The efficacy of pain neuroscience education on musculoskeletal pain: A systematic review of the literature

Educating women to prevent and treat low back and pelvic girdle pain during and after pregnancy: a systematized narrative review

PURPOSE

This review evaluated the effectiveness of patient education and information on low back pain (LBP) and pelvic girdle pain (PGP) in pregnant and postpartum women and evaluated their alignment with modern pain education principles rooted in the biopsychosocial model.

METHOD

A systematized narrative review was performed, including a systematic search of three databases and reference screening from relevant systematic reviews. The methodological quality of the included randomized controlled trials (RCT) was evaluated using the PEDro scale.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies, including nine RCTs with PEDro scores ranging from to 2-8, indicated that patient education during pregnancy can help reduce pain and related disability. Most studies did not differentiate between LBP and PGP, which limits the specificity and targeted approach of educational interventions. Education alone is less effective without accompanying active treatment. Current programs primarily emphasize biomechanics, covering anatomy and physical changes, but often neglect lifestyle factors, such as stress and sleep.

CONCLUSION

Although patient education is important for managing pregnancy-related LBP and PGP, its effectiveness may be improved by tailoring programs to specific pain conditions and integrating a biopsychosocial perspective on pain.

Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Spanish version of the Knowledge and Attitudes of Pain questionnaire (KNAP) in physiotherapists

BACKGROUND

Healthcare providers' attitudes and beliefs can influence how patients with persistent musculoskeletal pain are treated. A biopsychosocial approach is more effective than a purely biomedical approach. Ensuring healthcare professionals have appropriate pain science education (PSE) is essential for successful treatment outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To validate the Spanish version of the Knowledge and Attitudes of Pain (KNAP-SP) questionnaire among Spanish physiotherapists and students and analyze its psychometric properties.

METHODS

From May to October 2022, two independent teams adapted the KNAP questionnaire from English to both European and Hispanic-Spanish. A cross-sectional validation study was conducted with 517 physiotherapists examining internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), structural validity (exploratory factor analysis), and construct validity (hypothesis testing). Longitudinal analyses assessed test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC2,1; n = 63]) and responsiveness following a PSE intervention using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and hypothesis testing (n = 70).

RESULTS

The KNAP-SP showed strong internal consistency [overall α coefficient = 0.86; domain 1 (α = 0.82); domain 2 (α = 0.70)], explaining 32.3% of the variance. Construct validity was supported by 75% of the hypotheses. Test-retest reliability was high (ICC2,1 = 0.84). KNAP-SP's responsiveness was confirmed by ROC analysis (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.87 [95% CI: 0.79-0.96, p-value <.01]) and accepting 75% of prior hypotheses. The minimal clinically important change was 6.96 points. No floor or ceiling effects were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

The KNAP-SP, with robust psychometric properties and successful adaptation and validation, is a valuable tool for assessing pain knowledge and attitudes among Spanish-speaking physiotherapists.

Acceptability of multimodal and multidisciplinary group-based program for chronic low back pain: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

The Programa d'Atenció Integral pels Pacients amb Dolor Crònic (PAINDOC) is a multimodal and multidisciplinary group-based program that integrates pain neuroscience education, mindfulness meditation, pain psychotherapy, Empowered Relief, and therapeutic exercise. It serves as a therapeutic option for individuals with chronic low back pain, providing them with comprehensive adaptive strategies for pain management.

OBJECTIVE

This qualitative study explores participants' retrospective acceptability of the PAINDOC Program.

METHODS

To ensure demographic variability and information power, a purposive sampling approach was applied. Twelve participants were interviewed through three focus groups, supplemented with four individual semi-structured interviews. Data was analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis and evaluated based on the Therapeutic Framework of Acceptability.

RESULTS

Participants provide positive feedback regarding active pain coping strategies and improved self-management. While certain aspects of the Program were more emphasized, participants integrated tools from all components. Strategies included pain reconceptualization, positive self-talk, or problem-solving. The Program's ethicality was closely linked to individual values and may also be influenced by time constraints of certain program elements, the immediate effects of specific approaches, participant perceptions, and individual preferences.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings provide valuable insights into the acceptability of the PAINDOC Program, guiding future improvements and the development of similar interventions.

Occupational Therapy as Integral Partner in Lower Limb Amputation Rehabilitation: A Clinical Commentary

The population of individuals with lower limb amputations which impact daily functioning and participation is growing. These patients have complex rehabilitation needs necessitating interdisciplinary care, however, clinical practice guidelines for occupational therapy are lacking. Occupational therapy offers a unique skill set to support ongoing rehabilitation needs and participation, through a focus on cognition and mental health, activity, accessibility and safety, and pain treatment. This paper introduces a clinical commentary to guide lower limb amputation care and future research to more clearly define best practices related to the role of the occupational therapy in the care of this population.

Experiences and perceptions of employees and healthcare professionals on a multidisciplinary program for the secondary prevention of low back pain

Low back pain (LBP) can lead to disability and sick leave, impacting work participation and overall health. Given the complex and multifactorial nature of LBP, Belgium's Federal Agency for Occupational Risks (FEDRIS) promotes a secondary prevention strategy for LBP among workers engaged in ergonomically demanding tasks. This strategy includes multidisciplinary-based rehabilitation (MBR) and an optional workplace intervention. This paper explored the experiences and perceptions of employees and healthcare professionals (HCPs) regarding the secondary prevention program with a focus on the MBR component, aiming to identify its strengths, challenges, and potential solutions. A multicenter qualitative design involving six semistructured focus groups was employed. The participants included 15 employees who attended the program because of LBP and 24 HCPs involved in its delivery. The data were analyzed via thematic analysis. Three major themes were identified: functional and work-related outcomes, content-related factors, and duration and continuation. Positive outcomes included improvements in pain, function, and return to work (RTW), with workplace adaptations and ergonomic guidance playing key roles. Success factors such as education, exercise therapy, motivation, and social interaction were highlighted. However, challenges were identified, including limited communication between centers and employers, insufficient psychological support, and a lack of follow-up to sustain the program's effects. This qualitative evaluation highlights that person-centered, biopsychosocial approaches-encompassing individualized education, ergonomic adaptations, and psychological support-are crucial for optimizing the FEDRIS MBR program's long-term impact on LBP and RTW outcomes. Consistency in staffing, structured follow-up, and systematic prescreening are key areas for improvement. Although limited by a small sample size and retrospective design, these findings pinpoint actionable refinements that future longitudinal studies can explore to ensure sustained, cost-effective rehabilitation benefits.

Does Integrating Pain Neuroscience Education With Physiotherapy Enhance Outcomes in Chronic Plantar Fasciitis Patients?-Study Protocol for Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Chronic Plantar Fasciitis (CPF) is commonly associated with elevated levels of anxiety and pain catastrophizing. Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) has shown promise in addressing these psychological components, but high-quality evidence assessing its combined impact with physiotherapy for CPF is limited.

PURPOSE

This study evaluates the potential benefits of incorporating Pain Neuroscience Education alongside Physiotherapy for managing Chronic Plantar Fasciitis.

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial will recruit 160 participants between the ages of 18 and 44, all diagnosed with Chronic Plantar Fasciitis (CPF). Participants will be randomly and equally divided into two groups: a conventional physiotherapy group undergoing 45-min sessions of standard physiotherapy, and an experimental group receiving the same physiotherapy regimen supplemented with a weekly 15-min Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) session. The outcome measures will include the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for assessing morning first-step pain, the Foot Function Index (FFI) for evaluating foot and ankle function, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) for measuring catastrophic thinking, the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) for fear of movement, and the Y-Balance Test for dynamic balance assessment. Data will be collected at baseline, after 3 weeks, and at 6 weeks.

RESULTS

Data normality will be checked using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Depending on the data distribution, between-group differences will be analyzed using either the independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U test, and within-group changes will be assessed using the paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

DISCUSSION

The findings of this trial are expected to shed light on the additional benefits of integrating Pain Neuroscience Education with conventional physiotherapy in the management of Chronic Plantar Fasciitis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered with the CTRI registry. The trial number is CTRI/2024/03/064616.

Actively Waiting: Feasibility and Acceptability of a Virtual Self-Management Program Designed to Empower People With Chronic Pain Waiting for Interprofessional Care

Chronic pain affects 1.9 billion people worldwide and wait times for interprofessional pain management programs can be extensive. The existing wait times provide an opportunity to introduce internet-based interventions that enhance self-management ability.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility, acceptability, engagement, and meaningfulness of an online program designed to enhance the readiness for change and self-management.

DESIGN

Participants (N = 61) waiting for interprofessional chronic pain care at two centers were assigned to engage in either a series of eight self-directed web-based modules or engage in the modules with the addition of four one-on-one sessions delivered by coaches trained in motivational interviewing techniques.

METHODS

We collected participant demographics, feasibility and engagement metrics, and pre and post intervention questionnaires. A subset of participants from each group participated in an interview (n = 22).

RESULTS

The use of online modules was found to be feasible and acceptable for participants and engagement varied depending on individual preference and between modules. Participants noted that the content and approach were relevant and meaningful, influencing changes in thinking and behaviour around pain self-management. Exploratory analyses were performed and supported improvement in self-efficacy and chronic pain acceptance outcomes in both groups. Coaching did not augment improvements in any of our outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The use of a self-directed web-based chronic pain and motivational empowerment program appears to be a promising option to support people waiting for specialist care and may influence readiness for interprofessional care.

Unraveling the role of fear and avoidance behavior in chronic musculoskeletal pain: from theory to physical therapy clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Protective behaviors in the context of pain fostered by fear are helpful in acute traumatic pain to enable a person to protect their body from further injury and promote healing in the short term. However, protective behavior that is ongoing in the absence of tissue damage may contribute to the persistence of disability in people with musculoskeletal pain. Current evidence highlights the importance of addressing pain-related fear, fear of movement-related pain, and avoidance behavior in the management of people with chronic musculoskeletal pain. But, physical therapists find it challenging to make sense of and implement the evidence in their clinical practice. This issue partly stems from the pervasiveness of the biomedical model, which fails to address important psychological factors such as fear of movement-related pain and avoidance behavior and their role in chronic musculoskeletal pain. Despite a wider acceptance of the biopsychosocial model of care, physical therapists lack confidence and guidance on how to implement this model into practice.

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this masterclass are twofold: (1) to describe how the concepts/theory of fear learning can be applied in physical therapy practice for people with chronic musculoskeletal pain, (2) to illustrate the implementation of these concepts in clinical practice using an example of the management of a person with a chronic musculoskeletal pain condition.

DISCUSSION

We discuss how clinicians may identify and target fear of movement-related pain and avoidance behavior in clinical practice, with examples of how to understand and manage individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain using an associative learning and behavioral framework.

Pain Intensity and Pain Catastrophizing Among Patients with Chronic Pain: The Mediating Effect of Self-Efficacy

Aim

This study aimed to explore the mediating role of sense of self-efficacy in the relationship between pain intensity and pain catastrophizing among chronic pain patients.

Methods

A questionnaire survey was administered to patients with chronic pain at the pain intervention departments of three tertiary hospitals in Shaanxi Province between July 2023 and July 2024. The visual analogue scale, chronic pain self-efficacy scale, and pain catastrophizing scale were used to assess the patients' pain intensity, self-efficacy, and pain catastrophizing degree, respectively. SPSS 27.0 and Mplus 8.3 software were used for statistical analysis.

Results

This study included a total of 430 patients with chronic pain. The average score for catastrophizing pain among participants was 22.76 (score range 0-52), which is considered moderate. Pain intensity and pain catastrophizing were significantly and positively correlated, and the findings found that chronic pain self-efficacy mediated the correlation between pain intensity and pain catastrophizing after controlling for sociodemographic and disease-related variables. In addition, chronic pain self-efficacy was found to be an important mediator, accounting for 32.5% of the total effect.

Conclusion

Among patients with chronic pain, chronic pain self-efficacy explains the relationship of pain intensity and pain catastrophizing. These findings imply that interventions that decrease pain intensity and increase patients' sense of self-efficacy are beneficial for improving pain catastrophizing in this population.

Is there a correlation between length of employment and receiving a post-professional certification or residency in physical therapy? A pilot study

BackgroundVarious factors in recent years have been shown to negatively impact the physical therapy (PT) workforce in the United States, including decreased reimbursement, burnout, student debt, work-life balance, and more.ObjectiveTo determine if there is a correlation between length of employment and receiving a post-professional certification or residency training in PTMethodsA convenience sample of 121 PTs completing a post-professional certification or residency program, or none, was obtained from a large multi-clinic PT group with an accompanying educational department. Data for each of the employed PTs in the cohort was obtained regarding the hire date, duration of employment before certification/residency, since certification/residency, and overall.ResultsOnly one certification, the pain certification, was correlated to longer employment versus no formal post-professional certification/residency training (p = 0.02). Results show that the mean duration of employment before the start of a pain certification (3.67 years) was significantly longer than sports physical therapy residency (0.52 years; p = 0.001), orthopedic physical therapy residency (1.13 years; p = 0.006)) and manual therapy certification (0.81 years; (p = 0.001). Following training, employment duration produced a less pronounced difference.ConclusionEnrollment in a post-professional pain certification occurs later in the employment tenure compared to other certifications and residencies. Additional research is needed to explore the correlation between post-professional education and longevity of employment and other confounding variables.

Comparing the impact of interactive versus traditional e-learning on physiotherapists' knowledge, attitudes, and clinical decision-making in low back pain management: a randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Despite the recommendations to use a bio-psycho-social framework, many physiotherapists still manage their patients mainly from a biomedical point of view. The purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of two different e-learning interventions on knowledge, attitudes, and clinical decision-making of physiotherapists managing low back pain (LBP) to increase guideline-consistent care.

METHODS

Physiotherapists were allocated (1/1) either to an experimental or a traditional e-learning intervention. Baseline and post-intervention assessment included the Health Care Providers' Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale (HC-PAIRS), Back Pain Attitudes Questionnaire (Back-PAQ), Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire (NPQ), and a clinical vignette. Participants had 2 weeks to complete the post-intervention assessment. Statistics were processed using ANCOVA and Fisher's t-tests.

RESULTS

Four hundred nineteen physiotherapists were included in the analysis. Mean scores of HC-PAIRS, Back-PAQ, and NPQ significantly improved post-intervention in both groups. There was a significant effect of the intervention type (experimental versus traditional) on the scores of HC-PAIRS (p < .001; η2p = .243) and Back-PAQ (p < .001; η2p = .135) but not on NPQ scores. Return to work, recommendations assessed with the clinical vignette were significantly more guideline-consistent in the experimental group (p < .001) post-intervention.

CONCLUSION

An interactive e-learning intervention which includes concrete clinical examples and focused on patient's reassurance, self-management, and importance of screening psycho-social factors had more impact than a traditional e-learning intervention to enhance physiotherapists' knowledge, attitudes, and clinical decision-making regarding LBP.

Effect of pain neuroscience education+ (PNE+) in people with different mechanisms of chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic pain poses a multifaceted and prevalent challenge that significantly affects an individual's quality of life. Sensory mechanisms, behavioural components (kinesiophobia and catastrophising), and social factors can influence pain perception in both younger and older populations. Moreover, the mechanisms underlying these altered pain phenotypes require further investigation in order to plan appropriate treatment. While Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) has proven effective in managing chronic pain and previous research has been conducted on PNE physiotherapeutic techniques, there remains insufficient evidence on the efficacy of these adjunctive treatments.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the evidence for the efficacy of PNE + PT (PNE+) on pain as a primary outcome and 12 other psychosocial variables as secondary outcomes in patients with different pain mechanisms, and whether PNE+ could be applied to painful diabetic neuropathy.

METHODS

A thorough literature search was conducted in the database Scopus, MEDLINE/PubMed, ScienceDirect, CINAHL, and Web of Science, using keywords like "Pain Neuroscience Education", and "Chronic Pain" from 2010 to 2024 based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Twenty of the 2558 studies that underwent screening qualified for a meta-analysis and 24 of them for a systematic review. Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 was used to assess the quality of the studies. Forest plots were generated using the Revman 5.3 software.

RESULTS

Studies that predominantly addressed central sensitization and neuropathic pain demonstrated moderate-to good-quality evidence. The review findings indicate that PNE+ is effective in reducing experienced pain intensity and experienced pain interference on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS: SMD -0.70, 95% CI -1.26 to -0.14), Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS SMD -1.71, 95% CI -2.34 to -1.08), reduced kinesiophobia (Tampa scale of Kinesiophobia: SMD -5.29, 95% CI -7.33 to -3.25), and catastrophizing (pain catastrophizing scale: -3.82, 95% CI -6.44 to -1.21).

CONCLUSION

PNE + has been found to be an effective intervention for reducing perceived pain experience, pain interference and other psychosocial variables in the management of chronic pain with different pain mechanisms. Most studies have focused on central sensitization, urging future research to explore PNE+ efficacy in neuropathic pain, such as painful diabetic neuropathy.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023451101.

Meaningful contributions of rehabilitation for people with persistent pain; a reflexive thematic analysis

PURPOSE

This study aims to explore the meaningful contributions of rehabilitation for participants living with persistent pain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A phenomenological methodology was used. Thirteen purposefully selected participants, who self-identified as substantially improved from persistent pain due to rehabilitation, were interviewed in-depth. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analyses.

RESULTS

Participants included three men and ten women, age ranging from 22-69 years, pain duration was 2-30 years. Seven interconnected themes were developed: 1) indication of negative pain and health care experiences, 2) supporting working alliance with healthcare professionals, 3) Pain Dialogue, 4) improved self-awareness and self-regulation, 5) different view on pain, 6) autonomy and personal growth and 7) hope and new perspective. Integration of these themes provided a framework for understanding meaningful contributions of rehabilitation from the participants' perspective.

CONCLUSIONS

The study identified seven interconnected themes enhancing meaningful contributions of rehabilitation for participants who have substantially improved from persistent pain. These findings provide a novel conceptual understanding of how rehabilitation can foster recovery. The themes strongly support person-centred care, an understanding of Pain Dialogue and personal growth through the lens of the lived experience. The quality of the therapeutic relationship is considered a central vehicle for improved health outcomes.

Outpatient interdisciplinary multimodal pain treatment programme for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: a longitudinal cohort study

PURPOSE

To describe the outcomes of an interdisciplinary multimodal pain treatment (IMPT) for chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) patients up until 12 months post-treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were gathered during routine clinical practice during a 3-year period (2019-2021) at six Dutch rehabilitation centres. Assessments included patient-reported outcome measures for multiple domains including disability, pain and fatigue. Longitudinal data were analysed using repeated-measures models and by quantifying responder rates.

RESULTS

Included were 2309 patients with a mean age of 43.7 (SD 12.9) years, of which 73% female. All outcomes showed significant improvements at each timepoint. At discharge, large effect sizes were found for disability, average and worst pain, fatigue and health-related quality of life. Improvements were largely sustained at 12-months. Relatively large proportions of patients had clinically relevant improvements after treatment (pain-related disability: 60%; average pain: 52%; worst pain: 37.4%; work capacity: 50%; concentration: 50%; fatigue: 46%). Patients who received a treatment extension showed further improvements for all outcome measures, except average pain.

CONCLUSIONS

At group level, all outcomes significantly improved with mainly large effect sizes. The results were mostly sustained. The proportion of patients showing clinically relevant improvements tends to be larger than previously reported for mixed CMP patients.

Neuropathic Symptoms and Frequency of Chronic Pain in an International Online Sample of Individuals with Sub-Acute and Chronic Stroke

Background/Objectives: Chronic pain is common following a stroke and is associated with increased disability. Yet, little is known about the chronic pain experience in the stroke population. This study aimed to identify and explore the features and neuropathic symptoms of chronic pain in individuals with longstanding stroke. Methods: This observational study utilized an online survey that was developed for individuals who have had a stroke (>3 months). Data sought included participant demographics, medical history, and details of the stroke(s). Participants who reported experiencing chronic pain completed the Numerical Rating Scale for Pain, the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory, and body maps to indicate region(s) of pain. Results: A total of 533 individuals with longstanding stroke participated. Chronic pain was reported as being experienced by 60% of participants and was more frequently experienced by individuals who reported being female (p = 0.002). Moderate or severe pain intensity was commonly reported (mean = 5.98, SD = 1.89). Individuals with chronic pain post-stroke reported a range of neuropathic symptoms rather than a common pain experience, with combinations of spontaneous, paroxysmal, and evoked pains in addition to pain associated with paraesthesia/dysaesthesia. Pain involving the upper limb was the most common region (shoulder 39%, hand and forearm 38%), followed by the lower limb (foot 30%, leg 29%). Having multiple strokes was associated with a higher frequency of chronic pain (p = 0.01), as was peripheral vascular disease (p < 0.001) and lipid disorders (p = 0.001). Conclusions: These findings highlight the varied nature of chronic pain experienced by individuals following a stroke, while also detailing stroke and medical history associated with chronic pain. It builds on existing knowledge of chronic pain post-stroke and provides new insight into the neuropathic symptoms experienced. This knowledge has the potential to assist in the development of tailored interventions based on addressing pain symptomatology and health literacy.

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial Protocol for Therapeutic Neuroscience Education in Chronic Migraine Patients: A Clinical-Neurophysiological Combined Study Design

Chronic migraine (CM) is a highly disabling condition, affecting about 2% of the global population. Non-pharmacological treatments can be optimal for their non-invasive nature. This prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial aimed to test the efficacy of therapeutic neuroscience education (TNE) in CM. Early response biomarkers were also evaluated. A total of 80 CM patients were consecutively enrolled and randomly allocated to TNE or a general education program. Treatment effectiveness was evaluated at baseline (T1) and 2 months after the end of treatment (T4). We collected the responses to disability and comorbidity questionnaires at the start (T1) and end of treatment (T3, 10 weeks after start). Early response biomarkers were evaluated at screening (T0) and mid-way through the process (T2, 5 weeks after start). We expected that TNE would provide a greater benefit than the general education program, which served as the primary outcome of this study. We also expected that a change in clinical and neurophysiological measures could potentially occur, reflecting plasticity-induced reorganization and predicting clinical response. This is the first study selectively exploring the effect of TNE as a standalone treatment for CM. A new, effective treatment regime without interactions with other medication could be of great interest as an addition to migraine therapeutic strategies.

Effectiveness of pain neuroscience education, motivational interviewing and cognition targeted exercise therapy in patients with chronic neck pain: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (the COGMO-AP study)

INTRODUCTION

In primary care, the prevalence of neck pain has increased substantially. Evidence regarding treatment of chronic neck pain (CNP) is scarce, and its effectiveness is not entirely proven in different stages of chronicity, nor for different types of cervical disorders. The goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a complex intervention (COGMO intervention) compared with usual practice in primary care physiotherapy to improve neck pain intensity, severity and disability in patients with CNP.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Design: a pragmatic cluster-randomised clinical trial design with a 12-month follow-up.

SETTING

primary care.

PARTICIPANTS

physiotherapists as randomisation unit, and patients as analysis unit.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

individuals aged 18 to 65 years suffering from moderate to severe CNP. Sample size expected: 142 patients. Recruitment: patients referred from primary care physicians to physiotherapy.

INTERVENTION

pain neuroscience education (PNE), motivational interviewing (MI) and cognition targeted exercise therapy (CTE) compared with the standard treatment in primary care.

OUTCOMES

the main variable is reduction in pain intensity; secondary variables include pain severity, conditioned pain modulation, temporal summation, neck disability, fear/avoidance behaviour, kinesiophobia, catastrophising, therapeutic alliance and quality of life. Sociodemographic information and adherence to the intervention will be recorded.

DATA COLLECTION

baseline, and follow-up at 3, 6 and 12 months.

ANALYSIS

it will follow intention-to-treat principles, and difference in percentage of subjects achieving success on the primary endpoint at 12 months. A model with multilevel analysis will be adjusted through logistic regression (being the dependent variable pain intensity, and the independent, the intervention).

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval has been awarded by the Regional Ethics Committee of Madrid (code: COGMO-AP) and the primary health care central commission of research (code: 20210011). The results of the study will be disseminated through international peer-reviewed journals, international conferences, press and social media.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05785455.

The multidisciplinary team in the management of chronic pain and pain-related fear: an evidence-based approach in a clinical case

PURPOSE

Pain is a complex, intimate, and subjective experience influenced by biological, psychological, and social factors. This case report investigates the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary team approach in addressing chronic pain and pain-related fear.

CASE DESCRIPTION

The case report describes a 22-year-old female who experienced anterior knee pain for seven years, despite undergoing two knee surgeries and physiotherapy without improvement. Following a comprehensive assessment, which included a detailed medical history, clinical examination, and thoughtful clinical analysis, a multidisciplinary approach was recommended. Employing an evidence-based methodology that integrated neurocognitive rehabilitation techniques, including Pain Neuroscience Education, Graded Motor Imagery, and Tactile Discrimination Training, alongside psychological rehabilitation strategies such as Mindfulness, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, and Problem-Solving Therapy, the report presents a comprehensive in-depth rehabilitation plan exemplifying the application of this multimodal approach within a clinical setting in a patient with chronic pain. This approach is designed not to address the biomechanical aspects but to delve into the cognitive facets associated with pain perception and avoidance, as well as potential psychological factors that may be influencing the onset and persistence of symptoms.

OUTCOMES

The scores from the rating scales provided valuable insights into patient progress in pain management, functional improvement, fear of movement, and overall physical, psychological, and emotional well-being, at six months.

CONCLUSION

This case report offers valuable insights into the usefulness of this multidisciplinary and multimodal approach, highlighting its potential as an avenue in the management of chronic pain and pain-related fear.

Pain Neuroscience Education Reduces Pain and Improves Psychological Variables but Does Not Induce Plastic Changes Measured by Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF): A Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial

INTRODUCTION

PNE, focusing on cognitive aspects, aims to change patients' beliefs about pain. However, it is unclear if these cognitive changes are sufficient to influence other components such as neuroplastic changes.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether 3-h pain neuroscience education (PNE) can induce changes in brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels and pain intensity in chronic pain patients.

METHODS

A double-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted with 66 participants aged 18-65 years old (50.86 ± 8.61) with chronic primary musculoskeletal pain divided into two groups: an intervention group receiving 3-h PNE lecture and a control group that received an educational booklet. Primary outcomes included plasma BDNF levels and perceived pain intensity (VAS). Secondary outcomes included anxiety (HADS-A), depression (HADS-D), catastrophizing (PCS), kinesiophobia (TSK), stress (PSS), and knowledge about pain. Measurements were taken in both groups before and after a three-hour intervention. Data were analyzed using paired t-tests and Cohen's d for effect sizes.

RESULTS

The results showed no significant changes in BDNF levels for the PNE lecture group (p = 0.708) or the educational booklet group (p = 0.298). Both groups showed significant reductions in pain intensity (PNE: p < 0.001, d = 0.70; booklet: p = 0.036, d = 0.39). Secondary variables, such as knowledge (PNE: p < 0.001, d = -0.972; booklet: p < 0.001, d = -0.975) and anxiety (PNE: p < 0.001, d = 0.70; booklet: p = 0.035, d = 0.39), also showed significant improvements.

CONCLUSIONS

PNE did not significantly change BDNF levels but effectively improved pain intensity, pain-related knowledge, and other clinical variables. These findings suggest that while PNE has cognitive benefits, it may not be sufficient to induce immediate neurobiological changes. Further research is needed to explore long-term effects and incorporate additional therapeutic domains.

Real-world implementation of pain science education and barriers to use in private practice physiotherapy settings: an Australia-wide cross-sectional survey

ABSTRACT

Physiotherapists are critically positioned to integrate education into patient care, including pain science education (PSE) to enhance management and outcomes. Anecdotally, many physiotherapists report difficulty providing PSE in private practice settings. Here, we aimed to explore current PSE use, knowledge, and barriers to implementation. A nationwide online (Qualtrics) survey of PSE-trained Australian private practice physiotherapists assessed use, knowledge (revised Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire [rNPQ]), concept application, implementation barriers, and resource awareness/use/preferences, exploring associations with individual/clinic-level factors (clinical experience, PSE training, work location). A total of 278 physiotherapists (62.9% female, 39.4 [11.8] years, 15.2 [11.6] years of experience, 37.2% rural/remote) completed the survey. Pain science knowledge (rNPQ: mean 10.4 [2.2]/13) and perceived PSE competence was high, although 30% supported inaccurate PSE concepts. Pain science education training via professional development course was associated with higher knowledge relative to university training (multivariable; β = 1.337, P < 0.001). Physiotherapists reported providing PSE to 61% of patients, with patient-related barriers (expecting other treatments: 94%; previous negative/contradictory PSE experiences: 89%), clinic-level barriers (time constraints: 77%; insufficient billing schedules: 57%), and clinician-specific barriers (difficulties identifying/addressing patient maladaptive beliefs/behaviours: 53%; cultural/demographic translation challenges: 46%) reported. Fewer years of clinical experience was associated with heightened worry that providing PSE might go wrong (multivariable; β = -0.034, P = 0.010) and/or damage therapeutic relationships (multivariable; β = -0.049, P < 0.001). Physiotherapists were aware of over 100 PSE resources, with varying levels of perceived use/effectiveness, yet were largely unaware of educational strategies. Physiotherapists called for reduced complexity and greater ability to individualise PSE resources. Findings will guide improvements in PSE training/resources, to maximise physiotherapists' confidence and preparedness to effectively implement PSE.

Effectiveness of Adding a Pain Neuroscience Education Program to a Multimodal Physiotherapy Intervention in Patients with Chronic Shoulder Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of a pain neuroscience education program completed by patients with shoulder pain. Methods: A randomized, controlled trial was performed. Fifty-five patients satisfied the eligibility criteria, agreed to participate, and were randomized into an experimental group (n = 27) or control group (n = 28). A manual therapy and exercises program was administered for both groups. The experimental group also received a 4-week pain neuroscience education protocol (1 session/week, 75 min per session). The measurements taken included the active range of motion, pain, disability, catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, and therapeutic alliance. The outcomes were assessed at baseline and 5 weeks after completion of treatment. The primary outcome analyzed was the group × time interaction. Results: The 2 × 2 analysis of variance revealed a significant group × time interaction for the active range of motion (F = 15.27; p = 0.011), disability (F = 6.14; p = 0.01), catastrophizing (F = 8.79; p = 0.01), kinesiophobia (F = 7.62; p = 0.008), and therapeutic alliance (p = 0.03) in favor of the experimental group. Conclusions: This study showed that the patients with shoulder pain who completed the pain neuroscience program achieved significantly better results in terms of their active range of motion, disability, catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, and therapeutic alliance compared to those achieved by the control group. Therefore, pain neuroscience education may be beneficial in the treatment of patients with shoulder pain.

Keeping It Simple-Pain Science Education for Patients with Chronic Pain Referred to Community-Based Rehabilitation: Translation, Adaptation, and Clinical Feasibility Testing of PNE4Adults

Background/Objectives: Pain science education accommodating low health literacy is needed for people with chronic pain. The purpose of this study was to translate PNE4Kids, contextually adapt it into PNE4Adults, and test the feasibility of the newly developed pain science education program (PNE4Adults) for adult patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain in the municipality. Methods: A three-step approach was used to (1) translate PNE4Kids into Danish, (2) adapt to age and context (PNE4Adults), and (3) test the feasibility. (1) Translation was performed by a native Dane fluent in Dutch. (2) Two think-aloud group sessions were held, with therapists and end users. (3) Feasibility was tested amongst twenty adult patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain consecutively referred for rehabilitation in the municipality. The a priori success criteria were determined to be 70% acceptability and 70% understandability. Prior to inclusion of the first patient, the study was pre-registered on clinicaltrial.gov [NCT05140031]. Results: Translation was successfully performed. Both the therapist and end users found the program easy to grasp, the simplicity and interactive nature of the program ingenious, and the program to be well suited to an adult population. All patients (100%), across health literacy levels, found PNE4Adults comprehensible and acceptable. Conclusions: The aims were successfully met. Progression to a full trial is warranted and is underway.

Effectiveness of a pain science education programme in middle school students: a randomised controlled trial

Introduction

Chronic pain in childhood is a prevalent issue affecting approximately 20% of young people aged 8-16 years. This condition negatively impacts their quality of life, as well as their physical, psychological, and social functioning. In recent years, Pain Science Education has emerged as a promising strategy to enhance the conceptualization of pain and mitigate maladaptive pain-related behaviours in children and teenagers. The primary aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of the Pain Science Education programme called "Learning Pain" in improving the conceptualization of pain amongst 11-13-year-old children enrolled in their first year of middle school.

Materials and methods

A randomised controlled trial with single-blind parallel groups was conducted. Five participating institutes were randomly assigned to either the experimental group, which received the Pain Science Education intervention through the "Learning Pain" programme consisting of two sessions spaced 1 month apart, or the control group, which underwent only study assessments. Both groups underwent initial assessment and follow-up evaluations at 1 month (short term), 7 months (medium-term), and 13 months (long-term). The main outcome measure was the conceptualization of pain, assessed using the Conceptualization of Pain Questionnaire (COPAQ).

Results

The "Learning Pain" programme, a specific Pain Science Education intervention, demonstrated effectiveness in improving the conceptualization of pain at 1, 7, and 13 months follow-up assessments.

Discussion

The "Learning Pain" programme, a specific Pain Science Education intervention, enhances the conceptualization of pain in adolescents aged 11-13 years over short, medium, and long-term periods.

A multidisciplinary pain management program for patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized, single-blind, controlled, feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Multidisciplinary programs are the first recommendation for non-specific chronic low-back pain, but implementing this type of program is complicated to get up and running. The primary aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and appropriateness of the PAINDOC multidisciplinary program for subjects with chronic low-back pain. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the decrease in pain intensity, pain-related disability and pain catastrophizing, as well as the improvement in quality of life with this program. Furthermore, another of the secondary objectives was to calculate the sample size for a future randomized clinical trial.

METHODS

This study was conducted in a hospital pain unit using two successive recruitment waves. First, the feasibility outcomes (recruitment, completion, and drop-out rates) of a 5-month non-random prospective cohort (n = 227) were recorded. Then, the clinical outcomes (pain intensity, quality of life, disability, and pain catastrophizing) were recorded from a prospective, controlled, two-armed and single-blind feasibility study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05974072). It included 41 participants that were randomly allocated to either the pharmacological treatment (n = 21) arm or PAINDOC program (n = 20) arm.

RESULTS

The recruitment rate was 66%, with the completion rate standing at 80.7% and the drop-out rate at 19.3%. Significant differences and a medium size effect were observed between groups in terms of pain intensity (p = .017, r = .408) at the 4-month follow-up. The intragroup analysis of the PAINDOC group revealed significant lessening in pain intensity (p = < 0.001) and improvements in quality of life (p = .030).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that the PAINDOC multidisciplinary program is a feasible treatment for patients with non-specific chronic low-back pain. Furthermore, the exploratory results of this study suggest that it could be an effective treatment to reduce pain intensity and improve on self-reported quality of life in these patients, although a future randomized clinical trial is needed to determine its effectiveness.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05974072 (registration date July 11, 2023; retrospectively registered; ClinicalTrials.gov).

Patient education for the management of subacromial pain syndrome: A scoping review

OBJECTIVE

To identify the extent of the literature on patient education for subacromial pain syndrome (SAPS).

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA-ScR standards. Nine databases were searched until November 2022 to identify articles describing patient education interventions for the management of SAPS. Interventions were extracted and described according to the Template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and the core sets for shoulder-related health conditions of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).

RESULTS

Sixty studies of various designs met the inclusion criteria, including thirty RCTs. Patient education was a primary intervention in seven of the included RCTs. In most of the educational interventions identified in the included studies, the descriptions did not adequately cover a majority of the TIDieR's checklist items. Patient education content was often mentioned and covered most, but not all, of the ICF core sets for shoulder disorders.

CONCLUSION

Available data in current literature on patient education interventions for SAPS is scarce and lacks description.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

This study presents the content elements of patient education for the management of SAPS that are described in the literature and that clinicians could consider when treating individuals with SAPS.

Nociplastic Pain in Endometriosis: A Scoping Review

Endometriosis is an inflammatory chronic condition associated with nociceptive, neuropathic, and nociplastic pain. Central sensitization (CS) is the primary nociplastic pain mechanism. However, there are currently no standardized methods for detecting CS or nociplastic pain. This review aims to identify available tools for characterizing CS/nociplastic pain in endometriosis-related chronic pelvic pain. Following the PRISMA-P protocol, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and PsychINFO databases were searched on 23 April 2024, for the terms "endometriosis", "central sensitization", "nociplastic pain", "widespread pain", and "assessment tools". Publications were selected if they mentioned tool(s) for detecting nociplastic pain or CS in endometriosis patients. Information was extracted on study demographics, assessment types, and the tools used for detection. Of the 379 citations retrieved, 30 papers met the inclusion criteria. When working to identify CS and nociplastic pain, fourteen studies exclusively used patient-reported questionnaires, six used quantitative sensory testing (QST), two used clinical assessments, and eight used multiple approaches combining patient-reported questionnaires and clinical assessment. This review illustrates the diversity of tools currently used to identify CS and nociplastic pain in endometriosis patients. Further research is needed to evaluate their validity and to standardize methods in order to improve the accuracy of nociplastic pain identification and guide treatment.

Efficacy of a pain neuroscience educational program in improving executive function and pain intensity in fibromyalgia patients (Fibrobrain project): Study protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Fibromyalgia (FM) is a chronic musculoskeletal condition typically characterized by chronic pain, sleep disturbances, chronic fatigue, and cognitive problems. The present study aims to examine the efficacy of a pain neuroscience education program (PNE) in improving executive functions and pain intensity in patients with FM and compare them with those of standard treatment protocols.

METHODS

This blinded, controlled clinical trial will compare changes in executive function and pain intensity between two groups. The first group will receive standard treatment supplemented with PNE, consisting of ten sessions spread over five weeks, with each session lasting 40-45 min. The main objective of this method is to remodel cognitive and emotional reactions to pain, challenging the idea that pain is directly related to injury and highlighting the influence of emotions, sleep, and physical activity on pain perception. The second group will receive only standard pharmacological treatment. The study sample will include 62 adults diagnosed with FM, according to initial sample size estimates based on previous evidence. A baseline assessment of baseline characteristics will be performed, after which patients will be randomly assigned to the PNE group or the control group. The results of the intervention will be evaluated and statistically compared after 5 weeks. This protocol complies with all relevant ethical guidelines. It has been approved by two institutional committees (Reference: NR2006; Conbioethics:21-CEI-004-20,170,829).

CONCLUSION

It is anticipated that this intervention will be a cost-effective and superior alternative to standard treatments.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05084300.

Biopsychosocial rehabilitation therapy in small fiber neuropathy: research protocol to study the effect of rehabilitation treatment

Background

Small fiber neuropathy (SFN) is a chronic neuropathic pain condition that can lead to a decreased quality of life (QOL) and disability. Current pain treatment is mainly symptomatic, consisting of analgesics, with often disappointing results. There is a need for new, more effective treatment modality. Treatment based on a biopsychosocial approach on SFN-related pain may be a promising alternative. A rehabilitation treatment study protocol is presented with the following main objective: to test the effect of a tailored interdisciplinary rehabilitation treatment targeting both cognitive and psychological factors related to pain, in decreasing disability, and improving QOL in SFN.

Methods

Single-case experimental design. Ten participants with SFN will be included. Every patient will be offered a personalized program based on one of three rehabilitation treatment modules (graded activity, exposure in vivo or acceptance and commitment therapy) depending on the most prominent factor maintaining disability. Treatment will be provided for at least 8 weeks with 2 sessions a week.

Discussion/conclusion

This is the first study investigating personalized rehabilitation treatment in patients with idiopathic SFN. The findings are expected to result in an effective treatment for SFN with an increase in QOL and a decrease in disability.

Clinical trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT05798949.

Pain Neuroscience Education: Teaching People About Pain

Chronic pain is an ever-increasing global challenge, and few strategies have been shown to significantly alter this trajectory, and a pure pharmaceutical approach, especially opioids, is not the answer. To truly impact a person with chronic pain's life, current best-evidence supports changing their cognitions (how they think about their pain), moving more, and calming the peripheral and central nervous system, including non-pharmacological strategies. All healthcare providers, however, must use a unified strategy regardless of their professional designation, skillset, and clinical setting. One variable that spans all patient interactions is communication. All healthcare providers talk to patients, be it during informal, casual conversation or during specific medical education tied to diagnosis, prognosis, treatment, reassurance, and more. Current evidence supports teaching patients more about their pain experience, called pain neuroscience education (PNE), which has significant clinical benefits. Any provider may offer PNE, from physicians, pharmacists, therapists, psychologists, nurses, etc. Pain neuroscience education is shown to positively influence self-reported pain, disability, fear-avoidance, pain catastrophizing, movement, and healthcare utilization in patients with chronic pain. This commentary aims to introduce all healthcare providers to PNE, and how, along with non-pharmacological treatments (PNE+) have the ability to positively impact people's lives living with chronic pain.

Effects of pain neuroscience education combined with neuromuscular exercises on pain, functional disability and psychological factors in chronic low back pain: A study protocol for a single-blind randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a prevalent health condition worldwide. Several therapeutic interventions aim to improve CLBP. Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) helps patients better understand their pain from biological and physiological perspectives, which clinicians use to reduce pain and disability in patients with chronic musculoskeletal conditions. Neuromuscular exercises (NMS) are also treatments adopted in CLBP. This study will investigate whether PNE combined with an NMS program improves pain, functional and psychological outcomes more than NMS alone in patients with CLBP.

METHODS

In this single-blind randomized controlled trial, 60 patients (male and female; age range, 30-60 years) diagnosed with CLBP will be randomly assigned to one of the following groups: (1) PNE plus NMS (n = 30; 24 sessions of PNE plus NMS in a total of 8 weeks, 3 each week), and (2) NMS alone (n = 30; 24 sessions of NMS sessions in a total of 8 weeks, 3 each week). Outcome assessors will be blinded to the group allocation. The primary outcome will be pain. Secondary outcomes will be disability, fear-avoidance beliefs about work and physical activity, self-efficacy, exercise anxiety, and kinesiophobia. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, after 8 weeks of intervention, and 6 months post-intervention.

DISCUSSION

The findings of this RCT will help shed light on new treatment strategies to address the biopsychosocial dimensions of CLBP. The study protocol will be conducted in a clinical setting, offering the opportunity for future implementation in healthcare systems. Moreover, it will help clarify whether a combined treatment (PNE with NMS) is more effective than NMS alone for improving pain, functional and psychological outcomes in CLBP.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Study registration: The study was prospectively registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials-IRCT20190427043384N2 (https://www.irct.ir/trial/69146). Registered on March 17, 2023.

Nocebo belief and attitudes towards side effect disclosure: A general population-based online survey in Europe and North America

BACKGROUND

With evidence for large nocebo effects in pain, guidelines for nocebo-minimizing strategies regarding side effect disclosure are emerging. While the ethical implications and effectiveness of such strategies have been the subject of investigations, the perspective of healthcare users are missing despite the stakes for patient autonomy.

METHODS

In an online survey, 2766 adults (≥18 years) from a general population sample in Europe and North America responded to questions related to nocebo familiarity, nocebo beliefs and attitudes towards side effect disclosure.

RESULTS

Only 474 (17%) were familiar with nocebo terminology, while 1379 (50%) were familiar with the concept of nocebo side effects. Belief in nocebo side effects was not well-established; 738 (31%) agreed that side effect information could increase side effect occurrence. Nocebo belief was associated with more negative attitudes towards side effect disclosure and 1962 (73%) indicated that positive framing was an acceptable way of disclosing side effect information. In general, the majority of participants (65-76%) held positive attitudes towards the disclosure of all potential side effects and 2309 (84%) favoured patient autonomy over nonmaleficence. Although the general patterns were similar in the European and North American sample, the latter showed stronger nocebo belief and stronger positive attitudes towards side effect disclosure.

CONCLUSIONS

The study found a consistent, moderate association between nocebo belief and attitudes towards nondisclosure, alongside positive attitudes towards the use of framing. Together with the discovered discrepancy between nocebo familiarity and nocebo belief, these findings have implications for the implementation of nocebo education and risk framing strategies.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

This is the first large-scale, general population-based study to contribute to the scientific discussion about nocebo side effects from the perspective of healthcare users. The findings have implications for the discussion on how to handle the medical and ethical problem of nocebo side effects in clinical practice.

Enhancing pediatric pain management in Turkey: A modified Delphi study on culturally adapted pain neuroscience education for chronic pain in children

BACKGROUND

Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) is a commonly used technique applied by physical therapists in the rehabilitation of chronic pain.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to culturally adapt an existing PNE for children with chronic pain (PNE4Kids) to Turkish children with chronic pain (PNE4Kids-Turkish).

METHODS

A three-round modified Delphi-study was conducted between September 2023 and February 2024. Experts completed questionnaire with 5 items to elicit demographic data and 16 closed and 7 open-ended questions to assess relevance of information, feasibility of stories, visual information, and clarity of message in the 4 main areas of 'normal pain biology', 'pain modulation', 'chronic pain, adaptations, central sensitization', and 'the application and implications of PNE4Kids. MAXQDA software was used for qualitative analysis of open-ended questions. A total of 38 experts (mean age: 36.6 ± 9.05 years, 6 male, 32 female) were recruited for this study.

RESULTS

The results of the first round indicated that 84-100 % of Delphi experts strongly agreed or agreed on the relevance of information, feasibility of stories, visual information, and clarity of message in respect of the 4 main areas. During second and third round, an acceptable degree of agreement with clinical usefulness of PNE4Kids-Turkish materials was obtained.

CONCLUSIONS

PNE4Kids was culturally adapted for Turkish children suffering from chronic pain. The findings of this study mainly highlight the viewpoints of the experts.

IMPLICATION TO PRACTICE

This is the first study to have developed and culturally adapted the PNE4Kids for Turkish children with chronic pain. The PNE4Kids-Turkish is crucial, valuable, helpful, and understandable for Turkish children with chronic pain. In addition, the PNE4Kids-Turkish has the potential to close the gap in research and clinical areas for Turkish children with chronic pain.

Short- and medium-term effects of a single session of pain neuroscience education on pain and psychological factors in patients with chronic low back pain. A single-blind randomized clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Biopsychosocial approach in patients suffering chronic low back pain (CLBP) promotes pain self-management strategies. Current evidence recommends high dose of Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) for clinically significant differences. However, the workload and time constraints experienced by healthcare providers impede the application of the recommended treatment regimen. In fact, Back School with a biomechanical model is the main approach to manage CLBP in public systems.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to explore the effect of a 60 min single session of PNE as an adjunct to back school on pain intensity and psychological variables patients with CLBP.

METHODS

A double-blind, two-arm randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in patients with CLBP who attended back school sessions held in a Spanish public hospital. A total of 121 patients were randomized into control group, who received the Back School program during 5 weeks, and intervention group, who additionally received a single session of PNE. Patient-reported outcomes were the Numerical Pain Rating Scale, Central Sensitization Inventory, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, with a 12-week follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 113 patients were analysed. Intervention and control group presented similar effects on pain and kinesiophobia. At follow-up, intervention group exhibited reduced sensitization and catastrophism scores compared with control, including the subscales. Additionally, PNE reduced the percentage of participants classified as having central sensitization compared with control.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding a single PNE session in the back school program did not reduce pain but improved psychological factors as central sensitization and pain catastrophizing at medium-term. This study highlights the potential of PNE to optimize treatment strategies for CLBP, especially in public health centres where time resources are scarce.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

Adding a single PNE session in the back school program did not reduce pain but improved psychological factors as central sensitization and pain catastrophism at medium-term.

Therapeutic expectancy in physiotherapy

In health sciences, including physical therapy, communication techniques are a critical part of the success in the therapeutic process. Managing the patient's beliefs, perceptions, and the narrative of their problems, becomes an essential part of the therapeutic process. This is the key to achieving real changes regarding how the patient copes with pain, illness, dysfunction, as well as the ability to develop adequate resources for facing them. We call this "Therapeutic expectancy" a new concept that originates from the well-known Therapeutic alliance and incorporates practices from the field of Motivational interviewing and Strategic dialogue. The Therapeutic expectancy starts from the first interaction with the patient and continues throughout the different stages of the therapeutic process. This article describes the structure of the relationship with the patient and some verbal communication techniques to generate an effective physical therapist-patient interaction, building Therapeutic expectancy, through a "centered on the patient's narrative" strategy. Expectancy constitutes a desirable goal in any patient and in any pathological condition as it pursues a change in an individual's perception of their state of health, thereby enhancing the desire for healing and empowerment.

Contents and delivery methods of pain neuroscience education in pediatrics: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Pain is prevalent among children and adolescents. The development and implementation of Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) strategies tailored to this population remains overlooked in contrast to the adult population.

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to identify the content, delivery methods, and dosage of PNE for children and adolescents available in the literature.

METHOD

We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and clinical trial registration databases. Inclusion criteria consisted of studies that involved children submitted to a PNE program in community, school, clinics, hospitals or child development centers. We considered studies that included children with and without pain who received PNE strategies associated or not with self-motivational interventions. Studies focusing on psychological interventions were excluded. We extracted data on authors, publication year, country, sample characteristics, health condition, PNE content, study design, context, outcomes, duration, follow-up, main results, dropout, and adverse effects. Data extracted were qualitatively organized.

RESULTS

A total of 805 studies were initially reviewed. The final sample comprised 17 studies. Common PNE topics included pain neurophysiology, biopsychosocial influences, pain concepts, self-management, and coping strategies. Delivery methods ranged from slideshows and videos to booklets, with sessions lasting 8-60 min. Schools were the most common setting for these interventions.

CONCLUSION

Our review demonstrates the diversity in PNE content, delivery methods, and intervention dosages among the included studies. Most studies occurred in school settings, potentially limiting its generalizability for clinical contexts.

Healthcare professionals' experiences of delivering pain science education to adults from ethnically minoritised groups

BACKGROUND

Pain Science Education (PSE) seeks to increase patients understanding of their pain, to improve clinical outcomes. It has been primarily developed and tested within western cultures. There is a lack of research exploring its use with people from ethnically minoritised groups.

OBJECTIVE

To explore Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) experiences of delivering PSE to people with persistent pain from ethnically minoritised groups.

METHODS

In this qualitative study semi-structured interviews were carried out with a convenience sample of 14 HCPs who routinely deliver PSE to patients from ethnically minoritised groups. The interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Three themes were identified: 1) Biomedical model or disengagement, 2) Pain is a taboo topic, and 3) The importance of cultural competence. Participants believed that people from ethnically minoritised groups disengaged with PSE sooner in comparison to non-ethnically minoritised groups and this was rooted in a strong biomedical understanding of pain and preference for biomedical treatments. Addressing patients' beliefs was deemed difficult as participants felt that pain was considered a taboo amongst some ethnically minoritised groups and HCPs lacked sufficient training in cultural competency to confidently address their pain-related misconceptions.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, HCPs found that many people from ethnically minoritised groups held strongly biomedical views and/or a cultural reluctance to discuss pain. These factors made pain discussions challenging leading to disengagement from PSE and a preference for passive care. Cultural competency training and access to culturally competent PSE resources may facilitate engagement with PSE for people from ethnically minoritised background.

What are the predictors of response to physiotherapy in patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears? Gaining expert consensus using an international e-Delphi study

BACKGROUND

Massive irreparable rotator cuff tears can cause significant shoulder pain and disability. Treatment options include physiotherapy or surgery, with a lack of research comparing treatment options. For physiotherapy there is uncertainty about which patients will have a successful or unsuccessful response to treatment and a lack of consensus on what constitutes the best physiotherapy programme. With these significant gaps in the research, it is challenging for clinicians seeing patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears to advise on what is their best treatment pathway.

METHODS

A three round Delphi study was conducted with expert shoulder physiotherapists and orthopaedic surgeons to gain consensus on the important factors associated with response to physiotherapy in this patient population. Round 1 was an information-gathering round to identify predictors of response to physiotherapy in patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. Rounds 2 and 3 were consensus-seeking rounds on the importance and modifiability of the predictors. Consensus criteria were determined a priori using median, interquartile range, percentage agreement and Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance.

RESULTS

Participants were recruited April-October, 2023. 88 experts participated in Round 1 and of these, 70 completed Round 3 (79.54%). In Round 1, content analysis of 344 statements identified 45 predictors. In Round 2, 29 predictors reached consensus as important and 2 additional predictors were identified. In Round 3, of the 31 predictors from Round 2, 22 reached consensus as important and 12 of these reached consensus as modifiable by physiotherapists. Both patient factors and clinician factors from a broad range of domains reached consensus: biomechanical, psychological, social, co-morbidities, communication / healthcare interactions and pain.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this Delphi study suggest that clinicians assessing patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears should assess across all these domains and target the modifiable factors with interventions. Particular emphasis should be placed on optimising modifiable clinician factors including therapeutic alliance, comprehensive explanation of the condition and collaborative and realistic goal-setting. These in turn may influence modifiable patient factors including patient expectations, engagement with the physiotherapy programme, motivation and self-efficacy thus creating the ideal environment to intervene on a biomechanical level with exercises.

Pain neuroscience education and therapeutic exercise for the treatment of sequelae in breast cancer survivors living with chronic pain: A pilot study

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer represents the most common type of malignant neoplasm worldwide. Advances in diagnosis and treatment have increased the life expectancy of patients. However, the sequelae associated with the treatment of the disease such as chronic pain, kinesiophobia and loss of physical function in breast cancer survivors (BCS) are a long-term health problem. Therapeutic strategies are required for the treatment of chronic sequelae in this population.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of a pain neuroscience education (PNE) and therapeutic exercise (TE) for the treatment of chronic sequelae in BCS.

METHODS

Quasi-experimental repeated measures study. The intervention lasted 9 weeks, with 3 educational and 24 exercise sessions. Pain frequency and intensity (VAS scale), neuropathic pain (DN4), kinesiophobia level (TSK-11V), central sensitization (CSI-Sp), functionality of the affected arm (ULFI-Sp) and active joint range (ROM) with goniometry were measured at baseline, 3rd, 6th and 9th week. Statistical analysis included Friedman's test and ANOVA according to normality criteria.

RESULTS

A total sample of 26 BCS participate in the study. Significant statistical changes were found from the 3rd week of treatment in the frequency and intensity of pain, kinesiophobia and neuropathic pain (p < 0.05). All variables had significant changes at the 9th week (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The results of the present investigation suggest that the combination of PNE and TE are effective in treating sequelae at short term in BCS with chronic pain.

The effectiveness of cognitive functional therapy on patients with chronic neck pain: A systematic literature review

OBJECTIVE

Recently, psychological, and behavioral interventions such as cognitive functional therapy (CFT) has gained significant attention in musculoskeletal rehabilitation. We aimed to compare interventions with a CFT component in adults (>18 years old) suffering from chronic neck pain (CNP) or chronic whiplash associated disorders (>3 months) with another intervention or no intervention, in pain, disability, kinesiophobia, or any other reported outcome measure.

RESULTS

One case-study and three randomized controlled trials met the eligibility criteria. Statistically and clinically significant improvement in pain was found in favour of CFT combined with scapular exercise compared to exercise alone (MD = -19.91; 95%CI: -24.18 to -15.64) and controls (MD = -48.91; 95%CI: -53.88 to -43.94) at the very-short term follow-up. A significant difference in kinesiophobia was found at the short-term follow-up in favour of CFT and exercise compared to exercise alone (MD = -13.23; 95%CI-16.94 to -9.52) and controls (MD = -40.81 95%CI: -44.55 to -37.07). Finally, statistically and clinically significant improvement was found in favour of CFT compared to controls at the short-term follow-up in stress (MD = -36.62, 95%CI: 43.47 to -29.77), fear avoidance (MD = -35.44; 95%CI: 42.57 to -28.31), anxiety (MD = -34.43; 95%CI: 41.90 to -26.96), pain catastrophizing (MD = -25.19; 95%CI: 32.49 to -17.89), depression (MD = -30.72; 95%CI: 38.37 to -23.07), but a significant and clinically difference in favour of the control group at self-efficacy (MD = 29.56; 95%CI20.70 to 38.42).

CONCLUSIONS

Very low certainty evidence suggests that CFT alone or in combination with exercise may produce better outcomes than no treatment or exercise alone. The results should be interpreted with caution, given that the number of studies assessing CFT in CNP is limited.

[Current knowledge of German physiotherapy trainees and students on pain and the influence of a teaching intervention]

BACKGROUND

In order to properly inform patients about their pain and initiate targeted therapies, it is important for physiotherapists to learn about the latest scientific evidence on pain during their training.

AIM

This study aimed to assess the pain knowledge of German physiotherapy trainees and students. In addition, the influence of a teaching intervention (Pain Neuroscience Education, PNE) on their pain knowledge was investigated.

METHODS

An online test was performed, which contained the German versions of the revised Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire (rNPQ-D) and the Essential Knowledge of Pain Questionnaire (EKPQ). This test was completed by physiotherapy trainees and students (N = 279) in their final semester of vocational education or graduation under virtual supervision. After the test, a sub-cohort of physiotherapy trainees (n = 31) received a four-hour online teaching intervention (PNE), whereupon two retests took place.

RESULTS

The mean rNPQ-D score (63.8%) was significantly higher than the mean EKPQ score (28.4%) (p < 0.001). There was a significant positive correlation between the scores of rNPQ-D and EKPQ (r = 0.365, p < 0.001). Undergraduate students from university (n = 142) achieved significantly higher scores in both questionnaires (p < 0.001) compared to trainees from vocational schools (n = 137). In the sub-cohort, the online teaching intervention significantly improved the scores of both questionnaires immediately (p < 0.001) and six weeks after intervention (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The knowledge of German physiotherapy students about pain seems to be insufficient for an evidence-based treatment of pain patients. A PNE-based online learning program with the latest scientific evidence can significantly improve physiotherapy students' knowledge about pain.

Pain Neuroscience Education and Neuroimaging-A Narrative Review

BACKGROUND

Musculoskeletal pain is a leading cause of medical visits, posing significant challenges both socially and economically, encouraging the scientific community to continue researching and exploring the most effective methods to address the problem. An alternative way to deal with chronic pain is pain neuroscience education (PNE), a lesson plan that addresses the neurobiology, neurophysiology, and nervous system processing of pain. This method takes the place of the conventional one, which connected pain to tissue damage or nociception.

RESULTS

As a result, patients are taught that pain is often not a reliable measure of the health of the tissues but rather the outcome of the nervous system interpreting the injury in conjunction with additional psychosocial variables. In addition to finding research that examine, using neuroimaging, whether the administration of PNE has detectable effects at the level of the central nervous system, this narrative review seeks to clarify what PNE is, how it is administered, and if it is an effective treatment for musculoskeletal pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the findings, it appears that PNE is more therapeutically beneficial when combined with therapeutic exercise, when done one-on-one, and during lengthy, frequent sessions. Lastly, even though PNE has no effect on the morphological properties of the gray matter, it appears to cause decreased activation of the regions linked to pain.

Survey of Confidence and Knowledge in Managing Patellofemoral Pain among Physical Therapists in Saudi Arabia

BACKGROUND

This study assessed the beliefs and knowledge of physical therapists in Saudi Arabia regarding the management of patellofemoral pain (PFP) and their alignment with current Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs).

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted, involving 111 licensed physical therapists actively treating PFP patients. The survey included questions about PFP risk factors, prognosis, diagnosis, and treatment, using a Likert scale to measure confidence and knowledge.

RESULTS

Readers have significantly greater confidence in the knowledge of managing patients with PFP following current CPGs (p < 0.01). No significant differences were observed between groups in the other items (p > 0.01). However, over 70% of respondents, irrespective of guideline familiarity, held beliefs about risk factors, prognosis, diagnosis, and treatment that were inconsistent with CPGs.

CONCLUSIONS

These discrepancies highlight a significant knowledge gap that may affect patient care quality. Enhancing education and dissemination efforts regarding CPGs is essential to improve adherence to evidence-based practices among physical therapists in Saudi Arabia. To change practitioners' preferences, attitudes, and beliefs, more targeted programs and interventions for knowledge dissemination and implementation should be provided.

Frozen shoulder: subjects' needs and perspectives and clinicians' beliefs and management strategies: do they align? A cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

Physiotherapists (PTs) play a crucial role in managing individuals with Frozen Shoulder (FS), frequently being the first healthcare professionals involved in the treatment of this condition.

AIM

This study aimed to compare the beliefs, expectations, and perspectives of individuals with FS with the knowledge, skills, and strategies of PTs, highlighting similarities and differences.

METHOD

This study adhered to the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). From May 1st to August 1st, 2023, a two-part survey was conducted involving PTs and individuals diagnosed with FS. The survey focused on comparing key areas such as clinical assessment, patient education, treatment expectations, and the psychological aspects of the patient-clinician relationship.

RESULTS

A total of 501 PTs and 110 subjects with FS participated in the survey. Most PTs showed proficiency in FS pathoanatomical conditions and were also attentive to psychological aspects (88.4%), describing the pathology evolution in three or two stages (68.2%). They also highlighted the importance of patient education (89.6%) and recognized the potential benefits of a multiprofessional collaboration in managing FS (82.2%). Reassurance was reported as a priority by 32.3% of PTs. Subjects with FS expressed a preference for PTs who are both expert and empathetic (73.6%). Regarding their understanding of FS, 29.09% of subjects reported receiving a three-phase explanation, while 26.36% felt inadequately informed. Nearly half of the subjects (49.09%) anticipated being managed independently by a PT, with 93.64% prioritizing the improvement of their range of motion.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed a general agreement between subjects with FS and PTs regarding aspects of the therapeutic relationship, patient education, pathology management, compliance and motivation strategies, and pain management preferences. However, significant differences emerged concerning the perception of physiotherapy effectiveness, primary treatment goals, subjects' priorities, and the importance of psychological assessment.

Interdisciplinary pain program participants with high catastrophizing scores improve function utilizing enriched therapeutic encounters and integrative health techniques: a retrospective study

Introduction

Pain catastrophizing describes helplessness, rumination, and magnification of a pain experience. High pain catastrophizing is an independent risk factor for disability, pain severity, inadequate treatment response, chronicity, and opioid misuse. Interdisciplinary pain programs (IPPs) are beneficial and cost-effective for individuals with chronic pain, but their functional impact on individuals with high pain catastrophizing is not well established. The emerging field of placebo studies suggests that patient-provider relationships, positive treatment expectations, and sociobiologically informed care trigger physiological responses that may enhance therapeutic interventions.

Methods

In this retrospective observational cohort study, we compared admission and discharge data for 428 adults with high-impact chronic pain (mean 8.5 years) who completed the Spaulding-Medford Functional Restoration Program (FRP). The interdisciplinary FRP team of physiatrists, behavioral health clinicians, physical therapists, and occupational therapists specializes in evidenced-based conventional rehabilitation, integrative health, and pain psychoeducation via enriched therapeutic encounters, fostering collaboration, validation, trust, self-efficacy, and positive expectations. Clinical outcome measures included the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) assessing functional performance (COPM-PS) and satisfaction with function (COPM-SS), the Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9).

Results

FRP participants with clinically elevated catastrophizing at baseline (PCS ≥30, mean PCS 39) achieved statistically significant improvements in function (mean delta -2.09, CHI2 = 15.56, p < 0.001), satisfaction with function (COPM-SS mean delta -2.50, CHI2 = 7.42, p = 0.007), pain (NRS mean delta 2.7), mood (PHQ-9 mean delta 1.87, p = 0.002), and catastrophizing (PCS mean delta 4.16, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed racial disparities in pain scores, and exploratory analysis showed a trend toward reducing opiate consumption.

Discussion

Despite the known association of adverse outcomes with high catastrophizing, FRP participation was associated with increased productive engagement, reduced pain, reduced maladaptive thought processes, and improved mood. Although causation and efficacy cannot be established from a retrospective design, this is the first study to identify functional improvement in patients with high-impact chronic pain and clinically relevant high pain catastrophizing who participate in an IPP combining conventional and complementary rehabilitation with psychoeducation. These enriched therapeutic encounters may enhance the treatment process by promoting trust, empathy, collaboration, and beneficial reframing of patients' experiences, expectations, and goals.

"I could 100% see myself getting hurt if I did it wrong": a qualitative exploration of exercise perceptions in people with chronic low back pain

PURPOSE

Traditionally, a specific "core" exercise focus has been favoured for chronic low back pain (CLBP) which contrasts holistic exercise approaches. This study aims to explore the perceptions of exercise in people with CLBP and whether exercise itself can convey implicit messages regarding its use in CLBP management in the absence of a clinical narrative.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants were asked about their CLBP history, views of exercise for CLBP, and current exercise behaviours through online semi-structured interviews. Then, participants watched the interviewer perform the deadlift, Jefferson curl, and bird dog and were asked if they thought each individual exercise was beneficial for CLBP, and why. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis through a critical realism and social constructivism lens.

RESULTS

All participants (n = 16) viewed all exercises as beneficial for health and pain relief, but perceived efficacy varied. "Core" exercises were deemed crucial for CLBP relief, while spinal flexion and external load were often perceived as potentially injurious. Distrust towards healthcare practitioners also influenced exercise perceptions.

CONCLUSION

People with CLBP perceive different exercises to either relieve pain or improve health. Healthcare practitioners can influence these perceptions, highlighting the need for consideration of exercise perceptions in clinical contexts.

Perceived factors influencing the success of pain neuroscience education in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies

PURPOSE

We aimed to identify the factors influencing the success of Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) in chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) pain from the perspective of those experiencing PNE first-hand.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. Articles were found on MEDLINE via Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINHAL, and PsycINFO up to April 2023. Eligible qualitative studies focussed on adults (>16 years old) with a diagnosis of chronic primary or secondary MSK pain who performed PNE. Thematic synthesis by Thomas and Harden was followed. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool ensured the quality of the studies, while the Confidence in Evidence from the Reviews of Qualitative Research (CERQual) approach facilitated data confidence assessment.

RESULTS

Nine studies were included (188 participants). Three analytical themes were developed: (i) "Efficient Communication of Information", emphasising the importance of accurate content transmission; (ii) "Emotional Support and Well-being", recognising emotional aspects as integral to treatment; and (iii) "Empowerment Promotion", focusing on information retention and personal transformation. The studies showed good quality, with moderate confidence in the evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

The perceived factors influencing the success of PNE are intricately related to the domain of communication, the emotional dimension of personal experience, and the capacity to be empowered.

Does combining oro-facial manual therapy with bruxism neuroscience education affect pain and function in cases of awake bruxism? A pilot study

BACKGROUND

Although awake bruxism is associated with temporomandibular disorder (TMD) as well as head and neck pain, the effects of physical therapy and bruxism education to address these factors have not been investigated.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of oro-facial manual therapy and bruxism neuroscience education (BNE) on awake bruxism over a 3-week period with an open-ended follow-up questionnaire after 3 months.

METHODS

Subjects (n = 28) were randomly allocated to one of two groups, an intervention group and a control group. Data regarding disability, function and pain were collected pre- and post-assessment, with all measures administered in a single-blind fashion. Participants in both groups received six treatment sessions during this period. In addition to manual therapy, participants were provided with information on the neurophysiological mechanisms of bruxism and contributing factors. Individual behavioural guidelines and daily exercises were determined in consultation with the therapist. An introduction to a bruxism specific app (Brux.App) was also provided, which all participants used as an adjunct to their treatment.

RESULTS

The intervention group demonstrated notable improvement as indicated by their scores in the Neck Disability Index (NDI) (p = .008), Pain Disability Index (PDI) (p = .007) and Jaw Disability List (JDL) (p = .03). Furthermore, clinical assessments of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) revealed a significant progress in terms of mouth opening (p = .03) and lateral jaw movement (laterotrusion) (p = .03). The mechanical pain threshold (PTT) of both the masseter (p = .02) and temporalis muscle (p = .05) also showed significant improvement. At 3-month follow-up, the questionnaire revealed that the majority of the intervention group (13/15, 87%) reported a benefit from the treatment.

CONCLUSION

The reduction in pain and disability together with improvement in function and increased coping suggest a potential modification of awake bruxism through specialised musculoskeletal intervention and BNE tailored to the individual patient.

"I wish I knew then what I know now" - pain science education concepts important for female persistent pelvic pain: a reflexive thematic analysis

ABSTRACT

Pain science education (PSE) provides people with an understanding of "how pain works" grounded in the biopsychosocial model of pain; it has been demonstrated to improve outcomes in musculoskeletal pain conditions. Preliminary evidence suggests PSE may be effective for female individuals with persistent pelvic pain, but how the content of PSE needs to be modified for this group remains to be determined. A reflexive thematic analysis of qualitative data was performed to identify PSE concepts that female individuals with persistent pelvic pain consider important and why. Twenty individual, semistructured interviews were conducted with adult females who had engaged with PSE and had self-identified as having "improved" pelvic pain. Most participants had been diagnosed with endometriosis (n = 16). Four themes were generated capturing PSE concepts considered important by female individuals with "improved" pelvic pain: (1) "A sensitised nervous system leads to overprotective pain" validated their pelvic pain as being real; (2) "Pain does not have to mean the body is damaged (although sometimes it does)" provided reassurance that pelvic pain does not mean their condition is worsening; (3) "How I think, feel, and 'see' my pain can make it worse" enabled participants to find optimal ways to manage their pain; and (4) "I can change my pain… slowly" provided hope that pelvic pain can improve and empowered them to pursue pain improvement as a viable goal. This study generated 4 PSE learning concepts that were important to female individuals with improved pelvic pain and may be incorporated into PSE curricula for female individuals with pelvic pain.