Sequencing of the second exon of the MHC class II DQ6 alleles in patients with type 1 diabetes

DQA1*0102 DQB1*0602 haplotype distinguishes coeliac disease and its complications from gluten unrelated enteropathies

BACKGROUND

Duodenal villous atrophy is due not only to coeliac disease and its complications but also to other rare enteropathies unrelated to gluten consumption, defined as noncoeliac enteropathies. The diagnosis of noncoeliac enteropathies remains challenging, and HLA typing has been widely used to exclude coeliac disease if DQ2 and DQ8 alleles are absent. However, the frequency of the various HLA alleles in noncoeliac enteropathies is still unknown.

AIMS

To describe the HLA genetic profile of patients affected by noncoeliac enteropathies who have been evaluated at our centres between 2000 and 2021, and to investigate the diagnostic role of HLA typing.

METHODS

Genomic DNA was collected from 44 Italian and 19 British adult patients with noncoeliac enteropathies. Patient genotypes were compared with those of healthy Italian and British populations obtained from HLA bone marrow donors' banks. In addition, genotypes were also compared with those of patients with coeliac disease and complicated coeliac disease.

RESULTS

Both in the Italian and in the British group, the DQA1*0102 DQB1*0602 haplotype and related alleles occurred significantly more frequently in patients with noncoeliac enteropathies compared to coeliac disease and complicated coeliac disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Together with negative HLA-DQ2 and DQ8 haplotypes, the DQA1*0102 DQB1*0602 haplotype can be used to guide the differential diagnosis between coeliac disease and noncoeliac enteropathies.

Diabetes-science, serendipity and common sense

This paper is dedicated to young researchers in diabetes. One such person was Frederick Banting who, with his colleagues, isolated insulin in 1921, saving the lives of literally millions of people. What factors allowed Banting and other scientists to produce work that has immensely benefited the human race? I propose that it is the combination of good scientific background (the 'prepared mind'), commonly some serendipity taken with a good dose of common sense and supplemented by enthusiasm, tenacity and good mentoring, which drives the 'power of observation' and the ability to take forward the good idea. I give examples from history to support this and then discuss some of the 'truths, perspectives and controversies' within the diabetes arena when I first started in diabetes research in the late 1970s. I describe how my appetite was initially 'whetted' for research by moving to an excellent clinical research environment with encouragement to test ideas and controversies initially in a clinical research programme, followed by more scientific/basic research. The work that I performed as a young doctor and research fellow led to a lifelong professional interest in three major areas-causes and interventions for diabetes vascular disease, studies of the molecular genetics of Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes and work on diabetes in different ethnic groups. I provide a summation of my own and other people's work to demonstrate how research can be progressed and lead to patient benefit as well as providing an incredibly rewarding career. I believe that we need to encourage and put more resources into development of young doctors and scientists wishing to undertake research in our discipline. Areas ripe for much-needed clinical research programmes, for example, include work on best practice/provision of health care, application of the evidence base from clinical trials to achieve public health gains, attention to adherence issues and better-tolerated therapies. Most importantly, a greater emphasis on prevention through public health measures and 'buy in' from the whole population is urgently required.

Analysis of pathogenesis of juvenile new-onset diabetes

BACKGROUND

Measurement of anti-islet autoantibodies at the time of disease onset contributes greatly to the differentiation of Type 1A diabetes with HLA Class II subtyping also contributing.

METHODS

Blood samples were obtained from 900 patients with age from 1 month to 25 years (median age 11.1 years) within 2 weeks of diabetes onset to test anti-islet autoantibodies to insulin (IAA), glutamic acid decarboxylase (GADA), insulinoma antigen (IA-2AA), the zinc transporter-8 (ZnT8AA), and islet-cell antibodies (ICA). Polymorphisms of the HLA Class II gene were typed in 547 randomly selected patients.

RESULTS

Of the 900 subjects analyzed, 145 (16.1%) were negative for all five anti-islet autoantibodies, and autoantibody negativity significantly increased with age: 10.2% (38/372) among children <10 years of age, 14.2% (46/325) in those 10-14 years of age, and 30.1% (61/203) in those >14 years of age (P < 0.001). The prevalence of IA-2AA was the highest among young children. The prevalence of GADA increased with age while the prevalence of IAA was inversely correlated with age. At diagnosis, the subjects with negative antibodies had a higher body mass index (P < 0.001) and less high risk HLA genotype DR3-DQ2/DR4-DQ8 (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

A large percentage of children and youths negative for all anti-islet autoantibodies at the onset of diabetes are likely to have the non-immune form, especially those without DR3/DR4 and obese patients. Among autoantibody-positive Type 1A patients, IAA and GADA showed a reciprocal prevalence, suggesting differential disease pathogenesis.

The MHC type 1 diabetes susceptibility gene is centromeric to HLA-DQB1

HLA-DQB1 is widely considered to be the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) susceptibility gene for type 1 diabetes (T1D). However, since inheritance of the gene in T1D is recessive, the presence of the protective HLA-DQB1 0602 allele with normal nucleotide sequence in some patients raises the question of whether HLA-DQB1 is not the susceptibility locus itself but merely a good marker. HLA-DQB1 0602 is part of a conserved extended haplotype (CEH) [HLA-B7, SC31, DR2] (B7, DR2) with fixed DNA over more than 1Mb of genomic DNA that normally carries a protective allele at the true susceptibility locus. We postulated that, in patients with HLA-DQB1 0602, the protective allele at the susceptibility locus has been replaced by a susceptibility allele through an ancient crossover at meiosis centromeric to HLA-DQB1. We analyzed single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) distinguishing the HLA-DQA2 (the first expressed gene centromeric to HLA-DQB1) allele on the normal HLA-B7, DR2 CEH from those on susceptibility CEHs in T1D patients and controls with HLA-DQB1 0602. All but 1 of 20 healthy control HLA-DQB1 0602 haplotypes had identical (consensus) first intron HLA-DQA2 5-SNP haplotypes. Fifteen of 19 patients with HLA-DQB1 0602 were homozygous for 1 or more HLA-DQA2 SNPs differing from consensus HLA-DQA2 SNPs, providing evidence of crossover involving the HLA-DQA2 locus. The remaining 4 patients were heterozygous at all positions and therefore uninformative. The loss of dominant protection usually associated with HLA-DQB1 0602 haplotypes is consistent with a locus centromeric to HLA-DQB1 being a major determinant of MHC-associated susceptibility, and perhaps the true T1D susceptibility locus.

Molecular aspects of type 1 diabetes

Type 1 diabetes is a T cell mediated autoimmune disease, characterised by the selective destruction of pancreatic beta cells, and susceptibility is determined by a combination of genetic and environmental factors. The environmental agents implicated include viruses and dietary factors, although none has yet been shown to be directly responsible for triggering beta cell autoimmunity. The genetic factors that influence disease risk have been subjected to more intensive study and two gene regions of major importance have been identified: the human leucocyte antigen locus and the insulin gene. This review will focus on the mechanisms by which these genes might influence the risk of developing type 1 diabetes.