Combined modality radioimmunotherapy with Taxol and 90Y-Lym-1 for Raji lymphoma xenografts

The small molecule antibody mimic SH7139 targets a family of HLA-DRs expressed by B-cell lymphomas and other solid cancers

Selective high-affinity ligands (SHALs) belong to a novel class of small-molecule cancer therapeutics that function as targeted prodrugs. SH7139, the most advanced of the SHAL drugs designed to bind to a unique β-subunit structural epitope located on HLA-DR10, has exhibited exceptional preclinical efficacy and safety profiles. A comparison of SH7139 and SH7129, a biotin derivative of the drug developed for use as a diagnostic, showed the incorporation of a biotin tag did not alter the SHALs ability to target or kill HLA-DR10 expressing Raji cells. The use of SH7129 in an immuno-histochemical type assay to stain peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) obtained from individuals expressing specific HLA-DRB1 alleles has also revealed that in addition to HLA-DR10, seven other more commonly expressed HLA-DRs are targeted by the drug. Computational dockings of the SHAL's recognition ligands to a number of HLA-DR structures explain, in part, why the targeting domains of SH7129 and SH7139 bind to some HLA-DRs but not others. The results also substantiate the selectivity of SH7129 and suggest it may prove useful as a companion diagnostic for pre-screening biopsy samples to identify those patients whose tumours should respond to SH7139 therapy.

A preliminary study on treatment of human breast cancer xenografts with a cocktail of paclitaxel, doxorubicin, and 131I-anti-epithelial cell adhesion molecule (9C4)

Triple-negative breast cancer often has devastating outcomes and treatment options remain limited. Therefore, different treatment combinations are worthy of testing. The efficacy of a cocktail of paclitaxel, doxorubicin, and ¹³¹I-anti-epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) (9C4) to treat breast cancer was tested. Efficacy was tested with an MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer xenograft model. Anti-EpCAM (9C4) was demonstrated to bind to MDA-MB-231 human adenocarcinoma cells in vitro. Subsequently, mice-bearing MDA-MB-231× enografts were treated with either ¹³¹I-anti-EpCAM (9C4), unlabeled anti-EpCAM (9C4), paclitaxel, doxorubicin, or a cocktail of all of the agents. Tumor volume was measured for up to 70-day postinjection. Exponential regression was performed on tumor growth curves for each of the therapy groups. Statistical comparison of the growth constants λ of the regression models for each of the treatment groups with that of the cold antibody and control groups was done using extra sum-of-square F-tests. Biexponential clearance of ¹³¹I-anti-EpCAM (9C4) was observed with biological clearance half-times of 1.14 and 17.6 days for the first and second components, respectively. The mean growth rate of the tumors in animals treated with a cocktail of all of the agents was slower than in those treated with unlabeled anti-EpCAM (9C4) (P = 0.022). These preliminary data suggest that a cocktail of ¹³¹I-anti-EpCAM (9C4), paclitaxel, and doxorubicin may be suitable for treating breast cancers with high expression of EpCAM.

Relevance of radiobiological concepts in radionuclide therapy of cancer

PURPOSE

Radionuclide therapy (RNT) is a rapidly growing area of clinical nuclear medicine, wherein radionuclides are employed to deliver cytotoxic dose of radiation to the diseased cells/tissues. During RNT, radionuclides are either directly administered or delivered through biomolecules targeting the diseased site. RNT has been clinically used for diverse range of diseases including cancer, which is the focus of the review.

CONCLUSIONS

The major emphasis in RNT has so far been given towards developing peptides/antibodies and other molecules to conjugate a variety of therapeutic radioisotopes for improved targeting/delivery of radiation dose to the tumor cells. Despite that, many of the RNT approaches have not achieved their desired therapeutic success probably due to poor knowledge about complex and dynamic (i) fate of radiolabeled molecules; (ii) radiation dose delivered; (iii) cellular heterogeneity in tumor mass; and (iv) cellular radiobiological response. Based on understanding gathered during recent years, it may be stated that besides the absorbed dose, the net radiobiological response of tumor/normal cells also determines the clinical response of radiotherapeutic modalities including RNT. The radiosensitivity of tumor/normal cells is governed by radiobiological phenomenon such as radiation-induced bystander effect, genomic instability, adaptive response and low dose hyper-radiosensitivity. These concepts have been well investigated in the context of external beam radiotherapy, but their clinical implications during RNT have received meagre attention. In this direction, a few studies performed using in vitro and in vivo models envisage the possibilities of exploiting the radiobiological knowledge for improved therapeutic outcome of RNT.

Changes in lognormal shape parameter guide design of patient-specific radiochemotherapy cocktails

Uptake of radiopharmaceuticals and chemotherapeutic drugs is nonuniform at the microscopic level. Their distributions are typically lognormal, suggesting that failure in chemotherapy and targeted radionuclide therapy may be attributable, in part, to the characteristics of this biologically ubiquitous distribution. The lognormal problem can be overcome by using cocktails of 2 or more agents, tailored such that at least 1 agent is strongly incorporated by every cell in the target population. Therefore, critical assessment of the tissue uptake of each cocktail component is warranted.

METHODS

Cellular incorporation of the α-particle-emitting radiochemical ((210)Po-citrate) and 2 anticancer drugs (daunomycin and doxorubicin) was determined using flow cytometry. The role of their lognormal distribution in clonogenic cell survival was evaluated.

RESULTS

The shape parameter of the lognormal distribution was found to be correlated to both intracellular agent concentration and cell survival. Although no difference emerged between the shape parameters for citrate within the first 2 logs of cell kill, those for daunomycin and doxorubicin changed significantly.

CONCLUSION

Changes in the value of the lognormal shape parameter and slope of the cellular drug uptake curves can be used to rapidly screen radiopharmaceuticals and other cytotoxic agents to formulate more effective cocktails for cancer therapy.

A comparative analysis of conventional and pretargeted radioimmunotherapy of B-cell lymphomas by targeting CD20, CD22, and HLA-DR singly and in combinations

Relapsed B-cell lymphomas are currently incurable with conventional chemotherapy and radiation treatments. Radiolabeled antibodies directed against B-cell surface antigens have emerged as effective and safe therapies for relapsed lymphomas. We therefore investigated the potential utility of both directly radiolabeled 1F5 (anti-CD20), HD39 (anti-CD22), and Lym-1 (anti-DR) antibodies (Abs) and of pretargeted radioimmunotherapy (RIT) using Ab-streptavidin (SA) conjugates, followed by an N-acetylgalactosamine dendrimeric clearing agent and radiometal-labeled DOTA-biotin, for treatment of lymphomas in mouse models using Ramos, Raji, and FL-18 human lymphoma xenografts. This study demonstrates the marked superiority of pretargeted RIT for each of the antigenic targets with more complete tumor regressions and longer mouse survival compared with conventional one-step RIT. The Ab-SA conjugate yielding the best tumor regression and progression-free survival after pretargeted RIT varied depending upon the lymphoma cell line used, with 1F5 Ab-SA and Lym-1 Ab-SA conjugates yielding the most promising results overall. Contrary to expectations, the best rates of mouse survival were obtained using optimal single Ab-SA conjugates rather than combinations of conjugates targeting different antigens. We hypothesize that clinical implementation of pretargeted RIT methods will provide a meaningful prolongation of survival for patients with relapsed lymphomas compared with currently available treatment strategies.

Use of antibodies and immunoconjugates for the therapy of more accessible cancers

There are currently 6 unconjugated antibodies and 3 immunoconjugates approved for use in the United States in a variety of cancers, with a considerable number of new agents in clinical testing and preclinical development. Unconjugated antibodies alone can be effective, but more often, antibodies need to be combined with chemotherapy, which enhances the efficacy of the standard treatment. Immunoconjugates tend to be more effective than their unconjugated counterparts, but their increased toxicity often restricts when and how they are used. In order to improve efficacy, a number of immunoconjugates are being examined in settings where the disease is more easily accessible, such as leukemias, or within compartments that allow easier and more direct access to the tumor, such as in the peritoneal cavity or brain, or both locally and systemically, in adjuvant situations, where the disease burden has been reduced by some other means, and with the main goal of these treatments being to kill residual disease.

Current results and future applications of radioimmunotherapy management of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Monoclonal antibodies labeled with radionuclides have become an important therapeutic tool in the treatment of patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL). At the present time, their use in the US is approved for patients with rituximab-resistant, low-grade, follicular or transformed NHL. Encouraging responses seen in the relapsed and refractory patients have prompted their evaluation in earlier disease or in other histologic sub-types either alone or in combination with conventional chemotherapy. Additionally, they have been included as preparative regimens for stem cell transplant protocols within the context of clinical trials. This review discusses the latest clinical trials and future directions of radioimmunoconjugates in the treatment of NHL, with emphasis on US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved radioimmunoconjugates, namely 131I-tositumomab and 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan.

Evaluation of CD20, CD22, and HLA-DR Targeting for Radioimmunotherapy of B-Cell Lymphomas

Despite the promise of radioimmunotherapy using anti-CD20 antibodies (Ab) for the treatment of relapsed patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), most patients treated with conventional doses of (131)I-tositumomab or (90)Y-ibritumomab eventually relapse. We did comparative assessments using conventional radioimmunotherapy targeting CD20, CD22, and HLA-DR on human Ramos, Raji, and FL-18 lymphoma xenografts in athymic mice to assess the potential for improving the efficacy of radioimmunotherapy by targeting other NHL cell surface antigens. Results of biodistribution studies showed significant differences in tumor localization consistent with variable antigenic expression on the different lymphoma cell lines. Interestingly, the radioimmunoconjugate that yielded the best tumor-to-normal organ ratios differed in each tumor model. We also explored administering all three (111)In-1,4,7,10-tetra-azacylododecane N,N',N'',N'''-tetraacetic acid antibodies in combination, but discovered, surprisingly, that this approach did not augment the localization of radioactivity to tumors compared with the administration of the best single radiolabeled Ab alone. These data suggest that conventional radioimmunotherapy using anti-CD20, anti-HLA-DR, or anti-CD22 Abs is effective when used singly and provides targeted uptake of radiolabel into the tumor that is dependent on the levels of antigen expression. Improvements in tumor-to-normal organ ratios of radioactivity cannot be achieved using directly labeled Abs in combination but may be afforded by novel pretargeting methods.

Targeted radionuclide therapy for solid tumors: an overview

Although radioimmunotherapy (RIT) has been effective in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) as a single agent, solid tumors have shown less clinically significant therapeutic response to RIT alone. The clinical impact of RIT or other forms of targeted radionuclide therapy for solid tumors depends on the development of a high therapeutic index (TI) for the tumor vs. normal tissue effect, and the implementation of RIT as part of synergistic combined modality therapy (CMRIT). Preclinical and clinical studies have provided a wealth of information, and new prototypes or paradigms have shed light on future possibilities in many instances. Evidence suggests that combination and sequencing of RIT in CMRIT appropriately can provide effective treatment for many solid tumors. Vascular targets provide RIT enhancement opportunities and nanoparticles may prove to be effective carriers for RIT combined with intracellular drug delivery or alternating magnetic frequency (AMF) induced thermal tumor necrosis. The sequence and timing of combined modality treatments will be of critical importance to achieve synergy for therapy while minimizing toxicity. Fortunately, the radionuclide used for RIT also provides a signal useful for nondestructive quantitation of the influence of sequence and timing of CMRIT on events in animals and patients. This can be readily accomplished clinically using quantitative high-resolution imaging (e.g., positron emission tomography [PET]).

Radioimmunotherapy: a brief overview

With the advent of biotechnological advances and knowledge of molecular and cellular biology, radioimmunotherapy (RIT) has become a highly promising oncologic therapeutic modality with established clinically efficacy, particularly in non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. This paper provides a short survey of the basic science of RIT and the various monoclonal antibodies and radionuclides used. A brief review of the published literature on the clinical applications of radioimmunotherapy, particularly in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, is provided. New research data indicate many potential areas of development of this modality, including haematological and solid-organ radioimmunotherapy as well as new radionuclidic approaches and clinical protocols.

Comparative animal models for the study of lymphohematopoietic tumors: strengths and limitations of present approaches

The lymphomas probably represent the most complex and heterogenous set of malignancies known to cancer medicine. Underneath the single term lymphoma exist some of the fastest growing cancers known to science (i.e Burkitt's and lymphoblastic lymphoma), as well as some of the slowest growing (i.e. small lymphocytic lymphoma [SLL] and follicular lymphoma). It is this very biology that can dictate the selection of drugs and treatment approaches for managing these patients, strategies that can range from very aggressive combination chemotherapy administered in an intensive care unit (for example, patients with Burkitt's lymphoma), to watch and wait approaches that may go on for years in patients with SLL. This impressive spectrum of biology emerges from a relatively restricted number of molecular defects. The importance of these different molecular defects is of course greatly influenced by the intrinsic biology that defines the lymphocyte at its different stages of differentiation and maturation. It is precisely this molecular understanding that is beginning to form the basis for a new approach to thinking about lymphoma, and novel approaches to its management. Unfortunately, while our understanding of human lymphoma has blossomed, our ability to generate appropriate animal models reflective of this biology has not. Most preclinical models of these diseases still rely upon sub-cutaneous xenograft models of only the most aggressive lymphomas like Burkitt's lymphoma. While these models clearly serve an important role in understanding biology, and perhaps more importantly, in identifying promising new drugs for these diseases, they fall short in truly representing the broader, more heterogenous biology found in patients. Clearly, depending upon the questions being posed, or the types of drugs being studied, the best model to employ may vary from situation to situation. In this article, we will review the numerous complexities associated with various animal models of lymphoma, and will try to explore several alternative models which might serve as better in vivo.

Concepts in radioimmunotherapy and immunotherapy: Radioimmunotherapy from a Lym-1 perspective

Conventional chemotherapy regimens cure fewer than 50% of patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and fewer than 5% of patients with indolent lymphomas. However, the majority of patients remain responsive to remarkably low doses of external beam radiotherapy. A logical strategy for the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma is radioimmunotherapy (RIT); systemic radiation targeted to tumor cells using monoclonal antibodies. RIT involves continuous exposure to low-dose-rate radiation, with the intensity of the dose decreasing over time, and as such is distinct from conventional radiotherapy and chemotherapy. RIT has several advantages over monoclonal antibody therapy. For example, a functional immune system is not an absolute requirement to kill tumor cells, and, depending on the radiolabel used, beta-emissions are effective over 100 to 500 cell diameters, resulting in a crossfire effect on nearby tumor cells. The crossfire effect enables the eradication of cells that are not necessarily targeted by the antibody, but are affected by the radiation. The success of RIT depends on which antibody and radioisotope is used. This article examines how the antibody, radioisotope, chelator, and linker affect the safety and efficacy of RIT. The different approaches to dosing are also considered.

Development of 131I-tositumomab

The median survival for patients with advanced indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) has remained at 7 to 8 years since the 1960s. Targeted treatment using radioimmunotherapy (RIT), radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies directed against tumor-specific antigens, is an attractive option for this patient population, combining the advantages of an active biologic therapy with low dose-rate irradiation of an inherently radiosensitive tumor. Two anti-CD20 RIT agents have now been approved for the treatment of refractory NHL: 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin; Biogen Idec Inc, San Diego, CA, and Schering AG, Berlin, Germany) is approved in both the United States and Europe, and 131I-tositumomab (Bexxar; Corixa Corp, Seattle, WA) is approved only in the United States. This article discusses the development of 131I-tositumomab. Because 131I-labeled antibody clearance varies significantly among patients, prescription of 131I-tositumomab activity must be based on a calculated total-body dose derived from quantitative whole-body imaging. The maximum tolerated total-body dose has been established at 75 cGy in patients with adequate bone marrow reserves and less than 25% bone marrow involvement by lymphoma (65 cGy in patients with mild thrombocytopenia; 45 cGy in patients who have received stem cell transplantation). In a phase III trial, overall response rate (ORR) and complete response (CR) rate were significantly higher following 131I-tositumomab than following the patient's last qualifying chemotherapy (ORR, 65% v 28%; P <.001; CR, 20% v 3%; P <.001). 131I-tositumomab has also been shown to be effective in patients who are refractory to rituximab (ORR, 70%; CR, 32%) and as first-line therapy in patients with NHL (ORR, 97%; CR, 63%). The major side effects of 131I-tositumomab are hematologic. In the phase III study, 20% of patients experienced grade 4 neutropenia and 22% experienced grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Myelodysplastic syndromes or secondary acute myeloid leukemia have been reported in 8.4% of patients with chemotherapy-refractory disease treated with 131I-tositumomab, but have not been observed to date in patients receiving 131I-tositumomab as first-line therapy. Future progress in NHL management is likely to include RIT as part of a multi-modality approach; trials are planned or currently underway to investigate the combination of RIT with chemotherapy regimens.

Combined 90Yttrium-DOTA-labeled PAM4 antibody radioimmunotherapy and gemcitabine radiosensitization for the treatment of a human pancreatic cancer xenograft

We have examined the application of (90)Y-DOTA-cPAM4, anti-MUC1 IgG, in combination with the front-line drug gemcitabine as a potential therapeutic for pancreatic cancer. Athymic nude mice bearing CaPan1 human pancreatic cancer xenografts were administered 2 mg of gemcitabine on days 0, 3, 6, 9 and 12 with concurrent (90)Y-DOTA-cPAM4 (100 microCi) provided on day 0. A second group of mice received a second cycle of treatment 5 weeks after the start of the first cycle. Control groups of mice included those that received either treatment arm alone, the combined modality treatment employing a nontargeting control antibody (hLL2, anti-B-cell lymphoma) and a final group that was left untreated. Gemcitabine administered as a single agent provided no antitumor effect. A single cycle of the combined (90)Y-DOTA-cPAM4 and gemcitabine treatment provided greater inhibition of tumor growth than was observed for any of the other treatment procedures. Tumor growth was delayed for a period of 7 weeks. Two cycles of gemcitabine with concomitant (90)Y-DOTA-cPAM4 yielded significant tumor regression and increased median survival to 21 weeks vs. 12 weeks for mice receiving a single cycle of therapy (p<0.024). Median tumor volume doubling-times were 18 weeks in mice treated with 2-cycles of therapy vs. 7 weeks in mice given only 1-cycle (p<0.001), and 3.5 weeks for the group that received 2-cycles of gemcitabine concomitant with equitoxic nontargeting (90)Y-DOTA-hLL2 (p<0.001). These data suggest that addition of (90)Y-DOTA-cPAM4 RAIT to a gemcitabine treatment regimen may provide enhanced antitumor efficacy for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

HLA class II antibodies in the treatment of hematologic malignancies

Promising results have suggested human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class II as potential target for antibody-based lymphoma therapy. Thus, antibodies against HLA class II induced apoptosis in vitro, as well as complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) and effector cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC). Furthermore, animal models demonstrated strong antitumor effects in vivo. Importantly, early clinical studies with antibodies Lym-1 or Hu1D10, both against HLA-DR variants, suggested therapeutic potential. However, the increased risk of serious toxicity may require an improved understanding of the clinically relevant mechanisms of action of HLA class II-directed antibodies, which may then allow generation of optimized antibody constructs to achieve optimal therapeutic efficacy.

Anti-CD22 ligand-blocking antibody HB22.7 has independent lymphomacidal properties and augments the efficacy of 90Y-DOTA-peptide-Lym-1 in lymphoma xenografts

CD22 is a membrane glycophosphoprotein found on nearly all healthy B-lymphocytes and most B-cell lymphomas. Recent in vitro studies have identified several anti-CD22 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that block the interaction of CD22 with its ligand. One of these mAbs, HB22.7, has been shown to effectively induce apoptosis in several B-cell lymphoma cell lines. Lymphoma xenograft studies with Raji-xenograft mice were used to assess the toxicity and efficacy of HB22.7 alone and with combined modality immunotherapy (CMIT) with yttrium (90)Y-DOTA-peptide-Lym-1 radioimmunotherapy (RIT). The effect of the sequence of these agents on the combined treatment was assessed by administering HB22.7 24 hours before, simultaneously with, or 24 hours after RIT. Within the groups treated with RIT alone or with RIT and HB22.7 (CMIT), the reduction in tumor volume was the greatest when HB22.7 was administered simultaneously with and 24 hours after RIT, and in the RIT treatment groups, this translated into the greatest overall response and survival, respectively. Overall survival rates at the end of the 84-day CMIT trial were 67% and 50% in the groups treated with HB22.7 simultaneously and 24 hours after RIT, respectively. This compared favorably with the untreated and the RIT alone groups, which had survival rates of 38% and 43% at the end of the trial. Surprisingly, when compared with untreated controls and all other treatment groups, the greatest cure and overall survival rates were observed in the group treated with HB22.7 alone, with 47% cured and 76% surviving at the end of the 84-day trial. RIT clearance was not affected by treatment with HB22.7. When compared with RIT alone, there was no significant additional hematologic (white blood cell, red blood cell, or platelet count) toxicity when HB22.7 was added to RIT. Nonhematologic toxicity (assessed as change in body weight) was also unchanged when HB22.7 was added to RIT. Thus the anti-CD22 ligand-blocking antibody HB22.7 has independent lymphomacidal properties and augments the efficacy of (90)Y-DOTA-peptide-Lym-1 in lymphoma xenografts without significant toxicity.

Comparative physical and pharmacologic characteristics of iodine-131 and yttrium-90: implications for radioimmunotherapy for patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) is a promising new treatment option for patients with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Clinical trials have demonstrated that both iodine-131 (131I) and yttrium-90 (90Y) are suitable radionuclides for RIT. Iodine-131 and 90Y differ markedly in their physical properties including half-life, path length, type of energy emissions, intracellular stability, and the organs targeted by the free radionuclide. Both radionuclides can be safely administered in the outpatient setting under current Nuclear Regulatory Commission guidelines. Potential advantages of 131I for RIT include availability, stable chemistry, longer half-life, and an emission spectrum that allows for dosimetric studies and therapy with the same immunoconjugate. By contrast, 90Y has a longer path length and superior intracellular stability compared with 131I. Yttrium-90 may therefore be preferable to 131I for patients with bulky disease, poorly vascularized solid tumors, or when targeting internalized antigens. Although 90Y emits no gamma photon, dosimetry studies for 90Y RIT can be performed using a surrogate radionuclide such as indium-111. Both 131I- and 90Y-labeled anti-CD20 antibodies have demonstrated efficacy in treating relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Further studies are needed, however, to determine if the differences in the pharmacology of 131I and 90Y are clinically relevant.

Comparison of the biologic effects of MA5 and B-B4 monoclonal antibody labeled with iodine-131 and bismuth-213 on multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND

Using a specific monoclonal antibody (MAb), B-B4, coupled to bismuth-213 ((213)Bi) by a chelating agent (CITC-DTPA), the feasibility of alpha-radioimmunotherapy (RIT) for multiple myeloma (MM) has been demonstrated previously.

METHODS

In this study, the two MAbs tested, MA5 and B-B4, target the epithelial antigens Muc-1 and syndecan-1, respectively, which are both expressed by MM cell lines. Antibody characterization was evaluated by flow cytometric analysis of normal and tumoral hematopoeitic cells of MM patients as well as immunohistochemical tests of normal, nonhematopoetic tissues. Radiobiologic effects were evaluated for (213)Bi- and iodine-131 ((131)I)--labeled antibodies. We assessed in vitro mortality (thymidine incorporation, MTT, and clonogenic assays) and cell cycle modifications with propidium iodide staining. These tests were performed on MM cell lines until 120 hours postirradiation at several time points, using radiolabeled antibody concentrations ranging from 0.5 to 20 nM and specific activities ranging from 240 to 1200 MBq/mg of MAb.

RESULTS

MA5 stained all MM cells in only 50% of patients, whereas B-B4 recognized all MM cells in all patients. B-B4 principally showed hepatic, pulmonary, and duodenal staining, whereas MA5 marked renal and pulmonary tissues. RIT with (213)Bi-B-B4 induced specific mortality and G(2)/M phase cell cycle arrest, which depended on the concentrations and specific activity. For (213)Bi-MA5, this arrest appeared at concentrations above 10 nM, an amount fivefold higher than that required with B-B4. This difference was also found in thymidine incorporation assays. Furthermore, with (213)Bi-B-B4, the arrest at the G(2)/M phase appeared quickly, within 24 hours after irradiation, and affected up to 60% of the cells (for 20 nM of (213)Bi-B-B4 at 1,200 MBq/mg). Conversly, (131)I-B-B4 had a very limited effect on cell mortality and did not induce any cell cycle arrest.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study show that B-B4 might be the more effective therapeutic antibody and suggest that alpha-RIT might be more suitable than beta-RIT for treating single-cell tumor models. Thus, these findings set the stage for the beginning of clinical trials using alpha-emitter--radiolabeled B-B4, with special attention paid to hepatic, pulmonary, and intestinal side effects.

Combined modality radioimmunotherapy. Promise and peril

BACKGROUND

Single-agent radioimmunotherapy (RIT), although potentially useful for slowing solid tumor growth, has not been effective in curing aggressive tumors, such as breast cancer. These cancers typically have p53 mutations and are less susceptible to apoptosis, the apparent mechanism of cell death from low dose-rate radiation. Thus, synergistic or combined modality radioimmunotherapy (CMRIT) agents are needed to increase radiosensitivity for therapeutic enhancement without additive toxicity.

METHODS

To assess synergy in CMRIT in a breast cancer xenograft model, we evaluated RGD peptide EMD 121974, an inhibitor of alpha(v)beta(3) integrin; paclitaxel, an antimicrotubule; IMC-C225, a monoclonal antibody to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR); and bcl-2 antisense oligonucleotide G3139. Groups of mice received (90)Y-DOTA-ChL6 in combination with each agent. Tumor size, survival, and blood counts were monitored for efficacy and toxicity. Immunopathologic evaluation of apoptosis was performed at selected time points after RIT and RIT + RGD CMRIT.

RESULTS

CMRIT with RGD peptide increased apoptosis and resulted in 57% cures, compared with 0% cures with RIT alone. CMRIT with paclitaxel after RIT increased cures to 88%, compared with 25% cures with RIT before paclitaxel administration. CMRIT with IMC-C225 resulted in up to 20% cures if given before RIT. A time-dependent increase in toxicity was observed with IMC-C225 after RIT. CMRIT with bcl-2 antisense G3139 resulted in no cures and an increased rate of regrowth compared with RIT alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Some combined modality therapies resulted in higher numbers of cures, while others decreased cures and responses and increased toxicity compared with RIT alone. These results support the potential for CMRIT but illustrate the complexity of predicting the efficacy and toxicity and the importance of the relationship between dose and sequence of administration.

Combined modality radioimmunotherapy for human prostate cancer xenografts with taxanes and 90yttrium-DOTA-peptide-ChL6

BACKGROUND

Therapy for prostate cancer in the PC3 tumor-nude mouse model with 90yttrium-(90Y)-DOTA-peptide-ChL6 (5.55 MBq;150 microCi) has resulted in durable responses. To make radioimmunotherapy (RIT) more effective, the radiation-enhancing drugs Taxol (paclitaxel) and Taxotere (docetaxel) were tested for synergy with 90Y-DOTA-peptide-ChL6.

METHODS

Nude mice bearing human prostate cancer PC3 xenografts were treated with 90Y-DOTA-peptide-ChL6 (2.78 MBq; 75 microCi) and after 24 hr, paclitaxel (300 or 600 microg), or docetaxel (300 microg). Tumor size, survival, blood counts, and pharmacokinetics were monitored to assess efficacy and toxicity.

RESULTS

Docetaxel plus RIT had a 67% cure rate, whereas no mice were cured among the RIT alone, chemotherapy alone, or untreated controls. Paclitaxel (600 microg) plus RIT produced a 100% response rate with 20% cures. Average tumor volume was reduced to a greater degree in the combined modality radioimmunotherapy (CMRIT) groups compared to controls and the anti-tumor response was durable. Myelotoxicity in the combined modality groups (RIT plus paclitaxel or RIT plus docetaxel) were similar to groups receiving the same dose of RIT alone.

CONCLUSION

In the PC3-tumor nude mouse model, addition of paclitaxel or docetaxel to 90Y-DOTA-peptide-ChL6, in doses clinically achievable in humans, provided therapeutic synergy without increased or excessive toxicity.

Experimental radioimmunotherapy

Experimental radioimmunotherapy (RIT) studies in animal models have contributed significantly to the design of clinical RIT protocols, although the results have not always been directly translated. Reviewed in this article are current areas of active research in experimental RIT to increase the therapeutic ratio that are likely to have a significant impact on the design of future clinical studies. Approaches for increasing the therapeutic efficacy of RIT include the development of new targeting molecules (genetically engineered monoclonal antibodies, antibody fragments, single-chain antibodies, diabodies and minibodies, fusion toxins, or peptides); improved labeling chemistry; novel radionuclide use and fractionation; locoregional administration; pretargeting; use of biological response modifiers or gene transfer techniques to increase target receptor expression; bone marrow transplantation; and combined modality therapy with external-beam radiation therapy, chemotherapy, or gene therapy. Further research with these new experimental approaches in preclinical animal models is necessary to contribute to advances in the treatment of cancer patients using radiolabeled antibodies and peptides.

Paclitaxel derivatives for targeted therapy of cancer: toward the development of smart taxanes

The pharmacologic efficacy of the promising antitumor agent paclitaxel (Taxol) may be potentially enhanced through derivatization of the drug to a water-soluble tumor-recognizing conjugate. This work reports the design and synthesis of the first tumor-directed derivative of paclitaxel. A 7-amino acid synthetic peptide, BBN[7-13], which binds to the cell surface bombesin/gastrin-releasing peptide (BBN/GRP) receptor, was conjugated to the paclitaxel-2'-hydroxy function by a heterobifunctional poly(ethylene glycol) linker. The resulting conjugate, designated PTXPEGBBN[7-13], was soluble to the upper limit of tested concentrations (250 mg/mL). The conjugate completely retained the receptor binding properties of the attached peptide as compared with those of the unconjugated BBN[7-13]. In experiments with NCI-H1299 human nonsmall cell lung cancer cells, the cytotoxicity of the PTXPEGBBN[7-13] conjugate at a 15 nM dose was enhanced by a factor of 17.3 for 24 h and 10 for 96 h exposure times, relative to paclitaxel. The IC(50) of the conjugate, tested against the same cell line, was lower than the free drug by a factor of 2.5 for both 24 h and 96 h exposures. These results describe, for the first time, the design and synthesis of a soluble tumor-directed paclitaxel prodrug which may establish a new mode for the utilization of this drug in cancer therapy.