Clinical activity of ceftazidime/avibactam against MDR Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: pooled data from the ceftazidime/avibactam Phase III clinical trial programme

Clinical Characteristics of Patients Who Acquired Gram-Negative Bacteria During Ceftazidime-Avibactam Therapy

INTRODUCTION

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) is recommended to treat infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with difficult-to-treat resistance. The selective pressure of CZA results in the isolation of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB), causing superinfection or hospital-wide spread. We aimed to study the clinical characteristics of patients who acquired GNB during CZA treatment.

METHODS

Adult patients treated with CZA for ≥ 5 days for proven or suspected MDR-GNB were retrospectively enrolled at Taipei Veterans General Hospital between December 2019 and June 2021. GNB acquisition was defined as new GNB species resulting in infection or colonization isolated during the period from 5 days after the initiation of CZA until the end of treatment. Clinical features were compared between patients who acquired GNB from clinical specimen and those who did not. Multivariable analysis was used to explore risk factors for acquisition of GNB and 28-day mortality in patients who acquired GNB.

RESULTS

Among 321 patients treated with CZA, 68 GNB were identified in 55 patients (17.1%). Elizabethkingia species (n = 15) was the most common GNB, followed by Acinetobacter species (n = 13) and Burkholderia cenocepacia (n = 11). The presence of diabetes mellitus, and mechanical ventilation were independent risk factors for GNB acquisition. There was a statistically nonsignificant trend toward increased 28-day mortality in patients with GNB acquisition compared to those without (38.2% vs. 27.8%, P = 0.105). Cerebrovascular disease and acquired GNB resulting in infection were associated with 28-day mortality in patients who acquired GNB.

CONCLUSIONS

Elizabethkingia species, Acinetobacter species, and B. cenocepacia were the major GNB acquired during CZA treatment. A trend toward increased mortality was observed in patients with GNB acquisition during CZA treatment. Further studies on optimal treatments for these patients were warranted.

Rapid identification of carbapenemases and in vitro synergy testing of ceftazidime-avibactam with aztreonam in extensively drug-resistant gram-negative pathogens: Establishing the realm of promise

This study evaluated the effectiveness of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) alone and in combination with aztreonam (ATM) against 50 extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) isolates using disk stacking method. New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase (NDM) was the predominant carbapenemase, detected in 50 % of isolates showing synergy. The CZA-ATM combination demonstrated synergy in 40 % of isolates, with 75 % of patients receiving this combination achieving microbiological clearance. This simple, rapid synergy testing method can guide effective therapeutic decisions in resource-limited settings.

Newly developed antibiotics against multidrug-resistant and carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: action and resistance mechanisms

Antimicrobial resistance stands as one of the most urgent global health concerns in the twenty-first century, with projections suggesting that deaths related to drug-resistant infections could escalate to 10 million by 2050 if proactive measures are not implemented. In intensive care settings, managing infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria is particularly challenging, posing a significant threat to public health and contributing substantially to both morbidity and mortality. There are numerous studies on the antibiotics responsible for resistance in Gram-negative bacteria, but comprehensive research on resistance mechanisms against new antibiotics is rare. Considering the possibility that antibiotics may no longer be effective in combating diseases, it is crucial to comprehend the problem of emerging resistance to newly developed antibiotics and to implement preventive measures to curb the spread of resistance. Mutations in porins and efflux pumps play a crucial role in antibiotic resistance by altering drug permeability and active efflux. Porin modifications reduce the influx of antibiotics, whereas overexpression of efflux pumps, particularly those in the resistance-nodulation-cell division (RND) family, actively expels antibiotics from bacterial cells, significantly lowering intracellular drug concentrations and leading to treatment failure.This review examines the mechanisms of action, resistance profiles, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics of newly developed antibiotics designed to combat infections caused by MDR and carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. The antibiotics discussed include ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, aztreonam-avibactam, delafloxacin, temocillin, plazomicin, cefiderocol, and eravacycline.

Efficacy and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam in combination with metronidazole in Japanese patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection: A phase 3, multicentre, open-label study

BACKGROUND

This phase 3 open-label study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam in Japanese patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs).

METHODS

Hospitalised adults with cIAI received ceftazidime-avibactam + metronidazole for 5-14 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was clinical cure at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit in the clinically evaluable (CE) analysis set. Efficacy was evaluated against a pre-defined point estimate criterion of ≥78 %. Microbiological responses, safety and pharmacokinetics were assessed as secondary objectives.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were enrolled at 27 Japanese study sites; 59 (mean age 57 years, 42 % female) were included in the modified intent-to-treat (MITT) analysis set. The most common baseline pathogens (microbiological MITT analysis set; n = 42) were Escherichia coli (n = 31; 74 %), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 6; 14 %) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 5; 12 %); all were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam. In the CE analysis set (n = 40), 36 patients (90.0 %; 95 % confidence interval: 76.3, 97.2) achieved clinical cure at TOC. Favourable per-pathogen microbiological responses at TOC were >90 % for common Gram-negative pathogens, including E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa. Adverse events were generally mild; the most common were constipation (12 %), diarrhoea (12 %), and insomnia (10 %). Pharmacokinetic observations of ceftazidime and avibactam were consistent with previous reports.

CONCLUSION

The proportion of patients with clinical cure at TOC was greater than the pre-defined threshold of 78.0 %. These findings in Japanese patients are consistent with multi-regional phase 3 non-inferiority trials demonstrating the efficacy and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam in patients with cIAIs.

CLINICALTRIALS GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT04927312.

Difficult-to-Treat Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections in Critically Ill Patients: A Comprehensive Review and Treatment Proposal

The management of infections caused by difficult-to-treat Pseudomonas aeruginosa in critically ill patients poses a significant challenge. Optimal antibiotic therapy is crucial for patient prognosis, yet the numerous resistance mechanisms of P. aeruginosa, which may even combine, complicate the selection of an appropriate antibiotic. In this review, we examine the epidemiology, resistance mechanisms, risk factors, and available and future therapeutic options, as well as strategies for treatment optimization. Finally, we propose a treatment algorithm to facilitate decision making based on the resistance patterns specific to each Intensive Care Unit.

Ceftazidime-Avibactam Versus Colistin for the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections: A Multicenter Cohort Study

Purpose: To evaluate the real-world evidence of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) compared to intravenous colistin for the treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa infections. Method: This is a multicenter, retrospective cohort study conducted in the period between 2017 and 2023 at five institutions for patients who received either CAZ-AVI or colistin-based regimens for treating MDR P. aeruginosa infections. Outcomes were compared using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Result: Among the screened patients, 203 patients were included: 89 in the CAZ-AVI group and 114 in the colistin group. A total of 57% presented with pneumonia, 21% with bacteremia, and 61% were in the intensive care unit. The rate of clinical cure was significantly higher among patients who received CAZ-AVI (67% vs. 50%; OR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.16-3.68). The rate of in-hospital mortality was numerically lower among patients who received CAZ-AVI (40% vs. 49%; OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.33-1.03). The rate of AKI was significantly lower among patients who received CAZ-AVI (15% vs. 43%; OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.11-0.45). Conclusion: CAZ-AVI was more effective in treating MDR P. aeruginosa infections and showed a better safety profile compared to colistin. Thus, CAZ-AVI could be a better alternative for treating MDR P. aeruginosa infections.

In Vitro Dynamic Model Evaluation of Meropenem Alone and in Combination with Avibactam Against Carbapenemase-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae

Background: A potential strategy to maintain the efficacy of carbapenems against carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (CPKP) is their combination with carbapenemase inhibitors. To address these issues, the effectiveness of a novel combination of meropenem with avibactam against CPKP was studied. Additionally, the applicability of a pharmacokinetically-based approach to antibiotic/inhibitor minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determinations to better predict efficacy was examined. Methods: CPKP strains were exposed to meropenem alone or in combination with avibactam in an in vitro hollow-fiber infection model. Treatment effects were correlated with simulated antibiotic and antibiotic/inhibitor combination ratios of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) to the MIC (AUC/MIC). All MICs were determined at standard and at high inocula; combination MICs were determined using the conventional approach with fixed avibactam concentration or using the pharmacokinetic (PK)-based approach with a fixed meropenem-to-avibactam concentration ratio, equal to the respective drug therapeutic AUC ratios. Results: Meropenem alone was not effective even against a "susceptible" CPKP strain. The addition of avibactam significantly improved both meropenem MICs and its effectiveness. The effects of meropenem alone and in combination with avibactam (merged data) correlated well with AUC/MIC ratios only when MICs were determined at high inocula and using the PK-based approach (r2 0.97); the correlation was worse with the conventional approach (r2 0.73). Conclusions: The effectiveness of meropenem/avibactam against CPKP is promising. A single "effect-AUC/MIC" relationship useful for predicting meropenem efficacy (alone or in combination with avibactam) was obtained using MICs at high inocula and combination MICs determined using a PK-based approach.

Ceftazidime-avibactam versus other antimicrobial agents for treatment of Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR-PA) is a life-threatening infection with limited treatment options. This is the first meta-analysis of recently published data to compare the clinical outcomes of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) with other antimicrobial agents in treating MDR-PA infections.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library have been systematically reviewed, for publications in the English language, from database inception to July 2023.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Studies comparing CAZ-AVI outcomes with other antimicrobial agents were included. In-hospital mortality & 30-day mortality were assessed as the main outcomes.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Literature screening, data extraction, and the quality evaluation of studies were conducted by two researchers independently, with disagreements resolved by another researcher. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the bias risk for the included studies. Review Manager V.5.4 was employed for the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included four retrospective studies, enrolling 1934 patients. The CAZ-AVI group demonstrated significantly lower in-hospital mortality (risk ratio (RR) = 0.60, 95% CI:0.37-0.97, I2 = 74%, p = 0.04) in three studies with 1444 patients and lower 30-day mortality, in 438 patients from three studies (RR = 0.54, 95% CI:0.28-1.05, I2 = 67%, p = 0.07). No significant difference in clinical success, microbiological success, length of hospital, and ICU stay was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis demonstrated that CAZ-AVI treatment significantly lowered in-hospital mortality compared with other antimicrobial agents in MDR-PA infections. However, the analysis only included a few observational studies and high-quality, randomized controlled trials are needed to investigate further the scope of CAZ-AVI in MDR-PA  infections.

Novel β-lactam antibiotics versus other antibiotics for treatment of complicated urinary tract infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Novel β-lactam antibiotics as well as other kinds of antibiotics have been used to treat complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs); however, their efficacy and safety remain controversial.

Objective

We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis to explore the efficacy and safety of novel β-lactam antibiotics versus other antibiotics against cUTIs.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched systematically from inception through 15 March 2024 for clinical trials comparing novel β-lactam antibiotics with other antibiotics for treatment of cUTIs. Random-effects models were used to evaluate the impact of treatment on the risk ratio (RR) of clinical response, microbiologic response, adverse effects (AEs), serious adverse effects (SAEs). The quality of evidence was evaluated with the Cochrane Risk of Bias assessment tool. The review was registered in INPLASY (INPLASY202440054).

Results

Ten randomized controlled trials involving 5, 925 patients met our inclusion criteria. Our meta-analysis revealed that there was no significant difference in overall clinical response (RR = 1.02), AEs (RR = 1.07), SAEs (RR = 1.20) between novel β-lactam antibiotics groups and other antibiotics groups. However, a significant difference was found in a subgroup of clinical cure rates at the end of treatment between novel β-lactam antibiotics groups and carbapenems groups, with low heterogeneity (RR = 1.02). A significant difference was observed in microbiologic response (RR = 1.11). Subgroup analysis revealed a significant difference in microbiologic response between novel BBL/BLS groups and carbapenems groups (RR = 1.13, I2 = 21%, P = 0.005). Differences was observed between novel BBL/BLS groups and piperacillin/tazobactam sodium groups (RR = 1.21, I2 = 70%, P = 0.02). Similar results were obtained from subgroup analysis of the difference in microbiologic response between novel β-lactam antibiotics groups and ertapenem groups (RR = 0.92, I2 = 0, P = 0.01).

Conclusion

Novel β-lactam antibiotics had similar overall clinical cure, AEs, SAE, to other antibiotics in the treatment of cUTIs. However, novel β-lactam antibiotics demonstrated superior clinical cure rates compared to carbapenems in a subgroup analysis, and exhibited better microbiologic response than other antibiotics.

Novel β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitors as monotherapy versus combination for the treatment of drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections: A multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND

Data comparing the clinical outcomes of novel β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitors given in combination versus monotherapy for the treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa infections are lacking.

METHOD

This retrospective cohort study included patients who received novel β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitors as monotherapy or in combination for the treatment of MDR P. aeruginosa infections. The study was conducted between 2017 and 2022 in 6 tertiary care hospitals in Saudi Arabia. Overall in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, clinical cure, and acute kidney injury (AKI) were compared between recipients of monotherapy versus combination using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULT

118 patients and 82 patients were included in monotherapy and combination therapy arms, respectively. The cohort represented an ill population with 56% in the intensive care unit and 37% in septic shock. A total of 19% of patients presented with bacteremia. Compared to monotherapy, combination therapy did not significantly differ in clinical cure (57% vs. 68%; P = 0.313; OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.36-1.14) in-hospital mortality (45% vs. 37%; P = 0.267; OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.78-2.45), or 30-day mortality (27% vs. 24%; P = 0.619; OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.62-1.25). However, AKI (32% vs. 12%; P = 0.0006; OR, 3.45; 95% CI, 1.67-7.13) was significantly more common in patients who received combination therapy.

CONCLUSION

Novel β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitors when used in combination with other antibiotics did not add clinical benefit compared to their use as monotherapy in the treatment of MDR P. aeruginosa infections. A Combination regimen was associated with an increased risk of nephrotoxicity.

Antimicrobial susceptibility profile of ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam and cefiderocol against carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates from Türkiye

PURPOSE

Carbapenem resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CR-PA) is escalating worldwide and leaves clinicians few therapeutic options in recent years, β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam) and a new siderophore cephalosporin (cefiderocol) have been approved for the treatment of P. aeruginosa infection and have shown potent activity against isolates defined as carbapenem resistant. The aim of this study was to determine the phenotypic profile of these agents against CR-PA in the emerging setting of carbapenemases.

METHODS

CR-PA clinical isolates were collected from three teaching hospitals in different geographical regions between January 2017-December 2021. All isolates were subjected to phenotypic carbapenemase testing using modified carbapenem inactivation method. MICs were determined by reference broth microdilution and evaluated according to EUCAST standards, while genotypic profiling was determined using PCR methods.

RESULTS

244 CR-PA sourced most frequently from the respiratory tract (32.2%), blood (20.4%) and urine (17.5%) were evaluated. Of all isolates, 32 (13.1%) were phenotypically and 38 (15.6%) were genotypically defined as carbapenemase-positive. The most common carbapenemase was GES (63.1%), followed by VIM (15.8%). The MIC50/90(S%) of ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam and cefiderocol in all CR-PA isolates were 4 and 32 (80%), 1 and > 64 (69%) and 0.25 and 1 mg/L (96%), respectively. Cefiderocol was also the most active agent in carbapenemase-positive isolates (90%).

CONSLUSION

While ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam remained highly active against CR-PA devoid of carbapenemases, cefiderocol provided potent in vitro activity irrespective of carbapenemase production. When considering the potential clinical utility of newer agents against CR-PA, regional variations in carbapenemase prevalence must be considered.

Guidelines for Antibacterial Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Infections

This guideline aims to promote the prudent use of antibacterial agents for managing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) infections in clinical practice in Korea. The general section encompasses recommendations for the management of common CRE infections and diagnostics, whereas each specific section is structured with key questions that are focused on antibacterial agents and disease-specific approaches. This guideline covers both currently available and upcoming antibacterial agents in Korea.

Novel Siderophore Cephalosporin and Combinations of Cephalosporins with β-Lactamase Inhibitors as an Advancement in Treatment of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

In an era of increasing antibiotic resistance among pathogens, the treatment options for infectious diseases are diminishing. One of the clinical groups especially vulnerable to this threat are patients who are hospitalized in intensive care units due to ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant/extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. In order to prevent the exhaustion of therapeutic options for this life-threatening condition, there is an urgent need for new pharmaceuticals. Novel β-lactam antibiotics, including combinations of cephalosporins with β-lactamase inhibitors, are proposed as a solution to this escalating problem. The unique mechanism of action, distinctive to this new group of siderophore cephalosporins, can overcome multidrug resistance, which is raising high expectations. In this review, we present the summarized results of clinical trials, in vitro studies, and case studies on the therapeutic efficacy of cefoperazone-sulbactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, and cefiderocol in the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia. We demonstrate that treatment strategies based on siderophore cephalosporins and combinations of β-lactams with β-lactamases inhibitors show comparable or higher clinical efficacy than those used with classic pharmaceuticals, like carbapenems, colistin, or tigecycline, and are often associated with a lower risk of adverse events.

Management strategies for severe Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review focuses on the management of severe Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in critically ill patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is the most common pathogen in intensive care; the main related infections are nosocomial pneumonias, then bloodstream infections. Antimicrobial resistance is common; despite new antibiotics, it is associated with increased mortality, and can lead to a therapeutic deadlock.

SUMMARY

Carbapenem resistance in difficult-to-treat P. aeruginosa (DTR-PA) strains is primarily mediated by loss or reduction of the OprD porin, overexpression of the cephalosporinase AmpC, and/or overexpression of efflux pumps. However, the role of carbapenemases, particularly metallo-β-lactamases, has become more important. Ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam and imipenem-relebactam are useful against DTR phenotypes (noncarbapenemase producers). Other new agents, such as aztreonam-ceftazidime-avibactam or cefiderocol, or colistin, might be effective for carbapenemase producers. Regarding nonantibiotic agents, only phages might be considered, pending further clinical trials. Combination therapy does not reduce mortality, but may be necessary for empirical treatment. Short-term treatment of severe P. aeruginosa infections should be preferred when it is expected that the clinical situation resolves rapidly.

Resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: A Narrative Review of Antibiogram Interpretation and Emerging Treatments

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a ubiquitous Gram-negative bacterium renowned for its resilience and adaptability across diverse environments, including clinical settings, where it emerges as a formidable pathogen. Notorious for causing nosocomial infections, P. aeruginosa presents a significant challenge due to its intrinsic and acquired resistance mechanisms. This comprehensive review aims to delve into the intricate resistance mechanisms employed by P. aeruginosa and to discern how these mechanisms can be inferred by analyzing sensitivity patterns displayed in antibiograms, emphasizing the complexities encountered in clinical management. Traditional monotherapies are increasingly overshadowed by the emergence of multidrug-resistant strains, necessitating a paradigm shift towards innovative combination therapies and the exploration of novel antibiotics. The review accentuates the critical role of accurate antibiogram interpretation in guiding judicious antibiotic use, optimizing therapeutic outcomes, and mitigating the propagation of antibiotic resistance. Misinterpretations, it cautions, can inadvertently foster resistance, jeopardizing patient health and amplifying global antibiotic resistance challenges. This paper advocates for enhanced clinician proficiency in interpreting antibiograms, facilitating informed and strategic antibiotic deployment, thereby improving patient prognosis and contributing to global antibiotic stewardship efforts.

Efficacy and safety of ceftazidime/avibactam in patients with infections caused by β-lactamase-producing Gram-negative pathogens: a pooled analysis from the Phase 3 clinical trial programme

OBJECTIVES

This post hoc pooled analysis evaluated clinical and microbiological outcomes and safety in patients with infections caused by β-lactamase-producing Gram-negative pathogens across five Phase 3, randomized, controlled, multicentre trials of ceftazidime/avibactam in adults with complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI), complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI)/pyelonephritis and nosocomial pneumonia (NP), including ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).

METHODS

In each trial, RECLAIM/RECLAIM 3 (cIAI), REPRISE (cIAI/cUTI), RECAPTURE (cUTI) and REPROVE (NP, including VAP) patients were randomized 1:1 to IV ceftazidime/avibactam (plus metronidazole for patients with cIAI) or comparators (carbapenems in >97% patients) for 5-21 days. Clinical and microbiological responses at the test-of-cure visit were assessed for patients with ESBLs, and/or plasmidic and/or overexpression of chromosomal AmpC, and/or serine carbapenemases without MBLs identified in baseline Gram-negative isolates by phenotypic screening and molecular characterization in the pooled microbiological modified ITT (mMITT) population.

RESULTS

In total, 813 patients (ceftazidime/avibactam, n = 389; comparator, n = 424) had ≥1 β-lactamase-producing baseline pathogen identified, amongst whom 792 patients (ceftazidime/avibactam, n = 379; comparator, n = 413) had no MBLs. The most frequent β-lactamase-producing pathogens across treatment groups were Escherichia coli (n = 381), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 261) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 53). Clinical cure rates in the pooled non-MBL β-lactamase-producing mMITT population were 88.1% (334/379) for ceftazidime/avibactam and 88.1% (364/413) for comparators; favourable microbiological response rates were 76.5% (290/379) and 68.8% (284/413), respectively. The safety profile of ceftazidime/avibactam was consistent with previous observations.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis provides supportive evidence of the efficacy and safety of ceftazidime/avibactam in patients with infections caused by ESBLs, AmpC and serine carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative pathogens.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT01499290; NCT01726023; NCT01644643; NCT01595438/NCT01599806; NCT01808092.

Severe infections caused by difficult-to-treat Gram-negative bacteria

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) poses a significant global health concern, contributing to increased infections, mortality rates, and healthcare costs. This review discusses the main clinical manifestations, therapeutic options, and recent findings in managing antibiotic-resistant GNB, with a focus on difficult-to-treat infections.

RECENT FINDINGS

Difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) is a novel classification that identifies GNB exhibiting intermediate or resistant phenotypes to first-line agents in the carbapenem, beta-lactam, and fluoroquinolone categories. The main pathogens implicated in severe infections include DTR Enterobacterales, DTR Pseudomonas aeruginosa , and DTR Acinetobacter baumannii. Although the clinical implications of DTR strains are still under investigation, certain studies have linked them to prolonged hospital stays and poor patient outcomes.

SUMMARY

Severe infections caused by DTR-GNB pose a formidable challenge for healthcare providers and represent a growing global health issue. The proper administration and optimization of novel antibiotics at our disposal are of paramount importance for combating bacterial resistance and improving patient prognosis.

Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Versus Ceftazidime-Avibactam for the Treatment of Infections Caused by Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a Multicenter Cohort Study

Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C-T) and ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) are two novel antimicrobials that retain activity against resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The comparative effectiveness and safety of C-T versus CAZ-AVI remain unknown. A retrospective, multicenter cohort study was performed in six tertiary centers in Saudi Arabia and included patients who received either C-T or CAZ-AVI for infections due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa. Overall in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, and clinical cure were the main study outcomes. Safety outcomes were also evaluated. A multivariate analysis using logistic regression was used to determine the independent impact of treatment on the main outcomes of interest. We enrolled 200 patients in the study (100 in each treatment arm). A total of 56% were in the intensive care unit, 48% were mechanically ventilated, and 37% were in septic shock. Approximately 19% of patients had bacteremia. Combination therapy was administered to 41% of the patients. The differences between the C-T and CAZ-AVI groups did not reach statistical significance in the overall in-hospital mortality (44% versus 37%; P = 0.314; OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.76 to 2.36), 30-day mortality (27% versus 23%; P = 0.514; OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.65 to 2.35), clinical cure (61% versus 66%; P = 0.463; OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.43 to 1.49), or acute kidney injury (23% versus 17%; P = 0.289; OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 0.69 to 3.14), even after adjusting for differences between the two groups. C-T and CAZ-AVI did not significantly differ in terms of safety and effectiveness, and they serve as potential options for the treatment of infections caused by MDR P. aeruginosa.

Anti-Pseudomonas aeruginosa Vaccines and Therapies: An Assessment of Clinical Trials

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a Gram-negative opportunistic pathogen that causes high morbidity and mortality in cystic fibrosis (CF) and immunocompromised patients, including patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), severely burned patients, and patients with surgical wounds. Due to the intrinsic and extrinsic antibiotic resistance mechanisms, the ability to produce several cell-associated and extracellular virulence factors, and the capacity to adapt to several environmental conditions, eradicating P. aeruginosa within infected patients is difficult. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is one of the six multi-drug-resistant pathogens (ESKAPE) considered by the World Health Organization (WHO) as an entire group for which the development of novel antibiotics is urgently needed. In the United States (US) and within the last several years, P. aeruginosa caused 27% of deaths and approximately USD 767 million annually in health-care costs. Several P. aeruginosa therapies, including new antimicrobial agents, derivatives of existing antibiotics, novel antimicrobial agents such as bacteriophages and their chelators, potential vaccines targeting specific virulence factors, and immunotherapies have been developed. Within the last 2-3 decades, the efficacy of these different treatments was tested in clinical and preclinical trials. Despite these trials, no P. aeruginosa treatment is currently approved or available. In this review, we examined several of these clinicals, specifically those designed to combat P. aeruginosa infections in CF patients, patients with P. aeruginosa VAP, and P. aeruginosa-infected burn patients.

What to Do with the New Antibiotics?

Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria-related infections have become a real public health problem and have exposed the risk of a therapeutic impasse. In recent years, many new antibiotics have been introduced to enrich the therapeutic armamentarium. Among these new molecules, some are mainly of interest for the treatment of the multidrug-resistant infections associated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam); others are for carbapenem-resistant infections associated with Enterobacterales (ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam); and finally, there are others that are effective on the majority of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (cefiderocol). Most international guidelines recommend these new antibiotics in the treatment of microbiologically documented infections. However, given the significant morbidity and mortality of these infections, particularly in the case of inadequate therapy, it is important to consider the place of these antibiotics in probabilistic treatment. Knowledge of the risk factors for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (local ecology, prior colonization, failure of prior antibiotic therapy, and source of infection) seems necessary in order to optimize antibiotic prescriptions. In this review, we will assess these different antibiotics according to the epidemiological data.

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Optimized Two-Step-Administration Therapy with Ceftazidime/Avibactam for Treating Extensively Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Pulmonary Infections: a Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Analysis

The objective of this pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of different dosing regimens of ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) for the treatment of pulmonary infections by extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa using optimized two-step administration therapy (OTAT) and traditional infusion (TI). We used Monte Carlo simulations (MCS) to integrate PK parameters with PD parameters to assess the adequacy of CZA dosing in critically ill patients with XDR P. aeruginosa pulmonary infections. Dosing models were as follows: 2.5 g q8h, 2.5 g q6h, 4 g q8h, 4 g q6h, 1.25 g q8h, 1.25 g q6h, and 0.94 g q12h. MCS showed that the cumulative fraction of response of all dosing regimens of OTAT was higher than 90%. The probability of target attainment of all dosing regimens of OTAT at MICs (minimal inhibitory concentrations) between 16 mg/L and 32 mg/L was higher than that of TI. Based on these models, PK/PD goals were met with OTAT regimens, even with high MICs (>16 mg/L) compared to traditional infusion (TI) intervals. Thus, this study indicates that OTAT with sufficient PK exposure could improve the efficacy of CZA in critically ill patients with XDR P. aeruginosa pulmonary infections.

Ceftazidime/Avibactam for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection in Lung Transplant Recipients

Background

Experience of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ/AVI) for carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) infection in recipients after lung transplantation (LT) is relatively limited.

Methods

A retrospective observational study was conducted on lung transplant recipients receiving CAZ/AVI therapy for CRPA infection. The primary outcomes were the 14-day and 30-day mortality. The secondary outcomes were clinical cure and microbiological cure.

Results

Among 183 LT recipients, a total of 15 recipients with CRPA infection who received CAZ/AVI therapy were enrolled in this study. The mean age of recipients was 54 years and 73.3% of recipients were male. The median time from infection onset to initiation of CAZ/AVI treatment was 4 days (IQR, 3-7) and the mean duration of CAZ/AVI therapy was 10 days. CAZ/AVI was mainly administered as monotherapy in LT recipients (80%). Among these eligible recipients, 14-day and 30-day mortality were 6.7% and 13.3%, respectively. The clinical cure and microbiological cure rates of CAZ/AVI therapy were 53.3% and 60%, respectively. Three recipients (20%) experienced recurrent infection. In addition, the mean lengths of ICU stay and hospital stay were 24 days and 35 days, respectively, among LT recipients.

Conclusion

CAZ/AVI may be an alternative and promising regimen for CRPA eradiation in lung transplant recipients.

Ceftazidime-avibactam activity against Gram-negative respiratory isolates collected between 2018 and 2019

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to assess the in vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) and a panel of comparator agents against isolates of Enterobacter spp., Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected in 2018 and 2019 by different centres worldwide from patients with respiratory tract infections.

METHODS

Susceptibility and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of all organisms were determined using broth microdilution methodology for CAZ-AVI, and a panel of comparator antimicrobial agents by a central reference laboratory according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing guidelines.

RESULTS

CAZ-AVI demonstrated potent antimicrobial activity against isolates of Enterobacter spp. (97.6% susceptibility, MIC₉₀, 1 µg/ml), E. coli (98.5% susceptibility, MIC₉₀^, 0.25 µg/ml), K. pneumoniae (94.7% susceptibility, MIC₉₀ 2 µg/ml), and P. aeruginosa (91.2% susceptibility, MIC₉₀ 8 µg/ml). CAZ-AVI was also active (susceptibility >85%) against MDR isolates for all organisms except P. aeruginosa. Only a small proportion (<10%) of all isolates of Enterobacter spp. and E. coli were identified as XDR compared to isolates of K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa isolates (>20%). Susceptibility to CAZ-AVI was high (>70%) among XDR isolates of Enterobacter spp., K. pneumoniae, and E. coli, compared to P. aeruginosa (<70%). Among the comparator agents, only colistin showed consistent activity across all the organisms (>85%).

CONCLUSION

Gram-negative respiratory isolates collected in 2018-2019 showed high susceptibility to CAZ-AVI; CAZ-AVI represents a potential treatment option against infection caused by these organisms.

Best practices: Appropriate use of the new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam in South Africa

Antibiotic stewardship of hospital-acquired infections because of difficult-to-treat resistant (DTR) Gram-negative bacteria is a global challenge. Their increasing prevalence in South Africa has required a shift in prescribing in recent years towards colistin, an antibiotic of last resort. High toxicity levels and developing resistance to colistin are narrowing treatment options further. Recently, two new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam were registered in South Africa, bringing hope of new options for management of these life-threatening infections. However, with increased use in the private sector, increasing levels of resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam are already being witnessed, putting their long-term viability as treatment options of last resort, in jeopardy. This review focuses on how these two vital new antibiotics should be stewarded within a framework that recognises the resistance mechanisms currently predominant in South Africa's multi-drug and DTR Gram-negative bacteria. Moreover, the withholding of their use for resistant infections that can be treated with currently available antibiotics is a critical part of stewardship, if these antibiotics are to be conserved in the long term.

Treatment of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections: a case for cefiderocol

INTRODUCTION

Carbapenem-resistant (CR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections constitute a serious clinical threat globally. Patients are often critically ill and/or immunocompromised. Antibiotic options are limited and are currently centered on beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor (BL-BLI) combinations and the siderophore cephalosporin cefiderocol.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the mechanisms of P. aeruginosa resistance and their potential impact on the activity of current treatment options, along with evidence for the clinical efficacy of BL-BLI combinations in P. aeruginosa infections, some of which specifically target infections due to CR organisms. The preclinical and clinical evidence supporting cefiderocol as a treatment option for P. aeruginosa involving infections is also reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

Cefiderocol is active against most known P. aeruginosa mechanisms mediating carbapenem resistance. It is stable against different serine- and metallo-beta-lactamases, and, due to its iron channel-dependent uptake mechanism, is not impacted by porin channel loss. Furthermore, the periplasmic level of cefiderocol is not affected by upregulated efflux pumps. The potential for on-treatment resistance development currently appears to be low, although more clinical data are required. Information from surveillance programs, real-world compassionate use, and clinical studies demonstrate that cefiderocol is an important treatment option for CR P. aeruginosa infections.

Ceftazidime/Avibactam in Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Due to Difficult-to-Treat Non-Fermenter Gram-Negative Bacteria in COVID-19 Patients: A Case Series and Review of the Literature

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in critically ill patients with COVID-19 represents a very huge global threat due to a higher incidence rate compared to non-COVID-19 patients and almost 50% of the 30-day mortality rate. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the first pathogen involved but uncommon non-fermenter gram-negative organisms such as Burkholderia cepacea and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia have emerged as other potential etiological causes. Against carbapenem-resistant gram-negative microorganisms, Ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) is considered a first-line option, even more so in case of a ceftolozane/tazobactam resistance or shortage. The aim of this report was to describe our experience with CZA in a case series of COVID-19 patients hospitalized in the ICU with VAP due to difficult-to-treat (DTT) P. aeruginosa, Burkholderia cepacea, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and to compare it with data published in the literature. A total of 23 patients were treated from February 2020 to March 2022: 19/23 (82%) VAPs were caused by Pseudomonas spp. (16/19 DTT), 2 by Burkholderia cepacea, and 6 by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia; 12/23 (52.1%) were polymicrobial. Septic shock was diagnosed in 65.2% of the patients and VAP occurred after a median of 29 days from ICU admission. CZA was prescribed as a combination regimen in 86% of the cases, with either fosfomycin or inhaled amikacin or cotrimoxazole. Microbiological eradication was achieved in 52.3% of the cases and the 30-day overall mortality rate was 14/23 (60.8%). Despite the high mortality of critically ill COVID-19 patients, CZA, especially in combination therapy, could represent a valid treatment option for VAP due to DTT non-fermenter gram-negative bacteria, including uncommon pathogens such as Burkholderia cepacea and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.

New Drugs for the Treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections with Limited Treatment Options: A Narrative Review

P. aeruginosa is still one of the most threatening pathogens responsible for serious hospital-acquired infections. It is intrinsically resistant to many antimicrobial agents and additional acquired resistance further complicates the management of such infections. High rates of combined antimicrobial resistance persist in many countries, especially in the eastern and south-eastern parts of Europe. The aim of this narrative review is to provide a comprehensive assessment of the epidemiology, latest data, and clinical evidence on the current and new available drugs active against P. aeruginosa isolates with limited treatment options. The latest evidence and recommendations supporting the use of ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam, characterized by targeted clinical activity against a significant proportion of P. aeruginosa strains with limited treatment options, are described based on a review of the latest microbiological and clinical studies. Cefiderocol, with excellent in vitro activity against P. aeruginosa isolates, good stability to all β-lactamases and against porin and efflux pumps mutations, is also examined. New carbapenem combinations are explored, reviewing the latest experimental and initial clinical evidence. One section is devoted to a review of new anti-pseudomonal antibiotics in the pipeline, such as cefepime-taniborbactam and cefepime-zidebactam. Finally, other “old” antimicrobials, mainly fosfomycin, that can be used as combination strategies, are described.

Infectious Diseases Society of America 2022 Guidance on the Treatment of Extended-Spectrum β-lactamase Producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with Difficult-to-Treat Resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa)

BACKGROUND

The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) is committed to providing up-to-date guidance on the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections. The initial guidance document on infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa) was published on 17 September 2020. Over the past year, there have been a number of important publications furthering our understanding of the management of ESBL-E, CRE, and DTR-P. aeruginosa infections, prompting a rereview of the literature and this updated guidance document.

METHODS

A panel of 6 infectious diseases specialists with expertise in managing antimicrobial-resistant infections reviewed, updated, and expanded previously developed questions and recommendations about the treatment of ESBL-E, CRE, and DTR-P. aeruginosa infections. Because of differences in the epidemiology of resistance and availability of specific anti-infectives internationally, this document focuses on the treatment of infections in the United States.

RESULTS

Preferred and alternative treatment recommendations are provided with accompanying rationales, assuming the causative organism has been identified and antibiotic susceptibility results are known. Approaches to empiric treatment, duration of therapy, and other management considerations are also discussed briefly. Recommendations apply for both adult and pediatric populations.

CONCLUSIONS

The field of antimicrobial resistance is highly dynamic. Consultation with an infectious diseases specialist is recommended for the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections. This document is current as of 24 October 2021. The most current versions of IDSA documents, including dates of publication, are available at www.idsociety.org/practice-guideline/amr-guidance/.

Antimicrobial Treatment Options for Difficult-to-Treat Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria Causing Cystitis, Pyelonephritis, and Prostatitis: A Narrative Review

Urinary tract infections, including cystitis, acute pyelonephritis, and prostatitis, are among the most common diagnoses prompting antibiotic prescribing. The rise in antimicrobial resistance over the past decades has led to the increasing challenge of urinary tract infections because of multidrug-resistant and "difficult-to-treat resistance" among Gram-negative bacteria. Recent advances in pharmacotherapy and medical microbiology are modernizing how these urinary tract infections are treated. Advances in pharmacotherapy have included not only the development and approval of novel antibiotics, such as ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, imipenem/relebactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, cefiderocol, plazomicin, and glycylcyclines, but also the re-examination of the potential role of legacy antibiotics, including older aminoglycosides and tetracyclines. Recent advances in medical microbiology allow phenotypic and molecular mechanism of resistance testing, and thus antibiotic prescribing can be tailored to the mechanism of resistance in the infecting pathogen. Here, we provide a narrative review on the clinical and pre-clinical studies of drugs that can be used for difficult-to-treat resistant Gram-negative bacteria, with a particular focus on data relevant to the urinary tract. We also offer a pragmatic framework for antibiotic selection when encountering urinary tract infections due to difficult-to-treat resistant Gram-negative bacteria based on the organism and its mechanism of resistance.

The Efficacy of Using Combination Therapy against Multi-Drug and Extensively Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Clinical Settings

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a Gram-negative bacterium which is capable of developing a high level of antibiotic resistance. It has been placed on the WHO's critical priority pathogen list and it is commonly found in ventilator-associated pneumonia infections, blood stream infections and other largely hospital-acquired illnesses. These infections are difficult to effectively treat due to their increasing antibiotic resistance and as such patients are often treated with antibiotic combination regimens.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search with screening criteria using the Ovid search engine and the Embase, Ovid Medline, and APA PsycInfo databases.

RESULTS

It was found that in many cases the combination therapies were able to match or outperform the monotherapies and none performed noticeably worse than the monotherapies. However, the clinical studies were mostly small, only a few were prospective randomized clinical trials and statistical significance was lacking.

CONCLUSIONS

It was concluded that combination therapies have a place in the treatment of these highly resistant bacteria and, in some cases, there is some evidence to suggest that they provide a more effective treatment than monotherapies.

Therapeutic Strategies for Emerging Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates are frequent causes of serious nosocomial infections that may compromise the selection of antimicrobial therapy. The goal of this review is to summarize recent epidemiologic, microbiologic, and clinical data pertinent to the therapeutic management of patients with infections caused by MDR/XDR-P. aeruginosa. Historically, conventional antipseudomonal β-lactam antibiotics have been used for the empiric treatment of MDR/XDR-P. aeruginosa. Owing to the remarkable capacity of P. aeruginosa to confer resistance via multiple mechanisms, these traditional therapies are often rendered ineffective. To increase the likelihood of administering empiric antipseudomonal therapy with in vitro activity, a second agent from a different antibiotic class is often administered concomitantly with a traditional antipseudomonal β-lactam. However, combination therapy may pose an increased risk of antibiotic toxicity and secondary infection, notably, Clostridioides difficile. Multiple novel agents that demonstrate in vitro activity against MDR-P. aeruginosa (e.g., β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations and cefiderocol) have been recently granted US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval and are promising additions to the antipseudomonal armamentarium. Even so, comparative clinical data pertaining to these novel agents is sparse, and concerns surrounding the scarcity of antibiotics active against refractory MDR/XDR-P. aeruginosa necessitates continued assessment of alternative therapies. This is particularly important in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) who may be chronically colonized and suffer from recurrent infections and disease exacerbations due in part to limited efficacious antipseudomonal agents. Bacteriophages represent a promising candidate for combatting recurrent and refractory infections with their ability to target specific host bacteria and circumvent traditional mechanisms of antibiotic resistance seen in MDR/XDR-P. aeruginosa. Future goals for the management of these infections include increased comparator clinical data of novel agents to determine in what scenario certain agents may be preferred over others. Until then, appropriate treatment of these infections requires a thorough evaluation of patient- and infection-specific factors to guide empiric and definitive therapeutic decisions.

Effectiveness of ceftazidime-avibactam for the treatment of infections due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa

BACKGROUND

Clinical experience with ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) for the treatment due to multidrug or extremely resistant (MDR/XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa is limited.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa infections treated with CAZ-AVI Primary outcome was clinical cure by day 14, evaluated by logistic regression adjusted for the propensity score to receive CAZ-AVI as combination therapy. 30-day all-cause mortality, 90-day recurrence, emerging CAZ-AVI resistance, and safety of therapy were secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Sixty-one first episodes of MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa infection were included. The most common source was lower respiratory tract (34.4%), 14.8% episodes developed bloodstream infection and 50.8% sepsis at presentation. Ceftazidime-avibactam therapy was initiated at a median of 7.0 (interquartile range [IQR]: 3.5-12.0) days from symptoms onset. It was used as combined therapy in 29 (47.5%) episodes. Clinical cure rate by day 14 was 54.1% and predictors of response were days to source control (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72-0.98; P-value = 0.024), days until the initiation of CAZ-AVI therapy (aOR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.49-0.86; P-value = 0.003), age (aOR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.99-1.15; P-value = 0.066) and CAZ-AVI combination therapy (aOR: 0.02; 95% CI: 0.01-0.38; P-value = 0.009). Rates of 30-day all-cause mortality and 90-day recurrence were 13.1% and 12.5%, respectively. Emergence of drug resistance to CAZ-AVI was not detected. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 3 episodes (4.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

CAZ-AVI constitutes a valid alternative for the treatment of infections due to MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa.

European Society of clinical microbiology and infectious diseases (ESCMID) guidelines for the treatment of infections caused by Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (endorsed by ESICM -European Society of intensive care Medicine)

SCOPE

These ESCMID guidelines address the targeted antibiotic treatment of 3^rd generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales (3GCephRE) and carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, focusing on the effectiveness of individual antibiotics and on combination vs. monotherapy.

METHODS

An expert panel was convened by ESCMID. A systematic review was performed including randomized controlled trials and observational studies, examining different antibiotic treatment regimens for the targeted treatment of infections caused by the 3GCephRE, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumanni (CRAB). Treatments were classified as head-to-head comparisons between individual antibiotics and monotherapy vs. combination therapy regimens, including defined monotherapy and combination regimens only. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, preferably at 30 days and secondary outcomes included clinical failure, microbiological failure, development of resistance, relapse/recurrence, adverse events and length of hospital stay. The last search of all databases was conducted in December 2019, followed by a focused search for relevant studies up until ECCMID 2021. Data were summarized narratively. The certainty of the evidence for each comparison between antibiotics and between monotherapy vs. combination therapy regimens was classified by the GRADE recommendations. The strength of the recommendations for or against treatments was classified as strong or conditional (weak).

RECOMMENDATIONS

The guideline panel reviewed the evidence per pathogen, preferably per site of infection, critically appraising the existing studies. Many of the comparisons were addressed in small observational studies at high risk of bias only. Notably, there was very little evidence on the effects of the new, recently approved, beta-lactam beta-lactamase inhibitors on infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Most recommendations are based on very-low and low certainty evidence. A high value was placed on antibiotic stewardship considerations in all recommendations, searching for carbapenem-sparing options for 3GCephRE and limiting the recommendations of the new antibiotics for severe infections, as defined by the sepsis-3 criteria. Research needs are addressed.

Ceftazidime-Avibactam for the Treatment of Serious Gram-Negative Infections with Limited Treatment Options: A Systematic Literature Review

INTRODUCTION

A systematic literature review was undertaken to evaluate real-world use of ceftazidime-avibactam for infections due to aerobic Gram-negative organisms in adults with limited treatment options.

METHODS

Literature searches retrieved peer-reviewed publications and abstracts from major international infectious disease congresses from January 2015 to February 2021. Results were screened using pre-defined criteria to limit the dataset to relevant publications (notable exclusions were paediatric data and outcomes data for bacteria intrinsically resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam). Data for included publications were subjected to qualitative synthesis.

RESULTS

Seventy-three relevant publications (62 peer-reviewed articles; 10 abstracts) comprising 1926 patients treated with ceftazidime-avibactam (either alone or combined with other antimicrobials) and 1114 comparator/control patients were identified. All patients were hospitalised for serious illness and most had multiple comorbidities. The most common infections were pneumonia, bacteraemia, and skin/soft tissue, urinary tract, or abdominal infections; smaller numbers of patients with meningitis, febrile neutropenia, osteomyelitis, and cystic fibrosis were also included. Carbapenem-resistant or carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CRE; n = 1718) and carbapenem-resistant, multidrug-resistant (MDR), and extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 150) were the most common pathogens. Most publications reported positive outcomes for ceftazidime-avibactam treatment (clinical success rates ranged from 45 to 100% and reported 30-day mortality from 0 to 63%), which were statistically superior versus comparators in some studies. ceftazidime-avibactam resistance emergence occurred infrequently and mostly in Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae strains.

CONCLUSION

This review provides qualitative evidence of successful use of ceftazidime-avibactam for the treatment of hospitalised patients with CRE and MDR P. aeruginosa infections with limited treatment options.

Review of Ceftazidime-Avibactam for the Treatment of Infections Caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic Gram-negative pathogen that causes a range of serious infections that are often challenging to treat, as this pathogen can express multiple resistance mechanisms, including multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) phenotypes. Ceftazidime–avibactam is a combination antimicrobial agent comprising ceftazidime, a third-generation semisynthetic cephalosporin, and avibactam, a novel non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor. This review explores the potential role of ceftazidime–avibactam for the treatment of P. aeruginosa infections. Ceftazidime–avibactam has good in vitro activity against P. aeruginosa relative to comparator β-lactam agents and fluoroquinolones, comparable to amikacin and ceftolozane–tazobactam. In Phase 3 clinical trials, ceftazidime–avibactam has generally demonstrated similar clinical and microbiological outcomes to comparators in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections, complicated urinary tract infections or hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by P. aeruginosa. Although real-world data are limited, favourable outcomes with ceftazidime–avibactam treatment have been reported in some patients with MDR and XDR P. aeruginosa infections. Thus, ceftazidime–avibactam may have a potentially important role in the management of serious and complicated P. aeruginosa infections, including those caused by MDR and XDR strains.

Ceftazidime-avibactam: are we safe from class A carbapenemase producers' infections?

Recently, new combinations of β-lactams and β-lactamase inhibitors became available, including ceftazidime-avibactam, and increased the ability to treat infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE). Despite the reduced time of clinical use, isolates expressing resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam have been reported, even during treatment or in patients with no previous contact with this drug. Here, we detailed review data on global ceftazidime-avibactam susceptibility, the mechanisms involved in resistance, and the molecular epidemiology of resistant isolates. Ceftazidime-avibactam susceptibility remains high (≥ 98.4%) among Enterobacterales worldwide, being lower among extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producers and CRE. Alterations in class A β-lactamases are the major mechanism involved in ceftazidime-avibactam resistance, and mutations are mainly, but not exclusively, located in the Ω loop of these enzymes. Modifications in Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) 3 and KPC-2 have been observed by many authors, generating variants with different mutations, insertions, and/or deletions. Among these, the most commonly described is Asp179Tyr, both in KPC-3 (KPC-31 variant) and in KPC-2 (KPC-33 variant). Changes in membrane permeability and overexpression of efflux systems may also be associated with ceftazidime-avibactam resistance. Although several clones have been reported, ST258 with Asp179Tyr deserves special attention. Surveillance studies and rationale use are essential to retaining the activity of this and other antimicrobials against class A CRE.

Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Adequacy of Novel β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitors against Gram-Negative Bacterial in Critically Ill Patients

The optimal regimens of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BLBLIs), ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, and meropenem/vaborbactam, are not well defined in critically ill patients. This study was conducted to identify optimal regimens of BLBLIs in these patients. A Monte Carlo simulation was performed using the published data to calculate the joint probability of target attainment (PTA) and the cumulative fraction of response (CFR). For the target of β-lactam of 100% time with free drug concentration remains above minimal inhibitory concentrations, the PTAs of BLBLIs standard regimens were <90% at a clinical breakpoint for Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. For ceftazidime/avibactam, 2000 mg/500 mg/8 h by 4 h infusion achieved >90% CFR for Escherichia coli; even for 4000 mg/1000 mg/6 h by continuous infusion, CFR for Klebsiella pneumoniae was <90%; the CFRs of 3500 mg/875 mg/6 h by 4 h infusion and 4000 mg/1000 mg/8 h by continuous infusion were appropriate for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. For ceftolozane/tazobactam, the CFR of standard regimen was >90% for Escherichia coli, however, 2000 mg/1000 mg/6 h by continuous infusion achieved <90% CFRs for Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. For meropenem/vaborbactam, standard regimen achieved optimal attainments for Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae; 2000 mg/2000 mg/6 h by 5 h infusion, 2500 mg /2500 mg/6 h by 4 h infusion, 3000 mg/3000 mg/6 h by 3 h infusion and 4000 mg/4000 mg/8 h by 5 h infusion achieved >90% CFRs for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The CFRs of three BLBLIs were similar for Escherichia coli, but meropenem/vaborbactam were superior for Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

New drugs for difficult bugs: management of multidrug-resistant gram-negative infections in solid organ transplant recipients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria remain a significant threat to patient and allograft survival. Management of these infections in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients remains challenging due to a limited antimicrobial pipeline and reliance on novel agents, which have not been systematically evaluated in the transplant population.

RECENT FINDINGS

Novel antimicrobials, including the second-generation β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors, cefiderocol, plazomicin and eravacycline, have been developed to combat infections due to multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections, but each has microbiologic and therapeutic niches and warrant further study in SOT recipients.

SUMMARY

This review summarizes therapeutic options for extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with difficult-to-treat resistance in SOT recipients and emphasizes recently approved antimicrobial agents.

A Comparative Review on Current and Future Drug Targets Against Bacteria & Malaria

Long before the discovery of drugs like 'antibiotic and anti-parasitic drugs', the infectious diseases caused by pathogenic bacteria and parasites remain as one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality in developing and underdeveloped countries. The phenomenon by which the organism exerts resistance against two or more structurally unrelated drugs is called multidrug resistance (MDR) and its emergence has further complicated the treatment scenario of infectious diseases. Resistance towards the available set of treatment options and poor pipeline of novel drug development puts an alarming situation. A universal goal in the post-genomic era is to identify novel targets/drugs for various life-threatening diseases caused by such pathogens. This review is conceptualized in the backdrop of drug resistance in two major pathogens i.e. "Pseudomonas aeruginosa" and "Plasmodium falciparum". In this review, the available targets and key mechanisms of resistance of these pathogens have been discussed in detail. An attempt has also been made to analyze the common drug targets of bacteria and malaria parasite to overcome the current drug resistance scenario. The solution is also hypothesized in terms of a present pipeline of drugs and efforts made by scientific community.

An Update on Eight "New" Antibiotics against Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria

Infections in the ICU are often caused by Gram-negative bacteria. When these microorganisms are resistant to third-generation cephalosporines (due to extended-spectrum (ESBL) or AmpC beta-lactamases) or to carbapenems (for example carbapenem producing Enterobacteriales (CPE)), the treatment options become limited. In the last six years, fortunately, there have been new antibiotics approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) with predominant activities against Gram-negative bacteria. We aimed to review these antibiotics: plazomicin, eravacycline, temocillin, cefiderocol, ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, and imipenem/relebactam. Temocillin is an antibiotic that was only approved in Belgium and the UK several decades ago. We reviewed the in vitro activities of these new antibiotics, especially against ESBL and CPE microorganisms, potential side effects, and clinical studies in complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI), intra-abdominal infections (cIAI), and hospital-acquired pneumonia/ventilator-associatedpneumonia (HAP/VAP). All of these new antibiotics are active against ESBL, and almost all of them are active against CPE caused by KPC beta-lactamase, but only some of them are active against CPE due to MBL or OXA beta-lactamases. At present, all of these new antibiotics are approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for cUTI (except eravacycline) and most of them for cIAI (eravacycline, ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, and imipenem/relebactam) and for HAP or VAP (cefiderocol, ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, and imipenem/relebactam).

Interplay between ESKAPE Pathogens and Immunity in Skin Infections: An Overview of the Major Determinants of Virulence and Antibiotic Resistance

The skin is the largest organ in the human body, acting as a physical and immunological barrier against pathogenic microorganisms. The cutaneous lesions constitute a gateway for microbial contamination that can lead to chronic wounds and other invasive infections. Chronic wounds are considered as serious public health problems due the related social, psychological and economic consequences. The group of bacteria known as ESKAPE (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacter sp.) are among the most prevalent bacteria in cutaneous infections. These pathogens have a high level of incidence in hospital environments and several strains present phenotypes of multidrug resistance. In this review, we discuss some important aspects of skin immunology and the involvement of ESKAPE in wound infections. First, we introduce some fundamental aspects of skin physiology and immunology related to cutaneous infections. Following this, the major virulence factors involved in colonization and tissue damage are highlighted, as well as the most frequently detected antimicrobial resistance genes. ESKAPE pathogens express several virulence determinants that overcome the skin's physical and immunological barriers, enabling them to cause severe wound infections. The high ability these bacteria to acquire resistance is alarming, particularly in the hospital settings where immunocompromised individuals are exposed to these pathogens. Knowledge about the virulence and resistance markers of these species is important in order to develop new strategies to detect and treat their associated infections.

Is Ceftazidime/Avibactam an Option for Serious Infections Due to Extended-Spectrum-β-Lactamase- and AmpC-Producing Enterobacterales?: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Carbapenem-sparing regimens are needed for the treatment of infections caused by extended-spectrum-β-lactamase (ESBL)- and AmpC-producing members of the Enterobacterales We sought to compare the clinical efficacy of ceftazidime/avibactam and carbapenems against ESBL- and AmpC-producing Enterobacterales species. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing ceftazidime/avibactam with carbapenems for the treatment of ESBL- and AmpC-producing Enterobacterales was conducted. Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with ESBL- and AmpC-specific outcome data were compiled. Of the 246 patients infected with an ESBL-producing microorganism in the ceftazidime/avibactam arm, 224 (91%) had a clinical response at test of cure (TOC), versus 240 of 271 (89%) patients in the carbapenem arm (risk ratio [RR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97 to 1.08; P = 0.45; I ² = 0%). Clinical response rates for AmpC producers in the ceftazidime/avibactam and carbapenem arms were 32/40 (80%) and 37/42 (88%), respectively (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.10; P = 0.35; I ² = 0%). Microbiological response and mortality rates were not reported specifically for ESBL/AmpC producers. Ceftazidime/avibactam may be a carbapenem-sparing option for the treatment of mild to moderate complicated urinary tract and intra-abdominal infections caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacterales species, and the data are too limited to provide any conclusive recommendations for the AmpC producers. Care should be taken before extrapolating this to severe infections, given that the representation of this population in the reviewed studies was negligible. Ceftazidime/avibactam is a costly drug active against carbapenem-resistant microorganisms and should be used judiciously to preserve its activity against them.

New β-Lactam-β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations

The limited armamentarium against drug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli has led to the development of several novel β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BLBLIs). In this review, we summarize their spectrum of in vitro activities, mechanisms of resistance, and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) characteristics. A summary of available clinical data is provided per drug. Four approved BLBLIs are discussed in detail. All are options for treating multidrug-resistant (MDR) Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Ceftazidime-avibactam is a potential drug for treating Enterobacterales producing extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL), Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC), AmpC, and some class D β-lactamases (OXA-48) in addition to carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Ceftolozane-tazobactam is a treatment option mainly for carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (non-carbapenemase producing), with some activity against ESBL-producing Enterobacterales Meropenem-vaborbactam has emerged as treatment option for Enterobacterales producing ESBL, KPC, or AmpC, with similar activity as meropenem against P. aeruginosa Imipenem-relebactam has documented activity against Enterobacterales producing ESBL, KPC, and AmpC, with the combination having some additional activity against P. aeruginosa relative to imipenem. None of these drugs present in vitro activity against Enterobacterales or P. aeruginosa producing metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) or against carbapenemase-producing Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical data regarding the use of these drugs to treat MDR bacteria are limited and rely mostly on nonrandomized studies. An overview on eight BLBLIs in development is also provided. These drugs provide various levels of in vitro coverage of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, with several drugs presenting in vitro activity against MBLs (cefepime-zidebactam, aztreonam-avibactam, meropenem-nacubactam, and cefepime-taniborbactam). Among these drugs, some also present in vitro activity against carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (cefepime-zidebactam and cefepime-taniborbactam) and A. baumannii (cefepime-zidebactam and sulbactam-durlobactam).

A Critical Evaluation of Newer β-Lactam Antibiotics for Treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections

OBJECTIVE

This article critically evaluates common Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistance mechanisms and the properties newer β-lactam antimicrobials possess to evade these mechanisms.

DATA SOURCES

An extensive PubMed, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov search was conducted (January 1995 to July 2020) to identify relevant literature on epidemiology, resistance mechanisms, antipseudomonal agents, newer β-lactam agents, and clinical data available pertaining to P aeruginosa.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Relevant published articles and package inserts were reviewed for inclusion.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Therapeutic options to treat P aeruginosa infections are limited because of its intrinsic and acquired resistance mechanisms. The goal was to identify advances with newer β-lactams and characterize improvements in therapeutic potential for P aeruginosa infections.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) P aeruginosa isolates are increasingly encountered from a variety of infections. This review highlights potential activity gains of newer β-lactam antibacterial drugs and the current clinical data to support their use. Pharmacists will be asked to recommend or evaluate the use of these agents and need to be aware of information specific to P aeruginosa, which differs from experience derived from Enterobacterales infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Newer agents, including ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, imipenem-relebactam, and cefiderocol, are useful for the treatment of MDR P aeruginosa infections. These agents offer improved efficacy and less toxicity compared with aminoglycosides and polymyxins and can be used for pathogens that are resistant to first-line antipseudomonal β-lactams. Selection of one agent over another should consider availability, turnaround of susceptibility testing, and product cost. Efficacy data specific for pseudomonal infections are limited, and there are no direct comparisons between the newer agents.

Metallo-β-Lactamases: Structure, Function, Epidemiology, Treatment Options, and the Development Pipeline

Modern medicine is threatened by the global rise of antibiotic resistance, especially among Gram-negative bacteria. Metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) enzymes are a particular concern and are increasingly disseminated worldwide, though particularly in Asia. Many MBL producers have multiple further drug resistances, leaving few obvious treatment options. Nonetheless, and more encouragingly, MBLs may be less effective agents of carbapenem resistance in vivo, under zinc limitation, than in vitro Owing to their unique structure and function and their diversity, MBLs pose a particular challenge for drug development. They evade all recently licensed β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, although several stable agents and inhibitor combinations are at various stages in the development pipeline. These potential therapies, along with the epidemiology of producers and current treatment options, are the focus of this review.

Experience of Ceftazidime/avibactam in a UK tertiary cardiopulmonary specialist center

OBJECTIVES

Antimicrobial resistance is a major threat to public health. New drugs such as Ceftazidime/avibactam have been developed for the treatment of Multi-Drug resistant (MDR) pathogens. Susceptibility can be variable and inappropriate use can add a financial strain on the National Health Service (NHS). There is a pressing need to ensure these new and invaluable antimicrobials are preserved and used effectively.

METHODS

We undertook a retrospective observational study to assess the use of Ceftazidime/avibactam and evaluated prescribing against applied standards.

RESULTS

Between August 2017 and January 2019, 28 patients received 31 courses of Ceftazidime/avibactam. Prescribing according to the approved indications was observed for 68% of prescriptions (p < 0.0001). Duration of therapy was often prolonged but improved with Antimicrobial stewardship interventions. We observed 56% susceptibility (15/27 isolates) of MDR organisms (Pseudomonas, Klebsiella, Burkholderia, Enterobacter aerogenes, Achromobacter). We also report first in vivo experience to treat pulmonary disease caused by Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). Ceftazidime/avibactam was well tolerated, with no evidence of development of resistance at 6-months follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that Antimicrobial stewardship interventions led to a more appropriate use of Ceftazidime/avibactam (as measured by duration of therapy), preserving it as a treatment option for MDR infections.

The War against Bad Bugs: Fighting the Resistance

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) microorganisms have become a growing concern, especially in regions with high prevalence [...]