Recurrence of Helicobacter pylori infection after eradication: incidence and variables influencing it

Recurrence of Helicobacter pylori following successful eradication and clinical outcomes in Korean patients

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infections can recur as either recrudescence or reinfection. At a time when the decline in the eradication rate is becoming evident, increases in the rate of recurrence are concerning. In addition, there are no guidelines for selecting an eradication regimen for H. pylori recurrence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 996 H. pylori-infected patients treated with proton-pump inhibitor-based triple eradication therapy between 2017 and 2022 were enrolled in the study, and successful eradication therapies were confirmed by the 13 C-urea breath test. When retested within 1 year after successful eradication, analysis related to recrudescence was performed, and when retested after 1 year, analysis related to reinfection was performed. We reviewed the medical records and treatment outcomes of patients with H. pylori reinfection after successful eradication.

RESULTS

The recrudescence rate was 3.9% (9/228), and the reinfection rate was 3.7% (36/970 person-year). The frequency of reinfection reached 5.9% per person-year within the first 24 months and 2.0%-2.4% per person-year thereafter. In multivariate factor analysis, reinfection was significantly higher in patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia (p < 0.01). At first-line therapy for reinfection, the eradication rate of standard triple therapy (STT) was 50.0% (16/32). The eradication rate of second-line bismuth quadruple therapy was 81.3% (13/16), and levofloxacin-based rescue therapy was 66.7% (2/3).

CONCLUSION

Re-treatment of patients with H. pylori reinfection with STT had limited efficacy. Prospective research is needed to determine whether patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia are vulnerable to reinfection.

The recurrence rate of Helicobacter pylori in recent 10 years: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To update and evaluate the recurrence rate of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication therapy in recent 10 years.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and Web of science was performed to identify the studies of recurrence rate of H. pylori published from 2010 to 2019. Stata 15.0 was used for analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 31 studies (16,797 participants) were analyzed. The recurrence rate of H. pylori was 9% (95% CI, 8-11%), and it showed an upward trend with the time elapsed after eradication. The annual recurrence rate was 4%, and there was a stable trend with the time elapsed after eradication. Subgroup analyses showed that the recurrence rate of H. pylori eradication by triple therapy was higher than that of quadruple therapy (14% [95% CI, 9-19] vs 12% [95% CI, 7-17]); urban was higher than that of rural (8% [95% CI, 1-14] vs 5% [95% CI, 1-9]); males were higher than that of females (11% [95% CI, 8-14] vs 10% [95% CI, 7-14]); Europe had the highest recurrence rate (16% [95% CI, -1 to 42]), and Africa had the lowest (1% [95% CI, 0-2]). The recurrence rate ofH. pylori was inversely related to the human development index.

CONCLUSIONS

The recurrence rate of H. pylori showed an increasing trend in recent 10 years, and it is still a knotty public health problem worldwide. The recurrence rate of H. pylori showed an upward trend with the time elapsed after eradication, and the recurrence rate of H. pylori varies by area, gender, and eradication methods.

[Role of Helicobacter pylori coccoid forms in infection and recrudescence]

Helicobacter pylori is a spiral Gram-negative bacillus, which colonizes the human stomach and plays a key role in the pathogenesis of a number of gastroduodenal diseases. However, when expose to environmental stressed conditions, such as increased oxygen tension, extended incubation and exposure to antibiotics, Helicobacter pylori is able to entering the viable but nonculturable state, in which the bacterium modifies its morphology from a spiral to coccoid form, as a manifestation of cell adaptation to these adverse conditions. In gastric tissues, viable coccoid forms may remain latent for long time and retain virulence factors, so these forms possibly contribute to the treatment failures and recurrence of Helicobacter pylori infection and gastroduodenal diseases as well. In this review, we will discuss several aspects of cellular adaptation and survival of Helicobacter pylori, antibiotic susceptibility and virulence of coccoid forms and its involvement with recrudescence.

Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori and its recurrence after successful eradication in a developing nation (Morocco)

INTRODUCTION

In developed countries, reinfection after successful eradication of Helicobacter pylori appears unusual. High prevalences of H. pylori in developing countries may result in high reinfection rates. In Morocco, published studies regarding the prevalence of H. pylori are limited, and to our knowledge, there are no data regarding the reinfection rate of H. pylori after successful treatment.

AIM

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of H. pylori in our area, and the reinfection rate at 6 months and 1 year of follow-up after successful eradication.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with investigated ulcer or non-ulcer dyspepsia were prospectively enrolled in the Hassan II University Hospital of Fez. Patients with H. pylori infection were treated with a 1-week triple therapy or 10 day sequential therapy. Those tested urea breath test negative after 3 months of treatment were followed prospectively with repeated urea breath test at 6 months and 1 year. H. pylori status at endoscopic examination was determined by rapid urease test, histology, and culture.

RESULTS

Four hundred and twenty-nine patients were enrolled in the study, among them 324 patients (75.5%) presented with H. pylori infection. Two hundred and fifty-six (83.3%) patients had successfully eradicated H. pylori following treatment, among them, two patients (0.8%) were reinfected with H. pylori over 12 months. The rate of reinfection was 0.42% in the first 6 months and of 0.45% in the first year of the study.

CONCLUSION

The results of the present study demonstrate that firstly, prevalence of H. pylori is high (75.5%) in our area, secondly as in developed countries, there is a low (0.8%) but continuous risk of H. pylori infection in adulthood. A different approach for follow-up after H. pylori eradication is probably needed in patients of developing countries, since reinfection prevalence is different between countries.

Review article: Helicobacter pylori-negative duodenal ulcer disease

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori infection rates in duodenal ulcer (DU) patients may be lower than previously estimated.

AIM

To review the real prevalence of H. pylori-negative DUs and its possible causes.

METHODS

Bibliographical searches in MEDLINE looking for the terms 'H. pylori' and 'duodenal ulcer'.

RESULTS

Mean prevalence of H. pylori infection in DU disease, calculated from studies published during the last 10 years including a total of 16 080 patients, was 81%, and this figure was lower (77%) when only the last 5 years were considered. Associations with H. pylori-negative DU were: (1) False negative results of diagnostic methods, (2) NSAID use (21% in studies with <90% infection rate), (3) Complicated DU (bleeding, obstruction, perforation), (4) Smoking, (5) Isolated H. pylori duodenal colonization, (6) Older age, (7) Gastric hypersecretion, (8) Diseases of the duodenal mucosa, (9) Helicobacter'heilmanii' infection and (10) Concomitant diseases.

CONCLUSION

In patients with H. pylori-negative DU disease, one should carefully confirm that the assessment of H. pylori status is reliable. In truly H. pylori-negative patients, the most common single cause of DU is, by far, the use of NSAIDs. Ulcers not associated with H. pylori, NSAIDs or other obvious causes should, for the present, be viewed as 'idiopathic'. True idiopathic DU disease only exceptionally exists.

Unreliability of results of PCR detection of Helicobacter pylori in clinical or environmental samples

The aim of this study was to compare published Helicobacter pylori primer pairs for their ability to reliably detect H. pylori in gastric biopsy specimens and salivary samples. Detection limits of the 26 PCR primer pairs previously described for detection of H. pylori DNA in clinical samples were determined. Sensitivity and specificity were determined using primers with detection limits of <100 CFU/ml using 50 H. pylori-positive and -negative (by concordance by culture and histology) coded gastric biopsy specimens. These results were then confirmed with gastric biopsy specimens and saliva from patients with confirmed H. pylori status. Five of the twenty-six previously reported primer pairs (HP64-f/HP64-r, HP1/HP2, EHC-U/EHC-L, VAG-F/VAG-R, and ICT37/ICT38) had detection limits of <100 CFU/ml in the presence of gastric tissue. None had 100% specificity or sensitivity; all produced false-positive results. The HP64-f/HP64-r for ureA and HP1/HP2 for 16S rRNA individually had sensitivities and specificities of >90% with gastric biopsy specimens. No combinations of primer pairs improved the results. Using these five primer pairs, 54% of the positive saliva samples were determined to be false positive; both the HP64-f/HP64-r and the HP1/HP2 sets produced false positives with saliva. We conclude that clinicians should not rely on results using current PCR primers alone to decide the H. pylori status of an individual patient or as a basis for treatment decisions. The results of studies based on PCR identification of H. pylori in environmental samples should be viewed with caution. Possibly, specific primers sets can be identified based on the presence of multiple putative virulence factor genes.

Helicobacter pylori recurrence and infection rate in Israeli adults

INTRODUCTION

In developing countries the recurrence rate of Helicobacter pylori after successful eradication therapy is as high as 42%, while in developed countries it is estimated to be less than 3%. Such figures are very important in terms of determining clinical strategy and outcome.

AIM

To estimate the recurrence rate of H. pylori in Israel using the database of the "Central H. Pylori Laboratory of Clalit Health Services".

METHODS

The database was searched for patients who had undergone the [(13)C]-urea breath test ([(13)C]-UBT) for validation of the successful eradication of H. pylori or for evaluation of dyspepsia 7 years previously and for whom the result had been negative. These patients were invited to participate in the trial, fill a symptom questionnaire and undergo another [(13)C]-UBT.

RESULTS

A In total, 65 patients participated; of these, 26 patients had tested negative in the first( 13)CUBT, indicating the successful eradication of H. pylori (Group A), and 39 had been tested for dyspepsia (Group B). One patient in each group had a positive [(13)C]-UBT - 3.84% in Group A and 2.56% in Group B (non-significant difference, NS). The mean annual H. pylori recurrence rate was calculated to be 0.55% and 0.37% in Group A and Group B patients, respectively (NS).

CONCLUSION

Our results shown a very low re-infection or new infection rates in Israeli adults and are in line with other trials in developed countries; they do not support the a retesting program for patients after a successful eradication therapy.

H pylori recurrence after successful eradication

Recurrence of H pylori after eradication is rare in developed countries and more frequent in developing countries. Recrudescence (recolonization of the same strain within 12 mo after eradication) rather than reinfection (colonization with a new strain, more than 12 mo after eradication) is considered to be responsible for most of the cases. This observation was confirmed only in developed countries, while in developing countries a recent meta-analysis demonstrated a high rate of reinfection. The proportion of H pylori annual recurrence was 2.67% and 13.00% in developed and developing countries, respectively. Nested meta-analysis (only cases with a longer follow-up and a negative ¹³CUBT a year after eradication) revealed annual recurrence rate of 1.45% [relative risk (RR), 0.54] and 12.00% (RR, 0.92) in developed and developing countries, respectively. These findings support the notion that in developed countries many cases of recurrence are due to recrudescence within the first year after eradication, with a 46% drop in the recurrence rate after the first year post eradication, while in developing countries reinfection is more pronounced, and continue at the same rate since eradication. A different approach for follow-up after H pylori eradication is probably needed in patients of developing countries, since reinfection is highly prevalent.

Helicobacter pylori recurrence in developed and developing countries: meta-analysis of 13C-urea breath test follow-up after eradication

OBJECTIVE

Recurrence of Helicobacter pylori infection after eradication is rare in developed countries and more frequent in developing countries. Most recurrent cases are attributed to recrudescence (recolonization of the same strain within 12 months) rather than to reinfection (colonization with a new strain after more than 12 months). The aim of the study was to analyze recurrence rates in developed and developing countries and to deduce the relative roles of recrudescence and reinfection.

METHODS

The PubMed database was searched up to January 31, 2007 using the keywords "Helicobacter pylori" or "H. pylori" and "recurrence" or "recrudescence," or "reinfection." Only prospective case studies in adults that used the (13)C-urea breath test ((13)CUBT) were included. Meta-analyses were performed with statdirect Statistical software, version 2.6.1, StatsDirect Ltd, Chesire, UK.

RESULTS

The literature search yielded 10 studies of H. pylori recurrence in developed countries (3014 patients followed for 24-60 months) and 7 studies in developing countries (2071 patients followed for 12-60 months). The calculated annual recurrence rates were 2.67% and 13.00%, respectively. Nested meta-analysis of cases with a longer follow-up after eradication revealed an annual recurrence rate of 1.45% (RR 0.54) in developed countries and 12.00% (RR 0.92) in developing countries.

CONCLUSIONS

The similarity of the annual recurrence rates during the first year after eradication and the annual recurrence rates in the second year after successful eradication in developing countries supports reinfection as the main cause in the second period. Therefore, a different approach for follow-up of H. pylori eradication may be needed between developed and developing countries.

[Seven or ten days? Cost-effectiveness study on the duration of H. pylori treatment in primary care]

OBJECTIVE

To determine through an economic evaluation study whether it is cost-effective to extend treatment of dyspeptic patients from 7 to 10 days, distinguishing between functional dyspepsia, unexamined dyspepsia, and ulcer disease.

DESIGN

Cost-effectiveness study by means of a decision 3 comparing direct costs per patient cured with 2 strategies: a) 7 days treatment versus b) 10 days. Two-year study in the National Health System.

SETTING

Primary care.

PARTICIPANTS

One-hundred patients with peptic ulcer, functional dyspepsia, or unexamined dyspepsia who received treatment for H pylori infection.

INTERVENTIONS

H pylori eradication treatment with a proton pump inhibitor, clarithromycin, and amoxycillin for 7 or 10 days. Measurement variable: incremental cost per patient cured.

RESULTS

In peptic ulcer patients, the incremental cost per patient cured on extending the eradication treatment from 7 to 10 days was euro147 (95% CI, 121.3-162.7), whereas in patients with functional or unexamined dyspepsia, it was -euro39.8 (95% CI, -28.5 to -60.7) and -euro27.3 (95% CI, -14.92 to -52.72), respectively. The sensitivity analysis showed that the efficacy of eradication treatment (7 vs 10) was the factor that most affected the stability of the results.

CONCLUSIONS

Seven days is the most cost-effective duration of the triple therapy for eradicating H pylori in ulcer patients. However, 10 days is more cost-effective in functional dyspepsia patients or those with no prior endoscope diagnosis.

Long-term study of re-infection following successful eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND

'Re-infection' with Helicobacter pylori after eradication has been estimated to occur in 0-14% of patients, although most so-called 're-infections' occur within the first year following 'eradication' and many may actually be due to recrudescence of a temporarily suppressed infection.

AIM

To study the true re-infection rate, we have studied re-infection rates after eradication therapy by excluding the first year's data, minimizing the possible confounding effect of recrudescence.

METHODS

All patients tested for H. pylori infection following eradication therapy between 1987 and 2004 were evaluated. Testing was carried out by urea breath test and gastric biopsy. Patients were included if they were found to be negative for H. pylori infection by testing at least 1 year following eradication and underwent at least one further test for H. pylori.

RESULTS

1162 patients met the inclusion criteria with median post-eradication follow-up of 3 years (1.5-14) including 4668 tests; 3319 years of follow-up were analysed. Thirteen cases of re-infection occurred (re-infection rate 0.4% per year).

CONCLUSIONS

This large study of H. pylori re-infection avoided cases of recrudescence by excluding the first post-eradication year. True re-infection is probably less common than previously thought.

Reinfection after successful eradication of Helicobacter pylori: a 2-year prospective study in Alaska Natives

BACKGROUND

Limited information exists regarding risk factors for reinfection after cure of Helicobacter pylori infection.

AIM

To determine the 2-year reinfection rate of H. pylori in a cohort of urban Alaska Natives.

METHODS

Participants over 18 years of age undergoing oesophagogastroduodenoscopy had (13)C urea breath test, culture, CLOtest and histology performed. Those diagnosed with H. pylori who tested urea breath test-negative at 8 weeks after treatment were followed prospectively at 4 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years. Subjects experiencing H. pylori reinfection as defined by a positive urea breath test were compared with those who did not become reinfected using univariable and multivariable analysis. Risk of reinfection over time was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Helicobacter pylori reinfection occurred in 14 of 98 subjects successfully treated. The cumulative reinfection rate was 5.1% (95% CI: 0.7%-9.5%) at 4 months, 7.2% (2.0-12.3%) at 6 months, 10.3% (4.2-16.3%) at 1-year and 14.5% (7.5-21.6%) at 2 years. In multivariable analysis, a history of previous peptic ulcer disease or presence of ulcer at time of study oesophagogastroduodenoscopy were the only risk factors associated with reinfection (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the findings from our study, subjects with a history of or current peptic ulcer disease should be followed, after successful treatment for H. pylori, with periodic urea breath test to detect reinfection, as reinfection would put them at high risk for ulcer recurrence.

Recurrence of Helicobacter pylori infection after several eradication therapies: long-term follow-up of 1000 patients

AIM

To study the incidence of Helicobacter pylori recurrence, its chronological aspects, and the variables that might influence it.

METHODS

A total of 1000 patients in whom H. pylori had been eradicated were prospectively studied. Therapies were classified as low and high efficacy regimens. Four to eight weeks after completion of therapy, 13C-urea-breath-test was performed, and it was repeated yearly up to 5 years. In some patients, endoscopy with biopsies was also performed to confirm H. pylori eradication.

RESULTS

A total of 1000 patients were included, giving 2744 patient-years of follow-up. Seventy-one H. pylori recurrences were observed (2.6% per patient-year). Probability of being H. pylori-negative at 1 year was 94.7%, and at 5 years 90.7%. In the multivariate analysis, low age (OR: 1.84; 95% CI: 1.04-3.26) and low efficacy therapies (OR: 2.5; 1.23-5.04) correlated with 1-year H. pylori recurrence. Differences were observed when Kaplan-Meier curves were compared depending on age and therapy regimen.

CONCLUSION

Risk of posteradication H. pylori recurrence is higher during the first year, which suggests that most recurrences during this period are recrudescence and not true reinfections. H. pylori recurrence is more frequent in younger patients and in those treated with low efficacy therapies, but is exceptional if high efficacy therapies are used, in which case post-therapy eradication can be safely confirmed at 4 weeks with 13C-urea-breath-test.

Long-term follow-up of 13C-urea breath test results after Helicobacter pylori eradication: frequency and significance of borderline delta13CO2 values

BACKGROUND

The precise choice of cut-off point for the 13C-urea breath test to define whether it is positive or negative represents a controversial issue.

AIM

To quantify the 13C-urea breath test result for several years following Helicobacter pylori eradication, and to evaluate the frequency and the significance of borderline delta13CO2 values.

METHODS

Two-hundred H. pylori eradicated patients confirmed by 13C-urea breath test (100 mg of urea, citric acid), and having had repeated this test yearly up to 5 years, were studied. Delta13CO2 values between 2 and 5/1000 were considered as borderline results.

RESULTS

Eight H. pylori recurrences were observed during 406 patient-years of follow-up (1.97% yearly). In two of eight reinfected patients, the reinfection was preceded by a negative delta13CO2 value >2/1000. Borderline delta13CO2 values were detected in 4% of the 606 urea breath tests performed, and in 25% when only patients in whom H. pylori recurrence was detected in subsequent urea breath tests were included (P < 0.05). The negative-predictive value of a post-treatment delta13CO2 >2/1000 for the diagnosis of H. pylori recurrence was 99%.

CONCLUSIONS

Positive and negative urea breath test results tend to cluster outside the range between 2/1000 and 5/1000. Nevertheless, a borderline urea breath test delta value (e.g. very close to the selected cut-off point) should be interpreted cautiously, and the result should probably be confirmed either by repeating the urea breath test or by other diagnostic methods. On the contrary, a delta13CO2 value <2/1000 very confidently confirms H. pylori eradication.

The recurrence of Helicobacter pylori infection: incidence and variables influencing it. A critical review

The rate of H. pylori recurrence after eradication of the microorganism seems to be relatively low, at least in developed countries, where the mean annual reinfection rate is of approximately 3% per patient-year of follow-up, although the risk of reinfection in some developing regions is considerably higher. Several findings suggest that recrudescence rather than reinfection is likely to be responsible for most cases of recurrence: (i) the recurrences decrease with time and decline sharply after the first year, and (ii) studies using molecular fingerprinting techniques (polymerase chain reaction [PCR]) confirm that the identified microorganisms (before and after therapy) are usually genetically identical. The lower the efficacy of an antibiotic therapy, the greater the likelihood that recurrence occur, again suggesting that in these cases temporary "clearance" has been achieved rather than true eradication. The value of the (13)C-urea breath test after treatment is higher in those patients who suffer a recurrence; therefore, selection of a lower cut-off value may be helpful to maintain the diagnostic accuracy of posttreatment breath test, and thus preventing recrudescences. The observation of a pattern of histological (active) gastritis without the concomitant finding of H. pylori must raise the suspicion of a diagnostic error. Some studies suggest that recurrence is relatively infrequent, even if the patient's spouse is H. pylori-positive, suggesting that the patient's partner does not act as a reservoir for the reinfection. However, other investigators achieve contrary results, although a common exogenous source of H. pylori (for both partner's infection and patient's reinfection) cannot be ruled out. The oral cavity may be a potential source for recrudescence of gastric infection after successful therapy. When peptic ulcer reappears (sometimes with bleeding recurrence) or gastric MALT (mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue) lymphoma relapses after previous H. pylori eradication, recolonization of the gastric mucosa by the organism has almost always occurred.

Long-term recurrence rate after treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in children and adolescents in Estonia

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori infection is common in Estonia: 87% of adults and 56% of children aged 9-15 years have been found to be H. pylori seropositive. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term recurrence rate after treatment in children and adolescents in a setting of high H. pylori prevalence.

METHODS

All children (n = 27) who underwent gastroscopy at the Children's Clinic of Tartu University Clinics during 1993--95 and in whom H. pylori infection was verified by histological examination and rapid urease test and who had completed a treatment course against H. pylori infection were invited for a post-treatment follow-up endoscopy 4-6 weeks after completion of therapy (1st follow-up visit) and to the follow-up control by [13C]-urea breath test in 1997 (2nd follow-up visit) and 2002 (3rd follow-up visit).

RESULTS

Recurrence of H. pylori infection occurred in I patient out of 16 at the 2nd follow-up visit (mean 17.8+/-7.1 months after treatment), and in 5 patients out of 15 at the 3rd follow-up visit (mean 6.6+/-0.9 years after treatment). The recurrence rate calculated for the period between the 1st and the 2nd follow-up visits was 4.2% per patient-year, and between the 2nd and the 3rd follow-up visits the rate was 7.6% (95% CI 2.5%-17.6%) per patient-year. The recurrence rate calculated for the whole follow-up period was 6.7% (95% CI 2.5%-14.5%) per patient-year.

CONCLUSION

The post-treatment recurrence rate of H. pylori infection in children and adolescents is higher in Estonia than in low prevalence settings.

Recurrence of Helicobacter pylori infection 1 year after successful treatment: prospective cohort study in the Republic of Yemen

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in dyspeptic patients in the Republic of Yemen and the recurrence rate 1 year after apparently successful eradication.

METHODS

A total of 275 patients with chronic dyspepsia seen in one clinic were enrolled. Gastric biopsies were obtained at endoscopy and H. pylori infection was diagnosed using the rapid urease test. Patients with H. pylori infection were given either clarithromycin or metronidazole-based triple therapy. Six weeks later H. pylori status was assessed using the C-urea breath test (C-UBT). Those who were negative for H. pylori had a further C-UBT after 1 year to establish the recurrence rate.

RESULTS

The prevalence of H. pylori infection at entry to the study was 82.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 78-87%]. The overall eradication rate 6 weeks after treatment was 49.1% (95% CI 42.6-55.6%) by intention-to-treat analysis, and 60% (95% CI 53-67%) by per-protocol analysis. Recurrence rate of H. pylori infection at 1 year was 34% (95% CI 14-45%) and the only predictor of recurrence was an excess delta C-UBT value less than 3.5 per million but equal to or greater than 2.5 per million at 6 weeks after treatment (odds ratio 2.28; 95% CI 1.17-4.44; P = 0.028).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of H. pylori infection in dyspeptic patients in Yemen is very high, the eradication rate with standard triple therapy was unsatisfactory probably because of widespread bacterial resistance due to unrestricted antibiotic use. The recurrence rate of infection at 1 year was high, as a result of recrudescence of incompletely eradicated organisms rather than reinfection.

Meta-analysis: Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy vs. antisecretory non-eradication therapy for the prevention of recurrent bleeding from peptic ulcer

AIM

To perform a meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy vs. antisecretory non-eradication therapy for the prevention of recurrent bleeding from peptic ulcer.

METHODS

A search was made of the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and several congresses for controlled clinical trials comparing the efficacy of H. pylori eradication therapy vs. antisecretory non-eradication therapy for the prevention of peptic ulcer re-bleeding. Studies with all patients taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were excluded. Extraction and quality assessment of the studies were performed by two reviewers.

RESULTS

In the first meta-analysis, the mean percentage of re-bleeding in the H. pylori eradication therapy group was 4.5%, compared with 23.7% in the non-eradication therapy group without long-term antisecretory therapy [odds ratio, 0.18; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.09-0.37; 'number needed to treat' (NNT), 5; 95% CI, 4-8]. In the second meta-analysis, the re-bleeding rate in the H. pylori eradication therapy group was 1.6%, compared with 5.6% in the non-eradication therapy group with maintenance antisecretory therapy (odds ratio, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.08-0.76; NNT, 20; 95% CI, 12-100). When only patients with successful H. pylori eradication were included, the re-bleeding rate was 1%.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment of H. pylori infection is more effective than antisecretory non-eradication therapy (with or without long-term maintenance antisecretory treatment) in the prevention of recurrent bleeding from peptic ulcer. Consequently, all patients with peptic ulcer bleeding should be tested for H. pylori, and eradication therapy should be prescribed to infected patients.

H. pylori eradication therapy vs. antisecretory non-eradication therapy (with or without long-term maintenance antisecretory therapy) for the prevention of recurrent bleeding from peptic ulcer

BACKGROUND

Peptic ulcer is the main cause for upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage, and Helicobacter pylori infection is the main etiologic factor for peptic ulcer disease. Maintenance antisecretory therapy has been the standard long-term treatment for patients with bleeding ulcers to prevent recurrent bleeding. On the other hand, the precise efficacy of H. pylori eradication for the prevention of rebleeding from peptic ulcer is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy of H. pylori eradication therapy vs. antisecretory non-eradication therapy (with or without long-term maintenance antisecretory therapy) for the prevention of recurrent bleeding from peptic ulcer.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (the Cochrane Library issue 4, 2003), MEDLINE (January 1966 to January 2004), EMBASE (January 1988 to January 2004), CINAHL (January 1982 to January 2004), and reference lists of articles. We also conducted a manual search from several congresses.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Controlled clinical trials comparing the efficacy of H. pylori eradication therapy vs. antisecretory non-eradication therapy (with or without long-term maintenance antisecretory therapy) for the prevention of recurrent bleeding from peptic ulcer.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Extraction and quality assessment of studies were done by two reviewers. Study authors were contacted for additional information.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven studies with a total of 578 patients were included in the first meta-analysis: mean percentage of rebleeding in H. pylori eradication therapy group was 2.9%, and in the non-eradication therapy group without subsequent long-term maintenance antisecretory therapy it was 20% (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.32; there was no statistical evidence of heterogeneity; NNT was 7, 95% CI 5 to 11). Three studies with a total of 470 patients were included in the second meta-analysis: mean percentage of rebleeding in H. pylori eradication therapy group was 1.6%, and in non-eradication therapy group with long-term maintenance antisecretory therapy it was 5.6% (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.76; heterogeneity was not demonstrated; NNT was 20, 95% CI 12 to 100). SUBANALYSIS: Excluding patients taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) at the time of recurrent bleeding resulted in a rebleeding rate of 2.7% (first meta-analysis) or 0.78% (second meta-analysis) in the group receiving H. pylori eradication therapy. When only patients with H. pylori eradication success were included, rebleeding rate was 1.1% in H. pylori eradication therapy group, and NNT decreased from 7 to 6. In some cases, recurrence of H. pylori infection seemed to be responsible for recurrence of bleeding.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of H. pylori infection is more effective than antisecretory non-eradicating therapy (with or without long-term maintenance antisecretory therapy) in preventing recurrent bleeding from peptic ulcer. Consequently, all patients with peptic ulcer bleeding should be tested for H. pylori infection, and eradication therapy should be prescribed to H. pylori-positive patients.

High rates of recurrence and of transient reinfections of Helicobacter pylori in a population with high prevalence of infection

OBJECTIVES

Little is known concerning the magnitude of reinfection versus recrudescence of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection after eradication treatment. The aims of this study were to determine the magnitude of H. pylori reinfection versus recrudescence, and to identify possible risk factors for reinfection.

METHODS

Children and adults with upper GI symptoms treated at the Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI (Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, in Mexico City, Mexico) were studied. H. pylori infection was diagnosed with urea breath test (UBT), histology, and culture. Infected patients received triple therapy, and those who became UBT negative 4-6 wk after treatment were considered as eradicated and were included in the study. A cohort of 141 patients in whom the disease was eradicated was monitored for recurrence with UBT at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months. H. pylori was isolated from gastric biopsy samples before treatment and at recurrence and isolates compared by genotyping.

RESULTS

During this period, 32 (22.7%) cases of recurrence were documented the majority occurring during yr 1. In nine of the 32 (28.1%) cases, recurrence was eradicated spontaneously, suggesting these were transient reinfections. Recurrence rates were significantly higher in the subjects 41-60 yr of age than in younger or older subjects. H. pylori isolates from 12 recurrence cases were genotyped; nine (75%) were classified as true reinfection and three as recrudescence.

CONCLUSIONS

In our population, recurrence rate is high in adults and transient reinfection is common. In several cases, reinfection occurred by multiple strains, which suggests that soon after eradication, patients are exposed to multiple sources of reinfection.

Somatostatin and D cells in patients with gastritis in the course of Helicobacter pylori eradication: a six-month, follow-up study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

As well as causing chronic gastritis, Helicobacter pylori predisposes patients to peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer, and induces gastric functional disorders. The aim of our study was to investigate the effects of H. pylori eradication therapy on the morphological and functional recovery of gastric antral and corpus D cells in patients with chronic gastritis during 6 months of follow-up.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty consecutive, dyspeptic patients referred for endoscopy (31 with H. pylori infection and nine controls; mean age 49 years; 17 men, 23 women) entered the study. All patients had histological signs of gastritis but no signs of peptic ulcer or gastric cancer. Antrum (n=8) and corpus (n=6) biopsy specimens were collected for routine histology, radioimmunoassay tissue somatostatin levels, immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy, prior to and 6 months after therapy. Basal plasma somatostatin levels were determined prior to eradication, plus 6 weeks and 6 months after therapy. Eradication therapy consisted of amoxicillin, metronidazole and omeprazole.

RESULTS

Basal somatostatin plasma values in antral and corpus tissue were lower in infected patients than in the H. pylori-negative controls at the beginning of the study. A significant increase occurred after successful eradication therapy, together with an increase in the number of D cells in both regions. Changes in the D-cell ultrastructure in antral and corpus mucosa after eradication therapy suggest an increase in somatostatin synthesis and secretion.

CONCLUSIONS

The structural and functional restoration of D cells following eradication therapy indicates possible recovery of the diseased mucosa.

H. pylori eradication therapy vs. antisecretory non-eradication therapy (with or without long-term maintenance antisecretory therapy) for the prevention of recurrent bleeding from peptic ulcer

BACKGROUND

Peptic ulcer is the main cause for upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage, and Helicobacter pylori infection is the main etiologic factor for peptic ulcer disease. Maintenance antisecretory therapy has been the standard long-term treatment for patients with bleeding ulcers to prevent recurrent bleeding. On the other hand, the precise efficacy of H. pylori eradication for the prevention of rebleeding from peptic ulcer is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy of H. pylori eradication therapy vs. antisecretory non-eradication therapy (with or without long-term maintenance antisecretory therapy) for the prevention of recurrent bleeding from peptic ulcer.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (the Cochrane Library issue 1, 2003), MEDLINE (January 1966 to March 2003), EMBASE (January 1988 to March 2003), CINAHL (January 1982 to March 2003), and reference lists of articles. We also conducted a manual search from several congresses.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Controlled clinical trials comparing the efficacy of H. pylori eradication therapy vs. antisecretory non-eradication therapy (with or without long-term maintenance antisecretory therapy) for the prevention of recurrent bleeding from peptic ulcer.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Extraction and quality assessment of studies were done by two reviewers. Study authors were contacted for additional information.

MAIN RESULTS

Six studies with a total of 355 patients were included in the first meta-analysis: mean percentage of rebleeding in H. pylori eradication therapy group was 4.5%, and in the non-eradication therapy group without subsequent long-term maintenance antisecretory therapy it was 23.7% (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.37; there was no statistical evidence of heterogeneity; NNT was 5, 95% CI 4 to 8). Three studies with a total of 470 patients were included in the second meta-analysis: mean percentage of rebleeding in H. pylori eradication therapy group was 1.6%, and in non-eradication therapy group with long-term maintenance antisecretory therapy it was 5.6% (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.76; heterogeneity was not demonstrated; NNT was 20, 95% CI 12 to 100). Subanalysis. Excluding patients taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) at the time of recurrent bleeding resulted in a rebleeding rate of 4% (first meta-analysis) or 0.78% (second meta-analysis) in the group receiving H. pylori eradication therapy. When only patients with H. pylori eradication success were included, rebleeding rate was 1% in H. pylori eradication therapy group, and NNT decreased from 5 to 4. In some cases, recurrence of H. pylori infection seemed to be responsible for recurrence of bleeding.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of H. pylori infection is more effective than antisecretory non-eradicating therapy (with or without long-term maintenance antisecretory therapy) in preventing recurrent bleeding from peptic ulcer. Consequently, all patients with peptic ulcer bleeding should be tested for H. pylori infection, and eradication therapy should be prescribed to H. pylori-positive patients.

Reinfection rate in children after successful Helicobacter pylori eradication

OBJECTIVES

This study was performed to determine the rate of Helicobacter pylori reinfection after its successful eradication in children living in Germany.

DESIGN

A total of 102 children (48 boys; 31 German and 71 other nationalities; age 1.8-18 years) with a negative (13)C-urea breath test 8 weeks after triple therapy were followed up by a (13)C-urea breath test every 6 months. The cohort included 11 children aged <6 years, 58 children aged > or =6 to 12 years, and 33 children > or =12 years.

RESULTS

The mean duration (+/- standard deviation) of follow-up was 15.5 +/- 11.9 months with a maximum of 4.9 years, representing 132 patient years. Only three children (aged 9.7-14.9 years, one German, two Turkish) tested positive at 6, 12, and 18 months, respectively. The calculated reinfection rate was 2.3% per person per year.

CONCLUSION

The risk of reinfection with H. pylori is low in children living in Germany. There is no evidence that the reinfection rate depends on the age, sex, or nationality of the child. The low reinfection rate indicates that it is unnecessary to screen or treat asymptomatic family members in order to prevent reinfection.

Role of partner's infection in reinfection after Helicobacter pylori eradication

AIM

To evaluate whether the Helicobacter pylori status of the patient's spouse plays a role in reinfection after eradication success, and to assess the possibility of transmission of H. pylori among partners by using molecular methods.

METHODS

We studied prospectively 120 patients in whom H. pylori had been eradicated. Endoscopy with biopsies and a 13C-urea breath test were performed 1 month after completing therapy. The breath test was repeated in all patients at 6 and 12 months. At the 1-year follow-up visit (or before if reinfection occurred), a breath test was also performed on the patient's partner. Samples for the molecular study included gastric biopsies from patients and gastric content obtained by the string test from partners. The heterogeneity of ureC was studied by enzymatic digestion with MseI and HhaI enzymes of a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) product of 1179 bp belonging to the ureC gene, and different band patterns were generated after electrophoresis.

RESULTS

Four reinfections were diagnosed at 6 months, and four were diagnosed from 6 to 12 months (incidence 6.8% per patient-year). Seven of eight (87%) of the reinfected patients' spouses were infected, but H. pylori infection of spouses was also frequent (76%) among non-reinfected patients. In the multivariate analysis, age of the patient (odds ratio [OR] 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87 to 0.99, P < 0.05), delta(13)CO(2) value after therapy (OR 2.51, 95% CI 1.14 to 5, P < 0.05), and therapy regimen (OR 6.23, 95% CI 1.25 to 31, P < 0.05) were the only variables that correlated with H. pylori recurrence. However, family variables (H. pylori status of spouse, breath test value of spouse, length of time couple had lived together, number of children living at home, household density) did not correlate with recurrences. Thus, the OR for the H. pylori status of spouse (adjusted by age, delta(13)CO(2) and therapy) was 2.93 (95% CI 0.29 to 29, P > 0.05). H. pylori recurrence occurred in seven of 92 (7.6%) patients when the spouse was infected (95% CI 3.7% to 15%), and in one of 28 (3.6%) patients when the spouse was H. pylori-negative (95% CI 0.6% to 18%) (P > 0.05; however, the power of this comparison was < 20%). Therefore, even if the spouse was infected, 92.4% of patients will remain uninfected 1 year after H. pylori eradication. Three reinfected patients (at 1 year) and their partners (also infected) agreed to have the endoscopy and string test performed, respectively. The molecular study revealed that H. pylori strains involved were different in all cases.

CONCLUSION

Recurrence of H. pylori infection seems to be relatively infrequent, even if the patient's spouse is H. pylori-positive. The molecular study demonstrated that the strains in reinfected patients and their partners are different, suggesting that the patient's partner does not act as a reservoir for H. pylori reinfection.

Recurrence of Helicobacter pylori infection and the long-term outcome of peptic ulcer after successful eradication in Japan

Recurrence of peptic ulcer after successful eradication of Helicobacter pylori is closely associated with reinfection. The aim of this study was to examine the recurrence of peptic ulcer and reinfection with H. pylori after successful eradication. To eradicate H. pylori infection, patients with active peptic ulcer disease were assigned to two treatment groups depending on the year of their enrollment (AM group and OAMR group). Patients in the AM group received 400 mg of cimetidine twice per day, 300 mg of amoxicillin three times per day, and 250 mg of metronidazole three times per day for 2 weeks. Patients in the OAMR group received 20 mg of omeprazole once per day, 500 mg of amoxicillin granules three times per day, 250 mg of metronidazole three times per day, and 150 mg of roxithromycin twice per day for 1 week. After endoscopy verified ulcer scarring and successful eradication of H. pylori infection, study patients were followed up monthly and did not undergo acid-suppressive therapy. Endoscopy was performed at 6-month intervals for the 1st year. After the 1st year, follow-up endoscopies were performed annually. In total, 107 patients with peptic ulcer (duodenal ulcer [DU], 65; gastric ulcer [GU], 42) were followed up for a mean period of approximately 2 years. Recurrence of infection occurred in 10 (9.3%) of 107 patients (AM group, 9; OAMR group, 1) after 210 patient-years of follow-up; the recurrence rate was 4.8% per patient-year. Recurrence of H. pylori infection was significantly higher in the AM group (23.1%) than in the OAMR group (1.5%). H. pylori infection recurred in two patients 6 months after eradication therapy, in seven 1 year after, and in one 2 years after. Thereafter, no further cases of H. pylori recurrence were observed. During follow-up periods, seven cases of ulcer recurrence were observed (DU, 4; GU, 3). The rate of peptic ulcer recurrence within 2 years after eradication therapy was significantly higher than that after more than 2 years. Four cases of ulcer recurrence (DU, 3; GU, 1) also had recurrence of H. pylori infection. One recurrent case of DU without reinfection was associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The remaining two cases of GU recurred without H. pylori reinfection. In conclusion, peptic ulcer recurrence rarely occurred (3 [2.9%] of 103) in patients cured of H. pylori infection. Reinfection after apparent successful eradication was rarely noted when a powerful therapeutic regimen in eradication was used. Therefore, to eradicate H. pylori, a highly effective therapeutic regimen should always be used.

What is the optimal length of proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapies for H. pylori? A cost-effectiveness analysis

BACKGROUND

Triple therapy with a proton pump inhibitor, clarithromycin and amoxicillin is widely used for H. pylori infection. The appropriate length of treatment remains controversial.

AIM

To determine whether length of treatment has an impact on the cost-effectiveness of triple therapy.

METHODS

The study took the form of a cost-effectiveness analysis spanning 2 years. The perspective was societal and the setting, ambulatory care. Subjects were Helicobacter pylori-positive patients with a duodenal ulcer. The triple therapy trials spanned 7, 10 or 14 days and the main outcome measures were cost per patient and marginal cost for additional cured patient calculated for a low cost-of-care setting (Spain), for a high-cost setting (USA), and for two follow-up strategies: (i) systematic 13C-urea breath test after eradication; (ii) clinical follow-up, breath-test if symptoms recurred.

RESULTS

Base-case analysis showed that for both the 13C-UBT and the clinical follow-up branches, lowest costs were obtained with 7-day schedules both in Spain and the USA. Sensitivity analysis showed that in Spain, 10-day therapies would have to increase 7-day cure rates by 10-12% to become cost-effective. In contrast, in the USA only a 3-5% increase was needed. The corresponding figures for 14-day therapy were 25-35% and 8-11%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Seven-day therapies seem the most cost-effective strategy. However, in high-cost areas the differences were less evident.

Quality of life measurement clarifies the cost-effectiveness of Helicobacter pylori eradication in peptic ulcer disease and uninvestigated dyspepsia

OBJECTIVES

Previous economic studies of Helicobacter pylori eradication in dyspepsia and peptic ulcer disease have not measured quality of life using utilities (preference probabilities), which are needed to compare the cost-effectiveness of such treatment to other health care interventions. The goals of this study were to measure quality of life in patients with dyspepsia or peptic ulcer and apply these measurements to published models of disease management to determine cost-effectiveness in dollars per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained.

METHODS

Utilities for dyspepsia and peptic ulcer disease were measured in adult patients (n = 73) on chronic acid suppression for peptic ulcer or ulcer-like dyspepsia. Median utility values were applied to the results of published cost-effectiveness analyses and a previously validated dyspepsia model. Cost-utility ratios for early H. pylori eradication in uninvestigated dyspepsia and peptic ulcer disease were then computed.

RESULTS

The total disutility, or lost quality of life, for an ulcer was 0.11 QALY, of which 0.09 QALY was attributed to dyspeptic symptoms. After these results were incorporated into published studies, cost-utility ratios for ulcer treatment varied from $3,100 to $12,500 per QALY gained, whereas estimates for uninvestigated dyspepsia management ranged from $26,800 to $59,400 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses indicated a range of $1,300 to $27,300 per QALY for management of duodenal ulcer and $15,000 to $129,700 per QALY for dyspepsia.

CONCLUSIONS

Strategies that emphasize early H. pylori eradication were cost-effective for patients with peptic ulcer and possibly cost-effective for patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia, relative to other medical interventions. Dyspeptic symptoms cause significant disutility that should be incorporated in future cost-effectiveness analyses of treatment strategies.

Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori after triple therapy in uncomplicated duodenal ulcers--a cost-effectiveness analysis

BACKGROUND

The cost-effectiveness of determining Helicobacter pylori status after treatment remains to be established.

AIM

To determine the benefit of post-treatment assessment of H. pylori eradication in patients with uncomplicated duodenal ulcer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A decision analysis was performed in patients with uncomplicated duodenal ulcer who were H. pylori-positive and had received eradication therapy. A decision tree was devised to compare the costs per patient of two different strategies: (a) systematic performance of post-treatment urea breath test and new treatment if positive; and (b) clinical follow-up, 13C-urea breath test if dyspeptic symptoms recurred and eradication treatment if the test was positive.

RESULTS

Post-eradication 13C-urea breath test was notably more expensive than clinical follow-up, both in a low-cost per care setting (197 vs. 132 Euros) and in a high-cost per care (614 vs. 340 US $) scenario. This conclusion remained stable for a wide range of variations of the variables included in the decision tree (e.g. cure rates of eradication treatment, cost of the urea breath test or sensitivity, and specificity of urea breath test to detect eradication).

CONCLUSION

In patients with uncomplicated duodenal ulcer, evaluation of eradication after H. pylori treatment markedly increases costs with no clear improvement in results and therefore should not be performed routinely.

Consequences of Helicobacter pylori cure in ulcer patients

In the complex pathogenesis of genuine ulcer disease Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is an essential, although not on its own sufficient, causal factor. Eradication of the infection heals the active ulcer and, in the long term, leads to a drastic reduction in ulcer recurrence and attendant complications. Some patients remain symptomatic even without ulcer recurrence, and in these, pre-existing, exacerbated or induced gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is probably of some significance. Possible causes of ulcer relapse are reinfection, the use of ulcerogenic drugs and persistent gastric hypersecretion. In adults, and probably also in children from the age of six years, H. pylori reinfection is rare, provided that a sensitive and specific test for H. pylori is carried out at the earliest 4 weeks after concluding anti-bacterial treatment. The most common cause of the reappearance of H. pylori is recrudescence - true reinfection hardly ever occurs. The healing of H. pylori-associated ulcer disease improves the patient's quality of life and possibly also life expectancy. Computer-aided calculations, together with a randomized controlled study, have shown not only that individual patients benefit, but that also the health system profits financially. The hypothetical negative effects of H. pylori eradication treatment are still being controversially discussed.