Magnitude and duration of antitoxic response to human infection with Vibrio cholerae

Protection afforded by previous Vibrio cholerae infection against subsequent disease and infection: A review

BACKGROUND

Cholera is an acute, diarrheal disease caused by Vibrio cholerae O1 or 139 that is associated with a high global burden.

METHODS

We analyzed the estimated duration of immunity following cholera infection from available published studies. We searched PubMed and Web of Science for studies of the long-term immunity following cholera infection. We identified 22 eligible studies and categorized them as either observational, challenge, or serological.

RESULTS

We found strong evidence of protection at 3 years after infection in observational and challenge studies. However, serological studies show that elevated humoral markers of potential correlates of protection returned to baseline within 1 year. Additionally, a subclinical cholera infection may confer lower protection than a clinical one, as suggested by 3 studies that found that, albeit with small sample sizes, most participants with a subclinical infection from an initial challenge with cholera had a symptomatic infection when rechallenged with a homologous biotype.

CONCLUSIONS

This review underscores the need to elucidate potential differences in the protection provided by clinical and subclinical cholera infections. Further, more studies are warranted to bridge the gap between the correlates of protection and cholera immunity. Understanding the duration of natural immunity to cholera can help guide control strategies and policy.

Selective neutralization of a bacterial enterotoxin by serum immunoglobulin A in response to mucosal disease

One-third of convalescent-phase serum samples (6 of 18) from patients with Clostridium difficle-associated diarrhea demonstrated neutralization of the clostridial enterotoxin, toxin A. Although appreciable amounts of toxin A-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgA were present in these sera, the ability to neutralize the cytotoxic activity of toxin A on OTF9-63 cells in vitro was confined to the IgA fraction and the IgA1 subclass in serum samples from all six patients. In contrast to the patients with C. difficile diarrhea, this activity was present in both the IgA and IgG fractions in sera from two C. difficile-infected patients without diarrhea, one of whom presented with a splenic abscess. Sera and purified IgA which neutralized the cytotoxicity of toxin A on OTF9-63 cell cultures in vitro also neutralized the enterotoxicity of toxin A in rabbit ileal loops in vivo. This activity was not Fc dependent, since IgA retained neutralizing activity after pepsin digestion and F(ab')2 purification. The transition from nonneutralizing toxin A-specific IgA in the acute-phase sera to neutralizing specific IgA in the convalescent-phase sera was accompanied by a shift from a polymeric to a predominantly monomeric form of specific IgA. However, the neutralizing activity in convalescent-phase sera was present as both monomeric and polymeric IgA. Convalescent-phase sera from other patients with C. difficile diarrhea that failed to neutralize toxin A also failed to produce a predominantly monomeric-form specific IgA response. We conclude that serum IgA, not IgG, characteristically neutralizes toxin A in patients with C. difficile diarrhea who develop neutralizing systemic responses. This neutralization of an enteric bacterial toxin is a unique and selective role for serum IgA which provides a novel functional link between the systemic and mucosal immune systems.

Experimental studies on cholera immunization. II. Evidence for protective antitoxic immunity mediated by serum antibodies as well as local antibodies

By use of the ileal loop technique, the resistance to challenge with cholera enterotoxin was compared between unimmunized rabbits and rabbits immunized with toxin or toxoids. It was shown that subcutaneous as well as intraintestinal immunization induced protective immunity, the toxin being a better immunogen than Formalin-induced toxoid and much better than heat-induced toxoid. The relation between protection and serum antitoxin titer was poor, e.g., protection was seen in the absence of demonstrable serum antibodies. However, intravenous administration of antitoxic antiserum conferred some protection, suggesting that local as well as serum-mediated antitoxic immunity is operating in the host defence against cholera.