Specific androgen receptor activation by an artificial coactivator

Concordant Androgen-Regulated Expression of Divergent Rhox5 Promoters in Sertoli Cells

Concordant transcriptional regulation can generate multiple gene products that collaborate to achieve a common goal. Here we report a case of concordant transcriptional regulation that instead drives a single protein to be produced in the same cell type from divergent promoters. This gene product-the RHOX5 homeobox transcription factor-is translated from 2 different mRNAs with different 5' untranslated regions (UTRs) transcribed from alternative promoters. Despite the fact that these 2 promoters-the proximal promoter (Pp) and the distal promoter (Pd)-exhibit different patterns of tissue-specific activity, share no obvious sequence identity, and depend on distinct transcription factors for expression, they exhibit a remarkably similar expression pattern in the testes. In particular, both depend on androgen signaling for expression in the testes, where they are specifically expressed in Sertoli cells and have a similar stage-specific expression pattern during the seminiferous epithelial cycle. We report evidence for 3 mechanisms that collaborate to drive concordant Pp/Pd expression. First, both promoters have an intrinsic ability to respond to androgen receptor and androgen. Second, the Pp acts as an enhancer to promote androgen-dependent transcription from the Pd. Third, Pd transcription is positively autoregulated by the RHOX5 protein, which is first produced developmentally from the Pp. Together, our data support a model in which the Rhox5 homeobox gene evolved multiple mechanisms to activate both of its promoters in Sertoli cells to produce Rhox5 in an androgen-dependent manner during different phases of spermatogenesis.

Sutherlandia frutescens modulates adrenal hormone biosynthesis, acts as a selective glucocorticoid receptor agonist (SEGRA) and displays anti-mineralocorticoid properties

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Sutherlandia frutescens is a traditional African medicinal plant used in the treatment of stress and anxiety, while also exhibiting anti-inflammatory properties.

AIM OF STUDY

The study aimed at linking anti-stress and anti-inflammatory properties of S. frutescens to its influence on glucocorticoid biosynthesis and the inflammatory response via steroid receptor interaction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The influence of S. frutescens extracts and sutherlandioside B (SUB),10 and 30µM, on key steroidogenic enzymes was assayed in COS-1 cells. Effects were also assayed on basal and stimulated hormone levels in the adrenal H295R cell model. Agonist activity for transactivation and transrepression of the extract and SUB with the glucocorticoid- (GR) and mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) was subsequently investigated.

RESULTS

Inhibitory effects of the extract towards progesterone conversion by CYP17A1 and CYP21A2 were significant. SUB inhibited CYP17A1 and 3β-HSD2, while not affecting CYP21A2. In H295R cells, SUB decreased cortisol and androgen precursors significantly. The extract decreased total steroid production (basal and stimulated) with cortisol and its precursor, deoxycortisol, together with mineralocorticoid metabolites significantly decreased under forskolin stimulated conditions. S. frutescens extracts and SUB repressed NF-κB-driven gene expression without activating GRE-driven gene expression and while neither activated MR mediated gene transcription, both antagonized the effects of aldosterone via the MR.

CONCLUSION

Data provide evidence linking anti-stress, anti-inflammatory and anti-hypertensive properties of S. frutescens to inhibition of steroidogenic enzymes and modulation of adrenal hormone biosynthesis. Findings suggesting S. frutescens and SUB exhibit dissociated glucocorticoid characteristics underline potential therapeutic applications in the treatment of inflammation and hypertension.

A comparative study of the androgenic properties of progesterone and the progestins, medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) and norethisterone acetate (NET-A)

The importance of investigating the molecular mechanism of action of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) and norethisterone acetate (NET-A), two clinically important progestins used in hormone therapy (HT), has been highlighted by clinical evidence showing that MPA and norethisterone (NET) increase the risk of the development of breast cancer in HRT users, and that MPA may increase susceptibility to- and transmission of HIV-1. The aim of this study was to compare the molecular mechanisms of action of MPA, NET-A and progesterone (Prog) via the androgen receptor (AR) in a cell line model that can minimize confounding factors such as the presence of other steroid receptors. This study is the first to determine accurate apparent Ki values for Prog, MPA and NET-A toward the human AR in COS-1 cells. The results reveal that these ligands have a similar binding affinity for the AR to that of the natural androgen 5α-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) (Ki's for DHT, Prog, MPA and NET-A are 29.4, 36.6, 19.4 and 21.9 nM, respectively). Moreover, in both transactivation and transrepression transcriptional assays we demonstrate that, unlike Prog, MPA and NET-A are efficacious AR agonists, with activities comparable to DHT. One of the most novel findings of our study is that NET-A, like DHT, induces the ligand-dependent interaction between the NH2- and COOH-terminal domains (N/C-interaction) of the AR independent of promoter-context, while MPA does not induce the N/C interaction on a classical ARE and does so only weakly on an AR-selective ARE. This suggests that MPA and NET-A may exert differential promoter-specific actions via the AR in vivo. Consistent with this, molecular modeling suggests that MPA and NET-A induce subtle differences in the structure of the AR ligand binding domain. Taken together, the results from this study suggest that unlike Prog, both MPA and NET-A used in hormonal therapy are likely to compete with DHT and exert significant and promoter-specific off-target transcriptional effects via the AR, possibly contributing to some of the observed side-effects with the clinical use of MPA and NET-A.

11β-Hydroxydihydrotestosterone and 11-ketodihydrotestosterone, novel C19 steroids with androgenic activity: a putative role in castration resistant prostate cancer?

Adrenal C19 steroids, dehydroepiandrostenedione (DHEA(S)) and androstenedione (A4), play a critical role in castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) as they are metabolised to dihydrotestosterone (DHT), via testosterone (T), or via the alternate 5α-dione pathway, bypassing T. Adrenal 11OHA4 metabolism in CRPC is, however, unknown. We present a novel pathway for 11OHA4 metabolism in CRPC leading to the production of 11ketoT (11KT) and novel 5α-reduced C19 steroids - 11OH-5α-androstanedione, 11keto-5α-androstanedione, 11OHDHT and 11ketoDHT (11KDHT). The pathway was validated in the androgen-dependent prostate cancer cell line, LNCaP. Androgen receptor (AR) transactivation studies showed that while 11KT and 11OHDHT act as a partial AR agonists, 11KDHT is a full AR agonist exhibiting similar activity to DHT at 1nM. Our data demonstrates that, while 11OHA4 has negligible androgenic activity, its metabolism to 11KT and 11KDHT yields androgenic compounds which may be implicated, together with A4 and DHEA(S), in driving CRPC in the absence of testicular T.

Impact of glucocorticoid receptor density on ligand-independent dimerization, cooperative ligand-binding and basal priming of transactivation: a cell culture model

Glucocorticoid receptor (GR) levels vary between tissues and individuals and are altered by physiological and pharmacological effectors. However, the effects and implications of differences in GR concentration have not been fully elucidated. Using three statistically different GR concentrations in transiently transfected COS-1 cells, we demonstrate, using co-immunoprecipitation (CoIP) and fluorescent resonance energy transfer (FRET), that high levels of wild type GR (wtGR), but not of dimerization deficient GR (GRdim), display ligand-independent dimerization. Whole-cell saturation ligand-binding experiments furthermore establish that positive cooperative ligand-binding, with a concomitant increased ligand-binding affinity, is facilitated by ligand-independent dimerization at high concentrations of wtGR, but not GRdim. The down-stream consequences of ligand-independent dimerization at high concentrations of wtGR, but not GRdim, are shown to include basal priming of the system as witnessed by ligand-independent transactivation of both a GRE-containing promoter-reporter and the endogenous glucocorticoid (GC)-responsive gene, GILZ, as well as ligand-independent loading of GR onto the GILZ promoter. Pursuant to the basal priming of the system, addition of ligand results in a significantly greater modulation of transactivation potency than would be expected solely from the increase in ligand-binding affinity. Thus ligand-independent dimerization of the GR at high concentrations primes the system, through ligand-independent DNA loading and transactivation, which together with positive cooperative ligand-binding increases the potency of GR agonists and shifts the bio-character of partial GR agonists. Clearly GR-levels are a major factor in determining the sensitivity to GCs and a critical factor regulating transcriptional programs.

Investigating the anti-mineralocorticoid properties of synthetic progestins used in hormone therapy

A more detailed understanding of the affinities and efficacies for transcriptional regulation by the synthetic progestins medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) and norethisterone acetate (NET-A) via the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) is required, to better understand their relative risk profiles. Both MPA and NET-A bind to the MR, although with about 100-fold lower affinities than that of Prog. MPA and NET-A exhibit no agonist activity, but NET-A, unlike MPA, has similar antagonistic efficacy to Prog on the endogenous mineralocorticoid/glucocorticoid response element (MRE/GRE)-containing genes, α-glycolytic protein or orosomucoid-1 (Orm-1) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1). This study is the first to show that NET-A, but not MPA, can dissociate between transrepression and transactivation via the MR. Given the relatively low affinity and potency of MPA and NET-A for the MR, our results suggest that these progestins are unlikeley to exert significant effects via the MR at doses used in hormonal therapy. However, considering their relative free concentrations compared to endogenous hormones, the possibility that NET-A may exhibit significant MR antagonist activity, with some possible cardiovascular protective benefits, should not be excluded.

Differential nuclear localisation and promoter occupancy play a role in glucocorticoid receptor ligand-specific transcriptional responses

The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is a ligand-activated transcription factor for which a number of endogenous and synthetic ligands exist. A key question in steroid receptor biology is how different ligands elicit different maximal transcriptional responses via the same receptor and on the same promoter. This question was addressed quantitatively for the GR, using a panel of agonists, partial agonists and antagonists, on the endogenous GILZ gene in two different human cell lines. It was found that the extent of GR nuclear localization correlated with the efficacy for GILZ transactivation by the GR in U2OS cells. However, in A549 cells there was no significant correlation, with all ligands resulting in similar levels of GR nuclear localization, despite different levels of transcriptional activation of the GILZ gene. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis on the other hand, revealed ligand-specific differences in GILZ promoter occupancy in the A549 cells, which correlated with the transcriptional efficacy of the subset of ligands investigated. This suggests that ligand-specific differences in promoter occupancy by activated GR play a major role in discrimination between agonist, partial agonist and antagonist responses on the endogenous GILZ gene in A549 cells, while differences in nuclear localisation of liganded GR play a role in determining the transcriptional outcome in U2OS cells. These cell line-specific differences were not dependent on the amount of GR present, since transient overexpression of GR in U2OS did not alter the relative ligand-selective nuclear localisation. Our results show that there is a relationship between ligand-specific transactivation efficacy, extent of nuclear translocation and recruitment of GR to the promoter. However, the relative contribution of nuclear translocation and GR promoter recruitment to ligand-specific transactivation efficacy is cell-specific.

Abrogation of glucocorticoid receptor dimerization correlates with dissociated glucocorticoid behavior of compound a

Compound A (CpdA), a dissociated glucocorticoid receptor modulator, decreases corticosteroid-binding globulin (CBG), adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), and luteneinizing hormone levels in rats. Whether this is due to transcriptional regulation by CpdA is not known. Using promoter reporter assays we show that CpdA, like dexamethasone (Dex), directly transrepresses these genes. Results using a rat Cbg proximal-promoter reporter construct in BWTG3 and HepG2 cell lines support a glucocorticoid receptor (GR)-dependent transrepression mechanism for CpdA. However, CpdA, unlike Dex, does not result in transactivation via glucocorticoid-responsive elements within a promoter reporter construct even when GR is co-transfected. The inability of CpdA to result in transactivation via glucocorticoid-responsive elements is confirmed on the endogenous tyrosine aminotransferase gene, whereas transrepression ability is confirmed on the endogenous CBG gene. Consistent with a role for CpdA in modulating GR activity, whole cell binding assays revealed that CpdA binds reversibly to the GR, but with lower affinity than Dex, and influences association of [(3)H]Dex, but has no effect on dissociation. In addition, like Dex, CpdA causes nuclear translocation of the GR, albeit to a lesser degree. Several lines of evidence, including fluorescence resonance energy transfer, co-immunoprecipitation, and nuclear immunofluorescence studies of nuclear localization-deficient GR show that CpdA, unlike Dex, does not elicit ligand-induced GR dimerization. Comparison of the behavior of CpdA in the presence of wild type GR to that of Dex with a dimerization-deficient GR mutant (GR(dim)) strongly supports the conclusion that loss of dimerization is responsible for the dissociated behavior of CpdA.

Ligand-selective transactivation and transrepression via the glucocorticoid receptor: role of cofactor interaction

The mechanisms that determine ligand-selective transcriptional responses by the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) are not fully understood. Using a wide panel of GR ligands, we investigated the relationships between the potency and maximal response for transactivation via a glucocorticoid response element (GRE) and transrepression via both nuclear factor small ka, CyrillicB (NFsmall ka, CyrillicB) and activator protein-1 (AP-1) sites, relative binding affinity for the GR, as well as interaction with both coactivators and corepressors. The results showed ligand-selective differences in potency and efficacy for each promoter, as well as for a particular ligand between the three promoters. Ligand potency correlated with relative affinity for the GR for agonists and partial agonists in transactivation but not for transrepression. Maximal response was unrelated to relative affinity of ligand for GR for both transactivation and transrepression. A good and significant correlation between full length coactivator binding in two-hybrid assays and efficacy as well as potency of different receptor-steroid complexes for both transactivation and transrepression supports a major role for coactivator recruitment in determination of ligand-selective transcriptional activity. Furthermore, ligand-selective GR binding to GRIP-1, as determined by both two-hybrid and DNA pull down assays, correlated positively with ligand-selective efficacy for transactivation of both a synthetic GRE reporter with expressed GR as well as of an endogenous gene via endogenous GR. The receptor interacting domain of the corepressor SMRT exhibited strong interaction with both agonists and partial agonists, similar to the results for coactivators, suggesting a possible role for SMRT in activation of transcription. However, there was no correlation between ligand affinity for the GR and cofactor interaction. These results provide strong quantitative biochemical support for a model in which GR-mediated ligand-selective differential interaction with GRIP-1, SRC-1A, NCoR and SMRT is a major determinant of ligand-selective and promoter-specific differences in potency and efficacy, for both transactivation and transrepression.

FRAP and FRET methods to study nuclear receptors in living cells

Quantitative imaging techniques of fluorescently-tagged proteins have been instrumental in the study of the behavior of nuclear receptors (NRs) and coregulators in living cells. Ligand-activated NRs exert their function in transcription regulation by binding to specific response elements in promotor and enhancer sequences of genes. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) has proven to be a powerful tool to study the mobility of fluorescently-labeled molecules in living cells. Since binding to DNA leads to the immobilization of DNA-interacting proteins like NRs, FRAP is especially useful for determining DNA-binding kinetics of these proteins. The coordinated interaction of NRs with promoters/enhancers and subsequent transcription activation is not only regulated by ligand but also by interactions with sets of cofactors and, at least in the case of the androgen receptor (AR), by dimerization and interdomain interactions. In living cells, these interactions can be studied by fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET). Here we provide and discuss detailed protocols for FRAP and FRET procedures to study the behavior of nuclear receptors in living cells. On the basis of our studies of the AR, we provide protocols for two different FRAP methods (strip-FRAP and FLIP-FRAP) to quantitatively investigate DNA-interactions and for two different FRET approaches, ratio imaging, and acceptor photobleaching FRET to study AR domain interactions and interactions with cofactor motifs. Finally, we provide a protocol of a technique where FRAP and acceptor photobleaching FRET are combined to study the dynamics of interacting ARs.

Identification of androgen-selective androgen-response elements in the human aquaporin-5 and Rad9 genes

The AR (androgen receptor) is known to influence the expression of its target genes by binding to different sets of AREs (androgen-response elements) in the DNA. One set consists of the classical steroid-response elements which are partial palindromic repeats of the 5'-TGTTCT-3' steroid-receptor monomer-binding element. The second set contains motifs that are AR-specific and that are proposed to be partial direct repeats of the same motif. On the basis of this assumption, we used an in silico approach to identify new androgen-selective AREs in the regulatory regions of known androgen-responsive genes. We have used an extension of the NUBIScan algorithm to screen a collection of 85 known human androgen-responsive genes compiled from literature and database searches. We report the evaluation of the most promising hits resulting from this computational search by in vitro DNA-binding assays using full-size ARs and GRs (glucocorticoid receptors) as well as their isolated DBDs (DNA-binding domains). We also describe the ability of some of these motifs to confer androgen-, but not glucocorticoid-, responsiveness to reporter-gene expression. The elements found in the aquaporin-5 and the Rad9 (radiation-sensitive 9) genes showed selective AR versus GR binding in band-shift assays and a strong activity and selectivity in functional assays, both as isolated elements and in their original contexts. Our data indicate the validity of the hypothesis that selective AREs are recognizable as direct 5'-TGTTCT-3' repeats, and extend the list of currently known selective elements.

Compartmentalization of androgen receptor protein-protein interactions in living cells

Steroid receptors regulate gene expression in a ligand-dependent manner by binding specific DNA sequences. Ligand binding also changes the conformation of the ligand binding domain (LBD), allowing interaction with coregulators via LxxLL motifs. Androgen receptors (ARs) preferentially interact with coregulators containing LxxLL-related FxxLF motifs. The AR is regulated at an extra level by interaction of an FQNLF motif in the N-terminal domain with the C-terminal LBD (N/C interaction). Although it is generally recognized that AR coregulator and N/C interactions are essential for transcription regulation, their spatiotemporal organization is largely unknown. We performed simultaneous fluorescence resonance energy transfer and fluorescence redistribution after photobleaching measurements in living cells expressing ARs double tagged with yellow and cyan fluorescent proteins. We provide evidence that AR N/C interactions occur predominantly when ARs are mobile, possibly to prevent unfavorable or untimely cofactor interactions. N/C interactions are largely lost when AR transiently binds to DNA, predominantly in foci partly overlapping transcription sites. AR coregulator interactions occur preferentially when ARs are bound to DNA.

Loss of androgen receptor binding to selective androgen response elements causes a reproductive phenotype in a knockin mouse model

Androgens influence transcription of their target genes through the activation of the androgen receptor (AR) that subsequently interacts with specific DNA motifs in these genes. These DNA motifs, called androgen response elements (AREs), can be classified in two classes: the classical AREs, which are also recognized by the other steroid hormone receptors; and the AR-selective AREs, which display selectivity for the AR. For in vitro interaction with the selective AREs, the androgen receptor DNA-binding domain is dependent on specific residues in its second zinc-finger. To evaluate the physiological relevance of these selective elements, we generated a germ-line knockin mouse model, termed SPARKI (SPecificity-affecting AR KnockIn), in which the second zinc-finger of the AR was replaced with that of the glucocorticoid receptor, resulting in a chimeric protein that retains its ability to bind classical AREs but is unable to bind selective AREs. The reproductive organs of SPARKI males are smaller compared with wild-type animals, and they are also subfertile. Intriguingly, however, they do not display any anabolic phenotype. The expression of two testis-specific, androgen-responsive genes is differentially affected by the SPARKI mutation, which is correlated with the involvement of different types of response elements in their androgen responsiveness. In this report, we present the first in vivo evidence of the existence of two functionally different types of AREs and demonstrate that AR-regulated gene expression can be targeted based on this distinction.

Transfection with steroid-responsive reporter constructs shows glucocorticoid rather than androgen responsiveness in cultured Sertoli cells

It remains unclear why it has proven so difficult to identify androgen target genes in cultured Sertoli cells. Given the lack of useful endogenous reporter genes, we studied the androgen and glucocorticoid responsiveness of these cells by transfection with three different steroid-responsive reporter constructs. The constructs were driven by the tyrosine aminotransferase steroid-responsive region (TAT-GRE4x-Luc), the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter (MMTV-Luc) and the Pem homeobox gene proximal promoter respectively (Pem-Luc). These constructs can be activated either by both the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and the androgen receptor (AR) (TAT-GRE4x-Luc and MMTV-Luc) or selectively by the AR (Pem-Luc). Despite high transfection efficiency (30-40%) none of the constructs could be activated by treatment of the Sertoli cells with testosterone, 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone or synthetic androgens. Even pretreatment with follicle-stimulating hormone to raise AR levels (from 31 up to 82fmol/mg protein) did not result in androgen responsiveness. In contrast, treatment with dexamethasone markedly stimulated TAT-GRE4x-Luc and MMTV-Luc activity. GR levels reached a value of 172fmol/mg protein in the cultured cells and both AR and GR displayed homogeneous distribution by immunocytochemical evaluation. Androgen responsiveness was restored and glucocorticoid responsiveness was increased by cotransfection with AR or GR expression constructs. Under cotransfection conditions, 1nM of testosterone (a concentration that is some 100 times lower than that estimated to be present in the testis) was sufficient to stimulate the TAT-GRE4x-Luc maximally. Our data indicate that cultured Sertoli cells respond better to glucocorticoids than to androgens and that one of the factors limiting androgen responsiveness is the availability of AR. Other factors limiting the transactivation capacity of the (endogenous) AR, however, cannot be excluded.

Testosterone inhibits adipogenic differentiation in 3T3-L1 cells: nuclear translocation of androgen receptor complex with beta-catenin and T-cell factor 4 may bypass canonical Wnt signaling to down-regulate adipogenic transcription factors

Testosterone supplementation in men decreases fat mass; however, the mechanisms by which it inhibits fat mass are unknown. We hypothesized that testosterone inhibits adipogenic differentiation of preadipocytes by activation of androgen receptor (AR)/beta-catenin interaction and subsequent translocation of this complex to the nucleus thereby bypassing canonical Wnt signaling. We tested this hypothesis in 3T3-L1 cells that differentiate to form fat cells in adipogenic medium. We found that these cells express AR and that testosterone and dihydrotestosterone dose-dependently inhibited adipogenic differentiation as analyzed by Oil Red O staining and down-regulation of CCAAT/enhancer binding protein-alpha and -delta and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma2 protein and mRNA. These inhibitory effects of androgens were partially blocked by flutamide or bicalutamide. Androgen treatment was associated with nuclear translocation of beta-catenin and AR. Immunoprecipitation studies demonstrated association of beta-catenin with AR and T-cell factor 4 (TCF4) in the presence of androgens. Transfection of TCF4 cDNA inhibited adipogenic differentiation, whereas a dominant negative TCF4 cDNA construct induced adipogenesis and blocked testosterone's inhibitory effects. Our gene array analysis indicates that testosterone treatment led to activation of some Wnt target genes. Expression of constitutively activated AR fused with VP-16 did not inhibit the expression of CCAAT/enhancer binding protein-alpha in the absence of androgens. Testosterone and dihydrotestosterone inhibit adipocyte differentiation in vitro through an AR-mediated nuclear translocation of beta-catenin and activation of downstream Wnt signaling. These data provide evidence for a regulatory role for androgens in inhibiting adipogenic differentiation and a mechanistic explanation consistent with the observed reduction in fat mass in men treated with androgens.

Androgen receptor modifications in prostate cancer cells upon long-termandrogen ablation and antiandrogen treatment

To study the mechanisms whereby androgen-dependent tumors relapse in patients undergoing androgen blockade, we developed a novel progression model for prostate cancer. The PC346C cell line, established from a transurethral resection of a primary tumor, expresses wild-type (wt) androgen receptor (AR) and secretes prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Optimal proliferation of PC346C requires androgens and is inhibited by the antiandrogen hydroxyflutamide. Orthotopic injection in the dorsal-lateral prostate of castrated athymic nude mice did not produce tumors, whereas fast tumor growth occurred in sham-operated males. Three androgen-independent sublines were derived from PC346C upon long-term in vitro androgen deprivation: PC346DCC, PC346Flu1 and PC346Flu2. PC346DCC exhibited androgen-insensitive growth, which was not inhibited by flutamide. AR and PSA were detected at very low levels, coinciding with background AR activity in a reporter assay, which suggests that these cells have bypassed the AR pathway. PC346Flu1 and PC346Flu2 were derived by culture in steroid-stripped medium supplemented with hydroxyflutamide. PC346Flu1 strongly upregulated AR expression and showed 10-fold higher AR activation than the parental PC346C. PC346Flu1 proliferation was inhibited in vitro by R1881 at 0.1 nM concentration, consistent with a slower tumor growth rate in intact males than in castrated mice. PC346Flu2 carries the well-known T877A AR mutation, causing the receptor to become activated by diverse nonandrogenic ligands including hydroxyflutamide. Array-based comparative genomic hybridization revealed little change between the various PC346 lines. The common alterations include gain of chromosomes 1, 7 and 8q and loss of 13q, which are frequently found in prostate cancer. In conclusion, by in vitro hormone manipulations of a unique androgen-dependent cell line expressing wtAR, we successfully reproduced common AR modifications observed in hormone-refractory prostate cancer: downregulation, overexpression and mutation.

Use of artificial androgen receptor coactivators to alter myoblast proliferation

Skeletal muscle has long been thought to be a target tissue for androgens, eliciting their effect through the androgen receptor. In order to better understand androgen receptor action, a series of mutated androgen receptors were developed and their degree of specificity and cellular responses determined. Specificity, as measured by a reporter assay using HeLa cells, indicated that mutation of the ligand-binding domain or the AR (mutation H865Y), in combination with the p65 transactivating domain, resulted in an increased response to androgens as well as decreased specificity. Transfection of the mutant AR into mouse and rat myoblast cell lines resulted in an increase in expression of the reporter gene consistent with the data from HeLa cells. Overexpression of the wild type or mutant AR into myoblasts and treatment with testosterone induced both greater proliferation and faster differentiation of the cells compared to those expressing endogenous AR. Additionally, when treated with estrogen, these cells were able to proliferate and differentiate to similar levels as cells treated with testosterone. The ability of the mutated AR to act as an artificial coactivator to up-regulate androgen responsive genes is a useful tool for understanding the interaction of androgens and muscle growth.

Identification of an androgen response element in intron 8 of the sterol regulatory element-binding protein cleavage-activating protein gene allowing direct regulation by the androgen receptor

Sterol regulatory element-binding proteins (SREBPs) are transcription regulators that play a pivotal role in intracellular lipid homeostasis. They are synthesized as inactive precursor proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum, where they are retained by SREBP cleavage-activating protein (SCAP), a sterol sensing protein that in turn is linked to a retention protein complex. Low intracellular sterol concentrations weaken the interaction of SCAP with its retention proteins and allow translocation of the SREBP.SCAP complex to the Golgi compartment where SREBP is proteolytically cleaved and activated. Previous studies on the mechanisms by which androgens provoke a coordinated activation of lipogenic pathways in prostate cancer cells have suggested an alternative pathway of activation in which androgens increase the expression of SCAP and favor translocation of the SREBP.SCAP complex to the Golgi apparatus by disturbing the balance between SCAP and its retention proteins. Here we show that the SCAP gene contains an androgen-responsive region located in intron 8. This region interacts directly with the androgen receptor and confers androgen responsiveness to promoter-reporter constructs transfected in LNCaP cells. It contains a noncanonical androgen response element GGAAGAaaaTGTACC that interacts not only with the androgen receptor but also with the glucocorticoid receptor and that also confers glucocorticoid responsiveness. The identification of a steroid response element in intron 8 of the SCAP gene further supports the contention that SCAP is a direct target for steroid hormone action.

Functional interplay between two response elements with distinct binding characteristics dictates androgen specificity of the mouse sex-limited protein enhancer

Many of the aspects involved in steroid-specific transcriptional regulation are still unsolved to date. We describe here the detailed characterization of the mouse sex-limited protein enhancer as a paradigm for androgen-specific control of gene expression. By deletion analysis, we delineate the minimal enhancer region displaying androgen sensitivity and specificity. We also show that each of the three hormone response elements (HRE), which constitute this minimal enhancer region, is essential but not sufficient for its functionality. When investigated as isolated elements, HRE1 is inactive and HRE3 is a potent androgen response element as well as GRE. Only the non-canonical HRE2 (5-TGGTCAgccAGTTCT-3') is capable of conferring an androgen-specific transcriptional response to a heterologous promoter. This finding is correlated with the fact that HRE2 is recognized in binding assays in vitro by the DNA-binding domain (DBD) of the androgen but not the glucocorticoid receptor, while HRE3 is recognized by both DBDs. Differential binding of the androgen receptor to HRE2 in the context of the enhancer was analyzed in more detail in footprinting assays in vitro. In transient transfection experiments using chimeric receptors, the inability of the glucocorticoid receptor to transactivate via the slp-ARU as well as the isolated slp-HRE2 was rescued by the replacement of its DNA-binding domain with that of the androgen receptor. Our data suggest that the functional interplay between the weak, but highly androgen-specific HRE2 and the adjacent strong, but non-selective HRE3 is the major determinant in the generation of androgen specificity of transcriptional response via the sex-limited protein enhancer.

Comparative analysis of the influence of the high-mobility group box 1 protein on DNA binding and transcriptional activation by the androgen, glucocorticoid, progesterone and mineralocorticoid receptors

We performed a comparative analysis of the effect of high-mobility group box protein 1 (HMGB1) on DNA binding by the DNA-binding domains (DBDs) of the androgen, glucocorticoid, progesterone and mineralocorticoid receptors. The affinity of the DBDs of the different receptors for the tyrosine aminotransferase glucocorticoid response element, a classical high-affinity binding element, was augmented up to 7-fold by HMGB1. We found no major differences in the effects of HMGB1 on DNA binding between the different steroid hormone receptors. In transient transfection assays, however, HMGB1 significantly enhances the activity of the glucocorticoid and progesterone receptors but not the androgen or mineralocorticoid receptor. We also investigated the effect of HMGB1 on the binding of the androgen receptor DBD to a subclass of directly repeated response elements that is recognized exclusively by the androgen receptor and not by the glucocorticoid, progesterone or mineralocorticoid receptor. Surprisingly, a deletion of 26 amino acid residues from the C-terminal extension of the androgen receptor DBD does not influence DNA binding but destroys its sensitivity to HMGB1. Deletion of the corresponding fragment in the DBDs of the glucocorticoid, progesterone and mineralocorticoid receptor destroyed their DNA binding. This 26-residue fragment is therefore essential for the influence of HMGB1 on DNA recognition by all steroid hormone receptors that were tested. However, it is dispensable for DNA binding by the androgen receptor.

Androgen regulation of the cell-cell adhesion molecule-1 (Ceacam1) gene

Previous studies have established that the cell-cell adhesion molecule-1 (CEACAM1, previously known as C-CAM1) functions as a tumor suppressor in prostate cancer and is involved in the regulation of prostate growth and differentiation. However, the molecular mechanism that modulates CEACAM1 expression in the prostate is not well defined. Since the growth of prostate epithelial cells is androgen-regulated, we investigated the effects of androgen and the androgen receptor (AR) on CEACAM1 expression. Transient transfection experiments showed that the AR can enhance the Ceacam1 promoter activity in a ligand-dependent manner and that the regulatory element resides within a relatively short (-249 to -194 bp) segment of the 5'-flanking region of the Ceacam1 gene. This androgen regulation is likely through direct AR-promoter binding because a mutant AR defective in DNA binding failed to upregulate reporter gene expression. Furthermore, electrophoretic mobility shift assays demonstrated that the AR specifically binds to this sequence, and mutation analysis of the potential ARE sequences revealed a region within the sequence that was required for the AR to activate the Ceacam1 gene. Therefore, the regulation of Ceacam1 gene expression by androgen may be one of the mechanisms by which androgen regulates prostatic function.

Repression of androgen-regulated gene expression by dominant negative androgen receptors

The androgen receptor (AR) is a ligand-dependent transcription activator responsible for male sexual development. In order to specifically inhibit the AR pathway, dominant negative ARs were constructed by inactivation of the major transactivation domains of the wild type AR and fusing this mutant (AR122) to the Krüppel-associated box (KRAB) repressor domain and/or histone deacetylase (HDAC1). The HDAC1-KRAB-AR122 protein was the most successful dominant negative AR, capable of repressing the wild type AR ninefold when co-expressed at a 1:1 plasmid ratio. A maximal repression of 41-fold was achieved when HDAC1-KRAB-AR122 was cotransfected with the wild type AR at a 4:1 plasmid ratio. HDAC1-KRAB-AR122 repressed transcription in a ligand-dependent manner since it inhibited a constitutively active AR mutant (AR5) only in the presence of agonists. High concentrations of partial agonists such as RU486, cyproterone acetate, and estradiol were also capable of triggering repression by HDAC1-KRAB-AR122. The potent dominant negative AR proteins might prove useful tools to inhibit AR function in vitro and in vivo.

Change of specificity mutations in androgen-selective enhancers. Evidence for a role of differential DNA binding by the androgen receptor

The androgen and glucocorticoid receptors recognize identical DNA motifs, leaving unanswered the question of how steroid specificity of transcriptional regulation is established in cells containing both receptors. Here, we provide evidence that subtle differences in low affinity DNA recognition might be a crucial element in the generation of steroid-specific responses. Here we identify simple hormone response elements in the mouse sex-limited protein enhancer and the human secretory component androgen response unit to be essential for the androgen specificity of both enhancers. We describe specific in vitro binding to these motifs by the DNA-binding domain of the androgen but not the glucocorticoid receptor. Both elements can be considered partial direct repeats of the 5'-TGTTCT-3' core binding motif. In addition, we show that specific point mutations in their left half-sites, essentially changing the nature of the repeats, strongly enhance the glucocorticoid sensitivity of the respective enhancers, whereas they have no effect on their androgen responsiveness. Accordingly, these mutations allow specific binding of the glucocorticoid receptor DNA-binding domain to both elements in vitro. With these experiments, we demonstrate that differential recognition by the androgen receptor of nonconventional steroid response elements is, at least in some cases, an important mechanism in androgen-specific transcriptional regulation.

Differences in DNA binding characteristics of the androgen and glucocorticoid receptors can determine hormone-specific responses

The basis for specificity of gene regulation by steroid hormone receptors remains an important problem in the study of steroid hormone action. One possible mechanism for steroid specificity is the difference in DNA binding characteristics of the receptors, although they share a high homology in their DNA-binding domains. Indeed, the androgen-specific expression of, for example, the probasin (PB) gene can be explained by the presence of an androgen response element (ARE) in its promoter (PB-ARE-2), specifically recognized by the androgen and not by the glucocorticoid receptor. Three residues in the DNA-binding domain of the AR were identified as main determinants for its high affinity for the PB-ARE-2. In addition, the direct repeat nature of this ARE seems to prohibit high affinity binding by the glucocorticoid receptor. This is confirmed by the fact that several imperfect direct repeats of the 5'-TGTTCT-3' core recognition sequence are recognized by the androgen receptor and not by the glucocorticoid receptor. Up to now, only differences between the androgen and glucocorticoid receptor in the transcription activation functions were invoked to explain the specificity of their genomic actions. In the present study, we describe the influence of the DNA-binding domain on the specificity of androgen action. The novelty of our working hypothesis resides in the demonstration of the capacity of the AR-DNA-binding domain to recognize elements with a direct repeat structure.