1
|
Baron TH. Experience is "what separates the good and the great": implications of ERCP volume on patient outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 99:960-961. [PMID: 38762307 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2024] [Revised: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/20/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Todd H Baron
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Teles de Campos S, Diniz P, Castelo Ferreira F, Voiosu T, Arvanitakis M, Devière J. Assessing the impact of center volume on the cost-effectiveness of centralizing ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 99:950-959.e4. [PMID: 38061478 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.11.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS ERCP is a complex endoscopic procedure in which the center's procedure volume influences outcomes. With the increasing healthcare expenses and limited resources, promoting cost-effective care becomes essential for healthcare provision. This study was a cost-effectiveness analysis to evaluate the hypothesis that high-volume (HV) centers perform ERCP with higher quality at lower costs than low-volume (LV) centers. METHODS A baseline case compared the current distribution of ERCPs among HV and LV centers with a hypothetical scenario in which all ERCPs are performed at HV centers. A cost-effectiveness analysis was constructed, followed by 1- and 2-way sensitivity analyses, and probabilistic sensitivity analysis using Monte Carlo simulations. RESULTS In the baseline case, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was -$151,270 per year, due to the hypothetical scenario's lower costs and slightly higher quality-adjusted life years. The model was most sensitive to changes in transportation costs (109.34%), probability of significant adverse events (AEs) after successful ERCP at LV centers (42.12%), utility after ERCP with significant AEs (30.10%), and probability of significant AEs after successful ERCP at HV centers (23.53%); only transportation costs above $3655 changed the study outcome, however. The current ERCP distribution would only be cost-effective if LV centers achieved higher success (≥92.4% vs 89.3%), with much lower significant AEs (≤.5% vs 6.7%). The study's main findings remained unchanged while combining all model parameters in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS Our findings show that HV centers have high-performance rates at lower costs, raising the need to consider the principle of centralization of ERCPs into HV centers to improve the quality of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Teles de Campos
- Gastroenterology Department, Digestive Unit, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal; Université Libre Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Bioengineering and iBB, Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences, Instituto Superior Técnico, Fondation Michel Cremer, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - Pedro Diniz
- Department of Bioengineering and iBB, Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences, Instituto Superior Técnico, Fondation Michel Cremer, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal; Associate Laboratory i4HB, Institute for Health and Bioeconomy, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Frederico Castelo Ferreira
- Department of Bioengineering and iBB, Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences, Instituto Superior Técnico, Fondation Michel Cremer, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal; Associate Laboratory i4HB, Institute for Health and Bioeconomy, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Theodor Voiosu
- Gastroenterology Department, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Carol Davila Faculty of Medicine, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Marianna Arvanitakis
- Université Libre Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jacques Devière
- Gastroenterology Department, Digestive Unit, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal; Université Libre Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Bioengineering and iBB, Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences, Instituto Superior Técnico, Fondation Michel Cremer, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shiha MG, Sanders DS, Sidhu R. Road map to small bowel endoscopy quality indicators. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2024; 40:183-189. [PMID: 38190352 DOI: 10.1097/mog.0000000000000993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Quality indicators for upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy are well established and linked to patient outcomes. However, there is a perceived gap in the development and implementation of quality indicators for small bowel endoscopy. In this review, we aimed to discuss the development of quality indicators in small bowel endoscopy and their implementation in clinical practice. RECENT FINDINGS The proposed quality indicators for small bowel endoscopy focus on process measures, which mainly evaluate the procedural aspects, rather than the outcomes or the overall patient experience. These quality indicators have rarely been studied in clinical practice, leading to a limited understanding of their applicability and impact on patient outcomes and experience. SUMMARY Real-world studies evaluating the quality indicators of small bowel endoscopy are warranted to establish an evidence-based framework for their practical application and effectiveness. Linking these indicators to relevant patient outcomes is crucial for their broader acceptance and implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed G Shiha
- Academic Unit of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals
- Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - David S Sanders
- Academic Unit of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals
- Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Reena Sidhu
- Academic Unit of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals
- Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Teles de Campos S, Arvanitaki M, Boskoski I, Deviere J. Vade Mecum in ERCP, a roadmap to success: Tips from experts for excelling in ERCP. Endosc Int Open 2024; 12:E613-E620. [PMID: 38681145 PMCID: PMC11052645 DOI: 10.1055/a-2290-1479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Training in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is operator-dependent and traditionally, the apprenticeship model, in which experts are considered to be role models, has been adopted for it. The aim of this study was to develop a practical guide compiling tips from experts to help guide trainees to succeed in ERCP. Methods A web-based survey was created to understand the professional development of ERCP experts, the investments they made, the obstacles they overcame, and the quotes that guided their professional life. ERCP experts worldwide were invited to participate. Results Fifty-three experts (of 71; 74.6%) from 24 countries answered the survey. Experts started ERCP training early (average age 31 years; range, 24-52 years) and it often was combined with training for endoscopic ultrasound. A long training period (average 21 months; range, 3-120 months) was needed to achieve competence, frequently in another department, and it was commonly complemented with research in the field (76.5%). "Time and practice" were the most worthwhile investments they made to achieve success. "Sports" were an area outside endoscopy frequently considered to be important to acquire the skills necessary to excel in ERCP. "Lack of dedicated time for training" and "peer competition" were the biggest obstacles the experts faced. Several pieces of advice were given to the experts, such as to be resilient, careful, patient, responsible, and hard-working. "Personal life" was mentioned as an undeniably crucial factor for achieving long-term success that should not be forgotten. Conclusions This survey is the first to provide insight regarding the professional trajectory of renowned ERCP experts worldwide, providing valuable recommendations to help trainees excel in ERCP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Teles de Campos
- Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium
- Gastroenterology department, Digestive Unit, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
- Fondation Michel Cremer, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Marianna Arvanitaki
- Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium
- Service de Gastroentérologie, d’Hépato-Pancréatologie et d’Oncologie digestive, Hôpital Erasme, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Ivo Boskoski
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Jacques Deviere
- Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium
- Gastroenterology department, Digestive Unit, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
- Fondation Michel Cremer, Bruxelles, Belgium
- Service de Gastroentérologie, d’Hépato-Pancréatologie et d’Oncologie digestive, Hôpital Erasme, Bruxelles, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mikalsen IM, Breder S, Medhus AW, Folseraas T, Aabakken L, Ånonsen KV. ERCP for the initial management of malignant biliary obstruction - real world data on 596 procedures. Scand J Gastroenterol 2024; 59:369-377. [PMID: 37994406 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2023.2282375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/24/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To evaluate outcomes of ERCP as first-line management in patients with malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) of all causes and stages, reflecting a real-life setting. METHODS Retrospective observational study of patients with ERCP as the first-line management of MBO at Oslo University Hospital between 2015 and 2021. Primary outcome measure was a ≥ 50% decrease from the pre-procedural bilirubin within 30 days after ERCP. Secondary outcome measures were technical success of ERCP, complications and overall mortality. RESULTS A total of 596 patients were included, median age 70 years. ASA score was ≥ III in 67% of patients. The most common cancers causing MBO were pancreatic cancer (52%), metastatic lesions (20%) and cholangiocarcinoma (16%). The primary outcome measure was achieved in 62% of patients. With endoscopic access, overall technical success was 80% with 85% for the distal extrahepatic group, 71% for the perihilar, 40% for the intrahepatic and 53% for multiple level MBOs. Reinterventions were performed in 27% of the patients. Complications occurred in 15% of the patients, including post-ERCP pancreatitis in 9%. Most complications were of minor/moderate severity (81%). Overall mortality was 33% within the first 90 days. Patients deceased by the end of the study period (83%) had median survival of 146 days (range 1-2,582 days). CONCLUSIONS ERCP has a high rate of clinical effect and technical success in the management of both distal extrahepatic and perihilar MBO. Our data indicate that ERCP is a valid option in the first-line management of MBO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I M Mikalsen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - S Breder
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - A W Medhus
- Department of Gastroenterology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - T Folseraas
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - L Aabakken
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - K V Ånonsen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shiha MG, Sidhu R, Lucaciu LA, Palmer-Jones C, Ayeboa-Sallah B, Lazaridis N, Eckersley R, Hiner GE, Maxfield D, Shaheen W, Abduljabbar D, Hussain MA, O'Hare R, Phull PS, Eccles J, Caddy GR, Butt MA, Kurup A, Chattree A, Hoare J, Jennings J, Longcroft-Wheaton G, Collins P, Humphries A, Murino A, Despott EJ, Sanders DS. Device-assisted enteroscopy performance measures in the United Kingdom: DEEP-UK quality improvement project. Endoscopy 2024; 56:174-181. [PMID: 37949103 DOI: 10.1055/a-2199-7155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE) has become a well-established diagnostic and therapeutic tool for the management of small-bowel pathology. We aimed to evaluate the performance measures for DAE across the UK against the quality benchmarks proposed by the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). METHODS We retrospectively collected data on patient demographics and DAE performance measures from electronic endoscopy records of consecutive patients who underwent DAE for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes across 12 enteroscopy centers in the UK between January 2017 and December 2022. RESULTS A total of 2005 DAE procedures were performed in 1663 patients (median age 60 years; 53% men). Almost all procedures (98.1%) were performed for appropriate indications. Double-balloon enteroscopy was used for most procedures (82.0%), followed by single-balloon enteroscopy (17.2%) and spiral enteroscopy (0.7%). The estimated depth of insertion was documented in 73.4% of procedures. The overall diagnostic yield was 70.0%. Therapeutic interventions were performed in 42.6% of procedures, with a success rate of 96.6%. Overall, 78.0% of detected lesions were marked with a tattoo. Patient comfort was significantly better with the use of deep sedation compared with conscious sedation (99.7% vs. 68.5%; P<0.001). Major adverse events occurred in only 0.6% of procedures. CONCLUSIONS Performance measures for DAE in the UK meet the ESGE quality benchmarks, with high diagnostic and therapeutic yields, and a low incidence of major adverse events. However, there is room for improvement in optimizing sedation practices, standardizing the depth of insertion documentation, and adopting marking techniques to aid in the follow-up of detected lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed G Shiha
- Academic Unit of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
- Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Reena Sidhu
- Academic Unit of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
- Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Laura A Lucaciu
- Royal Free Unit for Endoscopy, The Royal Free Hospital, University College London Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Christopher Palmer-Jones
- Royal Free Unit for Endoscopy, The Royal Free Hospital, University College London Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Benjamin Ayeboa-Sallah
- Royal Free Unit for Endoscopy, The Royal Free Hospital, University College London Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Nikolaos Lazaridis
- Royal Free Unit for Endoscopy, The Royal Free Hospital, University College London Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Robert Eckersley
- Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - George E Hiner
- Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Dominic Maxfield
- Department of Gastroenterology, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Walaa Shaheen
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Duaa Abduljabbar
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Muhammad A Hussain
- Directorates of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Rosie O'Hare
- Division of Gastroenterology, Ulster Hospital, Dundonald, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Perminder S Phull
- Department of Digestive Disorders, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - John Eccles
- Division of Gastroenterology, Ulster Hospital, Dundonald, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Grant R Caddy
- Division of Gastroenterology, Ulster Hospital, Dundonald, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Mohammed A Butt
- Directorates of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Arun Kurup
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Amit Chattree
- Department of Gastroenterology, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Jonathan Hoare
- Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Jason Jennings
- Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Gaius Longcroft-Wheaton
- Department of Gastroenterology, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Paul Collins
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Adam Humphries
- Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Alberto Murino
- Royal Free Unit for Endoscopy, The Royal Free Hospital, University College London Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Edward J Despott
- Royal Free Unit for Endoscopy, The Royal Free Hospital, University College London Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - David S Sanders
- Academic Unit of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
- Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Han SY, Chon HK, Kim SH, Lee SH. Quality indicators of endoscopic ultrasound in the pancreatobiliary system: a brief review of current guidelines. Clin Endosc 2024; 57:158-163. [PMID: 37430396 PMCID: PMC10984746 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2023.064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Revised: 03/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Since its development, the use of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in the pancreas and the biliary tract has become increasingly important. The accuracy of EUS varies depending on the experience of the endoscopist. Hence, quality control measures using appropriate indicators are required to reduce these variations. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy have announced the EUS quality indicators. Here, we reviewed the quality indicators of the EUS procedure in the current published guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung Yong Han
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Hyung Ku Chon
- Division of Biliopancreas, Department of Internal Medicine, Wonkwang University College of Medicine, Iksan, Korea
- Institute of Wonkwang Medical Science, Wonkwang University College of Medicine, Iksan, Korea
| | - Seong-Hun Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Sang Hyub Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - The Research Group for Endoscopic Ultrasound in Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
- Division of Biliopancreas, Department of Internal Medicine, Wonkwang University College of Medicine, Iksan, Korea
- Institute of Wonkwang Medical Science, Wonkwang University College of Medicine, Iksan, Korea
- Department of Internal Medicine, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Badaoui A, Teles de Campos S, Fusaroli P, Gincul R, Kahaleh M, Poley JW, Sosa Valencia L, Czako L, Gines A, Hucl T, Kalaitzakis E, Petrone MC, Sadik R, van Driel L, Vandeputte L, Tham T. Curriculum for diagnostic endoscopic ultrasound training in Europe: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement. Endoscopy 2024; 56:222-240. [PMID: 38065561 DOI: 10.1055/a-2224-8704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) has recognized the need to formalize and enhance training in diagnostic endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). This manuscript represents the outcome of a formal Delphi process resulting in an official Position Statement of the ESGE and provides a framework to develop and maintain skills in diagnostic EUS. This curriculum is set out in terms of the prerequisites prior to training; the recommended steps of training to a defined syllabus; the quality of training; and how competence should be defined and evidenced before independent practice. 1: Trainees should have achieved competence in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy before training in diagnostic EUS. 2: The development of diagnostic EUS skills by methods that do not involve patients is advisable, but not mandatory, prior to commencing formal training in diagnostic EUS. 3: A trainee's principal trainer should be performing adequate volumes of diagnostic EUSs to demonstrate maintenance of their own competence. 4: Training centers for diagnostic EUS should offer expertise, as well as a high volume of procedures per year, to ensure an optimal level of quality for training. Under these conditions, training centers should be able to provide trainees with a sufficient wealth of experience in diagnostic EUS for at least 12 months. 5: Trainees should engage in formal training and supplement this with a range of learning resources for diagnostic EUS, including EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration and biopsy (FNA/FNB). 6: EUS training should follow a structured syllabus to guide the learning program. 7: A minimum procedure volume should be offered to trainees during diagnostic EUS training to ensure that they have the opportunity to achieve competence in the technique. To evaluate competence in diagnostic EUS, trainees should have completed a minimum of 250 supervised EUS procedures: 80 for luminal tumors, 20 for subepithelial lesions, and 150 for pancreaticobiliary lesions. At least 75 EUS-FNA/FNBs should be performed, including mostly pancreaticobiliary lesions. 8: Competence assessment in diagnostic EUS should take into consideration not only technical skills, but also cognitive and integrative skills. A reliable valid assessment tool should be used regularly during diagnostic EUS training to track the acquisition of competence and to support trainee feedback. 9: A period of supervised practice should follow the start of independent activity. Supervision can be delivered either on site if other colleagues are already practicing EUS or by maintaining contacts with the training center and/or other EUS experts. 10: Key performance measures including the annual number of procedures, frequency of obtaining a diagnostic sample during EUS-FNA/FNB, and adverse events should be recorded within an electronic documentation system and evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdenor Badaoui
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, CHU UCL NAMUR, Université catholique de Louvain, Yvoir, Belgium
| | - Sara Teles de Campos
- Department of Gastroenterology, Digestive Unit, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Pietro Fusaroli
- Unit of Gastroenterology, University of Bologna, Hospital of Imola, Imola, Italy
| | - Rodica Gincul
- Department of Gastroenterology, Jean Mermoz Private Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Michel Kahaleh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Jan-Werner Poley
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Leonardo Sosa Valencia
- IHU Strasbourg - Institute of Image-Guided Surgery - Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Laszlo Czako
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Angels Gines
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, ICMDM, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, CIBEREHD, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Tomas Hucl
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Evangelos Kalaitzakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Maria Chiara Petrone
- Division of Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Riadh Sadik
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Lydi van Driel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lieven Vandeputte
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, AZ Sint-Jan Brugge-Oostende AV, Bruges, Belgium
| | - Tony Tham
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ulster Hospital, Dundonald, Northern Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Laleman W, Vanderschueren E, Mehdi ZS, Wiest R, Cardenas A, Trebicka J. Endoscopic procedures in hepatology: Current trends and new developments. J Hepatol 2024; 80:124-139. [PMID: 37730125 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2023.08.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2023] [Revised: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
Gastrointestinal endoscopy has long been a reliable backbone in the diagnosis and management of hepatobilary disorders and their complications. However, with evolving non-invasive testing, personalised medicine has reframed the utility and necessity of endoscopic screening. Conversely, the growing interest and use of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and advanced endoscopy within gastrointestinal units has also opened novel diagnostic and therapeutic avenues for patients with various hepatobiliary diseases. The integration of "advanced endoscopy" within the practice of hepatology is nowadays referred to as "endo-hepatology". In essence, endo-hepatology consists of two pillars: one focusing primarily on disorders of the liver parenchyma, vascular disorders, and portal hypertension, which is mainly captured via EUS, while the other targets the hepatobiliary tract via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and advanced imaging. Applications under the umbrella of endo-hepatology include, amongst others, EUS-guided liver biopsy, EUS-guided portal pressure gradient measurement, coil and glue embolisation of gastric varices as well as cholangioscopy. As such endo-hepatology could become an attractive concept wherein advanced endoscopy might reinforce the medical management of patients with hepatobiliary disorders and their complications after initial basic work-up. In this review, we discuss current trends and future developments within endo-hepatology and the remaining hurdles to overcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wim Laleman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Section of Liver and Biliopancreatic Disorders, University Hospitals Leuven, KU LEUVEN, Leuven, Belgium; Medizinische Klinik B, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster University, Münster, Germany.
| | - Emma Vanderschueren
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Section of Liver and Biliopancreatic Disorders, University Hospitals Leuven, KU LEUVEN, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Zain Seyad Mehdi
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, KU LEUVEN, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Reiner Wiest
- Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, University Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Andres Cardenas
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red Enfermedades Hepaticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid, Spain; Institute of Digestive Disease and Metabolism, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain
| | - Jonel Trebicka
- Medizinische Klinik B, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster University, Münster, Germany; European Foundation of Chronic Liver Failure, EFCLIF, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Laleman W, Mertens J, Vanderschueren E, Praktiknjo M, Trebicka J. Advances in Endohepatology. Am J Gastroenterol 2023; 118:1756-1767. [PMID: 37610016 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
Over the past decade, the number of endoscopic procedures relevant to patients with liver disease not only increased but also altered and expanded in terms of indications and applications. "Endohepatology" refers to the integration of advanced endoscopy within the practice of hepatology with endoscopic ultrasound as one of the main pillars. Current applications under the umbrella of endohepatology focus on advanced diagnostics and oncological, vascular, and metabolic interventions. These involve, among others, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided liver biopsy, EUS-guided portal pressure gradient measurement, and EUS-guided coil and glue embolization of gastric varices. In addition to its conceptually attractive technical and innovative characteristics, endohepatology is also an appealing practical option for daily practice because it can be offered as a "one-stop clinic" intervention where comprehensive endoscopic diagnostic and/or therapeutic testing is performed in a single outpatient visit. In this review, we will discuss current trends and future developments within endohepatology and the remaining hurdles to overcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wim Laleman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Section of Liver and Biliopancreatic Disorders, University Hospitals Leuven, KU LEUVEN, Leuven, Belgium
- Medizinische Klinik B, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster University, Münster, Germany
| | - Joachim Mertens
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Klinik Hirslanden, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Emma Vanderschueren
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Section of Liver and Biliopancreatic Disorders, University Hospitals Leuven, KU LEUVEN, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Michael Praktiknjo
- Medizinische Klinik B, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster University, Münster, Germany
| | - Jonel Trebicka
- Medizinische Klinik B, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster University, Münster, Germany
- European Foundation of Chronic Liver Failure, EFCLIF, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Teles de Campos S, Papaefthymiou A, Florou T, Facciorusso A, Arvanitakis M, Devière J, Gkolfakis P. Impact of center and endoscopist ERCP volume on ERCP outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 98:306-315.e14. [PMID: 37201726 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.05.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 04/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Endoscopist experience and center volume might be associated with ERCP outcomes, as in other fields of endoscopy and in surgery. An effort to assess this relationship is important to improve practice. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate these comparative data and to assess the impact of endoscopist and center volume on ERCP procedure outcomes. METHODS We performed a literature search in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus through March 2022. Volume classification included high- and low-volume (HV and LV) endoscopists and centers. The primary outcome was the impact of endoscopist and center volume on ERCP success. Secondary outcomes were the overall adverse event (AE) rate and the specific AE rate. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Data synthesis was obtained by direct meta-analyses using a random-effects model; results are presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS Of 6833 relevant publications, 31 studies met the inclusion criteria. Procedure success was higher among HV endoscopists (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.59-2.06; I2 = 57%) and in HV centers (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.22-2.57; I2 = 67%). The overall AE rate was lower for procedures performed by HV endoscopists (OR, .71; 95% CI, .61-.82; I2 = 38%) and in HV centers (OR, .70; 95% CI, .51-.97; I2 = 92%). Bleeding was less frequent in procedures performed by HV endoscopists (OR, .67; 95% CI, .48-.95; I2 = 37%) but did not differ based on center volume (OR, .68; 95% CI, .24-1.90; I2 = 89%). No statistical differences were detected concerning pancreatitis, cholangitis, and perforation rates. CONCLUSIONS HV endoscopists and centers provide higher ERCP success rates with fewer overall AEs, especially bleeding, compared with respective LV comparators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Teles de Campos
- Gastroenterology Department, Digestive Unit, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal; Université Libre Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Apostolis Papaefthymiou
- Pancreaticobiliary Medicine Unit, University College London Hospitals (UCLH) NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Larissa, Thessaly, Greece
| | - Theodosia Florou
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Larissa, Thessaly, Greece
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Marianna Arvanitakis
- Université Libre Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jacques Devière
- Gastroenterology Department, Digestive Unit, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal; Université Libre Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium; Konstantopoulio-Patision General Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Koch AD. Competency assessment: a journey of lifelong learning. Endoscopy 2023; 55:857-858. [PMID: 37442157 DOI: 10.1055/a-2100-1294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Arjun D Koch
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute - University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Khan R, Homsi H, Gimpaya N, Lisondra J, Sabrie N, Gholami R, Bansal R, Scaffidi MA, Lightfoot D, James PD, Siau K, Forbes N, Wani S, Keswani RN, Walsh CM, Grover SC. Validity evidence for observational ERCP competency assessment tools: a systematic review. Endoscopy 2023; 55:847-856. [PMID: 36822219 DOI: 10.1055/a-2041-7546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND : Assessment of competence in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is critical for supporting learning and documenting attainment of skill. Validity evidence supporting ERCP observational assessment tools has not been systematically evaluated. METHODS : We conducted a systematic search using electronic databases and hand-searching from inception until August 2021 for studies evaluating observational assessment tools of ERCP performance. We used a unified validity framework to characterize validity evidence from five sources: content, response process, internal structure, relations to other variables, and consequences. Each domain was assigned a score of 0-3 (maximum score 15). We assessed educational utility and methodological quality using the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education framework and the Medical Education Research Quality Instrument, respectively. RESULTS : From 2769 records, we included 17 studies evaluating 7 assessment tools. Five tools were studied for clinical ERCP, one for simulated ERCP, and one for simulated and clinical ERCP. Validity evidence scores ranged from 2 to 12. The Bethesda ERCP Skills Assessment Tool (BESAT), ERCP Direct Observation of Procedural Skills Tool (ERCP DOPS), and The Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) and ERCP Skills Assessment Tool (TEESAT) had the strongest validity evidence, with scores of 10, 12, and 11, respectively. Regarding educational utility, most tools were easy to use and interpret, and required minimal additional resources. Overall methodological quality (maximum score 13.5) was strong, with scores ranging from 10 to 12.5. CONCLUSIONS : The BESAT, ERCP DOPS, and TEESAT had strong validity evidence compared with other assessments. Integrating tools into training may help drive learners' development and support competency decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rishad Khan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Hoomam Homsi
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada
| | - Nikko Gimpaya
- Division of Gastroenterology, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - James Lisondra
- Division of Gastroenterology, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Reza Gholami
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Gastroenterology, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Rishi Bansal
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | | | - David Lightfoot
- Health Science Library, Unity Health Toronto, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Paul D James
- Division of Gastroenterology, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Keith Siau
- Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Royal College of Physicians, London, United Kingdom
- Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Nauzer Forbes
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Sachin Wani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Rajesh N Keswani
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States
| | - Catharine M Walsh
- The Wilson Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- SickKids Research and Learning Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Paediatrics, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Samir C Grover
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Gastroenterology, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Milluzzo SM, Olivari N, Rossi G, Bianchi D, Liserre B, Graffeo M, Lovera M, Correale L, Hassan C, Spada C. Rapid on-site evaluation improves the sensitivity of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for solid pancreatic lesions irrespective of technique: A single-centre experience. Cytopathology 2023; 34:318-324. [PMID: 37186418 DOI: 10.1111/cyt.13237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Revised: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is the first-line technique for the sampling of pancreatic lesions. Many factors can influence the diagnostic performance of this procedure, including the use of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE). The primary aim of this study was to compare the adequacy, diagnostic yield, accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of EUS-FNA for solid pancreatic lesions before and after the introduction of ROSE. METHODS This retrospective single-centre study evaluated all consecutive patients who underwent EUS-FNA for suspicious, solid pancreatic masses from April 2012 to March 2015. We compared the findings of EUS-FNA procedures performed during the first and second years following the adoption of ROSE ("ROSE1" and "ROSE2", respectively) to those performed the year before ROSE introduction (the "pre-ROSE" group). RESULTS Ninety-one consecutive patients with a total of 93 pancreatic lesions were enrolled. For the pre-ROSE, ROSE1 and ROSE2 groups, the adequacy rates were 96.2%, 96.6% and 100%, the diagnostic yield values were 76.9%, 89.7% and 92.1% and accuracy values were 69.2%, 86.2% and 89.5% (p = NS). Sensitivity for malignancy improved from 63.7% in the pre-ROSE group to 91.7% and 91.2% in the post-ROSE groups (p < 0.05). Specificity for malignancy was 100% in all groups. CONCLUSIONS ROSE can improve the diagnostic performance of EUS-FNA for solid pancreatic lesions, although only sensitivity reached statistical significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nicola Olivari
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Giulio Rossi
- Pathology Unit, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Denise Bianchi
- Pathology Unit, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Massimo Graffeo
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Mauro Lovera
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Loredana Correale
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristiano Spada
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Gastroenterology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS -Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sabat N, McSweeney W, Konno T, Gilberd MA, Molloy C, Pretorius C. Advanced skills for general surgeons and carving out a niche: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in regional Australia. ANZ J Surg 2023; 93:1768-1772. [PMID: 37150893 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Revised: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The provision of high-quality healthcare in rural Australian hospitals has necessitated general surgeons to take up the challenge and expand their expertise to advanced endoscopy techniques including endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). This study examines the utility of ERCP in a regional setting especially in decreasing patient transfers and associated costs while achieving exceptional safety by measuring key indicators of safety and efficacy. METHODS A single-centre retrospective cross-sectional cohort review in a rural Queensland hospital of patients who underwent ERCP (emergent and elective) from January 2019 until July 2022. Standardized international ERCP performance indicators were collected and compared to benchmark literature values including the rate of cannulation, stone extraction, successful stent placement, and post-ERCP pancreatitis. RESULTS The majority of the ERCP performance indicator benchmarks were met. 100% of patients had an appropriate indication for the procedure and consent. 98.95% successful CBD cannulation with only 14.14% requiring multiple attempts. 92.22% successful stone retrieval with 100% stent placement, well above guideline targets. The post-procedural complication rate was 6.81% (2.09% pancreatitis; 1.05% pancreatitis; 1.05% duodenal perforation). Antibiotic prophylaxis adherence was identified to require improvement (12.57%). CONCLUSION High-quality ERCP procedures can be performed in a regional hospital by general surgeons in a safe and cost-effective manner, significantly decreasing the costs associated with patient transfer. This study reflects strong evidence for consistently achieving international ERCP performance benchmarks and the provision of high-quality healthcare by a regional hospital and provides a strong argument for increasing access to ERCP in rural and remote hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nestor Sabat
- Department of General Surgery, Mackay Base Hospital, West Mackay, Queensland, Australia
| | - William McSweeney
- Department of General Surgery, Mackay Base Hospital, West Mackay, Queensland, Australia
| | - Takuma Konno
- James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
| | | | - Charles Molloy
- Department of General Surgery, Mackay Base Hospital, West Mackay, Queensland, Australia
| | - Casper Pretorius
- Department of General Surgery, Mackay Base Hospital, West Mackay, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gomes C, O'Neill C, Pinho R, Barosa R, Ponte A, Magalhães-Costa P, Rodrigues A, Chagas C, Carvalho J. Critical Analysis of the Applicability of Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy Performance Measures among 2 Portuguese Centers with Different Capsule Endoscopy Platforms. GE PORTUGUESE JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 2023; 30:230-238. [PMID: 37387712 PMCID: PMC10305259 DOI: 10.1159/000523773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/09/2022] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) identified the need to benchmark the quality of small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) and produced a set of performance measures (PM). The aim of this study is to critically evaluate the accordance of the PM for SBCE in two Portuguese centers with different SBCE platforms. METHODS The authors conducted a cross-sectional analysis of consecutive SBCE performed in an 18-month period in 2 Portuguese centers that used two different SBCE platforms Mirocam® (IntroMedic, Seoul, South Korea) and PillCam® (Medtronic, Yokneam, Israel). A total of 10 PM (6 key, 4 minor) were evaluated and compared between the 2 centers. RESULTS A total of 493 SBCE were included. The minimum standard established by ESGE was reached in 3/6 key PM (complete visualization, lesion detection rate, and capsule retention rate), and none of the 4 minor PM. PM compliance significantly differed between the 2 centers: complete small bowel visualization 95.9 and 90% (p = 0.01), diagnostic yield 50.6 and 63% (p = 0.005), adequate small bowel cleansing level according to Brotz scale 69.54 and 84.6% (p ≤ 0.001), patients with high risk of capsule retention offered a patency capsule 4.2 and 73% (p ≤ 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION This study highlights and critically discusses technical and organizational issues that should be considered in defining more realistic PM thresholds, aiming to improve SBCE quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catarina Gomes
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Porto, Portugal
| | - Catarina O'Neill
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Rolando Pinho
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Porto, Portugal
| | - Rita Barosa
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Ana Ponte
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Porto, Portugal
| | - Pedro Magalhães-Costa
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Adélia Rodrigues
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Porto, Portugal
| | - Cristina Chagas
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - João Carvalho
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Balan GG, Timofte O, Gilca-Blanariu GE, Sfarti C, Diaconescu S, Gimiga N, Antighin SP, Sandu I, Sandru V, Trifan A, Moscalu M, Stefanescu G. Predicting Hospitalization, Organ Dysfunction, and Mortality in Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Acute Pancreatitis: Are SIRS and qSOFA Reliable Tools? APPLIED SCIENCES 2023; 13:6650. [DOI: 10.3390/app13116650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
Background: Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) has shown constant incidence throughout time, despite advances in endoscopic technology, devices, or personal skills of the operating endoscopists, with prevention and prediction of severity in PEP being constant concerns. Several prospective studies have investigated the role of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria or the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score in the PEP severity assessment. However, there are no clearly defined tools for the prediction of PEP severity. Methods: A total of 403 patients were prospectively monitored 60 days after ERCP for the detection of PEP development. Consequently, we evaluated the lengths of stay, incidence of organic dysfunction, and mortality rates of these patients. The predictive power of the univariate model was evaluated by using the receiver operating characteristic curve and analyzing the area under the curve (AUC). Results: Incidence of PEP was similar to that reported in the majority of trials. The 60-day survival rate of PEP patients reached 82.8%. A qSOFA score ≥ 1 is a very good predictor for organ dysfunction (AUC 0.993, p < 0.0001). SIRS can also be considered a significant predictor for organic dysfunctions in PEP patients (AUC 0.926, p < 0.0001). However, only qSOFA was found to significantly predict mortality in PEP patients (AUC 0.885, p = 0.003), with SIRS criteria showing a much lower predictive power. Neither SIRS nor qSOFA showed any predictive value for the length of stay of PEP patients. Conclusion: Our study offers novel information about severity prediction in PEP patients. Both SIRS criteria and qSOFA showed good predictive value for organic dysfunction, mortality, and hospitalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gheorghe Gh. Balan
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Clinic, “Sf. Spiridon” Emergency Hospital, 700111 Iasi, Romania
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania
| | - Oana Timofte
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Clinic, “Sf. Spiridon” Emergency Hospital, 700111 Iasi, Romania
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania
| | - Georgiana-Emmanuela Gilca-Blanariu
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Clinic, “Sf. Spiridon” Emergency Hospital, 700111 Iasi, Romania
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania
| | - Catalin Sfarti
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Clinic, “Sf. Spiridon” Emergency Hospital, 700111 Iasi, Romania
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania
| | | | - Nicoleta Gimiga
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania
- Clinical Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, “Sf. Maria” Emergency Children’s Hospital, 700309 Iasi, Romania
| | | | - Ion Sandu
- Academy of Romanian Scientists (AORS), 54 Splaiul Independentei St., Sector 5, 050094 Bucharest, Romania
- Science Department, Interdisciplinary Research Institute, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, 11 Carol I Boulevard, 700506 Iasi, Romania
- Romanian Inventors Forum, 3 Sf. Petru Movilă St., L11, III/3, 700089 Iasi, Romania
| | - Vasile Sandru
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Clinic, Floreasca Clinical Emergency Hospital, 014461 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Anca Trifan
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Clinic, “Sf. Spiridon” Emergency Hospital, 700111 Iasi, Romania
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania
| | - Mihaela Moscalu
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Interdisciplinarity, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania
| | - Gabriela Stefanescu
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Clinic, “Sf. Spiridon” Emergency Hospital, 700111 Iasi, Romania
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Chiba M, Kato M, Kinoshita Y, Akasu T, Matsui H, Shimamoto N, Tomita Y, Abe T, Kanazawa K, Tsukinaga S, Nakano M, Torisu Y, Toyoizumi H, Suka M, Sumiyama K. Analysis of the variation in learning curves for achieving competency in convex EUS training: a prospective cohort study using a standardized assessment tool. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 97:722-731.e7. [PMID: 36343675 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.10.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Revised: 10/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The need for mastering standard imaging techniques for convex EUS in the biliopancreatic regions has been increasing; however, large variations in the aptitude for achieving EUS competency hinder expert development. Therefore, we investigated the factors influencing the achievement of expert competency in EUS using a new assessment tool for multiple imaging items. METHODS Between January 2018 and February 2022, 3277 consecutive EUS procedures conducted by 5 beginners (EUS procedures <250), 7 intermediate trainees (250-749), and 2 experts (≥750) were prospectively evaluated. Immediately after each EUS procedure, the success or failure of imaging for each item was recorded using a newly developed EUS assessment tool that requires 17 items to be photographed. After correcting for missing values using multiple imputation, learning curves of EUS scores were created, and a competency was set based on expert scores. Finally, a comparative analysis between high and low performers was performed to extract factors influencing EUS scores. RESULTS Although 3 of 7 intermediates (43%; mean, 317 cases) achieved competency, none of the beginners achieved competency. During a comparative analysis, although no significant difference in the number of EUS procedures performed was observed between the high and low performers, the former had significantly higher scores in the written test (theoretical knowledge). CONCLUSIONS Our results showed that theoretical knowledge, rather than the number of EUS cases, may be a possible influencing factor for distinguishing high and low performers after treating 250 cases. (Clinical trial registration number: UMIN 000043271.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masafumi Chiba
- Department of Endoscopy, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masayuki Kato
- Department of Endoscopy, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuji Kinoshita
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takafumi Akasu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Matsui
- Department of Endoscopy, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nana Shimamoto
- Department of Endoscopy, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Youichi Tomita
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takahiro Abe
- Department of Endoscopy, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keisuke Kanazawa
- Department of Endoscopy, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shintaro Tsukinaga
- Department of Endoscopy, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masanori Nakano
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuichi Torisu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hirobumi Toyoizumi
- Department of Endoscopy, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Machi Suka
- Department of Public Health and Environmental Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuki Sumiyama
- Department of Endoscopy, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Messmann H, Bisschops R, Antonelli G, Libânio D, Sinonquel P, Abdelrahim M, Ahmad OF, Areia M, Bergman JJGHM, Bhandari P, Boskoski I, Dekker E, Domagk D, Ebigbo A, Eelbode T, Eliakim R, Häfner M, Haidry RJ, Jover R, Kaminski MF, Kuvaev R, Mori Y, Palazzo M, Repici A, Rondonotti E, Rutter MD, Saito Y, Sharma P, Spada C, Spadaccini M, Veitch A, Gralnek IM, Hassan C, Dinis-Ribeiro M. Expected value of artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement. Endoscopy 2022; 54:1211-1231. [PMID: 36270318 DOI: 10.1055/a-1950-5694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
This ESGE Position Statement defines the expected value of artificial intelligence (AI) for the diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal neoplasia within the framework of the performance measures already defined by ESGE. This is based on the clinical relevance of the expected task and the preliminary evidence regarding artificial intelligence in artificial or clinical settings. MAIN RECOMMENDATIONS:: (1) For acceptance of AI in assessment of completeness of upper GI endoscopy, the adequate level of mucosal inspection with AI should be comparable to that assessed by experienced endoscopists. (2) For acceptance of AI in assessment of completeness of upper GI endoscopy, automated recognition and photodocumentation of relevant anatomical landmarks should be obtained in ≥90% of the procedures. (3) For acceptance of AI in the detection of Barrett's high grade intraepithelial neoplasia or cancer, the AI-assisted detection rate for suspicious lesions for targeted biopsies should be comparable to that of experienced endoscopists with or without advanced imaging techniques. (4) For acceptance of AI in the management of Barrett's neoplasia, AI-assisted selection of lesions amenable to endoscopic resection should be comparable to that of experienced endoscopists. (5) For acceptance of AI in the diagnosis of gastric precancerous conditions, AI-assisted diagnosis of atrophy and intestinal metaplasia should be comparable to that provided by the established biopsy protocol, including the estimation of extent, and consequent allocation to the correct endoscopic surveillance interval. (6) For acceptance of artificial intelligence for automated lesion detection in small-bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE), the performance of AI-assisted reading should be comparable to that of experienced endoscopists for lesion detection, without increasing but possibly reducing the reading time of the operator. (7) For acceptance of AI in the detection of colorectal polyps, the AI-assisted adenoma detection rate should be comparable to that of experienced endoscopists. (8) For acceptance of AI optical diagnosis (computer-aided diagnosis [CADx]) of diminutive polyps (≤5 mm), AI-assisted characterization should match performance standards for implementing resect-and-discard and diagnose-and-leave strategies. (9) For acceptance of AI in the management of polyps ≥ 6 mm, AI-assisted characterization should be comparable to that of experienced endoscopists in selecting lesions amenable to endoscopic resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helmut Messmann
- III Medizinische Klinik, Universitatsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Raf Bisschops
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catholic University of Leuven (KUL), TARGID, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Giulio Antonelli
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Ospedale dei Castelli Hospital, Ariccia, Rome, Italy
- Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
| | - Diogo Libânio
- Department of Gastroenterology, Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center, and RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Porto, Portugal
- MEDCIDS, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Pieter Sinonquel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catholic University of Leuven (KUL), TARGID, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Mohamed Abdelrahim
- Endoscopy Department, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Omer F Ahmad
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London Hospital, London, UK
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London Hospital, London, UK
- Gastrointestinal Services, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Miguel Areia
- Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | | | - Pradeep Bhandari
- Endoscopy Department, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Ivo Boskoski
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk Domagk
- Department of Medicine I, Josephs-Hospital Warendorf, Academic Teaching Hospital, University of Muenster, Warendorf, Germany
| | - Alanna Ebigbo
- III Medizinische Klinik, Universitatsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Tom Eelbode
- Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT/PSI), Medical Imaging Research Center, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Rami Eliakim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer & Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Michael Häfner
- 2nd Medical Department, Barmherzige Schwestern Krankenhaus, Vienna, Austria
| | - Rehan J Haidry
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London Hospital, London, UK
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Rodrigo Jover
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Alicante ISABIAL, Departamento de Medicina Clínica, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain
| | - Michal F Kaminski
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland
- Department of Oncological Gastroenterology and Department of Cancer Prevention, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Roman Kuvaev
- Endoscopy Department, Yaroslavl Regional Cancer Hospital, Yaroslavl, Russian Federation
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Additional Professional Education, N.A. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Yuichi Mori
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | | | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Matthew D Rutter
- North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust, Stockton-on-Tees, UK
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Yutaka Saito
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Prateek Sharma
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Division, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas, USA
- Kansas City VA Medical Center, Kansas City, USA
| | - Cristiano Spada
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Digestive Endoscopy, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy
| | - Marco Spadaccini
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrew Veitch
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Ian M Gralnek
- Ellen and Pinchas Mamber Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel
- Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario Dinis-Ribeiro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center, and RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Dekker E, Nass KJ, Iacucci M, Murino A, Sabino J, Bugajski M, Carretero C, Cortas G, Despott EJ, East JE, Kaminski MF, Karstensen JG, Keuchel M, Löwenberg M, Monged A, Nardone OM, Neumann H, Omar MM, Pellisé M, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Rutter MD, Bisschops R. Performance measures for colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease patients: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. Endoscopy 2022; 54:904-915. [PMID: 35913069 DOI: 10.1055/a-1874-0946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) presents a short list of performance measures for colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. Current performance measures for colonoscopy mainly focus on detecting (pre)malignant lesions. However, these performance measures are not relevant for all colonoscopy indications in IBD patients. Therefore, our aim was to provide endoscopy services across Europe and other interested countries with a tool for quality monitoring and improvement in IBD colonoscopy. Eight key performance measures and one minor performance measure were recommended for measurement and evaluation in daily endoscopy practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karlijn J Nass
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marietta Iacucci
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Alberto Murino
- Royal Free Unit for Endoscopy, The Royal Free Hospital and University College London Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, London, UK
| | - João Sabino
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Leuven, TARGID, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marek Bugajski
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland.,Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.,Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Cristina Carretero
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Navarre Clinic, Healthcare Research Institute of Navarre, Pamplona, Spain
| | - George Cortas
- University of Balamand Faculty of Medicine, St. George Hospital University Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Edward J Despott
- Royal Free Unit for Endoscopy, The Royal Free Hospital and University College London Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, London, UK
| | - James E East
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Nuffield Department of Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Healthcare, London, UK
| | - Michal F Kaminski
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland.,Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.,Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - John Gásdal Karstensen
- Gastroenterology Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Martin Keuchel
- Clinic for Internal Medicine, Agaplesion Bethesda Krankenhaus Bergedorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Mark Löwenberg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ashraf Monged
- Endoscopy Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of Ireland Hospitals Group, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Olga M Nardone
- Institute of Translational Medicine and Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,Gastroenterology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Helmut Neumann
- Department of Medicine I, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Mahmoud M Omar
- Department of Internal Medicine, Digestive Diseases and Endoscopy, New Mowasat Hospital, Salmiya, Kuwait
| | - Maria Pellisé
- Gastroenterology Department, Endoscopy Unit, ICMDiM, Hospital Clinic, CIBEREHD, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | | | - Matthew D Rutter
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of North Tees, Stockton-on-Tees, Cleveland, UK
| | - Raf Bisschops
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Leuven, TARGID, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Rodríguez de Santiago E, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Pohl H, Agrawal D, Arvanitakis M, Baddeley R, Bak E, Bhandari P, Bretthauer M, Burga P, Donnelly L, Eickhoff A, Hayee B, Kaminski MF, Karlović K, Lorenzo-Zúñiga V, Pellisé M, Pioche M, Siau K, Siersema PD, Stableforth W, Tham TC, Triantafyllou K, Tringali A, Veitch A, Voiosu AM, Webster GJ, Vienne A, Beilenhoff U, Bisschops R, Hassan C, Gralnek IM, Messmann H. Reducing the environmental footprint of gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates (ESGENA) Position Statement. Endoscopy 2022; 54:797-826. [PMID: 35803275 DOI: 10.1055/a-1859-3726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Climate change and the destruction of ecosystems by human activities are among the greatest challenges of the 21st century and require urgent action. Health care activities significantly contribute to the emission of greenhouse gases and waste production, with gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy being one of the largest contributors. This Position Statement aims to raise awareness of the ecological footprint of GI endoscopy and provides guidance to reduce its environmental impact. The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and the European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates (ESGENA) outline suggestions and recommendations for health care providers, patients, governments, and industry. MAIN STATEMENTS 1: GI endoscopy is a resource-intensive activity with a significant yet poorly assessed environmental impact. 2: ESGE-ESGENA recommend adopting immediate actions to reduce the environmental impact of GI endoscopy. 3: ESGE-ESGENA recommend adherence to guidelines and implementation of audit strategies on the appropriateness of GI endoscopy to avoid the environmental impact of unnecessary procedures. 4: ESGE-ESGENA recommend the embedding of reduce, reuse, and recycle programs in the GI endoscopy unit. 5: ESGE-ESGENA suggest that there is an urgent need to reassess and reduce the environmental and economic impact of single-use GI endoscopic devices. 6: ESGE-ESGENA suggest against routine use of single-use GI endoscopes. However, their use could be considered in highly selected patients on a case-by-case basis. 7: ESGE-ESGENA recommend inclusion of sustainability in the training curricula of GI endoscopy and as a quality domain. 8: ESGE-ESGENA recommend conducting high quality research to quantify and minimize the environmental impact of GI endoscopy. 9: ESGE-ESGENA recommend that GI endoscopy companies assess, disclose, and audit the environmental impact of their value chain. 10: ESGE-ESGENA recommend that GI endoscopy should become a net-zero greenhouse gas emissions practice by 2050.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrique Rodríguez de Santiago
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Universidad de Alcalá, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mario Dinis-Ribeiro
- Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center (Porto.CCC), and RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Porto, Portugal
| | - Heiko Pohl
- Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire, and Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, VA White River Junction, Vermont, USA
| | - Deepak Agrawal
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dell Medical School, University of Texas Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Marianna Arvanitakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Robin Baddeley
- King's Health Partners Institute for Therapeutic Endoscopy, King's College Hospital, and Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St Mark's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Elzbieta Bak
- Department of Gastroenterology and Internal Medicine, Clinical Hospital of Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | - Michael Bretthauer
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, and Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Patricia Burga
- Endoscopy Department, University Hospital of Padua, Italy
| | - Leigh Donnelly
- Endoscopy Department, Northumbria Healthcare NHS Trust, Northumberland, United Kingdom
| | - Axel Eickhoff
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Diabetologie, Infektiologie, Klinikum Hanau, Hanau, Germany
| | - Bu'Hussain Hayee
- Department of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michal F Kaminski
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Department of Oncological Gastroenterology, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Katarina Karlović
- Clinical Hospital Center Rijeka , Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopy Unit, Rijeka, Croatia
| | - Vicente Lorenzo-Zúñiga
- Department of Gastroenterology, University and Polytechnic La Fe Hospital/IIS La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Maria Pellisé
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), and Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mathieu Pioche
- Endoscopy Unit, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France
| | - Keith Siau
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dudley Group Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, United Kingdom
| | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - William Stableforth
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dudley Group Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, United Kingdom
| | - Tony C Tham
- Division of Gastroenterology, Ulster Hospital, Dundonald, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine - Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Alberto Tringali
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, ULSS 2 Marca Trevigiana, Conegliano Hospital, Conegliano, Italy
| | - Andrew Veitch
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom
| | - Andrei M Voiosu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - George J Webster
- Department of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Raf Bisschops
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catholic University of Leuven (KUL), TARGID, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, and Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Ian M Gralnek
- Ellen and Pinchas Mamber Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Emek Medical Center, Afula, and Rappaport Faculty of Medicine Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Helmut Messmann
- III Medizinische Klinik Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Boal Carvalho P, Magalhães J, Dias de Castro F, Cúrdia Gonçalves T, Monteiro S, Xavier S, Rosa B, Cotter J. NSAIDs are not enough - a double blinded randomized controlled trial on the impact of intensive hydration for the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 34:751-756. [PMID: 35412495 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000002380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatitis is the most common complication following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). In patients receiving NSAID prophylaxis, we aimed to assess whether periprocedural intensive hydration (IH) resulted in a lower incidence of PEP when compared to standard hydration (SH). MATERIAL AND METHODS Prospective, single-center, double-blinded randomized controlled trial, with inclusion of consecutive patients submitted to inaugural ERCP between January 2015 and December 2018. Patients were randomized on admission, in a 1:1 ratio, to either SH-Ringer's Lactate (RL) at a rate of 1.5 mL/kg/h during and for 8 h following the procedure, or IH-RL at a rate of 3 mL/kg/h during and for 8 h following the procedure, with an additional bolus of 20 mL/kg at the end of the procedure. PEP incidence and severity were assessed according to the Atlanta Guidelines. RESULTS A total of 155 patients were randomized (83 to IH, 72 to SH). PEP was observed in 8,4% (n = 13) of the patients, and was significantly less frequent in IH patients when compared to SH (3,6% vs 13,9%, P = 0,021; relative risk 0.233 [95% IC, 0.061-0.881]); five patients in the SH group developed moderate to severe PEP, in contrast to 0 patients in the IH group (6.9% vs 0.0%, P = 0,020). CONCLUSIONS Intensive hydration significantly decreased the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis by four-fold. Moreover, no cases of moderate or severe pancreatitis were observed in patients submitted to this intervention. Associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, intensive hydration could constitute a new standard of care for patients undergoing ERCP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Boal Carvalho
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital da Senhora da Oliveira - Guimarães, Guimarães, Portugal
- Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Health Sciences, University of Minho, Braga
- ICVS/3B's, PT Government Associate Laboratory, Guimarães/Braga, Portugal
| | - Joana Magalhães
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital da Senhora da Oliveira - Guimarães, Guimarães, Portugal
- Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Health Sciences, University of Minho, Braga
- ICVS/3B's, PT Government Associate Laboratory, Guimarães/Braga, Portugal
| | - Francisca Dias de Castro
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital da Senhora da Oliveira - Guimarães, Guimarães, Portugal
- Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Health Sciences, University of Minho, Braga
- ICVS/3B's, PT Government Associate Laboratory, Guimarães/Braga, Portugal
| | - Tiago Cúrdia Gonçalves
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital da Senhora da Oliveira - Guimarães, Guimarães, Portugal
- Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Health Sciences, University of Minho, Braga
- ICVS/3B's, PT Government Associate Laboratory, Guimarães/Braga, Portugal
| | - Sara Monteiro
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital da Senhora da Oliveira - Guimarães, Guimarães, Portugal
- Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Health Sciences, University of Minho, Braga
- ICVS/3B's, PT Government Associate Laboratory, Guimarães/Braga, Portugal
| | - Sofia Xavier
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital da Senhora da Oliveira - Guimarães, Guimarães, Portugal
- Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Health Sciences, University of Minho, Braga
- ICVS/3B's, PT Government Associate Laboratory, Guimarães/Braga, Portugal
| | - Bruno Rosa
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital da Senhora da Oliveira - Guimarães, Guimarães, Portugal
- Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Health Sciences, University of Minho, Braga
- ICVS/3B's, PT Government Associate Laboratory, Guimarães/Braga, Portugal
| | - José Cotter
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital da Senhora da Oliveira - Guimarães, Guimarães, Portugal
- Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Health Sciences, University of Minho, Braga
- ICVS/3B's, PT Government Associate Laboratory, Guimarães/Braga, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ching HL, Lau MS, Azmy IA, Hopper AD, Keuchel M, Gyökeres T, Kuvaev R, Macken EJ, Bhandari P, Thoufeeq M, Leclercq P, Rutter MD, Veitch AM, Bisschops R, Sanders DS. Performance measures for the SACRED team-centered approach to advanced gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. Endoscopy 2022; 54:712-722. [PMID: 35636453 DOI: 10.1055/a-1832-4232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and United European Gastroenterology have defined performance measures for upper and lower gastrointestinal, pancreaticobiliary, and small-bowel endoscopy. Quality indicators to guide endoscopists in the growing field of advanced endoscopy are also underway. We propose that equal attention is given to developing the entire advanced endoscopy team and not the individual endoscopist alone.We suggest that the practice of teams intending to deliver high quality advanced endoscopy is underpinned by six crucial principles concerning: selection, acceptance, complications, reconnaissance, envelopment, and documentation (SACRED).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hey-Long Ching
- Academic Unit of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, UK
| | - Michelle S Lau
- Academic Unit of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, UK
| | - Iman A Azmy
- Department of Breast Surgery, Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Chesterfield, UK
| | - Andrew D Hopper
- Academic Unit of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, UK.,Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Martin Keuchel
- Clinic for Internal Medicine, Bethesda Krankenhaus Bergedorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tibor Gyökeres
- Department of Gastroenterology, Medical Center Hungarian Defence Forces, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Roman Kuvaev
- Endoscopy Department, Yaroslavl Regional Cancer Hospital, Yaroslavl, Russian Federation.,Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Additional Professional Education, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Elisabeth J Macken
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Pradeep Bhandari
- Department of Gastroenterology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Mo Thoufeeq
- Academic Unit of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Matthew D Rutter
- North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust, Stockton-on-Tees, UK.,Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Andrew M Veitch
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Raf Bisschops
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, TARGID, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - David S Sanders
- Academic Unit of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
de-Madaria E, Mira JJ, Carrillo I, Afif W, Ang D, Antelo M, Bollipo S, Castells A, Chahal P, Heinrich H, Law JK, van Leerdam ME, Lens S, Pannala R, Park SH, Rabiee A, Savarino EV, Singh VK, Vargo J, Charabaty A, Drenth JPH. The present and future of gastroenterology and hepatology: an international SWOT analysis (the GASTROSWOT project). Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 7:485-494. [PMID: 35247318 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(21)00442-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Revised: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
GASTROSWOT is a strategic analysis of the current and projected states of the different subspecialties in gastroenterology that aims to provide guidance for research, clinical, and financial planning in gastroenterology. We executed a consensus-based international strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis. Four general coordinators, six field coordinators, and 12 experts participated in the study. SWOTs were provided for the following fields: neurogastroenterology, functional gastrointestinal disorders, and upper gastrointestinal diseases; inflammatory bowel disease; pancreatology and biliary diseases; endoscopy; gastrointestinal oncology; and hepatology. The GASTROSWOT analysis highlights the following in the current state of the field of gastroenterology: the incidence and complexity of several gastrointestinal diseases, including malignancies, are increasing; the COVID-19 pandemic has affected patient care on several levels; and with the advent of technical innovations in gastroenterology, a well trained workforce and strategic planning are required to optimise health-care utilisation. The analysis calls attention to the following in the future of gastroenterology: artificial intelligence and the use of big data will speed up discovery and smarter health-care provision in the field; the growth and diversification of gastroenterological specialties will improve specialised care for patients, but could promote fragmentation of care and health system inefficiencies; and furthermore, thoughtful planning is needed to reach an effective balance between the need for subspecialists and the value of general gastroenterology services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrique de-Madaria
- Gastroenterology Department, Alicante University General Hospital, Alicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research, Alicante, Spain
| | - José J Mira
- Atenena Research Group, Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research of Valencia Region, FISABAO, Sant Joan d'Alacant, Spain; Department of Health Psychology, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, Elche, Spain
| | - Irene Carrillo
- Atenena Research Group, Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research of Valencia Region, FISABAO, Sant Joan d'Alacant, Spain; Department of Health Psychology, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, Elche, Spain
| | - Waqqas Afif
- Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Daphne Ang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Marina Antelo
- Oncology Section, Dr C Bonorino Udaondo Gastroenterology Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Steven Bollipo
- Department of Gastroenterology, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia; School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Antoni Castells
- Gastroenterology Department, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Prabhleen Chahal
- Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Henriette Heinrich
- Stadtspital Waid und Triemli Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Sabela Lens
- Liver Unit, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rahul Pannala
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - San Hyoung Park
- Department of Gastroenterology, and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Atoosa Rabiee
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Washington DC Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Edoardo V Savarino
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Vikesh K Singh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - John Vargo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Digestive Diseases and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Aline Charabaty
- Division of Gastroenterology, Sibley Memorial Hospital, Johns Hopkins University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Joost P H Drenth
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Vedantam S, Amin S, Maher B, Ahmad S, Kadir S, Niaz SK, Wright M, Tehami N. Increased ERCP volume improves cholangiogram interpretation: a new performance measure for ERCP training? Clin Endosc 2022; 55:426-433. [PMID: 35114744 PMCID: PMC9178142 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2021.239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Cholangiogram interpretation is not used as a key performance indicator (KPI) of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) training, and national societies recommend different minimum numbers per annum to maintain competence. This study aimed to determine the relationship between correct ERCP cholangiogram interpretation and experience. METHODS One hundred fifty ERCPists were surveyed to appropriately interpret ERCP cholangiographic findings. There were three groups of 50 participants each: "Trainees," "Consultants group 1" (performed >75 ERCPs per year), and "Consultants group 2" (performed >100 ERCPs per year). RESULTS Trainees was inferior to Consultants groups 1 and 2 in identifying all findings except choledocholithiasis outside the intrahepatic duct on the initial or completion/occlusion cholangiogram. Consultants group 1 was inferior to Consultants group 2 in identifying Strasberg type A bile leaks (odds ratio [OR], 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-0.96), Strasberg type B (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74-0.95), and Bismuth type 2 hilar strictures (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69-0.95). CONCLUSION This investigation supports the notion that cholangiogram interpretation improves with increased annual ERCP case volumes. Thus, a higher annual volume of procedures performed may improve the ability to correctly interpret particularly difficult findings. Cholangiogram interpretation, in addition to bile duct cannulation, could be considered as another KPI of ERCP training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shyam Vedantam
- Department of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Sunil Amin
- Division of Digestive Health and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Ben Maher
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
- Southampton Interventional Endoscopy Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Saqib Ahmad
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton in Ashfield, UK
| | - Shanil Kadir
- Department of Gastroenterology, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Saad Khalid Niaz
- Interventional Endoscopy Unit, Surgical Unit 4, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Mark Wright
- Southampton Interventional Endoscopy Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Nadeem Tehami
- Southampton Interventional Endoscopy Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Theunissen F, van der Wiel SE, Ter Borg PCJ, Koch AD, Ouwendijk RJT, Slangen RME, Siersema PD, Bruno MJ. Implementation of mandatory ERCP registration in The Netherlands and compliance with European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy performance measures: a multicenter database study. Endoscopy 2022; 54:262-267. [PMID: 34107538 DOI: 10.1055/a-1499-7477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2018, the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and United European Gastroenterology (UEG) published quality performance measures for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Since January 2016, all endoscopists in the Netherlands have been required to register all ERCP procedures in a nationwide quality registry. This study aimed to evaluate the procedural success rates of ERCP after the implementation of mandatory national registration and to compare these with the ESGE quality performance measures. METHODS This study was conducted with data from a multicenter endoscopy database. Data from 2019 and 2020 were analyzed. The primary outcome was ERCP procedural outcome. ESGE performance measures that could be evaluated were the percentage of successful bile duct cannulations in patients with virgin papillary anatomy; successful stent placement for a biliary obstruction located below the liver hilum; and complete removal of bile duct stones (< 10 mm). RESULT In total, 5295 ERCPs performed in 11 centers were included for analysis. The overall procedural success rate was 89.1 %. Successful biliary cannulation in patients with a virgin papilla was 90.3 % in nonacademic and 92.4 % in academic centers. The rates of successful stent placement in patients with a biliary obstruction located below the liver hilum were 97.0 % in nonacademic and 98.2 % in academic centers, and of successful bile duct stone extraction were 97.9 % in both nonacademic and academic centers. CONCLUSIONS The quality of ERCPs performed met five of the six evaluated ESGE performance measures. The 95 % target for successful biliary cannulation in patients with virgin papillary anatomy in academic centers was not met. Mandatory registration provides valuable insight into ERCP performance rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Theunissen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sophia E van der Wiel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter C J Ter Borg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ikazia Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arjun D Koch
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rob J T Ouwendijk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, ADRZ, Goes, The Netherlands
| | - Rob M E Slangen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, HagaZiekenhuis, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marco J Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
ERCP: see one, do one, teach a few? Not everybody needs to learn everything! Endoscopy 2022; 54:268-269. [PMID: 34710909 DOI: 10.1055/a-1642-0864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
|
28
|
Hollenbach M, Hoffmeister A. Adverse events in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP): Focus on post-ERCP-pancreatitis. United European Gastroenterol J 2022; 10:10-11. [PMID: 35134279 PMCID: PMC8830279 DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.12201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Marcus Hollenbach
- Medical Department II, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Albrecht Hoffmeister
- Medical Department II, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Zhang W, Kanwal F, Batool AI, Mustaqeem M, Rehman MFU, Wan X. Studying in vivo and in vitro effects of a novel polyvinyl benzyl chloride-D-glucaro-1, 4-lactonate polymer-coated bile duct stent for anti-biliary mud deposition. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater 2022; 20:22808000221134988. [DOI: 10.1177/22808000221134988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: We aim to coat a novel polyvinyl benzyl chloride-D-glucaro-1, 4-lactonate polymer-coated bile duct stent for anti-biliary mud deposition and investigate its in vivo and in vitro impacts. Biliary mud deposition is a leading cause of plastic biliary stent obstruction after its placement. Orally administrated D-glucaro-1, 4-lactonate is a specific competitive inhibitor of β-glucuronidase that causes biliary mud deposition. Methods: In this study, the stents coated with polyvinyl benzyl chloride-D-glucaro-1,4-lactonate polymer (PVBC-DGL) were placed in an ex vivo bile duct model perfused with porcine bile and observed every week until completely blocked. Post establishing the model of bile duct stenosis in piglets, stents are observed through endoscopy, hematology, patency time, and pathological changes within 6 months. Results: The 70% PVBC-DGL stents achieved the highest percentage of the inhibitory effect when the drugs were completely released in vitro. Results were obtained from 14 pigs (5: no coating (original), 4: 0% coating, and 5: 70% coating). The overall patency time of the stents was prolonged in all groups; however, the group with 70% coated stents showed a significantly prolonged patency time as compared to no coating (original) and the 0% coating groups in pigs (23.4 ± 1.8 vs 11.2 ± 2.1 w ( p = 0.05); 23.4 ± 1.8 vs 10.5 ± 2.5 w ( p = 0.05), respectively). Conclusion: The stents with 70% PVBC-DGL better prevent and control the deposition of bile mud and prolong the patency time of stent placement in the subject animals and may be proposed for further clinical trials in patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weixing Zhang
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Fariha Kanwal
- Med-X Research Institute, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Aima Iram Batool
- Department of Zoology, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Punjab, Pakistan
| | - Muhammad Mustaqeem
- Institute of Chemistry, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Punjab, Pakistan
| | | | - Xinjian Wan
- Digestive Endoscopic Center, Shanghai Sixth People‘s Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Arvanitakis M. Difficult bile duct cannulation: Do all roads lead to Rome? Endosc Int Open 2021; 9:E1768-E1769. [PMID: 34790543 PMCID: PMC8589550 DOI: 10.1055/a-1591-1044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
|
31
|
Johnson G, Webster G, Boškoski I, Campos S, Gölder SK, Schlag C, Anderloni A, Arnelo U, Badaoui A, Bekkali N, Christodoulou D, Czakó L, Fernandez Y Viesca M, Hritz I, Hucl T, Kalaitzakis E, Kylänpää L, Nedoluzhko I, Petrone MC, Poley JW, Seicean A, Vila J, Arvanitakis M, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Ponchon T, Bisschops R. Curriculum for ERCP and endoscopic ultrasound training in Europe: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement. Endoscopy 2021; 53:1071-1087. [PMID: 34311472 DOI: 10.1055/a-1537-8999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) has recognized the need to formalize and enhance training in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). This manuscript represents the outcome of a formal Delphi process resulting in an official Position Statement of the ESGE and provides a framework to develop and maintain skills in ERCP and EUS. This curriculum is set out in terms of the prerequisites prior to training; recommended steps of training to a defined syllabus; the quality of training; and how competence should be defined and evidenced before independent practice. 1: Trainees should be competent in gastroscopy prior to commencing training. Formal training courses and the use of simulation in training are recommended. 2: Trainees should keep a contemporaneous logbook of their procedures, including key performance indicators and the degree of independence. Structured formative assessment is encouraged to enhance feedback. There should be a summative assessment process prior to commencing independent practice to ensure there is robust evidence of competence. This evidence should include a review of a trainee's procedure volume and current performance measures. A period of mentoring is strongly recommended in the early stages of independent practice. 3: Specifically for ERCP, all trainees should be competent up to Schutz level 2 complexity (management of distal biliary strictures and stones > 10 mm), with advanced ERCP requiring a further period of training. Prior to independent practice, ESGE recommends that a trainee can evidence a procedure volume of > 300 cases, a native papilla cannulation rate of ≥ 80 % (90 % after a period of mentored independent practice), complete stones clearance of ≥ 85 %, and successful stenting of distal biliary strictures of ≥ 90 % (90 % and 95 % respectively after a mentored period of independent practice). 4: The progression of EUS training and competence attainment should start from diagnostic EUS and then proceed to basic therapeutic EUS, and finally to advanced therapeutic EUS. Before independent practice, ESGE recommends that a trainee can evidence a procedure volume of > 250 cases (75 fine-needle aspirations/biopsies [FNA/FNBs]), satisfactory visualization of key anatomical landmarks in ≥ 90 % of cases, and an FNA/FNB accuracy rate of ≥ 85 %. ESGE recognizes the often inadequate quality of the evidence and the need for further studies pertaining to training in advanced endoscopy, particularly in relation to therapeutic EUS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ivo Boškoski
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli, Rome, Italy
| | - Sara Campos
- Gastroenterology Department, Digestive Unit, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Stefan Karl Gölder
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Schlag
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Anderloni
- Division of Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Urban Arnelo
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences/Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Abdenor Badaoui
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Université catholique de Louvain, CHU UCL Namur, Yvoir, Belgium
| | - Noor Bekkali
- John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Dimitrios Christodoulou
- Department of Gastroenterology, Medical School and University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - László Czakó
- Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Michael Fernandez Y Viesca
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Istvan Hritz
- Centre for Therapeutic Endoscopy, 1st Department of Surgery and Interventional Gastroenterology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Tomas Hucl
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, IKEM, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Evangelos Kalaitzakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.,Digestive Disease Center, University Hospital of Copenhagen/Herley, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Leena Kylänpää
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ivan Nedoluzhko
- Moscow Clinical Scientific Center n.a. A.S. Loginov, Moscow, Russia
| | - Maria Chiara Petrone
- Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Jan-Werner Poley
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andrada Seicean
- Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Cluj-Napoca, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Iuliu Hatieganu", Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Juan Vila
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Navarra (IDISNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Marianna Arvanitakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Thierry Ponchon
- Gastroenterology Division, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Raf Bisschops
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, and TARGID, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Bisschops R, Dinis-Ribeiro M. ESGE quality parameters in colonoscopy: How to ensure their adoption? Endosc Int Open 2021; 9:E1463-E1465. [PMID: 34540536 PMCID: PMC8445679 DOI: 10.1055/a-1486-6788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Raf Bisschops
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- TARGID, KU Leuven , Leuven, Belgium
| | - Mário Dinis-Ribeiro
- Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- MEDCIDS, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Zorniak M, Sirtl S, Mahajan UM, Stubbe HC, Chapula M, Wosiewicz P, Hartleb M, Mayerle J, Schulz C. Influence of COVID-19 Pandemic on Endoscopic Procedures in Two European Large-Capacity Endoscopy Units: "Keep Calm, Keep Safe and Scope on?". Dig Dis 2021; 39:540-548. [PMID: 32836219 PMCID: PMC8450842 DOI: 10.1159/000511076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2020] [Accepted: 08/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19-pandemic poses challenges to the medical system and especially to endoscopic staff and patients. National, European and International societies provided recommendations on how to safely perform endoscopic procedures during the current pandemic. Until now, the effect of the current pandemic on tertiary endoscopy centers has not been reported. OBJECTIVE The aim of this was to analyze the influence of the early SARS-CoV2-pandemic on endoscopic care and work flow in 2 European tertiary endoscopy units. METHODS Data from 2 tertiary endoscopy units (Katowice and Munich) were retrospectively collected during the early pandemic and compared to an equivalent pre-pandemic period. Data include procedures, complications, benchmarks, and influence on endoscopy training. RESULTS During the early pandemic, we noted a highly significant decrease (49.1%) in the overall number of all endoscopies with a significant increase in therapeutic procedures. Besides, there were no significant differences in the number of urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or interventional endoscopic ultrasound procedures. The exceptional situation reduced endoscopic procedures performed by trainees significantly. CONCLUSIONS The SARS-CoV2-pandemic halved the endoscopy service of 2 tertiary centers while maintaining an urgent therapeutic service. Recommended personal safety measures in endoscopy proved to be efficient and safe in preventing SARS-CoV2 infection of staff or spreading. Unnecessarily, the SARS-CoV2 pandemic prevented routine endoscopy training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michal Zorniak
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland,Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Simon Sirtl
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Mateusz Chapula
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Piotr Wosiewicz
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Marek Hartleb
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Julia Mayerle
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Schulz
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany,*Christian Schulz,
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Nebel JA, Soldan M, Dumonceau JM, de Souza Carvalho CE, Chagas VLA, de Assis PG, Lapa E Silva JR, Rezende GFDM. Rapid On-Site Evaluation by Endosonographer of Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Pancreas 2021; 50:815-821. [PMID: 34347723 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000001846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) by cytopathologists during endoscopic ultrasound-fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of solid pancreatic lesions (SPLs) improves adequacy and diagnostic accuracy while reducing the number of needle passes. We evaluated the usefulness of ROSE performed by the endosonographer. METHODS Patients with an SPL were randomly assigned to EUS-FNA with ROSE or non-ROSE. Procedure duration, number of needle passes, specimen adequacy, and adverse event rates were compared. RESULTS Sixty-five patients were enrolled (33 in the ROSE vs 32 in the non-ROSE group). Both groups were similar in terms of age, sex, size, and location of the lesion. Specimen adequacy rates were high and similar between groups. Mean (standard deviation) procedure duration was shorter in the ROSE versus non-ROSE group (30.0 [11.3] vs 37.0 [7.2] minutes, P < 0.005), as well as the mean (standard deviation) number of needle passes (2.6 [0.8] vs 3.5 [0.8], P < 0.005). Accuracy parameters as sensitivity and accuracy of ROSE by the endosonographer for malignancy were 93% and 88%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS After specific training, the endosonographer can accurately evaluate samples during EUS-FNA of SPL, allowing for a shorter procedure duration and a lower number of needle passes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- João Autran Nebel
- From the Gastroenterology Service, Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Monica Soldan
- From the Gastroenterology Service, Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | - José Roberto Lapa E Silva
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Guilherme Ferreira da Motta Rezende
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Accuracy and other quality indicators of solid pancreatic mass endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and biopsy in two academic endoscopy centers. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 2021; 84:451-455. [PMID: 34599570 DOI: 10.51821/84.3.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration/biopsy (EUS-FNA/FNB) is highly accurate, but discrepancies between cytological and surgical diagnoses are still observed. We aimed to determine its accuracy and monitor quality indicators in our facilities. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective review of all cases of pancreatic solid lesions evaluated by EUS-FNA/FNB, between July 2015 and June 2018, in two centers. Cytological and surgical findings were categorized into five groups: benign, malignant, suspect of malignancy, undetermined and insufficient for diagnosis. Final diagnosis was based on surgical diagnosis and, in patients who did not undergo surgery, on clinical outcome after 6 months follow-up. RESULTS Altogether, 142 patients were included. FNA was the preferred tissue acquisition method (88%), with a predilection for the FNA 22G needle (57%). Cytology was insufficient for diagnosis in 2 cases, therefore a full diagnostic sample was available in 98.6% of the patients (>90%, ESGE target). Fifty-five (38.7%) patients underwent surgery. In term of cancer diagnosis, comparison with final surgical pathology (n=55) revealed 89% true positives, 5.5% true negatives, 3.6% false positives and 1.8% false negatives. When combining surgical diagnosis and clinical outcomes together, EUS-guided sampling sensitivity was 97.4% (92.5-99.5), specificity was 92.3% (74.9-99.1), positive predictive value was 98.2% (93.6- 99.5), negative predictive value was 88.9% (72.3-96.1) and accuracy was 96.4% (91.9-98.8). Post-procedural acute pancreatitis was reported in 2 patients (1.4%). CONCLUSIONS These results reveal a performance for diagnostic tissue sampling well above the ESGE proposed target standard. Also, the uncommon high specificity illustrates the determining role of the pathologist's final interpretation and diagnosis.
Collapse
|
36
|
Fusaroli P, Eloubeidi M, Calvanese C, Dietrich C, Jenssen C, Saftoiu A, De Angelis C, Varadarajulu S, Napoleon B, Lisotti A. Quality of reporting in endoscopic ultrasound: Results of an international multicenter survey (the QUOREUS study). Endosc Int Open 2021; 9:E1171-E1177. [PMID: 34222644 PMCID: PMC8216784 DOI: 10.1055/a-1482-7769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims The endoscopic report has a key role in quality improvement for gastrointestinal endoscopy. High quality standards have been set by the endoscopic societies in this field. Unlike other digestive endoscopy procedures, the quality of reporting in endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has not been thoroughly evaluated and a reference standard is lacking. Methods We performed an international online survey concerning the attitudes of endosonographers towards EUS reports in order to understand the needs for standardization and quality improvement. Endosonographers from different countries and institutional setting, with varying case volume and experience were invited to take part to complete a structured questionnaire. Results We collected replies from 171 endosonographers. Overall analysis of results according to case volume, experience and working environment of respondents (academic, public hospital, private) are provided. In brief, everyone agreed on the need for standardization of EUS reporting. The use of minimal standard terminology and a structured tree with mandatory items was considered of primary importance. Image documentation was also deemed fundamental in complementing EUS reports both for patient documentation and research purposes. A strong demand for connection and consultation among endosonographers for clinical and training needs was also found. In this respect, a formal expert consultation network was advocated in order to improve the quality of reporting in EUS. Conclusions Our survey showed a strong agreement among endosonographers who expressed the need for a standardization in order to improve the report and, as a consequence, the quality of EUS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pietro Fusaroli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences – DIMEC, University of Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Claudio Calvanese
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences – DIMEC, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Christoph Dietrich
- Department of Internal Medicine 2, Caritas Krankenhaus, Bad Mergentheim, Germany
| | - Christian Jenssen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Krankenhaus Märkisch Oderland Strausberg/Wriezen; Brandenburg Institute of Clinical Ultrasound, Medical University Brandenburg, Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Adrian Saftoiu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania
| | - Claudio De Angelis
- Department of General and Specialist Medicine, Gastroenterologia-U, Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Shyam Varadarajulu
- Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth Orlando, Orlando, Florida, USA.
| | - Bertrand Napoleon
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Hopital Privé J Mermoz Ramsay Générale de Santé, Lyon, France
| | - Andrea Lisotti
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences – DIMEC, University of Bologna, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kozarek R. Underutilization of societal guidelines: occasional or widespread? Endosc Int Open 2021; 9:E986-E988. [PMID: 34222617 PMCID: PMC8211483 DOI: 10.1055/a-1399-8891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Kozarek
- Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, United States
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Hedenström P, Marasco G, Eusebi LH, Lindkvist B, Sadik R. GAPS-EUS: a new and reliable tool for the assessment of basic skills and performance in EUS among endosonography trainees. BMJ Open Gastroenterol 2021; 8:bmjgast-2021-000660. [PMID: 34108134 PMCID: PMC8191616 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2021-000660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 05/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Endosonography (EUS) is a useful but complex diagnostic modality which requires advanced endoscopy training and guidance by a supervisor. Since learning curves vary among individuals, assessment of the actual competence among EUS trainees is important. Design/methods We designed a novel assessment tool entitled Global Assessment of Performance and Skills in EUS (GAPS-EUS) for assessing skills among EUS trainees. Five quality indicators were marked on a five-grade scale by the supervisor (Observer Score) and by the trainee (Trainee Score). Trainees were included in two high-volume centres (Gothenburg, Sweden, and Bologna, Italy). Outcomes were feasibility, patient safety, reliability, and validity of GAPS-EUS in trainee-performed EUS procedures. Results Twenty-two EUS-trainees were assessed in a total of 157 EUS procedures with a completion rate of 157/157 (100 %) and a patient adverse event rate of 2/157 (1.3 %; gastroenteritis n=1, fever n=1). GAPS-EUS showed a high measurement reliability (Cronbach’s alpha coefficient=0.87) and a high inter-rater reliability comparing the supervisor and the trainee (r=0.83, r2=0.69, p<0.001). The construct of GAPS-EUS was verified by comparing low-level and high-level performance procedures and the content validity by recording that the EUS-FNA manoeuvre resulted in a lower score than other aspects of EUS 3.07 (95% CI 2.91 to 3.23) vs 3.51 (95% CI 3.37 to 3.65) (p<0.001). External validity was confirmed via similar findings in both centres. Conclusion GAPS-EUS is an easy-to-use and reliable tool with a recorded high validity for the assessment of competence among trainees in EUS. It can be recommended to centres involved in the education of future endosonographers. Trial registration number NCT02455570.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Per Hedenström
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg Sahlgrenska Academy, Goteborg, Sweden .,Department of Internal Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Goteborg, Sweden
| | - Giovanni Marasco
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Leonardo Henry Eusebi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Bjorn Lindkvist
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg Sahlgrenska Academy, Goteborg, Sweden.,Department of Internal Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Goteborg, Sweden
| | - Riadh Sadik
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg Sahlgrenska Academy, Goteborg, Sweden.,Department of Internal Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Goteborg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Yao L, Zhang J, Liu J, Zhu L, Ding X, Chen D, Wu H, Lu Z, Zhou W, Zhang L, Xu B, Hu S, Zheng B, Yang Y, Yu H. A deep learning-based system for bile duct annotation and station recognition in linear endoscopic ultrasound. EBioMedicine 2021; 65:103238. [PMID: 33639404 PMCID: PMC7921468 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Revised: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Detailed evaluation of bile duct (BD) is main focus during endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). The aim of this study was to develop a system for EUS BD scanning augmentation. METHODS The scanning was divided into 4 stations. We developed a station classification model and a BD segmentation model with 10681 images and 2529 images, respectively. 1704 images and 667 images were applied to classification and segmentation internal validation. For classification and segmentation video validation, 264 and 517 videos clips were used. For man-machine contest, an independent data set contained 120 images was applied. 799 images from other two hospitals were used for external validation. A crossover study was conducted to evaluate the system effect on reducing difficulty in ultrasound images interpretation. FINDINGS For classification, the model achieved an accuracy of 93.3% in image set and 90.1% in video set. For segmentation, the model had a dice of 0.77 in image set, sensitivity of 89.48% and specificity of 82.3% in video set. For external validation, the model achieved 82.6% accuracy in classification. In man-machine contest, the models achieved 88.3% accuracy in classification and 0.72 dice in BD segmentation, which is comparable to that of expert. In the crossover study, trainees' accuracy improved from 60.8% to 76.3% (P < 0.01, 95% C.I. 20.9-27.2). INTERPRETATION We developed a deep learning-based augmentation system for EUS BD scanning augmentation. FUNDING Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease Minimally Invasive Incision, Hubei Province Major Science and Technology Innovation Project, National Natural Science Foundation of China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liwen Yao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Key Laboratory of Hubei Province for Digestive System Disease, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease Minimally Invasive Incision, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Jun Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Key Laboratory of Hubei Province for Digestive System Disease, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease Minimally Invasive Incision, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Jun Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Wuhan Union Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Liangru Zhu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Wuhan Union Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | | | - Di Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Key Laboratory of Hubei Province for Digestive System Disease, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease Minimally Invasive Incision, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Huiling Wu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Key Laboratory of Hubei Province for Digestive System Disease, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease Minimally Invasive Incision, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Zihua Lu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Key Laboratory of Hubei Province for Digestive System Disease, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease Minimally Invasive Incision, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Wei Zhou
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Key Laboratory of Hubei Province for Digestive System Disease, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease Minimally Invasive Incision, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Lihui Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Key Laboratory of Hubei Province for Digestive System Disease, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease Minimally Invasive Incision, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Bo Xu
- Wuhan Puai Hospital, Wuhan, China
| | - Shan Hu
- Wuhan EndoAngel Medical Technology Company, Wuhan, China
| | - Biqing Zheng
- Wuhan EndoAngel Medical Technology Company, Wuhan, China
| | - Yanning Yang
- Department of Ophthalmology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, 99 Zhangzhidong Road, Wuhan 430060, Hubei Province, China.
| | - Honggang Yu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Key Laboratory of Hubei Province for Digestive System Disease, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease Minimally Invasive Incision, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Pouw RE. Implementation of quality measures in endoscopy: Catch them young! United European Gastroenterol J 2021; 9:11-12. [PMID: 33624405 DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.12055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Roos E Pouw
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Bisschops R, Rutter MD, Areia M, Cristiano Spada, Domagk D, Kaminski MF, Veitch A, Khanoussi W, Gralnek IM, Hassan C, Messmann H, Ponchon T, Fockens P, Dignass A, Dinis-Ribeiro M. Overcoming the barriers to dissemination and implementation of quality measures for gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and United European Gastroenterology (UEG) position statement. United European Gastroenterol J 2021; 9:120-126. [PMID: 33323062 DOI: 10.1177/2050640620981366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) has developed performance measures and established a framework for quality assessment for gastrointestinal endoscopy in Europe. Most national societies actively undertake initiatives to implement and explicitly endorse these quality indicators. Given this, the ESGE proposes that, at a national level, strong leadership should exist to disseminate and implement quality parameters. Thus, understanding the potential barriers that may vary locally is of paramount importance. The ESGE suggests that each national society should prioritise quality and standards of care in gastrointestinal endoscopy in their activities and should survey/understand which measures area local priority to their members and make measuring quality intrinsic to daily endoscopy practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raf Bisschops
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Matthew D Rutter
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of North Tees, Stockton-on-Tees, UK.,Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Miguel Areia
- Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Coimbra, Portugal.,Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Cristiano Spada
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.,Digestive Endoscopy Unit and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Dirk Domagk
- Department of Medicine I, Joseph's Hospital Warendorf, Warendorf, Germany
| | - Michel F Kaminski
- Department of Gastroenterological Oncology and Department of Cancer Prevention, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Andrew Veitch
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Wafaa Khanoussi
- Hepato-gastroenterology Department, Mohammed VI University Hospital, Oujda, Morocco.,Digestive Diseases Research Laboratory (LARMAD), Mohammed First University, Oujda, Morocco
| | - Ian M Gralnek
- Ellen and Pinchas Mamber Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel.,Rappaport Family Faculty of Medicine, Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Endoscopy Unit, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Helmut Messmann
- Endoscopy Center, University Clinic of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Thierry Ponchon
- Gastroenterology Division, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France
| | - Paul Fockens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Axel Dignass
- Department of Medicine I, Agaplesion Markus Hospita, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Mario Dinis-Ribeiro
- Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Rondonotti E, Spada C, Cadoni S, Cannizzaro R, Calabrese C, de Franchis R, Elli L, Girelli CM, Hassan C, Marmo R, Riccioni ME, Oliva S, Scarpulla G, Soncini M, Vecchi M, Pennazio M. Quality performance measures for small capsule endoscopy: Are the ESGE quality standards met? Endosc Int Open 2021; 9:E122-E129. [PMID: 33532548 PMCID: PMC7834698 DOI: 10.1055/a-1319-0742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2020] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) recently issued a quality performance measures document for small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE). The aim of this nationwide survey was to explore SBCE practice with ESGE quality measures as a benchmark. Patients and methods A dedicated per-center semi-quantitative questionnaire based on ESGE performance measures for SBCE was created by a group of SBCE experts. One-hundred-eighty-one centers were invited to participate and were asked to calculate performance measures for SBCE performed in 2018. Data were compared with 10 ESGE quality standards for both key and minor performance measures. Results Ninety-one centers (50.3 %) participated in the data collection. Overall in the last 5 years (2014-2018), 26,615 SBCEs were performed, 5917 of which were done in 2018. Eighty percent or more of the participating centers reached the minimum standard established by the ESGE Small Bowel Working Group (ESBWG) for four performance measures (indications for SBCE, complete small bowel evaluation, diagnostic yield and retention rate). Conversely, compliance with six minimum standards established by ESBWG concerning adequate bowel preparation, patient selection, timing of SBCE in overt bleeding, appropriate reporting, reading protocols and referral to device-assisted enteroscopy was met by only 15.5 %, 10.9 %, 31.1 %, 67.7 %, 53.4 %, and 32.2 % of centers, respectively. Conclusions The present survey shows significant variability across SBCE centers; only four (4/10: 40 %) SBCE procedural minimum standards were met by a relevant proportion of the centers ( ≥ 80 %). Our data should help in identifying target areas for quality improvement programs in SBCE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuele Rondonotti
- Unità Operativa Complessa di Gastroenterologia, Ospedale Valduce, Como, Italy
| | - Cristiano Spada
- Unità Operativa di Endoscopia Digestiva, Università Cattolica, Rome, Italy,Unità Operativa di Endoscopia Digestiva, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Sergio Cadoni
- Unità Operativa di Endoscopia Digestiva, Centro Traumatologico Ortopedico, Iglesias, Italy
| | - Renato Cannizzaro
- Struttura Operativa Complessa di Gastroenterologia Oncologica, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | - Carlo Calabrese
- Unità Operativa Malattia Infiammatorie Croniche Intestinali, Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia (DIMEC), Ospedale S. Orsola-Malpighi Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Luca Elli
- Unità Operativa Complessa di Gastroenterologia ed Endoscopia-Centro per la Prevenzione e Diagnosi della Malattia Celiaca, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Maria Girelli
- Unità Di Gastroenterologia ed Endoscopia Digestiva, Ospedale di Busto Arsizio, Busto Arsizio, Italy
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Unità Operativa di Endoscopia Digestiva, Ospedale Nuovo Regina, Rome, Italy
| | - Riccardo Marmo
- Unità Operativa di Gastroenterologia, Ospedale Curto, Polla, Italy
| | - Maria Elena Riccioni
- Unità Operativa di Endoscopia Digestiva, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy
| | - Salvatore Oliva
- Unità Operativa di Gastroenterologia e Epatologia Pediatrica, Università La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Scarpulla
- Unità Operativa di Gastroenterologia, Ospedale M. Raimondi, San Cataldo, Italy
| | - Marco Soncini
- Dipartimento di Medicina Interna, Ospedale Alessandro Manzoni, Lecco, Italy
| | - Maurizio Vecchi
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche, Università degli Studi di Milan, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Pennazio
- Divisione di Gastroenterologia U, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Pécsi D, Gódi S, Hegyi P, Hanák L, Szentesi A, Altorjay I, Bakucz T, Czakó L, Kovács G, Orbán-Szilágyi Á, Pakodi F, Patai Á, Szepes Z, Gyökeres T, Fejes R, Dubravcsik Z, Vincze Á. ERCP is more challenging in cases of acute biliary pancreatitis than in acute cholangitis - Analysis of the Hungarian ERCP registry data. Pancreatology 2021; 21:59-63. [PMID: 33309622 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.11.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2020] [Revised: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 11/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an important therapeutic modality in acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP) cases with cholangitis or ongoing common bile duct obstruction. Theoretically, inflammation of the surrounding tissues would result in a more difficult procedure. No previous studies examined this hypothesis. OBJECTIVES ABP and acute cholangitis (AC) without ABP cases were compared to assess difficulty of ERCP. METHODS The rate of successful biliary access, advanced cannulation method, adverse events, cannulation and fluoroscopy time were compared in 240 ABP cases and 250 AC cases without ABP. Previous papillotomy, altered gastroduodenal anatomy, and cases with biliary stricture were excluded. RESULTS Significantly more pancreatic guidewire manipulation (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.921 [1.241-2.974]) and prophylactic pancreatic stent use (aOR 4.687 [2.415-9.098]) were seen in the ABP than in AC group. Average cannulation time in the ABP patients (248 vs. 185 s; p = 0.043) were longer than in AC cases. No difference was found between biliary cannulation and adverse events rates. CONCLUSION ERCP in ABP cases seem to be more challenging than in AC. Difficult biliary access is more frequent in the ABP cases which warrants the involvement of an experienced endoscopist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dániel Pécsi
- Institute for Translational Medicine, Szentágothai Research Center, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary; Division of Gastroenterology, First Department of Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Szilárd Gódi
- Division of Gastroenterology, First Department of Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Péter Hegyi
- Institute for Translational Medicine, Szentágothai Research Center, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Lilla Hanák
- Institute for Translational Medicine, Szentágothai Research Center, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Andrea Szentesi
- Institute for Translational Medicine, Szentágothai Research Center, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - István Altorjay
- Second Department of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Tamás Bakucz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Medical Centre Hungarian Defence Forces, Budapest, Hungary
| | - László Czakó
- First Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - György Kovács
- Second Department of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Ákos Orbán-Szilágyi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Medical Centre Hungarian Defence Forces, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Ferenc Pakodi
- Division of Gastroenterology, First Department of Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Árpád Patai
- First Department of Gastroenterology and Medicine, Markusovszky University Teaching Hospital, Szombathely, Hungary
| | - Zoltán Szepes
- First Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Tibor Gyökeres
- Department of Gastroenterology, Medical Centre Hungarian Defence Forces, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Roland Fejes
- First Department of Medicine, Szent György University Teaching Hospital of County Fejér, Székesfehérvár, Hungary
| | - Zsolt Dubravcsik
- Bács-Kiskun County University Teaching Hospital, Kecskemét, Hungary
| | - Áron Vincze
- Division of Gastroenterology, First Department of Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
Background and study aims Data on procedural outcome and quality of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in Belgian practice are scarce. The aim of this study is to assess current status of ERCP-performance in Belgium. Methods National multi-institutional survey (online questionnaire) among members of the Belgian Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (BSGIE), conducted in the period June-August 2018. The RIZIV/INAMI provided real-life data on the total number of ERCPs performed in Belgium. Results Forty-five responders completed the survey (for 43 centers performing ERCP), providing information for 8368 ERCPs performed in 45% (43/95) of institutions performing ERCP in Belgium. Fifty-eight percent of centers performed > 100 ERCPs/year and 7% of centers (n=3) performed < 50 ERCPs/year. According to the RIZIV/INAMI data, low case-volume centers are underrepresented in this survey. The most common ERCPindication was stone extraction (52%). 74% of endoscopists had more than 10 years of experience in performing ERCP. The majority of centers had their own written protocol (84%) for microbiological duodenoscope surveillance. Monitoring of cannulation rate and post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) was only performed in a minority of centers (30%). The majority of centers (76%) provided verbal informed consent relating to the ERCP-procedure ; a minority also requested a written informed consent (23%). 65% of centers systematically use NSAIDs for PEP prophylaxis. Conclusion This is the first survey of ERCP performance in Belgium. There were wide variations in practice. Adherence to key performance measures and measurement and evaluation of ERCP performance in daily practice at center and endoscopist level are not uniformly widespread.
Collapse
|
45
|
Ahmad OF, Stassen P, Webster GJ. Artificial intelligence in biliopancreatic endoscopy: Is there any role? Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2020; 52-53:101724. [PMID: 34172251 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2020.101724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) research in endoscopy is being translated at rapid pace with a number of approved devices now available for use in luminal endoscopy. However, the published literature for AI in biliopancreatic endoscopy is predominantly limited to early pre-clinical studies including applications for diagnostic EUS and patient risk stratification. Potential future use cases are highlighted in this manuscript including optical characterisation of strictures during cholangioscopy, prediction of post-ERCP acute pancreatitis and selective biliary duct cannulation difficulty, automated report generation and novel AI-based quality key performance metrics. To realise the full potential of AI and accelerate innovation, it is crucial that robust inter-disciplinary collaborations are formed between biliopancreatic endoscopists and AI researchers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omer F Ahmad
- Department of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 250 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, United Kingdom; Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London, Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TS, United Kingdom.
| | - Pauline Stassen
- Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - George J Webster
- Department of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 250 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Clinical Management of Bile Duct Diseases: Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in a Personalized Approach. J Pers Med 2020; 11:jpm11010001. [PMID: 33374902 PMCID: PMC7821935 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11010001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Revised: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Biliary diseases are common, but clinical symptoms are often unspecific and direct access and visualization of the biliopancreatic system for diagnostic purpose is difficult. In the last decades endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has become a primary method in the gastrointestinal tract. It significantly changed the role of endoscopy in diagnostic imaging in the gastrointestinal tract and adjacent organs. EUS has become an effective diagnostic tool in biliary stone disease as well as in the diagnosis of indeterminate biliary strictures. Furthermore, an EUS-directed transmural approach emerged as a safe and effective alternative to ERCP in patients requiring biliary drainage, in particular as a backup method if standard ERCP-approach fails. Development of new techniques, specific accessories and stents during the last decade led to an enormous step forward in terms of efficacy and safety of an EUS-directed approach. In the current article technical and clinical aspects of EUS-guided diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in different clinical indications will be discussed together with a review of the available data.
Collapse
|
47
|
Voiosu T, Voiosu A, Boškoski I, Arvanitakis M, Bronswijk M, Hollenbach M, Benguş A, Bălănescu P, Orlandini B, Blero D, Van der Merwe S, Mateescu RB, Devière J, Costamagna G. Technical and clinical outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures performed in patients with COVID-19. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2020; 13:1756284820980671. [PMID: 33425011 PMCID: PMC7756189 DOI: 10.1177/1756284820980671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 11/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The unprecedented situation caused by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has profoundly affected endoscopic practice in regard to access, volume, and workflow. We aimed to assess the potential changes in the technical outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures carried out in patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS We conducted an international, multicenter, retrospective, matched case-control study of ERCP procedures carried out in patients with confirmed COVID-19. The main outcome was technical success of the procedure as assessed by the endoscopist, and the secondary outcome was the development of procedure-related adverse events. Each case was matched in a 1:4 ratio with controls extracted from each center's database in order to identify relevant changes in outcome measures compared with the pre-pandemic era. RESULTS Eighteen procedures performed in 16 COVID-19 patients [14 men, 65 years (9-82)] and 67 controls were included in the final analysis. Technical success was achieved in 14/18 COVID-19 cases, which was significantly lower as compared with the control group (14/18 versus 64/67, p = 0.034), with an endoscopic reintervention required in 9/18 cases. However, the rate of procedure-related adverse events was low in both groups (1/18 versus 10/67, p = 0.44). On multivariable analysis, COVID-19 status remained the only risk factor for technical failure of the procedure [odds ratio of 19.9 (95% confidence interval 1.4-269.0)]. CONCLUSIONS The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the volume and practice of ERCP, resulting in lower technical success rates without significantly impacting patient safety. Prioritizing cases and following recommendations on safety measures can ensure good outcome with minimal risk in dedicated centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrei Voiosu
- Gastroenterology Department, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Ivo Boškoski
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy,Center for Endoscopic Research Therapeutics and Training (CERTT), Catholic University of Rome, Italy
| | - Marianna Arvanitakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Michiel Bronswijk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marcus Hollenbach
- Division of Gastroenterology; Medical Department II (Oncology, Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Pulmonology, Infectious Diseases), University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Andreea Benguş
- Gastroenterology Department, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Paul Bălănescu
- Internal Medicine Department, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Beatrice Orlandini
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy,Center for Endoscopic Research Therapeutics and Training (CERTT), Catholic University of Rome, Italy
| | - Daniel Blero
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Schalk Van der Merwe
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Radu Bogdan Mateescu
- Gastroenterology Department, Colentina Clinical Hospital Bucharest, Romania,Internal Medicine Department, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Jacques Devière
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Guido Costamagna
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy,Center for Endoscopic Research Therapeutics and Training (CERTT), Catholic University of Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Papanikolaou IS, Tziatzios G, Karatzas PS, Gkolfakis P, Facciorusso A, Triantafyllou K. Quality in pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound: what's new in 2020? Ann Gastroenterol 2020; 33:547-553. [PMID: 33162731 PMCID: PMC7599358 DOI: 10.20524/aog.2020.0537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2020] [Accepted: 08/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Quality assessment and improvement of an endoscopic service has emerged as a basic component of everyday gastrointestinal endoscopy. In order to ensure a high level of quality, a series of actions must be adopted when performing an endoscopic examination. Nonetheless, quality still remains a qualitative parameter; thus, implementation of specific indicators of quality is warranted. Irrespective of the nature of the endoscopic procedure, quality indicators usually refer to either structural properties of an endoscopy unit (e.g., examination availability), procedural factors (e.g., diagnostic accuracy), or patient outcomes (e.g., occurrence of an adverse event related to performance of an endoscopic procedure). Moreover, they are usually classified into 3 distinct sections, according to the phase of the procedure they relate to: i.e., before, during, and after the examination. The aim of this review is to present measures that need to be adopted in order to reach an optimal quality level during an endoscopic ultrasound examination and to provide up-to-date data regarding the respective quality indicators implicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis S Papanikolaou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Research Institute and Diabetes Center, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece (Ioannis S. Papanikolaou, Georgios Tziatzios, Konstantinos Triantafyllou)
| | - Georgios Tziatzios
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Research Institute and Diabetes Center, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece (Ioannis S. Papanikolaou, Georgios Tziatzios, Konstantinos Triantafyllou)
| | - Pantelis S Karatzas
- Academic Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Laiko General Hospital, University of Athens, Medical School, Athens, Greece (Pantelis S. Karatzas)
| | - Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Department of Gastroenterology Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium (Paraskevas Gkolfakis)
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia AOU, Foggia, Italy (Antonio Facciorusso)
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Research Institute and Diabetes Center, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece (Ioannis S. Papanikolaou, Georgios Tziatzios, Konstantinos Triantafyllou)
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Cennamo V, Landi S, Dabizzi E. What is Best Testing Ground for Clinical Evaluation of Single-use Duodenoscopes? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18:1899-1900. [PMID: 32068152 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.02.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2020] [Revised: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 02/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenzo Cennamo
- Gastroenterology and Interventional Endoscopy Unit, Local Health Authority of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Stefano Landi
- Gastroenterology and Interventional Endoscopy Unit, Local Health Authority of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Emanuele Dabizzi
- Gastroenterology and Interventional Endoscopy Unit, Local Health Authority of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Han SY, Kim DU, Lee MW, Park YJ, Baek DH, Kim GH, Song GA. Acute distal common bile duct angle is risk factor for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in beginner endoscopist. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8:20-28. [PMID: 31970166 PMCID: PMC6962061 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i1.20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2019] [Revised: 12/04/2019] [Accepted: 12/13/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) is a critical and poorly managed complication of ERCP. Endoscopists need to understand the risk factors for PEP. However, the majority of studies investigating ERCP-related risk factors have included well-trained endoscopists, with the issue of endoscopist experience on PEP incidence not having been systematically evaluated.
AIM To explore the risk factors for PEP in beginner endoscopists without supervision.
METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of 293 patients, with naïve papilla and no history of pancreatitis, treated using bile duct cannulation. Patients were classified according to the endoscopist’s experience (beginner vs expert). The angle of the distal common bile duct (CBD) was measured as the angle between the lower wall of the bile duct and a vertical line extending to the lower wall of the bile duct on coronal view computed tomography.
RESULTS After propensity matching, there were no differences between patients treated by the expert and beginner endoscopist with regard to age, sex, mean bile duct dilatation, and ratio of benign disease. The distal CBD angle was classified as acute (> 30º) or obtuse (≤ 30º), based on the mean angle of 29.9º for the group. An acute distal CBD angle was a significant risk factor for PEP for beginner (P = 0.049), but not expert.
CONCLUSION For beginner endoscopists first performing unsupervised ERCP, cases with an obtuse distal CBD angle may be more appropriate to lower the risk of PEP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung Yong Han
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan 49241, South Korea
| | - Dong Uk Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan 49241, South Korea
| | - Moon Won Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan 49241, South Korea
| | - Young Joo Park
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan 49241, South Korea
| | - Dong Hoon Baek
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan 49241, South Korea
| | - Gwang Ha Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan 49241, South Korea
| | - Geun Am Song
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan 49241, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|