1
|
Al Asfoor D, Tabche C, Al-Zadjali M, Mataria A, Saikat S, Rawaf S. Concept analysis of health system resilience. Health Res Policy Syst 2024; 22:43. [PMID: 38576011 PMCID: PMC10996206 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-024-01114-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are several definitions of resilience in health systems, many of which share some characteristics, but no agreed-upon framework is universally accepted. Here, we review the concept of resilience, identifying its definitions, attributes, antecedents and consequences, and present the findings of a concept analysis of health system resilience. METHODS We follow Schwarz-Barcott and Kim's hybrid model, which consists of three phases: theoretical, fieldwork and final analysis. We identified the concept definitions, attributes, antecedents and consequences of health system resilience and constructed an evidence-informed framework on the basis of the findings of this review. We searched PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL Complete, EBSCOhost-Academic Search and Premier databases and downloaded identified titles and abstracts on Covidence. We screened 3357 titles and removed duplicate and ineligible records; two reviewers then screened each title, and disagreements were resolved by discussion with the third reviewer. From the 130 eligible manuscripts, we identified the definitions, attributes, antecedents and consequences using a pre-defined data extraction form. RESULTS Resilience antecedents are decentralization, available funds, investments and resources, staff environment and motivation, integration and networking and finally, diversification of staff. The attributes are the availability of resources and funds, adaptive capacity, transformative capacity, learning and advocacy and progressive leadership. The consequences of health system resilience are improved health system performance, a balanced governance structure, improved expenditure and financial management of health and maintenance of health services that support universal health coverage (UHC) throughout crises. CONCLUSION A resilient health system maintains quality healthcare through times of crisis. During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic, several seemingly robust health systems were strained under the increased demand, and services were disrupted. As such, elements of resilience should be integrated into the functions of a health system to ensure standardized and consistent service quality and delivery. We offer a systematic, evidence-informed method for identifying the attributes of health system resilience, intending to eventually be used to develop a measuring tool to evaluate a country's health system resilience performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Celine Tabche
- WHOCC Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Salman Rawaf
- WHOCC Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Truppa C, Yaacoub S, Valente M, Celentano G, Ragazzoni L, Saulnier D. Health systems resilience in fragile and conflict-affected settings: a systematic scoping review. Confl Health 2024; 18:2. [PMID: 38172918 PMCID: PMC10763433 DOI: 10.1186/s13031-023-00560-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health systems resilience (HSR) research is a rapidly expanding field, in which key concepts are discussed and theoretical frameworks are emerging with vibrant debate. Fragile and conflict-affected settings (FCAS) are contexts exposed to compounding stressors, for which resilience is an important characteristic. However, only limited evidence has been generated in such settings. We conducted a scoping review to: (a) identify the conceptual frameworks of HSR used in the analysis of shocks and stressors in FCAS; (b) describe the representation of different actors involved in health care governance and service provision in these settings; and (c) identify health systems operations as they relate to absorption, adaptation, and transformation in FCAS. METHODS We used standard, extensive search methods. The search captured studies published between 2006 and January 2022. We included all peer reviewed and grey literature that adopted a HSR lens in the analysis of health responses to crises. Thematic analysis using both inductive and deductive approaches was conducted, adopting frameworks related to resilience characteristics identified by Kruk et al., and the resilience capacities described by Blanchet et al. RESULTS: Thirty-seven studies met our inclusion criteria. The governance-centred, capacity-oriented framework for HSR emerged as the most frequently used lens of analysis to describe the health responses to conflict and chronic violence specifically. Most studies focused on public health systems' resilience analysis, while the private health sector is only examined in complementarity with the former. Communities are minimally represented, despite their widely acknowledged role in supporting HSR. The documentation of operations enacting HSR in FCAS is focused on absorption and adaptation, while transformation is seldom described. Absorptive, adaptive, and transformative interventions are described across seven different domains: safety and security, society, health system governance, stocks and supplies, built environment, health care workforce, and health care services. CONCLUSIONS Our review findings suggest that the governance-centred framework can be useful to better understand HSR in FCAS. Future HSR research should document adaptive and transformative strategies that advance HSR, particularly in relation to actions intended to promote the safety and security of health systems, the built environment for health, and the adoption of a social justice lens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Truppa
- CRIMEDIM - Center for Research and Training in Disaster Medicine, Humanitarian Aid and Global Health, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy.
- International Committee of the Red Cross, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - Sally Yaacoub
- Center for Research in Epidemiology and StatisticS (CRESS), Université Paris Cité and Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Inserm, INRAE, 75004, Paris, France
| | - Martina Valente
- CRIMEDIM - Center for Research and Training in Disaster Medicine, Humanitarian Aid and Global Health, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
- Department for Sustainable Development and Ecological Transition, Università del Piemonte Orientale, 13100, Vercelli, Italy
| | - Giulia Celentano
- ETH Zürich, Institut Für Bau- Und Infrastrukturmanagement, Chair of Sustainable Construction, Zurich, Schweiz
| | - Luca Ragazzoni
- CRIMEDIM - Center for Research and Training in Disaster Medicine, Humanitarian Aid and Global Health, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
- Department for Sustainable Development and Ecological Transition, Università del Piemonte Orientale, 13100, Vercelli, Italy
| | - Dell Saulnier
- Division of Social Medicine and Global Health/Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Geneva Centre of Humanitarian Studies, Université de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Costa-Font J, Vilaplana-Prieto C. Trusting the Health System and COVID 19 Restriction Compliance. ECONOMICS AND HUMAN BIOLOGY 2023; 49:101235. [PMID: 36965359 PMCID: PMC9946735 DOI: 10.1016/j.ehb.2023.101235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Revised: 02/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
We examine the extent to which exposure to higher relative COVID-19 mortality (RM), influences health system trust (HST), and whether changes in HST explain the perceived ease of compliance with pandemic restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Drawing on evidence from two representative surveys covering all regions of 28 European countries before and after the first COVID-19 wave, and using a difference in differences strategy together with Coarsened Exact Matching (CEM), we document that living in a region with higher RM during the first wave of the pandemic increased HST. However, the positive effect of RM on HST is driven by individuals over 45 years of age, and the opposite effect is found among younger cohorts. Furthemore, we find that a higher HST reduces the costs of complying with COVID-19 restrictions, but only so long as excess mortality does not exceed the average by more than 20%, at which point the ease of complying with COVID-19 restrictions significantly declines, offsetting the positive effect of trust in the healthcare system. Our interpretation of these estimates is that a higher RM is interpreted as a risk signal among those over 45, and as a signal of health-care system failure among younger age individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joan Costa-Font
- Department of Health Policy London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), CESIfo & IZA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in Mozambique: The role of institutional trust. Vaccine 2023; 41:2846-2852. [PMID: 37003911 PMCID: PMC10040345 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.03.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Revised: 03/12/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
Background Vaccination plays an imperative role in protecting public health and preventing avoidable mortality. Yet, the reasons for vaccine hesitancy in African countries are not well understood. This study investigates the factors associated with the acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine in Mozambique, with a focus on the role of institutional trust. Methods The data came from the three waves of the COVID-19 Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices (KAP) survey which followed a cohort of 1,371 adults in Mozambique over six months (N=3,809). We examined vaccine acceptance based on three measurements: willingness to take vaccine, perceived vaccine efficacy, and perceived vaccine safety. We conducted multilevel regression analysis to investigate the trajectories of, and the association between institutional trust and vaccine acceptance. Results One third of the survey participants (37%) would definitely take the vaccine. Meanwhile, 31% believed the vaccine would prevent the COVID-19 infection, and 27% believed the vaccine would be safe. There was a significant decrease in COVID-19 vaccine acceptance between waves 1 and 3 of the survey. Institutional trust was consistently and strongly correlated with different measures of vaccine acceptance. There was a greater decline in vaccine acceptance in people with lower institutional trust. The positive correlation between institutional trust and vaccine acceptance was stronger in younger than older adults. Vaccine acceptance also varied by gender and marital status. Conclusions Vaccine acceptance can be volatile even over short periods of time. Institutional trust is a central driver of vaccine acceptance and contributes to the resilience of the health system. Our study highlights the importance of health communication and building a trustful relationship between the general public and the institutions in the context of a global pandemic.
Collapse
|
5
|
Nabi MNU, Zohora FT, Misbauddin S. Social media links with social capital to trust in healthcare facilities: empirical evidence from Bangladesh. LIBRARY HI TECH 2023. [DOI: 10.1108/lht-09-2022-0443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/26/2023]
Abstract
PurposeThe paper aims to investigate the most influential social media information sources to trust in healthcare facilities. The article shows a valuable point of reference for understanding how social media becomes the casting of social capital.Design/methodology/approachThis paper has taken 660 responses from the people who used social media for healthcare information in the mid of 2020 during the pandemic. The people were approached through different social media groups. The paper conducted structural equation modelling (SEM). The result has shown that with the instigating power of social capital where people put trust in social media information during pandemics.FindingsThe findings demonstrated that personal sources, government organisations and healthcare professionals are the most influential sources of social media. In order to effectively ensure the encompassing provision of COVID-19 health services, this article argues that social capital considerations establish trust between healthcare facilities seeking community to healthcare information providers.Research limitations/implicationsThis research has signified that social cohesion and concern for community welfare instigated people to engage in social media communication. The inherent social capital belongings influence people to trust the sources of health information from selected sources that appear on social media.Practical implicationsHealthcare policymakers may utilise this intense feeling of belongingness and cohesion of social capital and use social media platforms to spread health-related information.Originality/valueThe study shows social capital has the strength to entice people into healthcare-seeking behaviour. In this era, social capital is reformulated to digital social capital through social media and strongly affects people's trust.
Collapse
|
6
|
Brown GW, Bridge G, Martini J, Um J, Williams OD, Choupe LBT, Rhodes N, Ho ZJM, Chungong S, Kandel N. The role of health systems for health security: a scoping review revealing the need for improved conceptual and practical linkages. Global Health 2022; 18:51. [PMID: 35570269 PMCID: PMC9107590 DOI: 10.1186/s12992-022-00840-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Practical links between health systems and health security are historically prevalent, but the conceptual links between these fields remain under explored, with little on health system strengthening. The need to address this gap gains relevance in light of the COVID-19 pandemic as it demonstrated a crucial relationship between health system capacities and effective health security response. Acknowledging the importance of developing stronger and more resilient health systems globally for health emergency preparedness, the WHO developed a Health Systems for Health Security framework that aims to promote a common understanding of what health systems for health security entails whilst identifying key capacities required. METHODS/ RESULTS To further explore and analyse the conceptual and practical links between health systems and health security within the peer reviewed literature, a rapid scoping review was carried out to provide an overview of the type, extent and quantity of research available. Studies were included if they had been peer-reviewed and were published in English (seven databases 2000 to 2020). 343 articles were identified, of those 204 discussed health systems and health security (high and medium relevance), 101 discussed just health systems and 47 discussed only health security (low relevance). Within the high and medium relevance articles, several concepts emerged, including the prioritization of health security over health systems, the tendency to treat health security as exceptionalism focusing on acute health emergencies, and a conceptualisation of security as 'state security' not 'human security' or population health. CONCLUSION Examples of literature exploring links between health systems and health security are provided. We also present recommendations for further research, offering several investments and/or programmes that could reliably lead to maximal gains from both a health system and a health security perspective, and why these should be explored further. This paper could help researchers and funders when deciding upon the scope, nature and design of future research in this area. Additionally, the paper legitimises the necessity of the Health Systems for Health Security framework, with the findings of this paper providing useful insights and evidentiary examples for effective implementation of the framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Garrett Wallace Brown
- grid.9909.90000 0004 1936 8403School of Politics and International Studies (POLIS), University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT UK
| | - Gemma Bridge
- grid.4868.20000 0001 2171 1133Institute of Population Health Sciences, Centre for Clinical Trials & Methodology, Queen Mary University London, London, E1 2AD UK
| | - Jessica Martini
- grid.4989.c0000 0001 2348 0746School of Public Health, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jimyong Um
- grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XDepartment of Government and International Relations, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Owain D. Williams
- grid.9909.90000 0004 1936 8403School of Politics and International Studies (POLIS), University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT UK
| | | | - Natalie Rhodes
- grid.9909.90000 0004 1936 8403School of Politics and International Studies (POLIS), University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT UK
| | - Zheng Jie Marc Ho
- grid.3575.40000000121633745World Health Organisation, WHO Health Emergencies Program, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Stella Chungong
- grid.3575.40000000121633745World Health Organisation, WHO Health Emergencies Program, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Nirmal Kandel
- grid.3575.40000000121633745World Health Organisation, WHO Health Emergencies Program, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Saulnier DD, Thol D, Por I, Hanson C, von Schreeb J, Alvesson HM. 'We have a plan for that': a qualitative study of health system resilience through the perspective of health workers managing antenatal and childbirth services during floods in Cambodia. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e054145. [PMID: 34980624 PMCID: PMC8724583 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Health system resilience can increase a system's ability to deal with shocks like floods. Studying health systems that currently exhibit the capacity for resilience when shocked could enhance our understanding about what generates and influences resilience. This study aimed to generate empirical knowledge on health system resilience by exploring how public antenatal and childbirth health services in Cambodia have absorbed, adapted or transformed in response to seasonal and occasional floods. DESIGN A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis and informed by the Dimensions of Resilience Governance framework. SETTING Public sector healthcare facilities and health departments in two districts exposed to flooding. PARTICIPANTS Twenty-three public sector health professionals with experience providing or managing antenatal and birth services during recent flooding. RESULTS The theme 'Collaboration across the system creates adaptability in the response' reflects how collaboration and social relationships among providers, staff and the community have delineated boundaries for actions and decisions for services during floods. Floods were perceived as having a modest impact on health services. Knowing the boundaries on decision-making and having preparation and response plans let staff prepare and respond in a flexible yet stable way. The theme was derived from ideas of (1) seasonal floods as a minor strain on the system compared with persistent, system-wide organisational stresses the system already experiences, (2) the ability of the health services to adjust and adapt flood plans, (3) a shared purpose and working process during floods, (4) engagement at the local level to fulfil a professional duty to the community, and (5) creating relationships between health system levels and the community to enable flood response. CONCLUSION The capacity to absorb and adapt to floods was seen among the public sector services. Strategies that enhance stability and flexibility may foster the capacity for health system resilience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dell D Saulnier
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Dawin Thol
- National Institute of Public Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
| | - Ir Por
- National Institute of Public Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
| | - Claudia Hanson
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Johan von Schreeb
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Moucheraud C, Mboya J, Njomo D, Golub G, Gant M, Sudhinaraset M. Trust, Care Avoidance, and Care Experiences among Kenyan Women Who Delivered during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Health Syst Reform 2022; 8:2156043. [PMID: 36534179 PMCID: PMC9995165 DOI: 10.1080/23288604.2022.2156043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2022] [Revised: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
We explore how the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with avoidance of, and challenges with, antenatal, childbirth and postpartum care among women in Kiambu and Nairobi counties, Kenya; and whether this was associated with a report of declined trust in the health system due to the pandemic. Women who delivered between March and November 2020 were invited to participate in a phone survey about their care experiences (n = 1122 respondents). We explored associations between reduced trust and care avoidance, delays and challenges with healthcare seeking, using logistic regression models adjusted for women's characteristics. Approximately half of respondents said their trust in the health care system had declined due to COVID-19 (52.7%, n = 591). Declined trust was associated with higher likelihood of reporting barriers accessing antenatal care (aOR 1.59 [95% CI 1.24, 2.05]), avoiding care for oneself (aOR 2.26 [95% CI 1.59, 3.22]) and for one's infant (aOR 1.77 [95% CI 1.11, 2.83]), and of feeling unsafe accessing care (aOR 1.52 [95% CI 1.19, 1.93]). Since March 2020, emergency services, routine care and immunizations were avoided most often. Primary reported reasons for avoiding care and challenges accessing care were financial barriers and problems accessing the facility. Declined trust in the health care system due to COVID-19 may have affected health care-seeking for women and their children in Kenya, which could have important implications for their health and well-being. Programs and policies should consider targeted special "catch-up" strategies that include trust-building messages and actions for women who deliver during emergencies like the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corrina Moucheraud
- Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- UCLA Center for Health Policy Research, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - May Sudhinaraset
- Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Arakelyan S, Jailobaeva K, Dakessian A, Diaconu K, Caperon L, Strang A, Bou-Orm IR, Witter S, Ager A. The role of trust in health-seeking for non-communicable disease services in fragile contexts: A cross-country comparative study. Soc Sci Med 2021; 291:114473. [PMID: 34662762 PMCID: PMC8689406 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Revised: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) disproportionately affect people living in fragile contexts marked by poor governance and health systems struggling to deliver quality services for the benefit of all. This combination can lead to the erosion of trust in the health system, affecting health-seeking behaviours and the ability of individuals to sustain their health. In this cross-country multiple-case study, we analyse the role of trust in health-seeking for NCD services in fragile contexts. Our analysis triangulates multiple data sources, including semi-structured interviews (n = 102) and Group Model Building workshops (n = 8) with individuals affected by NCDs and health providers delivering NCD services. Data were collected in Freetown and Makeni (Sierra Leone), Beirut and Beqaa (Lebanon), and Morazán, Chalatenango and Bajo Lempa (El Salvador) between April 2018 and April 2019. We present a conceptual model depicting key dynamics and feedback loops between contextual factors, institutional, interpersonal and social trust and health-seeking pathways. Our findings signal that firstly, the way health services are delivered and experienced shapes institutional trust in health systems, interpersonal trust in health providers and future health-seeking pathways. Secondly, historical narratives about public institutions and state authorities' responses to contextual fragility drivers impact institutional trust and utilisation of services from public health institutions. Thirdly, social trust mediates health-seeking behaviour through social bonds and links between health systems and individuals affected by NCDs. Given the repeated and sustained utilisation of health services required with these chronic diseases, (re)building and maintaining trust in public health institutions and providers is a crucial task in fragile contexts. This requires interventions at community, district and national levels, with a key focus on promoting links and mutual accountability between health systems and communities affected by NCDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stella Arakelyan
- NIHR Research Unit of Health in Fragility, Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University Edinburgh, Queen Margaret University Way, Edinburgh, EH216UU, UK.
| | - Kanykey Jailobaeva
- NIHR Research Unit of Health in Fragility, Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University Edinburgh, Queen Margaret University Way, Edinburgh, EH216UU, UK
| | - Arek Dakessian
- NIHR Research Unit of Health in Fragility, Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University Edinburgh, Queen Margaret University Way, Edinburgh, EH216UU, UK
| | - Karin Diaconu
- NIHR Research Unit of Health in Fragility, Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University Edinburgh, Queen Margaret University Way, Edinburgh, EH216UU, UK
| | - Lizzie Caperon
- NIHR Research Unit of Health in Fragility, Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University Edinburgh, Queen Margaret University Way, Edinburgh, EH216UU, UK
| | - Alison Strang
- NIHR Research Unit of Health in Fragility, Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University Edinburgh, Queen Margaret University Way, Edinburgh, EH216UU, UK
| | - Ibrahim R Bou-Orm
- NIHR Research Unit of Health in Fragility, Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University Edinburgh, Queen Margaret University Way, Edinburgh, EH216UU, UK
| | - Sophie Witter
- NIHR Research Unit of Health in Fragility, Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University Edinburgh, Queen Margaret University Way, Edinburgh, EH216UU, UK
| | - Alastair Ager
- NIHR Research Unit of Health in Fragility, Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University Edinburgh, Queen Margaret University Way, Edinburgh, EH216UU, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Moucheraud C, Guo H, Macinko J. Trust In Governments And Health Workers Low Globally, Influencing Attitudes Toward Health Information, Vaccines. Health Aff (Millwood) 2021; 40:1215-1224. [PMID: 34339250 DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.02006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Trust, particularly during emergencies, is essential for effective health care delivery and health policy implementation. We used data from the 2018 Wellcome Global Monitor survey (comprising nationally representative samples from 144 countries) to examine levels and correlates of trust in governments and health workers and attitudes toward vaccines. Only one-quarter of respondents globally expressed a lot of trust in their government (trust was more common among people with less schooling, those living in rural areas, those who were financially comfortable, and those who were older), and fewer than half of respondents globally said that they trust doctors and nurses a lot. People's trust in these institutions was correlated with trust in health or medical advice from them, and with more positive attitudes toward vaccines. Vaccine enthusiasm varied substantially across regions, with safety being the most common concern. Policy makers should understand that the public may have varying levels of trust in different institutions and actors. Although much attention is paid to crafting public health messages, it may be equally important, especially during a pandemic, to identify appropriate, trusted messengers to deliver those messages more effectively to different target populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corrina Moucheraud
- Corrina Moucheraud is an associate professor in the Department of Health Policy and Management, Jonathan and Karin Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, in Los Angeles, California
| | - Huiying Guo
- Huiying Guo is a PhD student in the Department of Health Policy and Management, Jonathan and Karin Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles
| | - James Macinko
- James Macinko is a professor in the Departments of Health Policy and Management and Community Health Sciences, Jonathan and Karin Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Biddle L, Wahedi K, Bozorgmehr K. Health system resilience: a literature review of empirical research. Health Policy Plan 2021; 35:1084-1109. [PMID: 32529253 PMCID: PMC7553761 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czaa032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The concept of health system resilience has gained popularity in the global health discourse, featuring in UN policies, academic articles and conferences. While substantial effort has gone into the conceptualization of health system resilience, there has been no review of how the concept has been operationalized in empirical studies. We conducted an empirical review in three databases using systematic methods. Findings were synthesized using descriptive quantitative analysis and by mapping aims, findings, underlying concepts and measurement approaches according to the resilience definition by Blanchet et al. We identified 71 empirical studies on health system resilience from 2008 to 2019, with an increase in literature in recent years (62% of studies published since 2017). Most studies addressed a specific crisis or challenge (82%), most notably infectious disease outbreaks (20%), natural disasters (15%) and climate change (11%). A large proportion of studies focused on service delivery (48%), while other health system building blocks were side-lined. The studies differed in terms of their disciplinary tradition and conceptual background, which was reflected in the variety of concepts and measurement approaches used. Despite extensive theoretical work on the domains which constitute health system resilience, we found that most of the empirical literature only addressed particular aspects related to absorptive and adaptive capacities, with legitimacy of institutions and transformative resilience seldom addressed. Qualitative and mixed methods research captured a broader range of resilience domains than quantitative research. The review shows that the way in which resilience is currently applied in the empirical literature does not match its theoretical foundations. In order to do justice to the complexities of the resilience concept, knowledge from both quantitative and qualitative research traditions should be integrated in a comprehensive assessment framework. Only then will the theoretical ‘resilience idea’ be able to prove its usefulness for the research community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Biddle
- Social Determinants, Equity and Migration Working Group, Department of General Practice & Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Marsilius Arkaden, Turm West, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Katharina Wahedi
- Social Determinants, Equity and Migration Working Group, Department of General Practice & Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Marsilius Arkaden, Turm West, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Kayvan Bozorgmehr
- Social Determinants, Equity and Migration Working Group, Department of General Practice & Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Marsilius Arkaden, Turm West, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,Department of Population Medicine and Health Services Research, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, 33501 Bielefeld, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Joarder T, Khaled MN, Joarder MA. Urban educated group's perceptions of the COVID-19 pandemic management in Bangladesh: a qualitative exploration. F1000Res 2021; 10:170. [PMID: 34557291 PMCID: PMC8444153 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.28333.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Since the emergence of the COVID-19 outbreak, Government of Bangladesh (GoB) has taken various measures to restrict virus transmission and inform the people of the situation. However, the success of such measures largely depends on a positive public perception of the government's ability to act decisively and the transparency of its communication. We explored public perceptions of pandemic management efforts by the Bangladeshi health sector decision-makers in this study. Methods: As this qualitative research was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, data was gathered through seven online mixed-gender focus group discussions involving 50 purposively selected clinicians and non-clinicians. Results: The study participants concurred that, from the outset, decision-makers failed to engage the right kind of experts, which resulted in poor pandemic management that included imposing lockdown in periphery areas without arranging patient transport to the center, declaring certain hospitals as COVID-19 dedicated without preparing the facilities or the staff, and engaging private hospitals in care without allowing them to test the patients for COVID-19 infection. Several participants also commented on ineffective actions on behalf of the GoB, such as imposing home quarantine instead of institutional, corruption, miscommunication, and inadequate private sector regulation. The perception of the people regarding service providers is that they lacked responsiveness in providing treatment, with some doctors misleading the public by sharing misinformation. Service providers, on the other hand, observed that decision-makers failed to provide them with proper training, personal protective equipment, and workplace security, which has resulted in a high number of deaths among medical staff. Conclusions: The Bangladeshi health sector decision-makers should learn from their mistakes to prevent further unnecessary loss of life and long-term economic downturn. They should adopt a science-based response to the COVID-19 pandemic in the short term while striving to develop a more resilient health system in the long run.
Collapse
|
13
|
Joarder T, Khaled MN, Joarder MA. Public perceptions of the COVID-19 pandemic management in Bangladesh: a qualitative exploration. F1000Res 2021; 10:170. [PMID: 34557291 PMCID: PMC8444153 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.28333.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Since the emergence of the COVID-19 outbreak, Government of Bangladesh (GoB) has taken various measures to restrict virus transmission and inform the people of the situation. However, the success of such measures largely depends on a positive public perception of the government's ability to act decisively and the transparency of its communication. We explored public perceptions of pandemic management efforts by the Bangladeshi health sector decision-makers in this study. Methods: As this qualitative research was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, data was gathered through seven online mixed-gender focus group discussions involving 50 purposively selected clinicians and non-clinicians. Results: The study participants concurred that, from the outset, decision-makers failed to engage the right kind of experts, which resulted in poor pandemic management that included imposing lockdown in periphery areas without arranging patient transport to the center, declaring certain hospitals as COVID-19 dedicated without preparing the facilities or the staff, and engaging private hospitals in care without allowing them to test the patients for COVID-19 infection. Several participants also commented on ineffective actions on behalf of the GoB, such as imposing home quarantine instead of institutional, corruption, miscommunication, and inadequate private sector regulation. The perception of the people regarding service providers is that they lacked responsiveness in providing treatment, with some doctors misleading the public by sharing misinformation. Service providers, on the other hand, observed that decision-makers failed to provide them with proper training, personal protective equipment, and workplace security, which has resulted in a high number of deaths among medical staff. Conclusions: The Bangladeshi health sector decision-makers should learn from their mistakes to prevent further unnecessary loss of life and long-term economic downturn. They should adopt a science-based response to the COVID-19 pandemic in the short term while striving to develop a more resilient health system in the long run.
Collapse
|
14
|
Mani A, Estedlal AR, Kamali M, Ghaemi SZ, Zarei L, Shokrpour N, Heydari ST, Lankarani KB. Mental health status during COVID-19 pandemic in Fars Province, Iran: timely measures. BMC Public Health 2020; 20:1866. [PMID: 33287775 PMCID: PMC7719730 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09928-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Accepted: 11/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current corona virus pandemic is acting as a stressor or trauma, which not only threats physical health status, but also threats mental health status and well-being of people. Currently, COVID-19 pandemic is a life-threatening unpredictable condition accompanied with a large number of uncertainties. The present study has mainly aimed to assess mental health and the relevant social factors during this pandemic in Fars province. METHODS This cross-sectional study was performed on 922 participants in Fars province, Iran, using internet-based data collection technique. All the included participants filled out the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28). Moreover, demographic variables and some social factors were evaluated by asking some questions. All the participants were ensured of the confidentiality of the collected data, and willingly completed the questionnaire. RESULTS Among the participants, there were 629 women (68.2%) and 293 men (31.2%). The mean age of the participants was 36.98 ± 11.08 years old. Four hundred twenty-five subjects (46.1%) obtained GHQ-28 scores above the cut-off point, and accordingly, they were suspected of having poor mental health statuses. Women, in comparison to men (OR = 2.034, 95%:1.62-3.28), and individuals aged < 50 years old, in comparison to those aged > 50 years old (OR: 4.01 95%:2.15-7.50), have poorer mental health statuses. Trusting on media, health authorities, and cooperation with policy makers, as well as having uncertainty on information about Coronavirus pandemic were also shown to be associated with poor mental health condition (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION The present study revealed that the number of those people with suspected poor mental health in Fars province significantly increased compared to a previous study using the same questionnaire. Furthermore, the participants who had less trust in media and policymakers were more prone to mental health problems. Therefore, it can be concluded that supporting people in these life-threatening pandemic crises is of great importance, so the policy makers and media must present reliable and valid information to people as soon as possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arash Mani
- Research Center for Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Ali Reza Estedlal
- Health Policy Research Center, Institute of Heath, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Mahsa Kamali
- Health Policy Research Center, Institute of Heath, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Seyede Zahra Ghaemi
- Health Policy Research Center, Institute of Heath, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Leila Zarei
- Health Policy Research Center, Institute of Heath, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Nasrin Shokrpour
- English Department, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Seyed Taghi Heydari
- Health Policy Research Center, Institute of Heath, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
| | - Kamran Bagheri Lankarani
- Health Policy Research Center, Institute of Heath, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Diaconu K, Falconer J, Vidal N, O'May F, Azasi E, Elimian K, Bou-Orm I, Sarb C, Witter S, Ager A. Understanding fragility: implications for global health research and practice. Health Policy Plan 2020; 35:235-243. [PMID: 31821487 PMCID: PMC7050687 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czz142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Advances in population health outcomes risk being slowed—and potentially reversed—by a range of threats increasingly presented as ‘fragility’. Widely used and critiqued within the development arena, the concept is increasingly used in the field of global health, where its relationship to population health, health service delivery, access and utilization is poorly specified. We present the first scoping review seeking to clarify the meaning, definitions and applications of the term in the global health literature. Adopting the theoretical framework of concept analysis, 10 bibliographic and grey literature sources, and five key journals, were searched to retrieve documents relating to fragility and health. Reviewers screened titles and abstracts and retained documents applying the term fragility in relation to health systems, services, health outcomes and population or community health. Data were extracted according to the protocol; all documents underwent bibliometric analysis. Narrative synthesis was then used to identify defining attributes of the concept in the field of global health. A total of 377 documents met inclusion criteria. There has been an exponential increase in applications of the concept in published literature over the last 10 years. Formal definitions of the term continue to be focused on the characteristics of ‘fragile and conflict-affected states’. However, synthesis indicates diverse use of the concept with respect to: level of application (e.g. from state to local community); emphasis on particular antecedent stressors (including factors beyond conflict and weak governance); and focus on health system or community resources (with an increasing tendency to focus on the interface between two). Amongst several themes identified, trust is noted as a key locus of fragility at this interface, with critical implications for health seeking, service utilization and health system and community resilience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Diaconu
- NIHR Research Unit on Health in Situations of Fragility, Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, EH21 6UU, UK
| | - Jennifer Falconer
- NIHR Research Unit on Health in Situations of Fragility, Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, EH21 6UU, UK
| | - Nicole Vidal
- NIHR Research Unit on Health in Situations of Fragility, Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, EH21 6UU, UK
| | - Fiona O'May
- NIHR Research Unit on Health in Situations of Fragility, Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, EH21 6UU, UK
| | - Esther Azasi
- NIHR Research Unit on Health in Situations of Fragility, Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, EH21 6UU, UK
| | - Kelly Elimian
- NIHR Research Unit on Health in Situations of Fragility, Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, EH21 6UU, UK
| | - Ibrahim Bou-Orm
- NIHR Research Unit on Health in Situations of Fragility, Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, EH21 6UU, UK
| | - Cristina Sarb
- NIHR Research Unit on Health in Situations of Fragility, Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, EH21 6UU, UK
| | - Sophie Witter
- NIHR Research Unit on Health in Situations of Fragility, Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, EH21 6UU, UK
| | - Alastair Ager
- NIHR Research Unit on Health in Situations of Fragility, Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, EH21 6UU, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Saulnier DD, Hean H, Thol D, Ir P, Hanson C, Von Schreeb J, Mölsted Alvesson H. Staying afloat: community perspectives on health system resilience in the management of pregnancy and childbirth care during floods in Cambodia. BMJ Glob Health 2020; 5:e002272. [PMID: 32332036 PMCID: PMC7204936 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2019] [Revised: 02/27/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Resilient health systems have the capacity to continue providing health services to meet the community's diverse health needs following floods. This capacity is related to how the community manages its own health needs and the community and health system's joined capacities for resilience. Yet little is known about how community participation influences health systems resilience. The purpose of this study was to understand how community management of pregnancy and childbirth care during floods is contributing to the system's capacity to absorb, adapt or transform as viewed through a framework on health systems resilience. METHODS Eight focus group discussions and 17 semi-structured interviews were conducted with community members and leaders who experienced pregnancy or childbirth during recent flooding in rural Cambodia. The data were analysed by thematic analysis and discussed in relation to the resilience framework. RESULTS The theme 'Responsible for the status quo' reflected the community's responsibility to find ways to manage pregnancy and childbirth care, when neither the expectations of the health system nor the available benefits changed during floods. The theme was informed by notions on: i) developmental changes, the unpredictable nature of floods and limited support for managing care, ii) how information promoted by the public health system led to a limited decision-making space for pregnancy and childbirth care, iii) a desire for security during floods that outweighed mistrust in the public health system and iv) the limits to the coping strategies that the community prepared in case of flooding. CONCLUSIONS The community mainly employed absorptive strategies to manage their care during floods, relieving the burden on the health system, yet restricted support and decision-making may risk their capacity. Further involvement in decision-making for care could help improve the health system's resilience by creating room for the community to adapt and transform when experiencing floods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dell D Saulnier
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hom Hean
- School of Public Health, National Institute of Public Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
| | - Dawin Thol
- School of Public Health, National Institute of Public Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
| | - Por Ir
- Technical Bureau, National Institute of Public Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
| | - Claudia Hanson
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Johan Von Schreeb
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|