symptoms and endoscopy with <15 Eosinophils/HPF to define treatment response. 21.5% of all respondents did not prescribe maintenance therapies and 12.7% discontinued therapy before response evaluation endoscopy.

CONCLUSION

Our findings revealed significant heterogeneity in practice patterns and suboptimal adherence to EoE guidelines across Europe. Expertise in EoE and working in an academic hospital positively influenced clinical practices and adherence to guidelines.

The role of hypervigilance in chronic esophageal diseases: a scoping review

Background

Hypervigilance has emerged as an important construct in esophageal symptom reporting, but a review of the literature does not currently exist. This scoping review aimed to generate a comprehensive overview of the literature on hypervigilance in esophageal diseases and summarize the evidence for each esophageal disease.

Methods

Guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology, articles that were peer-reviewed original studies, published in English, and included adult patients with at least one esophageal disease were included. Articles were retrieved from PubMed and Embase databases and screened first by title and abstract for an initial round of exclusions, and then again by full text for a second round of exclusions.

Results

Nineteen studies were included. Studies were categorized by primary diagnosis: achalasia (1, 5%), eosinophilic esophagitis (1, 5%), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (6, 32%), laryngopharyngeal reflux (3, 16%), non-cardiac chest pain (3, 16%), and multi-disorder samples (5, 26%). Studies primarily evaluated associations between hypervigilance and symptom severity, psychosocial functioning, health-related quality of life, and physiological disease variables. A number of studies also evaluated hypervigilance across esophageal diseases or presentations (e.g., across motility disorders, across GERD phenotypes).

Conclusions

The role of hypervigilance in symptom reporting has been investigated in multiple esophageal conditions. Findings suggest potential clinical utility in assessing hypervigilance, such as for disease conceptualization and treatment planning. Future research is needed in larger samples, with consistent measures of hypervigilance, and using data synthesis methodology (i.e., systematic reviews) to better compare and contrast findings across studies.

Esophageal Remodeling Correlates With Eating Behaviors in Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis

INTRODUCTION

There are limited data characterizing eating habits among pediatric patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). We compared eating behaviors in pediatric patients with EoE with healthy controls and assessed the degree of correlation with symptomatology, endoscopic and histologic findings, and esophageal distensibility.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, observational study where subjects consumed 4 food textures (puree, soft solid, chewable, and hard solid) and were scored for eating behaviors including number of chews per bite, sips of fluid per food, and consumption time. Symptomatic, endoscopic, histologic, and esophageal distensibility data were collected for case subjects.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven case subjects and 25 healthy controls were enrolled in our study (mean age 11.0 years, 63.5% male). Compared with healthy controls, pediatric patients with EoE demonstrated more chews per bite with soft solid (13.6 vs 9.1, P = 0.031), chewable (14.7 vs 10.7, P = 0.047), and hard solid foods (19.0 vs 12.8, P = 0.037). Patients with EoE also demonstrated increased consumption time with soft solid (94.7 vs 58.3 seconds, P = 0.002), chewable (90.0 vs 65.1 seconds, P = 0.005), and hard solid foods (114.1 vs 76.4 seconds, P = 0.034) when compared with healthy controls. Subgroup analysis based on disease status showed no statistically significant differences in eating behaviors between active and inactive EoE. Total endoscopic reference score positively correlated with consumption time ( r = 0.53, P = 0.008) and number of chews ( r = 0.45, P = 0.027) for chewable foods and with number of chews ( r = 0.44, P = 0.043) for hard solid foods. Increased consumption time correlated with increased eosinophil count ( r = 0.42, P = 0.050) and decreased esophageal distensibility ( r = -0.82, P < 0.0001).

DISCUSSION

Altered eating behaviors including increased chewing and increased consumption time can be seen in pediatric patients with EoE, can persist despite histologic remission, and may be driven by changes in esophageal distensibility.

Peripheral Blood IL5RA Gene Expression as a Diagnostic Biomarker for Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an allergic inflammatory condition of the esophagus, often diagnosed late because of its challenging symptoms and costly and invasive diagnostic methods.1,2 To address the need for more accessible biomarkers in EoE,3 we aimed to investigate the potential of whole-blood RNA expression as a noninvasive biomarker for diagnosing and monitoring EoE, hypothesizing that genetic signatures in blood could distinguish EoE cases, correlate with disease activity, and predict treatment responses.

Monitoring and modulating the trajectory of eosinophilic esophagitis

Current treatments of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) aim to eliminate esophageal mucosal inflammation and attenuate, stabilize, or reverse stricture formation. However, our ability to study the long-term course of esophageal strictures in patients with EoE is hampered by the short-term existence of this disease. It is unclear to what degree of control of inflammation is needed to prevent stricture formation. Additionally, identified phenotypes of EoE may ultimately dictate different levels of concern and time intervals for developing fibrosis. Currently, multiple methods are used to monitor patients' disease progression to fibrosis, as symptoms alone do not correlate with disease activity. Endoscopic findings and mucosal histology are used to monitor disease activity, but these focus on improvements in inflammation with inconsistent evaluation of underlying fibrosis. The use of functional lumen impedance planimetry, barium esophagraphy, and endoscopic ultrasound continues to expand in EoE. The rapid advancements in EoE have led to an armamentarium of measuring tools and therapies that holistically characterize disease severity and response to therapy. Nevertheless, our ability to evaluate gross esophageal fibrosis and stricture formation from a transmural rather than mucosal view should be a focus of future investigations because it is essential to monitoring and modulating the trajectory of EoE.

Triggers for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE): The intersection of food allergy and EoE

Eosinophilic esophagitis and IgE-mediated food allergy are both food-triggered diseases that are increasing in prevalence. They share many clinical links, including significant comorbidity and similar food triggers, and as atopic diseases, they likely share upstream mechanisms related to barrier function and signals leading to TH2 skewing. In this review, we focus on links between eosinophilic esophagitis and IgE-mediated food allergy with an emphasis on what insights may be derived from overlapping food triggers and immune phenotypes. Through further investigation of these connections, we may be able to better understand not only IgE-mediated food allergy and eosinophilic esophagitis but also general atopic response to food proteins and evolution of allergic response to food.

Dietary Management of Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic immune-mediated food allergy-driven disease characterized by eosinophilic inflammation of the esophagus leading to symptoms of esophageal dysfunction. Prior studies have supported the key role of food allergen exposure as the main driver behind the etiopathogenesis showing that removal of food antigens can result in disease remission in both children and adults. These landmark studies serve as the basis for the rising interest and evolution of dietary therapy in EoE. This article will focus on the rationale for dietary therapy in EoE and provide helpful tools for the implementation of dietary therapy in practice.

Clinical Evaluation of the Child with Eosinophilic Esophagitis

The diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is based on clinical symptoms of esophageal dysfunction and eosinophil predominant esophageal inflammation. Clinical symptoms in children with EoE vary based on age and may be nonspecific. EoE has a male predominance with the majority having comorbid atopic disorders. At present, treatment options include medications (proton pump inhibition, swallowed topical steroids), dietary therapy or biologic therapy (dupilumab, approved for those ≥12 years of age). Outside of EoE in the context of oral immunotherapy, EoE is typically chronic requiring lifelong therapy. Long-term complications including feeding difficulties, malnutrition, and fibrostenotic disease.

Endoscopic Features of Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Edema, rings, exudates, furrows, and strictures (EREFS) represent the major endoscopic features of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). The Endoscopic Reference System (EREFS) grading system is easy to learn and apply during daily clinical practice in the diagnosis and follow-up of EoE patients. When endoscopy is performed by an EoE-experienced physician, the EREFS criteria will identify the majority of EoE patients. The EREFS score from the area of greatest involvement of the esophagus should be reported. The EREFS grading system was formally validated as an endoscopy score and several randomized placebo-controlled trials have shown responsiveness of the EREFS score to therapeutic interventions.

Endoscopic Features of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Diseases

Endoscopic evaluation with biopsies is a mainstay of the diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and non-EoE eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs). Increasing knowledge has resulted in the development of 2 standardized scoring systems: the Endoscopic REFerence Score (EREFS) for EoE and the EG-REFS for eosinophilic gastritis, although the latter has not been validated. In EGIDs, diagnosis and follow-up focus on eosinophil infiltration in biopsies. In this article, we will discuss the most commonly used endoscopic scores in EoE and non-EoE EGIDs, their validity for the diagnosis and follow-up of disease activity, as well as endoscopic interventions and areas of uncertainty.

Long-term course of untreated asymptomatic esophageal eosinophilia and minimally symptomatic eosinophilic esophagitis

Background and study aims The long-term course of untreated asymptomatic esophageal eosinophilia (aEE) and minimally symptomatic eosinophilic esophagitis (mEoE) are not well understood. This study aimed to clarify this course. Patients and methods A total of 36 patients with EE who were endoscopically followed up for more than 5 years, and who underwent more than one endoscopy evaluation after the first diagnosis, were investigated. These patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of the continuous treatment: no treatment group (NT group, n=22) and proton pump inhibitor/potassium competitive acid blocker group (Tx group, n=14). Symptoms and endoscopic and histological findings were retrospectively reviewed according to endoscopic phenotypes. Endoscopic assessment was performed using the EoE endoscopic reference score (EREFS). Results The median follow-up period was 84.5 months in the Tx group and 92 months in the NT group. During the follow-up period, about half of the patients in the Tx-diffuse group persisted EREFS >3, while the remaining half had EREFS ≤2. The total EREFS in the NT-diffuse group remained almost unchanged (median: 2-4) without apparent exacerbation. In contrast, EREFS in the NT-localized group exhibited an unchanged or gradually decreasing trend, with statistical significance from the first diagnosis to 72 to 83 months after. Conclusions Untreated aEE and mEoE are not likely to worsen even without treatment at least for a median follow-up of 7 years. Instead, the localized type may spontaneously improve, implying a different pathogenesis in the presence of the diffuse type. Further studies should clarify the long-term prognosis.

Eosinophilic Esophagitis: What the Otolaryngologist Needs to Know

Eosinophilic esophagitis is a male-predominant disease with presentations ranging from nonspecific feeding issues to dysphagia and food impaction. The currently proposed pathophysiology is a combination of genetics, allergens, and epithelial barrier impairment. Diagnosis is reliant on history, endoscopic examination, and biopsy. Recent guidelines recognize the role of concurrent gastroesophageal reflux disease. Treatment is based on 3 paradigms: diet, drugs, and dilation. Drug therapy has historically focused on topical corticosteroids; as of 2022, dupilumab was approved for targeted biologic therapy. Dilation is reserved for symptomatic and anatomic management. As this clinical entity is better understood, additional therapies will hopefully be developed.

Persistent esophageal changes after histologic remission in eosinophilic esophagitis

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is characterized by persistent or relapsing allergic inflammation, and both clinical and histologic features of esophageal inflammation persist over time in most individuals. Mechanisms contributing to EoE relapse are not understood, and chronic EoE-directed therapy is therefore required to prevent long-term sequelae.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated whether EoE patients in histologic remission have persistent dysregulation of esophageal gene expression.

METHODS

Esophageal biopsy samples from 51 pediatric and 52 adult subjects with EoE in histopathologic remission (<15 eosinophils per high-power field [eos/hpf]) and control (48 pediatric and 167 adult) subjects from multiple institutions were subjected to molecular profiling by the EoE diagnostic panel, which comprises a set of 94 esophageal transcripts differentially expressed in active EoE.

RESULTS

Defining remission as <15 eos/hpf, we identified 51 and 32 differentially expressed genes in pediatric and adult EoE patients compared to control individuals, respectively (false discovery rate < 0.05). Using the stringent definition of remission (0 eos/hpf), the adult and pediatric cohorts continued to have 18 and 25 differentially expressed genes (false discovery rate < 0.05). Among 6 shared genes between adults and children, CDH26 was upregulated in both children and adults; immunohistochemistry demonstrated increased cadherin 26 staining in the epithelium of EoE patients in remission compared to non-EoE controls. In the adult cohort, POSTN expression correlated with the endoscopic reference system score (Spearman r = 0.35, P = .011), specifically correlating with the rings' endoscopic reference system subscore (r = 0.53, P = .004).

CONCLUSION

We have identified persistent EoE-associated esophageal gene expression in patients with disease in deep remission. These data suggest potential inflammation-induced epigenetic mechanisms may influence gene expression during remission in EoE and provide insight into possible mechanisms that underlie relapse in EoE.

Composite score of physiomechanical esophageal function using functional lumen imaging probe panometry in eosinophilic esophagitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The evaluation provided by functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) panometry includes esophageal distensibility/compliance (mechanics) of the esophageal body and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) and esophageal motility (secondary peristalsis). We developed a composite score using these parameters to characterize physiomechanical function in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).

METHODS

Two hundred fifteen adult patients with EoE who completed FLIP panometry during sedated endoscopy with esophageal biopsy sampling were included. FLIP metrics of esophageal body Compliance, Contractile response, Distensibility plateau, and maximum EGJ Diameter (C2D2) were scored as 0 for normal versus 1 or 2 for increasing degree of abnormality. Scores were summed to calculate the composite C2D2 score.

RESULTS

The C2D2 score had a significant positive correlation with mucosal eosinophil count (ρ = .241) and total Endoscopic EoE Reference Score (ρ = .467). Among 46 patients off treatment at the baseline evaluation, future proton pump inhibitor (PPI) responders (ie, achieved mucosal eosinophil count <15 per high-powered field after PPI treatment) had lower C2D2 scores than PPI nonresponders (median, 2 [interquartile range, 1-3] vs 4 [interquartile range, 2-6], respectively; P = .003). A regression model (that controlled for age, sex, and baseline eosinophil count) showed a C2D2 score ≤3 had an odds ratio of 14.5 (95% confidence interval, 2.6-85) to predict future PPI response. However, total Endoscopic EoE Reference Scores (P = .142) and baseline eosinophil count (P = .480) did not differ between PPI responders and PPI nonresponders.

CONCLUSIONS

This composite score of FLIP panometry metrics, the C2D2 score, may facilitate characterizing physiomechanical function in EoE and serve as an objective outcome measure.

Monitoring pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis disease activity using an unsedated blind esophageal brushing model: A pilot study

BACKGROUND

Recurrent upper endoscopies are essential for monitoring therapy response and disease activity in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), leading to increased costs, procedural complications, and anesthesia exposure. The aim of this study was to examine an office-based model using serial sedation-free blind esophageal epithelial brushing (BEEB) to monitor therapy response through eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN) levels and guide therapy plans in pediatric EoE patients.

METHODS

EoE patients (≤21 years of age) were enrolled in this prospective study. Subjects were placed on dietary, pharmacologic, or combination therapy with the goal of inducing or maintaining remission. To assess response to sequential interventions, subjects underwent sequential sedation-free BEEBs through nasogastric tubes to measure EDN levels. Based on serial brushings, an individual plan of diet, medications, or a combination of both was created for each subject, and a final endoscopy was then performed to validate the accuracy of the individual plans.

RESULTS

Twenty-four subjects completed the study. The average peak eosinophil count in patients with active EoE was 58.1 ± 30.8 eosinophils per high-power field and mean EDN level was 165.2 ± 191.3 μg/mL. A total of 42 BEEBs were completed. Individual therapy plans based on sequential BEEB were accurate in 19 out of the 24 patients (79%) and specifically nine out of 10 patients (90%) treated with elimination diets.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that office-based sedation-free BEEBs can be used to monitor therapy response and disease activity in pediatric EoE patients.

A Multicenter Long-Term Cohort Study of Eosinophilic Esophagitis Variants and Their Progression to Eosinophilic Esophagitis Over Time

INTRODUCTION

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) variants have been recently characterized as conditions with symptoms of esophageal dysfunction resembling EoE, but absence of significant esophageal eosinophilia. Their disease course and severity have yet to be determined.

METHODS

Patients from 6 EoE centers with symptoms of esophageal dysfunction, but peak eosinophil counts of <15/hpf in esophageal biopsies and absence of gastroesophageal reflux disease with at least one follow-up visit were included. Clinical, (immuno)histological, and molecular features were determined and compared with EoE and healthy controls.

RESULTS

We included 54 patients with EoE variants (EoE-like esophagitis 53.7%; lymphocytic esophagitis 13.0%; and nonspecific esophagitis 33.3%). In 8 EoE-like esophagitis patients, EoE developed after a median of 14 months (interquartile range 3.6-37.6). Such progression increased over time (17.6% year 1, 32.0% year 3, and 62.2% year 6). Sequential RNA sequencing analyses revealed only 7 genes associated with this progression (with TSG6 and ALOX15 among the top 3 upregulated genes) with upregulation of a previously attenuated Th2 pathway. Immunostaining confirmed the involvement of eosinophil-associated proteins (TSG6 and ALOX15) and revealed a significantly increased number of GATA3-positive cells during progression, indicating a Th1/Th2 switch. Transition from one EoE variant (baseline) to another variant (during follow-up) was seen in 35.2% (median observation time of 17.3 months).

DISCUSSION

Transition of EoE variants to EoE suggests the presence of a disease spectrum. Few genes seem to be associated with the progression to EoE with upregulation of a previously attenuated Th2 signal. These genes, including GATA3 as a Th1/Th2 switch regulator, may represent potential therapeutic targets in early disease pathogenesis.

Eosinophilic esophagitis: absolute eosinophilic count, peak eosinophilic count, and potential biomarkers of eosinophilic degranulation products-an in-depth systematic review

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic esophagitis is a chronic inflammatory disorder, often relapsing. There is an increasing need to develop new alternative diagnostic and monitoring methods on a critical basis, which will provide samples through none or minimally invasive procedures. This study aims to identify and document the types and roles of potential biomarkers in eosinophilic esophagitis released by eosinophils as well as the potential relationship to the peak eosinophilic count and the degree of degranulation of in situ eosinophils (DGE/DGE + NDGE: degranulated eosinophils/degranulated eosinophils and non-degranulated eosinophils).

METHODS

This is the first in-depth systematic review study using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) parameters involving a literature search of academic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Medline, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Database, 2011-2022) targeting specifically the eosinophilic counts and ratio, and the eosinophilic degranulation products as potential biomarkers. Data were extracted from ten selected studies and presented on a spreadsheet.

RESULTS

The studies show the ability to detect eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic degranulation products, and absolute eosinophilic count in samples, including blood and urine, thereby serving as potential surrogates in making the diagnosis or monitoring disease progression in the future. There is an obvious paucity of studies that correlate potential biomarkers to the degree of degranulation of in situ eosinophils.

CONCLUSIONS

A few minimally invasive methods and biomarkers may be suggested as alternative tools in diagnosing and monitoring eosinophilic esophagitis. While there is no consensus on the clinical usefulness of these biomarkers, our critical evaluation may suggest that the eosinophilic degranulation ratio (DGE/DGE + NDGE: degranulated eosinophils/degranulated eosinophils and non-degranulated eosinophils) in the esophagus may be critical for evaluating properly these biomarkers. An increasing trend may culminate in the potential clinical use of these biomarkers evaluated not only with the peak eosinophilic count, but also with the degranulation score upon regulatory bodies' approval to monitor eosinophilic esophagitis in the future. We strongly advocate for the necessity to score the esophageal biopsies with both a peak eosinophilic count and a score of the degranulated eosinophils.

Pediatric Patients with Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Their Parents Identify Symptoms as the Most Important Treatment Outcome

INTRODUCTION

Given the lack of data, we aimed to explore which therapeutic endpoints pediatric patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and their parents consider to be relevant.

METHODS

We created an educational brochure on EoE and a questionnaire, both of which were content-validated by pediatric patients and parents. Validated documents were sent to 112 patients and parents. They ranked the importance (5 levels) of short (during next 3 months) and long-term (≥1 year) treatment effect on symptoms, quality of life, endoscopic inflammation, stricture formation, histological inflammation, and fibrosis.

RESULTS

A total of 45 parents and 30 pediatric patients ≥11 years completed the questionnaires. Pediatric patients identified improvement in the following domains as most important in the short- and long-term, respectively: symptoms (73% vs. 77%), QoL (53% vs. 57%), histologic inflammation (47% vs. 50%), histologic fibrosis (40% vs. 33%), endoscopic inflammation (47% vs. 40%), and strictures (33% vs. 40%). Parents of children ≥11 years old classified improvement in the following domains as most important in the short- and long-term, respectively: symptoms (70% vs. 83%), QoL (63% vs. 80%), histologic inflammation (67% vs. 77%), histologic fibrosis (47% vs. 63%), endoscopic inflammation (77% vs. 80%), and strictures (40% vs. 53%). Agreement between caregiver and children on the short-term importance of treatment outcomes was as follows: symptoms (77%), QoL (40%), histologic inflammation and fibrosis (47% and 43%), endoscopic inflammation and strictures (50% and 40%).

CONCLUSION

Pediatric patients and parents attributed most importance to improvement in symptoms and QoL. Agreement between parents and patients regarding therapy goals is limited.