Tremelimumab plus Durvalumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

MERTK inhibition improves therapeutic efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in hepatocellular carcinoma

Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients only achieves response rates of 25%-30%, indicating the necessity of new therapies for non-responder patients. Since myeloid-related suppressive factors are associated with poor responses to ICI in a subgroup of HCC patients, modulation of these targets may improve response rates. Our aim was to characterize the expression of the efferocytosis receptor MERTK in HCC and to analyze its potential as a new therapeutic target. In HCC patients, MERTK was expressed by myeloid cells and was associated with poorer survival. In a murine HCC model with progressive myeloid cell infiltration, MERTK was detected in dendritic cells and macrophages with an activated phenotype, which overexpressed the checkpoint ligand PD-L1. Concomitant expression of PD-1 in tumor T-cells suggested the pertinence of combined PD-1/PD-L1 and MERTK blockade. In vivo experiments in mice showed that inhibition of MERTK improved the therapeutic effect promoted by anti-PD-1 or by ICI combinations currently approved for HCC. This effect was associated with enhanced tumor infiltration and superior activity of antigen presenting cells and effector lymphocytes. Our results indicate that MERTK may behave as a relevant target for immunotherapeutic combinations in those HCC patients with tumors enriched in a myeloid component.

Avelumab induces greater Fc-Fc receptor-dependent natural killer cell activation and dendritic cell crosstalk compared to durvalumab

Several FDA-approved anti-PD-L1 (programmed cell death ligand-1) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are used to treat cancer. While these mAbs primarily target and intercept PD-L1:PD-1 inhibitory signaling in T-cells, the Fc-domains of these mAbs are distinct, and the unique cellular cascades triggered by differing Fc-domains of PD-L1 mAbs have not been directly investigated. In this study, we compared the innate immune effects of two widely used anti-PD-L1 IgG1 mAbs which bear distinct Fc-domains, avelumab (native-Fc) and durvalumab (mutated-Fc), using two-cell and three-cell co-culture systems containing Natural Killer cells (NK-cells), dendritic cells (DCs) and various tumor cell lines of multiple cancer origins. We show a robust enhancement in NK-cell effector function, DC maturation, reciprocal NK:DC crosstalk and DC editing that is unique to avelumab treatment using multiple functional immune assays. By transcriptomic analysis, we show for the first time pivotal differences in gene sets involved in NK-cell effector function, DC maturation, immunoregulatory interactions, and cytokine production between innate immune cells treated with avelumab versus durvalumab. Furthermore, we report several previously unknown Fc-receptor-associated biological pathways uniquely triggered by avelumab. Our findings elucidate novel mechanisms of Fc-dependent actions of PD-L1 mAbs which may inform their use in future clinical trials.

Evaluation of hyperprogressive disease with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for hepatocellular carcinoma: A secondary analysis of the IMbrave150 trial

The use of Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as monotherapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been associated with an increased risk of hyperprogressive disease (HPD), the occurrence of which carries a poor prognosis. However, it is unknown whether contemporary frontline treatment with the combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab causes significant HPD. This study conducted a secondary analysis of patient-level data from the IMbrave150 randomized controlled trial of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus sorafenib for frontline treatment of HCC. Multiple established definitions of early progression and treatment failure applicable to clinical trials were evaluated, including Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) HPD, HPD based on percent change of sum of longest diameter (SLD HPD), treatment failure HPD (TF HPD), and fast progression (FP). The incidence of these measures was compared between arms. The risk factors for and prognosis of TF HPD were evaluated. The risk of RECIST HPD and TF HPD was significantly lower with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab treatment than with sorafenib treatment-odds ratio for RECIST HPD: 0.29 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.82), TF HPD: 0.30 (0.17, 0.54). TF HPD was similarly associated with poor prognosis, irrespective of treatment arm. High blood alpha-fetoprotein and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio were both associated with an increased risk of TF HPD. For all definitions of early progression/treatment failure, the risk was either significantly lower with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab than with sorafenib, or there were no differences. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab treatment is unlikely to cause significant HPD.

PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma: Current status and potential biomarkers

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related death and the sixth most prevalent cancer worldwide. However, most patients with HCC are at an advanced stage at the time of clinical diagnosis, making surgery impossible. In the past, targeted therapeutic drugs such as sorafenib and lenvatinib were the main treatments. With recent breakthroughs in medicine, immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has garnered interest and has been extensively studied for clinical treatment. In addition to single-agent therapies, combination regimens involving ICIs have also been developed. Despite this progress, not all patients with HCC benefit from immunotherapy. Therefore, to improve the treatment response rates, it is crucial to identify patients with HCC who are suitable for immunotherapy. The exploration and validation of markers to predict the outcomes of immunotherapeutic treatments in patients with HCC are of clinical importance. In this article, we provide a comprehensive review of research progress in immunotherapy, particularly ICIs and combination therapies, for HCC. Furthermore, we summarize the clinical indicators and tumor markers discovered in recent years to forecast immunotherapy outcomes in patients with HCC. We also outline predictive markers for the occurrence of immune-related adverse events in patients with HCC receiving immunotherapy and discuss future research directions in the immunotherapeutic treatment landscape.

Delineation of monocytic and early-stage myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the peripheral blood of patients with hepatocarcinoma

In patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), increased myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) relate to aggressiveness and poor prognosis. Favorable responses with immune checkpoint inhibitors demonstrate that HCC is susceptible to immune activation, suggesting that the elimination of MDSC would provide therapeutic benefits. However, a global analysis of the different MDSC subsets in HCC is still missing. Here we phenotyped circulating myeloid cell subsets (monocytes, M-MDSC, PMN-MDSC and eMDSC) by flow cytometry in HCC and hepatocholangiocarcinoma patients and in healthy donors (HD). Isolated myeloid CD33+ cells were analyzed in immunosuppression assays, and cytokines were quantified in the supernatants. Arginase-1 activity (Arg-1) was analyzed in serum samples. All three proportions of MDSC, together with the immunosuppressive Arg-1, were significantly increased in HCC compared with HD. An important proportion of eMDSC expressed CD25, the IL-2 receptor α chain, and CD25+ eMDSC were also significantly expanded in HCC patients. HCC-CD33+ cells, enriched in M-MDSC and eMDSC, in vitro inhibited both CD4+ and CD8+ T cell proliferation and IL-2 production, and augmented IL-10, IL-6, and TNF-α. The correlation between the inhibition of T lymphocyte proliferation and M-MDSC was the strongest, while eMDSC or CD25+ eMDSC did not show antiproliferative capacity. Despite this functional difference, M-MDSC, CD25+ eMDSC, and CD25 expression in eMDSC were more prominent in advanced HCC as defined by a higher number of nodules, TNM stage, and alpha-fetoprotein level. This better delineation of M-MDSC and eMDSC phenotype and function in HCC could help to design therapies more likely to succeed in clinical trials.

Wogonin potentiates the irradiation effect on hepatocellular carcinoma by activating the Hippo-Yes-associated protein/transcriptional co-activator with PDZ-binding motif pathway

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether wogonin increases the radiosensitivity of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells by activating Hippo-Yes-associated protein (YAP)/transcriptional co-activator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ) signaling.

METHODS

HCC cells were treated with irradiation and wogonin; their proliferation and apoptosis were evaluated. Xenograft models were established to assess the radio-synergistic effects of wogonin; we evaluated whether wogonin influences the efficacy of radiotherapy in HCC cells by activating Hippo-YAP/TAZ signaling.

RESULTS

Fifty micromolar wogonin enhanced the radiosensitivity of HCC cells; 4-Gy X-rays promoted apoptosis in HCC cells. Wogonin pretreatment significantly increased radiosensitivity. In xenograft models, tumor weight and volume in the 100 mg/kg wogonin plus irradiation group were significantly reduced; pYAP and pTAZ levels were downregulated in HCC cells treated with radiotherapy. Following treatment with 4-Gy X-rays and 100 μM wogonin, the relative pYAP/total YAP and pTAZ/total TAZ ratios increased. We identified the possible target genes of YAP/TAZ: AXL, CCN1, and CCN2. WB results revealed the upregulation of AXL, CCN1, and CCN2 in the irradiation group. However, in the group receiving irradiation and wogonin, the protein expression levels of AXL, CCN1, and CCN2 were downregulated. XMU-MP-1 inhibited pYAP and pTAZ expression in the combination treatment group, thereby promoting AXL, CCN1, and CCN2 expression. The proliferative ability of HCC cells in the wogonin plus irradiation group was partially recovered following treatment with XMU-MP-1. Apoptosis in HCC cells was reversed after pretreatment with 2 μM XMU-MP-1 in the wogonin plus irradiation group.

CONCLUSION

Wogonin may modulate Hippo-YAP/TAZ signaling and enhance the radiosensitivity of HCCs.

Therapeutic Sequences of Systemic Therapy After Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Real-World Analysis of the IMMUreal Cohort

BACKGROUND

The introduction of several new systemic therapies in recent years has significantly altered the treatment landscape for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. However, while the approval of the combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab as the preferred first-line therapy over sorafenib represents progress, it has also raised uncertainties regarding optimal treatment sequencing for advanced disease.

AIMS

This study evaluates the sequential treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma following therapy with atezolizumab and bevacizumab, providing evidence from a prospective real-world cohort.

METHODS

Data were derived from the ongoing IMMUreal cohort, which investigates immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma across two tertiary centres in Bavaria. A total of 124 patients treated with atezolizumab and bevacizumab as first-line therapy between June 2020 and December 2023 were analysed. Feasibility, treatment patterns, and outcomes of sequential therapy were assessed, with a focus on defined prognostic subgroups.

RESULTS

The median overall survival under real-world conditions was 19.8 months. Less than half of the patients (41.2%) proceeded to second-line therapy, and only 19.2% were eligible for third-line treatment. This decline in treatment eligibility corresponded to a marked reduction in therapy duration and progressive deterioration in liver function, as indicated by Albumin-Bilirubin and Child-Pugh scores. While patients with worse baseline liver function, such as patients with Child-Pugh B or ALBI > 1, had a significantly lower probability of transitioning to 2nd line therapy, no significant association was found between the number of treatment lines and factors such as liver cirrhosis, poor physical condition, extrahepatic disease, or macrovascular invasion.

CONCLUSIONS

Sequential therapy following atezolizumab and bevacizumab is feasible only for selected patients. However, preserving liver function seems crucial to optimising multi-line therapy and improving outcomes in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Outcome and management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who achieved a complete response to immunotherapy-based systemic therapy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The outcome of patients with HCC who achieved complete response (CR) to immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based systemic therapies is unclear.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

Retrospective study of patients with HCC who had CR according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (CR-mRECIST) to ICI-based systemic therapies from 28 centers in Asia, Europe, and the United States. Of 3933 patients with HCC treated with ICI-based noncurative systemic therapies, 174 (4.4%) achieved CR-mRECIST, and 97 (2.5%) had CR according to RECISTv1.1 (CR-RECISTv1.1) as well. The mean age of the total cohort (male, 85%; Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer-C, 70%) was 65.9±9.8 years. The majority (83%) received ICI-based combination therapies. Median follow-up was 32.2 (95% CI: 29.9-34.4) months. One- and 3-year overall survival rates were 98% and 86%. One- and 3-year recurrence-free survival rates were excellent in patients with CR-mRECIST-only and CR-RECISTv1.1 (78% and 55%; 70% and 42%). Among patients who discontinued ICIs for reasons other than recurrence, those who received immunotherapy for ≥6 months after the first mRECIST CR had a longer recurrence-free survival than those who discontinued immunotherapy earlier ( p =0.008). Of 9 patients who underwent curative surgical conversion therapy, 8 (89%) had pathological CR (CR-RECISTv1.1, n= 2/2; CR-mRECIST-only, n= 6/7).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall survival and recurrence-free survival of patients with CR-mRECIST-only and CR-RECISTv1.1 were excellent, and 6 of 7 patients with CR-mRECIST-only who underwent surgical conversion therapy had pathological CR. Despite potential limitations, these findings support the use of mRECIST in the context of immunotherapy for clinical decision-making. When considering ICI discontinuation, treatment for at least 6 months beyond CR seems advisable.

Anlotinib plus penpulimab versus sorafenib in the first-line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (APOLLO): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy combinations have revolutionised the therapeutic landscape of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but not all yield a significant overall survival benefit, underscoring the need for novel effective agents. Anlotinib plus penpulimab has demonstrated encouraging activity and safety in a phase 2 study. In this phase 3 trial, we aimed to assess whether the combination of anlotinib plus penpulimab improved survival versus sorafenib in patients with unresectable HCC.

METHODS

APOLLO was a multicentre, open-label, parallel-controlled, randomised, phase 3 trial conducted at 79 centres in China. Patients aged 18-75 years with unresectable HCC, no previous systemic therapy, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 were randomly assigned (2:1) to anlotinib (10 mg orally once daily on days 1-14) plus penpulimab (200 mg intravenously on day 1), or sorafenib (400 mg orally twice daily) every 3 weeks. Randomisation was done centrally using block randomisation with a fixed block size of 3 and stratified by the presence of macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic metastasis, α-fetoprotein concentration, and ECOG performance status. Sex (male or female) and ethnicity (Chinese or other) were self-reported. The co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival assessed by masked independent review committee and overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug and had at least one recorded safety assessment. Final progression-free survival and second interim overall survival analyses are presented. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04344158, and follow-up is ongoing.

FINDINGS

From Aug 11, 2020, to June 20, 2023, 940 patients were screened for inclusion in the trial, 291 were excluded, and 649 were randomly assigned to an intervention (433 were assigned to the anlotinib plus penpulimab group and 216 were assigned to the sorafenib group. 551 (85%) of the 649 patients were male and 98 (15%) were female. All patients were Chinese with a median age of 57 years (IQR 50-65). For the final analysis of progression-free survival (June 5, 2023), 636 patients (424 patients in the anlotinib plus penpulimab group vs 212 patients in the sorafenib group) comprised the intention-to-treat population. For the second interim analysis of overall survival (Jan 29, 2024), 649 patients (433 vs 216) comprised the intention-to-treat population. Median follow-up was 6·2 months (IQR 5·5-7·5) for the anlotinib plus penpulimab group and 4·2 months (2·9-7·1) for the sorafenib group for final progression-free survival analysis, and 15·3 months (14·3-17·3) for the anlotinib plus penpulimab group and 14·5 months (11·5-17·0) for the sorafenib group for the second interim overall survival analysis. Median progression-free survival was significantly extended with anlotinib plus penpulimab versus sorafenib (6·9 months [95% CI 5·8-8·0] vs 2·8 months [2·7-4·1]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·52 [95% CI 0·41-0·66]; p<0·0001). Median overall survival was significantly prolonged with anlotinib plus penpulimab compared with sorafenib (16·5 months [95% CI 14·7-19·0] vs 13·2 months [9·7-16·9]; HR 0·69 [95% CI 0·55-0·87]; p=0·0014). The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events were hypertension (75 [17%] patients in the anlotinib plus penpulimab group vs 22 [10%] in the sorafenib group) and decrease in platelet count (39 [9%] vs 13 [6%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 90 (21%) and 19 (9%) patients in the respective groups; treatment-related deaths occurred in one (<1%) patient in the anlotinib plus penpulimab group (upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage) and two (1%) patients in the sorafenib group (hepatic failure and death of unknown cause).

INTERPRETATION

Anlotinib plus penpulimab significantly improved progression-free survival and overall survival versus sorafenib in unresectable HCC and might be a new first-line option. These findings require verification in other regions of the world.

FUNDING

Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group.

Proposal of discontinuation criteria of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab after curative conversion therapy for unresectable early-to-intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter proof-of-concept study

BACKGROUND

Achieving complete response (CR) is a desirable goal in early-to-intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). While systemic and locoregional therapies show promise, optimal drug discontinuation criteria remain unclear. This study aims to investigate drug-off criteria for atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as a proof-of-concept study.

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter study included child-pugh class A patients with unresectable HCC without extrahepatic spread or macrovascular invasion who received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as first-line therapy. Modified clinical CR (mCCR) was defined as CR per mRECIST with sustained normal alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels (< 10.0 ng/dl). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed based on the "drug-off" criteria defined by following: (1) mRECIST CR with locoregional therapies, (2) sustained normalization of AFP/AFP-L3/ des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin (DCP) for 12-24 weeks, and (3) complete tumor vascularity disappearance by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) or pathological curative resection.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 16.5 months (95% CI 15.2-17.8). Among 51 patients achieving mCCR, 11 underwent surgery, with pathological CR in three cases. In contrast, viable lesions were observed in 7 of 40 cases assessed using CEUS. All patients meeting the drug-off criteria (n = 9) showed no recurrence and none of them experienced mortality, while 45.2% (19/42) of those not meeting the criteria experienced recurrence (median RFS: 12.8 months, p = 0.007). The median OS was not reached in dug-off criteria met patients (n = 9), 37.7 months (95% CI: NA) in non-criteria met patients (n = 42), and 27.1 months (95% CI 16.7-37.6) in non-mCCR patients (n = 184) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In patients with unresectable and TACE-unsuitable early-to-intermediate-stage HCC who met the drug-off criteria, significantly improved RFS and OS were observed compared those who did not meet the criteria. However, further validation studies are required to confirm the utility of the criteria.

Pancreatic cancer precursor lesions - Can immunotherapy prevent progression into pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma?

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the deadliest cancers, with a 5-year survival rate of only 12.5 %. Early detection of PDAC or addressing risk factors for PDAC development are ways to improve outcomes. PDAC can arise from precursor lesions, including pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN), intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), and less frequent, mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN), and other rare precursor variants. High-risk precursor lesions harbor a substantial chance of evolving into PDAC. Such lesions can often be found in resected PDAC specimens adjacent to the cancer. Unfortunately, recognizing precursor lesions that need to be resected is often tricky, and resections frequently end in major surgical interventions. Thus, better ways to handle precursor lesions are desperately needed. We mapped the immune microenvironments (IMEs) of PanINs, IPMNs, and MCNs on a cellular level using multiplex immunofluorescence and computational imaging technology and compared the findings to PDACs and normal pancreatic tissues. We found distinct and potentially targetable mechanisms of immunosuppression between the two main precursor lesions, PanIN and IMPN. Immunosuppression in IPMNs seems partly mediated by programmed cell death protein 1 ligand (PD-L1) expression on antigen-presenting cells (APCs). By contrast, elevated numbers of regulatory T cells (Tregs) seem to be key players in the immunosuppression of PanINs. Thus, treating high-risk IPMNs with anti-PD-1 and high-risk PanINs with agents targeting Tregs, such as anti-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (anti-CTLA-4) antibodies, could reverse their immunosuppressive state. Reversal of immunosuppression will restore immunosurveillance and eventually prevent progression into PDAC. We also review relevant published and ongoing non-surgical treatment approaches for high-risk IPMNs and PanINs.

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus lenvatinib or sorafenib as first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (CheckMate 9DW): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma have a poor prognosis, and treatments with long-term benefits are needed. We report results from the preplanned interim analysis of the CheckMate 9DW trial assessing nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus lenvatinib or sorafenib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in the first-line setting.

METHODS

This open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma without previous systemic therapy at 163 hospitals and cancer centres across 25 countries in Asia, Australia, Europe, North America, and South America. Patients had at least one measurable untreated lesion per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1, a Child-Pugh score of 5 or 6, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via an interactive response technology system to receive nivolumab (1 mg/kg) plus ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) intravenously every 3 weeks for up to four doses, followed by nivolumab 480 mg every 4 weeks or investigator's choice of either oral lenvatinib (8 mg or 12 mg mg daily depending on bodyweight) or oral sorafenib (400 mg twice daily). Randomisation was stratified by aetiology; the presence of macrovascular invasion, extrahepatic spread, or both; and baseline alpha-fetoprotein concentration. The primary endpoint was overall survival, which was assessed in all randomly assigned patients; safety was an exploratory endpoint and was assessed in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study medication. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04039607 (ongoing).

FINDINGS

Between Jan 6, 2020, and Nov 8, 2021, 668 patients were randomly assigned to nivolumab plus ipilimumab (n=335) or lenvatinib or sorafenib (n=333). Early crossing of the overall survival Kaplan-Meier curves reflected a higher number of deaths during the first 6 months after randomisation with nivolumab plus ipilimumab (hazard ratio 1·65 [95% CI 1·12-2·43]) but was followed by a sustained separation of the curves thereafter in favour of nivolumab plus ipilimumab (0·61 [0·48-0·77]). After a median follow-up of 35·2 months (IQR 31·1-39·9), overall survival was significantly improved with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus lenvatinib or sorafenib (median 23·7 months [95% CI 18·8-29·4] vs 20·6 months [17·5-22·5]; hazard ratio 0·79 [0·65-0·96]; two-sided stratified log-rank p=0·018); respective overall survival rates were 49% (95% CI 44-55) versus 39% (34-45) at 24 months and 38% (32-43) versus 24% (19-30) at 36 months. Overall, 137 (41%) of 332 patients receiving nivolumab plus ipilimumab and 138 (42%) of 325 patients receiving lenvatinib or sorafenib had grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events. 12 deaths were attributed to treatment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab and three were attributed to treatment with lenvatinib or sorafenib.

INTERPRETATION

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab showed a significant overall survival benefit versus lenvatinib or sorafenib and manageable safety in patients with previously untreated unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. These results support nivolumab plus ipilimumab as a first-line treatment in this setting.

FUNDING

Bristol Myers Squibb.

Multicenter phase Ib/II study of second-line durvalumab and tremelimumab in combination with paclitaxel in patients with biomarker-selected metastatic gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

This multicenter phase Ib/II trial aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combining durvalumab, tremelimumab, and paclitaxel as second-line treatment for biomarker-selected patients with metastatic gastric cancer.

METHODS

In phase Ib, the standard 3 + 3 dose escalation method was used. Durvalumab and tremelimumab were administered every 4 weeks for 13 and 4 cycles, respectively, combining paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 (dose level 2) or 60 mg/m2 (dose level 1) on days 1, 8, and 15. The primary outcome for phase II was the objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

In phase Ib (n = 7), dose level-1 was selected as the recommended phase II dose. In phase II, 48 patients were enrolled: microsatellite instability-high or deficient mismatch repair protein tumors (n = 16); EBV-positive tumors (n = 15); high tumor mutation burden ( ≥ 5/Mb) (n = 11); CD274 amplification (n = 5); and POLD1 mutation (n = 1). The ORR was 52.1%, meeting the primary endpoint. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.3 and 13.1 months, respectively. The most common any-grade and grade 3-4 adverse events were anemia (41.7%) and neutropenia (10.4%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Durvalumab-tremelimumab with paclitaxel was tolerable and efficacious in biomarker-selected gastric cancer patients as a second-line treatment, highlighting the importance of biomarker-based approaches for immunotherapy in gastric cancer.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03751761.

Advances in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: An overview of the current and evolving therapeutic landscape for clinicians

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common malignancy and the third leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Contemporary advances in systemic and locoregional therapies have led to changes in peer-reviewed guidelines regarding systemic therapy as well as the possibility of downstaging disease that may enable some patients with advanced disease to ultimately undergo partial hepatectomy or transplantation with curative intent. This review focuses on all modalities of therapy for HCC, guided by modern-day practice-changing randomized data where available. The surgical management of HCC, including resection and transplantation, both of which have evolving criteria for what is considered biologically resectable and transplantable, as well as locoregional therapy (i.e., therapeutic embolization, ablation, radiation, and hepatic arterial infusion), are discussed. Historical and modern-day practice-changing trials evaluating immunotherapy with targeted therapies for advanced disease, as well as adjuvant systemic therapy, are also summarized. In addition, this article examines the critical dimension of toxicities and patient-oriented considerations to ensure a comprehensive and balanced discourse on treatment implications.

Carry-over effect of immunotherapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Combination immunotherapy is the current standard for treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The response elicited by upfront immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) might influence the efficacy of salvage therapy, a phenomenon known as the carry-over effect. This effect is thought to stem from immune memory and sustained immune activation, providing extended protection against tumor progression and resulting in a durable response even after discontinuation of ICI. This study aimed to investigate the carry-over effect of first-line ICI therapy in patients with advanced HCC.

METHODS

Patients who received first-line ICI therapy for advanced HCC from December 2017 to December 2021 were included if they exhibited disease progression and received second-line systemic therapy. We analyzed the associations between clinical benefit (classified as complete, partial response and stable disease) of first-line ICI therapy, post-progression survival (PPS) and second-line progression-free survival (PFS). We used a historical cohort of patients receiving first-line multikinase inhibitor (MKI) for comparison.

RESULTS

A total of 137 patients were analyzed. We included 60 patients who received first-line ICI therapy, of which clinical benefit was detected in 46 (76.7%). Compared with patients without clinical benefit of first-line ICI therapy, patients with clinical benefit exhibited significantly longer PPS (median: 14.6 vs. 4.9 months, P = 0.024) and second-line PFS (median: 3.6 vs. 1.6 months, P = 0.027). In multivariate analysis, clinical benefit of first-line ICI therapy remained an independent predictor of PPS [hazard ratio (HR): 0.295, P = 0.005] and second-line PFS (HR: 0.484, P = 0.047). Conversely, clinical benefit was not associated with PPS among patients receiving first-line MKI therapy in both univariate and multivariate analysis in historical MKI cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical benefit of first-line ICI therapy was associated with PPS and second-line PFS in patients with advanced HCC, suggestive of the carry-over effect of ICI.

Cardiological adverse events in hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving immunotherapy: Influence of comorbidities and clinical outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Immunotherapy-based combinations have revolutionized the first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), improving overall survival (OS). However, these therapies are associated with adverse events (AEs), particularly cardiological complications and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), which may adversely affect outcomes. The influence of comorbid conditions such as arterial hypertension (AHT) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on the incidence and prognosis of cardiological AEs in HCC patients remains understudied.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 109 HCC patients treated with atezolizumab-bevacizumab, tremelimumab-durvalumab, or durvalumab as first-line therapy at two Spanish medical centers from 2017-2023. Patients were stratified by comorbidities, AE incidence, and cardiological risk (CARDIOSOR scale). The primary endpoints were the incidence of treatment-modifying AEs and MACE, and their association with survival.

RESULTS

Among the cohort, 50.5 % experienced AEs of special interest (AESI), with 34 % considered immune-related (irAE). MACE occurred in 7.3 % of patients, including myocarditis (3.7 %). The CARDIOSOR scale identified a higher risk of MACE in patients with AHT, T2DM, or both (OR: 5.07, p = 0.034). Early cardiological AEs were independently associated with worse OS (HR: 3.38, p = 0.04). Patients with both AHT and T2DM exhibited higher rates of MACE (16.7 %) and treatment discontinuation (25.9 %). The CARDIOSOR scale effectively stratified patients into high-risk groups, correlating with increased MACE rates and poor survival outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Comorbid conditions, particularly AHT and T2DM, amplify the risk of MACE and influence treatment discontinuation. The CARDIOSOR scale is a valuable tool for personalized risk assessment, guiding tailored therapeutic strategies. Integrating cardiovascular risk management into HCC care is crucial for optimizing both oncological and cardiovascular outcomes.

Mutational Landscape of Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Association with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Outcomes

PURPOSE

Understanding the mutational landscape of recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) is important in identifying biomarkers to determine which patients may benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The HAWK (NCT02207530), CONDOR (NCT02319044), and EAGLE (NCT02369874) studies evaluated R/M HNSCC treatment with durvalumab or durvalumab-tremelimumab. Tumor tissue samples pooled from HAWK/CONDOR (n = 153) and plasma cell-free DNA samples from EAGLE (n = 285) were analyzed to identify somatic alterations and association with survival.

RESULTS

The mutational landscape was similar in tissue and plasma. Compared with the wild type, TP53 mutations were associated with significantly shorter overall survival (OS; HR; 95% confidence interval) with standard of care (SoC; EAGLE: 2.12; 1.20-3.78) and ICIs (HAWK/CONDOR: 1.49; 1.05-2.12 and EAGLE: 1.44; 0.99-2.10). In EAGLE, patients with TP53 mutations had significantly longer OS with durvalumab-tremelimumab versus SoC (P = 0.045). KMT2D mutations were associated with a trend toward longer OS (HR; 95% confidence interval) versus the wild type in HAWK/CONDOR (0.81; 0.56-1.19) and a trend toward longer OS with ICIs versus SoC in EAGLE. For both mutations, a European Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 was associated with worsened OS, and PD-L1 positivity was associated with improved OS.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first large-scale study to show the mutational landscape of R/M HNSCC and its association with clinical outcomes in patients treated with ICIs or SoC. The TP53 mutation was a negative prognostic marker; however, treatment with durvalumab-tremelimumab significantly improved survival over SoC. Further investigation of KMT2D as a predictive biomarker for immunotherapy in R/M HNSCC is warranted.

The clinical implications of trial endpoints in immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Investigative work in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma is rapidly growing with the advent of immunotherapy. Nonetheless, trial endpoints and, more importantly, clinically meaningful endpoints need to be accurately chosen depending on the phase of trial and the patient population studied. We provide a scoping review focusing on trial endpoints on the use of immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma.

AREAS COVERED

We searched PubMed and Google Scholar for prospective phase II and III trials using immunotherapy, whether in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, bridging, downstaging, or palliative settings, while discussing the clinical implications of trial endpoints.

EXPERT OPINION

The field of immune oncology is rapidly progressing and has become the standard of care in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the role of immunotherapy in the treatment of early and intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma is yet to be defined. Prospective trials for all stages of disease must strive for endpoints that are not only statistically significant but also clinically consequential. Whereas overall response rate may be a reasonable trial endpoint in phase II trials, phase III trials should rather aim for the improvement of overall survival or quality of life to have clinically meaningful impacts.

Radiotherapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy of RALOX versus FOLFOX for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: a propensity score-matching cohort study

BACKGROUND

This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with raltitrexed and oxaliplatin (RALOX-HAIC) combined with radiotherapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT).

METHODS

A propensity score-matching (PSM) cohort study was conducted. The tumor response, treatment-related adverse events, survival outcomes were compared. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to explore the risk factors of overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Twenty-one pairs of patients were evaluated after PSM. No statistical differences were found in the tumor response, objective response rate, disease control rate, PVTT response, surgical resection rate, metastasis, and mortality between the two groups before and after PSM. Compared with the FOLFOX-HAIC group, the incidences of abdominal pain and fever was lower in the RALOX-HAIC group (P = 0.028, P = 0.029). These differences still had statistical significance after PSM (P = 0.013, P = 0.014). No statistical differences were found in OS and progression-free survival (PFS) between the two groups before and after PSM (Before [OS: hazard ratio(HR) = 1.138; 95%CI 0.569-2.276, P = 0.715; PFS: HR = 0.549; 95%CI 0.195-1.548, P = 0.257; After [OS: HR = 0.998; 95%CI 0.438-2.274, P = 0.995; PFS: HR = 0.792; 95%CI 0.359-1.748, P = 0.564]). The prealbumin < 170 mg/L before therapy was an independent risk factor for OS (HR = 2.234; 95%CI 1.051-4.751; P = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

The RALOX-HAIC combined radiotherapy, TKI, and ICI may provide similar survival advantages with fewer treatment-related abdominal pain and fever compared to FOLFOX-HAIC for HCC patients with PVTT. The prealbumin < 170 mg/L before therapy is an independent risk factor for OS.

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant systemic therapy in resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a Systematic Review and meta-analysis

Background

Neoadjuvant systemic therapy has been shown to benefit patients with solid tumors such as breast cancer and colorectal cancer, but its application in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still in the exploratory stage, with no established effective regimen. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant systemic therapy in patients with resectable HCC.

Methods

The clinical trials of resectable HCC neoadjuvant systemic therapy in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched. A meta-analysis was performed using STATA/MP18.0 software, and the effect size was calculated using either a fixed effects model or a random effects model, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Subgroup analysis was performed according to the neoadjuvant systemic therapy regimen.

Results

This meta-analysis included 328 patients from 15 studies. In patients with resectable HCC, the pooled pathologic complete response (pCR) rate was 15% (95%CI: 10%-21%), the major pathologic response (MPR) rate was 28% (95%CI: 21%-35%), the incidence of grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) was 11% (95% CI: 4%-20%), the objective response rate (ORR) was 27% (95% CI: 20%-35%), the surgical resection rate was 84% (95%CI: 75%-92%), and the delay rate was 0.00% (95% CI: 0%-4%). The results of subgroup analysis showed that the efficacy of targeted therapy combined with immunotherapy is superior to dual ICI (immune checkpoint inhibitor) combination therapy and ICI monotherapy, while the safety of the ICI monotherapy was the highest, superior to the dual ICIs and the targeted therapy combined with immunotherapy.

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant systemic therapy shows preliminarily beneficial outcomes in resectable HCC treatment. However, future large-scale and multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm this conclusion.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024562257.

Multiomics analysis of immune correlatives in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with tremelimumab plus durvalumab

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. The combination of tremelimumab and durvalumab is now a standard treatment option for advanced HCC.

OBJECTIVE

To study immune responses in HCC patients treated with tremelimumab and durvalumab.

DESIGN

We treated 28 HCC patients with durvalumab, tremelimumab and locoregional therapies. We performed a high-dimensional multiomics analysis including whole exome sequencing, single-cell RNA seq, CO-Detection by indEXing, flow cytometry and multiplex cytokine/chemokine analysis of patients' blood and tumour samples and integrated this data to elucidate immune correlatives and response mechanisms. Mice with syngeneic HCC were treated with anti-PD-L1 plus anti-CTLA4 for hepatic lymphocytes, tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and peripheral blood mononuclear cell analysis.

RESULTS

The median overall survival was 19.2 months. Tumour tissue analysis revealed enhanced interferon responses, with stronger effects in responders. Gene set variation analysis indicated enhanced antigen presentation in responders. Spatial analysis revealed that non-responder tumours had higher numbers of Tregs located in neighbourhoods enriched with immune cells and expressed higher levels of ICOS and PD-1. Conversely, non-responder PD1+CD8+T in these Treg-enriched neighbourhoods expressed lower ICOS. Cell-communication analysis demonstrated that Treg-CD8+T interaction was enhanced in non-responder tissue. Peripheral blood analysis showed increased classical monocytes in responders and Tregs in non-responders. Treg-CD8+T interaction was confirmed in preclinical models. Finally, single-patient computational analysis from the all-across analysis was performed on 860 features, which led to the identification of multiomics feature sets including Treg features.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides a blueprint for in-depth analysis of immune correlates in immunotherapy studies and demonstrates the importance of Treg distribution in HCC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

NCT02821754 and the EudraCT identifier: 2019-002767-98.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma following immunotherapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To explore the emerging use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients eligible for liver transplantation (LT), particularly as bridging and downstaging therapies. This review also addresses the clinical challenges of integrating ICIs into transplant protocols, including graft rejection, immune-related toxicities, and gaps in evidence.

RECENT FINDINGS

ICIs have shown potential as bridging and downstaging therapies before LT, with multicentric studies reporting 75.6% successful downstaging, 85% 3-year post-LT survival, and 7.2% rejection-related mortality. A washout interval >94 days and older age have been identified as protective factors against allograft rejection. Combining locoregional therapies with ICIs has proven effective in the EMERALD-1 and LEAP-012 trials, which demonstrated improved progression-free survival (15.0 and 14.6 months, respectively) with ICI-TACE combinations. Similarly, the STAR-FIT phase II trial, combining TACE, SBRT, and avelumab, showed a 42% complete response rate and 12% conversion to curative therapy. Toxicity and rejection risk remain major challenges.

SUMMARY

ICIs represent a promising tool for expanding transplant eligibility in HCC, but their integration into LT pathways remains complex. Safety concerns, particularly regarding timing and immune modulation, require careful evaluation. Prospective studies and biomarker development are needed to guide clinical decision-making. Novel therapies such as CAR-T cells may offer more targeted approaches in the future.

Pathogenesis and Systemic Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Status and Prospects

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains one of the major threats to human health worldwide. The emergence of systemic therapeutic options has greatly improved the prognosis of patients with HCC, particularly those with advanced stages of the disease. In this review, we discussed the pathogenesis of HCC, genetic alterations associated with the development of HCC, and alterations in the tumor immune microenvironment. Then, important indicators and emerging technologies related to the diagnosis of HCC are summarized. Also, we reviewed the major advances in treatments for HCC, offering insights into future prospects for next-generation managements.

Molecular Testing and Targeted Therapies in Hepatobiliary Cancers: A Review

Importance

Hepatobiliary cancers are heterogeneous and molecularly complex. Recent advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) have enhanced the understanding of their molecular landscape and enabled deployment of biomarker-based gene- and immune-targeted therapies. This review examines the role of molecular testing and targeted therapies in these malignant neoplasms.

Observations

Patients with hepatobiliary cancers have poor outcomes. Precision oncology studies have shown that while many common molecular alterations are not currently targetable in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a large number of actionable alterations characterize biliary tract cancers (BTCs), with several therapies now approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. Immunotherapy is increasingly adopted in clinical practice, either as monotherapy or combined with cytotoxic chemotherapy, for both HCC and BTCs. Moreover, multiple solid cancer tumor-agnostic therapies are approved (larotrectinib, entrectinib, and repotrectinib for NTRK fusions; selpercatinib for RET fusions; dabrafenib and trametinib combination for BRAF V600E mutations; dostarlimab or pembrolizumab for tumors with high microsatellite instability and pembrolizumab for tumor mutation burden ≥10 mutations/megabase), highlighting the need for NGS as well as ERBB2 (formerly HER2) immunohistochemistry (IHC) (with the recent approval of solid tissue-agnostic deruxtecan trastuzumab for ERBB2-positive [IHC 3+] cancer) across cancers. N-of-1 clinical trials using customized drug combinations matched to the tumor's molecular profile have yielded encouraging results and provide a promising framework for future clinical trial design.

Conclusions and Relevance

Molecular testing and gene- and immune-targeted therapies are transforming hepatobiliary cancer treatment. Tumor-agnostic and N-of-1 clinical trials have challenged traditional clinical trial paradigms and provide the foundation for truly personalized oncology for patients with these aggressive cancers. Further work is needed to determine how to leverage these novel approaches into the management of operable disease.

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with lenvatinib and immune checkpoint inhibitor versus lenvatinib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter study with propensity score and coarsened exact matching

PURPOSE

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with lenvatinib (Len) and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) still needs further confirmation. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of HAIC combined with Len and ICI (HAIC + Len + ICI) versus Len alone in advanced HCC.

METHODS

A total of 290 patients in Len group and 349 patients in HAIC + Len + ICI group were analysed. Propensity score matching (PSM), inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW), and coarsened exact matching (CEM) analyses were used to balance the bias between two groups. Mediation analysis of treatment type in survival was performed for analysis.

RESULTS

The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.9 ± 0.2 months in Len group and 9.2 ± 0.5 months in HAIC + Len + ICI group. The HAIC + Len + ICI group demonstrated significantly better PFS than the Len group across the entire cohort (hazard ratio [HR], 0.50; 95% CI 0.43-0.60; P < 0.001). This advantage in PFS was sustained in the PSM, IPTW, and CEM cohorts. HAIC + Len + ICI group also showed better overall survival (OS) than the Len group (HR, 0.38; 95% CI 0.31-0.46; P < 0.001). The OS was also superior in the PSM, IPTW, and CEM cohorts. The objective response rate (ORR) in HAIC + Len + ICI group was twice as high as that in Len group. Further mediation analysis showed tumor response at 3 and 6 months had different mediation effect on survival.

CONCLUSIONS

HAIC combined with Len and ICI showed improved better OS and PFS than Len alone. This triple therapy could be considered as a first-line treatment for advanced HCC.

Overcoming chimeric antigen receptor-T (CAR-T) resistance with checkpoint inhibitors: Existing methods, challenges, clinical success, and future prospects : A comprehensive review

Immune checkpoint blockade is, as of today, the most successful form of cancer immunotherapy, with more than 43 % of cancer patients in the US eligible to receive it; however, only up to 12.5 % of patients respond to it. Similarly, adoptive cell therapy using bioengineered chimeric antigen receptorT (CAR-T) cells and T-cell receptor (TCR) cells has provided excellent responses against liquid tumours, but both forms of immunotherapy have encountered challenges within a tumour microenvironment that is both lacking in tumour-specific T-cells and is strongly immunosuppressive toward externally administered CAR-T and TCR cells. This review focuses on understanding approved checkpoint blockade and adoptive cell therapy at both biological and clinical levels before delving into how and why their combination holds significant promise in overcoming their individual shortcomings. The advent of next-generation checkpoint inhibitors has further strengthened the immune checkpoint field, and a special section explores how these inhibitors can address existing hurdles in combining checkpoint blockade with adoptive cell therapy and homing in on our cancer target for long-term immunity.

A deep learning-based clinical-radiomics model predicting the treatment response of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)-based conversion therapy in potentially convertible hepatocelluar carcinoma patients: a tumor marker prognostic study

BACKGROUND

The majority of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) miss the opportunity of radical resection, making immune check-point inhibitors (ICIs)-based conversion therapy a primary option. However, challenges persist in predicting response and identifying the optimal patient subset. The objective is to develop a CT-based clinical-radiomics model to predict durable clinical benefit (DCB) of ICIs-based treatment in potentially convertible HCC patients.

METHODS

The radiomics features were extracted by pyradiomics in training set, and machine learning models was generated based on the selected radiomics features. Deep learning models were created using two different protocols. Integrated models were constructed by incorporating radiomics scores, deep learning scores, and clinical variables selected through multivariate analysis. Furthermore, we analyzed the relationship between integrated model scores and clinical outcomes related to conversion therapy in the entire cohort. Finally, radiogenomic analysis was conducted on bulk RNA and DNA sequencing data.

RESULTS

The top-performing integrated model demonstrated excellent predictive accuracy with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94-0.99) in the training set and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.77-0.99) in the test set, effectively stratifying survival risk across the entire cohort and revealing significant disparity in overall survival (OS), as evidenced by Kaplan-Meier survival curves ( P < 0.0001). Moreover, integrated model scores exhibited associations with sequential resection among patients who achieved DCB and pathological complete response (pCR) among those who underwent sequential resection procedures. Notably, higher radiomics model was correlated with MHC I expression, angiogenesis-related processes, CD8 T cell-related gene sets, as well as a higher frequency of TP53 mutations along with increased levels of mutation burden and neoantigen.

CONCLUSION

The deep learning-based clinical-radiomics model exhibited satisfactory predictive capability in forecasting the DCB derived from ICIs-based conversion therapy in potentially convertible HCC, and was associated with a diverse range of immune-related mechanisms.

Impact of time-of-day atezolizumab plus bevacizumab combination therapy infusion for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective multicenter study

AIM

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of infusion timing of time-of-day on clinical outcomes in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab combination therapy.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted using data from 751 unresectable HCC patients treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab between September 2020 and April 2024. Patients were categorized into morning (AM; n = 351) and afternoon (PM; n = 400) groups based on infusion timing of time-of-day. Outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, objective response rate, and disease control rate, were assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

The PFS was significantly longer in the AM group (8.6 months, 95% CI 7.6-10.5) compared with the PM group (6.0 months, 95% CI 5.4-7.0; p = 0.006). In contrast, overall survival was similar between the groups (AM: 24.7 months vs. PM: 21.4 months; p = 0.99). Cox regression analysis revealed that morning infusion was an independent favorable predictor of PFS (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.04-1.45). Additionally, the AM group demonstrated superior objective response rate and disease control rate compared with the PM group, suggesting better tumor control.

CONCLUSION

Morning infusion of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab is associated with improved PFS and response rates in unresectable HCC patients, highlighting the potential for optimizing treatment outcomes through circadian timing.

Impact of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio on survival outcomes among cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma under atezolizumab-bevacizumab combination therapy

Background

The efficacy of atezolizumab-bevacizumab in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has not been studied separately in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of atezolizumab-bevacizumab in these patients, in relation to baseline values of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR).

Methods

We divided 57 atezolizumab-bevacizumab-treated HCC patients according to baseline NLR (>3: NLR-H, ≤3: NLR-L) and studied overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in 4 groups: group A, non-cirrhotic/NLR-L; group B, non-cirrhotic/NLR-H; group C, cirrhotic/NLR-L; and group D, cirrhotic/NLR-H.

Results

The 4 groups were comparable except for etiology, ALBI grade, macrovascular invasion, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage and prior therapy. Median OS and PFS were 30, 10, 12 and 5 months, and 14, 4, 8 and 2 months, for groups A, B, C, D, respectively (P<0.001). By Cox regression, cirrhotic/NLR-H patients showed significantly worse OS and PFS. Cirrhotic/NLR-L patients had better OS (12 vs. 5 months, P=0.002) and PFS (8 vs. 2 months, P=0.028) compared to cirrhotic/NLR-H. NLR was significantly correlated with OS (P=0.015). Non-cirrhotic/NLR-L patients had better OS (30 vs. 10 months, P=0.006) and PFS (15 vs. 4 months, P=0.01) compared to non-cirrhotic/NLR-H patients. Prior therapy was significantly correlated with better OS (30 vs. 8 months, P<0.001) and PFS (24 vs. 4 months, P<0.001) in non-cirrhotic patients.

Conclusions

Cirrhotic/NLR-H HCC patients presented the worst survival. NLR is an independent risk factor for worse survival in cirrhotic patients. Prior therapy is the only factor significantly correlated with OS and PFS in non-cirrhotic patients.

S2303: phase II/III trial of paclitaxel + ramucirumab ± nivolumab in gastric and esophageal adenocarcinoma (PARAMUNE)

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT06203600.

Care fragmentation in hepatocellular carcinoma: Opportunities to fix a broken sector

BACKGROUND

Care fragmentation refers to receipt of health care services through multiple institutions. Although care fragmentation has been linked to inferior oncologic outcomes, it also captures "upgrades" to specialized centers. Herein, we investigate the association between care fragmentation and hepatocellular carcinoma survival in California.

STUDY DESIGN

Hepatocellular carcinoma cases occurring between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2017, were retrospectively identified through a maintained, statewide database. Care fragmentation was measured (1) as a binary classification of fragmented or nonfragmented care, (2) by the number of facilities visited, and (3) in terms of care directionality through which care fragmentation occurred between Network of Comprehensive Cancer/National Cancer Institute-designated and -nondesignated centers, within 2 years of diagnosis. Multivariable time-varying covariate Cox regression analyses were used to model the impact of care fragmentation on overall survival.

RESULTS

Of 10,825 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, 5,778 patients (53.4%) received fragmented care. Compared with nonfragmented care, fragmented care was associated with worse overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.72-1.91, P < .001) by our analyses. The quantity of centers visited also corresponded to a greater mortality (2 facilities: hazard ratio, 1.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.56-1.75, P < .001; 3 facilities: hazard ratio, 2.21; 95% confidence interval, 2.02-2.41, P < .001; 4+ facilities: hazard ratio, 2.66; 95% confidence interval, 2.35-3.02, P < .001). Compared with nonfragmented-designated, all other care fragmentation directionality patterns, including fragmented-designated and nondesignated care, decreased overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.74; 95% confidence interval, 1.55-1.95, P < .001). Care fragmentation in surgical patients showed a similar trend for the fragmented-designated and nondesignated pattern (hazard ratio, 1.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-2.14, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

In hepatocellular carcinoma, fragmented care is associated with worse survival. Although fragmented-designated and nondesignated care was expected to mitigate such effect, this was not observed. Additional mechanisms driving such findings warrant further investigation.

Hepatic Recompensation Before Systemic Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Yields Comparable Survival to Compensated Cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The survival outcomes associated with hepatic recompensation in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with first-line systemic therapies remain unclear. We compared survival from the initiation of first-line systemic treatments for advanced HCC among patients with compensated, decompensated, and recompensated cirrhosis.

METHODS

A Latin American multicenter, prospective cohort study was conducted from 2018 to 2024, involving patients with HCC and Child-Pugh class A or B who received systemic therapy. At the time of first-line therapy, patients with cirrhosis were categorised as compensated (never decompensated), decompensated, or recompensated. Cox proportional hazards models were estimated.

RESULTS

Among 306 patients receiving first-line systemic therapy (sorafenib: 60.5%, atezolizumab + bevacizumab: 29.7%, lenvatinib: 9.1%), 240 had cirrhosis, with 30.4% having a history of hepatic decompensation. Of these, 57.5% (95% CI 45.4%-69.0%) achieved hepatic recompensation over a median period of 12 months. At the time of first-line therapy, 69.6% were compensated, 17.5% recompensated, and 12.9% decompensated. Metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) was the most common underlying aetiology in the recompensated group. Median survival was significantly shorter in the decompensated group (8.6 months) compared to the compensated group (17.2 months) [aHR 1.91 (95% CI 1.04-3.5); p = 0.03], without a significant difference between the recompensated and compensated groups [aHR 1.28 (95% CI 0.79-2.1); p = 0.31]. Tumour progression was the primary reason for treatment discontinuation, and similar access to second-line therapies was observed between the compensated and recompensated groups.

CONCLUSION

Patients with cirrhosis and advanced HCC who achieved hepatic recompensation might benefit from systemic therapies after a cautious observation period.

Serum FGF21 as a predictor of response to atezolizumab and bevacizumab in HCC

Background & Aims

Fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) is a crucial regulator of cell metabolism. Tumour-secreted FGF21 has shown immune-checkpoint factor functions, and high FGF21 levels are associated with a poor prognosis for patients. However, its prognostic value and impact on treatment response in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remain unclear. Thus, this study investigated the potential of high FGF21 levels as a prognostic marker and whether traditional ICI-based therapy can improve the prognosis of patients with high FGF21 levels.

Methods

In this retrospective multicentre study, patients with unresectable HCC who received atezolizumab/bevacizumab in the NORTE study group (n = 117) were classified into high (≥915 pg/ml; n = 29) and non-high (n = 88) FGF21 groups. For validation, we investigated patients treated with atezolizumab/bevacizumab in an independent cohort (n = 285). Overall survival, progression-free survival, and treatment response were compared between patients with and without high baseline FGF21 levels.

Results

The median overall survival (p <0.001) and progression-free survival (p = 0.045) were significantly shorter in the high FGF21 group than in the non-high FGF21 group. Independent cohort analysis validated these results. In the overall cohort, the median progression-free survival (5.75 vs. 8.84 months; p = 0.027) and median overall survival (14.13 vs. 22.08 months; p <0.001) were significantly shorter in the high FGF21 group than in the non-high FGF21 group. The durable response (≥6 months) + complete response rate was significantly decreased in the high FGF21 group (p = 0.045). No patient with a high FGF21 level achieved a complete response, whereas this was achieved in 4.1% (13/319) of patients with non-high FGF21 levels. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified high baseline serum FGF21 as an independent poor prognostic factor for overall survival (hazard ratio 2.20, p <0.001).

Conclusions

Serum FGF21 may be a robust, non-invasive prognostic and treatment response marker for unresectable HCC treated with atezolizumab/bevacizumab.

Impact and implications

FGF21 has been reported to act as a secreted immune-checkpoint factor, and elevated levels of FGF21 are associated with a poor prognosis in patients with HCC. It is not fully understood whether ICIs can overcome the impact of high FGF21 levels on the shortened prognosis of patients with HCC. In this multicentre retrospective study, patients with HCC and high baseline levels of serum FGF21 who received atezolizumab/bevacizumab treatment exhibited a significantly shorter overall survival and shorter progression-free survival. These findings suggest serum FGF21 as a robust prognostic marker and an indicator of treatment response in unresectable HCC treated with ICI-based therapy. These findings could be crucial for the implementation of personalised treatment strategies for unresectable HCC. However, identifying optimal therapeutic options for patients with unresectable HCC and high serum FGF21 levels remains an urgent and critical clinical issue.

Up-front resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: Assessing futility in the preoperative setting

OBJECTIVE

We sought to develop a predictive model to preoperatively identify patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at risk of undergoing futile upfront liver resection (LR).

METHODS

Patients undergoing curative-intent LR for HCC were identified from a large multi-institutional database. Futile LR was defined by death or disease recurrence within six months postoperatively. Backward logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with futility. Additionally, binary criteria were established for surgical candidacy, aiming to keep the likelihood of futility below 20 %.

RESULTS

Among 1633 patients with HCC, 264 (16.2 %) underwent futile upfront LR. Tumor burden score (TBS) (coefficient: 0.083, 95%CI: 0.067-0.099), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) (coefficient: 0.254, 95%CI: 0.195-0.310), and albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade 2/3 (coefficient: 0.566, 95%CI: 0.420-0.718) were independently associated with an increased risk of futile LR. The model demonstrated strong discrimination and calibration in both derivation and validation cohorts. Low, intermediate, and high-risk groups were determined based on the risk model, each with an escalating likelihood of futility, worse histological features, and worse survival outcomes. Six distinct conditions based on AFP-adjusted-to-TBS criteria were established, all with a futility likelihood of less than 20 %. Patients fulfilling these criteria had significantly better long-term recurrence-free and overall survival. The futility risk model was made available online for wide clinical applicability: (https://altaf-pawlik-hcc-futilityofsurgery-calculator.streamlit.app/).

CONCLUSION

A preoperative risk model and AFP-adjusted-to-TBS criteria were developed and validated to predict the likelihood of futile LR among patients with HCC. This pragmatic clinical tool may assist clinicians in preoperative decision-making, helping them avoid futile surgery unlikely to offer long-term benefits.

Evaluating two rechallenge strategies of immune checkpoint inhibitors: Durvalumab plus tremelimumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

AIM

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of durvalumab plus tremelimumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who have previously received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atez/Bev). Additionally, it seeks to assess the feasibility of administering immunotherapy after the occurrence of immune-mediated adverse events (imAEs) in real-world clinical practice.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed data from patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with durvalumab plus tremelimumab at four Japanese institutions. Clinical outcomes, adverse events, tumor dynamics, and serum cytokine and chemokine levels were evaluated, with a focus on efficacy following prior Atez/Bev treatment.

RESULTS

Durvalumab plus tremelimumab was administered to 68 patients. The objective response rate was 10.3%, and the disease control rate was 58.8%. Median progression-free survival was 3.1 months (95% confidence interval 2.0-4.9). imAEs occurred in 50.0% of patients, with colitis being the most common (22.1%). Durvalumab was safely readministered to 14 patients after imAE resolution, although five experienced recurrence. Among 33 patients (48.5%) previously treated with Atez/Bev, improved responses were noted, including two partial responses. Tumor growth dynamics decreased in 60.0% of patients receiving sequential therapy. Common adverse events included elevated liver enzymes (aspartate aminotransferase 50.0%, alanine aminotransferase 48.5%), pruritus (45.6%), and rash (44.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Durvalumab plus tremelimumab therapy is feasible with proper imAE management and patient selection. Sequential treatment following Atez/Bev offers clinical benefit in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, although some may experience rapid progression. Further biomarker research is needed to optimize immunotherapy strategies.

Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Adding Liver-Directed Radiation Therapy to Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Radiation therapy (RT) may potentiate an antitumor immune response when combined with immunotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) but carries the potential risk of bowel toxicity and impaired liver function. We describe our single-center experience of adding liver-directed RT to atezolizumab and bevacizumab (A/B) in patients with advanced HCC.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with HCC naive to systemic therapy who received A/B with or without liver-directed RT from January 1, 2020 until May 1, 2023. We assessed safety outcomes, the real-world response rate (rwRR), overall survival (OS), and time-to-progression (TTP) from initiation of A/B. Time-to-event outcomes were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier methodology. Given anticipated baseline imbalances between cohorts, no formal comparisons were performed.

RESULTS

We identified 49 patients (n=34 control, n=15 RT) who met the inclusion criteria. The cohorts differed in the presence of ascites, baseline liver dysfunction, infection with hepatitis B, and alcoholic liver disease. Two patients in the control group (5.8%) and 1 patient in the RT group (6.7%) experienced clinically significant bleeding. One patient (6.7%) developed possible RT-induced liver disease. The rwRR in the RT group was 73.3% (11/15) compared with 17.6% (6/34) in the control group. The median OS in the RT group was 14.4 months, and 10.8 months in the control group. Median TTP was 6.4 months with RT compared with 5.8 months in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of liver RT to A/B resulted in limited additional toxicity with increased response rates, although significant differences in baseline characteristics limit a full interpretation of this data. Ongoing trials and trials under development will provide informative data regarding the addition of RT to A/B, particularly to assess the impact on OS and TTP.

Tremelimumab plus durvalumab versus sorafenib in first-line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis from the US payer perspective

OBJECTIVE

In a recently published 4-year overall survival (OS) update from the phase III clinical trial named HIMALAYA (NCT03298451), single tremelimumab plus regular interval durvalumab (a regimen termed STRIDE) demonstrated significantly improved OS compared with sorafenib in the first-line setting of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). Although dual immunotherapy represents a novel treatment option for uHCC, the economic implications of these high-priced drugs require further exploration. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of STRIDE in uHCC to inform first-line treatment decisions and help allocate medical resources most effectively.

DESIGN

Using a partitioned survival model, we conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing STRIDE to sorafenib in the first-line treatment of uHCC. Clinical information was gathered from the phase III HIMALAYA trial. Costs and health state utilities data were derived from previous literature. Uncertainty of the model was assessed through one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Total costs, life years, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), incremental QALYs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).

SETTING

US payer perspective.

PARTICIPANTS

393 participants in the STRIDE group and 389 participants in the sorafenib group who were diagnosed with uHCC and had no previous systemic treatment.

INTERVENTIONS

Single-dose tremelimumab plus monthly durvalumab (STRIDE) versus sorafenib.

RESULTS

Treatment with STRIDE provided an additional 0.51 QALYs at an incremental total cost of United States dollar ($)9812. The ICER of STRIDE was $19 239 per QALY compared with sorafenib, which falls below the willingness-to-pay threshold of $150 000 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses indicated that our results were robust to the variation ranges of key inputs.

CONCLUSION

In this economic evaluation comparing two first-line systemic therapies for uHCC patients, STRIDE was cost-effective compared with sorafenib from a US payer perspective. Our study is the first to demonstrate that immunotherapy can provide both survival benefits and economic viability in uHCC.

Systemic treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and advanced liver dysfunction

Systemic therapy represents the standard of care treatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Given the increased risk of death from cirrhosis-related complications in patients with advanced liver dysfunction, pivotal phase III trials traditionally limited inclusion to patients with Child-Pugh class A, where death is more likely to be attributed to HCC progression. Therefore, Western guidelines recommend the use of systemic therapies primarily in patients with preserved liver function. However, patients with HCC and Child-Pugh class B are commonly encountered in clinical practice, but due to limited prospective evidence, there is no clear guidance on their optimal management.In this recent advances article, we discuss how the clinical course of cirrhosis can affect eligibility to treatment in the modern era of systemic therapy for HCC, elaborate on strategies to improve liver function in HCC patients by targeting cirrhosis-related and tumour-related factors and summarise the current literature on systemic therapy in HCC patients with Child-Pugh class B. Based on this information, we finally propose a clinical algorithm on how to systematically approach patients with HCC and advanced liver dysfunction in clinical practice.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma and the Role of Liver Transplantation: An Update and Review

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Multiple treatment modalities are available for the management of HCC, depending on its stage as determined by the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system. Because liver transplantation (LT) theoretically removes the cancer and replaces the organ at risk for future malignancy, LT is often considered the most definitive and one of the most efficacious treatment options for HCC. Nevertheless, the success and efficacy of liver transplantation depend on various tumor characteristics. As a result, multiple criteria have been developed to assess the appropriateness of a case of HCC for LT, with the pioneering Milan Criteria established in 1996. Over the past 20 to 30 years, these criteria have been critically evaluated, expanded, and often liberalized to make LT for patients with HCC a more universally applicable option. Furthermore, the development of other treatment modalities has enabled downstaging and bridging strategies for HCC prior to LT. In this narrative and comprehensive review, we provided an update on recent trends in the epidemiology of HCC, selection criteria for LT, implementation of LT across different regions, treatment modalities available as bridges, downstaging strategies, alternatives to LT, and, finally, post-LT surveillance.

USP24 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression by deubiquitinating and stabilizing YAP1

Yes-associated protein 1 (YAP1) plays a pivotal role in promoting the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Emerging evidence shows that inducing YAP1 degradation represents a promising strategy. Here, we identified USP24 as a bona fide deubiquitinating enzyme for YAP1. USP24 directly interacts with and deubiquitinates YAP1, thereby stabilizing YAP1 protein levels. Clinically, USP24 was significantly upregulated in HCC tissues and correlated with poor patient prognosis. Depletion of USP24 significantly suppressed the proliferation of HCC cells in vitro, which could be rescued by restoration of YAP1. Consistent with these findings, USP24 knockdown inhibited tumor growth in a xenograft mouse model. Overall, our study reveals that the USP24/YAP1 axis plays a critical role in the malignant progression of HCC, thus providing rationale for potential therapeutic interventions for YAP1-driven HCC.

Systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma, from the early to the advanced stage: a Japanese perspective

Systemic therapy has now become mainstream for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and is also changing from molecular-targeted therapy, such as with sorafenib and lenvatinib, to immunotherapy, such as with the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and durvalumab plus tremelimumab combination regimens. Molecular-targeted therapy is selected as the first-line treatment when immunotherapy is not indicated or as second- or later-line treatment when immunotherapy is ineffective. It is necessary to select the appropriate treatment taking into consideration the expected treatment efficacy and adverse events, as well as the hepatic reserve. Currently, newer agents and combination regimens as first-line/second-line treatment for advanced-stage HCC, combined therapy with transarterial chemoembolization for intermediate-stage HCC, and perioperative adjuvant therapy for curative treatment for early-stage HCC are being developed. Therefore, systemic therapy is now indicated for any stage of the disease. While local therapies were previously used as the main treatment strategy for HCC, systemic therapy in combination with local therapies is being actively attempted at present. Systemic therapy is currently the main focus of development of novel treatments for HCC.

Real-world insights into cabozantinib efficacy in hepatocellular carcinoma: Real-world cabozantinib efficacy in HCC

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Cabozantinib, a multi-kinase inhibitor targeting AXL and MET, is approved for second-line treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the combination of cabozantinib with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remains controversial after the COSMIC-312 study. The role of AXL and MET expression in predicting cabozantinib response is unclear. This study aims to evaluate cabozantinib's efficacy with ICIs and the predictive value of AXL and MET expression.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2019 and December 2023, 50 advanced HCC patients treated with cabozantinib were retrospectively enrolled.

RESULTS

Overall, 74% of patients received prior immunotherapy, 72% had been treated with more than two different multiple kinase inhibitors (MKIs), and 58% received cabozantinib as a fifth-line or later therapy. Cabozantinib was used alone (60%), with ICIs (12%), or with chemotherapy (28%). A majority (70%) received a dosage exceeding 40 mg/day. The ORR to cabozantinib was 0%, while the DCR was 42.2%. median PFS was 3.3 months, and OS was 6.1 months. There was no significant difference in PFS or OS between patients receiving five or more lines of treatment and those receiving fewer. Cabozantinib plus ICIs showed longer PFS (6.7 vs. 3.2 months, p = 0.04) and a trend toward improved OS compared to cabozantinib alone. AXL expression may predict better outcomes. Common adverse effects included palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (24.2%) and hypertension.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the potential of cabozantinib combined with immunotherapy in heavily pretreated HCC, with AXL expression as a possible predictive biomarker.

Post-treatment adverse events ranking in targeted immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: A network meta-analysis based on risk probability assessment

BACKGROUND

Despite the rapid evolution of targeted and immunotherapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a systematic comparison of their adverse event profiles remains limited. This review addresses this critical gap by synthesizing data from 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to prioritize treatment regimens on the basis of safety, thereby guiding clinical decision-making in an era of expanding therapeutic options.

METHODS

Clinical studies focusing on targeted and immunotherapies in HCC patients were chosen from databases such as PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library, which spans from 2008 to 2023. Data processing and evaluation followed PRISMA guidelines, with a random-effects model employed to merge the data. Network models were then developed, with adverse events serving as the primary endpoint for analysis.

RESULTS

A comprehensive review of the relevant literature was conducted, identifying 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) encompassing 13 treatment protocols for HCC. This study included a total of 10,760 patients. Adverse events within the same category were initially consolidated, followed by the sequential construction of a network model to assess the risk probabilities associated with different targeted immunotherapy regimens for various adverse events and establish priority rankings.

CONCLUSIONS

Cabozantinib, camrelizumab, and their combination therapy for HCC are associated with a higher incidence of common adverse reactions, whereas durvalumab, lenvatinib, and their combination therapy are less likely to cause common adverse effects.