1
|
Sales RK, Navarro MA. Early career researchers in health policy and systems research: insights from freelancers in a non-profit organization in the Philippines. Health Res Policy Syst 2024; 22:54. [PMID: 38685052 PMCID: PMC11059717 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-024-01142-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The freelance economy has seen rapid growth worldwide in recent years and the Philippines is not an exception. Freelance workers are becoming increasingly common in healthcare and research. Early career researchers carry out most of scientific research and can play a critical role in advancing public health by bringing new perspectives and diversity to the field. Existing literature has mostly focused on the experiences of early career researchers in an institutional academic setting. This study aimed to understand the experiences of freelance early career researchers in the health policy and systems space in the Philippines. METHODS This qualitative study collected data from 18 to 22 March 2022 through virtual interview and focus group discussions. Themes and codes were created based on the topic guide developed. New themes and codes were generated as they emerged. Two researchers coded the data using both a priori and emergent codes. Any coding conflicts were resolved through discussions until intercoder agreement was reached. Interpretation and conclusions from the data were developed by 2 researchers with consideration for its context and relationship between themes. RESULTS Fifteen current and former freelance researchers participated in the study. Most are female, under 35 years old, and with an undergraduate degree as the highest educational attainment. The findings highlight insights and challenges faced by early career researchers in aspects of: (1) work arrangement, (2) tasks, (3) expectations from senior researchers, (4) development in the health policy and systems field, (5) relationship with peers, and (6) motivations for continuing to work as a freelance health policy and systems researcher. CONCLUSION This study reveals the challenges freelance early career researchers face, highlighting the need for enhanced support and recognition amidst rapidly evolving workforce demands and complex health dilemmas. Recommendations include structured mentorship, professional development, innovative funding models, and the establishment of a supportive network. Advocacy for policies ensuring freelancer inclusion in the economy and policy-making is crucial. Future research should investigate their experiences further, including their roles, transitions, and the impacts of funding trends, to foster their development and integration into public health research and policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reneepearl Kim Sales
- Alliance for Improving Health Outcomes, Veria 1 Building, 62 West Avenue, West Triangle, 1104, Quezon City, Philippines.
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wellmann IA, Ayala LF, Rodríguez JJ, Guetterman TC, Irazola V, Palacios E, Huffman MD, Rohloff P, Heisler M, Ramírez-Zea M, Flood D. Implementing integrated hypertension and diabetes management using the World Health Organization's HEARTS model: protocol for a pilot study in the Guatemalan national primary care system. Implement Sci Commun 2024; 5:7. [PMID: 38195600 PMCID: PMC10775666 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00539-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The HEARTS technical package was developed by the World Health Organization to address the implementation gap in cardiovascular disease prevention in low- and middle-income countries. Guatemala is a middle-income country that is currently implementing HEARTS. National authorities in Guatemala are interested in exploring how hypertension and diabetes management can be integrated in HEARTS implementation. The objective of this study is to conduct a feasibility and acceptability pilot trial of integrated hypertension and diabetes management based on HEARTS in the publicly funded primary care system in Guatemala. METHODS A single-arm pilot trial for 6 months will be carried out in 11 Ministry of Health primary care facilities starting in September 2023. A planned sample of 100 adult patients diagnosed with diabetes (n = 45), hypertension (n = 45), or both (n = 10) will be enrolled. The intervention will consist of HEARTS-aligned components: Training health workers on healthy-lifestyle counseling and evidence-based treatment protocols, strengthening access to medications and diagnostics, training on risk-based cardiovascular disease management, team-based care and task sharing, and systems monitoring and feedback, including implementation of a facility-based electronic monitoring tool at the individual level. Co-primary outcomes of feasibility and acceptability will be assessed using an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design. Secondary outcomes include clinical effectiveness (treatment with medication, glycemic control, and blood pressure control), key implementation outcomes (adoption, fidelity, usability, and sustainability), and patient-reported outcome measures (diabetes distress, disability, and treatment burden). Using an implementation mapping approach, a Technical Advisory Committee will develop implementation strategies for subsequent scale-up planning. DISCUSSION This trial will produce evidence on implementing HEARTS-aligned hypertension and diabetes care in the MOH primary care system in Guatemala. Results also will inform future HEARTS projects in Guatemala and other low- and middle-income countries. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT06080451. The trial was prospectively registered on October 12, 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irmgardt Alicia Wellmann
- Research Center for Prevention of Chronic Diseases, Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama, Guatemala City, Guatemala
| | - Luis Fernando Ayala
- Research Center for Prevention of Chronic Diseases, Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama, Guatemala City, Guatemala
| | - José Javier Rodríguez
- Research Center for Prevention of Chronic Diseases, Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama, Guatemala City, Guatemala
| | | | - Vilma Irazola
- Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Eduardo Palacios
- National Program for the Prevention of Chronic Non-Communicable Diseases and Cancer, Ministry of Health, Guatemala City, Guatemala
| | - Mark D Huffman
- Department of Medicine and Global Health Center, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
- The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Peter Rohloff
- Center for Indigenous Health Research, Wuqu' Kawoq, Tecpán, Guatemala
- Division of Global Health Equity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michele Heisler
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
- Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Manuel Ramírez-Zea
- Research Center for Prevention of Chronic Diseases, Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama, Guatemala City, Guatemala
| | - David Flood
- Research Center for Prevention of Chronic Diseases, Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
- Center for Indigenous Health Research, Wuqu' Kawoq, Tecpán, Guatemala.
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sapkota S, Rushton S, van Teijlingen E, Subedi M, Balen J, Gautam S, Adhikary P, Simkhada P, Wasti SP, Karki JK, Panday S, Karki A, Rijal B, Joshi S, Basnet S, Marahatta SB. Participatory policy analysis in health policy and systems research: reflections from a study in Nepal. Health Res Policy Syst 2024; 22:7. [PMID: 38195539 PMCID: PMC10775624 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-01092-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Participatory policy analysis (PPA) as a method in health policy and system research remains underexplored. Using our experiences of conducting PPA workshops in Nepal to explore the impact of the country's move to federalism on its health system, we reflect on the method's strengths and challenges. We provide an account of the study context, the design and implementation of the workshops, and our reflections on the approach's strengths and challenges. Findings on the impact of federalism on the health system are beyond the scope of this manuscript. MAIN BODY We conducted PPA workshops with a wide range of health system stakeholders (political, administrative and service-level workforce) at the local and provincial levels in Nepal. The workshops consisted of three activities: river of life, brainstorming and prioritization, and problem-tree analysis. Our experiences show that PPA workshops can be a valuable approach to explore health policy and system issues - especially in a context of widespread systemic change which impacts all stakeholders within the health system. Effective engagement of stakeholders and activities that encourage both individual- and system-level reflections and discussions not only help in generating rich qualitative data, but can also address gaps in participants' understanding of practical, technical and political aspects of the health system, aid policy dissemination of research findings, and assist in identifying short- and long-term practice and policy issues that need to be addressed for better health system performance and outcomes. Conducting PPA workshops is, however, challenging for a number of reasons, including the influence of gatekeepers and power dynamics between stakeholders/participants. The role and skills of researchers/facilitators in navigating such challenges are vital for success. Although the long-term impact of such workshops needs further research, our study shows the usefulness of PPA workshops for researchers, for participants and for the wider health system. CONCLUSIONS PPA workshops can effectively generate and synthesize health policy and system evidence through collaborative engagement of health system stakeholders with varied roles. When designed with careful consideration for context and stakeholders' needs, it has great potential as a method in health policy and systems research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sujata Sapkota
- Manmohan Memorial Institute of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal.
| | - Simon Rushton
- Manmohan Memorial Institute of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal.
- The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
| | - Edwin van Teijlingen
- Manmohan Memorial Institute of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal
- Bournemouth University, Poole, United Kingdom
| | | | - Julie Balen
- Manmohan Memorial Institute of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal
- Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, United Kingdom
| | - Sujan Gautam
- Manmohan Memorial Institute of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Pratik Adhikary
- Bournemouth University, Poole, United Kingdom
- PHASE Nepal, Bhaktapur, Nepal
| | - Padam Simkhada
- University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, United Kingdom
| | | | - Jiban K Karki
- PHASE Nepal, Bhaktapur, Nepal
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Sujan B Marahatta
- Manmohan Memorial Institute of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal
- Nepal Open University, Lalitpur, Nepal
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sales RK, Reyes-Ramos GK, de Veyra C, Gascon G, Barraca V, Garcia G, Yap ME. Advancing health through evidence assisted decisions with health policy and systems research program: a qualitative evaluation of a national health research grant management process in the Philippines. Health Res Policy Syst 2023; 21:73. [PMID: 37443116 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-01021-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health policy and systems research (HPSR) has influenced Philippine policies, including tobacco control, mental health, and COVID-19. The Department of Health (DOH) Philippines and Philippine Council for Health Research and Development (PCHRD) launched the Advancing Health through Evidence-Assisted Decisions (AHEAD) with HPSR program in 2017, aiming to build a community of researchers and decision-makers committed to evidence production and utilization. Research systems employ grant management processes for transparency and accountability in research funding, preventing waste, fraud, and misuse of funds. METHODS This study evaluated AHEAD-HPSR's grant management using surveys, interviews, and focus groups to document (1) grant administration processes implemented by DOH and PCHRD, and (2) experiences of grantees, program managers, staff, and policymakers. Data were initially analyzed through the USA Grant Accountability Office's Federal Grant Life Cycle, with new themes created as they emerged. The study identified processes and gaps in the research grant life cycle stages: design/redesign, pre-award, award, implementation, closeout, and research dissemination and utilization. RESULTS Identification of research areas for the grant are identified using national and departmental research priorities. While Calls for Proposals are posted publicly, researchers that have previously worked with policymakers are contacted directly to submit proposals. The evaluation found that research is delayed by bureaucracies in grant administration, particularly in financial reporting and ethics review processes. Complying with the terminal financial report was identified as the most challenging part of the grant process due to immense auditing requirements. Grantees recommend the simplification of bureaucracy for fund release to enable them to focus on research work. CONCLUSION This study contributes to the limited literature on health research grant management in developing countries. Valuable information and recommendations were contributed by stakeholders in this evaluation. These are manifestations of a continuing interest and desire to make health policy and systems research in the Philippines more robust and relevant. It is imperative for the program to continually evolve and build systems most applicable to its multidisciplinary context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reneepearl Kim Sales
- Alliance for Improving Health Outcomes, Veria 1 Building, 62 West Avenue, West Triangle, 1104, Quezon City, Philippines.
| | - Gladys Kaye Reyes-Ramos
- Alliance for Improving Health Outcomes, Veria 1 Building, 62 West Avenue, West Triangle, 1104, Quezon City, Philippines
| | - Chiqui de Veyra
- Alliance for Improving Health Outcomes, Veria 1 Building, 62 West Avenue, West Triangle, 1104, Quezon City, Philippines
| | - Gabrielle Gascon
- Alliance for Improving Health Outcomes, Veria 1 Building, 62 West Avenue, West Triangle, 1104, Quezon City, Philippines
| | - Vianka Barraca
- Alliance for Improving Health Outcomes, Veria 1 Building, 62 West Avenue, West Triangle, 1104, Quezon City, Philippines
| | - Gillian Garcia
- Alliance for Improving Health Outcomes, Veria 1 Building, 62 West Avenue, West Triangle, 1104, Quezon City, Philippines
| | - Maria Eufemia Yap
- Alliance for Improving Health Outcomes, Veria 1 Building, 62 West Avenue, West Triangle, 1104, Quezon City, Philippines
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Strachan DL, Teague K, Asefa A, Annear PL, Ghaffar A, Shroff ZC, McPake B. Using health policy and systems research to influence national health policies: lessons from Mexico, Cambodia and Ghana. Health Policy Plan 2022; 38:3-14. [PMID: 36181467 PMCID: PMC9849714 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czac083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Revised: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Health system reforms across Africa, Asia and Latin America in recent decades demonstrate the value of health policy and systems research (HPSR) in moving towards the goals of universal health coverage in different circumstances and by various means. The role of evidence in policy making is widely accepted; less well understood is the influence of the concrete conditions under which HPSR is carried out within the national context and which often determine policy outcomes. We investigated the varied experiences of HPSR in Mexico, Cambodia and Ghana (each selected purposively as a strong example reflecting important lessons under varying conditions) to illustrate the ways in which HPSR is used to influence health policy. We reviewed the academic and grey literature and policy documents, constructed three country case studies and interviewed two leading experts from each of Mexico and Cambodia and three from Ghana (using semi-structured interviews, anonymized to ensure objectivity). For the design of the study, design of the semi-structured topic guide and the analysis of results, we used a modified version of the context-based analytical framework developed by Dobrow et al. (Evidence-based health policy: context and utilisation. Social Science & Medicine 2004;58:207-17). The results demonstrate that HPSR plays a varied but essential role in effective health policy making and that the use, implementation and outcomes of research and research-based evidence occurs inevitably within a national context that is characterized by political circumstances, the infrastructure and capacity for research and the longer-term experience with HPSR processes. This analysis of national experiences demonstrates that embedding HPSR in the policy process is both possible and productive under varying economic and political circumstances. Supporting research structures with social development legislation, establishing relationships based on trust between researchers and policy makers and building a strong domestic capacity for health systems research all demonstrate means by which the value of HPSR can be materialized in strengthening health systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Llywelyn Strachan
- *Corresponding author. The Nossal Institute for Global Health, University of Melbourne, 333 Exhibition Street, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia. E-mail:
| | - Kirsty Teague
- The Nossal Institute for Global Health, The University of Melbourne, 333 Exhibition Street, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Anteneh Asefa
- The Nossal Institute for Global Health, The University of Melbourne, 333 Exhibition Street, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia,Institute of Tropical Medicine, Kronenburgstraat 43, Antwerp (ITM) 2000, Belgium
| | - Peter Leslie Annear
- The Nossal Institute for Global Health, The University of Melbourne, 333 Exhibition Street, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Abdul Ghaffar
- The Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, WHO, 20 Avenue Appia, Geneva 1211, Switzerland
| | - Zubin Cyrus Shroff
- The Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, WHO, 20 Avenue Appia, Geneva 1211, Switzerland
| | - Barbara McPake
- The Nossal Institute for Global Health, The University of Melbourne, 333 Exhibition Street, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mijumbi-Deve RM, Kawooya I, Kayongo E, Izizinga R, Mamuye H, Amog K, Langlois EV. Paper 1: Demand-driven rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: lessons from Lebanon, Ethiopia, and South Africa on researchers and policymakers' experiences. Syst Rev 2022; 11:154. [PMID: 35907879 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-022-02021-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rapid reviews have emerged as an approach to provide contextualized evidence in a timely and efficient manner. Three rapid review centers were established in Ethiopia, Lebanon, and South Africa through the Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, to stimulate demand, engage policymakers, and produce rapid reviews to support health policy and systems decision-making. This study aimed to assess the experiences of researchers and policymakers engaged in producing and using rapid reviews for health systems strengthening and decisions towards universal health coverage (UHC). METHODS Using a case study approach with qualitative research methods, experienced researchers conducted semi-structured interviews with respondents from each center (n = 16). The topics covered included the process and experience of establishing the centers, stimulating demand for rapid reviews, collaborating between researchers and policymakers, and disseminating and using rapid reviews for health policies and interventions and the potential for sustaining and institutionalizing the services. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Major themes interacted and contributed to shape the experiences of stakeholders of the rapid review centers, including the following: organizational structural arrangements of the centers, management of their processes as input factors, and the rapid reviews as the immediate policy-relevant outputs. The engagement process and the rapid review products contributed to a final theme of impact of the rapid review centers in relation to the uptake of evidence for policy and systems decision-making. CONCLUSIONS The experiences of policymakers and researchers of the rapid review centers determined the uptake of evidence. The findings of this study can inform policymakers, health system managers, and researchers on best practices for demanding, developing and using rapid reviews to support decision- and policymaking, and implementing the universal healthcare coverage agenda.
Collapse
|
7
|
Doshmangir L, Khabiri R, Jabbari H, Arab-Zozani M, Kakemam E, Gordeev VS. Strategies for utilisation management of hospital services: a systematic review of interventions. Global Health 2022; 18:53. [PMID: 35606776 PMCID: PMC9125833 DOI: 10.1186/s12992-022-00835-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To achieve efficiency and high quality in health systems, the appropriate use of hospital services is essential. We identified the initiatives intended to manage adult hospital services and reduce unnecessary hospital use among the general adult population. Methods We systematically reviewed studies published in English using five databases (PubMed, ProQuest, Scopus, Web of Science, and MEDLINE via Ovid). We only included studies that evaluated interventions aiming to reduce the use of hospital services or emergency department, frequency of hospital admissions, length of hospital stay, or the use of diagnostic tests in a general adult population. Studies reporting no relevant outcomes or focusing on a specific patient population or children were excluded. Results In total, 64 articles were included in the systematic review. Nine utilisation management methods were identified: care plan, case management, care coordination, utilisation review, clinical information system, physician profiling, consultation, education, and discharge planning. Primary case management was shown to effectively reduce emergency department use. Care coordination reduced 30-day post-discharge hospital readmission or emergency department visit rates. The pre-admission review program decreased elective admissions. The physician profiling, concurrent review, and discharge planning effectively reduced the length of hospital stay. Twenty three studies that evaluated costs, reported cost savings in the hospitals. Conclusions Utilisation management interventions can decrease hospital use by improving the use of community-based health services and improving the quality of care by providing appropriate care at the right time and at the right level of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leila Doshmangir
- Road Traffic Injury Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. .,Department of Health Policy & Management, Tabriz Health Services Management Research Center, School of Management & Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
| | - Roghayeh Khabiri
- Tabriz Health Services Management Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Hossein Jabbari
- Department of Community Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Morteza Arab-Zozani
- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran
| | - Edris Kakemam
- Clinical Research Development Unit of Tabriz Valiasr Hospital, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Vladimir Sergeevich Gordeev
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.,Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Varallyay NI, Kennedy C, Bennett SC, Peters DH. Strategies to promote evidence use for health programme improvement: learning from the experiences of embedded implementation research teams in Latin America and the Caribbean. Health Res Policy Syst 2022; 20:38. [PMID: 35392931 PMCID: PMC8991468 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-022-00834-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To achieve global health targets, innovative approaches are needed to strengthen the implementation of efficacious interventions. New approaches in implementation research that bring together health system decision-makers alongside researchers to collaboratively design, produce and apply research evidence are gaining traction. Embedded implementation research (EIR) approaches led by decision-maker principal investigators (DM PIs) appear promising in this regard. Our aim is to describe the strategies study teams employ in the post-research phase of EIR to promote evidence-informed programme or policy improvement. Methods We conducted a prospective, comparative case study of an EIR initiative in Bolivia, Colombia and Dominican Republic. Guided by a conceptual framework on EIR, we used semi-structured key informant interviews (n = 51) and document reviews (n = 20) to examine three decision-maker-led study teams (“cases”). Focusing on three processes (communication/dissemination, stakeholder engagement with evidence, integrating evidence in decision-making) and the main outcome (enacting improvements), we used thematic analysis to identify associated strategies and enabling or hindering factors. Results Across cases, we observed diverse strategies, shaped substantially by whether the DM PI was positioned to lead the response to study findings within their sphere of work. We found two primary change pathways: (1) DM PIs implement remedial measures directly, and (2) DM PIs seek to influence other stakeholders to respond to study findings. Throughout the post-research phase, EIR teams adapted research use strategies based on the evolving context. Conclusions EIR led by well-positioned DM PIs can facilitate impactful research translation efforts. We draw lessons around the importance of (1) understanding DM PI positionality, (2) ongoing assessment of the evolving context and stakeholders and (3) iterative adaptation to dynamic, uncertain circumstances. Findings may guide EIR practitioners in planning and conducting fit-for-purpose and context-sensitive strategies to advance the use of evidence for programme improvement. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12961-022-00834-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Ilona Varallyay
- Health Systems Program, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, United States of America.
| | - Caitlin Kennedy
- Social and Behavioral Interventions Program, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, United States of America
| | - Sara C Bennett
- Health Systems Program, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, United States of America
| | - David H Peters
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sanadgol A, Doshmangir L, Majdzadeh R, Gordeev VS. Engagement of non-governmental organisations in moving towards universal health coverage: a scoping review. Global Health 2021; 17:129. [PMID: 34784948 PMCID: PMC8594189 DOI: 10.1186/s12992-021-00778-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Developing essential health services through non-governmental organisations (NGOs) is an important strategy for progressing towards Universal Health Coverage (UHC), especially in low- and middle-income countries. It is crucial to understand NGOs' role in reaching UHC and the best way to engage them. OBJECTIVE This study reviewed the role of NGOs and their engagement strategies in progress toward UHC. METHOD We systematically reviewed studies from five databases (PubMed, Web of Science (ISI), ProQuest, EMBASE and Scopus) that investigated NGOs interventions in public health-related activities. The quality of the selected studies was assessed using the mixed methods appraisal tool. PRISMA reporting guidelines were followed. FINDINGS Seventy-eight studies met the eligibility criteria. NGOs main activities related to service and population coverage and used different strategies to progress towards UHC. To ensure services coverage, NGOs provided adequate and competent human resources, necessary health equipment and facilities, and provided public health and health care services strategies. To achieve population coverage, they provided services to vulnerable groups through community participation. Most studies were conducted in middle-income countries. Overall, the quality of the reported evidence was good. The main funding sources of NGOs were self-financing and grants from the government, international organisations, and donors. CONCLUSION NGOs can play a significant role in the country's progress towards UHC along with the government and other key health players. The government should use strategies and interventions in supporting NGOs, accelerating their movement toward UHC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arman Sanadgol
- Department of Health Policy & Management, Tabriz Health Services Management Research Center, School of Management&Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Leila Doshmangir
- Department of Health Policy & Management, Tabriz Health Services Management Research Center, School of Management&Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Tabriz Univerisity of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
| | - Reza Majdzadeh
- CenterCommunity Based Participatory Research Center and Knowledge Utilization Research Center, Tehran Univerisity of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Vladimir Sergeevich Gordeev
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sampaio ML, Bispo Júnior JP. Towards comprehensive mental health care: experiences and challenges of psychosocial care in Brazil. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:1352. [PMID: 34238266 PMCID: PMC8268580 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11397-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2020] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Recommendations are in place for mental health (MH) care to be developed into a comprehensive, people-centred perspective and organised primarily through community services. In recent decades, Brazil has promoted psychiatric reform aimed at transforming the hospital-centred model into a psychosocial model of MH. However, current political and economic changes threaten this reform. This article analyses the comprehensive MH care offered by a Psychosocial Care Network (Rede de Atenção Psicossocial – RAPS) in Brazil. Methods The study involved semi-structured in-depth interviews with 33 stakeholders (policymakers, health professionals, and MH service users) and direct observation of MH services members of the RAPS. Data were analysed using framework analysis with the following dimensions: mental health services access, long-term mental health care, comprehensive mental health care, and crisis patient care. Results Results indicated progression towards comprehensive MH care provision. We identified MH care provided primarily by community services, featuring an ‘open door’ policy, development of localised actions and a search for autonomy. Deinstitutionalisation principles and the psychosocial model support a comprehensive view of MH by policy makers, MH professionals, and users. However, difficulties in providing comprehensive care remain, with the main challenges being insufficient services offered and difficulties in user access at all levels of care, fragile integration between services, lack of clear definitions of the responsibilities of each service, discontinuity of care, limitations in family support, and fragility in crisis patient care. Conclusion We highlight the need to increase funding and services of RAPS, qualification of staff professional, family support, and development of strategies for integrating services. Support and expansion of MH care depend on strengthening the Brazilian health system, which is in danger of being dismantled. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-11397-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariá Lanzotti Sampaio
- Multidisciplinary Institute of Health, Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), Vitória da Conquista, Brazil
| | - José Patrício Bispo Júnior
- Multidisciplinary Institute of Health, Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), Vitória da Conquista, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Background: Since the emergence of the COVID-19 outbreak, Government of Bangladesh (GoB) has taken various measures to restrict virus transmission and inform the people of the situation. However, the success of such measures largely depends on a positive public perception of the government's ability to act decisively and the transparency of its communication. We explored public perceptions of pandemic management efforts by the Bangladeshi health sector decision-makers in this study. Methods: As this qualitative research was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, data was gathered through seven online mixed-gender focus group discussions involving 50 purposively selected clinicians and non-clinicians. Results: The study participants concurred that, from the outset, decision-makers failed to engage the right kind of experts, which resulted in poor pandemic management that included imposing lockdown in periphery areas without arranging patient transport to the center, declaring certain hospitals as COVID-19 dedicated without preparing the facilities or the staff, and engaging private hospitals in care without allowing them to test the patients for COVID-19 infection. Several participants also commented on ineffective actions on behalf of the GoB, such as imposing home quarantine instead of institutional, corruption, miscommunication, and inadequate private sector regulation. The perception of the people regarding service providers is that they lacked responsiveness in providing treatment, with some doctors misleading the public by sharing misinformation. Service providers, on the other hand, observed that decision-makers failed to provide them with proper training, personal protective equipment, and workplace security, which has resulted in a high number of deaths among medical staff. Conclusions: The Bangladeshi health sector decision-makers should learn from their mistakes to prevent further unnecessary loss of life and long-term economic downturn. They should adopt a science-based response to the COVID-19 pandemic in the short term while striving to develop a more resilient health system in the long run.
Collapse
|
12
|
Joarder T, Khaled MN, Joarder MA. Public perceptions of the COVID-19 pandemic management in Bangladesh: a qualitative exploration. F1000Res 2021; 10:170. [PMID: 34557291 PMCID: PMC8444153 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.28333.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Since the emergence of the COVID-19 outbreak, Government of Bangladesh (GoB) has taken various measures to restrict virus transmission and inform the people of the situation. However, the success of such measures largely depends on a positive public perception of the government's ability to act decisively and the transparency of its communication. We explored public perceptions of pandemic management efforts by the Bangladeshi health sector decision-makers in this study. Methods: As this qualitative research was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, data was gathered through seven online mixed-gender focus group discussions involving 50 purposively selected clinicians and non-clinicians. Results: The study participants concurred that, from the outset, decision-makers failed to engage the right kind of experts, which resulted in poor pandemic management that included imposing lockdown in periphery areas without arranging patient transport to the center, declaring certain hospitals as COVID-19 dedicated without preparing the facilities or the staff, and engaging private hospitals in care without allowing them to test the patients for COVID-19 infection. Several participants also commented on ineffective actions on behalf of the GoB, such as imposing home quarantine instead of institutional, corruption, miscommunication, and inadequate private sector regulation. The perception of the people regarding service providers is that they lacked responsiveness in providing treatment, with some doctors misleading the public by sharing misinformation. Service providers, on the other hand, observed that decision-makers failed to provide them with proper training, personal protective equipment, and workplace security, which has resulted in a high number of deaths among medical staff. Conclusions: The Bangladeshi health sector decision-makers should learn from their mistakes to prevent further unnecessary loss of life and long-term economic downturn. They should adopt a science-based response to the COVID-19 pandemic in the short term while striving to develop a more resilient health system in the long run.
Collapse
|
13
|
Doshmangir L, Bazyar M, Rashidian A, Gordeev VS. Iran health insurance system in transition: equity concerns and steps to achieve universal health coverage. Int J Equity Health 2021; 20:37. [PMID: 33446202 PMCID: PMC7807408 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-020-01372-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Equity, efficiency, sustainability, acceptability to clients and providers, and quality are the cornerstones of universal health coverage (UHC). No country has a single way to achieve efficient UHC. In this study, we documented the Iranian health insurance reforms, focusing on how and why certain policies were introduced and implemented, and which challenges remain to keep a sustainable UHC. Methods This retrospective policy analysis used three sources of data: a comprehensive and chronological scoping review of literature, interviews with Iran health insurance policy actors and stakeholders, and a review of published and unpublished official documents and local media. All data were analysed using thematic content analysis. Results Health insurance reforms, especially health transformation plan (HTP) in 2014, helped to progress towards UHC and health equity by expanding population coverage, a benefits package, and enhancing financial protection. However, several challenges can jeopardize sustaining this progress. There is a lack of suitable mechanisms to collect contributions from those without a regular income. The compulsory health insurance coverage law is not implemented in full. A substantial gap between private and public medical tariffs leads to high out-of-pocket health expenditure. Moreover, controlling the total health care expenditures is not the main priority to make keeping UHC more sustainable. Conclusion To achieve UHC in Iran, the Ministry of Health and Medical Education and health insurance schemes should devise and follow the policies to control health care expenditures. Working mechanisms should be implemented to extend free health insurance coverage for those in need. More studies are needed to evaluate the impact of health insurance reforms in terms of health equity, sustainability, coverage, and access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leila Doshmangir
- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Health Management & Safety Promotion Research Institute, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.,Department of Health Policy& Management, Tabriz Health Services Management Research Center, Iranian Center of Excellence in Health Management, School of Management& Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Mohammad Bazyar
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran.
| | - Arash Rashidian
- Department of Science, Information and Dissemination, World Health Organization Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Vladimir Sergeevich Gordeev
- Institute of Population Health Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.,Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dugle G, Wulifan JK, Tanyeh JP, Quentin W. A critical realist synthesis of cross-disciplinary health policy and systems research: defining characteristic features, developing an evaluation framework and identifying challenges. Health Res Policy Syst 2020; 18:79. [PMID: 32664988 PMCID: PMC7359589 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-020-00556-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2019] [Accepted: 03/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health policy and systems research (HPSR) is an inherently cross-disciplinary field of investigation. However, conflicting conceptualisations about inter-, multi- and transdisciplinary research have contributed to confusion about the characteristics of cross-disciplinary approaches in HPSR. This review was conducted to (1) define the characteristic features of context-mechanism-outcome (CMO) configurations in cross-disciplinary HPSR, (2) develop criteria for evaluating cross-disciplinarity and (3) synthesise emerging challenges of the approach. METHOD The paper is a critical realist synthesis conducted in three phases, as follows: (1) scoping the literature, (2) searching for and screening the evidence, and (3) extracting and synthesising the evidence. Five databases, namely the International Bibliography of the Social Sciences and Web of Science, PubMed central, Embase and CINHAL, and reference lists of studies that qualified for inclusion in the review were searched. The search covered peer-reviewed original research, reviews, commentary papers, and institutional or government reports published in English between January 1998 and January 2020. RESULTS A total of 7792 titles were identified in the online search and 137 publications, comprising pilot studies as well as anecdotal and empirical literature were selected for the final review. The review draws attention to the fact that cross-disciplinary HPSR is not defined by individual characteristics but by the combination of a particular type of research question and setting (context), a specific way of researchers working together (mechanism), and research output (outcome) that is superior to what could be achieved under a monodisciplinary approach. This CMO framework also informs the criteria for assessing whether a given HPSR is truly cross-disciplinary. The challenges of cross-disciplinary HPSR and their accompanying coping mechanisms were also found to be context driven, originating mainly from conceptual disagreements, institutional restrictions, communication and information management challenges, coordination problems, and resource limitations. CONCLUSION These findings have important implications. First, the CMO framework of cross-disciplinary HPSR can provide guidance for researchers engaging in new projects and for policy-makers using their findings. Second, the proposed criteria for evaluating theory and practice of cross-disciplinary HPSR may inform the systematic development of new research projects and the structured assessment of existing ones. Third, a better understanding of the challenges of cross-disciplinary HPSR and potential response mechanisms may help researchers to avoid these problems in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gordon Dugle
- Department of Management Studies, School of Business and Law, University for Development Studies, Box UPW 36, Wa Campus, Wa, Ghana
- Nottingham University Business School, Jubilee Campus, Nottingham, NG8 1BB UK
| | - Joseph Kwame Wulifan
- Department of Management Studies, School of Business and Law, University for Development Studies, Box UPW 36, Wa Campus, Wa, Ghana
| | - John Paul Tanyeh
- Department of Management Studies, School of Business and Law, University for Development Studies, Box UPW 36, Wa Campus, Wa, Ghana
| | - Wilm Quentin
- Department of Healthcare Management, TU, Berlin, Germany
- European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Masefield SC, Megaw A, Barlow M, White PCL, Altink H, Grugel J. Repurposing NGO data for better research outcomes: a scoping review of the use and secondary analysis of NGO data in health policy and systems research. Health Res Policy Syst 2020; 18:63. [PMID: 32513183 PMCID: PMC7278191 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-020-00577-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2019] [Accepted: 05/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) collect and generate vast amounts of potentially rich data, most of which are not used for research purposes. Secondary analysis of NGO data (their use and analysis in a study for which they were not originally collected) presents an important but largely unrealised opportunity to provide new research insights in critical areas, including the evaluation of health policy and programmes. Methods A scoping review of the published literature was performed to identify the extent to which secondary analysis of NGO data has been used in health policy and systems research (HPSR). A tiered analytical approach provided a comprehensive overview and descriptive analyses of the studies that (1) used data produced or collected by or about NGOs; (2) performed secondary analysis of the NGO data (beyond the use of an NGO report as a supporting reference); and (3) analysed NGO-collected clinical data. Results Of the 156 studies that performed secondary analysis of NGO-produced or collected data, 64% (n = 100) used NGO-produced reports (mostly to a limited extent, as a contextual reference or to critique NGO activities) and 8% (n = 13) analysed NGO-collected clinical data. Of these studies, 55% (n = 86) investigated service delivery research topics and 48% (n = 51) were undertaken in developing countries and 17% (n = 27) in both developing and developed countries. NGOs were authors or co-authors of 26% of the studies. NGO-collected clinical data enabled HPSR within marginalised groups (e.g. migrants, people in conflict-affected areas), albeit with some limitations such as inconsistent and missing data. Conclusion We found evidence that NGO-collected and produced data are most commonly perceived as a source of supporting evidence for HPSR and not as primary source data. However, these data can facilitate research in under-researched marginalised groups and in contexts that are hard to reach by academics such as conflict-affected areas. NGO–academic collaboration could help address issues of NGO data quality to facilitate their more widespread use in research. The use of NGO data use could enable relevant and timely research in the areas of programme evaluation and health policy and advocacy to improve health and reduce health inequalities, especially in marginalised groups and developing countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah C Masefield
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, United Kingdom. .,Interdisciplinary Global Development Centre, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.
| | - Alice Megaw
- Interdisciplinary Global Development Centre, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, United Kingdom
| | - Matt Barlow
- Interdisciplinary Global Development Centre, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.,Department of Politics, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, United Kingdom
| | - Piran C L White
- Interdisciplinary Global Development Centre, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.,Department of Environment and Geography, University of York, York, YO10 5NG, United Kingdom
| | - Henrice Altink
- Interdisciplinary Global Development Centre, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.,Department of History, University of York, York, YO10 5NH, United Kingdom
| | - Jean Grugel
- Interdisciplinary Global Development Centre, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.,Department of Politics, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
González Block MA, Arroyo Laguna J, Cetrángolo O, Crocco Ábalos P, Guerrero R, Riva Knauth D, Ghaffar A, Pavón León P, Del Rocío Saénz M, González McQuire R, Martínez Zavala B, Gutiérrez Calderón E. Health policy and systems research publications in Latin America warrant the launching of a new specialised regional journal. Health Res Policy Syst 2020; 18:59. [PMID: 32503569 PMCID: PMC7275341 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-020-00565-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2019] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Scientific journals play a critical role in research validation and dissemination and are increasingly vocal about the identification of research priorities and the targeting of research results to key audiences. No new journals specialising in health policy and systems research (HPSR) and focusing in the developing world or in a specific developing world region have been established since the early 1980s. This paper compares the growth of publications on HPSR across Latin America and the world and explores the potential, feasibility and challenges of innovative publication strategies. Methods A bibliometric analysis was undertaken using HPSR MeSH terms with journals indexed in Medline. A survey was undertaken among 2500 authors publishing on HPSR in Latin America (LA) through an online survey, with a 13.1% response rate. Aggregate indicators were constructed and validated, and two-way ANOVA tests were performed on key variables. Results HPSR publications on LA observed an average annual growth of 27.5% from the years 2000 to 2018, as against 11.4% worldwide and yet a lag on papers published per capita. A total of 48 journals with an Impact Factor publish HPSR on LA, of which 5 non-specialised journals are published in the region and are ranked in the bottom quintile of Impact Factor. While the majority of HPSR papers worldwide is published in specialised HPSR journals, in LA this is the minority. Very few researchers from LA sit in the Editorial Board of international journals. Researchers highly support strengthening quality HPSR publications through publishing in open access, on-line journals with a focus on the LA region and with peer reviewers specialized on the region. Researchers would support a new open access journal specializing in the LA region and in HPSR, publishing in English. Open access up-front costs and disincentives while waiting for an Impact Factor can be overcome. Conclusion Researchers publishing on HPSR in LA widely support the launching of a new specialised journal for the region with a vigorous editorial policy focusing on regional and country priorities. Strategies should be in place to support English-language publishing and to develop a community of practice around the publication process. In the first years, special issues should be promoted through a priority-setting process to attract prominent authors, develop the audience and attain an Impact Factor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Juan Arroyo Laguna
- Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Escuela de Gobierno y Políticas Públicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Lima, Peru
| | - Oscar Cetrángolo
- Facultad de Ciencias Económicas de la UBA, Buenos Aires & Instituto Interdisciplinario de Economía Política, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Ramiro Guerrero
- Centro de Estudios en Protección Social y Economía de la Salud, Universidad ICESI, Cali, Colombia
| | - Daniela Riva Knauth
- Departamento de Medicina Social, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Abdul Ghaffar
- Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Patricia Pavón León
- Instituto de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Doshmangir L, Sajadi HS, Ghiasipour M, Aboutorabi A, Gordeev VS. Informal payments for inpatient health care in post-health transformation plan period: evidence from Iran. BMC Public Health 2020; 20:539. [PMID: 32312238 PMCID: PMC7171751 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-8432-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2019] [Accepted: 02/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2014, a revision of the national medical tariffs for inpatient health care services took place in Iran, and a new hotline was set up to report informal payments. It was expected that such measures would eliminate or decrease informal payments prevalence. This study estimates the prevalence of informal payments for inpatient health care services in the post-reform period, explores factors associated with informal payments and examines patients' and healthcare providers' views regarding the causes of informal payments and possible practical solutions for their reduction. METHODS We surveyed by phone patients who used inpatient health care services in seven Iranian hospitals in 2016. Descriptive and regression analyses were used to estimate the prevalence and determine factors associated with informal payments. We conducted a qualitative analysis through thematic analyses based on focus group discussions and in-depth interviews. RESULTS Of 2696 respondents, 14% reported paying informally for inpatient services. Informal payments were reported more frequently among private hospital users, given more frequently to physicians in public teaching hospitals and 'other staff' in private hospitals, in the form of cash and voluntary. Being an adult, hospital or treatment type, being insured, and household head's education influenced the probability of paying informally. The amount paid informally was associated with being insured, the educational status of the household's head, household size, service, and hospital types. Based on qualitative findings, the leading causes of informal payments reported by patients and healthcare providers can be categorized into four groups - financing challenges; governance challenges; service delivery challenges; and actors and stakeholders. Modifying, adjusting and applying policy interventions; supervision, monitoring and evaluation; and actors and stakeholders were identified as possible solutions for tackling informal payment in the inpatient health care services. CONCLUSION The prevalence of informal patient payments for inpatient services in the post-reform period seems to have reduced; however, they remain to be common. Regular monitoring, reviewing of payment policies to the physicians, informing patients, changing the behaviour of healthcare providers and patients, and developing ethical guidelines to prevent informal payments were suggested for reduction and elimination of informal payments in the Iranian healthcare sector.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leila Doshmangir
- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Tabriz Health Services Management Research Center, Iranian Center of Excellence in Health Management, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Haniye Sadat Sajadi
- Knowledge Utilization Research Center, University Research and Development Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Maryam Ghiasipour
- Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ali Aboutorabi
- School of Management and Medical Informatics, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Vladimir Sergeevich Gordeev
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, The London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.,Institute of Population Health Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Onwujekwe O, Mbachu C, Etiaba E, Ezumah N, Ezenwaka U, Arize I, Okeke C, Nwankwor C, Uzochukwu B. Impact of capacity building interventions on individual and organizational competency for HPSR in endemic disease control in Nigeria: a qualitative study. Implement Sci 2020; 15:22. [PMID: 32299484 PMCID: PMC7164165 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-020-00987-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2019] [Accepted: 04/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The need to build capacity for health policy and systems research (HPSR) in low- and middle-income countries has been underscored as this encompasses the processes of decision-making at all levels of the health system. This implementation research project was undertaken in Southeast Nigeria to evaluate whether the capacity-building intervention improves the capacity to produce and use research evidence for decision making in endemic disease control. METHODS Three training workshops were organized for purposively selected participants comprising "producers of evidence" such as health research scientists in three universities and "users of evidence" such as policy makers, program managers, and implementers in the public health sector. Participants also held step-down workshops in their organizations. The last workshop was used to facilitate the formation of knowledge networks comprising of both producers and users, which is a critical step for getting research into policy and practice (GRIPP). Three months after the workshops, a subset, 40, of workshop participants was selected for in-depth interviews. Information was collected on (i) perceptions of usefulness of capacity-building workshops, (ii) progress with proposed research and research uptake activities, (iii) effects of these activities on evidence-informed decision making, and (iv) constraints and enablers to implementation of proposed activities. RESULTS Most participants felt the workshops provided them with new competencies and skills in one or more of research priority setting, evidence generation, communication, and use for the control of endemic diseases. Participants were at different stages of planning and implementing their proposed research and research uptake activities, and were engaging across professional and disciplinary boundaries to ensure relevance and usefulness of outputs for decision making. Key enablers of successful implementation of activities were positive team dynamics, good balance of competencies, effective communication and engagement within teams, team leader's capacity to innovate, and personal interests such as career progress. Lack of funding, limited decision space, organizational bureaucracies, and poor infrastructure were the key constraints to the implementation of proposed activities. Lack of mentorship and continuous support from trainers delayed progress with implementing proposed activities. CONCLUSIONS The capacity-building interventions contributed to the development of a critical mass of research scientists, policy makers, and practitioners who have varying levels of competencies in HPSR for endemic disease control and would require further support in carrying out their medium and long-term goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Obinna Onwujekwe
- Department of Health Administration and Management, University of Nigeria Enugu campus, Nsukka, Nigeria
- Health Policy Research Group, University of Nigeria Nsukka, Nsukka, Nigeria
| | - Chinyere Mbachu
- Department of Health Administration and Management, University of Nigeria Enugu campus, Nsukka, Nigeria.
- Department of Community Medicine, University of Nigeria Enugu campus, Nsukka, Nigeria.
| | - Enyi Etiaba
- Department of Health Administration and Management, University of Nigeria Enugu campus, Nsukka, Nigeria
- Health Policy Research Group, University of Nigeria Nsukka, Nsukka, Nigeria
| | - Nkoli Ezumah
- Health Policy Research Group, University of Nigeria Nsukka, Nsukka, Nigeria
| | - Uchenna Ezenwaka
- Health Policy Research Group, University of Nigeria Nsukka, Nsukka, Nigeria
| | - Ifeyinwa Arize
- Department of Health Administration and Management, University of Nigeria Enugu campus, Nsukka, Nigeria
- Health Policy Research Group, University of Nigeria Nsukka, Nsukka, Nigeria
| | - Chinyere Okeke
- Department of Health Administration and Management, University of Nigeria Enugu campus, Nsukka, Nigeria
- Department of Community Medicine, University of Nigeria Enugu campus, Nsukka, Nigeria
| | - Chikezie Nwankwor
- Department of Health Administration and Management, University of Nigeria Enugu campus, Nsukka, Nigeria
- Health Policy Research Group, University of Nigeria Nsukka, Nsukka, Nigeria
| | - Benjamin Uzochukwu
- Department of Health Administration and Management, University of Nigeria Enugu campus, Nsukka, Nigeria
- Department of Community Medicine, University of Nigeria Enugu campus, Nsukka, Nigeria
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bennett S, Jessani N, Glandon D, Qiu M, Scott K, Meghani A, El-Jardali F, Maceira D, Javadi D, Ghaffar A. Understanding the implications of the Sustainable Development Goals for health policy and systems research: results of a research priority setting exercise. Global Health 2020; 16:5. [PMID: 31918730 PMCID: PMC6953300 DOI: 10.1186/s12992-019-0534-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2019] [Accepted: 12/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Given the paradigmatic shift represented by the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as compared to the Millennium Development Goals - in particular their broad and interconnected nature - a new set of health policy and systems research (HPSR) priorities are needed to inform strategies to address these interconnected goals. OBJECTIVES To identify high priority HPSR questions linked to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals. METHODS We focused on three themes that we considered to be central to achieving the health related SDGs: (i) Protecting and promoting access to health services through systems of social protection (ii) Strengthening multisectoral collaborations for health and (iii) Developing more participatory and accountable institutions. We conducted 54 semi-structured interviews and two focus group discussions to investigate policy-maker perspectives on evidence needs. We also conducted an overview of literature reviews in each theme. Information from these sub-studies was extracted into a matrix of possible research questions and developed into three domain-specific lists of 30-36 potential priority questions. Topic experts from the global research community then refined and ranked the proposed questions through an online platform. A final webinar on each theme sought feedback on findings. RESULTS Policy-makers continue to demand HPSR for many well-established issues such as health financing, human resources for health, and service delivery. In terms of service delivery, policy-makers wanted to know how best to strengthen primary health care and community-based systems. In the themes of social protection and multisectoral collaboration, prioritized questions had a strong emphasis on issues of practical implementation. For participatory and accountable institutions, the two priority questions focused on political factors affecting the adoption of accountability measures, as well as health worker reactions to such measures. CONCLUSIONS To achieve the SDGs, there is a continuing need for research in some already well established areas of HPSR as well as key areas highlighted by decision-makers. Identifying appropriate conceptual frameworks as well as typologies of examples may be a prerequisite for answering some of the substantive policymaker questions. In addition, implementation research engaging non-traditional stakeholders outside of the health sector will be critical.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Bennett
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
| | - Nasreen Jessani
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.,Africa Center for Evidence (ACE), University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.,Centre for Evidence Based Health Care (CEBHC), Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| | - Douglas Glandon
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Mary Qiu
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Kerry Scott
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Ankita Meghani
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | | | - Daniel Maceira
- Center for the Study of State and Society, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Dena Javadi
- Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Abdul Ghaffar
- Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
George A, Olivier J, Glandon D, Kapilashrami A, Gilson L. Health systems for all in the SDG era: key reflections based on the Liverpool statement for the fifth global symposium on health systems research. Health Policy Plan 2019; 34:ii135-ii138. [PMID: 31723972 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czz115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Asha George
- School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Robert Sobukwe Road, Bellville, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Jill Olivier
- Health Policy and Systems Division, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Observatory, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Douglas Glandon
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Lucy Gilson
- Health Policy and Systems Division, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Observatory, Cape Town, South Africa.,Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Brady L, De Vries S, Gallow R, George A, Gilson L, Louw M, Martin AW, Shamis K, Stuart T. Paramedics, poetry, and film: health policy and systems research at the intersection of theory, art, and practice. Hum Resour Health 2019; 17:64. [PMID: 31391060 PMCID: PMC6686373 DOI: 10.1186/s12960-019-0373-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2018] [Accepted: 05/09/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Violence is a public health issue. It is the consequence of a complex set of interacting political, social, and economic factors firmly rooted in past and current injustice. South Africa remains one of the most unequal countries in the world, and in some areas, the rates of violence are comparable to a country that is at war. Increasingly, paramedics working in high-risk areas of Cape Town are being caught in the crossfire, and in 2018, there was an attack on a paramedic crew nearly every week. These attacks are a symptom of much deeper, complex societal issues. Clearly, we require new approaches to better understand the complexity as we collectively find a way forward. It is in this context that we are collaborating with paramedics, poets, and filmmakers to tell human stories from the frontline thereby bringing the lived experiences of healthcare workers into policy making processes. In this commentary, we share a series of poems and a poetry-film that form part of a larger body of work focused on the safety of paramedics, to catalyze discussion about the possibilities that arts-based methods offer us as we seek to better understand and engage with complex social issues that have a direct impact on the health system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leanne Brady
- Health Policy and Systems Division, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Shaheem De Vries
- Emergency Medical Services, Health Department, Western Cape Provincial Government, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Rushaana Gallow
- Emergency Medical Services, Health Department, Western Cape Provincial Government, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Asha George
- School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Lucy Gilson
- Health Policy and Systems Division, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Moira Louw
- Emergency Medical Services, Health Department, Western Cape Provincial Government, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Abdul Waheem Martin
- Emergency Medical Services, Health Department, Western Cape Provincial Government, Cape Town, South Africa
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hall T, Kakuma R, Palmer L, Minas H, Martins J, Kermode M. Social inclusion and exclusion of people with mental illness in Timor-Leste: a qualitative investigation with multiple stakeholders. BMC Public Health 2019; 19:702. [PMID: 31174504 PMCID: PMC6554932 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7042-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2019] [Accepted: 05/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Social inclusion is a human right for all people, including people with mental illness. It is also an important part of recovery from mental illness. In Timor-Leste, no research has investigated the social experiences of people with mental illness and their families. To fill this knowledge gap and inform ongoing mental health system strengthening, we investigated the experiences of social inclusion and exclusion of people with mental illness and their families in Timor-Leste. METHODS Eighty-five participants from the following stakeholder groups across multiple locations in Timor-Leste were interviewed: (1) people with mental illness and their families; (2) mental health and social service providers; (3) government decision makers; (4) civil society members; and (5) other community members. Framework analysis was used to analyse interview transcripts. RESULTS People with mental illness in Timor-Leste were found to face widespread, multi-faceted sociocultural, economic and political exclusion. People with mental illness were stigmatised as a consequence of beliefs that they were dangerous and lacked capacity, and experienced instances of bullying, physical and sexual violence, and confinement. Several barriers to formal employment, educational, social protection and legal systems were identified. Experiences of social inclusion for people with mental illness were also described at family and community levels. People with mental illness were included through family and community structures that promoted unity and acceptance. They also had opportunities to participate in activities surrounding family life and livelihoods that contributed to intergenerational well-being. Some, but not all, Timorese people with mental illness benefited from disability-inclusive programming and policies, including the disability pension, training programs and peer support. CONCLUSIONS These findings highlight the need to combat social exclusion of people with mental illness and their families by harnessing local Timorese sociocultural strengths. Such an approach could centre around people with mental illness and their families to: increase population mental health awareness; bolster rights-based and culturally-grounded mental health services; and promote inclusive and accessible services and systems across sectors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa Hall
- Nossal Institute for Global Health, University of Melbourne, 333 Exhibition St, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia.
| | - Ritsuko Kakuma
- Centre for Global Mental Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Centre for Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Lisa Palmer
- School of Geography, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Harry Minas
- Centre for Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - João Martins
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, National University of Timor-Leste, Díli, Timor-Leste
| | - Michelle Kermode
- Nossal Institute for Global Health, University of Melbourne, 333 Exhibition St, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Mureithi L, Burnett JM, Bertscher A, English R. Emergence of three general practitioner contracting-in models in South Africa: a qualitative multi-case study. Int J Equity Health 2018; 17:107. [PMID: 30286772 PMCID: PMC6172712 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-018-0830-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2018] [Accepted: 07/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The general practitioner contracting initiative (GPCI) is a health systems strengthening initiative piloted in the first phase of national health insurance (NHI) implementation in South Africa as it progresses towards universal health coverage (UHC). GPCI aimed to address the shortage of doctors in the public sector by contracting-in private sector general practitioners (GPs) to render services in public primary health care clinics. This paper explores the early inception and emergence of the GPCI. It describes three models of contracting-in that emerged and interrogates key factors influencing their evolution. METHODS This qualitative multi-case study draws on three cases. Data collection comprised document review, key informant interviews and focus group discussions with national, provincial and district managers as well as GPs (n = 68). Walt and Gilson's health policy analysis triangle and Liu's conceptual framework on contracting-out were used to explore the policy content, process, actors and contractual arrangements involved. RESULTS Three models of contracting-in emerged, based on the type of purchaser: a centralized-purchaser model, a decentralized-purchaser model and a contracted-purchaser model. These models are funded from a single central source but have varying levels of involvement of national, provincial and district managers. Funds are channelled from purchaser to provider in slightly different ways. Contract formality differed slightly by model and was found to be influenced by context and type of purchaser. Conceptualization of the GPCI was primarily a nationally-driven process in a context of high-level political will to address inequity through NHI implementation. Emergence of the models was influenced by three main factors, flexibility in the piloting process, managerial capacity and financial management capacity. CONCLUSION The GPCI models were iterations of the centralized-purchaser model. Emergence of the other models was strongly influenced by purchaser capacity to manage contracts, payments and recruitment processes. Findings from the decentralized-purchaser model show importance of local context, provincial capacity and experience on influencing evolution of the models. Whilst contract characteristics need to be well defined, allowing for adaptability to the local context and capacity is critical. Purchaser capacity, existing systems and institutional knowledge and experience in contracting and financial management should be considered before adopting a decentralized implementation approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Mureithi
- Health Systems Research Unit, Health Systems Trust, 1st Floor Block B, Aintree Park, Kenilworth, Cape Town, 7700 South Africa
- School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - James Michael Burnett
- Health Systems Research Unit, Health Systems Trust, 1st Floor Block B, Aintree Park, Kenilworth, Cape Town, 7700 South Africa
| | - Adam Bertscher
- Health Systems Research Unit, Health Systems Trust, 1st Floor Block B, Aintree Park, Kenilworth, Cape Town, 7700 South Africa
| | - René English
- Health Systems Research Unit, Health Systems Trust, 1st Floor Block B, Aintree Park, Kenilworth, Cape Town, 7700 South Africa
- School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
George A, Campbell J, Ghaffar A. Advancing the science behind human resources for health: highlights from the Health Policy and Systems Research Reader on Human Resources for Health. Hum Resour Health 2018; 16:35. [PMID: 30103757 PMCID: PMC6090660 DOI: 10.1186/s12960-018-0302-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2018] [Accepted: 06/22/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Health workers are central to people-centred health systems, resilient economies and sustainable development. Given the rising importance of the health workforce, changing human resource for health (HRH) policy and practice and recent health policy and systems research (HPSR) advances, it is critical to reassess and reinvigorate the science behind HRH as part of health systems strengthening and social development more broadly. Building on the recently published Health Policy and Systems Research Reader on Human Resources for Health (the Reader), this commentary reflects on the added value of HPSR underpinning HRH. HPSR does so by strengthening the multi-disciplinary base and rigour of HRH research by (1) valuing diverse research inferences and (2) deepening research enquiry and quality. It also anchors the relevance of HRH research for HRH policy and practice by (3) broadening conceptual boundaries and (4) strengthening policy engagement. Most importantly, HPSR enables us to transform HRH from being faceless numbers or units of health producers to the heart and soul of health systems and vital change agents in our communities and societies. Health workers' identities and motivation, daily routines and negotiations, and training and working environments are at the centre of successes and failures of health interventions, health system functioning and broader social development. Further, in an increasingly complex globalised economy, the expansion of the health sector as an arena for employment and the liberalisation of labour markets has contributed to the unprecedented movement of health workers, many or most of whom are women, not only between public and private health sectors, but also across borders. Yet, these political, human development and labour market realities are often set aside or elided altogether. Health workers' lives and livelihoods, their contributions and commitments, and their individual and collective agency are ignored. The science of HRH, offering new discoveries and deeper understanding of how universal health coverage and the Sustainable Development Goals are dependent on millions of health workers globally, has the potential to overcome this outdated and ineffective orthodoxy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A.S. George
- School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Private Bag x17, Bellville, Cape Town, 7535 South Africa
| | - J. Campbell
- Health Workforce, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - A. Ghaffar
- The Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
George A, Campbell J, Ghaffar A. Advancing the science behind human resources for health: highlights from the Health Policy and Systems Research Reader on Human Resources for Health. Health Res Policy Syst 2018; 16:80. [PMID: 30103778 PMCID: PMC6090771 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-018-0346-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2018] [Accepted: 06/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Health workers are central to people-centred health systems, resilient economies and sustainable development. Given the rising importance of the health workforce, changing human resource for health (HRH) policy and practice and recent health policy and systems research (HPSR) advances, it is critical to reassess and reinvigorate the science behind HRH as part of health systems strengthening and social development more broadly. Building on the recently published Health Policy and Systems Research Reader on Human Resources for Health (the Reader), this commentary reflects on the added value of HPSR underpinning HRH. HPSR does so by strengthening the multi-disciplinary base and rigour of HRH research by (1) valuing diverse research inferences and (2) deepening research enquiry and quality. It also anchors the relevance of HRH research for HRH policy and practice by (3) broadening conceptual boundaries and (4) strengthening policy engagement. Most importantly, HPSR enables us to transform HRH from being faceless numbers or units of health producers to the heart and soul of health systems and vital change agents in our communities and societies. Health workers' identities and motivation, daily routines and negotiations, and training and working environments are at the centre of successes and failures of health interventions, health system functioning and broader social development. Further, in an increasingly complex globalised economy, the expansion of the health sector as an arena for employment and the liberalisation of labour markets has contributed to the unprecedented movement of health workers, many or most of whom are women, not only between public and private health sectors, but also across borders. Yet, these political, human development and labour market realities are often set aside or elided altogether. Health workers' lives and livelihoods, their contributions and commitments, and their individual and collective agency are ignored. The science of HRH, offering new discoveries and deeper understanding of how universal health coverage and the Sustainable Development Goals are dependent on millions of health workers globally, has the potential to overcome this outdated and ineffective orthodoxy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A.S. George
- School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Private Bag x17, Bellville, Cape Town, 7535 South Africa
| | - J. Campbell
- Health Workforce, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - A. Ghaffar
- The Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Bozorgmehr K, Samuilova M, Petrova-Benedict R, Girardi E, Piselli P, Kentikelenis A. Infectious disease health services for refugees and asylum seekers during a time of crisis: A scoping study of six European Union countries. Health Policy 2018; 123:882-887. [PMID: 29673804 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2017] [Revised: 03/28/2018] [Accepted: 04/04/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Systematic information on infectious disease services provided to refugees and asylum seekers in the European Union (EU) is sparse. We conducted a scoping study of experts in six EU countries in order to map health system responses related to infectious disease prevention and control among refugees and asylum seekers. METHODS We conducted 27 semi-structured in-depth interviews with first-line staff and health officials to collect information about existing guidelines and practices at each stage of reception in first-entry (Greece/Italy), transit (Croatia/Slovenia), and destination countries (Austria/Sweden). Thematic coding was used to perform a content analysis of interview material. RESULTS Guidance on infectious disease screening and health assessments lack standardisation across and-partly-within countries. Data collection on notifiable infectious diseases is mainly reported to be performed by national public health institutions, but is not stratified by migrant status. Health-related information is not transferred in a standardized way between facilities within a single country. International exchange of medical information between countries along the migration route is irregular. Services were reported to be fragmented, and respondents mentioned no specific coordination bodies beyond health authorities at different levels. CONCLUSION Infectious disease health services provided to refugees and asylum seekers lack standardisation in health assessments, data collection, transfer of health-related information and (partly) coordination. This may negatively affect health system performance including public health emergency preparedness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kayvan Bozorgmehr
- Dept. of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 130.3, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | | | | | - Enrico Girardi
- Istituto Nazionale per le Malattie Infettive L. Spallanzani, Italy
| | - Pierluca Piselli
- Istituto Nazionale per le Malattie Infettive L. Spallanzani, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Shroff ZC, Javadi D, Gilson L, Kang R, Ghaffar A. Institutional capacity to generate and use evidence in LMICs: current state and opportunities for HPSR. Health Res Policy Syst 2017; 15:94. [PMID: 29121958 PMCID: PMC5680819 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-017-0261-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2017] [Accepted: 10/24/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence-informed decision-making for health is far from the norm, particularly in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Health policy and systems research (HPSR) has an important role in providing the context-sensitive and -relevant evidence that is needed. However, there remain significant challenges both on the supply side, in terms of capacity for generation of policy-relevant knowledge such as HPSR, and on the demand side in terms of the demand for and use of evidence for policy decisions. This paper brings together elements from both sides to analyse institutional capacity for the generation of HPSR and the use of evidence (including HPSR) more broadly in LMICs. METHODS The paper uses literature review methods and two survey instruments (directed at research institutions and Ministries of Health, respectively) to explore the types of institutional support required to enhance the generation and use of evidence. RESULTS Findings from the survey of research institutions identified the absence of core funding, the lack of definitional clarity and academic incentive structures for HPSR as significant constraints. On the other hand, the survey of Ministries of Health identified a lack of locally relevant evidence, poor presentation of research findings and low institutional prioritisation of evidence use as significant constraints to evidence uptake. In contrast, improved communication between researchers and decision-makers and increased availability of relevant evidence were identified as facilitators of evidence uptake. CONCLUSION The findings make a case for institutional arrangements in research that provide support for career development, collaboration and cross-learning for researchers, as well as the setting up of institutional arrangements and processes to incentivise the use of evidence among Ministries of Health and other decision-making institutions. The paper ends with a series of recommendations to build institutional capacity in HPSR through engaging multiple stakeholders in identifying and maintaining incentive structures, improving research (including HPSR) training, and developing stronger tools for synthesising non-traditional forms of local, policy-relevant evidence such as grey literature. Addressing challenges on both the supply and demand side can build institutional capacity in the research and policy worlds and support the enhanced uptake of high quality evidence in policy decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zubin Cyrus Shroff
- Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, Geneva, 1211, Switzerland.
| | - Dena Javadi
- Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, Geneva, 1211, Switzerland
| | - Lucy Gilson
- Health Economics Unit, Health Policy and Systems Division, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.,Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rockie Kang
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Abdul Ghaffar
- Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, Geneva, 1211, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Akl EA, Fadlallah R, Ghandour L, Kdouh O, Langlois E, Lavis JN, Schünemann H, El-Jardali F. The SPARK Tool to prioritise questions for systematic reviews in health policy and systems research: development and initial validation. Health Res Policy Syst 2017; 15:77. [PMID: 28870215 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-017-0242-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2016] [Accepted: 08/16/2017] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Groups or institutions funding or conducting systematic reviews in health policy and systems research (HPSR) should prioritise topics according to the needs of policymakers and stakeholders. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a tool to prioritise questions for systematic reviews in HPSR. Methods We developed the tool following a four-step approach consisting of (1) the definition of the purpose and scope of tool, (2) item generation and reduction, (3) testing for content and face validity, (4) and pilot testing of the tool. The research team involved international experts in HPSR, systematic review methodology and tool development, led by the Center for Systematic Reviews on Health Policy and Systems Research (SPARK). We followed an inclusive approach in determining the final selection of items to allow customisation to the user’s needs. Results The purpose of the SPARK tool was to prioritise questions in HPSR in order to address them in systematic reviews. In the item generation and reduction phase, an extensive literature search yielded 40 relevant articles, which were reviewed by the research team to create a preliminary list of 19 candidate items for inclusion in the tool. As part of testing for content and face validity, input from international experts led to the refining, changing, merging and addition of new items, and to organisation of the tool into two modules. Following pilot testing, we finalised the tool, with 22 items organised in two modules – the first module including 13 items to be rated by policymakers and stakeholders, and the second including 9 items to be rated by systematic review teams. Users can customise the tool to their needs, by omitting items that may not be applicable to their settings. We also developed a user manual that provides guidance on how to use the SPARK tool, along with signaling questions. Conclusion We have developed and conducted initial validation of the SPARK tool to prioritise questions for systematic reviews in HPSR, along with a user manual. By aligning systematic review production to policy priorities, the tool will help support evidence-informed policymaking and reduce research waste. We invite others to contribute with additional real-life implementation of the tool. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12961-017-0242-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
29
|
Luyckx VA, Biller-Andorno N, Saxena A, Tran NT. Health policy and systems research: towards a better understanding and review of ethical issues. BMJ Glob Health 2017; 2:e000314. [PMID: 29225934 PMCID: PMC5717951 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2017] [Revised: 04/01/2017] [Accepted: 04/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Given the focus on health systems in the post-millennium development goal era and moving towards the sustainable development goals, there is a compelling need for a common framework for health policy and systems research ethics to guide researchers and facilitate review by research ethics committees. A consultation of global health policy and systems research and ethics experts was convened to identify ethical considerations relevant to health policy and systems research based on existing knowledge and to identify knowledge gaps through a scoping review and further expert deliberation. Health policy and systems research is highly complex and, in the absence of guidance documents, there is significant variability in ethics review. Although fundamental ethical principles pertain to both traditional clinical research and health policy and systems research, the application of these principles requires a comprehensive understanding of the nature of health policy and systems research with its distinct challenges. Such awareness must be raised among researchers and research ethics committees. Current research ethics committees lack familiarity with health policy and systems research and because health policy and systems research is conducted in real-world contexts, committees often have difficulties in determining whether a project is indeed research and/or requires ethical review. Given the strong current focus on health policy and systems research to rapidly improve health and health systems functioning globally, greater engagement and dialogue around the ethical concerns is required to optimise research review and research conduct in this rapidly evolving field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerie Ann Luyckx
- Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Nikola Biller-Andorno
- Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Abha Saxena
- Global Health Ethics Unit, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Nhan T Tran
- Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Yazdani S, Jadidfard MP. Developing a decision support system to link health technology assessment (HTA) reports to the health system policies in Iran. Health Policy Plan 2017; 32:504-515. [PMID: 28025325 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czw160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/28/2016] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The recent increase of 'Health Technology Assessment' (HTA)-related activities in Iran has necessitated the clarification of policy-making process based on the HTA reports. This study aimed to develop a Decision Support System (DSS) in order to adopt evidence-informed policies regarding health technologies in Iran. The study can be classified as Health Policy and Systems Research. A core panel of seven experts conducted two separate reviews of relevant literature for: 1- Determining the potential technology-related policies. 2- Listing the criteria influencing those policy decisions. The policies and criteria were separately discussed and subsequently rated for appropriateness and necessity during two expert meetings in 2013. In the next step, The 'Discrete Choice Experiment' (DCE) method was employed to develop the DSS for the final technology-related policies. Accordingly, the core panel members independently rated the appropriateness of each policy for 30 virtual technologies based on the random values assigned to all the criteria for each technology. The obtained data for each policy were separately analysed using stepwise regression model, resulting in a minimal set of independent and statistically significant criteria contributing in the experts' judgments about the appropriateness of that policy. The obtained regression coefficients were used as the relative weights of the different levels of the final criteria of any policy statement, shaping the decision support scoring tool for each policy. The study has outlined 64 policy decisions under 7 macro policy areas concerning a health technology. Also, 34 criteria used for making those policy decisions have been organized within a portfolio. DCE, using stepwise regression, resulted in 64 scoring tools shaping the DSS for all HTA-related policies. Both the results and methodology of the study may serve as a guide for policy makers (researchers), particularly in low and middle income countries, in developing decision aids for their own context-specific HTA-related policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahram Yazdani
- Dean of School of Medical Education, Shahid-Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad-Pooyan Jadidfard
- Department of Community Oral Health, School of Dentistry, Shahid-Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Daniels K, Hanefeld J, Marchal B. Social sciences: vital to improving our understanding of health equity, policy and systems. Int J Equity Health 2017; 16:57. [PMID: 28372545 PMCID: PMC5377021 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-017-0546-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2017] [Accepted: 03/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Daniels
- Health Systems Research Unit, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Johanna Hanefeld
- Health Policy and Systems Division, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
| | - Bruno Marchal
- Health Services Organisation unit, Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Lembani M, Teddy G, Molosiwa D, Hwabamungu B. Post-doctoral research fellowship as a health policy and systems research capacity development intervention: a case of the CHESAI initiative. Health Res Policy Syst 2016; 14:89. [PMID: 27993140 PMCID: PMC5168850 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-016-0159-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2016] [Accepted: 11/30/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Building capacity in health policy and systems research (HPSR), especially in low- and middle-income countries, remains a challenge. Various approaches have been suggested and implemented by scholars and institutions using various forms of capacity building to address challenges regarding HPSR development. The Collaboration for Health Systems Analysis and Innovation (CHESAI) - a collaborative effort between the Universities of Cape Town and the Western Cape Schools of Public Health - has employed a non-research based post-doctoral research fellowship (PDRF) as a way of building African capacity in the field of HPSR by recruiting four post-docs. In this paper, we (the four post-docs) explore whether a PDRF is a useful approach for capacity building for the field of HPSR using our CHESAI PDRF experiences. METHODS We used personal reflections of our written narratives providing detailed information regarding our engagement with CHESAI. The narratives were based on a question guide around our experiences through various activities and their impacts on our professional development. The data analysis process was highly iterative in nature, involving repeated meetings among the four post-docs to reflect, discuss and create themes that evolved from the discussions. RESULTS The CHESAI PDRF provided multiple spaces for our engagement and capacity development in the field of HPSR. These spaces provided us with a wide range of learning experiences, including teaching and research, policy networking, skills for academic writing, engaging practitioners, co-production and community dialogue. Our reflections suggest that institutions providing PDRF such as this are valuable if they provide environments endowed with adequate resources, good leadership and spaces for innovation. Further, the PDRFs need to be grounded in a community of HPSR practice, and provide opportunities for the post-docs to gain an in-depth understanding of the broader theoretical and methodological underpinnings of the field. CONCLUSION The study concludes that PDRF is a useful approach to capacity building in HPSR, but it needs be embedded in a community of practice for fellows to benefit. More academic institutions in Africa need to adopt innovative and flexible support for emerging leaders, researchers and practitioners to strengthen our health systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martina Lembani
- School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Robert Sobukwe Road, Private Bag X17, Bellville, 7535 Cape Town South Africa
| | - Gina Teddy
- Health Policy and Systems Division, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Observatory, 7925 Cape Town South Africa
| | - Dintle Molosiwa
- Health Policy and Systems Division, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Observatory, 7925 Cape Town South Africa
| | - Boroto Hwabamungu
- School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Robert Sobukwe Road, Private Bag X17, Bellville, 7535 Cape Town South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Makan A, Fekadu A, Murhar V, Luitel N, Kathree T, Ssebunya J, Lund C. Stakeholder analysis of the Programme for Improving Mental health carE (PRIME): baseline findings. Int J Ment Health Syst 2015; 9:27. [PMID: 26155307 PMCID: PMC4493963 DOI: 10.1186/s13033-015-0020-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2015] [Accepted: 06/26/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The knowledge generated from evidence-based interventions in mental health systems research is seldom translated into policy and practice in low and middle-income countries (LMIC). Stakeholder analysis is a potentially useful tool in health policy and systems research to improve understanding of policy stakeholders and increase the likelihood of knowledge translation into policy and practice. The aim of this study was to conduct stakeholder analyses in the five countries participating in the Programme for Improving Mental health carE (PRIME); evaluate a template used for cross-country comparison of stakeholder analyses; and assess the utility of stakeholder analysis for future use in mental health policy and systems research in LMIC. METHODS Using an adapted stakeholder analysis instrument, PRIME country teams in Ethiopia, India, Nepal, South Africa and Uganda identified and characterised stakeholders in relation to the proposed action: scaling-up mental health services. Qualitative content analysis was conducted for stakeholder groups across countries, and a force field analysis was applied to the data. RESULTS Stakeholder analysis of PRIME has identified policy makers (WHO, Ministries of Health, non-health sector Ministries and Parliament), donors (DFID UK, DFID country offices and other donor agencies), mental health specialists, the media (national and district) and universities as the most powerful, and most supportive actors for scaling up mental health care in the respective PRIME countries. Force field analysis provided a means of evaluating cross-country stakeholder power and positions, particularly for prioritising potential stakeholder engagement in the programme. CONCLUSION Stakeholder analysis has been helpful as a research uptake management tool to identify targeted and acceptable strategies for stimulating the demand for research amongst knowledge users, including policymakers and practitioners. Implementing these strategies amongst stakeholders at a country level will hopefully reduce the knowledge gap between research and policy, and improve health system outcomes for the programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit Makan
- />Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Alan J Flisher Centre for Public Mental Health, University of Cape Town, 46 Sawkins Road, Rondebosch, 7700 Cape Town South Africa
| | - Abebaw Fekadu
- />Department of Psychiatry, College of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Addis Ababa University, PO Box 9086, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
- />Department of Psychological Medicine, King’s College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Centre for Affective Disorders and Affective Disorders Research Group, London, UK
| | - Vaibhav Murhar
- />Public Health Foundation of India, Sangath House, House Number 6, Rishi Nagar, Char Imli, Bhopal, 462016 Madhya Pradesh India
| | - Nagendra Luitel
- />Transcultural Psychosocial Organization Nepal, Baluwatar, Box 8974, Kathmandu, GPO Nepal
| | - Tasneem Kathree
- />School of Psychology, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Howard College Campus, Durban, 4000 South Africa
| | | | - Crick Lund
- />Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Alan J Flisher Centre for Public Mental Health, University of Cape Town, 46 Sawkins Road, Rondebosch, 7700 Cape Town South Africa
| |
Collapse
|