Evaluation of the Clinical Usefulness of BRAFV600E Mutation Analysis of Core-Needle Biopsy Specimens in Thyroid Nodules with Previous Atypia of Undetermined Significance or Follicular Lesions of Undetermined Significance Results

Serum TSH as a predictor of malignancy in indeterminate thyroid nodules

INTRODUCTION

Thyroid nodules are lesions that are radiologically distinct from the thyroid parenchyma. Cervical ultrasound diagnoses 19-67% of nodules and is crucial in identifying those that lack cytological characterisation. Approximately 25% of biopsies reveal an indeterminate cytological result (Bethesda III), in which the risk of malignancy is variable (5-15%). The clinical importance of the diagnostic strategy used for thyroid nodules results from the need to exclude malignancy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of serum thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels as a predictor of malignancy in cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules.

METHODS

Our retrospective study included 40 patients with cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules seen in our hospital between January 2013 and December 2017. Clinical parameters were reviewed, including age, gender, serum TSH levels, family history of thyroid carcinoma, radiation exposure and some sonographic features of the nodules. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05.

RESULTS

Female gender was predominant (85%) and the mean (SD) age was 53.3 (15) years. Thyroid carcinoma was confirmed in 28% of patients. Median TSH levels were higher in patients with malignant (2.73µIU/ml) compared with benign (1.56µIU/ml) nodules (p<0.05). We demonstrated an increased risk of malignancy in patients with TSH levels of 2.68µIU/ml or above (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Higher serum TSH levels are associated with an increased risk of thyroid carcinoma in cytologically indeterminate nodules. TSH can become a fundamental diagnostic tool in stratifying the risk of malignancy and assist in diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to these nodules.

BRAFV600E mutation test on fine-needle aspiration specimens of thyroid nodules: Clinical correlations for 4600 patients

Background

The BRAF^V600E mutation is valuable for the diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). However, studies related to this mutation have involved only a small number of patients. Therefore, we performed a large‐scale analysis from a single institute to evaluate the accuracy of combined fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) and BRAF^V600E mutation tests for PTC diagnosis.

Methods

A total of 4600 patients with thyroid nodules who underwent both FNA cytology and BRAF^V600E mutation analysis on FNA specimens were enrolled. The association between the BRAF^V600E mutation and clinicopathological features was analyzed. A separate analysis was performed for the 311 patients who underwent repeated FNA for comparison of cytological evaluation and BRAF^V600E mutation results. The diagnostic efficacy of the BRAF^V600E mutation test and cytologic diagnoses was evaluated for 516 patients who underwent preoperative FNA tests in comparison with conclusive postoperative histopathologic results.

Results

The cytology results of all 4600 FNA samples were categorized according to The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytology (TBSRTC) stages I–VI, which accounted for 11.76%, 60.02%, 6.46%, 3.61%, 6.71%, and 11.43% of the samples, respectively. The BRAF^V600E mutation was detected in 762 (16.57%) FNA samples, with rates of 1.48%, 0.87%, 20.20%, 3.01%, 66.02%, and 87.81% for TBSRTC I–VI lesions, respectively. Among the 311 repeat FNA cases, 81.0% of the BRAF^V600E‐positive and 4.3% of the BRAF^V600E‐negative specimens with an initial indication of cytological non‐malignancy were ultimately diagnosed as malignant by repeat FNA (p < 0.001). Among the 516 patients who underwent thyroidectomy, the sensitivity and specificity of the BRAF^V600E mutation test alone for PTC diagnosis were 76.71% and 100.0%, respectively, which increased to 96.62% and 88.03%, respectively, when combining the BRAF^V600E mutation test with cytology. BRAF^V600E mutation was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis (p < 0.001), but not with age, gender, or tumor size.

Conclusions

The BRAF^V600E mutation test in FNA samples has potential to reduce false negatives in PTC diagnosis, and therefore plays an important role in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules, especially those with an indeterminate or nondiagnostic cytology, which should be considered for repeat FNA.

Application of biomarkers in the diagnosis of uncertain samples of core needle biopsy of thyroid nodules

Core needle biopsy (CNB) is now more frequently used for the preoperative diagnosis of thyroid nodules. Based on morphology alone, 5–20% of CNB samples cannot be determined as malignant or benign. Compared to fine-needle biopsy (FNB), samples collected by CNB are more accessible for various tests. Therefore, studying biomarkers’ application in distinguishing uncertain CNB samples of thyroid nodules is a practical need. Patients of thyroid nodules with both CNB and matched resected specimens were reviewed. Cases classified as indeterminate lesions, follicular neoplasms, and suspicious for malignancy were retrieved. All CNB samples were stained by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using antibodies against CK19, galectin-3, HBME-1, and CD56 and detected by next-generation sequencing (NGS) using an OncoAim® thyroid cancer multigene assay kit (Singlera Genomics) that detected 26 genes. Taking the resected specimens’ classification as the gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy of a single biomarker, and various combinations for discriminating malignancy from benignity were calculated. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy for preoperative malignancy evaluation were as follows. In the cohort of non-follicular-neoplasm-lesions (non-FN-lesion), they were 95.16%, 53.85%, 90.77%, 70.00%, and 88.00% for CK19; 95.16%, 38.46%, 88.06%, 62.50%, and 85.33% for galectin-3; 77.42%, 76.92%, 94.12%, 41.67%, and 58.00% for HBME-1; 66.13%, 100.00%, 100.00%, 38.24%, and 72.00% for CD56; 90.32%, 92.31%, 98.25%, 66.67%, and 90.67% for NGS; and 88.71%, 92.30%, 98.21%, 63.16%, and 89.33% for integrated IHC. In the cohort of follicular neoplasms (FN), they were 30.43%, 77.77%, 77.77%, 30.43%, and 43.75% for CK19; 73.91%, 66.67%, 85.00%, 50.00%, and 71.88% for galectin-3; 26.09%, 88.89%, 85.71%, 32.00%, and 43.75% for HBME-1; 26.09%, 100.00%, 100.00%, 34.62%, and 46.88% for CD56; 52.17%, 88.89%, 92.31%, 42.11%, and 62.50% for NGS; 82.61%, 66.67%, 86.36%, 60.00%, and 78.13% for integrated IHC; and 100%, 66.67%, 88.46%, 100%, and 90.63% for integrated IHC-NGS. The application of biomarkers in distinguishing uncertain CNB samples of thyroid nodules is available and capable. CD56 negative or NGS positive suggests malignancy strongly for both FN and non-FN-lesion, which may be used as a “rule in” tool. The negative predictive value of the integrated IHC and the integrated IHC-NGS implies a high possibility to be benign for non-FN-lesion and FN separately, which can work as a “rule out” tool. Considering the balance of specificity and sensitivity, NGS is the best for non-FN-lesion and the integrated IHC-NGS is the best for FN.

The clinical usefulness of chemokine C-X-C Motif Ligand 12 as a diagnostic marker for Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma

Background

Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is the most common type of thyroid cancer worldwide. It is essential to develop methods for the accurate diagnosis of PTC to avoid unnecessary surgery. The chemokine C-X-C motif ligand 12 (CXCL12) is associated with various cancers. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of CXCL12 in the diagnosis of PTC in fine-needle aspiration (FNA) specimens.

Methods

We prospectively collected samples from 58 patients who were scheduled for surgical treatment of PTC from 2013 to 2015. Tissue samples of 31 people with benign thyroid conditions were used as controls. Immunocytochemical and immunohistochemical staining for CXCL12 was performed on FNAs and corresponding tissue specimens. B-type Raf kinase (BRAF) V600E mutant protein expression and gene mutation were also analyzed to compare the clinical usefulness.

Results

: The mean age of the patients was 49.1 ± 1.4 years and 88.1% were women. Positive CXCL12 staining was observed in 6.5% of benign and in 98.3% of PTC samples; positive BRAF V600E mutant protein expression was found in 19.4% of benign and 93.1% of PTC samples. For the diagnosis of PTC for CXCL12 staining of FNA specimens, the calculated values were 93.1% sensitivity, 90.3% specificity, 94.7% positive predictive value, 87.5% negative predictive value, and 89.1% accuracy. CXCL12 had 100% sensitivity and specificity for the 12 cases of atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) diagnosed in FNA specimens.

Conclusions

CXCL12 may be a useful diagnostic tool for PTC, especially when the FNA specimen is classified as AUS.

Core needle biopsy in the management of thyroid nodules with an indeterminate fine-needle aspiration report

Ultrasonography (US)-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) cytology is widely used but is limited due to its pathologically indeterminate results in diagnosing thyroid nodules. Recently, US-guided core-needle biopsy (CNB) was introduced as an effective and safe technique for diagnosing indeterminate thyroid nodules. Using CNB, information about architectural histologic structure such as nodule capsule or more immunochemical staining can be obtained which lead to a more accurate diagnosis. Up to 98% of indeterminate thyroid lesions can be classified as malignant or benign when CNB is used for follow-up analysis. Other evidences revealed the effectiveness of CNB in reducing inconclusive results and improving the diagnostic performance of thyroid nodules initially diagnosed as AUS/FLUS by FNAB. In this review, we investigate how to deal with indeterminate thyroid nodules diagnosed by FNAB and determine how CNB has a role in diagnosing these indeterminate thyroid nodules.

Comparison of droplet digital PCR and direct Sanger sequencing for the detection of the BRAFV600E mutation in papillary thyroid carcinoma

Background

The BRAF^V600E mutation status is a useful diagnostic and prognostic marker for papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). Although it is a commonly used method, Sanger sequencing has several limitations in detecting the BRAF^V600E mutation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) as an alternative method for the detection of the BRAF^V600E mutation in PTC patients.

Methods

Samples from a total of 120 patients with PTC and 30 patients with benign nodular thyroid disease who underwent thyroid surgery were collected. The BRAF^V600E mutation status of the PTC patients was tested by Sanger sequencing and ddPCR.

Results

The BRAF^V600E mutation was detected in 67 samples (44.67%) by Sanger sequencing and 92 samples (61.33%) by ddPCR. The detection of the mutation by the two methods was inconsistent in twenty‐five samples (16.67%). The sensitivity and specificity of the ddPCR method were 100% and 69.88%, respectively, and the positive predictive and negative predictive values were 72.83% and 100%, respectively. The concordance rate between the two methods in detecting the BRAF^V600E mutation was 83.33%. Neither Sanger sequencing nor ddPCR detected BRAF^V600E in 30 patients with benign nodular thyroid disease. The 92 samples with the BRAF^V600E mutation were detected by ddPCR at a fractional abundance from 0.28% to 45.40% as follows: ≥10% (59 samples, 64.13%), 5%‐10% (8 samples, 8.70%), and ≤5% (25 samples, 27.17%). The BRAF^V600E mutation was detected in all 59 samples at a fractional abundance ≥10% and in four samples at a fractional abundance from 5% to 10%, and no BRAF^V600E mutation was detected at a fractional abundance ≤5% by Sanger sequencing.

Conclusions

ddPCR was a reliable, highly sensitive alternative method for the detection of the BRAF^V600E mutation in PTC patients.

Cytomorphologic, Imaging, Molecular Findings, and Outcome in Thyroid Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance/Atypical Cell of Undetermined Significance (AUS/FLUS): A Mini-Review

OBJECTIVES

Since the introduction of the entity of "Atypical cell of undetermined significance /follicular lesion of undetermined significance" (AUS/FLUS) by The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytology (TBSRTC) in 2007, there have been many published studies about the cytomorphologic criteria, subclassification, outcome, and management of patients with the diagnosis of AUS/FLUS. There have been many studies in different aspects of this indeterminate category, i.e., cytologic and molecular findings, ultrasonographic findings, and in some instances even core-needle biopsy to address a better and safer way of the management of patients with this fine-needle aspiration cytology diagnosis. The second edition of TBSRTC and the 2015 American Thyroid Association guidelines provide an update on the follow-up and management of AUS/FLUS. A multidisciplinary team consisting of pathologists, endocrinologists, surgeons, and radiologists should be involved in the diagnosis and management of AUS/FLUS, and all of them should be aware of the heterogeneity of this lesion for the prediction of the treatment and outcome.

STUDY DESIGN

In this review, we consider different research platforms (2008-2017) to find the best and key reports for the above-mentioned challenging aspects of AUS/FLUS.

CONCLUSION

AUS/FLUS is now a well-defined group of thyroid lesions, which can be most accurately diagnosed and managed with cytomorphology, molecular, and ancillary studies.

Comparison of Immunohistochemistry and Direct Sanger Sequencing for Detection of the BRAF(V600E) Mutation in Thyroid Neoplasm

BACKGROUND

The BRAF(V600E) mutation is the most common genetic alteration identified in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). Because of its costs effectiveness and sensitivity, direct Sanger sequencing has several limitations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of immunohistochemistry (IHC) as an alternative method to detect the BRAF(V600E) mutation in preoperative and postoperative tissue samples.

METHODS

We evaluated 71 patients who underwent thyroid surgery with the result of direct sequencing of the BRAF(V600E) mutation. IHC staining of the BRAF(V600E) mutation was performed in 49 preoperative and 23 postoperative thyroid specimens.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients (87.3%) had PTC, and of these, BRAF(V600E) was confirmed by direct sequencing in 57 patients (91.9%). In 23 postoperative tissue samples, the BRAF(V600E) mutation was detected in 16 samples (70%) by direct sequencing and 18 samples (78%) by IHC. In 24 fine needle aspiration (FNA) samples, BRAF(V600E) was detected in 18 samples (75%) by direct sequencing and 16 samples (67%) by IHC. In 25 core needle biopsy (CNB) samples, the BRAF(V600E) mutation was detected in 15 samples (60%) by direct sequencing and 16 samples (64%) by IHC. The sensitivity and specificity of IHC for detecting the BRAF(V600E) mutation were 77.8% and 66.7% in FNA samples and 99.3% and 80.0% in CNB samples.

CONCLUSION

IHC could be an alternative method to direct Sanger sequencing for BRAF(V600E) mutation detection both in postoperative and preoperative samples. However, application of IHC to detect the BRAF(V600E) mutation in FNA samples is of limited value compared with direct sequencing.

Reliability of core needle biopsy as a second-line procedure in thyroid nodules with an indeterminate fine-needle aspiration report: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This study was undertaken to summarize the published data and to provide more robust estimates regarding the issue of core needle biopsy (CNB) for discriminating thyroid nodules with indeterminate fine-needle aspiration (FNA) results.

METHODS

The systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The sources comprised studies published through November 2017. Original articles that investigated CNB in indeterminate thyroid lesions were searched. A random-effects model was used for statistical pooling of the data. The I² index was used to quantify the heterogeneity among the studies. The Egger test was carried out to evaluate the possible presence of significant publication bias. Quality assessment of the studies was performed according to QUADAS-2.

RESULTS

A total of 205 articles were retrieved, seven were initially selected, and the data of five papers were ultimately pooled in a meta-analysis. The overall cancer rate was 34%. The rate of cancers correctly diagnosed by CNB was 83% (95% confidence interval [CI], 76 to 89), with neither heterogeneity (I²=25%) nor publication bias (Egger test, P=0.918). The rate of benign nodules correctly assessed by CNB was 84% (95% CI, 65 to 97), with significant heterogeneity (I²=93.4%) and publication bias (Egger test, P=0.016).

CONCLUSION

Evidence was found that CNB can correctly diagnose the majority of nodules previously read as indeterminate on FNA.

The Role of Core Needle Biopsy for Thyroid Nodules with Initially Indeterminate Results on Previous Fine-Needle Aspiration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Sonography-guided fine-needle aspiration leads to relatively frequent cases of indeterminate cytology for the diagnosis of thyroid nodules.

PURPOSE

Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of core needle biopsy for the examination of thyroid nodules with initially indeterminate results on fine-needle aspiration.

DATA SOURCES

A computerized search of the MEDLINE and Embase databases was performed to identify relevant original articles.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies investigating the use of core needle biopsy for thyroid nodules with initially indeterminate results on previous fine-needle aspiration were eligible for inclusion.

DATA ANALYSIS

The pooled proportions for nondiagnostic results, inconclusive results, malignancy on core needle biopsy, the ability of core needle biopsy to diagnose malignancy, and the related complications of the procedure were analyzed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The meta-analytic pooling was based on a random-effects model. Nine eligible studies, involving 2240 patients with 2245 thyroid nodules, were included. The pooled proportion for nondiagnostic results was 1.8% (95% CI, 0.4%-3.2%), and the pooled proportion for inconclusive results was 25.1% (95% CI, 15.4%-34.9%). The pooled proportion for malignancy was 18.9% (95% CI, 8.4%-29.5%). With regard to the diagnostic performance for malignancy, the sensitivity of core needle biopsy varied, ranging from 44.7% to 85.0%, but the specificity was 100% in all cases. No major complications of core needle biopsy were observed.

LIMITATIONS

The relatively small number of included studies and retrospective nature were limitations.

CONCLUSIONS

Core needle biopsy has low nondiagnostic result rates and high specificity for the diagnosis of malignancy. It is a safe diagnostic technique with a higher diagnostic yield, especially when molecular testing is not available or fine-needle aspiration did not yield enough cells for molecular testing.

Core Needle Biopsy of the Thyroid: 2016 Consensus Statement and Recommendations from Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology

Core needle biopsy (CNB) has been suggested as a complementary diagnostic method to fine-needle aspiration in patients with thyroid nodules. Many recent CNB studies have suggested a more advanced role for CNB, but there are still no guidelines on its use. Therefore, the Task Force Committee of the Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology has developed the present consensus statement and recommendations for the role of CNB in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules. These recommendations are based on evidence from the current literature and expert consensus.

Impact of Reclassification on Thyroid Nodules with Architectural Atypia: From Non-Invasive Encapsulated Follicular Variant Papillary Thyroid Carcinomas to Non-Invasive Follicular Thyroid Neoplasm with Papillary-Like Nuclear Features

Background

The follicular variant of papillary thyroid cancer (FVPTC), especially the encapsulated non-invasive subtype, is a controversial entity. Recent study suggested using ‘non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP)’ for these indolent carcinomas. We evaluated the impact of reclassification from non-invasive encapsulated FVPTCs (EFVPTCs) to NIFTPs in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules with architectural atypia.

Methods

We reviewed 1301 thyroid nodules with architectural atypia in core needle biopsy (CNB) specimens obtained from March 2012 to February 2013. Nodules were classified into atypia of undetermined significance with architectural atypia (AUS-A, 984, 76%) or follicular neoplasm/suspicious for a follicular neoplasm (FN/SFN, 317, 24%). Among them, diagnostic surgery was performed in 384 nodules (30%).

Results

In total, 160 nodules (42%) presented final malignant diagnoses including 39 non-invasive encapsulated FVPTCs (10%). The malignancy rate was estimated to be 7–35% in AUS-A nodules and 28–49% in FN/SFN nodules. After reclassification, the malignancy rate was much decreased and estimated to be 5–24% in AUS-A nodules, and 23–39% in FN/SFN nodules. Thyroid nodules with final malignant diagnoses were significantly more likely to have a FN/SFN CNB diagnosis, malignant US features and concomitant nuclear atypia in CNB specimens. However, these factors could not differentiate NIFTPs from other malignancies.

Conclusions

After reclassification of non-invasive EFVPTCs to NIFTPs, the malignancy rate of thyroid nodules with architectural atypia in CNB specimens was decreased. However, there were no preoperative factors differentiating other malignancies from NIFTPs. The presence of malignant US features or concomitant nuclear atypia might help clinicians deciding diagnostic surgery but, these features also might indicate NIFTPs.

Core-needle biopsy versus repeat fine-needle aspiration for thyroid nodules initially read as atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of core-needle biopsy (CNB) by comparing the results of CNB and repeat fine-needle aspiration (FNA) for thyroid nodules that are initially read as atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) on FNA.

METHODS

Among 2631 initial AUS/FLUS FNA results, 505 consecutive nodules (295 repeat FNAs and 210 CNBs) were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was inconclusive (ie, nondiagnostic or AUS/FLUS). The secondary outcomes included inconclusive results of the subcategory, risk factors for inconclusive results, and diagnostic performance.

RESULTS

CNB demonstrated significantly fewer inconclusive results than repeat FNA for the overall nodules (40.9% vs 63%; p < .001). Repeat FNA and group FLUS were significant risk factors for inconclusive results (odds ratio = 1.92; p =.001 and odds ratio = 2.08; p <.001, respectively). All diagnostic performances using CNB were higher than repeat FNAs.

CONCLUSION

CNB is more useful than repeat FNAs for reducing inconclusive results and improving the diagnostic performance of thyroid nodules with initial AUS/FLUS FNA results. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 39: 361-369, 2017.

Triage of patients with AUS/FLUS on thyroid cytopathology: effectiveness of the multimodal diagnostic techniques

The management of patients with thyroid cytopathologic diagnosis of atypia (or follicular lesion) of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) is a complex clinical problem. The purpose of this study was to develop a practical triage scheme based on multiple diagnostic tests in general use. We performed a retrospective cohort study involving 15,335 consecutive patients with a referral diagnosis of thyroid nodule between April 2011 and March 2015 using an institutional database. We obtained 904 patients with an initial cytopathologic diagnosis of AUS/FLUS who underwent repeat fine‐needle aspiration or core needle biopsy, 388 of whom had a corresponding histopathological diagnosis for excised index lesions. The diagnostic performance of ultrasound (US) findings, repeat biopsy, and BRAF^V600E mutation in cytopathologic specimens were evaluated individually or as a set. Of the 388 resected AUS/FLUS cases, 338 (87.1%) were thyroid cancer. The positive likelihood ratios (LRs) for BRAF^V600E mutation and repeat biopsy result of suspicious for malignant cell (SMC) or worse were 11.6 (95% CI = 1.7–77.8) and 13.7 (95% CI = 4.6–41.0), respectively. The absence of suspicious findings on US combined with cytologic result of less than SMC or negative BRAF^V600E mutation produced negative LRs ranging from 0.06 to 0.15, corresponding to negative predictive values of over 90% in both primary and referral settings. For patients with AUS/FLUS cytopathology, clinical decision making can be guided by a simple triage scheme based on US findings, repeat biopsy, or BRAF^V600E mutation.