The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score and Prognosis in Malignant Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Controlling nutritional status score as a survival prognosticator in patients with head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of the preoperative Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

METHODS

Patients with HNSCC who underwent radical surgery between 2008 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed and randomly divided into training and validation cohorts by 3:1 ratio. The CONUT score, based on serum albumin, total cholesterol, and lymphocyte count measured within 1 week before surgery, was used. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression identified survival-related variables, forming the basis for predictive models developed in the training cohort and validated in the validation cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 636 patients were enrolled in this study, including 477 patients in the training cohort and 159 patients in validation cohort. A CONUT cutoff value of 2 effectively stratified patients into two distinct prognostic groups with significant survival differences in both the training and validation cohorts. In the multivariate Cox model, a high CONUT score emerged as an independent negative prognosticator of overall survival (OS) and cancer specific survival (CSS) in both training and validation cohorts. The CONUT score-based nomograms accurately predicted OS (concordance index: 0.778 in training cohort and 0.709 in validation cohort) and CSS (concordance index: 0.830 in training cohort and 0.778 in validation cohort).

CONCLUSION

The preoperative CONUT score is a useful prognostic marker for surgically treated HNSCC, enhancing nomogram-based risk models to identify high-risk patients and guide treatment decisions effectively.

Albumin-Butyrylcholinesterase as a Novel Prognostic Biomarker for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Post-hepatectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study with the Hiroshima Surgical Study Group of Clinical Oncology

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the association between a new biomarker that incorporates albumin (Alb) and butyrylcholinesterase (BCHE) levels, as well as the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after hepatectomy.

METHODS

The study enrolled 1712 patients who underwent primary hepatectomy for HCC between January 2003 and December 2019 at seven institutions belonging to the Hiroshima Surgical Study Group of Clinical Oncology. The entire dataset was randomly split into discovery and validation cohorts in a 7:3 ratio. The product of the preoperative Alb and BCHE levels was defined as the ABC. In the discovery cohort, the patients in the high-ABC group (≥ 951) were compared with those in the low-ABC group (< 951). These findings then were confirmed in the validation cohort.

RESULTS

In the discovery cohort, a significant difference was observed in the 5-year survival rate between the high- and low-ABC groups (p < 0.001), and ABC was identified as an independent prognostic factor for HCC. Similarly, in the validation cohort, a significant difference was observed in the 5-year survival rate between the high- and low-ABC groups (p < 0.001), and ABC was identified as an independent prognostic factor for HCC. Furthermore, in the discovery and validation cohorts, significant differences in the early recurrence rate between the two groups were observed (p < 0.001 and p = 0.020, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with HCC, ABC is a useful predictive biomarker because it can be calculated in a simple manner and because it provides accurate prognostic information.

Controlling nutritional status score and geriatric nutritional risk index as a predictor of mortality and hospitalization risk in hospitalized older adults

BACKGROUND

The COntrolling NUTritional Status (CONUT) score and the Global Nutrition Risk Index (GNRI) are screening tools for assessing the risk of malnutrition based on widely available biochemical parameters. The primary objective of this study was to investigate the predictive value of CONUT and GNRI score on 36 months mortality and hospitalization risk in hospitalized older patients.

METHODS

Data of 382 patients (196 women, mean age 80.9±6.8 years) were retrieved from the multicenter Italian Study conducted by the Gruppo Lavoro Italiano Sarcopenia-Trattamento e Nutrizione (GLISTEN) in 12 Acute Care Wards. Sarcopenia was defined as presence of low handgrip strength plus low skeletal mass index (EWGSOP2 criteria). CONUT score was calculated based on serum albumin, total cholesterol and total lymphocyte count, whilst the GNRI was calculated using serum albumin and present body weight/ideal body weight ratio.

RESULTS

During the 36-month follow-up, 120 out of 382 participants died (31.4%). From the results of the survival analysis, and after adjustment for potential confounders, participants with CONUT-derived moderate to high risk of malnutrition had shorter survival (HR = 2.67, 95%CI 1.34-5.33 and HR = 3.98, 95% CI: 1.77-8.97, respectively), as well as shorter survival free of urgent hospitalization (HR = 1.91; 95% CI: 1.03-3.55 and HR = 1.98; 95% CI: 1.14-3.42, respectively). Conversely, only GNRI indicative of high risk of malnutrition was an independent predictor of mortality 1.96 (95% CI: 1.06-3.62), but not of hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

The CONUT score seems a valid tool to predict long-term mortality and hospitalization risk. Conversely, the GNRI is associated with long-term mortality, but not with hospital readmissions.

Unlocking the Predictive Power of Nutritional Scores in Septic Patients

Background: Sepsis is a critical condition characterized by severe immune dysregulation, ranking among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in intensive care and internal medicine units. Nutritional status plays a pivotal role in modulating these responses, as when inadequate it can compromise immune defenses, the body's ability to handle stress and inflammation, and the clinical course. Malnutrition is frequently observed in septic patients and is strongly associated with worse clinical outcomes, including increased mortality, prolonged hospital stays, and greater complication rates. In this context, nutritional scoring systems have emerged as valuable tools to evaluate patients' nutritional status and predict clinical trajectories. Objectives: Given the absence of a direct comparison of their performance in an internal medicine setting, this study aimed to assess the effectiveness of various nutritional scores as predictive tools for clinical outcomes in septic patients, emphasizing their application within the field of internal medicine. Methods and Results: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 143 patients diagnosed with sepsis or septic shock who were admitted to an internal medicine unit. Key variables included clinical and laboratory parameters, comorbidities, and nutritional scores at the time of diagnosis. The modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS), the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score, the modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score, and the blood urea nitrogen-to-albumin ratio (BAR) were evaluated in forecasting mortality and clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis. Among them, the mNUTRIC score emerged as the strongest independent predictor of in-hospital mortality, with a good performance and a reasonable threshold for risk stratification. Conclusions: The study highlights the mNUTRIC score's practicality and reliability in assessing nutritional and inflammatory risks in septic patients, particularly in non-ICU settings. These findings suggest its potential utility in guiding nutritional interventions and improving clinical outcomes, emphasizing the importance of integrating nutritional assessment into sepsis management.

Is nutritional status a new indicator to use in clinical practice for colorectal cancer patients?

In this editorial we comment on the interesting article by Liu et al. The topic of discussion is the need for a cost-effective and easy-to-use scoring system for predicting the prognosis of colorectal cancer patients. In this context, nutritional assessment plays a crucial role in the multimodal evaluation of patients. In particular, the controlling nutritional status score was found to be an effective tool in the clinical decision-making process, in order to customize treatment strategies and to improve patient outcomes.

Prognostic Value of the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score in Patients Who Underwent Cytoreductive Surgery Combined with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy

The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is a novel nutritional index that integrates the serum albumin level, peripheral blood lymphocyte count, and total cholesterol level. This retrospective study explores its prognostic significance in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). We included 436 patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC, categorized into low (0-3) and high (4-12) CONUT score groups, and performed logistic regression analysis to predict one-year mortality and postoperative morbidity. Our findings revealed that high CONUT scores correlate with increased one-year mortality (47.1% vs. 20.3%, p < 0.001) and morbidity (39.2% vs. 18.2%, p < 0.001) compared to low CONUT scores. Multivariable regression analysis confirmed high CONUT scores as independent predictors of one-year mortality (odds ratio: 2.253, 95% CI: 1.014-5.005, p = 0.046) and postoperative morbidity (odds ratio: 2.201, 95% CI: 1.066-4.547, p = 0.033). These results underscore the CONUT score's effectiveness as an independent marker for evaluating risks associated with CRS-HIPEC, emphasizing its potential to improve risk stratification.

Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is a novel marker of type 2 diabetes mellitus and diabetic microvascular complications

OBJECTIVES

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and its microvascular complications are characterized by chronic inflammation. The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is a tool used to assess nutritional status and is often associated indirectly with inflammatory processes. We aimed to compare the CONUT scores of T2DM patients with those of healthy volunteers and to compare T2DM patients with and without microvascular complications.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with T2DM and healthy volunteers (as controls) were included in the study. The CONUT score is calculated using the following formula: serum albumin score + total cholesterol score + total lymphocyte count score. CONUT scores of T2DM patients and healthy controls, as well as those of diabetics with and without microvascular complications, were compared.

RESULTS

The CONUT scores of the T2DM and control groups were (1 [0-7]) and (0 [0-2]), respectively (p < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of the CONUT score (<1.5 threshold) in detecting T2DM were 43% and 90%, respectively (AUC: 0.67, p < 0.001, 95% CI: 0.64-0.71). Moreover, the CONUT score was an independent risk factor for T2DM (OR: 0.34, p < 0.001, 95% CI: 0.22-0.52). The CONUT score of T2DM patients with microvascular complications (2 [0-7]) was significantly higher than that of T2DM patients without microvascular complications (0 [0-4]) and control subjects (0 [0-2]) (p < 0.001). A CONUT score higher than 1.5 had 83% sensitivity and 92% specificity in detecting T2DM with microvascular complications (AUC: 0.91, p < 0.001, 95% CI: 0.89-0.93).

CONCLUSION

The CONUT score could be useful in detecting diabetic microvascular complications in clinical practice, as it is an inexpensive and easy-to-assess marker.

Association between the controlling nutritional status score and outcomes in ischemic stroke patients with active cancer

BACKGROUND

The effect of nutritional status on survival in ischemic stroke patients with active cancer remains unclear.

METHODS

This study retrospectively evaluated ischemic stroke patients with active cancer admitted to a university hospital in Japan between 2006 and 2016. Patients were followed for 2 years after stroke. The controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score was used to classify undernutrition degree into 4 groups: normal, light, moderate, and severe. Survival rates were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for mortality were calculated using Cox regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 158 patients (31 % women; median age: 71 years) were analyzed. Of these, 47 % had distant metastasis. The median (interquartile range) National Institute of Health Stroke Scale and CONUT scores were 4 (1-10) and 5 (3-7), respectively. Kaplan-Meier curve indicated that patients with poorer nutritional status had worse outcomes (overall log-rank test, p < 0.001). The univariable Cox regression analysis showed that the HR (95 % CI) for the light, moderate, and severe groups were 1.14 (0.45-2.86), 3.01 (1.27-7.12), and 2.94 (1.10-7.84), respectively. This statistical significance did not persist after adjustment for potential confounders (HR [95 % CI] for the light, moderate, and severe groups were 0.95 [0.36-2.49], 1.56 [0.57-4.28], and 1.34 [0.37-4.92], respectively). Past stroke, distant metastasis, and plasma D-dimer levels on admission were independent predictors of prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

This single-center, retrospective study suggests that nutritional status serves as a prognostic indicator for ischemic stroke patients with active cancer. However, the effect is not statistically independent.

Interpretations of the Role of Plasma Albumin in Prognostic Indices: A Literature Review

This review assesses how publications interpret factors that influence the serum or plasma albumin (PA) level in prognostic indices, focusing on inflammation and nutrition. On PubMed, a search for "albumin AND prognosis" yielded 23,919 results. From these records, prognostic indices were retrieved, and their names were used as search strings on PubMed. Indices found in 10 or more original research articles were included. The same search strings, restricted to "Review" or "Systematic review", retrieved yielded on the indices. The data comprised the 10 latest original research articles and up to 10 of the latest reviews. Thirty indices had 294 original research articles (6 covering two indices) and 131 reviews, most of which were from recent years. A total of 106 articles related the PA level to inflammation, and 136 related the PA level to nutrition. For the reviews, the equivalent numbers were 54 and 65. In conclusion, more publications mention the PA level as a marker of nutrition rather than inflammation. This is in contrast to several general reviews on albumin and nutritional guidelines, which state that the PA level is a marker of inflammation but not nutrition. Hypoalbuminemia should prompt clinicians to focus on the inflammatory aspects in their patients.

Association of preoperative nutritional status evaluated by the controlling nutritional status score with walking independence at 180 days postoperatively: a prospective cohort study in Chinese older patients with hip fracture

BACKGROUND

Malnutrition is significantly associated with unfavorable outcomes, but there is little high-level evidence to elucidate the association of malnutrition with losing walking independence (LWI) after hip fracture surgery. This study aimed to assess the association between preoperative nutritional status evaluated by the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score and walking independence at 180 days postoperatively in Chinese older hip fracture patients.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study included 1958 eligible cases from the SSIOS database. The restricted cubic spline was used to assess the dose-effect relationship between the CONUT score and the recovery of walking independence. Propensity score matching was performed to balance potential preoperative confounders, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was applied to assess the association between malnutrition and LWI with perioperative factors for further adjustment. Furthermore, inverse probability treatment weighting and sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the results and the Fine and Gray hazard model was applied to adjust the competing risk of death. Subgroup analyses were used to determine potential population heterogeneity.

RESULTS

The authors found a negative relationship between the preoperative CONUT score and recovery of walking independence at 180 days postoperatively, and that moderate-to-severe malnutrition evaluated by the CONUT score was independently associated with a 1.42-fold (95% CI, 1.12-1.80; P =0.004) increased risk of LWI. The results were overall robust. And in the Fine and Gray hazard model, the result was still statistically significant despite the apparent decrease in the risk estimate from 1.42 to 1.21. Furthermore, significant heterogeneities were observed in the subgroups of age, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, Charlson's comorbidity index, and surgical delay ( P for interaction < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative malnutrition is a significant risk factor for LWI after hip fracture surgery, and nutrition screening on admission would generate potential health benefits.

Real-world practice-based prognostic model for higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes treated with azacitidine monotherapy: The Kyoto prognostic scoring system

The prognostic impact of patient-related factors, including age, nutritional parameters, and inflammation status, in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS) has been largely unexplored. This multicenter retrospective study aimed to establish a real-world practice-based prognostic model for HR-MDS by considering both disease- and patient-related parameters in 233 patients treated with AZA monotherapy at seven institutions. We found that anemia, presence of circulating blasts in peripheral blood, low absolute lymphocyte count, low total cholesterol (T-cho) and albumin serum levels, complex karyotype, and del(7q) or  - 7 were poor prognostic factors. Therefore, we developed a new prognostic model called the Kyoto Prognostic Scoring System (KPSS) by incorporating the two variables with the highest C-indexes (complex karyotype and serum T-cho level). The KPSS classified patients into the following three groups: good (0 risk factors), intermediate (1), and poor (2). Median overall survival for these groups was 24.4, 11.3, and 6.9, respectively (p < 0.001). The discriminatory power of the KPSS was higher than that of the traditional International Prognostic Scoring System. In conclusion, we identified several nutritional parameters with prognostic relevance in patients with HR-MDS and generated a prognostic model consisting of complex karyotype and serum T-cho level that enabled excellent risk stratification.

Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score and the risk of mortality or impaired physical function in stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is a tool for assessing the risk of malnutrition (undernutrition) that can be calculated from albumin concentration, total peripheral lymphocyte count, and total cholesterol concentration. CONUT score has been proposed as a promising prognostic marker in several clinical settings; however, a consensus on its prognostic value in patients with stroke is lacking. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the relationship between CONUT score and clinical outcomes in patients with stroke based on all current available studies.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Systematic research on PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science from inception to February 2023 was performed on the association between CONUT score and clinical outcomes in patients with stroke. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses were followed. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale quality assessment tool. Pooled effect estimation was calculated by a random-effect model. Through the initial literature search, 15 studies (all high-quality) including 16 929 patients were found to be eligible and analysed in the meta-analysis. A significant risk of malnutrition (in most studies defined by a CONUT score ≥5) was directly associated with mortality, higher risk of poor functional outcome according to the modified Rankin Scale and total infection development. Evidence was consistent for acute ischaemic stroke and preliminary for acute haemorrhagic stroke.

CONCLUSION

CONUT score is an independent prognostic indicator, and it is associated with major disability and infection development during hospitalisation.

PROSPERO ID

CRD42022306560.

Prognostic and clinicopathological impacts of Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score on patients with gynecological cancer: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score has proven to be a potential biomarker for determining the prognosis of patients with various types of cancer. Its value in determining the prognosis of patients with gynecological cancer, however, remains unknown. The present study was a meta-analysis that aimed to evaluate the prognostic and clinicopathological significance of the CONUT score in gynecological cancer.

METHODS

The Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were comprehensively searched through November 22, 2022. A pooled hazard ratio (HR), together with a 95% confidence interval (CI), was used to determine whether the CONUT score had prognostic value in terms of survival outcomes. Using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs, we estimated the relationship between the CONUT score and clinicopathological characteristics of gynecological cancer.

RESULTS

We evaluated 6 articles, involving a total of 2,569 cases, in the present study. According to the results of our analyses, higher CONUT scores were significantly correlated with decreased overall survival (OS) (n = 6; HR = 1.52; 95% CI = 1.13-2.04; P = 0.006; I2 = 57.4%; Ph = 0.038) and progression-free survival (PFS) (n = 4; HR = 1.51; 95% CI = 1.25-1.84; P < 0.001; I2 = 0; Ph = 0.682) in gynecological cancer. Moreover, higher CONUT scores were significantly correlated with a histological grade of G3 (n = 3; OR = 1.76; 95% CI = 1.18-2.62; P = 0.006; I2 = 0; Ph = 0.980), a tumor size ≥ 4 cm (n = 2; OR = 1.50; 95% CI = 1.12-2.01; P = 0.007; I2 = 0; Ph = 0.721), and an advanced International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage (n = 2; OR = 2.52; 95% CI = 1.54-4.11; P < 0.001; I2 = 45.5%; Ph = 0.175). The correlation between the CONUT score and lymph node metastasis, however, was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher CONUT scores were significantly correlated with decreased OS and PFS in gynecological cancer. The CONUT score, therefore, is a promising and cost-effective biomarker for predicting survival outcomes in gynecological cancer.

Retrospective study of the combination of TP and PF regimens with or without immune checkpoint inhibitors for the first-line treatment of locally advanced or advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Objective

To investigate the efficacy and safety differences between the cisplatin + paclitaxel (TP) and cisplatin + fluorouracil (PF) regimens in combination with or without immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) first-line treatment and prognostic factors.

Methods

We selected the medical records of patients with late stage ESCC admitted to the hospital between 2019 and 2021. Based on the first-line treatment regimen, control groups were divided into chemotherapy plus ICIs (n = 243) and non-ICIs (n = 171), 119 (49%) in the TP + ICIs group, 124 (51%) in the PF + ICIs group, 83 (48.5%) in the TP group, and 88 (51.5%) in the PF group in the control group. We analyzed and compared factors related to efficacy, safety, or response to toxicity and prognosis across four subgroups.

Results

The overall objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) of the TP plus ICIs group were 42.1% (50/119) and 97.5% (116/119), respectively, which were 6.6% and 7.2% higher than those of the PF plus ICIs group. Patients in the TP combined with ICIs group had higher overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) than those in the PF combined with ICIs group [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.702, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.767-1.499, p = 0.0167 and HR = 1.158, 95% CI: 0.828-1.619, p = 0.0055] ORR and DCR were 15.7% (13/83) and 85.5% (71/83) in the TP chemotherapy alone group, significantly higher than the PF group [13.6% (12/88) and 72.2% (64/88)] (p < 0.05), OS and PFS were also better in patients treated with TP regimen chemotherapy than PF (HR = 1.173, 95% CI: 0.748-1.839, p = 0.0014 and HR = 0.1.245, 95% CI: 0.711-2.183, p = 0.0061). Furthermore, following the combination of TP and PF diets with ICIs, the OS of the patients was higher than that of the group treated with chemotherapy alone (HR = 0.526, 95% CI: 0.348-0.796, p = 0.0023 and HR = 0.781, 95% CI: 0.0.491-1.244, p < 0.001). Regression analysis showed that the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), the control nuclear status score (CONUT), and the systematic immune inflammation index (SII) were independent prognostic factors for the efficacy of immunotherapy (p < 0.05). The overall incidence of treatment-associated adverse events (TRAEs) was 79.4% (193/243) and 60.8% (104/171) in the experimental and control groups, respectively, and there was no statistically significant difference in TRAEs between TP + ICIs (80.6%) and PF + ICIs (78.2%) (61.4%) and PF groups (60.2%) (p > 0.05). Overall, 21.0% (51/243) of patients in the experimental group experienced immune-related adverse events (irAEs), and all of these adverse effects were tolerated or remitted following drug treatment without affecting follow-up.

Conclusion

The TP regimen was associated with better PFS and OS with or without ICIs. Furthermore, high CONUT scores, high NLR ratios, and high SII were found to be associated with poor prognosis in combination immunotherapy.

COntrolling NUTritional Status (CONUT) as Predictive Score of Hospital Length of Stay (LOS) and Mortality: A Prospective Cohort Study in an Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology Unit in Italy

BACKGROUND

Hospital malnutrition affects nearly 30% of patients in medical wards and correlates with worse outcomes. An early assessment is necessary to stratify the risk of short-term outcomes and mortality. The predictive role of COntrolling NUTritional status (CONUT) score in this context has not yet been elucidated in Western countries. We aimed to test CONUT at admission as a predictive score of hospital outcomes, in an Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology Department of an Italian Tertiary Care University hospital.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled patients admitted to our center, stratifying them into the four CONUT classes (normal = 0-1; mild = 2-4; moderate = 5-8; severe = 9-12 points) according to serum albumin (g/dL), total lymphocyte count (/mm³), and total cholesterol (mg/dL); the primary outcome measure was length of stay (LOS) and the secondary one was in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Out of a total of 203 patients enrolled, 44 (21.7%) patients had a normal status (0-1), 66 (32.5%) had a mild impairment (2-4), 68 (33.5%) had a moderate impairment (5-8), and 25 (12.3%) a severe impairment (9-12). The mean LOS was 8.24 ± 5.75 days; nine patients died. A moderate-severe CONUT correlated with a higher LOS at the univariate [HR 1.86 (95% CI 13.9-3.47); p < 0.0001] and multivariate analysis [HR 1.52 (95% CI 1.10-2.09); p = 0.01]. The CONUT score was also a predictor of mortality, with an AUC of 0.831 (95% CI 0.680-0.982) and with an optimal cut-off at 8.5 points. Nutritional supplementation within 48 h from admission correlated with lower mortality [OR 0.12 (95% CI 0.02-0.56) p = 0.006].

CONCLUSIONS

CONUT is a reliable and simple predictor of LOS and in-hospital mortality in medical wards.