A phase I dose escalation study of continuous oral capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin and pelvic radiation (XELOX-RT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery Versus Total Mesorectal Excision in ypT0-1 Rectal Cancer After Preoperative Radiochemotherapy: Postoperative Morbidity, Functional Results, and Long-term Oncologic Outcome

BACKGROUND

In patients with locally advanced extraperitoneal rectal cancer, a multidisciplinary approach represents the standard treatment. However, considering the favorable prognosis in patients with major or complete response, radical surgery might represent overtreatment.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate postoperative short-term morbidity, functional outcome, and oncologic long-term outcome in patients with rectal cancer treated with local excision by transanal endoscopic microsurgery or radical surgery and to determine who achieved a complete or major pathological response (ypT0-1) after neoadjuvant treatment.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective study.

SETTING

The study was conducted at a single center.

PATIENTS

Patients who had received neoadjuvant treatment by local excision with a major or complete pathological response at histological examination (transanal endoscopic microsurgery group) were compared to patients treated by radical surgery with the same pathological response (total mesorectal excision group).

INTERVENTIONS

The interventions included local excision by transanal endoscopic microsurgery and radical surgery with total mesorectal excision.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Postoperative short-term morbidity, functional outcome 1 year after surgery, and oncologic long-term outcome were measured.

RESULTS

Ninety-three patients were included in the study (35 in the transanal endoscopic microsurgery group and 58 in the mesorectal excision group). In the total mesorectal excision group, a sphincter-saving approach was possible in 89.7% (vs 100%; p = 0.049); a protective temporary stoma was necessary in 74.1% of radical procedures (vs 0%; p < 0.001), and 13.8% of these became permanent. Short-term postoperative morbidity was lower after local excision (14.3% vs 46.6%; p = 0.002). One year after surgery, the transanal endoscopic microsurgery group recorded better evacuation and continence function than the total mesorectal excision group. Oncologic outcome was similar between the groups.

LIMITATIONS

This study had a retrospective design.

CONCLUSION

If a major or complete pathological response occurs after neoadjuvant treatment, an organ-sparing approach by local excision seems to offer the same oncologic results as radical surgery, but it has a better postoperative morbidity rate and better functional results. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B901 .Microcirugía endoscópica transanal versus escisión total del mesorrecto en cáncer de recto ypT0-1 después de radioquimioterapia preoperatoria: morbilidad posoperatoria, resultados funcionales y resultado oncológico a largo plazo.

ANTECEDENTES

En pacientes con cáncer rectal extraperitoneal localmente avanzado, un abordaje multidisciplinario con radioquimioterapia preoperatoria y cirugía con escisión total del mesorrecto representa el tratamiento estándar. En pacientes que obtienen una respuesta mayor o completa, la cirugía radical puede representar un sobretratamiento, considerando el pronóstico favorable de estos casos.

OBJETIVO

Evaluar la morbilidad posoperatoria a corto plazo, el resultado funcional y el resultado oncológico a largo plazo en pacientes con cáncer de recto tratados con escisión local mediante microcirugía endoscópica transanal o mediante cirugía radical y que obtuvieron una respuesta patológica completa o mayor (ypT0-1) después del tratamiento neoadyuvante.

DISEO

Este fue un estudio retrospectivo.

AJUSTE

El estudio se realizó en un solo centro.

ESCENARIO

El estudio se realizó en un solo centro.

PACIENTES

Se comparó a los pacientes tratados, tras tratamiento neoadyuvante (1996-2016), mediante escisión local con respuesta patológica mayor o completa al examen histológico (grupo de microcirugía endoscópica transanal), con los pacientes tratados mediante cirugía radical con la misma respuesta patológica (grupo de escisión mesorrectal total).

INTERVENCIONES

Extirpación local mediante microcirugía endoscópica transanal y cirugía radical con escisión mesorrectal total.

PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO

Morbilidad posoperatoria a corto plazo, resultado funcional a un año después de la cirugía (evaluado con una puntuación de evacuación y continencia) y resultado oncológico a largo plazo.

LIMITACIONES

Las limitaciones de este estudio incluyen su diseño retrospectivo.

CONCLUSIN

Si se produce una respuesta patológica mayor o completa después del tratamiento neoadyuvante, un abordaje con preservación de órganos mediante escisión local parece ofrecer los mismos resultados oncológicos que la cirugía radical, pero tiene una menor tasa de morbilidad postoperatoria y mejores resultados funcionales un año después de la cirugía. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B901 . (Traducción-Dr. Felipe Bellolio ).

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy affects postoperative outcomes and functional results in patients treated with transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal neoplasms

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to quantify the incidence of short-term postoperative complications and functional disorders at 1 year from transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) for rectal neoplasms, to compare patients treated with TEM alone and with TEM after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and to analyse factors influencing postoperative morbidity and functional outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on all patients treated with TEM for rectal neoplasms at our institution in January 2000-December 2017. Data from a prospectively maintained database were retrospectively analysed. Patients were divided into two groups: adenoma or early rectal cancer (no CRT group) and locally advanced extraperitoneal rectal cancer with major or complete clinical response after preoperative CRT (CRT group). Short-term postoperative mortality and morbidity and the functional results at 1 year were recorded. The two groups were compared, and a statistical analysis of factors influencing postoperative morbidity and functional outcomes was performed. Functional outcome was also evaluated with the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score (0-20 no LARS, 21-29 minor LARS and 30-42 major LARS).

RESULTS

One hundred and thirteen patients (71 males, 42 females, median age 64 years [range 41-80 years]) were included in the study (46 in the CRT group). The overall postoperative complication rate was 23.0%, lower in the noCRT group (p < 0.001), but only 2.7% were grade ≥ 3. The most frequent complication was suture dehiscence (17.6%), which occurred less frequently in the noCRT group (p < 0.001). At 1 year from TEM, the most frequent symptoms was urgency (11.9%, without significant differences between the CRT group and the noCRT group); the noCRT group experienced a lower rate of soiling than the CRT group (0% vs. 7.7%; p: 0.027). The incidence of LARS was evaluated in 47 patients from May 2012 on and was 21.3% occurring less frequently in the noCRT group (10% vs. 41.2%; p: 0.012). Only 6.4% of the patients evaluated experienced major LARS. In multivariate analysis, preoperative CRT significantly worsened postoperative morbidity and functional outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

TEM is a safe procedure associated with only low risk of severe postoperative complications and major LARS. Preoperative CRT seems to increase the rate of postoperative morbidity after TEM and led to worse functional outcomes at 1 year after surgery.

A rectal cancer feasibility study with an embedded phase III trial design assessing magnetic resonance tumour regression grade (mrTRG) as a novel biomarker to stratify management by good and poor response to chemoradiotherapy (TRIGGER): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Pre-operative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for MRI-defined, locally advanced rectal cancer is primarily intended to reduce local recurrence rates by downstaging tumours, enabling an improved likelihood of curative resection. However, in a subset of patients complete tumour regression occurs implying that no viable tumour is present within the surgical specimen. This raises the possibility that surgery may have been avoided. It is also recognised that response to CRT is a key determinant of prognosis. Recent radiological advances enable this response to be assessed pre-operatively using the MRI tumour regression grade (mrTRG). Potentially, this allows modification of the baseline MRI-derived treatment strategy. Hence, in a 'good' mrTRG responder, with little or no evidence of tumour, surgery may be deferred. Conversely, a 'poor response' identifies an adverse prognostic group which may benefit from additional pre-operative therapy.

METHODS/DESIGN

TRIGGER is a multicentre, open, interventional, randomised control feasibility study with an embedded phase III design. Patients with MRI-defined, locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma deemed to require CRT will be eligible for recruitment. During CRT, patients will be randomised (1:2) between conventional management, according to baseline MRI, versus mrTRG-directed management. The primary endpoint of the feasibility phase is to assess the rate of patient recruitment and randomisation. Secondary endpoints include the rate of unit recruitment, acute drug toxicity, reproducibility of mrTRG reporting, surgical morbidity, pathological circumferential resection margin involvement, pathology regression grade, residual tumour cell density and surgical/specimen quality rates. The phase III trial will focus on long-term safety, regrowth rates, oncological survival analysis, quality of life and health economics analysis.

DISCUSSION

The TRIGGER trial aims to determine whether patients with locally advanced rectal cancer can be recruited and subsequently randomised into a control trial that offers MRI-directed patient management according to radiological response to CRT (mrTRG). The feasibility study will inform a phase III trial design investigating stratified treatment of good and poor responders according to 3-year disease-free survival, colostomy-free survival as well as an increase in cases managed without a major resection.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02704520 . Registered on 5 February 2016.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for locally advanced extraperitoneal rectal cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to provide a prospective analysis of post-operative and oncological outcomes in patients affected by locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), who obtained a major/complete clinical response after pre-operative radio-chemotherapy (RCT) and were treated with local excision (LE) by trans-anal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) to confirm a pathological complete response (pCR) after to neo-adjuvant RCT.

METHODS

All patients with LARC treated by pre-operative RCT and full-thickness LE by TEM (2000-2014) were included in the study. If the pathological analysis confirmed near complete or pCR, intensive follow up was proposed. If the pathological response was incomplete, a radical resection with TME was proposed. Post-operative (according to Clavien's classification), functional and long-term oncological outcome were analyzed.

RESULTS

36 patients were treated by TEM. The median post-operative hospital stay was 5 days. The post-operative morbidity was 41.6% (no grade ≥3). At pathological analysis, 23 specimens were ypT0 TRG1, and 4 were ypT1 TRG2. In 9 cases (ypT>1 and/or TRG>2), radical surgery with TME was proposed but 3 refused it. Median follow-up was 68 months. One local recurrence and 4 distant metastases occurred. The 5-yr actuarial local control, overall survival and disease-free survival were 96.0%, 92.0% and 82.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

In case of major or complete clinical response of LARC after pre-operative RCT, LE by TEM can be used to confirm the pathological response. This avoids the necessity of radical surgery and, in our experience, this approach seems to guarantee oncological safety with the functional advantages of an organ-sparing procedure.

Effectiveness of capecitabine with or without docetaxel therapy for the treatment of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma: a single-institution experience

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and toxicity of capecitabine (C) chemotherapy regimen with or without (w/o) docetaxel (D) in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC).

RESULTS

Clinical benefit rate were similar in two arms (C arm vs DC arm: 38.9% vs 45.5%, p = 0.411). There were two cases achieved partial response in DC arm. In C arm, the median PFS was 3.0 months (95% CI 2.5-3.5 months) and median OS was 11.3 months (95% CI 8.6-14.1 months). In DC arm, the median PFS was 2.2 months (95% CI 1.7-2.7 months) and median OS was 18 months (95% CI 6.8-29.9 months). Adverse events were mostly acceptable, including myelosuppession, hand-foot syndrome and mucositis. Anemia and leukopenia was found more in the DC arm than in the C arm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a one-center, observational, retrospective study. From April 2009 to March 2015, a total of 29 patients with metastatic UC were included in the study. Survivals, response rates and toxicities were collected retrospectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The result showed the activity and toxicity of C w/o D. As DC treatment did not reveal better outcome, C or D single-agent might be an option in platinum-failed patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma. Further clinical trials are warranted.

Drug Combinations in Preoperative Chemoradiation for Rectal Cancer

Preoperative radiotherapy has an accepted role in reducing the risk of local recurrence in locally advanced resectable rectal cancer, particularly when the circumferential resection margin is breached or threatened, according to magnetic resonance imaging. Fluoropyrimidine-based chemoradiation can obtain a significant down-sizing response and a curative resection can then be achieved. Approximately, 20% of the patients can also obtain a pathological complete response, which is associated with less local recurrences and increased survival. Patients who achieve a sustained complete clinical response may also avoid radical surgery. In unresectable or borderline resectable tumors, around 20% of the patients still fail to achieve a sufficient down-staging response with the current chemoradiation schedules. Hence, investigators have aspired to increase pathological complete response rates, aiming to improve curative resection rates, enhance survival, and potentially avoid mutilating surgery. However, adding additional cytotoxic or biological agents have not produced dramatic improvements in outcome and often led to excess surgical morbidity and higher levels of acute toxicity, which effects on compliance and in the global efficacy of chemoradiation.

How can we determine the best neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimen for rectal cancer?

SUMMARY 

The current management of patients with clinically defined ‘locally advanced rectal cancer’ often involves fluoropyrimidine-based preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by total mesorectal excision. The focus remains primarily on reducing local recurrence, and improving survival, with organ preservation an increasing target. The best neoadjuvant CRT is the most effective regimen, balanced against the tolerability and late functional consequences, which should be selected for the individual according to their individual risk of local and distant recurrence. Hence, what makes the best neoadjuvant treatment depends on the activity and toxicity of the particular schedule, the aims of treatment, the individual disease characteristics and the individual patient pharmacogenomics. Current research efforts focus on enhancing the efficacy of CRT by integrating additional cytotoxics and biologically targeted agents.

Long-term results with oral fluoropyrimidines and oxaliplatin-based preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with resectable rectal cancer. A single-institution experience

INTRODUCTION

Neoadjuvant 5-FU-based chemoradiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer (RC) is a standard of treatment. The use of oral fluoropyrimidines and new agents such as oxaliplatin may improve efficacy and tolerance.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between 1999 and 2009, 126 RC patients with T3-T4 and/or N+ disease were given three successive protocols: UFT (32), UFT-oxaliplatin (75) and capecitabine-oxaliplatin (19), alongside 45 Gy of radiotherapy; with surgery 4-6 weeks after. Adjuvant treatment was given in all patients. The primary objective was pathologic complete response (pCR).

RESULTS

Preoperative therapy was well tolerated, with no toxic deaths and a 15% grade 3-4 toxicity rate. Eighty-five percent of patients received the full chemotherapy dose, 56% had an abdominoperineal resection, 6% reinterventions and 57% received the full adjuvant chemotherapy planned. The pCR rate was 13%. The downstaging rate was 80%; 8% had progression of disease. The relapse rate was 20%, with local relapse in 6%. By 5 years of followup, 92% of relapses had occurred. Median follow-up was 73 months, 5- and 10-year disease-free survival rates were 75% and 50%, and 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 79% and 66% respectively. There was no benefit from the use of oxaliplatin regarding survival or pCR rates. Older patients had worse long-term outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with oral fluoropyrimidines and oxaliplatin is feasible and well tolerated. The risk of early progression is low. However, there was no added benefit with the use of oxaliplatin. There were no relapses in patients with pCR. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy is unclear.

Prospective phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy with Oxaliplatin and Capecitabine in locally advanced rectal cancer (XELOXART)

Neo-adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (CT-RT) has been shown to decrease local recurrence rate in locally advanced rectal cancer. This multicenter phase II trial was conducted to evaluate the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of a combination of pre-operative radiotherapy and concurrent Capecitabine plus Oxaliplatin (XELOXART Trial). From October 2008 to May 2011, fifty consecutive patients affected with T3/T4 and/or N+ rectal cancer were enrolled. Treatment protocol consisted of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions, Oxaliplatin 60 mg/m(2) once a week for 6 weeks and oral Capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) twice daily from day 1 to 14 and from day 22 to 35. Surgery was planned 6-8 weeks after. Main endpoints were pathological complete response rate (pCR) and the type of surgery performed compared to the planned one at diagnosis. 50 patients were included; pCR (ypT0N0M0) was achieved in 6 patients (12 %). Tumour downstaging was observed in 27 patients (54 %), and nodal downstaging in 32 patients (64 %). A total of 32 patients had lower rectal cancer, with 24 candidate for abdominal-perineal resection. At the end of CT-RT, a total of 12/24 (50 %) underwent conservative surgery. Grade 3 toxicity (fatigue and diarrhoea) occurred in 4 % of patients; grade 4 sensory neuropathy occurred in 2 % of patients. Perioperative complications of any grade occurred in 10 % of patients. Pre-operative CT-RT with Capecitabine-Oxaliplatin was well tolerated and resulted in an encouraging sphincter preservation and tumour downstaging rate. No improvements in terms of pathological complete response rate were shown.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for locally advanced extraperitoneal rectal cancer: short-term morbidity and functional outcome

BACKGROUND

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) after radiochemotherapy (RCT) has been reported in selected cases of locally advanced rectal cancer as an alternative to traditional radical resection with total mesorectal excision with a curative intent or as diagnostic tool to confirm a pathological complete response of the primary tumor. No study has evaluated functional outcome after TEM in preoperatively irradiated patients.

METHODS

This study was designed to evaluate short-term morbidity (according to Clavien's classifications) and establish (by a questionnaire) continence and evacuative function after RCT and TEM, at 1 year from surgery, analyzing the impact of RCT on postoperative outcomes. Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated by RCT and TEM (group 1) or with early T1 or adenomas treated only by TEM (group 2) entered this cohort comparative study.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients entered the study as group 1 and 25 as group 2. No postoperative mortality occurred. The morbidity rate was 36.4 % in group 1 vs. 16 % in group 2 (p = 0.114). The rate of suture dehiscence was 22.7 % in group 1 vs. 4 % in group 2 (p = 0.068). No grade III complications, reoperation, or hospital readmission within 30 days was recorded in either group. One year after surgery, continence and evacuative scores in group 1 were 1.05 ± 1.25 and 24.72 ± 2.79, respectively, which were similar to group 2 (p = 0.081 and 0.288, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

TEM after RCT in selected rectal cancer patients has an acceptable morbidity and functional results at 1 year from surgery. Preoperative irradiation could increase postoperative short-term morbidity, but it does not seem to influence evacuative or sphincter function after 1 year from surgery.

The role of capecitabine in locally advanced rectal cancer treatment: an update

Preoperative infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and concurrent radiation therapy (RT) followed by total mesorectal surgery is the current standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LAR). When compared with postoperative 5-FU-based chemoradiation, this strategy is associated with significantly lower rates of local relapse, lower toxicity and better compliance. Capecitabine is a rationally designed oral prodrug that is converted into 5-FU by intracellular thymidine phosphorylase. Substitution of infusional 5-FU with capecitabine is an attractive option that provides a more convenient administration schedule and, possibly, increased efficacy. Indeed, incorporation of capecitabine in combined modality neoadjuvant therapy for LAR has been under intense investigation during the last 10 years. Phase I and II clinical trials showed that a regimen consisting of capecitabine 825mg/m(2) twice daily for 7 days/week continuous oral administration in combination with RT is an active and well tolerated regimen, thereby being the preferred concurrent regimen. The definitive demonstration that efficacy of capecitabine/RT is similar to 5-FU/RT has been provided by the NSABP-R-04 and the German Margit trials. One approach to improve outcomes in rectal cancer is to deliver a second RT-sensitizing drug with effective systemic activity. Oxaliplatin and irinotecan are therefore good candidates. However, two phase III trials demonstrated that incorporation of oxaliplatin to capecitabine with RT did not improve early outcomes and, by contrast, increased toxicity. Capecitabine has also been combined with irinotecan. This regimen showed encouraging results in phase I and II clinical trials, which led to an ongoing phase III clinical trial. New strategies with induction chemotherapy with or without chemoradiation prior to surgery are currently under investigation. Whether or not capecitabine has a role in this setting is being investigated in ongoing trials. Incorporation of agents directed towards new targets, such as anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies or antiangiogenic agents, in combination preoperative regimens, is being hampered by results of early trials in which efficacy outcomes with cetuximab were poor and an excessive rate of surgical complications with bevacizumab was observed. The lack of improvements in efficacy with the addition of cetuximab or bevacizumab in the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer led to concerns about further development of these agents in rectal cancer. The role of capecitabine in the postoperative adjuvant setting is the aim of the ongoing Dutch SCRIPT trial. The prediction of response associated with capecitabine has been based on expression of thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, as well as on gene expression arrays. All these procedures require further validation and should be considered as investigational. In conclusion, capecitabine can safely and effectively replace intravenous continuous infusion of 5-FU in the preoperative chemoradiation setting for rectal cancer management. The addition of other new antineoplastic agents to a fluoropyrimidine-based regimen remains investigational.

Clinicopathologic Comparison of High-Dose-Rate Endorectal Brachytherapy versus Conventional Chemoradiotherapy in the Neoadjuvant Setting for Resectable Stages II and III Low Rectal Cancer

Purpose. To assess for differences in clinical, radiologic, and pathologic outcomes between patients with stage II-III rectal adenocarcinoma treated neoadjuvantly with conventional external beam radiotherapy (3D conformal radiotherapy (3DRT) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)) versus high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy (EBT). Methods. Patients undergoing neoadjuvant EBT received 4 consecutive daily 6.5 Gy fractions without chemotherapy, while those undergoing 3DRT or IMRT received 28 daily 1.8 Gy fractions with concurrent 5-fluorouracil. Data was collected prospectively for 7 EBT patients and retrospectively for 25 historical 3DRT/IMRT controls. Results. Time to surgery was less for EBT compared to 3DRT and IMRT (P < 0.001). There was a trend towards higher rate of pathologic CR for EBT (P = 0.06). Rates of margin and lymph node positivity at resection were similar for all groups. Acute toxicity was less for EBT compared to 3DRT and IMRT (P = 0.025). Overall and progression-free survival were noninferior for EBT. On MRI, EBT achieved similar complete response rate and reduction in tumor volume as 3DRT and IMRT. Histopathologic comparison showed that EBT resulted in more localized treatment effects and fewer serosal adhesions. Conclusions. EBT offers several practical benefits over conventional radiotherapy techniques and appears to be at least as effective against low rectal cancer as measured by short-term outcomes.

Simultaneous neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy with capecitabine and oxaliplatin for locally advanced rectal cancer. Treatment outcome outside clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Phase II trials of neoadjuvant treatment in UICC-TNM stage II and III rectal cancer with capecitabine and oxaliplatin demonstrated favourable rates on tumour regression with acceptable toxicity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective evaluation of 34 patients treated from 2005-2008 outside clinical trials (CTR) with neoadjuvant irradiation (45-50.4 Gy) and simultaneous capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) b.i.d. on days 1-14 and 22-35 and oxaliplatin 50 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 22 and 29 (CAPOX). Twenty-six (77%) patients received one or two courses of capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) b.i.d. on days 1-14 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on day 1 (XELOX) prior to simultaneous chemoradiotherapy.

RESULTS

UICC-TNM stage regression was observed in 60% (n = 20). Dworak's regression grades 3 and 4 were achieved in 18.2% (n = 6) and 15.1% (n = 5) of the patients. Sphincter-preserving surgery was performed in 53% (n = 8) of patients with a tumour of the lower rectum. Within the mean observation of 24 months, none of the patients relapsed locally, 1 patient had progressive disease and 5 patients (15%) relapsed distantly. Toxicity of grade 3 and 4 was mainly diarrhoea 18% (n = 6) and perianal pain 9% (n = 3). Nevertheless, severe cardiac events (n = 2), severe electrolyte disturbances (n = 2), and syncopes (n = 2) were observed as well.

CONCLUSION

Treatment efficacy and common toxicity are similar to the reports of phase I/II trials. However, several severe adverse events were observed in our cohort study. The predisposing factors for these events have yet to be studied and may have implications for the selection of patients outside CTR.

Oxaliplatin as a radiosensitiser for upper and lower gastrointestinal tract malignancies: what have we learned from a decade of translational research?

Some of the greatest advances in the treatment of solid malignancies have resulted from the combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy treatments. This article comprehensively reviews the current clinical evidence for oxaliplatin-based chemo-radiotherapy that may improve local control and survival. In order to understand how clinical studies should be designed, the pre-clinical evidence for the use of oxaliplatin chemotherapy as a radiosensitising agent is appraised. Particular focus is placed on oxaliplatin's biological mechanisms of action, including cell cycle effects, the formation of DNA adducts and interstrand cross-links and the role of DNA repair proteins. At a clinical level, there is currently no evidence to suggest that oxaliplatin provides an additional benefit to concurrent chemo-radiation regimes that utilise fluoropyrimidines; we evaluate the reasons for this observation, the limitations of clinical trial design and the opportunities that currently exist to design clinical trials which are underpinned by an understanding of the basic biology.

Phase II study of preoperative helical tomotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost for rectal cancer

PURPOSE

The addition of concomitant chemotherapy to preoperative radiotherapy is considered the standard of care for patients with cT3-4 rectal cancer. The combined treatment modality increases the complete response rate and local control (LC), but has no impact on survival or the incidence of distant metastases. In addition, it is associated with considerable toxicity. As an alternative strategy, we explored prospectively, preoperative helical tomotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 108 patients were treated with intensity-modulated and image-guided radiotherapy using the Tomotherapy Hi-Art II system. A dose of 46 Gy, in daily fractions of 2 Gy, was delivered to the mesorectum and draining lymph nodes, without concomitant chemotherapy. Patients with an anticipated circumferential resection margin (CRM) of less than 2 mm, based on magnetic resonance imaging, received a SIB to the tumor up to a total dose of 55.2 Gy. Acute and late side effects were scored using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0.

RESULTS

A total of 102 patients presented with cT3-4 tumors; 57 patients entered the boost group and 51 the no-boost group. One patient in the no-boost group developed a radio-hypersensitivity reaction, resulting in a complete tumor remission, a Grade 3 acute and Grade 5 late enteritis. No other Grade ≥3 acute toxicities occurred. With a median follow-up of 32 months, Grade ≥3 late gastrointestinal and urinary toxicity were observed in 6% and 4% of the patients, respectively. The actuarial 2-year LC, progression-free survival and overall survival were 98%, 79%, and 93%.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative helical tomotherapy displays a favorable acute toxicity profile in patients with cT3-4 rectal cancer. A SIB can be safely administered in patients with a narrow CRM and resulted in a promising LC.

Locally advanced rectal cancer: a comparison of management strategies

Traditionally, there has been a high local recurrence rate in rectal cancer and 10-40% of patients require a permanent stoma. Both short-course preoperative radiotherapy (SCPRT) and long-course preoperative chemoradiation (CRT) are used to reduce the risk of local recurrence and enable a curative resection. Total mesorectal excision has reduced the rate of local recurrence (even without radiotherapy) to below 10%, but has highlighted a high risk of metastatic disease in 30-40% of patients. Current trials suggest that in resectable cancers, where the preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) suggests the circumferential resection margin (CRM) is not potentially involved, then SCPRT and CRT are equivalent in terms of outcomes such as local recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). For patients with more advanced disease, where the CRM is breached or threatened according to the MRI, the integration of more active chemotherapy and biological agents into chemoradiation is an attractive strategy because of the high risk of metastases. However, in none of the trials published in the last decade has chemoradiation impacted on DFS or OS. We examine the strategies of neoadjuvant, concurrent, consolidation (after chemoradiation and before surgery) and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cytotoxic agents, and the integration of biological agents for future potential strategies of treatment. We also compare the trials and compare the different strategies of long-course preoperative radiotherapy and SCPRT; the intensification of preoperative radiation and chemoradiation with dose escalation of external beam radiotherapy, using brachytherapy, intra-operative radiotherapy, hyperfractionation, and various available techniques such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy. We recommend examining dose escalation of radiotherapy to the primary tumour where MRI predicts a threatened CRM. Of the potential treatment strategies involving cytotoxic agents, such as neoadjuvant, concurrent, consolidation and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, the most promising would appear to be consolidation chemotherapy following chemoradiation in locally advanced disease, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in MRI-selected patients who do not require radiation. Improvement in the quality of surgery is also an important future goal.

Postoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost in prostate cancer: a dose-escalation trial

OBJECTIVES

To determine the recommended phase II dose of postoperative accelerated intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Step and shoot IMRT with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) was delivered in 25 fractions over 5 weeks to patients with high risk resected prostate adenocarcinoma (stage pT3-4 and/or positive surgical margins). Pelvic nodes received 45 Gy at 1.8 Gy/fraction; dose escalation was performed only to the prostate bed (planned dose escalation: 56.8 Gy at 2.27 Gy/fraction, 59.7 Gy at 2.39 Gy/fraction, 61.25 Gy at 2.45 Gy/fraction, 62.5 Gy at 2.5 Gy/fraction). Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was any grade ≥ 3 acute toxicity (RTOG score).

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were treated: 7 patients at the 56.75 Gy dose level, 6 patients at each subsequent dose level. Pathologic stages were: pT2c: 2; pT3a: 11; pT3b: 12; pN0: 22; pN1: 3; R0: 7; R1: 18. Median follow-up time was 19 months (range: 6-36 months). No patient experienced DLT. Grade 1-2 acute rectal and urologic toxicity was common (17 and 22 patients, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The recommended dose was 62.5 Gy in 2.5 Gy/fraction. Postoperative hypofractionated IMRT SIB for prostate cancer seemed to be well tolerated and could be tested in phase II studies.

Preoperative oxaliplatin, capecitabine, and external beam radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed, primary operable, cT₃NxM0, low rectal cancer: a phase II study

PURPOSE

In patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), preoperative chemoradiation is known to improve local control, and down-staging of the tumor serves as a surrogate for survival. Intensification of the systemic therapy may lead to higher downstaging rates and, thus, enhance survival. This phase II study investigated the efficacy and safety of preoperative capecitabine and oxaliplatin in combination with radiotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with LARC of the mid and lower rectum, T₃NxM0 staged by MRI received radiotherapy (total dose 45 Gy) in combination with oral capecitabine (825 mg/m² twice a day on radiotherapy days; weeks 1-4) and oxaliplatin 50 mg/m² intravenously (days 1, 8, 15, and 22). Efficacy was evaluated as rate of tumor down-categorization at the T level.

RESULTS

A total of 59 patients were enrolled (19 women, 40 men; median age of 61 years) and all were evaluable for efficacy and toxicity. Down-categorization at the T level was observed in 53% with pathological complete response in 6 patients (10%). Actual total radiotherapy, oxaliplatin and capecitabine doses received were 97%, 90%, and 93% of the protocol-specified preplanned doses, respectively. Grade 3/4 toxicity was observed in 15 patients (25%). The most frequent was diarrhea (12%).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative chemoradiation with capecitabine and oxaliplatin is feasible in patients with MRI-proven cT₃ LARC. The only clinically relevant toxicity was diarrhea. Overall, efficacy of the multimodality treatment was good, but not markedly exceeding that of 5-FU- or capecitabine-based chemoradiation approaches.

Phase II, randomized study of concomitant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) compared with induction CAPOX followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in magnetic resonance imaging-defined, locally advanced rectal cancer: Grupo cancer de recto 3 study

PURPOSE The optimal therapeutic sequence of the adjuvant chemotherapy component of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer is controversial. Induction chemotherapy before preoperative CRT may be associated with better efficacy and compliance. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 108 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were randomly assigned to arm A-preoperative CRT with capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and concurrent radiation followed by surgery and four cycles of postoperative adjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX)-or arm B-induction CAPOX followed by CRT and surgery. The primary end point was pathologic complete response rate (pCR). Results On an intention-to-treat basis, the pCR for arms A and B were 13.5% (95% CI, 5.6% to 25.8%) and 14.3% (95% CI, 6.4% to 26.2%), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in other end points, including downstaging, tumor regression, and R0 resection. Overall, chemotherapy treatment exposure was higher in arm B than in arm A for both oxaliplatin (P < .0001) and capecitabine (P < .0001). During CRT, grades 3 to 4 adverse events were similar in both arms but were significantly higher in arm A during postoperative adjuvant CT than with induction CT in arm B. There were three deaths in each arm during the treatment period. CONCLUSION Compared with postoperative adjuvant CAPOX, induction CAPOX before CRT had similar pCR and complete resection rates. It did achieve more favorable compliance and toxicity profiles. On the basis of these findings, a phase III study to definitively test the induction strategy is warranted.

Comparison of the combined action of oxaliplatin or cisplatin and radiation in cervical and lung cancer cells

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To test the combined effects of oxaliplatin and radiation versus cisplatin and radiation using human cervical and lung cancer cell lines.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

CaSki cervical cancer cells, and A549 lung cancer cells were cultured under standard conditions. Cells were treated with escalating doses of gamma-irradiation (0-6 Gy), and with oxali- and cisplatin for 2 h or 24 h, or a combination of both. Cell survival was measured by a colony-forming assay. Survival curves were fitted to the data using the linear quadratic model. Sensitizer enhancement ratios (SER) were calculated at the 37% survival level, and isobologram analysis was applied to test for the drug-radiation interactions.

RESULTS

Oxaliplatin as well as cisplatin alone were cytotoxic in both cell lines. In CaSki cells, oxaliplatin and cisplatin significantly increased radiation toxicity. In A549 cells no increase of radiation toxicity was observed after treatment with cisplatin, however, isobologram analysis revealed supra-additive interaction between oxaliplatin and radiation in A549 cells.

CONCLUSION

Oxaliplatin had the same effectiveness on tumor cells as cisplatin and induced enhanced radiation toxicity in lung cancer cells, where cisplatin was not able to achieve radiosensitization.

Multislice CT as a primary screening tool for the prediction of an involved mesorectal fascia and distant metastases in primary rectal cancer: a multicenter study

PURPOSE

The purposes of this study were to assess whether multislice CT can identify tumors having a free or involved circumferential margin, to investigate the additional role of multislice CT as a "one-stop shopping" staging tool for staging nodal and distant metastases.

METHODS

A total of 250 patients with adenocarcinoma of the rectum underwent multislice CT scans of the chest and abdomen before undergoing total mesorectal excision. The scans were scored by two teams. The main outcome was yes/no involvement of the mesorectal fascia. Histology was taken as the standard for determining the involvement.

RESULTS

The overall sensitivity for predicting an involved mesorectal fascia was 74.2 percent and the overall specificity was 93.9 percent. The overall sensitivity for low tumors was 65.6 percent and the overall specificity was 81.5 percent. The overall sensitivity for mid-/high rectal tumors was 76.1 percent and the overall specificity was 96.3 percent. The interobserver agreement was substantial (kappa 0.695). The overall sensitivity for the prediction of liver metastases was 64.3 percent and the overall specificity was 94.4 percent with kappa 0.82. The accuracy in predicting lymph node metastases was low.

CONCLUSIONS

Multislice CT can be used for the assessment of mesorectal fascia involvement in primary rectal cancer, especially those located in the middle rectum and the high rectum; however, in the prediction of an involved margin of tumors located in the distal rectum, the accuracy of multislice CT falls short.

Outcomes of clinical T4M0 extra-peritoneal rectal cancer treated with preoperative radiochemotherapy and surgery: a prospective evaluation of a single institutional experience

BACKGROUND

Our objective was evaluate the outcome of primary clinical T4M0 extraperitoneal rectal cancer treated by neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. Prognosis of clinical T4 rectal cancer is poor. Preoperative chemoradiation therapy may be beneficial. The results obtained are unclear due to lack of objective and strictly applied staging methods.

METHODS

Patients with primary, clinical, T4MO, extraperitoneal rectal cancer, defined by transrectal ultrasonography, computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, were considered. Intraoperative radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy were employed in some patients after curative resection (R0). Variables influencing the possibility to perform an R0 resection and a sphincter-saving procedure were investigated as predictors of outcome.

RESULTS

100 patients were included. R0 resection was performed in 78 patients. R0 resection rate was greater in females (93% vs 67%) and in responders to neoadjuvant chemoradiation (94% vs 60%). The ability to perform a sphincter-saving procedure was 57%, greater in middle rectal location (85% vs 51%) and in responders to the chemoradiation (70% vs 47%). Median follow-up was 31 months (range, 4-136). Local recurrences were found in 7 patients (10%). Five-year local control in R0 patients was 90% and better in the IORT group (100%). Distant relapse occurred in 24 patients (30%). Five-year overall survival was 59%, and was better after an R0 versus an R1 or R2 resection (68% vs 22%). Overall and disease free survival in R0 patients improved after overall downstaging. Adjuvant chemotherapy given in addition to the neoadjuvant therapy did not appear to offer benefit in improving survival.

CONCLUSION

A multimodal approach enabled us to obtain a 5-year overall survival of about 60%. IORT increased local control. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy needs to be further investigated.

Early clinical results from chemoradiation with 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin for locally advanced rectal cancer

PURPOSE

Preoperative chemoradiation with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has improved local control and resectability in patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma. The possible benefit of adding oxaliplatin is being investigated. We present background on the use of oxaliplatin as well as institutional experience assessing treatment tolerability and early outcome data.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From August 2001 to August 2006, 15 patients were treated with concurrent 5-FU, oxaliplatin, and radiation. Each had locally advanced rectal carcinoma with staging as follows: T3 (10 patients), T4 (5 patients), N1 (3 patients), and M1 (1 patient). Three patients were treated for local recurrence; 2 had received previous radiation therapy. All patients received continuous-infusion 5-FU at 225 mg/m2 per day. The oxaliplatin dose was 70 mg/m2 in 1 patient and 85 mg/m2 in the others, administered every other week x 3 weeks starting on day 1 of radiation. Resection followed completion of radiation by 6 weeks.

RESULTS

The treatment was tolerable, with the most frequent hematologic toxicity being grade 1/2 anemia. Twelve patients were evaluable, with 11 treated preoperatively. All were able to undergo resection with negative margins, with T stage at resection as follows: T4 (2 patients, 1 with 5% viable tumor), T3 (4 patients), T2 (1 patient), T1 (2 patients); there were pathologic complete responses in 4 patients. At resection, 2 patients had N2 disease; 1 of these was also found to have a peritoneal metastasis. Two patients with clinical N1 disease initially were N0 at resection. With median follow-up of 13 months (range, 4-36 months), 9 patients have clinically no evidence of disease. There have been no local recurrences and 1 death from disease.

CONCLUSION

We present tolerability and early clinical efficacy data for patients treated with concurrent 5-FU and oxaliplatin chemoradiation. The oxaliplatin-based regimen was tolerable. All patients were able to undergo resection with negative margins, with encouraging downstaging, local control, and survival.

Rectal cancer

Rectal cancer is an important tumour from an epidemiological point of view and represents the benchmark for an optimal use of integrated treatments (surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy) in the oncological practice. The conventional use of total mesorectal excision and the integration with radiochemotherapy, better if preoperatively, are now able to increase survival, to decrease the occurrence of pelvic recurrence and to ameliorate the quality of life of patients. Updated recommendations for the management of these patients are here reported.

Phase I trial of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with capecitabine and weekly irinotecan followed by laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LTME) in rectal cancer patients

BACKGROUND

To analyze the feasibility of capecitabine with weekly irinotecan and concurrent radiotherapy followed by laparoscopic-total mesorectal excision (LTME) in rectal cancer patients.

METHODS

Eligible criteria included adenocarcinoma of the rectum staged by endoscopic ultrasonography (u), spiral abdominal and pelvic CT and chest X-ray. Patients received weekly irinotecan 50 mg/m(2) (days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29) and capecitabine (days 1 through 5 for 5 weeks); dose level; (DL) I 250 mg/m(2)/bid; DL II 375 mg/m(2)/bid; DL III 500 mg/m(2)/bid, according to phase I methodology. External beam radiotherapy was delivered up to a total dose of 45 Gy in daily fractions of 1.8 Gy, 5 days a week. LTME was planned 5-7 weeks after CRT.

RESULTS

From February 2003 to February 2006, 22 patients were included. Median age was 62 (range 48 to 78). Seven pts were uT3N0 and 15 pts uT3N1. Seven patients were treated at DL I, six at DL II and nine at DL III. Grade 3 adverse events were observed in all levels. The maximum tolerated dose was reached at 375 mg/m(2) (DL II). Conversion rate to open surgery was 5%. Median hospital stay was 6.6 days. One month post-surgical complications were noted in five patients (23%). Median excised nodes were 11 (range 4-21). Pathological complete response was observed in two patients (9%).

CONCLUSIONS

LTME after preoperative CRT with CAPIRI is feasible but severe adverse events were found in all levels despite the use of lower dose of capecitabine than previously published.

The use of capecitabine in the combined-modality therapy for rectal cancer

Locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma is treated by combined-modality therapy, which consists of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. A series of randomized trials established a preferred treatment sequence of preoperative radiation therapy and 5-fluorouracil(5-FU)-based chemotherapy, total mesorectal excision, and adjuvant 5-FU-based chemotherapy for patients with stage II/III disease. Capecitabine is an oral prodrug of 5-FU that has potential advantages compared with intravenous 5-FU, including ease of administration and potentially increased therapeutic effect. Capecitabine is converted by a 3-step enzymatic process; the last step involves the enzyme thymidine phosphorylase, which is overexpressed in tumor tissues and is stimulated by concurrent radiation therapy. Over the past 5 years, several phase I/II trials of capecitabine-based therapy were reported. This review discusses the evolution of combined-modality therapy for rectal cancer with specific attention given to the use of capecitabine in conjunction with radiation therapy.

Evolving management of colorectal cancer

This article reviews recent advances in surgical techniques and adjuvant therapies for colorectal cancer, including total mesorectal excision, the resection of liver and lung metastasis and advances in chemoradiation and foreshadows some interventions that may lie just beyond the frontier. In particular, little is known about the intracellular and extracellular cascades that may influence colorectal cancer cell adhesion and metastasis. Although the phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinases and focal adhesion associated proteins in response to integrin-mediated cell matrix binding (”outside in integrin signaling”) is well described, the stimulation of cell adhesion by intracellular signals activated by pressure prior to adhesion represents a different signal paradigm. However, several studies have suggested that increased pressure and shear stress activate cancer cell adhesion. Further studies of the pathways that regulate integrin-driven cancer cell adhesion may identify ways to disrupt these signals or block integrin-mediated adhesion so that adhesion and eventual metastasis can be prevented in the future.

Phase I study of oxaliplatin in combination with capecitabine and radiotherapy as postoperative treatment for stage II and III rectal cancer

PURPOSE

A Phase I study was conducted to determine the maximal tolerated dose and the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of oxaliplatin (OXA) combined with capecitabine and radiotherapy as adjuvant treatment in patients with operable rectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 21 patients with Stage II or III rectal adenocarcinoma after curative surgery were treated with radiotherapy to a total dose of 50 Gy in 5 weeks. OXA was administered at a dosage of 40 (n = 6), 50 (n = 3),60 (n = 3), 70 (n = 3), or 80 mg/m(2) (n = 6) once a week for 2 weeks (first cycle) followed by a second cycle after a 7-day break. Capecitabine at a fixed dose of 1,300 mg/m(2)/d was administered orally at the same schedule as for OXA. DLT was defined as Grade 3 or 4 hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity.

RESULTS

Grade 1-3 leukopenia, diarrhea, and nausea/vomiting were the most common toxic side effects, and most were Grade 1-2. A DLT was first observed in 1 of 3 patients at 40 mg/m(2) (Grade 3 diarrhea) but was not observed in the next 3 patients at the same level or in patients who received a dose level of 50-70 mg/m(2). At 80 mg/m(2), DLT occurred in 3 of 6 patients (1 Grade 4 leukopenia and 2 Grade 3 diarrhea).

CONCLUSIONS

OXA combined with a fixed dose of capecitabine at 625 mg/m(2) twice daily by mouth plus radiotherapy in the adjuvant setting was tolerable and clinically feasible. The maximal tolerated dose of OXA in this setting was 80 mg/m(2), comparable to the maximal tolerated dose of OXA in the neoadjuvant setting.

Phase II study of capecitabine and oxaliplatin given prior to and concurrently with preoperative pelvic radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

This multicentre phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of preoperative capecitabine plus oxaliplatin and radiotherapy (RT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (T3/T4 rectal adenocarcinoma with or without nodal involvement). Treatment consisted of one cycle of XELOX (capecitabine 1000 mg m(-2) bid on days 1-14 and oxaliplatin 130 mg m(-2) on day 1), followed by RT (1.8 Gy fractions 5 days per week for 5 weeks) plus CAPOX (capecitabine 825 mg m(-2) bid on days 22-35 and 43-56, and oxaliplatin 50 mg m(-2) on days 22, 29, 43 and 50). Surgery was recommended 5 weeks after completion of chemoradiotherapy. The primary end point was pathological complete tumour response (pCR). Sixty patients were enrolled. In the intent-to-treat population, the pCR rate was 23% (95% CI: 13-36%). 58 patients underwent surgery; R0 resection was achieved in 57 (98%) patients, including all 5 patients with T4 tumours. Sphincter preservation was achieved in 49 (84%) patients. Tumour and/or nodal downstaging was observed in 39 (65%) patients. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were diarrhoea (20%) and lymphocytopaenia (43%). Preoperative capecitabine, oxaliplatin and RT achieved encouraging rates of pCR, R0 resection, sphincter preservation and tumour downstaging in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Capecitabine vs continuous infusion 5-FU in neoadjuvant treatment of rectal cancer. A retrospective review

BACKGROUND

Standard therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is concurrent neo-adjuvant chemo-radiation using infusional 5-fluorouracil (CIV-5-FU). Capecitabine (CAP) offers a convenient oral replacement for CIV-5-FU. There is no randomized trial comparing infusional 5-FU to capecitabine. We retrospectively compared the safety and efficacy of CAP-based regimens with well-established CIV-5-FU-based regimens in LARC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We collected published data on 542 patients treated on either CIV-5-FU (197) or CAP (345) with concurrent radiation (external radiation treatment, XRT) for LARC. This included Phase I or II studies published or available from Pubmed. Safety was assessed by determining proportion of patients who experienced grade III/IV adverse effects. Efficacy was assessed by determining pathological complete response (pCR). Chi-square tests were used to compare the two regimens. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical tests were further corrected for multiplicity using the method of Benjamini and Yekutieli (Ann Stat, 29(4):1165-1188, 2001).

RESULTS

pCR was significantly higher in patients getting CAP vs CIV-5-FU (25 vs 13%; P = 0.008,.P adj = 0.034). Both regimens were generally well tolerated. There was no grade IV toxicity reported. Grade III hand foot syndrome was more common in the CAP group, and grade III diarrhea was more common in the CIV group.

CONCLUSIONS

CAP when compared to CIV seems to have superior efficacy with reasonable toxicities. It is reasonable to treat LARC with CAP + XRT.

Continuous oral capecitabine at fixed dose in patients older than 75 years with metastatic colorectal and gastric cancer: a study of the Multidisciplinary Oncology Group on Gastrointestinal Tumors

The aim of this study was to investigate the safety profile of continuous oral capecitabine at fixed dose in patients older than 75 years, having metastatic colorectal and gastric cancer. Capecitabine was administered at a fixed dose of 2000 mg daily without interruptions. Thirty-four patients were considered evaluable for toxicity and efficacy. The median age was 81 years (range 76-85). The median duration of treatment was 113 days (range 24-238 days). No grade 4 toxicity was observed. One patient had grade 3 nausea and vomiting, and one had grade 3 diarrhea. Partial responses were observed in six patients with colorectal cancer, and in one patient with gastric cancer. This study suggests that continuous oral capecitabine at a fixed daily dose of 2000 mg is well tolerated, and that it allows for the simplification and ease of dosing in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal and gastric cancer.

Complete clinical response after preoperative chemoradiation in rectal cancer: is a "wait and see" policy justified?

PURPOSE

A proportion of patients, who receive preoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced (T3, T4, NX) rectal cancer achieve a complete clinical response and a pathologic complete response in the region of 15 to 30 percent. Support is growing in the United Kingdom for the concept of "waiting to see" and not proceeding to radical surgery when a complete clinical response is observed. The purpose of this review was to use a literature search to assess how often complete clinical response is achieved after neoadjuvant chemoradiation, the concordance of this finding with pathologic complete response, and to determine whether it is feasible to observe patients who achieve complete clinical response rather than proceed to surgery.

RESULTS

In total, 218 Phase I/II or retrospective studies and 28 Phase III trials of preoperative radiotherapy or chemoradiation were identified: 96 percent of trials documented the pathologic complete response, but only 38 trials presented data on the achievement of a complete clinical response/partial clinical response. Only five studies were found in which patients with clinically staged T2/T3 tumors were treated with radiotherapy/chemoradiation and did not routinely proceed to surgery and also reported on the long-term outcome of a "wait and see" policy.

DISCUSSION

It remains uncertain whether the degree of response to chemoradiation in terms of complete clinical response or pathologic complete response is a useful clinical end point. Studies that include T3 rectal cancer are associated with high local recurrence rates after nonsurgical treatment. Few studies report long-term outcome after achievement of a complete clinical response.

CONCLUSIONS

The end point of complete clinical response is inconsistently defined and seems insufficiently robust with only partial concordance with pathologic complete response. The rationale of a "wait and see" policy when complete clinical response status is achieved relies on retrospective observations, which are currently insufficient to support this policy except in patients who are recognized to be unfit for or refuse radical surgery.

Phase I-II trial of concurrent capecitabine and oxaliplatin with preoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

PURPOSE

To identify the maximal tolerated dose level of preoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with capecitabine and oxaliplatin and to evaluate the efficacy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with rectal T3-T4 and/or N0-N+ rectal cancer received capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) twice daily Monday through Friday and oxaliplatin 60 mg/m(2) intravenously on Days 1, 8, and 15, concurrently with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. The radiation dose was increased in 5.0-Gy steps in cohorts of 3 patients starting from 37.5 Gy in 15 fractions (dose level [DL] 1). DL2 and DL3 were designed to reach 42.5 Gy in 17 fractions and 47.5 Gy in 19 fractions, respectively.

RESULTS

No dose-limiting toxicity was observed at DL1 or DL2. Of the 3 patients treated at DL3, 1 presented with Grade 3 diarrhea, which was considered a dose-limiting toxicity, and 3 additional patients were added. Of the 6 patients treated at DL3, no new dose-limiting toxicities were observed, and DL3 was identified as the recommended dose in this study. Eight additional patients were treated at 47.5 Gy. Grade 2 proctitis was the most frequent adverse event (40%); Grade 3 diarrhea occurred in 2 patients (10%). All patients underwent surgery, and 17 patients (85%) underwent R0 resection. Four patients (20%) presented with a histologic response of Grade 4, 11 (55%) with Grade 3+, 2 (15%) with Grade 3, and 2 patients (10%) with Grade 2.

CONCLUSION

The maximal tolerated dose in this study was 47.5 Gy. The high rates of pathologic response of Grade 3+ and 4 must be confirmed through the accrual of new patients in the Phase II study.

Rectal cancer treatment: Improving the picture

Multidisciplinary approach for rectal cancer treatment is currently well defined. Nevertheless, new and promising advances are enriching the portrait. Since the US NIH Consensus in the early 90’s some new characters have been added. A bird’s-eye view along the last decade shows the main milestones in the development of rectal cancer treatment protocols. New drugs, in combination with radiotherapy are being tested to increase response and tumor control outcomes. However, therapeutic intensity is often associated with toxicity. Thus, innovative strategies are needed to create a better-balanced therapeutic ratio. Molecular targeted therapies and improved technology for delivering radiotherapy respond to the need for accuracy and precision in rectal cancer treatment.

Whither Papillon? — Future Directions for Contact Radiotherapy in Rectal Cancer

Although contact radiotherapy was developed 70 years ago, and is highly effective with cure rates of over 90% for early rectal cancer, there are few centres that offer this treatment today. One reason is the lack of replacement of ageing contact X-ray machines, many of which are now over 30 years old. To address this problem, the International Contact Radiotherapy Evaluation (ICONE) group was formed at a meeting in Liverpool in 2005 with the aim of developing a new contact X-ray unit and to establish clinical protocols that would enable the new machine to safely engage in the treatment of rectal cancer. As a result of these efforts, a European company is starting production of the new Papillon RT-50 machine, which will be available shortly. In addition, the ICONE group is planning an observational study on contact X-ray and transanal endoscopic microsurgery (CONTEM) for curative treatment of rectal cancer. This protocol will ensure standardised diagnostic procedures, patient selection and treatment in centres across the world and the data will be collected prospectively for analysis and audit. It is hoped that the CONTEM trial will provide the scientific evidence that is needed to obtain a broader acceptance of local contact radiotherapy as a treatment option for selected cases with early stage rectal cancer.

Adjuvant therapy for rectal cancer

Patients with stage II and III rectal cancer benefit from a multidisciplinary approach to treatment. Studies of postoperative adjuvant therapy consistently demonstrate decreases in locoregional recurrence with the use of radiation therapy. The use of postoperative chemotherapy results in improved disease-free survival and overall survival in certain studies. Preoperative radiation therapy decreases locoregional recurrence and in one study demonstrated an improvement in survival. The addition of chemotherapy to preoperative radiation results in improved locoregional control, but not survival. Preoperative chemoradiation is the standard of care for patients with clinical stage II and III rectal cancer in the United States due to improved local recurrence, acute and late toxicity, and sphincter preservation compared with postoperative chemoradiation. Promising approaches include the incorporation of new chemotherapeutic and biologic agents into chemoradiation and adjuvant chemotherapy regimens; new radiation techniques, such as the use of intraoperative radiation therapy and an accelerated concomitant radiation boost; and gene and protein expression profiling, to better predict response to treatment and prognosis.

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine and oxaliplatin in locally advanced rectal cancer. A phase I-II multicenter study of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group

Background

We studied the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and efficacy of oxaliplatin added to capecitabine and radiotherapy (Capox-RT) as neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer.

Methods

T3-4 rectal cancer patients received escalating doses of oxaliplatin (day 1 and 29) with a fixed dose of capecitabine of 1000 mg/m² twice daily (days 1–14, 25–38) added to RT with 50.4 Gy and surgery after 6–8 weeks. The MTD, determined during phase I, was used in the subsequent phase II, in which R0 resection rate (a negative circumferential resection margin) was the primary end point.

Results

Twenty-one patients were evaluable. In the phase I part, oxaliplatin at 85 mg/m² was established as MTD. In phase II, the main toxicity was grade III diarrhea (18%). All patients underwent surgery, and 20 patients had a resectable tumor. An R0 was achieved in 17/21 patients, downstaging to T0-2 in 7/21 and a pCR in 2/21.

Conclusion

Combination of Capox-RT has an acceptable acute toxicity profile and a high R0 resection rate of 81% in locally advanced rectal cancer. However the pCR rate was low.

Mitomycin-C/5-fluorouracil/leucovorin and hyperfractionated radiation therapy for rectal carcinoma: a phase II study with long-term follow-up

PURPOSE

Preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy is a standard treatment for most patients with rectal cancer. We aimed to determine efficacy and tolerability of preoperative mitomycin, fluorouracil (5-FU), and leucovorin (LV) concurrent with hyperfractionated radiation therapy (RT) followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with clinical stage II/III disease were treated with mitomycin 10 mg/m(2) on day 1, continuous venous infusion 5-FU 600 mg/m(2) per day for 96 hours, and oral LV 25 mg every 6 hours on days 1-5. All patients received concurrent RT in fractions of 150 cGy twice daily beginning on day 1. Unfixed tumors received 3000 cGy, whereas fixed tumors received a dose of 4500 cGy. Patients then underwent resection and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with oral LV and continuous venous infusion 5-FU 600 mg/m(2) per day on days 1-5 on a 28-day cycle for 6 cycles. Primary endpoints were to determine the rate of pathologic response and downstaging, long-term locoregional control, progression-free survival, and overall survival.

RESULTS

Between the years 1993 and 2000, 83 patients were enrolled. Eighteen patients (31%) were downstaged. Six patients (7%) had pathologic complete response. Median follow-up was 62 months with a 5-year overall survival of 71%. Local control rate was 96%. Treatment was well tolerated with stomatitis, diarrhea, and radiation proctitis being the most common toxicities.

CONCLUSION

This regimen is effective in the treatment of rectal carcinoma. The favorable toxicity profile of mitomycin and hyperfractionated RT allows these strategies to be utilized with the newer chemotherapies for this disease.

Early changes in apparent diffusion coefficient predict the quantitative antitumoral activity of capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and irradiation in HT29 xenografts in athymic nude mice

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the possible use of changes in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measured by magnetic resonance imaging for pretreatment prediction and early detection of tumor response in a mouse model during fractionated chemoradiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Athymic mice with bilateral HT29 xenografts on rear flanks were allocated into three groups: control, capecitabine, and capecitabine and oxaliplatin. The left flanks of the mice received daily irradiation. T2 and diffusion images were acquired before therapy and weekly for the following 9 weeks. Pretreatment and changes in ADC were calculated and compared with tumor doubling growth delay.

RESULTS

No correlations between pretreatment ADC and changes in tumor volumes after therapy were seen. All treated tumors, except those receiving capecitabine (P = .06), showed increased mean tumor ADC values 11 days after initialization of therapy (P < .05) before returning to pretreatment values within 5 days posttherapy (day 18 after onset of therapy). This increase in mean tumor ADC showed a strong positive correlation (r = 0.92, P < .01) with mean tumor doubling growth delay.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment ADC values did not predict the effectiveness of therapy, whereas early changes in mean ADC quantitatively correlated with treatment outcome.