1
|
Domenech de Cellès M, Rohani P. Pertussis vaccines, epidemiology and evolution. Nat Rev Microbiol 2024:10.1038/s41579-024-01064-8. [PMID: 38907021 DOI: 10.1038/s41579-024-01064-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 06/23/2024]
Abstract
Pertussis, which is caused by Bordetella pertussis, has plagued humans for at least 800 years, is highly infectious and can be fatal in the unvaccinated, especially very young infants. Although the rollout of whole-cell pertussis (wP) vaccines in the 1940s and 1950s was associated with a drastic drop in incidence, concerns regarding the reactogenicity of wP vaccines led to the development of a new generation of safer, acellular (aP) vaccines that have been adopted mainly in high-income countries. Over the past 20 years, some countries that boast high aP coverage have experienced a resurgence in pertussis, which has led to substantial debate over the basic immunology, epidemiology and evolutionary biology of the bacterium. Controversy surrounds the duration of natural immunity and vaccine-derived immunity, the ability of vaccines to prevent transmission and severe disease, and the impact of evolution on evading vaccine immunity. Resolving these issues is made challenging by incomplete detection of pertussis cases, the absence of a serological marker of immunity, modest sequencing of the bacterial genome and heterogeneity in diagnostic methods of surveillance. In this Review, we lay out the complexities of contemporary pertussis and, where possible, propose a parsimonious explanation for apparently incongruous observations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pejman Rohani
- Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
- Center of Ecology of Infectious Diseases, Athens, GA, USA.
- Department of Infectious Diseases, College for Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Olson-Chen C, Swamy GK, Gonik B, Forsyth K, Heininger U, Hozbor D, von König CHW, Chitkara AJ, Top KA, Muloiwa R, van der Schyff M, Tan TQ. The current state of pertussis vaccination in pregnancy around the world, with recommendations for improved care: Consensus statements from the Global Pertussis Initiative. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2024; 165:860-869. [PMID: 38251722 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.15311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Revised: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
Bordetella pertussis, which causes a respiratory disease known as pertussis ("whooping cough") remains an important global challenge, with the incidence in pertussis cases increasing in recent years. Newborns and infants are at increased risk for severe morbidity and mortality from this bacterium. Vaccination in pregnancy has become an important strategy to both passively transfer immunity as well as prevent infection in pregnant persons, who are a major source of newborn infection, thus attempting to decrease the impact of this serious disease. It is considered safe for the pregnant person, the developing fetus, and the infant, and during the first 3 months of life it has been shown to be highly effective in preventing pertussis. There are a variety of strategies, recommendations, and adherence rates associated with pertussis vaccination in pregnancy around the world. We summarize the 2021 Global Pertussis Initiative Annual Meeting that reviewed the current global status of pertussis vaccination in pregnancy and remaining medical and scientific questions, with a focus on vaccination challenges and strategies for obstetric and gynecologic healthcare providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney Olson-Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Geeta K Swamy
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Bernard Gonik
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Kevin Forsyth
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Ulrich Heininger
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, Pediatric Infectious Diseases, University of Basel Children's Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Daniela Hozbor
- Laboratorio VacSal, Instituto de Biotecnología y Biología Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, CONICET, La Plata, Argentina
| | | | - Amar J Chitkara
- Department of Pediatrics, Max Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Karina A Top
- Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Rudzani Muloiwa
- Department of Paediatrics and Child health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Malikah van der Schyff
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Constantiaberg Mediclinic, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Tina Q Tan
- Department of Pediatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Haidara FC, Tapia MD, Diallo F, Portillo S, Williams M, Traoré A, Rotrosen E, Hensel E, Makowski M, Selamawi S, Powell JA, Kotloff KL, Pasetti MF, Sow SO, Neuzil KM. Safety and immunogenicity of a single dose of Tdap compared to Td in pregnant women in Mali and 3 its effect on infant immune responses: a single-centre, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled phase 2 study. EClinicalMedicine 2024; 71:102556. [PMID: 38586589 PMCID: PMC10998094 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Revised: 03/03/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background While maternal pertussis vaccination is a strategy to reduce infant morbidity, safety and immunogenicity data are limited in sub-Saharan Africa. We aimed to evaluate the safety of a single dose of tetanus, diphtheria and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) vaccine compared to tetanus and diphtheria vaccine (Td) vaccine in pregnant women in Bamako, Mali and to assess the pertussis toxin (PT) antibody response at birth. Methods In this phase 2, single-centre, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled study, from 23 January 2019 to 10 July 2019, healthy 18-39 year old women in the second trimester of a singleton pregnancy were randomised 2:1 to receive Tdap or Td. Blood was tested for serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) against PT and other vaccine antigens using a qualified Meso Scale Discovery multiplex immunoassay. The co-primary objectives evaluated safety and birth anti-PT levels. Infant immune responses to whole-cell pertussis vaccine (DTwP) were assessed. Statistical analysis was descriptive. This trial is registered with clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03589768. Findings 133 women received Tdap and 67 received Td, with 126 and 66 livebirths, respectively. In the Tdap group, 22 serious adverse events (SAEs) including one maternal death occurred in 20 participants (15·0%), with 10 SAEs in 10 participants (14·9%) in the Td group. Among infants, 18 events occurred among 13 participants (10.3%) and 8 SAEs in 6 participants (9.1%), including three and two infant deaths, occurred in Tdap and Td groups, respectively. None were related to study vaccines. Anti-PT geometric mean concentration (GMC) at birth in the Tdap group was higher than in the Td group (55.4 [46.2-66.6] IU/ml vs 7.9 [5.4-11.5] IU/ml). One month after the third dose of DTwP, the GMC in infants born to mothers in the Tdap group were lower compared to the Td group (20.2 [13.7-29.9] IU/ml vs 77.2 [32.2-184.8] IU/ml). By 6 months of age, the anti- PT GMCs were 17.3 [12.8-23.4] IU/ml and 67.1 [35.5-126.7] IU/ml in Tdap and Td groups, respectively. At birth, anti-tetanus toxin (TT) GMCs were higher in infants in the Td vs Tdap group (5.9 [5.0-7.0] IU/ml vs 4.1 [3.5-4.8] IU/ml). Anti-diphtheria toxin GMCs were similar in both groups. Interpretation Tdap administered to pregnant women in Mali is safe and well-tolerated. Infants of mothers who received Tdap were born with high PT and protective anti-TT antibody levels. By six months of age, after primary vaccination, the PT levels were lower in the Tdap group compared to the Td group. The blunted immune responses to primary DTwP vaccination in the Tdap infant group warrant further study. Funding This project was funded by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), under contract numbers 75N93021C00012 (The Emmes Company), and HHSN27220130000221 (University of Maryland, Baltimore). Dr. Susana Portillo was supported by NIH award no. T32AI007524. NIAID, NIH provided Tdap vaccine (BOOSTRIX).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Milagritos D. Tapia
- Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Susana Portillo
- Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Margaret Williams
- Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Awa Traoré
- Centre pour le Développement des Vaccins – Mali, Bamako, Mali
| | - Elizabeth Rotrosen
- Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Karen L. Kotloff
- Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Marcela F. Pasetti
- Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Samba O. Sow
- Centre pour le Développement des Vaccins – Mali, Bamako, Mali
| | - Kathleen M. Neuzil
- Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Guedalia J, Lipschuetz M, Cahen-Peretz A, Cohen SM, Sompolinsky Y, Shefer G, Melul E, Ergaz-Shaltiel Z, Goldman-Wohl D, Yagel S, Calderon-Margalit R, Beharier O. Maternal hybrid immunity and risk of infant COVID-19 hospitalizations: national case-control study in Israel. Nat Commun 2024; 15:2846. [PMID: 38565530 PMCID: PMC10987618 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-46694-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Hybrid immunity, acquired through vaccination followed or preceded by a COVID-19 infection, elicits robust antibody augmentation. We hypothesize that maternal hybrid immunity will provide greater infant protection than other forms of COVID-19 immunity in the first 6 months of life. We conducted a case-control study in Israel, enrolling 661 infants up to 6 months of age, hospitalized with COVID-19 (cases) and 59,460 age-matched non-hospitalized infants (controls) between August 24, 2021, and March 15, 2022. Infants were grouped by maternal immunity status at delivery: Naïve (never vaccinated or tested positive, reference group), Hybrid-immunity (vaccinated and tested positive), Natural-immunity (tested positive before or during the study period), Full-vaccination (two-shot regimen plus 1 booster), and Partial-vaccination (less than full three shot regimen). Applying Cox proportional hazards models to estimate the hazard ratios, which was then converted to percent vaccine effectiveness, and using the Naïve group as the reference, maternal hybrid-immunity provided the highest protection (84% [95% CI 75-90]), followed by full-vaccination (66% [95% CI 56-74]), natural-immunity (56% [95% CI 39-68]), and partial-vaccination (29% [95% CI 15-41]). Maternal hybrid-immunity was associated with a reduced risk of infant hospitalization for Covid-19, as compared to natural-immunity, regardless of exposure timing or sequence. These findings emphasize the benefits of vaccinating previously infected individuals during pregnancy to reduce COVID-19 hospitalizations in early infancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Guedalia
- Braun School of Public Health, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Michal Lipschuetz
- Obstetrics & Gynecology Division, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
- Henrietta Szold Hadassah Hebrew University School of Nursing in the Faculty of Medicine Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
- The Jerusalem Center for Personalized Computational Medicine Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
| | - Adva Cahen-Peretz
- Obstetrics & Gynecology Division, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Sarah M Cohen
- Obstetrics & Gynecology Division, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Yishai Sompolinsky
- Obstetrics & Gynecology Division, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Galit Shefer
- TIMNA-Israel Ministry of Health's Big Data Platform, Israel Ministry of Health, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Eli Melul
- TIMNA-Israel Ministry of Health's Big Data Platform, Israel Ministry of Health, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Zivanit Ergaz-Shaltiel
- Neonatology Department Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Debra Goldman-Wohl
- Obstetrics & Gynecology Division, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Simcha Yagel
- Obstetrics & Gynecology Division, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Ronit Calderon-Margalit
- Braun School of Public Health, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Ofer Beharier
- Obstetrics & Gynecology Division, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
- The Jerusalem Center for Personalized Computational Medicine Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kortsmit K, Oduyebo T, Simeone RM, Kahn KE, Razzaghi H, Galang RR, Ellington S, Ruffo N, Barfield WD, Warner L, Cox S. Influenza and Tetanus, Diphtheria, and Acellular Pertussis Vaccination Coverage During Pregnancy: Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, 2020. Public Health Rep 2024; 139:218-229. [PMID: 37386826 PMCID: PMC10851903 DOI: 10.1177/00333549231179252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/01/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Estimates of vaccination coverage during pregnancy and identification of disparities in vaccination coverage can inform vaccination campaigns and programs. We reported the prevalence of being offered or told to get the influenza vaccine by a health care provider (hereinafter, provider); influenza vaccination coverage during the 12 months before delivery; and tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccination coverage during pregnancy among women with a recent live birth in the United States. METHODS We analyzed 2020 data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System from 42 US jurisdictions (n = 41 673). We estimated the overall prevalence of being offered or told to get the influenza vaccine by a provider and influenza vaccination coverage during the 12 months before delivery. We estimated Tdap vaccination coverage during pregnancy from 21 jurisdictions with available data (n = 22 020) by jurisdiction and select characteristics. RESULTS In 2020, 84.9% of women reported being offered or told to get the influenza vaccine, and 60.9% received it, ranging from 35.0% in Puerto Rico to 79.7% in Massachusetts. Influenza vaccination coverage was lower among women who were not offered or told to get the influenza vaccine (21.4%) than among women who were offered or told to get the vaccine (68.1%). Overall, 72.7% of women received the Tdap vaccine, ranging from 52.8% in Mississippi to 86.7% in New Hampshire. Influenza and Tdap vaccination coverage varied by all characteristics examined. CONCLUSIONS These results can inform vaccination programs and strategies to address disparities in vaccination coverage during pregnancy and may inform vaccination efforts for other infectious diseases among pregnant women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Kortsmit
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Titilope Oduyebo
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Regina M. Simeone
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Katherine E. Kahn
- Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Leidos, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Hilda Razzaghi
- Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Romeo R. Galang
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Sascha Ellington
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Nan Ruffo
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Full Circle Computing, Inc, Exton, PA, USA
| | - Wanda D. Barfield
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Lee Warner
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Shanna Cox
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Psaras C, Regan A, Nianogo R, Arah OA, Seamans MJ. The impact of maternal pertussis vaccination recommendation on infant pertussis incidence and mortality in the USA: an interrupted time series analysis. Int J Epidemiol 2024; 53:dyad161. [PMID: 38041469 DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyad161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pertussis is a contagious respiratory disease. Maternal tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccination during pregnancy has been recommended by the United States Centres for Disease Control (US CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for unvaccinated pregnant women since October 2011 to prevent infection among infants; in 2012, ACIP extended this recommendation to every pregnancy, regardless of previous vaccination status. The population-level effect of these recommendations on infant pertussis is unknown. This study aimed to examine the impact of the 2011/2012 ACIP pertussis recommendation on pertussis incidence and mortality among US infants. METHODS We used monthly data on pertussis deaths among infants aged <1 year between January 2005 and December 2017 in the CDC Death Data and yearly infant pertussis incidence data from the CDC National Notifiable Disease Surveillance System to perform an interrupted time series analysis, accounting for the passage of the Affordable Care Act. RESULTS This study included 156 months of data. A potential decline in trend in infant pertussis incidence was noted during the post-recommendations period. No appreciable differences in trend were found in population-level infant pertussis mortality after the guideline changes in both adjusted and unadjusted models. Results were similar for all mortality sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS The 2011/2012 ACIP maternal pertussis vaccination recommendations were not associated with a population-level change in the trend in mortality, but were potentially associated with a decrease in incidence in the USA between 2005 and 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Psaras
- Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Annette Regan
- Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA
- School of Nursing and Health Professions, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Roch Nianogo
- Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Onyebuchi A Arah
- Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Statistics, UCLA College, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Research Unit for Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Marissa J Seamans
- Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sahni LC, Olson SM, Halasa NB, Stewart LS, Michaels MG, Williams JV, Englund JA, Klein EJ, Staat MA, Schlaudecker EP, Selvarangan R, Schuster JE, Weinberg GA, Szilagyi PG, Boom JA, Patel MM, Muñoz FM. Maternal Vaccine Effectiveness Against Influenza-Associated Hospitalizations and Emergency Department Visits in Infants. JAMA Pediatr 2024; 178:176-184. [PMID: 38109102 PMCID: PMC10728798 DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.5639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
Importance Influenza virus infection during pregnancy is associated with severe maternal disease and may be associated with adverse birth outcomes. Inactivated influenza vaccine during pregnancy is safe and effective and can protect young infants, but recent evidence, particularly after the 2009 novel influenza A (H1N1) pandemic, is limited. Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of influenza vaccination during pregnancy against laboratory-confirmed influenza-associated hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits in infants younger than 6 months. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a prospective, test-negative case-control study using data from the New Vaccine Surveillance Network from the 2016 to 2017 through 2019 to 2020 influenza seasons. Infants younger than 6 months with an ED visit or hospitalization for acute respiratory illness were included from 7 pediatric medical institutions in US cities. Control infants with an influenza-negative molecular test were included for comparison. Data were analyzed from June 2022 to September 2023. Exposure Maternal influenza vaccination during pregnancy. Main Outcomes and Measures We estimated maternal vaccine effectiveness against hospitalizations or ED visits in infants younger than 6 months, those younger than 3 months, and by trimester of vaccination. Maternal vaccination status was determined using immunization information systems, medical records, or self-report. Vaccine effectiveness was estimated by comparing the odds of maternal influenza vaccination 14 days or more before delivery in infants with influenza vs those without. Results Of 3764 infants (223 with influenza and 3541 control infants), 2007 (53%) were born to mothers who were vaccinated during pregnancy. Overall vaccine effectiveness in infants was 34% (95% CI, 12 to 50), 39% (95% CI, 12 to 58) against influenza-associated hospitalizations, and 19% (95% CI, -24 to 48) against ED visits. Among infants younger than 3 months, effectiveness was 53% (95% CI, 30 to 68). Effectiveness was 52% (95% CI, 30 to 68) among infants with mothers who were vaccinated during the third trimester and 17% (95% CI, -15 to 40) among those with mothers who were vaccinated during the first or second trimesters. Conclusions and Relevance Maternal vaccination was associated with reduced odds of influenza-associated hospitalizations and ED visits in infants younger than 6 months. Effectiveness was greatest among infants younger than 3 months, for those born to mothers vaccinated during the third trimester, and against influenza-associated hospitalizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leila C. Sahni
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston
| | - Samantha M. Olson
- Influenza Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Disease, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | | | - Marian G. Michaels
- University of Pittsburg Medical Center Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - John V. Williams
- University of Pittsburg Medical Center Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | - Mary A. Staat
- Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Elizabeth P. Schlaudecker
- Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Rangaraj Selvarangan
- University of Missouri, Kansas City School of Medicine, Children’s Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City
| | - Jennifer E. Schuster
- University of Missouri, Kansas City School of Medicine, Children’s Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City
| | | | - Peter G. Szilagyi
- University of California Los Angeles Mattel Children’s Hospital, Los Angeles
| | - Julie A. Boom
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston
| | - Manish M. Patel
- Influenza Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Disease, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Flor M. Muñoz
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Briga M, Goult E, Brett TS, Rohani P, Domenech de Cellès M. Maternal pertussis immunization and the blunting of routine vaccine effectiveness: a meta-analysis and modeling study. Nat Commun 2024; 15:921. [PMID: 38297003 PMCID: PMC10830464 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-44943-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Abstract
A key goal of pertussis control is to protect infants too young to be vaccinated, the age group most vulnerable to this highly contagious respiratory infection. In the last decade, maternal immunization has been deployed in many countries, successfully reducing pertussis in this age group. Because of immunological blunting, however, this strategy may erode the effectiveness of primary vaccination at later ages. Here, we systematically reviewed the literature on the relative risk (RR) of pertussis after primary immunization of infants born to vaccinated vs. unvaccinated mothers. The four studies identified had ≤6 years of follow-up and large statistical uncertainty (meta-analysis weighted mean RR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.38-1.32). To interpret this evidence, we designed a new mathematical model with explicit blunting mechanisms and evaluated maternal immunization's short- and long-term impact on pertussis transmission dynamics. We show that transient dynamics can mask blunting for at least a decade after rolling out maternal immunization. Hence, the current epidemiological evidence may be insufficient to rule out modest reductions in the effectiveness of primary vaccination. Irrespective of this potential collateral cost, we predict that maternal immunization will remain effective at protecting unvaccinated newborns, supporting current public health recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Briga
- Infectious Disease Epidemiology Group, Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Elizabeth Goult
- Infectious Disease Epidemiology Group, Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tobias S Brett
- Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA
- Department of Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA
| | - Pejman Rohani
- Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA
- Department of Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA
- Center of Ecology of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wright J, Science M, Osman S, Arnold C, Sumaida M, Crowcroft N, Deeks SL, Brown K, Halperin S, Hatchette T, McLachlan E, Campigotto A, Richardson S, Bolotin S. Uptake of pertussis immunization in pregnancy and determinants of vaccination in Toronto, Canada. Vaccine 2023; 41:6895-6898. [PMID: 37845156 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.10.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Revised: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pertussis causes significant morbidity and mortality in infants aged <6 months. Maternal pertussis vaccination during pregnancy has been recommended in Canada since 2018 to reduce these negative outcomes. In the absence of routine immunization coverage data, our objective was to evaluate uptake in Toronto, Canada. METHODS We recruited mother-infant pairs at The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, between 2018 and 2020. We performed logistic regression to examine associations between demographics and self-reported pertussis vaccination. RESULTS 76/243 mothers (31.3 %) reported receiving pertussis vaccination during their most recent pregnancy. Odds of receiving vaccination more than doubled with each 1-year increase in year of pregnancy (aOR: 2.2; 95 % CI: 1.3, 3.6; p < 0.01) and among those born in Canada as compared to those not (aOR: 2.0; 95 % CI: 1.1, 3.6; p = 0.02) CONCLUSION: Uptake of pertussis vaccination during pregnancy in Ontario has increased in recent years, however coverage remains lower than desirable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michelle Science
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto Canada; Centre for Vaccine Preventable Diseases, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Selma Osman
- Centre for Vaccine Preventable Diseases, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Callum Arnold
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA; Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
| | - Maya Sumaida
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Natasha Crowcroft
- Centre for Vaccine Preventable Diseases, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shelley L Deeks
- Centre for Vaccine Preventable Diseases, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University
| | - Kevin Brown
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Scott Halperin
- Canadian Center for Vaccinology (CCfV), IWK Health Centre, Nova Scotia Health Authority (NSHA), and Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia (NS), Canada
| | - Todd Hatchette
- Canadian Center for Vaccinology (CCfV), IWK Health Centre, Nova Scotia Health Authority (NSHA), and Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia (NS), Canada
| | - Elizabeth McLachlan
- National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Aaron Campigotto
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto Canada
| | - Susan Richardson
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto Canada
| | - Shelly Bolotin
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Centre for Vaccine Preventable Diseases, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Amaral E, Money D, Jamieson D, Pasupathy D, Aronoff D, Jacobsson B, Lizcano EIO. Vaccination during pregnancy: A golden opportunity to embrace. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2023; 163:476-483. [PMID: 37417315 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
Immunization strategies are part of routine pregnancy care to prevent infectious diseases in the mother, the fetus, and the newborn. Maternal immunization recommendations followed the recognition of the consequences of infectious diseases in pregnancy, including vertical transmission and perinatal consequences. The recent COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the issue of vaccination among pregnant individuals. Recommendations vary globally; however, Tdap, influenza, and, recently, COVID-19 vaccines are routinely recommended during pregnancy. There are several new maternal immunization products in the pipeline, including those directed against malaria, cytomegalovirus, Group B Streptococcus, herpes simplex virus, and respiratory syncytial virus. Important challenges must be addressed in all countries to guarantee that pregnant individuals and their babies receive the best care possible, including uptake of recommended immunizations by their entire target population groups. These challenges include disseminating appropriate data for vaccine recommendations and many others, such as ensuring stakeholder endorsement, achieving in-country distribution and administration, adequate vaccine supply, and a well-organized healthcare system, ideally offering the immunization free of charge. More recently, the hesitancy of pregnant women to receive immunizations highlights the relevance of cultural aspects and other contextual factors affecting vaccine uptake among pregnant individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eliana Amaral
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Deborah Money
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Vancouver, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Denise Jamieson
- Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Dharmintra Pasupathy
- Department of Maternal & Fetal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David Aronoff
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Bo Jacobsson
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Regan AK, Moore HC, Binks MJ, McHugh L, Blyth CC, Pereira G, Lust K, Sarna M, Andrews R, Foo D, Effler PV, Lambert S, Van Buynder P. Maternal Pertussis Vaccination, Infant Immunization, and Risk of Pertussis. Pediatrics 2023; 152:e2023062664. [PMID: 37807881 PMCID: PMC10598625 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2023-062664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Following the introduction of jurisdictional maternal pertussis vaccination programs in Australia, we estimated maternal vaccine effectiveness (VE) and whether maternal pertussis vaccination modified the effectiveness of the first 3 primary doses of pertussis-containing vaccines. METHODS We conducted a population-based cohort study of 279 418 mother-infant pairs using probabilistic linkage of administrative health records in 3 Australian jurisdictions. Infants were maternally vaccinated if their mother had a documented pertussis vaccination ≥14 days before birth. Jurisdictional immunization records were used to identify receipt of the first 3 infant doses of pertussis-containing vaccines. Infant pertussis infections were identified using notifiable disease records. VE was estimated using Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS Pertussis was administered during 51.7% (n = 144 429/279 418) of pregnancies, predominantly at 28-31 weeks' gestation. VE of maternal pertussis vaccination declined from 70.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 50.5-82.3) among infants <2 months old to 43.3% (95% CI, 6.8-65.6) among infants 7-8 months old and was not significant after 8 months of age. Although we observed slightly lower VE point estimates for the third dose of infant pertussis vaccine among maternally vaccinated compared with unvaccinated infants (76.5% vs 92.9%, P = .002), we did not observe higher rates of pertussis infection (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.61-3.39). CONCLUSIONS Pertussis vaccination near 28 weeks' gestation was associated with lower risk of infection among infants through 8 months of age. Although there was some evidence of lower effectiveness of infant vaccination among maternally vaccinated infants, this did not appear to translate to greater risk of disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annette K. Regan
- School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- School of Nursing and Health Professions, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, California
- Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Hannah C. Moore
- School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases
| | - Michael J. Binks
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
| | - Lisa McHugh
- School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Christopher C. Blyth
- Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases
- Division of Pediatrics, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Gavin Pereira
- School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Karin Lust
- Women’s and Newborn Services, Royal Brisbane Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Mohinder Sarna
- School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases
| | - Ross Andrews
- Communicable Disease Control Branch, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Damien Foo
- School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases
- Yale School of Environment, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Paul V. Effler
- Department of Health Western Australia, Communicable Disease Control Directorate, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Stephen Lambert
- Communicable Disease Control Branch, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- National Centre for Immunization Research and Surveillance, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Paul Van Buynder
- School of Medicine, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Edwards KM. Impact of Vaccination During Pregnancy on Infant Pertussis Disease. Pediatrics 2023; 152:e2023063067. [PMID: 37807871 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2023-063067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn M Edwards
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dubois V, Chatagnon J, Depessemier M, Locht C. Maternal acellular pertussis vaccination in mice impairs cellular immunity to Bordetella pertussis infection in offspring. JCI Insight 2023; 8:e167210. [PMID: 37581930 PMCID: PMC10561720 DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.167210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Given the resurgence of pertussis, several countries have introduced maternal tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (aP) vaccination during pregnancy to protect young infants against severe pertussis. Although protective against the disease, the effect of maternal aP vaccination on bacterial colonization of the offspring is unknown. Here, we used a mouse model to demonstrate that maternal aP immunization, either before or during pregnancy, protects pups from lung colonization by Bordetella pertussis. However, maternal aP vaccination resulted in significantly prolonged nasal carriage of B. pertussis by inhibiting the natural recruitment of IL-17-producing resident memory T cells and ensuing neutrophil influx in the nasal tissue, especially of those with proinflammatory and cytotoxic properties. Prolonged nasal carriage after aP vaccination is due to IL-4 signaling, as prolonged nasal carriage is abolished in IL-4Rα-/- mice. The effect of maternal aP vaccination can be transferred transplacentally to the offspring or via breastfeeding and is long-lasting, as it persists into adulthood. Maternal aP vaccination may, thus, augment the B. pertussis reservoir.
Collapse
|
14
|
Cheuvart B, Callegaro A, Rosillon D, Meyer N, Guignard A. Effectiveness of maternal immunisation with a three-component acellular pertussis vaccine at preventing pertussis in infants in the United States: Post-hoc analysis of a case-control study using Bayesian dynamic borrowing. Vaccine 2023; 41:5805-5812. [PMID: 37635001 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.07.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immunisation during pregnancy with a tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine can protect infants against pertussis between birth and paediatric vaccination. We aimed to estimate the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of third-trimester pregnancy immunisation with the three-component acellular pertussis (Td3ap) vaccine at preventing pertussis in infants <2 months in the United States (US), to support a label update. METHODS We performed a post-hoc sub-analysis of a case-control study conducted in six US Emerging Infections Program Network states between 2011 and 2014. Our analysis included only cases and controls whose mothers were either vaccinated with Td3ap or did not receive any Tdap vaccine. The association between Td3ap maternal immunisation and pertussis in infants was assessed for US data using a frequentist method with conditional logistic regression. A robustified analysis was conducted using Bayesian dynamic borrowing of non-US data, considering a mixing-weighted prior of 90% for historical non-US VE data, and of 10% for a vague prior. VE was estimated as (1-odds ratio) × 100%. Sensitivity analyses accounting for the impact of each non-US study, different mixing weights and missing/ambiguous data were performed. RESULTS We included 108 cases and 183 controls. Based on US data, the estimated VE of third-trimester maternal immunisation with Td3ap at preventing pertussis in infants <2 months was 78.0% (95% confidence interval: -38.0; 96.5). VE estimated by Bayesian dynamic borrowing of non-US data (with a 90% weight for historical data) was 83.4% (95% credible interval: 55.7; 92.5); sensitivity analyses produced similar VE estimates. CONCLUSIONS Effectiveness of third-trimester pregnancy immunisation with Td3ap at preventing infant pertussis in the US is very likely to be ≥ 50% and is most likely ∼ 80%. Bayesian dynamic borrowing of non-US VE data allowed overcoming the limited power (due to small sample size) of a brand-specific sub-analysis by considering additional evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Nadia Meyer
- GSK, Avenue Fleming 20, 1300 Wavre, Belgium.
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Antoniou T, McCormack D, Fell DB, Kwong JC, Gomes T. Impact of national recommendations for routine pertussis vaccination during pregnancy on infant pertussis in Ontario, Canada: a population-based time-series study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2023; 23:627. [PMID: 37653488 PMCID: PMC10469528 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05938-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In February 2018, Canada's National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) recommended antenatal tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) immunization in every pregnancy regardless of previous Tdap immunization history. We examined the impact of the NACI recommendation on rates of infant pertussis in Ontario, Canada. METHODS We conducted a population-based time-series study of all live births in Ontario between August 1, 2011 and February 28, 2020. We used interventional autoregressive integrated moving average models to examine the impact of the NACI recommendation on monthly rates of pertussis among infants ≤ 3 months of age. RESULTS We observed 675 incident cases of pertussis among 1,368,024 infants 3 months of age or less between August 2011 and February 2020. The average monthly percent change in infant pertussis during the period up to and including publication of the NACI guidance and the period following publication were 0.0% (95% CI: -0.4-0.3%) and - 0.8% (95% CI -2.3% to -0.1%), respectively. Following interventional ARIMA modelling, publication of the NACI guidance was not associated with a statistically significant decrease in the monthly pertussis incidence trend (-0.67 cases per 100,000 infants; p = 0.73). CONCLUSION Publication of national recommendations for antenatal Tdap immunization in every pregnancy did not significantly reduce infant pertussis rates. This may reflect the persistently low rate of antenatal vaccination following publication of the recommendations. Expanding the scope of practice of allied health care providers to include antenatal Tdap immunization and patient education regarding antenatal pertussis immunization should be considered to further optimize uptake of vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tony Antoniou
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | | | - Deshayne B Fell
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Jeffrey C Kwong
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tara Gomes
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Aldoosari A, Alosaimi B, Khalaf M. Improving Tdap maternal immunization rate in Saudi Arabia. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2023; 19:2253585. [PMID: 37706510 PMCID: PMC10503444 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2253585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/26/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Pertussis is a serious and potentially fatal disease in infants too young for vaccination. Despite a high vaccine coverage in children, pertussis continues to occur in unvaccinated infants in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Available data supports the use of maternal pertussis immunization for preventing pertussis in young infants. In June 2019, the Saudi Ministry of Health recommended maternal pertussis immunization with combined tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) during every pregnancy. To understand barriers to maternal immunization and identify strategies to improve maternal immunization, we conducted an online survey in November and December 2020, asking 60 obstetricians/gynecologists about their attitudes to maternal pertussis immunization. Fewer than 50% survey respondents considered maternal immunization as part of their role, and only 47% were aware of the national recommendation. Consequently, the uptake of maternal vaccination in KSA may be sub-optimal. The key barriers that hinder obstetricians/gynecologists from recommending maternal Tdap immunization were the anticipation of patient refusal, and their own need for more information/experience about the disease and the national recommendation. Vaccine availability and supply were important barriers, whereas cost/reimbursement and resource issues were of lesser concern. Disseminating evidence based information to physicians, educating pregnant women and addressing public misconceptions.
Collapse
|
17
|
Wang Y, Shi N, Wang Q, Yang L, Cui T, Jin H. The association between vaccine hesitancy and pertussis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ital J Pediatr 2023; 49:81. [PMID: 37443026 DOI: 10.1186/s13052-023-01495-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robust routine immunization schedules for pertussis-containing vaccines have been applied for years, but pertussis outbreaks remain a worldwide problem. This study aimed to investigate the association between vaccine hesitancy and pertussis in infants and children. METHODS We searched PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, Embase, and China National Knowledge Internet for studies published between January 2012 and June 2022. This study included case-control and cohort studies that assessed the association between childhood/maternal vaccine hesitancy and odds ratios (ORs), risk ratios (RRs), and vaccine effectiveness (VE) related to pertussis in infants and children [Formula: see text] 9 years old. ORs/VEs with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Random-effects meta-analysis models were used for appropriate pooled estimates, and heterogeneity was assessed using [Formula: see text]. Cumulative meta-analysis and subgroup analyses stratified by study characteristics were performed. RESULTS Twenty-two studies were included, with a mean quality score of 7.0 (range 6.0-9.0). Infants and children with pertussis were associated with higher vaccine hesitancy to all doses (OR = 4.12 [95% CI: 3.09-5.50]). The highest OR was between children who were unvaccinated over four doses and children who were fully vaccinated (OR = 14.26 [95%CI: 7.62-26.70]); childhood vaccine delay was not statistically significantly associated with pertussis risk (OR = 1.18 [95% CI: 0.74-1.89]). Maternal vaccine hesitancy was associated with significantly higher pertussis risk in infants aged 2 and 3 months old, with higher pertussis ORs in infants [Formula: see text] 2 months old (OR = 6.02 [95%CI: 4.31-8.50], OR = 5.14 [95%CI: 1.95-13.52] for infants [Formula: see text] 2 and [Formula: see text] 3 months old, respectively). Maternal and childhood VEs were high in reducing pertussis infection in infants and children. The administration time of maternal vaccination had little effect on VE. CONCLUSION Vaccine hesitancy increased pertussis risks in infants and children. Ensuring that children receive up-to-date pertussis vaccines is essential; short delays in receiving childhood vaccinations may be unimportant. Maternal vaccinations for pertussis should be encouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuning Wang
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China
- Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering, Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China
| | - Naiyang Shi
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China
- Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering, Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China
| | - Qiang Wang
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China
- Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering, Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China
| | - Liuqing Yang
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China
- Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering, Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China
| | - Tingting Cui
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China
- Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering, Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China
| | - Hui Jin
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China.
- Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering, Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mitchell SL, Schulkin J, Power ML. Vaccine hesitancy in pregnant Women: A narrative review. Vaccine 2023:S0264-410X(23)00608-4. [PMID: 37291023 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.05.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Pregnant women are often at higher risk for morbidity and mortality due to contracting vaccine-preventable diseases that result in adverse pregnancy outcomes such as spontaneous abortion, preterm births, and congenital fetal defects. For example, health care provider recommendation is correlated with maternal acceptance of influenza vaccination, however, up to 33 % of pregnant women remain unvaccinated irrespective of provider recommendation. Vaccine hesitancy is a multifactorial problem that both the medical and public health systems need to address synergistically. Vaccine education should incorporate balanced perspectives to deliver vaccine education. This narrative review addresses four questions: 1) what are the primary concerns of pregnant women that lead them to be hesitant about receiving vaccinations; 2) to what extent does the source (e.g. provider, friend, family) of vaccine advice and information influence a pregnant person's decision to accept a vaccine; 3) how does the delivery method of vaccine education influence their decision; 4) how can categorizing patients into four distinct groups based on their opinions and behavior regarding vaccines be used to improve provider-patient communication and increase vaccine acceptance. Results from the literature show that the three most common reasons for vaccine hesitancy include: i.) fear of side effects or adverse events; ii.) lack of confidence in vaccine safety; iii.) low perception of being at high risk of infection during pregnancy and/or not having previously received the vaccination when not pregnant. We conclude that vaccine hesitancy is dynamic therefore people do not always hold a static level of vaccine hesitancy. People may move between a continuum of vaccine hesitancy for a multifactorial reasons. A framework, characterized by levels of vaccine hesitancy before and during pregnancy, was constructed to help providers find balance between promoting individual health and public health while providing vaccine education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie L Mitchell
- Center for Species Survival, Smithsonian National Zoological Park and Conservation Biology Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
| | - Jay Schulkin
- Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, USA
| | - Michael L Power
- Center for Species Survival, Smithsonian National Zoological Park and Conservation Biology Institute, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Calvert A, Amirthalingam G, Andrews N, Basude S, Coleman M, Cuthbertson H, England A, Greening V, Hallis B, Johnstone E, Jones CE, Karampatsas K, Khalil A, Le Doare K, Matheson M, Peregrine E, Snape MD, Vatish M, Heath PT. Optimising the timing of whooping cough immunisation in mums (OpTIMUM) through investigating pertussis vaccination in pregnancy: an open-label, equivalence, randomised controlled trial. THE LANCET. MICROBE 2023; 4:e300-e308. [PMID: 37080224 DOI: 10.1016/s2666-5247(22)00332-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Revised: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pertussis vaccination in pregnancy is recommended in many countries to provide protection to young infants. The best timing for this vaccination is uncertain. In the UK, vaccination is recommended between 16 weeks and 32 weeks of gestation. In this trial we aimed to investigate the equivalence of three time periods for pertussis vaccination in pregnancy. METHODS In this open-label, equivalence, randomised controlled trial to investigate equivalence of different time windows for pertussis vaccination in pregnancy, participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1 ratio) to receive a pertussis-containing vaccine (Boostrix-inactivated poliovirus vaccine) in one of three gestational age groups, comprising group 1 (≤23 weeks + 6 days), group 2 (24-27 weeks + 6 days), and group 3 (28-31 weeks + 6 days) using a computer-generated randomisation list. The primary outcome was concentration of pertussis-specific antibodies in the infant born at term at birth. Maternal blood sampling was done before and 2 weeks after vaccination and at delivery, together with a cord sample, and an infant sample was collected at least 4 weeks after primary vaccination. Reactogenicity was assessed for 7 days after vaccination. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03908164). FINDINGS Between May 7, 2019, and Feb 13, 2020, of 1010 women assessed for eligibility, 364 women were recruited and 351 received the intervention (120 in group 1, 119 in group 2, and 112 in group 3). Equivalence of time periods was demonstrated for anti-pertussis toxin and anti-pertactin IgG concentrations. The cord blood geometric mean concentrations of anti-filamentous haemagglutinin IgG were higher with increasing gestational age at vaccination, such that for infants in group 1 (≤23 weeks + 6 days), equivalence to group 3 (28-31 weeks + 6 days) was not shown. Reported rates of fever were similar between study groups. INTERPRETATION Pertussis vaccination at three different time intervals in pregnancy resulted in equivalent concentrations of IgG antibodies in infants against two of the three pertussis antigens assessed. Overall, these findings support recommendations to vaccinate any time between 16 weeks and 32 weeks of gestation. FUNDING The Thrasher Research Fund and the National Immunisation Schedule Evaluation Consortium through the National Institute for Health and Care Research policy research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Calvert
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection and Vaccine Institute St George's, University of London, London, UK; St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - Gayatri Amirthalingam
- Immunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| | - Nick Andrews
- Immunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| | - Sneha Basude
- University Hospital Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Matthew Coleman
- NIHR Southampton Clinical Research Facility and Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK; Reproductive Health Research Team, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Anna England
- Research and Evaluation, UK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, UK
| | - Vanessa Greening
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection and Vaccine Institute St George's, University of London, London, UK; St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Bassam Hallis
- Research and Evaluation, UK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, UK
| | - Edward Johnstone
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Christine E Jones
- NIHR Southampton Clinical Research Facility and Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK; Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Konstantinos Karampatsas
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection and Vaccine Institute St George's, University of London, London, UK; St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Asma Khalil
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection and Vaccine Institute St George's, University of London, London, UK; St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Kirsty Le Doare
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection and Vaccine Institute St George's, University of London, London, UK; St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Research and Evaluation, UK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, UK; Medical Research Council and Ugandan Virus Research Institute and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Kampala, Uganda; Makerere University Johns Hopkins University, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Mary Matheson
- Research and Evaluation, UK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, UK
| | | | - Matthew D Snape
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Manu Vatish
- Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Clinical Research Network, Thames Valley and South Midlands
| | - Paul T Heath
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection and Vaccine Institute St George's, University of London, London, UK; St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Vargas-Zambrano JC, Clark LR, Johnson DR, Monfredo C, Pool V, Li L, Bouvet PE, Blangero Y, Macina D. Prenatal tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccine effectiveness at preventing infant pertussis. Vaccine 2023; 41:2968-2975. [PMID: 37032227 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.03.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2022] [Revised: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of the tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine containing five pertussis components (Tdap5; Adacel®, Sanofi) when given during pregnancy at preventing pertussis in infants less than 2 months of age. METHODS The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), in collaboration with the Emerging Infections Program (EIP) Network, undertook a case-control study evaluating the effectiveness of Tdap vaccination in pregnancy against pertussis in infants less than 2 months of age based on data collected by the EIP Network from 2011 through 2014. The dataset from the CDC/EIP Network study was used to conduct this product-specific vaccine effectiveness analysis of Tdap5 vaccination in pregnancy to prevent disease in young infants. The main outcome of interest was vaccine effectiveness in infants whose pregnant parents were vaccinated with Tdap5 between 27 and 36 weeks' gestation, in accordance with the ideal timing for Tdap vaccination in pregnancy recommended by the US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. Odd ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using conditional logistic regression, and vaccine effectiveness was calculated as (1-OR) × 100 %. RESULTS There were 160 infant pertussis cases and 302 matched controls included in this Tdap5-specific study. Tdap5 effectiveness in preventing pertussis in infants whose pregnant parents were vaccinated between 27 and 36 weeks' gestation was 92.5 % (95 % CI, 38.5 %-99.1 %). Effectiveness of Tdap5 against pertussis-related hospitalization in infants whose pregnant parents were vaccinated between 27 and 36 weeks' gestation could not be calculated due to lack of discordance among matched cases and controls. Vaccination of the parents after pregnancy or less than 14 days before delivery did not protect infants from pertussis. CONCLUSIONS Tdap5 vaccination in pregnancy between 27 and 36 weeks' gestation is highly effective at protecting young infants from pertussis. STUDY REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05040802.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Lin Li
- Epidemiology and Benefit Risk, Sanofi, Bridgewater, NJ, USA
| | | | | | - Denis Macina
- Global Medical Evidence Generation, Sanofi, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Skoff TH, Deng L, Bozio CH, Hariri S. US Infant Pertussis Incidence Trends Before and After Implementation of the Maternal Tetanus, Diphtheria, and Pertussis Vaccine. JAMA Pediatr 2023; 177:395-400. [PMID: 36745442 PMCID: PMC10071344 DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.5689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Importance Infants younger than 1 year have the highest burden of pertussis morbidity and mortality. In 2011, the US introduced tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccination during pregnancy to protect infants before vaccinations begin. Objective To assess the association of maternal Tdap vaccination during pregnancy with the incidence of pertussis among infants in the US. Design, Setting, and Participants In this ecologic study, a time-trend analysis was performed of infant pertussis cases reported through the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2019, in the US. Statistical analysis was performed from April 1, 2020, to October 31, 2022. Exposures Maternal Tdap vaccination during pregnancy. Main Outcomes and Measures Pertussis incidence rates were calculated and compared between 2 periods-the pre-maternal Tdap vaccination period (2000-2010) and the post-maternal Tdap vaccination period (2012-2019)-for 2 age groups: infants younger than 2 months (target group of maternal vaccination) and infants aged 6 months to less than 12 months (comparison group). Incidence rate differences between the 2 age groups were modeled using weighted segmented linear regression. The slope difference between the 2 periods was estimated to assess the association of maternal Tdap vaccination with pertussis incidence among infants. Results A total of 57 460 pertussis cases were reported in infants younger than 1 year between 2000 and 2019; 19 322 cases (33.6%) were in infants younger than 2 months. During the pre-maternal Tdap vaccination period, annual pertussis incidence did not change among infants younger than 2 months (slope, 3.29 per 100 000 infants per year; P = .28) but increased slightly among infants aged 6 months to less than 12 months (slope, 2.10 per 100 000 infants per year; P = .01). There was no change in the difference in incidence between the 2 age groups (slope, 0.08 per 100 000 infants per year; P = .97) during the pre-maternal Tdap vaccination period overall. However, in the post-maternal Tdap vaccination period, incidence decreased among infants younger than 2 months (slope, -14.53 per 100 000 infants per year; P = .001) while remaining unchanged among infants aged 6 months to less than 12 months (slope, 1.42 per 100 000 infants per year; P = .29). The incidence rate difference between the 2 age groups significantly decreased during the post-maternal Tdap vaccination period (slope, -14.43 per 100 000 infants per year; P < .001). Pertussis incidence rate differences were significantly different between the pre-maternal and post-maternal Tdap vaccination periods (slope difference, -14.51 per 100 000 infants per year; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance In this study, following maternal Tdap vaccine introduction, a sustained decrease in pertussis incidence was observed among infants younger than 2 months, narrowing the incidence gap with infants aged 6 months to less than 12 months. These findings suggest that maternal Tdap vaccination is associated with a reduction in pertussis burden in the target age group (<2 months) and that further increases in coverage may be associated with additional reductions in infant disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tami H. Skoff
- Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Li Deng
- Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Catherine H. Bozio
- Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
- Influenza Division, National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Susan Hariri
- Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Widdershoven V, Reijs RP, Eskes A, Verhaegh-Haasnoot A, Hoebe CJ. Acceptance of vaccination against pertussis, COVID-19 and influenza during pregnancy: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2023; 23:219. [PMID: 36997890 PMCID: PMC10061389 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05505-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
This study aims to assess the uptake of maternal pertussis and COVID-19 vaccination and the intention towards accepting the maternal influenza vaccination. Insights into different socio-demographic factors related to maternal vaccination coverage might help to address vaccine acceptance and improve maternal vaccine uptake in the future.
Methods
We conducted a cross-sectional survey among pregnant women and recent mothers, up to 6 months post-partum. The primary outcome measures of this study were behaviour for maternal pertussis and COVID-19 vaccination, and maternal influenza vaccination intention. Associations between socio-demographic factors and maternal pertussis vaccination and maternal COVID-19 vaccination behaviour; and socio-demographic factors and maternal influenza vaccination intention were assessed using binary logistic regression analyses.
Results
In total 1361 respondents filled out the questionnaire. Almost all women (95%) were vaccinated against pertussis during pregnancy, while almost two-third were vaccinated against COVID-19 during pregnancy (58%) and almost one-third (28%) had a positive intention towards receiving the maternal influenza vaccination. Results show that young maternal age and low education level were associated with lower maternal vaccination acceptance.
Conclusion
Vaccination campaigns focusing on the severity of diseases that are prevented, are needed to increase maternal vaccine acceptance in younger and low-educated pregnant women. We expect that differences in vaccination coverage between the three maternal vaccinations might partly be explained by existing recommendations, campaigns and whether the vaccination is part of the national immunisation program.
Collapse
|
23
|
Herdea V, Tarciuc P, Ghionaru R, Pana B, Chirila S, Varga A, Mărginean CO, Diaconescu S, Leibovitz E. A Sensitive Public Health Issue—The Vaccine Acceptancy and the Anti-Pertussis Immune Status of Pregnant Women from a Romanian Metropolitan Area. CHILDREN 2023; 10:children10040640. [PMID: 37189889 DOI: 10.3390/children10040640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 03/25/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Abstract
(1) Background: Immunization of pregnant women (PWs) against Bordetella pertussis infection is still a challenging health matter. (2) Methods: We gathered questionnaire data from 180 PWs regarding their expectancies and current opinion on infectious disease prevention. For the group of PWs who agreed to further investigations, the serum levels of Ig G anti-B. pertussis antibodies (IgG-PT) titer were measured and analyzed. (3) Results: A total of 180 PWs completed the questionnaire and 98 (54.44%, study group) accepted to perform the laboratory tests. During the first two pregnancy trimesters, PWs were found to be more willing (compared with the control group) to test for identifying high-risk situations that could affect themselves and their future infant (p < 0.001). Most of the participating PWs (91, 91.9%) had low levels of anti-pertussis antibodies (values < 40 IU/mL). Declared vaccine coverage of the PWs newborn infants for DTaP-1 and Prevenar 13 (at 2 months) and DTaP-2 and Prevenar 13 (at 4 months) vaccination reached 100% in the study group, while in the control group only 30/82 (36.59%) PWs accepted to be vaccinated during pregnancy, none of them providing data on their infants’ vaccine coverage. (4) Conclusions: Enrolled PWs faced a waning immunity against the B. pertussis infection. By raising maternal confidence in the protective role of vaccines against infectious diseases, better vaccine acceptance and better infant vaccine coverage can be achieved.
Collapse
|
24
|
Lipschuetz M, Guedalia J, Cohen SM, Sompolinsky Y, Shefer G, Melul E, Ergaz-Shaltiel Z, Goldman-Wohl D, Yagel S, Calderon-Margalit R, Beharier O. Maternal third dose of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine and risk of infant COVID-19 hospitalization. Nat Med 2023; 29:1155-1163. [PMID: 36959421 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02270-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023]
Abstract
Infants are at a higher risk of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related hospitalizations compared to older children. In this study, we investigated the effect of the recommended third maternal dose of BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy on rates of infant COVID-19-related hospitalizations. We conducted a nationwide cohort study of all live-born infants delivered in Israel between 24 August 2021 and 15 March 2022 to estimate the effectiveness of the third booster dose versus the second dose against infant COVID-19-related hospitalizations. Data were analyzed for the overall study period, and the Delta and Omicron periods were analyzed separately. Cox proportional hazard regression models estimated hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for infant hospitalizations according to maternal vaccination status at delivery. Among 48,868 live-born infants included in the analysis, rates of COVID-19 hospitalization were 0.4%, 0.6% and 0.7% in the third-dose, second-dose and unvaccinated groups, respectively. Compared to the second dose, the third dose was associated with reduced infant hospitalization with estimated effectiveness of 53% (95% CI: 36-65%). Greater protection was associated with a shorter interval between vaccination and delivery. A third maternal dose during pregnancy reduced the risk of infant hospitalization for COVID-19 during the first 4 months of life, supporting clinical and public health guidance for maternal booster vaccination to prevent infant COVID-19 hospitalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michal Lipschuetz
- Obstetrics & Gynecology Division Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
- Henrietta Szold Hadassah Hebrew University School of Nursing in the Faculty of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Joshua Guedalia
- Obstetrics & Gynecology Division Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Sarah M Cohen
- Obstetrics & Gynecology Division Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Yishai Sompolinsky
- Obstetrics & Gynecology Division Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Galit Shefer
- TIMNA-Israel Ministry of Health's Big Data Platform, Israel Ministry of Health, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Eli Melul
- TIMNA-Israel Ministry of Health's Big Data Platform, Israel Ministry of Health, Jerusalem, Israel
| | | | - Debra Goldman-Wohl
- Obstetrics & Gynecology Division Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Simcha Yagel
- Obstetrics & Gynecology Division Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Ronit Calderon-Margalit
- Braun School of Public Health, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Ofer Beharier
- Obstetrics & Gynecology Division Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Meghani M, Razzaghi H, Kahn KE, Hung MC, Srivastav A, Lu PJ, Ellington S, Zhou F, Weintraub E, Black CL, Singleton JA. Surveillance Systems for Monitoring Vaccination Coverage with Vaccines Recommended for Pregnant Women, United States. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2023; 32:260-270. [PMID: 36884385 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2022.0445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Pregnant women* and their infants are at increased risk for serious influenza, pertussis, and COVID-19-related complications, including preterm birth, low-birth weight, and maternal and fetal death. The advisory committee on immunization practices recommends pregnant women receive tetanus-toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine during pregnancy, and influenza and COVID-19 vaccines before or during pregnancy. Vaccination coverage estimates and factors associated with maternal vaccination are measured by various surveillance systems. The objective of this report is to provide a detailed overview of the following surveillance systems that can be used to assess coverage of vaccines recommended for pregnant women: Internet panel survey, National Health Interview Survey, National Immunization Survey-Adult COVID Module, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, Vaccine Safety Datalink, and MarketScan. Influenza, Tdap, and COVID-19 vaccination coverage estimates vary by data source, and select estimates are presented. Each surveillance system differs in the population of pregnant women, time period, geographic area for which estimates can be obtained, how vaccination status is determined, and data collected regarding vaccine-related knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and barriers. Thus, multiple systems are useful for a more complete understanding of maternal vaccination. Ongoing surveillance from the various systems to obtain vaccination coverage and information regarding disparities and barriers related to vaccination are needed to guide program and policy improvements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehreen Meghani
- CDC Foundation, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Hilda Razzaghi
- Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Katherine E Kahn
- Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Leidos, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Mei-Chuan Hung
- Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Leidos, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Anup Srivastav
- Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Leidos, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Peng-Jun Lu
- Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Sascha Ellington
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Fangjun Zhou
- Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Eric Weintraub
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infections, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Carla L Black
- Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - James A Singleton
- Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Sadeck LDSR, Kfouri RDÁ. An update on vaccination in preterm infants. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2023; 99 Suppl 1:S81-S86. [PMID: 36608935 PMCID: PMC10066441 DOI: 10.1016/j.jped.2022.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this article is to review the most current literature on vaccines, focusing on their safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy in preterm newborns, aiming to improve vaccine coverage in this population. DATA SOURCE Most recent scientific publications addressing the immunization of preterm newborns. DATA SYNTHESIS Despite its immunological immaturity, vaccination is well tolerated by preterm infants, and protective immune responses are observed, but some studies have shown that preterm infants undergo unjustified delays in their vaccination schedule. CONCLUSIONS Despite being widely recommended, the routine immunization of preterm infants is often delayed, putting this vulnerable population at risk for several diseases, many of which are preventable by immunization. Every effort should be made to develop universal guidelines that define the immunization of preterm infants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lilian Dos Santos Rodrigues Sadeck
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Centro Neonatal do Instituto da Criança e Adolescente do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Departamento Científico de Neonatologia, Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Renato de Ávila Kfouri
- Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Maternidade Santa Joana, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Departamento de Imunizações, Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Isenhour CJ, Skoff TH, Lindley MC, Zhou F, Hariri S. Tetanus, Diphtheria, and Acellular Pertussis Vaccination Coverage Among Publicly Insured Pregnant Women, U.S., 2016-2019. AJPM FOCUS 2023; 2:100060. [PMID: 37789941 PMCID: PMC10546573 DOI: 10.1016/j.focus.2022.100060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/05/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Vaccination with tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccine during pregnancy is highly effective against Bordetella pertussis in young infants. We aimed to evaluate the uptake of maternal tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccination during the recommended gestation period of 27 through 36 weeks among women enrolled in a public medical insurance plan in the U.S. Methods In this analysis using Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services insurance claims data, we identified women aged 15 through 49 years who delivered a live-born infant from 2016 through 2019. We identified claims for tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccination to calculate the proportion of women who were vaccinated during Weeks 27 through 36 of gestation in each calendar year. We also assessed the average annual maternal tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis coverage by age group, race and ethnicity, U.S. Census region of residence, and plan type. Data were analyzed in 2021. Results Among 4,318,823 deliveries, the 4-year national average for tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccination was 26%, improving from 22% in 2016 to 31% in 2019 (p<0.001). Within subgroups, the lowest 4-year average coverage was among women aged 15 through 18 years (22%); Black, non-Hispanic (23%) and Hispanic women (24%); those residing in the South (18%); those enrolled in a Children's Health Insurance Program plan (22%); and those covered by a fee-for-service plan (19%). Coverage increased across all subgroups from 2016 through 2019. Conclusions Although maternal tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis coverage among publicly insured women in the U.S. increased from 2016 through 2019, it remained considerably lower than estimated national coverage, with notable differences by race and ethnicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheryl J. Isenhour
- Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Tami H. Skoff
- Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Megan C. Lindley
- Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Fangjun Zhou
- Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Susan Hariri
- Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Amirthalingam G, Campbell H, Ribeiro S, Stowe J, Tessier E, Litt D, Fry NK, Andrews N. Optimization of Timing of Maternal Pertussis Immunization From 6 Years of Postimplementation Surveillance Data in England. Clin Infect Dis 2023; 76:e1129-e1139. [PMID: 35959786 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciac651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Revised: 07/31/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND England's third-trimester maternal pertussis vaccination, introduced in October 2012, was extended to the second trimester in 2016. Maternal vaccination provides high protection against infant disease, but routine second-trimester vaccination has not previously been assessed. METHODS National laboratory-confirmed pertussis case surveillance determined vaccination history, maternal vaccination history and hospitalization. Pertussis hospital admissions between 2012 and 2019 were extracted from the Hospital Episode Statistics data set. Vaccine effectiveness (VE) was calculated for pertussis case patients born between October 2012 and September 2018 using the screening method and matching with a nationally representative data set. RESULTS Higher coverage was observed after earlier maternal vaccination with approximately 40% of pregnant women vaccinated ≥13 weeks before delivery. Cases and hospitalizations stabilized at low levels in younger infants but remained elevated in older infants, children, and adults. No deaths occurred in infants with vaccinated mothers after 2016. Of 1162 laboratory-confirmed pertussis cases in the study, 599 (52%) were in infants aged <93 days: 463 (77%) with unvaccinated and 136 (23%) with vaccinated mothers. The VE was equivalent in infants with mothers vaccinated at different gestational periods except in those with mothers vaccinated between 7 days before and 41 days after delivery. Children whose mothers were unvaccinated but with vaccination in a previous pregnancy had a VE against disease of 44% (95% confidence interval, 19%-75%). There was no increased disease risk after primary vaccination in children with mothers vaccinated at least 7 days before delivery. CONCLUSIONS National policy recommending vaccination in the second trimester increased earlier maternal vaccine uptake with sustained high VE and impact against early infant disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gayatri Amirthalingam
- Immunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
| | - Helen Campbell
- Immunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sonia Ribeiro
- Immunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
| | - Julia Stowe
- Immunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
| | - Elise Tessier
- Immunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
| | - David Litt
- Vaccine Preventable Bacteria Section, Respiratory and Vaccine Preventable Bacteria Reference Unit, Specialised Microbiology and Laboratories Directorate, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
| | - Norman K Fry
- Immunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom.,Vaccine Preventable Bacteria Section, Respiratory and Vaccine Preventable Bacteria Reference Unit, Specialised Microbiology and Laboratories Directorate, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nick Andrews
- Immunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Havers FP, Skoff TH, Rench MA, Epperson M, Rajam G, Schiffer J, Hariri S, Swaim LS, Baker CJ, Healy CM. Maternal Tetanus Toxoid, Reduced Diphtheria Toxoid, and Acellular Pertussis Vaccination During Pregnancy: Impact on Infant Anti-Pertussis Antibody Concentrations by Maternal Pertussis Priming Series. Clin Infect Dis 2023; 76:e1087-e1093. [PMID: 35642525 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciac432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Revised: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acellular pertussis (aP) vaccines replaced whole-cell pertussis (wP) vaccines for the US childhood primary series in 1997. As women primed with aP vaccines enter childbearing age, protection of infants through tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccination during pregnancy may be impacted. METHODS Term infants born to women vaccinated with Tdap during pregnancy were included. Geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) of pertussis-specific immunoglobulin G antibodies (international units per milliliter) in cord blood of infants born to women born after 1997 (aP-primed) were compared with those born to women born before 1992 (wP-primed). RESULTS 253 and 506 infants born to aP- and wP-primed women, respectively, were included. Compared with wP-primed women, aP-primed women were younger, more likely to be Hispanic or non-Hispanic Black, and had lower-birthweight infants (P < .01 for all). Antibodies against pertussis toxin (PT) and filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA) were lower among infants born to aP-primed vs wP-primed women (PT, 17.3 vs 36.4; GMC ratio, .475; 95% confidence interval [CI], .408-.552 and FHA, 104.6 vs 121.4; GMC ratio, 0.861; 95% CI, .776-.958). No differences were observed for anti-fimbriae or anti-pertactin antibodies. CONCLUSIONS Transplacental anti-pertussis antibody concentrations in infants of women vaccinated with Tdap during pregnancy differed by type of childhood vaccine the women received. Notably, anti-PT antibody levels, considered most important in preventing severe infant disease, were lower in infants born to aP-primed vs wP-primed women. Maternal Tdap vaccination may confer less protection against pertussis in infants born to aP-primed vs those born to wP-primed women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona P Havers
- Division of Bacterial Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Tami H Skoff
- Division of Bacterial Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Marcia A Rench
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Monica Epperson
- Division of Bacterial Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Gowrisankar Rajam
- Division of Bacterial Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jarad Schiffer
- Division of Bacterial Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Susan Hariri
- Division of Bacterial Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Laurie S Swaim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Carol J Baker
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - C Mary Healy
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Faust JS, Rasmussen SA, Jamieson DJ. Pregnancy should be a condition eligible for additional doses of COVID-19 messenger RNA vaccines. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2023; 5:100801. [PMID: 36371035 PMCID: PMC9645060 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Revised: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 11/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy Samuel Faust
- Emergency Division of Health Policy and Public Health, Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (Dr Faust).
| | - Sonja A Rasmussen
- Department of Genetic Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Dr Rasmussen)
| | - Denise J Jamieson
- and Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (Dr Jamieson)
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Kurasawa K. Maternal vaccination-current status, challenges, and opportunities. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2023; 49:493-509. [PMID: 36444417 PMCID: PMC10100318 DOI: 10.1111/jog.15503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Revised: 11/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
AIM Maternal vaccination is a promising strategy for protecting pregnant women and newborns against severe infections. This review aims to describe the current status and challenges associated with maternal vaccination against seasonal influenza, tetanus-diphtheria-pertussis (Tdap/DTaP), and novel coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) in Japan and other countries, mainly the United States and the United Kingdom. METHODS A literature search was conducted in PubMed and other public websites (e.g., Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) to obtain information on maternal vaccination. RESULTS Inactivated vaccines are recommended for pregnant women by gynecologic societies in Japan, the United States, and the United Kingdom. Among pregnant Japanese women, the influenza and COVID-19 (two doses) vaccine coverage rates were 27.0%-53.5% (six studies) and 73.6% (one study), respectively; there are no studies on maternal vaccination with DTaP. Concerns regarding vaccine safety are a major barrier to maternal vaccination across countries. Maternal vaccination is effective in preventing severe disease in pregnant women and protecting infants aged <6 months, is generally safe, and does not increase the risk of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. Providing accurate information regarding vaccination through healthcare providers and the government and government funding for vaccines may help improve maternal vaccination rates in Japan. CONCLUSION Current coverage for maternal vaccination is still low globally mainly because of vaccine hesitancy among pregnant women. The government, drug-regulatory authorities, and healthcare professionals must educate pregnant women about the effectiveness and safety of maternal vaccines and encourage vaccination when the benefits outweigh the risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kentaro Kurasawa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Cataldi JR, Fisher ME, Brewer SE, Spina CI, Glasgow RE, Perreira C, Cochran F, O’Leary ST. Motivational interviewing for maternal Immunizations: Intervention development. Vaccine 2022; 40:7604-7612. [PMID: 36371367 PMCID: PMC9729433 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.10.091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2022] [Revised: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Vaccine uptake during pregnancy remains low. Our objectives were to describe 1) development and adaptation of a clinician communication training intervention for maternal immunizations and 2) obstetrics and gynecology (ob-gyn) clinician and staff perspectives on the intervention and fit for the prenatal care context. METHODS Design of the Motivational Interviewing for Maternal Immunizations (MI4MI) intervention was based on similar communication training interventions for pediatric settings and included presumptive initiation of vaccine recommendations ("You're due for two vaccines today") combined with motivational interviewing (MI) for hesitant patients. Interviews and focus group discussions were conducted with ob-gyn clinicians and staff in five Colorado clinics including settings with obstetric physicians, certified nurse midwives (CNMs), and clinician-trainees. Participants were asked about adapting training to the ob-gyn setting and their implementation experiences. Feedback was incorporated through iterative changes to training components. RESULTS Interview and focus group discussion results from participants before (n = 3), during (n = 11) and after (n = 25) implementation guided intervention development and adaptation. Three virtual, asynchronous training components were created: a video and two interactive modules. This virtual format was favored due to challenges attending group meetings; however, participants noted opportunities to practice skills through role-play were lacking. Training modules were adapted to include common challenging vaccine conversations and live-action videos. Participants liked interactive training components and use of adult learning strategies. Some participants initially resisted the presumptive approach but later found it useful after applying it in their practices. Overall, participants reported that MI4MI training fit well with the prenatal context and recommended more inclusion of non-clinician staff. CONCLUSIONS MI4MI training was viewed as relevant and useful for ob-gyn clinicians and staff. Suggestions included making training more interactive, and including more complex scenarios and non-clinician staff.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica R. Cataldi
- Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO,Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Mary E. Fisher
- Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO,Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Sarah E. Brewer
- Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO,Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Christine I. Spina
- Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO
| | - Russell E. Glasgow
- Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO,Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Cathryn Perreira
- Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO
| | - Fiona Cochran
- Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO
| | - Sean T. O’Leary
- Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO,Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Welder E, Powers J, Walter AC, Bedell D, Shen WW. Providing Prenatal Care for Patients with Limited Medical Insurance Coverage. J Community Health 2022; 47:974-980. [PMID: 35986826 DOI: 10.1007/s10900-022-01133-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Newer immigrants to the United States, whether undocumented, recent legal immigrants, those here on temporary visas, or migrant workers, are far less likely than native-born residents of the United States to have reliable health insurance. This entire group of patients is then at risk for delayed or absent medical care. Our study focused on what effects a free, quality prenatal care program had upon prenatal care and delivery outcomes for an underinsured population, primarily of immigrant women. With a recent change in Iowa's eligibility criteria for Presumptive Medicaid (referred to as Temporary Medicaid), pregnant patients who have less than a 5-year legal permanent residency status, undocumented status, or out-of-country resident status can receive up to two months of covered antepartum care, whereas previously eligible for coverage for the entirety of their pregnancy. With that reality, several faculty members from the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Iowa started a weekly prenatal care clinic in collaboration with the longstanding Iowa City Free Medical Clinic. This study sought to compare outcomes for patients who utilized only Temporary Medicaid to those who also had access to this prenatal free medical clinic (FMC), as well as to compare outcomes for the FMC program to typical Medicaid patients who had access to full prenatal care. Compared to the Temporary Medicaid-only group, our FMC patients had a significantly greater number of prenatal visits. This increased access of continuity prenatal care led to increased screening for gestational diabetes, receipt of recommended vaccinations, and screening for group B streptococcus. Our effort has shown that expanding prenatal healthcare coverage to this underinsured population can greatly increase the quality of maternity care and reduce the potential for high-risk pregnancies, bettering the care for these pregnant women and their newborns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Welder
- Department of Family Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA
| | - Jason Powers
- Department of Family Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA
| | - Alka C Walter
- Department of Family Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA
| | - David Bedell
- Department of Family Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA
| | - Wendy W Shen
- Department of Family Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Vaccination in Pregnancy against Pertussis: A Consensus Statement on Behalf of the Global Pertussis Initiative. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10121990. [PMID: 36560400 PMCID: PMC9786323 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10121990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Revised: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Infants are at high risk for severe morbidity and mortality from pertussis disease during early infancy. Vaccination against pertussis in pregnancy has emerged as the ideal strategy to protect infants during these early, vulnerable, first months of life. On 30 November and 1 December 2021, the Global Pertussis Initiative held a meeting that aimed to discuss and review the most up-to-date scientific literature supporting vaccination against pertussis in pregnancy and outstanding scientific questions. Herein, we review the current and historically published literature and summarize the findings as consensus statements on vaccination against pertussis in pregnancy on behalf of the Global Pertussis Initiative.
Collapse
|
35
|
Chong CY, Tan NWH, Yung CF, Li J, Kam KQ, Nadua K, Maiwald M, Sultana R, Thoon KC. Effectiveness of maternal pertussis vaccination in Singapore: A test-negative case-control study. Vaccine 2022; 40:6570-6574. [PMID: 36216649 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.09.087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Revised: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Pertussis vaccination (Tdap -Tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis) for pregnant women has been recommended since November 2017 in Singapore. In this prospective test-negative case-control study from 2018 to 2019, we aimed to evaluate vaccine effectiveness (VE) against pertussis infection and pertussis-related intensive care unit (ICU) admission according to Tdap (Tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis) during pregnancy and/or infant pertussis vaccination. A total of 58 children (26 cases, 32 controls) were recruited with 4 ICU admissions. The median age was 3 months (interquartile range [IQR] 1.50-4.56 months). Overall, 25.9 % of mothers had received antenatal Tdap vaccination and 43.1 % of infants received pertussis vaccination, majority only 1 dose. Tdap in pregnancy alone without infant vaccine or with 0-1 infant dose had a VE of 97.62 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 53.25-99.88 %), 98.17 % (95 %CI 66.61-99.9 %) respectively, against pertussis infection and 71.9 % (95 %CI 0.0-98.64), 75.86 % (95 % CI 0.0-98.78) respectively, against ICU admissions. Conclusion: Maternal Tdap vaccination was highly protective against infant pertussis and should be routinely recommended for all pregnant women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chia-Yin Chong
- Infectious Diseases, Department of Paediatrics, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, Singapore 229899, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Drive, Singapore 117597, Singapore; Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore 169857, Singapore; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, 11 Mandalay Road, Singapore 308232, Singapore.
| | - Natalie Woon-Hui Tan
- Infectious Diseases, Department of Paediatrics, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, Singapore 229899, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Drive, Singapore 117597, Singapore; Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore 169857, Singapore; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, 11 Mandalay Road, Singapore 308232, Singapore.
| | - Chee-Fu Yung
- Infectious Diseases, Department of Paediatrics, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, Singapore 229899, Singapore; Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore 169857, Singapore; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, 11 Mandalay Road, Singapore 308232, Singapore.
| | - Jiahui Li
- Infectious Diseases, Department of Paediatrics, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, Singapore 229899, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Drive, Singapore 117597, Singapore; Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore 169857, Singapore; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, 11 Mandalay Road, Singapore 308232, Singapore.
| | - Kai-Qian Kam
- Infectious Diseases, Department of Paediatrics, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, Singapore 229899, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Drive, Singapore 117597, Singapore; Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore 169857, Singapore; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, 11 Mandalay Road, Singapore 308232, Singapore.
| | - Karen Nadua
- Infectious Diseases, Department of Paediatrics, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, Singapore 229899, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Drive, Singapore 117597, Singapore; Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore 169857, Singapore; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, 11 Mandalay Road, Singapore 308232, Singapore.
| | - Matthias Maiwald
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore 169857, Singapore; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, Singapore 229899, Singapore; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, National University of Singapore, 5 Science Drive 2, Singapore 117545, Singapore.
| | - Rehena Sultana
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore 169857, Singapore.
| | - Koh Cheng Thoon
- Infectious Diseases, Department of Paediatrics, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, Singapore 229899, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Drive, Singapore 117597, Singapore; Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore 169857, Singapore; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, 11 Mandalay Road, Singapore 308232, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Ruiz-Botia I, Riera-Bosch MT, Rodríguez-Losada O, Soler-Palacín P, Melendo S, Moraga-Llop F, Balcells-Ramírez J, Otero-Romero S, Armadans-Gil L. Impact of vaccinating pregnant women against pertussis on hospitalizations of children under one year of age in a tertiary hospital in Catalonia. ENFERMEDADES INFECCIOSAS Y MICROBIOLOGIA CLINICA (ENGLISH ED.) 2022; 40:473-478. [PMID: 35752569 DOI: 10.1016/j.eimce.2022.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Revised: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 04/05/2021] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The recommendation for pertussis vaccination in pregnancy was established in Catalonia in February 2014. The objective of this study was to compare the hospitalisation rate for pertussis in children under one year of age before and after the implementation of the vaccination programme. METHODS Observational and retrospective study of patients under one year of age admitted to hospital with a diagnosis of pertussis. The hospitalisation rate of patients under one year of age of the period prior to the vaccination programme (2008-2013) was compared with the period with vaccination programme (2014-2019) in the total of children under one year of age and in 2 subgroups: children under 3 months and between 3-11 months. RESULTS Hospitalization rate was significantly lower in the period with vaccination programme in children under one year of age and specifically in children under 3 months (2.43 vs. 4.72 per 1000 person-years and 6.47 vs. 13.11 per 1000 person-years, respectively). The rate ratios were: 0.51 (95% CI 0.36-0.73) for children under one year of age; 0.49 (95% CI 0.32-0.75) for those younger than 3 months and 0.56 (95% CI 0.30-1.03) for those with 3-11 months. No statistically significant differences were observed in the clinical severity between both periods. CONCLUSION The introduction of the pertussis vaccination programme in pregnancy was associated with a global lower hospitalisation rate for pertussis in children under one year of age and specifically in those under 3 months of age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Ruiz-Botia
- Servicio de Pediatría, Hospital Universitari General de Catalunya, Sant Cugat del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Olalla Rodríguez-Losada
- Unidad de Urgencias Pediátricas, Hospital Infantil Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Campus Hospitalari, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pere Soler-Palacín
- Unidad de Patología Infecciosa e Inmunodeficiencias de Pediatría, Hospital Infantil Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Campus Hospitalari, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Susana Melendo
- Unidad de Patología Infecciosa e Inmunodeficiencias de Pediatría, Hospital Infantil Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Campus Hospitalari, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fernando Moraga-Llop
- Unidad de Patología Infecciosa e Inmunodeficiencias de Pediatría, Hospital Infantil Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Campus Hospitalari, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Balcells-Ramírez
- Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos Pediátricos, Hospital Infantil Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Campus Hospitalari, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Susana Otero-Romero
- Servicio de Medicina Preventiva y Epidemiología, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Campus Hospitalari, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lluís Armadans-Gil
- Servicio de Medicina Preventiva y Epidemiología, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Campus Hospitalari, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Effectiveness of pertussis vaccination in pregnancy to prevent hospitalisation in infants aged <2 months and effectiveness of both primary vaccination and mother's vaccination in pregnancy in infants aged 2-11 months. Vaccine 2022; 40:6374-6382. [PMID: 36182617 PMCID: PMC9589240 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.09.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Revised: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND PERTINENT is an active hospital-based surveillance system for pertussis in infants. In 2019, four of the six participating European countries recommended pertussis vaccination in pregnancy. Among infants aged <2 months, we measured the vaccine effectiveness (VE) in pregnancy; among infants aged 2-11 months, VE of vaccination in pregnancy and of primary vaccination (PV). METHODS From December 2015 to 2019, we included all infants aged <1 year presenting with pertussis-like symptoms. Using a test-negative-design, cases were infants testing positive for Bordetella pertussis by PCR or culture. Controls were those testing negative for all Bordetella species. Vaccinated mothers were those who received vaccine in pregnancy. Vaccinated infants were those who received ≥1 dose of PV > 14 days before symptom onset. We excluded infants with unknown maternal or PV status or with mothers vaccinated ≤14 days before delivery. We calculated pooled VE as 100 * (1-odds ratio of vaccination) adjusted for study site, onset date in quarters and infants' age group. RESULTS Of 829 infants presenting with pertussis-like symptoms, 336 (41%) were too young for PV. For the VE in pregnancy analysis, we included 75 cases and 201 controls. Vaccination in pregnancy was recorded for 9 cases (12%) and 92 controls (46%), adjusted VE was between 75% [95%CI: 35-91%] and 88% [95%CI: 57-96%]. Of 493 infants eligible for PV, we included 123 cases and 253 controls. Thirty-one cases and 98 controls recorded both PV with ≥ 1 dose and vaccination in pregnancy, adjusted VE was between 74% [95%CI: 33-90] and 95% [95%CI: 69-99]; 27 cases and 53 controls recorded PV only, adjusted VE was between 68% [95%CI: 27-86] and 94% [95%CI: 59-99]. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that vaccination in pregnancy reduces pertussis incidence in infants too young for PV. In infants aged 2-11 months, PV only and both PV and vaccination in pregnancy provide significant protection against severe pertussis.
Collapse
|
38
|
Chen WC, Lin YP, Cheng CM, Shen CF, Ching A, Chang TC, Shen CJ. Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 Alpha, Beta, and Gamma Variants in Pregnant Women and Their Neonates under Antenatal Vaccination with Moderna (mRNA-1273) Vaccine. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10091415. [PMID: 36146492 PMCID: PMC9505142 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10091415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2022] [Revised: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of the study was to examine the impact of COVID-19 vaccination on the anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor binding domain IgG antibody (SRBD IgG) binding ratio (SBR) from Alpha, Beta, and Gamma variants of SARS-CoV-2 in pregnant women and neonates. The impact of antenatal influenza (flu) and pertussis (Tdap) vaccines was also studied. We enrolled pregnant women vaccinated with the Moderna (mRNA-1273) vaccine during pregnancy and collected maternal plasma (MP) and neonatal cord blood (CB) during delivery to determine the SBR via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). A total of 78 samples were collected from 39 pregnant women. The SBR was higher for Alpha variants compared to Beta/Gamma variants (MP: 63.95% vs. 47.91% vs. 43.48%, p = 0.0001; CB: 72.14% vs. 56.78% vs. 53.66%, p = 0.006). Pregnant women receiving two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine demonstrated a better SBR against SARS-CoV-2 Alpha, Beta, and Gamma variants than women receiving just a single dose. Women who received the Tdap/flu vaccines demonstrated a better SBR when two COVID-19 vaccine doses were < 6 weeks apart. A better SBR was detected among women who had more recently received their second COVID-19 vaccine dose. Two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine provided recipients with a better SBR for Alpha/Beta/Gamma variants. Although Tdap/flu vaccines may affect the efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine, different vaccination timings can improve the SBR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei-Chun Chen
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New Taipei City Municipal Tucheng Hospital, New Taipei City 236, Taiwan
| | - Yen-Pin Lin
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Min Cheng
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Fen Shen
- Department of Pediatrics, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan
| | - Alex Ching
- Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15123, USA
| | - Ting-Chang Chang
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Ju Shen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
León-Morillo MDR, Gomez-Pastrana D, Díaz-Colom MC, Quecuty-Vela S, Alados-Arboledas JC, Aragón-Fernández C. Effect of pertussis vaccine in pregnancy and COVID-19 pandemic in the cases of wooping cough. ENFERMEDADES INFECCIOSAS Y MICROBIOLOGIA CLINICA (ENGLISH ED.) 2022; 40:499-502. [PMID: 35764476 PMCID: PMC9181273 DOI: 10.1016/j.eimce.2022.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Revised: 06/24/2021] [Accepted: 07/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background Methods Results Conclusions
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David Gomez-Pastrana
- Servicio de Pediatría, Hospital Universitario de Jerez, INIBICA, Jerez de la Frontera, Cádiz, Spain.
| | - María Cruz Díaz-Colom
- Servicio de Pediatría, Hospital Universitario de Jerez, INIBICA, Jerez de la Frontera, Cádiz, Spain
| | - Sonia Quecuty-Vela
- Servicio de Pediatría, Hospital Universitario de Jerez, INIBICA, Jerez de la Frontera, Cádiz, Spain
| | | | - Carmen Aragón-Fernández
- Servicio de Pediatría, Hospital Universitario de Jerez, INIBICA, Jerez de la Frontera, Cádiz, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Mutanga JN, Whitaker BI, Forshee RA. Regulatory considerations for study of infant protection through maternal immunization. Vaccine 2022; 40:3556-3565. [PMID: 35570075 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.04.087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Revised: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Childhood Immunization is one of the critical strategies to decrease infant morbidity and mortality due to infectious diseases, but primary immunization schedules for infants in most countries start at 2 months of age. Childhood vaccines therefore begin providing adequate protection later in life, leaving infants vulnerable to infectious diseases and creating an immunity gap that results in higher morbidity and mortality among younger infants. Maternal immunization, the practice of vaccinating individuals during pregnancy, reduces the risk of infant infection primarily through the transfer of protective maternal antibodies to the fetus during late pregnancy. Although much progress has been made in public health policies to support maternal immunization research, inclusion of pregnant individuals and children in clinical trials remains challenging. This has resulted in paucity of evidence regarding safety and effectiveness of vaccines to support licensure of products intended for use during pregnancy and lactation to prevent disease in the infant. In addition, although safeguards for clinical research in pregnancy are supportive, experimental vaccines, e.g., Respiratory Syncytial Virus, are more complicated to study because data on safety, efficacy, and dosing are limited. This requires randomized controlled trials with safety monitoring for the mother, the fetus, and the infant with follow-up for at least 1 year or longer to assess long-term health outcomes that may be associated with peripartum vaccine exposure. The goal of this paper is to discuss the general regulatory considerations for clinical research to evaluate safety and effectiveness of vaccines administered during pregnancy to protect infants from disease. This could be useful to inform future vaccine trials. This discussion is not intended to provide agency guidance nor to articulate agency policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane Namangolwa Mutanga
- US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA.
| | - Barbee I Whitaker
- US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA
| | - Richard A Forshee
- US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Gabutti G, Cetin I, Conversano M, Costantino C, Durando P, Giuffrida S. Experts' Opinion for Improving Pertussis Vaccination Rates in Adolescents and Adults: A Call to Action. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19074412. [PMID: 35410091 PMCID: PMC8998413 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19074412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Revised: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
This article highlights the importance of diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (with reduced antigen content, dTap) vaccination in preventing pertussis, a respiratory infection that is still widespread and easily transmitted. In particular, it highlights the need to receive a booster vaccination throughout life to maintain high antibody levels, which decrease through time. This document collects the opinions that emerged from the comparison between major Italian experts in the field of vaccination. This working group was created to promote a "call to action", aimed at raising awareness among all institutions, public health authorities, and health workers involved in the vaccination process, about the importance of dTap vaccine administration and with the mindset of implementing the strategic vaccination plan provided by the National Vaccine Plan (NVP). In fact, despite this vaccine being included in the NVP, there are some issues attributable to the practice of vaccination (local health authorities, vaccination centers, occupational health services, gynecology centers, societies of work). Therefore, it is necessary that the Ministry defines the vaccination coverage objectives, identifies the groups of subjects who should receive the booster vaccine (subjects exposed to greater risk of infection, subjects over 60, pregnant women), and applies all the necessary measures to encourage the implementation of this practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Gabutti
- Department of Medical Sciences, Section of Public Health Medicine, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-34-7888-9342
| | - Irene Cetin
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department “Woman, Mother and Child”—ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Buzzi Children’ Hospital, University of Milan, 20157 Milan, Italy;
| | | | - Claudio Costantino
- Department of Health Promotion, Maternal and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Excellence Specialties, University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy;
| | - Paolo Durando
- Occupational Medicine, Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy;
- Occupational Medicine Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| | - Sandro Giuffrida
- Department of Prevention, Azienda Sanitaria Provinciale of Reggio Calabria, 89124 Reggio Calabria, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Quinn HE, Comeau JL, Marshall HS, Elliott EJ, Crawford NW, Blyth CC, Kynaston JA, Snelling TL, Richmond PC, Francis JR, Macartney KK, McIntyre PB, Wood NJ. Pertussis Disease and Antenatal Vaccine Effectiveness in Australian Children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2022; 41:180-185. [PMID: 34711785 DOI: 10.1097/inf.0000000000003367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Population-level studies of severe pertussis extending beyond infancy are sparse, and none in the context of antenatal vaccination. We compared hospitalized pertussis cases from birth to 15 years of age before and after introduction of antenatal immunization. METHODS Active surveillance of laboratory-confirmed pertussis hospitalizations in a national network of pediatric hospitals in Australia January 2012 to June 2019. Impact of maternal vaccination was assessed by vaccine effectiveness (VE) in cases and test-negative controls with <2 months of age and by before-after comparison of age distribution of cases. Among cases eligible for one or more vaccine doses, we examined proportions age-appropriately immunized and with comorbidities by age group. RESULTS Among 419 eligible cases, the proportion <2 months of age significantly decreased from 33.1% in 2012 to 2014 compared with 19.6% in 2016 to 2019 when mothers of only 4 of 17 (23.5%) cases <2 months of age had received antenatal vaccination. VE was estimated to be 84.3% (95% CI, 26.1-96.7). Across all years (2012-2019), of 55 cases 4-11 months of age, 21 (38%) had ≥2 vaccine doses, whereas among 155 cases ≥12 months of age, 122 (85.2%) had ≥3 vaccine doses. Prevalence of comorbidities (primarily cardiorespiratory) increased from 5 (2.1%) <6 months of age to 36 (24.2%) ≥12 months of age (P < 0.001), with 6/16 (38%) cases ≥12 months of age who required intensive care having comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS Below the age of 12 months, prevention of severe pertussis will be maximized by high maternal antenatal vaccine uptake and timeliness of infant vaccine doses. Despite full immunization, we found children ≥12 months of age accounted for 27% of hospitalizations <15 years, with 24% having comorbities, suggesting new vaccine strategies, such as additional doses or more immunogenic vaccines, require evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen E Quinn
- From the National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jeannette L Comeau
- From the National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Helen S Marshall
- Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Robinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Elizabeth J Elliott
- Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Australian Paediatric Surveillance Unit (APSU), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nigel W Crawford
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute and The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Christopher C Blyth
- Wesfarmer's Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Division of Paediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | | | - Tom L Snelling
- Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Wesfarmer's Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Peter C Richmond
- Wesfarmer's Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Joshua R Francis
- Global & Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, Royal Darwin Hospital, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
| | - Kristine K Macartney
- From the National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Peter B McIntyre
- From the National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Womens and Childrens Health. University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Nicholas J Wood
- From the National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Gilbert NL, Guay M, Kokaua J, Lévesque I, Castillo E, Poliquin V. Pertussis vaccination in Canadian pregnant women, 2018-2019. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2022; 44:762-768. [PMID: 35151906 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2022.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Revised: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study was undertaken to measure the uptake of pertussis vaccination during pregnancy in Canada and to identify sociodemographic factors associated with non-vaccination. METHODS A total of 5091 biological mothers of children born between September 2, 2018, and March 1, 2019, were interviewed about pertussis vaccination during their pregnancy. RESULTS Among 4607 mothers who recalled whether they had been vaccinated for pertussis, 43% had been vaccinated and 57% had not. The main reason given by mothers for not having been vaccinated was not being aware that pertussis vaccination was recommended. Factors independently associated with non-vaccination were being born outside Canada, lower household income, living in a province or territory where pertussis vaccination was not provided free of charge, having had previous live births, and having received maternity care from a midwife. CONCLUSION Advice from the maternity care provider is an important driver of pertussis vaccination during pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas L Gilbert
- Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON; École de santé publique de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC.
| | - Mireille Guay
- Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON
| | - Jackie Kokaua
- Centre for Social Data Integration and Development, Statistics Canada, Ottawa, ON
| | - Isabelle Lévesque
- Centre for Social Data Integration and Development, Statistics Canada, Ottawa, ON
| | - Eliana Castillo
- Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
| | - Vanessa Poliquin
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Kim G, Berry JG, Janes JL, Perez A, Hall M. Association of Maternal Tdap Recommendations With Pertussis Hospitalizations of Young Infants. Hosp Pediatr 2022; 12:e106-e109. [PMID: 35132433 DOI: 10.1542/hpeds.2021-006323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is well established that young infants have the highest risk of severe pertussis, which often results in hospitalization. Since the 2012 recommendation of administering tetanus toxoid, diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine for every pregnancy, evaluation of pertussis hospitalizations among young infants in the United States has been limited. METHODS In this ecological study, we used the Kids' Inpatient Database, the largest all-payer pediatric inpatient database in the United States, to study pertussis hospitalizations among infants <1 month of age from 2000 to 2016. RESULTS The overall rate of pertussis hospitalizations before the Tdap vaccination recommendation was 5.06 per 100 000 infants (95% confidence interval, 4.36-5.76) and 2.15 per 100 000 infants (95% confidence interval, 1.49-2.81) afterward. CONCLUSIONS This study supports maternal vaccination against pertussis as an important strategy in protecting young infants, and continued evaluation is needed to assess the long-term trends in hospitalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace Kim
- Division of Pediatric Hospital Medicine, University Hospitals Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Jay G Berry
- Division of General Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jessica L Janes
- University Hospitals Clinical Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Abe Perez
- University Hospitals Clinical Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Matt Hall
- Children's Hospital Association, Lenexa, Kansas
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Chen Z, Pang J, Zhang N, Chen N, Ding Y, He Q. Seroprevalence Study of Pertussis in Adults at Childbearing Age and Young Infants Reveals the Necessity of Booster Immunizations in Adults in China. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10010084. [PMID: 35062745 PMCID: PMC8779665 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10010084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Revised: 12/31/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
In China, the vaccination strategy against pertussis is started from 3 months of age, with no booster dose used after the booster given at two years. Despite a high vaccination coverage, pertussis has been increasingly reported since the last decade. This study evaluates the prevalence of serum anti-pertussis toxin (PT) IgG antibodies in adults at childbearing age and infants before the age of primary immunization in Beijing, China. A total of 1175 serum samples randomly selected from individuals who attended an annual health examination at the Sixth Medical Center of the PLA General Hospital, Beijing, in 2019, was included. The geometric mean concentration (GMC) and median concentration of anti-PT IgG antibodies among adults aged 20–39 years were 3.81 IU/mL and 3.24 IU/mL, and the corresponding concentrations were 1.72 IU/mL and 1.43 IU/mL among infants under 3 months of age. The seroprevalence of PT IgG antibodies ≥ 40 IU/mL in adults and infants was 2.0% (15/735) and 1.1% (5/440). In total, 65.99% (485/735) of adults and 83.41% (367/440) of infants had non-detectable pertussis-specific antibodies (<5 IU/mL). Our results showed that the majority of adults at a reproductive age and young infants are vulnerable to pertussis, suggesting that booster vaccinations in adults should be considered in this country.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiyun Chen
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China; (Z.C.); (J.P.); (N.Z.); (N.C.); (Y.D.)
| | - Jie Pang
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China; (Z.C.); (J.P.); (N.Z.); (N.C.); (Y.D.)
| | - Nan Zhang
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China; (Z.C.); (J.P.); (N.Z.); (N.C.); (Y.D.)
| | - Ning Chen
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China; (Z.C.); (J.P.); (N.Z.); (N.C.); (Y.D.)
| | - Yiwei Ding
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China; (Z.C.); (J.P.); (N.Z.); (N.C.); (Y.D.)
- The Sixth Medical Center, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Chinese PLA General l Hospital, Beijing 100048, China
| | - Qiushui He
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China; (Z.C.); (J.P.); (N.Z.); (N.C.); (Y.D.)
- Research Center for Infections and Immunity, Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, 20520 Turku, Finland
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +358-50-472-2255
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kuznetsova A, Ceregido MA, Jourquin A, Campora L, Da Silva FT. Fourteen years of the Pregnancy Registry on maternal immunisation with a reduced-antigen-content tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine. Vaccine 2022; 40:904-911. [PMID: 34991926 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.12.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Revised: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND GSK initiated a Pregnancy Registry in the United States (US) for the reduced-antigen-content tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap; Boostrix, GSK) vaccine with the aim to detect and describe pregnancy outcomes in women vaccinated with Boostrix 28 days before estimated conception or during pregnancy. METHODS Voluntary reports of pregnancy exposure to Boostrix received from spontaneous and post-marketing surveillance sources in the US were assessed. Reports were classified as prospective or retrospective based on the knowledge of pregnancy outcomes at the time of reporting. For completeness, reports of exposure to Boostrix or to the Tdap-inactivated poliovirus vaccine (Boostrix-IPV, GSK) reported to the global safety database from countries outside the US were also evaluated. RESULTS From May 2005 to August 2019, 1517 (1455 prospective and 62 retrospective) pregnancy reports were received in the Boostrix US Pregnancy Registry. Of the prospective reports, 250 had known outcomes: 244 live infants with no apparent birth defects (BDs), three live infants with BDs, and three spontaneous abortions with no apparent BDs. Of the retrospective reports, 55 had known outcomes: 33 live infants with no apparent BDs, 16 live infants with BDs, one spontaneous abortion with no apparent BDs, four stillbirths with no apparent BDs, and one stillbirth with BDs. Cumulatively, 1321 pregnancy reports (1006 for Boostrix; 315 for Boostrix-IPV) were received from countries outside the US. Of these, 163 prospective reports and 551 retrospective reports had known outcomes. Results were in line with those from the Boostrix US Pregnancy Registry. CONCLUSIONS Data currently available from the Boostrix US Pregnancy Registry and from countries outside the US suggested that exposure to Boostrix or Boostrix-IPV during pregnancy does not raise safety concerns related to adverse pregnancy outcomes or BDs.
Collapse
|
47
|
The optimal strategy for pertussis vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials and real-world data. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022; 226:52-67.e10. [PMID: 34224687 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.06.096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Revised: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Severe pertussis infection has been reported in infants before receiving routine immunization series. This problem could be solved by vaccinating mothers during pregnancy or children at birth. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world evidence to evaluate the optimal strategy for pertussis vaccination. DATA SOURCES PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched until December 2020. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA RCTs, cohort studies, case-control studies, and case series were included if they investigated the efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of acellular pertussis vaccine during pregnancy and at birth. METHODS Number of pertussis cases, severe adverse events (SAEs), and pertussis antibody concentration in infants before and after they receive routine vaccination series were extracted and random-effect model was used to pool the analyses. RESULTS Overall, 29 studies were included. Our meta-analysis revealed that pertussis immunization during pregnancy significantly increased the concentrations of 3 pertussis antibodies and reduced the incidence rates of infected infants below 3 months of age (odds ratio, 0.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.33). Similarly, infants vaccinated at birth had higher levels of pertussis antibody than those who were not. No significant difference in rates of severe adverse events was seen in all vaccination groups (during pregnancy [risk ratio, 1.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-1.82] and at birth [risk ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-1.54]). CONCLUSION Pertussis vaccination during pregnancy could protect infants against pertussis disease before the routine vaccination. Pertussis immunization at birth would be an alternative for infants whose mothers did not receive pertussis vaccines during pregnancy.
Collapse
|
48
|
Immunization of preterm infants: current evidence and future strategies to individualized approaches. Semin Immunopathol 2022; 44:767-784. [PMID: 35922638 PMCID: PMC9362650 DOI: 10.1007/s00281-022-00957-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Preterm infants are at particularly high risk for infectious diseases. As this vulnerability extends beyond the neonatal period into childhood and adolescence, preterm infants benefit greatly from infection-preventive measures such as immunizations. However, there is an ongoing discussion about vaccine safety and efficacy due to preterm infants' distinct immunological features. A significant proportion of infants remains un- or under-immunized when discharged from primary hospital stay. Educating health care professionals and parents, promoting maternal immunization and evaluating the potential of new vaccination tools are important means to reduce the overall burden from infectious diseases in preterm infants. In this narrative review, we summarize the current knowledge about vaccinations in premature infants. We discuss the specificities of early life immunity and memory function, including the role of polyreactive B cells, restricted B cell receptor diversity and heterologous immunity mediated by a cross-reactive T cell repertoire. Recently, mechanistic studies indicated that tissue-resident memory (Trm) cell populations including T cells, B cells and macrophages are already established in the fetus. Their role in human early life immunity, however, is not yet understood. Tissue-resident memory T cells, for example, are diminished in airway tissues in neonates as compared to older children or adults. Hence, the ability to make specific recall responses after secondary infectious stimulus is hampered, a phenomenon that is transcriptionally regulated by enhanced expression of T-bet. Furthermore, the microbiome establishment is a dominant factor to shape resident immunity at mucosal surfaces, but it is often disturbed in the context of preterm birth. The proposed function of Trm T cells to remember benign interactions with the microbiome might therefore be reduced which would contribute to an increased risk for sustained inflammation. An improved understanding of Trm interactions may determine novel targets of vaccination, e.g., modulation of T-bet responses and facilitate more individualized approaches to protect preterm babies in the future.
Collapse
|
49
|
Factors Influencing Maternal Antepartum Tdap Vaccination. Matern Child Health J 2022; 26:2385-2395. [PMID: 36173502 PMCID: PMC9519405 DOI: 10.1007/s10995-022-03557-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Antepartum Tdap remains low despite national recommendations. This prospective observational study aims to identify factors associated with lower antepartum Tdap rates. METHODS Maternal demographics, personal health beliefs, Tdap vaccination status, and recall of in-office obstetric provider actions were collected from a convenience sample of postpartum women in a New York metropolitan hospital. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify significant factors and adjusted odds ratios (OR) for recorded Tdap; OR > 1 reflects elements with increased odds of not receiving antepartum Tdap, while OR < 1 demonstrates increased odds of receipt. RESULTS Surveys were collected (n = 1682) from a study population demographically similar to New York City and more diverse in race/ethnicity than the national population. Demographic analysis showed Hispanic women less likely than white, non-Hispanic women to vaccinate (OR 2.44, CI 1.54-3.88). Health beliefs associated with non-receipt of antepartum Tdap included "It is dangerous for pregnant women to get vaccines" (OR 1.68, CI 1.01-2.77), and "I worry about the safety of the Tdap vaccine" (OR 1.59, CI 1.12-2.24). Obstetric provider actions associated with vaccination included receiving an OB recommendation (OR 0.39, CI 0.23-0.65), getting written information about Tdap (OR 0.44, CI 0.30-0.64), and having Tdap offered in office (OR 0.24, CI 0.15-0.37). Health beliefs associated with antepartum Tdap included "I generally do what my OB/GYN provider recommends" (OR 0.49, CI 0.30-0.80), and "Pregnant women should get the Tdap (pertussis) vaccine" (OR 0.17, CI 0.09-0.33). DISCUSSION Maternal race/ethnicity, personal health beliefs, and obstetric provider actions predict antepartum Tdap.
Collapse
|
50
|
Alghounaim M, Alsaffar Z, Alfraij A, Bin-Hasan S, Hussain E. Whole-Cell and Acellular Pertussis Vaccine: Reflections on Efficacy. Med Princ Pract 2022; 31:313-321. [PMID: 35696990 PMCID: PMC9485965 DOI: 10.1159/000525468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Pertussis is a common respiratory infection caused by the bacterium Bordetella pertussis. Although most cases occur in developing countries, it is considered endemic globally. The World Health Organization estimates there are 20-40 million cases of pertussis annually. Pertussis vaccines played a pivotal role in reducing the burden of pertussis disease as well as infant morbidity and mortality. Although the two forms of pertussis vaccine are effective, each has its advantages and drawbacks. This review aims to review the current knowledge on pertussis vaccines, emphasizing vaccine effectiveness in different populations within a community. Clinical trials have shown favorable vaccine efficacy with acellular pertussis (aP)vaccine. However, observational and population-level studies showed that introducing at least a single dose of whole-cell pertussis (wP) vaccine within the routine immunization schedule is associated with better disease protection and a longer duration of immunity. On the other hand, wP vaccine is more reactogenic and associated with higher adverse events. Therefore, the selection of vaccine should be weighed against the effectiveness, reactogenicity, and cost-effectiveness. Due to its safety profile, aP vaccine can be offered to wider population groups. Booster adolescent and pregnant immunization programs have been implemented globally to control outbreaks and protect vulnerable infants. Due to the variable effectiveness performance of both vaccines, different countries adopted distinctive immunization programs. Determining the right vaccination approach depends on financial consideration, immunization program infrastructure, adverse event monitoring, and pertussis surveillance in the community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Alghounaim
- Department of Pediatrics, Amiri Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait
- *Mohammad Alghounaim,
| | - Zainab Alsaffar
- Department of Pediatrics, Farwaniya Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | - Abdulla Alfraij
- Department of Pediatrics, Farwaniya Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | - Saadoun Bin-Hasan
- Department of Pediatrics, Farwaniya Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait
- Dasman Diabetes Institute, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | - Entesar Hussain
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| |
Collapse
|