Effect of zidovudine resistance mutations on virologic response to treatment with zidovudine-lamivudine-ritonavir: genotypic analysis of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates from AIDS clinical trials group protocol 315.ACTG Protocol 315 Team

Trends in prevalence of HIV-1 drug resistance in Thailand 2009-2010

BACKGROUND

Treatment failure of antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1 infection is increasing due to development of viral resistance. Trends of resistance-associated mutation lead to the ineffective treatment in HIV-infected individuals.

METHODS

Extracted viral RNA from HIV-infected subjects in 2009 to 2010 was performed. The genotypic resistance testing was investigated for HIV-1 drug resistance in RT and PR genes. Frequencies of mutation were compared by a Fischer's exact test.

RESULTS

Three hundred and sixty-nine samples (147 in 2009 and 222 in 2010) were genotyped. At least one mutation was found in 90.8% (335/369) in PR gene and 87.0% (321/369) in RT gene. Three sequences in PR gene, M36I, H69K, and L90M, were decreased significantly in 2010 when compared to 2009. Mutations associated with resistance to nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI's) were found in 61.0% and 64.2% in nonnucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI's). A total of 49.6% was found in combined NRTI and NNRTI. In 2010, M41L was increased significantly from 7.5% to 14.9%. However, there was a decrease in the frequency of the mutations at position 67, 70, and 184 between 2009 and 2010.

CONCLUSIONS

In 2010, three mutations in PR gene, M36I, H69K, and L90M, were decreased significantly. However, only one mutation in RT gene, M41L was significantly increased.

Recent advances in the treatment of HIV/AIDS

In industrialized countries, highly active antiretroviral therapy has resulted in significant reductions in morbidity and mortality in patients with HIV/AIDS. At the same time, the management of the HIV-infected individual has become exceedingly complex due to the increasing number of antiretroviral medications and resistance to them. New medications are needed that are effective against the drug-resistant virus. The key advances in the management of HIV/AIDS as seen through the eyes of a front-line HIV physician who has been actively involved in patient care, clinical drug trials and as an educator for the past 15 years will be discussed.

Modelling human immunodeficiency virus ribonucleic acid levels with finite mixtures for censored longitudinal data

The measurement of human immunodeficiency virus ribonucleic acid levels over time leads to censored longitudinal data. Suitable models for dynamic modelling of these levels need to take this data characteristic into account. If groups of patients with different developments of the levels over time are suspected the model class of finite mixtures of mixed effects models with censored data is required. We describe the model specification and derive the estimation with a suitable expectation–maximization algorithm. We propose a convenient implementation using closed form formulae for the expected mean and variance of the truncated multivariate distribution. Only efficient evaluation of the cumulative multivariate normal distribution function is required. Model selection as well as methods for inference are discussed. The application is demonstrated on the clinical trial ACTG 315 data.

Mechanism of HIV antiretroviral drugs progress toward drug resistance

The rapid replication rate of HIV-1 RNA and its inherent genetic variation have led to the production of many HIV-1 variants with decreased drug susceptibility. The capacity of HIV to develop drug resistance mutations is a major obstacle to long-term effective anti-HIV therapy. Incomplete suppression of viral replication with an initial drug regimen diminishes the clinical benefit to the patient and may promote the development of broader drug resistance that may cause subsequent treatment regimens to be ineffective. The increased clinical use of combination antiretroviral treatment for HIV-1 infection has led to the selection of viral strains resistant to multiple drugs, including strains resistant to all licensed nucleoside analog RT inhibitors and protease inhibitors. Therefore, it is important to understand the influence of such mutations on viral properties such as replicative fitness, fidelity, and mutation rates. Although research continues to improve our understanding of resistance, leading to refined treatment strategies and, in some cases, improved outcome, resistance to antiretroviral therapy remains a major cause of treatment failure among patients living with HIV-1.

Cumulative viral load and virologic decay patterns after antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected subjects influence CD4 recovery and AIDS

BACKGROUND

The impact of viral load (VL) decay and cumulative VL on CD4 recovery and AIDS after highly-active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is unknown.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

Three virologic kinetic parameters (first year and overall exponential VL decay constants, and first year VL slope) and cumulative VL during HAART were estimated for 2,278 patients who initiated HAART in the U.S. Military HIV Natural History Study. CD4 and VL trajectories were computed using linear and nonlinear Generalized Estimating Equations models. Multivariate Poisson and linear regression models were used to determine associations of VL parameters with CD4 recovery, adjusted for factors known to correlate with immune recovery. Cumulative VL higher than the sample median was independently associated with an increased risk of AIDS (relative risk 2.38, 95% confidence interval 1.56-3.62, p<0.001). Among patients with VL suppression, first year VL decay and slope were independent predictors of early CD4 recovery (p = 0.001) and overall gain (p<0.05). Despite VL suppression, those with slow decay during the first year of HAART as well as during the entire therapy period (overall), in general, gained less CD4 cells compared to the other subjects (133 vs. 195.4 cells/µL; p = 0.001) even after adjusting for potential confounders.

CONCLUSIONS

In a cohort with free access to healthcare, independent of established predictors of AIDS and CD4 recovery during HAART, cumulative VL and virologic decay patterns were associated with AIDS and distinct aspects of CD4 reconstitution.

Optimal timing and duration of induction therapy for HIV-1 infection

The tradeoff between the need to suppress drug-resistant viruses and the problem of treatment toxicity has led to the development of various drug-sparing HIV-1 treatment strategies. Here we use a stochastic simulation model for viral dynamics to investigate how the timing and duration of the induction phase of induction–maintenance therapies might be optimized. Our model suggests that under a variety of biologically plausible conditions, 6–10 mo of induction therapy are needed to achieve durable suppression and maximize the probability of eradicating viruses resistant to the maintenance regimen. For induction regimens of more limited duration, a delayed-induction or -intensification period initiated sometime after the start of maintenance therapy appears to be optimal. The optimal delay length depends on the fitness of resistant viruses and the rate at which target-cell populations recover after therapy is initiated. These observations have implications for both the timing and the kinds of drugs selected for induction–maintenance and therapy-intensification strategies.

Clinicians treating HIV infection must balance the need to suppress viral replication against the harmful side effects and significant cost of antiretroviral therapy. Inadequate therapy often results in the emergence of resistant viruses and treatment failure. These difficulties are especially acute in resource-poor settings, where antiretroviral agents are limited. This has prompted an interest in induction–maintenance (IM) treatment strategies, in which brief intensive therapy is used to reduce host viral levels. Induction is followed by a simplified and more easily tolerated maintenance regimen. IM approaches remain an unproven concept in HIV therapy. We have developed a mathematical model to simulate clinical responses to antiretroviral drug therapy. We account for latent infection, partial drug efficacy, cross-resistance, viral recombination, and other factors. This model accurately reflects expected outcomes under single, double, and standard three-drug antiretroviral therapy. When applied to IM therapy, we find that (1) IM is expected to be successful beyond 3 y under a variety of conditions; (2) short-term induction therapy is optimally started several days to weeks after the start of maintenance; and (3) IM therapy may eradicate some preexisting drug-resistant viral strains from the host. Our simulations may help develop new treatment strategies and optimize future clinical trials.

Baseline Resistance and Virological Outcome in Patients with Virological Failure who Start a Regimen Containing Abacavir: Eurosida Study

Objectives

To investigate the ability of several HIV-1 drug-resistance interpretation systems, as well as the number of pre-specified combinations of abacavir-related mutations, to predict virological response to abacavir-containing regimens in antiretroviral therapy-experienced, abacavir-naive patients starting an abacavir-containing regimen in the EuroSIDA cohort.

Patients and methods

A total of 100 HIV-infected patients with viral load (VL) >500 copies/ml who had a plasma sample available at the time of starting abacavir (baseline) were included. Resistance to abacavir was interpreted by using eight different commonly used systems that consisted of rules-based algorithms or tables of mutations. Correlation between baseline abacavir-resistance mutations and month 6 virological response was performed on this population using a multivariable linear regression model accounting for censored data.

Results

The baseline VL was 4.36 log10 RNA copies/ml [interquartile range (IQR): 3.65–4.99 log10 RNA copies/ml] and the median CD4 cell count was 210 cells/μl (IQR: 67–305 cells/μl). Our patients were pre-exposed to a median of seven antiretrovirals (2–12) before starting abacavir therapy. The median (range) number of abacavir mutations (according to the International AIDS Society-USA) detected at baseline was 3.5 (0–8). Overall, the Kaplan–Meier estimate of the median month 6 VL decline was 0.86 log10 RNA copies/ml [95% confidence intervals (95% CI): 0.45–1.24]. The VL in those patients ( n=31) who intensified treatment by adding only abacavir decreased by a median 0.20 log10 RNA copies/ml (95% CI: -0.18; +0.94). The proportion of patients who harboured viruses fully resistant to abacavir among the eight genotypic resistance interpretation algorithms ranged from 12% [Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le SIDA (ANRS)] to 79% [Stanford HIV RT and PR Sequence Database (HIVdb)]. Some interpretation systems showed statistically significant associations between the predicted resistance status and the virological response while others showed no consistent association. The number of active drugs in the regimen was associated with greater virological suppression (additional month 6 VL reduction per additional sensitive drug=0.51, 95% CI: 0.15–0.88, P=0.006); baseline VL was also weakly associated (additional month 6 VL reduction per log10 higher=0.30, 95% CI: -0.02; +0.62, P=0.06). In contrast, the number of drugs previously received was associated with diminished viral reduction (additional month 6 VL reduction per additional drug=-0.14, 95% CI: -0.28; 0.00, P=0.05).

Conclusions

Our results revealed a high degree of variability among several genotypic resistance interpretation algorithms currently in use for abacavir. Therefore, the interpretation of genotypic resistance for predicting response to regimens containing abacavir remains a major challenge.

Role of Baseline pol Genotype in HIV-1 Fitness Evolution

Viral fitness can be modified upon development of antiretroviral drug resistance, usually by selection of compensatory mutations. In this study, we have used HIV-1 isolates from individuals receiving a protease inhibitor (PI)-based regimen to analyze the impact of basal genetic background on viral fitness evolution. Paired plasma samples and HIV-1 isolates were obtained from 10 PI-naive HIV-infected individuals enrolled in 2 different studies of combination antiretroviral therapy. Genomic regions from pol and env were sequenced. Viral fitness was measured using growth competition experiments followed by heteroduplex tracking analysis. Baseline genotypic analyses of pol showed that 9 of 10 viruses had a different degree of secondary mutations in the protease gene at codons associated with PI resistance (i.e., 10I, 36I, 63P, 71T, and 77I). After 48 weeks of PI-based therapy, a strong correlation was observed between protease genetic divergence and viral fitness difference (r = 0.78, P = 0.03), but not with reverse transcription or Env divergence, suggesting that genotypic changes in the protease gene were driving HIV-1 evolution in these patients. As expected, an inverse correlation was observed between the number of protease and reverse transcription primary mutations and viral fitness (r = -0.65, P < 0.0001). However, our results suggest that the preexistence of secondary mutations in protease genetic background may have implications in HIV-1 fitness evolution and virologic response to antiretroviral therapy.

Structure-based design and engineering of a nontoxic recombinant pokeweed antiviral protein with potent anti-human immunodeficiency virus activity

A molecular model of pokeweed antiviral protein (PAP)-RNA interactions was used to rationally engineer FLP-102((151)AA(152)) and FLP-105((191)AA(192)) as nontoxic PAPs with potent anti-human immunodeficiency virus (anti-HIV) activities. FLP-102 and FLP-105 have been produced in Escherichia coli and tested both in vitro and in vivo. These proteins depurinate HIV type 1 (HIV-1) RNA much better than rRNA and are more potent anti-HIV agents than native PAP or recombinant wild-type PAP. They are substantially less toxic than native PAP in BALB/c mice and exhibit potent in vivo activities against genotypically and phenotypically nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-resistant HIV-1 in a surrogate human peripheral blood lymphocyte (Hu-PBL) SCID mouse model of human AIDS. Rationally engineered nontoxic recombinant PAPs such as FLP-102 and FLP-105 may provide the basis for effective salvage therapies for patients harboring highly drug-resistant strains of HIV-1. The documented in vitro potencies of FLP-102 and FLP-105, their in vivo antiretroviral activities in the HIV-infected Hu-PBL SCID mouse model, and their favorable toxicity profiles in BALB/c mice warrant the further development of these promising new biotherapeutic agents.

Rates of transmission of antiretroviral drug resistant strains of HIV-1

BACKGROUND

It is clear that transmission of drug resistant HIV-1 is possible and occurs regularly. However, there is a lack of clarity concerning the true rate of this transmission in a given population, the impact of combination therapies on this rate, and the contribution of transmitted resistant virus to treatment failure either in an individual or on a population basis.

OBJECTIVES

To provide a review of our current understanding of rates of transmission of drug resistant HIV-1 in various populations and to report the results of a study conducted to determine this rate in Sydney, Australia in the years 1992-2000.

STUDY DESIGN

A review of the literature combined with a prospective study of antiretroviral drug resistance in 130 individuals who were diagnosed with symptomatic primary infection at St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia between 1992 and 2000. Sequencing of reverse transcriptase (RT) and protease (PR) was performed by the TruGene HIV-1 genotyping kit (Visible Genetics Inc.).

RESULTS

The results found in the Sydney population contrast with much of the literature. The prevalence of mutations that conferred primary resistance to protease inhibitors (PIs) was only 0.8% at position V82I. Secondary mutations/polymorphisms were seen in the PR at position L10I/V, K20R, M36I, L63P, A71T/V, or V77I in 60%. L63P was the most frequently found mutation (46.3%). The incidence of protease-resistant strains of HIV in primary HIV-1 infection did not change after the introduction of PIs in 1996. The distribution of the most common resistance mutations in the RT was as follows; M41L (8.5%) and T215Y (8.5%) and K70R (4.8%). The frequency of mutations associated with NRTI resistance was significantly lower in the post 1995 samples (43.9 vs. 19.1%, P < 0.05). Moreover, both M41L and K70R, but not T215Y, occurred with significantly decreased frequency in the post 1995 samples.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to other studies we found no increase in the rate of PR resistance and a decrease in the rate of RT resistance in recently transmitted virus over the period 1992-2000. The reasons for the differences between these results and those reported from elsewhere may relate to treatment regimens used in the transmitting population and may have implications for treatment policies in this country.

Predictive Factors and Selection of Thymidine Analogue Mutations by Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors According to Initial Regimen Received

Thymidine analogue mutations were determined and compared in patients who received zidovudine monotherapy and added didanosine or zalcitabine, and in patients who started with one of these dual nucleoside combinations. Although patients who started in the era of zidovudine monotherapy had a longer duration of therapy compared with the other group, there was no statistical difference in the number of mutations between the two groups. However, thymidine analogue mutations were more frequent in patients who added didanosine to zidovudine monotherapy compared with those who added zalcitabine. Patients who started with a dual nucleoside combination developed 215Y/F first, followed by 215Y/F+41L, then 215Y/F+41L+210W, then 215Y/F+67N+70R+41L or 219Q/E, and then 215Y/F+41L+67N+70R+219Q/E. Patients who started with zidovudine monotherapy had a different pathway with the mutation at codon 70 appearing first, followed by 215Y/F+70R or 210W, then 215Y/F+41L+210W, then 215Y/F+67N+70R+219Q/E, and then 215Y/F+41L+67N+70R+210W. Medication adherence was associated with the number of mutations in both groups of patients. Two distinct mutational patterns were noted. The first pattern involved mutations at codons 41, 210 and 215, while the second involved mutations at codons 67, 70 and 219.

Effect of zidovudine resistance mutations on virologic response to treatment with zidovudine or stavudine, each in combination with lamivudine and indinavir

The authors studied the effect of zidovudine (ZDV) resistance mutation on virologic response to treatment with ZDV or stavudine (d4T) each in combination with lamivudine and indinavir. Viral genotyping was performed on plasma HIV-1 RNA at study entry and concerned 155 patients previously treated with ZDV, didanosine, or zalcitabine and enrolled in the NOVAVIR (Agence National de Recherche sur le SIDA [ANRS] 073) trial. Three virologic responses were investigated: early response (<50 copies/mL at week 24), late response (<500 copies/mL at week 80), and virologic failure (two HIV-1 RNA >5000 copies/mL). Patients were classified as resistant or susceptible to ZDV according to the ANRS algorithm. Plasma viral RNA from 123 of 155 patients had two or more ZDV resistance mutations. The number of ZDV resistance mutations was positively correlated with the duration of prior antiviral therapy (p <.001). At week 24, 74% and 77% of patients with virus classified as resistant were responders in the d4T and ZDV arm, respectively. Similar results were found at week 80. Virologic failure was reached in 7 of 24 patients with virus classified as susceptible and in 26 of 131 patients with resistant virus (p =.29). In the ZDV arm, patients classified as resistant had longer times to virologic failure than those classified as susceptible (p =.003). In conclusion, sustained virologic response despite presence of ZDV resistance mutations implies that these mutations do not preclude an early and durable response to treatment with a potent three-drug regimen in these patients. Patients susceptible to ZDV had lower median mean corpuscular volumes and lower random indinavir levels, suggesting that adherence was the main reason for failure.

In vivo toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and anti-human immunodeficiency virus activity of stavudine-5'-(p-bromophenyl methoxyalaninyl phosphate) (stampidine) in mice

We have evaluated the clinical potential of stavudine-5'-(p-bromophenyl methoxyalaninyl phosphate(stampidine [STAMP]), a novel aryl phosphate derivative of stavudine, as a new anti-human immunodeficiency virus (anti-HIV) agent, by examining its acute, subacute, and chronic toxicity profile in mice as well as by testing its antiviral activity in a surrogate human peripheral blood lymphocyte (Hu-PBL)-SCID mouse model of human AIDS. STAMP was very well tolerated in BALB/c and CD-1 mice, without any detectable acute or subacute toxicity at single intraperitoneal or oral bolus doses as high as 500 mg/kg of body weight. Notably, daily administration of STAMP intraperitoneally or orally for up to 8 consecutive weeks was not associated with any detectable toxicity at cumulative dose levels as high as 6.4 g/kg. Micromolar concentrations of the active STAMP metabolite in plasma were rapidly achieved and maintained for more than 4 h after parenteral as well as oral administration of a nontoxic 100-mg/kg bolus dose of STAMP. In accordance with its favorable pharmacokinetic profile and in vitro potency, STAMP exhibited dose-dependent and potent in vivo anti-HIV activity in Hu-PBL-SCID mice against a genotypically and phenotypically nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-resistant clinical HIV type 1 (HIV-1) isolate (BR/92/019; D67N, L214F, T215D, K219Q) at nontoxic dose levels. The remarkable in vivo safety and potency of STAMP warrants the further development of this promising new antiretroviral agent for possible clinical use in patients harboring NRTI-resistant HIV-1.

Modelling HIV viral rebound using non-linear mixed effects models

Individuals infected with the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) who initiate antiretroviral therapy typically experience a marked decline in concentrations of HIV-1 RNA in plasma. Often, however, viral rebound occurs within the first year of treatment and this rebound may be associated with resistance to antiretroviral therapy. For this reason, it is important to study the patterns of virological response of HIV-1 RNA to treatment. In particular, there is interest in the relationship between the lowest level of plasma HIV-1 RNA attained after initiation of therapy (nadir value) and the time until rebound. To investigate this question, we implement a simple and flexible non-linear mixed effects model for the trajectory of the HIV-1 RNA until rebound. This model is also consistent with biological insights into the effects of treatment. We also show how the problem of censoring of HIV-1 RNA values at the lower limit of assay quantification can be addressed using a multiple imputation scheme. The algorithm is simple to implement and is based on accessible software. Our application makes use of data from clinical trial 315 conducted by the AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG 315). We find a strong relationship between HIV-1 RNA nadir and time to rebound, with potentially important consequences for the management of HIV-infected individuals.

Antiretroviral prophylaxis of perinatal HIV-1 transmission and the potential impact of antiretroviral resistance

Since 1994, trials of zidovudine, zidovudine and lamivudine, and nevirapine have demonstrated that these antiretroviral drugs can substantially reduce the risk of perinatal HIV-1 transmission. With reductions in drug price, identification of simple, effective antiretroviral regimens to prevent perinatal HIV-1 transmission, and an increasing international commitment to support health care infrastructure, antiretrovirals for both perinatal HIV-1 prevention and HIV-1 treatment will likely become more widely available to HIV-1-infected persons in resource-limited countries. In the United States, widespread antiretroviral usage has been associated with increased antiretroviral drug resistance. This raises concern that drug resistance may reduce the effectiveness of perinatal antiretroviral prophylaxis as well as therapeutic intervention strategies. The purpose of this article is to review what is known about resistance and risk of perinatal HIV transmission, assess the interaction between antiretroviral resistance and the prevention of perinatal HIV-1 transmission, and discuss implications for current global prevention and treatment strategies.

Efficacy of zidovudine compared to stavudine, both in combination with lamivudine and indinavir, in human immunodeficiency virus-infected nucleoside-experienced patients with no prior exposure to lamivudine, stavudine, or protease inhibitors (novavir trial)

We compared the efficacy and the toxicity of zidovudine (AZT) versus stavudine (d4T), in combination with lamivudine (3TC) and indinavir, in AZT-, dideoxyinosine (ddI)-, and/or dideoxycytosine (ddC)-experienced patients in a randomized comparative multicenter trial. One hundred seventy human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected patients, who had received AZT, ddI, and/or ddC for at least 6 months but were naive for d4T, 3TC, and protease inhibitors, were randomized to AZT at 250 to 300 mg twice daily, 3TC at 150 mg twice daily, and indinavir at 800 mg every 8 h or to d4T at 40 mg twice daily, 3TC at 150 mg twice daily, and indinavir at 800 mg every 8 h. The primary endpoint was time to virological failure, defined as plasma HIV-1 RNA levels of >5,000 copies/ml after at least 8 weeks of antiretroviral therapy. Additional endpoints were change from baseline in CD4 cell counts, AIDS-defining events and adverse events, and proportion of patients with HIV-1 RNA levels of <500 copies/ml and HIV-1 RNA levels of <50 copies/ml. At week 80, 15 patients in the AZT arm and 14 patients in the d4T arm had reached the primary endpoint, and time to virological failure did not differ between the two arms (P = 0.98). In the d4T and in the AZT arms, 67 and 73% of patients, respectively, had HIV-1 RNA levels of <500 copies/ml (P = 0.50). The median change from baseline in CD4 cell count was 195 x 10(6) and 175 x 10(6)/liter for the d4T- and AZT-containing arms, respectively. The proportions of patients with HIV-1 RNA levels of <50 copies/ml at weeks 8, 16, and 24 were similar in the two arms. The occurrence of serious adverse events was not significantly different between arms. In conclusion, in these patients heavily pretreated with AZT, switching from AZT to d4T when initiating indinavir and 3TC did not bring any additional benefit compared to maintaining AZT.

Genotypic testing for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 drug resistance

There are 16 approved human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) drugs belonging to three mechanistic classes: protease inhibitors, nucleoside and nucleotide reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors, and nonnucleoside RT inhibitors. HIV-1 resistance to these drugs is caused by mutations in the protease and RT enzymes, the molecular targets of these drugs. Drug resistance mutations arise most often in treated individuals, resulting from selective drug pressure in the presence of incompletely suppressed virus replication. HIV-1 isolates with drug resistance mutations, however, may also be transmitted to newly infected individuals. Three expert panels have recommended that HIV-1 protease and RT susceptibility testing should be used to help select HIV drug therapy. Although genotypic testing is more complex than typical antimicrobial susceptibility tests, there is a rich literature supporting the prognostic value of HIV-1 protease and RT mutations. This review describes the genetic mechanisms of HIV-1 drug resistance and summarizes published data linking individual RT and protease mutations to in vitro and in vivo resistance to the currently available HIV drugs.

Usefulness of monitoring HIV drug resistance and adherence in individuals failing highly active antiretroviral therapy: a randomized study (ARGENTA)

OBJECTIVE

To establish the influence of genotypic resistance-guided treatment decisions and patient-reported adherence on the virological and immunological responses in patients failing a potent antiretroviral regimen in a randomized, controlled trial in a tertiary care infectious diseases department.

PATIENTS

A total of 174 patients with virological failure were randomly assigned to receive standard of care (SOC) or additional genotypic resistance information (G). Adherence was measured by a self-administered questionnaire.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

Primary endpoints were the proportion with HIV-RNA < 500 copies/ml at 3 and 6 months by intention-to-treat analysis. Secondary endpoints were changes from baseline HIV-RNA levels and CD4 cell counts.

RESULTS

At entry, 25% had failed three or more highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens and 41% three drug classes; there were more resistance mutations in G. In 127 evaluable questionnaires, 43% reported last missed dose during the previous week. At 3 months, 11 of 89 patients (12%) in SOC and 23 of 85 (27%) in G had HIV-RNA < 500 copies/ml (OR 2.63, 95% CI 1.12-6.26); the relative proportions were 17 and 21% at 6 months. CD4 cell changes did not differ between arms. Six month CD4 cell changes were +62 in adherent and -13 cells/microl in non-adherent patients (P < 0.01). Being assigned to G, good adherence, previous history of virological success, fewer experienced HAART regimens and lower baseline viral load were independently predictive of 3 month virological success.

CONCLUSION

The virological benefit of genotype-guided treatment decisions in heavily pre-exposed patients was short term. Patients adherence and residual treatment options influenced outcomes.

Carrier rate of zidovudine-resistant HIV-1: the impact of failing therapy on transmission of resistant strains

OBJECTIVE

Because maintenance of treatment success in HIV-1 infection requires viruses to remain therapy sensitive in drug-naive seropositive persons, we looked at the primary infections caused by drug-resistant HIV-1 over time. Furthermore, to study the coverage rate of therapy and therapy failure in relation to the transmission of resistant viruses a mathematical model was developed.

DESIGN

The reverse transcriptase and protease genes of viruses were analysed in newly infected people in the period 1990-1998 in the Amsterdam Cohort Study on HIV infection and AIDS in homosexual men.

METHODS

The mathematical model was based on the coverage of drug regimens selecting zidovudine (ZDV) resistance, the lag time in which resistance is gained or lost, the death rate of people infected with resistant virus, and the replacement of resistance-selecting regimens by more potent treatments that substantially reduce viral load and mortality.

RESULTS

Of 43 individuals with a primary HIV-infection, three (7%) harboured ZDV-resistant viruses. The first of the ZDV-resistant strains was transmitted in 1995, the last two in 1996. The build-up of ZDV resistance was described by the mathematical model indicating that the equilibrium level of resistance due to treatment depends only on the treatment rate and the outflow rate of patients with resistance virus.

CONCLUSIONS

Our model indicates that the frequency of viral resistance in a population is determined largely by the number of individuals on insufficient or failing therapy and is influenced only modestly by secondary transmission of ZDV-resistant strains.

Effect of genotypic resistance on the virological response to highly active antiretroviral therapy in cerebrospinal fluid

Paired plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) specimens drawn from 15 HIV-infected patients with neurological disease before and after a median 6-week duration of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) were studied to assess the short-term virological response of CSF and whether this can be predicted on the basis of baseline resistance mutations. After treatment, the median plasma and CSF viral load (VL) decreased by, respectively, 2.08 log10 (p = 0.0001) and 0.91 log10 copies/ml (p = 0.007) in comparison with baseline. A plasma virological response was observed in all but one patient, whereas the posttreatment CSF VL increased, remained unchanged, or decreased at a substantial lower rate than in plasma of six "CSF non/slow responders" (40%). Direct sequencing of baseline specimens showed that none of these patients had reverse transcriptase (RT) or primary protease resistance mutations in the CSF alone, but two had RT mutations conferring high-level resistance to drugs included in the HAART regimen in both CSF and plasma. The other four patients had no RT or primary protease resistance mutations. There was no significant difference in the nucleotide diversity of the CSF and plasma RT sequences, baseline plasma or CSF VL, the CSF-to-plasma VL ratio, the number of CSF cells, the CD4+ cell counts, or the history of antiretroviral treatment between the CSF non-slow responders and the other patients. During this short-term follow-up and despite a plasma response, a significant proportion of HAART-treated patients with neurological symptoms showed a slow or absent CSF response. Most of these cases were not associated with the presence of resistant HIV strains in the CSF.

Clinical use of genotypic and phenotypic drug resistance testing to monitor antiretroviral chemotherapy

Assays that detect antiretroviral drug resistance in human immunodeficiency virus have recently become available to clinicians. Phenotypic assays measure the drug susceptibility of the virus by determining the concentration of drug that inhibits viral replication in tissue culture. Genotypic assays determine the presence of mutations that are known to confer decreased drug susceptibility. Although each type of assay has specific advantages, limitations associated with these tests often complicate the interpretation of results. Several retrospective clinical trials have suggested that resistance testing may be useful in the assessment of the success of salvage antiretroviral therapy. Prospective, controlled trials have demonstrated that resistance testing improves short-term virological response. Resistance testing is currently recommended to help guide the choice of new drugs for patients after treatment has failed and for pregnant women. Resistance testing should also be considered for treatment-naïve patients, to detect transmission of resistant virus.

International perspectives on antiretroviral resistance. Resistance to protease inhibitors

The availability of protease inhibitors (PIs) and their combination with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors marked the passage of antiretroviral therapy (ART) from potential for control to effective suppression and thus substantially reduced rates of morbidity and mortality related to HIV. Even so, what was first hoped to be an immutable HIV DNA treatment target has proved to be prone to resistance mutations, with substitutions identified at more than 20 amino acid sites, which reduces PI susceptibility and increases resistance to treatment. The mutation patterns associated with each PI have been defined, and have been observed to occur at one of two locations: at or near the active site, or in the substrate cleavage site. The natural history of PI resistance has been extensively studied, and the genetic and cellular pathways are described in detail in this article. In addition, cross-resistance among PIs is now recognized to be fairly extensive, although the degree of cross-resistance varies with the number of mutations and the variants selected by drug pressure. Thus, it is still possible to salvage a response with another PI after a first regimen with another PI has failed. The extensive basic science and clinical experience with PIs in the fight against HIV are reviewed in this article, which provides data on resistance-mutation profiles, cellular resistance mechanisms, viral fitness studies, and clinical outcome trials with various first-line and subsequent regimens that contain PIs. It is hoped that the information provided will guide physicians in best using PIs as part of a logical and successful ART strategy.

Clinical and laboratory guidelines for the use of HIV-1 drug resistance testing as part of treatment management: recommendations for the European setting. The EuroGUidelines Group for HIV resistance

Viral drug susceptibility is associated with virologic response to new treatments. Standardized drug resistance tests are now available, and data from some clinical trials suggest that the use of drug resistance testing may be associated with improved virologic outcome. However, drug resistance testing is complex in terms of performance, interpretation and clinical application. HIV-1 drug resistance testing is used across Europe in patient management, but not in a consistent manner. This is due to differences in the national approaches to treatment, treatment management and reimbursement, as well as availability of tests. National guidelines only exist in some countries. In addition, the laboratory quality assurance and quality control standards are not applied uniformly. The EuroGuidelines Group was established to formulate clinical as well as laboratory guidelines for the use of HIV-1 drug resistance testing that are specific for the European setting. The group is comprised of academic clinicians and virologists, scientist from the industry and representatives of the patient community. The panel of experts will review these guidelines and update them on a yearly basis as new scientific evidence becomes available.

Prevalence of Genotypic Resistance among Antiretroviral Drug-Naive HIV-1-Infected Patients in Belgium

Objectives

To estimate the prevalence and the evolution over time (1995–1998) of genotypic resistance to antiviral drugs in antiretroviral drug-naive HIV-1-infected patients in Belgium.

Design

Belgian Aids Reference Laboratories provided retrospective samples and clinical data from antiretroviral drug-naive HIV-1-infected patients who visited the hospital for the first time in 1995 ( n=45), 1997 ( n=75) and 1998 ( n=111). Genotypic resistance to the three available classes of drugs was monitored using the Line Probe Assay (Innogenetics, Gent, Belgium). Additionally, ARMS-151 was performed for scoring multinucleoside resistance.

Results

The prevalence of genotypic resistance at baseline to nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) were each between 10% and 20% for 1995, 1997 and 1998 without an increasing trend over time. For NRTIs, resistance mutations were mainly related to zidovudine in 1995, whereas in 1997 and 1998 baseline resistance was scored for zidovudine, lamivudine or for both drugs simultaneously. No patients displayed the multi-nucleoside resistance Q151M mutation. Baseline resistance mutations to protease inhibitors (PIs) did not rise significantly: 4.4% in 1995, 8% in 1997 and 9.9% in 1998. When scoring any resistance-related mutation, 26.6% displayed genotypic baseline resistance in 1995, 26.6% in 1997 and 31.5% in 1998.

Discussion

The prevalence of genotypic baseline resistance to any drug, as scored with LiPA, in naive HIV-1 patients in Belgium is 29%, with baseline resistance mutations to one or several drugs from all available classes of antiviral drugs. The ability of LiPA to pick up minor variants could be an explanation for the higher overall prevalence we observe, when compared to recent estimates in other countries of 16.3% and 22%, which were based on sequencing methods. According to the European guidelines for resistance testing, resistance testing in Belgium before starting antiviral therapy should be considered.

Altered viral fitness of HIV-1 following failure of protease inhibitor-based therapy

HIV-1 isolated from patients with improved CD4+ T-cell counts despite virologic failure on a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) and protease inhibitor (PI)-containing regimen were characterized. Five paired virus isolates from patients before and after zidovudine, lamivudine, and ritonavir treatment were tested. Human peripheral blood leukocyte-reconstituted severe combined immunodeficient (hu-PBL-SCID) mice were infected with pre-or posttreatment isolates and plasma HIV-1 RNA levels and CD4+ T cells were measured. Two of five post-treatment isolates exhibited decreased replication in hu-PBL-SCID mice compared with the paired pretreatment isolate, and both had the V82A mutation in protease associated with resistance to PI. One additional posttreatment isolate with the M184V mutation in reverse transcriptase showed diminished replication. CD4+ T-cell depletion was similar following infection with either the pre-or posttreatment isolates. Subtle losses in the replication capacity of PI-or NRTI-resistant viruses may contribute to relative preservation of CD4+ T-cell counts in persons who experience virologic failure. Cytopathic effects of viral infection for target T cells vary from patient to patient but appear not to be influenced by mutations associated with failure of therapy in this system.

Incidence and impact of resistance against approved antiretroviral drugs

More than 15 antiretroviral drugs are now available for clinical use, and have led to significant reductions in morbidity and mortality for HIV infected individuals. Nevertheless, antiviral drug resistance emerges to all these drugs, which limits their benefit. This review addresses the biological basis of antiretroviral drug resistance, and the prevalence of specific drug resistance associated mutations in patients treated with the three currently available classes of agents, namely nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors, non nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and protease inhibitors. In addition, data on prevalence of HIV drug resistance in untreated individuals published to date are summarised, and the implications of potential transmission of drug resistant HIV is discussed.