Lipoprotein(a): Just an Innocent Bystander in Arterial Hypertension?

Elevated plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a relatively common and highly heritable trait conferring individuals time-dependent risk of developing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD). Following its first description, Lp(a) triggered enormous scientific interest in the late 1980s, subsequently dampened in the mid-1990s by controversial findings of some prospective studies. It was only in the last decade that a large body of evidence has provided strong arguments for a causal and independent association between elevated Lp(a) levels and CVD, causing renewed interest in this lipoprotein as an emerging risk factor with a likely contribution to cardiovascular residual risk. Accordingly, the 2022 consensus statement of the European Atherosclerosis Society has suggested inclusion of Lp(a) measurement in global risk estimation. The development of highly effective Lp(a)-lowering drugs (e.g., antisense oligonucleotides and small interfering RNA, both blocking LPA gene expression) which are still under assessment in phase 3 trials, will provide a unique opportunity to reduce "residual cardiovascular risk" in high-risk populations, including patients with arterial hypertension. The current evidence in support of a specific role of Lp(a) in hypertension is somehow controversial and this narrative review aims to overview the general mechanisms relating Lp(a) to blood pressure regulation and hypertension-related cardiovascular and renal damage.

Data on the lipoprotein (a), coronary atherosclerotic burden and vulnerable plaque phenotype in angiographic obstructive coronary artery disease

Lipoprotein Lp(a) represents an independent risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD). However, its association with CAD burden and lipid rich plaques prone to rupture in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) still remains unknown. These data aim to investigate the association among serum Lipoprotein(a) (Lpa) levels, coronary atherosclerotic burden and features of culprit plaque in patients with ACS and obstructive CAD. For his reason, a total of 500 ACS patients were enrolled for the angiographic cohort and 51 ACS patients were enrolled for the optical coherence tomography (OCT) cohort. Angiographic CAD severity was assessed by Sullivan score and by Bogaty score including stenosis score and extent index, whereas OCT plaque features were evaluated at the site of the minimal lumen area and along the culprit segment. In the angiographic cohort, Lp(a) was a weak independent predictor of Sullivan score (p<0.0001), stenosis score (p<0.0001) and extent index (p<0.0001). In the OCT cohort, patients with higher Lp(a) levels (>30 md/dl) compared to patients with lower Lp(a) levels (<30 md/dl) exhibited a higher prevalence of lipidic plaque at the site of the culprit stenosis (P=0.02), a wider lipid arc (p=0.003) and a higher prevalence of thin-cap fibroatheroma (p=0.004)

Lipoprotein (a) is related to coronary atherosclerotic burden and a vulnerable plaque phenotype in angiographically obstructive coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Lipoprotein Lp(a) has been shown to be an independent risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD). However, its association with CAD burden in patients with ACS is largely unknown, as well as the association of Lp(a) with lipid rich plaques prone to rupture.

AIM

We aim at assessing CAD burden by coronary angiography and plaque features including thin cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) by optical coherence tomography (OCT) in consecutive patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and obstructive CAD along with serum Lp(a) levels.

METHODS

This study comprises an angiographic and an OCT cohort. A total of 500 ACS patients (370 men, average age 66 ± 11) were enrolled for the angiographic cohort and 51 ACS patients (29 males, average age 65 ± 11) were enrolled for the OCT cohort. Angiographic CAD severity was assessed by Sullivan score and by Bogaty score including stenosis score and extent index. OCT plaque features were evaluated at the site of the minimal lumen area and along the culprit segment.

RESULTS

In the angiographic cohort, at multivariate analysis, Lp(a) was a weak independent predictor of Sullivan score (p < 0.0001), stenosis score (p < 0.0001) and extent index (p < 0.0001). In the OCT cohort, patients with higher Lp(a) levels (≥ 30 md/dl) compared to patients with lower Lp(a) levels (<30 md/dl) exhibited a higher prevalence of lipidic plaque at the site of the culprit stenosis (67% vs. 27%; P = 0.02), a wider lipid arc (135 ± 114 vs 59 ± 111; P = 0.03) and a higher prevalence of TCFA (38% vs. 10%; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with ACS, raised Lp(a) levels are associated with an increased atherosclerotic burden and it identifies a subset of patients with features of high risk coronary atherosclerosis.

Plasma lipoprotein Lp(a), markers of haemostasis and inflammation, and risk and severity of coronary heart disease

BACKGROUND

Elevated plasma (Lp(a)) levels may represent an independent risk factor for atherothrombotic complications but the relation between Lp(a) levels and the extent of coronary artery disease (CHD) has been discussed controversially. Little is known about potential atherothrombogenic mechanisms of Lp(a).

DESIGN

Case-control study.

METHODS

We assessed the relationship between plasma Lp(a) and angiographically defined CHD, evaluating the severity of coronary atherosclerosis by three different scores. A total of 312 patients with stable angina aged 40-68 years with at least one coronary stenosis > 50% were studied. A group of 479 voluntary blood donors matched for age and sex served as controls. A complete lipid profile and a large number of markers of coagulation, fibrinolysis and inflammation were measured.

RESULTS

Plasma levels of Lp(a) were significantly higher in patients (14.8 mg/dl; 5.4-47.1 mg/dl; median/interquartile range) than in controls (9.7 mg/dl; 3.5-25.3) (P<0.0001). In a logistic regression model, the fully adjusted Odds Ratio for CHD was 3.3 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8-5.6, P<0.0001) for patients in the upper quartile of the Lp(a) distribution compared to the bottom quartile. There was no appreciable association between Lp(a) and apolipoproteins, markers of haemostasis, fibrinolysis and inflammation and the severity of CHD.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that elevated plasma Lp(a) levels may be an independent risk factor for CHD but unrelated to the severity and extension of CHD. Furthermore, there is no good evidence that the presumed link between Lp(a) and CHD is mediated by increased levels of markers of inflammation, or interference with markers of fibrinolysis or coagulation.

Electrophoretic measurement of lipoprotein(a) cholesterol in plasma with and without ultracentrifugation: comparison with an immunoturbidimetric lipoprotein(a) method

OBJECTIVES

Elevated plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a significant risk factor for vascular disease. Standardization of Lp(a) mass measurement is complicated by the heterogeneity of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)]. We investigated whether Lp(a) cholesterol measurement, which is not influenced by apo(a) size, is a viable alternative to measuring Lp(a) mass.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Plasma Lp(a) cholesterol was measured electrophoretically, with and without ultracentrifugation, and results were compared to each other and to immunoturbidimetrically measured Lp(a) mass in 470 subjects.

RESULTS

Ultracentrifuged and whole plasma Lp(a) cholesterol levels demonstrated high correlation (R = 0.964). All samples with detectable (>/=2.0 mg/dl) Lp(a) cholesterol had Lp(a) mass >30 mg/dl (the clinically relevant cutpoint), while 59 samples with Lp(a) mass >30 mg/dl did not have detectable Lp(a) cholesterol.

CONCLUSIONS

Lp(a) cholesterol can be measured in whole plasma without interference from VLDL lipoproteins. The relative clinical merits of measuring Lp(a) cholesterol vs. Lp(a) mass or both in combination deserves investigation.

Triglyceride and lipoprotein (a) are markers of coronary artery disease severity among postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE

After menopause, some women manifest coronary artery disease (CAD) with highly variable angiographic severity. For these women, postmenopausal appearing of some CAD risk factors may have differently influenced the CAD risk and severity. In this study, we attempt to unravel differences in the frequency or intensity of CAD risk factors among postmenopausal women with different angiographic severity.

METHODS

We studied 182 postmenopausal women (64+/-6 years) who underwent coronary angiography to investigate thoracic pain. Subjects with no detectable coronary lesions at angiography were recruited to the non-obstructive group and patients with CAD were grouped in one-vessel or multi-vessel groups. We compared clinical variables as the body mass index (BMI), age at menopause, age, hypertension, diabetes and cigarette smoking, and lipid measurements as plasma levels of total cholesterol, triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein (apo) A1, apo B and lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)).

RESULTS

Comparing to the non-obstructive group, Lp(a) was twofold higher in the one-vessel group and threefold higher in the multi-vessel group and triglycerides were 34% higher in the one-vessel group and 50% higher in the multi-vessel group. No further difference was found among the three groups. After multivariate logistic regression analysis, triglyceride (odds ratio: 1.01; P=0.0013) and Lp(a) (odds ratio: 1.006; P<0.0001) were independently indicative of the presence of obstructive CAD.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that both Lp(a) and triglycerides constitute useful markers of CAD severity among postmenopausal women.

Effect of hormone replacement therapy on lipids in perimenopausal and early postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of oral sequential hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on lipid-profile in perimenopausal and early postmenopausal women.

METHODS

We performed a single-center, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. The trial was double blind with respect to 17beta-estradiol/desogestrel (17beta-E-D) and placebo and open with respect to conjugated estrogens/norgestrel (CEE-N). A total of 125 healthy perimenopausal and early postmenopausal women, aged 43-58 years, were recruited from the general population in Zoetermeer, the Netherlands. The intervention consisted of 6 months treatment with 1.5 mg 17beta-estradiol/0.15 mg desogestrel (n=53), 0.625 mg conjugated estrogens/0.15 mg norgestrel (n=36) or placebo (n=36). At baseline, cycle 1, 3 and 6, overnight fasting blood samples were obtained in which lipids were determined. We used linear regression analysis to calculate differences in mean change from baseline in lipids in the active treatment groups compared to placebo.

RESULTS

In both treatment groups significant (P<0.05) falls in low-density-lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (17beta-E-D: -7.8% and CEE-N: -8.4%) and lipoprotein(a) (17beta-E-D: -11.7% and CEE-N: -28.3%) were found compared to placebo. Apolipoprotein A1 (17beta-E-D: 6.8% and CEE-N: 7.3%) and HDL-cholesterol (17beta-E-D: 6.4% and CEE-N: 8.0%) significantly increased compared to placebo. No significant changes were found in the other lipids. Mean changes from baseline in total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and apolipoprotein B were significantly more pronounced in postmenopausal women compared to perimenopausal women, adjustment for age-differences did not change the results.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of perimenopausal and early postmenopausal women with 17beta-E-D or CEE-N changes their lipid-profile in a potentially anti-atherogenic direction. Changes appear to be more pronounced in postmenopausal women compared to perimenopausal women.

Apolipoprotein B as the best predictor of coronary artery disease in Iranian normolipidemic patients

OBJECTIVES

A relatively high proportion of Iranian patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) have normal levels of traditional lipid risk factors and show early onset of CAD. In this study we examined the roles of apolipoprotein B (apoB), apolipoprotein AI (apoAI) and lipoprotein (a) [LP(a)] in predicting coronary heart disease in normolipidemic patients and those with premature CAD (age < or = 50).

DESIGN AND METHODS

Serum levels of apoB, apoAI, and LP(a) were determined in a total of 567 Iranian patients who were candidates for coronary angiography. A subgroup of 142 patients (93 males, 49 females) with normal levels of classical lipid risk factors, and a subgroup of patients (130 males, 71 females) with age below 50 years were separately assessed for coronary risk factors.

RESULTS

ApoB concentrations were significantly higher in patients with CAD (CAD+) relative to patients without CAD (CAD-) in the two subgroups. Multiple logistic regression after controlling for age and others risk factors showed apoB as the best determinant of CAD in the normolipidemic subgroup (OR, 4.3, p < 0.001) and in the men aged < or = 50 (OR, 5.7, p < 0.001). ApoB was the best predictor of CAD in a subgroup of very young patients (age < or = 40, n = 77, OR, 8.6, p < 0.009). There was a significant correlation between severity of atherosclerosis and serum apoB concentration in the normolipidemic subgroup (r = 0.22, p < 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that serum concentration of apoB is the best discriminating factor to predict the presence or absence of atherosclerosis in Iranian normolipidemic individuals and young patients undergoing coronary angiography.

Lipoprotein(a) changes during natural menstrual cycle and ovarian stimulation with recombinant and highly purified urinary FSH

This prospective, randomized, controlled study compared the effects of recombinant human FSH (r-hFSH) and highly purified urinary FSH (u-hFSH HP) on lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentrations in women undergoing ovarian stimulation. Fifty infertile women were randomly allocated into two equally sized treatment groups (n = 25 per group). Thirty normal ovulation women were recruited as controls. The infertile women received u-hFSH or r-hFSH 150 IU/day starting on cycle day 2. From cycle day 6 the dose was adjusted according to ovarian response. Human chorionic gonadotrophin 10,000 IU was administered once there was at least one follicle > or =18 mm in diameter. The luteal phase was supported with progesterone 50 mg/day for at least 15 days. Repeated measurements of Lp(a) concentrations were performed during both stimulated and natural cycles. A significant increase in luteal phase Lp(a) concentrations was detected in the stimulated cycles, whereas no significant changes in serum Lp(a) concentrations were observed during natural cycles. There were no significant differences between the urinary and recombinant FSH effects on serum Lp(a). The luteal Lp(a) increase was transitory because after 1 month Lp(a) concentrations returned to baseline values if pregnancy failed to occur; in pregnant women persistent increased Lp(a) concentrations were found at the 8th week. The percentage changes in serum Lp(a) were positively correlated with the luteal progesterone increase (r = 0.40, P < 0.05), but not with follicular or luteal oestradiol increase. The women with low baseline Lp(a) (< or =5 mg/dl) had a greater increase of the Lp(a) concentrations at midluteal phase than women with baseline Lp(a) >5 mg/dl. In conclusion, the recombinant or urinary hFSH administration does not directly influence Lp(a) concentrations. The luteal Lp(a) increase in stimulated cycles is not related to gonadotrophin treatment per se, but appears to be related to the high luteal progesterone concentrations, physiologically or pharmacologically determined. Our results also suggest that the sensitivity to the progesterone changes could be related to apolipoprotein(a) phenotype.

Lipoprotein(a) serum levels and vascular diseases in an older Caucasian population cohort. Italian Longitudinal Study on Aging (ILSA)

OBJECTIVE

To investigate elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels as a risk factor for stroke, myocardial infarction, angina, intermittent claudication, and combination of the above in a cohort of unselected older individuals.

DESIGN

Population cohort from one of the eight centers participating in the Italian Longitudinal Study on Aging (ILSA).

SETTING

General community.

PARTICIPANTS

A subsample of 446 subjects (M/F: 231/ 215, mean age: 74.5 +/- 5.7 years) of the original, randomly selected, population cohort of 704 individuals, 65 to 84 years of age, free-living or institutionalized in the Impruneta Municipality, area of Florence, Italy.

MEASUREMENTS

Conventional vascular risk factors and vascular diseases defined following a two-step procedure (screening phase and confirmation on positives) using standard and validated criteria. Lp(a) levels determined by an ELISA method.

RESULTS

No association was observed between elevated Lp(a) levels alone and any of the examined vascular diseases (stroke, myocardial infarction, angina, and intermittent claudication). In contrast, examining the interactions between elevated Lp(a) and conventional vascular risk factors, when elevated Lp(a) was combined with a history of smoking, a marked increase in the risk of vascular diseases combined (odds ratio [OR]: 4.12; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.27-13.40) was observed, much higher than that expected based on the additive effect of smoking and elevated Lp(a) alone.

CONCLUSIONS

With the cautions due to the cross-sectional design of the study and the limited statistical power, these results suggest a possible synergistic effect between elevated Lp(a) levels and other pro-atherogenic factors such as smoking on the risk of vascular diseases in older individuals.

Lipoprotein(a) associated with coronary artery disease in older women: age and gender analysis

BACKGROUND

Lipoprotein (a) has been associated with increased coronary artery disease (CAD) risk in men, but relatively little data exists in women. While age influences the cardiovascular risk associated with Lp(a) in men, little is known about this phenomenon in women. The impact of gender on Lp(a) has not been fully studied in an ongoing clinical practice.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Baseline Lp(a) values were measured in 918 CAD and 829 non-CAD patients (603 females, 1144 males) entering an outpatient prevention clinic. The age-specific association of elevated Lp(a) (> 30 mg/dl) with CAD was examined after adjustment for traditional risk factors. Lp(a) was a significant risk factor (OR = 1.9, CI, 1.4-2.6) in men and women (OR = 1.9, CI 1.3-2.9). In men age < or = 55 years the odds ratio for increased cardiovascular risk in high vs low Lp(a) was 2.5 (CI 1.6-3.9). In men < or = 55, CAD increased from 32 to 61% as Lp(a) progressively rose from < or = 5 to > or = 45 mg/dl (P value for trend < 0.001). No significant increase was observed in men > 55 years (OR = 1.3, CI 0.9-2.1). In women < or = 55 years, the risk of CAD increased from 22 to 35% (OR 1.6, CI 0.8-3.2), and increased from 38 to 63% in women > 55 (OR 2.1, CI 1.3-3.5). Further, of high-risk patients (men < or = 55 and women > 55 years) with an Lp(a) in the range of 20-44 mg/dl (third quartile), younger men showed a greater incidence of CAD (51%) than older women (43%). Both genders revealed substantial risk when the Lp(a) values were above 45 mg/dl. (OR = 3.7, CI = 2.0-6.8 in younger men; OR = 3.3, CI = 1.6-6.6 in older women).

CONCLUSIONS

In this cross sectional study of both men and women, elevated Lp(a) was associated with a significantly increased risk of CAD in men and women. While we corroborate previous reports on the lack of association in older men, the determination of an enhanced Lp(a)-related risk in older women was new and unanticipated. Further, in this population of high risk patients, substantial cardiovascular risk appeared to be represented by higher concentrations of Lp(a) in women than observed in men.

Lack of association of serum lipoprotein (a) levels with type-2 diabetes mellitus in patients with angiographically defined coronary artery disease

Multiple studies have demonstrated that elevated serum lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] levels are independent predictors for coronary artery disease (CAD) in subjects without diabetes mellitus (DM). However, their contribution in patients with DM is controversial and still requires clarification. We determined serum Lp(a) levels in 355 consecutive Caucasian patients (271 men and 84 women) with angiographically documented CAD, and in 100 control subjects (58 men and 42 women) who were clinically free of cardiovascular disease. In addition, the association of serum Lp(a) levels with type-2 DM in patients with CAD was investigated after reassigning patients according to the diagnosis of type-2 DM (61 men and 40 women with type-2 DM and 210 men and 44 women without). No gender differences in Lp(a) levels were observed between men and women (patients and control subjects). Patients with CAD had higher Lp(a) levels than the control subjects (33 (14-74) vs. 13 (9-29) mg/dl, P<0.001). Elevated Lp(a) levels (defined as >90th percentile of controls) were significantly more prevalent in men and women with CAD (35% and 28%, respectively) than in control subjects (13% and 10%, respectively). Serum Lp(a) levels correlated with LDL cholesterol (r=0.22, P<0.001) and apo B levels (r=0.18, P<0.03) in patients and control subjects. Stepwise discriminant analysis revealed that Lp(a) was an independent risk factor for the presence of CAD, independent of smoking, hypertension, type-2 DM, LDL and HDL cholesterol or apo A1 and B levels. When patients were studied according to the spread of CAD (evaluated as the number of narrowed vessels), no differences in serum Lp(a) levels were observed, nor was there a higher prevalence of elevated Lp(a) levels. Finally, when patients were re-assigned according to the diagnosis of type-2 DM, no effect of apo B and LDL-C levels on Lp(a) was found (r=0.06, P=n.s. and 40.14, P=n.s., respectively) and serum Lp(a) levels neither associated nor contributed to the extent of CAD. Our results showed that serum Lp(a) levels are increased in patients with angiographically documented CAD, but there were no significant differences between diabetic and non-diabetic patients, which indicates that elevated Lp(a) levels are specifically associated with CAD but not with type-2 DM.

Lack of association of lipoprotein(a) levels with coronary calcium deposits in asymptomatic postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine the relationship of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) and other cardiac risk factors to coronary atherosclerosis as measured by calcification of coronary arteries in asymptomatic postmenopausal women.

BACKGROUND

Lipoprotein(a) is considered a risk factor for coronary heart disease. Coronary calcium deposition is believed to be a useful noninvasive marker of coronary atherosclerosis in women. However, to our knowledge, there are no reports of the relationship of Lp(a) to coronary calcium in postmenopausal women.

METHODS

In 178 asymptomatic postmenopausal women (64 +/- 8 years), we measured Lp(a) and other cardiac risk factors: age, hypertension, diabetes, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, smoking status, body mass index, physical activity level and duration of hormone replacement therapy. Electron-beam computed tomography was done to measure coronary calcium (calcium score). We analyzed the relationship between calcium score and cardiac risk factors using multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Although calcium score correlated with traditional risk factors of age, diabetes, hypertension and smoking, it did not correlate with Lp(a) in the asymptomatic postmenopausal women. Similar multivariate analyses were done in the subjects age >60 years and in the subjects with significant coronary calcium deposit (calcium score > or =50). These analyses also have failed to show an association of levels of Lp(a) with coronary calcium deposits.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that in asymptomatic postmenopausal women, Lp(a) levels do not correlate with coronary atherosclerosis as measured by coronary calcium deposits.

Lipoprotein(a) interactions with lipid and non-lipid risk factors in patients with early onset coronary artery disease: results from the NHLBI Family Heart Study

BACKGROUND

A positive interaction between high plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and unfavorable plasma lipid levels has been reported to result in very high risk for premature coronary artery disease (CAD). We further examined this issue for men and women with early onset CAD. We also examined potential interactions between Lp(a) and non-lipid risk factors.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 338 men and women with early onset CAD (most with a positive family history of early CAD) and 480 general population controls, we measured Lp(a), lipids and other risk factors. In univariate analysis, relative odds for CAD was 1.7 (P = 0.002) for plasma Lp(a) >50 mg/dl. Elevated Lp(a) level was found to interact with adjusted plasma total/high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol such that when Lp(a) was over 50 mg/dl and adjusted plasma total/HDL cholesterol >5.8, relative odds for CAD were 8.0-9.6 (P<0.0001) in multiple logistic regression. Non-lipid risk factors were generally found to multiply the risk associated with Lp(a) (as predicted by logistic regression) without evidence for interaction.

CONCLUSIONS

We find evidence that Lp(a) does interact positively with adjusted plasma total/HDL cholesterol ratio. Aggressive risk factor intervention, especially for lipids, in those with elevated Lp(a) therefore appears indicated.

Effect of HELP-LDL-apheresis on outcomes in patients with advanced coronary atherosclerosis and severe hypercholesterolemia

In the secondary prevention of coronary artery disease (CAD) the beneficial effect of lipid lowering is no longer controversial. LDL-apheresis is a feasible therapy for effective lipid lowering in patients refractory to diet and cholesterol lowering drugs. To assess the impact of the HELP-therapy (heparin-induced, extracorporeal LDL precipitation) on patients' clinical outcome and coronary angiography, we set up a prospective trial, in which patients with advanced coronary atherosclerosis and severe hypercholesterolemia resistant to diet and drug therapy were treated with LDL-apheresis. A total of 44 patients were treated with adjunctive weekly HELP-therapy for 15.5 +/- 9.5 months. The mean levels of total cholesterol (Chol), LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C), Lp(a), and fibrinogen at baseline were 308.0 +/- 69.7, 231.8 +/- 72.7, 82.2 +/- 54.1, and 356.1 +/- 94.1 mg/dl, respectively. LDL-apheresis caused a mean per treatment reduction of 44.8 +/- 8.7, 55.5 +/- 8.6, 60.8 +/- 10.2, and 53.8 +/- 6.5% of Chol, LDL-C, Lp(a), and fibrinogen, resulting in mean treatment interval values of 190.4 +/- 33.7, 116.3 +/- 28.9, 51.9 +/- 33.1, and 213.7 +/- 148.9 mg/dl, respectively. Improvement of the clinical status (exercise tolerance, anti-anginal drug use, angina pectoris) was found in 73%, no change in 11%, and deterioration in 16% of the cases. Four patients died cardiac death. The maximal bicycle exercise work load of the patients increased significantly from 101 +/- 41 to 119 +/- 46 W (P < 0.001). Ten (40%) out of 25 patients who underwent follow-up angiography revealed CAD progression, whereas two (8%) patients had CAD regression. Despite angiographic deterioration eight out of ten progressors (80%) improved clinically. In patients with advanced coronary atherosclerosis and severe hypercholesterolemia HELP-therapy can safely and effectively lower LDL-C, Lp(a), and fibrinogen. The chronic weekly HELP-treatment results in clinical improvement in the majority of patients, even in those patients with angiographically shown CAD progression.

Influence of lipoprotein(a) plasma concentration on neointimal growth in a monkey model of vascular injury

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has been proposed as a risk factor for both restenosis and coronary heart disease. Recently, we identified Lp(a) in the arterial wall during the initial rapid neointimal growth phase that occurs after balloon injury in cynomolgus monkeys. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between circulating Lp(a) levels and the extent of early neointimal formation. Initially, 348 cynomolgus monkeys were screened to identify 15 monkeys that had either high or low circulating Lp(a) levels. In the 15 monkeys, circulating Lp(a) levels were confirmed by two separate measurements over 6 weeks using an immunoturbidimetric assay. Cohorts were identified with plasma Lp(a) levels that differed by four fold. Lp(a) levels expressed as total mass averaged 32 +/- 4 (N = 8) and 136 +/- 12 (N = 7) mg/dl in the low and high groups, respectively. Between the two assays absolute Lp(a) levels differed by less than 6%. Iliac arteries were harvested 14 days after injury induced by expansion of the internal vessel diameter 1.4 times its initial size with an angioplasty balloon. The neointimal area in the high Lp(a) monkeys was 16% greater (0.49 +/- 0.12 mm2, N = 8 versus 0.57 +/- 0.10 mm2, N = 7) than in the low animals; however, this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.63). Medial areas averaged 1.27 +/- 0.11 and 1.44 +/- 0.20 mm2 (P = 0.48) in these groups, respectively. Tissue Lp(a) quantification, using a mouse monoclonal anti-Lp(a) antibody, indicated that the percent total area staining positive for Lp(a) was 1.7-fold higher in the high versus the low Lp(a) group (2.7 +/- 0.4% versus 1.6 +/- 0.4%, N = 6-8); this difference was not statistical significant (P = 0.28). In summary, a four-fold increase in circulating plasma Lp(a) levels did not result in a statistically significant enhanced neointimal formation at 14 days after balloon injury. This finding suggests that studies of longer duration may be needed to amplify the trend toward increased neointimal growth observed in this study.

Elevated plasma lipoprotein(a) is associated with coronary artery disease in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris

OBJECTIVES

We sought to assess the relation between plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels, clinical variables and angiographic coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with chronic stable angina.

BACKGROUND

The relation between plasma Lp(a) levels and the severity and extent of angiographic CAD has not been studied in well characterized patients with stable angina pectoris.

METHODS

We investigated clinical variables, lipid variables and angiographic scores in 129 consecutive white patients (43 women) undergoing coronary angiography for chronic stable angina.

RESULTS

Plasma Lp(a) levels were significantly higher in patients with than in those without significant angiographic stenoses (> or =70%) (372 mg/liter [interquartile range 87 to 884] vs. 105 mg/liter [interquartile range 56 to 366], respectively, p=0.002). This difference remained significant when patients with mild or severe angiographic disease were compared with those with completely normal coronary arteries (312 mg/liter [interquartile range 64 to 864] vs. 116 mg/liter [interquartile range 63 to 366], respectively, p=0.02). However, subset analysis indicated that this difference achieved statistical significance only in women. Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that Lp(a) concentration was independently predictive of significant angiographic stenoses (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 9.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0 to 42.1, p=0.006) and remained true even after exclusion of patients receiving lipid-lowering treatment (n=27) (OR 10.4, 95% CI 1.1 to 102.9, p=0.05). Lp(a) also had independent predictive value in a similar analysis using mild or severe angiographic disease as the outcome variable (OR 11.8, 95% CI 1.5 to 90.8, p=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that elevated plasma Lp(a) is an independent risk factor for angiographic CAD in chronic stable angina and may have particular significance in women.

Modulation of lipoprotein(a) atherogenicity by high density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in middle-aged men with symptomatic coronary artery disease and normal to moderately elevated serum cholesterol. Regression Growth Evaluation Statin Study (REGRESS) Study Group

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to examine whether lipoprotein(a) levels predict coronary artery lumen changes in patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD) and normal to moderate hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND

Recent conflicting reports have confirmed or refuted the association of lipoprotein(a) with clinical events or angiographically verified disease progression.

METHODS

The association between serum lipoprotein(a) and changes in coronary artery lumen was studied in 704 men entered into the Regression Growth Evaluation Statin Study (REGRESS), a double-blind, placebo-controlled, quantitative angiographic study that assessed the effect of 2 years of pravastatin treatment. The primary end points were changes in average mean segment diameter (MSD) and average minimal obstruction diameter (MOD). Pravastatin- and placebo-treated patients were classified as having progressing, regressing or stable CAD, and median lipoprotein(a) concentrations were compared. Bivariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed in the overall patient group and in high risk subgroups.

RESULTS

Pravastatin treatment did not affect serum apolipoprotein(a) levels. Median in-trial (sampled at 24 months) apolipoprotein(a) levels for regressing, stable and progressing CAD were, respectively, 130, 162 and 251 U/liter in placebo-treated patients and 143, 224 and 306 U/liter in pravastatin-treated patients. Predictors of MSD and MOD changes were baseline MSD and MOD, in-trial apolipoprotein(a), in-trial high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and baseline use of long-acting nitrates. The multivariate models predicted 14% of MSD changes and 12% of MOD changes; apolipoprotein(a) predicted only 2.6% and 4.8%, respectively. However, in patients with in-trial HDL cholesterol levels <0.7 mmol/liter, apolipoprotein(a) predicted up to 37% of the arteriographic changes.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum lipoprotein(a) levels predict coronary artery lumen changes in normal to moderately hypercholesterolemic white men with CAD; its atherogenicity is marked in the presence of concomitant hypoalphalipoproteinemia.

Lipoprotein(a) interactions with lipid and nonlipid risk factors in early familial coronary artery disease

An interaction between high plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], unfavorable plasma lipids, and other risk factors may lead to very high risk for premature CAD. Plasma Lp(a), lipids, and other coronary risk factors were examined in 170 cases with early familial CAD and 165 control subjects to test this hypothesis. In univariate analysis, relative odds for CAD were 2.95 (P < .001) for plasma Lp(a) above 40 mg/dL. Nearly all the risk associated with elevated Lp(a) was found to be restricted to persons with historically elevated plasma total cholesterol (6.72 mmol/L [260 mg/dL] or higher) or with a total/HDL cholesterol ratio > 5.8. Nonlipid risk factors were also found to at least multiply the risk associated with Lp(a). When Lp(a) was over 40 mg/dL and plasma total/HDL cholesterol > 5.8, relative odds for CAD were 25 (P = .0001) in multiple logistic regression. If two or more nonlipid risk factors were also present (including hypertension, diabetes, cigarette smoking, high total homocysteine, or low serum bilirubin), relative odds were 122 (P < 1 x 10(-12)). The ability of nonlipid risk factors to increase risk associated with Lp(a) was dependent on at least a mildly elevated total/HDL cholesterol ratio. In conclusion, high Lp(a) was found to greatly increase risk only if the total/HDL cholesterol ratio was at least mildly elevated, an effect exaggerated by other risk factors. Aggressive lipid lowering in those with elevated Lp(a) therefore appears indicated.

Monthly intra-individual variation in lipoprotein(a) in 22 normal subjects over 12 months

OBJECTIVES

It is generally believe that lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) levels remain relatively constant in the same individual, but there is a paucity of data to substantiate this belief. This study was undertaken to determine the extent of intra-individual variation in Lp(a) over a 12-month period.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Lp(a) was measured monthly in duplicate over a 12-month period in 11 females and 11 males who were healthy, free-living, normal subjects by the Incstar Immunoprecipitin method using a goat antibody which was monospecific for Lp(a).

RESULTS

Some subjects showed considerable month-to-month variations which were not correlated with changes in other lipid parameters or with weight. Others showed fairly constant Lp(a) levels, with a few values which were quite different from the rest. This was not attributable to methodological factors; low and high controls gave mean (mg/L), SD and CV values of 181, 8.6, 4.7 and 431, 14, 3.3, respectively. The difference between the minimum and maximum values in the same individuals ranged from a low of 14 mg/L in one subject to a high of 229 mg/L in another over the one-year period.

CONCLUSIONS

Lp(a) showed greater intra-individual variations in normal subjects than is commonly believed. It is therefore recommended that Lp(a) should be measured sequentially over a few weeks to arrive at a mean value for assessing risk of coronary heart disease.

Lipoprotein(a) as a determinant of coronary heart disease in young women

BACKGROUND

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] appears to be a risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD) in men. The role of Lp(a) in women, however, is less clear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We examined the ability of Lp(a) to predict CHD in a population-based case-control study of women 65 years of age or younger who lived in the greater Stockholm area. Subjects were all patients hospitalized for an acute CHD event between February 1991 and February 1994. Control subjects were randomly selected from the city census and were matched to patients by age and catchment area. Lp(a) was measured 3 months after hospitalization by use of an immunoturbidometric method (Incstar) calibrated to the Northwest Lipid Research Laboratories (coefficient of variation was < 9%). Of the 292 consecutive patients, 110 (37%) were hospitalized for an acute myocardial infarction, and 182 were hospitalized (63%) for angina pectoris. The mean age for both patients and control subjects was 56 +/- 7 years. Of participants, 74 patients (25%) and 84 control subjects (29%) were premenopausal. The distributions of Lp(a) were highly skewed in both patients and control subjects, with a range from 0.001 to 1.14 g/L. Age-adjusted odds ratio for CHD in the highest versus the lowest quartile of Lp(a) was 2.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4 to 3.7). After adjustment for age, smoking, education, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, triglycerides, and HDL, the odds ratio was 2.9 (95% CI, 1.6 to 5.0). The odds ratios were similar when myocardial infarction and angina patients were compared with their respective control subjects. The odds ratios were 5.1 (95% CI, 1.4 to 18.4) and 2.4 (95% CI, 1.3 to 4.5) in premenopausal and postmenopausal women, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that Lp(a) is a determinant of CHD in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women.

Significant reduction of the bias among commercial immunoassays for lipoprotein(a) after use of a uniform calibrator

Despite the increasing interest in the measurements of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a) in serum or plasma, at present there is no effective standardization for Lp(a) assays; the main problems to solve are represented either by the lack of a suitable primary standard or by the absence of a reliable and widely available reference method. A first step is hence the uniformity of calibration of different immunoassays. We calibrated three commercial immunoassays for Lp(a) (enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), latex-enhanced immunonephelometric assay (LINA), and immunonephelometric assay (INA) with either proprietary standards or purified Lp(a) material obtained with a rapid and simple procedure. Final results of purified Lp(a) calibration were reported in terms of protein Lp(a) mass whereas we were able to quantify the exact protein concentration of our purified lipoprotein. The uniformity of the calibration of the different assays led to a significant improvement of regression slopes (from 1.88 to 0.90 ELISA vs. LINA, from 1.45 to 0.95 ELISA vs. INA and from 1.27 to 0.96 INA vs. LINA) and correlation coefficients (from 0.990 to 0.994 ELISA vs. LINA, from 0.987 to 0.990 ELISA vs. INA and from 0.985 to 0.987 INA vs. LINA). Furthermore, the significant differences among Lp(a) values obtained after calibration with proprietary standards were minimized, becoming non-significant in two out of three cases. In conclusion, we demonstrated that a better agreement of Lp(a) values obtained with different commercial assays could be simply reached by uniformity of calibration and by employing standards with values accurately measured.

Effects of postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy on lipoproteins including lipoprotein(a) and LDL subfractions

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects on lipoprotein risk markers for CHD of oestradiol given alone and in combination with the androgenic progestogen, norethisterone. Eighty postmenopausal women were randomly allocated to receive oestradiol (2 mg/day) alone or with continuous norethisterone (1 mg/day). Serum lipoprotein levels, including lipoprotein(a), were monitored during 12 months on treatment in all the women, and in a sub-set of 32 patients cholesterol was measured in the two major density subfractions of LDL. Oestradiol caused a transient rise in triglycerides, a small decrease in LDL cholesterol (significant only at 3 and 6 months, P < 0.05) and a consistent significant increase in HDL cholesterol (16%, P < 0.01). There was a downward trend in lipoprotein(a) levels which did not achieve statistical significance. The combined preparation caused significant, sustained decreases in triglycerides (31%, P < 0.01), total cholesterol (15%, P < 0.001), VLDL (42%, P < 0.01), LDL (9%, P < 0.05) and HDL (11%, P < 0.001). Lipoprotein(a) was also reduced (39%, P < 0.05). In the sub-set of patients in which LDL subfractions were measured, the reduction in LDL induced by oestradiol monotherapy was significant only at the 3-month visit (6%, P < 0.05). This was due to a decrease in the 'light' (1.025 < d < 1.044 g/ml) subfraction (10%, P < 0.05) and resulted in an apparent shift in subfraction distribution towards the 'heavy' (1.044 < d < 1.060 g/ml) subfraction, although there was no absolute increase in the latter. None of these changes was statistically significant at 12 months. Oestradiol/norethisterone caused sustained decreases in both 'light' (15%, P < 0.05) and 'heavy' (29%, P < 0.05) subfractions, with no significant change in the relative amounts. The changes in 'light' and 'heavy' LDL in this group were highly correlated with changes in triglyceride levels (r = -0.57, P < 0.05 and r = 0.82, P < 0.01 respectively). Therefore, at the end of 1 year's treatment with unopposed oestradiol the only statistically significant change was an increase in HDL cholesterol. Addition of norethisterone to the preparation reversed this potentially beneficial change, but favourably influenced triglycerides, VLDL, LDL subfraction profile and lipoprotein(a), which may counteract the adverse effect on HDL.

Lack of increased coronary atherosclerotic risk due to elevated lipoprotein(a) in women > or = 55 years of age

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have indicated that there is an association between lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and coronary artery disease (CAD) in middle-aged men; however, few studies have addressed this issue in women or the elderly.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Serum Lp(a) concentrations were determined in 354 women and 706 men with or without angiographically defined CAD (one or more coronary arteries with narrowing of > or = 75%). The age-specific impact of elevated Lp(a) (> or = 30 mg/dL) on CAD was examined in each sex. In the younger age group (< 55 years old), elevated Lp(a) was independently associated with CAD in both sexes (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: women, 6.90, P < .01; men, 2.63, P < .05). The age-specific ORs declined with age, and elevated Lp(a) no longer conferred an increased CAD risk in either elderly men or women > or = 65 years old. In the age group of 55 to 64 years, elevated Lp(a) was positively associated with CAD for men (adjusted OR: 2.45, P < .05) but not for women (adjusted OR: 0.56, P = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

For both sexes, elevated Lp(a) appears to be an independent risk factor for premature CAD and the importance of Lp(a) appears to decrease with age. However, for women, the risk estimate of Lp(a) began to decline at an age approximately 10 years younger than for men. These data suggest that not only age- but also sex-specific factors such as menstrual status may interact with the association between Lp(a) and CAD.

Effects of anticoagulants on lipoprotein(a) measurements with four commercial assays

Lipoprotein(a) levels in plasma are considered an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis at different sites. Although Lp(a) measurements have recently gained interest in clinical laboratories, several problems are still unresolved. A potential source of pre-analytical variability lies in the treatment of the specimens, since it has been reported that values of several lipid quantities are lower when measured in plasma instead of serum. Lp(a) was measured in serum and in EDTA-treated, heparinised and citrated plasma from 15 healthy volunteers. Four analytical methods were used: two enzyme linked immunosorbent assays [ELISA] based on a polyclonal anti-apolipoprotein(a) antibody and a polyclonal anti-apolipoprotein B antibody, respectively; and two immunonephelo-metric assays [INA] based on a N antiserum to Lp(a) and on three monoclonal antibodies adsorbed on latex particles, respectively. Our measured Lp(a) values in plasma were lower than those found in serum, in particular for EDTA-treated (anti-apolipoprotein(a) ELISA: p < 0.01, anti-apolipoprotein B ELISA: p < 0.001 and Latex enhanced INA: p < 0.001) and citrated plasma (anti-apolipoprotein(a) ELISA: p < 0.05, anti-apolipoprotein B ELISA: p < 0.001 and INA: p < 0.001). Lp(a) values measured in heparinised plasma were also lower than those found in serum, but the difference was not statistically significant.

Effects of 1 year of growth hormone therapy on serum lipoprotein levels in growth hormone-deficient adults. Influence of gender and Apo(a) and ApoE phenotypes

We investigated the influence of gender and apoE and apo(a) phenotypes as well as the effect of the metabolic effects of growth hormone (GH) on the effect of GH therapy on serum lipoprotein concentrations in GH-deficient (GHD) adults. Forty-four consecutive patients, 30 men and 14 women aged 46.5 (range, 19 to 76) years with GHD due mainly to pituitary tumors, were treated with recombinant human GH for 12 months. Serum concentrations of lipoproteins, insulin, thyroxine, and insulin-like growth factor-I were determined, body composition was assessed by bioelectrical impedance, and apo(a) and apoE phenotypes were analyzed. Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentrations in the GHD subjects were compared with a gender- and apo(a) phenotype-matched control group. After 12 months of GH treatment, the total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and apoB concentrations decreased, the HDL cholesterol and apoE concentrations increased, and the apoA-I and triglyceride concentrations were unchanged. Before treatment, the Lp(a) concentration was similar to that in the control group. However, after 12 months of treatment, the Lp(a) concentration had increased by 44% and 101% above baseline and the control group, respectively. Men and women responded differently to GH, with a more marked increase in Lp(a) concentration and fat-free mass and a more pronounced decrease in body-fat mass in men. Apo(a) phenotypes had no major influence on the effect of GH therapy. The only significant difference between apoE phenotypes was a higher baseline Lp(a) concentration among apoE4 heterozygotes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Lipoprotein (a)

Lipoprotein (a) is similar to low-density lipoprotein but is unique in having an additional apolipoprotein called apolipoprotein (a) (apo(a)) covalently linked to it. apo(a), which is a member of the plasminogen gene superfamily, has a protease domain which cannot be activated to cause fibrinolysis. Its sequence of kringles is much longer than that of plasminogen and there is remarkable genetic variation in its length. The consequent inherited differences in apo(a) molecular mass are largely responsible for the wide range of serum Lp(a) concentrations in different individuals with low levels predominating in Europid populations. Physiologically Lp(a) may participate in haemocoagulation or in wound-healing. Epidemiological evidence that it is a risk factor for atherosclerosis, particularly in populations with high serum LDL levels, has led to research to uncover its role in atherogenesis and thrombosis. Diseases such as renal disease, and probably atherogenesis and thrombosis. Diseases such as renal disease, and probably atherosclerosis itself, are associated with an increase in Lp(a) above its genetically determined level and it remains a subject of speculation as to whether such increases are as closely involved in atherothrombosis as are spontaneously high levels resulting from low-molecular-mass apo(a) variants.

Lipoprotein (a) is increased in acute coronary syndromes (unstable angina pectoris and myocardial infarction), but it is not predictive of the severity of coronary lesions

Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] concentrations were determined in 365 patients undergoing coronary angiography for stable angina (n = 159), unstable angina (n = 99), recent myocardial infarction (n = 45), and nonischemic heart disease (cardiomyopathy or valvular disease, n = 62, non-IHD). Mean +/- SD and median Lp(a) concentrations in stable angina (29.9 +/- 29.2;22 mg/dl) did not differ from those in non-IHD (26.9 +/- 26.3; 17), but were significantly lower than in patients with unstable angina (52.7 +/- 36.6; 58) and myocardial infarction (44.8 +/- 36.4; 34) (p < 0.01). Coronary angiography revealed that 261 patients, including 4 patients in the non-IHD group, had significant (> or = 50%) coronary lesions. Lp(a) was higher in patients with (41 +/- 35; 32) than in those without (28 +/- 27; 19) angiographic evidence of significant coronary stenosis (p < 0.05) and showed a weak univariate correlation with the angiographic index (Total Score) of the severity of the disease (r = 0.106;p < 0.05). However, in the subgroup of 303 patients with stable/unstable angina or myocardial infarction, Lp(a) was predictive neither of angiographic presence nor of severity of coronary disease. Patients were then ranked according to the Total Score values. Among patients with comparable angiographic severity of coronary artery disease, Lp(a) appeared to be remarkably higher in patients with acute ischemic syndromes (unstable angina, myocardial infarction) than in patients with stable angina. In conclusion, Lp(a) was roughly twice as high in acute (unstable angina, myocardial infarction) than in chronic (stable angina) ischemic syndromes, but there was no difference between chronic stable angina and non-IHD.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Apo(a) phenotypes and Lp(a) concentrations in offspring of men with and without myocardial infarction. The EARS Study. European Atherosclerosis Research Study

In the European Atherosclerosis Research Study, genetic and environmental markers of risk of premature coronary heart disease were compared in offspring of men with and without myocardial infarction before the age of 55 years. Cases were 682 students with a paternal history of myocardial infarction, and control subjects were 1312 students without such a history. The students were enrolled in 14 universities in five European regions (Finland, Great Britain, and northern, middle, and southern Europe). Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentrations were skewed towards lower concentrations in both cases (median, 7.3 mg/dL; 95% confidence interval, 6.3 to 8.1 mg/dL) and control subjects (median, 6.6 mg/dL; 95% confidence interval, 6.1 to 7.2 mg/dL) (P = .37). Significantly more northern European male cases than control subjects had Lp(a) levels exceeding 30 mg/dL (P = .040), but this did not pertain to females (P = .29), and overall, there was no difference between cases (16.5%) and control subjects (15.5%) in the frequency of Lp(a) concentrations above 30 mg/dL (P = .63). As expected, there was a significant (P < .01) inverse relationship between apo(a) molecular size and Lp(a) concentration. In Great Britain there was a significant difference in phenotype distribution between cases and control subjects (P = .035), due mainly to a high frequency of the apo(a) S2 isoform in cases. A similar but statistically insignificant tendency was seen in northern Europeans. In the three other regions, however, the distribution of apo(a) phenotypes among cases and controls was similar, and in the study population overall, the distribution of apo(a) phenotypes did not differ significantly (P = .74) between cases and control subjects.

Lipoprotein(a): levels in a Swedish population in relation to other lipid parameters and in comparison with a male Sri Lankan population

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate differences in Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] concentrations between a Swedish and Sri Lankan population.

METHODS

The distribution of Lp(a) and its relation to other lipid parameters, measured with an automated turbidimetric method, in 4646 Swedes (1944 females and 2702 males) undergoing health screening and 757 randomly selected Sri Lankan males (667 non-CHD and 80 CHD subjects) was evaluated.

RESULTS

The distribution was highly skewed towards low values in both the Swedish population and the Sri Lankan male population. The Swedish population had a median of 0.16 g/L (reported as total mass) whereas the Sri Lankan population median of 0.06 g/L was much lower. For the Swedes, there was a small significant difference of 0.03 g/L between the sexes (F < M; p < 0.001) and Lp(a) was significantly higher in subjects > 50 years of age in both sexes (p < 0.002(F); p < 0.02(M)). 29% had Lp(a) values > 0.30 g/L. In the Sri Lankan males population Lp(a) was also significantly higher in subjects > 50 years of age (p < 0.009) but only 7% had an Lp(a) concentration of > 0.30 g/L. In the CHD subgroup, though not significant, subjects > 50 years of age had a lower Lp(a) concentration, indicating that Lp(a) may be a more significant risk factor in younger subjects. Both the Swedish female and male hypercholesterolemic subgroups had significantly higher Lp(a) concentrations than normolipemic subgroups and the male hypertriglyceridemic subgroups significantly lower Lp(a) concentrations than normolipemic. Great differences in Lp(a) levels are thus found between the two populations. The differences are similar in normolipemic subjects and probably they reflect mainly genetic differences. Lipid/lipoprotein concentrations were also found to differ. It is being investigated if this reflects differences in CHD prevalence.

CONCLUSION

Our data support the importance of including Lp(a) measurements when assessing the risk profile for premature development of CHD in the individual patient.

Elevated serum lipoprotein(a) is a risk factor for clinical recurrence after coronary balloon angioplasty

BACKGROUND

Elevated lipoprotein (Lp) (a) concentrations are associated with coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction. Lp(a) is structurally related to proteins involved in lipid transport, fibrinolysis, coagulation, and cellular mitogenesis and is known to have important physiological interactions with the coagulation and fibrinolytic systems. Because these processes may be important to arterial healing after balloon injury, we hypothesized that elevated Lp(a) concentrations may be associated with recurrence of symptoms and restenosis after balloon angioplasty.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We assessed 240 consecutive patients undergoing coronary balloon angioplasty with measurements of Lp(a), total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein A-I, and apolipoprotein B-100 concentrations from fresh specimens. Patients were evaluated 4 to 6 months after angioplasty for clinical recurrence by repeat angiography if angina had returned or by maximal exercise treadmill testing with thallium imaging if patients remained asymptomatic. Ninety-seven patients (40%) had clinical recurrence; 143 (60%) did not. Patients with recurrence had significantly greater Lp(a) concentrations compared with those without (median, 29 versus 14; P < .0001). Each patient quintile stratified by increasing Lp(a) concentrations had incrementally greater recurrence rates ranging from 27% (lowest quintile) to 60% (highest quintile). By multivariate logistic regression analysis, Lp(a) concentration was the only predictor of recurrence (P < .0001). A subset of frozen, stored serum samples showed a significant decrease in measured Lp(a) concentration over time (mean, 605 days; P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

An elevated Lp(a) concentration was a risk factor for clinical recurrence after percutaneous transluminal balloon coronary angioplasty. Other lipid levels or clinical characteristics were not significantly associated with recurrence. When serum was frozen and stored for a prolonged period, Lp(a) concentration decreased over time.

Effects of tibolone on lipoprotein(a) and HDL subfractions

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of tibolone, a synthetic steroid used to alleviate climacteric symptoms and prevent osteoporosis, on lipoprotein metabolism, with particular reference to lipoprotein(a) levels and HDL subfraction profiles.

DESIGN

Thirty nine postmenopausal women were treated with tibolone (Livial) 2.5 mg/day for 6 months and fasting serum lipoprotein levels were estimated at 0, 2, 4 and 6 months.

RESULTS

Lipoprotein(a) levels were reduced significantly over the 6 months from a median level of 245 (range < 60-780) mg/l to 152 (range < 60-530) mg/l, a reduction of 39% in the median level. A decrease was observed in approximately two thirds of the women. Reductions were noted in all 6 subjects whose pretreatment levels were high, although concentrations remained at a level associated with increased risk in all but one. There were significant decreases in triglycerides and VLDL cholesterol and no significant change in LDL cholesterol. There was a significant reduction of 18% in HDL cholesterol and a 26% reduction in the HDL2-HDL3 ratio.

CONCLUSION

The reduction in lipoprotein(a) levels may have a beneficial effect on cardiovascular risk, which could go some way towards balancing the potentially adverse effect on the cardiovascular system caused by the reduction in HDL cholesterol.

A prospective investigation of elevated lipoprotein (a) detected by electrophoresis and cardiovascular disease in women. The Framingham Heart Study

BACKGROUND

Sinking prebeta lipoprotein is a putative marker for elevated levels of lipoprotein (a). Although prospective data suggest that increased plasma lipoprotein (a) is an independent risk factor for coronary heart disease in men, no prospective studies are available in women.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From 1968 through 1975, sinking prebeta lipoprotein was determined by paper electrophoresis in 3103 women Framingham Heart Study participants who were free of prevalent cardiovascular disease. A sinking prebeta lipoprotein band was detectable in 434 of the women (14%) studied. The median follow-up interval was approximately 12 years. Incident cardiovascular disease was associated with band presence using a proportional hazards model that included age, smoking, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, glucose intolerance, low- and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and ECG left ventricular hypertrophy. Multivariable adjusted relative risk estimates (with 95% confidence intervals) for outcomes in the band present versus absent groups were as follows: myocardial infarction (82 events), 2.37 (1.48 to 3.81); intermittent claudication (62 events), 1.94 (1.07 to 3.50); cerebrovascular disease (83 events), 1.88 (1.12 to 3.15); total coronary heart disease (174 events), 1.61 (1.13 to 2.29); and total cardiovascular disease (305 events), 1.44 (1.09 to 1.91). A subset analysis indicated that band presence was 50.9% sensitive and 95.4% specific for detecting plasma lipoprotein (a) levels of > 30 mg/dL, the threshold value linked to increased cardiovascular disease risk in men.

CONCLUSIONS

Sinking prebeta lipoprotein was a valid surrogate for elevated lipoprotein (a) levels in Framingham Heart Study women. Band presence and, equivalently, elevated plasma lipoprotein (a), was a strong, independent predictor of myocardial infarction, intermittent claudication, and cerebrovascular disease. Confirmation of these findings in other longitudinal studies of women is needed.

Coronary artery disease is associated with increased lipoprotein(a) concentrations independent of the size of circulating apolipoprotein(a) isoforms

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentration and apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] isoforms (identified by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis [SDS-PAGE] and Western blotting) were determined in a group of 508 asymptomatic Caucasian members of the community and in 318 Caucasian patients with angiographically defined coronary artery disease (CAD). Conventional risk factors for CAD were also measured. Lp(a) concentration was almost twice as high in subjects with CAD (geometric mean, 152 mg/L [geometric SD, 10 to 1398 mg/L]) as in asymptomatic control subjects (geometric mean, 84 mg/L [geometric SD, 21 to 334 mg/L]). Asymptomatic women had higher concentrations of Lp(a) than asymptomatic men. Patients with CAD were older and were more likely to have smoked and to have a first-degree relative with premature CAD (< 55 years of age), and a higher proportion were male. Patients with CAD had higher concentrations of Lp(a) independently of the number of isoform bands expressed. When apo(a) isoforms were allocated to 1 of 10 classes on the basis of their molecular size (Rf versus apoB in SDS-PAGE), patients with CAD did not express an excess of low-molecular-mass (higher concentration) isoforms but did express a higher proportion of double-band phenotypes with fewer "null" phenotypes. The relationship between the two isoform bands in a double-band phenotype was the same in both populations. Isoform mobility was defined as a continuous variable equal to the mobility of a single isoform band (single-band phenotypes) or the mean of the two isoforms in a double-band phenotype. Two variables, isoform mobility and the number of isoform bands expressed, were used to summarize the large range of isoform patterns (at least 45) that could be identified. Isoform mobility, the number of isoform bands expressed, and the presence of CAD were the three most important independent predictors of Lp(a) concentration (descending order). Only sex and LDL cholesterol were additional independent predictors of Lp(a) concentration in step-wise regression models including a wide range of demographic factors and lipid and glycemic risk factors. We conclude that Lp(a) concentration is associated with CAD independently of the isoform pattern expressed. The apo(a) gene locus exerts a strong control over circulating Lp(a) concentration, and a better understanding of the control of expression of the apo(a) gene will be essential to understand the relationship between Lp(a) and CAD.

Lysine-binding species of lipoprotein(a) in coronary artery disease

Elevated levels of plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] have frequently been associated with coronary artery disease (CAD). Recently Lp(a) was fractionated into two species with different affinities for Lysine-Sepharose. The influence of lysine-binding heterogeneity of Lp(a) on its cardiovascular pathogenicity has not previously been studied. The authors have determined plasma levels of total Lp(a), its lysine-binding [lys+] and unretained [lys-] species in 67 male CAD patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. Forty-three patients have severe CAD (two- or three-vessel disease) and 24 patients have less pronounced CAD (one-vessel disease or less than 50% narrowing of coronary vessels). All patients were ranked in order of their Lp(a) levels and then grouped into quartiles. The prevalence of severe CAD was significantly higher in the upper Lp(a) quartile as compared with the other three quartiles (odds ratio 10-5; chi-square 11.2; P = 0.0008). Similar results were obtained when the same analysis was carried out for [lys+] and [lys-] species of Lp(a) (odds ratio 11.52 and 3.3, respectively; chi-square 12.3 and 4.34, respectively; P = 0.0004 and 0.037, respectively). Thus, measurement of either species of Lp(a) does not provide any additional improvement in the prediction of CAD as compared to the estimation of total Lp(a) levels.

Fully mechanized latex immunoassay for serum lipoprotein(a)

We have developed a fully automated system to quantify lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) in human serum, based on the latex-enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay by application of the Immuno Chemistry Analyzer 501X. This assay was carried out with undiluted serum and was able to detect at Lp(a) levels higher than 4.0 mg/l. When judged to be out of range of the calibration (> 600 mg/l), the sample was automatically re-tested after automatic 10-fold dilution. Within-run C.V.s ranged from 1.9 to 2.1% and between-run C.V.s from 2.7 to 3.9%. Results by the present method were in good agreement with those by the in-house ELISA (r = 0.978) and the commercial ELISA (r = 0.990). The distribution of Lp(a) levels in sera from 508 healthy donors was highly skewed; the mean and median were 158 mg/l and 105 mg/l, respectively.

Lipoprotein(A): physiologic function, association with atherosclerosis, and effects of lipid-lowering drug therapy

OBJECTIVE

To review the structure and physiologic function of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], review the association of Lp(a) with the development of atherosclerosis, and to critically evaluate the current literature regarding the effects of lipid-lowering drug therapy on Lp(a) serum concentrations.

DATA SOURCES

English language clinical and animal studies, abstracts, and review articles pertaining to Lp(a).

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Relevant human and animal studies examining Lp(a)'s role in atherosclerosis and the effect of drug therapy on Lp(a) serum concentrations.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Possible physiologic functions and potential atherogenic mechanisms of Lp(a) are discussed. Evidence supporting the association of Lp(a) with atherosclerosis is presented. Studies evaluating the effects of lipid-lowering drug therapy on Lp(a) concentrations are reviewed and critiqued.

CONCLUSIONS

Lp(a) concentrations are correlated with the risk of atherosclerotic vascular disease (AVD) in both animals models and human studies. Drug therapies that have produced a consistent reduction in Lp(a) concentration include niacin alone or in combination with a bile acid sequestrant or neomycin. However, additional, larger studies are needed to evaluate the ability of drug therapies to specifically reduce elevated Lp(a) concentrations. Preliminary information suggests that reduction in Lp(a) concentrations may be associated with atherosclerotic plaque regression. Although drugs are available to lower Lp(a), one cannot conclude that lowering of Lp(a) is warranted until clinical trials demonstrating beneficial effects have been published.