Tumor-specific vascularization pattern of liver metastasis, hepatocellular carcinoma, hemangioma and focal nodular hyperplasia in the differential diagnosis of 1,349 liver lesions in contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)

[Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for characterisation of focal liver lesions]

Due to the trend towards increased use of imaging and rising awareness among high-risk patients, gastroenterologists and hepatologists are more frequently confronted with patients with focal liver lesions. In the differentiation of these lesions, CT and MRI have increasingly found their way into primary diagnostic steps in everyday clinical practice. Contrast-enhanced sonography, on the other hand, is a very effective and cost-efficient method for assessing focal liver lesions. The success of the method is not only based on the visualisation of microvascularisation in real time. If sonography is performed by the treating physician, he can use the exact knowledge of history and clinical findings to specifically adapt the examination procedure and to interpret the sonographic findings with greater accuracy ("clinical sonography"). At the same time, the method enables the practitioner to combine diagnostics and management decisions in his or her own hands. To achieve excellent results with contrast-enhanced sonography-as with any other imaging method-it is necessary that the examiner is sufficiently qualified.This article systematically presents the sonographic characteristics of the most common liver lesions and clearly shows their contrast patterns using videos (available via QR code). The article illustrates that CEUS could-and from the authors' point of view, should-have an even greater significance in the future.

Congestive Hepatopathy: Pathophysiology, Workup, and Imaging Findings with Pathologic Correlation

Liver congestion is increasingly encountered in clinical practice and presents diagnostic pitfalls of which radiologists must be aware. The complex altered hemodynamics associated with liver congestion leads to diffuse parenchymal changes and the development of benign and malignant nodules. Distinguishing commonly encountered benign hypervascular lesions, such as focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH)-like nodules, from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be challenging due to overlapping imaging features. FNH-like lesions enhance during the hepatic arterial phase and remain isoenhancing relative to the background liver parenchyma but infrequently appear to wash out at delayed phase imaging, similar to what might be seen with HCC. Heterogeneity, presence of an enhancing capsule, washout during the portal venous phase, intermediate signal intensity at T2-weighted imaging, restricted diffusion, and lack of uptake at hepatobiliary phase imaging point toward the diagnosis of HCC, although these features are not sensitive individually. It is important to emphasize that the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) algorithm cannot be applied in congested livers since major LI-RADS features lack specificity in distinguishing HCC from benign hypervascular lesions in this population. Also, the morphologic changes and increased liver stiffness caused by congestion make the imaging diagnosis of cirrhosis difficult. The authors discuss the complex liver macro- and microhemodynamics underlying liver congestion; propose a more inclusive approach to and conceptualization of liver congestion; describe the pathophysiology of liver congestion, hepatocellular injury, and the development of benign and malignant nodules; review the imaging findings and mimics of liver congestion and hypervascular lesions; and present a diagnostic algorithm for approaching hypervascular liver lesions. ©RSNA, 2024 Test Your Knowledge questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

Diagnostic Performance of Modified Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System in Patients Without Risk Factors for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Comparison With World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology Guideline

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the ability of the modified contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) to distinguish malignancy in patients without known hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk factors and compare diagnostic accuracy with that of the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB) guideline across radiologists with different levels of CEUS experience.

METHODS

A total of 848 individuals with no hepatitis infection presenting with 870 lesions in non-cirrhotic livers were included and divided into the Testing and Validation groups. The modified CEUS LI-RADS was proposed, including downgrading of focal nodular hyperplasia with typical features. Diagnostic performance of the modified CEUS LI-RADS was assessed in the Testing group. In the Validation group, two radiologists with more than 9 y of CEUS experience (Experts) and two radiologists with less than 6 mo of CEUS experience (Novices) used both the modified CEUS LI-RADS and the WFUMB guideline to evaluate performance in diagnosis of the lesions.

RESULTS

LR-5 + M (combination of modified LR-5 and modified LR-M) revealed optimal performance with a sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC) of 99.3%, 81.6% and 0.904, respectively. Novices using the modified CEUS LI-RADS outperformed those using the WFUMB guideline (AUC: 0.858 vs. 0.767, p = 0.005). Additionally, the sensitivity, specificity and AUC of Novices were comparable to those of Experts using the modified CEUS LI-RADS (94.1%, 77.6% and 0.858 vs. 96.1%, 77.6% and 0.868 for experts, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The modified CEUS LI-RADS is a valuable method for distinguishing hepatic malignancy in patients without HCC risk factors. This is particularly beneficial for radiologists with limited CEUS expertise.

HCCs lacking arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) - a diagnostic challenge. Findings from the prospective multicenter DEGUM CEUS HCC trial

OBJECTIVES

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) upon contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) typically shows arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE), followed by late (> 60 seconds) and mild contrast washout (WO). Although APHE is considered as the hallmark of HCC, it can be absent in some HCCs. Thus, we explored which sonomorphological and histopathological features of HCC are associated with a lack of APHE upon CEUS.

METHODS

Focal liver lesions in high-risk patients for HCC were assessed with CEUS following a standardized protocol in a prospective multi-center real-life setting. CEUS patterns in HCC were assessed, and tumour and patient characteristics were compared for HCCs with and without APHE.

RESULTS

316 patients with HCC were recruited (cirrhosis, 76.9%). APHE occurred in 271/316 HCCs (85.8%). A lack of APHE was associated with portal vein thrombosis, tumour infiltration of the liver vessels (p<0.001), larger size, multilocularity, and higher depth location upon ultrasound (p<0.01). Histological grading did not differ between HCCs with and without APHE (p=0.39). Histopathological features of HCCs without APHE included cirrhotic stromal reaction, marked tumour cell steatosis and absence of the typical surrounding dilated sinusoidal vascular channels.

CONCLUSION

Correlation with histopathological findings support the fact that HCCs with a lack of APHE in CEUS are a heterogeneous group. The examiner has to be aware that particularly HCCs with portal vein thrombosis or macro-invasion of the liver vessels may lack APHE.

Usefulness of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Differentiation between Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Benign Liver Lesions

A differentiation between hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and benign liver lesions is required. The aim of the study was to perform an analysis of the time of enhancement of focal liver lesions in a contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) examination. The curves of enhancement and the homogeneity of the tumor enhancement were assessed. The study included 52 patients with diagnoses of hepatocellular adenoma (18), focal nodular hyperplasia (11) and HCC (28). The study included magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography and a comparison of the obtained information with CEUS. In the benign lesions groups after 20-30 s, the enhancement was similar to the liver parenchyma. In the HCC group, the enhancement was slightly less intense compared to the liver parenchyma and the benign lesions. The difference of the enhancement in the arterial phase (benign lesions vs. HCC) was p = 0.0452, and the difference of enhancement in the late venous phase (benign lesions vs. HCC) was p = 0.000003. The homogeneity of the enhancement (benign lesions vs. HCC), respectively, was p = 0.001 in the arterial phase, p = 0.0003 in the portal venous phase and p = 0.00000007 in the late venous phase. Liver tumors can be classified as benign when they are homogenous in the arterial phase and don't present washout. HCC in the arterial phase is inhomogeneous and washout is observed in the venous phases. When radiological symptoms suggest malignant lesion, CEUS can be used to select the best biopsy access.

Incidental Findings in Pediatric Patients: How to Manage Liver Incidentaloma in Pediatric Patients

The World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB) is addressing the issue of incidental findings (IFs) with a series of publications entitled "Incidental imaging findings-the role of ultrasound". IFs in the liver of newborns and children are rare and much less commonly encountered than in adults; as a result, they are relatively much more frequently malignant and life-threatening, even when they are of benign histology. Conventional B-mode ultrasound is the well-established first line imaging modality for the assessment of liver pathology in pediatric patients. US technological advances, resulting in image quality improvement, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), liver elastography and quantification tools for steatosis have expanded the use of ultrasound technology in daily practice. The following overview is intended to illustrate incidentally detected liver pathology covering all pediatric ages. It aims to aid the examiner in establishing the final diagnosis. Management of incidentally detected focal liver lesions (FLL) needs to take into account the diagnostic accuracy of each imaging modality, the patient's safety issues (including ionizing radiation and nephrotoxic contrast agents), the delay in diagnosis, the psychological burden on the patient and the cost for the healthcare system. Moreover, this paper should help the pediatric clinician and ultrasound practitioner to decide which pathologies need no further investigation, which ones require interval imaging and which cases require further and immediate diagnostic procedures.

Head-to-head comparison of Sonazoid and SonoVue in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma for patients at high risk

Objectives

To compare the diagnostic efficacy of SonoVue-enhanced and Sonazoid-enhanced ultrasound (US) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients at high risk.

Methods

Between August 2021 and February 2022, participants at high risk for HCC with focal liver lesions were enrolled and underwent both SonoVue- and Sonazoid-enhanced US. Vascular-phase and Kupffer phase (KP) imaging features of contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) were analyzed. The diagnostic performance of both contrast agent-enhanced US according to the CEUS liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) and the modified criteria (using KP defect instead of late and mild washout) were compared. Histopathology and contrast-enhanced MRI/CT were used as reference standards.

Results

In total, 62 nodules, namely, 55 HCCs, 3 non-HCC malignancies and 4 hemangiomas, from 59 participants were included. SonoVue-enhanced US had comparable sensitivity to Sonazoid-enhanced US for diagnosing HCC [80% (95% confidential interval (CI): 67%, 89.6%) versus 74.6% (95% CI: 61%, 85.3%), p = 0.25]. Both SonoVue and Sonazoid-enhanced US achieved a specificity of 100%. Compared with CEUS LI-RADS, the modified criteria with Sonazoid did not improve sensitivity for HCC diagnosis [74.6% (95% CI: 61%, 85.3%) versus 76.4% (95% CI: 63%, 86.8%), p = 0.99].

Conclusions

Sonazoid-enhanced US had comparable diagnostic performance to SonoVue-enhanced US for patients with HCC risk. KP did not considerably improve the diagnostic efficacy, whereas KP defects in atypical hemangioma may be pitfalls in diagnosing HCC. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to further validate the conclusions in the present study.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound pattern of hepatocellular carcinoma in noncirrhotic liver - results from the prospective multicentre DEGUM CEUS HCC study

OBJECTIVES

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has a high diagnostic accuracy for the noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhosis. However, as HCC in noncirrhosis becomes an emerging clinical concern, our study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of CEUS and the CEUS algorithms CEUS LI-RADS and ESCULAP in noncirrhotic liver in a prospective multicentre real-life setting.

METHODS

High-risk patients for HCC with focal liver lesions upon B-mode ultrasound were recruited prospectively in a multicentre real-life approach to undergo standardized CEUS. Diagnostic accuracies of CEUS and the CEUS algorithms were assessed for the sub-collective of noncirrhotic patients. Histology, MRI and CT served as the reference standard.

RESULTS

In total 47/517 patients were noncirrhotic. The reference standard of the lesions showed 30 HCCs (63.8%), four intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinomas (iCCAs), two other malignancies and 11 benign lesions. HCCs in noncirrhosis showed a tendency towards larger tumor size and better differentiation. A typical CEUS pattern of arterial phase hyperenhancement and late-onset (>60 s), mild washout occurred in 22/30 HCCs (73.3%). Very late onset of washout > 4-6 min was not seen in noncirrhotic liver. The CEUS algorithm ESCULAP showed a perfect sensitivity (100 vs. 68% with CEUS LI-RADS), whereas CEUS LI-RADS had a superior specificity (83 vs. 53%). The positive predictive value was high with both algorithms.

CONCLUSION

The CEUS patterns of HCCs in noncirrhotic liver resembled those in cirrhosis. Our findings suggest that although designed for the application in cirrhosis only, the diagnostic accuracies of the CEUS algorithms in noncirrhotic liver seem comparable to the findings in cirrhosis.

The Preliminary Application of Simultaneous Display of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Micro-Flow Imaging Technology in the Diagnosis of Hepatic Tumors

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the value of simultaneous display of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and micro-flow imaging technology (CEUS-MFI) in intra-tumoral vessel detection and hepatic tumor diagnosis.

METHODS

A total of 82 patients with 82 focal liver lesions were enrolled in this study. Each patient received ultrasound exams including color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI), micro-flow imaging (MFI), contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), and CEUS-MFI with a Philips EPIQ7 ultrasound imaging system. The intra-tumoral vessels detected by CDFI, MFI, and CEUS-MFI were compared, respectively. The accuracy and confidence of using CEUS and CEUS-MFI in diagnosing hepatic tumors were also compared.

RESULTS

CEUS-MFI was capable of detecting more hepatic intra-tumoral vessels than MFI (P = .000) and CDFI (P = .000). Compared with CEUS, CEUS-MFI improved the diagnostic accuracy of hepatic lesions (P = .009). Particularly, among the correctly diagnosed hepatic lesions, the number of cases where radiologists diagnosed with great confidence was increased from 88.4% (61/69) with CEUS only to 92.4% (73/79) with CEUS-MFI (P = .041).

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS-MFI is sensitive in detecting hepatic intra-tumoral vessels and can improve the accuracy and confidence of radiologists in diagnosing hepatic lesions.

Focal Liver Lesions other than Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhosis: Diagnostic Challenges

Liver cirrhosis is associated with regenerative nodules and an increased risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, other benign and malignant liver lesions may also occur. Differentiating the other lesions from HCC is important for further therapeutic decisions. This review discusses the characteristics of non-HCC liver lesions in cirrhosis and their consequent appearance on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) with consideration of other imaging. Knowledge of this data would be helpful in avoiding misdiagnoses.

Differentiation of hepatic alveolar echinococcosis with a hemangioma-like pattern compared to typical liver hemangioma using contrast-enhanced ultrasound: a pilot study

PURPOSE

Echinococcus multilocularis infects humans as a false intermediate host, primarily with intrahepatic manifestation. Incorrect diagnostic interpretation of these liver tumors, especially the hemangioma-like pattern, can lead to progressive disease. The aim of the study was to investigate the differentiation of typical hemangioma and a hemangioma-like pattern of E. multilocularis using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).

METHODS

This prospective clinical pilot study comprised patients with hemangioma (n = 14) and patients with alveolar echinococcosis (AE) and hemangioma-like pattern (n = 7). Inclusion criteria were the detection of a liver lesion according to a hemangioma-like pattern on E. multilocularis Ulm classification-ultrasound (EMUC-US) and "confirmed" or "probable" AE according to WHO case definition. The comparison group had hepatic hemangioma with typical B-scan sonographic morphology. All participants underwent conventional and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.

RESULTS

The patient group comprised five men (71.4%) and two women (28.6%) with a mean average age of 64.1 ± 11.2 years. The patient group with hemangioma comprised nine female subjects (64.3%) and five male subjects (35.7%) with a mean average age of 56.1 ± 12.0 years. Early arterial bulbous ring enhancement (p < 0.0001) and iris diaphragm phenomenon could only be visualized in the patients with hemangioma (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, the patients with hemangioma exhibited hyperenhancement in the late phase (p = 0.0003). In contrast, the patients exhibited typical early arterial rim enhancement (p < 0.0001) and, in the portal venous and late phase, complete or incomplete non-enhancement (black hole sign; p = 0.0004).

CONSLUSION

The behavior of hemangioma-like AE lesions and typical liver hemangiomas is significantly different on CEUS. AE should be considered as a possible differential diagnosis, especially in high-endemic areas.

Benign liver lesions 2022: Guideline for clinical practice of Associazione Italiana Studio del Fegato (AISF), Società Italiana di Radiologia Medica e Interventistica (SIRM), Società Italiana di Chirurgia (SIC), Società Italiana di Ultrasonologia in Medicina e Biologia (SIUMB), Associazione Italiana di Chirurgia Epatobilio-Pancreatica (AICEP), Società Italiana Trapianti d'Organo (SITO), Società Italiana di Anatomia Patologica e Citologia Diagnostica (SIAPEC-IAP) - Part I - Cystic lesions

Benign liver lesions are increasingly diagnosed in daily clinical practice due to the growing use of imaging techniques for the study of the abdomen in patients who have non-specific symptoms and do not have an increased risk of hepatic malignancy. They include simple or parasitic cysts and solid benign tumors which differ widely in terms of prevalence, clinical relevance, symptoms and natural history and often lead to significant clinical problems relating to diagnosis and clinical management. Following the need to have updated guidelines on the management of benign focal liver lesions, the Scientific Societies mainly involved in their management have promoted the drafting of a new dedicated document. This document was drawn up according to the present Italian rules and methodologies necessary to produce clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic guidelines based on evidence. Here we present the first part of the guideline, concerning the characterization of focal hepatic lesions detected by ultrasound, and the diagnosis and clinical management of simple and parasitic hepatic cysts, and of polycystic liver disease.

Prevalence of Hepatic Space-Occupying Lesions Based on Sonographic Findings in Patients Referred to Guilan Cohort Center, Iran

Background: Early diagnosis of hepatic lesions can result in more successful treatment. Objectives: The present study aimed to diagnose hepatic space-occupying lesions by sonography in Guilan Cohort Center participants. Methods: In this cross-sectional prospective epidemiological research studies of Iranian adults (PERSIAN) Guilan cohort study (Sowme'eh Sara, Guilan, Iran) conducted in 2014 - 2017, the sample included 960 individuals of both genders, aged 35 - 60 years. A radiologist examined all individuals with sonography to determine hepatic space-occupying lesions. Demographical and clinical characteristics were recorded via a questionnaire. Data analysis was performed using SPSS software (version 16). Results: Only 2.3% of the patients were diagnosed with hepatic lesions such as hemangioma, hepatic cysts, and other lesions with frequencies of 1.1%, 0.8%, and 0.4%, respectively. Also, there was a significant relationship between gender and the presence of hepatic lesions (P < 0.05). The frequencies of hepatic lesions were 1.7% and 3.6% in men and women and 1.6%, 2.5%, and 4.4% in the age groups of 35 - 45, 45 - 55, and over 55 years, respectively. Conclusions: Hemangioma was the most common hepatic lesion diagnosed in ultrasonography examinations. Moreover, the only factor influencing the frequency of hepatic lesions was gender, which was found twice more in women than in men.

Focal Nodular Hyperplasia and Focal Nodular Hyperplasia-like Lesions

Focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) is a benign lesion occurring in a background of normal liver. FNH is seen most commonly in young women and can often be accurately diagnosed at imaging, including CT, MRI, or contrast-enhanced US. In the normal liver, FNH frequently must be differentiated from hepatocellular adenoma, which although benign, is managed differently because of the risks of hemorrhage and malignant transformation. When lesions that are histologically identical to FNH occur in a background of abnormal liver, they are termed FNH-like lesions. These lesions can be a source of diagnostic confusion and must be differentiated from malignancies. Radiologists' familiarity with the imaging appearance of FNH-like lesions and knowledge of the conditions that predispose a patient to their formation are critical to minimizing the risks of unnecessary intervention for these lesions, which are rarely symptomatic and carry no risk for malignant transformation. FNH is thought to form secondary to an underlying vascular disturbance, a theory supported by the predilection for formation of FNH-like lesions in patients with a variety of hepatic vascular abnormalities. These include abnormalities of hepatic outflow such as Budd-Chiari syndrome, abnormalities of hepatic inflow such as congenital absence of the portal vein, and hepatic microvascular disturbances, such as those that occur after exposure to certain chemotherapeutic agents. Familiarity with the imaging appearances of these varied conditions and knowledge of their association with formation of FNH-like lesions allow radiologists to identify with confidence these benign lesions that require no intervention. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2022.

High Frame Rate Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Helps Differentiate Malignant and Benign Focal Liver Lesions

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of high frame rate contrast-enhanced ultrasound (H-CEUS) of focal liver lesions (FLLs).

METHODS

From July 2017 to June 2019, conventional contrast-enhanced ultrasound (C-CEUS) and H-CEUS were performed in 78 patients with 78 nodules. The characteristics of C-CEUS and H-CEUS in malignant and benign groups and the differences between different lesion sizes (1-3 cm, 3-5 cm, or >5 cm) of C-CEUS and H-CEUS were examined. The diagnostic performance of C-CEUS and H-CEUS was analyzed. The chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used to assess inter-group differences. The receiver operating characteristic curve was plotted to determine the diagnostic performance of C-CEUS and H-CEUS.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in the enhancement area, fill-in direction and vascular architecture between C-CEUS and H-CEUS for both benign and malignant lesions (all p=0.000-0.008), but there were no significant differences in washout results (p=0.566 and p=0.684, respectively). For lesions 1-3 cm in size, the enhancement area, fill-in direction, and vascular architecture on C-CEUS and H-CEUS were significantly different (all p=0.000), unlike for lesions 3-5 cm or >5 cm in size. For differentiation of malignant from benign FLLs in the 1-3 cm group, H-CEUS showed sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values of 92.86%, 95.0%, 96.3%, 90.48% and 93.75%, respectively, which were higher than those for C-CEUS (75.0%, 70.0%, 77.78%, 66.67% and 72.91%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

H-CEUS provided more vascular information which could help differentiate malignant from benign FLLs, especially for lesions 1-3 cm in size.

CT/MRI and CEUS LI-RADS Major Features Association with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis

Background The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) assigns a risk category for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to imaging observations. Establishing the contributions of major features can inform the diagnostic algorithm. Purpose To perform a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis to establish the probability of HCC for each LI-RADS major feature using CT/MRI and contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) LI-RADS in patients at high risk for HCC. Materials and Methods Multiple databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus) were searched for studies from January 2014 to September 2019 that evaluated the accuracy of CT, MRI, and CEUS for HCC detection using LI-RADS (CT/MRI LI-RADS, versions 2014, 2017, and 2018; CEUS LI-RADS, versions 2016 and 2017). Data were centralized. Clustering was addressed at the study and patient levels using mixed models. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were determined for each major feature using multivariable stepwise logistic regression. Risk of bias was assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) (PROSPERO protocol: CRD42020164486). Results A total of 32 studies were included, with 1170 CT observations, 3341 MRI observations, and 853 CEUS observations. At multivariable analysis of CT/MRI LI-RADS, all major features were associated with HCC, except threshold growth (OR, 1.6; 95% CI: 0.7, 3.6; P = .07). Nonperipheral washout (OR, 13.2; 95% CI: 9.0, 19.2; P = .01) and nonrim arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) (OR, 10.3; 95% CI: 6.7, 15.6; P = .01) had stronger associations with HCC than enhancing capsule (OR, 2.4; 95% CI: 1.7, 3.5; P = .03). On CEUS images, APHE (OR, 7.3; 95% CI: 4.6, 11.5; P = .01), late and mild washout (OR, 4.1; 95% CI: 2.6, 6.6; P = .01), and size of at least 20 mm (OR, 1.6; 95% CI: 1.04, 2.5; P = .04) were associated with HCC. Twenty-five studies (78%) had high risk of bias due to reporting ambiguity or study design flaws. Conclusion Most Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System major features had different independent associations with hepatocellular carcinoma; for CT/MRI, arterial phase hyperenhancement and washout had the strongest associations, whereas threshold growth had no association. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

One stop shop approach for the diagnosis of liver hemangioma

Hepatic hemangioma is usually detected on a routine ultrasound examination because of silent clinical behaviour. The typical ultrasound appearance of hemangioma is easily recognizable and quickly guides the diagnosis without the need for further investigation. But there is also an entire spectrum of atypical and uncommon ultrasound features and our review comes to detail these particular aspects. An atypical aspect in standard ultrasound leads to the continuation of explorations with an imaging investigation with contrast substance [ultrasound/ computed tomography/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)]. For a clinician who practices ultrasound and has an ultrasound system in the room, the easiest, fastest, non-invasive and cost-effective method is contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Approximately 85% of patients are correctly diagnosed with this method and the patient has the correct diagnosis in about 30 min without fear of malignancy and without waiting for a computer tomography (CT)/MRI appointment. In less than 15% of patients CEUS does not provide a conclusive appearance; thus, CT scan or MRI becomes mandatory and liver biopsy is rarely required. The aim of this updated review is to synthesize the typical and atypical ultrasound aspects of hepatic hemangioma in the adult patient and to propose a fast, non-invasive and cost-effective clinical-ultrasound algorithm for the diagnosis of hepatic hemangioma.

Characterization of focal liver lesions using sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) microbubble contrast-enhanced ultrasonography

Background

Focal hepatic lesions incidentally detected during ultrasound usually need further step for proper characterization. The aim of this study was to highlight the efficacy of microbubble contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in characterization of focal liver lesions. This prospective study was conducted on 60 patients presented with hepatic focal lesions in the period from January 2019 to June 2020. CEUS studies were performed after a baseline conventional ultrasound with the same machine by the same operator. The ultrasound contrast agent used is second-generation US contrast agent. The enhancement patterns of the hepatic lesions were studied during the vascular phases up to 5 min and the data were correlated with histopathology, triphasic contrast-enhanced CT, and clinical follow-up.

Results

CEUS demonstrated a sensitivity of 94.2%, specificity of 88.9%, positive predictive value of 91%, negative predictive value of 94.1%, and accuracy of 92.3% for characterization of hepatic focal lesions, compared to a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 81.8%, positive predictive value of 84%, negative predictive value of 100%, and accuracy of 90.7% for triphasic CT.

Conclusion

CEUS is an effective tool in characterization of HFLs and recommended as a second diagnostic step after conventional ultrasound to immediately establish the diagnosis especially in patients with contraindications to CECT.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for the evaluation of malignant focal liver lesions

In this review, the authors address the analysis of different types of malignant focal liver lesions (FLLs) using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS). The specific enhancing patterns of hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and metastases are discussed and exemplified with images. In addition, the use of CEUS in malignant portal vein thrombosis is discussed. The advantages and limitations of CEUS for the analysis of malignant FLLs are also discussed.

Quantitative Analysis of the Time-Intensity Curve of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound of the Liver: Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Liver Lesions

Background: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of quantitative perfusion parameters in contrast-enhanced ultrasound to differentiate malignant from benign liver lesions. Methods: In this retrospective study 134 patients with a total of 139 focal liver lesions were included who underwent contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) between 2008 and 2018. All examinations were performed by a single radiologist with more than 15 years of experience using a second-generation blood pool contrast agent. The standard of reference was histopathology (n = 60), MRI or CT (n = 75) or long-term CEUS follow up (n = 4). For post processing regions of interests were drawn both inside of target lesions and the liver background. Time–intensity curves were fitted to the CEUS DICOM dataset and the rise time (RT) of contrast enhancement until peak enhancement, and a late-phase ratio (LPR) of signal intensities within the lesion and the background tissue, were calculated and compared between malignant and benign liver lesion using Student’s t-test. Quantitative parameters were evaluated with respect to their diagnostic accuracy using receiver operator characteristic curves. Both features were then combined in a logistic regression model and the cumulated accuracy was assessed. Results: RT of benign lesions (14.8 ± 13.8 s, p = 0.005), and in a subgroup analysis, particular hemangiomas (23.4 ± 16.2 s, p < 0.001) differed significantly to malignant lesions (9.3 ± 3.8 s). The LPR was significantly different between benign (1.59 ± 1.59, p < 0.001) and malignant lesions (0.38 ± 0.23). Logistic regression analysis with RT and LPR combined showed a high diagnostic accuracy of quantitative CEUS parameters with areas under the curve of 0.923 (benign vs. malignant) and 0.929 (hemangioma vs. malignant. Conclusions: Quantified CEUS parameters are helpful to differentiate malignant from benign liver lesions, in particular in case of atypical hemangiomas.

Infantile hepatic haemangioendothelioma resection in a newborn: A case report and literature review

Infantile hepatic haemangioendothelioma (IHH) is the most common benign hepatic tumour in infants. However, experience of managing IHH is lacking and treatments for symptomatic IHH are controversial. Here we report the case of a patient with IHH treated by liver resection. A liver mass was found in a newborn by prenatal ultrasonography. The patient presented with abdominal distention with a tangible mass. Further imaging diagnosis and biopsy were carried out and complete surgical resection of the mass was performed. Histological examination confirmed IHH. The patient recovered uneventfully after surgery, with no additional therapy after discharge and no recurrence during follow-up. We also summarise previously published resected cases of IHH and review the surgical outcomes. Surgical resection and liver transplantation appear to be effective treatments for symptomatic IHH.

MR versus CEUS LI-RADS for Distinguishing Hepatocellular Carcinoma from other Hepatic Malignancies in High-Risk Patients

Distinguishing between other hepatic malignancies (OMs) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is vital to allow clinicians to determine optimal treatment and assess prognosis in patients at high risk for HCC. This study evaluated the performance of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) versus contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) for differentiating HCC from OMs in patients at high risk for HCC. This retrospective study consecutively enrolled 106 high-risk patients with HCC and 52 high-risk patients with OMs. Patients underwent both MRI and CEUS, with histologic diagnosis as a reference standard. The diagnostic performance of MR versus CEUS LI-RADS was calculated and compared. The performance of the modified CEUS LI-RADS criteria was also evaluated and compared. Our research found that MRI features significantly differed between patients with OMs and those with HCC (p < 0.05), with sensitivities of 34.6%-69.2% and specificities of 83.0%-95.3% for diagnosing OMs and an LI-RADS M (LR-M): definite or probable malignancy, not specific for hepatocellular carcinoma sensitivity of 90.4% and specificity of 83.0% for diagnosing OM. CEUS features also significantly differed between patients with OM and HCC (p < 0.05), with sensitivities of 11.5%-96.2% and specificities of 23.6%-100% for diagnosing OMs, and an LR-M sensitivity of 98.1% and specificity of 84.0% for diagnosing OMs. Accuracies of category LR-M did not significantly differ between MR and CEUS LI-RADS (85.4% vs. 88.6%, p = 0.724). After reclassification of category LR-M nodules to category LR-5 if they exhibited clear intratumoral non-enhanced area boundaries and no punched-out appearance before 5 min, accuracy increased from 88.6% to 96.8% for CEUS LR-M and from 84.8% to 91.1% for CEUS LR-5. LR-M accuracies were significantly higher for the modified version of the CEUS LI-RADS than for MR LI-RADS (96.8% vs. 85.4%, respectively, p = 0.04). CEUS LI-RADS and MR LI-RADS can effectively be used to distinguish HCC from OMs. In patients at high risk of HCC, performance may be further improved by using a modified CEUS LI-RADS classification system in which category LR-M lesions are considered LR-5 if they have clear intratumoral non-enhanced area boundaries and do not have a punched-out appearance.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Children: Implementation and Key Diagnostic Applications

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) utilization is expanding rapidly, particularly in children, in whom the modality offers important advantages of dynamic evaluation of the vasculature, portability, lack of ionizing radiation, and lack of need for sedation. Accumulating data establish an excellent safety profile of ultrasound contrast agents in children. Although only FDA-approved for IV use in children for characterizing focal liver lesions and for use during echocardiography, growing off-label applications are expanding the diagnostic potential of ultrasound. Focal liver lesion evaluation is the most common use of CEUS, and the American College of Radiology Pediatric LI-RADS Working Group recommends including CEUS for evaluation of a newly discovered focal liver lesion in many circumstances. Data also support the role of CEUS in hemodynamically stable children with blunt abdominal trauma, and CEUS is becoming a potential alternative to CT in this setting. Additional potential applications that require further study include evaluation of pathology in the lung, spleen, brain, pancreas, bowel, kidney, female pelvis, and scrotum. This review explores the implementation of CEUS in children, describing basic principles of ultrasound contrast agents and CEUS technique and summarizing current and potential IV diagnostic applications based on pediatric-specific supporting evidence.

Real-life assessment of standardized contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and CEUS algorithms (CEUS LI-RADS®/ESCULAP) in hepatic nodules in cirrhotic patients-a prospective multicenter study

Objectives

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be diagnosed non-invasively with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in cirrhosis if the characteristic pattern of arterial phase hyperenhancement followed by hypoenhancement is present. Recent studies suggest that diagnosis based on this “hyper-hypo” pattern needs further refinement. This study compares the diagnostic accuracies of standardized CEUS for HCC according to the current guideline definition and following the newly developed CEUS algorithms (CEUS LI-RADS®, ESCULAP) in a prospective multicenter real-life setting.

Methods

Cirrhotic patients with liver lesions on B-mode ultrasound were recruited prospectively from 04/2018 to 04/2019, and clinical and imaging data were collected. The CEUS standard included an additional examination point after 4–6 min in case of no washout after 3 min. The diagnostic accuracies of CEUS following the guidelines (“hyper-hypo” pattern), based on the examiner’s subjective interpretation (“CEUS subjective”), and based on the CEUS algorithms ESCULAP and CEUS LI-RADS® were compared.

Results

In total, 470 cirrhotic patients were recruited in 43 centers. The final diagnosis was HCC in 378 cases (80.4%) according to the reference standard (histology 77.4%, MRI 16.4%, CT 6.2%). The “hyper-hypo” pattern yielded 74.3% sensitivity and 63% specificity. “CEUS subjective” showed a higher diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, 91.5%; specificity, 67.4%; positive predictive value, 92%; negative predictive value, 66%). Sensitivity was higher for ESCULAP (95%) and “CEUS subjective” (91.5%) versus CEUS LI-RADS® (65.2%; p < 0.001). Specificity was highest for CEUS LI-RADS® (78.6%; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

CEUS has an excellent diagnostic accuracy for the non-invasive diagnosis of HCC in cirrhosis. CEUS algorithms may be a helpful refinement of the “hyper-hypo” pattern defined by current HCC guidelines.

Key Points

• Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has a high diagnostic accuracy for the non-invasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhosis.

• The CEUS algorithm ESCULAP (Erlanger Synopsis for Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound for Liver lesion Assessment in Patients at risk) showed the highest sensitivity, whereas the CEUS LI-RADS® (Contrast-Enhanced UltraSound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System) algorithm yielded the highest specificity.

• A standardized CEUS examination procedure with an additional examination point in the late phase, after 4–6 min in lesions with no washout after 3 min, is vital.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-021-07872-3.

Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus computed tomography for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective, single-center evaluation of 234 patients

OBJECTIVE

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common cause of primary liver cancer. A major part of diagnostic HCC work-up is based on imaging findings from sonography, computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) allows for the dynamic assessment of the microperfusion pattern of suspicious liver lesions. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of CEUS compared with CT scans for assessing HCC.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, single-center study between 2004 and 2018 on 234 patients with suspicious liver lesions who underwent CEUS and CT examinations. All patients underwent native B-mode, color Doppler and CEUS after providing informed consent. Every CEUS examination was performed and interpreted by a single experienced radiologist (European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology level 3).

RESULTS

CEUS was performed on all included patients without occurrence of any adverse effects. CEUS showed a sensitivity of 94%, a specificity of 70%, a positive predictive value of 93% and a negative predictive value of 72% for analyzing HCC compared with CT as the diagnostic gold standard.

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS has an excellent safety profile and shows a high diagnostic accuracy in assessing HCC compared with corresponding results from CT scans.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound-guided musculoskeletal biopsies: our experience and technique

OBJECTIVE

To present our experience with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)-guided musculoskeletal soft tissue biopsies in a busy interventional clinic.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After IRB approval was obtained and informed consent was waived, we retrospectively reviewed all CEUS-guided musculoskeletal biopsies performed from December 1, 2018 to March 2, 2020. Relevant pre-procedure imaging was reviewed. Number of samples, suspected necrosis on pre-procedure imaging, specimen adequacy for pathologic analysis, correlation with pathologic diagnosis of surgical resection specimens, and procedural complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Thirty-six CEUS-guided musculoskeletal biopsies were performed in 32 patients (mean age 57, range 26-88; 22 males, 10 females). All procedures were performed using 16-gauge biopsy needles, and all procedures provided adequate samples for pathologic analysis as per the final pathology report. Between two and seven core specimens were obtained (mean 3.7). In 30/36 cases (83%), a contrast-enhanced MRI was obtained prior to biopsy, and 10/30 (33%) of these cases showed imaging features suspicious for necrosis. In 15/36 cases, surgical resection was performed, and the core biopsy and surgical resection specimens were concordant in 14/15 cases (93%). One patient noted transient leg discomfort at the time of microbubble bursting. Otherwise, no adverse reactions or procedural complications were observed.

CONCLUSION

CEUS is an accurate way to safely target representative areas of soft tissue lesions for biopsy and can be implemented in a busy interventional clinic. Our early experience has shown this to be a promising technique, especially in targeting representative areas of heterogeneous lesions and lesions with areas of suspected necrosis on prior imaging.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of benign and malignant liver lesions in children

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is increasingly being used in children. One of the most common referrals for CEUS performance is characterization of indeterminate focal liver lesions and follow-up of known liver lesions. In this setting, CEUS is performed with intravenous administration of ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs). When injected into a vein, UCA microbubbles remain confined within the vascular network until they dissipate. Therefore, visualization of UCA within the tissues and lesions corresponds to true blood flow. CEUS enables continuous, real-time observation of the enhancement pattern of a focal liver lesion, allowing in most cases for a definite diagnosis and obviating the need for further cross-sectional imaging or other interventional procedures. The recent approval of Lumason (Bracco Diagnostics, Monroe Township, NJ) for pediatric liver CEUS applications has spurred the widespread use of CEUS. In this review article we describe the role of CEUS in pediatric liver applications, focusing on the examination technique and interpretation of main imaging findings of the most commonly encountered benign and malignant focal liver lesions. We also compare the diagnostic performance of CEUS with other imaging modalities for accurate characterization of focal liver lesions.

The diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for evaluating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) juxtaposed to MRI findings; a retrospective single-center analysis of 292 patients

BACKGROUND

HCC is the most frequent primary liver cancer entity. Major risk factors comprise chronic HBC and HCV infections, ALD or NAFLD. Apart from the anamnesis, the clinical examination and serologic analysis, an essential part of the diagnostic HCC work-up is due to imaging findings from sonography, CT or MRI scans. HCC lesions feature a distinct vascularization pattern: hyperenhancement during early arterial and hypoenhancement/wash-out during portal venous or delayed phases. CEUS facilitates dynamic assessment of microperfusion patterns of suspicious liver lesions.

PURPOSE

The purpose of the present retrospective single-center study was to determine the diagnostic value of CEUS for assessing HCC by comparison with findings from MRI scans.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2004-2018 292 patients with suspicious liver lesions underwent CEUS and MRI. All patients underwent native B-mode, Color Doppler and CEUS after given informed consent. The applied contrast agent was a second-generation blood pool agent (SonoVue®, Bracco, Milan, Italy). Every CEUS examination was performed and interpreted by a single experienced radiologist (EFSUMB Level 3).

RESULTS

CEUS was performed on all included patients without occurrence of any adverse effects. CEUS showed a sensitivity of 96%, a specificity of 91%, a PPV of 95% and a NPV of 94% for analyzing HCC in comparison with MRI as the diagnostic gold standard.

CONCLUSION

With a distinguished safety profile CEUS shows a high diagnostic accuracy in assessing HCC compared to corresponding results from MRI scans.

Guidelines and Good Clinical Practice Recommendations for Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Liver - Update 2020 - WFUMB in Cooperation with EFSUMB, AFSUMB, AIUM, and FLAUS

The present, updated document describes the fourth iteration of recommendations for the hepatic use of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), first initiated in 2004 by the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB). The previous updated editions of the guidelines reflected changes in the available contrast agents and updated the guidelines not only for hepatic but also for non-hepatic applications.The 2012 guideline requires updating as previously the differences of the contrast agents were not precisely described and the differences in contrast phases as well as handling were not clearly indicated. In addition, more evidence has been published for all contrast agents. The update also reflects the most recent developments in contrast agents, including the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval as well as the extensive Asian experience, to produce a truly international perspective.These guidelines and recommendations provide general advice on the use of ultrasound contrast agents (UCA) and are intended to create standard protocols for the use and administration of UCA in liver applications on an international basis to improve the management of patients.

Guidelines and Good Clinical Practice Recommendations for Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Liver-Update 2020 WFUMB in Cooperation with EFSUMB, AFSUMB, AIUM, and FLAUS

The present, updated document describes the fourth iteration of recommendations for the hepatic use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, first initiated in 2004 by the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. The previous updated editions of the guidelines reflected changes in the available contrast agents and updated the guidelines not only for hepatic but also for non-hepatic applications. The 2012 guideline requires updating as, previously, the differences in the contrast agents were not precisely described and the differences in contrast phases as well as handling were not clearly indicated. In addition, more evidence has been published for all contrast agents. The update also reflects the most recent developments in contrast agents, including U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval and the extensive Asian experience, to produce a truly international perspective. These guidelines and recommendations provide general advice on the use of ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) and are intended to create standard protocols for the use and administration of UCAs in liver applications on an international basis to improve the management of patients.

Advanced Fusion Imaging and Contrast-Enhanced Imaging (CT/MRI-CEUS) in Oncology

Fusion imaging depicts an innovative technique that facilitates combining assets and reducing restrictions of advanced ultrasound and cross-sectional imaging. The purpose of the present retrospective study was to evaluate the role of fusion imaging for assessing hepatic and renal lesions. Between 02/2011-08/2020, 92 patients in total were included in the study, of which 32 patients had hepatic lesions, 60 patients had renal lesions. Fusion imaging was technically successful in all patients. No adverse side effects upon intravenous (i.v.) application of SonoVue® (Bracco, Milan, Italy) were registered. Fusion imaging could clarify all 11 (100%) initially as indeterminate described hepatic lesions by computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI). Moreover, 5/14 (36%) initially suspicious hepatic lesions could be validated by fusion imaging, whereas in 8/14 (57%), malignant morphology was disproved. Moreover, fusion imaging allowed for the clarification of 29/30 (97%) renal lesions initially characterized as suspicious by CT/MRI, of which 19/30 (63%) underwent renal surgery, histopathology revealed malignancy in 16/19 (84%), and benignity in 3/19 (16%). Indeterminate findings could be elucidated by fusion imaging in 20/20 (100%) renal lesions. Its accessibility and repeatability, even during pregnancy and in childhood, its cost-effectiveness, and its excellent safety profile, make fusion imaging a promising instrument for the thorough evaluation of hepatic and renal lesions in the future.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Focal Hepatic Lesions: When to Use and How to Differentiate Lesions?

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound can be used effectively to evaluate focal hepatic lesions and offers unique advantages over computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Serial vascular filling patterns of focal hepatic lesions during arterial, portal, and late phases can provide unique information on lesion characterization and differentiation. Sensitive depiction of arterial hypervascularity and analysis of washout pattern are clues for differentiation of several indeterminate hepatic nodules on conventional ultrasound and computed tomography/magnetic resonance. In this report, we present cases demonstrating clinical applications of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of focal hepatic lesions.

Diagnostic Value of High Frame Rate Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography and Post-processing Contrast Vector Imaging for Evaluation of Focal Liver Lesions: A Feasibility Study

This study evaluated the feasibility of contrast vector imaging (CVI) to characterize focal liver lesions. From July to October 2019, we prospectively enrolled 30 patients with focal liver lesions (hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC] [n = 19], metastasis [n = 8], combined HCC-cholangiocarcinoma [CC] [n = 1], intra-hepatic CC [n = 1] and sclerosed hemangioma [n = 1]). Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) was performed with high frame rate contrast harmonic imaging technique by one radiologist, and post-processing CVI was obtained and analyzed by two radiologists. On combined CVI with CEUS, the staining pattern was significantly predominant in HCCs (9/11, 81.8%), while peripheral rim was frequent in non-HCCs (5/8, 62.5%) (p = 0.020). HCCs exhibited feeding arteries (8/11, 45.5%) and high velocity variance (10/11, 90.9 %), whereas non-HCCs showed detour pattern (4/8, 50.0%) with either a high or low velocity variance (4/8, 50.0%, both), with no significant inter-group differences (p = 0.052 and 0.080, respectively). In conclusion, CVI was feasible and provided quantitative and multi-parametric information of different types of hepatic tumors.

Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in Focal Liver Lesions (FLL) with inconclusive findings on cross-sectional imaging

BACKGROUND

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has been used as an additional imaging technique in order to evaluate focal liver lesions. CEUS is easy and fast to perform, overcomes the limitations of B-mode US.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic potential of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in focal liver lesions (FLL) with unclear findings on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

In this single-center retrospective study, 146 patients with at least one FLL underwent additional CEUS of the liver to clarify inconclusive cross-sectional imaging findings. Ultrasonography was performed using B-mode imaging and CEUS after injection of sulphur hexafluoride microbubbles (second-generation contrast agent) within two months after ceMRI or ceCT and interpreted by an experienced radiologist (EFSUMB level 3). Histopathological reports, long-term follow-up or clinical course served as reference standard.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight of the 146 patients had malignant and 108 benign FLL. Overall, CEUS had 92% sensitivity (95% -CI, 79-97) and 98% specificity (95% -CI, 93-99) with an AUC of 0.95 in correctly characterizing the lesion as malignant or benign. Sensitivity increased to 98% (95% -CI, 96-100) for benign lesions and decreased to 92% (95% -CI, 78-98) for malignant lesions. CEUS showed the highest diagnostical accuracy in lesion <1 cm with an AUC of 1.000, while the lowest accuracy was achieved in lesions >2 cm with an AUC of 0.924 due to a decreasing specificity of 86% (95% -CI, 87-100).

CONCLUSION

CEUS correctly distinguished malignant from benign FLL in cases with inconclusive cross-sectional imaging findings and achieved high levels of diagnostic accuracy. CEUS has added diagnostic value especially in small lesions ≤1 cm while specificity remains limited in larger lesions.

Limited added value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound over B-mode for the subtyping of hepatocellular adenomas

PURPOSE

To compare the features of hepatocellular adenoma subtypes (HCAs) in B-mode and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).

METHOD

Thirty-three patients (31 women [94 %] and two men [6%], median age [Q1-Q3] 43.5 years old [35-51]) with 44 pathologically proven and subtyped HCAs (including 29 inflammatory HCAs [I-HCA] and 15 HNF1-α inactivated HCAs [H-HCA]) who underwent CEUS were included. The features of HCA on B-mode and CEUS were independently reviewed by two radiologists and compared between HCA subtypes.

RESULTS

I-HCAs were mostly hypoechoic (23/29, 79 %) or isoechoic (4/29, 14 %) with B-mode. Twelve of them (41 %) were heterogeneous. All H-HCAs except one demonstrated homogeneous hyperechogenicity (93 %) (p = 0.001). Moderate or marked liver steatosis was only observed in I-HCAs (12/29, 41 %) (p = 0.001). Arterial hyperenhancement was observed on CEUS in 27/29 (93 %) I-HCAs and in 14/15 (93 %) H-HCAs (p=0.98). Washout was present in 6/29 (21 %) I-HCAs and 1/15 (7%) H-HCAs (p=0.27). A total of 23/29 (79 %) I-HCAs and 15/15 (100 %) HCAs were homogeneous on portal and delayed phase acquisitions (p=0.04). The specificity for identifying an H-HCA was 100 % when the lesion was homogeneous and hyperechoic on B-mode, and the sensibility to rule out an H-HCA was 100 % if neither of these two features was present in a liver with obvious steatosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Most CEUS features, especially enhancement patterns, do not significantly differ between HCA subtypes. When HCA is suspected on CEUS, B-mode features should be considered, and a combination of lesion hyperechogenicity, homogeneity and the absence of obvious liver steatosis may be useful to distinguish H-HCAs from I-HCAs.

Differentiation of atypical hepatic hemangioma from liver metastases: Diagnostic performance of a novel type of color contrast enhanced ultrasound

BACKGROUND

In clinical practice, the diagnosis is sometimes difficult with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) when the case has an atypical perfusion pattern. Color parametric imaging (CPI) is an analysis software for CEUS with better detection of temporal differences in CEUS imaging using arbitrary colors. It measures the differences in arrival time of the contrast agent in lesions so that the perfusion features of atypical hemangioma and colorectal cancer (CRC) liver metastasis can be distinguished.

AIM

To evaluate the role of a novel type of CPI of CEUS in the differential diagnosis of atypical hemangioma from liver metastases in patients with a history of CRC.

METHODS

From January 2016 to July 2018, 42 patients including 20 cases of atypical hemangioma and 22 cases of liver metastases from CRC were enrolled. These patients had a mean age of 60.5 ± 9.3 years (range: 39-75 years). All patients received ultrasound, CEUS and CPI examinations. Resident and staff radiologists independently and retrospectively reviewed CEUS and CPI images. Two sets of criteria were assigned: (1) Routine CEUS alone; and (2) CEUS and CPI. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of resident and staff radiologists were analyzed.

RESULTS

The following CPI features were significantly different between liver hemangioma and liver metastases analyzed by staff and resident radiologists: Peripheral nodular enhancement (65%-70.0% vs 4.5%-13.6%, P < 0.001, P = 0.001), mosaic/chaotic enhancement (5%-10% vs 68.2%-63.6%, P < 0.001, P < 0.001) and feeding artery (20% vs 59.1%-54.5%, P = 0.010, P = 0.021). CPI imaging offered significant improvements in detection rates compared with routine CEUS in both resident and staff groups. By resident radiologists, the specificity and accuracy of CEUS+CPI were significantly increased compared with that of CEUS (77.3% vs 45.5%, P = 0.030; 78.6% vs 50.0%, P = 0.006). In addition, the area under the curve (AUC) of CEUS+CPI was significantly higher than that of CEUS (0.803 vs 0.757, P = 0.036). By staff radiologists, accuracy was improved in CEUS+CPI (81.0% vs 54.8%, P = 0.010), whereas no significant differences in specificity and sensitivity were found (P = 0.144, P = 0.112). The AUC of CEUS+CPI was significantly higher than that of CEUS (0.890 vs 0.825, P = 0.013) by staff radiologists.

CONCLUSION

Compared with routine CEUS, CPI could provide specific information on the hemodynamic features of liver lesions and help to differentiate atypical hemangioma from liver metastases in patients with CRC, even for senior radiologists.

[Sonographic diagnostics of liver tumors]

Liver tumors are often incidentally found during ultrasound examinations. The decision on further diagnostic imaging depends on the clinical context and the appearance in B mode ultrasound. This review highlights the role of grey scale and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and summarizes the ultrasonographic key features of the most common benign and malignant liver tumors. Conventional grey scale ultrasound is recommended in several guidelines for screening and follow-up of liver tumors in certain risk populations but its ability to characterize liver tumors is limited in most cases. The CEUS has an excellent tolerability and enables liver tumor characterization with a high sensitivity and specificity. The diagnostic value of CEUS is comparable to magnetic resonance imaging. In the case of unclear lesions, inconclusive findings by different imaging methods or if molecular targeted treatment is pursued, ultrasound-guided biopsy is often mandatory. Ultrasound is a rapidly and ubiquitously available method for the detection of liver tumors and CEUS is the only imaging method that enables real-time examination of all contrast phases in the liver. It should therefore be used as the first line imaging method for liver tumor characterization.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of liver lesions in children

Initial pediatric imaging of the liver heavily relies on ultrasonography (US) because it is free of ionizing radiation, easily portable and readily available. Although conventional US (gray-scale and color Doppler) is often an excellent screening tool, its relative low specificity compared to CT/MRI limits liver lesion characterization. The United States Food and Drug Administration's recent approval of an intravenous US contrast agent for pediatric liver lesion characterization (sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type A microspheres) and its excellent safety profile have spurred increased interest in contrast-enhanced US for definitive diagnosis of pediatric liver lesions. This review focuses on the safety of contrast-enhanced US, role of contrast-enhanced US in the evaluation of focal liver lesions, basic contrast-enhanced US technique for liver imaging, and interpretation principles. The authors review common focal liver lesions, with special attention to the role of contrast-enhanced US in the pediatric oncology population.

[Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions]

AIM

To continue studying the features of visualization of focal liver lesions by using of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis included 106 patients with morphologically confirmed benign liver tumors and metastases (MTS). Patients were divided into groups regarding morphological criteria: focal-nodular hyperplasia (FNH) - 22 patients, hemangiomas - 26, hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) - 15 and 43 patients with liver MTS. All patients underwent multiparametric ultrasound examination with CEUS.

RESULTS

Characteristic signs of FNH are early contrasting in the arterial phase (AF) and significantly different 'contrasting onset in focus' in comparison with hemangiomas (p<0.001), HCA and MTS (p<0.05). Specific signs: 'spokes of the wheel' symptom and advanced contrast accumulation (96%), 'center-to-edge' filling (86%). There was no contrasting in AF in 42% of patients with hemangiomas. Specific signs are 'peripheral nodular exacerbation' (92%) and 'edge-to-center' filling (76%). WASH-OUT sign is not typical. HCA is characterized by complete (100%) and intensive (80%) centripetal filling. WASH-OUT sing was detected in 6 (40%) patients (p<0.001 for 'wash-out onset' and p<0.005 for 'maximum wash-out time' in comparison with MTS). We did not find specific types of vascular pattern. The most important differential sign of MTS was WASH-OUT sign (100%). Me of 'wash-out onset' sign was 40 (35-56) seconds. Specific signs: 'black hole' symptom - 50% of patients, asymmetric vascular pattern - 39.5%, circumferential exacerbation (27.9%) and hypoperfusion zones in AF (32.6%).

Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for detecting colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To determine the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for detecting colorectal liver metastases.

METHODS

We performed comprehensive searches of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases to identify studies reporting the per-lesion diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for detecting colorectal liver metastases. Studies published between January 2003 and December 2018 with reference standards, including histopathology and intraoperative observation, and/or follow-up, were included. Sources of bias were assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. A linear mixed-effects regression model was used to determine sensitivity estimates.

RESULTS

Overall, 47 articles were included. The sensitivity estimates for contrast-enhanced ultrasound, diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for detecting colorectal liver metastases were 85.3%, 83.0%, and 90.1%, respectively. For lesions ≥10 mm in diameter, the sensitivities were 93.1%, 92.9%, and 94.5%, respectively. In 21 articles using histopathology as the only reference standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio for contrast-enhanced ultrasound/contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging were 86%/91%, 91%/95%, 9.2/16.6, 0.15/0.10, and 61/170, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS showed a diagnostic ability comparable to that of DWI and CEMRI, particularly for lesions ≥10 mm in diameter.

SIUMB guidelines and recommendations for the correct use of ultrasound in the management of patients with focal liver disease

The present document describes the SIUMB (Italian Society of Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology) guidelines for the use of ultrasound in the management of focal liver disease. The aim of the paper is to provide a clinical practice guideline for Italian physicians who are approaching the ultrasound study of a focal liver lesion. In particular, these guidelines provide simple indications, recommendations and general practice advices for the correct use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in this scenario. They represent the SIUMB position of the ultrasound role in the diagnostic flow charts of the principal focal liver lesions, and are in agreement with other, previously published national and international guidelines.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of pediatric focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatic adenoma: interobserver reliability

BACKGROUND

Focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatic adenoma are rare liver tumors in which specific features on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (US) have been reported but are little known in children.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the interobserver agreement in diagnosing and differentiating focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatic adenoma in children using established adult contrast-enhanced US characteristics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty children with a definite or probable diagnosis of focal nodular hyperplasia or hepatic adenoma on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/histology who underwent contrast-enhanced US studies were included. Typical and additional contrast-enhanced US features of focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatic adenoma were included. The lesions were classified as definite/probable focal nodular hyperplasia, definite/probably hepatic adenoma or unclassified. The interobserver kappa of contrast-enhanced US characteristics was calculated.

RESULTS

Focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatic adenoma in children demonstrate contrast-enhanced US characteristics similar to those in adults. Among the nine lesions with confirmed histological diagnosis, correct diagnosis was made in 7 (77.8%) based on contrast-enhanced US criteria. Two lesions were unclassified by both observers due to a mixed arterial filling pattern. Interobserver kappa for contrast-enhanced US diagnosis was 0.64 (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

There is a good interobserver kappa for separating focal nodular hyperplasia from hepatic adenoma in children using established adult contrast-enhanced US features.