The Tight Relationship Between the Tumoral Microenvironment and Radium-223

Radium-223 (223Ra) was the first radioactive isotope approved for treating castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) with symptomatic bone metastases without visceral metastatic disease. To better understand the action of 223Ra, its role in the tumor microenvironment represents a crucial aspect. A literature search was conducted using the PubMed/MEDLINE database and studies regarding the relationship between 223Ra and the tumoral microenvironment were considered. The tumoral microenvironment is a complex setting in which complex interactions between cells and molecules occur. Radium-223, as an alpha-emitter, induces double-stranded DNA breaks; to potentiate this effect, it could be used in patients with genetic instability but also in combination with therapies which inhibit DNA repair, modulate the immune response, or control tumor growth. In conclusion, a few studies have taken into consideration the tumoral microenvironment in association with 223Ra. However, its understanding is a priority to better comprehend how to effectively exploit 223Ra and its action mechanism.

Cabazitaxel-Loaded Thermosensitive Hydrogel System for Suppressed Orthotopic Colorectal Cancer and Liver Metastasis

The treatment of colorectal cancer is always a major challenge in the field of cancer research. The number of estimated new cases of colorectal cancer worldwide in 2020 is 1 148 515, and the estimated number of deaths is 576 858, revealing that mortality accounted for approximately half of the disease incidence. The development of new drugs and strategies for colorectal cancer treatment is urgently needed. Thermosensitive injectable hydrogel PDLLA-PEG-PDLLA (PLEL) loaded with cabazitaxel (CTX) is used to explore its anti-tumor effect on mice with orthotopic colorectal cancer. CTX/PLEL is characterized by a solution state at room temperature and a hydrogel state at physiologic temperature. The excipients MPEG-PCL and PDLLA-PEG-PDLLA have good biocompatibility and biodegradability. The simple material synthesis and preparation process renders this system cost-effective and more conducive to clinical transformation. An orthotopic colorectal cancer model is established by transplantation subcutaneous tumors onto the cecum of mice. According to the results of experiments in vivo, CTX/PLEL significantly inhibits orthotopic colorectal cancer and liver metastasis in mice. The results indicate that CTX/PLEL nanoparticle preparations have high security and excellent anti-tumor effects, and have great application potential in colorectal cancer therapy.

Long-term outcomes of a randomized, open-label, phase II study comparing cabazitaxel versus paclitaxel as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with triple-negative or luminal B/HER2-negative breast cancer (GENEVIEVE)

BACKGROUND

The GENEVIEVE study, comparing neoadjuvant cabazitaxel versus paclitaxel in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and luminal B/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer (BC), previously reported significant differences in pathological complete response (pCR) rates. Effects on long-term outcome are unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

GENEVIEVE randomized patients with cT2-3, any cN or cT1, cN+/pNSLN+, centrally confirmed TNBC or luminal B/HER2-negative BC (latter defined as estrogen/progesterone receptor-positive and >14% Ki-67-stained cells) to receive either cabazitaxel 25 mg/m2 q3w for four cycles or paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 weekly for 12 weeks. Anthracycline-containing chemotherapy was allowed in case of histologically proven invasive residuals as neoadjuvant treatment or after surgery as adjuvant treatment. Here we report the secondary endpoints invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Of the 333 patients randomized, 74.7% and 83.2% completed treatment in the cabazitaxel and paclitaxel arms, respectively. After a median follow-up of 89.3 months (interquartile range 68.8-97.3 months), 80 iDFS events (43 after cabazitaxel and 37 after paclitaxel) and 47 deaths (23 after cabazitaxel and 24 after paclitaxel) were reported. IDFS rates were not significantly different between the cabazitaxel and paclitaxel arms after a 3-year (83.6% versus 85.0%) and 5-year follow-up (76.2% versus 78.3%) [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.27, 95% confidence interval 0.82-1.96, P = 0.294], respectively. DDFS rates at 3 years (88.6% versus 87.8%) and 5 years (82.1% versus 82.8%) for cabazitaxel and paclitaxel were comparable (HR = 1.15, P = 0.573). Similarly, OS rates at 3 years (91.6% versus 91.8%) and 5 years (89.2% versus 86.8%) showed no significant differences (HR = 1.05, P = 0.872). Subgroup analysis for TNBC and luminal B/HER2-negative BCs indicated no significant variations in 3- or 5-year iDFS, DDFS, or OS.

CONCLUSIONS

The significant differences in pCR rates observed in both treatment arms did not significantly impact long-term outcomes for patients treated with cabazitaxel versus paclitaxel in the GENEVIEVE trial.

Management of infusion-related reactions in cancer therapy: strategies and challenges

Several anticancer therapies have the potential to cause infusion-related reactions (IRRs) in the form of adverse events that typically occur within minutes to hours after drug infusion. IRRs can range in severity from mild to severe anaphylaxis-like reactions. Careful monitoring at infusion initiation, prompt recognition, and appropriate clinical assessment of the IRR and its severity, followed by immediate management, are required to ensure patient safety and optimal outcomes. Lack of standardization in the prevention, management, and reporting of IRRs across cancer-treating institutions represents not only a quality and safety gap but also a disparity in cancer care. The present article, supported by recently published data, was developed to standardize these procedures across institutions and provide a useful tool for health care providers in clinical practice to recognize early signs and symptoms of an IRR and promptly and appropriately manage the event.

Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: From Uncovered Resistance Mechanisms to Current Treatments

Prostate cancer (PC) is the second most common cancer in men worldwide. Despite recent advances in diagnosis and treatment, castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) remains a significant medical challenge. Prostate cancer cells can develop mechanisms to resist androgen deprivation therapy, such as AR overexpression, AR mutations, alterations in AR coregulators, increased steroidogenic signaling pathways, outlaw pathways, and bypass pathways. Various treatment options for CRPC exist, including androgen deprivation therapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, localized or systemic therapeutic radiation, and PARP inhibitors. However, more research is needed to combat CRPC effectively. Further investigation into the underlying mechanisms of the disease and the development of new therapeutic strategies will be crucial in improving patient outcomes. The present work summarizes the current knowledge regarding the underlying mechanisms that promote CRPC, including both AR-dependent and independent pathways. Additionally, we provide an overview of the currently approved therapeutic options for CRPC, with special emphasis on chemotherapy, radiation therapy, immunotherapy, PARP inhibitors, and potential combination strategies.

Allergy in Cancer Care: Antineoplastic Therapy-Induced Hypersensitivity Reactions

As the backbone of oncological treatments, systemic chemotherapy is still one of the main pawns in cancer care, alone or in combination with newer targeted agents. All chemotherapy agents can be associated with a type of adverse event called an infusion reaction, which can be characterized as unpredictable, non-dose related, and unexplained by the cytotoxic profile of the drug. For some of these events, a certain immunological mechanism can be identified by blood or skin testing. In this case, we can speak of true hypersensitivity reactions that occur as a response to an antigen/allergen. The current work summarizes the main antineoplastic therapy agents and their susceptibility to induce hypersensitivity reactions and also includes a review of clinical presentation, diagnostic methods in hypersensitivity reactions, and perspectives to overcome these negative events in the treatment of patients suffering from various types of cancer.

New Visions on Natural Products and Cancer Therapy: Autophagy and Related Regulatory Pathways

Macroautophagy (autophagy) has been a highly conserved process throughout evolution and allows cells to degrade aggregated/misfolded proteins, dysfunctional or superfluous organelles and damaged macromolecules, in order to recycle them for biosynthetic and/or energetic purposes to preserve cellular homeostasis and health. Changes in autophagy are indeed correlated with several pathological disorders such as neurodegenerative and cardiovascular diseases, infections, cancer and inflammatory diseases. Conversely, autophagy controls both apoptosis and the unfolded protein response (UPR) in the cells. Therefore, any changes in the autophagy pathway will affect both the UPR and apoptosis. Recent evidence has shown that several natural products can modulate (induce or inhibit) the autophagy pathway. Natural products may target different regulatory components of the autophagy pathway, including specific kinases or phosphatases. In this review, we evaluated ~100 natural compounds and plant species and their impact on different types of cancers via the autophagy pathway. We also discuss the impact of these compounds on the UPR and apoptosis via the autophagy pathway. A multitude of preclinical findings have shown the function of botanicals in regulating cell autophagy and its potential impact on cancer therapy; however, the number of related clinical trials to date remains low. In this regard, further pre-clinical and clinical studies are warranted to better clarify the utility of natural compounds and their modulatory effects on autophagy, as fine-tuning of autophagy could be translated into therapeutic applications for several cancers.

Concept: A randomised multicentre trial of first line chemotherapy comparing three weekly cabazitaxel versus weekly paclitaxel in HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Paclitaxel is commonly used as first-line chemotherapy for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. However, with response rates of 21.5-53.7% and significant risk of peripheral neuropathy, there is need for better chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This open-label phase II/III trial randomised HER2-negative MBC patients 1:1 to either 6 cycles of three-weekly cabazitaxel (25 mg/m²), or, weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m²) over 18 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), time to response (TTR), overall survival (OS), safety and tolerability and quality of life (QoL).

RESULTS

158 patients were recruited. Comparing cabazitaxel to paclitaxel, median PFS was 6.7 vs 5.8 months (HR 0.87; 80%CI 0.70-1.08, P = 0.4). There was no difference in median OS (20.6 vs 18.2 months, HR 1.00; 95%CI 0.69-1.45, P = 0.99), ORR (41.8% vs 36.7%) or TTR (HR 1.09; 95%CI 0.68-1.75, P = 0.7). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 41.8% on cabazitaxel and 46.8% on paclitaxel; the most common being neutropenia (16.5%) and febrile neutropenia (12.7%) cabazitaxel and neutropenia (8.9%) and lung infection (7.6%) paclitaxel. Peripheral neuropathy of any grade occurred in 54.5% paclitaxel vs 16.5% cabazitaxel. Mean EQ-5D-5L single index utility score (+0.05; 95%CI 0.004-0.09, P = 0.03) and visual analogue scale score (+7.7; 95%CI 3.1-12.3, P = 0.001) were higher in cabazitaxel vs paclitaxel.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-weekly cabazitaxel in HER2-negative MBC does not significantly improve PFS compared to weekly paclitaxel, although it has a lower risk of peripheral neuropathy with better patient reported QoL outcomes. It is well tolerated and requires fewer hospital visits.

Premedication Protocols to Prevent Hypersensitivity Reactions to Chemotherapy: a Literature Review

Hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to chemotherapy may prevent patients from receiving the most effective therapy. This review was undertaken to identify evidence-based preventive premedication strategies that reduce the likelihood of HSR in the first instance and improve the safety of subsequent infusions in patients who have demonstrated HSR to a certain class of chemotherapy. PubMed was searched until October 2021 using the key words: "hypersensitivity to chemotherapeutic drugs," "hypersensitivity to antineoplastic agents," "taxanes hypersensitivity," "platinum compound hypersensitivity," "premedication," "dexamethasone," "prednisone," "hydrocortisone," "antihistamine," "diphenhydramine," "cetirizine," "famotidine," "meperidine," "aspirin," "ibuprofen," and "montelukast." The search was restricted to articles published in English. A total of 73 abstracts were selected for inclusion in the review. Most premedication regimens have been derived empirically rather than determined through randomized trials. Based on the available evidence, we provide an update on likely HSR mechanisms and a practical guide for classifying systemic HSR. The evidence indicates that a combination of prevention strategies using newer antihistamines, H2 antagonists, leukotriene receptor antagonists, and corticosteroids and other interventions used judiciously reduces the occurrence and severity of HSR and improves safety.

Cabazitaxel suppresses colorectal cancer cell growth via enhancing the p53 antitumor pathway

There were approximately 1.93 million new cases and 940 000 deaths from colorectal cancer in 2020. The first‐line chemotherapeutic drugs for colorectal cancer are mainly based on 5‐fluorouracil, although the use of these drugs is limited by the development of drug resistance. Consequently, there is a need for novel chemotherapeutic drugs for the efficient treatment of colorectal cancer patients. In the present study, we screened 160 drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration and identified that cabazitaxel (CBT), a microtube inhibitor, can suppress colony formation and cell migration of colorectal cancer cells in vitro. CBT also induces G2/M phase arrest and apoptosis of colorectal cancer cells. Most importantly, it inhibits the growth of colorectal cancer cell xenograft tumors in vivo. Transcriptome analysis by RNA‐sequencing revealed that Tub family genes are abnormally expressed in CBT‐treated colorectal cancer cells. The expression of several p53 downstream genes that are associated with cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and inhibition of angiogenesis and metastasis is induced by CBT in colorectal cancer cells. Overall, our results suggests that CBT suppresses colorectal cancer by upregulating the p53 pathway, and thus CBT may have potential as an alternative chemotherapeutic drug for colorectal cancer.

Hypersensitivity Reactions to Platinum Agents and Taxanes

Hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to chemotherapy agents can present a serious challenge to treating patients with preferred or first-line therapies. Allergic reactions through an immunologic mechanism have been established for platinum and taxane agents, which are used to treat a wide variety of cancers including gynecologic cancers. Platin HSRs typically occur after multiple cycles of chemotherapy, reflecting the development of drug IgE sensitization, while taxane HSRs often occur on first or second exposure. Despite observed differences between platin and taxane HSRs, drug desensitization has been an effective method to reintroduce both chemotherapeutic agents safely. Skin testing is the primary diagnostic tool used to risk-stratify patients after initial HSRs, with more widespread use for platinum agents than taxanes. Different practices exist around the use of skin testing, drug challenge, and choice of desensitization protocol. Here, we review the epidemiology, mechanism, and clinical presentation of HSRs to platinum and taxane agents, as well as key controversies in their evaluation and management.

Recent progress in nanoformulations of cabazitaxel

The antitumor efficacy of various paclitaxel (PTX) and docetaxel (DTX) formulations in clinical applications is seriously affected by drug resistance. Cabazitaxel, a second-generation taxane, exhibits greater anticancer activity than paclitaxel and docetaxel and has low affinity for the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) efflux pump because of its structure. Therefore, cabazitaxel has the potential to overcome taxane resistance. However, owing to the high systemic toxicity and hydrophobicity of cabazitaxel and the instability of its commercial preparation, Jevtana®, the clinical use of cabazitaxel is restricted to patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who show progression after docetaxel-based chemotherapy. Nanomedicine is expected to overcome the limitations associated with cabazitaxel application and surmount taxane resistance. This review outlines the drug delivery systems of cabazitaxel published in recent years, summarizes the challenges faced in the development of cabazitaxel nanoformulations, and proposes strategies to overcome these challenges.

Neutropenia Prevention in the Treatment of Post-docetaxel Metastatic, Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer With Cabazitaxel and Prednisone: A Multicenter, Open-label, Single-arm Phase IV Study

INTRODUCTION

Severe neutropenia is a dose-limiting factor that occurs in up to 82% of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with cabazitaxel. This study evaluated the effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) plus ciprofloxacin as prophylaxis in post-docetaxel patients with mCRPC treated with cabazitaxel and at high risk for neutropenia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a phase IV, multicenter, open-label, single-arm interventional study with men aged ≥ 65 years (or < 65 years and ≥ 25% irradiated bone marrow), presenting with mCRPC after docetaxel failure, performance status ≤ 1, and life expectancy > 12 weeks. Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m² and prednisone were given on day 1, every 21 days. G-CSF was administered on days 2 to 8 of each cycle or until an absolute neutrophil count > 2000/mm³, and ciprofloxacin 1000 mg was given orally on days 5 to 12. The rate of neutropenia grade ≥ 3 during the first cycle (primary endpoint), and frequency of neutropenia grade ≥ 3, febrile neutropenia, diarrhea grade ≥ 3, prostate-specific antigen response, and quality of life during treatment (secondary end points) were estimated.

RESULTS

We included 46 patients. The mean number of cabazitaxel cycles was 9.5. During the first cycle, 40.0% of patients had neutropenia grade ≥ 3, and 42.2% had at least 1 episode of neutropenia during treatment. Febrile neutropenia and diarrhea grade ≥ 3 occurred in 1 patient each. Twenty-nine (64.4%) patients achieved prostate-specific antigen response, and 77.2% improved quality of life scores in at least 1 visit.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic G-CSF was effective in preventing neutropenia grade ≥ 3 and other hematologic complications during treatment with cabazitaxel 25 mg/m² in post-docetaxel patients with mCRPC at high risk for neutropenia. The role of prophyclatic ciprofloxacin to prevent febrile neutropenia in this setting is still unclear and needs to be further evaluated.

The intravenous to oral switch of taxanes: strategies and current clinical developments

The taxanes paclitaxel, docetaxel and cabazitaxel are important anticancer agents that are widely used as intravenous treatment for several solid tumor types. Switching from intravenous to oral treatment can be more convenient for patients, improve cost-effectiveness and reduce the demands of chemotherapy treatment on hospital care. However, oral treatment with taxanes is challenging because of pharmaceutical and pharmacological factors that lead to low oral bioavailability. This review summarizes the current clinical developments in oral taxane treatment. Intravenous parent drugs, strategies in the oral switch, individual agents in clinical trials, challenges and further perspectives on treatment with oral taxanes are subsequently discussed.

Efficacy of cabazitaxel and the influence of clinical factors on the overall survival of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer: A local experience of a multicenter retrospective study

AIM

To date, the optimal sequencing of life-prolonging therapies for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) remains unclear owing to a lack of prospective trials. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cabazitaxel (CBZ) treatment and examine the prognostic factors for oncological outcomes in patients with mCRPC who received CBZ after docetaxel (DOC).

METHODS

This multi-institutional retrospective study included 44 patients with mCRPC who received CBZ. All enrolled patients had histologically confirmed prostate cancer (PCa) with distant metastases and had received DOC before CBZ administration. The primary endpoint was the oncological outcomes, including the overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were adverse events due to CBZ and rates of ≥30% reduction in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 9.2 months (range, 0.2-34 months). During this time, 34 patients (77%) died of PCa. The median OS and PFS were 12.2 (range, 0.2-34 months) and 1.4 months (range, 0.4-17 months), respectively. According to the PSA decline rate, patients who achieved a ≥30% reduction in PSA levels had significantly longer OS than those who showed a <30% reduction in PSA levels (P = 0.002). Regarding the number of cycles of CBZ, patients who received ≥4 cycles of CBZ showed significantly longer OS than those who received <4 cycles of CBZ (P < 0.001). Patients who had visceral metastasis showed significantly shorter OS than those without visceral metastasis (P = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that CBZ was effective and safe in Japanese local patients in a real-world setting. Patients with mCRPC who received ≥4 cycles of CBZ showed a ≥30% reduction in the serum PSA levels, and did not have visceral metastasis might achieve longer OS.

Dimerization-induced self-assembly of a redox-responsive prodrug into nanoparticles for improved therapeutic index

Although some formats of nanomedicines are now available for clinical use, the translation of new nanoparticles to the clinic remains a considerable challenge. Here, we describe a simple yet cost-effective strategy that converts a toxic drug, cabazitaxel, into a safe and effective nanomedicine. The strategy involves the ligation of drug molecules via a self-immolating spacer, followed by dimerization-induced self-assembly to assemble stable nanoparticles. Self-assembled cabazitaxel dimers could be further refined by PEGylation with amphiphilic polymers suitable for preclinical studies. This protocol enables the formation of systemically injectable nanoparticles (termed SNPs) with nearly quantitative entrapment efficiencies and exceptionally high drug loading (> 86%). In healthy mice, PEGylated SNPs show a favorable safety profile, with reduced systemic toxicity and negligible immunotoxicity. In two separate mouse xenograft models of cancer, administration of SNPs produces efficient antitumor activity with durable tumor suppression during therapeutic studies. Overall, this methodology opens up a practical and expedient route for the fabrication of clinically useful nanomedicines, transforming a hydrophobic and highly toxic drug into a systemic self-deliverable nanotherapy. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Despite the great progress in cancer nanomedicines, clinical translation of nanomedicines still remains a considerable challenge. In this study, we designed a self-assembling nanoplatform based on cabazitaxel dimer reversibly ligated via a bioactivatable linker. This approach enabled the generation of systemically injectable nanomedicines with quantitative entrapment efficiencies and exceptionally high drug loading (> 86%), which greatly obviates concerns about excipient-associated side effects. Self-assembled dimeric cabazitaxel exhibited a higher safety profile than free cabazitaxel and negligible immunotoxicity in animals. This is a practical and expedient example how the chemical ligation of a hydrophobic and highly toxic anticancer drug can be leveraged to create a self-assembling delivery nanotherapy which preserves inherent pharmacologic efficacy while reduces in vivo systemic and immune toxicity.

Photosensitizer-stabilized self-assembling nanoparticles potentiate chemo/photodynamic efficacy of patient-derived melanoma

Development of injectable nanoparticles for delivery of active anticancer compounds often requires complicated schemes that involve tedious synthetic protocols and nanoformulations. In particular, clinical translation of synergistic nanoparticles that can facilitate multimodal therapies remains a considerable challenge. Herein, we describe a self-assembling, small-molecule nanosystem with unique properties, including near-infrared (NIR) light-responsive drug activation, size transformability, combinatorial synergy, and substantially reduced toxicity. Ligation of anticancer cabazitaxel (CTX) drugs via a reactive oxygen species-activatable thioketal linkage generates a dimeric TKdC prodrug, and subsequent coassembly with a photosensitizer, chlorin e6 (Ce6), forms colloidal-stable nanoassemblies (termed psTKdC NAs). Upon NIR laser irradiation, psTKdC NAs are transformed into smaller size particles and facilitate production of pharmacologically active CTX. Importantly, reactive oxygen species yielded by coassembled Ce6 can synergize with chemotherapy to achieve potent combinatorial effects. In a preclinical orthotopic model of an aggressive, human melanoma patient-derived xenograft (PDX), we show that administration of psTKdC NAs followed by laser irradiation produced durable tumor regression, with the tumors being completely eradicated in three of six PDXs. Furthermore, low systemic toxicity of this smart, photo-activatable nanotherapy was observed in animals. The new self-deliverable combinatorial system addresses essential requirements for high efficacy, safety, and translational capacity and deserves further investigation.

Real-world efficacy and safety of two doses of cabazitaxel (20 or 25 mg/m2) in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer: results of a Japanese post-marketing surveillance study

Background

The recommended starting dose of cabazitaxel for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is 25 mg/m² in Japan and Europe. Although lower doses are established alternatives based on randomized controlled trials, the safety and efficacy of 25 and 20 mg/m² in real-world settings are not well established. Therefore, we investigated the safety and efficacy of cabazitaxel at the recommended starting dose or a lower dose (20 mg/m²) in real-world clinical practice.

Methods

We compared the safety and efficacy of cabazitaxel between patients who received cabazitaxel at starting doses of 25 and 20 mg/m² (C25 and C20, respectively) in a Japanese post-marketing surveillance study of 662 patients with docetaxel-refractory CRPC. Safety was assessed in terms of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate, overall survival (OS), and time-to-treatment failure (TTF) were compared between the C25 and C20 groups in unmatched patients and after applying propensity score matching.

Results

The C20 and C25 groups comprised 190 and 159 patients without matching and 112 patients per group after matching. In unmatched patients, any-grade (C25 vs C20: 89.3% vs 78.4%, Fisher’s p < 0.01) and grade ≥ 3 (81.1% vs 61.1%) ADRs were more frequent in the C25 group. Neutropenia (any grade: 61.6% vs 54.2%; grade ≥ 3: 55.3% vs 42.6%) and febrile neutropenia (grade ≥ 3: 30.2% vs 14.7%) were more frequent in the C25 group. In matched patients, the PSA response rate (reduction in PSA ≥30% from a baseline ≥5 ng/mL) was 26.4 and 32.0% in the C20 and C25 groups, respectively, median OS was 291 days (95% CI 230–not reached) versus not reached (hazard ratio 0.73, 95% CI 0.50–1.08), and TTF favored C25 (hazard ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.57–0.99).

Conclusions

Clinicians should consider the patient’s risk of clinically significant ADRs and prophylactic granulocyte colony stimulating factor when selecting the starting dose of cabazitaxel for CRPC. Some patients at high risk of ADRs or unfit patients may benefit from a lower starting dose of 20 mg/m², whereas fit patients may be candidates for a starting dose of 25 mg/m².

Trial registration

Not applicable.

Phase 2 study of cabazitaxel as second-line treatment in patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer previously treated with taxanes-a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) Trial

BACKGROUND

Cabazitaxel is a novel taxane that might be active in breast cancer resistant to first-generation taxanes.

METHODS

The purpose of the current multicentre phase II trial was to evaluate the activity and safety of cabazitaxel, as second-line treatment, in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) previously treated with taxanes. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Eighty-four patients were enrolled between October 2012 and November 2016. Taxane resistance to previous treatment was detected in 43 cases. The ORR was 22.6% in the intent-to-treat population, 23.3% in taxane-resistant and 20.5% in taxane-non-resistant cases. At a median follow-up of 39.6 months, the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.7 months (95% CI 2.2-4.4) and 15.2 months (95% CI 11.3-19.4), respectively. Regarding toxicity, grade 3-4 neutropenia was reported in 22.6% and febrile neutropenia in 6% of the patients, respectively. Two fatal events (one febrile neutropenia and one sepsis) were reported as being related to study treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This phase II trial suggests that cabazitaxel is active as second-line treatment in taxane-pretreated patients with HER2-negative MBC, with manageable toxicity.

Transforming a toxic drug into an efficacious nanomedicine using a lipoprodrug strategy for the treatment of patient-derived melanoma xenografts

Despite the progress made with the recent clinical use of the anticancer compound cabazitaxel, the efficacy in patients remains unsatisfactory, largely due to the high in vivo toxicity of the agent. Therefore, strategies that achieve favorable outcomes and good safety profiles will greatly expand the repertoire of this potent agent. Here, we propose a combinatorial strategy to reform the cabazitaxel agent and the use of sequential supramolecular nanoassembly with liposomal compositions to assemble a prodrug-formulated liposome, termed lipoprodrug, for safe and effective drug delivery. Reconstructing cabazitaxel with a polyunsaturated fatty acid (i.e., docosahexaenoic acid) via a hydrolyzable ester bond confers the generated prodrug with the ability to be readily integrated into the lipid bilayer of liposomes for systemic administration. The resulting lipoprodrug scaffold showed significantly sustained drug release profiles and improved pharmacokinetics in rats as well as a reduction in systemic toxicity in vivo. Notably, the lipoprodrug outperformed free cabazitaxel in terms of in vivo therapeutic efficacy in multiple separate tumor xenograft-bearing mouse models, one of which was a patient-derived xenograft model. Surprisingly, the lipoprodrug was able to reduce tumor invasiveness and reprogram the tumor immunosuppressive microenvironment by proinflammatory macrophage polarization. Our findings validate this lipoprodrug approach as a simple yet effective strategy for transforming the highly toxic cabazitaxel agent into an efficacious nanomedicine with excellent in vivo tolerability. This approach could also be applied to rescue other drugs or drug candidates that have failed in clinical trials due to poor pharmacokinetic properties or unacceptable toxicity in patients.

Self-assembling poly(ethylene glycol)-block-polylactide-cabazitaxel conjugate nanoparticles for anticancer therapy with high efficacy and low in vivo toxicity

Traditional approaches used for transforming hydrophobic anticancer drugs into therapeutically available nanoparticles heavily rely on the noncovalent formulation of drugs within amphiphilic copolymers. However, these nanotherapies have not yet shown the expected favorable clinical outcomes in cancer patients, presumably due to their insufficient stability. To solve this dilemma, we conceive a new class of nanotherapies assembled with polymeric prodrugs that maintain pharmacological activity while substantially alleviate the drug toxicity in animals. By exploiting methoxypoly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(D, L-lactic acid) (mPEG-PLA) as a promoiety, cabazitaxel is tethered to the terminus of the PLA fragment via a hydrolysable ester linkage. These conjugates recapitulate the self-assembly to produce colloidal stable nanotherapies. In a xenograft model of prostate cancer, this nanotherapy shows a durable inhibition of tumor progression upon the administration of a tolerable dose. Our results suggest that a hydrophobic and highly toxic drug can be rationally converted into a pharmacologically efficient and self-deliverable nanotherapy.

Determination of Genotoxic alkyl p-toluene Sulfonates in Cabazitaxel using LC-MS Method

Introduction:

A suitable LC-MS method for the quantitative determination of genotoxic impurities such as alkyl p-toluene sulfonates in Cabazitaxel was developed. Alkyl p-toluene sulfonates were estimated by LC-MS method using Waters Symmetry C18 (75×4.6 mm), 3.5 µ column.

Materials and Methods:

Column temperature was maintained 40 °C. Injection volume was 10 µL and flow rate was set as 0.8 mL/min. Sampler temperature was maintained to 25 °C and run time was set as 25 minutes. The mobile phase was a mixture of ammonium acetate buffer and acetonitrile in 70:30(v/v) was used.

Results:

The method validation has been carried as per ICH guidelines. LOQ was found to be 2.66 µg/mL, 2.75 µg/mL and 2.55 µg/mL for MPTS, EPTS and IPPTS Alkyl p-Toluene Sulfonates (APTS) respectively.

Conclusion:

The proposed Liquid chromatography-Mass spectroscopy method that can quantify genotoxic APTS in Cabazitaxel at low-level concentration has been developed and validated as per ICH guidelines. Hence, the proposed method was recommended for the assay of genotoxic impurities of cabazitaxel in dosage forms in busy pharmaceutical laboratories.

Sestrins as a Therapeutic Bridge between ROS and Autophagy in Cancer

The regulation of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) levels and the contribution therein from networks regulating cell metabolism, such as autophagy and the mTOR-dependent nutrient-sensing pathway, constitute major targets for selective therapeutic intervention against several types of tumors, due to their extensive rewiring in cancer cells as compared to healthy cells. Here, we discuss the sestrin family of proteins—homeostatic transducers of oxidative stress, and drivers of antioxidant and metabolic adaptation—as emerging targets for pharmacological intervention. These adaptive regulators lie at the intersection of those two priority nodes of interest in antitumor intervention—ROS control and the regulation of cell metabolism and autophagy—therefore, they hold the potential not only for the development of completely novel compounds, but also for leveraging on synergistic strategies with current options for tumor therapy and classification/stadiation to achieve personalized medicine.

Current therapeutic options in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

The tumors of many patients with prostate cancer eventually become refractory to androgen deprivation therapy with progression to metastatic castration-resistant disease. Significant advances in the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have been made in recent years, and new treatment strategies have recently been made available. The aim of this report was to schematically review all the approved pharmacologic treatment options for patients with mCRPC through 2018, analyzing the efficacy and possible side effects of each therapy to assist clinicians in reaching an appropriate treatment decision. New biomarkers potentially of aid in the choice of treatment in this setting are also briefly reviewed.

METHODS

We performed a literature search of clinical trials of new drugs and treatments for patients diagnosed with mCRPC published through 2018.

RESULTS

Two new hormonal drugs, abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide have been approved by FDA in 2011 and 2012, respectively for the treatment of patients with mCRPC and have undergone extensive testing. While these treatments have shown a benefit in progression-free and overall survival, the appropriate sequencing must still be determined so that treatment decisions can be made based on their specific clinical profile. Cabazitaxel has been shown to be an efficient therapeutic option in a postdocetaxel setting, while its role in chemotherapy-naïve patients must still be determined. Sipuleucel-T and radium-223 have been studied in patients without visceral metastases and have achieved overall survival benefits with good safety profiles. The feasibility and efficacy of combinations of new treatments with other known therapies such as chemotherapy are currently under investigation.

CONCLUSIONS

Drug development efforts continue to attempt to prolong survival and improve quality of life in the mCRPC setting, with several therapeutic options available. Ongoing and future trials are needed to further assess the efficacy and safety of these new drugs and their interactions, along with the most appropriate sequencing.

No significant impact of patient age and prior treatment profile with docetaxel on the efficacy of cabazitaxel in patient with castration-resistant prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

The correlation of the oncological outcomes of docetaxel and cabazitaxel in Japanese metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients has not been unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included a total of 47 consecutive Japanese mCRPC patients treated with cabazitaxel and assessed the prognostic significance of cabazitaxel, focusing on patient age and the correlation of efficacy between docetaxel and cabazitaxel.

RESULTS

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline was observed in 27 patients (57.4%), including 19 (40.0%) achieving the response defined by PSA decline ≥ 30%. The median overall survival (OS) periods after the introduction of cabazitaxel was 16.1 months. Twenty (42.6%) were judged to have responded to cabazitaxel with a PSA decrease ≥ 30% from the baseline. A 30% PSA response to cabazitaxel was achieved in 4 (50.0%) patients with ≧ 75 years (n = 8) and 16 (41.0%) patients with less than 75 years (n = 39). There was no significant correlation between the PSA response and patients' age (p = 0.707). A 30% PSA response to cabazitaxel was achieved in 13 (46.4%) and 7 (36.8%) patients with and without that to docetaxel, respectively. A 30% PSA response to cabazitaxel was achieved in 5 (16.6%) and 7 (41.2%) patients who had treated with less than 10 cycles docetaxel or 10 ≦ cycles, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that there were no significant correlation of patient age (p = 0.537), the response to prior docetaxel therapy (p = 0.339) or cycles of docetaxel therapy (p = 0.379) with shorter OS.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that the introduction of cabazitaxel for Japanese mCRPC patients could result in oncological outcomes without any association with patient's age and the profiles of previous docetaxel therapy.

Cabazitaxel Plus Lapatinib as Therapy for HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer With Intracranial Metastases: Results of a Dose-finding Study

BACKGROUND

Lapatinib is an oral small molecule tyrosine kinase epidermal growth factor receptor-1/HER2 inhibitor that crosses the blood-brain barrier and is active against central nervous system (CNS) metastases. Cabazitaxel is a taxoid that is effective against taxane-resistant metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and has distinguished itself by its ability to cross the blood-brain barrier. The present phase II study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01934894) evaluated the combination of these agents to treat HER2+ MBC patients with CNS metastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with HER2+ MBC and ≥ 1 untreated or progressive, measurable CNS metastasis were eligible. Using a 3+3 dose escalation design, patients were treated with escalating doses of intravenous cabazitaxel every 21 days and oral lapatinib daily in 21-day treatment cycles. Intracranial disease restaging was performed every 2 cycles for the first 8 cycles and then every 3 cycles until progression or unacceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

Eleven patients were treated at 2 dose levels. Six patients were treated at dose level 1 (intravenous cabazitaxel 20 mg/m2 plus oral lapatinib 1000 mg daily), and five were treated at dose level 2 (intravenous cabazitaxel 25 mg/m2 plus oral lapatinib 1000 mg daily). The most common treatment-related adverse events were myelosuppression, diarrhea, fatigue, and skin toxicity. A total of 5 dose-limiting toxicity events occurred. No intra- or extracranial objective responses were observed.

CONCLUSION

The combination of cabazitaxel plus lapatinib was not feasible because of toxicity and because no objective CNS activity was seen in the 5 evaluable patients. The role of cabazitaxel to treat breast cancer patients with CNS metastases remains undefined.

Risk stratification of castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with cabazitaxel

Patient characteristics before administering the first cycle of cabazitaxel for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) were collected to assess prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). Multivariate analysis revealed that prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥100 ng/ml prior to cabazitaxel treatment, visceral metastasis, and low absolute monocyte count were independent prognostic indicators for OS. The aim of the present study was to investigate prognostic biomarkers in patients treated with cabazitaxel among Japanese metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. In this retrospective study, 45 patients with mCRPC treated with cabazitaxel were reviewed retrospectively. Clinicopathological factors and laboratory data before administering the first cycle of cabazitaxel were collected to assess the prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). Treatment was generally well tolerated, with a median of 5 cycles (range, 1-26). Median OS from the start of cabazitaxel treatment was 16.1 months (95% confidence interval 6.8-25.5). Univariate analysis revealed that poor performance status, visceral metastasis, hemoglobin <11 mg/dl, absolute monocyte count <400/µl, and prostate-specific antigen ≥100 ng/ml prior to cabazitaxel treatment (P=0.002) were significantly associated with shorter OS. Multivariate analysis revealed that PSA ≥100 ng/ml prior to cabazitaxel treatment, visceral metastasis, and absolute monocyte count <400/µl were independent prognostic indicators for OS. Based on the relative risk of death, patients with mCRPC before cabazitaxel therapy were divided into three risk groups: Low, intermediate, and high (P<0.001). In conclusion, the practical implications of our results may assist in tailoring the introduction of cabazitaxel.

Combination of cabazitaxel and plicamycin induces cell death in drug resistant B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Bone marrow microenvironment mediated downregulation of BCL6 is critical for maintaining cell quiescence and modulating therapeutic response in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). In the present study, we have performed a high throughput cell death assay using BCL6 knockdown REH ALL cell line to screen a library of FDA-approved oncology drugs. In the process, we have identified a microtubule inhibitor, cabazitaxel (CAB), and a RNA synthesis inhibitor, plicamycin (PLI) as potential anti-leukemic agents. CAB and PLI inhibited cell proliferation in not only the BCL6 knockdown REH cell line, but also six other ALL cell lines. Furthermore, combination of CAB and PLI had a synergistic effect in inhibiting proliferation in a cytarabine-resistant (REH/Ara-C) ALL cell line. Use of nanoparticles for delivery of CAB and PLI demonstrated that the combination was very effective when tested in a co-culture model that mimics the in vivo bone marrow microenvironment that typically supports ALL cell survival and migration into protective niches. Furthermore, exposure to PLI inhibited SOX2 transcription and exposure to CAB inhibited not only Mcl-1 expression but also chemotaxis in ALL cells. Taken together, our study demonstrates the utility of concomitantly targeting different critical regulatory pathways to induce cell death in drug resistant ALL cells.

Treatment of Advanced Prostate Cancer-A Review of Current Therapies and Future Promise

Despite many recent advances in the therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), the disease remains incurable, although men suffering from this disease are living considerably longer. In this review, we discuss the current treatment options available for this disease, such as taxane-based chemotherapy, the novel hormone therapies abiraterone and enzalutamide, and treatments such as radium-223 and sipuleucel-T. We also highlight the need for ongoing research in this field, because, despite numerous recent advances, the prognosis for mCRPC remains poor. Furthermore, as a growing body of evidence shows the increasing heterogeneity of the disease, and highlights the ongoing need for disease molecular stratification and validation/qualification of predictive biomarkers, we explore this burgeoning research space that is likely to transform how we treat this disease. We describe putative predictive biomarkers, including androgen receptor splice variants, phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) loss, homologous recombination repair defects, including BRCA2 loss, and mismatch repair defects. The development of next-generation sequencing techniques and the routine biopsy of metastatic disease have driven significant advances in our understanding of the genomics of cancer, and are now poised to transform our treatment of this disease.

Prognostic significance of grade 3/4 neutropenia in Japanese prostate cancer patients treated with cabazitaxel

The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of cabazitaxel in Japanese patients affected by metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) previously treated with a docetaxel-containing regimen. In this retrospective study, 41 patients with mCRPC treated with cabazitaxel at Keio University Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Cabazitaxel at a dose of 20-25 mg/m² was administered every 3 or 4 weeks. Clinicopathological factors and laboratory data were collected to assess the prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). An upfront dose-reduction was required in 52.5% of patients due to their reduced general condition or advanced age. Prophylactic G-CSF was prescribed to all the patients. Grade ≥3 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia occurred in 21 patients (53.6%) and 3 patients (6.8%), respectively. Treatment was generally well tolerated, with a median of 5 cycles (range 1-17). Median PFS and OS from the start of cabazitaxel treatment were 4.4 and 15.0 months (95% CI 8.9-21.2), respectively. Waterfall plot analysis revealed that a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline >50% was noticed in n = 11 patients receiving cabazitaxel (26.8%). Univariate analysis revealed that poor performance status, PSA ≥100 ng/mL prior to cabazitaxel treatment, visceral metastasis, absence of grade 3/4 neutropenia during cabazitaxel therapy and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio were significantly associated with shorter overall survival. Multivariate analysis revealed that poor performance status, visceral metastasis, and the absence of grade 3/4 neutropenia during cabazitaxel therapy were the independent prognostic indicators for OS. The practical implication of our results might be to tailor cabazitaxel dosing on the basis of its hematological effects.

Reactive oxygen species induction by cabazitaxel through inhibiting Sestrin-3 in castration resistant prostate cancer

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) production induced by taxanes in cancer cells may influence the taxane-induced cell death or the drug resistance. We investigated the correlation between the cytotoxic effect of taxanes and ROS production in human castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) cell lines. Three human prostate cancer cell lines were treated with increasing concentrations of docetaxel or cabazitaxel in vitro. Cabazitaxel showed significantly higher cytotoxic efficacy than docetaxel in human CRPC cells, accompanied by elevated ROS production detected by FACS analysis. To investigate whether cabazitaxel-mediated cell death was caused by the ROS generation induced by cabazitaxel, we treated CRPC cells in the presence of antioxidant NAC. NAC reduced the cytotoxic effect induced by cabazitaxel. We found that ROS elimination by Sestrin-3 (SESN3) was significantly inhibited by cabazitaxel, but not by docetaxel. These results indicate higher sensitivity of human CRPC to cabazitaxel compared to docetaxel involves ROS production through inhibiting the expression of antioxidant enzyme SESN3.

Phase III Study Comparing a Reduced Dose of Cabazitaxel (20 mg/m2) and the Currently Approved Dose (25 mg/m2) in Postdocetaxel Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer-PROSELICA

Purpose Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m² (C25) significantly improved overall survival (OS) versus mitoxantrone ( P < .001) in postdocetaxel patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the phase III TROPIC study. The phase III PROSELICA study ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01308580) assessed the noninferiority of cabazitaxel 20 mg/m² (C20) versus C25 in postdocetaxel patients with mCRPC. Methods Patients were stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, measurability of disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), and region, and randomly assigned to receive C20 or C25. To claim noninferiority of C20 (maintenance of ≥ 50% of the OS benefit of C25 v mitoxantrone in TROPIC) with 95% confidence level, the upper boundary of the CI of the hazard ratio (HR) for C20 versus C25 could not exceed 1.214 under a one-sided 98.89% CI after interim analyses. Secondary end points included progression-free survival, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), tumor and pain responses and progression, health-related quality of life, and safety. Results Overall, 1,200 patients were randomly assigned (C20, n = 598; C25, n = 602). Baseline characteristics were similar in both arms. Median OS was 13.4 months for C20 and 14.5 months for C25 (HR, 1.024). The upper boundary of the HR CI was 1.184 (less than the 1.214 noninferiority margin). Significant differences were observed in favor of C25 for PSA response (C20, 29.5%; C25, 42.9%; nominal P < .001) and time to PSA progression (median: C20, 5.7 months; C25, 6.8 months; HR for C20 v C25, 1.195; 95% CI, 1.025 to 1.393). Health-related quality of life did not differ between cohorts. Rates of grade 3 or 4 treatment-emergent adverse events were 39.7% for C20 and 54.5% for C25. Conclusion The efficacy of cabazitaxel in postdocetaxel patients with mCRPC was confirmed. The noninferiority end point was met; C20 maintained ≥ 50% of the OS benefit of C25 versus mitoxantrone in TROPIC. Secondary efficacy end points favored C25. Fewer adverse events were observed with C20.

Randomised, open-label, phase II study comparing the efficacy and the safety of cabazitaxel versus weekly paclitaxel given as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with operable triple-negative or luminal B/HER2-negative breast cancer (GENEVIEVE)

BACKGROUND

The GENEVIEVE study compared the pathological complete response (pCR) rate (ypT0/is ypN0/+) in patients with operable human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer (BC) treated with either cabazitaxel or paclitaxel.

METHODS

GENEVIEVE was a prospective, multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase II study comparing the efficacy and the safety of four 3-weekly cycles cabazitaxel versus 12 weeks of paclitaxel given as neoadjuvant treatment. Primary end-point was the pCR rate defined as the complete absence of invasive carcinoma on histological examination of the breast irrespective of lymph node involvement (ypT0/is, ypN0/+) after the taxane treatment. Patients could receive an anthracycline-based therapy thereafter.

RESULTS

Overall, 333 patients were randomised and started treatment with 74.7% and 83.2% of patients completing treatment in the cabazitaxel and paclitaxel arms, respectively. Patients in cabazitaxel arm had a significantly lower pCR rate compared to the paclitaxel arm (1.2% versus 10.8%; p = 0.001). A total of 42 (25.3%) patients in the cabazitaxel arm and 17 (10.2%) in the paclitaxel arm had at least one serious adverse event (p < 0.001). Dose reductions were observed in 9.6% patients in the cabazitaxel arm compared to 11.4% in the paclitaxel arm (p = 0.721). Main reason for dose reductions was non-haematological toxicities in 3.0% versus 7.8% (p = 0.087), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The GENEVIEVE study showed no short-term effect of cabazitaxel in triple-negative or luminal B/HER2-negative primary BC, while there seemed to be no differences in drug exposure and patient compliance between the two arms.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01779479.

No significant impact of prior treatment profile with docetaxel on the efficacy of cabazitaxel in Japanese patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

The objective of this study was to retrospectively analyze the oncological outcomes of Japanese patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who received cabazitaxel. This study included a total of 63 consecutive Japanese mCRPC patients treated with cabazitaxel following the failure of docetaxel, and assessed the prognostic significance of cabazitaxel therapy in these patients focusing on the association of efficacies between two taxane agents. After treatment with cabazitaxel (median 5 cycles), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline was observed in 39 patients (61.9%), including 13 (27.0%) achieving the response defined by PSA decline ≥50%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) periods after the introduction of cabazitaxel were 4.1 and 14.8 months, respectively. The response rate to cabazitaxel was not significantly different between responders and non-responders to prior docetaxel, and there was no significant correlation between the PFSs with docetaxel and cabazitaxel. Furthermore, univariate analyses of several parameters identified the performance status (PS) and clinical symptoms, but not the cycles of docetaxel therapy, total amount of administered docetaxel or objective response to docetaxel therapy, as significant predictors of OS on cabazitaxel therapy, of which only PS was independently associated with OS on multivariate analysis. These findings suggest that oncological outcomes in Japanese mCRPC patients receiving cabazitaxel are generally satisfactory, irrespective of the profiles related to prior treatment with docetaxel, and that it might be preferable to introduce cabazitaxel to mCRPC patients with a good PS to maximize the prognostic benefit of this agent.

Phase I/II trial of cabazitaxel plus abiraterone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) progressing after docetaxel and abiraterone

Background

Abiraterone and cabazitaxel improve survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We conducted an open-label phase I/II trial of cabazitaxel plus abiraterone to assess the antitumor activity and tolerability in patients with progressive mCRPC after docetaxel (phase I), and after docetaxel and abiraterone (phase II) (NCT01511536).

Patients and methods

The primary objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of cabazitaxel plus abiraterone (phase I), and the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response defined as a ≥ 50% decrease confirmed ≥3 weeks later with this combination (phase II).

Results

Ten patients were enrolled in the phase I component; nine were evaluable. No DLTs were identified. The MTD was established as the approved doses for both drugs (cabazitaxel 25 mg/m2 every 3 weeks and abiraterone 1000 mg once daily). Daily abiraterone treatment did not impact on cabazitaxel clearance. Twenty-seven patients received cabazitaxel plus abiraterone plus prednisone (5 mg twice daily) in phase II. The median number of cycles administered (cabazitaxel) was seven (range: 1-28). Grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events included asthenia (in 5 patients; 14%), neutropenia (in 5 patients; 14%) and diarrhea (in 3 patients; 8%). Nine patients (24%) required dose reductions of cabazitaxel. Of 26 evaluable patients, 12 achieved a PSA response [46%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 26.6-66.6%]. Median PSA-progression-free survival was 6.9 months (95% CI: 4.1-10.3 months). Of 14 patients with measurable disease at baseline, 3 (21%) achieved a partial response per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors.

Conclusions

The combination of cabazitaxel and abiraterone has a manageable safety profile and shows antitumor activity in patients previously treated with docetaxel and abiraterone.

Supramolecular Amphiphilic Polymer-Based Micelles with Seven-Armed Polyoxazoline Coating for Drug Delivery

Supramolecular polymer micelles composed of seven-armed poly(2-methy-2-oxazoline) as the coating and linear poly(dl-lactide) as the core were prepared through synthesizing β-cyclodextrin-terminated poly(2-methy-2-oxazoline) and adamantine-terminated linear poly(dl-lactide), followed by host-guest interaction between β-cyclodextrin and adamantine groups in two polymers and self-assembly in aqueous solution. Dynamic light-scattering measurement showed that the micelles based on supramolecular amphiphilic polymers have the size of 119 nm and were highly stable in salt solution. When the micelles were used as the carrier of cabazitaxel, an antitumor agent for drug-resistant cancers, satisfactory drug loading content and encapsulation efficacy were obtained. In vitro cellular cytotoxicity assays found that cabazitaxel-loaded micelles presented obvious cytotoxicity against taxane-sensitive and -resistant cancer cells. Further in vivo antitumor activity evaluation showed that cabazitaxel-loaded micelles have significantly superior efficacy in inhibiting tumor growth and prolonging survival in tumor-bearing mice compared to that of free paclitaxel and free cabazitaxel.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of cabazitaxel in patients with hepatic impairment: a phase I dose-escalation study

Purpose

Cabazitaxel has not been studied in patients with hepatic impairment (HI). This phase I study assessed cabazitaxel safety and pharmacokinetics in patients with HI.

Methods

Patients with advanced, non-hematologic cancer, and normal hepatic function (Cohort 1: C-1), or mild (C-2), moderate (C-3), severe (C-4) HI received cabazitaxel starting doses of 25, 20, 10, and 10 mg/m², respectively. Doses were escalated in patients with HI based on Cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Adverse events and the cabazitaxel pharmacokinetic profile were assessed.

Results

In C-2, three patients receiving cabazitaxel 25 mg/m² experienced DLTs; maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 20 mg/m². In C-3, two patients receiving 20 mg/m² experienced DLTs; MTD was 15 mg/m². C-4 was discontinued early due to DLTs. The most frequent cabazitaxel-related, grade 3–4 toxicity was neutropenia (42%). Cabazitaxel clearance normalized to body surface area (CL/BSA) was lower in C-1 (geometric mean [GM] 13.4 L/h/m²) than expected (26.4 L/h/m²), but similar in C-2 (23.5 L/h/m²) and C-3 (27.9 L/h/m²). CL/BSA in C-4 was 18.1 L/h/m². Compared with C-2, CL/BSA increased 19% in C-3 (GM ratio 1.19; 90% CI 0.74–1.91), but decreased 23% in C-4 (0.77; 0.39–1.53). Cabazitaxel free fraction was unaltered. No significant correlation was found between grade 3–4 toxicities and pharmacokinetic parameters.

Conclusions

Mild–moderate HI did not cause substantial decline in cabazitaxel clearance. Cabazitaxel dose reductions in patients with mild–moderate HI, and a contraindication in patients with severe HI, are justified based on safety data.

A phase I pharmacokinetic and safety study of cabazitaxel in adult cancer patients with normal and impaired renal function

PURPOSE

Limited data are available on cabazitaxel pharmacokinetics in patients with renal impairment. This open-label, multicenter study assessed cabazitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors and normal or impaired renal function.

METHODS

Cohorts A (normal renal function: creatinine clearance [CrCL] >80 mL/min/1.73 m²), B (moderate renal impairment: CrCL 30 to <50 mL/min/1.73 m²) and C (severe impairment: CrCL <30 mL/min/1.73 m²) received cabazitaxel 25 mg/m² (A, B) or 20 mg/m² (C, could be escalated to 25 mg/m²), once every 3 weeks. Pharmacokinetic parameters and cabazitaxel unbound fraction (F _U) were assessed using linear regression and mixed models. Geometric mean (GM) and GM ratios (GMRs) were determined using mean CrCL intervals (moderate and severe renal impairment: 40 and 15 mL/min/1.73 m²) versus a control (90 mL/min/1.73 m²).

RESULTS

Overall, 25 patients received cabazitaxel (median cycles: 3 [range 1-20]; Cohort A: 5 [2-13]; Cohort B: 3 [1-15]; and Cohort C: 5 [1-20]), of which 24 were eligible for pharmacokinetic analysis (eight in each cohort). For moderate and severe renal impairment versus normal renal function, GMR estimates were: clearance normalized to body surface area (CL/BSA) 0.95 (90% CI 0.80-1.13) and 0.89 (0.61-1.32); area under the curve normalized to dose (AUC/dose) 1.06 (0.88-1.27) and 1.14 (0.76-1.71); and F _U 0.99 (0.94-1.04) and 0.97 (0.87-1.09), respectively. Estimated slopes of linear regression of log parameters versus log CrCL (renal impairment) were: CL/BSA 0.06 (-0.15 to 0.28); AUC/dose -0.07 (-0.30 to 0.16); and F _U 0.02 (-0.05 to 0.08). Cabazitaxel safety profile was consistent with previous reports.

CONCLUSIONS

Renal impairment had no clinically meaningful effect on cabazitaxel pharmacokinetics.

Role of Chemotherapy and Mechanisms of Resistance to Chemotherapy in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Chemotherapy using the taxanes, docetaxel and cabazitaxel, remains an important therapeutic option in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). However, despite the survival benefits afforded by these agents, the survival increments are modest and resistance occurs universally. Efforts to overcome resistance to docetaxel by combining with biologic agents have heretofore been unsuccessful. Indeed, resistance to these taxanes is also associated with cross-resistance to the antiandrogen drugs, abiraterone and enzalutamide. Here, we discuss the various mechanisms of resistance to chemotherapy in metastatic CRPC and the potential role of emerging regimens and agents in varying clinical phases of development.

Cabazitaxel and indocyanine green co-delivery tumor-targeting nanoparticle for improved antitumor efficacy and minimized drug toxicity

Cabazitaxel (CBX) is an effective antineoplastic agent for the treatment of many kinds of cancers. However, the poor water solubility remains a serious deterrent to the utilization of CBX as a commercial drug. In this study, we designed a strategy that integrated CBX into albumin nanoparticles (ANs) formed with human serum albumin (HSA) to improve the water solubility and targeting ability. Meanwhile, we utilized a photothermal agent-indocyanine green (ICG), which could cooperate with CBX to enhance the antitumor effect. The obtained ANs containing ICG and CBX (AN-ICG-CBX) exhibited good mono-dispersity. In vitro cytotoxicity study showed the effectiveness of CBX and ICG, respectively, whereas AN-ICG-CBX with irradiation exhibited the most efficient antiproliferative ability (83.7%). In vivo safety evaluation studies demonstrated the safety of AN-ICG-CBX. Furthermore, the in vivo antitumor study indicated that the AN-ICG-CBX with irradiation achieved higher tumor inhibition rate (91.3%) compared with CBX-encapsulated AN (AN-CBX) (83.3%) or ICG-encapsulated AN (AN-ICG) plus irradiation (60.1%) in 4T1 tumor-bearing mice. To sum up, a safety and effective formulation AN-ICG-CBX was developed in this study and successfully reduced the drug toxicity, improved the targeting efficiency and enhanced the therapeutic effects, becoming a promising candidate for clinical application.

Cancer therapy-related complications in the bowel and mesentery: an imaging perspective

Cancer therapy-induced complications in the bowel and mesentery are fairly common. It is important for clinicians to be aware of these complications and the agents most frequently implicated. Cancer therapy is rapidly evolving and often encompasses both classic cytotoxic drugs and newer molecular targeted agents. Drugs from both broad classes can have numerous adverse effects on the bowel and mesentery that can be detected on imaging. These adverse effects include ileus, various forms of enterocolitis, gastrointestinal perforation, pneumatosis intestinalis, secretory diarrhea, and sclerosing mesenteritis. These complications are diverse and range from relatively benign to life threatening. The management is also variable, but many of these conditions are easily controlled and reversed with supportive care and cessation of the particular cancer therapy. The objective of this pictorial essay is to demonstrate some of the more common cancer therapy-induced complications of the bowel and mesentery, with a focus on the radiographic findings.

Cabazitaxel Versus Topotecan in Patients with Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Progressive Disease During or After First-Line Platinum-Based Chemotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) typically respond well to initial chemotherapy. However, relapse invariably occurs, and topotecan, the only approved second-line treatment option, has limited efficacy. Taxanes have activity in SCLC, and cabazitaxel is a second-generation taxane with potential for enhanced activity in chemorefractory malignancies.

METHODS

Patients with SCLC who relapsed after initial platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive cabazitaxel 25 mg/m every 21 days or topotecan 1.5 mg/m on days 1-5 every 21 days. Two patient subgroups, defined by chemosensitive and chemo-resistant/refractory disease, were assessed in combination and separately.

RESULTS

The safety profile of cabazitaxel and topotecan was consistent with previous studies, and despite considerable toxicity in both arms, no new safety concerns were identified. Patients receiving cabazitaxel had inferior progression-free survival compared with topotecan (1.4 versus 3.0 months, respectively; two-sided p < 0.0001; hazard ratio = 2.17, 95% confidence interval = 1.563-3.010), and results were similar in both the chemosensitive and chemorefractory subgroups. No complete responses were observed in either arm, and no partial responses were observed in the cabazitaxel group. The partial response rate in the topotecan arm was 10%. Median overall survival was 5.2 months in the cabazitaxel arm and 6.8 months in the topotecan arm (two-sided p = 0.0125; hazard ratio = 1.57, 95% confidence interval = 1.10-2.25).

CONCLUSION

Cabazitaxel, a next-generation taxane, had inferior efficacy when compared with standard-dose topotecan in the treatment of relapsed SCLC. Topotecan remains a suboptimal therapy, and continued efforts to develop improved second-line treatments are warranted.