NHS services for epilepsy from the patient's perspective: a survey of primary, secondary and tertiary care access throughout the UK

Modeling the determinants of attrition in a two-stage epilepsy prevalence survey in Nairobi using machine learning

Background

Attrition is a challenge in parameter estimation in both longitudinal and multi-stage cross-sectional studies. Here, we examine utility of machine learning to predict attrition and identify associated factors in a two-stage population-based epilepsy prevalence study in Nairobi.

Methods

All individuals in the Nairobi Urban Health and Demographic Surveillance System (NUHDSS) (Korogocho and Viwandani) were screened for epilepsy in two stages. Attrition was defined as probable epilepsy cases identified at stage-I but who did not attend stage-II (neurologist assessment). Categorical variables were one-hot encoded, class imbalance was addressed using synthetic minority over-sampling technique (SMOTE) and numeric variables were scaled and centered. The dataset was split into training and testing sets (7:3 ratio), and seven machine learning models, including the ensemble Super Learner, were trained. Hyperparameters were tuned using 10-fold cross-validation, and model performance evaluated using metrics like Area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, Brier score and F1 score over 500 bootstrap samples of the test data.

Results

Random forest (AUC = 0.98, accuracy = 0.95, Brier score = 0.06, and F1 = 0.94), extreme gradient boost (XGB) (AUC = 0.96, accuracy = 0.91, Brier score = 0.08, F1 = 0.90) and support vector machine (SVM) (AUC = 0.93, accuracy = 0.93, Brier score = 0.07, F1 = 0.92) were the best performing models (base learners). Ensemble Super Learner had similarly high performance. Important predictors of attrition included proximity to industrial areas, male gender, employment, education, smaller households, and a history of complex partial seizures.

Conclusion

These findings can aid researchers plan targeted mobilization for scheduled clinical appointments to improve follow-up rates. These findings will inform development of a web-based algorithm to predict attrition risk and aid in targeted follow-up efforts in similar studies.

The international league against epilepsy primary healthcare educational curriculum: Assessment of educational needs

OBJECTIVE

To assess the need for an epilepsy educational curriculum for primary healthcare providers formulated by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) and the importance attributed to its competencies by epilepsy specialists and primary care providers and across country-income settings.

METHODS

The ILAE primary care epilepsy curriculum was translated to five languages. A structured questionnaire assessing the importance of its 26 curricular competencies was posted online and publicized widely to an international community. Respondents included epilepsy specialists, primary care providers, and others from three World Bank country-income categories. Responses from different groups were compared with univariate and ordinal logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

Of 785 respondents, 60% noted that a primary care epilepsy curriculum did not exist or they were unaware of one in their country. Median ranks of importance for all competencies were high (very important to extremely important) in the entire sample and across different groups. Fewer primary care providers than specialists rated the following competencies as extremely important: definition of epilepsy (p = .03), recognition of seizure mimics (p = .02), interpretation of test results for epilepsy care (p = .001), identification of drug-resistant epilepsy (0.005) and management of psychiatric comorbidities (0.05). Likewise, fewer respondents from LMICs in comparison to UMICs rated 15 competencies as extremely important.

SIGNIFICANCE

The survey underscores the unmet need for an epilepsy curriculum in primary care and the relevance of its competencies across different vocational and socioeconomic settings. Differences across vocational and country income groups indicate that educational packages should be developed and adapted to needs in different settings.

Causes and classification of first unprovoked seizures and newly-diagnosed epilepsy in a defined geographical area- an all-comers analysis

PURPOSE

The ILAE recently updated the operational definition of epilepsy and the classifications of seizures and epilepsy incorporating aetiology into the classification framework. To date, these classifications have not been applied in any whole population incidence study.

METHODS

Multiple overlapping methods of case identification were applied to a defined geographical area (population 542,868 adults and children) to identify all first unprovoked seizures and new diagnosis of epilepsy presenting during the calendar year 2017. The 2017 ILAE classification frameworks were applied. Incidence was age-standardised to the 2013 Standard European Population.

RESULTS

The annual incidence per 100,000 population was 44 for focal epilepsy, 6.8 for generalized epilepsy and 10.9 for unclassified epilepsy (age standardized 56, 6.9 and 11.4, respectively). Focal epilepsy was diagnosed in all age groups, though incidence increased in those ≥55 years of age. Primary generalised epilepsy accounted for 10% (n = 32) of newly diagnosed epilepsy. The most frequently diagnosed aetiology was structural (54%, n = 182). In 30% (n = 102) of newly diagnosed epilepsy, aetiology was not established.

CONCLUSION

We report on the causes of incident first unprovoked seizures and epilepsy in accordance with recently updated ILAE definitions and classification systems employing standard diagnostic investigations. We report a higher proportion of structural aetiology than previous studies, which may reflect incorporation of imaging in aetiology classification. Despite improved access to diagnostic testing, aetiology of a large fraction of first seizures and newly diagnosed epilepsy remains unknown.

Best care for older people with epilepsy: A scoping review

There are two peaks of diagnosis of epilepsy: in childhood and in people over 65. Older people may have complex needs like co-morbidity, polypharmacy, frailty, and social isolation. This scoping review focusses on the care of older people with epilepsy beyond diagnosis and medical treatment. We sought to identify areas within the UK health service needing development either in clinical practice or through further research. The search returned 4864 papers with 33 papers included in the review. The papers were grouped into psychosocial, self-management and services themes. Only one randomised controlled trial was found. Research was mainly based on cohort and case-control studies. Older people require more information to self-manage epilepsy and more psychological support to help with symptoms of anxiety and depression. People reported experiencing stigma and a reluctance to disclose their condition. This may increase the risk of isolation and difficulties in managing epilepsy. Studies reported that older people are referred less to neurologists, suggesting there may be a gap in care provision compared to younger people. Generalist health professionals may be better placed to provide holistic care, but they may need additional training to alleviate uncertainties in managing epilepsy. Care plans could help provide information, particularly for co-morbidity, but few had one. Our findings highlight psychological and self-management needs for managing epilepsy in older people. Health service staff may require upskilling to shift epilepsy management from neurologists to generalists. More research is needed regarding psychological and self-management interventions, particularly in the form of randomised controlled trials.

Seizure first aid training for people with epilepsy attending emergency departments and their significant others: the SAFE intervention and feasibility RCT

Background

No seizure first aid training intervention exists for people with epilepsy who regularly attend emergency departments and their significant others, despite such an intervention’s potential to reduce clinically unnecessary and costly visits.

Objectives

The objectives were to (1) develop Seizure first Aid training For Epilepsy (SAFE) by adapting a broader intervention and (2) determine the feasibility and optimal design of a definitive randomised controlled trial to test SAFE’s efficacy.

Design

The study involved (1) the development of an intervention informed by a co-design approach with qualitative feedback and (2) a pilot randomised controlled trial with follow-ups at 3, 6 and 12 months and assessments of treatment fidelity and the cost of SAFE’s delivery.

Setting

The setting was (1) third-sector patient support groups and professional health-care organisations and (2) three NHS emergency departments in England.

Participants

Participants were (1) people with epilepsy who had visited emergency departments in the prior 2 years, their significant others and emergency department, paramedic, general practice, commissioning, neurology and nursing representatives and (2) people with epilepsy aged ≥ 16 years who had been diagnosed for ≥ 1 year and who had made two or more emergency department visits in the prior 12 months, and one of their significant others. Emergency departments identified ostensibly eligible people with epilepsy from attendance records and patients confirmed their eligibility.

Interventions

Participants in the pilot randomised controlled trial were randomly allocated 1 : 1 to SAFE plus treatment as usual or to treatment as usual only.

Main outcome measures

Consent rate and availability of routine data on emergency department use at 12 months were the main outcome measures. Other measures of interest included eligibility rate, ease with which people with epilepsy could be identified and routine data secured, availability of self-reported emergency department data, self-reported emergency department data’s comparability with routine data, SAFE’s effect on emergency department use, and emergency department use in the treatment as usual arm, which could be used in sample size calculations.

Results

(1) Nine health-care professionals and 23 service users provided feedback that generated an intervention considered to be NHS feasible and well positioned to achieve its purpose. (2) The consent rate was 12.5%, with 53 people with epilepsy and 38 significant others recruited. The eligibility rate was 10.6%. Identifying people with epilepsy from attendance records was resource intensive for emergency department staff. Those recruited felt more stigmatised because of epilepsy than the wider epilepsy population. Routine data on emergency department use at 12 months were secured for 94.1% of people with epilepsy, but the application process took 8.5 months. Self-reported emergency department data were available for 66.7% of people with epilepsy, and people with epilepsy self-reported more emergency department visits than were captured in routine data. Most participants (76.9%) randomised to SAFE received the intervention. The intervention was delivered with high fidelity. No related serious adverse events occurred. Emergency department use at 12 months was lower in the SAFE plus treatment as usual arm than in the treatment as usual only arm, but not significantly so. Calculations indicated that a definitive trial would need ≈ 674 people with epilepsy and ≈ 39 emergency department sites.

Limitations

Contrary to patient statements on recruitment, routine data secured at the pilot trial’s end indicated that ≈ 40% may not have satisfied the inclusion criterion of two or more emergency department visits.

Conclusions

An intervention was successfully developed, a pilot randomised controlled trial conducted and outcome data secured for most participants. The consent rate did not satisfy a predetermined ‘stop/go’ level of ≥ 20%. The time that emergency department staff needed to identify eligible people with epilepsy is unlikely to be replicable. A definitive trial is currently not feasible.

Future work

Research to more easily identify and recruit people from the target population is required.

Trial registration

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN13871327.

Funding

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 8, No. 39. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Self-Management education for adults with poorly controlled epILEpsy [SMILE (UK)]: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Epilepsy is a common neurological condition resulting in recurrent seizures. Research evidence in long-term conditions suggests that patients benefit from self-management education and that this may improve quality of life (QoL). Epilepsy self-management education has yet to be tested in a UK setting.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of Self-Management education for people with poorly controlled epILEpsy [SMILE (UK)].

DESIGN

A parallel pragmatic randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Participants were recruited from eight hospitals in London and south-east England.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults aged ≥ 16 years with epilepsy and two or more epileptic seizures in the past year, who were currently being prescribed antiepileptic drugs.

INTERVENTION

A 2-day group self-management course alongside treatment as usual (TAU). The control group received TAU.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome is QoL in people with epilepsy at 12-month follow-up using the Quality Of Life In Epilepsy 31-P (QOLIE-31-P) scale. Other outcomes were seizure control, impact of epilepsy, medication adverse effects, psychological distress, perceived stigma, self-mastery and medication adherence. Cost-effectiveness analyses and a process evaluation were undertaken.

RANDOMISATION

A 1 : 1 ratio between trial arms using fixed block sizes of two.

BLINDING

Participants were not blinded to their group allocation because of the nature of the study. Researchers involved in data collection and analysis remained blinded throughout.

RESULTS

The trial completed successfully. A total of 404 participants were enrolled in the study [SMILE (UK), n = 205; TAU, n = 199] with 331 completing the final follow-up at 12 months [SMILE (UK), n = 163; TAU, n = 168]. In the intervention group, 61.5% completed all sessions of the course. No adverse events were found to be related to the intervention. At baseline, participants had a mean age of 41.7 years [standard deviation (SD) 14.1 years], and had epilepsy for a median of 18 years. The mean QOLIE-31-P score for the whole group at baseline was 66.0 out of 100.0 (SD 14.2). Clinically relevant levels of anxiety symptoms were reported in 53.6% of the group and depression symptoms in 28.0%. The results following an intention-to-treat analysis showed no change in any measures at the 12-month follow-up [QOLIE-31-P: SMILE (UK) mean: 67.4, SD 13.5; TAU mean: 69.5, SD 14.8]. The cost-effectiveness study showed that SMILE (UK) was possibly cost-effective but was also associated with lower QoL. The process evaluation with 20 participants revealed that a group course increased confidence by sharing with others and improved self-management behaviours.

CONCLUSIONS

For people with epilepsy and persistent seizures, a 2-day self-management education course is cost-saving, but does not improve QoL after 12-months or reduce anxiety or depression symptoms. A psychological intervention may help with anxiety and depression. Interviewed participants reported attending a group course increased their confidence and helped them improve their self-management.

FUTURE WORK

More research is needed on self-management courses, with psychological components and integration with routine monitoring.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN57937389.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 22, No. 21. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Health Care Utilization Following Vagus Nerve Stimulation Therapy in Pediatric Epilepsy Patients From a Pediatric Accountable Care Organization

BACKGROUND

Vagus nerve stimulation has been a therapy for epilepsy approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for patients 4 and older and shown efficacy and safety in younger pediatric patients.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective analysis utilizing Medicaid claims from an accountable care organization to measure the intervention of vagus nerve stimulation therapy in regard to unplanned health care utilization. Thirteen unique patients were included who had vagus nerve stimulation therapy who had at least 6 months of continuous enrollment in a managed Medicaid health plan. Comparison with 12 months of data before and after vagus nerve stimulation implantation was performed.

RESULTS

Patients had statistically significant fewer unplanned inpatient visits per patient per enrollment month after vagus nerve stimulation implantation.

CONCLUSION

Utilizing claims data, vagus nerve stimulation implantation demonstrates a reduction in unplanned hospitalizations.

Characteristics associated with quality of life among people with drug-resistant epilepsy

Quality of Life (QoL) is the preferred outcome in non-pharmacological trials, but there is little UK population evidence of QoL in epilepsy. In advance of evaluating an epilepsy self-management course we aimed to describe, among UK participants, what clinical and psycho-social characteristics are associated with QoL. We recruited 404 adults attending specialist clinics, with at least two seizures in the prior year and measured their self-reported seizure frequency, co-morbidity, psychological distress, social characteristics, including self-mastery and stigma, and epilepsy-specific QoL (QOLIE-31-P). Mean age was 42 years, 54% were female, and 75% white. Median time since diagnosis was 18 years, and 69% experienced ≥10 seizures in the prior year. Nearly half (46%) reported additional medical or psychiatric conditions, 54% reported current anxiety and 28% reported current depression symptoms at borderline or case level, with 63% reporting felt stigma. While a maximum QOLIE-31-P score is 100, participants’ mean score was 66, with a wide range (25–99). In order of large to small magnitude: depression, low self-mastery, anxiety, felt stigma, a history of medical and psychiatric comorbidity, low self-reported medication adherence, and greater seizure frequency were associated with low QOLIE-31-P scores. Despite specialist care, UK people with epilepsy and persistent seizures experience low QoL. If QoL is the main outcome in epilepsy trials, developing and evaluating ways to reduce psychological and social disadvantage are likely to be of primary importance. Educational courses may not change QoL, but be one component supporting self-management for people with long-term conditions, like epilepsy.

Developing and assessing the acceptability of an epilepsy first aid training intervention for patients who visit UK emergency departments: A multi-method study of patients and professionals

Epilepsy affects around 1% of the UK population; 40% of whom experience two or more seizures annually. However, most Emergency Department (ED) visits by people with epilepsy (PWE) are clinically unnecessary. Evidence highlights that with correct training, seizures can be safely managed by patients and their families within the community. Arguably therefore, PWE who frequently visit the ED might benefit from a self-management intervention that improves their own and their families' confidence and ability in managing seizures. Currently, no such intervention is available for PWE attending the ED. A collaborative approach (patients, carers, health professionals) was adopted to develop a patient-focused, self-management intervention. An existing group-based seizure management course, offered by the Epilepsy Society, was adapted. Collaborative feedback was sought via a base-line document review, one-to-one semi-structured interviews, and focus group discussions. The applied framework provided a systematic approach from development through to implementation. Participant feedback overall was extremely positive. People with epilepsy who visit the ED reported a positive view of epilepsy seizure first aid training and associated educational materials. Their feedback was then used to develop the optimized intervention presented here. Strengths and perceived barriers to successful implementation and participation, as well as the practical and psychosocial benefits, were identified. We describe the developed intervention together with the process followed. This description, while being project-specific, provides a useful template to assist in the development of interventions more generally. Ongoing evaluation will determine the effects of the training intervention on participants' behavior.

People with epilepsy obtain added value from education in groups: results of a qualitative study

Background and purpose

Having epilepsy requires individuals to learn about self‐management. So far, trials of self‐management courses have not included in‐depth qualitative evaluations of how the learning method influences participants’ perceptions and behaviour. We aimed to interview participants who had attended a course, as part of a randomized controlled trial, to examine: (i) their perceptions of what they valued and negative aspects of the intervention, and (ii) whether and in what ways they continued to make use of the training.

Methods

Twenty participants were selected within 6 months of undertaking a course from the larger randomized controlled trial conducted in England. Semi‐structured interviews were based on a topic guide.

Results

Participants’ characteristics were representative of the clinical and demographic characteristics of the trial group. Their mean age was 44 years, half were male, and three‐quarters had had epilepsy for over 10 years and had experienced one or more seizures in the previous month. Participants valued the opportunity to meet ‘people like them’. Structured learning methods encouraged them to share and compare feelings and experience. Specific benefits included: overcoming the sense of ‘being alone’ and improving self‐acceptance through meeting people with similar experience. Over half reported that this, and comparison of attitudes and experience, helped them to improve their confidence to talk openly, and make changes in health behaviours.

Conclusions

People feel socially isolated in long‐term poorly controlled epilepsy. They gain confidence and self‐acceptance from interactive groups. Expert‐facilitated courses that encourage experiential learning can help people learn from each other, and this may enhance self‐efficacy and behaviour change.

Self-management for people with poorly controlled epilepsy: Participants' views of the UK Self-Management in epILEpsy (SMILE) program

BACKGROUND

Epilepsy is a long-term condition that requires self-management, but currently, there is no well-evaluated epilepsy self-education or self-management intervention in the United Kingdom (UK).

AIM

The aim of this study was to examine the views and experiences of the first participants of the Self-Management in epILEpsy UK (SMILE UK) program to assist the development of a full trial.

METHOD

In-depth semistructured interviews and group discussions were conducted with 10 people with poorly controlled epilepsy to explore their views and experiences of the self-management program. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed thematically.

RESULTS

All participants viewed the program positively. Three themes emerged: i) peer support was experienced through knowledge sharing, disclosure of experiences, and exchange of contact details; ii) participants felt better equipped to enter discussions with doctors and other health-care professionals about their condition; and iii) participants reported an improvement in their personal life through increased confidence to live with epilepsy and acceptance of their diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

A brief group self-management intervention increased knowledge and confidence in managing epilepsy.

Epilepsy service provision in the National Health Service in England in 2012

PURPOSE

The National Health Service in the United Kingdom compares favourably on many international measures of quality and cost-effectiveness. It has many centres of excellence for epilepsy care and in some areas is a world-leader. However, for over twenty years there have been concerns that the provision of good quality care is variable and in many areas major improvements are required. We report the results of the latest major survey into the quality of epilepsy care in the NHS.

METHODS

Four target groups were sent questionnaires: acute hospital trusts, Clinical Commissioning Groups, local authorities and patients. Each questionnaire was specifically designed by Epilepsy Action after reviewing national guidance and quality standards.

RESULTS

We present the key results of the survey and we discuss them in the context of the latest national guidelines, quality standards, the organisational structure of the NHS and the research literature.

CONCLUSION

Although there are some examples of excellent services for people with epilepsy these results show that overall there has been little improvement in recent years and there continues to be significant geographical variability in quality with many areas offering sub-optimal care.

Epilepsy services in Ireland: 'A survey of people with epilepsy in relation to satisfaction, preferences and information provision'

BACKGROUND

A challenge facing modern health care systems is to develop and implement new models of service that deliver increased capacity while providing a higher-quality, more cost-effective service within resource constraints. Incorporating the experience of people with epilepsy must be seen as central to the effectiveness of service design and delivery. This paper, therefore, reports the views of people with epilepsy with regards to health service delivery in Ireland.

METHOD

A cross-sectional descriptive survey design involving both quantitative and qualitative items was administered to a convenience sample of one hundred and two people with epilepsy (n=102) attending an epilepsy specialist centre.

RESULTS

Despite high levels of satisfaction with hospital and primary care, participants offered several suggestions to improve healthcare delivery, such as: less delay in accessing specialist care and hospital appointments; better communication; and easier access to investigatory services. Findings demonstrate that for people with epilepsy the burden of the disorder is substantial and complex encompassing social, psychological and structural difficulties. Poor information provision particularly among women is reported. Furthermore, a lack of empowerment in people with epilepsy is highlighted.

CONCLUSION

This study has implications for the reform and development of epilepsy services in relation to practice, education and research. It provides a basis for an evaluation of current practice and identifies opportunities for future service reorganization to improve the quality and efficiency of healthcare provision.

Self-Management education for adults with poorly controlled epILEpsy (SMILE (UK)): a randomised controlled trial protocol

BACKGROUND

Teaching people with epilepsy to identify and manage seizure triggers, implement strategies to remember to take antiepileptic drugs, implement precautions to minimize risks during seizures, tell others what to do during a seizure and learn what to do during recovery may lead to better self-management. No teaching programme exists for adults with epilepsy in the United Kingdom although a number of surveys have shown patients want more information.

METHODS/DESIGN

This is a multicentre, pragmatic, parallel group randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a two-day Self-Management education for epILEpsy (SMILE (UK)), which was originally developed in Germany (MOSES).Four hundred and twenty eight adult patients who attended specialist epilepsy outpatient clinics at 15 NHS participating sites in the previous 12 months, and who fulfil other eligibility criteria will be randomised to receive the intervention (SMILE (UK) course with treatment as usual- TAU) or to have TAU only (control). The primary outcome is the effect on patient reported quality of life (QoL). Secondary outcomes are seizure frequency and psychological distress (anxiety and depression), perceived impact of epilepsy, adherence to medication, management of adverse effects from medication, and improved self-efficacy in management (mastery/control) of epilepsy.Within the trial there will be a nested qualitative study to explore users' views of the intervention, including barriers to participation and the perceived benefits of the intervention. The cost-effectiveness of the intervention will also be assessed.

DISCUSSION

This study will provide quantitative and qualitative evidence of the impact of a structured self management programme on quality of life and other aspects of clinical and cost effectiveness in adults with poorly controlled epilepsy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials: ISRCTN57937389.

Can an epilepsy nurse specialist-led self-management intervention reduce attendance at emergency departments and promote well-being for people with severe epilepsy? A non-randomised trial with a nested qualitative phase

Objectives

To (1) describe the characteristics and service use of people with established epilepsy (PWE) who attend the emergency department (ED); (2) evaluate the economic impact of PWE who attend the ED; (3) determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an epilepsy nurse specialist (ENS)-led self-management intervention plus treatment as usual (TAU) compared with TAU alone in reducing ED use and promoting well-being; (4) describe patients' views of the intervention; and (5) explore their reasons for attending the ED.

Design

Non-randomised trial with nested qualitative study.

Setting

The EDs of three inner London hospitals. The EDs each offer similar services and support a similar local population, which made a comparison of patient outcomes reasonable.

Participants

Adults diagnosed with epilepsy for ≥ 1 year were prospectively identified from the EDs by presenting symptom/discharge diagnosis. We recruited 85 of 315 patients with 44 forming the intervention group and 41 the comparison group.

Intervention

Intervention participants were offered two one-to-one outpatient sessions delivered by an ENS who aimed to optimise self-management skills and knowledge of appropriate emergency service use. The first session lasted for 45–60 minutes and the second for 30 minutes.

Main outcome measures

The primary outcome was the number of ED visits that participants reported making over the 6 months preceding the 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes were visits reported at the 6-month follow-up and scores on psychosocial measures.

Results

In the year preceding recruitment, the 85 participants together made 270 ED visits. The frequency of their visits was positively skewed, with 61% having attended multiple times. The mean number of visits per participant was 3.1 [standard deviation (SD) 3.6] and the median was two (interquartile range 1–4). Mean patient service cost was £2355 (SD £2455). Compared with findings in the general epilepsy population, participants experienced more seizures and had greater anxiety, lower epilepsy knowledge and greater perceived stigma. Their outpatient care was, however, consistent with National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence recommendations. In total, 81% of participants were retained at the 6- and 12-month follow-ups, and 80% of participants offered the intervention attended. Using intention-to-treat analyses, including those adjusted for baseline differences, we found no significant effect of the intervention on ED use at the 6-month follow-up [adjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93 to 3.28] or the 12-month follow-up (adjusted IRR 1.92, 95% CI 0.68 to 5.41), nor on any psychosocial outcomes. Because they spent less time as inpatients, however, the average service cost of intervention participants over follow-up was less than that of TAU participants (adjusted difference £558, 95% CI –£2409 to £648). Lower confidence in managing epilepsy and more felt stigma at baseline best predicted more ED visits over follow-up. Interviews revealed that patients generally attended because they had no family, friend or colleague nearby who had the confidence to manage a seizure. Most participants receiving the intervention valued it, including being given information on epilepsy and an opportunity to talk about their feelings. Those reporting most ED use at baseline perceived the most benefit.

Conclusions

At baseline, > 60% of participants who had attended an ED in the previous year had reattended in the same year. In total, 50% of their health service costs were accounted for by ED use and admissions. Low confidence in their ability to manage their epilepsy and a greater sense of stigma predicted frequent attendance. The intervention did not lead to a reduction in ED use but did not cost more, partly because those receiving the intervention had shorter average hospital stays. The most common reason reported by PWE for attending an ED was the lack of someone nearby with sufficient experience of managing a seizure. Those who attended an ED frequently and received the intervention were more likely to report that the intervention helped them. Our findings on predictors of ED use clarify what causes ED use and suggest that future interventions might focus more on patients' perceptions of stigma and on their confidence in managing epilepsy. If addressed, ED visits might be reduced and efficiency savings generated.

Trial registration

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN06469947.

Funding

This project was funded by the NIHR Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full inHealth Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 1, No. 9. See the HSDR programme website for further project information.

Predictors of health-related quality of life and costs in adults with epilepsy: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Given the high burden of epilepsy on both health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and costs, identification of factors that are predictive of either reduced HRQoL or increased expenditure is central to the better future targeting and optimization of existing and emerging interventions and management strategies for epilepsy.

METHODS

Searches of Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library (up to July 2010) to identify studies examining the association between demographic, psychosocial, and condition-related factors and HRQoL, resource utilization or costs in adults with epilepsy. For each study, predictor factor associations were summarized on the basis of statistical significance and direction; the results were then combined across studies.

KEY FINDINGS

Ninety-three HRQoL and 16 resource utilization/cost studies were included. Increases in seizure frequency, seizure severity, level of depression, and level of anxiety and presence of comorbidity were strongly associated with reduced HRQoL. The majority of studies were cross-sectional in design and had an overall methodologic quality that was judged to be "moderate" for HRQoL studies and "poor" for health care resource or costs studies. In the 53 multivariate studies, age, gender, marital status, type of seizure, age at diagnosis, and duration of epilepsy did not appear to be associated with HRQoL, whereas the predictive influence of educational and employment status, number of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and AED side effects was unclear. The association between predictive factors and HRQoL appeared to be consistent across individuals whether refractory or seizures controlled or managed by AEDs. There were insufficient multivariate studies (five) to reliably comment on the predictors of resource utilization or cost in epilepsy.

SIGNIFICANCE

In addition to seizure control, effective epilepsy management requires the early detection of those most at risk of psychological dysfunction and comorbidity, and the targeting of appropriate interventions. There is need for more rigorous studies with appropriate multivariate statistical methods that prospectively investigate the predictors of HRQoL, resource utilization, and costs in epilepsy.

Chronic illness, reproductive health and moral work: women's experiences of epilepsy

BACKGROUND

The impact of chronic illness on families has long been noted in the literature, but in such studies families appear as ready-formed entities. This exploratory qualitative study addresses the largely unacknowledged work involved in the production of families and the maintenance of reproductive health by women with epilepsy, a condition whose symptoms and treatment have serious implications for all aspects of reproductive health.

METHODS

Qualitative in-depth interviews were conducted with a sample of 15 women aged 20-40 years diagnosed with epilepsy and recruited from across the UK. The women had a range of neurological symptoms and hence different diagnostic categories; most had been diagnosed during childhood or adolescence. Ten women had at least one child.

RESULTS

Women's experiences of healthcare services for key phases of reproduction are explored. While some women reported that they had received good healthcare, others reported that they were given inadequate information and that advice was offered too late to enable them to take appropriate action.

DISCUSSION

Management of both epilepsy and reproductive health involves work with a significant moral dimension, the accomplishment of which is contingent on appropriate and timely advice from healthcare practitioners.

Cross-country measures for monitoring epilepsy care

PURPOSE

The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Commission on Healthcare Policy in consultation with the World Health Organization (WHO) examined the applicability and usefulness of various measures for monitoring epilepsy healthcare services and systems across countries. The goal is to provide planners and policymakers with tools to analyze the impact of healthcare services and systems and evaluate efforts to improve performance.

METHODS

Commission members conducted a systematic literature review and consulted with experts to assess the nature, strengths, and limitations of the treatment gap and resource availability measures that are currently used to assess the adequacy of epilepsy care. We also conducted a pilot study to determine the feasibility and applicability of using new measures to assess epilepsy care developed by the WHO including Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs), responsiveness, and financial fairness.

RESULTS

The existing measures that are frequently used to assess the adequacy of epilepsy care focus on structural or process factors whose relationship to outcomes are indirect and may vary across regions. The WHO measures are conceptually superior because of their breadth and connection to articulated and agreed upon outcomes for health systems. However, the WHO measures require data that are not readily available in developing countries and most developed countries as well.

CONCLUSION

The epilepsy field should consider adopting the WHO measures in country assessments of epilepsy burden and healthcare performance whenever data permit. Efforts should be made to develop the data elements to estimate the measures.

The development of a city-wide epilepsy register

The provision of care for patients with epilepsy in the UK is fragmented and inadequate. Lack of support in the community, poor communication across the primary-secondary care interface and inaccessibility of specialist services are contributory factors. The inclusion of epilepsy as a quality marker in the new general practitioner (GP) contract provides an opportunity to improve co-ordination of services. Prior to the acceptance of the New GP Contract in April 2004, the first part of this audit aimed to (a) assess the documentation of the process of care of patients with epilepsy in the city of Chester; and (b) provide GPs with a clinical resource to facilitate review of patients and targeting of referrals to secondary care. The case notes of 610 patients were scrutinised to identify the proportion (a) receiving regular review, (b) in whom diagnosis was uncertain, (c) in documented remission, (d) who were women of child-bearing age, (e) who were non-compliant with treatment. A computerised template, including specific suggestions, was produced for every patient but responsibility for review remained with each GP. Re-audit in 2 years was planned. Two hundred and fifty (41%) had been seen by a GP in the previous year. One hundred and sixteen (19%) had regular review arrangements. One hundred and thirty-eight (22.6%) had shared care of whom 79 had seen their GP in previous year. Three hundred and one (49%) had not seen any doctor concerning their epilepsy in the previous year. Forty-three percent of adults who should be receiving shared care were not doing so. In 67 (11%) cases, there was diagnostic uncertainty. Only 178 (29.2%) patients were in documented remission. One hundred and nine (17.8%) patients were women of child-bearing age of whom 37 were receiving sodium valproate. In 84 (14%), there was evidence of non-compliance. Haphazard follow-up arrangements preclude review of diagnostic accuracy, estimation of remission rate, assessment of adherence to prescribed treatment and awareness of level of patients' knowledge especially women of child-bearing age on teratogenic drugs. One cannot identify those patients who can be managed solely in the community and those who merit reassessment in hospital clinics. Assuming these findings are representative, primary and specialist secondary care face an enormous task in reorganising services to ensure that all patients receive appropriate care. This project describes a method of improving local co-ordination of patient care.

Epilepsy in the UK: Misdiagnosis, mistreatment, and undertreatment?

OBJECTIVE

To assess the diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties in patients with epilepsy who had never come into contact with specialist services.

METHODS

Assessment was offered to 676 patients diagnosed as having epilepsy and receiving anti-epileptic drug therapy (AED), who had no previous contact with the local epilepsy services. Two hundred and seventy-five patients gave consent and attended for reassessment. We identified the proportion of patients (a) who had previously seen a neurologist, (b) in whom the diagnosis of epilepsy was not secure, (c) in whom planned AED withdrawal could be considered (d) in whom seizure control could be improved.

RESULTS

53/275 (19.3%) of those attending for review had previously been seen by a neurologist. 87/275 (31.6%) patients ultimately received continued specialist care. Diagnostic doubt was expressed in 3/53 (5.6%) and 42/222 (18.9%) of patients diagnosed by neurologist and non-specialist, respectively. Of 133/219 (60.7%) of patients whose epilepsy was in remission, only 6 elected to withdraw or change medication. Of 18 patients with diagnostic doubt who accepted follow-up, 12 successfully stopped treatment. 17/55 (30.9%) patients with active epilepsy (10 partial, 7 generalised) achieved at least a 1 year remission consequent upon treatment in this clinic. In 15 cases this was a first ever remission.

CONCLUSION

Approximately 55% of the population of adults receiving treatment for epilepsy have never received specialist advice. Reassessment of these patients uncovers diagnostic uncertainty, failure to classify (leading to sub-optimal therapy) and lack of information and advice about all aspects of epilepsy care. The development of integrated services for people with epilepsy (PWE) must take account of this hidden need. The new General Medical Services contract for general practitioners will bring this need to our attention, and our experience will help predict the measures required to deal with the under-treatent and mistreatment of this group. The majority of PWE, not currently receiving shared care, merit reassessment and approximately one-third will require continued specialist care. Existing services do not have the capacity to process a marked increase in rate of referral. This project informs prioritisation of referrals and service reorganisation.

Evidence of cultural hybridity in responses to epilepsy among Pakistani muslims living in the UK

OBJECTIVES

To examine how people from Bradford's Pakistani Muslim community experience living with epilepsy. Specifically, the paper addresses social interactions and negotiations with care providers and considers how different understandings of epilepsy are integrated.

METHODS

Interviews were conducted with a sample of Bradford's Pakistani Muslim community (n = 20). Interviews were analysed to identify themes and significant areas of shared concern.

RESULTS

This paper identifies popular, professional and folk sectors contributing to an individual's 'health system'. Where sectors overlap, zones of hybridity are created: that is, a person might simultaneously seek help from a doctor and from a religious healer, or might offer explanations for seizures that include neurological and spiritual components.

DISCUSSION

While there are many similarities between the experiences of these minority ethnic community members and published work on the lived experience of epilepsy in other communities, there are also important differences that service providers need to recognize and respond to. Differences include forms of cultural expression and specific language needs. Improving communication between professionals and persons with epilepsy needs to be prioritized.

The Epidemiology of the Comorbidity of Epilepsy in the General Population

PURPOSE

To describe the epidemiology of somatic and psychiatric conditions in adults with epilepsy in the community and compare it to that of people without epilepsy.

METHODS

A cross-sectional population-based study extracting data from the UK General Practice Research Database for the period 1995-1998. Age- and sex-standardized prevalence rates were estimated for selected conditions and groups of conditions (categorized by ICD-9 chapters) in adults with epilepsy registered with primary care physicians. Results were compared with those in adults without epilepsy in the cohort, and prevalence ratios were calculated according to two broad age groups (16-64 and older than 64 years).

RESULTS

Conditions common in the general population also were common in adults with epilepsy. Psychiatric disorders occurred twice as often, and the risk of somatic disorders was increased in people with epilepsy, with the exception of musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders in older adults. The prevalence ratio of neoplasia, excluding intracranial tumors, was not increased in epilepsy. The prevalence ratio of brain tumors was particularly increased in young adults [prevalence ratio (PR), 70.7] and of meningiomas in older adults (PR, 91.9). Neurodegenerative conditions, particularly dementias and Alzheimer' disease (PR, 6.3 and 8, respectively) and Parkinson' disease (PR, 3.2), appeared more frequently in people with epilepsy. Upper gastrointestinal bleed occurred more frequently in epilepsy (PR, 4.3), as did cardio- and cerebrovascular disorders, fractures, pneumonia and chronic lung diseases, and diabetes. Eczema, osteoarthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis did not occur more frequently in epilepsy.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence ratio of many common psychiatric and somatic conditions is increased in adults with epilepsy who consult a primary care physician in the U.K. These findings may have implications in the diagnosis and management of epilepsy and coexisting conditions, as well as in health care provision.

Information recalled by women taking anti-epileptic drugs for epilepsy: a questionnaire study

Women with epilepsy have different needs from men, particularly associated with childbearing. Despite clinical guidelines, the care of women with epilepsy remains suboptimal. The aim of this study was to establish whether women with epilepsy recall being given information on topics relating to childbearing. Design of study and methods included a postal questionnaire study of 795 women with epilepsy and of childbearing age. The respondents were identified through both general practices and hospital clinics as part of the Clinical Standards Advisory Group study into Epilepsy Services. Of those women who considered the questions personally relevant, 38-48% recalled receiving information about contraception, pre-pregnancy planning, folic acid and teratogenicity, with lower overall proportions among adolescent women. The proportions that recalled receiving information about vitamin K, safety in child-care and breast-feeding were lower at 12, 24 and 24%, respectively. While it is recognised that information provided may not be recalled, our results suggest that further measures are required to improve the effectiveness of information provision in the UK in relation to women of childbearing age with epilepsy.

The epilepsy nurse specialist at a tertiary care hospital-improving the interface between primary and tertiary care

Recent literature suggests that access to an epilepsy nurse specialist (ENS) may help improve patients understanding and management of their condition and in doing so may decrease morbidity and mortality. This paper describes the role of the ENS at a large tertiary referral epilepsy centre, the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (NHNN) in supporting patients with refractory epilepsy in the hospital and community. Approximately 300 patients were referred to the ENS in the first 6 months of the service. A questionnaire was posted to 193 patients, 69% responded. Most patients had multiple seizures each month, took polytherapy, underwent frequent antiepileptic drug (AED) dose changes and often experienced drug side effects. Sixty percent of patients contacted the ENS for urgent medical advice. Important aspects of the service were access by telephone to medication advice, information, support and adequate time to discuss issues. The ENS improved continuity of, and accessibility to, care for patients, has become a key member of the multidisciplinary epilepsy team and has freed up scarce medical time.

A survey of a novel epilepsy clinic

The management of a group of epilepsy patients from primary care, in a geographical area with clear epilepsy management guidelines and secondary care clinics is surveyed. Suggestions are made to improve liaison between primary and secondary care as well as epilepsy management in primary care. All 42 local primary care practices were invited to take part in this project. A study day providing a broad overview of epilepsy management was held. Those attending were expected to identify all patients in their practice with epilepsy using diagnostic codes and prescribing data. Nine of the invited 42 practices took part in the project, and identified 506 patients prescribed anti-epilepsy drugs (AEDs). Three hundred and three patients were invited for review by their practice nurse, following exclusion of those prescribed AEDs for other conditions, children and those already under specialist review. One hundred and sixteen patients attended for review. Seventy-one patients were identified as requiring specialist review and a consultant neurologist, epilepsy nurse specialist and clinical assistant completed them. Of the 71 patients 31 had experienced no seizures for 5 years, 40 had experienced seizures in the past 5 years, of whom 32 had experienced seizures in the last year. Sixteen were suffering at least one seizure per month, and a few had poorly controlled epilepsy. Patients were taking mainly Phenytoin, Carbamazepine and Sodium valproate. Twenty were taking polytherapy and one no treatment.Fifty-two patients reported side effects and 15 poor compliance. Many patients reviewed were considered to be taking unnecessary medication and suffering unnecessary side effects. There is a need for improved epilepsy management in primary care and better liaison between primary and secondary care.

Differences in the use of health services among people with and without epilepsy in the United Kingdom: socio-economic and disease-specific determinants

We aim to examine the socio-economic, demographic and disease-specific determinants in the use of health services by patients with epilepsy, compared to people without epilepsy. We used data from the fourth national survey of morbidity in general practice, carried out in 1991-1992. Overall mean annual number of consultations with general practitioners, home visits and referrals to secondary care per person were calculated for people with epilepsy, stratified by age, sex and socio-economic status. The proportion of patients consulting for certain diseases or disease groups were also calculated for patients with epilepsy. Results were compared to these in people without epilepsy, and rate ratios were calculated. Patients with epilepsy consulted twice as often, required three to four times more home visits, and were referred to secondary care three times more often than people without epilepsy, irrespective of age, sex and social class. Among patients with epilepsy, consultation rates and home visits were higher in females, older people and people from the manual social classes. A higher proportion of patients with epilepsy consulted for neoplasms, haematological and mental health disorders, dementia, stroke and gastrointestinal bleeding. Older age and low social class were less strongly associated with health service utilisation than in people without epilepsy, indicating that people with epilepsy lose much of the protective effect of young age and high social class on health. Factors contributing to the higher utilisation of health services in people with epilepsy need to be studied further and their effects taken into account in the organisation of health services for people with epilepsy.