Transformation of retinal glia cells into lens phenotype: expression of MP26, a lens plasma membrane antigen

Cellular signaling and factors involved in Müller cell gliosis: neuroprotective and detrimental effects

Müller cells are active players in normal retinal function and in virtually all forms of retinal injury and disease. Reactive Müller cells protect the tissue from further damage and preserve tissue function by the release of antioxidants and neurotrophic factors, and may contribute to retinal regeneration by the generation of neural progenitor/stem cells. However, Müller cell gliosis can also contribute to neurodegeneration and impedes regenerative processes in the retinal tissue by the formation of glial scars. This article provides an overview of the neuroprotective and detrimental effects of Müller cell gliosis, with accounts on the cellular signal transduction mechanisms and factors which are implicated in Müller cell-mediated neuroprotection, immunomodulation, regulation of Müller cell proliferation, upregulation of intermediate filaments, glial scar formation, and the generation of neural progenitor/stem cells. A proper understanding of the signaling mechanisms implicated in gliotic alterations of Müller cells is essential for the development of efficient therapeutic strategies that increase the supportive/protective and decrease the destructive roles of gliosis.

Lentoid Bodies in the Avian Retina

In-vitro studies suggest that, in avian retina, lentoid bodies arise from Müller cells or developing neuroretina. This report describes lentoid bodies in adult avian retinas in association with retinal trauma or degeneration. Retinal lentoids were identified in four birds (three owls and one parrot) in the course of routine diagnostic histopathology. Sections were stained with periodic acid-Schiff for the purposes of descriptive histology, and immunolabelled for a Müller cell marker (glial fibrillary acidic protein; GFAP) and a lens-specific marker (crystallin alpha-A). Intraretinal lentoids of varying size were identified, the constituent cells resembling bladder cells similar to those seen in cataracts. The process of lentoid formation followed a consistent pattern, characterized by progressive Müller cell hypertrophy in damaged areas, culminating in lentoid formation. GFAP immunoreactivity was strongest in Müller cells in the early stages of hypertrophy and receded as Müller cell hypertrophy advanced and lentoids developed. In contrast to GFAP immunoreactivity, crystalline alpha-A labelling increased in distribution and intensity as Müller hypertrophy became more prominent and lentoids were formed. This represents the first report of intraretinal lentoids in birds in vivo. The immunohistochemical data suggest that they arise from Müller cells. Association of lentoids with retinal damage supports the assertion that they arise following disruption of normal cell-cell communication.

Proteomic profiling of primary retinal Müller glia cells reveals a shift in expression patterns upon adaptation to in vitro conditions

Cultured primary retinal Müller glia cells (RMG), a glia cell spanning the entire neuroretina, have recently gained increased attention, especially with respect to their presumed in vivo role in supporting photoreceptor function and survival. Cultured RMG cells, however, are at risk to lose much of their in vivo features. To determine the conditions of isolated primary RMG cells best corresponding with their physiological role in the intact retina, we profiled the respective proteomes of RMG freshly isolated from intact pig eye, as well as from cultured material at different timepoints. Protein samples were separated by high-resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis (2-DE), and isolated proteins were identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of- flight (MALDI-TOF) peptide mass fingerprint. Compared with freshly isolated RMG, the in vitro protein expression patterns remain relatively stable for the first 3 days in culture but change dramatically thereafter. Proteins involved in specific RMG physiological functions, such as glycolysis, transmitter recycling, CO2 siphoning, visual pigment cycle, and detoxification, are either downregulated or absent. In contrast, cytoskeletal proteins, as well as proteins involved in motility and in proliferation, are upregulated during culture. In the present report, we show for the first time, on a systematic level, that profound changes in the RMG proteome reflect transdifferentiation from a multifunctional, highly differentiated glial cell to a dedifferentiated fibroblast-like phenotype in culture.

The cellular and molecular bases of vertebrate lens regeneration

Lens regeneration takes place in some vertebrates through processes of cellular dedifferentiation and transdifferentiation, processes by which certain differentiated cell types can give rise to others. This review describes the principal forms of lens regeneration that occur in vivo as well as related in vitro systems of transdifferentiation. Classic experimental studies are reviewed that define the tissue interactions that trigger these events in vivo. Recent molecular analyses have begun to identify the genes associated with these processes. These latter studies generally reveal tremendous similarities between embryonic lens development and lens regeneration. Different models are proposed to describe basic molecular pathways that define the processes of lens regeneration and transdifferentiation. Finally, studies are discussed suggesting that fibroblast growth factors play key roles in supporting the process of lens regeneration. Retinoids, such as retinoic acid, may also play important roles in this process.

Difference between dorsal and ventral iris in lens producing potency in normal lens regeneration is maintained after dissociation and reaggregation of cells from the adult newt, Cynops pyrrhogaster

In Wolffian lens regeneration, lentectomized newt eye can produce a new lens from the dorsal marginal iris, but the ventral iris has never shown such capabilities. To investigate the difference of lens regenerating potency between dorsal and ventral iris epithelium at the cellular level, a transplantation system using cell reaggregates was developed. Two methods were devised for preparing the reaggregates from pigmented iris epithelial cells. One was rotating cells in an agar-coated multiplate on a gyratory shaker and the other was incubating cells in a microcentrifuge tube after slight centrifugation. Reaggregates made of dorsal iris cells that had been completely dissociated into single cells were phenotypically transformed into a lens when placed in the pupillary region of the lentectomized host eye. None of the ventral reaggregates produced a lens. Even dorsal reaggregates could not transdifferentiate into lens when they were placed away from the pupil. The produced lenses from the reaggregates were morphologically and immunohistochemically identified. To obtain evidence whether produced lenses really originated from singly dissociated cells, we labeled dissociated cells with a fluorescent dye (PKH26) before reaggregate formation and then traced it in the produced lens.

Differentiation and angiogenic growth factor message in two mammalian lens epithelial cell lines

Lens epithelial cells in culture can sometimes be induced to form spheroid aggregates termed lentoid bodies, composed of cells exhibiting various characteristics of the more highly differentiated lens fiber cells. However, lentoid bodies are often slow to form, and the ability to produce them declines with serial subculture. It was therefore of interest to establish and/or characterize lens epithelial cell lines capable of forming lentoid bodies. The differentiation state was assessed in lentoid bodies formed by each of two lens epithelial cell lines, the transformed alpha TN4 cell line from mouse and the nontransformed N/N1135A cell line from rabbit. Lentoid and monolayer cultures of each cell line were examined for transcripts of the lens-specific alpha A-crystallin ("alpha A"), gamma D-crystallin ("gamma D"; formerly gamma 1-crystallin) and MP26 genes. alpha TN4 lentoid bodies contained 2.5 times the alpha A RNA found in monolayer cells, but lacked detectable gamma D and MP26 RNA. None of the three markers were detected in either lentoid or monolayer N/N1135A cultures grown under the conditions described. Lentoid body formation alone, therefore, does not indicate the extent of differentiation occurring. At least some of the changes in cell adhesion occurring during lentoid body formation involve laminin-like and fibronectin-like interactions, and are reminiscent of those observed during embryonic lens formation. Finally, vascular endothelial growth factor mRNA was absent from the lens but present in alpha TN4 cells, suggesting a mechanism whereby the lens tumors of the founder mouse became vascularized.

Cell type expression mediated by cell cycle events, and signaled by mitogens and growth inhibitors

It is initially pointed out that the majority of factors that induce cell type expression in mature precursor cells are either mitogens or growth inhibitors. On the basis of available data, a theoretical model of regulation of cell type expression for each group of factors is proposed. In model A the mitogen affects the expression of cell type through the positive control of cell cycle progression, while in model B the growth inhibitor induces the negative control of cell cycle progression, which in its turn causes the cell type expression. In connection with those two models, various systems of cell type expression are classified into three groups. In model A systems, the cell lineage has an option of autotypic and allotypic cell types. The former is expressed in the absence of added mitogen, and the latter is expressed in its presence. In model B systems the cell lineage-specific cell type is expressed by the negative cell cycle control induced by the growth inhibitor. In model A-B systems both mitogen and inhibitor are needed in tandem for the expression of a cell type. The second major point made is that the expression of cell type follows the negative control of cell cycle progression even in model A systems. However, in this system the control occurs spontaneously. This suggests that the negative control is essential for cell type expression in all systems, and directly precedes the expression. In contrast, the positive control induced by exogenous mitogen is not required in the expression in model B systems or in that of autotypic cell types in model A systems. The third point is that on the basis of the hypothesis of replication-transcription coupling, proposed by Sauer and colleagues, it is speculated that the pattern of early-replicating genes may be functioning as the potential gene transcription pattern for cell type expression in precursor cells. If this pattern is perpetuated through cell generations, the original cell type specificity of the precursor cell lineage should be maintained. If this pattern is modified by the positive control of cell cycle progression in model A systems, the potential transcriptional pattern for the allotypic pathway may emerge. Furthermore, it is proposed that the realization of the potential pattern may depend on a signal, informing the completion of the negative control of cell cycle progression. Thus in all cell lineages, when the negative cell cycle control is completed, chromatin receives this signal, and the potential transcription pattern is converted into cell type differentiation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Antiserum to lens antigens immunostains Müller glia cells in the neural retina

Antiserum to a lens fraction enriched for alpha-crystallin selectively immunostains Müller glia cells in the neural retina of several vertebrate species. Also, in embryonic retina (chicken), this antiserum reacts with Müller cells and, at early stages of development, with their apparent precursors. Thus, antibodies to a lens product(s) detect a Müller glia cell marker that begins to be expressed very early in their ontogeny and can be useful in studies on differentiation, function, and pathologies of this cell type.

Expression of the intermediate-filament-associated protein synemin in chicken lens cells

Synemin, a 230-kilodalton polypeptide component of avian muscle and erythrocyte intermediate filaments, is also found in association with the vimentin filaments of lens tissue. In chicken lens cells, synemin is bound to the core vimentin polymer with the same 180-nm periodicity that it exhibits in erythrocytes. Its solubility properties are characteristic of those of intermediate filaments in general and similar to those of synemin in muscle cells and erythrocytes. Synemin appears at an early stage of lens development and undergoes a dramatic accumulation as the epithelial cells elongate and differentiate into fiber cells. In contrast to synemin in cultured skeletal muscle, lens synemin is not confined to postmitotic, terminally differentiating cells but is present in proliferative cells as well. It is lost from the fibers near the center of the lens, as are many other cellular structures including intermediate filaments. These findings provide new information about the occurrence and expression of avian synemin and new insight regarding its presumptive role as a modulator of intermediate-filament function.

Expression of the intermediate-filament-associated protein synemin in chicken lens cells

Synemin, a 230-kilodalton polypeptide component of avian muscle and erythrocyte intermediate filaments, is also found in association with the vimentin filaments of lens tissue. In chicken lens cells, synemin is bound to the core vimentin polymer with the same 180-nm periodicity that it exhibits in erythrocytes. Its solubility properties are characteristic of those of intermediate filaments in general and similar to those of synemin in muscle cells and erythrocytes. Synemin appears at an early stage of lens development and undergoes a dramatic accumulation as the epithelial cells elongate and differentiate into fiber cells. In contrast to synemin in cultured skeletal muscle, lens synemin is not confined to postmitotic, terminally differentiating cells but is present in proliferative cells as well. It is lost from the fibers near the center of the lens, as are many other cellular structures including intermediate filaments. These findings provide new information about the occurrence and expression of avian synemin and new insight regarding its presumptive role as a modulator of intermediate-filament function.