1
|
Spiekman IAC, Zeverijn LJ, Geurts BS, Verkerk K, Haj Mohammad SF, van der Noort V, Roepman P, de Leng WWJ, Jansen AML, Gootjes EC, de Groot DJA, Kerver ED, van Voorthuizen T, Roodhart JML, Valkenburg-van Iersel LBJ, Gelderblom H, Voest EE, Verheul HMW. Trastuzumab plus pertuzumab for HER2-amplified advanced colorectal cancer: Results from the drug rediscovery protocol (DRUP). Eur J Cancer 2024; 202:113988. [PMID: 38471288 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.113988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Revised: 02/23/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2-5% of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) is amplified or overexpressed. Despite prior evidence that anti-HER2 therapy confers clinical benefit (CB) in one-third of these patients, it is not approved for this indication in Europe. In the Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP), patients are treated with off-label drugs based on their molecular profile. Here, we present the results of the cohort 'trastuzumab/pertuzumab for treatment-refractory patients with RAS/BRAF-wild-type HER2amplified metastatic CRC (HER2+mCRC)'. METHODS Patients with progressive treatment-refractory RAS/BRAF-wild-type HER2+mCRC with measurable disease were included for trastuzumab plus pertuzumab treatment. Primary endpoints of DRUP are CB (defined as confirmed objective response (OR) or stable disease (SD) ≥ 16 weeks) and safety. Patients were enrolled using a Simon-like 2-stage model, with 8 patients in stage 1 and 24 patients in stage 2 if at least 1/8 patients had CB. To identify biomarkers for response, whole genome sequencing (WGS) was performed on pre-treatment biopsies. RESULTS CB was observed in 11/24 evaluable patients (46%) with HER2+mCRC, seven patients achieved an OR (29%). Median duration of response was 8.4 months. Patients had undergone a median of 3 prior treatment lines. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 4.3 months (95% CI 1.9-10.3) and 8.2 months (95% CI 7.2-14.7), respectively. No unexpected toxicities were observed. WGS provided potential explanations for resistance in 3/10 patients without CB, for whom WGS was available. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study confirm a clinically significant benefit of trastuzumab plus pertuzumab treatment in patients with HER2+mCRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilse A C Spiekman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Laurien J Zeverijn
- Oncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Birgit S Geurts
- Oncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Karlijn Verkerk
- Oncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Soemeya F Haj Mohammad
- Department of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Paul Roepman
- Hartwig Medical Foundation, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wendy W J de Leng
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Anne M L Jansen
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Elske C Gootjes
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Derk-Jan A de Groot
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Emile D Kerver
- Department of Medical Oncology, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jeanine M L Roodhart
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Liselot B J Valkenburg-van Iersel
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, GROW school of Oncology and Development Biology, Maastricht University Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Hans Gelderblom
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Emile E Voest
- Oncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Henk M W Verheul
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gurruchaga Sotés I, Gómez-Mateo MC, Ortega Izquierdo ME, Martínez-Trufero J. Beneficial Use of the Combination of Gemcitabine and Dacarbazine in Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Real-World Data. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:267. [PMID: 38254758 PMCID: PMC10813902 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16020267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Revised: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 01/06/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The combination of gemcitabine and dacarbazine has exhibited efficacy in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for aSTSs, albeit without robust confirmation from larger clinical trials. METHODS We conducted a retrospective study in a single institution involving aSTS patients treated with gemcitabine and dacarbazine. RESULTS 95 patients were assessed, pointing to a benefit in PFS of 3.5 months and an OS of 14.2 months. Patients with translocated histotypes had better PFS, while those with platelet-lymphocyte ratios (PLRs) surpassing a specific threshold or lower albumin levels had poorer overall survival. CONCLUSIONS This study validates previous findings from three phase I-II trials, affirming the utility of this treatment approach in routine clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ibon Gurruchaga Sotés
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Aragón, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain; (M.E.O.I.); (J.M.-T.)
| | - M. Carmen Gómez-Mateo
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain;
| | - María Eugenia Ortega Izquierdo
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Aragón, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain; (M.E.O.I.); (J.M.-T.)
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Javier Martínez-Trufero
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Aragón, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain; (M.E.O.I.); (J.M.-T.)
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gutierrez-Sainz L, Martinez-Fdez S, Pedregosa-Barbas J, Peña J, Alameda M, Viñal D, Villamayor J, Martinez-Recio S, Perez-Wert P, Pertejo-Fernandez A, Gallego A, Martinez-Marin V, Zamora P, Espinosa E, Mendiola M, Feliu J, Redondo A. Efficacy of second and third lines of treatment in advanced soft tissue sarcomas: a real-world study. Clin Transl Oncol 2023; 25:3519-3526. [PMID: 37329429 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03221-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are an uncommon and heterogeneous group of tumours. Several drugs and combinations have been used in clinical practice as second-line (2L) and third-line (3L) treatment. The growth modulation index (GMI) has previously been used as an exploratory efficacy endpoint of drug activity and represents an intra-patient comparison. METHODS We performed a real-world retrospective study including all patients with advanced STS who had received at least 2 different lines of treatment for advanced disease between 2010 and 2020 at a single institution. The objective was to study the efficacy of both 2L and 3L treatments, analysing the time to progression (TTP) and the GMI (defined as the ratio of TTP between 2 consecutive lines of therapy). RESULTS Eighty-one patients were included. The median TTP after 2L and 3L treatment was 3.16 and 3.06 months, and the median GMI was 0.81 and 0.74, respectively. The regimens most frequently used in both treatments were trabectedin, gemcitabine-dacarbazine, gemcitabine-docetaxel, pazopanib and ifosfamide. The median TTP by each of these regimens was 2.80, 2.23, 2.83, 4.10, and 5.00 months, and the median GMI was 0.78, 0.73, 0.67, 1.08, and 0.94, respectively. In terms of histotype, we highlight the activity (GMI > 1.33) of gemcitabine-dacarbazine in undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) and in leiomyosarcoma, pazopanib in UPS, and ifosfamide in synovial sarcoma. CONCLUSIONS In our cohort, regimens commonly used after first-line STS treatment showed only slight differences in efficacy, although we found significant activity of specific regimens by histotype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Gutierrez-Sainz
- Department of Medical Oncology, La Paz University Hospital-Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Sara Martinez-Fdez
- Department of Medical Oncology, La Paz University Hospital-Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jorge Pedregosa-Barbas
- Department of Medical Oncology, La Paz University Hospital-Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jesus Peña
- Department of Medical Oncology, La Paz University Hospital-Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria Alameda
- Department of Medical Oncology, La Paz University Hospital-Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain
| | - David Viñal
- Department of Medical Oncology, La Paz University Hospital-Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain
| | - Julia Villamayor
- Department of Medical Oncology, La Paz University Hospital-Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sergio Martinez-Recio
- Department of Medical Oncology, La Paz University Hospital-Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pablo Perez-Wert
- Department of Medical Oncology, La Paz University Hospital-Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Pertejo-Fernandez
- Department of Medical Oncology, La Paz University Hospital-Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alejandro Gallego
- Department of Medical Oncology, La Paz University Hospital-Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Virginia Martinez-Marin
- Department of Medical Oncology, La Paz University Hospital-Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain
- Translational Oncology Group, IdiPAZ, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pilar Zamora
- Department of Medical Oncology, La Paz University Hospital-Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain
- Translational Oncology Group, IdiPAZ, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain
- Cátedra UAM-AMGEN, School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Enrique Espinosa
- Department of Medical Oncology, La Paz University Hospital-Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain
- Translational Oncology Group, IdiPAZ, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain
- Cátedra UAM-AMGEN, School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Center for Biomedical Research in the Cancer Network (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, CIBERONC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Marta Mendiola
- Center for Biomedical Research in the Cancer Network (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, CIBERONC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Molecular Pathology and Therapeutic Targets Group, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jaime Feliu
- Department of Medical Oncology, La Paz University Hospital-Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain
- Translational Oncology Group, IdiPAZ, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain
- Cátedra UAM-AMGEN, School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Center for Biomedical Research in the Cancer Network (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, CIBERONC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Andres Redondo
- Department of Medical Oncology, La Paz University Hospital-Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.
- Translational Oncology Group, IdiPAZ, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.
- Cátedra UAM-AMGEN, School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Subbiah V, Chawla SP, Conley AP, Wilky BA, Tolcher A, Lakhani NJ, Berz D, Andrianov V, Crago W, Holcomb M, Hussain A, Veldstra C, Kalabus J, O’Neill B, Senne L, Rowell E, Heidt AB, Willis KM, Eckelman BP. Preclinical Characterization and Phase I Trial Results of INBRX-109, A Third-Generation, Recombinant, Humanized, Death Receptor 5 Agonist Antibody, in Chondrosarcoma. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:2988-3003. [PMID: 37265425 PMCID: PMC10425732 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-0974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Revised: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with unresectable/metastatic chondrosarcoma have poor prognoses; conventional chondrosarcoma is associated with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of <4 months after first-line chemotherapy. No standard targeted therapies are available. We present the preclinical characterization of INBRX-109, a third-generation death receptor 5 (DR5) agonist, and clinical findings from a phase I trial of INBRX-109 in unresectable/metastatic chondrosarcoma (NCT03715933). PATIENTS AND METHODS INBRX-109 was first characterized preclinically as a DR5 agonist, with binding specificity and hepatotoxicity evaluated in vitro and antitumor activity evaluated both in vitro and in vivo. INBRX-109 (3 mg/kg every 3 weeks) was then evaluated in a phase I study of solid tumors, which included a cohort with any subtype of chondrosarcoma and a cohort with IDH1/IDH2-mutant conventional chondrosarcoma. The primary endpoint was safety. Efficacy was an exploratory endpoint, with measures including objective response, disease control rate, and PFS. RESULTS In preclinical studies, INBRX-109 led to antitumor activity in vitro and in patient-derived xenograft models, with minimal hepatotoxicity. In the phase I study, INBRX-109 was well tolerated and demonstrated antitumor activity in unresectable/metastatic chondrosarcoma. INBRX-109 led to a disease control rate of 87.1% [27/31; durable clinical benefit, 40.7% (11/27)], including two partial responses, and median PFS of 7.6 months. Most treatment-related adverse events, including liver-related events, were low grade (grade ≥3 events in chondrosarcoma cohorts, 5.7%). CONCLUSIONS INBRX-109 demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity with a favorable safety profile in patients with unresectable/metastatic chondrosarcoma. A randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II trial (ChonDRAgon, NCT04950075) will further evaluate INBRX-109 in conventional chondrosarcoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivek Subbiah
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Sant P. Chawla
- Sarcoma Oncology Research Center, Santa Monica, California
| | - Anthony P. Conley
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Breelyn A. Wilky
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | | | | | - David Berz
- Valkyrie Clinical Trials, Los Angeles, California
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Martín-Broto J, Hindi N, Grignani G, Merlini A, Ibrahim T, Le Cesne A. Experience with second-line trabectedin in daily clinical practice: case studies. Future Oncol 2022; 18:23-32. [PMID: 36200932 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2022-0519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
As a recommended second-line option for advanced soft tissue sarcoma, trabectedin can provide the necessary balance between long-term tumor control and preserved quality of life. Three case studies illustrate the long-lasting responses that patients can achieve with second-line trabectedin. A female patient with metastatic leiomyosarcoma maintained disease control for 2 years with trabectedin (× 41 cycles) with excellent tolerability and no relevant adverse events. At the time of writing, a male patient with a metastatic solitary fibrous tumor was asymptomatic after 30 cycles of trabectedin and treatment was ongoing. A young male patient with a recurrent, nonresectable, retroperitoneal myxoid/round cell liposarcoma was able to continue his sporting activities (triathlons) over 2 years with trabectedin (× 14 cycles) plus watchful waiting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Martín-Broto
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital Fundación Jimenez Diaz, 28040 Madrid, Spain.,University Hospital General de Villalba, 28400 Collado Villalba, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria Fundacion Jimenez Diaz (IIS/FJD; UAM), 28015 Madrid, Spain
| | - Nadia Hindi
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital Fundación Jimenez Diaz, 28040 Madrid, Spain.,University Hospital General de Villalba, 28400 Collado Villalba, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria Fundacion Jimenez Diaz (IIS/FJD; UAM), 28015 Madrid, Spain
| | - Giovanni Grignani
- Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, SP 142 Km 3.95, 10060 Candiolo, Italy
| | - Alessandra Merlini
- Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, SP 142 Km 3.95, 10060 Candiolo, Italy.,Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy
| | - Tony Ibrahim
- International Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Axel Le Cesne
- International Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Saint-Ghislain M, Derrien AC, Geoffrois L, Gastaud L, Lesimple T, Negrier S, Penel N, Kurtz JE, Le Corre Y, Dutriaux C, Gardrat S, Barnhill R, Matet A, Cassoux N, Houy A, Ramtohul T, Servois V, Mariani P, Piperno-Neumann S, Stern MH, Rodrigues M. MBD4 deficiency is predictive of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic uveal melanoma patients. Eur J Cancer 2022; 173:105-112. [PMID: 35863105 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.06.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Revised: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND MBD4 mutations have been reported in uveal melanomas, acute myeloid leukemias, colorectal adenocarcinomas, gliomas, and spiradenocarcinomas and cause a hypermutated phenotype. Although metastatic uveal melanomas (mUM) are usually resistant to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), the first reported MBD4-mutated (MBD4m) patient responded to ICI, suggesting that MBD4 mutation may predict response to ICI. METHODS Retrospective cohort of mUM patients treated with ICI. MBD4 was sequenced in a subset of these patients. RESULTS Three hundred mUM patients were included. Median follow-up was 17.3 months. Ten patients with an objective response and 20 cases with stable disease for >12 months were observed, corresponding to an objective response rate of 3.3% and a clinical benefit (i.e., responder patients and stable disease) rate of 10%. Of the 131 tumors sequenced for MBD4, five (3.8%) were mutated. MBD4 mutation was associated with a better objective response rate as three out of five MBD4m versus 4% of MBD4 wild-type patients responded (p < 0.001). Of these five responders, three presented progressive disease at 2.8, 13.9, and 22.3 months. Median PFS was 4.0 months in MBD4 wild-type and 22.3 months in MBD4m patients (HR = 0.22; p = 0.01). Median OS in MBD4def patients was unreached as compared to 16.6 months in MBD4pro (HR = 0.11; 95% CI: 0.02-0.86; log-rank p-test = 0.04; Fig. 2e). CONCLUSIONS In mUM patients, MBD4 mutation is highly predictive for the response, PFS, and overall survival benefit to ICI. MBD4 could be a tissue-agnostic biomarker and should be sequenced in mUM, and other tumor types where MBD4 mutations are reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathilde Saint-Ghislain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France; INSERM U830, DNA Repair and Uveal Melanoma (D.R.U.M.), Equipe Labellisée Par La Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
| | - Anne-Céline Derrien
- INSERM U830, DNA Repair and Uveal Melanoma (D.R.U.M.), Equipe Labellisée Par La Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
| | - Lionnel Geoffrois
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine - Alexis Vautrin Cancer, Nancy, France.
| | - Lauris Gastaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Centre, 06000 Nice, France.
| | - Thierry Lesimple
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France.
| | | | - Nicolas Penel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille University, Lille, France.
| | - Jean-Emmanuel Kurtz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.
| | - Yannick Le Corre
- Department of Dermatology, Angers University Hospital, UNAM, France.
| | - Caroline Dutriaux
- Dermatology Department, CHU de Bordeaux, Hôpital Saint André, Bordeaux, France.
| | - Sophie Gardrat
- Department of Biopathology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
| | - Raymond Barnhill
- Department of Biopathology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France; Faculty of Medicine, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
| | - Alexandre Matet
- Department of Ocular Oncology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France; Université de Paris, Paris, France.
| | - Nathalie Cassoux
- Department of Ocular Oncology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France; Université de Paris, Paris, France.
| | - Alexandre Houy
- INSERM U830, DNA Repair and Uveal Melanoma (D.R.U.M.), Equipe Labellisée Par La Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
| | - Toulsie Ramtohul
- Department of Radiology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
| | - Vincent Servois
- Department of Radiology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
| | - Pascale Mariani
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
| | | | - Marc-Henri Stern
- INSERM U830, DNA Repair and Uveal Melanoma (D.R.U.M.), Equipe Labellisée Par La Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France; Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
| | - Manuel Rodrigues
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France; INSERM U830, DNA Repair and Uveal Melanoma (D.R.U.M.), Equipe Labellisée Par La Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lashari BH, Kumaran M, Aneja A, Bull T, Rali P. Beyond Clots in the Pulmonary Circulation: Pulmonary Artery Tumors Mimicking Pulmonary Embolism. Chest 2022; 161:1642-1650. [PMID: 35041833 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Revised: 01/02/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the most common filling defect seen on CT scan pulmonary angiography. Pulmonary artery (PA) tumors can mimic PE on imaging and clinical presentation. One classic feature of tumors is failure to improve on anticoagulation. PA tumors, particularly malignant ones, have radically different treatments and usually have a grim prognosis. Thus, it is essential that PA tumors, when suspected, receive an expedited confirmatory diagnosis followed by multidisciplinary treatment at an expert center. In this review, we present clinical, imaging, and histopathologic features of benign and malignant PA tumors, emphasizing differentiating features from PE. We also describe available diagnostic and treatment methods for PA tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bilal Haider Lashari
- Department of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA.
| | - Maruti Kumaran
- Department of Radiology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Amandeep Aneja
- Department of Pathology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Todd Bull
- Department of Medicine, Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO
| | - Parth Rali
- Department of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Thirasastr P, Somaiah N. Overview of systemic therapy options in liposarcoma, with a focus on the activity of selinexor, a selective inhibitor of nuclear export in dedifferentiated liposarcoma. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2022; 14:17588359221081073. [PMID: 35251319 PMCID: PMC8891917 DOI: 10.1177/17588359221081073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Liposarcoma (LPS) is a common soft tissue sarcoma that encompasses diverse subtypes of well-differentiated/dedifferentiated, myxoid/round cell, and pleomorphic LPS. There is heterogeneity among the various LPS types with regard to prognosis, molecular pathogenesis, and response to treatment. Well-differentiated (WDLPS) and dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) are most common types, which share common genetic alteration of chromosome 12q13-15 amplification resulting in amplification of oncogenes, including MDM2 (Mouse double minute 2), CDK4 (cyclin-dependent kinase 4), and HMGA2 (High mobility group protein AT-hook 2). Despite sharing the same molecular alteration, DDLPS has a worse prognosis, with a higher recurrence rate and higher propensity for metastases compared to WDLPS. Here we provide an overview of the LPS treatment landscape focusing on recent developments in the treatment of DDLPS with a focus on selinexor. Selinexor, a selective inhibitor of XPO1, was recently evaluated in a phase 3 trial, the first prospective randomized trial in DDLPS, and we discuss its efficacy in context of other available agents for DDLPS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prapassorn Thirasastr
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Neeta Somaiah
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd. Unit 0450, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gaultney JG, Bouvy JC, Chapman RH, Upton AJ, Kowal S, Bokemeyer C, Solà-Morales O, Wolf J, Briggs AH. Developing a Framework for the Health Technology Assessment of Histology-independent Precision Oncology Therapies. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2021; 19:625-634. [PMID: 34028672 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-021-00654-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/17/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
The arrival of precision oncology is challenging the evidence standards under which technologies are evaluated for regulatory approval as well as for health technology assessment (HTA) purposes. Several key concepts are discussed to highlight the source of the challenges in evaluating these products, particularly those impacting the HTA of histology-independent therapies. These include the basket trial design, high uncertainty in (potentially substantial) benefits for histology-independent therapies, and the inability to identify and quantify benefits of standard of care in daily practice when the biomarker is not currently used in practice. There is little precedent for a technology with the unique mixture of challenges for HTA of histology-independent therapies and they will be evaluated using standard HTA, as there currently is no evidence suggesting the standard HTA framework is not appropriate. A number of questions proposed to help guide HTA bodies when assessing the appropriateness of local processes to optimally evaluate histology-independent therapies. Pragmatic solutions are further proposed to decrease uncertainty in the benefits of histology independent therapies as well as fill gaps in comparative evidence. The proposed solutions ensure a consistent and streamlined approach to evaluation across histology-independent products, although with varying strengths and limitations. Alongside these solutions, sponsors should engage early with HTA bodies/payers and regulatory agencies through parallel/joint scientific advice to facilitate the integration of both regulatory and HTA perspectives into one clinical development programme, potentially reconciling evidence requirements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jürgen Wolf
- Center for Integrated Oncology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Thebault E, Piperno-Neumann S, Tran D, Pacquement H, Marec-Berard P, Lervat C, Castex MP, Cleirec M, Bompas E, Vannier JP, Plantaz D, Saumet L, Verite C, Collard O, Pluchart C, Briandet C, Monard L, Brugieres L, Le Deley MC, Gaspar N. Successive Osteosarcoma Relapses after the First Line O2006/Sarcome-09 Trial: What Can We Learn for Further Phase-II Trials? Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13071683. [PMID: 33918346 PMCID: PMC8038261 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13071683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2021] [Revised: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignant bone tumour in adolescents and young adults. The survival of osteosarcoma patients has not improved for four decades. The purpose was to describe first and subsequent relapses in patients from the OS2006/Sarcome-09 trial, to help future trial design. Among the 434 patients with a confirmed osteosarcoma who achieved CR1 during first line treatment, 157 patients experienced at least one relapse. The 3-year progression-free and overall survival rates were 21% and 37%, respectively. Only a quarter of the patients were included in clinical trials at first recurrence. We want to promote randomised phase-II trials in osteosarcoma relapses, with broad inclusion criteria at study entry in terms of age and disease status, and PFS as primary endpoint. Surgery/local treatment of all residual lesions should be allowed when feasible. Single-arm trial design could be used for subsequent relapses. Abstract The purpose was to describe first and subsequent relapses in patients from the OS2006/Sarcome-09 trial, to help future trial design. We prospectively collected and analysed relapse data of all French patients included in the OS2006/Sarcome-09 trial, who had achieved a first complete remission. 157 patients experienced a first relapse. The median interval from diagnosis to relapse was 1.7 year (range 0.5–7.6). The first relapse was metastatic in 83% of patients, and disease was not measurable according to RECIST 1.1 criteria in 23%. Treatment consisted in systemic therapy (74%) and surgical resection (68%). A quarter of the patients were accrued in a phase-II clinical trial. A second complete remission was obtained for 79 patients. Most of them had undergone surgery (76/79). The 3-year progression-free and overall survival rates were 21% and 37%, respectively. In patients who achieved CR2, the 3y-PFS and OS rates were 39% and 62% respectively. Individual correlation between subsequent PFS durations was poor. For osteosarcoma relapses, we recommend randomised phase-II trials, open to patients from all age categories (children, adolescents, adults), not limited to patients with measurable disease (but stratified according to disease status), with PFS as primary endpoint, response rate and surgical CR as secondary endpoints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Thebault
- Department of Oncology for Child and Adolescent, Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, 94800 Villejuif, France; (E.T.); (L.B.)
| | | | - Diep Tran
- Biostatistics Department, Gustave Roussy Institute, 94800 Villejuif, France;
| | | | - Perrine Marec-Berard
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Institut D’hématologie et D’oncologie Pédiatrique, 69008 Lyon, France;
| | - Cyril Lervat
- Department of Tumor Pediatrics, Centre Oscar Lambret, 59000 Lille, France;
| | - Marie-Pierre Castex
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Unity Oncology, Toulouse University Hospital, 31300 Toulouse, France;
| | - Morgane Cleirec
- Pediatric Onco-Hematology Department, University Hospital Center of Nantes, 44093 Nantes, France;
| | - Emmanuelle Bompas
- Department of Medicine, Institut Cancerologie de l’Ouest, 44093 Nantes, France;
| | - Jean-Pierre Vannier
- Pediatric Hematology, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire Charles Nicolle, 76038 Rouen, France;
| | - Dominique Plantaz
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, University Hospital, 38700 Grenoble, France;
| | - Laure Saumet
- Department of Paediatric Onco-Haematology, Montpellier University Hospital, 34295 Montpellier, France;
| | - Cecile Verite
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Hematogy and Oncology, Pellegrin Hospital, 33000 Bordeaux, France;
| | - Olivier Collard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de la Loire, Lucien Neuwirth, 42270 St Priest en Jarez, France;
| | - Claire Pluchart
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire, 51100 Reims, France;
| | - Claire Briandet
- Department of Paediatric Immuno-Hematology, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire, 21079 Dijon, France;
| | | | - Laurence Brugieres
- Department of Oncology for Child and Adolescent, Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, 94800 Villejuif, France; (E.T.); (L.B.)
| | | | - Nathalie Gaspar
- Department of Oncology for Child and Adolescent, Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, 94800 Villejuif, France; (E.T.); (L.B.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-1-42-11-41-66; Fax: +33-1-42-11-52-75
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Krebs MG, Blay JY, Le Tourneau C, Hong D, Veronese L, Antoniou M, Bennett I. Intrapatient comparisons of efficacy in a single-arm trial of entrectinib in tumour-agnostic indications. ESMO Open 2021; 6:100072. [PMID: 33676294 PMCID: PMC8103537 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Revised: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Entrectinib is a tropomyosin receptor kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) fusion-positive solid tumours based on single-arm trials. Traditional randomised clinical trials in rare cancers are not feasible; we conducted an intrapatient analysis to evaluate the clinical benefit of entrectinib versus prior standard-of-care systemic therapies. Methods Patients with locally advanced/metastatic NTRK fusion-positive tumours enrolled in the global phase II, single-arm STARTRK-2 trial were grouped according to prior systemic therapy and response. The key analysis used growth modulation index [GMI; ratio of progression-free survival (PFS) on entrectinib to time to discontinuation (TTD) on the most recent prior therapy]; ratio ≥1.3 indicated clinically meaningful efficacy. Additional analyses investigated TTD and objective response rate (ORR) for entrectinib and prior therapies. Results Seventy-one patients were included; 51 received prior systemic therapy. In 38 patients who progressed on prior therapy, ORR was 60.5% (23/38) with entrectinib and 15.8% (6/38) with the most recent prior therapy. Median PFS [11.2 months; 95% confidence interval (CI) 6.7–not estimable] for entrectinib exceeded median TTD (2.9 months; 95% CI 2.0-4.9) for most recent prior therapy. From the intrapatient analysis of GMI, 65.8% had a ratio ≥1.3 and median GMI was 2.53. Consistent results were observed at more stringent GMI thresholds; 60.5% of patients had GMI ≥1.5 or ≥1.8 and 57.9% had GMI ≥2.0. Conclusions ORR was high and PFS was longer on entrectinib versus TTD on prior therapy. Furthermore, 65.8% of patients experienced clinically meaningful benefit based on GMI. This intrapatient analysis demonstrates comparative effectiveness of entrectinib in a rare, heterogeneous adult population. Randomised trials are unfeasible for molecular targeted agents in rare indications because of low patient numbers. Intrapatient comparison with prior therapies can be used to evaluate relative treatment efficacy in rare tumours. Entrectinib is a potent tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitor with proven efficacy in neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) fusion-positive tumours from the global STARTRK-2 trial. Median progression-free survival on entrectinib was longer than time to discontinuation on prior therapy (11.2 months versus 2.9 months). About 61% of patients with prior therapy progression responded to entrectinib; 66% had growth modulation index ≥1.3 (clinically meaningful threshold).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M G Krebs
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| | - J-Y Blay
- Centre Léon Bérard, UNICANCER, Université Claude Bernard Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - C Le Tourneau
- Department of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris-Saclay University, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France
| | - D Hong
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - L Veronese
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
| | - M Antoniou
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
| | - I Bennett
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
A Growth Modulation Index-Based GEISTRA Score as a New Prognostic Tool for Trabectedin Efficacy in Patients with Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcomas: A Spanish Group for Sarcoma Research (GEIS) Retrospective Study. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13040792. [PMID: 33672857 PMCID: PMC7917652 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13040792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2021] [Revised: 01/31/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are an uncommon and heterogeneous group of tumors, with scarce options for treatment in advanced cases. There is no consensus regarding which is the best treatment sequence for these patients. Although trabectedin is an approved drug for STS treatment, after progression to anthracyclines, the clinical profile of the patients that most benefit from this drug it is not defined. We have retrospectively analyzed a sample of 357 nonselected sarcoma patients from real-world experience, treated homogeneously with trabectedin, confirming and validating results from previous clinical trials and other retrospective studies. After analyzing clinical prognostic factors, we selected those which predicted a better growth modulation index (GMI > 1.33), and we defined the GEISTRA score, an easy to obtain and reproducible clinical tool, that can help us to optimize the use of trabectedin in advanced sarcoma patients. Abstract The aim of this study was to identify an easily reliable prognostic score that selects the subset of advanced soft tissue sarcoma (ASTS) patients with a higher benefit with trabectedin in terms of time to progression and overall survival. A retrospective series of 357 patients with ASTS treated with trabectedin as second- or further-line in 19 centers across Spain was analyzed. First, it was confirmed that patients with high growth modulation index (GMI > 1.33) were associated with the better clinical outcome. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with a GMI > 1.33. Thus, GEISTRA score was based on metastasis free-interval (MFI ≤ 9.7 months), Karnofsky < 80%, Non L-sarcomas and better response in the previous systemic line. The median GMI was 0.82 (0–69), with 198 patients (55%) with a GMI < 1, 41 (11.5%) with a GMI 1–1.33 and 118 (33.1%) with a GMI > 1.33. The lowest GEISTRA score showed a median of time-to-progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) of 5.7 and 19.5 months, respectively, whereas it was 1.8 and 3.1 months for TTP and OS, respectively, for the GEISTRA 4 score. This prognostic tool can contribute to better selecting candidates for trabectedin treatment in ASTS.
Collapse
|
13
|
Hindi N, Carrasco García I, Sánchez-Camacho A, Gutierrez A, Peinado J, Rincón I, Benedetti J, Sancho P, Santos P, Sánchez-Bustos P, Marcilla D, Encinas V, Chacon S, Muñoz-Casares C, Moura D, Martin-Broto J. Trabectedin Plus Radiotherapy for Advanced Soft-Tissue Sarcoma: Experience in Forty Patients Treated at a Sarcoma Reference Center. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12123740. [PMID: 33322663 PMCID: PMC7764328 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12123740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2020] [Revised: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 12/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Active therapeutic options in advanced sarcomas, able to induce durable objective responses, are scarce beyond first line. New strategies for disease and symptomatic control are thus needed. Our aim was to analyze the activity of the combination of trabectedin and palliative radiotherapy in the real-life setting, in patients with pretreated metastatic sarcoma. Our findings on 40 pretreated metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma patients, in terms of objective responses (overall response rate by RECIST of 32.5%) and outcome (median progression-free survival of 7.5 months and median overall survival of 23.5 months), confirm the activity of this regimen, which is a valuable option to consider, especially in patients in which a dimensional response could help for symptomatic control. Abstract Symptomatic control and tumoral shrinkage is an unmet need in advanced soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) patients beyond first-line. The combination of trabectedin and radiotherapy showed activity in a recently reported clinical trial in this setting. This retrospective series aims to analyze our experience with the same regimen in the real-life setting. We retrospectively reviewed advanced sarcoma patients treated with trabectedin concomitantly with radiotherapy with palliative intent. Growth-modulation index (GMI) was calculated as a surrogate of efficacy. Forty metastatic patients were analyzed. According to RECIST, there was one (2.5%) complete response, 12 (30%) partial responses, 18 (45%) disease stabilizations, and nine (22.5%) progressions. After a median follow-up of 15 months (range 2–38), median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 7.5 months (95% CI 2.8–12.2) and 23.5 months (95% CI 1.1–45.8), respectively. Median GMI was 1.42 (range 0.19–23.76), and in 16 (53%) patients, it was >1.33. In patients with GMI >1.33, median OS was significantly longer than in those with GMI 0–1.33 (median OS 52.1 months (95% CI not reached) vs. 8.9 months (95% CI 6.3–11.6), p = 0.028). The combination of trabectedin plus radiotherapy is an active therapeutic option in patients with advanced STS, especially when tumor shrinkage for symptomatic relief is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Hindi
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Av Manuel Siurot s/n, 41013 Sevilla, Spain; (N.H.); (I.C.G.); (A.S.-C.); (J.B.); (P.S.); (P.S.)
- TERABIS Group, IBiS (Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla), 41013 Sevilla, Spain; (P.S.-B.); (D.M.)
| | - Irene Carrasco García
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Av Manuel Siurot s/n, 41013 Sevilla, Spain; (N.H.); (I.C.G.); (A.S.-C.); (J.B.); (P.S.); (P.S.)
- TERABIS Group, IBiS (Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla), 41013 Sevilla, Spain; (P.S.-B.); (D.M.)
| | - Alberto Sánchez-Camacho
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Av Manuel Siurot s/n, 41013 Sevilla, Spain; (N.H.); (I.C.G.); (A.S.-C.); (J.B.); (P.S.); (P.S.)
| | - Antonio Gutierrez
- Hematology Department, University Hospital Son Espases, 07120 Mallorca, Spain;
| | - Javier Peinado
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital Virgen del Rocio, 41013 Sevilla, Spain; (J.P.); (I.R.)
- Biología Molecular del Cáncer, IBiS (Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla), 41013 Sevilla, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Inmaculada Rincón
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital Virgen del Rocio, 41013 Sevilla, Spain; (J.P.); (I.R.)
| | - Johanna Benedetti
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Av Manuel Siurot s/n, 41013 Sevilla, Spain; (N.H.); (I.C.G.); (A.S.-C.); (J.B.); (P.S.); (P.S.)
| | - Pilar Sancho
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Av Manuel Siurot s/n, 41013 Sevilla, Spain; (N.H.); (I.C.G.); (A.S.-C.); (J.B.); (P.S.); (P.S.)
| | - Paloma Santos
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Av Manuel Siurot s/n, 41013 Sevilla, Spain; (N.H.); (I.C.G.); (A.S.-C.); (J.B.); (P.S.); (P.S.)
- TERABIS Group, IBiS (Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla), 41013 Sevilla, Spain; (P.S.-B.); (D.M.)
| | - Paloma Sánchez-Bustos
- TERABIS Group, IBiS (Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla), 41013 Sevilla, Spain; (P.S.-B.); (D.M.)
| | - David Marcilla
- Pathology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Av Manuel Siurot s/n, 41013 Sevilla, Spain;
| | - Victor Encinas
- Musculoskeletal Unit, Radiology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Av Manuel Siurot s/n, 41013 Sevilla, Spain;
| | - Sara Chacon
- Musculoskeletal Tumor Unit, Orthopedics Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Av Manuel Siurot s/n, 41013 Sevilla, Spain;
| | - Cristobal Muñoz-Casares
- Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Av Manuel Siurot s/n, 41013 Sevilla, Spain;
| | - David Moura
- TERABIS Group, IBiS (Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla), 41013 Sevilla, Spain; (P.S.-B.); (D.M.)
| | - Javier Martin-Broto
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Av Manuel Siurot s/n, 41013 Sevilla, Spain; (N.H.); (I.C.G.); (A.S.-C.); (J.B.); (P.S.); (P.S.)
- TERABIS Group, IBiS (Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla), 41013 Sevilla, Spain; (P.S.-B.); (D.M.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +34-629-108-979
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Martin-Broto J, Hindi N, Grignani G, Martinez-Trufero J, Redondo A, Valverde C, Stacchiotti S, Lopez-Pousa A, D'Ambrosio L, Gutierrez A, Perez-Vega H, Encinas-Tobajas V, de Alava E, Collini P, Peña-Chilet M, Dopazo J, Carrasco-Garcia I, Lopez-Alvarez M, Moura DS, Lopez-Martin JA. Nivolumab and sunitinib combination in advanced soft tissue sarcomas: a multicenter, single-arm, phase Ib/II trial. J Immunother Cancer 2020; 8:jitc-2020-001561. [PMID: 33203665 PMCID: PMC7674086 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2020-001561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sarcomas exhibit low expression of factors related to immune response, which could explain the modest activity of PD-1 inhibitors. A potential strategy to convert a cold into an inflamed microenvironment lies on a combination therapy. As tumor angiogenesis promotes immunosuppression, we designed a phase Ib/II trial to test the double inhibition of angiogenesis (sunitinib) and PD-1/PD-L1 axis (nivolumab). METHODS This single-arm, phase Ib/II trial enrolled adult patients with selected subtypes of sarcoma. Phase Ib established two dose levels: level 0 with sunitinib 37.5 mg daily from day 1, plus nivolumab 3 mg/kg intravenously on day 15, and then every 2 weeks; and level -1 with sunitinib 37.5 mg on the first 14 days (induction) and then 25 mg per day plus nivolumab on the same schedule. The primary endpoint was to determine the recommended dose for phase II (phase I) and the 6-month progression-free survival rate, according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 (phase II). RESULTS From May 2017 to April 2019, 68 patients were enrolled: 16 in phase Ib and 52 in phase II. The recommended dose of sunitinib for phase II was 37.5 mg as induction and then 25 mg in combination with nivolumab. After a median follow-up of 17 months (4-26), the 6-month progression-free survival rate was 48% (95% CI 41% to 55%). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events included transaminitis (17.3%) and neutropenia (11.5%). CONCLUSIONS Sunitinib plus nivolumab is an active scheme with manageable toxicity in the treatment of selected patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma, with almost half of patients free of progression at 6 months.Trial registration number NCT03277924.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Martin-Broto
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla, Spain .,Institute of Biomedicine of Sevilla (IBIS, HUVR, CSIC, Universidad de Sevilla), Sevilla, Spain
| | - Nadia Hindi
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla, Spain.,Institute of Biomedicine of Sevilla (IBIS, HUVR, CSIC, Universidad de Sevilla), Sevilla, Spain
| | - Giovanni Grignani
- Division of Medical Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS - Str. Prov.le 142, km. 3,95 - Candiolo (TO) 10060, Candiolo, Italy
| | | | - Andres Redondo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Claudia Valverde
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Silvia Stacchiotti
- Cancer Medicine Department, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Via Venezian 1, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Lorenzo D'Ambrosio
- Division of Medical Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS - Str. Prov.le 142, km. 3,95 - Candiolo (TO) 10060, Candiolo, Italy
| | - Antonio Gutierrez
- Medical Hematology Department, University Hospital Son Espases, Mallorca, Spain
| | | | | | - Enrique de Alava
- Institute of Biomedicine of Sevilla (IBiS), Virgen del Rocio University Hospital /CSIC/University of Sevilla/CIBERONC, Sevilla, Spain.,Department of Normal and Pathological Cytology and Histology, School of Medicine, University of Seville, 41009, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Paola Collini
- Soft Tissue and Bone Pathology, Histopathology and Pediatric Pathology Unit, Diagnostic Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Department, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Peña-Chilet
- Institute of Biomedicine of Sevilla (IBIS, HUVR, CSIC, Universidad de Sevilla), Sevilla, Spain.,Clinical Bioinformatics Area, Fundación Progreso y Salud (FPS). CDCA, Hospital Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla, Spain.,Bioinformatics in Rare Diseases (BiER), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), FPS, Hospital Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Joaquin Dopazo
- Institute of Biomedicine of Sevilla (IBIS, HUVR, CSIC, Universidad de Sevilla), Sevilla, Spain.,Clinical Bioinformatics Area, Fundación Progreso y Salud (FPS). CDCA, Hospital Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla, Spain.,Bioinformatics in Rare Diseases (BiER), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), FPS, Hospital Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla, Spain.,INB-ELIXIR-es, FPS, Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Irene Carrasco-Garcia
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla, Spain.,Institute of Biomedicine of Sevilla (IBIS, HUVR, CSIC, Universidad de Sevilla), Sevilla, Spain
| | - Maria Lopez-Alvarez
- Institute of Biomedicine of Sevilla (IBIS, HUVR, CSIC, Universidad de Sevilla), Sevilla, Spain
| | - David S Moura
- Institute of Biomedicine of Sevilla (IBIS, HUVR, CSIC, Universidad de Sevilla), Sevilla, Spain
| | - Jose A Lopez-Martin
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Larotrectinib versus Prior Therapies in Tropomyosin Receptor Kinase Fusion Cancer: An Intra-Patient Comparative Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12113246. [PMID: 33158040 PMCID: PMC7692104 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12113246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Revised: 10/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Clinical trials for new drugs to treat rare diseases are difficult to evaluate due to the limited patient population available for recruitment. Growth modulation index (GMI) is a very useful tool in these instances, as this calculation compares the patient’s outcome on the current drug to the same patient’s outcome on their most recent prior therapy, using the patient as their own control. GMI is the ratio of progression-free survival on the current therapy to time to progression on the last prior line of therapy and offers a method to determine if the investigational drug provides a benefit compared to the patient’s last prior treatment. Using a GMI ≥ 1.33 as the threshold of meaningful clinical activity, we found that larotrectinib, a tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitor approved to treat patients with TRK fusion cancer, improves progression-free survival for most patients with TRK fusion cancer compared with prior therapy. Abstract Randomized controlled basket trials investigating drugs targeting a rare molecular alteration are challenging. Using patients as their own control overcomes some of these challenges. Growth modulation index (GMI) is the ratio of progression-free survival (PFS) on the current therapy to time to progression (TTP) on the last prior line of therapy; GMI ≥ 1.33 is considered a threshold of meaningful clinical activity. In a retrospective, exploratory analysis among patients with advanced tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) fusion cancer treated with the selective TRK inhibitor larotrectinib who received ≥1 prior line of therapy for locally advanced/metastatic disease, we determined the proportion of patients with GMI ≥ 1.33; patients who had not progressed by data cut-off were censored for PFS. Among 72 eligible patients, median GMI was 2.68 (range 0.01–48.75). Forty-seven patients (65%) had GMI ≥ 1.33; 13/25 patients (52%) with GMI < 1.33 had not yet progressed on larotrectinib. Kaplan–Meier estimates showed a median GMI of 6.46. The probability of attaining GMI ≥ 1.33 was 0.75 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.65–0.85). Median TTP on previous treatment was 3.0 months (95% CI, 2.6–4.4). Median PFS on larotrectinib was not estimable ((NE); 95% CI, NE; hazard ratio, 0.220 (95% CI, 0.146–0.332)). This analysis suggests larotrectinib improves PFS for patients with TRK fusion cancer compared with prior therapy.
Collapse
|
16
|
Gallego A, Ramon-Patino J, Brenes J, Mendiola M, Berjon A, Casado G, Castelo B, Espinosa E, Hernandez A, Hardisson D, Feliu J, Redondo A. Bevacizumab in recurrent ovarian cancer: could it be particularly effective in patients with clear cell carcinoma? Clin Transl Oncol 2020; 23:536-542. [PMID: 32651885 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-020-02446-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Accepted: 06/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Treatment of recurrent ovarian carcinoma is a challenge, particularly for the clear cell (CCC) subtype. However, there is a preclinical rationale that these patients could achieve a benefit from antiangiogenic therapy. To assess this hypothesis, we used the growth modulation index (GMI), which represents an intrapatient comparison of two successive progression-free survival (PFS). METHODS We conducted a retrospective real-world study performed on 34 patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, treated with bevacizumab-containing regimens from January 2009 to December 2017. The primary endpoint was GMI. An established cut-off > 1.33 was defined as a sign of drug activity. RESULTS 73.5% of patients had high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC), and 17.7% had CCC; 70.6% of patients received carboplatin/gemcitabine/bevacizumab, and 29.4% received weekly paclitaxel/bevacizumab. According to histological subtype, the overall response rate and median PFS were 52% and 14 months for HGSOC and 83.3% and 20 months for CCC, respectively. The overall population median GMI was 0.99; it was 0.95 and 2.36 for HGSOC and CCC, respectively. CCC subtype was significantly correlated with GMI > 1.33 (odds ratio 41.67; 95% confidence interval 3.6-486.94; p = .03). CONCLUSION Adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy in recurrent CCC is associated with a remarkable benefit in this cohort. The efficacy of antiangiogenic drugs in CCC warrants further prospective evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Gallego
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.,Translational Oncology Research Laboratory, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
| | - J Ramon-Patino
- Translational Oncology Research Laboratory, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
| | - J Brenes
- Department of Medical Oncology, Instituto Catalán de Oncología, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Mendiola
- Molecular Pathology and Therapeutic Targets Group, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.,Center for Biomedical Research in the Cancer Network (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, CIBERONC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - A Berjon
- Molecular Pathology and Therapeutic Targets Group, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.,Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - G Casado
- Department of Pharmacy, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - B Castelo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.,Translational Oncology Research Laboratory, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.,Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.,Cátedra Universidad Autónoma de Madrid UAM-Amgen, Madrid, Spain
| | - E Espinosa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.,Translational Oncology Research Laboratory, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.,Center for Biomedical Research in the Cancer Network (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, CIBERONC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.,Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.,Cátedra Universidad Autónoma de Madrid UAM-Amgen, Madrid, Spain
| | - A Hernandez
- Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.,Department of Gynecology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - D Hardisson
- Molecular Pathology and Therapeutic Targets Group, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.,Center for Biomedical Research in the Cancer Network (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, CIBERONC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.,Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.,Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - J Feliu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.,Translational Oncology Research Laboratory, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.,Center for Biomedical Research in the Cancer Network (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, CIBERONC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.,Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.,Cátedra Universidad Autónoma de Madrid UAM-Amgen, Madrid, Spain
| | - A Redondo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain. .,Translational Oncology Research Laboratory, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain. .,Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. .,Cátedra Universidad Autónoma de Madrid UAM-Amgen, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Italiano A, Mir O, Mathoulin-Pelissier S, Penel N, Piperno-Neumann S, Bompas E, Chevreau C, Duffaud F, Entz-Werlé N, Saada E, Ray-Coquard I, Lervat C, Gaspar N, Marec-Berard P, Pacquement H, Wright J, Toulmonde M, Bessede A, Crombe A, Kind M, Bellera C, Blay JY. Cabozantinib in patients with advanced Ewing sarcoma or osteosarcoma (CABONE): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2020; 21:446-455. [PMID: 32078813 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30825-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 153] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2019] [Revised: 11/23/2019] [Accepted: 12/10/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with Ewing sarcoma or osteosarcoma have a median overall survival of less than 12 months after diagnosis, and a standard treatment strategy has not yet been established. Pharmacological inhibition of MET signalling and aberrant angiogenesis has shown promising results in several preclinical models of Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma. We aimed to investigate the activity of cabozantinib, an inhibitor of MET and VEGFR2, in patients with advanced Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma. METHODS We did a multicentre, single-arm, two-stage, phase 2 trial in patients with advanced Ewing sarcoma or osteosarcoma recruited from ten centres in the French Sarcoma Group. Key eligibility criteria were aged 12 years or older, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, and documented disease progression (according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1) before study entry. The number of previous lines of treatment was not limited. Patients received cabozantinib (adults 60 mg, children [<16 years] 40 mg/m2) orally once daily in 28-day cycles until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, the investigator's decision to discontinue, or participant withdrawal. The primary endpoint for Ewing sarcoma was best objective response within 6 months of treatment onset; for osteosarcoma, a dual primary endpoint of 6-month objective response and 6-month non-progression was assessed. All enrolled patients who received at least one dose of cabozantinib were included in the safety analysis, and all participants who received at least one complete or two incomplete treatment cycles were included in the efficacy population. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02243605. FINDINGS Between April 16, 2015, and July 12, 2018, 90 patients (45 with Ewing sarcoma 45 with osteosarcoma) were recruited to the study. Median follow-up was 31·3 months (95% CI 12·4-35·4) for patients with Ewing sarcoma and 31·1 months (24·4-31·7) for patients with osteosarcoma. 39 (87%) patients with Ewing sarcoma and 42 (93%) patients with osteosarcoma were assessable for efficacy after histological and radiological review. In patients with Ewing sarcoma, ten (26%; 95% CI 13-42) of 39 patients had an objective response (all partial responses) by 6 months; in patients with osteosarcoma, five (12%; 4-26) of 42 patients had an objective response (all partial responses) and 14 (33%; 20-50) had 6-month non-progression. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were hypophosphataemia (five [11%] for Ewing sarcoma, three [7%] for osteosarcoma), aspartate aminotransferase increase (two [4%] for Ewing sarcoma, three [7%] for osteosarcoma), palmar-plantar syndrome (three [7%] for Ewing sarcoma, two [4%] for osteosarcoma), pneumothorax (one [2%] for Ewing sarcoma, four [9%] for osteosarcoma), and neutropenia (two [4%] for Ewing sarcoma, four [9%] for osteosarcoma). At least one serious adverse event was reported in 61 (68%) of 90 patients. No patients died from drug-related toxic effects. INTERPRETATION Cabozantinib has antitumor activity in patients with advanced Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma and was generally well tolerated. Cabozantinib could represent a new therapeutic option in this setting, and deserves further investigation. FUNDING Institut Bergonié; French National Cancer Institute; Association pour la Recherche contre le Cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine Italiano
- Early Phase Trials and Sarcoma Unit, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
| | - Olivier Mir
- Department of Medicine, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Simone Mathoulin-Pelissier
- Unité d'épidémiologie et de recherche cliniques, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Inserm UMR 1219, Équipe Epicene, Bordeaux, France; Inserm CIC-EC 1401, Bordeaux, France
| | - Nicolas Penel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, University of Lille, Lille, France
| | | | - Emmanuelle Bompas
- Department of Medicine, Institut Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Nantes, France
| | | | - Florence Duffaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital La Timone, Marseille, France
| | - Natacha Entz-Werlé
- Department of Tumor Pediatrics, University Hospital Centre of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Esma Saada
- Department of Medicine, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | | | - Cyril Lervat
- Department of Tumor Pediatrics, Centre Oscar Lambret, University of Lille, Lille, France
| | - Nathalie Gaspar
- Department of Tumor Pediatrics, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | | | - John Wright
- Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP), Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Maud Toulmonde
- Early Phase Trials and Sarcoma Unit, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | | | | | | | - Carine Bellera
- Unité d'épidémiologie et de recherche cliniques, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Inserm CIC-EC 1401, Bordeaux, France
| | - Jean-Yves Blay
- Department of Medicine, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
A comprehensive review on the diagnosis and management of intimal sarcoma of the pulmonary artery. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2020; 147:102889. [PMID: 32035299 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.102889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2018] [Revised: 01/20/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Only a few hundred cases of intimal sarcomas of pulmonary artery (ISPA) were reported on the literature. Diagnosis of this rare entity is a challenging dilemma with the need for a high expertise in the radiological and pathological identification of ISPA. Treatment strategies rely initially on an early aggressive surgery aiming for complete surgical resection with clear margins while no clear recommendations guiding the choice for additional drug therapy or radiotherapy exist. In this article, we perform an extensive review of the literature on ISPA with details on the clinical presentation, diagnosis and management strategies. An additional goal of this paper is to make practicing oncologists aware of this rare entity with clear idea on the initial management.
Collapse
|
19
|
Kobayashi H, Iwata S, Wakamatsu T, Hayakawa K, Yonemoto T, Wasa J, Oka H, Ueda T, Tanaka S. Efficacy and safety of trabectedin for patients with unresectable and relapsed soft-tissue sarcoma in Japan: A Japanese Musculoskeletal Oncology Group study. Cancer 2019; 126:1253-1263. [PMID: 31825533 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Revised: 11/20/2019] [Accepted: 11/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although initial trabectedin (1.2 mg/m2 ) is safe and effective for patients with translocation-related sarcoma (TRS) in Japan, its efficacy in other types of soft-tissue sarcomas (STSs) remains unknown. This study retrospectively investigated its efficacy and safety through postmarketing surveillance of trabectedin in patients with unresectable and relapsed STS. METHODS One hundred forty patients received intravenous trabectedin (1.2 mg/m2 on day 1 every 21 days) over the course of 24 hours. The primary endpoint was the efficacy and safety of trabectedin. RESULTS Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 100 patients (71%) and included hepatotoxicity (37.8%), neutropenia (32.8%), and rhabdomyolysis (3.6%). Patients at high risk for grade 3 or higher rhabdomyolysis (36%) were classified by height (≥170.3 cm) and age (≤32 years) through a classification and regression tree model (area under the curve, 0.9). The overall median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.7 months; with respect to the histological type, the median PFS was 17.4 months for myxoid liposarcoma, 4.9 months for leiomyosarcoma, 5.6 months for synovial sarcoma, and 3.7 months for dedifferentiated liposarcoma. Histological type (liposarcoma/leiomyosarcoma [L-sarcoma] and TRS) and grade 3 neutropenia (but not grade 4) were associated with significantly improved PFS after trabectedin treatment (P = .003, P = .04, and P = .001). The median growth modulation index (GMI) was 0.91; 37 patients (36.7%) experienced a GMI > 1.33, and among patients with solitary fibrous tumors and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, 60% and 42.9%, respectively, had a GMI > 1.33. The median overall survival (OS) was 16.4 months. A GMI > 1.33 was associated with significantly improved OS (P = .0006). CONCLUSIONS Initial trabectedin at 1.2 mg/m2 has clinically meaningful benefits for patients with L-sarcoma and certain histological subtypes of TRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroshi Kobayashi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shintaro Iwata
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toru Wakamatsu
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology Service, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Keiko Hayakawa
- Department of Orthopedic Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tsukasa Yonemoto
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Junji Wasa
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Oka
- Department of Medical Research and Management for Musculoskeletal Pain, 22nd Century Medical and Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takafumi Ueda
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Sakae Tanaka
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Assi T, Kattan J, El Rassy E, Honore C, Dumont S, Mir O, Le Cesne A. A comprehensive review of the current evidence for trabectedin in advanced myxoid liposarcoma. Cancer Treat Rev 2019; 72:37-44. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2018] [Revised: 11/12/2018] [Accepted: 11/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
21
|
Trabectedin and olaparib in patients with advanced and non-resectable bone and soft-tissue sarcomas (TOMAS): an open-label, phase 1b study from the Italian Sarcoma Group. Lancet Oncol 2018; 19:1360-1371. [PMID: 30217671 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30438-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2018] [Revised: 06/03/2018] [Accepted: 06/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Trabectedin is an alkylating drug with a unique mechanism of action causing single-strand and double-strand DNA breaks that activate DNA damage-response pathways. Based on our preclinical data, we hypothesised that poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) inhibitors might be an ideal partner of trabectedin and aimed to assess the safety, identify the recommended phase 2 dose, and explore preliminary signs of activity of trabectedin and olaparib combination treatment in patients with bone and soft-tissue sarcoma. METHODS We did an open-label, multicentre, phase 1b study, recruiting patients from the national Italian sarcoma network aged 18 years and older with histologically confirmed bone and soft-tissue sarcoma progressing after standard treatments with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 or less. In a classic 3 + 3 design, patients received a 24 h infusion of trabectedin on day 1 and olaparib orally twice a day in 21-day cycles across six dose levels (trabectedin 0·675-1·3 mg/m2 every 3 weeks; olaparib 100-300 mg twice a day from day 1 to 21). Intermediate dose levels were permitted to improve safety and tolerability. The primary endpoint was determination of the recommended phase 2 dose (the maximum tolerated dose). Safety and antitumour activity were assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of the study drugs. We report the results of the dose-escalation and dose-expansion cohorts. The trial is still active but closed to enrolment, and follow-up for patients who completed treatment is ongoing. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02398058. FINDINGS Between Nov 17, 2014, and Jan 30, 2017, of 54 patients assessed for eligibility, we enrolled 50 patients: 28 patients in the dose-escalation cohort and 22 patients in the dose-expansion cohort. Patients received a median of four cycles of treatment (IQR 2-6; range 1-17 [the patients who received the highest number of cycles are still on treatment]) with a median follow-up of 10 months (IQR 5-23). Considering all dose levels, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were lymphopenia (32 [64%] of 50 patients), neutropenia (31 [62%]), thrombocytopenia (14 [28%]), anaemia (13 [26%]), hypophosphataemia (20 [40%]), and alanine aminotransferase concentration increase (9 [18%]). No treatment-related life-threatening adverse events or deaths occurred. One (2%) patient interrupted treatment without progression without reporting any specific toxicity. Observed dose-limiting toxicities were thrombocytopenia, neutropenia for more than 7 days, and febrile neutropenia. We selected intermediate dose level 4b (trabectedin 1·1 mg/m2 every 3 weeks plus olaparib 150 mg twice a day) as the recommended phase 2 dose. Seven (14%; 95% CI 6-27) of 50 patients achieved a partial response according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors 1.1. INTERPRETATION Trabectedin and olaparib in combination showed manageable toxicities at active dose levels for both drugs. Preliminary data on antitumour activity are encouraging. Two dedicated phase 2 studies are planned to assess activity of this combination in both ovarian cancer (EudraCT2018-000230-35) and soft-tissue sarcomas. FUNDING Italian Association for Cancer Research, Italian Sarcoma Group, Foundation for Research on Musculoskeletal and Rare Tumors, and Italian Ministry of Health.
Collapse
|
22
|
Esser M, Kloth C, Thaiss WM, Reinert CP, Fritz J, Kopp HG, Horger M. CT-response patterns and the role of CT-textural features in inoperable abdominal/retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas treated with trabectedin. Eur J Radiol 2018; 107:175-182. [PMID: 30292263 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2018] [Revised: 08/06/2018] [Accepted: 09/05/2018] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate CT patterns and textural features of soft tissue sarcomas following trabectedin therapy as well as their suitability for predicting therapeutic response. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 31 patients (18 female, 13 male; mean age, 58.0years; range, 38-79years) with sarcoma under trabectedin as a third-line therapy between October 2008 and July 2017 underwent baseline and follow-up contrast-enhanced CT. Response evaluation was based on modifiedCHOI-criteria and RECIST1.1, classified as partial response(PR), stable disease(SD), progressive disease(PD). For CT-texture analysis (CTTA), mean, entropy and uniformity of intensity/skewness/entropy of co-occurrence matrix (COM) and contrast of neighboring-grey-level-dependence-matrix (NGLDM) were calculated. RESULTS Following CHOI-criteria, 9 patients achieved PR, 10 SD and 12 PD. RECIST1.1. classified patients into 5 PR, 15 SD and 11 PD. A frequent (n = 6/31; 19.3%) pattern of response was tumor liquefaction. In responders differences in entropy of entropy-NGLDM(p = 0.028) and uniformity-NGLDM(p = 0.021), in non-responders entropy of average(p = 0.039), deviation(p = 0.04) and uniformity of deviation(p = 0.013) occured between baseline and follow-up. Mean intensity and average were higher when liquefication occured(p = 0.03; p = 0.02), whereas mean deviation was lower(p = 0.02) at baseline compared to other response patterns. Differences in mean(p = 0.023), entropy(p = 0.049) and uniformity(p = 0.023) of entropy-NGLDM were found between responders and non-responders at follow-up. For the mean of heterogeneity a cut-off value was calculated for prediction of response in baseline CTTA (0.12; sensitivity 89%; specificity 77%). CONCLUSION A frequent pattern of response to trabectedin was tumor liquefication being responsible for pseudoprogression, therefore modifiedCHOI should be preferred. Single CT-textural features can be used complementarily for prediction and monitoring response to trabectedin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Esser
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls- University, Hoppe-Seyler-Str.3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
| | - Cristopher Kloth
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls- University, Hoppe-Seyler-Str.3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
| | - Wolfgang Maximilian Thaiss
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls- University, Hoppe-Seyler-Str.3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
| | - Christian Philipp Reinert
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls- University, Hoppe-Seyler-Str.3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
| | - Jan Fritz
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, 601 N. Caroline Street, JHOC 3140A, Baltimore, MD, 21287, United States.
| | - Hans-Georg Kopp
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Eberhard-Karls- University, Otfried-Müller-Str. 10, 72076, Tübingen, Germany; Department of Molecular Oncology, Robert-Bosch-Hospital, Auerbacherstr. 110, Stuttgart, 70736, Germany.
| | - Marius Horger
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls- University, Hoppe-Seyler-Str.3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Brodowicz T, Mir O, Wallet J, Italiano A, Blay JY, Bertucci F, Eisterer W, Chevreau C, Piperno-Neumann S, Bompas E, Ryckewaert T, Liegl-Antzwager B, Thery J, Penel N, Le Cesne A, Le Deley MC. Efficacy and safety of regorafenib compared to placebo and to post-cross-over regorafenib in advanced non-adipocytic soft tissue sarcoma. Eur J Cancer 2018; 99:28-36. [PMID: 29902612 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2018] [Revised: 04/24/2018] [Accepted: 05/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The placebo-controlled phase-2 REGOSARC trial demonstrated the efficacy of regorafenib in patients with leiomyosarcoma, synovial sarcoma and other non-adipocytic sarcoma but not in liposarcoma. Patients initially allocated to placebo were allowed to receive regorafenib after progression. We report here an updated analysis of the trial including evaluation of regorafenib activity after cross-over. METHODS From June 2013 to December 2014, 139 patients were enrolled in the non-adipocytic sarcoma cohorts. Median follow-up is now 32.4 months. Benefit of regorafenib versus placebo in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from randomisation was estimated by hazard ratio (HR) in Cox models. In the placebo arm, intra-patient benefit of regorafenib after cross-over was evaluated by the growth modulation index (GMI) (GMI was here, for each patient, PFS after cross-over regorafenib divided by PFS with placebo). Furthermore, the activity of delayed (after cross-over) versus early (at study entry) regorafenib was evaluated by comparing PFS after cross-over to regorafenib to PFS after randomisation in the regorafenib arm. RESULTS PFS benefit of regorafenib as compared to placebo was confirmed with longer follow-up (HR = 0.50; 95% CI: 0.35-0.71; p < .0001). OS was not statistically significant different (HR = 0.78; 0.54-1.12; p = .18). This finding may partially be explained by the fact that 55/68 patients who progressed on placebo (81%) received cross-over Regorafenib after progression: 59% of them had a GMI ≥ 1.3 (95% CI, 45-71%). Delayed start of regorafenib was associated with a statistically non-significant shorter PFS as compared to early treatment (HR = 1.21; 0.84-1.73; p = .30) without impact on OS. CONCLUSIONS Observed PFS confirms that regorafenib warrants further clinical investigation in refractory non-adipocytic sarcomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Brodowicz
- Department of Medicine /Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, General Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center - MusculoSkeletalTumorUnit, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria; Sarcoma Platform Austria, Austria.
| | - Olivier Mir
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, 114 rue Edouard Vaillant, 94800 Villejuif, France.
| | - Jennifer Wallet
- Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, Centre Oscar Lambret, 3 rue Combemale, 59000 Lille, France.
| | - Antoine Italiano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, 229 Cours de l'Argonne, 33000 Bordeaux, France; Department of Medicine, Institut Bergonié, 229 Cours de l'Argonne, 33000 Bordeaux, France.
| | - Jean-Yves Blay
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 rue Laennec, 69008, Lyon, France; Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, 43 boulevard du 11 novembre 1918, 69622, Villeurbanne cedex, France.
| | - François Bertucci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmette, 232 Boulevard de Sainte-Marguerite, 13009 Marseille, France.
| | - Wolfgang Eisterer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Klinikum Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Feschnigstraße 11, 9020 Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Austria; Sarcoma Platform Austria, Austria.
| | - Christine Chevreau
- Department of Medical Oncology, IUCT Oncopole, 1 Av. Irène Joliot-Curie, 31100 Toulouse, France.
| | | | - Emmanuelle Bompas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre René Gauducheau, St. Herblain, Saint-Herblain, France.
| | - Thomas Ryckewaert
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.
| | - Bernadette Liegl-Antzwager
- Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria; Sarcoma Platform Austria, Austria.
| | - Julien Thery
- Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, Centre Oscar Lambret, 3 rue Combemale, 59000 Lille, France.
| | - Nicolas Penel
- Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, Centre Oscar Lambret, 3 rue Combemale, 59000 Lille, France; Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital, 3 rue Combemale, 59000 Lille, France.
| | - Axel Le Cesne
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, 114 rue Edouard Vaillant, 94800 Villejuif, France.
| | - Marie-Cécile Le Deley
- Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, Centre Oscar Lambret, 3 rue Combemale, 59000 Lille, France; Paris-Saclay University, Univ. Paris-Sud, CESP, INSERM, Gustave Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Evaluation of Treatment Effect with Paired Failure Times in a Single-Arm Phase II Trial in Oncology. COMPUTATIONAL AND MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN MEDICINE 2018; 2018:1672176. [PMID: 29568321 PMCID: PMC5820554 DOI: 10.1155/2018/1672176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2017] [Accepted: 11/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
In early phase clinical trials of cytotoxic drugs in oncology, the efficacy is typically evaluated based on the tumor shrinkage. However, this criterion is not always appropriate for more recent cytostatic agents, and alternative endpoints have been proposed. The growth modulation index (GMI), defined as the ratio between the times to progression in two successive treatment lines, has been proposed for a single-arm phase II trials. The treatment effect is evaluated by estimating the rate of patients having a GMI superior to a given threshold. To estimate this rate, we investigated a parametric method based on the distribution of the times to progression and a nonparametric one based on a midrank estimator. Through simulations, we studied their operating characteristics and the impact of different design parameters (censoring, dependence, and distribution) on them. In these simulations, the nonparametric estimator slightly underestimated the rate and had slightly overconservative confidence intervals in some cases. Conversely, the parametric estimator overestimated the rate and had anticonservative confidence intervals in some cases. The nonparametric method appeared to be more robust to censoring than the parametric one. In conclusion, we recommend the nonparametric method, but the parametric method can be used as a supplementary tool.
Collapse
|
25
|
A noninterventional, multicenter, prospective phase IV study of trabectedin in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma. Anticancer Drugs 2018; 28:1157-1165. [PMID: 28926423 DOI: 10.1097/cad.0000000000000560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
This prospective, noninterventional study is the first phase IV trial designed to evaluate trabectedin in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma in real-life clinical practice across Europe. To be included in the study, patients must have received more than or equal to one cycle of trabectedin and be currently on treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival as defined by investigators. The secondary endpoints included objective response rate, disease control rate, time to progression and the growth modulation index (GMI), overall survival, and an assessment of the cancer-related symptoms and safety. A total of 218 patients from 41 European centers were evaluated. Patients received a median of six cycles per patient, mostly on an outpatient basis (n=132; 60.6%). The median progression-free survival was 5.9 months, with 70 and 49% of patients free from progression at 3 and 6 months after treatment, respectively. Three (1.4%) patients achieved a complete response and 55 (25.2%) patients achieved a partial response for an objective response rate of 26.6%. A total of 85 (39.0%) patients had disease stabilization for a disease control rate of 65.6%. The median GMI was 0.8, with 5.1 and 38.8% of patients with a GMI of greater than 1.1 to less than 1.33 and greater than or equal to 1.33, respectively. The median overall survival was 21.3 months. Febrile neutropenia (2.3% of patients), neutropenia, nausea, and pneumonia (1.4% each) were the most common trabectedin-related grade 3/4 serious adverse drug reactions. Trabectedin confers clinically meaningful long-term benefits to patients with multiple soft tissue sarcoma histotypes, being either comparable or better than those observed previously in clinical trials, and with a manageable safety profile.
Collapse
|
26
|
|
27
|
Mir O, Brodowicz T, Italiano A, Wallet J, Blay JY, Bertucci F, Chevreau C, Piperno-Neumann S, Bompas E, Salas S, Perrin C, Delcambre C, Liegl-Atzwanger B, Toulmonde M, Dumont S, Ray-Coquard I, Clisant S, Taieb S, Guillemet C, Rios M, Collard O, Bozec L, Cupissol D, Saada-Bouzid E, Lemaignan C, Eisterer W, Isambert N, Chaigneau L, Cesne AL, Penel N. Safety and efficacy of regorafenib in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (REGOSARC): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2016; 17:1732-1742. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(16)30507-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 155] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2016] [Revised: 08/22/2016] [Accepted: 08/23/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
28
|
Gounder MM, Zer A, Tap WD, Salah S, Dickson MA, Gupta AA, Keohan ML, Loong HH, D'Angelo SP, Baker S, Condy M, Nyquist-Schultz K, Tanner L, Erinjeri JP, Jasmine FH, Friedlander S, Carlson R, Unger TJ, Saint-Martin JR, Rashal T, Ellis J, Kauffman M, Shacham S, Schwartz GK, Abdul Razak AR. Phase IB Study of Selinexor, a First-in-Class Inhibitor of Nuclear Export, in Patients With Advanced Refractory Bone or Soft Tissue Sarcoma. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34:3166-74. [PMID: 27458288 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.67.6346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PKs), pharmacodynamics, safety, and efficacy of selinexor, an oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export compound, in patients with advanced soft tissue or bone sarcoma with progressive disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS Fifty-four patients were treated with oral selinexor twice per week (on days 1 and 3) at one of three doses (30 mg/m(2), 50 mg/m(2), or flat dose of 60 mg) either continuously or on a schedule of 3 weeks on, 1 week off. PK analysis was performed under fasting and fed states (low v high fat content) and using various formulations of selinexor (tablet, capsule, or suspension). Tumor biopsies before and during treatment were evaluated for pharmacodynamic changes. RESULTS The most commonly reported drug-related adverse events (grade 1 or 2) were nausea, vomiting, anorexia, and fatigue, which were well managed with supportive care. Commonly reported grade 3 or 4 toxicities were fatigue, thrombocytopenia, anemia, lymphopenia, and leukopenia. Selinexor was significantly better tolerated when administered as a flat dose on an intermittent schedule. PK analysis of selinexor revealed a clinically insignificant increase (approximately 15% to 20%) in drug exposure when taken with food. Immunohistochemical analysis of paired tumor biopsies revealed increased nuclear accumulation of tumor suppressor proteins, decreased cell proliferation, increased apoptosis, and stromal deposition. Of the 52 patients evaluable for response, none experienced an objective response by RECIST (version 1.1); however, 17 (33%) showed durable (≥ 4 months) stable disease, including seven (47%) of 15 evaluable patients with dedifferentiated liposarcoma. CONCLUSION Selinexor was well tolerated at a 60-mg flat dose on a 3-weeks-on, 1-week-off schedule. There was no clinically meaningful impact of food on PKs. Preliminary evidence of anticancer activity in sarcoma was demonstrated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mrinal M Gounder
- Mrinal M. Gounder, William D. Tap, Mark A. Dickson, Mary Louise Keohan, Sandra P. D'Angelo, Mercedes Condy, Lanier Tanner, Joseph P. Erinjeri, and Francis H. Jasmine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College; Gary K. Schwartz, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Alona Zer, Samer Salah, Abha A. Gupta, Herbert H. Loong, Stephanie Baker, Kjirsten Nyquist-Schultz, and Albiruni Ryan Abdul Razak, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Sharon Friedlander, Robert Carlson, Thaddeus J. Unger, Jean-Richard Saint-Martin, Tami Rashal, Joel Ellis, Michael Kauffman, and Sharon Shacham, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Newton, MA.
| | - Alona Zer
- Mrinal M. Gounder, William D. Tap, Mark A. Dickson, Mary Louise Keohan, Sandra P. D'Angelo, Mercedes Condy, Lanier Tanner, Joseph P. Erinjeri, and Francis H. Jasmine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College; Gary K. Schwartz, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Alona Zer, Samer Salah, Abha A. Gupta, Herbert H. Loong, Stephanie Baker, Kjirsten Nyquist-Schultz, and Albiruni Ryan Abdul Razak, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Sharon Friedlander, Robert Carlson, Thaddeus J. Unger, Jean-Richard Saint-Martin, Tami Rashal, Joel Ellis, Michael Kauffman, and Sharon Shacham, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Newton, MA
| | - William D Tap
- Mrinal M. Gounder, William D. Tap, Mark A. Dickson, Mary Louise Keohan, Sandra P. D'Angelo, Mercedes Condy, Lanier Tanner, Joseph P. Erinjeri, and Francis H. Jasmine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College; Gary K. Schwartz, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Alona Zer, Samer Salah, Abha A. Gupta, Herbert H. Loong, Stephanie Baker, Kjirsten Nyquist-Schultz, and Albiruni Ryan Abdul Razak, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Sharon Friedlander, Robert Carlson, Thaddeus J. Unger, Jean-Richard Saint-Martin, Tami Rashal, Joel Ellis, Michael Kauffman, and Sharon Shacham, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Newton, MA
| | - Samer Salah
- Mrinal M. Gounder, William D. Tap, Mark A. Dickson, Mary Louise Keohan, Sandra P. D'Angelo, Mercedes Condy, Lanier Tanner, Joseph P. Erinjeri, and Francis H. Jasmine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College; Gary K. Schwartz, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Alona Zer, Samer Salah, Abha A. Gupta, Herbert H. Loong, Stephanie Baker, Kjirsten Nyquist-Schultz, and Albiruni Ryan Abdul Razak, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Sharon Friedlander, Robert Carlson, Thaddeus J. Unger, Jean-Richard Saint-Martin, Tami Rashal, Joel Ellis, Michael Kauffman, and Sharon Shacham, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Newton, MA
| | - Mark A Dickson
- Mrinal M. Gounder, William D. Tap, Mark A. Dickson, Mary Louise Keohan, Sandra P. D'Angelo, Mercedes Condy, Lanier Tanner, Joseph P. Erinjeri, and Francis H. Jasmine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College; Gary K. Schwartz, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Alona Zer, Samer Salah, Abha A. Gupta, Herbert H. Loong, Stephanie Baker, Kjirsten Nyquist-Schultz, and Albiruni Ryan Abdul Razak, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Sharon Friedlander, Robert Carlson, Thaddeus J. Unger, Jean-Richard Saint-Martin, Tami Rashal, Joel Ellis, Michael Kauffman, and Sharon Shacham, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Newton, MA
| | - Abha A Gupta
- Mrinal M. Gounder, William D. Tap, Mark A. Dickson, Mary Louise Keohan, Sandra P. D'Angelo, Mercedes Condy, Lanier Tanner, Joseph P. Erinjeri, and Francis H. Jasmine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College; Gary K. Schwartz, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Alona Zer, Samer Salah, Abha A. Gupta, Herbert H. Loong, Stephanie Baker, Kjirsten Nyquist-Schultz, and Albiruni Ryan Abdul Razak, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Sharon Friedlander, Robert Carlson, Thaddeus J. Unger, Jean-Richard Saint-Martin, Tami Rashal, Joel Ellis, Michael Kauffman, and Sharon Shacham, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Newton, MA
| | - Mary Louise Keohan
- Mrinal M. Gounder, William D. Tap, Mark A. Dickson, Mary Louise Keohan, Sandra P. D'Angelo, Mercedes Condy, Lanier Tanner, Joseph P. Erinjeri, and Francis H. Jasmine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College; Gary K. Schwartz, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Alona Zer, Samer Salah, Abha A. Gupta, Herbert H. Loong, Stephanie Baker, Kjirsten Nyquist-Schultz, and Albiruni Ryan Abdul Razak, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Sharon Friedlander, Robert Carlson, Thaddeus J. Unger, Jean-Richard Saint-Martin, Tami Rashal, Joel Ellis, Michael Kauffman, and Sharon Shacham, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Newton, MA
| | - Herbert H Loong
- Mrinal M. Gounder, William D. Tap, Mark A. Dickson, Mary Louise Keohan, Sandra P. D'Angelo, Mercedes Condy, Lanier Tanner, Joseph P. Erinjeri, and Francis H. Jasmine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College; Gary K. Schwartz, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Alona Zer, Samer Salah, Abha A. Gupta, Herbert H. Loong, Stephanie Baker, Kjirsten Nyquist-Schultz, and Albiruni Ryan Abdul Razak, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Sharon Friedlander, Robert Carlson, Thaddeus J. Unger, Jean-Richard Saint-Martin, Tami Rashal, Joel Ellis, Michael Kauffman, and Sharon Shacham, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Newton, MA
| | - Sandra P D'Angelo
- Mrinal M. Gounder, William D. Tap, Mark A. Dickson, Mary Louise Keohan, Sandra P. D'Angelo, Mercedes Condy, Lanier Tanner, Joseph P. Erinjeri, and Francis H. Jasmine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College; Gary K. Schwartz, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Alona Zer, Samer Salah, Abha A. Gupta, Herbert H. Loong, Stephanie Baker, Kjirsten Nyquist-Schultz, and Albiruni Ryan Abdul Razak, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Sharon Friedlander, Robert Carlson, Thaddeus J. Unger, Jean-Richard Saint-Martin, Tami Rashal, Joel Ellis, Michael Kauffman, and Sharon Shacham, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Newton, MA
| | - Stephanie Baker
- Mrinal M. Gounder, William D. Tap, Mark A. Dickson, Mary Louise Keohan, Sandra P. D'Angelo, Mercedes Condy, Lanier Tanner, Joseph P. Erinjeri, and Francis H. Jasmine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College; Gary K. Schwartz, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Alona Zer, Samer Salah, Abha A. Gupta, Herbert H. Loong, Stephanie Baker, Kjirsten Nyquist-Schultz, and Albiruni Ryan Abdul Razak, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Sharon Friedlander, Robert Carlson, Thaddeus J. Unger, Jean-Richard Saint-Martin, Tami Rashal, Joel Ellis, Michael Kauffman, and Sharon Shacham, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Newton, MA
| | - Mercedes Condy
- Mrinal M. Gounder, William D. Tap, Mark A. Dickson, Mary Louise Keohan, Sandra P. D'Angelo, Mercedes Condy, Lanier Tanner, Joseph P. Erinjeri, and Francis H. Jasmine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College; Gary K. Schwartz, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Alona Zer, Samer Salah, Abha A. Gupta, Herbert H. Loong, Stephanie Baker, Kjirsten Nyquist-Schultz, and Albiruni Ryan Abdul Razak, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Sharon Friedlander, Robert Carlson, Thaddeus J. Unger, Jean-Richard Saint-Martin, Tami Rashal, Joel Ellis, Michael Kauffman, and Sharon Shacham, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Newton, MA
| | - Kjirsten Nyquist-Schultz
- Mrinal M. Gounder, William D. Tap, Mark A. Dickson, Mary Louise Keohan, Sandra P. D'Angelo, Mercedes Condy, Lanier Tanner, Joseph P. Erinjeri, and Francis H. Jasmine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College; Gary K. Schwartz, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Alona Zer, Samer Salah, Abha A. Gupta, Herbert H. Loong, Stephanie Baker, Kjirsten Nyquist-Schultz, and Albiruni Ryan Abdul Razak, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Sharon Friedlander, Robert Carlson, Thaddeus J. Unger, Jean-Richard Saint-Martin, Tami Rashal, Joel Ellis, Michael Kauffman, and Sharon Shacham, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Newton, MA
| | - Lanier Tanner
- Mrinal M. Gounder, William D. Tap, Mark A. Dickson, Mary Louise Keohan, Sandra P. D'Angelo, Mercedes Condy, Lanier Tanner, Joseph P. Erinjeri, and Francis H. Jasmine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College; Gary K. Schwartz, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Alona Zer, Samer Salah, Abha A. Gupta, Herbert H. Loong, Stephanie Baker, Kjirsten Nyquist-Schultz, and Albiruni Ryan Abdul Razak, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Sharon Friedlander, Robert Carlson, Thaddeus J. Unger, Jean-Richard Saint-Martin, Tami Rashal, Joel Ellis, Michael Kauffman, and Sharon Shacham, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Newton, MA
| | - Joseph P Erinjeri
- Mrinal M. Gounder, William D. Tap, Mark A. Dickson, Mary Louise Keohan, Sandra P. D'Angelo, Mercedes Condy, Lanier Tanner, Joseph P. Erinjeri, and Francis H. Jasmine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College; Gary K. Schwartz, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Alona Zer, Samer Salah, Abha A. Gupta, Herbert H. Loong, Stephanie Baker, Kjirsten Nyquist-Schultz, and Albiruni Ryan Abdul Razak, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Sharon Friedlander, Robert Carlson, Thaddeus J. Unger, Jean-Richard Saint-Martin, Tami Rashal, Joel Ellis, Michael Kauffman, and Sharon Shacham, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Newton, MA
| | - Francis H Jasmine
- Mrinal M. Gounder, William D. Tap, Mark A. Dickson, Mary Louise Keohan, Sandra P. D'Angelo, Mercedes Condy, Lanier Tanner, Joseph P. Erinjeri, and Francis H. Jasmine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College; Gary K. Schwartz, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Alona Zer, Samer Salah, Abha A. Gupta, Herbert H. Loong, Stephanie Baker, Kjirsten Nyquist-Schultz, and Albiruni Ryan Abdul Razak, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Sharon Friedlander, Robert Carlson, Thaddeus J. Unger, Jean-Richard Saint-Martin, Tami Rashal, Joel Ellis, Michael Kauffman, and Sharon Shacham, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Newton, MA
| | - Sharon Friedlander
- Mrinal M. Gounder, William D. Tap, Mark A. Dickson, Mary Louise Keohan, Sandra P. D'Angelo, Mercedes Condy, Lanier Tanner, Joseph P. Erinjeri, and Francis H. Jasmine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College; Gary K. Schwartz, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Alona Zer, Samer Salah, Abha A. Gupta, Herbert H. Loong, Stephanie Baker, Kjirsten Nyquist-Schultz, and Albiruni Ryan Abdul Razak, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Sharon Friedlander, Robert Carlson, Thaddeus J. Unger, Jean-Richard Saint-Martin, Tami Rashal, Joel Ellis, Michael Kauffman, and Sharon Shacham, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Newton, MA
| | - Robert Carlson
- Mrinal M. Gounder, William D. Tap, Mark A. Dickson, Mary Louise Keohan, Sandra P. D'Angelo, Mercedes Condy, Lanier Tanner, Joseph P. Erinjeri, and Francis H. Jasmine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College; Gary K. Schwartz, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Alona Zer, Samer Salah, Abha A. Gupta, Herbert H. Loong, Stephanie Baker, Kjirsten Nyquist-Schultz, and Albiruni Ryan Abdul Razak, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Sharon Friedlander, Robert Carlson, Thaddeus J. Unger, Jean-Richard Saint-Martin, Tami Rashal, Joel Ellis, Michael Kauffman, and Sharon Shacham, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Newton, MA
| | - Thaddeus J Unger
- Mrinal M. Gounder, William D. Tap, Mark A. Dickson, Mary Louise Keohan, Sandra P. D'Angelo, Mercedes Condy, Lanier Tanner, Joseph P. Erinjeri, and Francis H. Jasmine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College; Gary K. Schwartz, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Alona Zer, Samer Salah, Abha A. Gupta, Herbert H. Loong, Stephanie Baker, Kjirsten Nyquist-Schultz, and Albiruni Ryan Abdul Razak, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Sharon Friedlander, Robert Carlson, Thaddeus J. Unger, Jean-Richard Saint-Martin, Tami Rashal, Joel Ellis, Michael Kauffman, and Sharon Shacham, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Newton, MA
| | - Jean-Richard Saint-Martin
- Mrinal M. Gounder, William D. Tap, Mark A. Dickson, Mary Louise Keohan, Sandra P. D'Angelo, Mercedes Condy, Lanier Tanner, Joseph P. Erinjeri, and Francis H. Jasmine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College; Gary K. Schwartz, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Alona Zer, Samer Salah, Abha A. Gupta, Herbert H. Loong, Stephanie Baker, Kjirsten Nyquist-Schultz, and Albiruni Ryan Abdul Razak, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Sharon Friedlander, Robert Carlson, Thaddeus J. Unger, Jean-Richard Saint-Martin, Tami Rashal, Joel Ellis, Michael Kauffman, and Sharon Shacham, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Newton, MA
| | - Tami Rashal
- Mrinal M. Gounder, William D. Tap, Mark A. Dickson, Mary Louise Keohan, Sandra P. D'Angelo, Mercedes Condy, Lanier Tanner, Joseph P. Erinjeri, and Francis H. Jasmine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College; Gary K. Schwartz, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Alona Zer, Samer Salah, Abha A. Gupta, Herbert H. Loong, Stephanie Baker, Kjirsten Nyquist-Schultz, and Albiruni Ryan Abdul Razak, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Sharon Friedlander, Robert Carlson, Thaddeus J. Unger, Jean-Richard Saint-Martin, Tami Rashal, Joel Ellis, Michael Kauffman, and Sharon Shacham, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Newton, MA
| | - Joel Ellis
- Mrinal M. Gounder, William D. Tap, Mark A. Dickson, Mary Louise Keohan, Sandra P. D'Angelo, Mercedes Condy, Lanier Tanner, Joseph P. Erinjeri, and Francis H. Jasmine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College; Gary K. Schwartz, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Alona Zer, Samer Salah, Abha A. Gupta, Herbert H. Loong, Stephanie Baker, Kjirsten Nyquist-Schultz, and Albiruni Ryan Abdul Razak, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Sharon Friedlander, Robert Carlson, Thaddeus J. Unger, Jean-Richard Saint-Martin, Tami Rashal, Joel Ellis, Michael Kauffman, and Sharon Shacham, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Newton, MA
| | - Michael Kauffman
- Mrinal M. Gounder, William D. Tap, Mark A. Dickson, Mary Louise Keohan, Sandra P. D'Angelo, Mercedes Condy, Lanier Tanner, Joseph P. Erinjeri, and Francis H. Jasmine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College; Gary K. Schwartz, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Alona Zer, Samer Salah, Abha A. Gupta, Herbert H. Loong, Stephanie Baker, Kjirsten Nyquist-Schultz, and Albiruni Ryan Abdul Razak, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Sharon Friedlander, Robert Carlson, Thaddeus J. Unger, Jean-Richard Saint-Martin, Tami Rashal, Joel Ellis, Michael Kauffman, and Sharon Shacham, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Newton, MA
| | - Sharon Shacham
- Mrinal M. Gounder, William D. Tap, Mark A. Dickson, Mary Louise Keohan, Sandra P. D'Angelo, Mercedes Condy, Lanier Tanner, Joseph P. Erinjeri, and Francis H. Jasmine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College; Gary K. Schwartz, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Alona Zer, Samer Salah, Abha A. Gupta, Herbert H. Loong, Stephanie Baker, Kjirsten Nyquist-Schultz, and Albiruni Ryan Abdul Razak, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Sharon Friedlander, Robert Carlson, Thaddeus J. Unger, Jean-Richard Saint-Martin, Tami Rashal, Joel Ellis, Michael Kauffman, and Sharon Shacham, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Newton, MA
| | - Gary K Schwartz
- Mrinal M. Gounder, William D. Tap, Mark A. Dickson, Mary Louise Keohan, Sandra P. D'Angelo, Mercedes Condy, Lanier Tanner, Joseph P. Erinjeri, and Francis H. Jasmine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College; Gary K. Schwartz, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Alona Zer, Samer Salah, Abha A. Gupta, Herbert H. Loong, Stephanie Baker, Kjirsten Nyquist-Schultz, and Albiruni Ryan Abdul Razak, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Sharon Friedlander, Robert Carlson, Thaddeus J. Unger, Jean-Richard Saint-Martin, Tami Rashal, Joel Ellis, Michael Kauffman, and Sharon Shacham, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Newton, MA
| | - Albiruni Ryan Abdul Razak
- Mrinal M. Gounder, William D. Tap, Mark A. Dickson, Mary Louise Keohan, Sandra P. D'Angelo, Mercedes Condy, Lanier Tanner, Joseph P. Erinjeri, and Francis H. Jasmine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College; Gary K. Schwartz, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Alona Zer, Samer Salah, Abha A. Gupta, Herbert H. Loong, Stephanie Baker, Kjirsten Nyquist-Schultz, and Albiruni Ryan Abdul Razak, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Sharon Friedlander, Robert Carlson, Thaddeus J. Unger, Jean-Richard Saint-Martin, Tami Rashal, Joel Ellis, Michael Kauffman, and Sharon Shacham, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Newton, MA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Araki N, Takahashi S, Sugiura H, Ueda T, Yonemoto T, Takahashi M, Morioka H, Hiraga H, Hiruma T, Kunisada T, Matsumine A, Kawai A. Retrospective inter- and intra-patient evaluation of trabectedin after best supportive care for patients with advanced translocation-related sarcoma after failure of standard chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer 2016; 56:122-130. [PMID: 26845175 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2015] [Revised: 12/04/2015] [Accepted: 12/14/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
AIM Our randomised phase II study showed the clinical benefit of trabectedin compared with best supportive care (BSC) in patients with advanced translocation-related sarcomas after the failure of standard chemotherapy. The aim of the present study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of trabectedin in the identical patients crossed over to trabectedin after disease progression in the BSC arm of the randomised study. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a single-arm study of the BSC patients of the randomised study in whom disease progressed. Trabectedin (1.2 mg/m(2)) was administered over 24 h on day 1 of a 21-d treatment cycle. The efficacy and safety of trabectedin after BSC were evaluated and retrospectively compared with the results of the randomised study. RESULTS Thirty patients crossed over to trabectedin. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.9-9.1) after crossover compared with 0.9 months (95% CI: 0.9-1.0) at BSC in the randomised study. PFS in the present study was comparable to that of the trabectedin arm in the randomised study. The number of patients with growth modulation index ≥1.33 was 25 (86%). Individual tumour volume was decreased in 11 patients after crossover. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were observed in 27 patients (96.4%). ADRs of grade III-IV were mainly bone marrow suppression and abnormal liver functions. CONCLUSION Trabectedin was revealed to be effective and well tolerated in the identical patients crossed over to trabectedin after disease progression in BSC. The present study is registered with the Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center, number JapicCTI-121853.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nobuhito Araki
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Osaka 537-8511, Japan.
| | - Shunji Takahashi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan
| | - Hideshi Sugiura
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya 464-8681, Japan; Department of Physical Therapy, Nagoya University School of Health Sciences, Nagoya 461-8673, Japan
| | - Takafumi Ueda
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka 540-0006, Japan
| | - Tsukasa Yonemoto
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba 260-8717, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Takahashi
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka 411-8777, Japan
| | - Hideo Morioka
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Hiraga
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hokkaido Cancer Center, Hokkaido 003-0804, Japan
| | - Toru Hiruma
- Department of Musculoskeletal Tumor Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama 241-8515, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Kunisada
- Department of Medical Materials for Musculoskeletal Reconstruction, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama 700-8558, Japan
| | - Akihiko Matsumine
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie 514-8507, Japan
| | - Akira Kawai
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Rare Cancer Center, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
De Sanctis R, Marrari A, Marchetti S, Mussi C, Balzarini L, Lutman FR, Daolio P, Bastoni S, Bertuzzi AF, Quagliuolo V, Santoro A. Efficacy of trabectedin in advanced soft tissue sarcoma: beyond lipo- and leiomyosarcoma. DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY 2015; 9:5785-91. [PMID: 26604682 PMCID: PMC4629957 DOI: 10.2147/dddt.s92395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Objective Trabectedin is effective in leiomyosarcoma and liposarcoma, especially the myxoid variant, related to the presence of the FUS-CHOP transcript. We evaluated the efficacy of trabectedin in specific subgroups of patients with soft tissue sarcomas (STS). Methods Seventy-two patients with advanced anthracycline-pretreated STS, who received trabectedin at a dose of 1.5 mg/m2 every 3 weeks by continuous 24-hour infusion, were retrospectively analyzed. Best response rate according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria and severe adverse events (AEs) according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE v4.02) were evaluated. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival and overall survival (OS). Results Median age was 48 (range, 20–75) years, with a median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0. The median number of previous chemotherapy regimens was 1 (range, 0–5). Median number of trabectedin cycles was 3 (range, 1–17). About 69/72 patients (95.8%) were evaluable for response: 9 patients (13%) achieved partial response and 26 (37.7%) stable disease. According to histotype, clinical benefit (partial response + stable disease) was reported in synovial sarcoma (n=5), retroperitoneal liposarcoma (n=10), myxoid liposarcoma (n=5), leiomyosarcoma (n=8), high-grade undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (n=5), Ewing/peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor (n=1), and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (n=1). Any grade AEs were noncumulative, reversible, and manageable. G3/G4 AEs included anemia (n=1, 1.4%), neutropenia (n=7, 9.6%), liver toxicity (n=6, 8.3%), and fatigue (n=2, 2.8%). With a median follow-up time of 11 (range, 2–23) months, median progression-free survival and OS of the entire cohort were 2.97 months and 16.5 months, respectively. Conclusion Our experience confirms trabectedin as an effective therapeutic option for metastatic lipo- and leiomyosarcoma and suggests promise in synovial sarcomas and high-grade undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rita De Sanctis
- Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Andrea Marrari
- Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Silvia Marchetti
- Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Chiara Mussi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Luca Balzarini
- Department of Radiology, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | | | - Primo Daolio
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Orthopaedic Institute "G. Pini", Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Bastoni
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Orthopaedic Institute "G. Pini", Milan, Italy
| | - Alexia Francesca Bertuzzi
- Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy ; Department of Medical Oncology, Adelaide and Meath Hospital, Incorporating the National Children's Hospital (AMNCH), Dublin, Ireland
| | - Vittorio Quagliuolo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Armando Santoro
- Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Khalifa J, Ouali M, Chaltiel L, Le Guellec S, Le Cesne A, Blay JY, Cousin P, Chaigneau L, Bompas E, Piperno-Neumann S, Bui-Nguyen B, Rios M, Delord JP, Penel N, Chevreau C. Efficacy of trabectedin in malignant solitary fibrous tumors: a retrospective analysis from the French Sarcoma Group. BMC Cancer 2015; 15:700. [PMID: 26472661 PMCID: PMC4608145 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-015-1697-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2014] [Accepted: 10/07/2015] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Advanced malignant solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs) are rare soft-tissue sarcomas with a poor prognosis. Several treatment options have been reported, but with uncertain rates of efficacy. Our aim is to describe the activity of trabectedin in a retrospective, multi-center French series of patients with SFTs. Methods Patients were mainly identified through the French RetrospectYon database and were treated between January 2008 and May 2013. Trabectedin was administered at an initial dose of 1.5 mg/m2, q3 weeks. The best tumor response was assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors 1.1. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The growth-modulation index (GMI) was defined as the ratio between the time to progression with trabectedin (TTPn) and the TTP with the immediately prior line of treatment (TTPn-1). Results Eleven patients treated with trabectedin for advanced SFT were identified. Trabectedin had been used as second-line treatment in 8 patients (72.7 %) and as at least third-line therapy in a further 3 (27.3 %). The best RECIST response was a partial response (PR) in one patient (9.1 %) and stable disease (SD) in eight patients (72.7 %). Disease-control rate (DCR = PR + SD) was 81.8 %. After a median follow-up of 29.2 months, the median PFS was 11.6 months (95 % CI = 2.0; 15.2 months) and the median OS was 22.3 months (95 % CI = 9.1 months; not reached). The median GMI was 1.49 (range: 0.11–4.12). Conclusion Trabectedin is a very promising treatment for advanced SFTs. Further investigations are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Khalifa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud/Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopôle, 1, avenue Irène Joliot-Curie, 31059, Toulouse Cedex 9, France.
| | - M Ouali
- Department of Statistics, Institut Claudius Regaud / Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopôle, 1, avenue Irène Joliot-Curie, 31059, Toulouse, France.
| | - L Chaltiel
- Department of Statistics, Institut Claudius Regaud / Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopôle, 1, avenue Irène Joliot-Curie, 31059, Toulouse, France.
| | - S Le Guellec
- Department of Pathology, Institut Claudius Regaud / Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopôle, 1, avenue Irène Joliot-Curie, 31059, Toulouse, France.
| | - A Le Cesne
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, 114 rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805, Villejuif, France.
| | - J-Y Blay
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 Promenade Léa et Napoléon Bullukian, 69008, Lyon, France.
| | - P Cousin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 Promenade Léa et Napoléon Bullukian, 69008, Lyon, France.
| | - L Chaigneau
- Department of Medical Oncology, Jean Minjoz University Hospital, 3 Boulevard Alexandre Fleming, 25030, Besançon, France.
| | - E Bompas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Site Hospitalier Nord Boulevard Jacques Monod, 44805, Saint-Herblain, France.
| | - S Piperno-Neumann
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75248, Paris, France.
| | - B Bui-Nguyen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, 229 cours de l'Argonne, 33000, Bordeaux, France.
| | - M Rios
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Alexis Vautrin, 6 Avenue de Bourgogne, 54519, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
| | - J-P Delord
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud/Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopôle, 1, avenue Irène Joliot-Curie, 31059, Toulouse Cedex 9, France.
| | - N Penel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, 3 Rue Frédéric Combemale, 59000, Lille, France.
| | - C Chevreau
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud/Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopôle, 1, avenue Irène Joliot-Curie, 31059, Toulouse Cedex 9, France.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Stacchiotti S, Sommer J. Building a global consensus approach to chordoma: a position paper from the medical and patient community. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16:e71-83. [PMID: 25638683 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(14)71190-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 296] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Chordomas are very rare bone malignant tumours that have had a shortage of effective treatments for a long time. New treatments are now available for both the local and the metastatic phase of the disease, but the degree of uncertainty in selecting the most appropriate treatment remains high and their adoption remains inconsistent across the world, resulting in suboptimum outcomes for many patients. In December, 2013, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) convened a consensus meeting to update its clinical practice guidelines on sarcomas. ESMO also hosted a parallel consensus meeting on chordoma that included more than 40 chordoma experts from several disciplines and from both sides of the Atlantic, with the contribution and sponsorship of the Chordoma Foundation, a global patient advocacy group. The consensus reached at that meeting is shown in this position paper.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Stacchiotti
- Adult Mesenchymal Tumour Medical Therapy Unit, Cancer Medicine Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Reid A, Martin-Liberal J, Benson C. Trabectedin for advanced soft tissue sarcomas: optimizing use. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2014; 10:1003-11. [PMID: 25540587 PMCID: PMC4270297 DOI: 10.2147/tcrm.s49330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with locally advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma have a poor outlook with median survival in the order of 1 year. There is therefore an urgent need for novel agents to impact this disease. Trabectedin is one such novel agent that has demonstrated activity for patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma and it was licensed in Europe in 2007 for patients in the second-line setting or first-line in those patients deemed unsuitable to receive cytotoxics. In order to best serve patients with novel agents, it is imperative to understand the mechanism or mechanisms of action and the best ways of assessing response in order to optimize antitumor activity. Frequently, the mechanism of action and the optimal means of assessing response will be different from those of traditional cytotoxics. Trial design should reflect these factors to ensure that active drugs are not wrongly marked as futile. This review discusses a number of factors that may influence the optimization of trabectedin use. These factors include the administration schedule, the optimal timing of trabectedin administration in the disease process, the histopathological and molecular subtypes that may be most sensitive to trabectedin, the challenge of assessing response, particularly using radiology, and, finally, the safety considerations with this agent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Reid
- Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Charlotte Benson
- Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Italiano A, Le Cesne A, Bellera C, Piperno-Neumann S, Duffaud F, Penel N, Cassier P, Domont J, Takebe N, Kind M, Coindre JM, Blay JY, Bui B. GDC-0449 in patients with advanced chondrosarcomas: a French Sarcoma Group/US and French National Cancer Institute Single-Arm Phase II Collaborative Study. Ann Oncol 2014; 24:2922-6. [PMID: 24170610 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pre-clinical data have suggested a therapeutic role of Hedgehog (Hh) pathway inhibitors in chondrosarcoma. METHODS This phase II trial included patients with progressive advanced chondrosarcoma. They received GDC-0449 150 mg/day (days 1-28, 28-day cycle). The primary end point was the 6-month clinical benefit rate (CBR) defined as the proportion of patients with non-progressive disease at 6 months. A 6-month CBR of 40% was considered as a reasonable objective to claim drug efficacy. RESULTS Between February 2011 and February 2012, 45 patients were included. Twenty had received prior chemotherapy. Thirty-nine were assessable for efficacy. The 6-month CBR was 25.6% (95% confidence interval 13.0-42.1). All stable patients had grade 1 or 2 conventional chondrosarcoma with documented progression within the 6 months before inclusion. All but one with available data also had overexpression of the Hh ligand. Median progression-free and overall survivals were 3.5 and 12.4 months, respectively. The most frequent adverse events were grade 1 or 2 myalgia, dysgeusia and alopecia. CONCLUSIONS GDC-0449 did not meet the primary end point of this trial. Results suggest some activity in a subset of patients with progressive grade 1 or 2 conventional chondrosarcoma. Further studies assessing its role in combination with chemotherapy are warranted. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER NCT01267955.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Italiano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Le Cesne A. 13 years of trabectedin, 5 years of Yondelis®: what have we learnt? Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2014; 13:11-9. [DOI: 10.1586/era.13.49] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
|
36
|
Cousin S, Blay JY, Bertucci F, Isambert N, Italiano A, Bompas E, Ray-Coquard I, Perrot D, Chaix M, Bui-Nguyen B, Chaigneau L, Corradini N, Penel N. Correlation between overall survival and growth modulation index in pre-treated sarcoma patients: a study from the French Sarcoma Group. Ann Oncol 2013; 24:2681-2685. [PMID: 23904460 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Growth modulation index (GMI), the ratio of two times to progression measured in patients receiving two successive treatments (GMI = TTP2/TTP1), has been proposed as a criterion of phase II clinical trials. Nevertheless, its use has been limited until now. PATIENTS AND METHODS We carried out a retrospective multicentre study in soft tissue sarcoma patients receiving a second-line treatment after doxorubicin-based regimens to evaluate the link between overall survival and GMI. Second-line treatments were classified as 'active' according to the EORTC-STBSG criteria (3-month progression-free rate >40% or 6-month PFR >14%). Comparisons used chi-squared and log-rank tests. RESULTS The population consisted in 106 men and 121 women, 110 patients (48%) received 'active drugs'. Median OS from the second-line start was 317 days. Sixty-nine patients experienced GMI >1.33 (30.4%). Treatments with 'active drug' were not associated with OS improvement: 490 versus 407 days (P = 0.524). Median OS was highly correlated with GMI: 324, 302 and 710 days with GMI <1, GMI = [1.00-1.33], and GMI >1.33, respectively (P < 0.0001). In logistic regression analysis, the sole predictive factor was the number of doxorubicin-based chemotherapy cycles. CONCLUSION GMI seems to be an interesting end point that provides additional information compared with classical criteria. GMI >1.33 is associated with significant OS improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Cousin
- Department of General Oncology, Oscar Lambret Center, Lille
| | - J Y Blay
- Department of Medical Oncology, Léon Berard Center, Lyon
| | - F Bertucci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille
| | - N Isambert
- Department of Medical Oncology, Georges-François Leclerc Center, Dijon
| | - A Italiano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bergonie Institute, Bordeaux
| | - E Bompas
- Department of Medical Oncology, René Gauducheau Center, St Herblain
| | - I Ray-Coquard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Léon Berard Center, Lyon
| | - D Perrot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille
| | - M Chaix
- Department of Medical Oncology, Georges-François Leclerc Center, Dijon
| | - B Bui-Nguyen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bergonie Institute, Bordeaux
| | - L Chaigneau
- Department of Medical Oncology, Jean Minjoz University Hospital, Besançon
| | - N Corradini
- Department of Paediatrician Oncology, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes
| | - N Penel
- Department of General Oncology, Oscar Lambret Center, Lille; Research Unit (EA 2694), Medical School University, Lille-Nord-de-France University, France.
| |
Collapse
|