Truncal site and detoxifying enzyme polymorphisms significantly reduce time to presentation of further primary cutaneous basal cell carcinoma

Computer-assisted diagnosis techniques (dermoscopy and spectroscopy-based) for diagnosing skin cancer in adults

BACKGROUND

Early accurate detection of all skin cancer types is essential to guide appropriate management and to improve morbidity and survival. Melanoma and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) are high-risk skin cancers which have the potential to metastasise and ultimately lead to death, whereas basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is usually localised with potential to infiltrate and damage surrounding tissue. Anxiety around missing early curable cases needs to be balanced against inappropriate referral and unnecessary excision of benign lesions. Computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD) systems use artificial intelligence to analyse lesion data and arrive at a diagnosis of skin cancer. When used in unreferred settings ('primary care'), CAD may assist general practitioners (GPs) or other clinicians to more appropriately triage high-risk lesions to secondary care. Used alongside clinical and dermoscopic suspicion of malignancy, CAD may reduce unnecessary excisions without missing melanoma cases.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the accuracy of CAD systems for diagnosing cutaneous invasive melanoma and atypical intraepidermal melanocytic variants, BCC or cSCC in adults, and to compare its accuracy with that of dermoscopy.

SEARCH METHODS

We undertook a comprehensive search of the following databases from inception up to August 2016: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); MEDLINE; Embase; CINAHL; CPCI; Zetoc; Science Citation Index; US National Institutes of Health Ongoing Trials Register; NIHR Clinical Research Network Portfolio Database; and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. We studied reference lists and published systematic review articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies of any design that evaluated CAD alone, or in comparison with dermoscopy, in adults with lesions suspicious for melanoma or BCC or cSCC, and compared with a reference standard of either histological confirmation or clinical follow-up.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted all data using a standardised data extraction and quality assessment form (based on QUADAS-2). We contacted authors of included studies where information related to the target condition or diagnostic threshold were missing. We estimated summary sensitivities and specificities separately by type of CAD system, using the bivariate hierarchical model. We compared CAD with dermoscopy using (a) all available CAD data (indirect comparisons), and (b) studies providing paired data for both tests (direct comparisons). We tested the contribution of human decision-making to the accuracy of CAD diagnoses in a sensitivity analysis by removing studies that gave CAD results to clinicians to guide diagnostic decision-making.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 42 studies, 24 evaluating digital dermoscopy-based CAD systems (Derm-CAD) in 23 study cohorts with 9602 lesions (1220 melanomas, at least 83 BCCs, 9 cSCCs), providing 32 datasets for Derm-CAD and seven for dermoscopy. Eighteen studies evaluated spectroscopy-based CAD (Spectro-CAD) in 16 study cohorts with 6336 lesions (934 melanomas, 163 BCC, 49 cSCCs), providing 32 datasets for Spectro-CAD and six for dermoscopy. These consisted of 15 studies using multispectral imaging (MSI), two studies using electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and one study using diffuse-reflectance spectroscopy. Studies were incompletely reported and at unclear to high risk of bias across all domains. Included studies inadequately address the review question, due to an abundance of low-quality studies, poor reporting, and recruitment of highly selected groups of participants.Across all CAD systems, we found considerable variation in the hardware and software technologies used, the types of classification algorithm employed, methods used to train the algorithms, and which lesion morphological features were extracted and analysed across all CAD systems, and even between studies evaluating CAD systems. Meta-analysis found CAD systems had high sensitivity for correct identification of cutaneous invasive melanoma and atypical intraepidermal melanocytic variants in highly selected populations, but with low and very variable specificity, particularly for Spectro-CAD systems. Pooled data from 22 studies estimated the sensitivity of Derm-CAD for the detection of melanoma as 90.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) 84.0% to 94.0%) and specificity as 74.3% (95% CI 63.6% to 82.7%). Pooled data from eight studies estimated the sensitivity of multispectral imaging CAD (MSI-CAD) as 92.9% (95% CI 83.7% to 97.1%) and specificity as 43.6% (95% CI 24.8% to 64.5%). When applied to a hypothetical population of 1000 lesions at the mean observed melanoma prevalence of 20%, Derm-CAD would miss 20 melanomas and would lead to 206 false-positive results for melanoma. MSI-CAD would miss 14 melanomas and would lead to 451 false diagnoses for melanoma. Preliminary findings suggest CAD systems are at least as sensitive as assessment of dermoscopic images for the diagnosis of invasive melanoma and atypical intraepidermal melanocytic variants. We are unable to make summary statements about the use of CAD in unreferred populations, or its accuracy in detecting keratinocyte cancers, or its use in any setting as a diagnostic aid, because of the paucity of studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In highly selected patient populations all CAD types demonstrate high sensitivity, and could prove useful as a back-up for specialist diagnosis to assist in minimising the risk of missing melanomas. However, the evidence base is currently too poor to understand whether CAD system outputs translate to different clinical decision-making in practice. Insufficient data are available on the use of CAD in community settings, or for the detection of keratinocyte cancers. The evidence base for individual systems is too limited to draw conclusions on which might be preferred for practice. Prospective comparative studies are required that evaluate the use of already evaluated CAD systems as diagnostic aids, by comparison to face-to-face dermoscopy, and in participant populations that are representative of those in which the test would be used in practice.

Occurrence of metachronous basal cell carcinomas: a prognostic model

BACKGROUND

A third of patients with a first basal cell carcinoma (BCC) will develop subsequent (metachronous) BCCs.

OBJECTIVES

To study the prognostic effect of the number of previous BCC diagnosis dates a patient has experienced to derive a prediction model to assess the risk of metachronous BCCs that may inform individualized decision making on surveillance.

METHODS

We considered participants of north-western European ancestry from a prospective population-based cohort study (Rotterdam Study). After linkage with the Dutch Pathology Registry, 1077 patients with a first BCC were included. Candidate predictors for metachronous BCCs included patient, lifestyle and tumour characteristics. The prognostic model was developed with Fine and Gray regression analysis to account for competing risk of death. We used bootstrapping to correct for within-patient correlation and statistical optimism in predictive performance.

RESULTS

Second to fifth BCCs occurred in 293, 122, 58 and 36 patients, with median follow-up times of 3·0, 2·1, 1·7 and 1·8 years after the previous BCC, respectively. The risk of a new BCC was higher for patients with more metachronous BCCs. Having more than one BCC at diagnosis was another strong predictor of metachronous BCCs. Discriminative ability of the model was reasonable with an optimism-corrected c-index of 0·70 at 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of previous BCC diagnosis dates was a strong prognostic factor and should be considered when predicting the risk of metachronous BCCs. When the number of previous BCC diagnosis dates is combined with other readily available characteristics into a prognostic model, patients at high risk of a new BCC can be identified.

Effect of GSTM1 polymorphism on risks of basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis

Glutathione S-transferases are important enzymes in the detoxification of a wide range of reactive oxygen species produced during melanin synthesis and oxidative stress processes. Glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1) null genotype may be a candidate genetic polymorphism with a role in susceptibility to skin cancer such as basal and squamous cell carcinomas. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to define the effect of GSTM1 null polymorphism on skin cancer risk. We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases to identify published case-control studies investigating the association between GSTM1 null genotype and skin cancer risk. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed using the I (2) statistic. Odds ratios (OR) with corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI) from individual studies were pooled using fixed and random effects models. Nineteen case-control studies (4,275 cases and 4,255 controls) were considered eligible and included in the meta-analysis, and 11 of which were on basal cell carcinoma; ten, on melanoma, and seven, on squamous cell carcinoma. Overall, the GSTT1 null genotype was not associated with the risk of skin cancer (OR, 1.01; 95 % CI 0.93-1.11; P = 0.76). Subgroup analysis by histological types showed that GSTT1 null genotype was not associated with risks of basal cell carcinoma (OR, 1.06; 95 % CI 0.92-1.21; P = 0.42), squamous cell carcinoma (OR, 0.97; 95 % CI 0.76-1.24; P = 0.80), and cutaneous malignant melanoma (OR, 1.00; 95 % CI 0.88-1.14; P = 0.60). Therefore, this meta-analysis suggests that GSTM1 null polymorphism is not associated with risks of basal and squamous cell carcinomas.

Changing pathology with changing drugs: skin cancer

Today skin cancer is mainly treated by surgical interventions. New findings concerning molecular biology and the signaling pathways in epithelial skin cancers such as basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma or melanoma, and mesenchymal skin cancers such as angiosarcoma and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) have identified new molecular targets for a systemic or local treatment approach. For DFSP there is an opportunity already today to reduce the intensity of surgical procedures by pretreatment with targeted therapy. This article highlights important aspects in several skin cancer types.

Site-specific occurrence of nonmelanoma skin cancers in patients with cutaneous melanoma

In a registry-based case–control study, we compared the site-specific occurrence of nonmelanoma (keratinocytic) skin cancers among patients with cutaneous melanoma cases (cases, n=3774) and solid tumours (controls, n=349 923), respectively. Overall, patients with melanoma were almost five-fold more likely to develop keratinocytic cancers compared with solid tumour controls (adjusted OR 4.7, 95% CI 4.1–5.3), but the risks varied depending upon the site of melanoma. Whereas patients with melanoma of the head and neck had similarly increased risks of keratinocytic cancers across all body sites, patients with melanoma of the trunk were significantly more likely to develop keratinocyte cancer diagnosed on the trunk (adjusted OR 12.5, 95% CI 7.2–20.2) than on the head and neck (adjusted OR 3.0, 95% CI 2.2–4.3). Similar colocalisation of skin tumours was observed for patients with melanomas of the lower limb. These findings provide support for the hypothesis that skin cancers at different anatomical sites may arise through different causal pathways.

Molecular aetiology and pathogenesis of basal cell carcinoma

Recent insights into the cell biology of the epidermis and its appendages are transforming our understanding of the pathogenesis of basal cell carcinoma (BCC). The significant progress that has been made warrants a comprehensive review of the molecular and cellular pathology of BCC. The items addressed include environmental and genetic risk factors, the biology of the putative precursor cell(s), and the contribution of aberrations in processes such as apoptosis, cell proliferation, differentiation and signalling to carcinogenesis. Furthermore, established and novel treatment modalities are discussed with particular attention to future biological approaches.

Gene Expression Profiling of Early- and Late-Relapse Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumor and Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumor of the Testis

PURPOSE

To better understand the molecular mechanisms that underlay the development and progression of nonseminomatous germ cell tumor of testis (NSGCTT) as well as malignant transformation of teratoma and primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We studied the gene expression profiles of 17 retroperitoneal NSGCTTs (10 yolk sac tumors, 3 embryonal carcinomas, 4 teratomas) and 2 PNETs obtained from patients with two clinical outcomes. Tissue samples were obtained from the Indiana University. One group of NSGCTT and PNET patients developed metastases within 2 years (early-relapse) of initial successful treatment, and the other group developed metastases after 2 years (late-relapse). Gene expression in these groups of patients was quantified using cDNA microarrays and real-time relative quantitative PCR.

RESULTS

We demonstrate that the gene expression profiles of these tumors correlate with histological type. In addition, we identify type-specific genes that may serve as novel diagnostic markers. We also identify a gene set that can distinguish between early-relapse and late-relapse yolk sac tumors. The expression differences of these genes may underlie the differences in clinical outcome and drug response of these tumors.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study that used gene expression profiling to examine the molecular characteristics of the NSGCTTs and drug response in early- and late-relapse tumors. These results suggest that two molecularly distinct forms of NSGCTTs exist and that the integration of expression profile data with clinical parameters could enhance the diagnosis and prognosis of NSGCTTs. More importantly, the identified genes provide insight into the molecular mechanisms of aggressive NSGCTTs and suggest intervention strategies.

Basal cell carcinoma

The authors of this review aim to provide a comprehensive overview of basal cell carcinoma, concentrating in particular on incidence, risk factors, molecular genetics, clinical features, and treatment

The GSTM1 null genotype confers an increased risk for solar keratosis development in an Australian Caucasian population

Solar keratoses affect approximately 50% of Australian Caucasians aged over 40 y. Solar keratoses can undergo malignant transformation into squamous cell carcinoma followed by possible metastasis and are risk factors for basal cell carcinoma, melanoma, and squamous cell carcinoma. The glutathione-S-transferase genes play a part in detoxification of carcinogens and mutagens, including some produced by ultraviolet radiation. This study examined the role of glutathione-S-transferase M1, T1, P1, and Z1 gene polymorphisms in susceptibility to solar keratoses development. Using DNA samples from volunteers involved in the Nambour Skin Cancer Prevention Trial, allele and genotype frequencies were determined using polymerase chain reaction and restriction enzyme digestion. No significant differences were detected in glutathione-S-transferase P1 and glutathione-S-transferase Z1 allele or genotype frequencies; however, a significant association between glutathione-S-transferase M1 genotypes and solar keratoses development was detected (p=0.003) with null individuals having an approximate 2-fold increase in risk for solar keratoses development (odds ratio: 2.1; confidence interval: 1.3-3.5) and a significantly higher increase in risk in conjunction with high outdoor exposure (odds ratio: 3.4; confidence interval: 1.9-6.3). Also, a difference in glutathione-S-transferase T1 genotype frequencies was detected (p=0.039), although considering that multiple testing was undertaken, this was found not to be significant. Fair skin and inability to tan were found to be highly significant risk factors for solar keratoses development with odds ratios of 18.5 (confidence interval: 5.7-59.9) and 7.4 (confidence interval: 2.6-21.0), respectively. Overall, glutathione-S-transferase M1 conferred a significant increase in risk of solar keratoses development, particularly in the presence of high outdoor exposure and synergistically with known phenotypic risk factors of fair skin and inability to tan.

Environment, phenotype and genetics: risk factors associated with BCC of the skin

Basal cell carcinoma is the most common cancer in Caucasians and its incidence is rising. Whilst not life threatening, the tumor can cause substantial morbidity and because of long follow-up, it places a major burden on healthcare agencies worldwide. Patients with the disease demonstrate wide phenotypic diversity with respect to tumor numbers, rate of tumor appearance and site. The factors involved in patient susceptibility to basal cell carcinoma are not well understood although exposure to ultraviolet radiation in sunlight appears critical. In this review we discuss the role of environmental and genetic factors on predisposition to basal cell carcinoma and illustrate how stratification of the basal cell carcinoma cohort into high-risk subgroups is helpful in identifying factors significant in disease susceptibility.

Basal cell carcinoma follow-up practices by dermatologists: a national survey

BACKGROUND

After treatment of a basal cell carcinoma (BCC) patients are at risk of recurrence of that BCC; also, patients who have had a primary BCC are those who have an increased risk of developing a subsequent primary BCC. However, long-term hospital-based follow-up of all patients would put large strains on the U.K. health service.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the follow-up intentions of U.K. dermatologists for well-defined facial BCC and to investigate the effect that variations in site and clinical indicators might have on those intentions.

METHODS

A self-completion questionnaire relating to BCC follow-up sent to 388 dermatology consultants and associate specialists in the U.K. had a response rate of 68%. The effects of treatment modality, tumour site, histology, multiple lesions and various patient variables that might alter the likelihood of follow-up were examined. General views on the subject of BCC follow-up were sought.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven per cent of respondents reported that they would not review further after excision of a 'well-defined' BCC from inside a central 'T' area on the face; 37% reported that they would review on one occasion; and 36% reported that they review more than once.

CONCLUSIONS

While it is currently not feasible to follow-up all treated BCCs, a strategy to identify and monitor high-risk patients and a system to gather long-term outcome data prospectively are necessary aspects of a national health service. This study illustrates that the first issue is being addressed to some extent, but at the currently reported level of BCC follow-up in the U.K. there is little scope for collecting comprehensive long-term data on outcomes.

Susceptibility and modifier genes in cutaneous basal cell carcinomas and their associations with clinical phenotype

While ultraviolet radiation (UV) is critical in the pathogenesis of basal cell carcinomas (BCC), its role in determining the phenotypic variation shown by patients is unknown. Thus, patients manifest variation in BCC numbers, patterns of presentation and tumour site. We have used this diversity to classify patients into subgroups that are associated with different risks of developing tumours. Two phenotypes are particularly interesting. Firstly, presentation with clusters of BCC. These patients, termed multiple presentation phenotype (MPP), had two to five BCC at one presentation, suggesting rapid accrual over short periods of time. They comprised 15% of our 1200 BCC patients. A minority of patients demonstrated multiple clustering events, a phenomenon that is associated with a genetic pre-disposition. The second risk phenotype, characterised by tumours on the trunk, is also associated with a pre-disposition. Both phenotypes were characterised by a susceptibility to develop numerous BCC. Thus, all our patients with more than five BCC had one or both of these phenotypes. We are using a candidate gene approach to identify loci associated with risk of these phenotypes (susceptibility genes) and tumour numbers in them (modifier genes). Interestingly, we did not identify differences in UV exposure between patients with high- and low-risk phenotypes.

Cutaneous basal cell carcinomas: distinct host factors are associated with the development of tumors on the trunk and on the head and neck

BACKGROUND

Patients with basal cell carcinoma (BCC) demonstrate marked variation in clinical phenotype, suggesting the presence of distinct subgroups. Patients with truncal lesions comprise an interesting subgroup, because, although the pathogenesis of these tumors is unclear, there is evidence to suggest that their development is mediated by different mechanisms than the mechanisms that mediate the development of BCC on other sites. The authors now speculate that some patients inherit a predisposition to truncal BCC and develop disproportionately more BCC on this site than other patients.

METHODS

The authors studied 100 patients who, at the time of initial presentation, had a truncal BCC lesion and 493 patients who had a lesion on the head and neck. The 493 patients with head and neck lesions included 36 patients who subsequently developed a truncal BCC and 457 patients who do not.

RESULTS

Initial presentation with a truncal tumor was associated with significantly more subsequent BCC lesions on this site compared with patients who presented initially with a head and neck lesion. The mean truncal tumor accrual after initial presentation in patients who presented with an initial truncal BCC lesion was 0.13 BCC lesions per year compared with 0.03 BCC lesions per year in patients who presented with an initial head and neck lesion (P < 0.001). Patients with truncal lesions were significantly younger at the time of initial presentation and developed more clusters of BCC lesions (2--10 new tumors at any presentation) compared with patients who did not develop tumors on the trunk.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that the development of a truncal BCC is not random but, rather, is associated with a predisposition. In contrast, the accrual of nontruncal BCC lesions was similar in patients with and without initial truncal lesions, suggesting that different mechanisms determine the development of truncal BCC and nontruncal BCC.

Genetic factors determining cutaneous basal cell carcinoma phenotype

BACKGROUND

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) patients demonstrate considerable phenotypic diversity. The basis of this heterogeneity is poorly understood. We have shown that presentational phenotypes are associated with BCC numbers. Thus, patients with a cluster of new BCC at any presentation comprise a subgroup, termed MPP, that is at increased risk of developing numerous lesions. Patients with more than one cluster (multiple cluster MPP) are at particular risk.

PROCEDURE

We determined in a cohort of BCC cases, whether: (i) tumor accrual was altered after clustering; and (ii) multiple cluster MPP is associated with characteristics linked with sensitivity to UV or, GSTT1, GSTM1, GSTM3, GSTP1, MC1R, CYP2D6, TNF-alpha, and VDR genotypes previously associated with BCC presentational phenotypes.

RESULTS

(i) After clustering BCC accrual increased; and (ii) exposure to UV in single and multiple cluster MPP cases were similar. In multiple cluster cases, mean age at first presentation with a single tumor occurred earlier and, the frequencies of CYP2D6 EM (94.4%) and GSTT1 null (41.2%) were significantly greater (P = 0.028 and P = 0.004) than in single cluster cases (67.1 and 14.3%). The odds ratios for these associations with the multiple cluster MPP were large; 15.5 and 7.39, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The finding of clusters of new, primary BCC is a critical event that is followed by markedly increased accrual of further tumors. Clustering occurs at a relatively late age and may be associated with a failure in immune surveillance. We propose the MPP is not the consequence of excessive UV exposure but reflects the presence of a distinct BCC subgroup defined by a combination of risk genes.

Mammalian class theta GST and differential susceptibility to carcinogens: a review

Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) are an important part of the cellular detoxification system and, perhaps, evolved to protect cells against reactive oxygen metabolites. Theta is considered the most ancient among the GSTs and theta-like GSTs are found in mammals, fish, insects, plants, unicellular algae, and bacteria. It is thought that an ancestral theta-gene underwent an early duplication before the divergence of fungi and animals and further duplications generated the variety of the other classes of GSTs (alpha, mu, phi, etc.). The comparison of the aminoacidic homologies among mammals suggests that a duplication of an ancient GST theta occurred before the speciation of mammals and resulted in the subunits GSTT1 and GSTT2. The ancestral GST theta has a dehalogenase activity towards several halogenated compounds, such as the dichloromethane. In fact, some aerobic and anaerobic methylotrophic bacteria can use these molecules as the sole carbon and energy source. The mammalian GST theta cannot sustain the growth of bacteria but still retains the dehalogenating activity. Therefore, although mammalian GST theta behaves as a scavenger towards electrophiles, such as epoxides, it acts also as metabolic activator for halogenated compounds, producing a variety of intermediates potentially dangerous for DNA and cells. For example, mice exposed to dichloromethane show a dose-dependent incidence of cancer via the GSTT1-1 pathway. Because GSTT1-1 is polymorphic in humans, with about 20% of Caucasians and 80% of Asians lacking the enzyme, the relationship between the phenotype and the incidence of cancer has been investigated extensively in order to detect GSTT1-1-associated differential susceptibility towards endogenous or exogenous carcinogens. The lack of the enzyme is related to a slightly increased risk of cancer of the bladder, gastro-intestinal tract, and for tobacco-related tumors (lung or oral cavity). More pronounced risks were found in males with the GSTT1-null genotype for brain diseases and skin basal cell carcinomas not related to sunlight exposures. Moreover, there was an increased risk of kidney and liver tumors in humans with the GSTT1-1 positive genotype following exposures to halogenated solvents. Interestingly, the liver and kidney are two organs that express the highest level of GST theta in the human body. Thus, the GSTT1-1 genotype is suspected to confer decreased or increased risk of cancer in relation to the source of exposure; in vitro studies, mostly conducted on metabolites of butadiene, confirm the protective action of GSTT1-1, whereas, thus far, experimental studies prove that the increasing risk is limited.

Glutathione S-transferase: genetics and role in toxicology

The glutathione S-transferases (GST) are a supergene family of dimeric, enzymes that catalyse the conjugation of glutathione (GSH) to a variety of electrophiles including arene oxides, unsaturated carbonyls, organic halides and other substrates. Their importance is suggested by the finding that GST enzymes are expressed in probably all life forms. In humans, polymorphism in GST genes has been associated with susceptibility to various diseases though some recent data indicate that these genotypes modify disease phenotype. Thus, GST genotypes alone and in combination have been linked with clinical outcome.

Detoxifying enzyme genotypes and susceptibility to cutaneous malignancy

While ultraviolet (UV) exposure is thought to be a major risk factor for basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma, more recent research has focused on genetic factors predisposing to these cancers. UV constitutes an oxidative stress with generation of free radicals, leading to lipid and DNA damage and gene mutation. It could therefore be hypothesized that individual ability to deal with these products may be important in cutaneous carcinogenesis. It is clear from recent studies that polymorphisms in detoxifying enzyme genes are important in determining susceptibility to skin cancer. The magnitude of effect in BCC is similar to that seen with many other previously described risk factors. However, uncertainties exist regarding the phenotypic consequences of some of these polymorphisms and relevant substrates. This review describes the influence of polymorphisms in detoxifying enzymes in determining susceptibility to skin cancer (in particular to BCC) and give a brief overview of the biochemistry of the detoxification process.

Drug metabolism polymorphisms as modulators of cancer susceptibility

Recently, several molecular genetic bases of polymorphic enzyme activities involved in drug activation and detoxification have been elucidated. Many molecular epidemiology studies based on these premises have sought to gather information on the association of genetically determined metabolic variants with different risks of environmentally induced cancer. While rare alterations of tumor suppressor genes dramatically raise cancer risk for the single affected subjects, far more common and less dramatic differences in genes encoding for drug metabolism enzymes can be responsible for a relatively small, but rather frequent increase of cancer risk at the population level. This increase could be especially important in specific cases of occupational, pharmacological or environmental exposure. Examination of the current literature reveals that the most extensively investigated metabolic polymorphisms are those of P450 1A1 and P450 2D6 cytochromes, glutathione S-transferases (GSTs; M1 and, to a lesser extent, M3, P1 and T1) and N-acetyltransferases (NATs; NAT1 and NAT2). Making reference to these enzymes, we have assayed the current knowledge on the relations among polymorphisms of human xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes and cancer susceptibilities. We have found intriguing models of susceptibility toward different types of cancer. We have reviewed and commented these models on light of the complex balance among different enzyme activities that, in each individual, determines the degree of each cancer susceptibility. Moreover, we have found techniques of molecular genetic analysis, more suitable than previous ones on phenotypic expression, now allowing better means to detect individuals at risk of cancer. According to the models presently available, a systematic screening of individuals at risk seems to make sense only in situations of well defined carcinogenic exposures and when performed by the polymorphism analysis of coordinated enzyme activities concurring to the metabolism of the carcinogen(s) in question. Genetic polymorphism analysis can allow for the detection of patients more prone to some types of specific cancers, or to the adverse effects of specific pharmaceutical agents. Considering the increasingly confirmed double-edged sword nature of metabolism polymorphism (both wild-type and variant alleles can predispose to cancer, albeit in different situations of exposure), individual susceptibility to cancer should be monitored as a function of the nature, and mechanism of action, of the carcinogen(s) to which the individual under study is known to be exposed, and with reference to the main target organ of the considered type of exposure.

The melanocyte stimulating hormone receptor polymorphism: association of the V92M and A294H alleles with basal cell carcinoma

Allelic variants in the melanocyte stimulating hormone receptor (MC1R) gene are susceptibility/outcome candidates for cutaneous basal cell carcinoma (BCC). We identified the val92met (V92M) and asp294his (A294H) alleles in 311 cases and 190 controls. The cases included four homo- and 53 heterozygotes for V92M and 12 heterozygotes for A294H and two compound heterozygotes (V92M/A294H). Allele frequencies were similar in controls. In the cases, we found no association between the alleles and skin type though A294H was more common in those with red hair (4/19) than with other hair colours (6/163) (P = 0.012). V92M was not associated with BCC numbers. Cases with A294H had fewer BCC in comparison with those without the allele though the difference was not significant. After inclusion of red hair in the model, A294H was significantly associated with fewer tumours. While MCIR alleles are attractive candidates for BCC, the variants studied did not influence susceptibility. The association with outcome was relatively weak. The large number of MC1R alleles and their low frequency, make assessment of the importance of this gene in the pathogenesis of skin cancers difficult.

Polymorphisms of N-acetyltransferases, glutathione S-transferases, microsomal epoxide hydrolase and sulfotransferases: influence on cancer susceptibility

It has become clear that several polymorphisms of human drug-metabolizing enzymes influence an individual's susceptibility for chemical carcinogenesis. This review gives an overview on relevant polymorphisms of four families of drug-metabolizing enzymes. Rapid acetylators (with respect to N-acetyltransferase NAT2) were shown to have an increased risk of colon cancer, but a decreased risk of bladder cancer. In addition an association between a NAT1 variant allele (NAT*10, due to mutations in the polyadenylation site causing approximately two fold higher activity) and colorectal cancer among NAT2 rapid acetylators was observed, suggesting a possible interaction between NAT1 and NAT2. Glutathione S-transferases M1 and T1 (GSTM1 and GSTT1) are polymorphic due to large deletions in the structural gene. Meta-analysis of 12 case-control studies demonstrated a significant association between the homozygous deletion of GSTM1 (GSTM1-0) and lung cancer (odds ratio: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.23-1.61). Combination of GSTM1-0 with two allelic variants of cytochrome P4501A1 (CYP1A1), CYP1A1 m2/m2 and CYP1A1 Val/Val further increases the risk for lung cancer. Indirect mechanisms by which deletion of GSTM1 increases risk for lung cancer may include GSTM1-0 associated decreased expression of GST M3 and increased activity of CYP1A1 and 1A2. Combination of GST M1-0 and NAT2 slow acetylation was associated with markedly increased risk for lung cancer (odds ratio: 7.8; 95% CI: 1.4-78.7). In addition GSTM1-0 is clearly associated with bladder cancer and possibly also with colorectal, hepatocellular, gastric, esophageal (interaction with CYP1A1), head and neck as well as cutaneous cancer. In individuals with the GSTT1-0 genotype more chromosomal aberrations and sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs) were observed after exposure to 1,3-butadiene or various haloalkanes or haloalkenes. Evidence for an association between GSTT1-0 and myelodysplastic syndrome and acute lymphoblastic leukemia has been presented. A polymorphic site of GSTP1 (valine to isoleucine at codon 104) decreases activity to several carcinogenic diol epoxides and was associated with testicular, bladder and lung cancer. Microsomal expoxide hydrolase (mEH) is polymorphic due to amino acid variation at residues 113 and 139. Polymorphic variants of mEH were associated with hepatocellular cancer (His-113 allele), ovarian cancer (Tyr-113 allele) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (His-113 allele). Three human sulfotransferases (STs) are regulated by genetic polymorphisms (hDHEAST, hM-PST, TS PST). Since a large number of environmental mutagens are activated by STs an association with human cancer risk might be expected.