1
|
Park S, Wang X, Mo Y, Zhang S, Li X, Fong KC, Yu C, Tran AA, Scipioni L, Dai Z, Huang X, Huang L, Shi X. Proximity labeling expansion microscopy (PL-ExM) evaluates interactome labeling techniques. J Mater Chem B 2024; 12:8335-8348. [PMID: 39105364 PMCID: PMC11426358 DOI: 10.1039/d4tb00516c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/07/2024]
Abstract
Understanding protein-protein interactions (PPIs) through proximity labeling has revolutionized our comprehension of cellular mechanisms and pathology. Various proximity labeling techniques, such as HRP, APEX, BioID, TurboID, and μMap, have been widely used to biotinylate PPIs or organelles for proteomic profiling. However, the variability in labeling precision and efficiency of these techniques often results in limited reproducibility in proteomic detection. We address this persistent challenge by introducing proximity labeling expansion microscopy (PL-ExM), a super-resolution imaging technique that combines expansion microscopy with proximity labeling techniques. PL-ExM enabled up to 17 nm resolution with microscopes widely available, providing visual comparison of the labeling precision, efficiency, and false positives of different proximity labeling methods. Our mass spectrometry proteomic results confirmed that PL-ExM imaging is reliable in guiding the selection of proximity labeling techniques and interpreting the proteomic results with new spatial information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sohyeon Park
- Center for Complex Biological Systems, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
| | - Xiaorong Wang
- Physiology and Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
| | - Yajin Mo
- Center for Complex Biological Systems, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
| | - Sicheng Zhang
- Department of Developmental and Cell Biology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
| | - Xiangpeng Li
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Katie C Fong
- Department of Developmental and Cell Biology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
| | - Clinton Yu
- Physiology and Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
| | - Arthur A Tran
- Cardiovascular Research Institute, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco 94143, USA
| | - Lorenzo Scipioni
- Laboratory for Fluorescence Dynamics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
| | - Zhipeng Dai
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Xiao Huang
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Health Systems, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Lan Huang
- Physiology and Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
| | - Xiaoyu Shi
- Center for Complex Biological Systems, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
- Department of Developmental and Cell Biology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
- Department of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fote GM, Eapen VV, Lim RG, Yu C, Salazar L, McClure NR, McKnight J, Nguyen TB, Heath MC, Lau AL, Villamil MA, Miramontes R, Kratter IH, Finkbeiner S, Reidling JC, Paulo JA, Kaiser P, Huang L, Housman DE, Thompson LM, Steffan JS. Huntingtin contains an ubiquitin-binding domain and regulates lysosomal targeting of mitochondrial and RNA-binding proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2024; 121:e2319091121. [PMID: 39074279 PMCID: PMC11317567 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2319091121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Understanding the normal function of the Huntingtin (HTT) protein is of significance in the design and implementation of therapeutic strategies for Huntington's disease (HD). Expansion of the CAG repeat in the HTT gene, encoding an expanded polyglutamine (polyQ) repeat within the HTT protein, causes HD and may compromise HTT's normal activity contributing to HD pathology. Here, we investigated the previously defined role of HTT in autophagy specifically through studying HTT's association with ubiquitin. We find that HTT interacts directly with ubiquitin in vitro. Tandem affinity purification was used to identify ubiquitinated and ubiquitin-associated proteins that copurify with a HTT N-terminal fragment under basal conditions. Copurification is enhanced by HTT polyQ expansion and reduced by mimicking HTT serine 421 phosphorylation. The identified HTT-interacting proteins include RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) involved in mRNA translation, proteins enriched in stress granules, the nuclear proteome, the defective ribosomal products (DRiPs) proteome and the brain-derived autophagosomal proteome. To determine whether the proteins interacting with HTT are autophagic targets, HTT knockout (KO) cells and immunoprecipitation of lysosomes were used to investigate autophagy in the absence of HTT. HTT KO was associated with reduced abundance of mitochondrial proteins in the lysosome, indicating a potential compromise in basal mitophagy, and increased lysosomal abundance of RBPs which may result from compensatory up-regulation of starvation-induced macroautophagy. We suggest HTT is critical for appropriate basal clearance of mitochondrial proteins and RBPs, hence reduced HTT proteostatic function with mutation may contribute to the neuropathology of HD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianna M. Fote
- Department of Biological Chemistry, UC Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, CA92697
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UC Irvine School of Medicine, Orange, CA92868
| | - Vinay V. Eapen
- Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA02115
- Casma Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA02139
| | - Ryan G. Lim
- The University of California Irvine Institute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders, University of California, Irvine, CA92697
| | - Clinton Yu
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, CA92697
| | - Lisa Salazar
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, UC Irvine School of Medicine, Orange, CA92868
| | - Nicolette R. McClure
- Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, CA92697
| | - Jharrayne McKnight
- Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, CA92697
| | - Thai B. Nguyen
- Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, CA92697
| | - Marie C. Heath
- Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, CA92697
| | - Alice L. Lau
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, UC Irvine School of Medicine, Orange, CA92868
| | - Mark A. Villamil
- Department of Biological Chemistry, UC Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, CA92697
| | - Ricardo Miramontes
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, UC Irvine School of Medicine, Orange, CA92868
| | - Ian H. Kratter
- Center for Systems and Therapeutics, Gladstone Institutes, San Francisco, CA94158
- Stanford Brain Stimulation Lab, Stanford, CA94304
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA94304
| | - Steven Finkbeiner
- Center for Systems and Therapeutics, Gladstone Institutes, San Francisco, CA94158
- Department of Physiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA94158
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA94158
| | - Jack C. Reidling
- The University of California Irvine Institute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders, University of California, Irvine, CA92697
| | - Joao A. Paulo
- Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA02115
| | - Peter Kaiser
- Department of Biological Chemistry, UC Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, CA92697
| | - Lan Huang
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, CA92697
| | - David E. Housman
- Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, The Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA02139
| | - Leslie M. Thompson
- Department of Biological Chemistry, UC Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, CA92697
- The University of California Irvine Institute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders, University of California, Irvine, CA92697
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, UC Irvine School of Medicine, Orange, CA92868
- Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, CA92697
- Center for Epigenetics and Metabolism, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA92697
| | - Joan S. Steffan
- The University of California Irvine Institute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders, University of California, Irvine, CA92697
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, UC Irvine School of Medicine, Orange, CA92868
- Center for Epigenetics and Metabolism, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA92697
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Park S, Wang X, Li X, Huang X, Fong KC, Yu C, Tran AA, Scipioni L, Dai Z, Huang L, Shi X. Proximity Labeling Expansion Microscopy (PL-ExM) resolves structure of the interactome. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.11.09.566477. [PMID: 38014020 PMCID: PMC10680661 DOI: 10.1101/2023.11.09.566477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
Elucidating the spatial relationships within the protein interactome is pivotal to understanding the organization and regulation of protein-protein interactions. However, capturing the 3D architecture of the interactome presents a dual challenge: precise interactome labeling and super-resolution imaging. To bridge this gap, we present the Proximity Labeling Expansion Microscopy (PL-ExM). This innovation combines proximity labeling (PL) to spatially biotinylate interacting proteins with expansion microscopy (ExM) to increase imaging resolution by physically enlarging cells. PL-ExM unveils intricate details of the 3D interactome's spatial layout in cells using standard microscopes, including confocal and Airyscan. Multiplexing PL-ExM imaging was achieved by pairing the PL with immunofluorescence staining. These multicolor images directly visualize how interactome structures position specific proteins in the protein-protein interaction network. Furthermore, PL-ExM stands out as an assessment method to gauge the labeling radius and efficiency of different PL techniques. The accuracy of PL-ExM is validated by our proteomic results from PL mass spectrometry. Thus, PL-ExM is an accessible solution for 3D mapping of the interactome structure and an accurate tool to access PL quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sohyeon Park
- Center for Complex Biological Systems, University of California, Irvine; Irvine, 92697, United States
| | - Xiaorong Wang
- Physiology and Biophysics, University of California, Irvine; Irvine, 92697, United States
| | - Xiangpeng Li
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco; San Francisco, 94143, United States
| | - Xiao Huang
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Health Systems, Drexel University; Philadelphia, PA19104
| | - Katie C. Fong
- Department of Developmental and Cell Biology, University of California, Irvine; Irvine, 92697, United States
- Current Address: School of Criminal Justice and Criminalistics, California State University, Los Angeles; Los Angeles, 90042, United States
| | - Clinton Yu
- Physiology and Biophysics, University of California, Irvine; Irvine, 92697, United States
| | - Arthur A. Tran
- Cardiovascular Research Institute, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco; San Francisco, 94143, United States
| | - Lorenzo Scipioni
- Laboratory for Fluorescence Dynamics, University of California, Irvine; Irvine, 92697, United States
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine; Irvine, 92697, United States
| | - Zhipeng Dai
- Department of Developmental and Cell Biology, University of California, Irvine; Irvine, 92697, United States
| | - Lan Huang
- Physiology and Biophysics, University of California, Irvine; Irvine, 92697, United States
| | - Xiaoyu Shi
- Center for Complex Biological Systems, University of California, Irvine; Irvine, 92697, United States
- Department of Developmental and Cell Biology, University of California, Irvine; Irvine, 92697, United States
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine; Irvine, 92697, United States
- Department of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine; Irvine, 92697, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Negi H, Osei-Amponsa V, Ibrahim B, Evans CN, Sullenberger C, Loncarek J, Chari R, Walters KJ. An engineered cell line with a hRpn1-attached handle to isolate proteasomes. J Biol Chem 2023; 299:104948. [PMID: 37354974 PMCID: PMC10372910 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2023.104948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Revised: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Regulated protein degradation in eukaryotes is performed by the 26S proteasome, which contains a 19-subunit regulatory particle (RP) that binds, processes, and translocates substrates to a 28-subunit hollow core particle (CP) where proteolysis occurs. In addition to its intrinsic subunits, myriad proteins interact with the proteasome transiently, including factors that assist and/or regulate its degradative activities. Efforts to identify proteasome-interacting components and/or to solve its structure have relied on over-expression of a tagged plasmid, establishing stable cell lines, or laborious purification protocols to isolate native proteasomes from cells. Here, we describe an engineered human cell line, derived from colon cancer HCT116 cells, with a biotin handle on the RP subunit hRpn1/PSMD2 (proteasome 26S subunit, non-ATPase 2) for purification of 26S proteasomes. A 75-residue sequence from Propionibacterium shermanii that is biotinylated in mammalian cells was added following a tobacco etch virus protease cut site at the C terminus of hRpn1. We tested and found that 26S proteasomes can be isolated from this modified HCT116 cell line by using a simple purification protocol. More specifically, biotinylated proteasomes were purified from the cell lysates by using neutravidin agarose resin and released from the resin following incubation with tobacco etch virus protease. The purified proteasomes had equivalent activity in degrading a model ubiquitinated substrate, namely ubiquitinated p53, compared to commercially available bovine proteasomes that were purified by fractionation. In conclusion, advantages of this approach to obtain 26S proteasomes over others is the simple purification protocol and that all cellular proteins, including the tagged hRpn1 subunit, remain at endogenous stoichiometry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hitendra Negi
- Protein Processing Section, Structural Biophysics Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, Maryland, USA
| | - Vasty Osei-Amponsa
- Protein Processing Section, Structural Biophysics Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, Maryland, USA
| | - Bishoy Ibrahim
- Protein Processing Section, Structural Biophysics Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, Maryland, USA
| | - Christine N Evans
- Genome Modification Core, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland, USA
| | - Catherine Sullenberger
- Cancer Innovation Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, Maryland, USA
| | - Jadranka Loncarek
- Cancer Innovation Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, Maryland, USA
| | - Raj Chari
- Genome Modification Core, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland, USA
| | - Kylie J Walters
- Protein Processing Section, Structural Biophysics Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, Maryland, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Proteins are workhorses in the cell; they form stable and more often dynamic, transient protein-protein interactions, assemblies, and networks and have an intimate interplay with DNA and RNA. These network interactions underlie fundamental biological processes and play essential roles in cellular function. The proximity-dependent biotinylation labeling approach combined with mass spectrometry (PL-MS) has recently emerged as a powerful technique to dissect the complex cellular network at the molecular level. In PL-MS, by fusing a genetically encoded proximity-labeling (PL) enzyme to a protein or a localization signal peptide, the enzyme is targeted to a protein complex of interest or to an organelle, allowing labeling of proximity proteins within a zoom radius. These biotinylated proteins can then be captured by streptavidin beads and identified and quantified by mass spectrometry. Recently engineered PL enzymes such as TurboID have a much-improved enzymatic activity, enabling spatiotemporal mapping with a dramatically increased signal-to-noise ratio. PL-MS has revolutionized the way we perform proteomics by overcoming several hurdles imposed by traditional technology, such as biochemical fractionation and affinity purification mass spectrometry. In this review, we focus on biotin ligase-based PL-MS applications that have been, or are likely to be, adopted by the plant field. We discuss the experimental designs and review the different choices for engineered biotin ligases, enrichment, and quantification strategies. Lastly, we review the validation and discuss future perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shou-Ling Xu
- Department of Plant Biology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, California, USA;
- Carnegie Mass Spectrometry Facility, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Ruben Shrestha
- Department of Plant Biology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, California, USA;
| | - Sumudu S Karunadasa
- Department of Plant Biology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, California, USA;
| | - Pei-Qiao Xie
- Department of Plant Biology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, California, USA;
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Buel GR, Chen X, Myint W, Kayode O, Folimonova V, Cruz A, Skorupka KA, Matsuo H, Walters KJ. E6AP AZUL interaction with UBQLN1/2 in cells, condensates, and an AlphaFold-NMR integrated structure. Structure 2023; 31:395-410.e6. [PMID: 36827983 PMCID: PMC10081965 DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2023.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
The E3 ligase E6AP/UBE3A has a dedicated binding site in the 26S proteasome provided by the RAZUL domain of substrate receptor hRpn10/S5a/PSMD4. Guided by RAZUL sequence similarity, we test and demonstrate here that the E6AP AZUL binds transiently to the UBA of proteasomal shuttle factor UBQLN1/2. Despite a weak binding affinity, E6AP AZUL is recruited to UBQLN2 biomolecular condensates in vitro and E6AP interacts with UBQLN1/2 in cellulo. Steady-state and transfer nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) experiments indicate direct interaction of AZUL with UBQLN1 UBA. Intermolecular contacts identified by NOE spectroscopy (NOESY) data were combined with AlphaFold2-Multimer predictions to yield an AZUL:UBA model structure. We additionally identify an oligomerization domain directly adjacent to UBQLN1/2 UBA (UBA adjacent [UBAA]) that is α-helical and allosterically reconfigured by AZUL binding to UBA. These data lead to a model of E6AP recruitment to UBQLN1/2 by AZUL:UBA interaction and provide fundamental information on binding requirements for interactions in condensates and cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gwen R Buel
- Protein Processing Section, Center for Structural Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, MD 21702, USA
| | - Xiang Chen
- Protein Processing Section, Center for Structural Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, MD 21702, USA
| | - Wazo Myint
- Cancer Innovation Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD 21702, USA
| | - Olumide Kayode
- Protein Processing Section, Center for Structural Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, MD 21702, USA
| | - Varvara Folimonova
- Protein Processing Section, Center for Structural Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, MD 21702, USA
| | - Anthony Cruz
- Protein Processing Section, Center for Structural Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, MD 21702, USA
| | - Katarzyna A Skorupka
- Cancer Innovation Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD 21702, USA
| | - Hiroshi Matsuo
- Cancer Innovation Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD 21702, USA
| | - Kylie J Walters
- Protein Processing Section, Center for Structural Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, MD 21702, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Buneeva OA, Kopylov AT, Medvedev AE. Proteasome Interactome and Its Role in the Mechanisms of Brain Plasticity. BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) 2023; 88:319-336. [PMID: 37076280 DOI: 10.1134/s0006297923030033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/28/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Proteasomes are highly conserved multienzyme complexes responsible for proteolytic degradation of the short-lived, regulatory, misfolded, and damaged proteins. They play an important role in the processes of brain plasticity, and decrease in their function is accompanied by the development of neurodegenerative pathology. Studies performed in different laboratories both on cultured mammalian and human cells and on preparations of the rat and rabbit brain cortex revealed a large number of proteasome-associated proteins. Since the identified proteins belong to certain metabolic pathways, multiple enrichment of the proteasome fraction with these proteins indicates their important role in proteasome functioning. Extrapolation of the experimental data, obtained on various biological objects, to the human brain suggests that the proteasome-associated proteins account for at least 28% of the human brain proteome. The proteasome interactome of the brain contains a large number of proteins involved in the assembly of these supramolecular complexes, regulation of their functioning, and intracellular localization, which could be changed under different conditions (for example, during oxidative stress) or in different phases of the cell cycle. In the context of molecular functions of the Gene Ontology (GO) Pathways, the proteins of the proteasome interactome mediate cross-talk between components of more than 30 metabolic pathways annotated in terms of GO. The main result of these interactions is binding of adenine and guanine nucleotides, crucial for realization of the nucleotide-dependent functions of the 26S and 20S proteasomes. Since the development of neurodegenerative pathology is often associated with regioselective decrease in the functional activity of proteasomes, a positive therapeutic effect would be obviously provided by the factors increasing proteasomal activity. In any case, pharmacological regulation of the brain proteasomes seems to be realized through the changes in composition and/or activity of the proteins associated with proteasomes (deubiquitinase, PKA, CaMKIIα, etc.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga A Buneeva
- Institute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow, 119121, Russia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Osei-Amponsa V, Walters KJ. Proteasome substrate receptors and their therapeutic potential. Trends Biochem Sci 2022; 47:950-964. [PMID: 35817651 PMCID: PMC9588529 DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2022.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Revised: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
The ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) is critical for protein quality control and regulating protein lifespans. Following ubiquitination, UPS substrates bind multidomain receptors that, in addition to ubiquitin-binding sites, contain functional domains that bind to deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs) or the E3 ligase E6AP/UBE3A. We provide an overview of the proteasome, focusing on its receptors and DUBs. We highlight the key role of dynamics and importance of the substrate receptors having domains for both binding and processing ubiquitin chains. The UPS is rich with therapeutic opportunities, with proteasome inhibitors used clinically and ongoing development of small molecule proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs) for the degradation of disease-associated proteins. We discuss the therapeutic potential of proteasome receptors, including hRpn13, for which PROTACs have been developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasty Osei-Amponsa
- Protein Processing Section, Center for Structural Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, MD 21702, USA
| | - Kylie J Walters
- Protein Processing Section, Center for Structural Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, MD 21702, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yu C, Wang X, Huang L. Developing a Targeted Quantitative Strategy for Sulfoxide-Containing MS-Cleavable Cross-Linked Peptides to Probe Conformational Dynamics of Protein Complexes. Anal Chem 2022; 94:4390-4398. [PMID: 35193351 DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c05298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
In recent years, cross-linking mass spectrometry (XL-MS) has made enormous strides as a technology for probing protein-protein interactions (PPIs) and elucidating architectures of multisubunit assemblies. To define conformational and interaction dynamics of protein complexes under different physiological conditions, various quantitative cross-linking mass spectrometry (QXL-MS) strategies based on stable isotope labeling have been developed. These QXL-MS approaches have effectively allowed comparative analysis of cross-links to determine their relative abundance changes at global scales. Although successful, it remains challenging to consistently obtain quantitative measurements on low-abundant cross-links. Therefore, targeted QXL-MS is needed to enable MS "Western" analysis of cross-links to enhance sensitivity and reliability in quantitation. To this end, we have established a robust parallel reaction monitoring (PRM)-based targeted QXL-MS platform using sulfoxide-containing MS-cleavable cross-linker disuccinimidyl sulfoxide (DSSO), permitting label-free comparative analysis of selected cross-links across multiple samples. In addition, we have applied this methodology to study phosphorylation-dependent conformational dynamics of the human 26S proteasome. The PRM-based targeted QXL-MS analytical platform described here is applicable for all sulfoxide-containing MS-cleavable cross-linkers and can be directly adopted for comparative studies of protein-protein interactions in various cellular contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clinton Yu
- Department of Physiology & Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, Medical Science I, D233, Irvine, California 92697-4560, United States
| | - Xiaorong Wang
- Department of Physiology & Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, Medical Science I, D233, Irvine, California 92697-4560, United States
| | - Lan Huang
- Department of Physiology & Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, Medical Science I, D233, Irvine, California 92697-4560, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wang Y, Hu Y, Höti N, Huang L, Zhang H. Characterization of In Vivo Protein Complexes via Chemical Cross-Linking and Mass Spectrometry. Anal Chem 2022; 94:1537-1542. [PMID: 34962381 PMCID: PMC9006583 DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c02410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Cells perform various functions by proteins via protein complexes. Characterization of protein complexes is critical to understanding their biological and clinical significance and has been one of the major efforts of functional proteomics. To date, most protein complexes are characterized by the in vitro system from protein extracts after the cells or tissues are lysed, and it has been challenging to determine which of these protein complexes are formed in intact cells. Herein, we report an approach to preserve protein complexes using in vivo cross-linking, followed by size exclusion chromatography and data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry. This approach enables the characterization of in vivo protein complexes from cells or tissues, which allows the determination of protein complexes in clinical research. More importantly, the described approach can identify protein complexes that are not detected by the in vitro system, which provide unique protein function information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuefan Wang
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21231, USA
| | - Yingwei Hu
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21231, USA
| | - Naseruddin Höti
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21231, USA
| | - Lan Huang
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, California 92697, United States
| | - Hui Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21231, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Yu C, Wang X, Li W, Liu Y, Huang L. Developing a Bimolecular Affinity Purification Strategy to Isolate 26S Proteasome Holocomplexes for Complex-Centric Proteomic Analysis. Anal Chem 2021; 93:13407-13413. [PMID: 34550675 DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c03551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The 26S proteasome is a mega-dalton protein complex responsible for intracellular degradation in eukaryotes. It is composed of two subcomplexes: the 20S core particle and the 19S regulatory particle, which form compositionally and structurally heterogeneous proteasome complexes in cells. To fully characterize the 26S proteasome, it is necessary to understand its structural and functional diversities. Multiple mass spectrometry (MS) methodologies have been developed in recent years for the study of proteasome structural dynamics in which biochemically isolated complexes are subjected to analysis. Due to the inherent heterogeneity of proteasome complexes, single-bait affinity purification typically results in a mixture of compositionally heterogeneous complexes regardless of the baits, making accurate assessment of complex-specific conformations and functions challenging. To facilitate complex-centric analysis, we have adopted a bimolecular affinity purification method utilizing a dual-bait cell line expressing tagged 19S and tagged 20S subunits to improve the homogeneity of the resulting 26S holocomplexes. To establish the method, four types of purifications were performed and the resulting samples were extensively examined by biochemical analysis and two label-free quantitative MS methods. Our results have demonstrated the effectiveness of this purification strategy in improving the complex homogeneity for downstream biochemical and MS characterizations. This strategy will be valuable for facilitating detailed quantitative assessments of complex-specific molecular details under different conditions and can be directly adopted for studying other complexes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clinton Yu
- Department of Physiology & Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, California 92697, United States
| | - Xiaorong Wang
- Department of Physiology & Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, California 92697, United States
| | - Wenxue Li
- Yale Cancer Biology Institute, Department of Pharmacology, Yale University, West Haven, Connecticut 06516, United States
| | - Yansheng Liu
- Yale Cancer Biology Institute, Department of Pharmacology, Yale University, West Haven, Connecticut 06516, United States
| | - Lan Huang
- Department of Physiology & Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, California 92697, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Chen X, Htet ZM, López-Alfonzo E, Martin A, Walters KJ. Proteasome interaction with ubiquitinated substrates: from mechanisms to therapies. FEBS J 2021; 288:5231-5251. [PMID: 33211406 PMCID: PMC8131406 DOI: 10.1111/febs.15638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2020] [Revised: 11/10/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The 26S proteasome is responsible for regulated proteolysis in eukaryotic cells. Its substrates are diverse in structure, function, sequence length, and amino acid composition, and are targeted to the proteasome by post-translational modification with ubiquitin. Ubiquitination occurs through a complex enzymatic cascade and can also signal for other cellular events, unrelated to proteasome-catalyzed degradation. Like other post-translational protein modifications, ubiquitination is reversible, with ubiquitin chain hydrolysis catalyzed by the action of deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs), ~ 90 of which exist in humans and allow for temporal events and dynamic ubiquitin-chain remodeling. DUBs have been known for decades to be an integral part of the proteasome, as deubiquitination is coupled to substrate unfolding and translocation into the internal degradation chamber. Moreover, the proteasome also binds several ubiquitinating enzymes and shuttle factors that recruit ubiquitinated substrates. The role of this intricate machinery and how ubiquitinated substrates interact with proteasomes remains an area of active investigation. Here, we review what has been learned about the mechanisms used by the proteasome to bind ubiquitinated substrates, substrate shuttle factors, ubiquitination machinery, and DUBs. We also discuss many open questions that require further study or the development of innovative approaches to be answered. Finally, we address the promise of expanded therapeutic targeting that could benefit from such new discoveries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiang Chen
- Protein Processing Section, Structural Biophysics Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD, USA
| | - Zaw Min Htet
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California at Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Erika López-Alfonzo
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California at Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Andreas Martin
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California at Berkeley, CA, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California at Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Kylie J Walters
- Protein Processing Section, Structural Biophysics Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kaake RM, Echeverria I, Kim SJ, Von Dollen J, Chesarino NM, Feng Y, Yu C, Ta H, Chelico L, Huang L, Gross J, Sali A, Krogan NJ. Characterization of an A3G-Vif HIV-1-CRL5-CBFβ Structure Using a Cross-linking Mass Spectrometry Pipeline for Integrative Modeling of Host-Pathogen Complexes. Mol Cell Proteomics 2021; 20:100132. [PMID: 34389466 PMCID: PMC8459920 DOI: 10.1016/j.mcpro.2021.100132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Revised: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Structural analysis of host-pathogen protein complexes remains challenging, largely due to their structural heterogeneity. Here, we describe a pipeline for the structural characterization of these complexes using integrative structure modeling based on chemical cross-links and residue-protein contacts inferred from mutagenesis studies. We used this approach on the HIV-1 Vif protein bound to restriction factor APOBEC3G (A3G), the Cullin-5 E3 ring ligase (CRL5), and the cellular transcription factor Core Binding Factor Beta (CBFβ) to determine the structure of the (A3G-Vif-CRL5-CBFβ) complex. Using the MS-cleavable DSSO cross-linker to obtain a set of 132 cross-links within this reconstituted complex along with the atomic structures of the subunits and mutagenesis data, we computed an integrative structure model of the heptameric A3G-Vif-CRL5-CBFβ complex. The structure, which was validated using a series of tests, reveals that A3G is bound to Vif mostly through its N-terminal domain. Moreover, the model ensemble quantifies the dynamic heterogeneity of the A3G C-terminal domain and Cul5 positions. Finally, the model was used to rationalize previous structural, mutagenesis and functional data not used for modeling, including information related to the A3G-bound and unbound structures as well as mapping functional mutations to the A3G-Vif interface. The experimental and computational approach described here is generally applicable to other challenging host-pathogen protein complexes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robyn M Kaake
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA; Quantitative Biosciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA; Gladstone Institute of Data Science and Biotechnology, J. David Gladstone Institutes, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Ignacia Echeverria
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA; Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Seung Joong Kim
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - John Von Dollen
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA; Quantitative Biosciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Nicholas M Chesarino
- Divisions of Human Biology and Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Yuqing Feng
- Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology, Immunology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Clinton Yu
- Department of Physiology & Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Hai Ta
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Linda Chelico
- Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology, Immunology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Lan Huang
- Department of Physiology & Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| | - John Gross
- Quantitative Biosciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA; Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Andrej Sali
- Quantitative Biosciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA; Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA; Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
| | - Nevan J Krogan
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA; Quantitative Biosciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA; Gladstone Institute of Data Science and Biotechnology, J. David Gladstone Institutes, San Francisco, California, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Protein interaction landscapes revealed by advanced in vivo cross-linking-mass spectrometry. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021; 118:2023360118. [PMID: 34349018 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2023360118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Defining protein-protein interactions (PPIs) in their native environment is crucial to understanding protein structure and function. Cross-linking-mass spectrometry (XL-MS) has proven effective in capturing PPIs in living cells; however, the proteome coverage remains limited. Here, we have developed a robust in vivo XL-MS platform to facilitate in-depth PPI mapping by integrating a multifunctional MS-cleavable cross-linker with sample preparation strategies and high-resolution MS. The advancement of click chemistry-based enrichment significantly enhanced the detection of cross-linked peptides for proteome-wide analyses. This platform enabled the identification of 13,904 unique lysine-lysine linkages from in vivo cross-linked HEK 293 cells, permitting construction of the largest in vivo PPI network to date, comprising 6,439 interactions among 2,484 proteins. These results allowed us to generate a highly detailed yet panoramic portrait of human interactomes associated with diverse cellular pathways. The strategy presented here signifies a technological advancement for in vivo PPI mapping at the systems level and can be generalized for charting protein interaction landscapes in any organisms.
Collapse
|
15
|
Samavarchi-Tehrani P, Samson R, Gingras AC. Proximity Dependent Biotinylation: Key Enzymes and Adaptation to Proteomics Approaches. Mol Cell Proteomics 2020; 19:757-773. [PMID: 32127388 PMCID: PMC7196579 DOI: 10.1074/mcp.r120.001941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 127] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2020] [Revised: 02/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The study of protein subcellular distribution, their assembly into complexes and the set of proteins with which they interact with is essential to our understanding of fundamental biological processes. Complementary to traditional assays, proximity-dependent biotinylation (PDB) approaches coupled with mass spectrometry (such as BioID or APEX) have emerged as powerful techniques to study proximal protein interactions and the subcellular proteome in the context of living cells and organisms. Since their introduction in 2012, PDB approaches have been used in an increasing number of studies and the enzymes themselves have been subjected to intensive optimization. How these enzymes have been optimized and considerations for their use in proteomics experiments are important questions. Here, we review the structural diversity and mechanisms of the two main classes of PDB enzymes: the biotin protein ligases (BioID) and the peroxidases (APEX). We describe the engineering of these enzymes for PDB and review emerging applications, including the development of PDB for coincidence detection (split-PDB). Lastly, we briefly review enzyme selection and experimental design guidelines and reflect on the labeling chemistries and their implication for data interpretation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Reuben Samson
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada; Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Anne-Claude Gingras
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada; Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Structural dynamics of the human COP9 signalosome revealed by cross-linking mass spectrometry and integrative modeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2020; 117:4088-4098. [PMID: 32034103 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1915542117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The COP9 signalosome (CSN) is an evolutionarily conserved eight-subunit (CSN1-8) protein complex that controls protein ubiquitination by deneddylating Cullin-RING E3 ligases (CRLs). The activation and function of CSN hinges on its structural dynamics, which has been challenging to decipher by conventional tools. Here, we have developed a multichemistry cross-linking mass spectrometry approach enabled by three mass spectometry-cleavable cross-linkers to generate highly reliable cross-link data. We applied this approach with integrative structure modeling to determine the interaction and structural dynamics of CSN with the recently discovered ninth subunit, CSN9, in solution. Our results determined the localization of CSN9 binding sites and revealed CSN9-dependent structural changes of CSN. Together with biochemical analysis, we propose a structural model in which CSN9 binding triggers CSN to adopt a configuration that facilitates CSN-CRL interactions, thereby augmenting CSN deneddylase activity. Our integrative structure analysis workflow can be generalized to define in-solution architectures of dynamic protein complexes that remain inaccessible to other approaches.
Collapse
|
17
|
Northrop A, Vangala JR, Feygin A, Radhakrishnan SK. Disabling the Protease DDI2 Attenuates the Transcriptional Activity of NRF1 and Potentiates Proteasome Inhibitor Cytotoxicity. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:ijms21010327. [PMID: 31947743 PMCID: PMC6982299 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21010327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2019] [Revised: 12/27/2019] [Accepted: 12/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Proteasome inhibition is used therapeutically to induce proteotoxic stress and trigger apoptosis in cancer cells that are highly dependent on the proteasome. As a mechanism of resistance, inhibition of the cellular proteasome induces the synthesis of new, uninhibited proteasomes to restore proteasome activity and relieve proteotoxic stress in the cell, thus evading apoptosis. This evolutionarily conserved compensatory mechanism is referred to as the proteasome-bounce back response and is orchestrated in mammalian cells by nuclear factor erythroid derived 2-related factor 1 (NRF1), a transcription factor and master regulator of proteasome subunit genes. Upon synthesis, NRF1 is cotranslationally inserted into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), then is rapidly retrotranslocated into the cytosol and degraded by the proteasome. In contrast, during conditions of proteasome inhibition or insufficiency, NRF1 escapes degradation, is proteolytically cleaved by the aspartyl protease DNA damage inducible 1 homolog 2 (DDI2) to its active form, and enters the nucleus as an active transcription factor. Despite these insights, the cellular compartment where the proteolytic processing step occurs remains unclear. Here we further probed this pathway and found that NRF1 can be completely retrotranslocated into the cytosol where it is then cleaved and activated by DDI2. Furthermore, using a triple-negative breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231, we investigated the therapeutic utility of attenuating DDI2 function. We found that DDI2 depletion attenuated NRF1 activation and potentiated the cytotoxic effects of the proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib. More importantly, expression of a point-mutant of DDI2 that is protease-dead recapitulated these effects. Taken together, our results provide a strong rationale for a combinational therapy that utilizes inhibition of the proteasome and the protease function of DDI2. This approach could expand the repertoire of cancer types that can be successfully treated with proteasome inhibitors in the clinic.
Collapse
|
18
|
Chen X, Ebelle DL, Wright BJ, Sridharan V, Hooper E, Walters KJ. Structure of hRpn10 Bound to UBQLN2 UBL Illustrates Basis for Complementarity between Shuttle Factors and Substrates at the Proteasome. J Mol Biol 2019; 431:939-955. [PMID: 30664872 PMCID: PMC6389388 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.01.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2018] [Revised: 12/07/2018] [Accepted: 01/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The 26S proteasome is a highly complex 2.5-MDa molecular machine responsible for regulated protein degradation. Proteasome substrates are typically marked by ubiquitination for recognition at receptor sites contributed by Rpn1/S2/PSMD2, Rpn10/S5a, and Rpn13/Adrm1. Each receptor site can bind substrates directly by engaging conjugated ubiquitin chains or indirectly by binding to shuttle factors Rad23/HR23, Dsk2/PLIC/UBQLN, or Ddi1, which contain a ubiquitin-like domain (UBL) that adopts the ubiquitin fold. Previous structural studies have defined how each of the proteasome receptor sites binds to ubiquitin chains as well as some of the interactions that occur with the shuttle factors. Here, we define how hRpn10 binds to the UBQLN2 UBL domain, solving the structure of this complex by NMR, and determine affinities for each UIM region by a titration experiment. UBQLN2 UBL exhibits 25-fold stronger affinity for the N-terminal UIM-1 over UIM-2 of hRpn10. Moreover, we discover that UBQLN2 UBL is fine-tuned for the hRpn10 UIM-1 site over the UIM-2 site by taking advantage of the additional contacts made available through the longer UIM-1 helix. We also test hRpn10 versatility for the various ubiquitin chains to find less specificity for any particular linkage type compared to hRpn1 and hRpn13, as expected from the flexible linker region that connects the two UIMs; nonetheless, hRpn10 does exhibit some preference for K48 and K11 linkages. Altogether, these results provide new insights into the highly complex and complementary roles of the proteasome receptor sites and shuttle factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiang Chen
- Protein Processing Section, Structural Biophysics Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702, USA
| | - Danielle L Ebelle
- Protein Processing Section, Structural Biophysics Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702, USA
| | - Brandon J Wright
- Protein Processing Section, Structural Biophysics Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702, USA
| | - Vinidhra Sridharan
- Protein Processing Section, Structural Biophysics Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702, USA
| | - Evan Hooper
- Protein Processing Section, Structural Biophysics Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702, USA; Linganore High School, Frederick, MD 21701, USA
| | - Kylie J Walters
- Protein Processing Section, Structural Biophysics Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Yu C, Wang X, Huszagh AS, Viner R, Novitsky E, Rychnovsky SD, Huang L. Probing H 2O 2-mediated Structural Dynamics of the Human 26S Proteasome Using Quantitative Cross-linking Mass Spectrometry (QXL-MS). Mol Cell Proteomics 2019; 18:954-967. [PMID: 30723094 DOI: 10.1074/mcp.tir119.001323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Cytotoxic protein aggregation-induced impairment of cell function and homeostasis are hallmarks of age-related neurodegenerative pathologies. As proteasomal degradation represents the major clearance pathway for oxidatively damaged proteins, a detailed understanding of the molecular events underlying its stress response is critical for developing strategies to maintain cell viability and function. Although the 26S proteasome has been shown to disassemble during oxidative stress, its conformational dynamics remains unclear. To this end, we have developed a new quantitative cross-linking mass spectrometry (QXL-MS) workflow to explore the structural dynamics of proteasome complexes in response to oxidative stress. This strategy comprises SILAC-based metabolic labeling, HB tag-based affinity purification, a 2-step cross-linking reaction consisting of mild in vivo formaldehyde and on-bead DSSO cross-linking, and multi-stage tandem mass spectrometry (MSn) to identify and quantify cross-links. This integrated workflow has been successfully applied to explore the molecular events underlying oxidative stress-dependent proteasomal regulation by comparative analyses of proteasome complex topologies from treated and untreated cells. Our results show that H2O2 treatment weakens the 19S-20S interaction within the 26S proteasome, along with reorganizations within the 19S and 20S subcomplexes. Altogether, this work sheds light on the mechanistic response of the 26S to acute oxidative stress, suggesting an intermediate proteasomal state(s) before H2O2-mediated dissociation of the 26S. The QXL-MS strategy presented here can be applied to study conformational changes of other protein complexes under different physiological conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clinton Yu
- From the ‡Department of Physiology & Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92694
| | - Xiaorong Wang
- From the ‡Department of Physiology & Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92694
| | - Alexander Scott Huszagh
- From the ‡Department of Physiology & Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92694
| | - Rosa Viner
- §Thermo Fisher, 355 River Oaks Parkway, San Jose, CA 95134
| | - Eric Novitsky
- ¶Department of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92694
| | - Scott D Rychnovsky
- ¶Department of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92694
| | - Lan Huang
- From the ‡Department of Physiology & Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92694;.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Klykov O, Steigenberger B, Pektaş S, Fasci D, Heck AJR, Scheltema RA. Efficient and robust proteome-wide approaches for cross-linking mass spectrometry. Nat Protoc 2018; 13:2964-2990. [DOI: 10.1038/s41596-018-0074-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 107] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
21
|
A cross-linking/mass spectrometry workflow based on MS-cleavable cross-linkers and the MeroX software for studying protein structures and protein–protein interactions. Nat Protoc 2018; 13:2864-2889. [DOI: 10.1038/s41596-018-0068-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 114] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
22
|
Yu C, Huang L. Cross-Linking Mass Spectrometry: An Emerging Technology for Interactomics and Structural Biology. Anal Chem 2018; 90:144-165. [PMID: 29160693 PMCID: PMC6022837 DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 240] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Clinton Yu
- Department of Physiology & Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697
| | - Lan Huang
- Department of Physiology & Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Alkafeef SS, Yu C, Huang L, Liu H. Wor1 establishes opaque cell fate through inhibition of the general co-repressor Tup1 in Candida albicans. PLoS Genet 2018; 14:e1007176. [PMID: 29337983 PMCID: PMC5786334 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2017] [Revised: 01/26/2018] [Accepted: 12/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The pathogenic fungus Candida albicans can undergo phenotypic switching between two heritable states: white and opaque. This phenotypic plasticity facilitates its colonization in distinct host niches. The master regulator WOR1 is exclusively expressed in opaque phase cells. Positive feedback regulation by Wor1 on the WOR1 promoter is essential for opaque formation, however the underlying mechanism of how Wor1 functions is not clear. Here, we use tandem affinity purification coupled with mass spectrometry to identify Wor1-interacting proteins. Tup1 and its associated complex proteins are found as the major factors associated with Wor1. Tup1 occupies the same regions of the WOR1 promoter as Wor1 preferentially in opaque cells. Loss of Tup1 is sufficient to induce the opaque phase, even in the absence of Wor1. This is the first such report of a bypass of Wor1 in opaque formation. These genetic analyses suggest that Tup1 is a key repressor of the opaque state, and Wor1 functions via alleviating Tup1 repression at the WOR1 promoter. Opaque cells convert to white en masse at 37°C. We show that this conversion occurs only in the presence of glycolytic carbon sources. The opaque state is stabilized when cells are cultured on non-glycolytic carbon sources, even in a MTLa/α background. We further show that temperature and carbon source affect opaque stability by altering the levels of Wor1 and Tup1 at the WOR1 promoter. We propose that Wor1 and Tup1 form the core regulatory circuit controlling the opaque transcriptional program. This model provides molecular insights on how C. albicans adapts to different host signals to undergo phenotypic switching for colonization in distinct host niches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Selma S. Alkafeef
- Department of Biological Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, California, United States of America
| | - Clinton Yu
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, California, United States of America
| | - Lan Huang
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, California, United States of America
| | - Haoping Liu
- Department of Biological Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, California, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Wang X, Huang L. Dissecting Dynamic and Heterogeneous Proteasome Complexes Using In Vivo Cross-Linking-Assisted Affinity Purification and Mass Spectrometry. Methods Mol Biol 2018; 1844:401-410. [PMID: 30242723 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8706-1_25] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Protein-protein interactions are essential for protein complex formation and function. Affinity purification coupled with mass spectrometry (AP-MS) is the method of choice for studying protein-protein interactions at the systems level under different physiological conditions. Although effective in capturing stable protein interactions, transient, weak, and/or dynamic interactors are often lost due to extended procedures during conventional AP-MS experiments. To circumvent this problem, we have recently developed XAP (in vivo cross-linking (X)-assisted affinity purification)-MS strategy to better preserve dynamic protein complexes under native lysis conditions. In addition, we have developed XBAP (in vivo cross-linking (X)-assisted bimolecular tandem affinity purification)-MS method by incorporating XAP with bimolecular affinity purification to define dynamic and heterogeneous protein subcomplexes. Here we describe general experimental protocols of XAP- and XBAP-MS to study dynamic protein complexes and their subcomplexes, respectively. Specifically, we present their applications in capturing and identifying proteasome dynamic interactors and ubiquitin receptor (UbR)-proteasome subcomplexes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaorong Wang
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Lan Huang
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Wang X, Chemmama IE, Yu C, Huszagh A, Xu Y, Viner R, Block SA, Cimermancic P, Rychnovsky SD, Ye Y, Sali A, Huang L. The proteasome-interacting Ecm29 protein disassembles the 26S proteasome in response to oxidative stress. J Biol Chem 2017; 292:16310-16320. [PMID: 28821611 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m117.803619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2017] [Revised: 08/11/2017] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Oxidative stress has been implicated in multiple human neurological and other disorders. Proteasomes are multi-subunit proteases critical for the removal of oxidatively damaged proteins. To understand stress-associated human pathologies, it is important to uncover the molecular events underlying the regulation of proteasomes upon oxidative stress. To this end, we investigated H2O2 stress-induced molecular changes of the human 26S proteasome and determined that stress-induced 26S proteasome disassembly is conserved from yeast to human. Moreover, we developed and employed a new proteomic approach, XAP (in vivo cross-linking-assisted affinity purification), coupled with stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture (SILAC)-based quantitative MS, to capture and quantify several weakly bound proteasome-interacting proteins and examine their roles in stress-mediated proteasomal remodeling. Our results indicate that the adapter protein Ecm29 is the main proteasome-interacting protein responsible for stress-triggered remodeling of the 26S proteasome in human cells. Importantly, using a disuccinimidyl sulfoxide-based cross-linking MS platform, we mapped the interactions of Ecm29 within itself and with proteasome subunits and determined the architecture of the Ecm29-proteasome complex with integrative structure modeling. These results enabled us to propose a structural model in which Ecm29 intrudes on the interaction between the 20S core particle and the 19S regulatory particle in the 26S proteasome, disrupting the proteasome structure in response to oxidative stress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaorong Wang
- From the Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, California 92697
| | - Ilan E Chemmama
- the Departments of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143
| | - Clinton Yu
- From the Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, California 92697
| | - Alexander Huszagh
- From the Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, California 92697
| | - Yue Xu
- the Laboratory of Molecular Biology, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
| | - Rosa Viner
- Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, California 95134, and
| | - Sarah A Block
- the Department of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, California 92697
| | - Peter Cimermancic
- the Departments of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143
| | - Scott D Rychnovsky
- the Department of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, California 92697
| | - Yihong Ye
- the Laboratory of Molecular Biology, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
| | - Andrej Sali
- the Departments of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143
| | - Lan Huang
- From the Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, California 92697,
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Wang X, Cimermancic P, Yu C, Schweitzer A, Chopra N, Engel JL, Greenberg C, Huszagh AS, Beck F, Sakata E, Yang Y, Novitsky EJ, Leitner A, Nanni P, Kahraman A, Guo X, Dixon JE, Rychnovsky SD, Aebersold R, Baumeister W, Sali A, Huang L. Molecular Details Underlying Dynamic Structures and Regulation of the Human 26S Proteasome. Mol Cell Proteomics 2017; 16:840-854. [PMID: 28292943 PMCID: PMC5417825 DOI: 10.1074/mcp.m116.065326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2016] [Revised: 02/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
The 26S proteasome is the macromolecular machine responsible for ATP/ubiquitin dependent degradation. As aberration in proteasomal degradation has been implicated in many human diseases, structural analysis of the human 26S proteasome complex is essential to advance our understanding of its action and regulation mechanisms. In recent years, cross-linking mass spectrometry (XL-MS) has emerged as a powerful tool for elucidating structural topologies of large protein assemblies, with its unique capability of studying protein complexes in cells. To facilitate the identification of cross-linked peptides, we have previously developed a robust amine reactive sulfoxide-containing MS-cleavable cross-linker, disuccinimidyl sulfoxide (DSSO). To better understand the structure and regulation of the human 26S proteasome, we have established new DSSO-based in vivo and in vitro XL-MS workflows by coupling with HB-tag based affinity purification to comprehensively examine protein-protein interactions within the 26S proteasome. In total, we have identified 447 unique lysine-to-lysine linkages delineating 67 interprotein and 26 intraprotein interactions, representing the largest cross-link dataset for proteasome complexes. In combination with EM maps and computational modeling, the architecture of the 26S proteasome was determined to infer its structural dynamics. In particular, three proteasome subunits Rpn1, Rpn6, and Rpt6 displayed multiple conformations that have not been previously reported. Additionally, cross-links between proteasome subunits and 15 proteasome interacting proteins including 9 known and 6 novel ones have been determined to demonstrate their physical interactions at the amino acid level. Our results have provided new insights on the dynamics of the 26S human proteasome and the methodologies presented here can be applied to study other protein complexes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaorong Wang
- From the ‡Department of Physiology & Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697
| | - Peter Cimermancic
- §Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143
| | - Clinton Yu
- From the ‡Department of Physiology & Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697
| | - Andreas Schweitzer
- ¶Department of Molecular Structural Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried 82152, Germany
| | - Nikita Chopra
- §Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143
| | - James L Engel
- ‖Department of Pharmacology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, 92093
| | - Charles Greenberg
- §Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143
| | - Alexander S Huszagh
- From the ‡Department of Physiology & Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697
| | - Florian Beck
- ¶Department of Molecular Structural Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried 82152, Germany
| | - Eri Sakata
- ¶Department of Molecular Structural Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried 82152, Germany
| | - Yingying Yang
- From the ‡Department of Physiology & Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697
| | - Eric J Novitsky
- **Department of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697
| | - Alexander Leitner
- ‡‡Department of Biology, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule (ETH) Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Paolo Nanni
- §§Functional Genomics Center Zurich (FGCZ), University of Zurich, ETH Zurich, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Abdullah Kahraman
- ¶¶Institute of Molecular Life Sciences, University of Zurich, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Xing Guo
- ‖Department of Pharmacology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, 92093
| | - Jack E Dixon
- ‖Department of Pharmacology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, 92093
| | - Scott D Rychnovsky
- **Department of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697
| | - Ruedi Aebersold
- ‡‡Department of Biology, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule (ETH) Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Faculty of Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Wolfgang Baumeister
- ¶Department of Molecular Structural Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried 82152, Germany
| | - Andrej Sali
- §Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143
| | - Lan Huang
- From the ‡Department of Physiology & Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697;
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ubiquitinated proteins promote the association of proteasomes with the deubiquitinating enzyme Usp14 and the ubiquitin ligase Ube3c. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017; 114:E3404-E3413. [PMID: 28396413 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1701734114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
In mammalian cells, the 26S proteasomes vary in composition. In addition to the standard 28 subunits in the 20S core particle and 19 subunits in each 19S regulatory particle, a small fraction (about 10-20% in our preparations) also contains the deubiquitinating enzyme Usp14/Ubp6, which regulates proteasome activity, and the ubiquitin ligase, Ube3c/Hul5, which enhances proteasomal processivity. When degradation of ubiquitinated proteins in cells was inhibited, levels of Usp14 and Ube3c on proteasomes increased within minutes. Conversely, when protein ubiquitination was prevented, or when purified proteasomes hydrolyzed the associated ubiquitin conjugates, Usp14 and Ube3c dissociated rapidly (unlike other 26S subunits), but the inhibitor ubiquitin aldehyde slowed their dissociation. Recombinant Usp14 associated with purified proteasomes preferentially if they contained ubiquitin conjugates. In cells or extracts, adding Usp14 inhibitors (IU-1 or ubiquitin aldehyde) enhanced Usp14 and Ube3c binding further. Thus, in the substrate- or the inhibitor-bound conformations, Usp14 showed higher affinity for proteasomes and surprisingly enhanced Ube3c binding. Moreover, adding ubiquitinated proteins to cell extracts stimulated proteasome binding of both enzymes. Thus, Usp14 and Ube3c cycle together on and off proteasomes, and the presence of ubiquitinated substrates promotes their association. This mechanism enables proteasome activity to adapt to the supply of substrates.
Collapse
|
28
|
Smeekens JM, Xiao H, Wu R. Global Analysis of Secreted Proteins and Glycoproteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Proteome Res 2016; 16:1039-1049. [PMID: 27933904 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Protein secretion is essential for numerous cellular activities, and secreted proteins in bodily fluids are a promising and noninvasive source of biomarkers for disease detection. Systematic analysis of secreted proteins and glycoproteins will provide insight into protein function and cellular activities. Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) is an excellent model system for eukaryotic cells, but global analysis of secreted proteins and glycoproteins in yeast is challenging due to the low abundances of secreted proteins and contamination from high-abundance intracellular proteins. Here, by using mild separation of secreted proteins from cells, we comprehensively identified and quantified secreted proteins and glycoproteins through inhibition of glycosylation and mass spectrometry-based proteomics. In biological triplicate experiments, 245 secreted proteins were identified, and comparison with previous experimental and computational results demonstrated that many identified proteins were located in the extracellular space. Most quantified secreted proteins were down-regulated from cells treated with an N-glycosylation inhibitor (tunicamycin). The quantitative results strongly suggest that the secretion of these down-regulated proteins was regulated by glycosylation, while the secretion of proteins with minimal abundance changes was contrarily irrelevant to protein glycosylation, likely being secreted through nonclassical pathways. Glycoproteins in the yeast secretome were globally analyzed for the first time. A total of 27 proteins were quantified in at least two protein and glycosylation triplicate experiments, and all except one were down-regulated under N-glycosylation inhibition, which is solid experimental evidence to further demonstrate that the secretion of these proteins is regulated by their glycosylation. These results provide valuable insight into protein secretion, which will further advance protein secretion and disease studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna M Smeekens
- School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, and Petit Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology , Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States
| | - Haopeng Xiao
- School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, and Petit Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology , Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States
| | - Ronghu Wu
- School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, and Petit Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology , Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
Protein complexes form the critical foundation for a wide range of biological process, however understanding the intricate details of their activities is often challenging. In this review we describe how mass spectrometry plays a key role in the analysis of protein assemblies and the cellular pathways which they are involved in. Specifically, we discuss how the versatility of mass spectrometric approaches provides unprecedented information on multiple levels. We demonstrate this on the ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway, a process that is responsible for protein turnover. We follow the various steps of this degradation route and illustrate the different mass spectrometry workflows that were applied for elucidating molecular information. Overall, this review aims to stimulate the integrated use of multiple mass spectrometry approaches for analyzing complex biological systems.
Collapse
|
30
|
Yu C, Huszagh A, Viner R, Novitsky EJ, Rychnovsky SD, Huang L. Developing a Multiplexed Quantitative Cross-Linking Mass Spectrometry Platform for Comparative Structural Analysis of Protein Complexes. Anal Chem 2016; 88:10301-10308. [PMID: 27626298 PMCID: PMC5361889 DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b03148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Cross-linking mass spectrometry (XL-MS) represents a recently popularized hybrid methodology for defining protein-protein interactions (PPIs) and analyzing structures of large protein assemblies. In particular, XL-MS strategies have been demonstrated to be effective in elucidating molecular details of PPIs at the peptide resolution, providing a complementary set of structural data that can be utilized to refine existing complex structures or direct de novo modeling of unknown protein structures. To study structural and interaction dynamics of protein complexes, quantitative cross-linking mass spectrometry (QXL-MS) strategies based on isotope-labeled cross-linkers have been developed. Although successful, these approaches are mostly limited to pairwise comparisons. In order to establish a robust workflow enabling comparative analysis of multiple cross-linked samples simultaneously, we have developed a multiplexed QXL-MS strategy, namely, QMIX (Quantitation of Multiplexed, Isobaric-labeled cross (X)-linked peptides) by integrating MS-cleavable cross-linkers with isobaric labeling reagents. This study has established a new analytical platform for quantitative analysis of cross-linked peptides, which can be directly applied for multiplexed comparisons of the conformational dynamics of protein complexes and PPIs at the proteome scale in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clinton Yu
- Department of Physiology & Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697
| | - Alexander Huszagh
- Department of Physiology & Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697
| | - Rosa Viner
- Thermo Fisher, 355 River Oaks Parkway, San Jose, CA 95134
| | - Eric J. Novitsky
- Department of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697
| | | | - Lan Huang
- Department of Physiology & Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Chakrabarty JK, Naik AG, Fessler MB, Munske GR, Chowdhury SM. Differential Tandem Mass Spectrometry-Based Cross-Linker: A New Approach for High Confidence in Identifying Protein Cross-Linking. Anal Chem 2016; 88:10215-10222. [PMID: 27649375 DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b02886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Chemical cross-linking and mass spectrometry are now widely used to analyze large-scale protein-protein interactions. The major challenge in cross-linking approaches is the complexity of the mass spectrometric data. New approaches are required that can identify cross-linked peptides with high-confidence and establish a user-friendly analysis protocol for the biomedical scientific community. Here, we introduce a novel cross-linker that can be selectively cleaved in the gas phase using two differential tandem mass-spectrometric fragmentation methods, such as collision-induced or electron transfer dissociation (CID and ETD). This technique produces two signature mass spectra of the same cross-linked peptide, thereby producing high confidence in identifying the sites of interaction. Further tandem mass spectrometry can also give additional confidence on the peptide sequences. We demonstrate a proof-of-concept for this method using standard peptides and proteins. Peptides and proteins were cross-linked and their fragmentation characteristics were analyzed using CID and ETD tandem mass spectrometry. Two sequential cleavages unambiguously identified cross-linked peptides. In addition, the labeling efficiency of the new cross-linker was evaluated in macrophage immune cells after stimulation with the microbial ligand lipopolysaccharide and subsequent pulldown experiments with biotin-avidin affinity chromatography. We believe this strategy will help advance insights into the structural biology and systems biology of cell signaling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Michael B Fessler
- Immunity, Inflammation and Disease Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH , Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, United States
| | - Gerhard R Munske
- Laboratory of Bioanalysis, Washington State University , Pullman, Washington 98195, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Chen X, Randles L, Shi K, Tarasov SG, Aihara H, Walters KJ. Structures of Rpn1 T1:Rad23 and hRpn13:hPLIC2 Reveal Distinct Binding Mechanisms between Substrate Receptors and Shuttle Factors of the Proteasome. Structure 2016; 24:1257-1270. [PMID: 27396824 DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2016.05.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2016] [Revised: 05/10/2016] [Accepted: 05/25/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Three receptors (Rpn1/S2/PSMD2, Rpn10/S5a, Rpn13/Adrm1) in the proteasome bind substrates by interacting with conjugated ubiquitin chains and/or shuttle factors (Rad23/HR23, Dsk2/PLIC/ubiquilin, Ddi1) that carry ubiquitinated substrates to proteasomes. We solved the structure of two such receptors with their preferred shuttle factor, namely hRpn13(Pru):hPLIC2(UBL) and scRpn1 T1:scRad23(UBL). We find that ubiquitin folds in Rad23 and Dsk2 are fine-tuned by residue substitutions to achieve high affinity for Rpn1 and Rpn13, respectively. A single substitution in hPLIC2 yields enhanced interactions with the Rpn13 ubiquitin contact surface and sterically blocks hRpn13 binding to its preferred ubiquitin chain type, K48-linked chains. Rpn1 T1 binds two ubiquitins in tandem and we find that Rad23 binds exclusively to the higher-affinity Helix28/Helix30 site. Rad23 contacts at Helix28/Helix30 are optimized compared to ubiquitin by multiple conservative amino acid substitutions. Thus, shuttle factors deliver substrates to proteasomes through fine-tuned ubiquitin-like surfaces.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiang Chen
- Protein Processing Section, Structural Biophysics Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702, USA
| | - Leah Randles
- Protein Processing Section, Structural Biophysics Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702, USA
| | - Ke Shi
- Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - Sergey G Tarasov
- Biophysics Resource, Structural Biophysics Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702, USA
| | - Hideki Aihara
- Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - Kylie J Walters
- Protein Processing Section, Structural Biophysics Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702, USA.
| |
Collapse
|