1
|
Scourzic L, Salataj E, Apostolou E. Deciphering the Complexity of 3D Chromatin Organization Driving Lymphopoiesis and Lymphoid Malignancies. Front Immunol 2021; 12:669881. [PMID: 34054841 PMCID: PMC8160312 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.669881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Proper lymphopoiesis and immune responses depend on the spatiotemporal control of multiple processes, including gene expression, DNA recombination and cell fate decisions. High-order 3D chromatin organization is increasingly appreciated as an important regulator of these processes and dysregulation of genomic architecture has been linked to various immune disorders, including lymphoid malignancies. In this review, we present the general principles of the 3D chromatin topology and its dynamic reorganization during various steps of B and T lymphocyte development and activation. We also discuss functional interconnections between architectural, epigenetic and transcriptional changes and introduce major key players of genomic organization in B/T lymphocytes. Finally, we present how alterations in architectural factors and/or 3D genome organization are linked to dysregulation of the lymphopoietic transcriptional program and ultimately to hematological malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Effie Apostolou
- Sanford I. Weill Department of Medicine, Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jost KL, Bertulat B, Rapp A, Brero A, Hardt T, Domaing P, Gösele C, Schulz H, Hübner N, Cardoso MC. Gene repositioning within the cell nucleus is not random and is determined by its genomic neighborhood. Epigenetics Chromatin 2015; 8:36. [PMID: 26388944 PMCID: PMC4574441 DOI: 10.1186/s13072-015-0025-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2015] [Accepted: 09/01/2015] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Heterochromatin has been reported to be a major silencing compartment during development and differentiation. Prominent heterochromatin compartments are located at the nuclear periphery and inside the nucleus (e.g., pericentric heterochromatin). Whether the position of a gene in relation to some or all heterochromatin compartments matters remains a matter of debate, which we have addressed in this study. Answering this question demanded solving the technical challenges of 3D measurements and the large-scale morphological changes accompanying cellular differentiation. RESULTS Here, we investigated the proximity effects of the nuclear periphery and pericentric heterochromatin on gene expression and additionally considered the effect of neighboring genomic features on a gene's nuclear position. Using a well-established myogenic in vitro differentiation system and a differentiation-independent heterochromatin remodeling system dependent on ectopic MeCP2 expression, we first identified genes with statistically significant expression changes by transcriptional profiling. We identified nuclear gene positions by 3D fluorescence in situ hybridization followed by 3D distance measurements toward constitutive and facultative heterochromatin domains. Single-cell-based normalization enabled us to acquire morphologically unbiased data and we finally correlated changes in gene positioning to changes in transcriptional profiles. We found no significant correlation of gene silencing and proximity to constitutive heterochromatin and a rather unexpected inverse correlation of gene activity and position relative to facultative heterochromatin at the nuclear periphery. CONCLUSION In summary, our data question the hypothesis of heterochromatin as a general silencing compartment. Nonetheless, compared to a simulated random distribution, we found that genes are not randomly located within the nucleus. An analysis of neighboring genomic context revealed that gene location within the nucleus is rather dependent on CpG islands, GC content, gene density, and short and long interspersed nuclear elements, collectively known as RIDGE (regions of increased gene expression) properties. Although genes do not move away/to the heterochromatin upon up-/down-regulation, genomic regions with RIDGE properties are generally excluded from peripheral heterochromatin. Hence, we suggest that individual gene activity does not influence gene positioning, but rather chromosomal context matters for sub-nuclear location.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Laurence Jost
- Department of Biology, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Bianca Bertulat
- Department of Biology, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Alexander Rapp
- Department of Biology, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Alessandro Brero
- Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, 13125 Berlin, Germany
| | - Tanja Hardt
- Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, 13125 Berlin, Germany
| | - Petra Domaing
- Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, 13125 Berlin, Germany
| | - Claudia Gösele
- Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, 13125 Berlin, Germany
| | - Herbert Schulz
- Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, 13125 Berlin, Germany
| | - Norbert Hübner
- Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, 13125 Berlin, Germany
| | - M Cristina Cardoso
- Department of Biology, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Transcriptional control of CD4 and CD8 coreceptor expression during T cell development. Cell Mol Life Sci 2013; 70:4537-53. [PMID: 23793512 PMCID: PMC3827898 DOI: 10.1007/s00018-013-1393-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2013] [Revised: 05/27/2013] [Accepted: 05/29/2013] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
The differentiation and function of peripheral helper and cytotoxic T cell lineages is coupled with the expression of CD4 and CD8 coreceptor molecules, respectively. This indicates that the control of coreceptor gene expression is closely linked with the regulation of CD4/CD8 lineage decision of DP thymocytes. Research performed during the last two decades revealed comprehensive mechanistic insight into the developmental stage- and subset/lineage-specific regulation of Cd4, Cd8a and Cd8b1 (Cd8) gene expression. These studies provided important insight into transcriptional control mechanisms during T cell development and into the regulation of cis-regulatory networks in general. Moreover, the identification of transcription factors involved in the regulation of CD4 and CD8 significantly advanced the knowledge of the transcription factor network regulating CD4/CD8 cell-fate choice of DP thymocytes. In this review, we provide an overview of the identification and characterization of CD4/CD8 cis-regulatory elements and present recent progress in our understanding of how these cis-regulatory elements control CD4/CD8 expression during T cell development and in peripheral T cells. In addition, we describe the transcription factors implicated in the regulation of coreceptor gene expression and discuss how these factors are integrated into the transcription factor network that regulates CD4/CD8 cell-fate choice of DP thymocytes.
Collapse
|
4
|
Mehta I, Chakraborty S, Rao BJ. IMACULAT - an open access package for the quantitative analysis of chromosome localization in the nucleus. PLoS One 2013; 8:e61386. [PMID: 23577217 PMCID: PMC3620108 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2012] [Accepted: 03/07/2013] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
The alteration in the location of the chromosomes within the nucleus upon action of internal or external stimuli has been implicated in altering genome function. The effect of stimuli at a whole genome level is studied by using two-dimensional fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to delineate whole chromosome territories within a cell nucleus, followed by a quantitative analysis of the spatial distribution of the chromosome. However, to the best of our knowledge, open access software capable of quantifying spatial distribution of whole chromosomes within cell nucleus is not available. In the current work, we present a software package that computes localization of whole chromosomes - Image Analysis of Chromosomes for computing localization (IMACULAT). We partition the nucleus into concentric elliptical compartments of equal area and the variance in the quantity of any chromosome in these shells is used to determine its localization in the nucleus. The images are pre-processed to remove the smudges outside the cell boundary. Automation allows high throughput analysis for deriving statistics. Proliferating normal human dermal fibroblasts were subjected to standard a two-dimensional FISH to delineate territories for all human chromosomes. Approximately 100 images from each chromosome were analyzed using IMACULAT. The analysis corroborated that these chromosome territories have non-random gene density based organization within the interphase nuclei of human fibroblasts. The ImageMagick Perl API has been used for pre-processing the images. The source code is made available at www.sanchak.com/imaculat.html.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ishita Mehta
- Department of Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, India
| | - Sandeep Chakraborty
- Department of Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, India
| | - Basuthkar J. Rao
- Department of Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Heterochromatin and gene positioning: inside, outside, any side? Chromosoma 2012; 121:555-63. [PMID: 23090282 PMCID: PMC3501169 DOI: 10.1007/s00412-012-0389-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2012] [Revised: 10/07/2012] [Accepted: 10/08/2012] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
All cellular processes depend on the expression and repression of the right sets of genes at the right time. As each cell contains the same DNA, transcriptional and epigenetic factors have to maintain tight control over gene expression. Even a small divergence from the correct transcriptional program can lead to severe defects and even death. Having deciphered the complete linear genetic information, we need to clarify how this information is organized into the dynamic and highly heterogeneous three-dimensional space of the eukaryotic cell nucleus. Observations on the higher order organization of DNA into differentiated condensation levels date back to the early twentieth century, and potential implications of these structural features to gene expression were postulated shortly after. In particular, proximity of genes to condensed regions of heterochromatin was proposed to negatively influence their expression and, henceforward, the concept of heterochromatin as subnuclear silencing compartment emerged. Methodological advances fueled a flurry of recent studies, which only, in part, led support to this concept. In this review, we address how (hetero)chromatin structure and proximity might influence gene expression and discuss the challenges and means to unravel this fundamental biological question.
Collapse
|
6
|
Sato T, Chiba T, Ohno SI, Sato C, Sugoh T, Miyashita K, Akatsuka H, Hozumi K, Okada Y, Iida Y, Akatsuka A, Agata Y, Chiba M, Kohu K, Satake M, Tanabe H, Saya H, Habu S. Reciprocal Control of G1-Phase Progression Is Required for Th-POK/Runx3–Mediated CD4/8 Thymocyte Cell Fate Decision. THE JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY 2012; 189:4426-36. [DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1102748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
|
7
|
Rui J, Liu H, Zhu X, Cui Y, Liu X. Epigenetic Silencing of Cd8 Genes by ThPOK-Mediated Deacetylation during CD4 T Cell Differentiation. THE JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY 2012; 189:1380-90. [DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1201077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
8
|
Xi Y, Watanabe S, Hino Y, Sakamoto C, Nakatsu Y, Okada S, Nakao M. Hmga1 is differentially expressed and mediates silencing of the CD4/CD8 loci in T cell lineages and leukemic cells. Cancer Sci 2012; 103:439-447. [PMID: 22106824 PMCID: PMC7713622 DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2011.02159.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2011] [Revised: 11/11/2011] [Accepted: 11/19/2011] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
High-mobility group A1 (Hmga1) protein is an architectural chromatin factor, and aberrant Hmga1 expression in mice causes hematopoietic malignancies with defects in cellular differentiation. However, the functional involvement of Hmga1 in hematopoietic development and leukemic cells remains to be elucidated. Using Hmga1-green fluorescent protein (GFP) knock-in mice that endogenously express an Hmga1-GFP fusion protein, we examined Hmga1 expression in undifferentiated and differentiated populations of hematopoietic cells. During early T cell development in the thymus, Hmga1 is highly expressed in CD4/CD8-double negative (DN) cells and is transiently downregulated in CD4/CD8-double positive (DP) cells. Consistently, Hmga1 directly binds to cis-regulatory elements in the CD4/CD8 loci and the heterochromatin foci in DN-stage cells, but not in DP cells. Interestingly, CD4/CD8 expression in DN-stage leukemic cells is induced by inhibition of Hmga1 binding to nuclear DNA or RNA interference-mediated Hmga1 knockdown. In addition, Hmga1-depleted leukemic T cells markedly diminish proliferation, with transcriptional activation of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor genes as a direct target of Hmga1. The data in the present study reveal a role of Hmga1 in transcriptional silencing in T cell lineages and leukemic cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Xi
- Department of Medical Cell Biology, Institute of Molecular Embryology and Genetics, and Global Center of Excellence Cell Fate Regulation Research and Education Unit, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wang L, Xiong Y, Bosselut R. Maintaining CD4-CD8 lineage integrity in T cells: where plasticity serves versatility. Semin Immunol 2011; 23:360-7. [PMID: 21963088 PMCID: PMC3740965 DOI: 10.1016/j.smim.2011.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2010] [Accepted: 08/19/2011] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
The divergence of the two αβ T cell subsets defined by the mutually exclusive expression of CD4 and CD8 glycoproteins is an important event during the intrathymic differentiation of T lymphocytes. This reviews briefly summarizes the mechanisms that promote commitment to the CD4 or CD8 lineage in the thymus, and discusses the transcription factor circuits and epigenetic mechanisms that concur to maintain lineage integrity in post-thymic cells and yet allow effector cell differentiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lie Wang
- Laboratory of Immune Cell Biology, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-4259, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Collins A, Hewitt S, Chaumeil J, Sellars M, Micsinai M, Allinne J, Parisi F, Nora EP, Bolland D, Corcoran A, Kluger Y, Bosselut R, Ellmeier W, Chong M, Littman D, Skok J. RUNX transcription factor-mediated association of Cd4 and Cd8 enables coordinate gene regulation. Immunity 2011; 34:303-14. [PMID: 21435585 PMCID: PMC3101577 DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2010] [Revised: 09/07/2010] [Accepted: 12/21/2010] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
T cell fate is associated with mutually exclusive expression of CD4 or CD8 in helper and cytotoxic T cells, respectively. How expression of one locus is temporally coordinated with repression of the other has been a long-standing enigma, though we know RUNX transcription factors activate the Cd8 locus, silence the Cd4 locus, and repress the Zbtb7b locus (encoding the transcription factor ThPOK), which is required for CD4 expression. Here we found that nuclear organization was altered by interplay among members of this transcription factor circuitry: RUNX binding mediated association of Cd4 and Cd8 whereas ThPOK binding kept the loci apart. Moreover, targeted deletions within Cd4 modulated CD8 expression and pericentromeric repositioning of Cd8. Communication between Cd4 and Cd8 thus appears to enable long-range epigenetic regulation to ensure that expression of one excludes the other in mature CD4 or CD8 single-positive (SP) cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amélie Collins
- Molecular Pathogenesis Program, The Kimmel Center for Biology and Medicine of the Skirball Institute, New York University School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Susannah L. Hewitt
- Department of Pathology, New York University School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Julie Chaumeil
- Department of Pathology, New York University School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - MacLean Sellars
- Molecular Pathogenesis Program, The Kimmel Center for Biology and Medicine of the Skirball Institute, New York University School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Mariann Micsinai
- New York University Center for Health Informatics and Bioinformatics, New York University School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
- NYU Cancer Institute, New York University School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
- Department of Pathology and Yale Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Jeanne Allinne
- Department of Pathology, New York University School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Fabio Parisi
- Department of Pathology and Yale Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Elphège P. Nora
- Institut Curie, CNRS UMR3215, INSERM U934, 75724 Paris Cedex 05, France
| | - Dan J. Bolland
- The Babraham Institute, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, CB22 3AT, UK
| | - Anne E. Corcoran
- The Babraham Institute, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, CB22 3AT, UK
| | - Yuval Kluger
- Department of Pathology and Yale Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Remy Bosselut
- Laboratory of Immune Cell Biology, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-4259, USA
| | - Wilfried Ellmeier
- Division of Immunobiology, Institute of Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Lazarettgasse 19, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Mark M.W. Chong
- Molecular Pathogenesis Program, The Kimmel Center for Biology and Medicine of the Skirball Institute, New York University School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Dan R. Littman
- Molecular Pathogenesis Program, The Kimmel Center for Biology and Medicine of the Skirball Institute, New York University School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
| | - Jane A. Skok
- Department of Pathology, New York University School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
- Division of Infection and Immunity, The Department of Immunology and Molecular Pathology, University College London, London W1T 4JF, UK
- Corresponding author
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
The epigenetic landscape of lineage choice: lessons from the heritability of CD4 and CD8 expression. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2011; 356:165-88. [PMID: 21989924 PMCID: PMC4417357 DOI: 10.1007/82_2011_175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Developing αβ T cells choose between the helper and cytotoxic lineages, depending upon the specificity of their T cell receptors for MHC molecules. The expression of the CD4 co-receptor on helper cells and the CD8 co-receptor on cytotoxic cells is intimately linked to this decision, and their regulation at the transcriptional level has been the subject of intense study to better understand lineage choice. Indeed, as the fate of developing T cells is decided, the expression status of these genes is accordingly locked. Genetic models have revealed important transcriptional elements and the ability to manipulate these elements in the framework of development has added a new perspective on the temporal nature of their function and the epigenetic maintenance of gene expression. We examine here novel insights into epigenetic mechanisms that have arisen through the study of these genes.
Collapse
|
12
|
Guillemin C, Francastel C. [Heterochromatin compartments and gene silencing: human hematopoietic differentiation as a model study]. Biol Aujourdhui 2010; 204:221-33. [PMID: 20950566 DOI: 10.1051/jbio/2010016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2010] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
In order to accomplish its differentiation program, the nucleus of a multipotent cell must be sequentially reprogrammed to acquire and maintain new gene expression patterns. When a stem cell is committed to differentiate towards a given lineage, global genome reprogramming involves both repression of non-affiliated genes and selective activation of genes involved in the establishment of the lineage. Accumulating evidence indicates that lineage specific gene expression is determined not only by the availability of specific transcription factors, but also by epigenetic modifications including both local modifications of DNA and chromatin structure, as well as global topological changes in chromosomes and genes positioning in the nucleus. Combined, these different levels of gene regulation allow for fine controls that integrate environmental and intracellular signals to establish appropriate gene expression programs, and hence ultimately determine the identity of the cell. Therefore, epigenetic modifications most likely precede gene activation and play a critical role in the choices of a stem cell to continue to self-renew or to differentiate. However, the cause-effect relationship between chromatin structure, nuclear architecture and cell-fate decisions is still a matter of debate. The pericentromeric heterochromatin compartment will be presented as one of the best studied examples to understand the impact of and positioning of a gene on its transcription. We will set the influence of heterochromatin compartments in the context of hematopoietic differentiation of human multipotent progenitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Guillemin
- CNRS, Université Paris Diderot, UMR7216, Épigénétique et Destin Cellulaire, Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
During alphabeta T cell development, cells diverge into alternate CD4 helper and CD8(+) cytotoxic T cell lineages. The precise correlation between a T cell's CD8 and CD4 choice and its TCR specificity to class I or class II MHC was noted more than 20 years ago, and establishing the underlying mechanism has remained a focus of intense study since then. This review deals with three formerly discrete topics that are gradually becoming interconnected: the role of TCR signaling in lineage commitment, the regulation of expression of the CD4 and CD8 genes, and transcriptional regulation of lineage commitment. It is widely accepted that TCR signaling exerts a decisive influence on lineage choice, although the underlying mechanism remains intensely debated. Current evidence suggests that both duration and intensity of TCR signaling may control lineage choice, as proposed by the kinetic signaling and quantitative instructive models, respectively. Alternate expression of the CD4 and CD8 genes is the most visible manifestation of lineage choice, and much progress has been made in defining the responsible cis elements and transcription factors. Finally, important clues to the molecular basis of lineage commitment have been provided by the recent identification of the transcription factor ThPOK as a key regulator of lineage choice. ThPOK is selectively expressed in class II-restricted cells at the CD4(+)8(lo) stage and is necessary and sufficient for development to the CD4 lineage. Given the central role of ThPOK in lineage commitment, understanding its upstream regulation and downstream gene targets is expected to reveal further important aspects of the molecular machinery underlying lineage commitment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xi He
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ktistaki E, Garefalaki A, Williams A, Andrews SR, Bell DM, Foster KE, Spilianakis CG, Flavell RA, Kosyakova N, Trifonov V, Liehr T, Kioussis D. CD8 locus nuclear dynamics during thymocyte development. THE JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY 2010; 184:5686-95. [PMID: 20404270 DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1000170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Nuclear architecture and chromatin reorganization have recently been shown to orchestrate gene expression and act as key players in developmental pathways. To investigate how regulatory elements in the mouse CD8 gene locus are arranged in space and in relation to each other, three-dimensional fluorescence in situ hybridization and chromosome conformation capture techniques were employed to monitor the repositioning of the locus in relation to its subchromosomal territory and to identify long-range interactions between the different elements during development. Our data demonstrate that CD8 gene expression in murine lymphocytes is accompanied by the relocation of the locus outside its subchromosomal territory. Similar observations in the CD4 locus point to a rather general phenomenon during T cell development. Furthermore, we show that this relocation of the CD8 gene locus is associated with a clustering of regulatory elements forming a tight active chromatin hub in CD8-expressing cells. In contrast, in nonexpressing cells, the gene remains close to the main body of its chromosomal domain and the regulatory elements appear not to interact with each other.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleni Ktistaki
- Division of Molecular Immunology, Medical Research Council, National Institute for Medical Research, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wang L, Wildt KF, Castro E, Xiong Y, Feigenbaum L, Tessarollo L, Bosselut R. The zinc finger transcription factor Zbtb7b represses CD8-lineage gene expression in peripheral CD4+ T cells. Immunity 2008; 29:876-87. [PMID: 19062319 PMCID: PMC3392968 DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.09.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 122] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2008] [Revised: 09/04/2008] [Accepted: 09/30/2008] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
How CD4-CD8 differentiation is maintained in mature T cells is largely unknown. The present study has examined the role in this process of the zinc finger protein Zbtb7b, a critical factor for the commitment of MHC II-restricted thymocytes to the CD4+ lineage. We showed that Zbtb7b acted in peripheral CD4+ T cells to suppress CD8-lineage gene expression, including that of CD8 and cytotoxic effector genes perforin and Granzyme B, and was important for the proper repression of interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) during effector differentiation. The inappropriate expression of IFN-gamma by Zbtb7b-deficient CD4+ T cells required the activities of Eomesodermin and Runx transcription factors. Runx activity was needed for Granzyme B expression, indicating that Runx proteins control expression of the cytotoxic program. We conclude that a key function of Zbtb7b in the mature CD4+ T cell compartment is to repress CD8-lineage gene expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lie Wang
- Laboratory of Immune Cell Biology, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Kathryn F. Wildt
- Laboratory of Immune Cell Biology, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Ehydel Castro
- Laboratory of Immune Cell Biology, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Yumei Xiong
- Laboratory of Immune Cell Biology, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | - Rémy Bosselut
- Laboratory of Immune Cell Biology, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
The spatial organization of the genome is thought to play an important part in the coordination of gene regulation. New techniques have been used to identify specific long-range interactions between distal DNA sequences, revealing an ever-increasing complexity to nuclear organization. CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) is a versatile zinc finger protein with diverse regulatory functions. New data now help define how CTCF mediates both long-range intrachromosomal and interchromosomal interactions, and highlight CTCF as an important factor in determining the three-dimensional structure of the genome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Williams
- Department of Immunobiology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
T lymphocyte development is directed by a gene-expression program that occurs in the complex nucleoprotein environment of chromatin. This review examines basic principles of chromatin regulation and evaluates ongoing progress toward understanding how the chromatin template is manipulated to control gene expression and gene recombination in developing thymocytes. Special attention is devoted to the loci encoding T cell receptors alpha and beta, T cell coreceptors CD4 and CD8, and the enzyme terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase. The properties of SATB1, a notable organizer of thymocyte chromatin, are also addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael S Krangel
- Department of Immunology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710 USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lanctôt C, Cheutin T, Cremer M, Cavalli G, Cremer T. Dynamic genome architecture in the nuclear space: regulation of gene expression in three dimensions. Nat Rev Genet 2007; 8:104-15. [PMID: 17230197 DOI: 10.1038/nrg2041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 593] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The regulation of gene expression is mediated by interactions between chromatin and protein complexes. The importance of where and when these interactions take place in the nucleus is currently a subject of intense investigation. Increasing evidence indicates that gene activation or silencing is often associated with repositioning of the locus relative to nuclear compartments and other genomic loci. At the same time, however, structural constraints impose limits on chromatin mobility. Understanding how the dynamic nature of the positioning of genetic material in the nuclear space and the higher-order architecture of the nucleus are integrated is therefore essential to our overall understanding of gene regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Lanctôt
- Department Biologie II, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität, Grosshadernerstr. 2, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Jenkinson SR, Intlekofer AM, Sun G, Feigenbaum L, Reiner SL, Bosselut R. Expression of the transcription factor cKrox in peripheral CD8 T cells reveals substantial postthymic plasticity in CD4-CD8 lineage differentiation. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2007; 204:267-72. [PMID: 17296789 PMCID: PMC2118724 DOI: 10.1084/jem.20061982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Most T cells belong to either of two lineages defined by the mutually exclusive expression of CD4 and CD8 coreceptors: CD4 T cells are major histocompatibility complex (MHC) II restricted and have helper function, whereas CD8 T cells are MHC I restricted and have cytotoxic function. The divergence between these two lineages occurs during intrathymic selection and is thought to be irreversible in mature T cells. It is, however, unclear whether the CD4-CD8 differentiation of postthymic T cells retains some level of plasticity or is stably maintained by mechanisms distinct from those that set lineage choice in the thymus. To address this issue, we examined if coreceptor or effector gene expression in mature CD8 T cells remains sensitive to the zinc finger transcription factor cKrox, which promotes CD4 and inhibits CD8 differentiation when expressed in thymocytes. We show that cKrox transduction into CD8 T cells inhibits their expression of CD8 and cytotoxic effector genes and impairs their cytotoxic activity, and that it promotes expression of helper-specific genes, although not of CD4 itself. These observations reveal a persistent degree of plasticity in CD4-CD8 differentiation in mature T cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Rhiannon Jenkinson
- Laboratory of Immune Cell Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Shav-Tal Y, Darzacq X, Singer RH. Gene expression within a dynamic nuclear landscape. EMBO J 2006; 25:3469-79. [PMID: 16900099 PMCID: PMC1538565 DOI: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2006] [Accepted: 06/07/2006] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Molecular imaging in living cells or organisms now allows us to observe macromolecular assemblies with a time resolution sufficient to address cause-and-effect relationships on specific molecules. These emerging technologies have gained much interest from the scientific community since they have been able to reveal novel concepts in cell biology, thereby changing our vision of the cell. One main paradigm is that cells stochastically vary, thus implying that population analysis may be misleading. In fact, cells should be analyzed within time-resolved single-cell experiments rather than being compared to other cells within a population. Technological imaging developments as well as the stochastic events present in gene expression have been reviewed. Here, we discuss how the structural organization of the nucleus is revealed using noninvasive single-cell approaches, which ultimately lead to the resolution required for the analysis of highly controlled molecular processes taking place within live cells. We also describe the efforts being made towards physiological approaches within the context of living organisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaron Shav-Tal
- The Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
Helper T cells coordinate immune responses through the production of cytokines. Th2 cells express the closely linked Il4, Il13, and Il5 cytokine genes, whereas these same genes are silenced in the Th1 lineage. The Th1/Th2 lineage choice has become a textbook example for the regulation of cell differentiation, and recent discoveries have further refined and expanded our understanding of how Th2 differentiation is initiated and reinforced by signals from antigen-presenting cells and cytokine-driven feedback loops. Epigenetic changes that stabilize the active or silent state of the Il4 locus in differentiating helper T cells have been a major focus of recent research. Overall, the field is progressing toward an integrated model of the signaling and transcription factor networks, cis-regulatory elements, epigenetic modifications, and RNA interference mechanisms that converge to determine the lineage fate and gene expression patterns of differentiating helper T cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Mark Ansel
- Harvard Medical School, CBR Institute for Biomedical Research, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
He X, Kappes DJ. CD4/CD8 lineage commitment: light at the end of the tunnel? Curr Opin Immunol 2006; 18:135-42. [PMID: 16480861 DOI: 10.1016/j.coi.2006.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2005] [Accepted: 02/01/2006] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Two surprisingly clear results have emerged in the past year that suggest that the seemingly intractable problem of CD4/CD8 lineage commitment might eventually be resolved. Manipulating expression of the CD4 and CD8 coreceptors has long been a favorite method to examine the influence of T-cell receptor signalling on lineage commitment. An elegant new twist on this approach now shows that it is all a matter of timing. Thus, termination of CD4 expression after the initiation of positive selection is sufficient to cause complete redirection of class II-restricted thymocytes to the CD8 lineage, which strongly supports quantitative instructive models of lineage commitment. Progress in the field has been significantly hampered by ignorance of the underlying intracellular pathways. Two independent groups, which employed old-fashioned genetics versus new-fangled microarray technology, have now identified the same transcription factor, Th-POK, as a key regulator of alternate lineage commitment. The presence of this factor directs positively selected thymocytes to the CD4 lineage, whereas its absence causes default development to the CD8 lineage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao He
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, 7701 Burholme Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Wilson CB, Merkenschlager M. Chromatin structure and gene regulation in T cell development and function. Curr Opin Immunol 2006; 18:143-51. [PMID: 16472999 PMCID: PMC1820769 DOI: 10.1016/j.coi.2006.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2005] [Accepted: 01/31/2006] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Transcription factors control gene expression programs in the context of the chromatin structure of their target genes. DNA methylation, post-translational histone modifications such as acetylation and methylation, and higher order chromatin organization allow the maintenance of gene expression patterns through mitosis, but how do they accommodate developmentally regulated changes in gene expression programs? Although histone acetylation and deacetylation are in dynamic equilibrium and mechanisms for the removal of methyl groups from histones are emerging, the extent to which there is active demethylation of DNA remains controversial. Looking at chromatin in the three-dimensional space of the nucleus, recent work demonstrates that gene regulation involves contacts between regulatory elements within genes or gene clusters on the same chromosome (in cis) and between different chromosomes (in trans). Finally, non-coding RNAs make a significant contribution to transcriptional and post-transcriptional gene silencing. Together, these advances contribute to an understanding of how gene expression programs are established, maintained and modified during development.
Collapse
|
24
|
Corry GN, Underhill DA. Subnuclear compartmentalization of sequence-specific transcription factors and regulation of eukaryotic gene expression. Biochem Cell Biol 2005; 83:535-47. [PMID: 16094457 DOI: 10.1139/o05-062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
To date, the majority of the research regarding eukaryotic transcription factors has focused on characterizing their function primarily through in vitro methods. These studies have revealed that transcription factors are essentially modular structures, containing separate regions that participate in such activities as DNA binding, protein-protein interaction, and transcriptional activation or repression. To fully comprehend the behavior of a given transcription factor, however, these domains must be analyzed in the context of the entire protein, and in certain cases the context of a multiprotein complex. Furthermore, it must be appreciated that transcription factors function in the nucleus, where they must contend with a variety of factors, including the nuclear architecture, chromatin domains, chromosome territories, and cell-cycle-associated processes. Recent examinations of transcription factors in the nucleus have clarified the behavior of these proteins in vivo and have increased our understanding of how gene expression is regulated in eukaryotes. Here, we review the current knowledge regarding sequence-specific transcription factor compartmentalization within the nucleus and discuss its impact on the regulation of such processes as activation or repression of gene expression and interaction with coregulatory factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gareth N Corry
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
Understanding the different molecular mechanisms responsible for gene expression has been a central interest of molecular biologists for several decades. Transcription, the initial step of gene expression, consists of converting the genetic code into a dynamic messenger RNA that will specify a required cellular function following translocation to the cytoplasm and translation. We now possess an in-depth understanding of the mechanism and regulations of transcription. By contrast, an understanding of the dynamics of an individual gene's expression in real time is just beginning to emerge following recent technological developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xavier Darzacq
- Department of Anatomy, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
The mechanism of CD4-CD8 lineage commitment, which ensures the correlation between T cell receptor specificity and adoption of the T killer or T helper phenotype, has long been the subject of intense debate. Various approaches are slowly elucidating the underlying molecular pathways. Analysis of the function of T cell receptor signaling (the 'top-down' approach) supports the view that differences in signal strength and/or duration 'instruct' alternative commitment. Analysis of the transcriptional regulation of the genes encoding CD4 and CD8 (the 'bottom-up' approach) has identified critical cis-acting elements and their interacting factors. Finally, identification of the transcription factor Th-POK as a central component of the CD4 lineage-determining pathway has provided a new starting point from which to unravel this intriguing process 'from the inside out'.
Collapse
|
27
|
Laky K, Fowlkes BJ. Receptor signals and nuclear events in CD4 and CD8 T cell lineage commitment. Curr Opin Immunol 2005; 17:116-21. [PMID: 15766669 DOI: 10.1016/j.coi.2005.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
MHC specificity in positive selection is a major determinant in the CD4/CD8 T cell lineage decision. Previous studies support the view that quantitative differences in T cell receptor (TCR) signaling in immature CD4+CD8+ double positive thymocytes leads to an instructive bias in CD4/CD8 T cell lineage commitment that must be re-inforced in subsequent selection steps to ensure that MHC-restricted antigen recognition is linked to appropriate effector functions in mature T cells. Recent work has further defined the TCR signaling pathways involved in this process, but a major effort has been made to identify transcription factors and other regulators of CD4 and CD8 T cell lineage commitment. Methods and screens for detecting changes in gene expression, associated with TCR signaling in positive selection and lineage determination, are starting to provide a better understanding of these complex developmental processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Laky
- Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
Helper T cells engaged in an immune response confront a prevalent challenge for developmentally regulated gene expression: How does a cell give rise to daughter cells with different fates? Additionally, lymphocyte function is intimately associated with the processes of cell division and migration. This imposes an additional burden for daughter cells, to remember inductive events from which they are temporally and spatially removed. An emerging view is that helper T cells use epigenetic mechanisms tied to the structure of chromatin and its covalent modifications to achieve at least two important features of their programmed gene expression. Epigenetic effects organize the ability of signal transduction pathways to generate a restricted set of progeny from a multi-potent progenitor. In addition, epigenetic effects seem to allow dividing cells to memorize, or imprint, signaling events that occurred earlier in their development. Beyond helper T cells, the use of epigenetic effects is emerging as a common strategy in development and function of the mammalian immune system, suggesting that epigenetic effects may play a more prominent role in metazoan cell differentiation than previously appreciated. Lymphocytes are, thus, becoming a tractable system for genetic and biochemical dissection of the ways in which the genome is embedded with regulatory information to achieve developmental complexity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven L Reiner
- Abramson Family Cancer Research Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|