1
|
Chokephaibulkit K, Puthanakit T, Chaithongwongwatthana S, Bhat N, Tang Y, Anugulruengkitt S, Chayachinda C, Anuwutnavin S, Lapphra K, Rungmaitree S, Tawan M, Andi-Lolo I, Holt R, Fortuna L, Kerdsomboon C, Yuwaree V, Mansouri S, Thai PH, Innis BL. Effective and safe transfer of maternal antibodies persisting two months postpartum following maternal immunization with different doses of recombinant pertussis-containing vaccines. Vaccine 2024; 42:383-395. [PMID: 38061956 PMCID: PMC10789266 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.11.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 10/29/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/01/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Recombinant acellular pertussis (ap) vaccines containing genetically inactivated pertussis toxin (PTgen) and filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA) with or without tetanus (TT) and diphtheria (DT) vaccines (Td) were found safe and immunogenic in non-pregnant and pregnant women. We report here maternal antibody transfer and safety data in mothers and neonates. METHODS This is the follow up of a phase 2 trial in 2019 among 400 pregnant women who randomly received one dose of recombinant pertussis-only vaccine containing 1 µg PTgen and 1 µg FHA (ap1gen), or Td combined with ap1gen (Tdap1gen), or with 2 µg PTgen and 5 µg FHA (Tdap2gen), or with 5 µg PTgen and 5 µg FHA (TdaP5gen, Boostagen®, BioNet, Thailand) or chemically-inactivated acellular pertussis comparator (Tdap8chem, Boostrix™, GSK, Belgium), either in the second or third trimester of gestation. IgG against PT, FHA, TT and DT were assessed by ELISA, PT-neutralizing antibodies (PTNA) by Chinese Hamster Ovary cell assay and safety outcomes at delivery in mothers and at birth. RESULTS Anti-PT and anti-FHA geometric mean concentration (GMC) ratio between infants at birth and mothers at delivery was above 1 in all groups. PT GMC in infants at birth were ≥30 IU/mL in all groups with the highest titers in infants found in TdaP5gen group at birth (118.8 [95% CI 93.9-150.4]). At 2 months, PT GMC ratio to Tdap8chem (98.75% CI) was significantly higher for TdaP5gen (2.6 [1.7-4.0]) and comparable for other recombinant vaccines. No difference in PTNA titers at birth was observed between all groups nor between time of vaccination. Adverse events were comparable in all vaccine groups. CONCLUSIONS BioNet licensed (TdaP5gen and Tdap2gen) and candidate vaccines (Tdap1gen and ap1gen) when given to pregnant women in the second or third trimester of gestation are safe and have induced passive pertussis immunity to infants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kulkanya Chokephaibulkit
- Siriraj Institute of Clinical Research (SICRES) Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkok 10700, Thailand; Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
| | - Thanyawee Puthanakit
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Center of Excellence in Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Vaccines, Chulalongkorn University, Rama IV Road, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| | - Surasith Chaithongwongwatthana
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Rama IV Road, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| | - Niranjan Bhat
- PATH, 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98121, USA
| | - Yuxiao Tang
- PATH, 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98121, USA
| | - Suvaporn Anugulruengkitt
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Center of Excellence in Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Vaccines, Chulalongkorn University, Rama IV Road, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| | - Chenchit Chayachinda
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
| | - Sanitra Anuwutnavin
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
| | - Keswadee Lapphra
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
| | - Supattra Rungmaitree
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
| | - Monta Tawan
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Center of Excellence in Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Vaccines, Chulalongkorn University, Rama IV Road, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| | - Indah Andi-Lolo
- PATH, 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98121, USA
| | - Renee Holt
- PATH, 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98121, USA
| | - Librada Fortuna
- BioNet-Asia Co., Ltd., 19 Soi Udomsuk 37, Sukhumvit 103 Road, Bangjak, Prakanong, Bangkok 10260, Thailand.
| | - Chawanee Kerdsomboon
- BioNet-Asia Co., Ltd., 19 Soi Udomsuk 37, Sukhumvit 103 Road, Bangjak, Prakanong, Bangkok 10260, Thailand
| | - Vilasinee Yuwaree
- BioNet-Asia Co., Ltd., 19 Soi Udomsuk 37, Sukhumvit 103 Road, Bangjak, Prakanong, Bangkok 10260, Thailand
| | - Souad Mansouri
- BioNet-Asia Co., Ltd., 19 Soi Udomsuk 37, Sukhumvit 103 Road, Bangjak, Prakanong, Bangkok 10260, Thailand
| | - Pham Hong Thai
- BioNet-Asia Co., Ltd., 19 Soi Udomsuk 37, Sukhumvit 103 Road, Bangjak, Prakanong, Bangkok 10260, Thailand
| | - Bruce L Innis
- PATH, 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98121, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Febriani Y, Mansour T, Sadarangani M, Ulanova M, Amaral K, Halperin SA, De Serres G, Racine É, Brousseau N. Tdap vaccine in pregnancy and immunogenicity of pertussis and pneumococcal vaccines in children: What is the impact of different immunization schedules? Vaccine 2023; 41:6745-6753. [PMID: 37816653 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.09.063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/30/2023] [Indexed: 10/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2019, the 3 + 1 schedule for children's vaccination (2-4-6-18 months old) was changed for a reduced 2 + 1 schedule (2-4-12 months old) in Quebec, Canada. We compared the post-booster anti-pertussis and anti-pneumococcus IgG antibody concentrations among children of Tdap-vaccinated and unvaccinated mothers for different vaccine schedules and vaccine formulations. METHODS We conducted an observational cohort study. An invitation letter to potential participants was provided during a routine vaccination visit. Children's blood samples were analyzed post-booster at 13 (2 + 1 schedule) or 19 (3 + 1 schedule) months of age for antibodies against pertussis antigens (pertussis toxin (PT), filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA) and pertactin (PRN)) and pneumococcal antigens (serotypes 4, 18C, 19A, and 19F). IgG concentrations among children of Tdap-vaccinated and unvaccinated mothers for each vaccination schedule were compared using geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) and GMC ratios (GMRs), adjusting for potentially immune-response-influencing factors (aGMR). Serotype-specific pneumococcal seroprotection rates were also compared. RESULTS A total of 360 children were included for pertussis analysis and 248 for pneumococcal analysis. For the 2 + 1 schedule, 13-month-old children of Tdap-vaccinated mothers had lower GMCs against PT, FHA, and PRN, with aGMR (95 %CI) of 0.77 (0.65-0.90), 0.66 (0.55-0.79), 0.72 (0.52-0.99), respectively. For the 3 + 1 schedule, at 19 months old, the interference appeared to be attenuated (higher aGMR values). GMCs against PT were slightly higher in the 3 + 1 than the 2 + 1 schedule: 126.5 IU/ml vs 91.6 IU/ml; aGMR = 1.27. GMCs against PT, FHA and PRN were slightly higher among children who received Infanrix hexa® compared to those who received Pediacel® at 12 months old. For pneumococcal antibodies, at 13 months old, there was no strong evidence of immune interference in children of Tdap-vaccinated mothers. CONCLUSION Infant vaccination schedule may influence immune interference associated with maternal Tdap vaccination. More studies are needed to assess the clinical impact of this interference on children's protection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yossi Febriani
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Thowiba Mansour
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Manish Sadarangani
- BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vaccine Evaluation Center, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; University of British Columbia, Department of Pediatrics, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Kyle Amaral
- BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vaccine Evaluation Center, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; University of British Columbia, Department of Medicine, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Scott A Halperin
- Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Departments of Pediatrics and Microbiology and Immunology, Dalhousie University and IWK Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Gaston De Serres
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada; Institut national de santé publique du Québec, Biological and Occupational Risks, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada; Laval University, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Étienne Racine
- Institut national de santé publique du Québec, Biological and Occupational Risks, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Nicholas Brousseau
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada; Institut national de santé publique du Québec, Biological and Occupational Risks, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada; Laval University, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Clark LR, Johnson DR. Safety and Clinical Benefits of Adacel ® and Adacel ®-Polio Vaccination in Pregnancy: A Structured Literature Review. Infect Dis Ther 2023; 12:1955-2003. [PMID: 37653123 PMCID: PMC10505126 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-023-00847-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Vaccination in pregnancy using a tetanus toxoid, reduced dose diphtheria toxoid, and reduced dose acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine is important for prevention of severe pertussis disease in young infants. The objectives of this systematic literature review were to search for original research studies evaluating the vaccine effectiveness, immunogenicity, and safety of Adacel®/Adacel-Polio® used during pregnancy to prevent pertussis disease in young infants. Medical databases used included EMBASE, BIOSIS Previews, and Chemical Abstracts, with search terms related to pregnancy, vaccines/immunization, safety, pertussis, effectiveness/efficacy, and immune response; other potentially eligible reports were included where applicable. Search results were restricted to literature published from 1 January 1995 to 26 July 2021. A total of 2021 articles and 4 other reports were identified for primary review. A total of 49 publications qualified for inclusion after primary and secondary reviews. Effectiveness studies of Adacel or Adacel-Polio given in pregnancy consistently showed high levels of protection from pertussis disease in the newborn (vaccine effectiveness: 91-93%). In immunogenicity studies, the response in pregnant women was consistent with that of non-pregnant women. Infants of mothers vaccinated with Adacel or Adacel-Polio in pregnancy had higher anti-pertussis antibody levels at birth and at 2 months of age compared to infants born to women vaccinated with comparator vaccines, placebo, or those not vaccinated during pregnancy. There was evidence of a slightly decreased response to primary pertussis vaccination in infants of mothers vaccinated with Adacel or Adacel-Polio, but this was not thought to be clinically significant. In safety studies, Adacel or Adacel-Polio vaccination was well tolerated by pregnant woman and not associated with pregnancy, postpartum, or neonatal complications. In conclusion, Adacel or Adacel-Polio vaccination in pregnancy is highly effective in protecting young infants from pertussis disease, with a favorable safety profile for both pregnant women and their infants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liana R Clark
- Global Medical, Sanofi, 1 Discovery Drive, Swiftwater, PA, 18370, USA.
| | - David R Johnson
- Global Medical, Sanofi, 1 Discovery Drive, Swiftwater, PA, 18370, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Martin Aispuro P, Bottero D, Zurita ME, Gaillard ME, Hozbor DF. Impact of maternal whole-cell or acellular pertussis primary immunization on neonatal immune response. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1192119. [PMID: 37435078 PMCID: PMC10330814 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1192119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023] Open
Abstract
With the introduction of pertussis immunization for pregnant women in many countries, there has been renewed interest in the impact of whole-cell pertussis vaccine (wP) versus acellular vaccine (aP) on disease control, particularly regarding the best approach for priming. To gather evidence on this topic, we analyzed the impact of aP or wP priming on aP vaccination during pregnancy (aPpreg) in mice. Two-mother vaccination schemes were employed (wP-wP-aPpreg and aP-aP-aPpreg), and the immune response in the mothers and their offspring, as well as the protection of the offspring against Bordetella pertussis challenge, were assessed. Pertussis toxin (PTx)-specific IgG responses were detected in mothers after both the second and third doses, with higher titers after the third dose, regardless of the vaccination schedule. However, a significant reduction in PTx-IgG levels was observed after 22 weeks post aPpreg immunization in mothers with the aP-aP-aPpreg scheme but not in the wP-wP-aPpreg immunized mothers. The aP-aP-aPpreg schedule triggered a murine antibody response mainly to a Th2-profile, while wP-wP-aPpreg induced a Th1/Th2 mixed profile. Both immunization schemes administered to the mothers protected the offspring against pertussis, but the wP-wP-aPpreg vaccination conferred offspring protection in all pregnancies at least up to 20 weeks after receiving the aPpreg-dose. In contrast, the immunity induced by aP-aP-aPpreg began to decline in births that occurred 18 weeks after receiving the aPpreg dose. For the aP-aP-aPpreg scheme, pups born from gestations furthest from aPpreg (+22 weeks) had lower PTx-specific IgG levels than those born closer to the application of the dose during pregnancy. In contrast, for pups born to wP-wP-aPpreg vaccinated mothers, the PTx-specific IgG levels were maintained over time, even for those born at the longest time studied (+22 weeks). It is noteworthy that only the pups born from mothers with aP-aP-aPpreg and receiving a neonatal dose of either aP or wP were more susceptible to B. pertussis infection than mice with only maternal immunity, suggesting interference with the induced immunity (p<0.05). However, it should be noted that mice with maternal immunity, whether vaccinated or not with neonatal doses, are better protected against colonization with B. pertussis than mice without maternal immunity but vaccinated with aP or wP.
Collapse
|
5
|
Skoff TH, Deng L, Bozio CH, Hariri S. US Infant Pertussis Incidence Trends Before and After Implementation of the Maternal Tetanus, Diphtheria, and Pertussis Vaccine. JAMA Pediatr 2023; 177:395-400. [PMID: 36745442 PMCID: PMC10071344 DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.5689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Importance Infants younger than 1 year have the highest burden of pertussis morbidity and mortality. In 2011, the US introduced tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccination during pregnancy to protect infants before vaccinations begin. Objective To assess the association of maternal Tdap vaccination during pregnancy with the incidence of pertussis among infants in the US. Design, Setting, and Participants In this ecologic study, a time-trend analysis was performed of infant pertussis cases reported through the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2019, in the US. Statistical analysis was performed from April 1, 2020, to October 31, 2022. Exposures Maternal Tdap vaccination during pregnancy. Main Outcomes and Measures Pertussis incidence rates were calculated and compared between 2 periods-the pre-maternal Tdap vaccination period (2000-2010) and the post-maternal Tdap vaccination period (2012-2019)-for 2 age groups: infants younger than 2 months (target group of maternal vaccination) and infants aged 6 months to less than 12 months (comparison group). Incidence rate differences between the 2 age groups were modeled using weighted segmented linear regression. The slope difference between the 2 periods was estimated to assess the association of maternal Tdap vaccination with pertussis incidence among infants. Results A total of 57 460 pertussis cases were reported in infants younger than 1 year between 2000 and 2019; 19 322 cases (33.6%) were in infants younger than 2 months. During the pre-maternal Tdap vaccination period, annual pertussis incidence did not change among infants younger than 2 months (slope, 3.29 per 100 000 infants per year; P = .28) but increased slightly among infants aged 6 months to less than 12 months (slope, 2.10 per 100 000 infants per year; P = .01). There was no change in the difference in incidence between the 2 age groups (slope, 0.08 per 100 000 infants per year; P = .97) during the pre-maternal Tdap vaccination period overall. However, in the post-maternal Tdap vaccination period, incidence decreased among infants younger than 2 months (slope, -14.53 per 100 000 infants per year; P = .001) while remaining unchanged among infants aged 6 months to less than 12 months (slope, 1.42 per 100 000 infants per year; P = .29). The incidence rate difference between the 2 age groups significantly decreased during the post-maternal Tdap vaccination period (slope, -14.43 per 100 000 infants per year; P < .001). Pertussis incidence rate differences were significantly different between the pre-maternal and post-maternal Tdap vaccination periods (slope difference, -14.51 per 100 000 infants per year; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance In this study, following maternal Tdap vaccine introduction, a sustained decrease in pertussis incidence was observed among infants younger than 2 months, narrowing the incidence gap with infants aged 6 months to less than 12 months. These findings suggest that maternal Tdap vaccination is associated with a reduction in pertussis burden in the target age group (<2 months) and that further increases in coverage may be associated with additional reductions in infant disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tami H. Skoff
- Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Li Deng
- Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Catherine H. Bozio
- Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
- Influenza Division, National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Susan Hariri
- Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Amirthalingam G, Campbell H, Ribeiro S, Stowe J, Tessier E, Litt D, Fry NK, Andrews N. Optimization of Timing of Maternal Pertussis Immunization From 6 Years of Postimplementation Surveillance Data in England. Clin Infect Dis 2023; 76:e1129-e1139. [PMID: 35959786 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciac651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Revised: 07/31/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND England's third-trimester maternal pertussis vaccination, introduced in October 2012, was extended to the second trimester in 2016. Maternal vaccination provides high protection against infant disease, but routine second-trimester vaccination has not previously been assessed. METHODS National laboratory-confirmed pertussis case surveillance determined vaccination history, maternal vaccination history and hospitalization. Pertussis hospital admissions between 2012 and 2019 were extracted from the Hospital Episode Statistics data set. Vaccine effectiveness (VE) was calculated for pertussis case patients born between October 2012 and September 2018 using the screening method and matching with a nationally representative data set. RESULTS Higher coverage was observed after earlier maternal vaccination with approximately 40% of pregnant women vaccinated ≥13 weeks before delivery. Cases and hospitalizations stabilized at low levels in younger infants but remained elevated in older infants, children, and adults. No deaths occurred in infants with vaccinated mothers after 2016. Of 1162 laboratory-confirmed pertussis cases in the study, 599 (52%) were in infants aged <93 days: 463 (77%) with unvaccinated and 136 (23%) with vaccinated mothers. The VE was equivalent in infants with mothers vaccinated at different gestational periods except in those with mothers vaccinated between 7 days before and 41 days after delivery. Children whose mothers were unvaccinated but with vaccination in a previous pregnancy had a VE against disease of 44% (95% confidence interval, 19%-75%). There was no increased disease risk after primary vaccination in children with mothers vaccinated at least 7 days before delivery. CONCLUSIONS National policy recommending vaccination in the second trimester increased earlier maternal vaccine uptake with sustained high VE and impact against early infant disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gayatri Amirthalingam
- Immunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
| | - Helen Campbell
- Immunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sonia Ribeiro
- Immunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
| | - Julia Stowe
- Immunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
| | - Elise Tessier
- Immunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
| | - David Litt
- Vaccine Preventable Bacteria Section, Respiratory and Vaccine Preventable Bacteria Reference Unit, Specialised Microbiology and Laboratories Directorate, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
| | - Norman K Fry
- Immunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom.,Vaccine Preventable Bacteria Section, Respiratory and Vaccine Preventable Bacteria Reference Unit, Specialised Microbiology and Laboratories Directorate, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nick Andrews
- Immunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Szwejser-Zawislak E, Wilk MM, Piszczek P, Krawczyk J, Wilczyńska D, Hozbor D. Evaluation of Whole-Cell and Acellular Pertussis Vaccines in the Context of Long-Term Herd Immunity. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 11:vaccines11010001. [PMID: 36679846 PMCID: PMC9863224 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11010001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2022] [Revised: 12/04/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
After the pertussis vaccine had been introduced in the 1940s and was shown to be very successful in reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with the disease, the possibility of improving both vaccine composition and vaccination schedules has become the subject of continuous interest. As a result, we are witnessing a considerable heterogeneity in pertussis vaccination policies, which remains beyond universal consensus. Many pertussis-related deaths still occur in low- and middle-income countries; however, these deaths are attributable to gaps in vaccination coverage and limited access to healthcare in these countries, rather than to the poor efficacy of the first generation of pertussis vaccine consisting in inactivated and detoxified whole cell pathogen (wP). In many, particularly high-income countries, a switch was made in the 1990s to the use of acellular pertussis (aP) vaccine, to reduce the rate of post-vaccination adverse events and thereby achieve a higher percentage of children vaccinated. However the epidemiological data collected over the past few decades, even in those high-income countries, show an increase in pertussis prevalence and morbidity rates, triggering a wide-ranging debate on the causes of pertussis resurgence and the effectiveness of current pertussis prevention strategies, as well as on the efficacy of available pertussis vaccines and immunization schedules. The current article presents a systematic review of scientific reports on the evaluation of the use of whole-cell and acellular pertussis vaccines, in the context of long-term immunity and vaccines efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ewa Szwejser-Zawislak
- Institute of Biotechnology of Serums and Vaccines Biomed, Al. Sosnowa 8, 30-224 Krakow, Poland
| | - Mieszko M. Wilk
- Department of Immunology, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, 30-387 Krakow, Poland
| | - Piotr Piszczek
- Institute of Biotechnology of Serums and Vaccines Biomed, Al. Sosnowa 8, 30-224 Krakow, Poland
| | - Justyna Krawczyk
- Institute of Biotechnology of Serums and Vaccines Biomed, Al. Sosnowa 8, 30-224 Krakow, Poland
| | - Daria Wilczyńska
- Institute of Biotechnology of Serums and Vaccines Biomed, Al. Sosnowa 8, 30-224 Krakow, Poland
| | - Daniela Hozbor
- VacSal Laboratory, Institute of Biotechnology and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Sciences, National University of La Plata (UNLP), National Council for Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET), La Plata 1900, Argentina
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Vaccination in Pregnancy against Pertussis: A Consensus Statement on Behalf of the Global Pertussis Initiative. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10121990. [PMID: 36560400 PMCID: PMC9786323 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10121990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Revised: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Infants are at high risk for severe morbidity and mortality from pertussis disease during early infancy. Vaccination against pertussis in pregnancy has emerged as the ideal strategy to protect infants during these early, vulnerable, first months of life. On 30 November and 1 December 2021, the Global Pertussis Initiative held a meeting that aimed to discuss and review the most up-to-date scientific literature supporting vaccination against pertussis in pregnancy and outstanding scientific questions. Herein, we review the current and historically published literature and summarize the findings as consensus statements on vaccination against pertussis in pregnancy on behalf of the Global Pertussis Initiative.
Collapse
|
9
|
Protecting the Offspring, the Gift of Maternal Immunization: Current Status and Future Perspectives. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10111953. [DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10111953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Revised: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Pregnancy is characterized by immunological alterations in pregnant women that permit the growth of a semi-allogenic fetus, resulting in greater susceptibility of childbearing women to infections. Furthermore, due to the immaturity of the immune system of neonates, a protection gap is present in early life, leaving neonates and infants vulnerable to infectious diseases with increased morbidity and mortality. Maternal immunization against influenza, pertussis, and, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2 has been implemented in several countries, with beneficial effects on both the mother and the offspring. The main protective mechanism of vaccination during pregnancy is transplacental transfer of maternal antibodies. However, recent evidence has implied that the fetal immune system may be influenced beyond passive immunity. This review sheds light on the current status of the routinely administered vaccinations during pregnancy, focusing on the impact of maternal immunization on the priming of the fetal immune system and suggesting future perspectives for the optimization of vaccination strategies.
Collapse
|
10
|
Nunes MC, Madhi SA. COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy. Trends Mol Med 2022; 28:662-680. [PMID: 35610123 PMCID: PMC9061132 DOI: 10.1016/j.molmed.2022.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2022] [Revised: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
11
|
Thuy Nga DT, Thi Bich Thuy P, Ainai A, Takayama I, Huong DT, Saitoh A, Nakagawa S, Minh Dien T, Nakajima N, Saitoh A. Association Between Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction Cycle Threshold Value and Clinical Severity in Neonates and Infants Infected With Bordetella pertussis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2022; 41:388-393. [PMID: 35093999 DOI: 10.1097/inf.0000000000003471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is highly sensitive and is thus the standard method for diagnosing pertussis. Real-time PCR is widely used because of its accuracy and the simplicity of the simultaneous cycle threshold (Ct) value, which represents the copy numbers of the target gene. Little is known of the association of Ct value with pertussis severity in neonates and infants. METHODS This study determined Ct values in neonates and infants diagnosed with pertussis by real-time PCR using nasopharyngeal samples at Vietnam National Children's Hospital in Hanoi in 2017 and 2019. The association of disease severity and clinical parameters were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS We evaluated 108 patients with pertussis [median age: 63 days, interquartile range (IQR): 41-92 days]. Only 6/108 (6%) received at least 1 dose of a pertussis-containing vaccine. Among them, 24 (22.2%) had severe disease requiring care in a pediatric intensive care unit, 16 (13.8%) required mechanical ventilation, and 3 (2.6%) died. The median Ct value was lower in patients with severe disease (19.0, IQR: 16.5-22.0, n = 24) than in those without severe disease (25.5, IQR: 20.0-30.0, n = 84) (P = 0.002). Logistic regression analyses demonstrated that PCR Ct value [odds ratio (OR): 1.783, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.013-3.138, P = 0.045], age (OR: 3.118, 95% CI: 1.643-5.920, P = 0.001), and white blood cell counts (OR: 0.446, 95% CI: 0.261-0.763, P = 0.003) remained significantly associated with severe disease. CONCLUSIONS Real-time PCR Ct values for pertussis might be useful as a predictor of severe disease in neonates and infants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Do Thi Thuy Nga
- From the Division of General Internal Medicine, The Center for Tropical Diseases, Vietnam National Children's Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Phung Thi Bich Thuy
- Department of Molecular Biology for Infectious Disease, Vietnam National Children's Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Akira Ainai
- Department of Pathology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ikuyo Takayama
- Center for Influenza and Respiratory Virus Research, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Do Thu Huong
- Department of Molecular Biology for Infectious Disease, Vietnam National Children's Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Aya Saitoh
- Department of Nursing, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan
| | - Satoshi Nakagawa
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tran Minh Dien
- Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Vietnam National Children's Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Noriko Nakajima
- Department of Pathology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akihiko Saitoh
- Department of Pediatrics, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Etti M, Calvert A, Galiza E, Lim S, Khalil A, Le Doare K, Heath PT. Maternal vaccination: a review of current evidence and recommendations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022; 226:459-474. [PMID: 34774821 PMCID: PMC8582099 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.10.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2021] [Revised: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Maternal vaccination is an effective means of protecting pregnant women, their fetuses, and infants from vaccine-preventable infections. Despite the availability of sufficient safety data to support the use of vaccines during pregnancy, maternal immunization remains an underutilized method of disease prevention, often because of concerns from both healthcare providers and pregnant women about vaccine safety. Such concerns have been reflected in the low uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine among pregnant women seen in many parts of the world. Here, we present an update of the current recommendations for the use of vaccines during pregnancy, including the evidence supporting the use of novel vaccine platforms. We also provide an overview of the data supporting the use of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy and an update of the status of vaccines that are currently under development for use in pregnant women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Etti
- Paediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Anna Calvert
- Paediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Eva Galiza
- Paediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Suzy Lim
- Paediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Asma Khalil
- Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St. George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kirsty Le Doare
- Paediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Paul T Heath
- Vaccine Institute and Paediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
González-López JJ, Álvarez Aldeán J, Álvarez García FJ, Campins M, Garcés-Sánchez M, Gil-Prieto R, Grande-Tejada AM. Epidemiology, prevention and control of pertussis in Spain: New vaccination strategies for lifelong protection. ENFERMEDADES INFECCIOSAS Y MICROBIOLOGIA CLINICA (ENGLISH ED.) 2022; 40:195-203. [PMID: 35473991 DOI: 10.1016/j.eimce.2021.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 04/22/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Pertussis is a highly contagious, vaccine-preventable respiratory tract infection, with high morbidity and mortality and a particularly severe effect on newborns and infants under 2 months. The first pertussis vaccines were introduced in the 1940s. Since 1980, however, the incidence of cases has risen despite the extensive vaccination programmes and antibiotic adjuvant treatments available. Transition from the use of whole-cell vaccines to acellular vaccines and the antigenic modifications of Bordetella pertussis have contributed, among other factors, to a reduction in vaccine-acquired immunity and reemergence of the disease. Today, there are still unmet needs not covered by conventional prevention measures and existing antibiotic treatments. This review aims to update the available data, and to discuss which vaccine strategies might contribute to better disease control and prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan José González-López
- Department of Clinical Microbiology, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Microbiology and Genetics, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain.
| | | | - Francisco José Álvarez García
- Pediatrics, Centro de Salud de Llanera, Asturias, Spain; Department of Medicine, Universidad de Oviedo, Asturias, Spain
| | - Magda Campins
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Ruth Gil-Prieto
- Department of Medicine and Public Health, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
The optimal strategy for pertussis vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials and real-world data. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022; 226:52-67.e10. [PMID: 34224687 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.06.096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Revised: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Severe pertussis infection has been reported in infants before receiving routine immunization series. This problem could be solved by vaccinating mothers during pregnancy or children at birth. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world evidence to evaluate the optimal strategy for pertussis vaccination. DATA SOURCES PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched until December 2020. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA RCTs, cohort studies, case-control studies, and case series were included if they investigated the efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of acellular pertussis vaccine during pregnancy and at birth. METHODS Number of pertussis cases, severe adverse events (SAEs), and pertussis antibody concentration in infants before and after they receive routine vaccination series were extracted and random-effect model was used to pool the analyses. RESULTS Overall, 29 studies were included. Our meta-analysis revealed that pertussis immunization during pregnancy significantly increased the concentrations of 3 pertussis antibodies and reduced the incidence rates of infected infants below 3 months of age (odds ratio, 0.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.33). Similarly, infants vaccinated at birth had higher levels of pertussis antibody than those who were not. No significant difference in rates of severe adverse events was seen in all vaccination groups (during pregnancy [risk ratio, 1.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-1.82] and at birth [risk ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-1.54]). CONCLUSION Pertussis vaccination during pregnancy could protect infants against pertussis disease before the routine vaccination. Pertussis immunization at birth would be an alternative for infants whose mothers did not receive pertussis vaccines during pregnancy.
Collapse
|
15
|
Abu-Raya B, Maertens K, Munoz FM, Zimmermann P, Curtis N, Halperin SA, Rots N, Barug D, Holder B, Rice TF, Kampmann B, Leuridan E, Sadarangani M. Factors affecting antibody responses to immunizations in infants born to women immunized against pertussis in pregnancy and unimmunized women: Individual-Participant Data Meta-analysis. Vaccine 2021; 39:6545-6552. [PMID: 34598822 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.09.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2021] [Revised: 09/04/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Exploring factors that affect immune responses to immunizations in infants born to women immunized with tetanus-diphtheria-acellular-pertussis (Tdap) in pregnancy compared with unimmunized women is important in designing immunization programs. METHODS Individual-participant data meta-analysis of 8 studies reporting post-immunization immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels to vaccine antigens in infants born to either women immunized with Tdap in pregnancy or unimmunized women, using mixed-effects models. RESULTS In infants of Tdap-immunized women, two-fold higher levels of anti-pertussis toxin (PT) and anti-diphtheria-toxoid (DT) IgG pre-primary immunization were associated with 9% and 10% lower post-primary immunization levels, (geometric mean ratio [GMR], PT: 0.91; 95% CI, 0.88-0.95,n = 494, DT: 0.9; 0.87-0.93,n = 519). Timing of immunization in pregnancy did not affect post-primary immunization anti-Bordetella pertussis, anti-tetanus-toxoid (TT) and anti-DT IgG levels. Spacing of infant immunization did not affect post-primary immunization anti-B. pertussis and anti-DT levels. In infants of Tdap-immunized women, two-fold higher levels of anti-PT and anti-filamentous haemagglutinin (FHA) IgG pre-primary immunization were associated with lower post-booster immunization levels, (GMR, PT: 0.91; 0.85-0.97,n = 224, FHA: 0.92; 0.85-0.99,n = 232). Timing of immunization in pregnancy did not affect post-booster immunization anti-Bordetella pertussis, anti-tetanus-toxoid (TT) and anti-DT IgG levels. Spacing of infant immunization did not affect post-booster immunization anti-PT, anti-pertactin (PRN), anti-TT and anti-DT IgG levels. In infants of unimmunized women, two-fold higher IgG levels of some vaccine antigens pre-primary immunization were associated with 8-17% lower post-primary immunization levels (GMR, PT 0.92, 95% CI:0.88-0.97, n = 373; FHA:0.88, 95% CI:0.85-0.92,n = 378; PRN:0.84, 95% CI:0.81-0.88, n = 367; TT:0.88, 95% CI:0.83-0.93, n = 241; DT: 0.83, 95% CI:0.79-0.87,n = 278). Two-fold higher levels of anti-FHA IgG pre-primary immunization were associated with 8% lower post-booster immunization levels (GMR, 0.92; 95% CI: 0.86-0.99,n = 138). DISCUSSION Increased IgG levels pre-primary immunization is associated with reduced post-primary and post-booster immunization levels for some antigens in infants of women immunized or unimmunized in pregnancy, but their clinical significance is uncertain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bahaa Abu-Raya
- Vaccine Evaluation Center, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| | - Kirsten Maertens
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Belgium.
| | - Flor M Munoz
- Departments of Pediatrics and Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Petra Zimmermann
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne and Infectious Diseases Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Pediatrics, Fribourg Hospital HFR and Faculty of Science and Medicine, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Nigel Curtis
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne and Infectious Diseases Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Scott A Halperin
- Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Departments of Pediatrics and Microbiology and Immunology, Dalhousie University, Izaak Walton Killam Health Centre, and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Nynke Rots
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Daan Barug
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Beth Holder
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom; Section of Paediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas F Rice
- Section of Paediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Beate Kampmann
- Vaccines and Immunity Theme, Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, Gambia; The Vaccine Centre, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Elke Leuridan
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Manish Sadarangani
- Vaccine Evaluation Center, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Shook LL, Fallah PN, Silberman JN, Edlow AG. COVID-19 Vaccination in Pregnancy and Lactation: Current Research and Gaps in Understanding. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2021; 11:735394. [PMID: 34604115 PMCID: PMC8481914 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.735394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated the urgent need to develop vaccine strategies optimized for pregnant people and their newborns, as both populations are at risk of developing severe disease. Although not included in COVID-19 vaccine development trials, pregnant people have had access to these vaccines since their initial release in the US and abroad. The rapid development and distribution of novel COVID-19 vaccines to people at risk, including those who are pregnant and lactating, presents an unprecedented opportunity to further our understanding of vaccine-induced immunity in these populations. In this review, we aim to summarize the literature to date on COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy and lactation and highlight opportunities for investigation that may inform future maternal vaccine development and implementation strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lydia L. Shook
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Parisa N. Fallah
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Jason N. Silberman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Andrea G. Edlow
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abu-Raya B, Maertens K, Munoz FM, Zimmermann P, Curtis N, Halperin SA, Rots N, Barug D, Holder B, Kampmann B, Leuridan E, Sadarangani M. The Effect of Tetanus-Diphtheria-Acellular-Pertussis Immunization During Pregnancy on Infant Antibody Responses: Individual-Participant Data Meta-Analysis. Front Immunol 2021; 12:689394. [PMID: 34305922 PMCID: PMC8299947 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.689394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Immunization with tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine in pregnancy is increasingly recommended. We determined the effect of Tdap immunization in pregnancy on infants' vaccine responses. Methods Individual-participant data meta-analysis of ten studies (n=1884) investigating infants' antibody response to routine immunizations following Tdap immunization in pregnancy was performed. Geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of antigen-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels were calculated using mixed-effects models. Seroprotection rates were compared using chi-squared tests. Results Infants of Tdap-immunized women had significantly lower IgG against pertussis toxin (GMR 0.65; 95%CI 0.57-0.74), filamentous haemagglutinin (FHA) (0.68; 0.53-0.87), pertactin (0.65; 0.58-0.72) and fimbria 2/3 (FIM2/3) (0.41; 0.32-0.52) after primary immunization, compared with infants of unimmunized women. These lower levels persisted after booster immunization for FHA (0.72; 0.61-0.84) and FIM2/3 (0.53; 0.29-0.96). After primary immunization, infants of Tdap-immunized women had lower seroprotection rates against diphtheria (90% [843/973] vs 98% [566/579]; p<0.001) and invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) caused by 5 Streptococcus pneumoniae (SPN) serotypes (SPN5, SPN6B, SPN9V, SPN19A, SPN23F), and higher seroprotection rates against Haemophilus influenzae type b (short-term and long-term seroprotection rates, 86%[471/547] vs 76%[188/247] and 62%[337/547] vs 49%(121/247), respectively, all p=0.001). After booster immunization, seroprotection rates against diphtheria and tetanus were 99% (286/288) and (618/619) in infants of Tdap-immunized women, respectively. Conclusions Infants of Tdap-immunized women in pregnancy had lower IgG levels against pertussis, diphtheria and some SPN serotypes after their immunization compared with infants of unimmunized women. Enhanced surveillance of pertussis, diphtheria and IPD in infants is needed to determine the clinical significance of these findings. Systematic Review Registration CRD42017079171.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bahaa Abu-Raya
- Vaccine Evaluation Center, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Kirsten Maertens
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Flor M Munoz
- Departments of Pediatrics and Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Petra Zimmermann
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne and Infectious Diseases Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Department of Pediatrics, Fribourg Hospital HFR and Faculty of Science and Medicine, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Nigel Curtis
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne and Infectious Diseases Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Scott A Halperin
- Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Departments of Pediatrics and Microbiology and Immunology, Dalhousie University, Izaak Walton Killam Health Centre, and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Nynke Rots
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands
| | - Daan Barug
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands
| | - Beth Holder
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.,Section of Paediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Beate Kampmann
- Vaccines and Immunity Theme, Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, Gambia.,The Vaccine Centre, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Elke Leuridan
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Manish Sadarangani
- Vaccine Evaluation Center, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
González-López JJ, Álvarez Aldeán J, Álvarez García FJ, Campins M, Garcés-Sánchez M, Gil-Prieto R, Grande-Tejada AM. Epidemiology, prevention and control of pertussis in Spain: New vaccination strategies for lifelong protection. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 2021:S0213-005X(21)00185-3. [PMID: 34154858 DOI: 10.1016/j.eimc.2021.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Revised: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 04/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Pertussis is a highly contagious, vaccine-preventable respiratory tract infection, with high morbidity and mortality and a particularly severe effect on newborns and infants under 2 months. The first pertussis vaccines were introduced in the 1940s. Since 1980, however, the incidence of cases has risen despite the extensive vaccination programmes and antibiotic adjuvant treatments available. Transition from the use of whole-cell vaccines to acellular vaccines and the antigenic modifications of Bordetella pertussis have contributed, among other factors, to a reduction in vaccine-acquired immunity and reemergence of the disease. Today, there are still unmet needs not covered by conventional prevention measures and existing antibiotic treatments. This review aims to update the available data, and to discuss which vaccine strategies might contribute to better disease control and prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan José González-López
- Department of Clinical Microbiology, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Microbiology and Genetics, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain.
| | | | - Francisco José Álvarez García
- Pediatrics, Centro de Salud de Llanera, Asturias, Spain; Department of Medicine, Universidad de Oviedo, Asturias, Spain
| | - Magda Campins
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Ruth Gil-Prieto
- Department of Medicine and Public Health, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Jones CE, Calvert A, Southern J, Matheson M, Andrews N, Khalil A, Cuthbertson H, Hallis B, England A, Heath PT, Miller E. A phase IV, multi-centre, randomized clinical trial comparing two pertussis-containing vaccines in pregnant women in England and vaccine responses in their infants. BMC Med 2021; 19:138. [PMID: 34098951 PMCID: PMC8186138 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-021-02005-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pertussis vaccines containing three or five pertussis antigens are recommended in pregnancy in many countries, but no studies have compared the effect on infants' antigen-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) concentrations. The aim of this study was to compare anti-pertussis IgG responses following primary immunization in infants of mothers vaccinated with TdaP5-IPV (low dose diphtheria toxoid, tetanus toxoid, acellular pertussis [five antigens] and inactivated polio) or TdaP3-IPV in pregnancy (three pertussis antigens). METHODS This multi-centre phase IV randomized clinical trial was conducted in a tertiary referral centre and primary care sites in England. Women were randomized to receive TdaP5-IPV (n = 77) or TdaP3-IPV (n = 77) at 28-32 gestational weeks. A non-randomized control group of 44 women who had not received a pertussis-containing vaccine in pregnancy and their 47 infants were enrolled post-partum. RESULTS Following infant primary immunization, there was no difference in the geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) of anti-pertussis toxin, filamentous haemagglutinin or pertactin IgG between infants born to women vaccinated with TdaP5-IPV (n = 67) or TdaP3-IPV (n = 63). However, the GMC of anti-pertussis toxin IgG was lower in infants born to TdaP5-IPV- and TdaP3-IPV-vaccinated mothers compared to infants born to unvaccinated mothers (n = 45) (geometric mean ratio 0.71 [0.56-0.90] and 0.78 [0.61-0.98], respectively); by 13 months of age, this difference was no longer observed. CONCLUSION Blunting of anti-pertussis toxin IgG response following primary immunization occurs in infants born to women vaccinated with TdaP5-IPV and TdaP3-IPV, with no difference between maternal vaccines. The blunting effect had resolved by 13 months of age. These results may be helpful for countries considering which pertussis-containing vaccine to recommend for use in pregnancy. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02145624 , registered 23 May 2014.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Elizabeth Jones
- Paediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, St George's, University of London, London, UK. .,St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. .,Faculty of Medicine and Institute for Life Sciences, University of Southampton and NIHR Southampton Clinical Research Facility and NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Room LF102, F Level, South Academic Block, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
| | - Anna Calvert
- Paediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, St George's, University of London, London, UK.,St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jo Southern
- Immunisation and Countermeasures, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Mary Matheson
- National Infection Service, Public Health England, Porton, Salisbury, UK
| | - Nick Andrews
- Statistics, Modelling and Economics Department, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Asma Khalil
- St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Hannah Cuthbertson
- National Infection Service, Public Health England, Porton, Salisbury, UK
| | - Bassam Hallis
- National Infection Service, Public Health England, Porton, Salisbury, UK
| | - Anna England
- National Infection Service, Public Health England, Porton, Salisbury, UK
| | - Paul T Heath
- Paediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, St George's, University of London, London, UK.,St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Elizabeth Miller
- Immunisation and Countermeasures, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Vaz-de-Lima LR, Sato APS, Pawloski LC, Fernandes EG, Rajam G, Sato HK, Patel D, Li H, de Castilho EA, Tondella ML, Schiffer J. Effect of maternal Tdap on infant antibody response to a primary vaccination series with whole cell pertussis vaccine in São Paulo, Brazil. Vaccine X 2021; 7:100087. [PMID: 33817624 PMCID: PMC8010450 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2021.100087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2020] [Revised: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 02/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Maternal Tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccination provides antibody transfer to newborn infants and may affect their antibody response to the primary vaccination series. This study aimed to assess the effect of Tdap vaccination during pregnancy on infant antibody response to the whole cell pertussis (DTwP) primary series. METHODS Plasma from 318 pregnant women (243 Tdap-vaccinated and 75 unvaccinated) and their infants (cord blood) was collected at delivery; infant blood was again collected at 2 and 7 months, before and after their primary DTwP series. Anti-pertussis toxin (PT), pertactin (PRN), filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA), fimbriae 2/3 (FIM) and adenylate cyclase toxin (ACT) IgG antibodies were quantified by a microsphere-based multiplex antibody capture assay and anti-PT neutralizing antibodies by the Real Time Cell analysis system. RESULTS Infant geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) of IgG anti-Tdap antigens were significantly higher (p < 0.001) among the Tdap-vaccinated (PT: 57.22 IU/mL; PRN: 464.86 IU/mL; FHA: 424.0 IU/mL), versus the unvaccinated group (4 IU/mL, 15.43 IU/mL, 31.99 IU/mL, respectively) at delivery. Anti-FIM and ACT GMCs were similar between the two groups. At 2 months of age, anti-PT, PRN, and FHA GMCs remained higher (p < 0.001) in the Tdap-vaccinated group (12.64 IU/mL; 108.76 IU/mL; 87.41 IU/mL, respectively) than the unvaccinated group (1.02 IU/mL; 4.46 IU/mL; 6.89 IU/mL). However, at 7 months, after receiving the third DTwP dose, the anti-PT GMC was higher (p = 0.016) in the unvaccinated group (7.91 IU/mL) compared to the vaccinated group (2.27 IU/mL), but without differences for anti-PRN, FHA, FIM and ACT GMCs. CONCLUSION Elevated antibody levels suggest that maternal Tdap vaccination might protect infants until 2 months of age. Reduced anti-PT levels at 7 months indicate potential blunting of immune response in infants. Surveillance would help determine if blunting alters vaccine immunity and impacts pertussis prevention in infants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lourdes R.A. Vaz-de-Lima
- Centro de Imunologia, Instituto Adolfo Lutz, Coordenadoria de Controle de Doenças da Secretaria de Estado da Saúde, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Ana Paula S. Sato
- Departmento de Epidemiologia, Faculdade de Saúde Pública, Universidade de São Paulo – USP, Brazil
| | - Lucia C. Pawloski
- Division of Bacterial Diseases, NCIRD, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Eder G. Fernandes
- Divisão de Imunização, Centro de Vigilância Epidemiológica Prof. Alexandre Vranjac, Coordenadoria de Controle de Doenças da Secretaria de Estado da Saúde SP, Brazil
| | - Gowrisankar Rajam
- Division of Bacterial Diseases, NCIRD, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Helena K. Sato
- Divisão de Imunização, Centro de Vigilância Epidemiológica Prof. Alexandre Vranjac, Coordenadoria de Controle de Doenças da Secretaria de Estado da Saúde SP, Brazil
| | - Divya Patel
- Division of Bacterial Diseases, NCIRD, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Han Li
- Division of Bacterial Diseases, NCIRD, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Maria Lucia Tondella
- Division of Bacterial Diseases, NCIRD, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jarad Schiffer
- Division of Bacterial Diseases, NCIRD, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pertussis, caused by Bordetella pertussis, remains a major public health problem, despite high vaccination coverage. Furthermore, the disease incidence has increased recently, especially in countries that have switched from whole-cell to acellular pertussis vaccines. AREAS COVERED Here, we provide a state-of-the art summary of the reasons for the pertussis resurgence and discuss potential solutions using current vaccines and challenges for the development of novel vaccines. PubMed was searched for publications with the terms pertussis and vaccines. Many new vaccine candidates are proposed but most have not reached clinical development. Most of them induce strong systemic immune responses and protection in mice. However, since B. pertussis is a mucosal pathogen, albeit with systemic effects, local immunity may be crucial to prevent B. pertussis infection and transmission. Recent efforts have focused on vaccine candidates able to induce immunity in the nasal cavity, and one of them is currently in clinical development. EXPERT COMMENTARY New pertussis vaccines are needed to durably control the disease and circulation of B. pertussis. A major challenge is to prove efficacy against disease in randomized controlled trials, while it is feasible to provide evidence for prevention of infection, since asymptomatic carriage of B. pertussis is wide spread.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camille Locht
- Univ. Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur De Lille, U1019 - UMR 8204 - CIIL - Center for Infection and Immunity of Lille, Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wanlapakorn N, Maertens K, Vongpunsawad S, Puenpa J, Tran TMP, Hens N, Van Damme P, Thiriard A, Raze D, Locht C, Poovorawan Y, Leuridan E. Quantity and Quality of Antibodies After Acellular Versus Whole-cell Pertussis Vaccines in Infants Born to Mothers Who Received Tetanus, Diphtheria, and Acellular Pertussis Vaccine During Pregnancy: A Randomized Trial. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 71:72-80. [PMID: 31418814 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciz778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2019] [Accepted: 08/12/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The blunting effect of pertussis immunization during pregnancy on infant antibody responses induced by whole-cell pertussis (wP) vaccination is not well-defined. METHODS This randomized controlled trial (NCT02408926) followed term infants born to mothers vaccinated with tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine during pregnancy in Thailand. Infants received either acellular pertussis (aP)- or wP-containing vaccine at 2, 4, 6, and 18 months of age. A comparison group comprised wP-vaccinated children born to mothers not vaccinated during pregnancy. Antibodies against pertussis toxin (PT), filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA), and pertactin (PRN) were evaluated using commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Functionality of antibodies against Bordetella pertussis was measured using Bordetella pertussis growth inhibition assay. RESULTS After maternal Tdap vaccination, 158 infants vaccinated with aP-containing vaccines possessed higher antibody levels (P < .001) against all tested B. pertussis antigens postpriming compared to 157 infants receiving wP-containing vaccines. At 1 month postbooster, only anti-FHA and anti-PRN antibodies were still significantly higher (P < .001) in the aP group. Significantly higher anti-PT and anti-FHA (P < .001), but not anti-PRN immunoglobulin G, were observed among 69 wP-vaccinated infants born to control mothers compared with wP-vaccinated infants of Tdap-vaccinated mothers after primary and booster vaccination. The antibody functionality was higher in all wP-vaccinated infants at all times. CONCLUSIONS Maternal Tdap vaccination inhibited more pertussis-specific responses in wP-vaccinated infants compared to aP-vaccinated infants, and the control group of unvaccinated women had highest PT-specific responses, persisting until after the booster dose. Antibody functionality was better in the wP groups. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NCT02408926.Infant whole-cell pertussis (wP) vaccine responses are blunted after maternal Tdap vaccination. Pertussis antibody titers are higher in acellular pertussis (aP)- than wP-vaccinated infants of immunized mothers, yet quality of antibodies, measured as serum-mediated bacterial growth inhibition, is better after wP than aP vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nasamon Wanlapakorn
- Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.,Division of Academic Affairs, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Kirsten Maertens
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Sompong Vongpunsawad
- Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Jiratchaya Puenpa
- Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Thao Mai Phuong Tran
- Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics, Hasselt University, Belgium
| | - Niel Hens
- Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics, Hasselt University, Belgium.,Centre for Health Economics Research and Modelling Infectious Diseases, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Pierre Van Damme
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Anaïs Thiriard
- Université de Lille, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique , Inserm, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, U1019-UMR8204, Center for Infection and Immunity of Lille, France
| | - Dominique Raze
- Université de Lille, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique , Inserm, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, U1019-UMR8204, Center for Infection and Immunity of Lille, France
| | - Camille Locht
- Université de Lille, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique , Inserm, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, U1019-UMR8204, Center for Infection and Immunity of Lille, France
| | - Yong Poovorawan
- Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Elke Leuridan
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Impact of maternal diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccination on pertussis booster immune responses in toddlers: Follow-up of a randomized trial. Vaccine 2021; 39:1598-1608. [PMID: 33612341 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2020] [Revised: 11/26/2020] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transplacentally transferred antibodies induced by maternal pertussis vaccination interfere with infant immune responses to pertussis primary vaccination. We evaluated whether this interference remains in toddlers after booster vaccination. METHODS In a prior phase IV, observer-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study (NCT02377349), pregnant women in Australia, Canada and Europe received intramuscular tetanus-reduced-antigen-content diphtheria-three-component acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap group) or placebo (control group) at 270/7-366/7 weeks' gestation, with crossover immunization postpartum. Their infants were primed (study NCT02422264) and boosted (at 11-18 months; current study NCT02853929) with diphtheria-tetanus-three-component acellular pertussis-hepatitis B virus-inactivated poliovirus/Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine (DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib) and 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. Immunogenicity before and after booster vaccination, and reactogenicity and safety of the booster were evaluated descriptively. RESULTS 263 (Tdap group) and 277 (control group) toddlers received a DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib booster. Pre-booster vaccination, observed geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) for the three pertussis antigens and diphtheria were 1.4-1.5-fold higher in controls than in the Tdap group. No differences were observed for the other DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib antigens. One month post-booster vaccination, booster response rates for pertussis antigens were ≥ 92.1% and seroprotection rates for the other DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib antigens were ≥ 99.2% in both groups (primary objective). Higher post-booster GMCs were observed in controls versus the Tdap group for anti-filamentous hemagglutinin (1.2-fold), anti-pertussis toxoid (1.5-fold) and anti-diphtheria (1.4-fold). GMCs for the other DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib antigens were similar between groups. Serious adverse events were reported for three toddlers (controls, not vaccination-related). One death occurred pre-booster (Tdap group, not vaccination-related). CONCLUSIONS As a consequence of interference of maternal pertussis antibodies with infant immune responses to pertussis primary vaccination, pertussis antibody concentrations were still lower in toddlers from Tdap-vaccinated mothers before DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib booster vaccination. After the booster, antibody concentrations were lower for filamentous hemagglutinin and pertussis toxoid but not for pertactin. The clinical significance of this interference requires further evaluation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02853929.
Collapse
|
24
|
Romanin V, Acosta AM, Juarez MDV, Briere E, Sanchez SM, Cordoba BL, Sevilla ME, Lucion MF, Urrutia A, Sagradini S, Skoff TH, Vizzotti C. Maternal Vaccination in Argentina: Tetanus, Diphtheria, and Acellular Pertussis Vaccine Effectiveness During Pregnancy in Preventing Pertussis in Infants <2 Months of Age. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 70:380-387. [PMID: 30877308 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciz217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2018] [Accepted: 03/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2011, Argentina experienced its highest pertussis incidence and mortality rates of the last decade; 60% of deaths were among infants aged <2 months. In response, a dose of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine was recommended for all pregnant women at ≥20 weeks of gestation. Although recent studies suggest that maternal Tdap vaccination is effective at preventing infant disease, no data have come from low- or middle-income countries, nor from ones using whole-cell pertussis vaccines for primary immunization. METHODS We conducted a matched case-control evaluation to assess the effectiveness of maternal Tdap vaccination in preventing pertussis among infants aged <2 months in Argentina. Pertussis case patients identified from September 2012 to March 2016 at 6 hospital sites and confirmed by polymerase chain reaction testing were included. Five randomly selected controls were matched to each case patient by hospital site and mother's health district. We used multivariable conditional logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (ORs). Vaccine effectiveness (VE) was estimated as (1 - OR) × 100%. RESULTS Seventy-one case patients and 300 controls were included in the analysis. Forty-nine percent of case patients and 78% of controls had mothers who were vaccinated during pregnancy. Overall Tdap VE was estimated at 80.7% (95% confidence interval, 52.1%-92.2%). We found similar VE whether Tdap was administered during the second or third trimester. CONCLUSIONS Tdap vaccination during pregnancy is effective in preventing pertussis in infants aged <2 months in Argentina, with similar effectiveness whether administered during the second or third trimester of pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viviana Romanin
- Dirección de Control de Enfermedades Inmunoprevenibles, Ministerio de Salud de la Nación, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Anna M Acosta
- Meningitis and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Branch, Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Maria Del Valle Juarez
- Dirección de Control de Enfermedades Inmunoprevenibles, Ministerio de Salud de la Nación, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Elizabeth Briere
- Meningitis and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Branch, Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Sandra Sagradini
- Dirección de Control de Enfermedades Inmunoprevenibles, Ministerio de Salud de la Nación, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Tami H Skoff
- Meningitis and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Branch, Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Carla Vizzotti
- Dirección de Control de Enfermedades Inmunoprevenibles, Ministerio de Salud de la Nación, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abu-Raya B, Maertens K. Protection of the Newborn Through Vaccination in Pregnancy. Neoreviews 2021; 22:e25-e39. [PMID: 33386312 DOI: 10.1542/neo.22-1-e25] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Newborns and infants are at risk for severe infections with some pathogens (eg, Bordetella pertussis, influenza, respiratory syncytial virus, group B Streptococcus) during early life. To decrease this window of high susceptibility to some infections during early life and protect young infants, vaccination in pregnancy against some vaccine-preventable diseases (eg, influenza, pertussis, tetanus) has been recommended in an increasing number of countries with notable success. In addition, recent advances have been made in developing vaccines for pregnant women with the aim of reducing the respiratory syncytial virus and group B Streptococcus burden in infancy. In this article, we review the vaccines currently recommended during pregnancy and their benefits to newborns and infants. We also discuss progress made in the development of other vaccines that are expected to be evaluated in pregnant women in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bahaa Abu-Raya
- Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Vaccine Evaluation Center, British Columbia Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kirsten Maertens
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Diseases Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Dubé E, Gagnon D, Kaminsky K, Green CR, Ouakki M, Bettinger JA, Brousseau N, Castillo E, Crowcroft NS, Driedger SM, Greyson D, Fell D, Fisher W, Gagneur A, Guay M, Halperin D, Halperin SA, MacDonald S, Meyer SB, Waite NM, Wilson K, Witteman HO, Yudin M, Cook JL. Vaccination during pregnancy: Canadian maternity care providers' opinions and practices. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2020; 16:2789-2799. [PMID: 32271655 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1735225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
A number of countries have implemented vaccination in pregnancy as a strategy to reduce the burden of influenza and pertussis. The aim of this study was to assess the involvement of Canadian maternity care providers in administration of vaccines to their pregnant patients. A cross-sectional web-based survey was sent to family physicians, obstetricians-gynecologists, midwives, pharmacists, and nurses. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to determine variables independently associated with offering vaccination services in pregnancy in providers' practice. A total of 1,135 participants participated. Overall, 64% (n = 724) of the participants reported offering vaccines in their practice and 56% (n = 632) reported offering vaccines to pregnant patients. The main reasons reported for not offering vaccination services in pregnancy were the belief that vaccination was outside of the scope of practice; logistical issues around access to vaccines; or lack of staff to administer vaccines. In multivariable analysis, the main factors associated with vaccination of pregnant patients in practices where vaccination services were offered were: providers' confidence in counseling pregnant patients about vaccines, seeing fewer than 11 pregnant patients on average each week, and being a nurse or a family physician. Although the majority of participants expressed strong support for vaccination during pregnancy, half were not offering vaccination services in their practice. Many were not equipped to offer vaccines in their practice or felt that it was not their role to do so. To enhance vaccine acceptance and uptake in pregnancy, it will be important to address the logistical barriers identified in this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eve Dubé
- Direction des risques biologiques et de la santé au travail, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec , Québec, Canada
| | - Dominique Gagnon
- Direction des risques biologiques et de la santé au travail, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec , Québec, Canada
| | - Kyla Kaminsky
- Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada , Ottawa, Canada
| | - Courtney R Green
- Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada , Ottawa, Canada
| | - Manale Ouakki
- Direction des risques biologiques et de la santé au travail, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec , Québec, Canada
| | - Julie A Bettinger
- Vaccine Evaluation Center, University of British Columbia , Vancouver, Canada
| | - Nicholas Brousseau
- Direction des risques biologiques et de la santé au travail, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec , Québec, Canada
| | - Eliana Castillo
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary , Calgary, Canada
| | - Natasha S Crowcroft
- Public Health Ontario, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences and University of Toronto , Toronto, Canada
| | - S Michelle Driedger
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba , Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Devon Greyson
- Vaccine Evaluation Center, University of British Columbia , Vancouver, Canada
| | - Deshayne Fell
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa , Ottawa, Canada.,Research Institute, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario , Ottawa, Canada
| | - William Fisher
- Department of Psychology, Western University , London, Canada
| | - Arnaud Gagneur
- Département des soins de santé communautaire, Université de Sherbrooke , Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - Maryse Guay
- Direction des risques biologiques et de la santé au travail, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec , Québec, Canada.,Centre de recherche de l'hôpital Charles Le Moyne , Longueuil, Canada
| | - Donna Halperin
- School of Nursing, St. Francis Xavier University , Antigonish, Canada
| | - Scott A Halperin
- Department of Pediatrics, Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University and the IWK Health Centre , Halifax, Canada
| | - Shannon MacDonald
- Faculty of Nursing, School of Public Health, University of Alberta , Edmonton, Canada
| | - Samantha B Meyer
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo , Waterloo, Canada
| | - Nancy M Waite
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo , Waterloo, Canada
| | | | - Holly O Witteman
- Département de médecine familiale et de médecine d'urgence, Université Laval , Québec, Canada
| | - Mark Yudin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto , Toronto, Canada
| | - Jocelynn L Cook
- Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada , Ottawa, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Elucidating the difference in the kinetics of antibody titres of infants in Belgium and Vietnam. Vaccine 2020; 38:7079-7086. [PMID: 32933790 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2020] [Revised: 08/28/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Serological results obtained in a single laboratory from twin-studies on maternal immunisation, in Vietnam and Belgium offer the opportunity to compare antibody kinetics in infants before and after infant vaccination in the presence of vaccine-induced maternal antibodies. Nonlinear mixed-effects models (NLMMs) making use of a hypothesised dynamic evolution that captures the change in antibody titres over time, were employed to model anti-PT and anti-Prn antibody dynamics. Our proposed modelling approach provided useful insight into understanding the differences in the infants' antibody kinetics in both countries since NLMMs offer the possibility of pooling all data in one analysis and incorporate relevant covariates of interest. In both controlled cohort studies, pregnant women were vaccinated with a tetanus, diphtheria, acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine (Boostrix®, Belgium; Adacel®, Vietnam), and children were followed before and after primary vaccination, and before and after booster vaccination (Infanrix hexa®). From our models, both anti-PRN and anti-PT antibody titres at birth of Vietnamese infants were significantly lower than those of Belgian infants born to vaccinated women groups. Even though the antibody titres in the cord at birth of Belgian infants were also higher than those of Vietnamese infants born to the control women groups, the difference was not significant. The significant difference between infants born to vaccinated women in the two countries was likely due to the use of different vaccine brands in pregnant women and the different vaccination histories of women in these two countries. Our analyses also suggested that the blunting effect was present during the primary immunisation but went away afterward for anti-PT data. In contrast, for anti-PRN antibodies, the blunting effect persisted after the primary vaccination and possibly went away after the booster dose. Countries should be aware of the regional situation in view of recommending maternal immunization.
Collapse
|
28
|
Wanlapakorn N, Maertens K, Thongmee T, Srimuan D, Thatsanathorn T, Van Damme P, Leuridan E, Poovorawan Y. Levels of antibodies specific to diphtheria toxoid, tetanus toxoid, and Haemophilus influenzae type b in healthy children born to Tdap-vaccinated mothers. Vaccine 2020; 38:6914-6921. [PMID: 32888740 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.08.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Revised: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 08/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Vaccination of pregnant women protects both women and their newborns against some infectious diseases. Thailand implemented tetanus toxoid (TT) vaccination of pregnant women in 1977, which was replaced by tetanus-diphtheria toxoid (dT) vaccination in 2005. The tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine has been recommended for pregnant women at 27-36 weeks of gestation since 2012 in several countries. Data on antibody responses to diphtheria toxoid (DT), TT, and Hemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) induced by combined vaccines in children born to TT-vaccinated and/or Tdap-vaccinated mothers are limited. MATERIAL AND METHODS We investigated anti-DT, anti-TT, and anti-Hib IgG responses in a cohort of Thai children (ClinicalTrial.gov NCT02408926) born to mothers who received a TT-containing and/or the Tdap vaccine during pregnancy. Children born to Tdap-vaccinated mothers were randomized to receive either a hexavalent (Infanrix-hexa) or pentavalent (Quinvaxem) vaccine, whereas children born to TT-vaccinated mothers received only Quinvaxem vaccine at 2, 4, 6, and 18 months of age. IgG levels were evaluated at birth (cord blood), 2 (pre-primary), 7 (post-primary), 18 (pre-booster), and 19 months of age (post-booster) using a commercially available enzyme-linked immunoassay. RESULTS Seroprotective concentrations of anti-DT, anti-TT, and anti-Hib IgG were achieved in >90% and >99% of children following primary and booster vaccination, respectively. Among children born to Tdap-vaccinated mothers, the pentavalent vaccine induced higher levels of anti-Hib IgG than the hexavalent vaccine after primary and booster vaccination. Significantly higher anti-Hib IgG levels were observed among children receiving the pentavalent vaccine and who were born to TT-vaccinated mothers than among children receiving the pentavalent vaccine and born to Tdap-vaccinated mothers after primary and booster vaccination. CONCLUSIONS Vaccination with a TT-containing and/or the Tdap vaccine during pregnancy did not compromise the seroprotection rate achieved following primary and booster immunization in individuals receiving either the pentavalent or hexavalent vaccine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nasamon Wanlapakorn
- Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand; Division of Academic Affairs, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Kirsten Maertens
- Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Thanunrat Thongmee
- Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Donchida Srimuan
- Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Thaksaporn Thatsanathorn
- Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Pierre Van Damme
- Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Elke Leuridan
- Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Yong Poovorawan
- Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abu-Raya B, Maertens K, Edwards KM, Omer SB, Englund JA, Flanagan KL, Snape MD, Amirthalingam G, Leuridan E, Damme PV, Papaevangelou V, Launay O, Dagan R, Campins M, Cavaliere AF, Frusca T, Guidi S, O'Ryan M, Heininger U, Tan T, Alsuwaidi AR, Safadi MA, Vilca LM, Wanlapakorn N, Madhi SA, Giles ML, Prymula R, Ladhani S, Martinón-Torres F, Tan L, Michelin L, Scambia G, Principi N, Esposito S. Global Perspectives on Immunization During Pregnancy and Priorities for Future Research and Development: An International Consensus Statement. Front Immunol 2020; 11:1282. [PMID: 32670282 PMCID: PMC7326941 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2020] [Accepted: 05/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Immunization during pregnancy has been recommended in an increasing number of countries. The aim of this strategy is to protect pregnant women and infants from severe infectious disease, morbidity and mortality and is currently limited to tetanus, inactivated influenza, and pertussis-containing vaccines. There have been recent advancements in the development of vaccines designed primarily for use in pregnant women (respiratory syncytial virus and group B Streptococcus vaccines). Although there is increasing evidence to support vaccination in pregnancy, important gaps in knowledge still exist and need to be addressed by future studies. This collaborative consensus paper provides a review of the current literature on immunization during pregnancy and highlights the gaps in knowledge and a consensus of priorities for future research initiatives, in order to optimize protection for both the mother and the infant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bahaa Abu-Raya
- Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Kirsten Maertens
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Kathryn M. Edwards
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Saad B. Omer
- Department of Internal Medicine (Infectious Diseases), Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Medicine, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Janet A. Englund
- Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Katie L. Flanagan
- Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS, Australia
- School of Health and Biomedical Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Immunology and Pathology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Matthew D. Snape
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Gayatri Amirthalingam
- Immunisation and Countermeasures Division, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom
| | - Elke Leuridan
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Pierre Van Damme
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Vana Papaevangelou
- Third Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital ATTIKON, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Odile Launay
- Université de Paris, Inserm, CIC 1417, F-CRIN I REIVAC, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Ron Dagan
- The Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Magda Campins
- Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology Department, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Franca Cavaliere
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS-Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Tiziana Frusca
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Sofia Guidi
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS-Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Miguel O'Ryan
- Microbiology and Mycology Program, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Biomedical Sciences and Associate Researcher, Millennium Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Ulrich Heininger
- Pediatric Infectious Diseases, University of Basel Children's Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Tina Tan
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Ahmed R. Alsuwaidi
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Marco. A. Safadi
- Department of Pediatrics, Santa Casa de São Paulo School of Medical Sciences, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Luz M. Vilca
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Buzzi Hospital - ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Nasamon Wanlapakorn
- Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Shabir A. Madhi
- Department of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation: Vaccine Preventable Diseases, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Medical Research Council: Respiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Michelle L. Giles
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Roman Prymula
- School of Medicine Hradec Kralove, Institute of Social Medicine, Charles University Prague, Prague, Czechia
| | - Shamez Ladhani
- Immunisation and Countermeasures Division, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom
| | - Federico Martinón-Torres
- Translational Pediatrics and Infectious Diseases, Pediatrics Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, University of Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Litjen Tan
- Immunization Action Coalition, St. Paul, MN, United States
| | - Lessandra Michelin
- Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology Division, Health Sciences Post Graduation Program, University of Caxias Do Sul, Caxias Do Sul, Brazil
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS-Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Susanna Esposito
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Pediatric Clinic, Pietro Barilla Children's Hospital, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Chitkara AJ, Pujadas Ferrer M, Forsyth K, Guiso N, Heininger U, Hozbor DF, Muloiwa R, Tan TQ, Thisyakorn U, Wirsing von König CH. Pertussis vaccination in mixed markets: Recommendations from the Global Pertussis Initiative. Int J Infect Dis 2020; 96:482-488. [PMID: 32413606 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.04.081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2020] [Revised: 04/25/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The Global Pertussis Initiative is an expert scientific forum that publishes consensus recommendations concerning pertussis for many regions of the world. Here, we give recommendations for the primary vaccination of infants in those countries where whole-cell pertussis (wP)- and acellular pertussis (aP)-containing combination vaccines are used in parallel. A selective literature review was performed concerning the influence on safety, immunogenicity, and effectiveness of mixing wP- and aP-containing vaccines for primary immunization of infants. In addition, local data were collected from various countries and the results discussed in a face-to-face meeting. Very few data addressing issues of mixing combination vaccines were identified, and no data were available concerning the effectiveness or duration of protection. It was also found that pharmacovigilance data are scarce or lacking in those countries where they would be needed the most. We then identified frequent problems occurring in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where both vaccine types are used. Relying on local knowledge, we give practical recommendations for a variety of situations in different settings. Specific needs for additional data addressing these issues were also identified. International bodies, such as the World Health Organization (WHO), as well as vaccine producers should try to find ways to highlight the problems of mixing wP- and aP-containing combination vaccines with robust data. Countries are urged to improve on their pharmacovigilance for vaccines. For practicing physicians, our recommendations offer guidance when wP- and aP-containing vaccines are used in parallel during primary immunization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Daniela Flavia Hozbor
- Laboratorio VacSal, Instituto de Biotecnología y Biología Molecular, Universidad Nacional de La Plata y CCT-La Plata, La Plata, Argentina
| | - Rudzani Muloiwa
- Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Tina Q Tan
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Kandeil W, Savic M, Ceregido MA, Guignard A, Kuznetsova A, Mukherjee P. Immune interference (blunting) in the context of maternal immunization with Tdap-containing vaccines: is it a class effect? Expert Rev Vaccines 2020; 19:341-352. [PMID: 32237928 DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2020.1749597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Maternal immunization with reduced antigen content tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap)-containing vaccines has been recommended to prevent infant pertussis. However, maternal antibodies may interfere with infant responses to routine immunization with diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (DTaP)-containing vaccines, raising concerns of suboptimal protection after infant vaccination. We performed a narrative literature review to assess whether blunting occurs regardless of the manufacturer of maternal and infant vaccines. Because internationally agreed correlates of protection are lacking, the clinical significance of blunting is not yet fully understood. We have reviewed the evidence available to date. AREAS COVERED Thirteen studies that evaluated blunting after maternal immunization and infant primary/booster series were identified. Blunting was observed with various combinations of Tdap- and DTaP-containing vaccines for maternal and pediatric immunization. Studies assessing the effectiveness of maternal Tdap immunization beyond the primary infant immunization series in England and in the United States suggested no evidence of a clinically relevant blunting effect so far. EXPERT COMMENTARY This review indicates that the phenomenon of blunting does not depend on the manufacturer/brand of the pertussis-containing vaccines used for immunizing mothers or children. Currently, there is no epidemiological evidence that children whose mothers received Tdap are at increased risk of pertussis after pediatric vaccinations, although longer follow-up is required.
Collapse
|
32
|
Maertens K, Orije MRP, Van Damme P, Leuridan E. Vaccination during pregnancy: current and possible future recommendations. Eur J Pediatr 2020; 179:235-242. [PMID: 31912233 PMCID: PMC7222942 DOI: 10.1007/s00431-019-03563-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2019] [Revised: 11/15/2019] [Accepted: 12/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Immunizing pregnant women to protect the mother, fetus and infant from infection has increasingly been used over the last decade. Protection against infectious diseases in neonates is mainly provided by maternal antibodies transferred from mother to infant during pregnancy through transplacental transport or after delivery via breastfeeding. Both the transplacental- and breast milk-derived maternal antibodies function as the primary source of protection against infectious diseases in neonates during the first vulnerable weeks of life. During recent infectious disease outbreaks (influenza, pertussis, Zika…) and for other infectious diseases (CMV, GBS…), pregnant women are increasingly identified as an important target for vaccination. For some of these diseases, vaccines are already on the market, and recommended during pregnancy. For others, vaccines are currently under development; furthermore, some are even specifically designed to be administered during pregnancy.Conclusion: This review article provides an overview on the rationale and main mechanism of the maternal vaccination strategy and gives a summary about the current and possible future recommendations for maternal vaccination.What is Known:• Maternal vaccination has a far-reaching potential in the protection of both women and offspring.• Currently, tetanus, pertussis and influenza vaccination during pregnancy is recommended in some countries. Several new vaccines specifically designed for use in pregnancy are currently under development.What is New:• Review providing a timely overview of the rationale and main mechanisms of the maternal vaccination strategy• Up-to-date summary of the current and possible future recommendations for maternal vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten Maertens
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium.
| | - Marjolein Rozemarie Paulien Orije
- grid.5284.b0000 0001 0790 3681Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Pierre Van Damme
- grid.5284.b0000 0001 0790 3681Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Elke Leuridan
- grid.5284.b0000 0001 0790 3681Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Switzer C, D'Heilly C, Macina D. Immunological and Clinical Benefits of Maternal Immunization Against Pertussis: A Systematic Review. Infect Dis Ther 2019; 8:499-541. [PMID: 31535327 PMCID: PMC6856250 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-019-00264-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Infants are vulnerable to pertussis infection particularly before initiation of pertussis vaccination. Maternal pertussis vaccination during pregnancy has been introduced in a number of countries in order to confer on young infants indirect protection from the disease through transplacental transfer of maternal antibodies. We reviewed the evidence on the immunogenicity and efficacy of maternal pertussis vaccination during pregnancy. A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, ProQuest, and Science Direct was undertaken to identify studies published between January 1995 and December 2018. This review was not specific to any particular pertussis vaccine but included applicable data on available pertussis vaccines administered to pregnant women. The search identified 40 publications for inclusion in this review. Vaccination during pregnancy elicited robust maternal immune responses against all vaccine antigens and resulted in high placental transfer of pertussis antibodies to the infant that persisted well beyond delivery. Vaccination during the second or early third trimesters was considered ideal for antibody quantity and functionality. Although blunting of immune responses to some antigens in the primary immunization series was documented in neonates born to women vaccinated during pregnancy, there was no apparent adverse effect on vaccine efficacy. Multiple studies conducted in diverse settings have confirmed the effectiveness of maternal pertussis vaccination during pregnancy in preventing pertussis in infants prior to receipt of their first primary vaccine dose and beyond. These findings collectively underscore the value of maternal pertussis vaccination during pregnancy in protecting vulnerable infants too young to be vaccinated.Funding Sanofi Pasteur.Plain Language Summary Plain language summary available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Denis Macina
- Sanofi Pasteur, Vaccines Epidemiology and Modeling, Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Perrett KP, Halperin SA, Nolan T, Carmona Martínez A, Martinón-Torres F, García-Sicilia J, Virta M, Vanderkooi OG, Zuccotti GV, Manzoni P, Kostanyan L, Meyer N, Ceregido MA, Cheuvart B, Kuriyakose SO, Stranak Z, Merino Arribas JM, Cilleruelo Ortega MJ, Miranda-Valdivieso M, Arias Novas B, Ramos Amador JT, Omeñaca F, Baca M, Marchisio PG, Mesaros N. Impact of tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis immunization during pregnancy on subsequent infant immunization seroresponses: follow-up from a large randomized placebo-controlled trial. Vaccine 2019; 38:2105-2114. [PMID: 31776027 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.10.104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2019] [Revised: 10/30/2019] [Accepted: 10/31/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pertussis immunization during pregnancy results in high pertussis antibody concentrations in young infants but may interfere with infant immune responses to post-natal immunization. METHODS This phase IV, multi-country, open-label study assessed the immunogenicity and safety of infant primary vaccination with DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib and 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13). Enrolled infants (6-14 weeks old) were born to mothers who were randomized to receive reduced-antigen-content diphtheria-tetanus-three-component acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap group) or placebo (control group) during pregnancy (270/7-366/7 weeks' gestation) with crossover immunization postpartum. All infants received 2 or 3 DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib and PCV13 doses according to national schedules. Immunogenicity was assessed in infants pre- and 1 month post-primary vaccination. The primary objective was to assess seroprotection/vaccine response rates for DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib antigens 1 month post-primary vaccination. RESULTS 601 infants (Tdap group: 296; control group: 305) were vaccinated. One month post-priming, seroprotection rates were 100% (diphtheria; tetanus), ≥98.5% (hepatitis B), ≥95.9% (polio) and ≥94.5% (Hib) in both groups. Vaccine response rates for pertussis antigens were significantly lower in infants whose mothers received pregnancy Tdap (37.5-77.1%) versus placebo (90.0-99.2%). Solicited and unsolicited adverse event rates were similar between groups. Serious adverse events occurred in 2.4% (Tdap group) and 5.6% (control group) of infants, none were vaccination-related. CONCLUSIONS Pertussis antibodies transferred during pregnancy may decrease the risk of pertussis infection in the first months of life but interfere with the infant's ability to produce pertussis antibodies, the clinical significance of which remains unknown. Safety and reactogenicity results were consistent with previous experience. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02422264.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten P Perrett
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute and Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Scott A Halperin
- Dalhousie University, Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Halifax, Canada.
| | - Terry Nolan
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute and Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| | | | - Federico Martinón-Torres
- Translational Pediatrics and Infectious Diseases, Pediatrics Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela and Genetics, Vaccines and Pediatrics Research Group, University of Santiago de Compostela, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
| | | | - Miia Virta
- Tampere Vaccine Research Center, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
| | - Otto G Vanderkooi
- Alberta Children's Hospital, University of Calgary, Alberta, Calgary, Canada.
| | | | - Paolo Manzoni
- Ospedale Ostetrico Ginecologico Sant'Anna, Turin, Italy and Department of Maternal-Infant -Pediatric Health, Hospital "Degli Infermi", Biella, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Zbynek Stranak
- Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Prague, Czech Republic.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Manuel Baca
- Hospital Quiron Malaga, Andalucia, Malaga, Spain.
| | - Paola Giovanna Marchisio
- Unità Pediatrica di Cure Altamente Intensive, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Lombardia, Milano, Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Halperin SA, Langley JM, Ye L, MacKinnon-Cameron D, Elsherif M, Allen VM, Smith B, Halperin BA, McNeil SA, Vanderkooi OG, Dwinnell S, Wilson RD, Tapiero B, Boucher M, Le Saux N, Gruslin A, Vaudry W, Chandra S, Dobson S, Money D. A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Safety and Immunogenicity of Tetanus, Diphtheria, and Acellular Pertussis Vaccine Immunization During Pregnancy and Subsequent Infant Immune Response. Clin Infect Dis 2019; 67:1063-1071. [PMID: 30010773 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciy244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2017] [Accepted: 04/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Immunization of pregnant women with tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) provides protection against pertussis to the newborn infant. Methods In a randomized, controlled, observer-blind, multicenter clinical trial, we measured the safety and immunogenicity of Tdap during pregnancy and the effect on the infant's immune response to primary vaccination at 2, 4, and 6 months and booster vaccination at 12 months of age. A total of 273 women received either Tdap or tetanus-diphtheria (Td) vaccine in the third trimester and provided information for the safety analysis and samples for the immunogenicity analyses; 261 infants provided serum for the immunogenicity analyses. Results Rates of adverse events were similar in both groups. Infants of Tdap recipients had cord blood levels that were 21% higher than maternal levels for pertussis toxoid (PT), 13% higher for filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA), 4% higher for pertactin (PRN), and 7% higher for fimbriae (FIM). These infants had significantly higher PT antibody levels at birth and at 2 months and significantly higher FHA, PRN, and FIM antibodies at birth and 2 and 4 months, but significantly lower PT and FHA antibody levels at 6 and 7 months and significantly lower PRN and FIM antibody levels at 7 months than infants whose mothers received Td. Differences persisted prebooster at 12 months for all antigens and postbooster 1 month later for PT, FHA, and FIM. Conclusions This study demonstrated that Tdap during pregnancy results in higher levels of antibodies early in infancy but lower levels after the primary vaccine series. Clinical Trials Registration NCT00553228.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott A Halperin
- Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University and the IWK Health Centre and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax.,Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University and the IWK Health Centre and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax.,Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Dalhousie University and the IWK Health Centre and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax
| | - Joanne M Langley
- Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University and the IWK Health Centre and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax.,Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University and the IWK Health Centre and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax.,Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University and the IWK Health Centre and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax
| | - Lingyun Ye
- Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University and the IWK Health Centre and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax
| | - Donna MacKinnon-Cameron
- Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University and the IWK Health Centre and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax
| | - May Elsherif
- Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University and the IWK Health Centre and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax
| | - Victoria M Allen
- Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University and the IWK Health Centre and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax.,Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University and the IWK Health Centre and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dalhousie University and the IWK Health Centre and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax
| | - Bruce Smith
- Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University and the IWK Health Centre and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax.,Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Dalhousie University and the IWK Health Centre and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax
| | - Beth A Halperin
- Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University and the IWK Health Centre and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax.,Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University and the IWK Health Centre and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax.,School of Nursing, Dalhousie University and the IWK Health Centre and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax
| | - Shelly A McNeil
- Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University and the IWK Health Centre and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax.,Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University and the IWK Health Centre and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax.,Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University and the IWK Health Centre and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax
| | - Otto G Vanderkooi
- Departments of Paediatrics, Microbiology, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Pathology, and Laboratory Medicine.,Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Alberta Health Services
| | | | - R Douglas Wilson
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Alberta Health Services.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Calgary.,Department of Medical Genetics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary
| | - Bruce Tapiero
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine and University of Montreal
| | - Marc Boucher
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine and University of Montreal
| | | | - Andrée Gruslin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Ottawa
| | - Wendy Vaudry
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta and the Women and Children's Health Research Institute, Edmonton
| | - Sue Chandra
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alberta and the Women and Children's Health Research Institute, Edmonton
| | - Simon Dobson
- Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Deborah Money
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
The effect of maternal antibodies on the cellular immune response after infant vaccination: A review. Vaccine 2019; 38:20-28. [PMID: 31672332 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.10.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2018] [Revised: 10/08/2019] [Accepted: 10/09/2019] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
During the last few decades, maternal immunization as a strategy to protect young infants from infectious diseases has been increasingly recommended, yet some issues have emerged. Studies have shown that for several vaccines, such as live attenuated, toxoid and conjugated vaccines, high maternal antibody titers inhibit the infant's humoral immune response after infant vaccination. However, it is not clear whether this decreased antibody titer has any clinical impact on the infant's protection, as the cellular immune responses are often equally important in providing disease protection and may therefore compensate for diminished antibody levels. Reports describing the effect of maternal antibodies on the cellular immune response after infant vaccination are scarce, probably because such studies are expensive, labor intensive and utilize poorly standardized laboratory techniques. Therefore, this review aims to shed light on what is currently known about the cellular immune responses after infant vaccination in the presence of high (maternal) antibody titers both in animal and human studies. Overall, the findings suggest that maternally derived antibodies do not interfere with the cellular immune responses after infant vaccination. However, more research in humans is clearly needed, as most data originate from animal studies.
Collapse
|
37
|
Brillo E, Tosto V, Giardina I, Buonomo E. Maternal tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) and influenza immunization: an overview. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2019; 34:3415-3444. [PMID: 31645152 DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1680633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Maternal tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) and influenza immunization for women during pregnancy (the so-called "maternal immunization") has been introduced in several countries, and recently also in Italy, to protect mother and fetus during pregnancy, infant in his first months of life and mother during postpartum period. However, very low vaccination coverage rates have been reached due to several variables. METHODS A literature search was conducted on PubMed and Embase, including any experimental or observational studies, to assesses existing evidence on the effectiveness, efficacy, safety and optimal timing of administration of Tdap and influenza immunization in pregnancy for mothers and their infants. The search was finalized in August 2019. RESULTS Reviewing the literature, we identified only a few studies that, among several maternal and infant outcomes, found sporadic significant associations with maternal influenza immunization and even less with Tdap immunization. Moreover, most of the authors of these studies explained these findings as a result of residual confounding effect. The effectiveness of maternal influenza immunization is more complicated to prove than the effectiveness of Tdap immunization because of several reasons. Not all nations recommend and offer vaccines in the same weeks of pregnancy and this one manifests the complexity in defining the best timing for Tdap or influenza immunization. CONCLUSIONS The safety of maternal Tdap or influenza immunization is supported by the evidence so far, however, regular surveillance should be maintained, especially with regard to the influenza vaccine that changes in formulation each year. There is a need to optimize the timing of vaccination in pregnancy and to have a national system of detection of maternal immunization in each country.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleonora Brillo
- Center for Research in Perinatal and Reproductive Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.,Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
| | - Valentina Tosto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Irene Giardina
- Center for Research in Perinatal and Reproductive Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Ersilia Buonomo
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Zimmermann P, Perrett KP, Messina NL, Donath S, Ritz N, van der Klis FR, Curtis N. The Effect of Maternal Immunisation During Pregnancy on Infant Vaccine Responses. EClinicalMedicine 2019; 13:21-30. [PMID: 31517260 PMCID: PMC6733996 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2019] [Revised: 06/01/2019] [Accepted: 06/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Immunisation during pregnancy to protect infants against tetanus, pertussis and influenza is recommended in many countries. However, maternal antibodies can interfere with infant vaccine responses. We investigated the effect of antenatal diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (dTpa) and trivalent inactivated influenza (TIV) immunisation on specific and heterologous antibody responses to routine immunisations given in the first year of life. METHODS In total, 471 healthy infants were included. At 7 and 13 months of age, antibodies to the primary course of routine vaccines given at 6 weeks, 4 and 6 months of age (pertussis (pertussis toxin (PT), filamentous haemagglutinin (FHA), pertactin (PRN)), polio (type 1, 2, 3), Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), pneumococcus (serotype 1, 3, 4, 5, 6A, 6B, 7F, 9V, 14, 18C, 19A, 19F, 23F)) were measured, and at 13 months of age, antibodies to the 12-month routine vaccines (Hib, meningococcus C, measles, mumps and rubella). The seroprotection rates for each vaccine and the geometric mean concentrations (GMC) of antibodies were compared between infants whose mothers did or did not receive dTpa or TIV immunisation during pregnancy. RESULTS A total of 369 infants were included in the final analysis. Maternal dTpa immunisation was associated with reduced antibody responses to both specific (diphtheria and pertussis) and heterologous (polio and pneumococcus) vaccine antigens. This effect was stronger for persistence of antibodies at 13 months of age than it was at 7 months of age. At 7 months of age, adjusted average antibody concentrations were significantly lower for diphtheria, pertussis (PT, FHA, PRN) and polio type 2, and at 13 months of age, for diphtheria, pertussis (PT, FHA, PRN), polio type 1-3 and pneumococcal serotypes 1, 4, 5, 6A, 6B, 7F, 18C and 23F. Additionally, at 13 months of age, seroprotection rates for diphtheria, PT, pneumococcal serotype 1, 6A and 6B were significantly lower in infants after maternal dTpa immunisation. In contrast, for Hib, in infants with maternal dTpa immunisation, the adjusted average antibody concentration and the seroprotection rate were higher, particularly at 7 months of age. Maternal TIV immunisation had minimal effect on infant vaccine responses. CONCLUSION Whilst maternal immunisation protects infants in the first few months of life, it might interfere with both specific and heterologous (unrelated) vaccines responses in infants. RESEARCH IN CONTEXT Evidence before this study: Maternal immunisation during pregnancy helps to protect infants during the period before they complete their primary immunisations. It has been proven to be safe and beneficial. However, pre-existing maternal antibodies can influence antibody responses following infant immunisation, an effect called 'blunting'. Previous studies have investigated the influence of dTpa but not influenza immunisation during pregnancy on infant vaccine responses. The majority of studies investigated antibody concentrations only to the specific vaccine antigens included in the maternal immunisation, and there is scarce data available on heterologous vaccine responses, particularly pneumococcal responses.Added value of this study: In this study, we have shown that maternal dTpa immunisation during pregnancy is associated with reduced antibody responses to both specific (diphtheria and pertussis) and heterologous (polio and pneumococcus) vaccine antigens. This effect is stronger for persistence of antibodies at 13 months of age than after primary immunisation at 7 months of age. In contrast, for Hib, in infants with maternal dTpa immunisation, antibody concentrations are higher, particularly at 7 months of age. Maternal TIV immunisation has minimal effect on infant vaccine responses.Implications of all the available evidence: Whilst maternal immunisation protects infants in the first few months of life, it might interfere with both specific and heterologous (unrelated) vaccines responses in infants. As most vaccines induce very high antibody responses, small differences in antibody concentrations may not be of clinical significance. However, since maternal immunisation during pregnancy also influences seroprotection rates, strategies, such as additional booster doses in the second year of life, particularly for pertussis and pneumococcus, might need to be considered to address this.
Collapse
Key Words
- Adacel
- Antibodies
- BCG, Bacillus Calmette-Guérin vaccine
- Boostrix
- CI, confidence interval
- FHA, filamentous haemagglutinin
- FIM, fimbriae
- Flu
- GMC, geometric mean antibody concentration
- GMR, geometric mean antibody ratio
- HepB, hepatitis B
- Heterologous
- Hib, Haemophilus influenzae type b
- Humoral
- IPV, inactivated polio vaccine
- IgG, immunoglobulin G
- Immunisation
- Immunoglobulin
- Influenza
- MIS BAIR, Melbourne Infant Study: BCG for Allergy and Infection Reduction
- MMR, measles-mumps-rubella vaccine
- MenC, meningococcus type C
- Non-specific
- PCV13, 13-valent conjugate pneumococcal vaccine
- PRN, pertactin
- PT, pertussis toxin
- TCV, tetanus-containing vaccine
- TIV, trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine
- Titre
- Vaccination
- dTpa
- dTpa, diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccine
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra Zimmermann
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Infectious Diseases Unit, The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Infectious Diseases Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, Fribourg Hospital HFR and Faculty of Science and Medicine, University of Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Kirsten P. Perrett
- Food Allergy Research Group and Melbourne Children's Trial Centre, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
- Departments of Allergy and Immunology and General Medicine, Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Nicole L. Messina
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Infectious Diseases Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
| | - Susan Donath
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Infectious Diseases Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
| | - Nicole Ritz
- Infectious Diseases Unit, The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Infectious Diseases Unit, University of Basel Children's Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Fiona R.M. van der Klis
- Laboratory for Infectious Diseases and Screening, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Nigel Curtis
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Infectious Diseases Unit, The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Infectious Diseases Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
- Corresponding author at: Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Sarna M, Andrews R, Moore H, Binks MJ, McHugh L, Pereira GF, Blyth CC, Van Buynder P, Lust K, Effler P, Lambert SB, Omer SB, Mak DB, Snelling T, D'Antoine HA, McIntyre P, de Klerk N, Foo D, Regan AK. 'Links2HealthierBubs' cohort study: protocol for a record linkage study on the safety, uptake and effectiveness of influenza and pertussis vaccines among pregnant Australian women. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e030277. [PMID: 31227542 PMCID: PMC6596983 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pregnant women and infants are at risk of severe influenza and pertussis infection. Inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) and diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccine (dTpa) are recommended during pregnancy to protect both mothers and infants. In Australia, uptake is not routinely monitored but coverage appears sub-optimal. Evidence on the safety of combined antenatal IIV and dTpa is fragmented or deficient, and there remain knowledge gaps of population-level vaccine effectiveness. We aim to establish a large, population-based, multi-jurisdictional cohort of mother-infant pairs to measure the uptake, safety and effectiveness of antenatal IIV and dTpa vaccines in three Australian jurisdictions. This is a first step toward assessing the impact of antenatal vaccination programmes in Australia, which can then inform government policy with respect to future strategies in national vaccination programmes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: 'Links2HealthierBubs' is an observational, population-based, retrospective cohort study established through probabilistic record linkage of administrative health data. The cohort includes births between 2012 and 2017 (~607 605 mother-infant pairs) in jurisdictions with population-level antenatal vaccination and health outcome data (Western Australia, Queensland and the Northern Territory). Perinatal data will be the reference frame to identify the cohort. Jurisdictional vaccination registers will identify antenatal vaccination status and the gestational timing of vaccination. Information on maternal, fetal and child health outcomes will be obtained from hospitalisation and emergency department records, notifiable diseases databases, developmental anomalies databases, birth and mortality registers. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval was obtained from the Western Australian Department of Health, Curtin University, the Menzies School of Health Research, the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, and the West Australian Aboriginal Health Ethics Committees. Research findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals, at scientific meetings, and may be incorporated into communication materials for public health agencies and the public.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohinder Sarna
- School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Ross Andrews
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
- National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Hannah Moore
- School of Public Health, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia
- Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines & Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Michael J Binks
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
| | - Lisa McHugh
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
| | - Gavin F Pereira
- School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Christopher C Blyth
- Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines & Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
- Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | | | - Karin Lust
- Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Paul Effler
- Communicable Disease Control Directorate, Department of Health Government of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Stephen B Lambert
- Child Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Saad B Omer
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Donna B Mak
- Communicable Disease Control Directorate, Department of Health Government of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Notre Dame University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Thomas Snelling
- Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines & Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- School of Public Health, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
| | - Heather A D'Antoine
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
| | - Peter McIntyre
- National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nicholas de Klerk
- Telethon Kids Institute, West Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Damien Foo
- School of Public Health, Curtin University School of Public Health, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Annette K Regan
- School of Public Health, Curtin University School of Public Health, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America
- Wesfarmers Centre for Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Neonatal Immunity to Bordetella pertussis Infection and Current Prevention Strategies. J Immunol Res 2019; 2019:7134168. [PMID: 30882004 PMCID: PMC6387735 DOI: 10.1155/2019/7134168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2018] [Revised: 12/22/2018] [Accepted: 01/03/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Bordetella pertussis is the bacterial agent of whooping cough, an infectious disease that is reemerging despite high vaccine coverage. Newborn children are the most affected, not only because they are too young to be vaccinated but also due to qualitative and quantitative differences in their immune system, which makes them more susceptible to infection and severe manifestations, leading to a higher mortality rate comparing to other groups. Until recently, prevention consisted of vaccinating children in the first year of life and the herd vaccination of people directly in touch with them, but the increase in cases demands more effective strategies that can overcome the developing immune response in early life and induce protection while children are most vulnerable.
Collapse
|
41
|
Recommendations to control pertussis prioritized relative to economies: A Global Pertussis Initiative update. Vaccine 2018; 36:7270-7275. [PMID: 30337176 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.10.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2018] [Revised: 10/03/2018] [Accepted: 10/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Pertussis is a vaccine-preventable disease that causes morbidity and mortality, particularly in infants and children <5 years of age. The Global Pertussis Initiative (GPI) recommendations represent a systematic evaluation and prioritization of strategies to prevent pertussis-related infant and child deaths, reduce global disease burden and prevent resurgence through vaccination strategies and public health policies at national, regional and local levels. The GPI recommendations are based on clinical trials and observational and surveillance data, which are essential in the planning, implementation and evaluation of vaccination practices and best use of available resources. Many low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) continue to use whole-cell pertussis (wP) vaccines for primary vaccination, while most high-income countries have replaced wP with the less-reactogenic acellular pertussis (aP) vaccines. This present manuscript pertains to discussions held during the GPI's meeting on November 11-13, 2016, in Cape Town, Republic of South Africa. The GPI recommends that LMIC aim for high coverage of infant series pertussis vaccines as a priority. In LMIC and countries with constrained vaccine funding, if wP vaccines are currently used, wP should continue to be used. Furthermore, given that protection against disease and death due to pertussis in neonates is a key priority of the GPI, it recommends that ap immunization in pregnancy should be implemented as a priority in all countries if resources allow. Given that surveillance and epidemiology data on which to base vaccine decisions are important, the GPI also suggests that, in areas where wP vaccines are implemented, standardization and calibration of wP vaccines are checked, considering the many different manufacturers and variable standards of production and quality control. In addition, as immunity to pertussis wanes following the primary infant series of vaccination, the GPI further recommends that toddlers, adolescents, healthcare and childcare workers receive booster vaccine doses, where resources allow.
Collapse
|
42
|
Wanlapakorn N, Maertens K, Chaithongwongwatthana S, Srimuan D, Suratannon N, Vongpunsawad S, Tran TMP, Hens N, Van Damme P, Locht C, Poovorawan Y, Leuridan E. Assessing the reactogenicity of Tdap vaccine administered during pregnancy and antibodies to Bordetella pertussis antigens in maternal and cord sera of Thai women. Vaccine 2018; 36:1453-1459. [PMID: 29426663 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.01.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2017] [Revised: 01/17/2018] [Accepted: 01/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pregnant Thai women have low antibody titers against B. pertussis antigens, which coincide with an increasing incidence of pertussis among Thai infants. Thus, there exists a potential benefit of a booster dose of tetanus- diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine administered during pregnancy. Here, we report the vaccine reactogenicity profile and birth outcomes in Tdap-vaccinated pregnant women who have or have not had prior immunization with tetanus vaccine, and the IgG levels to B. pertussis antigens in maternal and cord sera at delivery. MATERIALS AND METHODS Pregnant women (N = 370) aged 18-40 years were administered the Tdap vaccine (Boostrix®, GlaxoSmithKline, Rixensart, Belgium) at 26-36 weeks gestation. Adverse events following vaccination were identified by follow-up telephone call and medical record review. IgG against pertussis toxin (anti-PT), filamentous hemagglutinin (anti-FHA) and pertactin (anti-PRN) in both maternal and umbilical cord blood obtained at delivery were quantitatively evaluated using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (EUROIMMUN®, Lübeck, Germany). RESULTS There was no reported increase in the severity or duration of adverse events associated with the administration of an extra tetanus-containing vaccine within the previous five years (N = 181) or multiple doses of tetanus-containing vaccines during the current pregnancy (N = 98). Vaccination at least eight weeks prior to delivery resulted in high antibody titers to all B. pertussis antigens studied. CONCLUSIONS The reactogenicity of Tdap vaccine administered during pregnancy was not affected by prior tetanus toxoid immunization. High transplacental antibody against B. pertussis antigens in the cord blood provides evidence of antibody transfer and should thus help to protect newborns from pertussis during early life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nasamon Wanlapakorn
- Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand; Joint PhD program in Biomedical Sciences and Biotechnology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Kirsten Maertens
- Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Diseases Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium
| | | | - Donchida Srimuan
- Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Narissara Suratannon
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Sompong Vongpunsawad
- Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Thao Mai Phuong Tran
- Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics, Hasselt University, Belgium
| | - Niel Hens
- Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics, Hasselt University, Belgium; Centre for Health Economics Research & Modelling Infectious Diseases, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Pierre Van Damme
- Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Diseases Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Camille Locht
- Univ. Lille, CNRS, INSERM, Institut Pasteur de Lille, U1019 - UMR8204, Center for Infection and Immunity of Lille, France
| | - Yong Poovorawan
- Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
| | - Elke Leuridan
- Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Diseases Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Campbell H, Gupta S, Dolan GP, Kapadia SJ, Kumar Singh A, Andrews N, Amirthalingam G. Review of vaccination in pregnancy to prevent pertussis in early infancy. J Med Microbiol 2018; 67:1426-1456. [PMID: 30222536 DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.000829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Maternal pertussis vaccination has been introduced in several countries to protect infants from birth until routine infant vaccination takes place. This review assesses existing evidence on the effectiveness and safety of immunization in pregnancy. The search was finalized in April 2017 and was based on searches using several databases. The selection criteria included any experimental or observational study reporting on the immunogenicity, effectiveness or safety of vaccination with a pertussis-containing vaccine in pregnant women and their infants. Following de-duplication and exclusions, we identified 8395 studies, which were reduced to 46 for inclusion. The overall risk of bias was low, with the exception of some early studies and pharmacovigilance safety data. The evidence demonstrates efficient transplacental transfer of maternal antibodies in infants whose mothers were vaccinated with Tdap or Tdap/IPV in pregnancy, with good evidence that this protects against disease in young infants. Safety studies covering more than 150 000 women vaccinated mostly in the late second or third trimesters are generally consistent and provide reassurance of no significant increased risk of recognized maternal conditions or of adverse events (including congenital anomalies) in infants born to vaccinated women. The clinical significance of reduced seroconversion to pertussis following routine immunization is not yet clear, but no increased risk of pertussis in infants whose mothers were vaccinated in pregnancy was found following primary immunizations in North American and English studies. Most post-booster studies suggest that any blunting effect is short-lived and that longer-term protection in infants from active immunization is not compromised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Campbell
- 1Department of Immunisation, Hepatitis and Blood Safety, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Saurabh Gupta
- 2Public Health, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Ambition Health Private Limited, Gurgaon, India
- 3National Technical Advisory Group on Immunization Secretariat, National Institute of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi, India
| | - Gayle P Dolan
- 4North East PHE Centre, Public Health England, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Smita J Kapadia
- 5Health Protection Team, Public Health England, East of England, Harlow, UK
| | - Awnish Kumar Singh
- 3National Technical Advisory Group on Immunization Secretariat, National Institute of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi, India
| | - Nick Andrews
- 6Department of Statistics Modelling and Economics, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Gayatri Amirthalingam
- 1Department of Immunisation, Hepatitis and Blood Safety, Public Health England, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Madhi SA, Nunes MC. Experience and challenges on influenza and pertussis vaccination in pregnant women. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2018; 14:2183-2188. [PMID: 30024822 PMCID: PMC6183140 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1483810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Young infants contribute to relatively high burden of vaccine-preventable diseases, including infections by influenza virus and Bordetella pertussis. Vaccination of pregnant women can enhance transplacental transfer of protective antibody to the fetus and protect the infant against disease during the first few months of life. Pregnant women are a priority group for seasonal influenza vaccination, due to third-trimester pregnancy being a risk-factor for severe influenza illness. Furthermore, randomized controlled trials confirmed that influenza vaccination during pregnancy confers protection against influenza-confirmed illness in the women, and their infants up to 3 months of age; and is also associated with 20% reduction in all-cause pneumonia among young-infants. Maternal influenza vaccination might also reduce the risk of low-birth weight, preterm births, and stillbirths however, data on this is conflicting. Vaccination of pregnant women with acellular pertussis vaccines reduces pertussis in their young infants by up to 93%. The increase in specific pertussis antibody among the infants born to vaccinated women might, however, interfere with the active pertussis vaccination of the infant following the primary series of vaccines. The clinical implication of this is yet to be ascertained, particularly since immune responses following the booster vaccine are unaffected. Vaccination of pregnant women with inactivated influenza vaccine and acellular pertussis vaccine have been demonstrated to confer protection to their young infants, and warrants consideration for inclusion into public health immunization programs, including in low and middle income countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shabir A Madhi
- a Department of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation: Vaccine Preventable Diseases, Faculty Health Sciences , University of the Witwatersrand , Johannesburg , South Africa.,b Medical Research Council: Respiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research Unit, Faculty Health Sciences , University of the Witwatersrand , Johannesburg , South Africa
| | - Marta C Nunes
- a Department of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation: Vaccine Preventable Diseases, Faculty Health Sciences , University of the Witwatersrand , Johannesburg , South Africa.,b Medical Research Council: Respiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research Unit, Faculty Health Sciences , University of the Witwatersrand , Johannesburg , South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Brousseau N, Gagnon D, Vivion M, Poliquin V, Boucoiran I, Tapiéro B, Dubé E. Expected challenges of implementing universal pertussis vaccination during pregnancy in Quebec: a cross-sectional survey. CMAJ Open 2018; 6:E391-E397. [PMID: 30237315 PMCID: PMC6182110 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20180040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vaccination of all pregnant women with an acellular pertussis-containing vaccine (tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis [Tdap]) was recently recommended in Canada, ideally between 27 and 32 weeks of gestation. This study aimed to describe the existing model of prenatal care in Quebec and determine to what extent maternal vaccination against pertussis could be integrated into this model. METHODS In Quebec, health care is organized around Local Community Service Centres (LCSCs) that serve specific geographic areas. For each of 158 LCSCs (98.1% of LCSCs in the province), we invited 1 nurse or manager involved in prenatal care to participate in a cross-sectional Web-based survey. The structure of prenatal care visits and potential integration of maternal Tdap vaccination into the existing model were documented and compared according to urbanization level, determined with the use of census data. RESULTS A completed survey was obtained for 127 LCSCs (response rate 80.4%). Only 13 (10.2%) and 14 (11.0%) LCSCs offered on-site visits with a nurse for the majority of pregnant women during the second and third trimesters, respectively. A significantly higher proportion of rural LCSCs than urban LCSCs offered on-site visits to pregnant women in the third trimester (13 [18%] v. 1 [2%]) (p = 0.003). In at least 50 LCSC service areas (39.4%), vaccines were not available in most medical clinics offering prenatal care. INTERPRETATION Given the current situation in Quebec, implementing universal maternal Tdap vaccination may be challenging, which may result in suboptimal vaccine coverage among pregnant women. As other Canadian provinces may face similar issues, a priority will be to evaluate province-based implementation models to develop efficient ways to provide maternal Tdap vaccination across Canada.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Brousseau
- Institut national de santé publique du Québec (Brousseau, Gagnon, Vivion, Dubé); Université Laval (Brousseau, Vivion, Dubé), Québec, Que.; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences (Poliquin), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-Justine (Boucoiran, Tapiéro), Montréal, Que.
| | - Dominique Gagnon
- Institut national de santé publique du Québec (Brousseau, Gagnon, Vivion, Dubé); Université Laval (Brousseau, Vivion, Dubé), Québec, Que.; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences (Poliquin), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-Justine (Boucoiran, Tapiéro), Montréal, Que
| | - Maryline Vivion
- Institut national de santé publique du Québec (Brousseau, Gagnon, Vivion, Dubé); Université Laval (Brousseau, Vivion, Dubé), Québec, Que.; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences (Poliquin), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-Justine (Boucoiran, Tapiéro), Montréal, Que
| | - Vanessa Poliquin
- Institut national de santé publique du Québec (Brousseau, Gagnon, Vivion, Dubé); Université Laval (Brousseau, Vivion, Dubé), Québec, Que.; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences (Poliquin), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-Justine (Boucoiran, Tapiéro), Montréal, Que
| | - Isabelle Boucoiran
- Institut national de santé publique du Québec (Brousseau, Gagnon, Vivion, Dubé); Université Laval (Brousseau, Vivion, Dubé), Québec, Que.; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences (Poliquin), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-Justine (Boucoiran, Tapiéro), Montréal, Que
| | - Bruce Tapiéro
- Institut national de santé publique du Québec (Brousseau, Gagnon, Vivion, Dubé); Université Laval (Brousseau, Vivion, Dubé), Québec, Que.; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences (Poliquin), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-Justine (Boucoiran, Tapiéro), Montréal, Que
| | - Eve Dubé
- Institut national de santé publique du Québec (Brousseau, Gagnon, Vivion, Dubé); Université Laval (Brousseau, Vivion, Dubé), Québec, Que.; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences (Poliquin), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-Justine (Boucoiran, Tapiéro), Montréal, Que
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Munoz FM. Current Challenges and Achievements in Maternal Immunization Research. Front Immunol 2018; 9:436. [PMID: 29559976 PMCID: PMC5845678 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2017] [Accepted: 02/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Maternal immunization has the potential to significantly improve maternal and child health worldwide by reducing maternal and infant morbidity and mortality associated with disease caused by pathogens that are particularly relevant in the perinatal period and in early life, and for which no alternative effective preventive strategies exist. Research on all aspects related to vaccines for administration during pregnancy is ongoing with support of multiple stakeholders and global participation. Substantial progress has been made, and the availability of new vaccines licensed exclusively for use in pregnant women to protect their infants has become an achievable goal. This review provides an update of the current challenges and achievements in maternal immunization research, focusing on recent milestones that advance the field and the prospects to make maternal immunization a feasible and accessible strategy to improve global health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flor M. Munoz
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
- Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Bento AI, King AA, Rohani P. Maternal pertussis immunisation: clinical gains and epidemiological legacy. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018; 22:30510. [PMID: 28449735 PMCID: PMC5476979 DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.es.2017.22.15.30510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2016] [Accepted: 12/13/2016] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
The increase in whooping cough (pertussis) incidence in many countries with high routine vaccination coverage is alarming, with incidence in the US reaching almost 50,000 reported cases per year, reflecting incidence levels not seen since the 1950s. While the potential explanations for this resurgence remain debated, we face an urgent need to protect newborns, especially during the time window between birth and the first routine vaccination dose. Maternal immunisation has been proposed as an effective strategy for protecting neonates, who are at higher risk of severe pertussis disease and mortality. However, if maternally derived antibodies adversely affect the immunogenicity of the routine schedule, through blunting effects, we may observe a gradual degradation of herd immunity. 'Wasted' vaccines would result in an accumulation of susceptible children in the population, specifically leading to an overall increase in incidence in older age groups. In this Perspective, we discuss potential long-term epidemiological effects of maternal immunisation, as determined by possible immune interference outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana I Bento
- Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.,Center for the Ecology of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States
| | - Aaron A King
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Pejman Rohani
- Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.,Center for the Ecology of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.,Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Nicholl S, Seale H, Saul N, Campbell-Lloyd S. The importance of involving midwives before and during the implementation of an antenatal pertussis vaccination program in New South Wales, Australia. Women Birth 2018; 31:463-468. [PMID: 29398459 DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2018.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2017] [Revised: 05/28/2017] [Accepted: 01/02/2018] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PROBLEM Typically there is limited opportunity for stakeholder engagement to determine service delivery gaps when implementing an outbreak or supplementary vaccination program. BACKGROUND In response to increasing pertussis notifications in NSW, Australia, an antenatal pertussis vaccination program was introduced offering pertussis containing vaccine to all pregnant women in the third trimester. AIM To explore the effectiveness of consulting with midwives prior to and during a new state-wide vaccination program. METHODS A pre-program needs analysis was conducted through an online audit of the NSW Clinical Midwifery Consultants followed by a post-implementation audit at 18 months. FINDINGS Information received from the midwives was utilised during program planning which facilitated program implementation without any major issues in all Local Health Districts. The post-implementation audit provided feedback to program planners that that implementation was continuing consistently and Midwives were found to be very supportive and engaged. DISCUSSION Education and support of clinicians is vital for high vaccine uptake in new vaccination programs which can be enabled through appropriate educational packages and program resources. CONCLUSION Consulting with the midwives in advance of a new vaccination program was a new initiative and highly recommended as it was time well spent gaining essential information on program resourcing and operational needs. Conducting a post-implementation audit is also strongly recommended as a check-point for issues and recommendations, to empower frontline staff and support consistent program implementation. Frontline staff engagement before and during implementation of a new vaccination program is a powerful mechanism for effective, efficient and consistent program delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonya Nicholl
- Immunisation Unit, Health Protection New South Wales, Australia.
| | - Holly Seale
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, UNSW Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nathan Saul
- Communicable Diseases Branch, Health Protection New South Wales, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Potential Impact of Changes in the Schedule for Primary Diphtheria-Tetanus Toxoids-Pertussis Immunization as Control Strategy for Pertussis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2018; 37:e36-e42. [PMID: 28859017 DOI: 10.1097/inf.0000000000001752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pertussis is a vaccine-preventable respiratory disease that may cause death mainly in infants. The schedules for primary pertussis vaccination are set in each country by the local health authorities. Several different schedules meet World Health Organization recommendations, 2-4-6 months, 6-10-14 weeks, 2-3-4 months and 3-4-5 months being the most commonly used worldwide. In this work, we analyze the benefits of changing the vaccination schedule to control the disease. METHODS We used an age-structured deterministic mathematical model for pertussis transmission to compute the incidences for the 4 above-mentioned schedules. Different vaccination coverages and vaccine effectiveness levels were considered. Immunization data from Argentina and Belgium were used. RESULTS The highest reduction in incidence was obtained by adopting the 6-10-14 weeks schedule, reaching about a 36% reduction of 0-1-year incidence with respect to the 2-4-6 months schedule. We show the dependence of this reduction on both vaccine effectiveness and coverage. The severe pertussis incidence decreased significantly when the first dose of the 2-4-6 months schedule was accelerated to 6 weeks. Finally, we estimated that the communication campaign adopted in Flanders (Belgium) to improve compliance with the vaccine schedule could lead to a reduction of 16% in severe pertussis incidence and about 7% in total incidence in infants. CONCLUSIONS Our work highlights the use of mathematical modeling to quantify the benefits of the existing vaccination schedules and the strategies that could be implemented to improve their compliance. Our results indicated that the 6-10-14 weeks is the best schedule option and that the Belgium vaccination campaign significantly reduced the incidence of severe cases.
Collapse
|
50
|
Marked Underreporting of Pertussis Requiring Hospitalization in Infants as Estimated by Capture-Recapture Methodology, Germany, 2013-2015. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2018; 37:119-125. [PMID: 28723872 DOI: 10.1097/inf.0000000000001698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Germany, pertussis became notifiable in eastern federal states in 2002 and nationwide in March 2013. Infants are at greatest risk for severe disease, with a high proportion requiring hospitalization. We implemented enhanced hospital-based surveillance to estimate the incidence of pertussis requiring hospitalization among infants in Germany and to determine the proportion of infants hospitalized with pertussis too young to have been vaccinated. METHODS Enhanced surveillance was implemented within a nationwide hospital surveillance network (ESPED). We defined cases as children less than 1 year of age hospitalized due to laboratory-confirmed pertussis with disease onset from 01/07/2013-30/06/2015. We matched cases to those ascertained in the national statutory notification system, and estimated incidence using capture-recapture methodology. RESULTS The estimated annual incidence of pertussis requiring hospitalization in infants was 52/100,000 infants (95% confidence interval [CI] 48-57/100,000), with 39% under-reporting to the national notification system. During the two epidemiologic years under-reporting decreased from 46% to 32% and was lower in eastern than western federal states (21% vs. 40%). Within ESPED, 154 of 240 infants (64%) were younger than or still at the age recommended for the first vaccine dose; 55 (23%) could have received one or more vaccine doses. Median length of hospitalization was 9 days (IQR 5-13 days) and 18% required intensive care treatment. CONCLUSIONS Our study revealed a high burden of pertussis in infants with marked under-reporting, especially in western federal states where notification was only recently established. Strategies for the prevention of severe pertussis.
Collapse
|