1
|
Jin K, Luo J, Yu X, Guo X. Hypofractionated radiotherapy with simultaneous tumor bed boost (Hi-RISE) in breast cancer patients receiving upfront breast-conserving surgery: study protocol for a phase III randomized controlled trial. Radiat Oncol 2024; 19:62. [PMID: 38802888 PMCID: PMC11131299 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02449-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effectiveness and safety of moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCS) has been demonstrated in several pivotal randomized trials. However, the feasibility of applying simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to the tumor bed and regional node irradiation (RNI) using modern radiotherapy techniques with HFRT needs further evaluation. METHODS This prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled, non-inferiority phase III trial aims to determine the non-inferiority of HFRT combined with SIB (HFRTsib) compared with conventional fractionated radiotherapy with sequential boost (CFRTseq) in terms of five-year locoregional control rate in breast cancer patients undergoing upfront BCS. A total of 2904 participants will be recruited and randomized in a 1:1 ratio into the HFRTsib and CFRTseq groups. All patients will receive whole breast irradiation, and those with positive axillary nodes will receive additional RNI, including internal mammary irradiation. The prescribed dose for the HFRTsib group will be 40 Gy in 15 fractions, combined with a SIB of 48 Gy in 15 fractions to the tumor bed. The CFRTseq group will receive 50 Gy in 25 fractions, with a sequential boost of 10 Gy in 5 fractions to the tumor bed. DISCUSSION This trial intends to assess the effectiveness and safety of SIB combined with HFRT in early breast cancer patients following BCS. The primary endpoint is locoregional control, and the results of this trial are expected to offer crucial evidence for utilizing HFRT in breast cancer patients after BCS. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial was registered at ClincalTrials.gov (NCT04025164) on July 18, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kairui Jin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, 270 DongAn Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Jurui Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Xiaoli Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, 270 DongAn Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| | - Xiaomao Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, 270 DongAn Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Boland MR. Modern management of the axilla. J Surg Oncol 2024. [PMID: 38643485 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024]
Abstract
Surgical management of the axilla has evolved considerably in recent years, with a strong focus on de-escalation to minimise morbidity whilst maintaining oncological outcomes. Current trials will focus on the omission of Sentinel node biopsy in select groups of patients, while axillary lymph node dissection will be reserved for those with more aggressive disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R Boland
- Department of Breast Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zangouri V, Roshanshad A, Ranjbar A, Izadi M, Rajaeifar S, Goodarzi A, Nasrollahi H. Outcomes and complications of intraoperative radiotherapy versus external beam radiotherapy for early breast cancer. Cancer Rep (Hoboken) 2024; 7:e1950. [PMID: 38205671 PMCID: PMC10849931 DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Revised: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) is an alternative for external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for early stage breast cancer (BC). Herein, we compared outcomes, postoperative and post-radiation complications of IORT and EBRT. METHODS We conducted a cohort study to compare complications of IORT and EBRT in patients. A checklist of the complications of IORT and EBRT, was used to assess and post-radiation complications and outcomes. RESULTS Overall, 264 women (121 in IORT and 143 in EBRT group) with a mean (SD) age of 55 ± 8.6 years analyzed in this study. The IORT group (quadrantectomy + SLNB + IORT) had more severe post-operative pain compared to the EBRT group (quadrantectomy + SLNB) (OR = 1.929, 95% CI: 1.116-3.332). Other postoperative complications, including edema, erythema, seroma, hematoma, and wound complications were not significantly different between the IORT and EBRT groups. EBRT was associated with higher rates post-radiation complications, including erythema (95.8% vs. 21.5%), skin dryness (30.8% vs. 12.4%), pruritus (26.6% vs. 17.4%), hyperpigmentation (48.3% vs. 9.9%), and telangiectasia (1.4% vs. 0.8%). Multivariate analysis showed that erythema, skin dryness and pruritus, and hyperpigmentation were more severe in the EBRT group, while breast induration was higher in the IORT group (OR = 4.109, 95% CI: 2.242-7.531). Excellent, good, and fair cosmetic outcome was seen in 11.2%, 72%, and 16.8% of the patients in the EBRT group and 29.8%, 63.6%, and 6.6% in the IORT group, respectively, suggesting that the cosmetic outcome was significantly better in the IORT group (P < .001). There wasn't statistically significant difference in recurrence-free survival and overall survival rates between two groups of patients who received either IORT or EBRT (P = .953, P = .56). CONCLUSION IORT is considered to have lower post-radiation complications and better cosmetic outcomes in breast cancer patients. Therefore, IORT might be used as the treatment of choice in eligible patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vahid Zangouri
- Surgical Oncology Division, General Surgery DepartmentShiraz University of Medical SciencesShirazIran
- Breast Diseases Research CenterShiraz University of Medical SciencesShirazIran
| | - Amirhossein Roshanshad
- Student Research CommitteeShiraz University of Medical SciencesShirazIran
- Poostchi Ophthalmology Research CenterShiraz University of Medical SciencesShirazIran
| | - Aliyeh Ranjbar
- Breast Diseases Research CenterShiraz University of Medical SciencesShirazIran
- Student Research CommitteeShiraz University of Medical SciencesShirazIran
| | - Mahsa Izadi
- Student Research CommitteeShiraz University of Medical SciencesShirazIran
| | - Sara Rajaeifar
- Student Research CommitteeShiraz University of Medical SciencesShirazIran
| | - Ali Goodarzi
- Student Research CommitteeShiraz University of Medical SciencesShirazIran
| | - Hamid Nasrollahi
- Radiation Oncology, Radio‐Oncology Department, School of MedicineShiraz University of Medical SciencesShirazIran
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dee EC, Taunk NK, Chino FL, Deville C, McClelland S, Muralidhar V, McBride SN, Gillespie EF, Yamoah K, Nguyen PL, Mahal BA, Winkfield KM, Vapiwala N, Santos PMG. Shorter Radiation Regimens and Treatment Noncompletion Among Patients With Breast and Prostate Cancer in the United States: An Analysis of Racial Disparities in Access and Quality. JCO Oncol Pract 2023; 19:e197-e212. [PMID: 36399692 PMCID: PMC9970278 DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Revised: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Compared with conventional external-beam radiation therapy (cEBRT) for patients with breast cancer (BC) and prostate cancer (PC), shorter radiation regimens may be associated with lower treatment noncompletion rates. We assess disparities in receipt of shorter radiation regimens and treatment noncompletion for BC and PC. PATIENTS AND METHODS The 2004-2017 National Cancer Database was queried for adjuvant cEBRT or hypofractionated EBRT (hEBRT) for nonmetastatic BC; and definitive cEBRT, moderate hypofractionation (mEBRT), or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for localized PC. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with treatment noncompletion and receipt of shorter regimens. FINDINGS We identified 170,386 men with PC (median age [interquartile range], 70 [64-75] years; Black, 17.5%; White, 82.5%) and 306,846 women with BC (61 [52-69] years; Black, 12.3%; White, 87.7%). Among patients who received cEBRT for PC, Black men had higher treatment noncompletion rates compared with White (14.1% v 13.0%; odds ratio [95% CI] 1.07 [1.03 to 1.12]; P < .001). In contrast, treatment noncompletion was not disparate with SBRT (Black 1.6% v White 1.3%; 1.20 [0.72 to 2.00], P = .49) or mEBRT (Black 9.0% v White 7.1%; 1.05 [0.72 to 1.54], P = .79). From 2004 to 2017, SBRT (0.07% to 11.8%; 1.32 [1.31 to 1.33]) and mEBRT (0.35% to 9.1%; 1.27 [1.25 to 1.28]) increased (both P < .001); however, Black men were consistently less likely to receive SBRT (7.4% v White, 8.3%; 0.84 [0.79 to 0.89], P < .001). Among women with BC, there were no racial differences in treatment noncompletion; however, hEBRT was associated with lower treatment noncompletion rates (1.0% v cEBRT 2.3%; 0.39 [0.35 to 0.44], P < .001). Although hEBRT for BC increased (0.8% to 35.6%) between 2004 and 2017, Black women were less likely to receive hEBRT (10.4% v 15.3%; 0.78 [0.75 to 0.81], P < .001). INTERPRETATION Black patients were consistently less likely to receive hypofractionated radiation for PC or BC, despite evidence suggesting that shorter regimens may lower rates of treatment noncompletion with similar oncologic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Neil K. Taunk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Fumiko L. Chino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Affordability Working Group, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Curtiland Deville
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Shearwood McClelland
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Neurological Surgery, University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH
| | - Vinayak Muralidhar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Sean N. McBride
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Erin F. Gillespie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Kosj Yamoah
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Paul L. Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Brandon A. Mahal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Karen M. Winkfield
- Meharry-Vanderbilt Alliance, Nashville, TN
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
- Department of Medicine, Meharry Medical College; Nashville, TN
| | - Neha Vapiwala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Whole Breast Irradiation Versus Intraoperative Electron Radiation Therapy for Breast Conserving Therapy: A Large Mature Single Institution Matched-Pair Evaluation of True Local Relapse, Progression Free Survival, and Overall Survival. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023:S0360-3016(23)00098-6. [PMID: 36736632 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.01.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Revised: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/21/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Comparative outcome data after intraoperative radiation therapy and whole breast irradiation (WBI) for breast cancer at >10 years median follow-up are rare. We present a mature, single-institution, matched-pair comparison reporting survival and relapse rates in patients treated with either modality. METHODS AND MATERIALS Complete data sets for 258 intraoperative electron radiation therapy (IOERT) patients treated between 2000 and 2010 were matched with 258 patients postoperatively treated with WBI by age/histology/tumor size, grading/lymph-node-status/hormone receptors/type of adjuvant therapy/surgical margins, and treatment date. Relapse at surgical intervention site was classified as true local recurrence (LR). All recurrences in the treated breast (any quadrant) were classified as ipsilateral recurrence (IR). RESULTS Median follow-up was 157 months (12-251) for the IOERT group and 154 months (31-246) for the WBI group. Cumulative incidence of IR at 5, 10, and 15 years was 2.4%, 7.9%, and 12.7% for IOERT and 1.2%, 4.1%, and 5.0% for WBI (P = .02). Cumulative incidence of LR at 5, 10, and 15 years was 1.6%, 5.1%, and 8.3% for IOERT and 0.4%, 2.1%, and 2.5% for WBI (P = .02). No differences in overall survival, disease-free survival, second cancer incidence, or cardiac events were recorded in either treatment group. Outcome was better in the accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI)-suitable group than in the APBI-unsuitable group (2009 criteria) (cumulative incidence of IR at 5, 10, and 15 years was 0% vs 7.3%, 6.1% vs 13.3%, and 7.3% vs 19.9% for IOERT and 0% vs 1.8%, 2.0% vs 3.9%, and 3.1% vs 3.9% for WBI) and in the revised APBI-suitable group than in the APBI-cautionary group (2017 criteria) (cumulative incidence of IR at 5, 10, and 15 years was 1.1% vs 6.4%, 6.2% vs 13.3%, and 7.8% vs 27.5% for IOERT and 1.7% vs 0%, 4.1% vs 4.4%, and 5.4% vs 4.4% for WBI). CONCLUSIONS The IR and LR rate were higher after IOERT than after WBI for the American Society for Radiation Oncology suitable patient group, although without reaching statistical significance. Thus, IOERT could be an alternative to WBI upon stringent patient selection, but patients should be counseled carefully about the potential for increased IR rate with IOERT. Second cancer incidence and cardiac events did not differ between IOERT and WBI.
Collapse
|
6
|
Ohsumi S, Nishimura R, Masuda N, Akashi-Tanaka S, Suemasu K, Yamauchi H, Tokunaga E, Ikeda T, Nishi T, Hayashi H, Iino Y, Takatsuka Y, Ohashi Y, Inaji H. A prospective analysis of two studies that used the 5-mm interval slices and 5-mm margin-free method for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conserving surgery without radiotherapy. Breast Cancer 2023; 30:131-138. [PMID: 36175750 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-022-01406-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast-conserving surgery with radiotherapy is one of standard treatments for early breast cancer. However, it is regarded as an option to treat elderly patients with small hormone receptor-positive breast cancer with breast-conserving surgery and hormone therapy without radiotherapy. We conducted two sequential prospective studies to examine the feasibility of breast-conserving surgery without radiotherapy since 2002 and present the results. PATIENTS AND METHODS Primary female breast cancer patients who fulfilled the strict eligibility criteria were prospectively enrolled in two sequential studies named WORTH 1 and 2. The surgical materials were sliced in 5-mm intervals and all slices were examined microscopically. Postoperative radiotherapy was not allowed, but tamoxifen or anastrozole was administered for 5 years. Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR)-free survival was the primary outcome. RESULTS The data of the two studies were combined (N = 321). The median follow-up period for IBTR was 94 months (4-192 months). Only three patients were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. The 5- and 10-year IBTR-free rates were 97.0% and 90.5%, respectively. The age at operation and PR status affected IBTR rates independently. When we calculated IBTR-free rates of patients who were 65 years of age or older at the time of surgery and had PR-positive tumors, the 5- and 10-year IBTR rates were both 98.4%. CONCLUSIONS Our "5-mm-thick slice and 5-mm free-margin" method may be effective to select patients who can be treated by breast-conserving surgery and hormone therapy without radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shozo Ohsumi
- Department of Breast Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, 160 Kou, Minami-umemoto-machi, Matsuyama, Ehime, 791-0280, Japan.
| | - Reiki Nishimura
- Department of Breast Oncology, Kumamoto Shinto General Hospital, Kumamoto, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Norikazu Masuda
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Sadako Akashi-Tanaka
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, Show University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Hideko Yamauchi
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Eriko Tokunaga
- Department of Breast Oncology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Tadashi Ikeda
- Department of Surgery, Kitasato University Kitasato Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Hiroto Hayashi
- Department of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kanmon Medical Center, Shimonoseki, Yamaguchi, Japan
| | - Yuichi Iino
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Kusunoki Hospital, Fujioka, Gunma, Japan
| | - Yuichi Takatsuka
- Department of Breast Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Yasuo Ohashi
- Faculty of Science and Engineering, Chuo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideo Inaji
- Department of Breast Surgery, Kaizuka City Hospital, Kaizuka, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Efficacy and Tolerance of IMRT Boost Compared to IORT Boost in Early Breast Cancer: A German Monocenter Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14246196. [PMID: 36551680 PMCID: PMC9776951 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14246196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2022] [Revised: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this retrospective study is to compare the two boost subgroups, IORT or IMRT, in terms of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), cosmesis, and acute and late toxicity. It shall be shown whether and which of the boost techniques offers better results with respect to the facial points, since there are already many studies on applying boost to the tumor bed after/during breast conserving surgery, and there are few which compare the different techniques. For this comparison, two subgroups of 76 patients each (n = 152), treated between 2002 and 2015, were enrolled in the study. In one subgroup, the 9 Gy boost was intraoperatively administered after complete removal of the primary tumor, while the other subgroup received the boost of 8.4 Gy percutaneously and simultaneously integrated into the tumor bed after breast conserving surgery. Both subgroups have subsequently undergone whole breast irradiation (WBI) of 50.4/50 Gy in 1.8−2 Gy per fraction. OS and the incidence of late toxicity did not differ between the two subgroups and no risk factor was found regarding PFS. Acute toxicities initially occurred significantly less (p < 0.001) in the IORT subgroup; however, after WBI took place, this difference vanished. Therefore, boost application by means of IORT or IMRT can be considered equivalent.
Collapse
|
8
|
Philippson C, Larsen S, Simon S, Vandekerkhove C, De Caluwe A, Van Gestel D, Chintinne M, Veys I, De Neubourg F, Noterman D, Roman M, Nogaret JM, Desmet A. Intraoperative electron radiotherapy in early invasive ductal breast cancer: 6-year median follow-up results of a prospective monocentric registry. Breast Cancer Res 2022; 24:83. [DOI: 10.1186/s13058-022-01582-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Intraoperative electron radiotherapy (IOERT) can be used to treat early breast cancer during the conservative surgery thus enabling shorter overall treatment times and reduced irradiation of organs at risk. We report on our first 996 patients enrolled prospectively in a registry trial.
Methods
At Jules Bordet Institute, from February 2010 onwards, patients underwent partial IOERT of the breast. Women with unifocal invasive ductal carcinoma, aged 40 years or older, with a clinical tumour size ≤ 20 mm and tumour-free sentinel lymph node (on frozen section and immunohistochemical analysis). A 21 Gy dose was prescribed on the 90% isodose line in the tumour bed with the energy of 6 to 12 MeV (Mobetron®-IntraOp Medical).
Results
Thirty-seven ipsilateral tumour relapses occurred. Sixteen of those were in the same breast quadrant. Sixty patients died, and among those, 12 deaths were due to breast cancer. With 71.9 months of median follow-up, the 5-year Kaplan–Meier estimate of local recurrence was 2.7%.
Conclusions
The rate of breast cancer local recurrence after IOERT is low and comparable to published results for IORT and APBI. IOERT is highly operator-dependent, and appropriate applicator sizing according to tumour size is critical. When used in a selected patient population, IOERT achieves a good balance between tumour control and late radiotherapy-mediated toxicity morbidity and mortality thanks to insignificant irradiation of organs at risk.
Collapse
|
9
|
Jeibouei S, Shams F, Mohebichamkhorami F, Sanooghi D, Faal B, Akbari ME, Zali H. Biological and clinical review of IORT-induced wound fluid in breast cancer patients. Front Oncol 2022; 12:980513. [DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.980513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) has become a growing therapy for early-stage breast cancer (BC). Some studies claim that wound fluid (seroma), a common consequence of surgical excision in the tumor cavity, can reflect the effects of IORT on cancer inhibition. However, further research by our team and other researchers, such as analysis of seroma composition, affected cell lines, and primary tissues in two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) culture systems, clarified that seroma could not address the questions about IORT effectiveness in the surgical site. In this review, we mention the factors involved in tumor recurrence, direct or indirect effects of IORT on BC, and all the studies associated with BC seroma to attain more information about the impact of IORT-induced seroma to make a better decision to remove or remain after surgery and IORT. Finally, we suggest that seroma studies cannot decipher the mechanisms underlying the effectiveness of IORT in BC patients. The question of whether IORT-seroma has a beneficial effect can only be answered in a trial with a clinical endpoint, which is not even ongoing.
Collapse
|
10
|
Ramelli E, Weingertner N, Welsch A, Reix N, Antoni D, Amé S, Molière S, Mathelin C. Innovative approach to lymphadenectomy in breast sarcoma. Bull Cancer 2022; 109:1017-1028. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2022.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2021] [Revised: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
11
|
Effectiveness and safety of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) with low-energy X-rays (INTRABEAM ®) for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). Clin Transl Oncol 2022; 24:1732-1743. [PMID: 35305245 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-022-02823-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate treatment outcomes in patients with early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) treated with targeted intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) administered as accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). METHODS Between December 2014 and May 2019, 50 patients diagnosed with ESBC were treated with a 50 kilovoltage (kV) X-ray source with a single dose of 20 Gy using the Intrabeam® radiotherapy delivery system. All patients were followed prospectively to assess local control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), radiation-induced toxicity, and cosmetic outcomes. We also evaluated the prognostic implications of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR). RESULTS Median follow-up was 53 months. Mean patient age was 70 years. The mean duration of radiation delivery was 22.25 min. Two patients developed a recurrence. One death was recorded. Elevated pretreatment NLR levels were a significant risk factor for mortality (p = 0.0026). The most common treatment-related toxicities were breast induration (30%) and seroma (18%). Five-year LC, DFS, CSS, and OS rates were 97.1%, 93.9%, 100%, and 94.4%, respectively. Cosmesis was excellent or good in most cases (94%). CONCLUSION These findings confirm the effectiveness of a single dose of 20 Gy of IORT with the Intrabeam device as APBI. The toxicity profile was good with excellent cosmesis. These results provide further support for the clinical use of APBI in well-selected patients.
Collapse
|
12
|
Management Strategies for Older Patients with Low-Risk Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Physician Survey. Curr Oncol 2021; 29:1-13. [PMID: 35049675 PMCID: PMC8774930 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29010001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2021] [Revised: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
When managing older patients with lower-risk hormone-receptor-positive (HR+), HER2 negative (HER2-) early-stage breast cancer (EBC), the harms and benefits of adjuvant therapies should be taken into consideration. A survey was conducted among Canadian oncologists on the definitions of "low risk" and "older", practice patterns, and future trial designs. We contacted 254 physicians and 21% completed the survey (50/242). Most respondents (68%, 34/50) agreed with the definition of "low risk" HR+/HER2- EBC being node-negative and either: ≤3 cm and low histological grade, ≤2 cm and intermediate grade, or ≤1 cm and high grade. The most popular chronological and biological age definition for older patients was ≥70 (45%, 22/49; 45% 21/47). In patients ≥ 70 with low risk EBC, most radiation and medical oncologists would recommend post-lumpectomy radiotherapy (RT) and endocrine therapy (ET). Seventy-eight percent (38/49) felt that trials are needed to evaluate RT and ET's role in patients ≥ 70. The favored design was ET alone, vs. RT plus ET (39%, 15/38). The preferred primary and secondary endpoints were disease-free survival and quality of life, respectively. Although oncologists recommended both RT and ET, there is interest in performing de-escalation trials in patients ≥ 70.
Collapse
|
13
|
Hersh EH, King TA. De-escalating axillary surgery in early-stage breast cancer. Breast 2021; 62 Suppl 1:S43-S49. [PMID: 34949533 PMCID: PMC9097808 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.11.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Revised: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The role of axillary surgery has evolved over the last three decades from routine axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) to sentinel lymph node biopsy to omission of axillary surgery altogether in select patients. This evolution has been achieved through the design and conduct of multiple clinical trials demonstrating that ALND does not impact survival and is not necessary for local control in patients with early-stage breast cancer and limited nodal involvement. Importantly, this practice-changing shift mirrored the trend towards earlier stage at diagnosis and the recognition of the interplay between local and systemic therapies in maintaining local control. There are numerous clinical scenarios today in which axillary staging can be safely avoided, including (1) DCIS treated with lumpectomy, (2) at the time of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy, and (3) in elderly patients with early-stage, HR+/HER2-clinically node-negative (cN0) disease. Ongoing clinical trials seek to expand the cohorts in which surgical nodal staging can be omitted. These populations include a broader range of early-stage, cN0 patients undergoing upfront surgery, as seen in the SOUND, INSEMA, BOOG 2013-08, SOAPET and NAUTILUS trials. Omission of axillary surgery in cN0 patients with HER2+ or triple-negative disease treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy is also being tested in the ASICS and EUBREAST-01 trials. Continued advances in imaging and the growing role of genomic assays in selecting patients for systemic therapy are likely to further minimize the need for axillary surgery; thereby further reducing the morbidity of local therapy for women with breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eliza H Hersh
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tari A King
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Toxicity of Hypofractionated Whole Breast Radiotherapy Without Boost and Timescale of Late Skin Responses in a Large Cohort of Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients. Clin Breast Cancer 2021; 22:e480-e487. [PMID: 34955430 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2021.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Revised: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
AIM To report toxicity of hypofractionated whole-breast radiotherapy in a large cohort of early-stage breast cancer (BCaients. MATERIALS AND METHODS From 02/2009-05/2017, 1325 consecutive BCa patients were treated with 40.05 Gy/15 fractions, without boost. Median age was 62 (IQR:51.1-70.5) years. Chemotherapy was prescribed for 28% of patients, hormonal therapy for 80.3%, monoclonal antibodies for 8.2%. RESULTS Median follow-up was 72.4 (IQR: 44.6-104.1) months. Acute RTOG toxicity was: 69.8% Grade (G) 1, 14.3% G2 and 1.7% G3. Late SOMA-LENT toxicities were: edema-hyperpigmentation (E-H): G1 28.67%, G2 4.41%, G3 0.15%; fibrosis-atrophy-telangiectasia-pain (F-A-T-P): G1 14.6%, G2 3.2%, G3 0.8%, G4 0.1%. Median time to first occurrence was 6 and 18 months, respectively. Aesthetic result after surgery was excellent in 28.7%, good in 41.5%, acceptable in 20.3% and poor in 9.5% of patients. Change in breast appearance after radiotherapy was mild in 6.9%, moderate in 2.3% and marked in 1.3% of patients. Concomitant chemotherapy, obesity, smoking, use of bolus and planning target volume (PTV) were associated with higher acute toxicity. Patients ≥55 years old were less likely to experience acute toxicity. PTV and acute G2 toxicity were associated with ≥G2 E-H. PTV, concomitant chemotherapy, hypertension and ≥G2 acute toxicity were associated with increased risk of F-A-T-P. CONCLUSION Hypofractionated whole-breast radiotherapy without boost demonstrated mild acute and late toxicity in a large cohort of consecutive patients. Moderate and marked changes in breast appearance were registered for 3.6% of patients and occurred between 18 to 42 months.
Collapse
|
15
|
Long-term results of hypofractionation with concomitant boost in patients with early breast cancer: A prospective study. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0258186. [PMID: 34618862 PMCID: PMC8496829 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim To report the long-term local control and survival of patients with early breast cancer who had hypofractionated whole breast irradiation with concomitant boost (Hypo-CB). Methods and materials Between October 2009 and June 2010, 73 patients with early breast cancer (T1-3N0-1M0) who underwent breast conserving surgery were enrolled into the study. Thirty-six of these participants received 50 Gy of conventional irradiation in 25 fractions over 5 weeks to the whole breast with a sequential boost to the tumor bed with 10–16 Gy in 5–8 fractions (Conv-SEQ). The other 37 participants received a hypofractionated dose of 43.2 Gy in 16 fractions with an additional daily concomitant boost (CB) of 0.6 Gy over 3 weeks (Hypo-CB). Results At a median follow-up time of 123 months, ipsilateral local recurrence (ILR) was found in 3 participants, 1 of whom was in the hypofractionated group. All 3 ILR were true local recurrence (TR). There were no significant differences in the 10-year disease free survival (DFS) and 10-year overall survival rates (OS) between the conventional and hypofractionated groups (93.9% vs. 94.4%, p = 0.96 and 91.9% vs. 91.6%, p = 0.792, respectively). Conclusion This study showed that the effectiveness, DFS and OS were comparable between hypofractionated whole breast irradiation with a CB and the conventional irradiation with a sequential boost.
Collapse
|
16
|
Luo J, Yin Z, Zhang Z, Guo X, Yu X, Wang J. Does the protocol-required uniform margin around the CTV adequately account for setup inaccuracies in whole breast irradiation? Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:143. [PMID: 34344403 PMCID: PMC8336062 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01863-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2020] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To use cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging to determine the impacts of patient characteristics on the magnitude of geometric setup errors and obtain patient-specific planning target volume (PTV) margins from the correlated patient characteristics in whole breast irradiation (WBI). Methods Between January 2019 and December 2019, a total of 97 patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery, followed by intensity-modulated radiation therapy in WBI, were scanned with pre-treatment CBCT for the first three treatment fractions and weekly for the subsequent fractions. Setup errors in the left–right (LR), superior–inferior (SI) and anterior–posterior (AP) directions were recorded and analyzed with patient characteristics—including age, tumor location, body mass index (BMI), chest circumference (CC) and breast volume (BV)—to examine the predictors for setup errors and obtain specific PTV margins. Results A total of 679 CBCT images from 97 patients were acquired for analysis. The mean setup errors for the whole group were 2.32 ± 1.21 mm, 3.71 ± 2.21 mm and 2.75 ± 1.56 mm in the LR, SI and AP directions, respectively. Patients’ BMI, CC and BV were moderately associated with setup errors, especially in the SI directions (R = 0.40, 0.43 and 0.22, respectively). Setup errors in the SI directions for patients with BMI > 23.8 kg/m2, CC > 89 cm and BV > 657 cm3 were 4.56 ± 2.59 mm, 4.77 ± 2.42 mm and 4.30 ± 2.43 mm, respectively, which were significantly greater than those of patients with BMI ≤ 23.8 kg/m2, CC ≤ 89 cm and BV ≤ 657 cm3 (P < 0.05). Correspondingly, the calculated PTV margins in patients with BMI > 23.8 kg/m2, CC > 89 cm and BV > 657 cm3 were 4.25/7.95/4.93 mm, 4.37/7.66/5.24 mm and 4.22/7.54/5.29 mm in the LR/SI/AP directions, respectively, compared with 3.64/4.64/5.09 mm, 3.31/4.50/4.82 mm and 3.29/5.74/4.73 mm for BMI ≤ 23.8 kg/m2, CC ≤ 89 cm and BV ≤ 657 cm3, respectively. Conclusions The magnitude of geometric setup errors was moderately correlated with BMI, CC and BV. It was recommended to set patient-specific PTV margins according to patient characteristics in the absence of daily image-guided treatment setup.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jurui Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 DongAn Road, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Zhihai Yin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 DongAn Road, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Zhen Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 DongAn Road, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Xiaomao Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 DongAn Road, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Xiaoli Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 DongAn Road, Shanghai, China. .,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| | - Juanqi Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 DongAn Road, Shanghai, China. .,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Boutrus RR, El Sherif S, Abdelazim Y, Bayomy M, Gaber AS, Farahat A, Hashem T, El Sebaie M. Once Daily Versus Twice Daily External Beam Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation: A Randomized Prospective Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 109:1296-1300. [PMID: 33714527 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.11.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2020] [Revised: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 11/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of the current study was to compare toxicity, cosmesis, and local control between the once daily and the twice daily fractionation schemes for external beam accelerated partial breast irradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS From December 2012 to June 2018, we enrolled 113 patients with ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive breast cancer, node negative disease, and tumors less than 3 cm in size to receive accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) to a total dose of 38.5 Gy over 10 fractions given either once (oAPBI) or twice daily (tAPBI). Sixty patients were included in the tAPBI arm and 53 patients were included in the oAPBI arm. RESULTS Median follow-up was 74 months (range, 24-105). The median pain score during treatment was 3 out of 10 in the oAPBI and 5 in the tAPBI (P = .001). No differences were observed in GIII early skin toxicity (P = .4) or GI early pulmonary toxicity (P = 1.0) between the 2 treatment arms. GIII late skin toxicity developed in 3.8% and 11.7% of patients in the oAPBI and tAPBI arms, respectively (P = .001). GIII subcutaneous fibrosis developed in 1.9% and 8.3% of patients in the oAPBI and tAPBI, respectively (P = .001). The rate of patients with adverse cosmesis (poor/fair) was 7.5% at 12 months and at 24 months in the oAPBI arm compared with 21.7% and 26.7% in the tAPBI arm (P = .03 and .008, respectively). CONCLUSIONS oAPBI is a safe, well-tolerated schedule with more favorable outcomes than the tAPBI schedule with regards to late toxicity and cosmesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rimoun R Boutrus
- Radiation Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
| | - Sara El Sherif
- Radiation Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Yasser Abdelazim
- Radiation Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Mohammed Bayomy
- Clinical Oncology Department, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
| | - Ayman S Gaber
- Medical Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Ahmed Farahat
- Surgical Oncology Department, Breast Division, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Tarek Hashem
- Surgical Oncology Department, Breast Division, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Medhat El Sebaie
- Radiation Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Shahrabi Farahani F, Paapsi K, Innos K. The impact of sociodemographic factors on the utilization of radiation therapy in breast cancer patients in Estonia: a register-based study. Int J Equity Health 2021; 20:152. [PMID: 34193144 PMCID: PMC8247084 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-021-01497-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Accepted: 06/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Radiation therapy is an important part of multimodal breast cancer treatment. The aim was to examine the impact of sociodemographic factors on radiation therapy use in breast cancer (BC) patients in Estonia, linking cancer registry data to administrative databases. Methods Estonian Cancer Registry provided data on women diagnosed with BC in Estonia in 2007–2018, including TNM stage at diagnosis. Use of radiation therapy within 12 months of diagnosis was determined from Estonian Health Insurance Funds claims, and sociodemographic characteristics from population registry. Receipt of radiation therapy was evaluated over time and by clinical and sociodemographic factors. Poisson regression with robust variance was used to calculate univariate and multivariate prevalence rate ratios (PRR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for receipt of radiation therapy among stage I–III BC patients age < 70 years who underwent primary surgery. Results Overall, of 8637 women included in the study, 4310 (50 %) received radiation therapy within 12 months of diagnosis. This proportion increased from 39 to 58 % from 2007 to 2009 to 2016–2018 (p < 0.001). Multivariate regression analysis showed that compared to women with stage I BC, those with more advanced stage were less likely to receive radiation therapy. Receipt of radiation therapy increased significantly over time and was nearly 40 % higher in 2016–2018 than in 2007–2009. Use of radiation therapy was significantly lower for women with the lowest level of education compared to those with a university degree (PRR 0.88, 95 % CI 0.80–0.97), and for divorced/widowed women (PRR 0.95, 95 % CI 0.91–0.99) and single women (PRR 0.92, 95 % CI 0.86–0.99), compared to married women. Age at diagnosis, nationality and place of residence were not associated with receipt of radiation therapy. Conclusions The study showed considerable increase in the use of radiation therapy in Estonia over the study period, which is in line with increases in available equipment. The lack of geographic variations suggests equal access to therapy for patients living in remote regions. However, educational level and marital status were significantly associated with receipt of radiation therapy, highlighting the importance of psychosocial support in ensuring equal access to care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fereshteh Shahrabi Farahani
- School of Information Technologies, Department of Health Technologies, Tallinn University of Technology, Digital Health MSc Programme, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - Keiu Paapsi
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, National Institute for Health Development, Hiiu 42, 11619, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - Kaire Innos
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, National Institute for Health Development, Hiiu 42, 11619, Tallinn, Estonia.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Battisti NML, Hatton MQ, Reed MWR, Herbert E, Morgan JL, Bradburn M, Simcock R, Walters SJ, Collins KA, Ward SE, Holmes GR, Burton M, Lifford KJ, Edwards A, Robinson TG, Martin C, Chater T, Pemberton KJ, Brennan A, Leung Cheung K, Todd A, Audisio RA, Wright J, Green T, Revell D, Gath J, Horgan K, Holcombe C, Winter MC, Naik J, Parmeshwar R, Gosney MA, Thompson AM, Wyld L, Ring A. Observational cohort study in older women with early breast cancer: Use of radiation therapy and impact on health-related quality of life and mortality. Radiother Oncol 2021; 161:166-176. [PMID: 34146616 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.06.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2021] [Revised: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiotherapy reduces in-breast recurrence risk in early breast cancer (EBC) in older women. This benefit may be small and should be balanced against treatment effect and holistic patient assessment. This study described treatment patterns according to fitness and impact on health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL). METHODS A multicentre, observational study of EBC patients aged ≥ 70 years, undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCS) or mastectomy, was undertaken. Associations between radiotherapy use, surgery, clinico-pathological parameters, fitness based on geriatric parameters and treatment centre were determined. HRQoL was measured using the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaires. RESULTS In 2013-2018 2811 women in 56 UK study centres underwent surgery with a median follow-up of 52 months. On multivariable analysis, age and tumour risk predicted radiotherapy use. Among healthier patients (based on geriatric assessments) with high-risk tumours, 534/613 (87.1%) having BCS and 185/341 (54.2%) having mastectomy received radiotherapy. In less fit individuals with low-risk tumours undergoing BCS, 149/207 (72.0%) received radiotherapy. Radiotherapy effects on HRQoL domains, including breast symptoms and fatigue were seen, resolving by 18 months. CONCLUSION Radiotherapy use in EBC patients ≥ 70 years is affected by age and recurrence risk, whereas geriatric parameters have limited impact regardless of type of surgery. There was geographical variation in treatment, with some fit older women with high-risk tumours not receiving radiotherapy, and some older, low-risk, EBC patients receiving radiotherapy after BCS despite evidence of limited benefit. The impact on HRQoL is transient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolò Matteo Luca Battisti
- Department of Medicine, Breast Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK & Breast Cancer Research Division, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Matthew Q Hatton
- Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | | | - Esther Herbert
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, School for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK
| | - Jenna L Morgan
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
| | - Michael Bradburn
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, School for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK
| | - Richard Simcock
- Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK
| | - Stephen J Walters
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, School for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK
| | - Karen A Collins
- College of Health, Wellbeing and Life Sciences, Department of Allied Health Professions, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
| | - Sue E Ward
- Department of Health Economics and Decision Science, School for Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, UK
| | - Geoffrey R Holmes
- Department of Health Economics and Decision Science, School for Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, UK
| | - Maria Burton
- College of Health, Wellbeing and Life Sciences, Department of Allied Health Professions, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
| | - Kate J Lifford
- Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Adrian Edwards
- Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Thompson G Robinson
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Leicester, Cardiovascular Research Centre, Leicester, UK
| | - Charlene Martin
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
| | - Tim Chater
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, School for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK
| | - Kirsty J Pemberton
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, School for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK
| | - Alan Brennan
- Department of Health Economics and Decision Science, School for Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, UK
| | - Kwok Leung Cheung
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, UK
| | - Annaliza Todd
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
| | - Riccardo A Audisio
- University of Gothenberg, Sahlgrenska Universitetssjukhuset, Göteborg, Sweden
| | | | - Tracy Green
- Yorkshire and Humber Consumer Research Panel, Sheffield, UK
| | - Deirdre Revell
- Yorkshire and Humber Consumer Research Panel, Sheffield, UK
| | - Jacqui Gath
- Yorkshire and Humber Consumer Research Panel, Sheffield, UK
| | - Kieran Horgan
- Department of Breast Surgery, Bexley Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Chris Holcombe
- Liverpool University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Matthew C Winter
- Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Jay Naik
- Pinderfields Hospital, Mid Yorkshire NHS Foundation Trust, Wakefield, UK
| | - Rishi Parmeshwar
- University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay, Royal Lancashire Infirmary, Lancaster, UK
| | | | | | - Lynda Wyld
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK.
| | - Alistair Ring
- Department of Medicine, Breast Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK & Breast Cancer Research Division, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Vieira RADAC, Biller G, Silva FCBDA, Silva JJDA, Oliveira MADE, Bailão-Junior A. New criteria for breast symmetry evaluation after breast conserving surgery for cancer. Rev Col Bras Cir 2021; 48:e20202698. [PMID: 34133654 PMCID: PMC10683423 DOI: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20202698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2020] [Accepted: 11/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE to evaluate symmetry after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for cancer. METHODS a prospective study of patients undergoing BCS. These patients were photographed using the same criteria of evaluation. The references points used were the nipple height difference (NH), the nipple-manubrium distances (NM), nipple-sternum distances (NS) and the angle between the intramammary fold and the nipple (nipple angle; NA). ImageJ software was used. Three breast symmetry models were evaluated: excellent/others (model 1), excellent-good/others (model 2) and others/poor (model 3). The ROC curve was used to select acceptable criteria for the evaluation of symmetry. Decision tree model analysis was performed. RESULTS a total of 274 women were evaluated. The BCCT.core result was excellent in 5.8% (16), good in 24.1% (66), fair in 46.4% (127) and poor in 23.7% (65). The difference in NH was associated with good breast area (0.837-0.846); acceptable differences were below 3.1 cm, while unacceptable values were greater than 6.4 cm. Differences in the NM were associated with average breast area (0.709-0.789); a difference in value of less than 4.5 cm was acceptable, while values greater than 6.3 cm were unacceptable. In the decision tree combined model, a good-excellent outcome for patients with differential (d) dNH = 1 (0 to 5.30 cm) and dNM ≠ 3 (<6.28 cm); and for a poor/poor result, values dNM = 3 (> 6.35). CONCLUSIONS the results presented here are simple tools that can assist the surgeon for breast symmetry evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- René Aloisio DA Costa Vieira
- - Hospital de Câncer de Barretos, Programa de Pós-graduação em Oncologia - Barretos - SP - Brasil
- - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Programa de Pós-graduação em Tocoginecologia - Botucatu - SP - Brasil
- - Hospital de Câncer de Muriaé, Departamento de Cirurgia. Divisão de Mastologia - Muriaé - MG - Brasil
| | - Gabriele Biller
- - Hospital de Câncer de Barretos, Programa de Pós-graduação em Oncologia - Barretos - SP - Brasil
| | | | - Jonathas José DA Silva
- - Hospital de Câncer de Barretos, Programa de Pós-graduação em Oncologia - Barretos - SP - Brasil
| | | | - Antônio Bailão-Junior
- - Hospital de Câncer de Barretos, Departamento de Mastologia e Reconstrução Mamária - Barretos - SP - Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Cernusco NLV, Bianco PD, Romano M, Muraglia A, Rossi G, Giri MG, Guariglia S, Lombardi D, Pellini F, Cavedon C, Pollini GP, Mazzarotto R. Long-Term Outcomes Using Electron IOERT APBI for Early Stage Breast Cancer: The Verona University Hospital Experience. Clin Breast Cancer 2021; 22:e167-e172. [PMID: 34257000 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2021.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2020] [Revised: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 05/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
METHODS AND MATERIALS From July 2006 to December 2015, 295 patients suitable for breast-conserving therapy entered a single-arm phase II study and were treated with IOERT as radical treatment. Inclusion criteria were age >50, postmenopausal status, cT1N0M0 stage, grade G1-G2, positive estrogen receptor status; unicentric and unifocal disease, histologically proven invasive ductal carcinoma no previous breast irradiation, good performance status. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 7.1 years (95% CI, 6.5;7.4) 6 women (2.0%) experienced a true local recurrence (reappearance of the tumour in the same quadrant). Five-year overall survival and local recurrence-free survival were 96% (95% CI, 92.9;97.8) and 94.9% (95% CI, 91.6;97.0) respectively. CONCLUSION Our trial suggests that, in highly selected early stage breast cancers, a single-dose IOERT can be safely delivered with excellent results and very low long-term recurrence rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paola Del Bianco
- Clinical Research Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Mario Romano
- Radiation Therapy Unit, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Gabriella Rossi
- Radiation Therapy Unit, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | | | | | - Davide Lombardi
- Breast Surgery Unit, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Carlo Cavedon
- Medical Physics Unit, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Renzo Mazzarotto
- Radiation Therapy Unit, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Mathieu KM, YouYou TG, Hicks ML, Mutombo A, Anaclet MM, Sylvain MK, Pinder L, Hicks MM, Kanda L, Kanda M, Parham GP, Henry-Tillman R. Building a breast cancer detection and treatment platform in the Democratic Republic of the Congo by integrating training, service and infrastructure development. Ecancermedicalscience 2021; 15:1233. [PMID: 34221116 PMCID: PMC8225335 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2021.1233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Breast cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa, a global region where opportunities for breast care of any type are extremely limited due to insufficient infrastructure, a paucity of clinical services and vast shortages of trained human resources. Methods A team of Zambian and US gynaecologic and breast oncology experts and nurse-specialists made multiple visits (each lasting 5 working days) to the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), over a 2-year period. During each of five week-long site visits, hands-on training of local Congolese health providers was conducted during which time they were taught clinical breast exam (CBE), breast and axillary ultrasound, ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy/fine needle aspiration (FNA) and breast surgery. Simultaneous with the training exercises, a new breast care clinic was established and operationalised, and existing surgical theatres were upgraded. All activities were implemented in a private sector health care facility - Biamba Marie Mutombo Hospital - in the capital city of Kinshasa. Results From April 2017 to August 2020, a total of 5,211 women were identified as having breast abnormalities on CBE. Ages ranged from 26 to 86 years; median age: 42.0 (±14.1) years. Ultrasound abnormalities were noted in 1,420 (27%) clients, of which 516 (36%) met the criteria (indeterminate cystic lesion, solid or suspicious masses) for ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy or FNA. Pathology reports were available for 368 (71%) of the 516 clients who underwent biopsy, of which 164 were malignant and 204 benign. The majority (88%) of the cancers were advanced (TNM stages 3 and 4). Surgical procedures consisted of 183 lumpectomies, 58 modified radical mastectomies and 45 axillary lymph node dissections. Clinical competency for diagnostic and surgical procedures was reached early in the course of the training programme. Conclusion By integrating onsite training with simultaneous investments in clinical service and infrastructure development, the barriers to breast cancer diagnosis and treatment were disrupted and a modern breast care service platform was established in a private sector health care facility in the DRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kabongo Mukuta Mathieu
- Biamba Marie Mutombo Hospital, No. 9777, Boulevard Lumumba, Commune de Masina, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| | - Tankoy Gombo YouYou
- Biamba Marie Mutombo Hospital, No. 9777, Boulevard Lumumba, Commune de Masina, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| | - Michael L Hicks
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 101 Manning Dr, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Teaching Hospital - Women and Newborn Hospital, 10101 Nationalist Way, Lusaka, Zambia.,St Mary Mercy Cancer Center, 36475 Five Mile Rd, Livonia, MI 48154, USA.,St Joseph Mercy Oakland Cancer Center, 44405 Woodward Ave, Suite 202, Pontiac, MI 48341, USA.,McLaren Macomb Medical Center, 1000 Harrington Blvd, Mount Clemens, MI 48043, USA.,https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1819-155X
| | - Alex Mutombo
- Biamba Marie Mutombo Hospital, No. 9777, Boulevard Lumumba, Commune de Masina, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| | - Mukanya Mpalata Anaclet
- Biamba Marie Mutombo Hospital, No. 9777, Boulevard Lumumba, Commune de Masina, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| | - Mulumba Kapuku Sylvain
- Biamba Marie Mutombo Hospital, No. 9777, Boulevard Lumumba, Commune de Masina, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| | - Leeya Pinder
- Department of Oncology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.,https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8929-7810
| | - Maya M Hicks
- Howard University College of Medicine, 520 W St NW, Washington, DC 20059, USA.,https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1993-3367
| | - Louis Kanda
- Dikembe Mutombo Foundation, 400 Interstate N Pkwy, Suite 1040, Atlanta, GA 30339, USA
| | - Mirielle Kanda
- Dikembe Mutombo Foundation, 400 Interstate N Pkwy, Suite 1040, Atlanta, GA 30339, USA
| | - Groesbeck P Parham
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 101 Manning Dr, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Teaching Hospital - Women and Newborn Hospital, 10101 Nationalist Way, Lusaka, Zambia.,https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1782-9523
| | - Ronda Henry-Tillman
- Winthrop P Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 West Markham St, Slot #725, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Optimizing Breast Reconstruction through Integration of Plastic Surgery and Radiation Oncology. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2021; 9:e3577. [PMID: 33977003 PMCID: PMC8104197 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000003577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) is an important adjunct to improve oncologic outcomes and survival in select breast cancer patients at increased risk for local recurrence. As recommendations for PMRT broaden, an increasing number of patients will have it included as part of their breast cancer treatment plan.
Collapse
|
24
|
Wuhrer A, Uhlig S, Tuschy B, Berlit S, Sperk E, Bieback K, Sütterlin M. Wound Fluid from Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Intraoperative Radiotherapy Exhibits an Altered Cytokine Profile and Impairs Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Function. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:2140. [PMID: 33946741 PMCID: PMC8124792 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13092140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Revised: 04/18/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) displays an increasingly used treatment option for early breast cancer. It exhibits non-inferiority concerning the risk of recurrence compared to conventional external irradiation (EBRT) in suitable patients with early breast cancer. Since most relapses occur in direct proximity of the former tumor site, the reduction of the risk of local recurrence effected by radiotherapy might partially be due to an alteration of the irradiated tumor bed's micromilieu. Our aim was to investigate if IORT affects the local micromilieu, especially immune cells with concomitant cytokine profile, and if it has an impact on growth conditions for breast cancer cells as well as mammary mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC), the latter considered as a model of the tumor bed stroma.42 breast cancer patients with breast-conserving surgery were included, of whom 21 received IORT (IORT group) and 21 underwent surgery without IORT (control group). Drainage wound fluid (WF) was collected from both groups 24 h after surgery for flow cytometric analysis of immune cell subset counts and potential apoptosis and for multiplex cytokine analyses (cytokine array and ELISA). It served further as a supplement in cultures of MDA-MB 231 breast cancer cells and mammary MSC for functional analyses, including proliferation, wound healing and migration. Furthermore, the cytokine profile within conditioned media from WF-treated MSC cultures was assessed. Flow cytometric analysis showed no group-related changes of cell count, activation state and apoptosis rates of myeloid, lymphoid leucocytes and regulatory T cells in the WF. Multiplex cytokine analysis of the WF revealed group-related differences in the expression levels of several cytokines, e.g., oncostatin-M, leptin and IL-1β. The application of WF in MDA-MB 231 cultures did not show a group-related difference in proliferation, wound healing and chemotactic migration. However, WF from IORT-treated patients significantly inhibited mammary MSC proliferation, wound healing and migration compared to WF from the control group. The conditioned media collected from WF-treated MSC-cultures also exhibited altered concentrations of VEGF, RANTES and GROα. IORT causes significant changes in the cytokine profile and MSC growth behavior. These changes in the tumor bed could potentially contribute to the beneficial oncological outcome entailed by this technique. The consideration whether this alteration also affects MSC interaction with other stroma components presents a promising gateway for future investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Wuhrer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; (B.T.); (S.B.); (M.S.)
| | - Stefanie Uhlig
- FlowCore Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; (S.U.); (K.B.)
| | - Benjamin Tuschy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; (B.T.); (S.B.); (M.S.)
| | - Sebastian Berlit
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; (B.T.); (S.B.); (M.S.)
| | - Elena Sperk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany;
| | - Karen Bieback
- FlowCore Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; (S.U.); (K.B.)
- Institute of Transfusion Medicine and Immunology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, German Red Cross Blood Donor Services, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
- Mannheim Institute for Innate Immunoscience, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Marc Sütterlin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; (B.T.); (S.B.); (M.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Hedden N, Xu H. Radiation therapy dose prediction for left-sided breast cancers using two-dimensional and three-dimensional deep learning models. Phys Med 2021; 83:101-107. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.02.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2020] [Revised: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
|
26
|
Tringale KR, Berger ER, Sevilimedu V, Wen HY, Gillespie EF, Mueller BA, McCormick B, Xu AJ, Cuaron JJ, Cahlon O, Khan AJ, Powell SN, Morrow M, Heerdt AS, Braunstein LZ. Breast conservation among older patients with early-stage breast cancer: Locoregional recurrence following adjuvant radiation or hormonal therapy. Cancer 2021; 127:1749-1757. [PMID: 33496354 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2020] [Revised: 10/16/2020] [Accepted: 11/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For patients with breast cancer undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCS), adjuvant radiation (RT) and hormonal therapy (HT) reduce the risk of locoregional recurrence (LRR). Although several studies have evaluated adjuvant HT ± RT, the outcomes of HT versus RT monotherapy remain less clear. In this study, the risk of LRR is characterized among older patients with early-stage breast cancer following adjuvant RT alone, HT alone, neither, or both. METHODS This study included female patients from the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (New York, New York) who were aged ≥65 years with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) T1N0 breast cancer treated with BCS. The primary endpoint was time to LRR evaluated by Cox regression analysis. RESULTS There were 888 women evaluated with a median age of 71 years (range, 65-100 years) and median follow-up of 4.9 years (range, 0.0-9.5 years). There were 27 LRR events (3.0%). Five-year LRR was 11% for those receiving no adjuvant treatment, 3% for HT alone, 4% for RT alone, and 1% for HT and RT. LRR rates were significantly different between the groups (P < .001). Compared with neither HT nor RT, HT or RT monotherapy each yielded similar LRR reductions: HT alone (HR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.10-0.68; P = .006) and RT alone (HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.11-0.92; P = .034). Distant recurrence and breast cancer-specific survival rates did not significantly differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS LRR risk following BCS is low among women aged ≥65 years with T1N0, ER+/HER2- breast cancer. Adjuvant RT and HT monotherapy each similarly reduce this risk; the combination yields a marginal improvement. Further study is needed to elucidate whether appropriate patients may feasibly receive adjuvant RT monotherapy versus the current standards of HT monotherapy or combined RT/HT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn R Tringale
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Elizabeth R Berger
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Varadan Sevilimedu
- Biostatistics Service, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Hannah Y Wen
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Erin F Gillespie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Boris A Mueller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Beryl McCormick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Amy J Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - John J Cuaron
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Oren Cahlon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Atif J Khan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Simon N Powell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Monica Morrow
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Alexandra S Heerdt
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Lior Z Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Valente SA, Tendulkar RD, Cherian S, Shah C, Ross DL, Lottich SC, Laronga C, Broman KK, Donnelly ED, Bethke KP, Shaw C, Lockney NA, Pederson A, Rudolph R, Hasselle M, Kelemen P, Hermanto U, Ashikari A, Kang S, Hoefer RA, McCready D, Fyles A, Escallon J, Rohatgi N, Graves J, Graves G, Willey SC, Tousimis E, Riley L, Deb N, Tu C, Small W, Grobmyer SR. TARGIT-R (Retrospective): 5-Year Follow-Up Evaluation of Intraoperative Radiation Therapy (IORT) for Breast Cancer Performed in North America. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:2512-2521. [PMID: 33433786 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09432-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) has been investigated for patients with low-risk, early-stage breast cancer. The The North American experience was evaluated by TARGIT-R (retrospective) to provide outcomes for patients treated in "real-world" clinical practice with breast IORT. This analysis presents a 5-year follow-up assessment. METHODS TARGIT-R is a multi-institutional retrospective registry of patients who underwent lumpectomy and IORT between the years 2007 and 2013. The primary outcome of the evaluation was ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). RESULTS The evaluation included 667 patients with a median follow-up period of 5.1 years. Primary IORT (IORT at the time of lumpectomy) was performed for 72%, delayed IORT (after lumpectomy) for 3%, intended boost for 8%, and unintended boost (primary IORT followed by whole-breast radiation) for 17% of the patients. At 5 years, IBTR was 6.6% for all the patients, with 8% for the primary IORT cohort and 1.7% for the unintended-boost cohort. No recurrences were identified in the delayed IORT or intended-boost cohorts. Noncompliance with endocrine therapy (ET) was associated with higher IBTR risk (hazard ratio [HR], 3.67). Patients treated with primary IORT who were complaint with ET had a 5-year IBTR rate of 3.9%. CONCLUSION The local recurrence rates in this series differ slightly from recent results of randomized IORT trials and are notably higher than in previous published studies using whole-breast radiotherapy for similar patients with early-stage breast cancer. Understanding differences in this retrospective series and the prospective trials will be critical to optimizing patient selection and outcomes going forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Darrel L Ross
- Community Physician Network Breast Care, Community Health Network, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - S Chace Lottich
- Community Physician Network Breast Care, Community Health Network, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | | | - Eric D Donnelly
- Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Kevin P Bethke
- Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | | | - Ray Rudolph
- Memorial University Medical Center, Savannah, GA, USA
| | | | - Pond Kelemen
- St. Johns Riverside Hospital, Dobbs Ferry, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Song Kang
- The Sentara Dorothy G. Hoefer Comprehensive Breast Center, Newport News, VA, USA
| | - Richard A Hoefer
- The Sentara Dorothy G. Hoefer Comprehensive Breast Center, Newport News, VA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Eleni Tousimis
- Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Lee Riley
- St. Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, PA, USA
| | - Nimisha Deb
- St. Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, PA, USA
| | - Chao Tu
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - William Small
- Loyola University Chicago, Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Singh D, Saini G, Koul R, Gupta V, Abrol D, De S, Kulshrestha P, Hukku SN, Lakshmi SJ, Parikh PM, Aggarwal S. Practical consensus recommendations regarding role of postmastectomy radiation therapy. South Asian J Cancer 2020; 7:87-90. [PMID: 29721470 PMCID: PMC5909302 DOI: 10.4103/sajc.sajc_108_18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The use of radiation therapy after mastectomy (PMRT) has been limited to those patients who are at significant risk of cancer recurring in the chest wall or in the nodal basins. The use of PMRT has been widely accepted for patients with four or more positive lymph nodes,[1],[2] but there is still controversy regarding the value of PMRT for those with one to three positive nodes. This expert group used data from published literature, practical experience and opinion of a large group of academic oncologists to arrive at these practical consensus recommendations for the benefit of community oncologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Singh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Max Hospital, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - G Saini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Max Hospital, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - R Koul
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - V Gupta
- Department of Surgical Oncology, BLK Super Specialty Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - D Abrol
- Department or Radiation Oncology, Jammu Medical College, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India
| | - S De
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jaypee Hospital, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - P Kulshrestha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Metro Hospital and Cancer Institute, New Delhi, India
| | - S N Hukku
- Department of Radiation Oncology, BLK Super Specialty Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - S J Lakshmi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Artemis Hospital, Gurugram, Haryana, India
| | - Purvish M Parikh
- Department of Oncology, Shalby Cancer and Research Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - S Aggarwal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Whelan T, Levine M, Sussman J. Hypofractionated Breast Irradiation: What’s Next? J Clin Oncol 2020; 38:3245-3247. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.01243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy Whelan
- McMaster University, Department of Oncology, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Hamilton Health Sciences Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark Levine
- Escarpment Cancer Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jonathan Sussman
- McMaster University, Department of Oncology, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Hamilton Health Sciences Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Tiberi D, Vavassis P, Nguyen D, Guilbert MC, Simon-Cloutier A, Dubé P, Gervais MK, Sideris L, Leblanc G, Hijal T, Dufresne MP, Yassa M. Tumour response 3 months after neoadjuvant single-fraction radiotherapy for low-risk breast cancer. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 27:155-158. [PMID: 32669925 DOI: 10.3747/co.27.6059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Standard treatment for early-stage invasive breast cancer (bca) consists of breast-conserving surgery and several weeks of adjuvant radiotherapy (rt). Neoadjuvant single-fraction rt is a novel approach for early-stage bca. We sought to investigate the effect of delaying surgery after neoadjuvant rt with respect to the rate of pathologic response (pr). Methods Women 65 years of age or older with a new diagnosis of stage i luminal A bca were eligible for inclusion. A single 20 Gy dose to the primary breast tumour was given, followed by breast-conserving surgery 3 months later. The primary endpoint was the pr rate assessed by microscopic evaluation using the Miller-Payne system. Results To date, 10 patients have been successfully treated. Median age of the patients was 72 years (range: 65-84 years). In 8 patients, neoadjuvant rt resulted in a tumour pr with median residual cellularity of 3%. No immediate rt complications other than mild dermatitis were noted. Conclusions This study demonstrates a method for delivering single-fraction rt that can lead to a high level of pr in most patients. Continued accrual to this study and subsequent trials are needed to determine the feasibility, safety, and role of this novel technique in the management of early-stage bca.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Tiberi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC
| | - P Vavassis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC
| | - D Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC
| | - M C Guilbert
- Department of Pathology, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC
| | - A Simon-Cloutier
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC
| | - P Dubé
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC
| | - M K Gervais
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC
| | - L Sideris
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC
| | - G Leblanc
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC
| | - T Hijal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, QC
| | - M P Dufresne
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC
| | - M Yassa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Yang V, Gouveia MJ, Santos J, Koksch B, Amorim I, Gärtner F, Vale N. Breast cancer: insights in disease and influence of drug methotrexate. RSC Med Chem 2020; 11:646-664. [PMID: 33479665 PMCID: PMC7578709 DOI: 10.1039/d0md00051e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2020] [Accepted: 05/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
According to the World Health Organization, cancer is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The previously estimated 14 million new cases in the year of 2012 are expected to rise, yearly, over the following 2 decades. Among women, breast cancer is the most common one. In 2012, almost 1.7 million people were diagnosed worldwide and half a million died from the disease. Despite having several treatments available, from surgery to chemotherapy, most of these treatments have severe adverse effects. Chemotherapy has a narrow therapeutic window and requires high dosage treatment in patients with advanced-stage cancers and further need innovative treatment strategies. Although methotrexate (MTX) is not a first line drug used against breast cancer, however, it might be valuable to fight the disease. MTX is an effective and cheap drug that might impair malignant growth without irreversible damage to normal tissues. Nevertheless, while MTX does present some disadvantages including poor solubility and low permeability, several strategies are being used to discover and provide novel and effective targeted treatment against breast cancer. In this review, we analyze the chemotherapy of breast cancer and its relationship with drug MTX.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vítor Yang
- Department of Molecular Pathology and Immunology , Abel Salazar Biomedical Sciences Institute (ICBAS) , University of Porto , Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, 228 , 4050-313 Porto , Portugal .
- Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S) , University of Porto , Rua Alfredo Allen, 208 , 4200-135 Porto , Portugal
| | - Maria João Gouveia
- Department of Molecular Pathology and Immunology , Abel Salazar Biomedical Sciences Institute (ICBAS) , University of Porto , Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, 228 , 4050-313 Porto , Portugal .
- Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S) , University of Porto , Rua Alfredo Allen, 208 , 4200-135 Porto , Portugal
| | - Joana Santos
- Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S) , University of Porto , Rua Alfredo Allen, 208 , 4200-135 Porto , Portugal
| | - Beate Koksch
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry , Freie Universität Berlin , Takustrasse 3 , 14195 Berlin , Germany
| | - Irina Amorim
- Department of Molecular Pathology and Immunology , Abel Salazar Biomedical Sciences Institute (ICBAS) , University of Porto , Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, 228 , 4050-313 Porto , Portugal .
- Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S) , University of Porto , Rua Alfredo Allen, 208 , 4200-135 Porto , Portugal
- Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (IPATIMUP) , Rua Júlio Amaral de Carvalho, 45 , 4200-135 Porto , Portugal
| | - Fátima Gärtner
- Department of Molecular Pathology and Immunology , Abel Salazar Biomedical Sciences Institute (ICBAS) , University of Porto , Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, 228 , 4050-313 Porto , Portugal .
- Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S) , University of Porto , Rua Alfredo Allen, 208 , 4200-135 Porto , Portugal
- Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (IPATIMUP) , Rua Júlio Amaral de Carvalho, 45 , 4200-135 Porto , Portugal
| | - Nuno Vale
- Department of Molecular Pathology and Immunology , Abel Salazar Biomedical Sciences Institute (ICBAS) , University of Porto , Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, 228 , 4050-313 Porto , Portugal .
- Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S) , University of Porto , Rua Alfredo Allen, 208 , 4200-135 Porto , Portugal
- Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (IPATIMUP) , Rua Júlio Amaral de Carvalho, 45 , 4200-135 Porto , Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Askari E, Seyfoori A, Amereh M, Gharaie SS, Ghazali HS, Ghazali ZS, Khunjush B, Akbari M. Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogels for Local Post-Surgical Drug Delivery. Gels 2020; 6:E14. [PMID: 32397180 PMCID: PMC7345431 DOI: 10.3390/gels6020014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2020] [Revised: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 04/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Currently, surgical operations, followed by systemic drug delivery, are the prevailing treatment modality for most diseases, including cancers and trauma-based injuries. Although effective to some extent, the side effects of surgery include inflammation, pain, a lower rate of tissue regeneration, disease recurrence, and the non-specific toxicity of chemotherapies, which remain significant clinical challenges. The localized delivery of therapeutics has recently emerged as an alternative to systemic therapy, which not only allows the delivery of higher doses of therapeutic agents to the surgical site, but also enables overcoming post-surgical complications, such as infections, inflammations, and pain. Due to the limitations of the current drug delivery systems, and an increasing clinical need for disease-specific drug release systems, hydrogels have attracted considerable interest, due to their unique properties, including a high capacity for drug loading, as well as a sustained release profile. Hydrogels can be used as local drug performance carriers as a means for diminishing the side effects of current systemic drug delivery methods and are suitable for the majority of surgery-based injuries. This work summarizes recent advances in hydrogel-based drug delivery systems (DDSs), including formulations such as implantable, injectable, and sprayable hydrogels, with a particular emphasis on stimuli-responsive materials. Moreover, clinical applications and future opportunities for this type of post-surgery treatment are also highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esfandyar Askari
- Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering Department, Breast Cancer Research Center, Motamed Cancer Institute, ACECR, Tehran P.O. Box 1517964311, Iran;
| | - Amir Seyfoori
- Laboratory for Innovations in Micro Engineering (LiME), Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada; (A.S.); (M.A.); (S.S.G.); (B.K.)
| | - Meitham Amereh
- Laboratory for Innovations in Micro Engineering (LiME), Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada; (A.S.); (M.A.); (S.S.G.); (B.K.)
| | - Sadaf Samimi Gharaie
- Laboratory for Innovations in Micro Engineering (LiME), Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada; (A.S.); (M.A.); (S.S.G.); (B.K.)
| | - Hanieh Sadat Ghazali
- Nanotechnology Department, School of Advanced Technologies, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran P.O. Box 16846-13114, Iran;
| | - Zahra Sadat Ghazali
- Biomedical Engineering Department, Amirkabir University of Technology (AUT), Tehran P.O. Box 158754413, Iran;
| | - Bardia Khunjush
- Laboratory for Innovations in Micro Engineering (LiME), Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada; (A.S.); (M.A.); (S.S.G.); (B.K.)
| | - Mohsen Akbari
- Laboratory for Innovations in Micro Engineering (LiME), Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada; (A.S.); (M.A.); (S.S.G.); (B.K.)
- Center for Biomedical Research, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada
- Center for Advanced Materials and Related Technologies, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Acute Toxicity and Quality of Life of Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 107:943-948. [PMID: 32334033 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.03.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2020] [Accepted: 03/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the acute toxicity and quality of life (QOL) of hypofractionation compared with conventional fractionation for whole breast irradiation (WBI) after breast-conserving surgery. METHODS AND MATERIALS Women with node-negative breast cancer who had undergone breast-conserving surgery with clear margins were randomly assigned to conventional WBI of 5000 cGy in 25 fractions over 35 days or hypofractionated WBI of 4256 cGy in 16 fractions over 22 days. Acute skin toxicity and QOL were assessed at baseline and 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks from the start of treatment for a subgroup of patients. QOL was assessed at baseline and 4 weeks posttreatment for all patients. In the acute toxicity substudy, repeated measures modeling was used to investigate treatment by time interactions over the 8-week period for acute toxicity and QOL mean change score. QOL mean change score from baseline to 4 weeks posttreatment was compared for all patients. RESULTS In the acute toxicity substudy, 161 patients participated. In the main trial, 1152 patients participated. Acute skin toxicity was initially similar between groups but was less with hypofractionation compared with conventional fractionation toward the end of the 8-week period (P < .001). QOL at 6 weeks from the start of treatment was improved with hypofractionation for the skin side effects, breast side effects, fatigue, attractiveness, and convenience domains (all P < .05). In the main trial, hypofractionation resulted in improved overall QOL and QOL attributed to skin side effects, breast side effects, and attractiveness (all P < .01). CONCLUSIONS Hypofractionated WBI compared with conventional WBI resulted in less acute toxicity and improved QOL. This further supports the benefits of hypofractionation.
Collapse
|
34
|
Allam O, Park KE, Chandler L, Mozaffari MA, Ahmad M, Lu X, Alperovich M. The impact of radiation on lymphedema: a review of the literature. Gland Surg 2020; 9:596-602. [PMID: 32420295 PMCID: PMC7225495 DOI: 10.21037/gs.2020.03.20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2019] [Accepted: 12/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) is a common adjunct therapy in oncology. However, it carries a significant risk of lymphedema when utilized in some anatomic locations. Recent studies have provided insight into lymphedema pathophysiology, diagnostic techniques, and RT. This review will examine the role of RT in upper and lower extremity lymphedema. Radiation's role in increasing the risk of lymphedema through decreased lymphatic proliferation potential, interstitial fibrosis compressing lymphatic vessels, and mechanical insufficiency of the lymphatic system will be reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omar Allam
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Kitae E Park
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Ludmila Chandler
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Maham Ahmad
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Xiaona Lu
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Michael Alperovich
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Taylor CW, Dodwell D, Darby SC, Broggio J, McGale P. Eligibility for Partial Breast Radiotherapy in England. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2020; 32:217-220. [PMID: 31668377 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2019.09.061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2019] [Accepted: 09/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- C W Taylor
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
| | - D Dodwell
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - S C Darby
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - J Broggio
- Public Health England, Birmingham, UK
| | - P McGale
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Alhaddad JB, Bleibel JZ, Hoteit M, Bou Harb S, Haddad YB. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Secondary to Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer: A Case Report. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CASE REPORTS 2020; 21:e919477. [PMID: 32222723 PMCID: PMC7161935 DOI: 10.12659/ajcr.919477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Patient: Female, 69-year-old Final Diagnosis: ARDS secondary to radiotherapy for breast cancer Symptoms: Acute respiratory distress • dyspnea • hypotension • hypoxemia Medication:— Clinical Procedure: — Specialty: Critical Care Medicine
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jerar Z Bleibel
- Pulmonary and Critical Care Division, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Mayssaa Hoteit
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Souad Bou Harb
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Youssef B Haddad
- Pulmonary and Critical Care Division, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon.,Pulmonary and Critical Care Division, Lebanese Hospital University Medical Center - Geitaoui, Beirut, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Yap RV, De La Serna FM. Outcomes of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Using Blue Dye Method for Early Breast Cancer - A Single-Institution Experience in the Philippines. BREAST CANCER-TARGETS AND THERAPY 2020; 12:37-44. [PMID: 32210610 PMCID: PMC7073425 DOI: 10.2147/bctt.s242115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2019] [Accepted: 02/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to share our experience with SLNB in the Filipino population with early breast cancer. Patients and Methods A retrospective review was done on all patients with confirmed invasive breast carcinoma, tumor size of 5 cm or less (T1/T2), who preoperatively had no clinical signs of axillary metastasis and subsequently underwent SLNB with blue dye method from January 01, 2008 to December 31, 2017. Clinicopathologic profiles were recorded. Outcomes of patients who had SLNB only were assessed. Results One hundred twenty-nine patients matched the inclusion criteria with a mean age of 54.3 years. The majority (88.4%) had a total mastectomy. Invasive ductal carcinoma (65.1%) was the most common tumor. Estrogen and progesterone receptors were positive in 69% and 61.2% respectively while only 28.7% were HER2 positive. SLNB was successfully carried out in 126 (97.7%) patients with a range of 2-4 SLNs harvested. Thirty-four (26.4%) patients had completion ALND. With a median of 25 months follow-up, 75 out of 95 patients who underwent SLNB alone had follow-up data. Forty-six (61.3%) patients had seroma formation. One (1.3%) patient developed arm paresthesia, 2 (2.7%) local (chest wall) and 2 (2.7%) axillary recurrences after a negative SLNB. None of the patients developed lymphedema. Conclusion The blue dye method alone is acceptable and can be readily employed in institutions with limited resources. Even with the limited population, the morbidity and oncologic outcomes of patients who underwent SLNB alone were low and comparable to similar international published data. SLNB should be the preferred method for staging the axilla.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ralph Victor Yap
- Department of Surgery, Cebu Doctors' University Hospital, Cebu City, Cebu, Philippines
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Fastner G, Reitsamer R, Urbański B, Kopp P, Murawa D, Adamczyk B, Karzcewska A, Milecki P, Hager E, Reiland J, Ciabattoni A, Matuschek C, Budach W, Nowell K, Schumacher C, Ricke A, Fusco V, Vidali C, Alessandro M, Ivaldi GB, Ziegler I, Fussl C, Zehentmayr F, Grambozov B, Sir A, Hitzl W, Ricardi U, Sedlmayer F. Toxicity and cosmetic outcome after hypofractionated whole breast irradiation and boost-IOERT in early stage breast cancer (HIOB): First results of a prospective multicenter trial (NCT01343459). Radiother Oncol 2020; 146:136-142. [PMID: 32151790 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2019] [Revised: 01/27/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To assess the role of intraoperative radiation with electrons (IOERT) as tumor bed boost followed by hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (HWBI) after breast conserving surgery (BCS) of patients with low to intermediate risk breast cancer focusing on acute/late toxicity and cosmetic outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS In 2011, a prospective multicenter trial (NCT01343459) was started. Treatment consisted of BCS, IOERT (11.1 Gy) and HWBI (40.5 Gy in 15 fractions). In a single-arm design, 5-year IBR-rates are benchmarked by a sequential ratio test (SQRT) against best published evidences in 3 age groups (35-40 y, 41-50 y, >50 y). Acute/late toxicity and cosmesis were evaluated by validated scorings systems. RESULTS Of 627 eligible patients, 44 were excluded, leaving 583 to analyze. After a median follow-up (FUP) of 45 months (range 0-74), for acute effects CTCAE-score 0/1 was noted in 91% (end of HWBI) and 92% (4 weeks later), respectively. Late toxicity Grading 0/1 (mean values, ranges) by LENT-SOMA criteria were observed in 92.7% (89-97.3) at 4/5 months, rising to 96.5% (91-100) at 6 years post HWBI. Baseline cosmesis after wound healing prior to HWBI was scored as excellent/good in 86% of cases by subjective (patient) and in 74% by objective (doctor) assessment with no impairment thereafter. CONCLUSIONS Acute and late treatment tolerance of a combined Boost-IOERT/HWBI regimen is excellent in short/mid-term assessment. Postoperative cosmetic appearance is not impaired after 3 years FUP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerd Fastner
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, University Hospital Salzburg, Landeskrankenhaus, Salzburg, Austria.
| | - Roland Reitsamer
- Department of Gynecology, Paracelsus Medical University, University Hospital Salzburg, Landeskrankenhaus, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Bartosz Urbański
- Department of Radiotherapy and Gynecological Oncology, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznań, Poland
| | - Peter Kopp
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, University Hospital Salzburg, Landeskrankenhaus, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Dawid Murawa
- Clinic of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences University, Zielona Gora, Poland
| | - Beata Adamczyk
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznań, Poland
| | | | - Piotr Milecki
- Department of Radiotherapy Greater Poland Cancer Center and Chair of Electroradiology Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland
| | - Eva Hager
- Department of Radiotherapy/Radiooncology, Klagenfurt, Austria
| | - Juliann Reiland
- Avera McKennan Hospitals and University Health System, Avera Medical Group, Comprehensive Breast Care, Sioux Falls, United States
| | | | - Christiane Matuschek
- Medical Faculty, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Medical Faculty, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Kerri Nowell
- Department of General Surgery, UnityPoint Health-St.Lukes Hospital, Cedar Rapids, United States
| | - Claudia Schumacher
- Breast Center/Department of Senology, St.-Elisabeth Hospital Cologne-Hohenlind, Germany
| | - Angelika Ricke
- Radiation Institute-CDT-center for Diagnostic and Therapy GmbH, Cologne, Germany
| | - Vincenzo Fusco
- Radioterapia, IRCCS-CROB Reference Cancer Center Basilicata, Rionero in Vulture, Italy
| | - Cristiana Vidali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste (ASUITS), Italy
| | - Marina Alessandro
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Ospedale di Città di Castello, USL UMBRIA 1, Città di Castello, Italy
| | | | - Ingrid Ziegler
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, University Hospital Salzburg, Landeskrankenhaus, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Christoph Fussl
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, University Hospital Salzburg, Landeskrankenhaus, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Franz Zehentmayr
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, University Hospital Salzburg, Landeskrankenhaus, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Brane Grambozov
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, University Hospital Salzburg, Landeskrankenhaus, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Andreas Sir
- Department of Gynecology, Paracelsus Medical University, University Hospital Salzburg, Landeskrankenhaus, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Wolfgang Hitzl
- Research Office - Biostatistics, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Austria; Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, University Hospital Salzburg, Landeskrankenhaus, Salzburg, Austria
| | | | - Felix Sedlmayer
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, University Hospital Salzburg, Landeskrankenhaus, Salzburg, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Franco P, De Rose F, De Santis MC, Pasinetti N, Lancellotta V, Meduri B, Meattini I. Omission of postoperative radiation after breast conserving surgery: A progressive paradigm shift towards precision medicine. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2020; 21:112-119. [PMID: 32090175 PMCID: PMC7025960 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2020.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2019] [Revised: 02/02/2020] [Accepted: 02/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Post-operative radiotherapy is standard after breast conservation in early breast cancer. To de-escalate the treatment burden, indentifying a subset at very low risk of relapse is crucial. Clinical and pathological factors are important, but can be integrated with genomic signatures. Ongoing trials will provide evidence on patients at low risk for radiotherapy omission.
Radiation therapy is a standard therapeutic option in the post-operative setting for early breast cancer patients after breast conserving surgery, providing a substantial benefit in reducing the risk of local relapse with a consequent survival gain. Nevertheless, the reduction in the burden related to treatment is becoming crucial in modern oncology for both local and systemic therapies and investigational efforts are being put forward by radiations oncologists to identify a subset of women at very low risk to be potentially omitted from post-operative irradiation after breast conservation. Clinical factors, classical pathological parameters and new predictive scores derived from gene expression and next generation sequencing techniques are being integrated in the quest toward a reliable low-risk profile for breast cancer patients. We herein provide a comprehensive overview on the topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierfrancesco Franco
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Italy.,Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, AOU Citta' della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Fiorenza De Rose
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | | | - Nadia Pasinetti
- Radiation Oncology Department, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - Valentina Lancellotta
- Radiation Oncology Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario 'A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Bruno Meduri
- Radiation Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Icro Meattini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Radiation Oncology Unit - Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Melnik I, Yerushalmi R, Sobol Y, Magen A, Givon‐Madhala O, Birinbaum Y, Fenig E, Sharon E. Intraoperative radiation therapy for breast cancer—Immediate and 30‐month oncological outcomes. Breast J 2019; 26:946-951. [DOI: 10.1111/tbj.13708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2019] [Revised: 10/28/2019] [Accepted: 11/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Idit Melnik
- Department of Surgery B Rabin Medical Center – Hasharon Hospital Petach Tikva Israel
| | - Rinat Yerushalmi
- Department of Oncology Rabin Medical Center – Beilinson Hospital Petach Tikva Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel
| | - Yael Sobol
- Department of Surgery Rabin Medical Center – Beilinson Hospital Petach Tikva Israel
| | - Ada Magen
- Department of Surgery Rabin Medical Center – Beilinson Hospital Petach Tikva Israel
| | - Osnat Givon‐Madhala
- Department of Surgery Rabin Medical Center – Beilinson Hospital Petach Tikva Israel
| | - Yehudit Birinbaum
- Department of Surgery Rabin Medical Center – Beilinson Hospital Petach Tikva Israel
| | - Eyal Fenig
- Department of Oncology Rabin Medical Center – Beilinson Hospital Petach Tikva Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel
| | - Eran Sharon
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel
- Department of Surgery Rabin Medical Center – Beilinson Hospital Petach Tikva Israel
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Masood S. The changing role of pathologists from morphologists to molecular pathologists in the era of precision medicine. Breast J 2019; 26:27-34. [PMID: 31876097 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.13728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2019] [Accepted: 12/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Pathology is the study of human illness. Throughout centuries of scientific discoveries, pathologic examination of tissue samples has been the gold standard for diagnosis and pathologists have been involved in the elucidation of aetiology, assessment of the biology, clinicopathologic correlation and prediction of prognosis. The advances in science and technology and focused interest in breast cancer research have provided ample opportunities for pathologists to participate in better understanding of the basic fundamental cascade of events leading to tumorigenesis in breast cancer. They also partnered with their clinical colleagues and scientists to find more effective therapeutic options. This change has been possible with recognition of the fact that morphology alone may not be sufficient to tell the entire story of clinical behaviour of all breast cancer patients. In addition, the realization of heterogeneity of breast cancer and the differences in the expression of various biomarkers and the observed differences in response to therapy have resulted in extensive efforts to better define the characters of each breast cancer subtype. It is now generally agreed that breast cancer is not a single disease and not all patients with breast cancer can benefit from the same therapy. These changes have brought new challenges for pathologists. Pathologist are now required to not only provide diagnosis, but also study the precise molecular characterization of each individual breast cancer case and play a significant role in the treatment planning of breast cancer patients. This remarkable change in the role of the pathologist require his/her involvement in the modern taxonomy of this disease and to rise to the challenge of genomic medicine and molecular diagnostics, which are the fastest growing areas of medicine. Emphasis should also been placed to create a new morphomolecular pathology and train our young pathologist to expand beyond morphology and to embrace the power of molecular diagnostics, in order to be able to effectively practise in the era of precision medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahla Masood
- Department of Pathology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jax, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Whelan TJ, Julian JA, Berrang TS, Kim DH, Germain I, Nichol AM, Akra M, Lavertu S, Germain F, Fyles A, Trotter T, Perera FE, Balkwill S, Chafe S, McGowan T, Muanza T, Beckham WA, Chua BH, Gu CS, Levine MN, Olivotto IA. External beam accelerated partial breast irradiation versus whole breast irradiation after breast conserving surgery in women with ductal carcinoma in situ and node-negative breast cancer (RAPID): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2019; 394:2165-2172. [PMID: 31813635 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32515-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 242] [Impact Index Per Article: 48.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2019] [Revised: 09/24/2019] [Accepted: 10/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whole breast irradiation delivered once per day over 3-5 weeks after breast conserving surgery reduces local recurrence with good cosmetic results. Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) delivered over 1 week to the tumour bed was developed to provide a more convenient treatment. In this trial, we investigated if external beam APBI was non-inferior to whole breast irradiation. METHODS We did this multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial in 33 cancer centres in Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Women aged 40 years or older with ductal carcinoma in situ or node-negative breast cancer treated by breast conserving surgery were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either external beam APBI (38·5 Gy in ten fractions delivered twice per day over 5-8 days) or whole breast irradiation (42·5 Gy in 16 fractions once per day over 21 days, or 50 Gy in 25 fractions once per day over 35 days). Patients and clinicans were not masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence (IBTR), analysed by intention to treat. The trial was designed on the basis of an expected 5 year IBTR rate of 1·5% in the whole breast irradiation group with 85% power to exclude a 1·5% increase in the APBI group; non-inferiority was shown if the upper limit of the two-sided 90% CI for the IBTR hazard ratio (HR) was less than 2·02. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00282035. FINDINGS Between Feb 7, 2006, and July 15, 2011, we enrolled 2135 women. 1070 were randomly assigned to receive APBI and 1065 were assigned to receive whole breast irradiation. Six patients in the APBI group withdrew before treatment, four more did not receive radiotherapy, and 16 patients received whole breast irradiation. In the whole breast irradiation group, 16 patients withdrew, and two more did not receive radiotherapy. In the APBI group, a further 14 patients were lost to follow-up and nine patients withdrew during the follow-up period. In the whole breast irradiation group, 20 patients were lost to follow-up and 35 withdrew during follow-up. Median follow-up was 8·6 years (IQR 7·3-9·9). The 8-year cumulative rates of IBTR were 3·0% (95% CI 1·9-4·0) in the APBI group and 2·8% (1·8-3·9) in the whole breast irradiation group. The HR for APBI versus whole breast radiation was 1·27 (90% CI 0·84-1·91). Acute radiation toxicity (grade ≥2, within 3 months of radiotherapy start) occurred less frequently in patients treated with APBI (300 [28%] of 1070 patients) than whole breast irradiation (484 [45%] of 1065 patients, p<0·0001). Late radiation toxicity (grade ≥2, later than 3 months) was more common in patients treated with APBI (346 [32%] of 1070 patients) than whole breast irradiation (142 [13%] of 1065 patients; p<0·0001). Adverse cosmesis (defined as fair or poor) was more common in patients treated with APBI than in those treated by whole breast irradiation at 3 years (absolute difference, 11·3%, 95% CI 7·5-15·0), 5 years (16·5%, 12·5-20·4), and 7 years (17·7%, 12·9-22·3). INTERPRETATION External beam APBI was non-inferior to whole breast irradiation in preventing IBTR. Although less acute toxicity was observed, the regimen used was associated with an increase in moderate late toxicity and adverse cosmesis, which might be related to the twice per day treatment. Other approaches, such as treatment once per day, might not adversely affect cosmesis and should be studied. FUNDING Canadian Institutes for Health Research and Canadian Breast Cancer Research Alliance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy J Whelan
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University and Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| | - Jim A Julian
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University and Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Tanya S Berrang
- Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer - Victoria, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Do-Hoon Kim
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University and Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Isabelle Germain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Alan M Nichol
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of British Columbia and BC Cancer - Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Mohamed Akra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Sophie Lavertu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Francois Germain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada; Division of Radiation Oncology, University of British Columbia and BC Cancer - Kelowna, BC, Canada
| | - Anthony Fyles
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Francisco E Perera
- Department of Oncology, Western University and London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON, Canada
| | | | - Susan Chafe
- Department of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Alberta and Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Thomas McGowan
- Trillium Health Partners Credit Valley Hospital, Mississauga, ON, Canada
| | - Thierry Muanza
- Department of Oncology, McGill University and Jewish General Hospital Segal Cancer Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Wayne A Beckham
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria and BC Cancer - Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Boon H Chua
- University of New South Wales and Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Chu Shu Gu
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University and Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Mark N Levine
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University and Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Costanzo D. Oncologic breast surgery: An historical perspective. Breast J 2019; 26:1363-1365. [PMID: 31742815 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.13694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2019] [Accepted: 10/31/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is the most common female cancer worldwide and the second most common cause of cancer-related death in women. BC diagnosis and management have changed dramatically over the years. We recount the historic milestones that have brought the surgical management of breast cancer to its current state.
Collapse
|
44
|
Inoue H, Hirano A, Ogura K, Kamimura M, Hattori A, Yukawa H, Sakaguchi S, Tanaka N, Matsuoka A, Kodera A, Shimizu T. Breast-conserving surgery without radiation in elderly women with early breast cancer. Surg Oncol 2019; 31:22-25. [PMID: 31479976 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2019.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2019] [Revised: 07/07/2019] [Accepted: 08/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Irradiation after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) decreases the incidence of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) and breast cancer-related death. However, daily radiation treatments are burdensome to elderly patients, whose risk of IBTR is relatively low. Since 2001, we have offered BCS without radiation to patients meeting our selection criteria. This study assessed the prognosis of the patients who chose this option. METHODS Between 2001 and 2014, 203 patients met the selection criteria: aged ≥60 years; pathologically node-negative, hormone-positive breast cancer; a negative surgical margin; and no lymphovascular invasion. Among these patients, 84 and 119 underwent BCS with or without radiation, respectively. IBTR, overall survival (OS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were evaluated. RESULTS The median follow-up duration was 6.2 years. There were no significant differences in tumor size or the number of patients with adjuvant therapy between the groups. The 5-year IBTR rates were 0.9% and 1.6% in the non-irradiated and irradiated groups, respectively (p = 0.308). The 5-year OS rates were 94.1% and 98.7% (p = 0.391). Similarly, the 5-year BCSS rates were 97.2% and 98.7% (p = 0.812). CONCLUSION It is suggested that the omission of irradiation could be an option for elderly breast cancer patients who satisfy our criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroaki Inoue
- Department of Breast Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Thoracic, Endocrine Surgery and Oncology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Akira Hirano
- Department of Breast Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Kaoru Ogura
- Department of Breast Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mari Kamimura
- Department of Breast Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akinori Hattori
- Department of Breast Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroko Yukawa
- Department of Breast Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shiho Sakaguchi
- Department of Breast Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Natsuko Tanaka
- Department of Breast Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Aya Matsuoka
- Department of Breast Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Asaka Kodera
- Department of Breast Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tadao Shimizu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
He L, Lv Y, Song Y, Zhang B. The prognosis comparison of different molecular subtypes of breast tumors after radiotherapy and the intrinsic reasons for their distinct radiosensitivity. Cancer Manag Res 2019; 11:5765-5775. [PMID: 31303789 PMCID: PMC6612049 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s213663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2019] [Accepted: 05/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy can increase the cell cycle arrest that promotes apoptosis, reduces the risk of tumor recurrence and has become an irreplaceable component of systematic treatment for patients with breast cancer. Substantial advances in precise radiotherapy unequivocally indicate that the benefits of radiotherapy vary depending on intrinsic subtypes of the disease; luminal A breast cancer has the highest benefit whereas human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) are affected to a lesser extent irrespective of the selection of radiotherapy strategies, such as conventional whole-breast irradiation (CWBI), accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI), and hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (HWBI). The benefit disparity correlates with the differential invasiveness, malignance, and radiosensitivity of the subtypes. A combination of a number of molecular mechanisms leads to the strong radioresistant profile of HER2-positive breast cancer, and sensitization to irradiation can be induced by multiple drugs or compounds in luminal disease and TNBC. In this review, we aimed to summarize the prognostic differences between various subtypes of breast tumors after CWBI, APBI, and HWBI, the potential reasons for drug-enhanced radiosensitivity in luminal breast tumors and TNBC, and the robust radioresistance of HER2-positive cancer. ![]()
Point your SmartPhone at the code above. If you have a QR code reader the video abstract will appear. Or use: https://youtu.be/ugTrSMuQVI8
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin He
- Breast Center B Ward, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Yang Lv
- Department of Oncology, The PLA Navy Anqing Hospital, Anqing, Anhui Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuhua Song
- Breast Center B Ward, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Biyuan Zhang
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Fekrmandi F, Panzarella T, Dinniwell RE, Helou J, Levin W. Predictive factors for persistent and late radiation complications in breast cancer survivors. Clin Transl Oncol 2019; 22:360-369. [PMID: 31123988 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-019-02133-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2019] [Accepted: 05/11/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE With improved diagnostic techniques and treatments of breast cancer, overall survival times are longer, giving more opportunity for normal tissue complications of treatment to manifest. Radiation late effects (RLEs) could have profound long-term impacts on the quality of life of the survivors. The aim of this study was to identify predictive factors influencing timing and types of complications in patients referred to the Adult Radiation Late Effects Clinic (ARLEC). METHODS In a period of 16 years, 296 breast cancer patients were referred to the ARLEC. The clinical records were retrospectively studied to collect epidemiologic, medical and treatment data. Associations were sought between candidate predictive factors and time to the first complication after radiation treatment (RT) completion (primary outcome), and pain or swelling (secondary outcomes) using univariable and multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses. All analyses were performed in SAS, version 9.4. RESULTS All patients were female with a mean age of 56.3 years. The first treatment-related complication occurred after a median of 3 months. Patients were followed at ARLEC for a median of 18 months. Older age and delay from surgery to RT (S-RT delay) were associated with earlier onset of complications (both p < 0.001). The most common complications were breast pain (62.1%) and swelling (45.9%). Histology and RT boost were associated with pain (p = 0.035 and 0.013). RT boost and S-RT delay on the other hand were associated with swelling (p = 0.013 and 0.005). CONCLUSIONS Clinical factors identified could help recognize the patients at high risk for developing RLEs and alert physicians to initiate earlier diagnostic and therapeutic measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Fekrmandi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, 700 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1Z5, Canada
| | - T Panzarella
- Biostatistics Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - R E Dinniwell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program, Western University, London, Canada
| | - J Helou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, 700 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1Z5, Canada
| | - W Levin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, 700 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1Z5, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Acea-Nebril B, García-Novoa A, Cereijo-Garea C, Builes-Ramirez S, Bouzon-Alejandro A, Mosquera-Oses J. Single-Incision Approach for Breast-Conserving Surgery: Effectiveness, Complications and Quality of Life. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26:2466-2474. [PMID: 31102095 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07443-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess the success of tumor resection and its postoperative complications, satisfaction, and quality of life using a single-incision approach for breast-conserving surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was an observational, prospective study conducted between 2015 and 2018. The study group consisted of patients in whom tumor extirpation and lymph node (LN) staging was performed using a single incision, while the control group consisted of patients who underwent a breast-conserving procedure with independent incisions. All patients were given the preoperative and postoperative module of the Breast-Q™ questionnaire. RESULTS Overall, 226 patients met the study's inclusion criteria, 152 of whom successfully underwent breast and LN removal using a single-incision approach (98.7% overall success). There were no significant differences in postoperative complications, although there was a greater tendency towards breast seroma in the study group and axillary neuralgia in the control group. Both groups presented a similar rate of breast and axillary salvage surgery. The postoperative Breast-Q™ questionnaire showed that the study group had greater satisfaction with both the breast and the information provided by the surgeon. CONCLUSION The single-incision approach is as effective as standard surgery, with custom incisions in terms of breast resection, LN staging, and complications. There was greater satisfaction with both the breast and the information provided.
Collapse
|
48
|
Demicheli R, Dillekås H, Straume O, Biganzoli E. Distant metastasis dynamics following subsequent surgeries after primary breast cancer removal. Breast Cancer Res 2019; 21:57. [PMID: 31046808 PMCID: PMC6498656 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-019-1139-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2018] [Accepted: 04/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of the research was to separate the distant metastasis (DM) enhancing effect due to breast tumour removal from that due to surgical manoeuvre by itself. Methods DM dynamics following surgery for ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence (IBTR), contralateral breast cancer (CBC) and delayed reconstruction (REC), which was performed after the original breast cancer surgical removal, was analysed. A total of 338 patients with IBTR, 239 with CBC and 312 with REC were studied. Results The DM dynamics following IBTR, CBC and REC, when assessed with time origin at their surgical treatment, is similar to the analogous pattern following primary tumour removal, with a first major peak at about 18 months and a second lower one at about 5 years from surgery. The time span between primary tumour removal and the second surgery is influential on DM risk levels for IBTR and CBC patients, not for REC patients. Conclusions The role of breast tumour removal is different from the role of surgery by itself. Our findings suggest that the major effect of reconstructive surgery is microscopic metastasis acceleration, while breast tumour surgical removal (either primary or IBTR or CBC) involves both tumour homeostasis interruption and microscopic metastasis growth acceleration. The removal of a breast tumour would eliminate its homeostatic restrains on metastatic foci, thus allowing metastasis development, which, in turn, would be supported by the forwarding action of the mechanisms triggered by the surgical wounding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Romano Demicheli
- Laboratory of Medical Statistics, Biometry and Bioinformatics "Giulio A. Maccacaro", Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan Campus Cascina Rosa, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, via Vanzetti 5, 20133, Milan, Italy.
| | - Hanna Dillekås
- Department of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, N 5021, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, N 5012, Bergen, Norway
| | - Oddbjørn Straume
- Department of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, N 5021, Bergen, Norway.,Centre of Cancer Biomarkers, University of Bergen, N 5012, Bergen, Norway
| | - Elia Biganzoli
- Laboratory of Medical Statistics, Biometry and Bioinformatics "Giulio A. Maccacaro", Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan Campus Cascina Rosa, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, via Vanzetti 5, 20133, Milan, Italy.,Laboratory of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, "Giulio A. Maccacaro", Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Kawaguchi H, Tsujino K, Miki M, Matsumoto Y, Ota Y, Hirokaga K, Takao S, Soejima T, Sasaki R. Patient preference study comparing hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated whole-breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2019; 49:545-553. [PMID: 30796835 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyz003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2018] [Revised: 12/25/2018] [Accepted: 01/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroki Kawaguchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe City, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Kayoko Tsujino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hyogo Cancer Center, 13–70 Kitaoji-Cho, Akashi, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Mayuko Miki
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe City, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Yoko Matsumoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hyogo Cancer Center, 13–70 Kitaoji-Cho, Akashi, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Yosuke Ota
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hyogo Cancer Center, 13–70 Kitaoji-Cho, Akashi, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Koichi Hirokaga
- Department of Breast Surgery, Hyogo Cancer Center, 13–70 Kitaoji-Cho, Akashi, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Shintaro Takao
- Department of Breast Surgery, Hyogo Cancer Center, 13–70 Kitaoji-Cho, Akashi, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Toshinori Soejima
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kobe Proton Center, 1-6-8 Minatojima-minamimachi, Chuo-ku, Kobe City, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Ryohei Sasaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe City, Hyogo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
A phase II study investigating the acute toxicity of targeted intraoperative radiotherapy as tumor-bed boost plus whole breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery in Korean patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018; 174:157-163. [DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-5038-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2018] [Accepted: 11/02/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|