Sequence conservation at human and mouse orthologous common fragile regions, FRA3B/FHIT and Fra14A2/Fhit

The chromosomal challenge of human embryos: Mechanisms and fundamentals

Chromosomal abnormalities in human pre-implantation embryos, originating from either meiotic or mitotic errors, present a significant challenge in reproductive biology. Complete aneuploidy is primarily linked to errors during the resumption of meiosis in oocyte maturation, which increase with maternal age, while mosaic aneuploidies result from mitotic errors after fertilization. The biological causes of these abnormalities are increasingly becoming a topic of interest for research groups and clinical specialists. This review explores the intricate processes of meiotic and early mitotic divisions in embryos, shedding light on the mechanisms that lead to changes in chromosome number in daughter cells. Key factors in meiotic division include difficulties in spindle assembly without centrosomes, kinetochore (KT) orientation disturbances, and inefficient cell-cycle checkpoints. The weakening of cohesion molecules that bind chromosomes, exacerbated by maternal aging, further complicates chromosomal segregation. Mitotic errors in early development are influenced by defects in sperm centrosomes, KT misalignment, and the gradual depletion of maternal regulatory factors. Coupled with the inactive or partially active embryonic genome, this depletion increases the likelihood of chromosomal aberrations. While various theoretical mechanisms for these abnormalities exist, current data remain insufficient to determine their exact contributions. Continued research is essential to unravel these complex processes and improve outcomes in assisted reproductive technologies.

PhyloPGM: boosting regulatory function prediction accuracy using evolutionary information

Motivation

The computational prediction of regulatory function associated with a genomic sequence is of utter importance in -omics study, which facilitates our understanding of the underlying mechanisms underpinning the vast gene regulatory network. Prominent examples in this area include the binding prediction of transcription factors in DNA regulatory regions, and predicting RNA–protein interaction in the context of post-transcriptional gene expression. However, existing computational methods have suffered from high false-positive rates and have seldom used any evolutionary information, despite the vast amount of available orthologous data across multitudes of extant and ancestral genomes, which readily present an opportunity to improve the accuracy of existing computational methods.

Results

In this study, we present a novel probabilistic approach called PhyloPGM that leverages previously trained TFBS or RNA–RBP binding predictors by aggregating their predictions from various orthologous regions, in order to boost the overall prediction accuracy on human sequences. Throughout our experiments, PhyloPGM has shown significant improvement over baselines such as the sequence-based RNA–RBP binding predictor RNATracker and the sequence-based TFBS predictor that is known as FactorNet. PhyloPGM is simple in principle, easy to implement and yet, yields impressive results.

Availability and implementation

The PhyloPGM package is available at https://github.com/BlanchetteLab/PhyloPGM

Supplementary information

Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

OUP accepted manuscript

Conflicts between transcription and replication machinery are a potent source of replication stress and genome instability; however, no technique currently exists to identify endogenous genomic locations prone to transcription–replication interactions. Here, we report a novel method to identify genomic loci prone to transcription–replication interactions termed transcription–replication immunoprecipitation on nascent DNA sequencing, TRIPn-Seq. TRIPn-Seq employs the sequential immunoprecipitation of RNA polymerase 2 phosphorylated at serine 5 (RNAP2s5) followed by enrichment of nascent DNA previously labeled with bromodeoxyuridine. Using TRIPn-Seq, we mapped 1009 unique transcription–replication interactions (TRIs) in mouse primary B cells characterized by a bimodal pattern of RNAP2s5, bidirectional transcription, an enrichment of RNA:DNA hybrids, and a high probability of forming G-quadruplexes. TRIs are highly enriched at transcription start sites and map to early replicating regions. TRIs exhibit enhanced Replication Protein A association and TRI-associated genes exhibit higher replication fork termination than control transcription start sites, two marks of replication stress. TRIs colocalize with double-strand DNA breaks, are enriched for deletions, and accumulate mutations in tumors. We propose that replication stress at TRIs induces mutations potentially contributing to age-related disease, as well as tumor formation and development.

Fragile site instability: measuring more than breaks

Genome instability is not only a hallmark of cancer, it is necessary for its initiation and evolution, and naturally accumulates as cells age. Replication stress is a potent source of genome instability found in many tumor types [1]. Chromosomal fragile sites are genomic loci highly prone to DNA damage specifically from replication stress and are frequently mutated in cancer [2-4]2-4]. While tracking the origin of individual mutations has proved challenging, measuring DNA damage and repair at endogenous sites can offer key insights into understanding the etiology of cancer. In the past 15 years, the causal link between replication stress, oncogene activation, and tumor initiation and evolution has become increasingly clear [1, 5-9]. Replication-associated damage accumulates at early stages of tumorigenesis and may promote further transformation. Studying the causes and consequences of fragile site instability can offer a window into the earliest stages of carcinogenesis [10-13]. In particular, fragile site studies will help us understand the molecular underpinnings influencing the frequency of DNA breakage, successful repair processes suppressing genome instability, and unsuccessful repair leading to mutations and chromosome rearrangements. Of these, measuring successful repair is the most challenging as it leaves little evidence behind.

The epicenter of chromosomal fragility of Fra14A2, the mouse ortholog of human FRA3B common fragile site, is largely attached to the nuclear matrix in lymphocytes but not in other cell types that do not express such a fragility

Common fragile sites (CFSs) correspond to chromosomal regions susceptible to present breaks, discontinuities or constrictions in metaphase chromosomes from cells subjected to replication stress. They are considered as genomic regions intrinsically difficult to replicate and they are evolutionary conserved at least in mammals. However, the recent discovery that CFSs are cell-type specific indicates that DNA sequence by itself cannot account for CFS instability. Nevertheless, the large gene FHIT that includes FRA3B, the most highly expressed CFS in human lymphocytes, is commonly deleted in a variety of tumors suggesting a tumor suppressor role for its product. Here, we report that the epicenter of fragility of Fra14A2/Fhit, the mouse ortholog of human FRA3B/FHIT that like its human counterpart is the most highly expressed CFS in mouse lymphocytes, is largely attached to the nuclear matrix compartment in naive B lymphocytes but not in primary hepatocytes or cortical neurons that do not express such a CFS. Our results suggest a structural explanation for the difficult-to-replicate nature of such a region and so for its common fragility in lymphocytes, that is independent of the possible tumor suppressor role of the gene harboring such CFS.

Visualizing locus-specific sister chromatid exchange reveals differential patterns of replication stress-induced fragile site breakage

Chromosomal fragile sites are genomic loci sensitive to replication stress which accumulate high levels of DNA damage, and are frequently mutated in cancers. Fragile site damage is thought to arise from the aberrant repair of spontaneous replication stress, however successful fragile site repair cannot be calculated using existing techniques. Here, we report a new assay measuring recombination-mediated repair at endogenous genomic loci by combining a sister chromatid exchange (SCE) assay with fluorescent in situ hybridization (SCE-FISH). Using SCE-FISH, we find that endogenous and exogenous replication stress generated unrepaired breaks and SCEs at fragile sites. We also find that distinct sources of replication stress induce distinct patterns of breakage: ATR inhibition induces more breaks at early replicating fragile sites (ERFS), while ERFS and late-replicating common fragile sites (CFS) are equally fragile in response to aphidicolin. Furthermore, SCEs were suppressed at fragile sites near centromeres in response to replication stress, suggesting that genomic location influences DNA repair pathway choice. SCE-FISH also measured successful recombination in human primary lymphocytes, and identificed the proto-oncogene BCL2 as a replication stress-induced fragile site. These findings demonstrate that SCE-FISH frequency at fragile sites is a sensitive indicator of replication stress, and that large-scale genome organization influences DNA repair pathway choice.

Common fragile site instability in normal cells: Lessons and perspectives

Mechanisms and events related to common fragile site (CFS) instability are well known in cancer cells. Here, we argue that normal cells remain an important experimental model to address questions related to CFS instability in the absence of alterations in cell cycle and DNA damage repair pathways, which are common features acquired in cancer. Furthermore, a major gap of knowledge concerns the stability of CFSs during gametogenesis. CFS instability in meiotic or postmeiotic stages of the germ cell line could generate chromosome deletions or large rearrangements. This in turn can lead to the functional loss of the several CFS-associated genes with tumor suppressor function. Our hypothesis is that such mutations can potentially result in genetic predisposition to develop cancer. Indirect evidence for CFS instability in human germ cells has been provided by genomic investigations in family pedigrees associated with genetic disease. The issue of CFS instability in the germ cell line should represent one of the future efforts, and may take advantage of the existence of sequence and functional conservation of CFSs between rodents and humans.

The "enemies within": regions of the genome that are inherently difficult to replicate

An unusual feature of many eukaryotic genomes is the presence of regions that appear intrinsically difficult to copy during the process of DNA replication. Curiously, the location of these difficult-to-replicate regions is often conserved between species, implying a valuable role in some aspect of genome organization or maintenance. The most prominent class of these regions in mammalian cells is defined as chromosome fragile sites, which acquired their name because of a propensity to form visible gaps/breaks on otherwise-condensed chromosomes in mitosis. This fragility is particularly apparent following perturbation of DNA replication-a phenomenon often referred to as "replication stress". Here, we review recent data on the molecular basis for chromosome fragility and the role of fragile sites in the etiology of cancer. In particular, we highlight how studies on fragile sites have provided unexpected insights into how the DNA repair machinery assists in the completion of DNA replication.

Common Chemical Inductors of Replication Stress: Focus on Cell-Based Studies

DNA replication is a highly demanding process regarding the energy and material supply and must be precisely regulated, involving multiple cellular feedbacks. The slowing down or stalling of DNA synthesis and/or replication forks is referred to as replication stress (RS). Owing to the complexity and requirements of replication, a plethora of factors may interfere and challenge the genome stability, cell survival or affect the whole organism. This review outlines chemical compounds that are known inducers of RS and commonly used in laboratory research. These compounds act on replication by direct interaction with DNA causing DNA crosslinks and bulky lesions (cisplatin), chemical interference with the metabolism of deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates (hydroxyurea), direct inhibition of the activity of replicative DNA polymerases (aphidicolin) and interference with enzymes dealing with topological DNA stress (camptothecin, etoposide). As a variety of mechanisms can induce RS, the responses of mammalian cells also vary. Here, we review the activity and mechanism of action of these compounds based on recent knowledge, accompanied by examples of induced phenotypes, cellular readouts and commonly used doses.

The complex nature of fragile site plasticity and its importance in cancer

Common fragile sites (CFSs) are chromosomal regions characterized as hotspots for breakage and chromosomal rearrangements following DNA replication stress. They are preferentially unstable in pre-cancerous lesions and during cancer development. Recently CFSs were found to be tissue- and even oncogene-induced specific, thus indicating an unforeseen complexity. Here we review recent developments in CFS research that shed new light on the molecular basis of their instability and their importance in cancer development.

Interplay between genetic and epigenetic factors governs common fragile site instability in cancer

Common fragile sites (CFSs) are regions within the normal chromosomal structure that were characterized as hotspots for genomic instability in cancer almost 30 years ago. In recent years, many efforts have been made to understand the basis of CFS fragility and their involvement in the genomic signature of instability found in malignant tumors. CFSs are among the first regions to undergo genomic instability during cancer development because of their intrinsic sensitivity to replication stress conditions, which result from oncogene expression. The preferred sensitivity of CFSs to replication stress stems from various mechanisms including: replication fork arrest at AT-rich repeats, origin paucity along large genomic regions, failure in activation of dormant origins, late replication timing, collision between replication and transcription along large genes, all leading to incomplete replication of the CFS region and resulting in chromosomal instability. Here we review shared and unique characteristics of CFSs, their underlying causes and implications, particularly for the development of cancer.

A high resolution map of mammalian X chromosome fragile regions assessed by large-scale comparative genomics

Chromosomal evolution involves multiple changes at structural and numerical levels. These changes, which are related to the variation of the gene number and their location, can be tracked by the identification of syntenic blocks (SB). First reports proposed that ~180-280 SB might be shared by mouse and human species. More recently, further studies including additional genomes have identified up to ~1,400 SB during the evolution of eutherian species. A considerable number of studies regarding the X chromosome's structure and evolution have been undertaken because of its extraordinary biological impact on reproductive fitness and speciation. Some have identified evolutionary breakpoint regions and fragile sites at specific locations in the human X chromosome. However, mapping these regions to date has involved using low-to-moderate resolution techniques. Such scenario might be related to underestimating their total number and giving an inaccurate location. The present study included using a combination of bioinformatics methods for identifying, at base-pair level, chromosomal rearrangements occurring during X chromosome evolution in 13 mammalian species. A comparative technique using four different algorithms was used for optimizing the detection of hotspot regions in the human X chromosome. We identified a significant interspecific variation in SB size which was related to genetic information gain regarding the human X chromosome. We found that human hotspot regions were enriched by LINE-1 and Alu transposable elements, which may have led to intraspecific chromosome rearrangement events. New fragile regions located in the human X chromosome have also been postulated. We estimate that the high resolution map of X chromosome fragile sites presented here constitutes useful data concerning future studies on mammalian evolution and human disease.

Analysis of the t(3;8) of hereditary renal cell carcinoma: a palindrome-mediated translocation

It has emerged that palindrome-mediated genomic instability generates DNA-based rearrangements. The presence of palindromic AT-rich repeats (PATRRs) at the translocation breakpoints suggested a palindrome-mediated mechanism in the generation of several recurrent constitutional rearrangements: the t(11;22), t(17;22), and t(8;22). To date, all reported PATRR-mediated translocations include the PATRR on chromosome 22 (PATRR22) as a translocation partner. Here, the constitutional rearrangement, t(3;8)(p14.2;q24.1), segregating with renal cell carcinoma in two families, is examined. The chromosome 8 breakpoint lies in PATRR8 in the first intron of the RNF139 (TRC8) gene, whereas the chromosome 3 breakpoint is located in an AT-rich palindromic sequence in intron 3 of the FHIT gene (PATRR3). Thus, the t(3;8) is the first PATRR-mediated, recurrent, constitutional translocation that does not involve PATRR22. Furthermore, we detect de novo translocations similar to the t(11;22) and t(8;22), involving PATRR3 in normal sperm. The breakpoint on chromosome 3 is in proximity to FRA3B, the most common fragile site in the human genome and a site of frequent deletions in tumor cells. However, the lack of involvement of PATRR3 sequence in numerous FRA3B-related deletions suggests that there are several different DNA sequence-based etiologies responsible for chromosome 3p14.2 genomic rearrangements.

The complex basis underlying common fragile site instability in cancer

Common fragile sites (CFSs) were characterized almost 30 years ago as sites undergoing genomic instability in cancer. Recently, in vitro studies have found that oncogene-induced replication stress leads to CFS instability. In vivo, CFSs were found to be preferentially unstable during early stages of cancer development and to leave a unique signature of instability. It is now increasingly clear that, along the spectrum of replication features characterizing CFSs, failure of origin activation is a common feature. This and other features of CFSs, together with the replication stress characterizing early stages of cancer development, lead to incomplete replication that results in genomic instability preferentially at CFSs. Here, we review the shared and unique characteristics of CFSs, their underlying causes and their implications, particularly with respect to the development of cancer.

A genome-wide analysis of common fragile sites: what features determine chromosomal instability in the human genome?

Chromosomal common fragile sites (CFSs) are unstable genomic regions that break under replication stress and are involved in structural variation. They frequently are sites of chromosomal rearrangements in cancer and of viral integration. However, CFSs are undercharacterized at the molecular level and thus difficult to predict computationally. Newly available genome-wide profiling studies provide us with an unprecedented opportunity to associate CFSs with features of their local genomic contexts. Here, we contrasted the genomic landscape of cytogenetically defined aphidicolin-induced CFSs (aCFSs) to that of nonfragile sites, using multiple logistic regression. We also analyzed aCFS breakage frequencies as a function of their genomic landscape, using standard multiple regression. We show that local genomic features are effective predictors both of regions harboring aCFSs (explaining ∼77% of the deviance in logistic regression models) and of aCFS breakage frequencies (explaining ∼45% of the variance in standard regression models). In our optimal models (having highest explanatory power), aCFSs are predominantly located in G-negative chromosomal bands and away from centromeres, are enriched in Alu repeats, and have high DNA flexibility. In alternative models, CpG island density, transcription start site density, H3K4me1 coverage, and mononucleotide microsatellite coverage are significant predictors. Also, aCFSs have high fragility when colocated with evolutionarily conserved chromosomal breakpoints. Our models are predictive of the fragility of aCFSs mapped at a higher resolution. Importantly, the genomic features we identified here as significant predictors of fragility allow us to draw valuable inferences on the molecular mechanisms underlying aCFSs.

Failure of origin activation in response to fork stalling leads to chromosomal instability at fragile sites

Perturbed DNA replication in early stages of cancer development induces chromosomal instability preferentially at fragile sites. However, the molecular basis for this instability is unknown. Here, we show that even under normal growth conditions, replication fork progression along the fragile site, FRA16C, is slow and forks frequently stall at AT-rich sequences, leading to activation of additional origins to enable replication completion. Under mild replication stress, the frequency of stalling at AT-rich sequences is further increased. Strikingly, unlike in the entire genome, in the FRA16C region additional origins are not activated, suggesting that all potential origins are already activated under normal conditions. Thus, the basis for FRA16C fragility is replication fork stalling at AT-rich sequences and inability to activate additional origins under replication stress. Our results provide a mechanism explaining the replication stress sensitivity of fragile sites and thus, the basis for genomic instability during early stages of cancer development.

Fragile histidine triad protein: structure, function, and its association with tumorogenesis

BACKGROUND

The human fragile histidine triad (FHIT) gene is a putative tumor suppressor gene, which is located at chromosome region 3p14.2. It was suggested that the loss of heterozygosity (LOH), homozygous deletions, and abnormal expression of the FHIT gene were involved in several types of human malignancies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To determine the role of FHIT in various cancers, we have performed structural and functional analysis of FHIT in detail.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The protein FHIT catalyzes the Mg(2+) dependent hydrolysis of P1-5 cent-O-adenosine-P3-5 cent-O-adenosine triphosphate, Ap3A, to AMP, and ADP. The reaction is thought to follow a two-step mechanism. Histidine triad proteins, named for a motif related to the sequence H-cent-H-cent-H-cent-cent- (cent, a hydrophobic amino acid), belong to superfamily of nucleotide hydrolases and transferases. This enzyme acts on the R-phosphate of ribonucleotides, and contain a approximately 30-kDa domain that is typically a homodimer of approximately 15 kDa polypeptides with catalytic site.

CONCLUSION

Here we have gathered information is known about biological activities of FHIT, the structural and biochemical bases for their functions. Our approach may provide a comparative framework for further investigation of FHIT.

Molecular cloning of the canine fragile histidine triad (FHIT) gene and Fhit protein expression in canine peripheral blood mononuclear cells

A fragile histidine triad (FHIT) gene has been studied as a tumor-associated gene in humans. The aberrant FHIT gene and its protein expression have been reported in many types of human cancers. The present study explored the canine FHIT gene structure and its protein expression in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of healthy dogs by RT-PCR, RACE and immunoblot analysis. The obtained canine FHIT gene contained nine small exons and was located on canine chromosome 20. Furthermore, we identified an alternative splicing form of the FHIT transcript. The deduced amino acid sequence was well conserved between species, and anti-human Fhit antibody could be used to detect the canine Fhit protein. These findings will be useful for future research.

Comparative genomics and molecular dynamics of DNA repeats in eukaryotes

Repeated elements can be widely abundant in eukaryotic genomes, composing more than 50% of the human genome, for example. It is possible to classify repeated sequences into two large families, "tandem repeats" and "dispersed repeats." Each of these two families can be itself divided into subfamilies. Dispersed repeats contain transposons, tRNA genes, and gene paralogues, whereas tandem repeats contain gene tandems, ribosomal DNA repeat arrays, and satellite DNA, itself subdivided into satellites, minisatellites, and microsatellites. Remarkably, the molecular mechanisms that create and propagate dispersed and tandem repeats are specific to each class and usually do not overlap. In the present review, we have chosen in the first section to describe the nature and distribution of dispersed and tandem repeats in eukaryotic genomes in the light of complete (or nearly complete) available genome sequences. In the second part, we focus on the molecular mechanisms responsible for the fast evolution of two specific classes of tandem repeats: minisatellites and microsatellites. Given that a growing number of human neurological disorders involve the expansion of a particular class of microsatellites, called trinucleotide repeats, a large part of the recent experimental work on microsatellites has focused on these particular repeats, and thus we also review the current knowledge in this area. Finally, we propose a unified definition for mini- and microsatellites that takes into account their biological properties and try to point out new directions that should be explored in a near future on our road to understanding the genetics of repeated sequences.

Stably transfected common fragile site sequences exhibit instability at ectopic sites

Common fragile sites (CFSs) are loci that are especially prone to forming gaps and breaks on metaphase chromosomes under conditions of replication stress. Although much has been learned about the cellular responses to gaps and breaks at CFSs, less is known about what makes these sites inherently unstable. CFS sequences are highly conserved in mammalian evolution and contain a number of sequence motifs that are hypothesized to contribute to their instability. To examine the role of CFS sequences in chromosome breakage, we stably transfected two BACs containing FRA3B sequences and two nonCFS control BACs containing similar sequence content into HCT116 cells and isolated cell clones with BACs integrated at ectopic sites. Integrated BACs were present at just a few to several hundred contiguous copies. Cell clones containing integrated FRA3B BACs showed a significant, three to sevenfold increase in aphidicolin-induced gaps and breaks at the integration site as compared to control BACs. Furthermore, many FRA3B integration sites displayed additional chromosome rearrangements associated with CFS instability. Clones were examined for replication timing and it was found that the integrated FRA3B sequences were not dependent on late replication for their fragility. This is the first direct evidence in human cells that introduction of CFS sequences into ectopic nonfragile loci is sufficient to recapitulate the instability found at CFSs. These data support the hypothesis that sequences at CFSs are inherently unstable, and are a major factor in the formation of replication stress induced gaps and breaks at CFSs.

Disabled-1 is a large common fragile site gene, inactivated in multiple cancers

Common fragile sites (CFS) are large, genomically unstable regions, which are hot-spots for deletions and other alterations, especially in cancer cells. Several have been shown to contain genes that span large genomic regions, such as FHIT (1.5 Mb), WWOX (1.0 Mb), GRID2 (1.36 Mb), PARK2 (1.3 Mb), and RORA (730 kb). These genes are frequently inactivated in multiple different cancers, and FHIT and WWOX are shown to function as tumor suppressors. The disabled-1 gene (DAB1) is one of the human homologs of the Drosophila disabled locus, which in mammals is involved in neuronal migration and lamination in the developing cerebral cortex. Mice DAB1 inactivation results in the neurological mutant Scrambler, having similarities to mice with the inactivation of PARK2 (Quaker), GRID2 (Lurcher), and RORA (Staggerer). We were interested in whether DAB1 was another large CFS gene that could have cancer development importance. We demonstrated here that the human DAB1 gene (spanning 1.25 Mb) mapped within FRA1B CFS region on chromosomal band 1p32.2. Real-time RT-PCR analysis revealed that the expression level of DAB1 was decreased in many human cancer samples, including primary tumor tissues and cancer-derived cell lines, from several different cancers, especially in brain and endometrial cancer. Additionally, the introduction of an over-expression DAB1 plasmid into two different cell lines, having insignificant endogenous DAB1 expression, resulted in decreased cell growth. In summary, DAB1 is another gene that resides within an unstable CFS region and might play a role in human tumorigenesis. These data may provide further linkage between neurological development and cancer.

Genome instability: a mechanistic view of its causes and consequences

Genomic instability in the form of mutations and chromosome rearrangements is usually associated with pathological disorders, and yet it is also crucial for evolution. Two types of elements have a key role in instability leading to rearrangements: those that act in trans to prevent instability--among them are replication, repair and S-phase checkpoint factors--and those that act in cis--chromosomal hotspots of instability such as fragile sites and highly transcribed DNA sequences. Taking these elements as a guide, we review the causes and consequences of instability with the aim of providing a mechanistic perspective on the origin of genomic instability.

Chromosome Fragile Sites

Chromosomal fragile sites are specific loci that preferentially exhibit gaps and breaks on metaphase chromosomes following partial inhibition of DNA synthesis. Their discovery has led to novel findings spanning a number of areas of genetics. Rare fragile sites are seen in a small proportion of individuals and are inherited in a Mendelian manner. Some, such as FRAXA in the FMR1 gene, are associated with human genetic disorders, and their study led to the identification of nucleotide-repeat expansion as a frequent mutational mechanism in humans. In contrast, common fragile sites are present in all individuals and represent the largest class of fragile sites. Long considered an intriguing component of chromosome structure, common fragile sites have taken on novel significance as regions of the genome that are particularly sensitive to replication stress and that are frequently rearranged in tumor cells. In recent years, much progress has been made toward understanding the genomic features of common fragile sites and the cellular processes that monitor and influence their stability. Their study has merged with that of cell cycle checkpoints and DNA repair, and common fragile sites have provided insight into understanding the consequences of replication stress on DNA damage and genome instability in cancer cells.

Relationship between FRA11F and 11q13 gene amplification in oral cancer

Common fragile sites (CFS) are nonstaining gaps or breaks in chromosomes that are expressed under conditions inducing replicative stress. CFS have been suggested to play a role in epithelial cancers by their association with loss of heterozygosity, loss of gene expression, and/or gene amplification in the form of homogeneously staining regions (hsrs). In oral squamous-cell carcinomas (OSCC), amplification of chromosomal band 11q13 occurs in the form of an hsr. We suggested previously that CFS flanking 11q13 may be susceptible to breakage induced by tobacco or other carcinogens and/or human papillomavirus, promoting formation of the 11q13 amplicon. Examination of OSCC cell lines with 11q13 amplification using fluorescence in situ hybridization showed loss of FRA11F sequences, whereas cell lines without 11q13 amplification displayed an intact FRA11F site. Cell lines with more complex 11q rearrangements expressed FRA11F in the form of an inverted duplication, characteristic of breakage-fusion-bridge cycles. Our findings suggest that gene amplification involving chromosomal band 11q13 in OSCC may be initiated by breakage at FRA11F.

Large common fragile site genes and cancer

The common fragile sites are large regions of genomic instability that are found in all individuals and are hot spots for chromosomal rearrangements and deletions. A number of the common fragile sites have been found to span genes that are encoded by very large genomic regions. Two of these genes, FHIT and WWOX, have already been demonstrated to function as tumor suppressors. In this review we will discuss the large common fragile site genes that have been identified to date, and the role that these genes appear to play both in cellular responses to stress and in the development of cancer.

Common fragile genes and digestive tract cancers

FRA3B and FRA16D are the most sensitive common chromosomal fragile site loci in the human genome. Two tumor suppressor genes, the fragile histidine triad (FHIT) gene and the WW domain-containing oxidoreductase (WWOX), map to the common fragile sites, FRA3B and FRA16D, respectively. Interestingly, FHIT and WWOX have similarities: for example, they are both larger than 1 Mb and encompass fragile sites, they both show frequent allelic loss regions in various human cancers, they both span a region of homozygous deletion in multiple cancers, and they both frequently show aberrant transcripts. The development of human cancers, including digestive tract cancers, is strongly associated with exposure to environmental carcinogens. Common fragile sites are very sensitive to this type of exposure, and the resulting DNA damage leads to the inactivation of genes such as FHIT and WWOX. We present an overview of these two common fragile genes, namely FHIT/FRA3B and WWOX/FRA16D, in digestive tract cancers.

Common fragile sites are conserved features of human and mouse chromosomes and relate to large active genes

Common fragile sites (CFSs) are seen as chromosomal gaps and breaks brought about by inhibition of replication, and it is thought that they cluster with tumor breakpoints. This study presents a comprehensive analysis using conventional and molecular cytogenetic mapping of CFSs and their expression frequencies in two mouse strains, BALB/c and C57BL/6, and in human probands. Here we show that induced mouse CFSs relate to sites of spontaneous gaps and breaks and that CFS expression levels in chromosome bands are conserved between the two mouse strains and between syntenic mouse and human DNA segments. Furthermore, four additional mouse CFSs were found to be homologous to human CFSs on the molecular cytogenetic level (Fra2D-FRA2G, Fra4C2-FRA9E, Fra6A3.1-FRA7G, and Fra6B1-FRA7H), increasing the number of such CFSs already described in the literature to eight. Contrary to previous reports, DNA helix flexibility is not increased in the 15 human and eight mouse CFSs molecularly defined so far, compared to large nonfragile control regions. Our findings suggest that the mechanisms that provoke instability at CFSs are evolutionarily conserved. The role that large transcriptionally active genes may play in CFS expression is discussed.

Common fragile sites as targets for chromosome rearrangements

Common fragile sites are large chromosomal regions that preferentially exhibit gaps or breaks after DNA synthesis is partially perturbed. Fragile site instability in cultured cells is well documented and includes gaps and breaks on metaphase chromosomes, translocation and deletions breakpoints, and sister chromosome exchanges. In recent years, much has been learned about the genomic structure at fragile sites and the cellular mechanisms that monitor their stability. The study of fragile sites has merged with that of cell cycle checkpoints and DNA repair, with multiple proteins from these pathways implicated in fragile site stability, including ATR, BRCA1, CHK1, and RAD51. Since their discovery, fragile sites have been implicated in constitutional and cancer chromosome rearrangements in vivo and recent studies suggest that common fragile sites may serve as markers of chromosome damage caused by replication stress during early tumorigenesis. Here we review the relationship of fragile sites to chromosome rearrangements, particularly in tumor cells, and discuss the mechanisms that may be involved.

The molecular basis of common and rare fragile sites

Fragile sites are specific loci that form gaps and constrictions on chromosomes exposed to partial replication stress. Fragile sites are classified as rare or common, depending on their induction and frequency within the population. These loci are known to be involved in chromosomal rearrangements in tumors and are associated with human diseases. Therefore, the understanding of the molecular basis of fragile sites is of high significance. Here we discuss the works performed in recent years that investigated the characteristics of fragile sites which underlie their inherent instability.

Common fragile sites

Common fragile sites are regions showing site-specific gaps and breaks on metaphase chromosomes after partial inhibition of DNA synthesis. Common fragile sites are normally stable in somatic cells. However, following treatment of cultured cells with replication inhibitors, fragile sites display gaps, breaks, rearrangements and other features of unstable DNA. Studies showing that fragile sites and associated genes are frequently deleted or rearranged in many cancer cells have clearly demonstrated their importance in genome instability in cancer. Until recently, little was known about the molecular nature and mechanisms involved in fragile site instability. From studies conducted in many laboratories, it is now known that fragile sites extend over large regions, are associated with genes, exhibit delayed replication, and contain regions of high DNA flexibility. Recent findings from our laboratory showing that the key cell cycle checkpoint genes are important for genome stability at fragile sties have shed new light on these mechanisms and on the significance of these sites in cancer and normal chromosome structure. Since their discovery over two decades ago, much has been learned regarding their significance in chromosome structure and instability in cancer, but a number of key questions remain, including why these sites are 'fragile' and the impact of this instability on associated genes in cancer cells. These and other questions have been addressed by participants of this meeting, which highlighted instability at common fragile sites. This brief review is intended to provide background on common fragile sites that has led up to many of the studies presented in the accompanying reports in this volume and not to summarize the findings presented therein. Some aspects of this review were taken from Glover et al. (T.W. Glover, M.F. Arlt, A.M. Casper, S.G. Durkin, Mechanisms of common fragile site instability, Hum. Molec. Genet. 14 (in press). [1]).

Homologous recombination and nonhomologous end-joining repair pathways regulate fragile site stability

Common fragile sites are specific loci that form gaps and constrictions on metaphase chromosomes exposed to replication stress, which slows DNA replication. These sites have a role in chromosomal rearrangements in tumors; however, the molecular mechanism of their expression is unclear. Here we show that replication stress leads to focus formation of Rad51 and phosphorylated DNA-PKcs, key components of the homologous recombination (HR) and nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ), double-strand break (DSB) repair pathways, respectively. Down-regulation of Rad51, DNA-PKcs, or Ligase IV, an additional component of the NHEJ repair pathway, leads to a significant increase in fragile site expression under replication stress. Replication stress also results in focus formation of the DSB markers, MDC1 and gammaH2AX. These foci colocalized with those of Rad51 and phospho-DNA-PKcs. Furthermore, gammaH2AX and phospho-DNA-PKcs foci were localized at expressed fragile sites on metaphase chromosomes. These findings suggest that DSBs are formed at common fragile sites as a result of replication perturbation. The repair of these breaks by both HR and NHEJ pathways is essential for chromosomal stability at these sites.

Mechanisms of common fragile site instability

The study of common fragile sites has its roots in the early cytogenetic investigations of the fragile X syndrome. Long considered an interesting component of chromosome structure, common fragile sites have taken on novel significance as regions of the genome that are particularly sensitive to certain forms of replication stress, which are frequently rearranged in cancer cells. In recent years, much has been learned about the genomic structure at fragile sites and the cellular checkpoint functions that monitor their stability. Recent findings suggest that common fragile sites may serve as markers of chromosome damage caused by replication stress during early stages of tumorigenesis. Thus, the study of common fragile sites can provide insight not only into the nature of fragile sites, but also into the broader consequences of replication stress on DNA damage and cancer. However, despite recent advances, many questions remain regarding the normal functional significance of these conserved regions and the basis of their fragility.

A mouse model of the fragile gene FHIT: From carcinogenesis to gene therapy and cancer prevention

Mouse models of tumor suppressors are increasingly useful to investigate biomedical aspects of cancer genetics. Some tumor suppressor genes are located at common fragile sites that are specific chromosomal regions highly susceptible to DNA lesions. The tumor suppressor gene FHIT, at the fragile site FRA3B, is the first fragile gene with a developed and characterized mouse knockout model. The human gene FHIT is frequently deleted in cancers and cancer cell lines of many epithelial tissues, and Fhit protein is absent or reduced in most cancers. The mouse Fhit ortholog is also located at a common fragile site, Fra14A2 on murine chromosome 14, and sustains homozygous deletions in murine cancer cell lines. The Fhit knockout mouse is, therefore, an adequate model to study human FHIT function. To establish an animal model and to explore the role of FHIT in tumorigenesis, we have developed a mouse strain carrying one or two inactivated Fhit alleles. Insights into Fhit mouse genetics that have emerged in the last 7 years, and are reviewed in the present article, allowed for development of new tools in carcinogenesis and gene delivery studies.

Increased frequency of multiradial chromosome structures in mouse embryonic fibroblasts lacking functional Werner syndrome protein and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1

To determine whether the mouse Werner syndrome homologue (Wrn) and the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) enzymes act in concert to prevent specific chromosomal rearrangements, mice with a mutation in the helicase domain of the Wrn gene (Wrn(Deltahel/Deltahel) mice) were crossed to PARP-1 null mice. Spectral karyotyping of the mouse metaphases was used in correlation with conventional G-banded karyotype analysis to precisely define the chromosomal aberrations in cells. Although there was no recurrent clonal chromosome aberration, PARP-1 null/Wrn(Deltahel/Deltahel) fibroblasts were distinguished by an increased frequency of chromatid breaks. Interestingly, multiradial structures were the only type of DNA rearrangement that was significantly higher in such PARP-1 null/Wrn(Deltahel/Deltahel) cells. These results indicate that Wrn and PARP-1 enzymes may be part of a protein complex involved in the processing of DNA breaks that can ultimately lead to multiradial structures when both enzymes are nonfunctional. Finally, regions of chromosomes known to be fragile sites in the mouse genome are not more prone to DNA rearrangements in the absence of both PARP-1 and functional Wrn proteins. Moreover, the low number of recurrent rearranged chromosome at any given site suggest a random mutagenesis process in PARP-1 null/Wrn(Deltahel/Deltahel) fibroblasts.

Common fragile sites

Aphidicolin-induced common fragile sites are site-specific gaps or breaks seen on metaphase chromosomes after partial inhibition of DNA synthesis. These fragile sites were first recognized during the early studies of the fragile X syndrome and are induced by the same conditions of folate or thymidylate stress used to induce the fragile X site. Common fragile sites are normally stable in cultured human cells. However, following induction with replication inhibitors, they display a number of characteristics of unstable and highly recombinogenic DNA. From the many studies that have cloned and characterized fragile sites, it is now known that these sites extend over large regions, are associated with genes, exhibit late or delayed replication, and contain regions of high flexibility but are otherwise unremarkable in sequence. Studies showing that fragile sites and their associated genes are frequently deleted or rearranged in cancer cells have clearly demonstrated their importance in genome instability in tumorigenesis. Yet until recently, very little was known about the molecular mechanisms involved in their stability. Recent findings showing that the key checkpoint genes ATR and BRCA1 are critical for genome stability at fragile sites have shed new light on these mechanisms and on the biological significance of common fragile sites.

WWOX, the common chromosomal fragile site, FRA16D, cancer gene

Gross chromosomal rearrangements and aneuploidy are among the most common somatic genomic abnormalities that occur during cancer initiation and progression, in particular in human solid tumor carcinogenesis. The loss of large chromosomal regions as consequence of gross rearrangements (e.g. deletions, monosomies, unbalanced translocations and mitotic recombination) have been traditionally associated with the existence of tumor suppressor genes within the areas affected by the loss of genetic material. The long arm of chromosome 16 was identified as being frequently associated with structural abnormalities in multiple neoplasias, that led us to focus attention on the detailed genetic dissection of this region resulting in the cloning of the putative tumor suppressor gene, WWOX (WW domain containing Oxidoreductase). Interestingly, the WWOX gene resides in the very same region as that of the common chromosomal fragile site 16D (FRA16D). The WWOX gene encodes a protein that contains two WW domains, involved in protein-protein interactions, and a short chain dehydrogenase (SDR) domain, possibly involved in sex-steroid metabolism. We have identified the WWOX WW domain ligand as the PPXY motif confirming the biochemical activity of this domain. WWOX normally resides in the Golgi and we will demonstrate that Golgi localization requires an intact SDR. Inactivation of the WWOX gene during tumorigenesis can occur by homozygous deletions and possibly mutation, however, aberrantly spliced forms of WWOX mRNA have been observed even when one allele is still intact. The aberrantly spliced mRNAs have deletions of the exons that encode the SDR and these WWOX protein isoforms display abnormal intracellular localization to the nucleus possibly functioning as dominant negative inhibitors of full length WWOX. Thus, generation of aberrant transcripts of WWOX may represent a novel mechanism to functionally inactivate WWOX without genomic alteration of the remaining allele. In this article we will review the cloning and identification of WWOX as the target of FRA16D. In addition, we will discuss the possible biochemical functions of WWOX and present evidence that ectopic WWOX expression inhibits tumor growth.

Alterations in the common fragile site gene Parkin in ovarian and other cancers

The cloning and characterization of the common fragile site (CFS) FRA6E (6q26) identified Parkin, the gene involved in the pathogenesis of many cases of juvenile, early-onset and, rarely, late-onset Parkinson's disease, as the third large gene to be localized within a large CFS. Initial analyses of Parkin indicated that in addition to playing a role in Parkinson's disease, it might also be involved in the development and/or progression of ovarian cancer. These analyses also indicated striking similarities among the large CFS-locus genes: fragile histidine triad gene (FHIT; 3p14.2), WW domain-containing oxidoreductase gene (WWOX; 16q23), and Parkin (6q26). Analyses of FHIT and WWOX in a variety of different cancer types have identified the presence of alternative transcripts with whole exon deletions. Interestingly, various whole exon duplications and deletions have been identified for Parkin in juvenile and early-onset Parkinson's patients. Therefore, we performed mutational/exon rearrangement analysis of Parkin in ovarian cancer cell lines and primary tumors. Four (66.7%) cell lines and four (18.2%) primary tumors were identified as being heterozygous for the duplication or deletion of a Parkin exon. Additionally, three of 23 (13.0%) nonovarian tumor-derived cell lines were also identified as having a duplication or deletion of one or more Parkin exons. Analysis of Parkin protein expression with antibodies revealed that most of the ovarian cancer cell lines and primary tumors had diminished or absent Parkin expression. While functional analyses have not yet been performed for Parkin, these data suggest that like FHIT and WWOX, Parkin may represent a tumor suppressor gene.

Molecular basis for expression of common and rare fragile sites

Fragile sites are specific loci that form gaps, constrictions, and breaks on chromosomes exposed to partial replication stress and are rearranged in tumors. Fragile sites are classified as rare or common, depending on their induction and frequency within the population. The molecular basis of rare fragile sites is associated with expanded repeats capable of adopting unusual non-B DNA structures that can perturb DNA replication. The molecular basis of common fragile sites was unknown. Fragile sites from R-bands are enriched in flexible sequences relative to nonfragile regions from the same chromosomal bands. Here we cloned FRA7E, a common fragile site mapped to a G-band, and revealed a significant difference between its flexibility and that of nonfragile regions mapped to G-bands, similar to the pattern found in R-bands. Thus, in the entire genome, flexible sequences might play a role in the mechanism of fragility. The flexible sequences are composed of interrupted runs of AT-dinucleotides, which have the potential to form secondary structures and hence can affect replication. These sequences show similarity to the AT-rich minisatellite repeats that underlie the fragility of the rare fragile sites FRA16B and FRA10B. We further demonstrate that the normal alleles of FRA16B and FRA10B span the same genomic regions as the common fragile sites FRA16C and FRA10E. Our results suggest that a shared molecular basis, conferred by sequences with a potential to form secondary structures that can perturb replication, may underlie the fragility of rare fragile sites harboring AT-rich minisatellite repeats and aphidicolin-induced common fragile sites.

Fragile site orthologs FHIT/FRA3B and Fhit/Fra14A2: evolutionarily conserved but highly recombinogenic

Common fragile sites are regions that show elevated susceptibility to DNA damage, leading to alterations that can contribute to cancer development. FRA3B, located at chromosome region 3p14.2, is the most frequently expressed human common fragile site, and allelic losses at FRA3B have been observed in many types of cancer. The FHIT gene, encompassing the FRA3B region, is a tumor-suppressor gene. To identify the features of FHIT/FRA3B that might contribute to fragility, sequences of the human FHIT and the flanking PTPRG gene were compared with those of murine Fhit and Ptprg. Human and mouse orthologous genes, FHIT and Fhit, are more highly conserved through evolution than PTPRG/Ptprg and yet contain more sequence elements that are exquisitely sensitive to genomic rearrangements, such as high-flexibility regions and long interspersed nuclear element 1s, suggesting that common fragile sites serve a function. The conserved AT-rich high-flexibility regions are the most characteristic of common fragile sites.

Human and mouse genomic sequences reveal extensive breakpoint reuse in mammalian evolution

The human and mouse genomic sequences provide evidence for a larger number of rearrangements than previously thought and reveal extensive reuse of breakpoints from the same short fragile regions. Breakpoint clustering in regions implicated in cancer and infertility have been reported in previous studies; we report here on breakpoint clustering in chromosome evolution. This clustering reveals limitations of the widely accepted random breakage theory that has remained unchallenged since the mid-1980s. The genome rearrangement analysis of the human and mouse genomes implies the existence of a large number of very short "hidden" synteny blocks that were invisible in the comparative mapping data and ignored in the random breakage model. These blocks are defined by closely located breakpoints and are often hard to detect. Our results suggest a model of chromosome evolution that postulates that mammalian genomes are mosaics of fragile regions with high propensity for rearrangements and solid regions with low propensity for rearrangements.

Genetic alterations in cancer as a result of breakage at fragile sites

The organization and replication of DNA render fragile sites (FSs) prone to breakage, recombination as well as becoming preferential targets for mutagens-carcinogens and integration of oncogenic viruses. For many years, attempts to link FSs and cancer generated mostly circumstantial evidence. The discoveries that chromosome translocations, amplification of proto-oncogenes, deletion of tumor suppressor genes, and integration of oncogenic viruses all result from the specific breakage of genomic DNA at FSs, however, have provided compelling support for such a link, further suggesting a causative role for FSs in cancer.

Fhit gene alterations in hepatocarcinogenesis induced by a choline-deficient L-amino acid-defined diet in rats

Alterations of the fragile histidine triad (Fhit) gene were investigated in rat hepatocarcinogenesis induced by a choline-deficient L-amino acid-defined (CDAA) diet. Males of the F344 strain, 6 wk of age, were fed a CDAA diet, and subgroups were killed at 2, 4, 12, 20, and 75 wk after the beginning of the experiment. Fifteen hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) were noted in rats by the last time point; they were dissected free from the surrounding tissue. Normal control liver specimens were obtained from 6-wk-old rats. Total RNAs were extracted from whole livers of animals fed the CDAA diet for 2, 4, 12, and 20 wk and from HCCs, for assessment of aberrant transcription of the Fhit gene by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Aberrant transcripts were detected in livers of rats fed the CDAA diet for 4, 12, and 20 wk, but not 2 wk, as well as in 11 of 15 HCCs (73.3%). Southern blot analysis showed a genomic DNA abnormality in one of seven informative HCCs (14.3%), while Western blot analysis showed reduction of Fhit protein expression in seven of nine HCCs (77.8%). No abnormal expression was evident in the livers after exposure to the CDAA diet for 2-20 wk. These results suggest that Fhit alterations may play important roles in hepatocarcinogenesis due to choline deficiency in rats.

Covariation in frequencies of substitution, deletion, transposition, and recombination during eutherian evolution

Six measures of evolutionary change in the human genome were studied, three derived from the aligned human and mouse genomes in conjunction with the Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium, consisting of (1) nucleotide substitution per fourfold degenerate site in coding regions, (2) nucleotide substitution per site in relics of transposable elements active only before the human-mouse speciation, and (3) the nonaligning fraction of human DNA that is nonrepetitive or in ancestral repeats; and three derived from human genome data alone, consisting of (4) SNP density, (5) frequency of insertion of transposable elements, and (6) rate of recombination. Features 1 and 2 are measures of nucleotide substitutions at two classes of "neutral" sites, whereas 4 is a measure of recent mutations. Feature 3 is a measure dominated by deletions in mouse, whereas 5 represents insertions in human. It was found that all six vary significantly in megabase-sized regions genome-wide, and many vary together. This indicates that some regions of a genome change slowly by all processes that alter DNA, and others change faster. Regional variation in all processes is correlated with, but not completely accounted for, by GC content in human and the difference between GC content in human and mouse.

Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome

The sequence of the mouse genome is a key informational tool for understanding the contents of the human genome and a key experimental tool for biomedical research. Here, we report the results of an international collaboration to produce a high-quality draft sequence of the mouse genome. We also present an initial comparative analysis of the mouse and human genomes, describing some of the insights that can be gleaned from the two sequences. We discuss topics including the analysis of the evolutionary forces shaping the size, structure and sequence of the genomes; the conservation of large-scale synteny across most of the genomes; the much lower extent of sequence orthology covering less than half of the genomes; the proportions of the genomes under selection; the number of protein-coding genes; the expansion of gene families related to reproduction and immunity; the evolution of proteins; and the identification of intraspecies polymorphism.

FHIT: from gene discovery to cancer treatment and prevention

Chromosomal abnormalities, including homozygous deletions and loss of heterozygosity, are among the most common features of human tumours. The short arm of human chromosome 3, particularly the region 3p14.2, is a major site of such rearrangements. The 3p14.2 region spans the most active common fragile site of the human genome, encompassing a familial-kidney-cancer-associated breakpoint and a papilloma virus integration site. 6 years ago, the FHIT gene was identified in this region. Subsequent studies have shown that FHIT is commonly the target of chromosomal aberrations involving the long arm of human chromosome 3 and is thereby inactivated in most of the common human malignant diseases, including cancers of the lung, oesophagus, stomach, breast, and kidney. During the past 5 years, evidence has accumulated in support of a tumour-suppressor function for FHIT. In this review, we describe the recent findings in the molecular biology of FHIT with particular focus on the opportunities for treatment and prevention of cancer that have emerged.

ATR Regulates Fragile Site Stability

Conditions that partially inhibit DNA replication induce expression of common fragile sites. These sites form gaps and breaks on metaphase chromosomes and are deleted and rearranged in many tumors. Yet, the mechanism of fragile site expression has been elusive. We demonstrate that the replication checkpoint kinase ATR, but not ATM, is critical for maintenance of fragile site stability. ATR deficiency results in fragile site expression with and without addition of replication inhibitors. Thus, we propose that fragile sites are unreplicated chromosomal regions resulting from stalled forks that escape the ATR replication checkpoint. These findings have important implications for understanding both the mechanism of fragile site instability and the consequences of stalled replication in mammalian cells.

Novel vertebrate genes and putative regulatory elements identified at kidney disease and NR2E1/fierce loci

Fierce (frc) mice are deleted for nuclear receptor 2e1 (Nr2e1), and exhibit cerebral hypoplasia, blindness, and extreme aggression. To characterize the Nr2e1 locus, which may also contain the mouse kidney disease (kd) allele, we compared sequence from human, mouse, and the puffer fish Fugu rubripes. We identified a novel gene, c222389, containing conserved elements in noncoding regions. We also discovered a novel vertebrate gene conserved across its length in prokaryotes and invertebrates. Based on a dramatic upregulation in lactating breast, we named this gene lactation elevated-1 (LACE1). Two separate 100-bp elements within the first NR2E1 intron were virtually identical between the three species, despite an estimated 450 million years of divergent evolution. These elements represent strong candidates for functional NR2E1 regulatory elements in vertebrates. A high degree of conservation across NR2E1 combined with a lack of interspersed repeats suggests that an array of regulatory elements embedded within the gene is required for proper gene expression.

Plant evolutionary genomics

Evolutionary genomics combines functional and evolutionary analyses of genome conservation and differentiation. Gene duplication and polyploidy have fundamentally shaped the genomes of Arabidopsis and all angiosperms. Recent comparative studies have focussed on gene regulation, the function of untranscribed genomic regions, and the effects of natural selection on protein function. A large fraction of interspecific protein divergence is probably adaptive, and may be useful for experimental studies of genes and proteins.

A role for common fragile site induction in amplification of human oncogenes

Oncogene amplification is an important process in human tumorigenesis, but its underlying mechanism is currently unknown. Cytogenetic analysis indicates that amplification of drug-selected genes in rodent cells is driven by recurrent breaks within chromosomal common fragile sites (CFSs), via the breakage-fusion-bridge (BFB) mechanism. Here we show that BFB cycles drive the intrachromosomal amplification of the MET oncogene in a human gastric carcinoma. Our molecular evidence includes a "ladder-like" structure and inverted repeat organization of the MET amplicons. Furthermore, we show that the breakpoints, setting the centromeric amplicon boundaries, are within the CFS FRA7G region. Upon replication stress, this region showed perturbed chromatin organization, predisposing it to breakage. Thus, in vivo induction of CFSs can play an important role in human oncogenesis.