An update on the pharmacokinetic considerations in the treatment of ADHD with long-acting methylphenidate and amphetamine formulations

Effect of psychostimulant medications on physical function in children with cerebral palsy: scoping review

The aim of this scoping review is to examine the extent and depth of the literature on effects of central nervous system (CNS) stimulant medications on physical function in children with cerebral palsy (CP). A systematic search for relevant peer-reviewed studies was conducted of PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, SPORTDiscus, Embase, & Scopus (January 2002 & August 2022). We included studies that examined the effects of CNS stimulants on physical function in children with CP. Four studies met our selection criteria. All studies explored the effect of Modafinil on physical function outcomes. Three studies of the four included studies reported positive effects of Modafinil on spasticity, motor performance, and gait, whereas one study reported no significant effects of Modafinil. Our findings suggest that there is very low-quality evidence that suggests that Modafinil may enhance physical improvements in body structure and function, including reduction in spasticity and improvements in gait parameters. IMPACT: Central nervous system stimulants were examined for efficacy on physical function and spasticity in children with cerebral palsy. The evidence on the effects of central nervous system stimulants on physical function in children with CP is limited and inconsistent.

Psychostimulant Medications for Physical Function and Spasticity in Children With Cerebral Palsy: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Cerebral palsy (CP) is a prevalent nonprogressive disorder that leads to impaired movement (ie, spasticity), posture, and balance, which affects functions such as walking and upper extremity tasks. Current medical treatments show efficacy in improving motor performance but have considerable side effects. Emerging off-label use of central nervous system (CNS) medications for improving motor performance has shown promising results in children with CP and other populations.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to describe a protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) to examine the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of methylphenidate (MPH) and modafinil on spasticity and motor performance in children with CP.

METHODS

This will be a protocol study for a pilot, triple-masked, placebo-controlled RCT (a class I trial following the American Academy of Neurology criteria) with blinded patients, outcome assessors, and intervention delivery team. Eligible children should be diagnosed with CP levels I or II based on the Gross Motor Function Classification System and be aged between 7 and 12 years. Thirty-six children with CP will be randomized into 3 groups to receive (1) MPH (2.5 mg of MPH + 100 mg placebo), (2) modafinil (100 mg modafinil + 2.5 mg placebo), or (3) a placebo (2.5 mg placebo + 100 mg placebo), in addition to physical therapy for 12 weeks. Primary outcomes include the Gross Motor Function Measure-66 and the Modified Ashworth Scale. Secondary outcomes include the Timed Up and Go test, 5 Time Sit to Stand test, Modified Clinical Test for Sensory Interaction of Balance, and 10-Meter Walk Test.

RESULTS

The protocol has been accepted by Kuwait University (VDR/EC-225) and the Ministry of Health of Kuwait (2022/2157). The inclusion of participants will start in June 2024.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of CNS stimulant medications and controlling for rehabilitation has not been studied yet. The findings of this study may determine if using CNS stimulant medications is beneficial for the reduction of spasticity and improvement of physical function in children with spastic CP.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05675098; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05675098.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

PRR1-10.2196/53728.

Pharmacokinetics of Long-Acting Methylphenidate: Formulation Differences, Bioequivalence, Interchangeability

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder is one of the most common neuropsychiatric conditions in children, and methylphenidate (MPH) is one of the first-line therapies. MPH is available in a variety of extended-release (ER) formulations worldwide, and most formulations are not considered bioequivalent due to differences in pharmacokinetics. It is hypothesized that the current bioequivalence guidelines from the different regulatory bodies may generate inconsistent findings or recommendations when assessing the bioequivalence of ER MPH formulations. This manuscript aims to conduct a comprehensive and narrative critical literature review to analyze pharmacokinetic data pertaining to ER formulations of MPH in order to assess bioequivalence, differences in regulatory guidelines, and additional pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic parameters that may help define interchangeability.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane Library with no time limits. Study characteristics, non-compartmental pharmacokinetic parameters, and bioequivalence data were extracted for analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-three studies were identified with primary pharmacokinetic data after the administration of ER MPH, of which 10 were direct comparative studies (i.e., at least 2 formulations tested within a single setting) and 23 were indirect comparisons (i.e., different experimental settings). Two formulations were consistently reported as bioequivalent across the regulatory bodies using criteria from their guidance documents, although inconsistencies have been observed. However, when additional kinetic criteria (discussed in this manuscript) were imposed, only one study met the more stringent definition of bioequivalence. Various clinical factors also had inconsistent effects on the pharmacokinetics and interchangeability of the different formulations, which were associated with a lack of standardization for assessing covariates across the regulatory agencies.

CONCLUSION

Additional pharmacokinetic parameters and consistency in guidelines across the regulatory bodies may improve bioequivalence assessments. Based on our findings, more research is also required to understand whether bioequivalence is an appropriate measure for determining MPH interchangeability. This critical review is suitable for formulation scientists, clinical pharmacologists, and clinicians.

Investigating Variations in Medicine Approvals for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Cross-Country Document Analysis Comparing Drug Labeling

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the approval of medicines for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) for pediatric patients across five countries.

METHOD

A document analysis was completed, using the drug labeling for ADHD medicines from five countries; United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, Canada and United States (US). Comparisons of available formulations and approval information for ADHD medicine use in pediatric patients were made.

RESULTS

The US had the highest number of approved medicines and medicine forms across the studied countries (29 medicine forms for 10 approved medicines). Approved age and dosage variations across countries and missing dosage information were identified in several drug labeling.

CONCLUSIONS

The discrepancies in approval information in ADHD medicine drug labeling and differing availability of medicine formulations across countries suggest variations in the management of ADHD across countries. The update of drug labeling and further research into reasons for variability and impact on practice are needed.

UK adult ADHD services in crisis

The UK's services for adult attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are in crisis, with demand outstripping capacity and waiting times reaching unprecedented lengths. Recognition of and treatments for ADHD have expanded over the past two decades, increasing clinical demand. This issue has been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite an increase in specialist services, resource allocation has not kept pace, leading to extended waiting times. Underfunding has encouraged growth in independent providers, leading to fragmentation of service provision. Treatment delays carry a human and financial cost, imposing a burden on health, social care and the criminal justice system. A rethink of service procurement and delivery is needed, with multiple solutions on the table, including increasing funding, improving system efficiency, altering the service provision model and clinical prioritisation. However, the success of these solutions hinges on fiscal capacity and workforce issues.

Adverse Events During Dosing of Delayed-release/Extended-release Methylphenidate: Learnings From the Open-label Phase of a Registration Trial and a Real-world Postmarketing Surveillance Program

PURPOSE

Delayed-release/extended-release methylphenidate (DR/ER-MPH) (formerly HLD200) is an evening-dosed agent used for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Postmarketing surveillance data from approximately 74,000 patients exposed to DR/ER-MPH (up to June 17, 2022) were reported and compared with the open-label, treatment-optimization phase of a Phase III clinical trial to derive possible learnings on how to approach adverse events (AEs) that emerge during dose titration.

METHODS

An analysis of AEs spontaneously reported to Ironshore in postmarketing surveillance included, where available, age, dose, timing, and discontinuations. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics.

FINDINGS

A total of 395 children, adolescents, and adults reported 601 AEs in postmarketing surveillance. Five AEs were classified as serious. AEs preceded drug use discontinuation in 172 patients. Many AEs occurred early (52% were reported within 30 days) and at lower doses (54% were reported at 20 to 40 mg), similar to the trial data. Reported AEs included those similar in type but orders of magnitude lower in number than those from the clinical trial.

IMPLICATIONS

No new safety concerns were revealed in this real-world setting compared with the safety profile identified in DR/ER-MPH trial data. In real-world practices, clinicians tended to discontinue DR/ER-MPH treatment after AE onset, whereas trial investigators continued to optimize treatment and found that AEs were generally tolerable, suggesting that health care practitioners may consider developing strategies to manage tolerability issues with DR/ER-MPH treatment on AE emergence rather than immediately discontinuing use of the drug to provide optimal therapeutic benefit.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov identifier: NCT02493777.

Single and Combined Effects of Multiple Intensities of Behavioral Modification and Methylphenidate for Children with ADHD in the Home Setting

Behavioral treatment, stimulants, and their combination are the recommended treatments for childhood attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The current study utilizes within-subjects manipulations of multiple doses of methylphenidate (placebo, 0.15, 0.30, and 0.60 mg/kg/dose t.i.d.) and intensities of behavioral modification (no, low, and high intensity) in the summer treatment program (STP) and home settings. Outcomes are evaluated in the home setting. Participants were 153 children (ages 5-12) diagnosed with ADHD. In alignment with experimental conditions implemented during the STP day, parents implemented behavioral modification levels in three-week intervals, child medication status varied daily, and the orders were randomized. Parents provided daily reports of child behavior, impairment, and symptoms and self-reported parenting stress and self-efficacy. At the end of the study, parents reported treatment preferences. Stimulant medication led to significant improvements across all outcome variables with higher doses resulting in greater improvement. Behavioral treatment significantly improved child individualized goal attainment, symptoms, and impairment in the home setting and parenting stress and self-efficacy. Effect sizes indicate that behavioral treatment combined with a low-medium dose (0.15 or 0.30 mg/kg/dose) of medication results in equivalent or superior outcomes compared to a higher dose (0.60 mg/kg/dose) of medication alone. This pattern was seen across outcomes. Parents overwhelmingly reported preferring treatment with a behavioral component as a first-choice treatment (99%). Results underscore the need to consider dosing as well as parent preference when utilizing combined treatment approaches. This study provides further evidence that combining behavioral treatment and stimulant medication may reduce the stimulant dose needed for beneficial effects.

Methylphenidate for children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)

BACKGROUND

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most commonly diagnosed and treated psychiatric disorders in childhood. Typically, children and adolescents with ADHD find it difficult to pay attention and they are hyperactive and impulsive. Methylphenidate is the psychostimulant most often prescribed, but the evidence on benefits and harms is uncertain. This is an update of our comprehensive systematic review on benefits and harms published in 2015.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of methylphenidate for children and adolescents with ADHD.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, three other databases and two trials registers up to March 2022. In addition, we checked reference lists and requested published and unpublished data from manufacturers of methylphenidate.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised clinical trials (RCTs) comparing methylphenidate versus placebo or no intervention in children and adolescents aged 18 years and younger with a diagnosis of ADHD. The search was not limited by publication year or language, but trial inclusion required that 75% or more of participants had a normal intellectual quotient (IQ > 70). We assessed two primary outcomes, ADHD symptoms and serious adverse events, and three secondary outcomes, adverse events considered non-serious, general behaviour, and quality of life.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently conducted data extraction and risk of bias assessment for each trial. Six review authors including two review authors from the original publication participated in the update in 2022. We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures. Data from parallel-group trials and first-period data from cross-over trials formed the basis of our primary analyses. We undertook separate analyses using end-of-last period data from cross-over trials. We used Trial Sequential Analyses (TSA) to control for type I (5%) and type II (20%) errors, and we assessed and downgraded evidence according to the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 212 trials (16,302 participants randomised); 55 parallel-group trials (8104 participants randomised), and 156 cross-over trials (8033 participants randomised) as well as one trial with a parallel phase (114 participants randomised) and a cross-over phase (165 participants randomised). The mean age of participants was 9.8 years ranging from 3 to 18 years (two trials from 3 to 21 years). The male-female ratio was 3:1. Most trials were carried out in high-income countries, and 86/212 included trials (41%) were funded or partly funded by the pharmaceutical industry. Methylphenidate treatment duration ranged from 1 to 425 days, with a mean duration of 28.8 days. Trials compared methylphenidate with placebo (200 trials) and with no intervention (12 trials). Only 165/212 trials included usable data on one or more outcomes from 14,271 participants. Of the 212 trials, we assessed 191 at high risk of bias and 21 at low risk of bias. If, however, deblinding of methylphenidate due to typical adverse events is considered, then all 212 trials were at high risk of bias.

PRIMARY OUTCOMES

methylphenidate versus placebo or no intervention may improve teacher-rated ADHD symptoms (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.88 to -0.61; I² = 38%; 21 trials; 1728 participants; very low-certainty evidence). This corresponds to a mean difference (MD) of -10.58 (95% CI -12.58 to -8.72) on the ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS; range 0 to 72 points). The minimal clinically relevant difference is considered to be a change of 6.6 points on the ADHD-RS. Methylphenidate may not affect serious adverse events (risk ratio (RR) 0.80, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.67; I² = 0%; 26 trials, 3673 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The TSA-adjusted intervention effect was RR 0.91 (CI 0.31 to 2.68).

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

methylphenidate may cause more adverse events considered non-serious versus placebo or no intervention (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.37; I² = 72%; 35 trials 5342 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The TSA-adjusted intervention effect was RR 1.22 (CI 1.08 to 1.43). Methylphenidate may improve teacher-rated general behaviour versus placebo (SMD -0.62, 95% CI -0.91 to -0.33; I² = 68%; 7 trials 792 participants; very low-certainty evidence), but may not affect quality of life (SMD 0.40, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.83; I² = 81%; 4 trials, 608 participants; very low-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The majority of our conclusions from the 2015 version of this review still apply. Our updated meta-analyses suggest that methylphenidate versus placebo or no-intervention may improve teacher-rated ADHD symptoms and general behaviour in children and adolescents with ADHD. There may be no effects on serious adverse events and quality of life. Methylphenidate may be associated with an increased risk of adverse events considered non-serious, such as sleep problems and decreased appetite. However, the certainty of the evidence for all outcomes is very low and therefore the true magnitude of effects remain unclear. Due to the frequency of non-serious adverse events associated with methylphenidate, the blinding of participants and outcome assessors is particularly challenging. To accommodate this challenge, an active placebo should be sought and utilised. It may be difficult to find such a drug, but identifying a substance that could mimic the easily recognised adverse effects of methylphenidate would avert the unblinding that detrimentally affects current randomised trials. Future systematic reviews should investigate the subgroups of patients with ADHD that may benefit most and least from methylphenidate. This could be done with individual participant data to investigate predictors and modifiers like age, comorbidity, and ADHD subtypes.

Pharmacokinetics of a Modified-Release Dexamphetamine Sulfate Formulation Following Single and Multiple Dosing in Healthy Adults: Comparative Bioavailability with Immediate-Release Dexamphetamine Sulfate, between Strengths, Assessment of Food and Meal Composition Effects

Background

A modified-release dexamphetamine sulfate formulation (DEX-MR) is under development for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Objective

We investigated the bioequivalence of once-daily DEX-MR to twice-daily immediate-release dexamphetamine sulfate (DEX-IR) after single and multiple dosing and between strengths, and effects of food and meal types.

Method

Three randomized, open-label, crossover studies in healthy males were conducted. In the single-dose study, participants received DEX-MR 20 mg, DEX-MR 10 mg (20 mg dose), and twice-daily DEX-IR 10 mg under fasted conditions and after a high-fat, high-calorie breakfast. In the breakfast study, participants received DEX-MR 20 mg and twice-daily DEX-IR 10 mg after a normocaloric and a high-fat, high-calorie breakfast. In the multiple-dose study, participants received DEX-MR 20 mg and twice-daily DEX-IR 10 mg for seven days each. In the run-in period (five days), participants consumed a normocaloric breakfast; on profile days, participants consumed a normocaloric breakfast (day 6) or a high-fat, high-calorie breakfast (day 7).

Results

Once-daily DEX-MR at a dose of 20 mg was bioequivalent to twice-daily DEX-IR 10 mg after single dosing under fasted and fed conditions and after multiple dosing under fed conditions. DEX-MR 10 mg and DEX-MR 20 mg were bioequivalent when administered as a single 20 mg dose. Food slightly reduced the rate and extent of absorption of DEX-MR and delayed the time to peak plasma concentration (tmax) by approximately two hours compared to the fasted state. Bioavailability of DEX-MR was comparable under different meal conditions (normocaloric vs. high-fat, high-calorie breakfast) both after single and multiple dosing.

Conclusions

Bioequivalence of once-daily DEX-MR and twice-daily DEX-IR was established. 1×2 DEX-MR 10 mg was bioequivalent to 1×1 DEX-MR 20 mg. DEX-MR should be administered with/after a meal to achieve the targeted pharmacokinetic profile (delayed tmax). Bioavailability of DEX-MR is not affected by meal composition (i.e., fat and caloric content).

Reciprocal effects of single or repeated exposure to methylphenidate or sex in adult male rats

RATIONALE

Exposure to rewards can alter behavioral reactivity to them. For example, stimulants sensitize locomotor activation, whereas sexual experience sensitizes copulatory behaviors. Moreover, rewards can cross-sensitize one another. Although stimulants are known to cross-sensitize locomotor effects, the evidence for cross-sensitization between stimulants and sex is less clear.

OBJECTIVES

This study determined the effects of single and repeated pre-exposure to methylphenidate (MPH) or sex on one another in adult male rats.

METHODS

Cross-sensitization between MPH (5 mg/kg) and sex (30 min with sexually experienced female) was examined. Adult male rats were pre-exposed to 0, 1, or 10 trials of either sex or MPH before being exposed to the other reward. Locomotor chambers were used in MPH trials. Bilevel chambers were used in sexual trials, and sexual behaviors were video scored.

RESULTS

The amount of prior sexual experience differentially influenced the ceiling of MPH-dependent sensitization; in the last drug trial, locomotion was highest in males given 1 previous sexual trial compared with 0 or 10. Compared with MPH-naive males, pre-exposure to MPH (1 and 10 trials) reduced the number of ejaculations without impacting sexual performance (intromission/mount latency and frequency).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that the degree of pre-exposure to a reward can differentially affect reactivity to novel rewards. The results showed that previous findings of cross-sensitization between amphetamine and sex do not extend to MPH. However, exposure to MPH prior to sexual experience can increase the amount of sexual stimulation needed to achieve ejaculation.

Interventions for ADHD in children & adolescents with epilepsy: A review and decision tree to guide clinicians

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is one of the most common pediatric epilepsy comorbidities. Treating ADHD in the context of epilepsy can be overwhelming for parents and clinicians. Current frontline treatment for ADHD is stimulant medication. However, some parents of pediatric patients with epilepsy have concerns about adding additional medication to their child's epilepsy regimen and/or about adverse effects of stimulant medication. Non-medication ADHD treatments including psychosocial interventions and ketogenic diet have also shown success in improving ADHD symptoms. Our focused review provides an easy-to-use guide for clinicians on ADHD interventions and combinations of interventions for pediatric patients with epilepsy and ADHD. Our guide includes information from 8 electronic databases for peer-reviewed, English language studies of psychosocial treatments for youth with epilepsy and ADHD. One hundred eight studies were selected based on inclusion criteria (21 systematic reviews, 12 meta-analyses, 8 literature reviews, 6 population surveys, 31 clinical trials, 20 cross-sectional studies, and 10 retrospective reviews). Results indicated that stimulant medication is a frontline treatment for ADHD symptoms in youth with epilepsy, with important caveats and alternatives.

The Loudness Dependence of Auditory Evoked Potentials is associated with the Symptom Severity and Treatment in Boys with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Effect of Colonic Absorption on the Pharmacokinetic Properties of Delayed-Release and Extended-Release Methylphenidate: In Vivo, In Vitro, and Modeling Evaluations

Most stimulants used to treat attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder are administered in the morning and absorbed in the upper gastrointestinal tract. DR/ER‐MPH (formerly HLD200), an evening‐dosed delayed‐release and extended‐release methylphenidate, is predicted to be absorbed in the proximal colon. The pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of DR/ER‐MPH is characterized by an 8‐ to 10‐hour delay in initial methylphenidate absorption and a subsequent gradual increase in plasma concentration, followed by a slow decline. To examine the relationship of absorption site to pharmacokinetics, the DR/ER‐MPH formulation was altered to release methylphenidate in the small intestine and distal colon. The 3 formulations were administered in an open‐label, 3‐way, crossover study in healthy adults (N = 18). Compared with the small intestine formulation, the PK profile of the proximal colon (DR/ER‐MPH) formulation exhibited a longer delay before initial methylphenidate absorption, decreased peak methylphenidate concentration, increased time to peak concentration, and decreased bioavailability; these characteristics were amplified in the distal colon formulation. Safety profiles fell within the expectations for methylphenidate products. Modeled PK profiles were similar between the small intestine formulation and a morning‐dosed extended‐release methylphenidate (both predicted to release methylphenidate in the upper gastrointestinal tract), providing additional evidence that the PK profile of DR/ER‐MPH is shaped by colonic absorption.

Family Function Impacts Relapse Tendency in Substance Use Disorder: Mediated Through Self-Esteem and Resilience

BACKGROUND

Substance abuse has been a public health concern, and even after detoxification treatment, the relapse rate is still high. Family function is closely related to substance dependence. However, studies on psychological mechanisms between them are rare.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to explore the mediating role of self-esteem and resilience in the pathway that family function impacts the relapse tendency among patients with substance use disorder (SUD).

METHODS

A total of 282 SUD patients were recruited, and standard questionnaires were administered for each patient. The relapse tendency, family function, self-esteem and resilience were assessed by the family care index questionnaire, the Connor-Davidson resilience scale, the Rosenberg self-esteem scale and the relapse tendency questionnaire. Bootstrap method was conducted for mediation analysis to test the effects of how family function affects relapse tendency mediated through self-esteem and resilience.

RESULTS

The average score of relapse tendency of the patients was 28.47 (SD = 11.89). Intermediary analysis found that self-esteem played an intermediary role in the relationship between family function and relapse tendency. Resilience plays an intermediary role in the relationship between family function and relapse tendency. Further, the path analysis showed that family function not only had a direct association with relapse tendency, but also indirectly related to relapse tendency through self-esteem and resilience.

CONCLUSIONS

Self-esteem and resilience are the key factors in the relationship between family function and relapse tendency of SUD patients.

Current Pharmacological Treatments for ADHD

Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a prevalent neurodevelopmental condition associated with impaired function and increased risk of poor outcomes in children, young people and adults with the condition. Currently approved pharmacological treatments for ADHD include a range of stimulant (methylphenidate, amphetamine) and nonstimulant (atomoxetine, guanfacine, clonidine) medications. All have been shown to be effective in treating the symptoms of ADHD and improving other functional outcomes including quality of life, academic performance, rates of accidents and injuries, and do not appear to be associated with significant adverse outcomes or side effects. In this chapter, we review medications for ADHD by summarising the mechanisms of action of each of the two main classes of compounds (stimulants and nonstimulants), the formulations of the most commonly prescribed medications within each class, their efficacy in treating ADHD symptoms and other outcomes, and other factors that influence treatment decisions including side effects and tolerability, comorbidities and medical history. We conclude with a summary of the treatment decisions made by clinicians and suggest some next steps for research. Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms of action of these medications and how exactly they improve symptoms, and to examine their effects on commonly occurring comorbidities.

Patterns of Response to Methylphenidate Administration in Children with ADHD: A Personalized Medicine Approach through Clustering Analysis

Individual responses to methylphenidate (MPH) can significantly differ in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in terms of the extent of clinical amelioration, optimal dosage needed, possible side effects, and short- and long-term duration of the benefits. In the present repeated-measures observational study, we undertook a proof-of-concept study to determine whether clustering analysis could be useful to characterize different clusters of responses to MPH in children with ADHD. We recruited 33 children with ADHD who underwent a comprehensive clinical, cognitive, and neurophysiological assessment before and after one month of MPH treatment. Symptomatology changes were assessed by parents and clinicians. The neuropsychological measures used comprised pen-and-paper and computerized tasks. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy was used to measure cortical hemodynamic activation during an attentional task. We developed an unsupervised machine learning algorithm to characterize the possible clusters of responses to MPH in our multimodal data. A symptomatology improvement was observed for both clinical and neuropsychological measures. Our model identified distinct clusters of amelioration that were related to symptom severity and visual-attentional performances. The present findings provide preliminary evidence that clustering analysis can potentially be useful in identifying different responses to MPH in children with ADHD, highlighting the importance of a personalized medicine approach within the clinical framework.

Methylphenidate for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adults: a narrative review

RATIONALE

Psychostimulants, including methylphenidate (MPH), are the mainstay of pharmacotherapy for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults. Even though MPH is the most commonly used medication for ADHD these days, there are relatively few resources available that provide comprehensive insight into the pharmacological and clinical features of the compound.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this paper is to provide an up-to-date outline of the pharmacology and clinical utility of MPH for ADHD in adult patients.

METHODS

While conducting the narrative review, we applied structured search strategies covering the two major online databases (MEDLINE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials). In addition, we performed handsearching of reference lists of relevant papers.

RESULTS

Methylphenidate exhibits multimodal mechanism of action, working primarily as a dopamine and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor. It also protects the dopaminergic system against the ongoing 'wearing off' (by securing a substantial reserve pool of the neurotransmitter, stored in the presynaptic vesicles). In placebo-controlled trials, MPH was shown to be moderately effective both against the core ADHD symptoms (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35-0.64), and the accompanying emotion regulation deficits (SMD, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.23-0.45). The most common adverse events related to long-term treatment with MPH are decreased appetite (~ 20%), dry mouth (15%), heart palpitations (13%), gastrointestinal infections (~ 10%), and agitation/feeling restless (~ 10%).

CONCLUSIONS

There is substantial body of evidence to suggest that MPH is an effective and safe treatment option for adults with ADHD.

A mixed herbal extract as an adjunctive therapy for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A randomized placebo-controlled trial

Background

Methylphenidate improves clinical symptoms and brain activity in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) patients through the attention-regulation network's dopamine system. Additionally, water-soluble extracts (HX106) of four plants (Gastrodia elata Blume, Liriope platyphylla Wang et Tang, Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge, and Dimocarpus longan Lour) improve cognitive function. We hypothesized that the combination of HX106 and methylphenidate would improve ADHD symptoms and brain activity of the attention network more effectively than the combination of placebo and methylphenidate.

Methods

Twenty-seven patients with ADHD were administered a herbal mixture and methylphenidate (n=13), or placebo and methylphenidate (n=14) during a 4-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Changes in ADHD symptoms (K-ARS scores), as well as brain activity and functional connectivity, were assessed at baseline and 4 weeks later.

Results

The HX106 group showed a greater improvement in total attention (16.8%) and inattention (17.2%) scores than the placebo group. The HX106 group showed increased brain activity within the left precuneus compared to the placebo group. The HX106 group also showed increased functional connectivity from the precuneus seed to the left middle temporal gyrus compared with the placebo group. In all participants, the changes in K-ARS scores were negatively correlated with changes in brain activity in the left middle temporal gyrus.

Conclusions

HX106 enhanced the effect of methylphenidate on ADHD symptoms and increased brain activity in the attention-regulation network. Therefore, HX106 may be an effective adjunctive therapy for patients with ADHD.

Novel Formulations of ADHD Medications: Stimulant Selection and Management

Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most commonly diagnosed psychiatric disorder in children and adolescents in the United States. In 2016, approximately 3.8 million U.S. children ages 2 to 17 years with ADHD were being treated with medication. There are approximately 30 different amphetamine (AMPH) and methylphenidate (MPH) formulations on the market. These include immediate-release and extended-release compounds. The extended-release formulations contain various ratios of immediate-release and extended-release components, which determine the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile. For stimulants, the PK and pharmacodynamic (PD) profiles are tightly linked, and the immediate-release and extended-release percentages influence onset and duration of drug effects. Choosing the right stimulant medication for a patient depends on an understanding of the PK/PD profile, the time of day that symptoms are most impairing, the need for morning and evening symptom control and individual patient preferences.

A Post Hoc Comparison of Prior ADHD Medication Dose and Optimized Delayed-release and Extended-release Methylphenidate Dose in a Pivotal Phase III Trial

PURPOSE

HLD200 is the first evening-dosed, delayed-release and extended-release methylphenidate (DR/ER-MPH) designed to delay initial release of MPH and provide treatment effects throughout the day and into the evening for individuals with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Because DR/ER-MPH is uniquely absorbed in the colon, it cannot be substituted for other ADHD medications on a milligram-per-milligram basis. To provide clinicians with a target dose range for DR/ER-MPH when transitioning patients from a prior ADHD medication, dose conversion ratios (DCRs) between prior medication doses and optimized doses of DR/ER-MPH were determined post hoc from a pivotal Phase III study of children (aged 6-12 years) with ADHD.

METHODS

DR/ER-MPH doses were optimized over a 6-week open-label period. DCRs were calculated between optimized doses of DR/ER-MPH at week 6 and prior stable doses of ADHD medication.

FINDINGS

Mean DCRs ranged from 1.8 to 4.3 for optimized DR/ER-MPH dose versus previous stable dose for individuals taking an extended-release stimulant monotherapy. DCRs for those taking an immediate-release stimulant monotherapy ranged from 4.7 to 6.0.

IMPLICATIONS

In a Phase III trial of children with ADHD, optimized doses of DR/ER-MPH were higher than doses of prior ADHD medications, but the adverse event profile was consistent with that of other MPHs. Higher DCRs compared with those predicted by bioavailability differences are consistent with a predicted dose-dependent duration of effect for DR/ER-MPH: with increasing doses, absorption is extended but with an attenuated increase in C_max compared with MPH formulations absorbed in the upper bowel. These data may help guide clinicians to optimize DR/ER-MPH doses. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02493777.

A Pharmacokinetic Study of Methylphenidate Hydrochloride Multilayer Extended-Release Capsules (Aptensio XR®) in Preschool-Aged Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

OBJECTIVE

This was a single-dose, one-period, multicenter, pharmacokinetic (PK) study to evaluate the PK of methylphenidate (MPH) hydrochloride multilayer extended-release capsules (MPH-MLR) in preschool children aged 4 to < 6 years, previously diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and on a stable dose of MPH.

METHODS

Preschool-aged children (N = 10) received a single oral dose of MPH-MLR (10, 15, or 20 mg) sprinkled over applesauce; a dose equivalent to their pre-enrollment daily dose of MPH. Blood samples for the measurement of MPH concentrations were obtained pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 24 h post-dose. No structural model was assumed in the derivation of PK values for analysis. Maximum plasma concentration (C_max), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), elimination half-life, clearance (CL), and volume of distribution (V_d) data were compared with a historical group of older children aged 6-11 years (N = 11) and analyzed by bodyweight. Safety (adverse event monitoring, vital signs, electrocardiogram, clinical laboratory testing, physical examination) was assessed.

RESULTS

Mean dose-normalized C_max and area under the curve to the last measurable observation (AUC_0-t) values were similar across dose groups, ranging from 0.67 ng/mL/mg (MPH 15 mg) to 0.81 ng/mL/mg (MPH 10 mg) for C_max/dose, and from 7.80 h × ng/mL/mg (MPH 20 mg) to 8.92 h × ng/mL/mg (MPH 10 mg) for AUC_0-t/dose. PK results were integrated into a previously described pharmacostatistical population PK model. Visual predictive check plots showed greater variability in the 6- to 11-year-old group than the 4- to < 6-year-old group, and CL increased with increasing body weight in a greater than dose-proportional manner. Mean CL, normalized for body weight, was constant for all dose groups, ranging from 4.88 L/h/kg to 5.80 L/h/kg. Median time to C_max ranged from 2.00 to 3.00 h post-dose, and overall, dose-normalized C_max concentrations indicated greater systemic exposures of MPH-MLR in preschool children aged 4 to < 6 years compared with children aged 6-11 years. Children aged 4 to < 6 years had a lower V_d than children aged 6-11 years. There were no unexpected safety signals.

CONCLUSION

The PK of MPH-MLR in preschool children demonstrated the biphasic absorption profile described earlier in older children, and the PK profile in children with ADHD aged 4 to < 6 years was similar to the profile in those aged 6-11 years, apart from a lower V_d and relatively higher systemic MPH levels for children in the preschool group.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02470234.