Analgesic efficacy and CSF pharmacokinetics of intrathecal morphine-6-glucuronide: comparison with morphine

Hydrocodone, Oxycodone, and Morphine Metabolism and Drug-Drug Interactions

Awareness of drug interactions involving opioids is critical for patient treatment as they are common therapeutics used in numerous care settings, including both chronic and disease-related pain. Not only do opioids have narrow therapeutic indexes and are extensively used, but they have the potential to cause severe toxicity. Opioids are the classical pain treatment for patients who suffer from moderate to severe pain. More importantly, opioids are often prescribed in combination with multiple other drugs, especially in patient populations who typically are prescribed a large drug regimen. This review focuses on the current knowledge of common opioid drug-drug interactions (DDIs), focusing specifically on hydrocodone, oxycodone, and morphine DDIs. The DDIs covered in this review include pharmacokinetic DDI arising from enzyme inhibition or induction, primarily due to inhibition of cytochrome p450 enzymes (CYPs). However, opioids such as morphine are metabolized by uridine-5'-diphosphoglucuronosyltransferases (UGTs), principally UGT2B7, and glucuronidation is another important pathway for opioid-drug interactions. This review also covers several pharmacodynamic DDI studies as well as the basics of CYP and UGT metabolism, including detailed opioid metabolism and the potential involvement of metabolizing enzyme gene variation in DDI. Based upon the current literature, further studies are needed to fully investigate and describe the DDI potential with opioids in pain and related disease settings to improve clinical outcomes for patients. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: A review of the literature focusing on drug-drug interactions involving opioids is important because they can be toxic and potentially lethal, occurring through pharmacodynamic interactions as well as pharmacokinetic interactions occurring through inhibition or induction of drug metabolism.

Evidence-based guidance for use of intrathecal morphine as an alternative to diamorphine for Caesarean delivery analgesia

Intrathecal morphine in combination with fentanyl is an effective and safe alternative to diamorphine for Caesarean delivery analgesia. Evidence suggests minimal differences in clinical efficacy and side-effects between intrathecal morphine and diamorphine. Recommended intrathecal morphine doses for Caesarean delivery analgesia are 100-150 ug.

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model for the prediction of morphine brain disposition and analgesia in adults and children

Morphine is a widely used opioid analgesic, which shows large differences in clinical response in children, even when aiming for equivalent plasma drug concentrations. Age-dependent brain disposition of morphine could contribute to this variability, as developmental increase in blood-brain barrier (BBB) P-glycoprotein (Pgp) expression has been reported. In addition, age-related pharmacodynamics might also explain the variability in effect. To assess the influence of these processes on morphine effectiveness, a multi-compartment brain physiologically based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PB-PK/PD) model was developed in R (Version 3.6.2). Active Pgp-mediated morphine transport was measured in MDCKII-Pgp cells grown on transwell filters and translated by an in vitro-in vivo extrapolation approach, which included developmental Pgp expression. Passive BBB permeability of morphine and its active metabolite morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) and their pharmacodynamic parameters were derived from experiments reported in literature. Model simulations after single dose morphine were compared with measured and published concentrations of morphine and M6G in plasma, brain extracellular fluid (ECF) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), as well as published drug responses in children (1 day– 16 years) and adults. Visual predictive checks indicated acceptable overlays between simulated and measured morphine and M6G concentration-time profiles and prediction errors were between 1 and -1. Incorporation of active Pgp-mediated BBB transport into the PB-PK/PD model resulted in a 1.3-fold reduced brain exposure in adults, indicating only a modest contribution on brain disposition. Analgesic effect-time profiles could be described reasonably well for older children and adults, but were largely underpredicted for neonates. In summary, an age-appropriate morphine PB-PK/PD model was developed for the prediction of brain pharmacokinetics and analgesic effects. In the neonatal population, pharmacodynamic characteristics, but not brain drug disposition, appear to be altered compared to adults and older children, which may explain the reported differences in analgesic effect.

Developmental processes in children can affect pharmacokinetics: “what the body does to the drug” as well as pharmacodynamics: “what the drug does to the body”. A typical example is morphine, of which the analgesic response is variable and particularly neonates suffer more often from respiratory depression, even when receiving doses corrected for differences in elimination. One way to mathematically incorporate developmental processes is by employing physiologically based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PB-PK/PD) models, where physiological differences between individuals are incorporated. In this study, we developed a morphine PB-PK/PD model to predict brain drug disposition as well as analgesic response in adults and children, as both processes could potentially contribute to developmental variability in the effect of morphine. We found that age-related variation in BBB expression of the main morphine efflux transporter P-glycoprotein was not responsible for differences in brain exposure. In contrast, pharmacodynamic modelling suggested an increased sensitivity to morphine in neonates.

Diagnosis of Heroin Overdose in an 8-Year-Old Boy: Reliable Contribution of Toxicological Investigations

Toxicological investigations are often required by clinicians in comatose patients with suspected poisoning. However, the usefulness of toxicological analyses to support a diagnosis of acute poisoning is debated among clinicians and the interpretation of laboratory tests is challenging given the wide diversity of analytical techniques available. We report the case of an 8-year-old boy who was admitted to an intensive care unit with severe respiratory depression and neurological impairment. In order to formulate appropriate hypothesizes about the diagnosis and circumstances of intoxication, clinicians consulted toxicologists for a comprehensive toxicological screening. Routine blood immunoassays were negative for common toxicants but urine tests were positive for opiates. A general unknown screening using liquid and gas chromatography combined with mass spectrometry detection confirmed the presence of morphine, codeine and related glucuronides metabolites in plasma and urine. Subsequently, morphine and codeine were quantified in plasma samples by online-SPE-LC-MS-MS. In addition, analyses performed with GC-MS and LC-MSn identified compounds used as markers when profiling illicit heroin, namely noscapine, dextromethorphan and codeine. In conjunction with the patient's history, clinical picture and circumstances of intoxication, toxicological findings strongly suggested an acute pediatric opioid overdose as a collateral damage of parental heroin abuse in the home. This case highlights the significant contribution of toxicological investigations in sensitive legal cases and the critical role of communications between clinicians and toxicologists.

Pharmacological consequences of long-term morphine treatment in patients with cancer and chronic non-malignant pain

BACKGROUND

In patients with pain of malignant origin morphine may be administered in high and often increasing doses during extended periods of time. In patients with chronic pain of non-malignant origin morphine may be an important remedy, and in these cases the goal is to keep the morphine dose stable. The pharmacokinetic as well as the pharmacodynamic consequences of long-term morphine treatment with special reference to the two most important metabolites of morphine morphine-6-glucuronide (M-6-G) and morphine-3-glucuronide (M-3-G) remain to be settled.

METHODS

Assessments for pain, sedation and other morphine induced side effects were made several times for 19 cancer patients treated with changing doses of oral sustained release (SR) morphine and twice for 17 non-cancer patients treated with stable doses of SR morphine. Blood samples were obtained simultaneously and analysed for contents of morphine, M-3-G and M-6-G by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).

RESULTS

Significant correlations were found between the daily dose of SR morphine and plasma morphine (r = 0.469, p < 0.01), plasma M-6-G (r = 0.677, p < 0.01), and plasma M-3-G ((r = 0.827, p < 0.01), in the cancer patient group, but only between the daily dose of SR morphine and plasma M-3-G (0.662, p < 0.01) and plasma M-6-G (0.571, p < 0.01) in the non-cancer patient group. Normalised M-3-G/M and M-6-G/M ratios for the cancer patient group were independent of duration of treatment and daily dose of SR morphine. Likewise in the non-cancer patient group duration of treatment did not influence the metabolite ratios. Correlations between pain score and plasma morphine, M-6-G and M-6-G/M were weak in the cancer patient as well as in the non-cancer patient group making it impossible to draw any conclusion regarding the potential contributory analgesic effect of M-6-G. Dryness of the mouth was the most frequent adverse effect reported in the non-cancer as well as the cancer patient group. In the latter group patients complaining of dryness of the mouth had significantly higher plasma morphine and M-6-G concentrations than patients who did not suffer from this side effect. This difference persisted (or was close to significance) when excluding patients receiving antidepressants.

CONCLUSION

In the cancer patient group neither dose nor treatment period seems to influence morphine glucuronidation. Likewise in the non-cancer patient group receiving stable doses of morphine duration of treatment does not seem to influence morphine glucuronidation. Dryness of the mouth was positively correlated to high plasma concentrations of morphine and M-6-G.

Analgesic effects of codeine-6-glucuronide after intravenous administration

Centrally administered codeine glucuronide has been shown to exhibit antinociceptive properties with decreased immunosuppressive effects compared to codeine. In this study, codeine-6-glucuronide was administered to rats, and its analgesic effect was compared to that of codeine. The concentrations of codeine and its metabolites in plasma and brain were also determined at the peak response time after administration of each compound. Receptor-binding studies with rat brain homogenates and affinity profiles were also determined. Intravenous administration of codeine-6-glucuronide resulted in approximately 60% of the analgesic response elicited by codeine itself. Analysis of plasma and brain showed that codeine-6-glucuronide is relatively stable in vivo, with only small amounts of morphine-6-glucuronide being detected in addition to unchanged codeine-6-glucuronide. The receptor affinity of codeine-6-glucuronide was similar to that of codeine. It is concluded that intravenously administered codeine-6-glucuronide possesses analgesic activity similar to that of codeine, and may have clinical benefit in the treatment of pain

Modulation of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase activity by endogenous compounds

Glucuronidation is one of the major pathways of metabolism of endo- and xenobiotics. UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase (UGT)-catalyzed glucuronidation accounts for up to 35% of phase II reactions. The expression and function of UGT is modulated by gene regulation, post-translational modifications and protein-protein association. Many studies have focused on drug-drug interactions involving UGT, and there are a number of reports describing the inhibition of UGT by xenobiotics. However, studies about the role of endogenous compounds as an inhibitor or activator of UGT are limited, and it is important to understand any change in the function and regulation of UGT by endogenous compounds. Recent studies in our laboratory have shown that fatty acyl-CoAs are endogenous activators of UGT, although fatty acyl-CoAs had been considered as inhibitors of UGT. Further, we have also suggested that adenine and related compounds are endogenous allosteric inhibitors of UGT. In this review, we summarize the endogenous modulators of UGT and discuss their relevance to UGT function.

A double-blind, randomized, crossover comparison between single-dose and double-dose immediate-release oral morphine at bedtime in cancer patients

The European Association for Palliative Care guidelines for treatment of cancer pain recommend a double dose (DD) of immediate-release morphine at bedtime instead of single doses (SD) repeated every four hours throughout the night. A previous open controlled study reported more side effects after DD than after SD. The present study was a randomized, double-blind, crossover study comparison of DD and SD of immediate-release morphine during the night, followed by an open pharmacokinetic study. The primary outcome was average pain intensity during the night, as measured on an 11-point numerical rating scale. Secondary outcomes were morning pain, number of rescue medications, adverse effects (nausea, xerostomia, tiredness, sleep quality, and number of awaking episodes) and patient preference. Morphine and metabolites were quantified by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. Nineteen patients completed the clinical study; 13 participated in the pharmacokinetic follow up. Average pain during the night for DD vs. SD was close to statistical significance (mean 0.8 and 1.4, respectively, P=0.058; mean [95% confidence interval] for the difference was 0.50 [0.02, 1.0]). A similar trend was observed for strongest night pain (P=0.069) and sleep quality (P=0.077). Only two patients required rescue morphine. Four patients had no treatment preference; nine and six favored DD and SD, respectively. DD patients displayed higher area under the curve for morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide during the first part of the night. Although DD tended to perform slightly better than SD, a difference in average pain during the night of 0.50 has little clinical significance, and the two procedures are, therefore, clinically equivalent. It is speculated whether the initial higher exposure to morphine-6-glucuronide may have clinical significance.

Intrathecal analgesia for refractory cancer pain

The use of intrathecal analgesics is an important treatment consideration for many patients with chronic cancer pain. This review describes the various opioid and nonopioid analgesics that have been used in this setting, including morphine, hydromorphone, fentanyl, meperidine, methadone, sufentanil, local anesthetics, clonidine, ketamine, baclofen, midazolam, betamethasone, and octreotide. We discuss available evidence for their analgesic and adverse effects.

Role of active metabolites in the use of opioids

The opioid class of drugs, a large group, is mainly used for the treatment of acute and chronic persistent pain. All are eliminated from the body via metabolism involving principally CYP3A4 and the highly polymorphic CYP2D6, which markedly affects the drug's function, and by conjugation reactions mainly by UGT2B7. In many cases, the resultant metabolites have the same pharmacological activity as the parent opioid; however in many cases, plasma metabolite concentrations are too low to make a meaningful contribution to the overall clinical effects of the parent drug. These metabolites are invariably more water soluble and require renal clearance as an important overall elimination pathway. Such metabolites have the potential to accumulate in the elderly and in those with declining renal function with resultant accumulation to a much greater extent than the parent opioid. The best known example is the accumulation of morphine-6-glucuronide from morphine. Some opioids have active metabolites but at different target sites. These are norpethidine, a neurotoxic agent, and nordextropropoxyphene, a cardiotoxic agent. Clinicians need to be aware that many opioids have active metabolites that will become therapeutically important, for example in cases of altered pathology, drug interactions and genetic polymorphisms of drug-metabolizing enzymes. Thus, dose individualisation and the avoidance of adverse effects of opioids due to the accumulation of active metabolites or lack of formation of active metabolites are important considerations when opioids are used.

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Pilot Study of IV Morphine-6-Glucuronide for Postoperative Pain Relief After Knee Replacement Surgery

OBJECTIVES

To determine the dose-response effect of intravenous morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) on acute postoperative pain.

METHODS

Patients undergoing knee replacement surgery under spinal anesthesia were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 single intravenous M6G doses, 0 (placebo), 10, 20, or 30 mg/70 kg, administered 150 minutes after the spinal anesthetic was given. Analgesic effects were evaluated by determining the cumulative patient controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine dose, consumed over a 12 and 24 hours period, after the initial dose of M6G. For pain assessments, a 10 cm visual analog scale was used.

RESULTS

Data from 41 patients were evaluated (n=10, 10, 10, and 11 in the 0, 10, 20, and 30 mg M6G groups). Only at the highest M6G dose (30 mg/70 kg), morphine PCA consumption was significantly less compared with placebo: over the first 12 postoperative hours mean PCA morphine consumption was 3.0+/-2.0 mg/h after placebo and 1.4+/-0.5 mg/h after 30 mg M6G (P=0.03); over the first 24 h mean PCA morphine consumption was 2.5+/-2.1 mg after placebo and 1.0+/-0.4 mg after 30 mg M6G (P=0.04) (mean+/-SD). Visual analog scale values were similar across all groups during these time periods.

DISCUSSION

The analgesic effect of M6G in postoperative pain was demonstrated with 30 mg/70 kg M6G superior to placebo. At this dose, M6G has a long duration of action as determined by a reduction in the use of morphine PCA over 12 and 24 hours.

Blood-brain distribution of morphine-6-glucuronide in sheep

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

At present there are few data regarding the rate and extent of brain-blood partitioning of the opioid active metabolite of morphine, morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G). In this study the cerebral kinetics of M6G were determined, after a short-term intravenous infusion, in chronically instrumented conscious sheep.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Five sheep received an intravenous infusion of M6G 2.2 mg kg(-1) over a four-minute period. Non-linear mixed-effects analysis, with hybrid physiologically based kinetic models, was used to estimate cerebral kinetics from the arterio-sagittal sinus concentration gradients and cerebral blood flow measurements.

KEY RESULTS

A membrane limited model was selected as the final model. The blood-brain equilibration of M6G was relatively slow (time to reach 50% equilibration of the deep compartment 5.8 min), with low membrane permeability (PS, population mean, 2.5 ml min(-1)) from the initial compartment (V1, 13.7 ml) to a small deep distribution volume (V2) of 18.4 ml. There was some between-animal variability (%CV) in the initial distribution volume (29%), but this was not identified for PS or V2.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Pharmacokinetic modelling of M6G showed a delayed equilibration between brain and blood of a nature that is primarily limited by permeability across the blood-brain-barrier, in accordance with its physico-chemical properties.

Morphine-6-Glucuronide: Morphine??s Successor for Postoperative Pain Relief?

In searching for an analgesic with fewer side effects than morphine, examination of morphine's active metabolite, morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G), suggests that M6G is possibly such a drug. In contrast to morphine, M6G is not metabolized but excreted via the kidneys and exhibits enterohepatic cycling, as it is a substrate for multidrug resistance transporter proteins in the liver and intestines. M6G exhibits a delay in its analgesic effect (blood-effect site equilibration half-life 4-8 h), which is partly related to slow passage through the blood-brain barrier and distribution within the brain compartment. In humans, M6G's potency is just half of that of morphine. In clinical studies, M6G is well tolerated and produces adequate and long lasting postoperative analgesia. At analgesic doses, M6G causes similar reduction of the ventilatory response to CO2 as an equianalgesic dose of morphine but significantly less depression of the hypoxic ventilatory response. Preliminary data indicate that M6G is associated less than morphine with nausea and vomiting, causing 50% and 75% less nausea in postoperative and experimental settings, respectively. Although the data from the literature are very promising, we believe that more studies are necessary before we may conclude that M6G is superior to morphine for postoperative analgesia.

Opioid metabolites

The metabolism of opioids closely relates to their chemical structure. Opioids are subject to O-dealkylation, N-dealkylation, ketoreduction, or deacetylation leading to phase-I metabolites. By glucuronidation or sulfatation, phase-II metabolites are formed. Some metabolites of opioids have an activity themselves and contribute to the effects of the parent compound. This can go as far that the main clinical activity is exerted through active metabolites while the parent compounds are only weak agonist at mu-opioid receptors, as in the case of codeine and tilidine. The clinical effects of tramadol also involve an important contribution of its active metabolite. With morphine, the active metabolite morphine-6-glucuronide exerts important clinical opioid effects when it accumulates in the plasma of patients with renal failure. However, after short-term administration of morphine, its contribution to the central nervous effects of morphine is probably poor. Morphine-6-glucuronide has recently been identified to exert important peripheral opioid effects. By this, it may play an important role in the clinical effects of morphine. Several other opioids, such as meperidine and perhaps also morphine and hydromorphone, produce metabolites with neuroexcitatory effects. In sum, the evidence suggests that the metabolites of several opioids account for an important part of the clinical effects that must be considered in clinical practice.

Improved Brain Uptake and Pharmacological Activity Profile of Morphine-6-Glucuronide Using a Peptide Vector-Mediated Strategy

Morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G), an active metabolite of morphine, has been shown to have significantly attenuated brain penetration relative to that of morphine. Recently, we have demonstrated that conjugation of various drugs to peptide vectors significantly enhances their brain uptake. In this study, we have conjugated morphine-6-glucuronide to a peptide vector SynB3 to enhance its brain uptake and its analgesic potency after systemic administration. We show by in situ brain perfusion that vectorization of M6G (Syn1001) markedly enhances the brain uptake of M6G. This enhancement results in a significant improvement in the pharmacological activity of M6G in several models of nociception. Syn1001 was about 4 times more potent than free M6G (ED(50) of 1.87 versus 8.74 micromol/kg). Syn1001 showed also a prolonged duration of action compared with free M6G (300 and 120 min, respectively). Furthermore, the conjugation of M6G results in a lowered respiratory depression, as measured in a rat model. Taken together, these data strongly support the utility of peptide-mediated strategies for improving the efficacy of drugs such as M6G for the treatment of pain.

Morphine-6-glucuronide: Actions and mechanisms

Morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) appears to show equivalent analgesia to morphine but to have a superior side-effect profile in terms of reduced liability to induce nausea and vomiting and respiratory depression. The purpose of this review is to examine the evidence behind this statement and to identify the possible reasons that may contribute to the profile of M6G. The vast majority of available data supports the notion that both M6G and morphine mediate their effects by activating the micro-opioid receptor. The differences for which there is a reasonable consensus in the literature can be summarized as: (1) Morphine has a slightly higher affinity for the micro-opioid receptor than M6G, (2) M6G shows a slightly higher efficacy at the micro-opioid receptor, (3) M6G has a lower affinity for the kappa-opioid receptor than morphine, and (4) M6G has a very different absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) profile from morphine. However, none of these are adequate alone to explain the clinical differences between M6G and morphine. The ADME differences are perhaps most likely to explain some of the differences but seem unlikely to be the whole story. Further work is required to examine further the profile of M6G, notably whether M6G penetrates differentially to areas of the brain involved in pain and those involved in nausea, vomiting, and respiratory control or whether micro-opioid receptors in these brain areas differ in either their regulation or pharmacology.

Morphine metabolites as novel analgesic drugs?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Morphine metabolites have attracted continuing interest for their contribution to the desired and unwanted effects of morphine. Among the metabolites of morphine, morphine-6-glucuronide has been given most scientific attention. It accounts for 10% of the morphine metabolism, acts as an agonist at mu-opioid receptors and exerts antinociceptive effects. This review summarizes the recent findings on morphine-6-glucuronide and discusses its potential use as an analgesic.

RECENT FINDINGS

Morphine-6-glucuronide has a very long delay between the time course of its plasma concentrations and the time course of its central nervous effects, with 6-8 h probably the longest transfer half-life between plasma and effect site of all opioids administered in humans. This complicates the control of morphine-6-glucuronide therapy when used as an intravenous analgesic, and the long duration of action confers no advantage over other opioids because long-lasting opioid analgesia can be readily obtained with sustained release formulations of other opioids. During acute treatment, however, morphine-6-glucuronide appears to be sufficiently potent to exert peripheral analgesic effects, without exerting major central nervous opioid side effects for a short period of time. The side effects profile does not clearly separate morphine-6-glucuronide from morphine, with reports of similar side effects. There are contrasting reports, however, about similar or less respiratory depression and other side effects compared with morphine after systemic injection.

SUMMARY

Morphine-6-glucuronide might qualify as an analgesic but it has several pharmacological properties that make it far from ideal for therapeutic use. Whether it will be a useful addition to the currently established analgesics has yet to be demonstrated.

Local anaesthetics and additives for spinal anaesthesia--characteristics and factors influencing the spread and duration of the block

Different characteristics of patients and local anaesthetic formulations will influence the spread of spinal anaesthesia. The predictability of the spread of spinal anaesthesia can be improved by altering both baricity of the solution, and the position of the patient during the intrathecal local anaesthetic injection. The role of adrenaline and clonidine in prolonging the block and associated side effects is discussed. The role of opioids added to local anaesthetic solutions is discussed from a cost/benefit point of view.

A highly toxic morphine-3-glucuronide derivative

By the coupling of octylamine to the uronic acid function of morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) a new glycoconjugate (morphine-3-octylglucuronamide, M3GOAM) was prepared. When assayed in both rats and mice up to ng/kg (i.p.) doses none of the animals survived. The aliphatic octyl chain may be the lethal factor since a closely related derivative (M3GNH2), was not toxic and showed similar opioid antagonist properties than naloxone.

A novel metabolic pathway of morphine: formation of morphine glucosides in cancer patients

AIMS

To characterize directly the conjugated metabolites of morphine in urine samples of cancer patients.

METHODS

Urine samples from the patients were treated by solid-phase extraction method and chromatographed using three high-performance liquid chromatography systems. Conjugated metabolites were directly detected with liquid chromatographic/ion trap mass spectrometric (LC/MSn) technique by selected ion monitoring, full scan MS/MS and MS3 modes.

RESULTS

Six conjugated metabolites including two new metabolites M5 and M6 were found. Morphine-3-glucuronide (M-3-G) and morphine-6-glucuronide (M-6-G) were identified by comparing their l.c. retention times and multistage mass spectra with those of the reference substances. Two novel metabolites, morphine-3-glucoside and morphine-6-glucoside, as well as normorphine glucuronides were identified by comparing their mass fragment patterns and l.c. retention times with those of M-3-G and M-6-G. Hydrolysis of urine samples with beta-glucosidase and beta-glucuronidase provided further evidence of the metabolites M5 and M6 as morphine glucosides. The excretion amounts of morphine conjugates in urines were in the order of morphine glucuronides, morphine glucosides and normorphine glucuronides.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study, the applications of l.c. separation and multistage mass spectra have permitted the direct identification of conjugated metabolites of morphine. To our knowledge, this is the first report about O-linked glucosides of morphine at 3-aromatic and 6-aliphatic hydroxyl groups.

Plasma concentrations of morphine, morphine-6-glucuronide and morphine-3-glucuronide and their relationship with analgesia and side effects in patients with cancer-related pain

Morphine, the recommended drug for the management of moderate to severe cancer pain, is metabolized predominantly to the glucuronides morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) and morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G). The quantitative clinical importance of these metabolites following the administration of oral morphine is unclear. This study investigates the relationship between plasma concentrations of morphine (M), M6G, M3G and clinical effects in patients receiving sustained release oral morphine for cancer-related pain. Peak and trough plasma concentrations of morphine and its metabolites were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). At corresponding time points, pain [Visual Analogue Scales (VAS), Verbal Rating Scales (VRS), Pain Relief Scores (PRS)] and toxicity (VAS and VRS) were assessed. Renal and liver function tests were performed. Forty-six patients were included in the study. There was a significant correlation between dose and both peak and trough plasma M, M6G and M3G (r > 0.60, P < 0.001 for each). Differences between peak and trough M, M6G, M3G, M+M6G, M6G:M, M3G:M and M3G:M6G were all significant (P < 0.001 for each). Pain was generally well controlled in the group, with a median VAS of 15 mm at the peak blood sampling time point. The differences between peak and trough values for VAS pain, VAS nausea and VAS drowsiness were not statistically significant (P = 0.078, 0.45 and 0.099, respectively). There were no differences in peak or trough morphine and metabolite concentrations or ratios between patients with low (< median) or high pain scores. Similarly, there was no significant relationship between high and low plasma concentrations and clinical effect. This study did not identify a simple relationship between plasma concentrations of morphine, morphine metabolites or metabolite ratios and clinical effects in patients with cancer and pain who were receiving chronic oral morphine therapy. Although overall pain control was good, there was marked interpatient variability in the dose of morphine and the plasma concentrations necessary to achieve this degree of analgesia.

Relationships among morphine metabolism, pain and side effects during long-term treatment: an update

The two metabolites of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G), have been studied intensively in animals and humans during the past 30 years in order to elucidate their precise action and possible contribution to the desired effects and side effects seen after morphine administration. M3G and M6G are formed by morphine glucuronidation, mainly in the liver, and are excreted by the kidneys. The metabolites are found in the cerebrospinal fluid after single as well as multiple doses of morphine. M6G binds to opioid receptors, and animal studies have demonstrated that M6G may be a more potent analgesic than morphine. Results from human studies regarding the analgesic effect of M6G are not unanimous. The potency ratio between systemic M6G and morphine in humans has not been settled, but is probably lower than previously assumed. Hitherto, only a few studies have found evidence for a contributory effect of M6G to the overall effects observed after morphine administration. Several studies have demonstrated that administration of M6G is accompanied by fewer and a milder degree of opioid-like side effects than observed after morphine administration, but most of the studies have used lower doses of M6G than of morphine. M3G displays very low affinity for opioid receptors and has no analgesic activity. Animal studies have shown that M3G may antagonize the analgesic effect of morphine and M6G, but no human studies have demonstrated this. M3G has also been connected to certain neurotoxic symptoms, such as hyperalgesia, allodynia and myoclonus, which have been observed after administration of M3G or high doses of morphine in animals. The symptoms have been reported sporadically in humans treated primarily with high doses of morphine, but the role of M3G in eliciting the symptoms is not fully elucidated.

Unwanted effects of morphine-6-glucoronide and morphine

The active metabolite of morphine, morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G), may have fewer unwanted effects than morphine. We randomly allocated 144 women to receive either M6G or morphine as part of general anaesthesia for day case gynaecological laparoscopy. The incidence of nausea, vomiting, pain, sedation and skin rash, and severity of nausea, pain and sedation after surgery were recorded by direct observation in hospital, and by questionnaire until the next morning. Compared with the M6G group, patients who received morphine were more likely to report nausea in the first 2 h after surgery (odds ratio 2.9, CI 1.31-6.21) and to suffer it with greater severity. During the same time period, they were more likely to vomit and feel sleepy, but the intensity of pain and use of rescue analgesics were similar in both groups. The incidences of nausea, vomiting and the feeling of sleepiness continued to be greater in the morphine group during and after the journey home. The next morning, patients in the morphine group remained sleepier, but the incidence of nausea was similar for the two groups. M6G appears to have a better toxicity profile than morphine. More efficacy studies are needed to define accurately the analgesic potency of systemically administered M6G.

Pharmacokinetic differences of morphine and morphine-glucuronides are reflected in locomotor activity

The main metabolites of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G), have been considered to participate in some of the effects of morphine. There is limited knowledge of the pharmacokinetics and dynamics of morphine and the main metabolites in mice, but mice are widely used to study both the analgesic effects and the psychomotor effects of morphine. The present study aimed to explore pharmacokinetic differences between morphine and morphine-glucuronides in mice after different routes of administration, and to investigate how possible differences were reflected in locomotor activity, a measure of psychostimulant properties. Mice were given morphine, M3G or M6G by different routes of administration. Serum concentrations versus time curves, pharmacokinetic parameters and locomotor activity were determined. Intraperitoneal administration of morphine reduced the bioavailability compared to intravenous and subcutaneous administration, but not so for morphine-glucuronides. The two morphine-glucuronides had similar pharmacokinetics, but morphine demonstrated higher volume of distribution and clearance than morphine-glucuronides. The present results demonstrated no locomotor effect of M3G, but a serum concentration effect relationship for morphine and M6G. When serum concentrations and effect changes were followed over time, there was some right hand shifts with respect to locomotor activity, especially during the declining phase of the concentration curve and particularly for M6G.

Hydromorphone metabolites: isolation and identification from pooled urine samples of a cancer patient

1. Hydromorphone-3-glucuronide, dihydromorphine, dihydroisomorphine, dihydromorphine-3-glucuronide and dihydroisomorphine-3-glucuronide were isolated from a cancer patient's urine and identified as metabolites of hydromorphone by comparison with synthetic standards using LC/MS/MS with gradient elution. 2. The relative urinary recovery of dihydroisomorphine-3-glucuronide was estimated to be 17-fold higher than previously reported. 3. Three new metabolites, including hydromorphone-3-sulphate, norhydromorphone and nordihydroisomorphine, were tentatively identified.

Pain, sedation and morphine metabolism in cancer patients during long-term treatment with sustained-release morphine

BACKGROUND

Morphine-6-glucuronide (M-6-G) and morphine-3-glucuronide (M-3-G) are the two most important metabolites of morphine. Both are pharmacologically active, however, with different effects. M-6-G has been demonstrated capable of inducing anti-nociception and sedation, and M-3-G may induce behavioural excitation and possibly antagonise anti-nociception. Their impact on pharmacodynamics in patients in long-term treatment with oral morphine remains to be settled.

METHODS

Forty-two cancer patients treated with oral sustained-release (SR) morphine were assessed for pain, sedation and other side effects related to morphine treatment. Blood samples were analysed for morphine, M-3-G and M-6-G by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).

RESULTS

Significant correlations were found between the daily dose of SR morphine and plasma morphine (M) (r = 0.535, P < 0.001), plasma M-6-G (r = 0.868, P < 0.001) and plasma M-3-G (r = 0.865, P < 0.001). There was no relationship between plasma morphine, M-6-G, M-6-G/M and pain and sedation scores. Seventy-nine percent of the patients suffered from dryness of the mouth, which was the most frequent side effect observed. Patients in this group had higher plasma morphine and M-6-G concentrations than patients who did not suffer from this side effect.

CONCLUSION

The plasma concentrations of morphine and its metabolites, M-3-G and M-6-G, are significantly correlated to the daily dose of SR morphine. Although M-6-G has analgesic properties, no associations were found between pain and plasma morphine and morphine metabolites. This may be due to the multitudinous factors affecting the dose-effect relationship. Patients with dryness of the mouth had higher concentrations of morphine and M-6-G than patients without this side effect.

Changing M3G/M6G ratios and pharmacodynamics in a cancer patient during long-term morphine treatment

A cancer patient receiving long-term oral sustained-release morphine treatment and periodically presenting with unusually high plasma M3G/M6G ratios is described. We found the patient's formation of M6G more unstable and perhaps delayed compared to the formation of M3G. There is no apparent explanation for this phenomenon and the high M3G/M6G ratios had no implications for the patient's pain experience or side effects from the morphine treatment.

Morphine-6-glucuronide: an analgesic of the future?

Morphine-6-beta-glucuronide (M6G) is an opioid agonist that plays a role in the clinical effects of morphine. Although M6G probably crosses the blood-brain barrier with difficulty, during long term morphine administration it may reach sufficiently high CNS concentrations to exert clinically relevant opioid effects. As a consequence of its almost exclusive renal elimination, M6G may accumulate in the body of patients with impaired renal function and cause severe opioid adverse effects with insidious onset and long persistence. Its profile of receptor affinities, however, gives reason to speculate that M6G may exhibit analgesic effects while causing fewer adverse effects than morphine. This is supported by reports of the good tolerability of intrathecal and intravenous injections of M6G in humans with intact renal function. M6G may thus be contemplated as an analgesic for short term postoperative analgesia, especially for intrathecal analgesic therapy. In addition, its possibly higher potency than morphine makes M6G a candidate opioid for local or peripheral analgesic therapy. However, current knowledge is too incomplete to finally judge the clinical usefulness of M6G. The next topics for clinical research on M6G should include: (i) a comparison of the potencies of M6G and morphine to cause wanted and unwanted clinical effects; (ii) development of a predictive population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model of M6G with calculation of the transfer half-life between plasma and effect site; and (iii) identification of cofactors influencing the action of M6G that can serve as predictors for the clinical outcome of morphine/M6G therapy in an individual including the pharmacogenetics of M6G.

High-performance liquid chromatographic determination of morphine and its 3- and 6-glucuronide metabolites by two-step solid-phase extraction

To provide more accurate measurement of morphine and its metabolites for a study of the genetic differences on morphine response, a method for the analysis of morphine and its metabolites is described which has the advantages of increased sensitivity and specificity by using a cleaner extraction. The new extraction method involves both the hydrophobic isolation on a carbon cartridge and ion-exchange isolation on ion-exchange resin which has not preliminary been described for morphine analysis. The combination of these two steps successfully purified drugs from human plasma with maximum removal of interfering substance comparing with a conventional C18 cartridge alone. The analytes are quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography on a reversed-phase C18 column employing a mobile phase consisting of 25% acetonitrile in 0.05 M phosphate buffer (pH 2.1), and 2.5 mM sodium dodecyl sulfate as the pairing ion with a combination of electrochemical and fluorometric detections. The recoveries for morphine (M), morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G), morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) and hydromorphone after the SPE procedure were 86+/-7.1%, 82+/-6.9%, 79+/-6.0% and 85+/-6.0%, respectively. Limits of detection for this method are 0.1 ng/ml for M, and 0.18 ng/ml for M3G and M6G. Limits of quantitation were approximately 0.25 ng/ml for M, and 0.45 ng/ml for M3G and M6G. The present assay was applied to measure M, M3G and M6G content in human plasma to test the applicability and suitability of this method for clinical and research use.

Steady-state kinetics and dynamics of morphine in cancer patients: is sedation related to the absorption rate of morphine?

Eighteen patients suffering from chronic pain due to cancer completed a balanced, double-blind, double-dummy, two period cross-over trial comparing the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of morphine and its metabolites, morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide, after administration of morphine given as controlled-release (CR) tablets (every 12 h) and immediate-release (IR) tablets (every 6 h). The same total daily dose of morphine was given in both study periods. Patients received both test formulations for 4 days and on the final day of each period, peripheral venous blood samples for analysis of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide, and morphine-6-glucuronide were obtained. Pain intensity, sedation, and continuous reaction time (CRT) were assessed. No significant differences could be demonstrated in AUC/dose, Cmin, Cmax or fluctuation index values between the two treatments (IR and CR tablets) for either morphine or its metabolites. Tmax for morphine and its metabolites occurred significantly later after administration of CR tablets than after administration of IR tablets. There were no significant differences between the IR and the CR formulation with respect to analgesia and side effects, and there was no difference in the patients' overall impression of the two treatments. More important, there was no difference between the Tmax and the time to peak sedation after administration of IR tablets (P = 0.63). However, due to the relatively small number of patients and the variability in the data, the statistical power of the test was only 0.074. The risk of a type II error is 0.926. These data demonstrate the PK and PD similarities and differences between CR and IR morphine. They suggest that there may be a relationship between Tmax (determined by absorption rate) and sedation, but further evaluation of this potential relationship is needed.

Population pharmacokinetics of oral morphine and its glucuronides in children receiving morphine as immediate-release liquid or sustained-release tablets for cancer pain

OBJECTIVES

(1) To determine the pharmacokinetics of morphine, morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G), and morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) in children with cancer receiving morphine as immediate-release morphine liquid or sustained-release tablets. (2) To determine differences with age within the group and from adults. (3) To explore relationships between plasma concentration and pain measurements.

STUDY DESIGN

Blood samples were collected and plasma analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical and fluorescence detection. Population pharmacokinetic parameters were derived with the program P-PHARM.

RESULTS

Forty children with a median age of 11.4 years (range 1.7 to 18.7 years) received a median dose of 1.4 mg/kg/d (range 0.4 to 24.6 mg/kg/d). A median of 4 blood samples per child was collected. Plasma clearance of morphine was 23.1 mL/min per kg body weight. The volume of distribution was 5.2 L/kg. Molar ratios of M3G/morphine, M6G/morphine, and M3G/M6G were 21.1, 4.7, and 4.2, respectively. Children <11 years had significantly higher clearance and larger volume of distribution for morphine and its glucuronides than older children and adults. Regression analysis indicated average plasma morphine concentration equal to dose (mg/kg/d) x 8.6 (95% confidence interval 7.4 to 9.9). Significant pain was present in 30% of the children. Higher pain scores were recorded in children with average morphine concentrations <12 ng/mL (P <.01 MW).

CONCLUSION

Age differences in morphine pharmacokinetics exist within children and compared with adults. The study supports a starting dose of 1.5 to 2. 0 mg/kg/d to provide plasma morphine concentrations >12 ng/mL in children with cancer pain unrelieved by mild to moderate strength analgesia.

Morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide in the plasma and cerebrospinal fluid of children

AIMS

To measure morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide in the plasma and cerebrospinal fluid of children following a single intravenous dose of morphine.

METHODS

Twenty-nine paired samples of cerebrospinal fluid and plasma were collected from children with leukaemia undergoing therapeutic lumbar puncture. An intravenous dose of morphine was administered at selected intervals before the procedure. Concentrations of morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) were measured in each sample. Morphine was measured using a specific radioimmunoassay (r.i.a.) and M6G was measured using a novel enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

RESULTS

The ELISA for measuring M6G was highly sensitive. The intra-and interassay variations were less than 15%. Using a two-compartment model for plasma morphine, the area under the curve to infinity (AUC, 7143 ng ml-1 min), volume of distribution (3.6 l kg-1 ) and elimination half-life (88 min) were comparable with those reported in adults. Clearance (35 ml min-1 ) was higher than that in adults. Morphine-6-glucuronide was readily synthesized by the children in this study. The elimination half-life (321 min) and AUC (35507 ng ml-1 min) of plasma M6G were much greater than those of morphine.

CONCLUSIONS

Extensive metabolism of morphine to M6G in children with cancer has been demonstrated. These data provide further evidence to support the importance of M6G accumulation after multiple doses. There was no evidence that morphine passed more easily into the CSF of children than adults.

Pharmacokinetics of opioids in liver disease

The liver is the major site of biotransformation for most opioids. Thus, the disposition of these drugs may be affected in patients with liver insufficiency. The major metabolic pathway for most opioids is oxidation. The exceptions are morphine and buprenorphine, which primarily undergo glucuronidation, and remifentanil, which is cleared by ester hydrolysis. Oxidation of opioids is reduced in patients with hepatic cirrhosis, resulting in decreased drug clearance [for pethidine (meperidine), dextropropoxyphene, pentazocine, tramadol and alfentanil] and/or increased oral bioavailability caused by a reduced first-pass metabolism (for pethidine, dextropropoxyphene, pentazocine and dihydrocodeine). Although glucuronidation is thought to be less affected in liver cirrhosis, and clearance of morphine was found to be decreased and oral bioavailability increased. The consequence of reduced drug metabolism is the risk of accumulation in the body, especially with repeated administration. Lower doses or longer administration intervals should be used to remedy this risk. Special risks are known for pethidine, with the potential for the accumulation of norpethidine, a metabolite that can cause seizures, and for dextropropoxyphene, for which several cases of hepatotoxicity have been reported. On the other hand, the analgesic activity of codeine and tilidine depends on transformation into the active metabolites, morphine and nortilidine, respectively. If metabolism is decreased in patients with chronic liver disease, the analgesic action of these drugs may be compromised. Finally, the disposition of a few opioids, such as fentanyl, sufentanil and remifentanil, appears to be unaffected in liver disease.

Immunoaffinity extraction of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide from blood of heroin victims for simultaneous high-performance liquid chromatographic determination

The development of an immunoaffinity-based extraction method for the determination of morphine and its glucuronides in human blood is described. For the preparation of an immunoadsorber, specific antisera (polyclonal, host: rabbit) against morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide were coupled to 1,1'-carbonyldiimidazole-activated tris-acrylgel and used for immunoaffinity extraction of morphine and its glucuronides from coronary blood. The resulting extracts were analysed by HPLC with native fluorescence detection. The mean recoveries from spiked blood samples were 71%, 76% and 88% for morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide, respectively. The limit of detection was 3 ng/g blood and the limit of quantitation was 10 ng/g blood for all three analytes. The results of the analysis of coronary blood samples from 23 fatalities due to heroin are presented.

The role of morphine glucuronides in cancer pain

Morphine metabolites are involved in various ways in determining the complex effects of morphine, both favourable and adverse, and may complicate the clinical use of morphine in the treatment of cancer pain. The production and effects of the principal morphine metabolites, morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide, in both normal and pathological states have been reviewed in the current literature. Therapeutic implications are also reviewed on the basis of experimental and clinical reports. The presence of these metabolites should be recognized in the chronic treatment of cancer pain with morphine, especially in the presence of renal impairment, and should be considered to have an important influence on opioid responsiveness, defined as a balance between the achievement of an optimal analgesia and the occurrence of adverse effects.

Pharmacokinetics of morphine-6-glucuronide and its formation from morphine after intravenous administration

BACKGROUND

Morphine-6-beta-glucuronide is a primary morphine metabolite with potent opioid action. However, its low and slow brain permeability eventually prevents its central opioid effects after short-term intravenous administration. Research is needed to establish whether morphine-6-beta-glucuronide qualifies as an analgesic; this study provides the pharmacokinetic bases for such studies.

METHODS

Plasma concentration-time data of morphine-6-beta-glucuronide and morphine obtained from 20 healthy volunteers after short-term intravenous administration of either morphine-6-beta-glucuronide or morphine were described by a biexponential disposition curve. Disposition parameters of morphine-6-beta-glucuronide and morphine were estimated by nonlinear regression, and basic pharmacokinetic parameters (clearance, volume of distribution at steady state, and mean disposition residence time) were derived. A new model of metabolite kinetics was applied, and the disposition parameters of morphine and morphine-6-beta-glucuronide were then used to fit the plasma concentration-time profile of morphine-6-beta-glucuronide formed from morphine. Thereby the fraction of morphine metabolized to morphine-6-beta-glucuronide and the mean transit time of morphine across the site of metabolism were estimated.

RESULTS

The extent and time course of morphine-6-beta-glucuronide formation from morphine could be well described by a parametric model, with a fraction of morphine metabolized to morphine-6-beta-glucuronide of 7.55% +/- 1.24% and a mean metabolic transit time for morphine to morphine-6-beta-glucuronide of 0.28 +/- 0.21 hour. The underlying disposition of morphine and morphine-6-beta-glucuronide was characterized by clearance (morphine clearance, 32.7 +/- 6 ml.min-1.kg-1, morphine-6-beta-glucuronide clearance, 2.2 +/- 0.4 ml.min-1.kg-1), volume of distribution at steady state (morphine, 1.8 +/- 0.3 L.hr-1; morphine-6-beta-glucuronide, 0.12 +/- 0.02 L.hr-1), and mean disposition residence time (morphine, 1.8 +/- 0.4 hours; morphine-6-beta-glucuronide, 1.7 +/- 0.4 hours).

CONCLUSIONS

The time course of morphine-6-beta-glucuronide formation kinetics was analyzed with use of the information on the disposition kinetics of both morphine and preformed morphine-6-beta-glucuronide, which was obtained by separate data fits. The transformation of morphine to morphine-6-beta-glucuronide could be described by two parameters characterizing the extent and delay of metabolite formation. The results of this study will serve as pharmacokinetic bases of future investigations of morphine-6-beta-glucuronide in human beings.

Influence of ranitidine on the morphine-3-glucuronide to morphine-6-glucuronide ratio after oral administration of morphine in humans

1. In humans morphine is metabolised to morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) which possess no opioid activity, and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) which is a potent opioid receptor agonist that probably contribute to the desired as well as toxic effects of morphine. 2. In order to investigate the possible effect of ranitidine on morphine glucuronidation indicated by clinical studies and later confirmed in vitro, a double blind cross-over study on eight human volunteers administered oral morphine plus ranitidine or placebo was conducted. 3. Urine was collected in fractions for 24 h. Serum and urine samples were prepared by solid phase extraction and morphine, M3G and M6G were quantified by HPLC. 4. Ranitidine significantly reduced the individual serum M3G/M6G ratio, and tended to increase the serum AUC(0-90) of morphine. In contrast, ranitidine had no significant effect on the urinary M3G/M6G ratio. The urinary recovery of morphine or morphine glucuronides was unaffected by ranitidine. 5 Possible explanations to the apparent incongruity between the serum and urine data are discussed.

Differential inhibition of morphine glucuronidation in the 3- and 6-position by ranitidine in isolated hepatocytes from guinea pig

The influence of ranitidine on morphine metabolism, with special emphasise on the ratio between morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide was studied in isolated guinea pig hepatocytes. Ranitidine reduced the Kel of morphine dose-dependently with a maximum effect of 50%, and increased the relative concentration of morphine-6-glucuronide to morphine-3-glucuronide. These effects could be due to a direct or indirect effect on the conjugation enzymes involved, or an effect on the transport of morphine or glucuronides across cell membranes. The latter explanation was rejected on the basis of the observation that the ratios between intra- and extracellular concentrations of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide were not influenced by ranitidine. Increasing concentrations of ranitidine gradually decreased the morphine-3-glucuronide/morphine-6-glucuronide ratio by up to 21%. This could stem from interference of energy or co-substrate supply, or through direct effects on the different UDPGTases involved. The observation that the present effect on morphine glucuronidation was the opposite of that observed when administering a known co-substrate (UDPGA) depletor, indicated that in all probability the effect of ranitidine was a direct inhibition on the uridine 5'-diphosphate glucuronyltransferases involved, with a more pronounced effect for the isoenzymes responsible for the 3'-glucuronidation.