Stereotactic radiotherapy for oligometastatic cancer: a prognostic model for survival

Future directions in the evaluation and management of newly diagnosed metastatic cancer

There is much debate regarding optimal selection in patients with metastatic cancer who should undergo local treatment (surgery or radiation treatment) to the primary tumor and/or metastases. Additionally, the optimal treatment of newly diagnosed metastatic cancer is largely unclear. Current prognostication systems to best inform these clinical scenarios are limited, as all metastatic patients are grouped together as having Stage IV disease without further incorporation of patient and disease-specific covariates that significantly impact patient outcomes. Therefore, improving current prognostic scoring systems and incorporation of these covariates is essential to best individualize treatment for patients with metastatic cancer. In this narrative review article, we provide a detailed review of prognostication systems that can be used for both the site of metastasis and primary site to best tailor treatment in these patients. Additionally, we discuss the incorporation and ongoing developments in radiographic, genomic, and biostatistical techniques that can be used as prognostication tools.

Precision in Motion Management: Long-Term Local Control and Prognostic Insights in SBRT for Oligometastatic Lung and Liver Metastases

Background/Objectives: Inadequate dosing and respiratory motion contribute to local recurrence for oligometastatic disease (OMD). While short-term LC rates are well-documented, data on long-term LC remain limited. This study investigated long-term LC after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), using respiratory motion management techniques. Methods: This retrospective study took place at UZ Brussel with follow-up until Oct 2024. It analyzed oligometastatic patients treated with SBRT between Jul 2012 and Feb 2017. Treatment involved delivering 50 Gy in 10 fractions on the 80% isodose line, building on data from a prior prospective study. Lesion movement was managed using internal target volume (ITV) or dynamic tumor tracking (DTT) with marker. The primary endpoint of the study was long-term LC and identifying variables associated with it using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results: A total of 100 patients were treated for a total of 211 metastatic lesions. Lesions were predominantly in the lungs (74%) and treated using ITV (88%). LC rates at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years were 76.5%, 53.8%, 38.1%, and 36.3%, respectively. Improved LC was observed in locations other than lung and liver (HR: 0.309; p = 0.024) and with increasing age (HR: 0.975; p < 0.010). Worse LC was seen in liver lesions (HR: 1.808; p = 0.103) and systemic therapy post-radiotherapy (HR: 3.726; p < 0.001). No significant associations were found with tumor size or tumor motion, nor between the two motion management strategies used (DTT and ITV). Conclusions: Appropriate motion management is key in LC for OMD. No significant difference in LC was found between both techniques. Lesion location, patient age, and systemic therapy post-radiotherapy were prognostic factors for LC.

Maintaining First-Line Therapy Plus Radiation Therapy May Prolong Progression-Free Survival and Delay Second-Line Therapy for Oligoprogressive Hepatocellular Carcinoma

PURPOSE

Optimal treatment strategies for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with oligoprogression after first-line systemic therapy (FLST) remain undefined. We aimed to determine whether maintaining (ie, continuing) FLST plus radiation therapy (RT) for oligoprogressive lesions (m-FLST + RT) would result in progression-free survival (PFS) equal to or greater than that of second-line systemic therapy (s-SLST), either alone or with RT (s-SLST + RT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From October 2018 to February 2024, 154 patients from 7 medical centers who developed oligoprogression after FLST were enrolled and assigned to 1 of 3 groups based on post-oligoprogression treatment strategy: m-FLST + RT, s-SLST + RT, or s-SLST-only. The primary outcome was PFS, and early patterns of recurrence were noted.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up time of 8.4 months, the median PFS time was longer in the m-FLST + RT group (8.6 months) compared with the s-SLS-only group (3.1 months) (hazard ratio, 3.163; 95% CI, 2.133-4.690; P < .001) and the s-SLST + RT group (5.8 months) (hazard ratio, 2.183; 95% CI, 1.110-4.293; P = .006). Multivariate Cox analysis demonstrated that albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade and postoligoprogression treatment strategy were independent prognostic factors for PFS. Stratified analysis by ALBI grade showed that m-FLST + RT resulted in significantly longer median PFS in patients with both ALBI-1 and ALBI-2 compared with s-SLST-only (P < .001). Regarding subsequent patterns of relapse, the m-FLST + RT group had a lower rate of re-enlargement of recently oligoprogressive lesions (27.6%) than the s-SLST + RT (31.8%) and s-SLST-only (50.0%) groups. It also had the lowest rate of re-enlargement of previously identified metastases that did not progress during FLST (13.8%) compared with s-SLRT + RT (27.3%) and s-SLST-only (24.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests a potential clinical benefit of m-FLST + RT without the need for s-SLST and provides insights to optimize treatment strategies for oligoprogressive hepatocellular carcinoma.

ACROPath Oligometastases: The American College of Radiation Oncology Clinical Pathway

Radiation oncology is among the most data-driven specialties in medicine. Recently, a wealth of peer-reviewed data has been published supporting the treatment of oligometastatic malignancies, demonstrating improved survival with metastasis-directed therapy, such as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), when combined with appropriate patient selection and treatment. However, there are currently few, if any, established guidelines that synthesize the abundance of data specific to radiotherapy into a single, easily accessed resource for clinicians. ACROPath® is a major initiative of the American College of Radiation Oncology (ACRO) that aims to present aggregated clinical pathway data in a highly usable format that is readily accessible to clinicians at the point of care in real time. The oligometastases pathway is the first published algorithm in this collection, with additional pathways anticipated in future publications. Clinical radiation oncologists with expertise in the treatment and management of oligometastatic disease were recruited from across ACRO's diverse membership, including both academic and private practice physicians, to ensure a broad-based experience and insight. Individual participants were assigned subsections of the pathway for guideline development, and then, each subsection was presented to the full group for evaluation and consensus development based on published data. Rather than presenting an unstructured set of treatment options, as is common in other treatment guidelines, this initiative aimed to categorize appropriate treatments based on published clinical evidence in a hierarchy further ranked by efficacy, toxicity, and cost. Based on these strata, treatment recommendations were collated and grouped into three rank categories (gold, silver, or bronze) to denote the degree of applicability. The team assembled an interactive document that will eventually be available online, and it is summarized in detail here. Recommendations are grouped both by the anatomic site of metastasis and by the primary tumor type, recognizing that original histology might impact the treatment differently in different anatomic locations. After a review of available published clinical evidence, the committee reached a consensus on all recommendations presented, categorizing each option as gold, silver, or bronze to guide clinicians appropriately. This first iteration of ACROPath® Oligometastases represents one of the few comprehensive clinical decision support tools available for managing patients with limited metastatic disease. It presents available data in a highly accessible, easily used reference, which will be formally reviewed and updated by the committee as frequently as emerging data requires, likely at six- to 12-month intervals.

Outcomes of Radiotherapy in Oligoprogressive Breast Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Radiotherapy (RT) shows potential for improving local control in cases of oligoprogressive metastatic breast cancer (mBC). This retrospective analysis aims to evaluate the advantages of RT in such a clinical scenario.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis including patients with mBC who received radiation therapy (RT) for up to three sites of oligoprogression while continuing systemic therapy. The study took place between January 2014 and December 2021. Our endpoints were progression-free survival after radiotherapy (PFS-AR), the rate of discontinuation of systemic therapy (RDT) at three months post-RT, and overall survival (OS). We used Cox regression analysis to perform multivariate analysis for PFS-AR.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients met the inclusion criteria. The PFS-AR was 13 months (95% CI 8.5-18.8 months). At three months, the RDT was 3% (two patients). A significant difference in median PFS-AR was observed between patients in the first + second-line group and those in the subsequent line group (p = 0.03). In the multivariate analysis conducted for PFS-AR, the biologically effective dose (BED) with α/β = 4 > 100 Gy emerged as the sole significant variable (p = 0.0017). The median overall survival (OS) was 24.4 months (95% CI 17-24.4 months).

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first report on the outcomes of radiotherapy in a cohort of over 50 patients with oligoprogressive metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Our findings emphasize the significant relationship between PFS-AR, the number of ongoing lines of systemic therapy, and the BED of radiotherapy.

Efficacy of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in patients with oligometastatic hepatocellular carcinoma: A phase II study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) can extend survival and offers the potential for cure in some patients with oligometastatic disease (OMD). However, limited evidence exists regarding its use in oligometastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to prospectively investigate the efficacy and safety of SABR in patients with oligometastatic HCC.

METHODS

We enrolled patients with controlled primary HCC and one to five metastatic lesions amenable to SABR. The primary endpoint was treatment efficacy defined as overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included time to local progression, objective response rate, disease control rate, toxicities, and quality of life (QOL), assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 before, and 0, 1, and 3 months after SABR.

RESULTS

Overall, 40 consecutive patients received SABR on 62 lesions between 2021 and 2022. The most common locations for OMD were the lungs (48.4%), lymph nodes (22.6%), and bone (17.7%). After a median follow-up of 15.5 months, the 2-year OS was 80%. Median PFS was 5.3 months, with 1- and 2-year PFS rates of 21.2% and 0%, respectively. A shorter time to OMD from the controlled primary independently correlated with PFS (p = 0.039, hazard ratio 2.127) alongside age, Child-Pugh class, and alpha-fetoprotein (p = 0.002, 0.004, 0.019, respectively). The 2-year time to local progression, objective response rate, and disease control rate were 91.1%, 75.8%, and 98.4%, respectively. Overall, 10% of patients experienced acute toxicity, and 7.5% experienced late toxicity, with no grade 3+ toxicity. All QOL scores remained stable, whereas the patients without systemic treatments had improved insomnia and social functioning scores.

CONCLUSIONS

SABR is an effective and feasible option for oligometastatic HCC that leads to excellent local tumor control and improves survival without adversely affecting QOL.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is a non-invasive treatment approach capable of efficiently ablating the target lesion; however, neither the oligometastatic disease concept nor the potential benefits of SABR have been well-defined in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). According to this study, SABR is an effective and safe treatment option for oligometastatic HCC, yielding excellent local tumor control and survival improvement without worsening patients' quality of life, regardless of tumor sites. We also demonstrated that patients with a later presentation of OMD from the controlled primary and lower alpha-fetoprotein levels achieved better survival outcomes. This is the first prospective study of SABR in oligometastatic HCC, providing insights for the development of novel strategies to improve oncologic outcomes.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

NCT05173610.

Definitive results of a prospective non-randomized phase 2 study on stereotactic body radiation therapy (sbrt) for medically inoperable lung and liver oligometastases from breast cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To report mature results for local control and survival in oligometastatic (OM) breast cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) on lung and/or liver lesions in a phase II trial.

METHODS

This is a prospective non-randomized phase II trial (NCT02581670) which enrolled patients from 2015 to 2021. Eligibility criteria included: age > 18 years, ECOG 0-2, diagnosis of breast cancer, maximum of 4 lung/liver lesions (with a maximum diameter < 5 cm), metastatic disease confined to the lungs and liver or extrapulmonary or extrahepatic disease stable or responding to systemic therapy. The primary end-points were local control (LC) and treatment-related toxicities. The secondary end-points included overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), time to next systemic therapy (TTNS), poly-progression free survival (PPFS).

RESULTS

The study included 64 patients with a total of 90 lesions treated with SBRT. LC at 1 and 2 years was 94.9 %, 91 % at 3 years. Median local control was not reached. Median OS was 16.5 months, OS at 1, 2 and 3 years was 87.5 %, 60.9 % and 51.9 %, respectively. Median DMFS was 8.3 months, DMFS at 1, 2 and 3 years was 38.1 %, 20.6 % and 16 % respectively. At univariate analysis, local response to SBRT was found to be statistically linked with better OS, DMFS and STFS.

CONCLUSION

SBRT is a safe and valid option in oligometastatic breast cancer patients, with very high rates of local control. An optimal selection of patients is likely needed to improve survival outcomes and reduce the rate of distant progression.

Consideration of Metastasis-Directed Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Expert Survey and Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

A survey of medical oncologists (MOs), radiation oncologists (ROs), and surgical oncologists (SOs) who are experts in the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) was conducted to identify factors used to consider metastasis-directed therapy (MDT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An online survey to assess clinical factors when weighing MDT in patients with mCRC was developed based on systematic review of the literature and integrated with clinical vignettes. Supporting evidence from the systematic review was included to aid in answering questions.

RESULTS

Among 75 experts on mCRC invited, 47 (response rate 62.7%) chose to participate including 16 MOs, 16 ROs, and 15 SOs. Most experts would not consider MDT in patients with 3 lesions in both the liver and lung regardless of distribution or timing of metastatic disease diagnosis (6 vs. 36 months after definitive treatment). Similarly, for patients with retroperitoneal lymph node and lung and liver involvement, most experts would not offer MDT regardless of timing of metastatic disease diagnosis. In general, SOs were willing to consider MDT in patients with more advanced disease, ROs were more willing to offer treatment regardless of metastatic site location, and MOs were the least likely to consider MDT.

CONCLUSIONS

Among experts caring for patients with mCRC, significant variation was noted among MOs, ROs, and SOs in the distribution and volume of metastatic disease for which MDT would be considered. This variability highlights differing opinions on management of these patients and underscores the need for well-designed prospective randomized trials to characterize the risks and potential benefits of MDT.

Predicting long‑term survival following involved site radiotherapy for oligometastases

The majority of cancer-associated mortalities are due to distant metastases, and systemic therapy alone is generally not curative. Patients with oligometastases are amenable to involved site radiotherapy with the possibility of long-term disease-free survival; however, prognostic factors remain poorly defined. The present retrospective, single institution study consisted of consecutive adult patients with oligometastases from solid tumor malignancy referred to a single high volume radiation oncologist between January 2014 and December 2021. Oligometastases were defined as ≤5 extracranial or intracranial metastatic lesions where all sites of active disease are treatable, including patients requiring treatment of the primary tumor and/or regional lymph nodes. The study population consisted of 130 patients with 207 treated distant metastases. Radical radiotherapy was administered to all areas of known residual disease and included stereotactic radiotherapy (median dose, 27 Gy in 3 fractions) or intensity modulated radiotherapy (median dose, 50 Gy in 15 fractions). At a median follow-up of 28.8 months, the median overall survival was 37.9 months with a 4-year overall survival of 41.1%. The median progression-free survival was 12.3 months and the 4-year progression-free survival was 22.6%. On multivariate an1alysis, the strongest predictors of overall survival were age, ECOG performance status, primary prostate, breast or kidney tumor and pre-radiation serum albumin (P≤0.01 for all). Overall, the present study demonstrated that long-term overall survival was possible after radical treatment for oligometastases and identified potential prognostic factors.

Designing clinical trials based on modern imaging and metastasis-directed treatments in patients with oligometastatic breast cancer: a consensus recommendation from the EORTC Imaging and Breast Cancer Groups

Breast cancer remains the most common cause of cancer death among women. Despite its considerable histological and molecular heterogeneity, those characteristics are not distinguished in most definitions of oligometastatic disease and clinical trials of oligometastatic breast cancer. After an exhaustive review of the literature covering all aspects of oligometastatic breast cancer, 35 experts from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Imaging and Breast Cancer Groups elaborated a Delphi questionnaire aimed at offering consensus recommendations, including oligometastatic breast cancer definition, optimal diagnostic pathways, and clinical trials required to evaluate the effect of diagnostic imaging strategies and metastasis-directed therapies. The main recommendations are the introduction of modern imaging methods in metastatic screening for an earlier diagnosis of oligometastatic breast cancer and the development of prospective trials also considering the histological and molecular complexity of breast cancer. Strategies for the randomisation of imaging methods and therapeutic approaches in different subsets of patients are also addressed.

Survival outcomes of patients with oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer who were treated with radical therapy: a multicenter analysis

BACKGROUND

Oligometastatic disease for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is generally thought to represent a better prognosis with a quieter biology, limited number of disease sites and long-term disease control. In this study, we aimed to determine the efficacy of radical treatment options for patients with oligometastatic NSCLC.

METHODS

This retrospective trial included totally 134 patients with oligometastatic NSCLC. The presence of oncodriver mutation, tumor stages and nodal status, the number of metastases and involved metastatic site, treatment of primary tumor and oligometastasis, response rate, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 134 patients 66.4% were defined as adenocarcinoma, 26.1% were squamous cell carcinoma and 7.5% of patients were in other histology. Based on the treatment of primary tumor, in 36 patients (26.9%) curative surgery has undergone, in addition, 19 (14.2%) patients were received chemotherapy, 73 (54.5%) were treated with chemoradiotherapy, while immunotherapy and targeted therapy were used in 1 (0.7%) and 2 (1.4%), respectively. The preferred treatment for oligometastatic lesions were SBRT in 72.4% of patients, surgery in 10.5%, and both SBRT and surgery in 17.1% of patients. At the median follow up of 31.3 months (range: 9.5-48.5), the median PFS and OS times were 17 and 24.4 months, respectively. Moreover, OS-2 after progression was also 7.2 months.

DISCUSSION

Based on our real-life experience, we demonstrated a significant correlation between good response to first treatment and survival in oligometastatic disease, we also understand that local ablative treatment modalities prolong and also delay both OS and PFS in oligometastatic NSCLC patients OS-2.

The pattern of failure after Stereotactic Radiation Therapy (SRT) for oligo-metastases: predictive factors for poly-progression

PURPOSE

Patients with oligo-metastatic disease (OMD) can be safely treated with Stereotactic Radiation Therapy (SRT). Further disease progression is common in these patients. In most cases, patients relapse again with oligo-metastases, however some can experience a poly-progression after a local ablative treatment (LAT). The purpose of this study was to retrospectively identify factors associated with poly-progression in patients receiving SRT for OMD.

METHODS

Data from a monocentric database were retrospectively analyzed. Patients treated with SRT for OMD and who developed progression after LAT were selected. Patients were categorized as oligo- or poly-progressive according to the number of new/progressing metastases (≤ or > 5). Herein, we analyzed data about patients' characteristics, oligo-metastatic presentation and radiation treatment characteristics to evaluate their relationship with progression type.

RESULTS

From 2013 to 2021, data on 700 patients progressing after LAT were analyzed. Among them, 227 patients (32.4%) experienced a poly-progression; the median time to poly-progression was 7.72 months (range 1-79.6). Five variables associated with poly-progression were found to be statistically significant in the univariate analysis: performance status (p < 0.001), site of the primary tumor (p = 0.016), ablative dose (p = 0.002), treated site (p = 0.002), single or double organ (p = 0.03). Of those, all but the number of involved organs retained their significant predictive value on the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Our study identified four independent factors associated with poly-progression in patients with OMD receiving SRT. Our data may support comprehensive characterization of OMD, better understanding of factors associated with progression.

Unravelling oligometastatic disease from the perspective of radiation and medical oncology. Part II: prostate cancer and colorectal cancer

Oligometastatic disease (OMD) defines a status of cancer that is intermediate between localized and widely spread metastatic disease, and can be treated with curative intent. While imaging diagnostic tools have considerably improved in recent years, unidentified micrometastases can still escape from current detection techniques allowing disease to progress. The variety of OMD scenarios are mainly defined by the number of metastases, the biological and molecular tumour profiles, and the timing of the development of metastases. Increasing knowledge has contributed to the earlier and improved detection of OMD, underlining the importance of an early disease control. Based on increasing detection rates of OMD in the current real clinical practice and the lack of standardized evidence-based guidelines to treat this cancer status, a board of experts from the Spanish Societies of Radiation Oncology (SEOR) and Medical Oncology (SEOM) organized a series of sessions to update the current state-of-the-art on OMD from a multidisciplinary perspective, and to discuss how results from clinical studies may translate into promising treatment options. This experts' review series summarizes what is known and what it is pending clarification in the context of OMD in the scenarios of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Breast Cancer (Part I), and Prostate Cancer and Colorectal Cancer (Part II), aiming to offer specialists a pragmatic framework that might contribute to the improved management of patients.

Unravelling oligometastatic disease from the perspective of radiation and medical oncology. Part I: non-small cell lung cancer and breast cancer

Oligometastatic disease (OMD) defines a cancer status that is intermediate between localized and widely spread metastatic disease, and can be treated with curative intent. While diagnostic imaging tools have considerably improved in recent years, unidentified micrometastases can still evade current detection techniques, allowing the disease to progress. The various OMD scenarios are mainly defined by the number of metastases, the biological and molecular tumour profiles, and the timing of the development of metastases. Increasing knowledge has contributed to the earlier and improved detection of OMD, underlining the importance of early disease control. In view of increasing OMD detection rates in current real-world clinical practice and the lack of standardized evidence-based guidelines to treat this cancer status, a board of experts from the Spanish Societies of Radiation Oncology (SEOR) and Medical Oncology (SEOM) organized a series of sessions to update the current state-of-the-art on OMD from a multidisciplinary perspective, and to discuss how results from clinical studies might translate into promising treatment options. This expert review series summarizes what is known and what it is pending clarification in the context of OMD in the scenarios of non-small cell lung cancer and breast cancer (Part I), and prostate cancer and colorectal cancer (Part II), aiming to offer specialists a pragmatic framework to help improve patient management.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy in the treatment of cancer patients with oligometastatic disease: a real world study

PURPOSE

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a treatment modality with curative intent for oligometastatic cancer patients, commonly defined by a low-burden metastatic disease with 1-5 systemic metastases. Better knowledge of the clinical profile and prognostic factors in oligometastatic cancer patients could help to improve the selection of candidates who may obtain most benefits from SBRT. The objective of this study was to describe the clinical data and outcome in term of overall survival (OS) of patients with oligometastatic disease treated with SBRT over a 6-year period.

METHODS

From 2013 to 2018, 284 solid tumor cancer patients with 1-5 oligometastases underwent SBRT at a large university-affiliated oncological center in Barcelona, Spain. Variables related to the patient profile, tumor, oligometastatic disease, and treatment were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 327 metastatic tumors were treated with SBRT. In 65.5% of cases, metachronous tumors were diagnosed at least 1 year after diagnosis of the primary tumor. The median age of the patients was 73.9 years and 66.5% were males. The median follow-up was 37.5 months. The most common primary tumors were lung and colorectal cancer, with lung and bone as the most commonly treated metastatic sites. Ninety-three percent of patients showed a Karnofsky score (KPS) between 80 and 100. Adenocarcinoma was the most common histological type. The median overall survival was 53.4 months, with 1-, 2- and 5-year survival rates of 90.5%, 73.9% and 43.4%, respectively. Overall survival rates of breast (67.6 months, 95% CI 56.4-78.9), urological (63.3 months, 95% CI 55.8-70.8), and colorectal (50.8 months, 95% CI 44.2-57.4) tumors were higher as compared with other malignancies (20 months, 95% CI 11.2-28.8 months) (p < 0.001). Patients with Karnofsky score (KPS) of 90 and 100 showed a significantly better survival than those with impaired performance status (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

SBRT appears to be well tolerated and safe approach in oligometastatic patients. Patients with good performance status and with primary breast, urological and colorectal cancer have higher OS compared with other malignancies. More studies are necessary to evaluate the prognostic factors in oligometastatic disease (OMD) in order to select patients who could benefit more from this therapeutic approach.

Dose-escalated radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost for bone metastases in selected patients with assumed favourable prognosis

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) concepts for dose escalation are increasingly used for bone metastases in patients with oligometastatic or oligoprogressive disease. For metastases that are not suitable for SBRT-regimens, a treatment with 30/40 Gy with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in 10 fractions represents a possible regimen. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of this concept and the acute and subacute toxicities.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Clinical records for dose-escalated radiotherapy of all consecutive patients treated with this regimen were evaluated retrospectively (24 patients with 28 target volumes for oncologic outcomes and 25 patients with 29 target volumes for treatment feasibility and dose parameters analysis). Analysis of radiotherapy plans included size of target volumes and dosimetric parameter for target volumes and organs at risk (OAR). Acute and subacute toxicities were evaluated according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) V4.0.

RESULTS

The most common localization was the spine (71.4%). The most common histology was prostate cancer (45.8%). Oligometastatic or oligoprogressive disease was the indication for dose-escalated radiotherapy in 19/24 patients (79.2%). Treatment was feasible with all patients completing radiotherapy. Acute toxicity grade 1 was documented in 36.0% of the patients. During follow up, one patient underwent surgery due to bone instability. The 1-year local control and patient-related progression-free survival (PFS) were 90.0 ± 6.7% and 33.3 ± 11.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Dose-escalated hypofractionated radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost for bone metastases resulted in good local control with limited acute toxicities. Only one patient required surgical intervention. The regimen represents an alternative to SBRT in selected patients.

Association between Statin Use and Survival in Cancer Patients with Brain Metastasis: Retrospective Analysis from the Chinese Population

Brain metastasis predicts a worse clinical outcome in cancer patients. Emerging observational evidence suggests that statin use has a protective role in overall cancer prevention. Whether statin use could also be a supplementary treatment for advanced-stage cancers remains under researched and controversial. Data for cancer patients with brain metastasis were selected from the linked electronic medical care records of the West China Hospital between October 2010 and July 2019. Fisher’s exact chi-square test was used to compare the differences between cohorts. Multivariate Cox analysis was conducted to adjust the potential confounders in evaluating the role of statin use in the overall survival (OS) of cancer patients with brain metastasis. There were 4510 brain metastatic patients included in this retrospective study. The overall statin use rate in our patients was 5.28% (219 cases/4510 cases). Compared with the non-statin use cohort, patients who received statin therapy showed a decreased Karnofsky performance score (KPS, p < 0.001) and lower high-density lipoprotein (HDL, p = 0.020) but higher body mass index (BMI, p = 0.002) and triglyceride (TG, p < 0.001) at admission. There was no association between statin use and the OS of the cancer patients with brain metastasis (Hazard ratio (HR) = 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.73−1.07, p = 0.213) during the univariate analysis. However, after adjusting for baseline patient characteristics, metabolism indicators, and cancer-specific factors, statin use was shown to have a significant protective role, aiding the survival of the cancer patients with brain metastasis (adjustHR = 0.82, 95%CI: 0.69−0.99, p = 0.034). Our results highlight that statin use shows significant survival benefits in cancer patients with brain metastasis. However, future research is needed to validate our findings.

Oligometastatic Disease in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: An Update

Simple Summary

Approximately 7–50% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) develop oligometastases, which are new tumors found in another part of the body, arising from cancer cells of the original tumor that have travelled through the body. In recent years, these patients have been increasingly regarded as a distinct group that could benefit from treatment that intends to cure the disease, rather than palliative care, to achieve a better clinical outcome. Various treatment procedures have been developed for treating NSCLC patients with different oligometastatic sites. In addition, the newly proposed uniform definition for oligometastases as well as ongoing trials may lead to increased appropriate patient selection and evaluation of treatment effectiveness. The aim of this review article is to summarize the latest evidence regarding optimal management strategies for NSCLC patients with oligometastases.

Abstract

Oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a distinct entity that is different from localized and disseminated diseases. The definition of oligometastatic NSCLC varies across studies in past decades owing to the use of different imaging modalities; however, a uniform definition of oligometastatic NSCLC has been proposed, and this may facilitate trial design and evaluation of certain interventions. Patients with oligometastatic NSCLC are candidates for curative-intent management, in which local ablative treatment, such as surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery, should be instituted to improve clinical outcomes. Although current guidelines recommend that local therapy for thoracic and metastatic lesions should be considered for patients with oligometastatic NSCLC with stable disease after systemic therapy, optimal management strategies for different oligometastatic sites have not been established. Additionally, the development of personalized therapies for individual patients with oligometastatic NSCLC to improve their quality of life and overall survival should also be addressed. Here, we review relevant articles on the management of patients with oligometastatic NSCLC and categorize the disease according to the site of metastases. Ongoing trials are also summarized to determine future directions and expectations for new treatment modalities to improve patient management.

Recent advances in radiosensitivity determinants in melanoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Radiotherapy has been proven to be useful but insufficient in melanoma management due to the intrinsic radioresistance of melanoma cells. Elucidation of the molecular mechanisms and pathways related to resistance/sensitivity to radiotherapy in melanoma is of paramount importance. In this review, we will summarize and discuss the recent 'discoveries' and advances in radiosensitivity determinants in melanoma.

RECENT FINDINGS

The different levels of radiosensitivity among the various melanoma tumors could be attributed to the DNA damage signaling and repair proteins, tumor microenvironment, hypoxia, cell metabolism, glutathione and redox balance, protein kinase signaling pathways as well as pigmentation and melanin content.

SUMMARY

It is therapeutically important to elucidate the factors involved in radiation resistance/sensitivity of melanoma. More importantly, improving radiosensitivity may 'widen the clinical utility' in melanoma of this important therapeutic modality.

Development of a Prognostic Model for Overall Survival in Patients with Extracranial Oligometastatic Disease Treated with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

BACKGROUND

Patients with oligometastatic disease (OMD) may experience durable disease control with ablative therapy to all sites of disease. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an important modality in the management of OMD patients though a validated prognostic model for OMD patients treated with SBRT is currently lacking. The purpose of this study was to develop a prognostic model for overall survival (OS) in OMD patients treated with SBRT.

METHODS

A multi-institutional database of extracranial OMD patients treated with SBRT was used for model development. The final prognostic model was generated in a training set using recursive partitioning analysis representing 75% of the population. Model performance was evaluated in the reserved test set.

RESULTS

1,033 patients were included in the analysis. The median OS for the entire cohort was 44.2 months (95% confidence interval: 39.2-48.8 months). The variables used in the regression tree, in order of importance, were primary histology, lung-only OMD on presentation, the timing of OMD presentation and age at the start of SBRT. A full 5-category risk stratification system based on the terminal nodes possessed fair to good discriminative power with a Harrell's concordance statistic of 0.683 (0.634-0.731) and time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.709 (0706-0.711) in the test set, with good calibration. A simplified risk stratification system consisting of 3 risk categories was also proposed for greater ease-of-use with comparable performance.

CONCLUSION

A clinical prognostic model for OS in patients with extracranial OMD treated with SBRT has been developed and validated.

Results of Radiation Therapy as Local Ablative Therapy for Oligometastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Oligometastatic cancer is characterized by a limited number of metastatic deposits. Compared with lung cancer patients who have more widespread disease, oligometastatic lung cancer patients have more favorable survival outcomes. Therefore, it has been hypothesized that local ablative therapy (LAT) directed at the metastatic deposits in addition to standard-of-care systemic therapy may further improve survival outcomes in oligometastatic lung cancer patients. One LAT modality that has been utilized in oligometastatic lung cancer is radiation therapy. In particular, ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy, also known as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), has been shown to provide excellent local control with a favorable safety profile. Here, we reviewed the retrospective studies and prospective trials that have deployed radiation therapy as LAT in oligometastatic lung cancer, including randomized studies showing benefits for progression-free survival and overall survival with the addition of LAT. We also discuss the impact of targeted therapies and immunotherapy on radiation as LAT.

Late metastatic presentation is associated with improved survival and delayed wide-spread progression after ablative stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastasis

Background

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly used to treat oligometastatic disease (OMD), but the effect of metastasis timing on patient outcomes remains uncertain.

Methods

An international database of patients with OMD treated with SBRT was assembled with rigorous quality assurance. Early versus late metastases were defined as those diagnosed ≤24 versus >24 months from the primary tumor. Overall survival (OS), progression‐free survival (PFS), and incidences of wide‐spread progression (WSP) were estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazard models stratified by primary tumor types.

Results

The database consists of 1033 patients with median follow‐up of 24.1 months (0.3–104.7). Late metastatic presentation (N = 427) was associated with improved OS compared to early metastasis (median survival 53.6 vs. 33.0 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.47–0.72, p < 0.0001). Patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, N = 255, HR 0.49, 95% CI: 0.33–0.74, p = 0.0005) and colorectal cancer (N = 235, HR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.30–0.84, p = 0.008) had better OS if presenting with late metastasis. Late metastasis correlated with longer PFS (median 17.1 vs. 9.0 months, HR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.61–0.83, p < 0.0001) and lower 2‐year incidence of WSP (26.1% vs. 43.6%, HR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.49–0.74, p < 0.0001). Fewer WSP were observed in patients with NSCLC (HR 0.52, 95% CI: 0.33–0.83, p = 0.006) and kidney cancer (N = 63, HR 0.37, 95% CI: 0.14–0.97, p = 0.044) with late metastases. Across cancer types, greater SBRT target size was a significant predictor for worse OS.

Conclusion

Late metastatic presentation is associated with improved survival and delayed progression in patients with OMD treated with SBRT.

12 × 6 Gy stereotactic radiotherapy for lung tumors. Is there a difference in response between lung metastases and primary bronchial carcinoma?

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and long-term tumor control after stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) with 12 × 6 Gy of patients with primary bronchial carcinoma (BC) or with pulmonary metastases (MET) of various solid tumors. Local progression-free survival (LPFS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and prognostic factors were compared.

METHODS

Between May 2012 and January 2020, 168 patients with 206 pulmonary lesions (170 MET and 36 primary BC) were treated with 12 × 6 Gy (BED₁₀ 116 Gy). The irradiated pulmonary MET were from the following cancers: 47 (27.6%) head and neck, 37 (21.8%) rectum or colon, 30 (17.6%) bronchial, 13 (7.6%) malignant melanoma, 9 (5.3%) esophageal, 9 (5.3%) sarcoma, and 25 (14.8%) other.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 16.26 months (range: 0.46-89.34) for BC and 19.18 months (0.89-91.11) for MET. Survival rates at 3 years were: OS 43% for BC and 35% for MET; LPFS BC 96% and MET 85%; PFS BC 35% and MET 29%. The most frequently observed grade 3 adverse events (AEs) were pneumonitis (5.9% BC, 4.8% MET), pulmonary fibrosis (2.9% BC, 4% MET), and pulmonary embolism (2.9% BC, 0.8% MET). The favorable prognostic effects on overall survival of patients with MET were female gender (log-rank: p < 0.001), no systemic progression (log-rank; p = 0.048, multivariate COX regression p = 0.039), and malignant melanoma histology (log-rank; p = 0.015, multivariate COX regression p = 0.020). For patients with BC, it was tumor location within the lower lobe (vs. upper lobe, log-rank p = 0.027). LPFS of patients with metastatic disease was beneficially influenced by female gender (log-rank: p = 0.049).

CONCLUSION

The treatment concept of 12 × 6 Gy is associated with 96% local progression-free survival for BC and 85% for pulmonary metastases after 3 years. There was no difference in response after SRT of primary lung carcinoma or pulmonary metastases.

Long-Term Survival in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Metachronous Brain-Only Oligorecurrence Who Underwent Definitive Treatment

Purpose

Metachronous brain-only oligorecurrence in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a rare event with favorable prognosis, but the clinical outcome has not been fully determined. We retrospectively analyzed clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in metachronous brain-only oligorecurrence in patients with NSCLC who underwent definitive treatment.

Materials and Methods

We reviewed 4,437 NSCLC patients without oncogenic driver mutations who underwent definitive treatment between 2008 and 2018. Among them, we identified 327 patients who developed 1 to 5 brain metastases with or without systemic metastasis. Of the 327 patients, 71 had metachronous brain-only oligorecurrence without extracranial progression and were treated with local therapy to the brain. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and prognostic factors affecting OS were analyzed.

Results

The median OS was 38.9 months (95% CI, 21.8 to 56.1 months) in 71 patients. The 2-year OS rate was 67.8% and the 5-year OS rate was 33.1%. The median PFS was 25.5 months (95% CI, 12.2 to 14.4 months). The longest surviving patient had a survival period of 115 months. Through multivariate analysis, ECOG ≥ 1 (HR: 5.33, p=0.005) was associated with poor survival. There was no significant difference in OS between patients with local therapy and those with local plus systemic therapy (18.5 vs. 34.7 months, p=0.82).

Conclusion

Metachronous brain-only oligorecurrence NSCLC patients who underwent definitive treatment experienced long-term survival with local therapy, highlighting the unique patient population. The role of systemic chemotherapy in this patient population requires further investigation.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for oligometastatic gynecologic malignancies: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for oligometastatic gynecologic malignancies.

METHOD

A comprehensive search of the PubMed, Medline, and EMBASE databases was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. "Oligometastatic" was defined as a limited number of uncontrolled/untreated metastatic lesions (typically ≤ 5), including regional nodal metastases. Primary outcomes were response rate (complete response or partial response), local control of oligometastatic lesions, and toxicity.

RESULTS

Of 716 screened records, 17 studies (13 full length articles, 4 conference abstracts) were selected and analyzed as 16 unique studies. A total of 667 patients were treated with ~1071 metastatic lesions identified. Primary sites included ovarian (57.6%), cervical (27.1%), uterine (11.1%), vaginal (0.4%), vulvar (0.3%), and other/unspecified (3.4%). Most patients (65.4%) presented with a single metastatic lesion. Metastatic lesion sites included the abdomen (44.2%), pelvis (18.8%), thorax (15.5%), neck (4.6%), central nervous system (4.3%), bone (1.6%), and other/unspecified (11%). Of the lesions, 64% were nodal. Response rate (among 8 studies) ranged from 49% to 97%, with 7/8 studies reporting > 75% response rate. Local control ranged from 71% to 100%, with 14/16 studies reporting ≥ 80% local control. No grade ≥ 3 toxicities were observed in 9/16 (56%) studies. Median progression-free survival (PFS) (among 10 studies) ranged from 3.3 months to 21.7 months. Disease progression most commonly occurred outside of the SBRT radiation field (79% to 100% of failures).

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT for oligometastatic gynecologic malignancies is associated with favorable response and local control rates but a high rate of out-of-field progression and heterogeneous PFS. Additional study into rational combinations of SBRT and systemic therapy appears warranted to further improve patient outcomes.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Bone Metastases in Breast Cancer: Radiotherapy, Local Approach and Systemic Therapy in a Guide for Clinicians

The standard care for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is systemic therapies with imbrication of focal treatment for symptoms. Recently, thanks to implementation of radiological and metabolic exams and development of new target therapies, oligometastatic and oligoprogressive settings are even more common-paving the way to a paradigm change of focal treatments role. In fact, according to immunophenotype, radiotherapy can be considered with radical intent in these settings of patients. The aim of this literature review is to analyze available clinical data on prognosis of bone metastases from breast cancer and benefits of available treatments for developing a practical guide for clinicians.

Stereobody radiotherapy for nodal recurrences in oligometastatic patients: a pooled analysis from two phase I clinical trials

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been shown to achieve high local control rates in limited metastatic burden of disease. Few papers reported on the efficacy of SBRT in nodal oligometastases. The primary aim of the present paper was to analyze the treatment outcome in this setting. Data from DESTROY-1 and SRS-DESTROY-2 phase I clinical trials were reviewed and analyzed. These trials were based on a 5 fractions and a single fraction regimens, respectively. End-points of this analysis were toxicity rates, overall response rate (ORR), and local control (LC). Patients treated between December 2003 and January 2018, with any metastatic site, and primary tumor type and histology were included. One hundred-eighty-one patients (M/F: 93/88; median age: 67, range 37-88) treated with SBRT on 253 nodal lesions were analyzed. Initially, the used technique was 3D-CRT (20.9%), while subsequently treatments were delivered by VMAT (79.1%). The total dose to the PTV ranged between 12 Gy/single fraction to 50 Gy/5 fractions. With a median follow-up of 21 months (2-124), no grade 3 acute or late toxicity was recorded. ORR based on functional imaging was 92.5% with a complete response rate of 76%. Two- and three-year actuarial LC were 81.6% and 76.0%, respectively. Our large pooled analysis confirms the efficacy and safety of SBRT/SRS in patients with nodal metastases and identifies clinical and treatment variables able to predict complete response and local control rate.

Comparison of long-term outcomes between esophagectomy and chemoradiotherapy after endoscopic resection of submucosal esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Esophagectomy represents the standard treatment strategy for superficial esophageal cancer diagnosed pathologically as submucosal disease (pT1b) following an endoscopic resection (ER). However, chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is expected to become an alternative treatment option. This study retrospectively compared the outcomes of patients who underwent ER of submucosal esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, and who received additional treatment in the form of surgery and CRT. Data were collected from 83 patients who underwent ER and were diagnosed as pT1b (sm) between January 2002 and December 2013. Of them, 52 patients underwent additional treatment (19 surgery, 33 CRT). The long-term outcomes, recurrent patterns, and recurrence risk factor were analyzed retrospectively. No significant differences were identified between the two groups regarding the following aspects: sex, Charlson comorbidity index, tumor size, macroscopic type, cut end positivity, and en bloc resection rate. On the contrary, significant differences were observed in age (P = 0.042) and lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.003) between the two groups. There were more patients with positive lymphovascular invasion, which was one of the strongest risk factors, in the surgery group. The 3-year overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) rates were both 100% in the surgery group and 90.4% and 87.4%, respectively, in the CRT group. The 5-year OS and RFS rates both decreased to 89.5% in the surgery group and to 80.3% and 70.4%, respectively, in the CRT group. The surgery group achieved a superior OS and RFS compared to the CRT group, though not significant (P = 0.172, P = 0.127). Tumor recurrence was observed in 6 patients. All these patients were in the CRT group (P = 0.075). They included 3 patients with hematogenous metastases (of the lung, bone, and adrenal gland) and 3 patients with regional lymph node metastasis. The patient with hematogenous adrenal gland metastasis had simultaneous extended lymph node metastasis. Through a univariate analysis, it was observed that tumor size (≥ 40 mm) and positive lymphatic invasion represented the significant risk factors for recurrence in the CRT group (P = 0.048 and P = 0.035, respectively). To achieve a better long-term survival, surgery is recommended as the additional treatment for ER-pT1b esophageal cancer. While CRT represents an acceptable alternative, the indication should be carefully decided, especially in high-risk patients for recurrence with large tumor size (≥ 40 mm) or positive lymphatic invasion.

Is there an oligometastatic state in pancreatic cancer? Practical clinical considerations raise the question

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the role of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) as a local ablative treatment (LAT) in oligometastatic pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Patients affected by histologically confirmed stage IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma were included in this analysis. Endpoints are local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

From 2013 to 2017, a total of 41 patients were treated with SBRT on 64 metastases. Most common sites of disease were lung (29.3%) and liver (56.1%). LC at 1 and 2 years were 88.9% (95% CI 73.2-98.6) and 73.9% (95% CI 50-87.5), respectively. Median LC was 39.9 months (95% CI 23.3-not reached).PFS rates at 1 and 2 years were 21.9% (95% CI 10.8-35.4) and 10.9% (95% CI 3.4-23.4), respectively. Median PFS was 5.4 months (95%CI 3.1-11.3).OS rates at 1 and 2 years were 79.9% (95% CI 63.7-89.4) and 46.7% (95% CI 29.6-62.2). Median OS was 23 months (95%CI 14.1-31.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results, although based on a retrospective analysis of a small number of patients, show that patients with oligometastatic pancreatic cancer may benefit from local treatment with SBRT. Larger studies are warranted to confirm these results.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Selected patients affected by oligometastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma can benefit from local ablative approaches, like SBRT.

Prognostic factors for local control and survival for inoperable pulmonary colorectal oligometastases treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy

PURPOSE

The study aimed to evaluate overall survival and local control, and to identify factors independently associated with overall survival (OS) and local control (LC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study examined 118 patients with primary colorectal cancer, in whom 202 inoperable pulmonary oligometastases were treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy between 2005 and 2015. Primary endpoint was to evaluate OS and identify prognostic factors associated with OS. Secondary aim was to evaluate LC and identify prognostic factors associated with LC.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 31 months (range 3-88 months). Median OS was 39.2 months (95% CI 34.8-43.6 months). Two-, three-, and five-year OS was 69%, 55% and 36%, respectively. LC at 2-, 3-, and 5-year was 83%, 81% and 77% respectively. Factors independently associated with OS in the multivariable analysis included BED₁₀ ≥ 100 Gy (HR 0.52), male gender (HR 0.52), age < 70 years (HR 0.52) and presence of single metastasis (HR 0.37). BED₁₀ < 100 Gy (HR 3.67) and pre-SBRT chemotherapy (HR 2.66) were independently associated with poor LC in a multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT was associated with 2- year OS of 69% and 2-year LC of 83%. SBRT dose ≥ 100 Gy BED₁₀ was independently associated with both better overall survival and local control.

Development of Hepatocellular Carcinoma During Nivolumab Treatment for Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Case Report

Nivolumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), is the standard second-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the current immunotherapy era, it is often difficult to evaluate the therapeutic effect, disease progression, and pseudo-enlargement of the tumor or the emergence of another etiology. In the present report, we describe a 79-year-old patient with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) newly detected during nivolumab treatment for recurrent NSCLC. When the patient was 73 years old, he had suffered from NSCLC and received concurrent chemoradiotherapy comprising cisplatin and docetaxel, achieving a complete response. Six years after the chemoradiotherapy, the patient had multiple lung and hepatic lesions. We thus started the treatment with nivolumab for recurrent NSCLC. All those lesions responded to nivolumab over nine cycles. By contrast, a lesion was newly detected in the medial segment of left hepatic lobe, liver segment 4 (S4), and was gradually getting larger, as judged by computed tomographic scan. Liver biopsy revealed the growing lesion to be a well-differentiated HCC. Consequently, the patient was treated with radiofrequency ablation to HCC, while nivolumab treatment was continued for NSCLC. Immunohistochemical analysis of the HCC specimens revealed nuclear accumulation of β-catenin compared with normal liver cells and undetectable expression of program death ligand 1 (PD-L1). Such expression profiles of β-catenin and PD-L1 in HCC may be responsible for the resistance against nivolumab treatment. Immunohistochemical features of the biopsy specimens may be predictive of the effectiveness of the immunotherapy in HCC.

Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy Combined with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Reboots the Immune Response Assisted by Immunotherapy in Metastatic Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have represented a revolution in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To improve these results, combined approaches are being tested. The addition of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) to ICI seems promising. A systematic review was performed in order to assess the safety and efficacy of SABR-ICI combination. Material and Methods: MEDLINE databases from 2009 to March 3, 2019 were reviewed to obtain English language studies reporting clinical outcomes of the combination of ICI-SABR in NSCLC. 18 out of the 429 initial results fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were selected for review. Results: Eighteen articles, including six prospective studies, describing 1736 patients treated with an ICI-SABR combination fulfilled the selection criteria. The reported mean rates for local control and distant/abscopal response rates were 71% and 41%, respectively. Eleven studies reported progression-free survival and overall survival, with a mean of 4.6 and 12.4 months, respectively. Toxicity rates were consistent with the ones attributable to ICI treatment alone. Conclusions: The ICI-SABR combination has a good safety profile and achieves high rates of local control and greater chances of obtaining abscopal responses than SABR alone, with a relevant impact on PFS. More studies are needed to improve patient selection for an optimal benefit from this approach.

The METABANK score: A clinical tool to predict survival after stereotactic radiotherapy for oligometastatic disease

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT, SBRT) is widely used in oligometastatic cancer, but the heterogeneity of the population complicates estimation of the prognosis. We investigated the role of different clinical and inflammatory parameters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included all patients treated with SRT for 1-5 oligometastases between 2003 and 2017 in our center. Patients were randomized between a model training set (2/3) and a separate validation set (1/3). A Cox regression model was built, validated and risk points were attributed to the resulting parameters.

RESULTS

403 patients received SRT for 760 metastases. Treated sites were mainly lung, liver, nodal areas, and brain. Most common primaries were colorectal and lung cancer. Median follow-up for living patients reached 42 months and median overall survival (MS) was 26.6 months (95% CI 23.8-29.3). Five independent adverse factors were discriminated: male sex, synchronous timing of oligometastases, brain metastasis, non-adenocarcinoma histology, KPS <80. A risk score is formed by summation of the points of each factor (M:4, T:2, B:7, N:7, K:8). Four risk groups were defined: (1) 0-2 points: MS 41.2 months (95% CI 30.2-52.3); (2) 3-8 points: 29.3 months (24.6-34.0); (3) 9-13 points: 17.4 months (10.1-24.7), and (4) 14-28 points: 7.9 months (5.5-10.3).

CONCLUSION

We propose a prognostic score applicable in a variety of primary tumors and disease locations, including presence of brain metastases. The nomogram and risk groups can be used to stratify patients in new trials and to support individualized care for oligometastatic patients. An online calculator will become available at predictcancer.org.

Predictive Factors for Response and Survival in a Cohort of Oligometastatic Patients Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

This study evaluated patients, treatment, or disease characteristics that could predict response to stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and survival in a database of patients with oligometastatic disease from different solid tumors.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients treated with SBRT for oligometastatic disease between 2014 and 2015 were included. Patients were defined as oligometastatic if they were affected by a maximum of 5 active lesions in 3 different sites. They had to be treated with SBRT with radical intent.

RESULTS

The study included 358 patients. With a median follow-up of 31.83 months, local control at 6 and 24 months was 94.6% and 78.9%, respectively. Distant progression was recorded in 279 patients (77.9%). Progression-free survival at 6 and 24 months was 66.1% and 18.4%, respectively. At last follow-up, 195 patients (54.5%) were still alive in 59 cases with no evidence of disease. The median overall survival (OS) was 34.7 months (95% confidence interval, 29.66-43.83). OS at 6 and 24 months was 96.07% and 63.57%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, the presence of lung metastases (hazard ratio [HR], 0.50 [0.33-0.75]; P = .001) and nodal metastases (HR, 0.44 [0.24-0.78]; P = .005) was related to longer OS. Primary lung cancer (HR, 1.89 [1.14-3.13]; P = .013), increasing age (HR, 1.02 [1.01-1.04]; P = .002), and the presence of metastatic sites other than the irradiated ones (HR, 2.19 [1.39-3.43]; P = .001) were all independent predictors of shorter OS. Local response was associated with OS.

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT for patients with oligometastatic disease is effective. Local response is strongly correlated with patients'' prognosis, also underlying its relevance in a metastatic setting.

Survival and prognostic factors of pulmonary oligometastases treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for pulmonary oligometastatic disease achieves excellent treatment outcomes in terms of local control and toxicity. Patients treated with SBRT are often elderly and have multiple co-morbidities. This subset of patients may experience different survival as compared to young and fit patients subjected to radical metastasectomies. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate OS and identify factors associated with OS for inoperable pulmonary oligometastases treated with SBRT.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Criteria used for selection of patients with oligometastases included: metastases limited to ≤2 organs and in total ≤5 metastases at the time of treatment. Peripheral tumors were treated with 51 Gy to 60 Gy in three fractions or a single fraction of 30 Gy. Central tumors received a dose of 45-60 Gy in 5-8 fractions. Survival probabilities were estimated by means of Kaplan-Meier method and the relation between potential prognostic factors and OS was studied by means of Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

In this study, 327 inoperable pulmonary oligometastases in 206 patients were treated with SBRT from the year 2005 to 2015. Primary sites of pulmonary oligometastases included colorectal carcinoma (n = 118), lung carcinoma (n = 36), melanoma (n = 11), sarcoma (n = 10), breast carcinoma (n = 7), and other tumors sites (n = 24). Median follow-up was 26 months. Median survival was 33 months. The 2-year and 5-year OS rates were 63% and 30%, respectively. On univariate analysis synchronous oligometastases (HR 0.59) and colorectal primary (HR 0.64) were associated with improved OS. On multivariable analysis synchronous oligometastases (HR 0.56), colorectal primary (HR 0.62) and tumor size <3 cm (HR 0.68) were independently associated with OS.

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT to pulmonary oligometastases was associated with a 2-year OS of 63%. Tumor size <3 cm and colorectal primary tumors experienced improved OS compared to tumors >3 cm and non-colorectal primary tumors.

Oligometastatic breast cancer

Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is considered as incurable. The group of patients with oligometastatic disease (a few metastatic lesions and organs involved) apparently have better prognosis. It is claimed that, these patients could be treated with curative intent, and multidisciplinary aggressive approach should be considered. Despite the lack of strong data it is increasingly accepted in clinical practice. Currently, the appropriate candidate would be young woman with good performance status, low tumour burden with long disease-free interval. Because for them with already favorable nature of their disease, aggressive treatment has greater chances to improve survivals. Local ablative treatment (radiotherapy/surgery) has a crucial role in this setting. Available mainly from retrospective in nature long-term results are encouraging but need confirmation in prospective randomized studies. In this review, I discuss the definition of oligometastatic disease, its nature, currently available data and ongoing prospective randomized trials dedicated to oligometastatic breast cancer patients.

Surgical intervention may be a therapeutic option for NSCLC patients with AJCC stage IV: a large population-based study

Background

Few studies have focused on the role of surgery in the treatment of stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In our study, we mainly focused on the surgical therapeutic option for NSCLC patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage IV.

Patients and methods

Using the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database, we screened out an appropriate patient population with stage IV NSCLC treated between 2004 and 2013. Kaplan–Meier curve analysis was used to compare the survival between patients receiving surgery and standard of care. The effect of surgery on primary and regional/distant sites on overall survival (OS) was further evaluated by Cox proportional hazard model. Finally, subgroup analysis based on patient and disease variables was conducted by Cox proportional hazard and presented as a forest plot.

Results

A total of 61,418 stage IV NSCLC patients were enrolled. However, only 11.6% received local surgical treatment. Surgery to primary and regional/distant sites were both independent prognostic factors of OS (P<0.001). Survival advantage was identified in those patients who received surgery to primary sites for all subgroup variables (P<0.001). However, survival benefit was not demonstrated for patients with surgery to regional/distant sites in some subgroup variables, including black racial background, squamous cell carcinoma, large cell carcinoma, and N1 staging (all, P>0.1). Importantly, we observed that surgery of primary tumor sites at stage N0 showed the maximum OS benefit (P<0.001).

Conclusion

These findings about N staging and primary tumor site treatment should be taken into consideration by surgeons when determining the suitability of surgery for stage IV NSCLC patients.

Locoregional control and survival after lymph node SBRT in oligometastatic disease

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as an effective option in oligo-metastatic cancer patients affected by lymph node metastases, but its use might be questioned due to risk of regional and distant dissemination through the lymph node chain. The primary aim of our study was to assess the loco-regional control following SBRT in this setting. Ninety-one patients undergoing SBRT for at least one lymph node metastasis from miscellaneous primary tumors were retrospectively evaluated for patterns of failure and toxicity. locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) at 4 years were 79 and 44%. Repeated use of local therapy after progression resulted in a median interval of 17 months until allocation to systemic therapy or supportive care. Forty-three percent of patients were alive at 4 years. Local failure, occurring in 15% of patients, was the only predictor of poor survival (HR: 3.06). Tumor diameter ≥ 30 mm and urothelial primary tumor predicted for impaired local control (HR: 4.59 and 5.43, respectively). Metastases from pulmonary cancer showed a significant earlier distant dissemination (HR: 3.53). Only acute and late grade 1–2 toxicities were reported except for 1 case of G3 dysphagia. Loco-regional failure risk is low (18%) and justifies the use of local therapies for patients with oligometastatic disease. Durable disease remission can be achieved by iterative use of local approaches. Local control is correlated to improved OS. Diameter and primary tumor type may affect response to SBRT and risk for early metastatic dissemination.

Oligometastatic prostate cancer and salvage lymph node dissection: systematic review

INTRODUCTION

We provide a comprehensive description of the physio-pathological theories behind oligometastatic prostate cancer (PCa) and analyze modern imaging techniques, presenting a systematic review of the available evidences regarding salvage lymph node dissection (sLND).

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic review was attempted. The PubMed/Medline database was searched for "salvage" AND ("lymph node dissection" OR "lymphadenectomy") AND "prostate" AND "cancer." Only English publications were targeted. Relevant original articles addressing the role of sLND in PCa were selected.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Biochemical response (BR) was reported in 10-79.5% of the cases overall. These results were not durable and biochemical recurrence occurred in 54.5-93.8% of the cases, within 5 years. Furthermore, 50-80% of patients received some kind of adjuvant treatment right after sLND, regardless post-operative prostate-specific antigen levels. Surgery-related morbidity was low, with a 0-27% incidence of Clavien-Dindo III complications. No sLND-related deaths were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

sLND is not associated with a durable response over time but may postpone HT and its related complications, in selected patients. Although a limited morbidity was reported, sLND remains technically demanding and a careful selection of patients is advisable.

Classification for long-term survival in oligometastatic patients treated with ablative radiotherapy: A multi-institutional pooled analysis

Background

Radiotherapy is increasingly used to treat oligometastatic patients. We sought to identify prognostic criteria in oligometastatic patients undergoing definitive hypofractionated image-guided radiotherapy (HIGRT).

Methods

Exclusively extracranial oligometastatic patients treated with HIGRT were pooled. Characteristics including age, sex, primary tumor type, interval to metastatic diagnosis, number of treated metastases and organs, metastatic site, prior systemic therapy for primary tumor treatment, prior definitive metastasis-directed therapy, and systemic therapy for metastasis associated with overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and treated metastasis control (TMC) were assessed by the Cox proportional hazards method. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) identified prognostic risk strata for OS and PFS based on pretreatment factors.

Results

361 patients were included. Primary tumors included non-small cell lung (17%), colorectal (19%), and breast cancer (16%). Three-year OS was 56%, PFS was 24%, and TMC was 72%. On multivariate analysis, primary tumor, interval to metastases, treated metastases number, and mediastinal/hilar lymph node, liver, or adrenal metastases were associated with OS. Primary tumor site, involved organ number, liver metastasis, and prior primary disease chemotherapy were associated with PFS.

OS RPA identified five classes: class 1: all breast, kidney, or prostate cancer patients (BKP) (3-year OS 75%, 95% CI 66–85%); class 2: patients without BKP with disease-free interval of 75+ months (3-year OS 85%, 95% CI 67–100%); class 3: patients without BKP, shorter disease-free interval, ≤ two metastases, and age < 62 (3-year OS 55%, 95% CI 48–64%); class 4: patients without BKP, shorter disease-free interval, ≥ three metastases, and age < 62 (3-year OS 38%, 95% CI 24–60%); class 5: all others (3-year OS 13%, 95% CI 5–35%). Higher biologically effective dose (BED) (p < 0.01) was associated with OS.

Conclusions

We identified clinical factors defining oligometastatic patients with favorable outcomes, who we hypothesize are most likely to benefit from metastasis-directed therapy.

Stereotactic ablative body radiation for oligometastatic and oligoprogressive disease

Stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) exists on a spectrum, with a subset of patients presenting with oligometastatic disease involving only a limited number of distant sites. For these patients, local consolidative therapy (LCT) has been demonstrated to improve outcomes through ablation or cytoreduction of metastatic disease, as shown in an increasing number of randomized controlled trials. In particular, stereotactic ablative body radiation (SABR) has emerged as a feasible treatment modality for elimination of oligometastatic sites. This focused review examines the underlying biologic mechanisms and clinical data in support of SABR in the setting of oligometastatic NSCLC. Following a comprehensive evaluation of the pertinent retrospective, prospective, and anticipated trials to date, we summarize the evidence regarding patient selection, treatment safety, and technical considerations to provide guidance of this approach for clinicians.

Oligometastatic state predicts a favorable outcome for renal cell carcinoma patients with bone metastasis under the treatment of sunitinib

Background

The aim of the study was to investigate whether RCC patients with oligometastatic state of bone metastasis treated with sunitinib had a favorable clinical outcome.

Results

22 patients were classified into oligometastatic state of bone metastasis with a median OS of 30.1 months (95%CI: 26.3 to 33.8 months). The 45 patients with non-oligometastatic state had a median OS of 12.7 months (95%CI: 9.43 to 16.0 months). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significant difference between them (Log Rank test p<0.001). When we set patients with only multiple bone (at least 5 sites) metastases as a single group, there was still significant difference between oligometastatic state group and non-oligometastatic state groups. In multivariate Cox proportion hazard ratio analysis, metastatic states (p=0.012), MSKCC score (p=0.002), ECOG (p=0.001) and lymph nodes metastasis (p=0.000) were significantly associated with prognosis. The integration of metastatic state into the MSKCC risk model improved the c-index from 0.651 to 0.752

Method

67 patients from Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center with bone metastatic RCC were divided into 2 metastatic states. One included those with oligometastatic state of bone metastasis with less than 5 sites of bone metastasis. The other involved those patients with multiple bone metastases (at least 5 sites) or together with other sites of metastasis. Then patients with only multiple bone (at least 5 sites) metastases were set into a single group.

Conclusion

RCC patients with oligometastatic state of bone metastasis treated with sunitinib had a favorable clinical outcome.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligo-recurrence in the liver in a patient with esophageal carcinoma: A case report

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a safe and effective treatment for solitary cancerous lesions. The present study reported a rare case of sustained remission after SBRT for oligorecurrence in the liver in a patient with esophageal carcinoma. A 60-year-old Japanese man presented with a chief complaint of dysphagia. On medical examination, the patient was diagnosed as having squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus that was clinically staged as T4bN1M0. The patient received definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy, consisting of four 28-day cycles of chemotherapy comprising nedaplatin 80 mg/m² on day 1 and S-1 120 mg/body orally on days 1-14, with radiotherapy comprising a total of 50 Gy in daily fractions of 2 Gy. After a 9-month disease-free interval following the primary treatment, a solitary liver metastasis was identified. The patient underwent SBRT using a radiation dose of 48 Gy in 4 fractions and two 28-day cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy comprising nedaplatin 80 mg/m² on day 1, and S-1 100 mg/body orally on days 1-14. The patient exhibited no signs of recurrence for 3 years with sustained local control. SBRT may be considered a treatment option for patients with relapsed esophageal cancer with oligo-recurrence in the liver.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Lung Metastases from Colorectal Cancer: Prognostic Factors for Disease Control and Survival

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate disease control and survival after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for lung metastases from colorectal cancer and to identify prognostic factors after treatment.

METHODS

Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer to the lungs treated with SBRT from 2002 to 2013 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Patients may have received prior systemic therapy, radiotherapy to nonthoracic sites and/or resection of thoracic and/or nonthoracic metastases. Endpoints were timed from end of SBRT and included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, distant metastases-free survival, and local failure-free survival. Univariate and multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazard modeling was used to identify prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients were identified. Before SBRT, 69.2% and 33.8% of patients received systemic therapy and lung-directed local therapy, respectively, for metastatic disease. At the time of SBRT, 64.6% had lung-only involvement. Median survivals were: OS of 20.3 months (95% confidence intervals [CI], 15.9-27.0 mo), progression-free survival of 5.7 months (95% CI, 3.2-7.0 mo), distant metastases-free survival of 5.8 months (95% CI, 3.2-7.6 mo), and local failure-free survival of 15.4 months (95% CI, 8.5-21.1 mo). Nearly all (98%) patients developed distant progression. Extra lung and liver involvement at the time of initial metastases (hazard ratios [HR] 2.10) and extra lung involvement at SBRT (HR 2.67) were the only independent predictors of OS. Net gross target volume of >14.1 mL (HR 2.49) was the only independent predictor of local failure-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Reasonable survival and local control can be achieved with SBRT. We identified several prognostic factors testable in future prospective trials that may help improve patient selection.

Long-term outcomes of surgical resection for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: A national analysis

OBJECTIVE

Treatment guidelines recommend surgical resection in select cases of stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but are based on limited evidence. This study evaluated outcomes associated with surgery in stage IV disease.

METHODS

Factors associated with survival of stage IV NSCLC patients treated with surgery in the National Cancer Date Base (2004-2013) were evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses. Outcomes of the subset of patients with cT1-2, N0-1, M1 and cT3, N0, M1 disease treated with surgery or chemoradiation were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analyses.

RESULTS

The five-year survival of all stage IV NSCLC patients who underwent surgical resection (n=3098) was 21.1%. Outcomes were related to the locoregional extent of the primary tumor, as both increasing T status (T2 HR 1.30 [p<0.001], T3 HR 1.28 [p<0.001], and T4 HR 1.28 [p<0.001], respectively, compared to T1) and nodal involvement (N1 HR 1.34 [p<0.001], N2 HR 1.50 [p<0.001], and N3 HR 1.49 [p<0.001], respectively, compared to N0) were associated with worse survival. Outcomes were also related to the extent of surgical resection, as pneumonectomy (HR 1.58, p<0.001), segmentectomy (HR 1.36, p=0.009), and wedge resection (HR 1.70, p<0.001) were all associated with decreased survival when compared to lobectomy. The five-year survival of cT1-2, N0-1, M1 and cT3, N0, M1 patients was 25.1% (95% CI: 22.8-27.5) after surgical resection (n=1761) and 5.8% (95% CI: 5.2-6.5) after chemoradiation (n=8180).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery for cT1-2, N0-1, M1 or cT3, N0, M1 disease is associated with a 5-year survival of 25% and does not appear to compromise outcomes when compared to non-operative therapy, supporting guidelines that recommend surgery for very select patients with stage IV disease. However, surgery provides less benefit and should be considered much less often for stage IV patients with mediastinal nodal disease or more locally advanced tumors.

Oligometastatic cancer: stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for patients affected by isolated body metastasis

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the outcome of patients affected by a single isolated body metastasis treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Seven-eight patients were treated with SBRT for isolated body metastasis. The most frequent primary tumor was prostate cancer (28.2%), followed by colorectal cancer (23.1%) and lung cancer (20.5%). Median age at diagnosis of oligometastatic disease was 70 years (range 47-88). Median Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) was 90 (range 70-100). The most common SBRT fractionation scheme was 5 × 7 Gy (total dose 35 Gy). Response to radiotherapy was determined according to RECIST criteria v1.1. Toxicity was registered according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0. The survival analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier method. The correlation between time actuarial incidence and clinical parameters was studied, and the Kaplan-Meier method of log-rank test was applied.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 22.68 months, local control was achieved in 89.7% of the cases. The two-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 68% and 42%, respectively. On univariate analysis, KPS ≥80 is predictive for improved OS (p = .001) and PFS (p = .001). Acute toxicity of grade ≥2 occurred in eight (10.2%) patients and late grade ≥2 toxicity in five (6.4%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Ablative radiotherapy in 'early oligometastatic state' is a safe, effective and minimally invasive treatment modality. A good performance status (KPS ≥80) seems to influence the clinical outcome.

Radiosurgery for liver metastases. A single institution experience

AIM

To report our initial results on the use of radiosurgery for treatment of liver metastases.

BACKGROUND

In recent years there has been increasing interest in the use of stereotactic body radiation therapy to treat metastatic disease to the liver as an alternative to interventional procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between November 2008 and June 2015 a total of 36 LINAC-based radiosurgeries using VMAT were performed in 27 patients with liver metastases from 10 different primary sites. Doses ranged from 21 Gy to 60 Gy in 1 to 5 fractions. In all patients the volume of liver receiving less than 15 Gy was more than 700 cc. The volume treated with the prescription dose ranged from 1 cc to 407 cc with a median of 58 cc. All patients but one received systemic treatment.

RESULTS

Overall median survival for the entire group is 9 months (ranging from 1 to 67 months). Local recurrence free survival ranged from 4 to 67 months with a median of 14 months. Twenty patients (80%) survived more than six months. Three patients treated for oligometastases were alive after 3 years. Grade 0 toxicity was encountered in 22/27 patients, Grade 1 toxicity in 5/27 and only 1/27 patient experienced Grade 2 toxicity. No patient experienced grade 3-4 toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Based on these initial results we conclude that SBRT for treating liver metastases with radiosurgery is safe and effective for treating one or multiple lesions as long as normal tissue constraints for liver are respected.