Adjuvant exemestane with ovarian suppression in premenopausal breast cancer

Systematic literature review and trial-level meta-analysis of aromatase inhibitors vs tamoxifen in patients with HR+/HER2- early breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Current standard of care for patients with HR+/HER2- early breast cancer (EBC) includes adjuvant endocrine therapy with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) or tamoxifen (TAM). We present a trial-level meta-analysis on efficacy of AI vs TAM in patients with HR+/HER2- EBC.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted using key medical literature databases (eg, PubMed; inception to October 2023) and data from conferences (to December 2023). Phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that had ≥80 % of patients with HR+/HER2- EBC (or available subgroup data) and reported a disease-free survival (DFS) hazard ratio for AI vs TAM were included in the meta-analysis, regardless of menopausal status and ovarian function suppression (OFS) use. The generic invariance method was used to calculate a pooled effect estimate of DFS hazard ratios and 95 % CIs. A base-case analysis (all RCTs) and scenario analyses for NSAI-only, premenopausal, and postmenopausal RCTs were conducted.

RESULTS

Five RCTs were identified for inclusion in the meta-analysis. In the base-case analysis, DFS significantly favored AI ± OFS vs TAM ± OFS (pooled hazard ratio, 0.68; 95 % CI, 0.61-0.76; P < .0001). Results from scenario analyses were consistent with the base case; NSAI-only (pooled hazard ratio, 0.68; 95 % CI, 0.59-0.78; P < .0001), premenopausal (pooled hazard ratio, 0.65; 95 % CI, 0.56-0.76; P < .0001), and postmenopausal (pooled hazard ratio, 0.72; 95 % CI, 0.61-0.86; P = .001) RCTs favored AI ± OFS over TAM ± OFS.

CONCLUSIONS

This trial-level meta-analysis demonstrated a significant DFS benefit with AI vs TAM for patients with HR+/HER2- EBC, which was more pronounced in premenopausal women.

Real-world risk of recurrence and treatment outcomes with adjuvant endocrine therapy in patients with stage II-III HR+/HER2- early breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Despite adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET), recurrence is still a concern for patients with HR+/HER2- early breast cancer (EBC). We assessed recurrence risk in real-world patients with stage II/III HR+/HER2- EBC treated with adjuvant ET.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted using the ConcertAI Patient360 database (January 1995 to April 2021) of patients with stage II/III HR+/HER2- EBC ≥18 years who underwent surgery and received adjuvant ET. Risk of recurrence was assessed using invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) with adapted STEEP criteria. An ET subanalysis evaluated iDFS, distant disease-free survival, and overall survival in patients receiving adjuvant non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors (NSAI) vs tamoxifen.

RESULTS

In the full analysis cohort (N = 3133), the risk of an iDFS event was 26.1 % at 5 years, rising to 45.0 % at 10 years. Among patients with stage II disease, the risk of an iDFS event at 5 and 10 years was 22.7 % and 40.5 %, respectively; stage III 5- and 10-year risk was 40.4 % and 62.9 %. Patients with node-negative disease had 5- and 10-year risks of 22.1 % and 36.9 %, respectively; node-positive 5- and 10-year risk was 28.9 % and 49.4 %. ET subanalysis showed improved iDFS with NSAI ± ovarian function suppression vs tamoxifen ± ovarian function suppression (HR, 0.83; 95 % CI, 0.69-0.98; p = 0.031); this trend was observed regardless of menopausal status.

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world study highlights the considerable risk of recurrence with adjuvant ET in patients with stage II or III HR+/HER2- EBC (including node-negative disease) and confirms the need for improved treatment options.

Comparison of oncological outcomes of premenopausal with ovarian function suppression versus postmenopausal women in ER+/HER2- breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The Rx for positive node endocrine-responsive breast cancer trial highlighted that premenopausal (PRE) women who underwent chemotherapy exhibited superior survival rates compared to postmenopausal (POST) counterparts, but showed worse survival without chemotherapy. This raises the question whether application of ovarian function suppression (OFS) in PRE women aligns with their cancer biology, treatment response, and outcomes observed in POST women.

METHODS

Data from the Seoul National University Hospital breast cancer cohort focusing on patients with stage pT1-3, pN0-1, estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), and HER2-negative breast cancer were analyzed. Survival outcomes, including invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS), were compared between PRE women receiving OFS and POST women, with chemotherapy usage as a stratification factor. Propensity score matching was performed.

RESULT

We analyzed 3483 patients, comprising 2901 POST and 582 PRE women with OFS. In the cohort without chemotherapy, the 10-year iDFS rates were 90.3 % and 88.3 % (hazard ratio [HR], 1.32; p = 0.16), and 10-year DRFS rates were 94.3 % and 96.1 % (HR, 0.78; p = 0.41) for POST and PRE women with OFS, respectively. Among women treated with chemotherapy, 10-year iDFS rates were 83.0 % and 79.5 % (HR, 1.21; p = 0.37), and DRFS rates were 86.7 % and 85.7 % (HR, 1.14; p = 0.58) for POST and PRE women with OFS, respectively. These results remained consistent after PSM.

CONCLUSION

Oncological outcomes of PRE women receiving OFS were comparable to those of POST women with ER+ and HER2-early breast cancer, irrespective of chemotherapy administration.

Evaluation of dermatologic adverse events associated with aromatase inhibitors: insights from the FAERS database

Background

This study evaluates the risk of dermatologic adverse events (AEs) associated with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) through an analysis of data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Methods

FAERS data from Q1 2004 to Q2 2024 were analyzed for dermatologic AEs related to AIs. A disproportionality analysis using reporting odds ratio (ROR) assessed AE risk, and the time to onset of these AEs was examined.

Results

Out of 21,035,995 AE reports, 2,237 involved skin impairment. Sixty-one preferred terms (PTs) presented positive signals, including nail disorders, onychoclasis, and abnormal hair growth in patients on anastrozole, exemestane, or letrozole. The highest associations were with pseudo cellulitis (ROR = 57.73), anhidrosis (ROR = 48.68), and nail toxicity (ROR = 38.40). Strong associations were observed for anastrozole (ROR = 1.07, 95% confidence interval: 1.03-1.11) and exemestane (ROR = 1.1, 95% CI: 1.04-1.16), but not for letrozole. Eleven dermatologic PTs had onset times under 50 days, with the earliest at 2 days; the latest, skin ulcer, appeared at 241.5 days with exemestane.

Conclusion

The findings provide substantial evidence of dermatologic AEs associated with AIs, particularly anastrozole and exemestane, emphasizing the importance of dermatologic monitoring during AI therapy and the need for further research into AI-induced dermatologic AEs.

Long-term health-related quality of life among adolescent and young adult breast cancer survivors

PURPOSE

As the prognosis for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with breast cancer has improved, long-term health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has become increasingly important. This study aimed to analyze the long-term HRQoL of AYA breast cancer survivors compared to an age-matched normative population and to identify factors associated with HRQoL.

METHODS

Secondary analyses were conducted using data from the SURVAYA study. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) was used to assess HRQoL. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare HRQoL scores of AYA breast cancer survivors with those of the normative population (n = 409). Linear regression models were constructed to identify patient and treatment characteristics associated with HRQoL.

RESULTS

A total of 944 female AYA breast cancer survivors were included, with a median age of 36.0 years and a median follow-up of 12.2 years. AYA breast cancer survivors scored significantly lower on five functional scales: physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social, and higher on five symptom scales: fatigue, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, and financial impact compared to the normative population. Being in a relationship, having a positive body image, and adaptive coping were positively associated with HRQoL, while older age, chemotherapy, unemployment, and maladaptive coping were negatively associated.

CONCLUSION

AYA breast cancer survivors experience significantly compromised long-term HRQoL compared to an age-matched normative population. These results highlight the need for tailored follow-up care and long-term support, as well as the importance of shared decision-making about the benefits and risks of treatments before initiation.

Bone Health Management in Men Commencing Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer and Women Commencing Anti-Oestrogen Therapy for Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Survival of patients with prostate and breast cancer, the commonest cancer in men and women, respectively, has markedly improved with advances in early diagnosis, treatment and multi-disciplinary care by the oncology and surgical community. However, the use of increasingly potent endocrine therapies may cause bone loss, resulting in secondary osteoporosis.

REVIEW

This review summarises the current management of cancer treatment-induced bone loss in this group of patients at high risk of osteoporotic fractures with their attendant morbidity and mortality.

CONCLUSION

Bone health is an increasingly important part of cancer survivorship. Radiation and medical oncologists, urologists, bone health experts, general practitioners, healthcare professional bodies and bone health and cancer consumer organisations should increase awareness of the potential adverse effect of endocrine therapy on bone health. While this should never delay cancer treatment, bone health should be part of routine care for men and women receiving endocrine therapy for prostate and breast cancer.

Clinical Management of Ovarian Function Suppression in Premenopausal Women With Breast Cancer: A Survey of Members of ASCO

PURPOSE

Ovarian function suppression (OFS) with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHas) is a standard of care for premenopausal patients with high-risk stage II/III hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (BC). Practical guidance on the optimal choice of GnRHa, timing, schedule, and monitoring is limited. Our aim was to determine how oncologists use OFS in routine care.

METHODS

We designed a questionnaire to determine the choice of GnRHa, schedule, duration, initiation, use of bone modifiers, and monitoring of estradiol (E2). The questionnaire was sent to oncologists treating BC, in practice for >1 year and participating in the ASCO Research Survey Pool (RSP). It was also forwarded by investigators to oncologists meeting these criteria. The survey was open between November 14, 2023, and January 5, 2024.

RESULTS

Of 996 oncologists participating in the ASCO RSP, 178 (18%) completed the survey. An additional 56 oncologists contacted by investigators responded. Respondents were from the United States (57%), Asia (15%), and Europe (14%). Goserelin (54%) and leuprolide (39%) were the most frequently used GnRHas and were administered once every month by 46%. Approaches to starting GnRHas were varied. Most continued them for the duration of aromatase inhibitor therapy (57%). Estradiol monitoring was performed regularly, sometimes, or never by 43%, 27%, and 27%, respectively. The E2 assays used were standard (65%), ultrasensitive (16%), and unknown (14%). Interpreting E2 assay results were considered difficult by 55%; however, 62% of oncologists changed treatment on the basis of them. A total of 92% of respondents would like ASCO guidance on the practical use of OFS.

CONCLUSION

Considerable practice variation exists for similar clinical scenarios in OFS administration. Respondents would welcome ASCO guidance on all aspects of OFS.

The treatment of breast cancer in the era of precision medicine

The management of breast cancer, one of the most common and heterogeneous malignancies, has transformed with the advent of precision medicine. This review explores current developments in genetic profiling, molecular diagnostics, and targeted therapies that have revolutionized breast cancer treatment. Key innovations, such as cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), have improved outcomes for hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-positive (HER2+), and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtypes remarkably. Additionally, emerging treatments, such as PI3K inhibitors, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, and mRNA-based therapies, offer new avenues for targeting specific genetic mutations and improving treatment response, particularly in difficult-to-treat breast cancer subtypes. The integration of liquid biopsy technologies provides a non-invasive approach for real-time monitoring of tumor evolution and treatment response, thus enabling dynamic adjustments to therapy. Molecular imaging and artificial intelligence (AI) are increasingly crucial in enhancing diagnostic precision, personalizing treatment plans, and predicting therapeutic outcomes. As precision medicine continues to evolve, it has the potential to significantly improve survival rates, decrease recurrence, and enhance quality of life for patients with breast cancer. By combining cutting-edge diagnostics, personalized therapies, and emerging treatments, precision medicine can transform breast cancer care by offering more effective, individualized, and less invasive treatment options.

Adjuvant ovarian function suppression in premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early breast cancer: a multi-center retrospective study

PURPOSE

Based on SOFT and TEXT trials data, a composite recurrence risk score (CR-score) model was developed for early premenopausal women with hormone receptor -positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer using the subgroup treatment effect map (STEPP) method to guide ovarian function suppression (OFS) application. However, the CR-score model has yet to be validate in real-world settings.

METHODS

Our study included patients diagnosed between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2021, from 42 breast centers in China. We utilized restricted cubic splines (RCS) to visualize continuous CR-score and hazard ratios for breast cancer recurrence. After adjusting for confounding factors via propensity score matching (PSM), Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare disease-free survival (DFS) among premenopausal patients between the OFS and non-OFS groups.

RESULTS

The hazard ratio of recurrence consistently increased with higher CR-scores. Notably, 87.68% of patients who received OFS had a CR-score above 1.42. Following PSM, adjuvant OFS significantly improved DFS in the high CR-score group (CR-score above 1.42)(HR 0.571; 95% CI 0.403-0.809; p = 0.001). Among patients younger than 35 years old, those receiving OFS had significantly better DFS compared to those without OFS. After matching for age, grade, ER, PR, and lymph node status, OFS can significantly improve the DFS of those chemotherapy-treated patients with CR-score above 1.42 (p = 0.006). Furthermore, the group with high CR-score but ER expression below 50% did not benefit from OFS.

CONCLUSION

The CR-score model can effectively guide clinicians in making decisions regarding OFS for premenopausal patients with HR+/HER2- breast cancer.

Differential benefit of adjuvant everolimus according to endocrine therapy backbone in the randomized UNIRAD trial

BACKGROUND

The randomized, double-blind UNIRAD trial evaluating the addition of 2 years of everolimus to endocrine therapy in patients with high-risk, early luminal breast cancer failed to demonstrate a benefit. We report the subgroup analyses.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We randomly assigned 1278 patients in a 1 : 1 ratio to receive 2 years of placebo or everolimus, added to endocrine therapy for up to 4 years after initiation. Randomization was stratified by endocrine therapy agent, prior adjuvant versus neoadjuvant therapy, progesterone receptor expression, and lymph node involvement. Subgroup analyses by each stratification factor were pre-specified. Post hoc analyses were carried out according to menopausal status and age. Treatment adherence was also analyzed.

RESULTS

We observed a limited trend toward more favorable prognostic features in tamoxifen-treated patients, with more frequent estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive tumors (88.5% versus 84.1%, P = 0.026) and less frequent pN2-positive status (39.8% versus 46.0%, P = 0.032). In premenopausal women, we observed a numerical benefit of everolimus: 3-year disease-free survival was 86% in the placebo group and 90% in the everolimus group (hazard ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.43-1.34). In premenopausal patients treated with tamoxifen (n = 153; 12.3%), we observed an even stronger trend in favor of everolimus as 3-year DFS was 84% in the placebo group and 91% in the everolimus group (hazard ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.28-1.02). Early discontinuation of either everolimus or placebo was less frequent in the tamoxifen group than in the aromatase inhibitor group: 48.0% versus 56.9% (P = 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

The present post hoc analyses generate hypotheses regarding the interaction between menopausal status, tamoxifen, and everolimus in patients with high-risk, ER-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2-negative early breast cancer. They suggest that tamoxifen alone is an underpowered endocrine treatment in high-risk premenopausal patients.

Endocrine Therapy Interruption, Resumption, and Outcomes Associated With Pregnancy After Breast Cancer

This cohort study examines interruption and resumption of endocrine therapy among women with breast cancer who became pregnant.

Escalation and De-Escalation Strategies for Endocrine Therapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer

Although adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) greatly lowers the risk of recurrence and mortality in hormone receptor (HR)-positive early-stage breast cancer (EBC), more than 20% of patients may experience relapses within 10 years, often manifesting as incurable distant metastases. To improve outcomes, ovarian function suppression (OFS) with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) added to tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors like exemestane have shown significant disease-free survival (DFS) and, in some cases, overall survival (OS) benefits. CDK4/6 inhibitors, a cornerstone in metastatic HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer (MBC), are now being explored in EBC. Trials with abemaciclib and ribociclib have shown promise in high-risk EBC. For BRCA-mutant patients, the PARP inhibitor olaparib, as demonstrated in the OlympiA trial, significantly improved invasive DFS and OS when used as adjuvant therapy for one year. Conversely, de-escalation strategies are also emerging. Recent studies suggest that younger premenopausal women with low-risk disease may safely interrupt ET after 18-30 months to pursue pregnancy. Additionally, genomic tumor profiling is widely utilized to decide on aggressiveness of adjuvant therapy of EBC. These advancements reflect a shift toward personalized adjuvant therapy, integrating targeted treatments like CDK4/6 inhibitors and PARP inhibitors, optimizing ET with OFS, and balancing efficacy with quality of life through de-escalation strategies. This tailored approach aims to improve long-term outcomes for HR-positive EBC patients.

CYP2D6 polymorphisms and endoxifen concentration in Chinese patients with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The plasma concentration of endoxifen, the active metabolite of tamoxifen, might be affected by different CYP2D6 genotypes in patients with breast cancer, but solid evidence is still lacking in Asian patients. This prospective study aimed to investigate the relationship between CYP2D6 genetic polymorphisms and endoxifen plasma concentrations among Chinese patients with breast cancer treated with tamoxifen.

METHODS

From August 2015 to June 2018, 110 patients with breast cancer were enrolled. CYP2D6 variant alleles and endoxifen plasma concentration were determined using Sanger sequencing and high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, respectively.

RESULTS

The most frequent allele of CYP2D6 was *10 (56.4%). The most frequent genotype of CYP2D6 was *10/*10 (33%), *1/*10(28.2%) and *2/*10(14.5%). Sixty-four patients (58.2%) were Normal Metabolizers (NM), while 46 (41.8%) were Intermediate Metabolizers (IM). All patients except two had endoxifen concentrations above the threshold of 5.9ng/ml. The median endoxifen plasma concentrations for patients with CYP2D6 genotypes *1/*2 and *1/10 were higher compared to other genotypes (p = 0.012). The median endoxifen plasma concentration was higher in NM than in IM (18ng/ml vs. 13ng/ml, p = 0.0077). Patients with CYP2D6*10(T/T) had lower endoxifen concentrations than those with *10(C/T) and *10(C/C) but the difference was not significant. There were no significant differences in adverse events between patients in the NM and IM groups or between patients with the CYP2D6*10 (T/T) genotype and non-*10 (T/T) genotype.

CONCLUSION

Only CYP2D6 IMs and NMs were identified in this study. Almost all patients had the endoxifen concentrations above the threshold. The endoxifen plasma concentration was lower in CYP2D6 IMs than in NMs, but these variants did not compromise the adverse effects of tamoxifen in Asian patients with breast cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study protocol was approved by the institutional review boards of Sun YatSen University Cancer Center (Ethics approval number, B201506501,20160115).

Prevalence of Occult Ovarian Cancer and Metastatic Breast Cancer in Ovarian Ablation Specimens of Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: Implications for Tissue Sampling Strategies, Early Ovarian Cancer Detection and Resource Utilization

Bilateral oophorectomy is one method of hormone suppression for premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Such specimens could, in theory, harbor occult early ovarian cancer and/or metastatic breast cancer but guidelines for tissue sampling for pathologic examination remain to be addressed. Therefore, we evaluated oophorectomy specimens from 166 patients who underwent ovarian ablation for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Results of germline genetic testing were documented by the surgeon in only 31.3% of the pathology specimen requisition forms, whereas that information was available for 81.3% of patients elsewhere in the electronic medical records. All but 5.2% tested negative for a hereditary ovarian cancer gene pathogenic variant before oophorectomy. Complete tissue sampling was performed in 77.1% of the cases and representative sampling in the remainder. No cases of ovarian cancer were observed. Ovarian metastasis of breast cancer was identified in 9.6% of patients, all of whom were already known to have advanced-stage disease. The number of tissue cassettes per ovary required for complete tissue submission was on average three times higher than that for representative tissue sampling ( P < 0.01) and ranged up to 20 cassettes per ovary when multiple follicle cysts were present. We propose that guidelines for tissue sampling in this context be defined by a combination of hereditary risk and macroscopic examination; representative sampling is reasonable for macroscopically normal ovaries in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients whose germline genetic testing is negative. Positive genetic test results merit complete tissue submission even if macroscopically normal. This strategy balances the goals of early ovarian cancer detection and optimal resource utilization. However, it depends on clear documentation of genetic test results. Our study demonstrates that many opportunities remain to close gaps in the communication of genetic test results by clinicians submitting oophorectomy specimens for pathologic evaluation.

Effects of a Multimodal Program on Frailty Syndrome and Psychological Alterations in Breast Cancer Women Treated with Aromatase Inhibitors

Background/Objectives: Treatment with aromatase inhibitors can worsen frailty syndrome and psychological symptoms in women diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) receiving these drugs to prevent cancer recurrence. We analyze whether postmenopausal women with localized BC receiving aromatase inhibitors (AIs) treatment can achieve improvements in their mental health and their level of frailty through a multimodal program that includes supervised physical exercise and health education workshops. Methods: A total of 52 postmenopausal women with a prior diagnosis of BC and receiving hormonal treatment with AIs were included in the multimodal physical exercise and health education program and evaluated before and after it. The assessment included the following five frailty syndrome (FS) criteria: involuntary weight loss, weakness, low physical activity, slow gait speed, and low muscle strength. Mental health was assessed using the Goldberg scale, with its subscales for anxiety and depressive symptoms. The Athens scale was used to assess subjective sleep quality. Results: There was a significant difference in the number of robust, pre-frail and frail women after the program compared to the baseline. Six women did not fulfill any criteria for (robust) FS before the program (11.5%), and thirty-three women (63.5%) after the program did not fulfill any criteria for FS. A total of 33 (63.5%) women met one or two FS criteria (pre-frail) before the program, and 18 (34.6%) met one or two FS criteria after the program; thirteen (25%) women met three or more FS criteria (frail) before the program and one (1.9%) after it (p < 0.001). A statistically significant improvement on the Goldberg scale was observed (on both the subscales for anxiety and depressive symptoms) (p < 0.001). A statistically significant improvement was also noted on the Athens insomnia scale (p < 0.001). A multivariate regression model analysis identified marital status (being married) (p = 0.047, beta coefficient= -0.249, 95% CI -1.4844--0.14) and the percentage of attendance at training sessions (p = 0.041, beta coefficient = -0.290, 95% CI 0.104-0.002) as associated variables, with a lower score on the Goldberg depression subscale. Conclusions: Mental health and frailty, common in postmenopausal women diagnosed with BC on hormonal treatment with AI, can be improved with multimodal programs of supervised physical exercise and health education.

Incomplete ovarian function suppression in premenopausal breast cancer patients treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists

BACKGROUND

Ovarian function suppression (OFS) has emerged as a crucial adjuvant therapy for premenopausal breast cancer patients. Some patients fail to achieve complete OFS with commonly used OFS drugs. The definition of incomplete OFS remains unclear, and large-scale data on its incidence are lacking. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the definition, occurrence, impact on therapeutic efficacy and corresponding treatment measures for incomplete OFS.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases in recent twenty years with keywords as "ovarian function escape", "incomplete OFS" and "estrogen breakthrough", and carried out a snowballing of references to important literature. Clinical literature of premenopausal breast cancer patients treated with OFS was screened. The patient characteristics, definition and incidence of incomplete OFS, prognosis, interventions and other information were extracted.

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies were included in the analysis, including RCTs, retrospective or prospective cohort studies and case reports. Literature indicates that the incidence of incomplete OFS is around 5-50 % when the estradiol (E2) threshold is set as 2.72 pg/mL, 10 pg/mL, 20 pg/mL, or 30 pg/mL. Young age, high body mass index (BMI), and no prior chemotherapy were the risk factors for incomplete OFS. The treatment of incomplete OFS included dose adjustments, alternative OFS drugs, or the adoption of other OFS measures.

CONCLUSIONS

The incomplete OFS rate decreased with the extension of treatment time. It is reasonable to monitor E2 levels to ensure successful OFS in the patients with high risk factors for incomplete OFS or with concurrent use of aromatase inhibitor (AI). Transient incomplete OFS seems to have no impact on prognosis, but sustained incomplete OFS needs personalized adjustment of treatment strategy to ensure complete OFS.

Trends in breast cancer-specific death by clinical stage at diagnoses between 2000 and 2017

BACKGROUND

Approximately 40 000 individuals die from metastatic breast cancer each year. We examined what fractions of annual breast cancer-specific death are due to stage I, II, III, and IV disease and if these proportions changed over time.

METHODS

We used data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program covering 1975-2017. After filtering for female sex at birth, 1 primary tumor type, surgery, American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual (6th edition) stage above 0, no bilateral cancer, and survival data available, the final analysis included 972 763 patients. Temporal trends were assessed using a linear model and analysis of variance test.

RESULTS

The contribution of stage I and II cancers to breast cancer-specific death increased statistically significantly from 16.2% to 23.1% and from 30.7% to 39.5%, respectively, between 2000 and 2017. The contribution of stages III and IV cancers decreased from 36.4% to 30.3% and from 16.7% to 7.1%, respectively. In 2000, 0.92%, 4.0%, and 10.7% breast cancer-specific deaths were due to T1a, T1b, and T1c node-negative cancers, respectively, which increased significantly to 1.9%, 5.8%, and 14.7% by 2017. These temporal trends were similar for hormone receptor-positive and hormone receptor-negative cancers. The contribution of breast cancer-specific death to all-cause mortality declined from 23.9% to 16.6% for stage I and from 47.7% to 36.9% for stage II cancers by 2017.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with stage I and II breast cancers have excellent prognosis, yet these cancers account for more than 60% of current breast cancer-specific death because of their large absolute numbers. To further reduce breast cancer death, strategies are needed to identify and treat patients with stage I and II disease who remain at risk for recurrence.

Safety of topical estrogen therapy during adjuvant endocrine treatment among patients with breast cancer: A meta-analysis based expert panel discussion

IMPORTANCE

Endocrine treatments, such as Tamoxifen (TAM) and/or Aromatase inhibitors (AI), are the adjuvant therapy of choice for hormone-receptor positive breast cancer. These agents are associated with menopausal symptoms, adversely affecting drug compliance. Topical estrogen (TE) has been proposed for symptom management, given its' local application and presumed reduced bioavailability, however its oncological safety remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

The present systematic review, meta-analysis and expert panel review aimed to evaluate the strength of the available evidence on the risk of recurrence and mortality when TE is utilised in congruence with TAM or AI treatment, among BC survivors.

DATA SOURCES

Six databases and two prospective registers, were interrogated from inception to January 3rd, 2024. Search terms were Breast cancer AND Hormone replacement therapy AND topical/vaginal oestrogen AND recurrence/mortality.

STUDY SELECTION

All study designs reporting the use vs. non-use of TE in breast cancer survivors receiving adjuvant endocrine treatment were included. Six observational studies were deemed eligible for inclusion.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Sources of heterogeneity were explored using subgroup analysis by risk of bias, median follow-up period, node positivity and menopausal status. Trial sequential analysis was performed to quantify outcome reliability. A global expert panel was called to deliberate on the data, pinpoint areas of limited understanding, and determine the most important areas for future research.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Risk ratio effect sizes (RR) and corresponding 95 % Confidence Intervals (CI) of breast cancer recurrence and mortality in survivors on endocrine treatment (TAM and/or AI) exposed to TE were reported. Expert panel appraisal of meta-analysis evidence with definition of current knowledge gaps and future research aims.

RESULTS

In 38 050 female patients receiving adjuvant endocrine treatment, of whom 1805 had been exposed to TE, TE exposure of those on AI, did not increase all-cause mortality (RR 0.99 [95 %CI 0.58, 1.69], I2 = 81 %, P = 0.96; moderate GRADE certainty). However, such exposure may convey an increased risk of recurrence (RR 2.51 [95 % CI 1.10, 5.72], I2 = 9 %, P = 0.03; low-GRADE certainty). Exposure to TE during TAM did not increase either recurrence risk or all-cause mortality. Clinical factors such as lymph node positivity at the time of diagnosis and menopausal status and follow-up time appeared to be significant confounders.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The use of TE does not appear to increase either recurrence or mortality risk among BC survivors treated with TAM. An increased recurrence risk, without an increase in mortality, cannot be ruled out when TE is used during AI.

Effects of Anticancer Therapy on Osteoporosis in Breast Cancer Patients: A Nationwide Study Using Data from the National Health Insurance Service-National Health Information Database

Background/Objectives: This nationwide retrospective study evaluated the effects of anticancer therapy on osteoporosis in 126,132 Korean breast cancer survivors from 2002 to 2020. Methods: The Cox proportional hazards model assessed the effects of treatment on osteoporosis. To circumvent the guarantee-time bias for osteoporosis development, a landmark analysis was employed. A stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting was performed to control any confounding bias. The propensity score was calculated using a multinomial logistic regression model with age, national health insurance, and the Charlson comorbidity index. Results: During a median follow-up of 4.22 years, 28,603 cases of osteoporosis were documented. Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) were associated with a higher risk of osteoporosis development in comparison to tamoxifen (TMX) or chemotherapy. Notably, AIs administered subsequent to a combination of chemotherapy and anti-HER2 therapy exhibited the highest risk of osteoporosis development. Subgroup analysis revealed that the mean interval from breast cancer diagnosis to osteoporosis development was 5.00 years for women diagnosed with cancer at age < 50 and 3.89 years for those diagnosed at age ≥ 60. TMX increased the risk of osteoporosis in women diagnosed with cancer at age < 50, whereas chemotherapy was not a significant risk factor for osteoporosis development in those diagnosed at age ≥ 60. The impact of anticancer therapy on osteoporosis development was more pronounced in women diagnosed with breast cancer at a younger age compared to those diagnosed at an older age. Conclusions: Effective prevention and active management strategies should be implemented to address bone loss in both younger and older breast cancer patients.

Ten-year update of HOBOE phase III trial comparing triptorelin plus either tamoxifen or letrozole or zoledronic acid + letrozole in premenopausal hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

The Hormonal Bone Effects (HOBOE) study tested whether adjuvant triptorelin plus either letrozole (L) or zoledronic acid (Z) plus L (ZL) was more effective than tamoxifen (T) in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) early breast cancer (BC). Here we report the long-term follow-up analysis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

HOBOE (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00412022) is an open-label, three-arm, randomised, phase III trial that involved 16 centres in Italy. One thousand and sixty-five premenopausal patients with HR+ early BC receiving triptorelin were randomly assigned (1 : 1 : 1) to adjuvant T, L or ZL for 5 years. Cancer recurrence, second breast or non-breast cancer and death were considered events for the intention-to-treat disease-free survival (DFS) analysis.

RESULTS

As of 24 October 2024 at a median follow-up of 9.2 years, 199 DFS events and 79 deaths were reported. Both ZL and L improved DFS over T, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.58 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41-0.82; P = 0.002] for ZL versus T and 0.69 (95% CI 0.49-0.97, P = 0.030) for L versus T. No statistically significant difference in OS was reported (global log-rank P = 0.103). The previously reported statistically significant interaction with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status was confirmed for ZL versus T comparison (P = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

In this updated analysis, L plus triptorelin, with or without Z, demonstrated a statistically significant DFS improvement over T plus triptorelin for the adjuvant treatment of early BC in premenopausal patients.

Measurement of Completeness and Timeliness of Linked Electronic Health Record Pharmacy Data for Early Detection of Nonadherence to Breast Cancer Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy

PURPOSE

This retrospective cohort study evaluated whether linked electronic health record (EHR) pharmacy data were adequately complete and timely to detect primary nonadherence to breast cancer adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Linked EHR pharmacy data were extracted from the EHR for patients with stage 0 to III breast cancer who had their first prescription order for AET between 2016 and 2021. Patients with the first dispense event within 90 days of the prescription were classified as having sufficient or insufficient data available for early detection of primary adherence.

RESULTS

A total of 1,446 eligible patients had a first AET prescription order between 2016 and 2021; these orders were routed to 871 unique pharmacies, of which 856 (98.2%) were contracted with the linked EHR pharmacy database and 15 (1.8%) were not contracted. Among the 1,428 patients with a first prescription sent to a contract pharmacy, 164 (13%) had incomplete linked EHR pharmacy data refresh events to assess primary adherence. Among the 1,244 patients with at least 1 refresh event after their first prescription, 82% occurred within 90 days and were sufficiently timely for early detection of primary adherence. Overall, 32% of patients would benefit from an intervention to verify or improve primary adherence to AET.

CONCLUSION

Although linked EHR pharmacy data have adequate completeness of contract pharmacy data, local configurations of data refresh events tailored to medication reconciliation workflows are incomplete (13%) and insufficiently timely (32%) to fully support clinical decision support (CDS) for early detection of primary medication nonadherence. Prospective CDS interventions using linked EHR pharmacy data are possible with enhancements to the frequency and timeliness of refresh events.

Chemotherapy Combined With Endocrine Therapy: Old Wine in a New Bottle?

Both chemotherapy (CT) and endocrine therapy (ET) play important roles in the systemic treatment of breast cancer (BC). However, previous studies have shown an antagonistic effect when CT and ET are administered simultaneously. Therefore, sequential administration is more effective than combined administration. The current guidelines and consensus recommend a sequential schedule of CT and ET for patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) BC. However, with the continuous introduction of new endocrine drugs, the question of whether the simultaneous administration of CT and ET is superior to sequential therapy has surfaced again as a hot topic of clinical concern. Recent studies have shown that the combination of certain chemotherapeutic agents with endocrine drugs has a synergistic effect. This review aims to summarize the new advances achieved in recent years on the old topic of CT combined with ET in the treatment of BC.

Progress on the mechanism of action of emodin against breast cancer cells

At present, the role of active ingredients of traditional Chinese medicine in tumor therapy has gradually attracted people's attention, and anthraquinones, which are structurally similar to adriamycin and epirubicin, are one of the hotspots of research. Emodin (1,3,8-trihydroxy-6-methylanthraquinone) is a natural anthraquinone compound isolated from rhubarb, Polygonum cuspidatum, and aloe vera. In recent years, emodin has received widespread attention for its remarkable anti-tumor effects, and its anti-breast cancer effects are manifested as induction of apoptosis, inhibition of tumor cell proliferation, inhibition of invasion and metastasis of tumor cells, and anti-tumor drug resistance. Moreover, emodin can act against multiple types of breast cancer cells by acting on different targets. In this paper, we reviewed the latest research progress on the anti-breast cancer effects of emodin and its anti-tumor mechanism, to provide reference and information for the treatment of breast cancer and the development of anti-tumor drugs.

Prediction of menstrual recovery patterns in premenopausal women with breast cancer taking tamoxifen after chemotherapy: an ASTRRA Substudy

BACKGROUND

Chemo-endocrine therapy can lead to various side effects associated with ovarian dysfunction. Predicting menstrual recovery is necessary to discuss the treatment-related issues regarding fertility and premature menopause with patients.

METHODS

In the ASTRRA trial, patients who resumed ovarian function within 2 years after chemotherapy were randomized to receive tamoxifen for 5 years or OFS with tamoxifen for 2 years. With these 1298 patients, we developed a model that predicts when menstrual recovery will occur within a 3-year period after chemotherapy using variables including age, body mass index, chemotherapy regimen and duration, and serum estradiol and follicle-stimulating hormone levels.

RESULTS

The data of 957 patients were used to develop the prediction model, and those of 341 patients were used for validation. In the development group, menstruation resumed in 450 patients (47.0%) within 5 years. In multivariable analysis, younger age (< 35 vs. 45, HR 7.85, 95% CI 4.63-13.30, p < 0.0001), anthracycline-based chemotherapy without taxane (vs. with taxane, HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.37-2.38, p < 0.0001), and chemotherapy duration (≤ 90 days vs. > 90 days, HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.01-1.72, p = 0.045) correlated with menstrual recovery. Using combined age, regimen, and duration of chemotherapy, we developed a simplified scoring system to estimate recovery chances and used a concordance index of 0.679 overall and 0.744 at 3 years for validation.

CONCLUSION

This model predicted timing and probability of menstrual recovery, based on their individual age, type and duration of chemotherapy in premenopausal women diagnosed with breast cancer who received tamoxifen after chemotherapy.

Hormones as a double-edged sword: the role of hormones in cancer progression and the potential of targeted hormone therapies

Cancer remains a significant cause of mortality in the world, with increasing prevalence worldwide. There are numerous treatments ranging from surgery to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, but since cancer is a heterogeneous disease, only few patients possibly respond to treatments. However, it opens a huge space for the advent of targeted therapies such as hormone therapy, immunotherapy, and target-specific drugs. Hormonal therapy using hormone agonists/antagonists or hormone receptor inhibitors-called the next-generation hormonal agents-hits distinct hormonal pathways that are involved in breast, prostate and ovarian cancer. Preliminary results show that through combination of drugs, it is possible that the synergistic effects may actually lead to better survival than with the use of single drugs. With manageable adverse effects, hormonal therapy offers much hope for treatment of this rather challenging malignancy of the hormone-sensitive cancers, especially in combination with other treatments.

Breast cancer in adolescents and young adults has a specific biology and poor patient outcome compared with older patients

BACKGROUND

We aimed to clarify the features of adolescents and young adults (AYA: younger than 40 years old) breast cancer (BC) compared with other age groups in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative BC, given the effects of age-related hormonal status.

METHODS

The cohorts analyzed were divided into AYA (15-39 years old), perimenopausal (40-54 years old), menopausal (55-64 years old), and old (65+ years old). Clinicopathological and biological features were analyzed using gene set variation analysis and xCell algorithm using transcriptome profiles from large public databases of ER-positive/HER2-negative BC (METABRIC; n = 1353, SCAN-B; n = 2381).

RESULTS

In the ER-positive/HER2-negative subtype, pathological lymph node positivity, and Nottingham grade 3 were higher among AYA (all P < 0.001). AYA patients had a trend toward worse disease-specific and overall survival, particularly compared with the perimenopausal group. Estrogen response late signaling decreased with age (all P ≤ 0.001 in both METABRIC and SCAN-B cohorts). AYA was associated with significantly higher BRCAness and DNA repair than the other groups (all P < 0.05 in both cohorts). AYA significantly enriched cell proliferation-related and procancerous gene sets [mTORC1, unfolded protein response, and phosphoinositide 3-kinase/protein kinase B/mammalian target of rapamycin (PI3K/AKT/mTOR) signaling] when compared with the others (all P < 0.03 in both cohorts). Interestingly, these features have also been observed in tumors <2 cm. Infiltration of CD8+, regulatory, T helper type 2 cells, and M1 macrophages was higher, while M2 macrophages were lower in AYA (all P < 0.03 in both cohorts). Finally, ER-positive/HER2-negative BC in AYA patients has different features of gene mutations, including AHNAK2, GATA3, HERC2, and TG, which were observed at a higher rate in AYA, and KMT2C, which was observed at a lower rate in AYA, compared with other age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

ER-positive/HER2-negative BC in AYA was highly proliferative with high immune cell infiltration compared with the other age groups.

Factors associated with weight gain in pre- and post-menopausal women receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer

PURPOSE

Weight gain after breast cancer poses health risks. We aimed to identify factors associated with weight gain during adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET).

METHODS

Women initiating AET enrolled in a prospective cohort. Participants completed FACT-ES plus PROMIS pain interference, depression, anxiety, fatigue, sleep disturbance and physical function measures at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months. Treatment-emergent symptoms were defined as changes in scores in the direction indicative of worsening symptoms that exceeded the minimal important difference at 3 and/or 6 months compared to baseline. We used logistic regression to evaluate associations of clinicodemographic features and treatment-emergent symptoms with clinically significant weight gain over 60 months (defined as ≥ 5% compared to baseline) in pre- and post-menopausal participants.

RESULTS

Of 309 participants, 99 (32%) were pre-menopausal. The 60 months cumulative incidence of clinically significant weight gain was greater in pre- than post-menopausal participants (67% vs 43%, p < 0.001). Among pre-menopausal participants, treatment-emergent pain interference (OR 2.49), aromatase inhibitor receipt (OR 2.8), mastectomy, (OR 2.06) and White race (OR 7.13) were associated with weight gain. Among post-menopausal participants, treatment-emergent endocrine symptoms (OR 2.86), higher stage (OR 2.25) and White race (OR 2.29) were associated with weight gain while treatment-emergent physical function decline (OR 0.30) was associated with lower likelihood of weight gain.

CONCLUSIONS

Weight gain during AET is common, especially for pre-menopausal women. Clinicodemographic features and early treatment-emergent symptoms may identify at risk individuals.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Patients at risk for weight gain can be identified early during AET.

CLINICAL TRIALS

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT01937052, registered September 3, 2013.

Can contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and oophorectomy increase survival in BRCA-related breast cancer? Results from the Italian MUTina study

INTRODUCTION

In the Emilia-Romagna region of Italy, a unique Hub and Spoke model was adopted to recognize BRCA-related breast cancer (BC) patients. Characteristics and outcomes of tumors identified by this model will be presented.

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective cohort study involved patients diagnosed with BRCA-related BC identified in the Emilia-Romagna region between January 2000 and December 2013. Seven provinces collected data on patient and tumor characteristics; clinical and gene testing information were also registered. Comparisons between BRCA1 and BRCA2 BC were performed. To balance different variants to identify significant predictors of survival, an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis on Cox regression was conducted.

RESULTS

From 2000 to 2013, 284 BRCA-related BC were registered (171 BRCA1, 110 BRCA2, and 3 BRCA1 and BRCA2). BRCA1 were diagnosed at an earlier stage compared to BRCA2 (50.1 % vs 30 %, respectively, in stage I, P = 0.0015). BRCA2 patients underwent more up-front surgery (85 % vs. 74.9 %, P = 0.049) and less chemotherapy (69.1 % vs 88.9 %, P = 0.004) than BRCA1 patients. At 11.8 years median follow-up, BRCA1 patients developed more second contralateral BC (P = 0.09), while BRCA2 had more visceral relapses (P = 0.013). No differences in overall survival (OS) between BRCA1 and BRCA2 patients (P = 0.07) were found. An advantage in OS was independently seen for patients who underwent contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (P = 0.0001) and oophorectomy (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, adopting a homogeneous regional framework provides important information about prevention and treatment strategies of BRCA-related BC and suggests using maximal surgery to improve OS.

Patient-reported outcome and survival in premenopausal hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients at moderate to high risk: comparing toremifene with aromatase inhibitor in a real-world study

Toremifene, a selective estrogen receptor modulator, is commonly used in China for premenopausal breast cancer patients. This real-world study aimed to compare patient-reported outcome (PRO) and survival between toremifene and aromatase inhibitor (AI) plus ovarian function suppression (OFS) in patients with moderate-/high-risk premenopausal hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer. The primary endpoint was PROs, assessed using SF-36 and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires between January and March 2023. A total of 392 patients were included, with 171 receiving toremifene and 221 receiving AI. The toremifene group showed significantly higher scores in the role physical (p = 0.034) and mental health (p = 0.009) dimensions of SF-36 and lower anxiety/depression (AD) scores (p = 0.038) in EQ-5D-5L compared to AI group. The estimated 5- and 8-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were similar in toremifene and AI groups: 96.5% versus 91.9%, and 87.4% versus 87.8% (p = 0.39), respectively. Adverse event rates were similar in two groups, except for a greater risk of endometrial thickening (p < 0.001) and a lower occurrence of morning stiffness (p < 0.001) in the toremifene compared to the AI group. Premenopausal HR-positive breast cancer patients receiving toremifene plus OFS had better role physical and mental health outcomes and lower AD dimensions than those receiving AI plus OFS. Both treatments had comparable DFS and favorable tolerability profiles.

Adjuvant endocrine therapy choices in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer: Insights from the prospective GIM23-POSTER study

BACKGROUND

Most premenopausal patients with early breast cancer (eBC) are diagnosed with hormone receptor-positive disease and therefore candidate for adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The Gruppo Italiano Mammella (GIM) 23-POSTER (GIM23) is a multicenter, prospective, observational study conducted in 26 Italian institutions, aiming to evaluate ET choices for premenopausal patients affected by hormone receptor-positive eBC in a real-world setting. Here we report also the results in terms of type of ET prescribed according to the definition of high-risk patients by monarchE and NATALEE trials.

RESULTS

Between October 2019 and June 2022, 600 premenopausal patients were included, with a median age of 46 years. Almost half (271, 45.2 %) of the patients had stage I disease, while 254 (42.3 %) and 60 (10.0 %) patients had stage II and III, respectively. Overall, 149 (25.1 %) patients received tamoxifen alone, 83 (14.0 %) tamoxifen with ovarian function suppression (OFS), while 361 (60.9 %) received aromatase inhibitor (AI) with OFS. Patients treated with AI and OFS had higher number of metastatic axillary nodes, higher grade and more often received chemotherapy (all p < 0.001). According to the inclusion criteria of the monarchE and NATALEE trials, 81 patients (15.6 %) were considered high-risk for the monarchE and received AI with OFS in 88.9 % of the cases, while 231 patients (44.4 %) were considered high-risk for the NATALEE trial and received AI with OFS in 74.5 % of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

AI with OFS is the most prescribed adjuvant ET among premenopausal patients, especially in the presence of high-risk features.

Breast Cancer Index in Premenopausal Women With Early-Stage Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer

Importance

Adjuvant ovarian function suppression (OFS) with oral endocrine therapy improves outcomes for premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer but adds adverse effects. A genomic biomarker for selecting patients most likely to benefit from OFS-based treatment is lacking.

Objective

To assess the predictive and prognostic performance of the Breast Cancer Index (BCI) for OFS benefit in premenopausal women with HR+ breast cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This prospective-retrospective translational study used all available tumor tissue samples from female patients from the Suppression of Ovarian Function Trial (SOFT). These individuals were randomized to receive 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen alone, tamoxifen plus OFS, or exemestane plus OFS. BCI testing was performed blinded to clinical data and outcome. The a priori hypothesis was that BCI HOXB13/IL17BR ratio (BCI[H/I])-high tumors would benefit more from OFS and high BCI portended poorer prognosis in this population. Settings spanned multiple centers internationally. Participants included premenopausal female patients with HR+ early breast cancer with specimens in the International Breast Cancer Study Group tumor repository available for RNA extraction. Data were collected from December 2003 to April 2021 and were analyzed from May 2022 to October 2022.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary end points were breast cancer-free interval (BCFI) for the predictive analysis and distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) for the prognostic analyses.

Results

Tumor specimens were available for 1718 of the 3047 female patients in the SOFT intention-to-treat population. The 1687 patients (98.2%) who had specimens that yielded sufficient RNA for BCI testing represented the parent trial population. The median (IQR) follow-up time was 12 (10.5-13.4) years, and 512 patients (30.3%) were younger than 40 years. Tumors were BCI(H/I)-low for 972 patients (57.6%) and BCI(H/I)-high for 715 patients (42.4%). Patients with tumors classified as BCI(H/I)-low exhibited a 12-year absolute benefit in BCFI of 11.6% from exemestane plus OFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.48 [95% CI, 0.33-0.71]) and an absolute benefit of 7.3% from tamoxifen plus OFS (HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.48-0.97]) relative to tamoxifen alone. In contrast, patients with BCI(H/I)-high tumors did not benefit from either exemestane plus OFS (absolute benefit, -0.4%; HR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.70-1.53]; P for interaction = .006) or tamoxifen plus OFS (absolute benefit, -1.2%; HR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.72-1.54]; P for interaction = .11) compared with tamoxifen alone. BCI continuous index was significantly prognostic in the N0 subgroup for DRFI (n = 1110; P = .004), with 12-year DRFI of 95.9%, 90.8%, and 86.3% in BCI low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk N0 cancers, respectively.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this prospective-retrospective translational study of patients enrolled in SOFT, BCI was confirmed as prognostic in premenopausal women with HR+ breast cancer. The benefit from OFS-containing adjuvant endocrine therapy was greater for patients with BCI(H/I)-low tumors than BCI(H/I)-high tumors. BCI(H/I)-low status may identify premenopausal patients who are likely to benefit from this more intensive endocrine therapy.

Different dosage forms of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist with endocrine therapy in premenopausal hormone receptor-positive breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Despite the wide use of a 3-month gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist for ovarian function suppression in premenopausal breast cancer patients, it remains unclear whether it is as effective and safe as a 1-month GnRH agonist regimen when combined with selective estrogen receptor modulators or aromatase inhibitors, especially in younger patients.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 1109 premenopausal hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients treated with GnRH agonist plus selective estrogen receptor modulator or aromatase inhibitor. The estradiol (E2) inhibition rate within 1-24 months after treatment with 1-month or 3-month GnRH agonist in cohorts and different subgroups was analyzed.

RESULTS

Following 1:1 propensity score matching, 950 patients with a mean age of 39 years and a median follow-up of 46 months were included. Both the 1-month and 3-month groups achieved more than 90% E2 inhibition within 24 months (94.53% vs 92.84%, with a 95% confidence interval for the difference ranging from -4.78% to 1.41%), confirming the noninferiority of 3-month GnRH agonist. Both 1-month and 3-month GnRH agonist rapidly and consistently reduced E2 levels. Of the patients, 60 (6.3%) experienced incomplete ovarian function suppression, with similar rates in the 1-month and 3-month groups (5.5% vs 7.2%). Incomplete ovarian function suppression mainly occurred within the first 12 months, with age younger than 40 years and no prior chemotherapy being the risk factors. Similar disease-free survival and overall survival were found in the 1-month and 3-month groups and in patients with complete and incomplete ovarian function suppression (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The ovarian function suppression with 3-month GnRH agonist was not inferior to that with 1-month GnRH agonist, regardless of age or combination with a selective estrogen receptor modulator or an aromatase inhibitor.

Safety and efficacy of topical testosterone in breast cancer patients receiving ovarian suppression and aromatase inhibitor therapy

BACKGROUND

Premenopausal, high-risk, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients are often treated with ovarian suppression in combination with aromatase inhibitors (AI). This combination has important adverse effects, particularly in sexual function, such as vaginal dryness and loss of libido. There is no effective therapy for reduced sexual function in this setting. Our study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety, particularly regarding sexual function, of a low-dose, topical testosterone gel administration.

METHODS

This is a pilot, single-center study, designed to evaluate the efficacy of topical testosterone gel (3 mg/day) in improving sexual function in 29 premenopausal patients on ovarian suppression in combination with an AI. The primary safety endpoint was to assess serum estradiol elevation. The primary efficacy endpoint was sexual function improvement, assessed by the Female Sexual Function Index questionnaire.

RESULTS

We report the results on 29 patients. Twenty-two patients (75%) completed the 3-month treatment, and seven discontinued treatment before completion, mostly due to logistical difficulties related to the COVID-19 pandemic. All patients maintained the value of baseline mass spectrometry assay for estradiol of less than 2.7 pg/mL during the undertaken measurements. We observed a significant improvement in Female Sexual Function Index measures over the visits, with an increase from a mean of 11.7 at baseline to 19.1 in the third month (p < 0.001), with the greatest improvement observed between the second and third months.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that topical testosterone seems to be safe and may be effective in improving sexual function in patients on ovarian suppression and AI.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The project was submitted and approved through the hospital's SGPP platform in 11/26/2019 (Project No. SGPP 393819) and CAAE (Research Ethics Committee) (CAAE No 25609719.5.0000.007).

Approach to Bone Health in the Patient With Breast Cancer

Treatment for breast cancer, including endocrine therapies, can contribute to bone loss and increase the risk of osteoporosis and fractures. Management of bone health in patients with cancer is often coordinated between oncologists, endocrinologists, and primary care physicians. In this article, we discuss the approach to screening for fracture risk among patients initiating treatments for breast cancer and recommendations for lifestyle modifications to optimize bone health. We will review 3 indications for pharmacologic bone-targeted therapies: prevention of cancer treatment-induced bone loss, adjuvant therapy to reduce recurrence, and management of bone metastases.

Cardiometabolic Effects of Denosumab in Premenopausal Women With Breast Cancer Receiving Estradiol Suppression: RCT

CONTEXT

Menopause is associated with changes in musculoskeletal, body composition, and metabolic parameters that may be amplified in premenopausal women receiving estradiol suppression for breast cancer. Denosumab offsets deleterious skeletal effects of estradiol suppression and has been reported to have effects on body composition and metabolic parameters in preclinical and observational studies, but evidence from double-blind randomized controlled trials is limited.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of denosumab on body composition and metabolic parameters.

METHODS

In a prespecified secondary analysis of a 12-month randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 68 premenopausal women with breast cancer initiating ovarian function suppression and aromatase inhibition were randomized to denosumab 60-mg or placebo administered at baseline and 6 months. Outcome measures were total and regional fat and lean mass (DXA), body mass index (BMI), waist and hip circumference, fasting glucose, HOMA-IR, and lipid profile. Using a mixed model, between-group mean adjusted differences over time are reported.

RESULTS

Over 12 months, relative to placebo, android and gynoid fat mass decreased in the denosumab group (-266 g [95% CI -453 to -79], P = .02, and -452 g [-783 to -122], P = .03, respectively). Total fat mass and waist circumference were lower in the denosumab group but not significantly (-1792 g [-3346 to -240], P = .08 and (- 3.77 cm [-6.76 to -0.79], P = .06, respectively). No significant treatment effects were detected in lean mass, BMI, hip circumference, fasting glucose, HOMA-IR, or lipid profile.

CONCLUSION

In premenopausal women receiving estradiol suppression, denosumab decreases some measures of fat mass with no detectable effects on other measures of body composition or metabolic parameters.

A Functional Survey of the Regulatory Landscape of Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Evolution

Only a handful of somatic alterations have been linked to endocrine therapy resistance in hormone-dependent breast cancer, potentially explaining ∼40% of relapses. If other mechanisms underlie the evolution of hormone-dependent breast cancer under adjuvant therapy is currently unknown. In this work, we employ functional genomics to dissect the contribution of cis-regulatory elements (CRE) to cancer evolution by focusing on 12 megabases of noncoding DNA, including clonal enhancers, gene promoters, and boundaries of topologically associating domains. Parallel epigenetic perturbation (CRISPRi) in vitro reveals context-dependent roles for many of these CREs, with a specific impact on dormancy entrance and endocrine therapy resistance. Profiling of CRE somatic alterations in a unique, longitudinal cohort of patients treated with endocrine therapies identifies a limited set of noncoding changes potentially involved in therapy resistance. Overall, our data uncover how endocrine therapies trigger the emergence of transient features which could ultimately be exploited to hinder the adaptive process. Significance: This study shows that cells adapting to endocrine therapies undergo changes in the usage or regulatory regions. Dormant cells are less vulnerable to regulatory perturbation but gain transient dependencies which can be exploited to decrease the formation of dormant persisters.

Hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer in young women: A comprehensive review

The incidence of breast cancer in ≤ 40 yr-old women (YWBC) has been steadily increasing in recent decades. Although this group of patients represents less than 10 % of all newly diagnosed BC cases it encompasses a significant burden of disease. Usually underrepresented in clinical trials, YWBCs are also characterized by late diagnoses and poorly differentiated, aggressive-subtype disease, partly explaining its poor prognosis along with a high recurrence risk, and high mortality rates. On the other hand, YWBC treatment poses unique challenges such as preservation of fertility, and long-term toxicity and adverse events. Herein, we summarize the current evidence in hormone receptor-positive YWBC including specific risk factors, clinicopathologic and genomic features, and available evidence on response to chemotherapy and endocrine therapy. Overall, we advocate for a more comprehensive multidisciplinary healthcare model to improve the outcomes and the quality of life of this subset of younger patients.

Revisiting ovarian function suppression with GnRH agonists for premenopausal women with breast cancer: Who should use and the impact on survival outcomes

Breast cancer diagnosed in premenopausal women tends to be more aggressive and the benefit of ovarian function suppression (OFS), at least in certain groups of patients, is well known. There is hesitancy in using OFS in some groups of patients who may otherwise benefit from the treatment. For instance, it is clear that in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), high-risk, early-stage breast cancer, gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) should be given in the adjuvant setting; however, confusion remains whether premenopausal patients with intermediate-risk disease benefit from GnRHa, given the lack of consensus on its definition in guidelines and clinical practice. Most recent evidence on the long-term efficacy of GnRHa, with up to 20-years of follow-up, reinforced its benefits in premenopausal patients with early-stage breast cancer. In this comprehensive review, we reviewed the long-term efficacy in terms of improvement in disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) for early-stage HR+ breast cancer and examined evidence from multiple randomized clinical studies to identify the clinicopathological characteristics that correlated with improved DFS and OS with the addition of OFS to adjuvant endocrine therapy. Other aspects of GnRHa, including its efficacy in advanced breast cancer, safety profile, evidence in ovarian function preservation, and the advantages of long-acting formulations were also discussed. By addressing the existing gaps and grey areas regarding the inclusion of OFS as a crucial treatment component for premenopausal breast cancer patients, physicians are more aware of who to administer and the potential impact on survival outcomes.

A phase 3 study (PATHWAY) of palbociclib plus tamoxifen in patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer

Palbociclib combined with endocrine therapy is approved for treating patients with hormone-receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer; however, data on palbociclib combined with tamoxifen are limited. We investigated the efficacy and safety of palbociclib-tamoxifen in patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer. This double-blind phase 3 study included 184 women who were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive palbociclib-tamoxifen or placebo-tamoxifen. Pre/perimenopausal women also received goserelin. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and safety. Median PFS was 24.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.1-32.4) with palbociclib-tamoxifen and 11.1 months (95% CI, 7.4-14.6) with placebo-tamoxifen (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; 95% CI, 0.43-0.85; P = 0.002). Palbociclib-tamoxifen improved PFS in patients who were treated with first-line or second-line endocrine therapy and pre-, peri-, and postmenopausal patients. Though OS data are still immature (median not reached in both groups), an overall risk reduction of 27% (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.44-1.21) with palbociclib-tamoxifen was observed at the time of PFS analysis. The most common grade 3/4 adverse event with palbociclib-tamoxifen was neutropenia (89.0% [none were febrile] versus 1.1% with placebo-tamoxifen). There were no deaths owing to adverse events in either group. Among patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer, palbociclib-tamoxifen resulted in significantly longer PFS than tamoxifen alone. Early OS data showed a trend favoring palbociclib-tamoxifen. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03423199. Study registration date: February 06, 2018.

Bone-active drugs in premenopausal women with breast cancer under hormone-deprivation therapies

BACKGROUND

Bone health management in premenopausal women with breast cancer (BC) under hormone-deprivation therapies (HDTs) is often challenging, and the effectiveness of bone-active drugs is still unknown.

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter study included 306 premenopausal women with early BC undergoing HDTs. Bone mineral density (BMD) and morphometric vertebral fractures (VFs) were assessed 12 months after HDT initiation and then after at least 24 months.

RESULTS

After initial assessment, bone-active drugs were prescribed in 77.5% of women (151 denosumab 60 mg/6 months, 86 bisphosphonates). After 47.0 ± 20.1 months, new VFs were found in 16 women (5.2%). Vertebral fracture risk was significantly associated with obesity (odds ratio [OR] 3.87, P = .028), family history of hip fractures or VFs (OR 3.21, P = .040], chemotherapy-induced menopause (OR 6.48, P < .001), preexisting VFs (OR 25.36, P < .001), baseline T-score less than or equal to -2.5 standard deviation (SD) at any skeletal site (OR 4.14, P = .036), and changes at lumbar and total hip BMD (OR 0.94, P = .038 and OR 0.88, P < .001, respectively). New VFs occurred more frequently in women untreated compared to those treated with bone-active drugs (14/69, 20.8% vs 2/237, 0.8%; P < .001) and the anti-fracture effectiveness remained significant after correction for BMI (OR 0.03; P < .001), family history of fractures (OR 0.03; P < .001), chemotherapy-induced menopause (OR 0.04; P < .001), and preexisting VFs (OR 0.01; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Premenopausal women under HDTs are at high risk of VFs in relationship with high BMI, densitometric diagnosis of osteoporosis, preexisting VFs, and family history of osteoporotic fractures. Vertebral fractures in this setting might be effectively prevented by bisphosphonates or denosumab.

Effectiveness of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists for ovarian function suppression in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: a retrospective single-center real-world study

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the effectiveness of ovarian function suppression (OFS) of various gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) combined with aromatase inhibitors (AI) in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR-positive) breast cancer. Potential risk factors associated with insufficient OFS were analyzed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Premenopausal HR-positive breast cancer patients who had received AI with GnRHa were studied retrospectively. Patients were divided into different groups according to monthly or trimonthly GnRHa schedules they received, and the effectiveness of OFS was compared between groups. Insufficient OFS was defined as at least one instance of estradiol ≥ 30 pg/ml. Patient data was gathered from medical records for this comparison.

RESULTS

Of the 264 patients enrolled in this study, 117 were administered 3.6 mg of goserelin monthly (goserelin 1 M group), 63 received 3.75 mg of leuprorelin monthly (leuprorelin 1 M group) and 84 were given 11.25 mg of leuprorelin every three months (leuprorelin 3 M group). Overall, 7.20% experienced insufficient OFS. The incidence rates in the three GnRHa depot groups were 7.69%, 6.35%, and 7.14%, respectively, without a significant statistical difference (P = 0.900). Notably, younger patients exhibited a higher likelihood of insufficient OFS [OR = 0.900, 95%CI (0.824-0.982), P = 0.018].

CONCLUSION

Insufficient OFS remains a concern during GnRHa and AI treatment. The effectiveness of the three GnRHa depots commonly used in China seems comparable. Younger patients face a heightened risk of insufficient OFS.

Serum Cholesterol Level Changes during Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone-Agonist Therapy in Premenopausal Female Patients with Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the changes in cholesterol levels during medical ovarian suppression.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records and blood test results of 187 female patients with breast cancer who underwent gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-agonist therapy for > 24 weeks at our hospital between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2020. The study excluded patients in this cohort who had previously been diagnosed with dyslipidemia, diabetes, or had recently received lipid-lowering agents, resulting in a final sample size of 152 participants. The age at diagnosis and preoperative body mass index (BMI) were included as baseline demographics. A generalized additive mixed model was applied to analyze the relationship between the duration of GnRH-agonist treatment and changes in cholesterol levels.

RESULTS

The study participants had a mean age of 42.5 ± 5.2 years and a mean preoperative BMI of 23.0 ± 3.6 kg/m²; the mean GnRH-agonist therapy duration was 19.3 months (range: 5.6-37.7 months); and the total cholesterol level before GnRH-agonist treatment was 171 mg/dL that was significantly higher at 181 mg/dL (P = 0.03) during the most recent measurement. The total cholesterol level was unaffected by the GnRH-agonist therapy until 19.3 months after which it significantly increased by 1.28 mg/dL per month (P = 0.011). There was no significant effect of age, preoperative BMI, or the glomerular filtration rate on the total cholesterol levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term GnRH agonist therapy for > 19 months can cause a significant increase in the serum cholesterol levels. To prevent complications, patients receiving the treatment should be informed and monitored for the possible progression of dyslipidemia.

A retrospective analysis of clinicopathological characteristics and risk factors for recurrence in young patients with breast cancer

Background

Younger and older patients with breast cancer often present with different clinicopathological characteristics and exhibit different risk factors for recurrence. This study sought to evaluate the biological characteristics and identify the recurrence risk factors in patients with operable breast cancer who were ≤40 years of age.

Methods

This retrospective study investigated the biological characteristics and clinical outcomes of young patients (aged ≤40 years) with operable breast cancer who had been admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University for treatment from January 2015 to December 2019. Clinicopathological and follow-up data were collected and statistically analyzed using IBM SPSS 27.0 software. The disease-free survival (DFS) rates were evaluated, and regression analyses were conducted to identify risk factors associated with adverse outcomes.

Results

A total of 154 young patients (aged ≤40 years) with operable breast cancer were included in this study, of whom 68 (44.2%) were aged ≤35 years. In terms of breast cancer subtypes, there were 19 (12.3%) patients with luminal A-like disease, 74 (48.1%) patients with luminal B-like disease, 17 (11.0%) patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive (non-luminal) disease, and 44 (28.6%) patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The 5-year DFS rate of all the patients was 88%; among those with TNBC, the rate was slightly lower at 76%. According to the results of the log-rank test, tumor (T) stage, node (N) status (N0 or N+), the biological subtype, and the Ki-67 index (with a 14% cut-off value between high and low expression levels) were risk factors for recurrence. The Cox regression analysis showed that the biological subtype was the only risk factor for recurrence. The multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated that the pathological type, tumor grade, estrogen receptor (ER) labeling intensity, and progesterone receptor (PR) expression level significantly affected the level of Ki-67 expression.

Conclusions

This retrospective study showed that biological subtype was the most important risk factor for recurrence in operable breast cancer patients ≤40 years. The Ki-67 index is influenced by the pathological type, primary tumor grade, ER labeling intensity, and PR expression level. Fourteen percent is recommended as the cut-off value for the high and low expression of Ki-67 in clinical practice.

Denosumab Prevents Bone Loss and Microarchitectural Deterioration in Premenopausal Women With Breast Cancer Receiving Estradiol Suppression Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

Suppression of ovarian function and aromatase inhibition (AI) increases disease-free survival in premenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive early-stage breast cancer but accelerates bone loss. We therefore hypothesized that suppressing bone remodeling using denosumab (DMAB) would prevent bone loss in these women.

METHODS

In a 12-month double-blind randomized trial, 68 women with ER-positive early-stage breast cancer commencing ovarian function suppression and AI were randomly assigned to 60 mg DMAB (n = 34) or placebo (PBO; n = 34) once every 6 months (at 0 and 6 months). Volumetric bone mineral density (BMD), microarchitecture, and estimated bone strength of the distal tibia and distal radius were measured using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography, and spine and hip BMD were measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at 0, 6, and 12 months. The primary end point and treatment effect was the mean adjusted between group difference (MAD; [95% CI]) in distal tibial total volumetric BMD over 12 months, with a single P value tested over all time points. The study is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (anzctr.org.au; identifier: ACTRN12616001051437).

RESULTS

Intention-to-treat analysis included all 68 randomly assigned women. Over 12 months, compared with PBO, DMAB prevented the decrease in distal tibial total BMD (MAD, 20.8 mg HA/cm3 [95% CI, 17.3 to 24.2]), cortical BMD (42.9 mg HA/cm3 [95% CI, 32.1 to 53.9]), trabecular BMD (3.32 mg HA/cm3 [95% CI, 1.45 to 5.20], P = .004), estimated stiffness (11.6 kN/m [95% CI, 7.6 to 15.6]), and failure load (563 N [95% CI, 388 to 736]). Findings were similar at the distal radius. Decreases in BMD at the lumbar spine (MAD, 0.13 g/cm2 [95% CI, 0.11 to 0.15]), total hip (0.08 g/cm2 [95% CI, 0.07 to 0.09], and femoral neck (0.06 g/cm2 [95% CI, 0.05 to 0.07]) were also prevented. All P < .001 unless otherwise noted.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with DMAB at commencement of estradiol suppression therapy preserves BMD, bone microarchitecture, and estimated strength, and is likely to increase fracture-free survival.

Drug-induced osteoporosis and mechanisms of bone tissue regeneration through trace elements

Osteoporosis is associated with an imbalance in bone formation, with certain drugs used in disease treatment being implicated in its development. Supplementation with trace elements may contribute to bone regeneration, offering an alternative approach by enhancing bone mineral density (BMD) and thereby thwarting the onset of osteoporosis. This review aims to assess the mechanisms through which trace elements such as copper (Cu), iron (Fe), selenium (Se), manganese (Mn), and zinc (Zn) are linked to increased bone mass, thus mitigating the effects of pharmaceuticals. Our findings underscore that the use of drugs such as aromatase inhibitors (AIs), proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), antiretrovirals, glucocorticoids, opioids, or anticonvulsants can result in decreased BMD, a primary contributor to osteoporosis. Research indicates that essential elements like Cu, Fe, Se, Mn, and Zn, through various mechanisms, can bolster BMD and forestall the onset of the disease, owing to their protective effects. Consequently, our study recommends a minimum daily intake of these essential minerals for patients undergoing treatment with the aforementioned drugs, as the diverse mechanisms governing the effects of trace elements Cu, Fe, Mn, Se, and Zn facilitate bone remodeling.

Real-world treatment patterns of adjuvant endocrine therapy and ovarian suppression in premenopausal HR+/HER2+ breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The optimal adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) in hormone receptor positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+) premenopausal breast cancer (BC) remains unclear. Moreover, the benefit and clinical indications of ovarian suppression (OS) is poorly elucidated. We described real-world patterns surrounding choice of ET and clinicopathologic features which predicted treatment with OS in a contemporary cohort of premenopausal women with HR+/HER2+ BC.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included premenopausal patients with nonmetastatic HR+/HER2+ BC from the CancerLinQ Discovery database from January 2010 to May 2020. Women were less than 50 years and received chemotherapy, anti-HER2 therapy, and ET. They were categorized into 1 of 4 groups based on type of ET prescribed at initiation: aromatase inhibitor (AI) + OS, OS, tamoxifen + OS, or tamoxifen. Multivariable logistic regression assessed associations between clinicopathologic features and OS use.

RESULTS

Out of 360,540 patients with BC, 937 were included. The majority (n = 818, 87%) were prescribed tamoxifen, whereas 4 (0.4%), 50 (5.3%), and 65 (6.9%) received OS, tamoxifen + OS and AI + OS, respectively. No clinicopathologic features predicted OS use apart from age; patients <35 years were more likely to receive OS compared with those ≥35 years (odds ratio 2.33, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first real-world study evaluating ET treatment patterns in HR+/HER2+ premenopausal BC. OS use was uncommon and the majority received tamoxifen as the preferred ET regardless of most clinicopathologic risk factors. Additional research is needed to optimize ET decisions in young women with this distinct BC subtype.

Impact of Anti-Estrogen Therapy on Early Cardiovascular Referrals, Tests and Medications in Premenopausal Women with Operable Breast Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Premenopausal women with high-risk hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer often receive ovarian function suppression (OFS) and anti-estrogen therapy which induces near complete estrogen deprivation (NCED). This treatment improves recurrence-free survival but may increase cardiovascular risk. We sought to identify patterns of cardiovascular care and outcomes in premenopausal women with operable breast cancer.

METHODS

Premenopausal women ≤ 50 years of age with stage I-III HR-positive or triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) were identified by retrospective review. We categorized women into 3 groups based on anti-estrogen therapy approach: NCED (HR + OFS), anti-estrogen therapy without OFS (HRnoOFS), and no anti-estrogen therapy (TNBC). Baseline characteristics, post-diagnosis cardiovascular events and cardiovascular actions (tests, referrals and medications) were recorded. Categorical variables were compared among the groups using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests; continuous outcomes were compared using ANOVA.

RESULTS

82, 83, and 52 women were identified in the HR + OFS, HRnoOFS, and TNBC groups respectively; mean follow-up was 5.0 years. Mean number of cardiovascular actions per year were highest in the HR + OFS group compared with HRnoOFS and TNBC groups (0.35 vs. 0.20 and 0.27, respectively; P = .036). The HR + OFS group had significantly more referrals and tests per year than the other groups. Cardiovascular medication initiation did not differ among groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this early follow-up period, there were meaningful numbers of cardiovascular actions, with women on NCED experiencing the most per year. Future work should seek to further understand the impact of anti-estrogen therapy on the cardiovascular health of premenopausal women and test strategies to mitigate cardiotoxicity.

Long-term Multimodal Recording Reveals Epigenetic Adaptation Routes in Dormant Breast Cancer Cells

Patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer receive adjuvant endocrine therapies (ET) that delay relapse by targeting clinically undetectable micrometastatic deposits. Yet, up to 50% of patients relapse even decades after surgery through unknown mechanisms likely involving dormancy. To investigate genetic and transcriptional changes underlying tumor awakening, we analyzed late relapse patients and longitudinally profiled a rare cohort treated with long-term neoadjuvant ETs until progression. Next, we developed an in vitro evolutionary study to record the adaptive strategies of individual lineages in unperturbed parallel experiments. Our data demonstrate that ETs induce nongenetic cell state transitions into dormancy in a stochastic subset of cells via epigenetic reprogramming. Single lineages with divergent phenotypes awaken unpredictably in the absence of recurrent genetic alterations. Targeting the dormant epigenome shows promising activity against adapting cancer cells. Overall, this study uncovers the contribution of epigenetic adaptation to the evolution of resistance to ETs.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study advances the understanding of therapy-induced dormancy with potential clinical implications for breast cancer. Estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cells adapt to endocrine treatment by entering a dormant state characterized by strong heterochromatinization with no recurrent genetic changes. Targeting the epigenetic rewiring impairs the adaptation of cancer cells to ETs. See related commentary by Llinas-Bertran et al., p. 704. This article is featured in Selected Articles from This Issue, p. 695.

Progression from ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer: molecular features and clinical significance

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) represents pre-invasive breast carcinoma. In untreated cases, 25-60% DCIS progress to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). The challenge lies in distinguishing between non-progressive and progressive DCIS, often resulting in over- or under-treatment in many cases. With increasing screen-detected DCIS in these years, the nature of DCIS has aroused worldwide attention. A deeper understanding of the biological nature of DCIS and the molecular journey of the DCIS-IDC transition is crucial for more effective clinical management. Here, we reviewed the key signaling pathways in breast cancer that may contribute to DCIS initiation and progression. We also explored the molecular features of DCIS and IDC, shedding light on the progression of DCIS through both inherent changes within tumor cells and alterations in the tumor microenvironment. In addition, valuable research tools utilized in studying DCIS including preclinical models and newer advanced technologies such as single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics and artificial intelligence, have been systematically summarized. Further, we thoroughly discussed the clinical advancements in DCIS and IDC, including prognostic biomarkers and clinical managements, with the aim of facilitating more personalized treatment strategies in the future. Research on DCIS has already yielded significant insights into breast carcinogenesis and will continue to pave the way for practical clinical applications.