1
|
Vaid AK, Pagani O, Ramesh A, Bharthuar A, Desai C, Biswas G, Wadhwa J, Mohapatra PN, Gulia S, Prasad S, Sahoo TP, Agarwal V, Desai RR, Kotak BP, Dawer F. Optimizing Premenopausal Hormone Receptor-Positive Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Early Breast Cancer Management in India: Insights From Expert Consensus. Cureus 2024; 16:e76392. [PMID: 39867062 PMCID: PMC11763344 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.76392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/24/2024] [Indexed: 01/28/2025] Open
Abstract
This research aims to optimize adjuvant ovarian function suppression (OFS) for premenopausal Indian women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) /human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) early breast cancer (eBC). To address specific challenges identified in clinical practice, a comprehensive questionnaire consisting of 21 statements was developed. These statements were reviewed and validated by a scientific committee, ensuring their accuracy and relevance to the study's objectives. A panel of 46 Indian experts and one global expert in the field of eBC were asked to rate their level of agreement/disagreement with each statement. Consensus was defined as achieving ≥80% agreement among participants. Following two rounds of the modified Delphi technique, a consensus was achieved on 19 out of 21 statements addressing critical aspects of premenopausal HR+ HER2- eBC management. The expert panel strongly recommended comprehensive risk stratification for premenopausal patients with HR+ HER2- eBC, highlighting age ≤40 as a high-risk factor and advising composite assessments for patients ≥40 years. For high-risk patients, OFS coupled with an aromatase inhibitor emerged as the recommended therapeutic strategy. The panel recommended a potential duration of up to five years for OFS, provided tolerability is maintained. For patients under 40, simultaneous OFS and chemotherapy is advised when needed. For those over 40, sequential initiation is acceptable. Triptorelin is preferred among luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogs, though all options have similar efficacies. The outcomes of this consensus offer valuable clinical guidance, enabling individualized and evidence-based approaches for OFS in Indian patients with HR+ HER2- eBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashok K Vaid
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medanta Cancer Institute, Gurugram, IND
| | - Olivia Pagani
- Department of Medical Oncology, Interdisciplinary Cancer Service, Hôpital Riviera-Chablais, Vaud, CHE
| | - Anita Ramesh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kauvery Hospital, Chennai, IND
| | - Anubha Bharthuar
- Department of Medical Oncological Sciences and Hematology, Patel Hospital, Jalandhar , IND
| | - Chirag Desai
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hemato Oncology Clinic, Vedanta Hospital, Ahmedabad, IND
| | - Ghanashyam Biswas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sparsh Hospital and Critical Care, Bhubaneswar, IND
| | - Jyoti Wadhwa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Paras Healthcare, Gurugram, IND
| | | | - Seema Gulia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, IND
| | - Svss Prasad
- Department of Hematology, Apollo Hospitals, Hyderabad, Hyderabad, IND
| | - Tarini P Sahoo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Silverline Hospital, Bhopal, IND
| | - Vijay Agarwal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Apollo Hospital, Bengaluru, IND
| | - Rohit R Desai
- Department of Medical Affairs, Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Hyderabad, IND
| | - Bhavesh P Kotak
- Department of Medical Affairs, Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Hyderabad, IND
| | - Femina Dawer
- Department of Medical Affairs, Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Hyderabad, IND
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chan SH, Kuo WH, Wang LH. SCEL regulates switches between pro-survival and apoptosis of the TNF-α/TNFR1/NF-κB/c-FLIP axis to control lung colonization of triple negative breast cancer. J Biomed Sci 2023; 30:93. [PMID: 38037106 PMCID: PMC10688137 DOI: 10.1186/s12929-023-00986-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 11/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) have a higher probability of developing visceral metastasis within 5 years after the initial diagnosis. Therefore, a deeper understanding of the progression and spread of mTNBC is urgently needed. METHODS The isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ)-based LC-MS/MS proteomic approach was applied to identify novel membrane-associated proteins in the lung-tropic metastatic cells. Public domain datasets were used to assess the clinical relevance of the candidate proteins. Cell-based and mouse models were used for biochemical and functional characterization of the protein molecule Sciellin (SCEL) identified by iTRAQ to elucidate its role and underlying mechanism in promoting lung colonization of TNBC cells. RESULTS The iTRAQ-based LC-MS/MS proteomic approach identified a membrane-associated protein SCEL that was overexpressed in the lung-tropic metastatic cells, and its high expression was significantly correlated with the late-stage TNBC and the shorter survival of the patients. Downregulation of SCEL expression significantly impaired the 3D colony-forming ability but not the migration and invasion ability of the lung colonization (LC) cells. Knockdown of SCEL reduced TNF-α-induced activation of the NF-κB/c-FLIP pro-survival and Akt/Erk1/2 growth signaling pathways in the LC cells. Specifically, knockdown of SCEL expression switched TNF-α-mediated cell survival to the caspase 3-dependent apoptosis. Conversely, ectopic expression of SCEL promoted TNF-α-induced activation of NF-κB/c-FLIP pro-survival and Akt/Erk1/2 pro-growth signaling pathway. The result of co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) and GST pull-down assay showed that SCEL could interact with TNFR1 to promote its protein stability. The xenograft mouse model experiments revealed that knockdown of SCEL resulted in increase of caspase-3 activity, and decrease of ki67 and TNFR1 expression as well as increase of tumor-associated macrophages in the metastatic lung lesions. Clinically, SCEL expression was found to be positively correlated with TNFR1 in TNBC tissues. Lastly, we showed that blocking TNF-α-mediated cell survival signaling by adalimumab effectively suppressed the lung colonization of the SCEL-positive, but not the SCEL-downregulated LC cells in the tail-vein injection model. CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate that SCEL plays an essential role in the metastatic lung colonization of TNBC by promoting the TNF-α/TNFR1/NF-κB/c-FLIP survival and Akt/Erk1/2 proliferation signaling. Thus, SCEL may serve as a biomarker for adalimumab treatment of TNBC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shih-Hsuan Chan
- School of Chinese Medicine, College of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
- Chinese Medicine Research Center, China Medical University, No. 91, Hsueh-Shih Road, Taichung, 40402, Taiwan.
- Cancer Biology and Precision Therapeutics Center, China Medical University, Taichung, 40402, Taiwan.
| | - Wen-Hung Kuo
- Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, 100, Taiwan
| | - Lu-Hai Wang
- Chinese Medicine Research Center, China Medical University, No. 91, Hsueh-Shih Road, Taichung, 40402, Taiwan.
- Graduate Institute of Integrated Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ergun Y, Ucar G, Akagunduz B. Comparison of HER2-zero and HER2-low in terms of clinicopathological factors and survival in early-stage breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev 2023; 115:102538. [PMID: 36898351 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2022] [Revised: 02/25/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prognostic differences between HER2-zero and HER2-low breast cancer (BC) remain unclear. Purpose of this meta-analysis is to investigate the differences between HER2-low and HER2-zero in terms of clinicopathological factors and survival outcomes in early-stage BC. METHODS We searched major databases and congress proceedings until November 1, 2022 to identify studies comparing HER2-zero and HER2-low in early-stage BC. HER2-zero immunohistochemically (IHC) was defined as score 0, while HER2-low was defined as IHC 1+ or 2+/in situ hybridization negative. RESULT A total of 23 retrospective studies involving 636,535 patients were included. HER2-low rate was 67.5% in the hormone receptor (HR)-positive group, while this rate was 48.6% in the HR-negative group. In the analysis of clinicopathological factors by HR status, the proportion of premenopausal patients within the HR-positive group was greater in the HER2-zero arm (66.5% vs 61.8%), whereas grade 3 tumors (74.2% vs 71.5%), patients younger than 50 years of age (47.3% vs 39.6%), and T3-T4 tumors (7.7% vs 6.3%) within the HR-negative group was higher in the HER2-zero arm. In both the HR-positive and HR-negative groups, the HER2-low arm showed significantly improved results for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). The hazard ratios for DFS and OS in the HR-positive group were 0.88 (95% CI 0.83-0.94) and 0.87 (95% CI 0.78-0.96), respectively. In the HR-negative group, the hazard ratios for DFS and OS were 0.87 (95% CI 0.79-0.97) and 0.86 (95% CI 0.84-0.89), respectively. CONCLUSION In early-stage BC, HER2-low is associated with better DFS and OS compared to HER2-zero, regardless of HR status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yakup Ergun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Batman World Hospital, Batman, Turkey.
| | - Gokhan Ucar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Baran Akagunduz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Binali Yıldırım University Mengücek Gazi Training and Research Hospital, Erzincan, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Li M, Jiang F, Xue L, Peng C, Shi Z, Zhang Z, Li J, Pan Y, Wang X, Feng C, Qiao D, Chen Z, Luo Q, Chen X. Recent Progress in Biosensors for Detection of Tumor Biomarkers. Molecules 2022; 27:7327. [PMID: 36364157 PMCID: PMC9658374 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27217327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Revised: 07/31/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 10/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide, with an increasing mortality rate over the past years. The early detection of cancer contributes to early diagnosis and subsequent treatment. How to detect early cancer has become one of the hot research directions of cancer. Tumor biomarkers, biochemical parameters for reflecting cancer occurrence and progression have caused much attention in cancer early detection. Due to high sensitivity, convenience and low cost, biosensors have been largely developed to detect tumor biomarkers. This review describes the application of various biosensors in detecting tumor markers. Firstly, several typical tumor makers, such as neuron-specific enolase (NSE), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA), carbohydrate, antigen19-9 (CA19-9) and tumor suppressor p53 (TP53), which may be helpful for early cancer detection in the clinic, are briefly described. Then, various biosensors, mainly focusing on electrochemical biosensors, optical biosensors, photoelectrochemical biosensors, piezoelectric biosensors and aptamer sensors, are discussed. Specifically, the operation principles of biosensors, nanomaterials used in biosensors and the application of biosensors in tumor marker detection have been comprehensively reviewed and provided. Lastly, the challenges and prospects for developing effective biosensors for early cancer diagnosis are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mantong Li
- Department of Forensic Toxicology, School of Forensic Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
- Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Forensic Multi-Omics for Precision Identification, School of Forensic Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Feng Jiang
- Department of Forensic Toxicology, School of Forensic Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
- Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Forensic Multi-Omics for Precision Identification, School of Forensic Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Liangyi Xue
- Department of Forensic Toxicology, School of Forensic Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
- Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Forensic Multi-Omics for Precision Identification, School of Forensic Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Cheng Peng
- Guangzhou Institute of Food Inspection, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Zhengzheng Shi
- Department of Forensic Toxicology, School of Forensic Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Zheng Zhang
- Department of Forensic Toxicology, School of Forensic Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Jia Li
- Department of Forensic Toxicology, School of Forensic Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Yupeng Pan
- Department of Forensic Toxicology, School of Forensic Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Xinya Wang
- Department of Forensic Toxicology, School of Forensic Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Chunqiong Feng
- Department of Forensic Toxicology, School of Forensic Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Dongfang Qiao
- Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Forensic Multi-Omics for Precision Identification, School of Forensic Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Zhenzhong Chen
- Department of Forensic Toxicology, School of Forensic Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Qizhi Luo
- Department of Forensic Toxicology, School of Forensic Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
- Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Forensic Multi-Omics for Precision Identification, School of Forensic Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Xuncai Chen
- Department of Forensic Toxicology, School of Forensic Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
- Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Forensic Multi-Omics for Precision Identification, School of Forensic Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tufail M, Cui J, Wu C. Breast cancer: molecular mechanisms of underlying resistance and therapeutic approaches. Am J Cancer Res 2022; 12:2920-2949. [PMID: 35968356 PMCID: PMC9360230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/11/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) affects over 250,000 women in the US each year. Drug-resistant cancer cells are responsible for most breast cancer fatalities. Scientists are developing novel chemotherapeutic drugs and targeted therapy combinations to overcome cancer cell resistance. Combining drugs can reduce the chances of a tumor developing resistance to treatment. Clinical research has shown that combination chemotherapy enhances or improves survival, depending on the patient's response to treatment. Combination therapy is a highly successful supplemental cancer treatment. This review sheds light on intrinsic resistance to BC drugs and the importance of combination therapy for BC treatment. In addition to recurrence and metastasis of BC, the article discussed biomarkers for BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Tufail
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Shanxi UniversityTaiyuan 030006, Shanxi, China
| | - Jia Cui
- Department of Microbiology, Changzhi Medical CollegeChangzhi 046000, Shanxi, China
| | - Changxin Wu
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Shanxi UniversityTaiyuan 030006, Shanxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zahnd WE, Ranganathan R, Adams SA, Babatunde OA. Sociodemographic disparities in molecular testing for breast cancer. Cancer Causes Control 2022; 33:843-859. [PMID: 35474496 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-022-01575-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Molecular testing is a critical component of breast cancer care used to identify the presence of estrogen and/or progesterone receptors (jointly hormone receptors-HRs) and the expression of human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) on a tumor. Our objective was to characterize trends and predictors of lack of molecular testing among female breast cancer patients overall and by sociodemographic characteristics. METHODS We examined data on female breast cancer patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2016 from Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results-18. Joinpoint regression analyses assessed annual percent change (APC) in lack of ER, PR, or HER2 testing. Multivariable, multilevel logistic regression models identified factors associated with lack of molecular testing. RESULTS A nominally lower proportion of rural patients did not receive molecular testing (e.g., 1.8% in rural vs. 2.3% in urban for HER2). For all tests, a higher proportion of Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black women were not tested. Across all characteristics, improvement in testing was noted, although disparities among groups remained. For example, lack of HER2 testing improved from 3.2 to 1.7% in White patients (APC = - 10.05) but was consistently higher in Black patients 3.9 to 2.3% (APC = - 8.21). Multivariable, multilevel models showed that older, non-Hispanic Black, and unpartnered women were at greater odds of not receiving molecular testing. CONCLUSIONS While lack of molecular testing of breast cancer patients is relatively rare, racial/ethnic, insurance status, and age-related disparities have been identified. To reduce testing and downstream treatment and outcome disparities, it is imperative for all breast cancer patients to receive molecular testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Whitney E Zahnd
- Rural and Minority Health Research Center, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA. .,Department of Health Management and Policy, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
| | - Radhika Ranganathan
- Rural and Minority Health Research Center, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Swann Arp Adams
- Rural and Minority Health Research Center, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.,College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wang R, Wang R, Tian J, Wang J, Tang H, Wu T, Wang H. BTG2 as a tumor target for the treatment of luminal A breast cancer. Exp Ther Med 2022; 23:339. [PMID: 35401805 PMCID: PMC8988138 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2022.11269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
As one of the most common breast cancer subtypes, luminal A breast cancer is sensitive to endocrine-based therapy and insensitive to chemotherapy. Patients with luminal A subtype of breast cancer have a relatively good prognosis compared with that of patients with other subtypes of breast cancer. However, with the increased incidence in endocrine resistance and severe side effects, simple endocrine therapy has become unsuitable for the treatment of luminal A breast cancer. Therefore, identifying novel therapeutic targets for luminal A breast cancer may accelerate the development of an effective therapeutic strategy. The bioinformatical analysis of the current study, which included KEGG and GO analyses of the GSE20437 dataset containing 24 healthy and 18 breast cancer tissue samples, identified key target genes associated with breast cancer. Moreover, survival analysis results revealed that a low expression of BTG2 was significantly associated with the low survival rate of patients with breast cancer, indicated that B-cell translocation gene 2 (BTG2) may be a potential target in breast cancer. However, BTG2 may be cancer type-dependent, as overexpression of BTG2 has been demonstrated to suppress the proliferation of pancreatic and lung cancer cells, but promote the proliferation of bladder cancer cells. Since the association between BTG2 and luminal A-subtype breast cancer remains unclear, it is important to understand the biological function of BTG2 in luminal A breast cancer. Based on the expression levels of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor, MCF-7 cells were selected in the present study as a luminal A breast cancer cell type. MTT, Transwell invasion and wound healing assays revealed that overexpression of BTG2 suppressed the levels of MCF-7 cell proliferation, migration and invasion. In addition, the downregulation of BTG2 at the mRNA and protein level was also confirmed in luminal A breast tumor tissue, which was consistent with the results in vitro. These results indicated that BTG2 may act as an effective target for the treatment of luminal A breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Runzhi Wang
- Department of Pharmacology, Qingdao University School of Pharmacy, Qingdao, Shandong 266021, P.R. China
| | - Ronghua Wang
- Department of Pharmacy, The Affiliated Weihai Second Municipal Hospital of Qingdao University, Weihai, Shandong 264200, P.R. China
| | - Jinjun Tian
- Department of Pharmacy, The Affiliated Weihai Second Municipal Hospital of Qingdao University, Weihai, Shandong 264200, P.R. China
| | - Jian Wang
- Department of Breast Center, The Affiliated Weihai Second Municipal Hospital of Qingdao University, Weihai, Shandong 264200, P.R. China
| | - Huaxiao Tang
- Department of Pathology, The Affiliated Weihai Second Municipal Hospital of Qingdao University, Weihai, Shandong 264200, P.R. China
| | - Tao Wu
- Department of Pharmacy, The Affiliated Weihai Second Municipal Hospital of Qingdao University, Weihai, Shandong 264200, P.R. China
| | - Hui Wang
- Department of Pharmacy, The Affiliated Weihai Second Municipal Hospital of Qingdao University, Weihai, Shandong 264200, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Xia S, Lin Q. Estrogen Receptor Bio-Activities Determine Clinical Endocrine Treatment Options in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2022; 21:15330338221090351. [PMID: 35450488 PMCID: PMC9036337 DOI: 10.1177/15330338221090351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
In estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer therapy, estrogen receptors (ERs) are the major targeting molecules. ER-targeted therapy has provided clinical benefits for approximately 70% of all breast cancer patients through targeting the ERα subtype. In recent years, mechanisms underlying breast cancer occurrence and progression have been extensively studied and largely clarified. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, microRNA regulation, and other ER downstream signaling pathways are found to be the effective therapeutic targets in ER+ BC therapy. A number of the ER+ (ER+) breast cancer biomarkers have been established for diagnosis and prognosis. The ESR1 gene mutations that lead to endocrine therapy resistance in ER+ breast cancer had been identified. Mutations in the ligand-binding domain of ERα which encoded by ESR1 gene occur in most cases. The targeted drugs combined with endocrine therapy have been developed to improve the therapeutic efficacy of ER+ breast cancer, particularly the endocrine therapy resistance ER+ breast cancer. The combination therapy has been demonstrated to be superior to monotherapy in overall clinical evaluation. In this review, we focus on recent progress in studies on ERs and related clinical applications for targeted therapy and provide a perspective view for therapy of ER+ breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Song Xia
- School of Medicine, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China
| | - Qiong Lin
- School of Medicine, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China
- Qiong Lin, School of Medicine, Jiangsu University, 301 Xuefu Road, Zhenjiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dai J, Nishi A, Tran N, Yamamoto Y, Dewey G, Ugai T, Ogino S. Revisiting social MPE: an integration of molecular pathological epidemiology and social science in the new era of precision medicine. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2021; 21:869-886. [PMID: 34253130 DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2021.1952073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Molecular pathological epidemiology (MPE) is an integrative transdisciplinary area examining the relationships between various exposures and pathogenic signatures of diseases. In line with the accelerating advancements in MPE, social science and its health-related interdisciplinary areas have also developed rapidly. Accumulating evidence indicates the pathological role of social-demographic factors. We therefore initially proposed social MPE in 2015, which aims to elucidate etiological roles of social-demographic factors and address health inequalities globally. With the ubiquity of molecular diagnosis, there are ample opportunities for researchers to utilize and develop the social MPE framework. AREAS COVERED Molecular subtypes of breast cancer have been investigated rigorously for understanding its etiologies rooted from social factors. Emerging evidence indicates pathogenic heterogeneity of neurological disorders such as Alzheimer's disease. Presenting specific patterns of social-demographic factors across different molecular subtypes should be promising for advancing the screening, prevention, and treatment strategies of those heterogeneous diseases. This article rigorously reviewed literatures investigating differences of race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status across molecular subtypes of breast cancer and Alzheimer's disease to date. EXPERT OPINION With advancements of the multi-omics technologies, we foresee a blooming of social MPE studies, which can address health disparities, advance personalized molecular medicine, and enhance public health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin Dai
- Department of Epidemiology, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - Akihiro Nishi
- Department of Epidemiology, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California, United States.,California Center for Population Research, University of California, Los Angeles, CA United States
| | - Nathan Tran
- Department of Epidemiology, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - Yasumasa Yamamoto
- Graduate School of Advanced Integrated Studies in Human Survivability, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto Japan
| | - George Dewey
- Department of Epidemiology, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - Tomotaka Ugai
- Program in MPE Molecular Pathological Epidemiology, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.,Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Shuji Ogino
- Program in MPE Molecular Pathological Epidemiology, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.,Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.,Cancer Immunology Program, Dana-Farber Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.,Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ronchi A, Pagliuca F, Zito Marino F, Accardo M, Cozzolino I, Franco R. Current and potential immunohistochemical biomarkers for prognosis and therapeutic stratification of breast carcinoma. Semin Cancer Biol 2021; 72:114-122. [PMID: 32165319 DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2020] [Revised: 03/01/2020] [Accepted: 03/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
The identification of biomarkers on cancer tissue samples could be obtained through several technologies. In this setting, the immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization are accessible in most pathology laboratories. Particularly, immunohistochemistry can be used not only for diagnostic issues, but also to define prognostic classes and to define response to specific therapies. Particularly the last applications have been firstly developed in the breast cancer pathology. In addition, the development of molecular classification proposed some prognostic/predictive classes that could be easily defined by immunohistochemistry. Thus, the role of the pathologists has become increasingly important in the definition of prognosis and in the choice therapy, because the immunohistochemical biomarkers are used to guide treatment, to classify breast cancer into biologically and prognostically distinct subtypes. In this review, we will provide information on the current application of the immunohistochemical biomarkers useful in the management of breast cancer patients. Moreover, we consider the application of immunohistochemistry in the definition of the most promising biomarkers derived from molecular studies of the breast cancer, that in the future could integrate the characterization of breast cancer into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Ronchi
- Pathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Via Luciano Armanni 5, 80100, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesca Pagliuca
- Pathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Via Luciano Armanni 5, 80100, Naples, Italy
| | - Federica Zito Marino
- Pathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Via Luciano Armanni 5, 80100, Naples, Italy
| | - Marina Accardo
- Pathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Via Luciano Armanni 5, 80100, Naples, Italy
| | - Immacolata Cozzolino
- Pathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Via Luciano Armanni 5, 80100, Naples, Italy
| | - Renato Franco
- Pathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Via Luciano Armanni 5, 80100, Naples, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jin H, Gao X, Xiao L, He H, Cheng S, Zhang C, Hou Y, Song F, Su X, Gao Q, Lu Z, Yang R, Song X, Yang J, Duan W, Hou Y. Screening and identification of a specific peptide binding to breast cancer cells from a phage-displayed peptide library. Biotechnol Lett 2020; 43:153-164. [PMID: 33145670 DOI: 10.1007/s10529-020-03044-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2020] [Accepted: 10/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Breast cancer is a popular fatal malignant tumor for women with high of rates incidence and mortality. Development of the new approaches for breast cancer targeted diagnosis and chemotherapy is emergently needed by the current clinical practice, the important first step is finding a breast cancer specifically binding molecule or fragment as early clinical indicators. RESULTS By a phage-displayed peptide library, a 12-mer peptide, CSB1 was screened out using MCF-7 cells as the target. The consequently results under immunofluorescence and laser scanning confocal microscope (LSCM) indicated that CSB1 bound MCF-7 cells and breast cancer tissues specifically and sensitively with high affinity. Bioinformatics analysis suggested that the peptide CSB1 targets the 5-Lipoxygenase-Activating Protein (FLAP), which has been implicated in breast cancer progression and prognosis. CONCLUSIONS The peptide, CSB1 is of the potential as a candidate to be used for developing the new approaches of molecular imaging detection and targeting chemotherapy of breast cancer in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huijuan Jin
- Laboratory of Tumor Molecular and Cellular Biology, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, 620 West Chang'an Avenue, Xi'an, 710119, Shaanxi, China
| | - Xiaojie Gao
- Laboratory of Tumor Molecular and Cellular Biology, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, 620 West Chang'an Avenue, Xi'an, 710119, Shaanxi, China
| | - Li Xiao
- Laboratory of Tumor Molecular and Cellular Biology, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, 620 West Chang'an Avenue, Xi'an, 710119, Shaanxi, China
| | - Huimin He
- Laboratory of Tumor Molecular and Cellular Biology, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, 620 West Chang'an Avenue, Xi'an, 710119, Shaanxi, China
| | - Sinan Cheng
- Laboratory of Tumor Molecular and Cellular Biology, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, 620 West Chang'an Avenue, Xi'an, 710119, Shaanxi, China
| | - Caixia Zhang
- Laboratory of Tumor Molecular and Cellular Biology, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, 620 West Chang'an Avenue, Xi'an, 710119, Shaanxi, China
| | - Yifan Hou
- Laboratory of Tumor Molecular and Cellular Biology, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, 620 West Chang'an Avenue, Xi'an, 710119, Shaanxi, China
| | - Fengying Song
- Laboratory of Tumor Molecular and Cellular Biology, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, 620 West Chang'an Avenue, Xi'an, 710119, Shaanxi, China
| | - Xiaorong Su
- Laboratory of Tumor Molecular and Cellular Biology, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, 620 West Chang'an Avenue, Xi'an, 710119, Shaanxi, China
| | - Qian Gao
- Laboratory of Tumor Molecular and Cellular Biology, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, 620 West Chang'an Avenue, Xi'an, 710119, Shaanxi, China
| | - Zheng Lu
- Laboratory of Tumor Molecular and Cellular Biology, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, 620 West Chang'an Avenue, Xi'an, 710119, Shaanxi, China
| | - Ruina Yang
- Laboratory of Tumor Molecular and Cellular Biology, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, 620 West Chang'an Avenue, Xi'an, 710119, Shaanxi, China
| | - Xigui Song
- Laboratory of Tumor Molecular and Cellular Biology, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, 620 West Chang'an Avenue, Xi'an, 710119, Shaanxi, China
| | - Jin Yang
- The College of Life, Northwest University, Xi'an, 710069, Shaanxi, China
| | - Wei Duan
- School of Medicine, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, VIC, 3216, Australia
| | - Yingchun Hou
- Laboratory of Tumor Molecular and Cellular Biology, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, 620 West Chang'an Avenue, Xi'an, 710119, Shaanxi, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Escala-Garcia M, Abraham J, Andrulis IL, Anton-Culver H, Arndt V, Ashworth A, Auer PL, Auvinen P, Beckmann MW, Beesley J, Behrens S, Benitez J, Bermisheva M, Blomqvist C, Blot W, Bogdanova NV, Bojesen SE, Bolla MK, Børresen-Dale AL, Brauch H, Brenner H, Brucker SY, Burwinkel B, Caldas C, Canzian F, Chang-Claude J, Chanock SJ, Chin SF, Clarke CL, Couch FJ, Cox A, Cross SS, Czene K, Daly MB, Dennis J, Devilee P, Dunn JA, Dunning AM, Dwek M, Earl HM, Eccles DM, Eliassen AH, Ellberg C, Evans DG, Fasching PA, Figueroa J, Flyger H, Gago-Dominguez M, Gapstur SM, García-Closas M, García-Sáenz JA, Gaudet MM, George A, Giles GG, Goldgar DE, González-Neira A, Grip M, Guénel P, Guo Q, Haiman CA, Håkansson N, Hamann U, Harrington PA, Hiller L, Hooning MJ, Hopper JL, Howell A, Huang CS, Huang G, Hunter DJ, Jakubowska A, John EM, Kaaks R, Kapoor PM, Keeman R, Kitahara CM, Koppert LB, Kraft P, Kristensen VN, Lambrechts D, Le Marchand L, Lejbkowicz F, Lindblom A, Lubiński J, Mannermaa A, Manoochehri M, Manoukian S, Margolin S, Martinez ME, Maurer T, Mavroudis D, Meindl A, Milne RL, Mulligan AM, Neuhausen SL, Nevanlinna H, Newman WG, Olshan AF, Olson JE, Olsson H, et alEscala-Garcia M, Abraham J, Andrulis IL, Anton-Culver H, Arndt V, Ashworth A, Auer PL, Auvinen P, Beckmann MW, Beesley J, Behrens S, Benitez J, Bermisheva M, Blomqvist C, Blot W, Bogdanova NV, Bojesen SE, Bolla MK, Børresen-Dale AL, Brauch H, Brenner H, Brucker SY, Burwinkel B, Caldas C, Canzian F, Chang-Claude J, Chanock SJ, Chin SF, Clarke CL, Couch FJ, Cox A, Cross SS, Czene K, Daly MB, Dennis J, Devilee P, Dunn JA, Dunning AM, Dwek M, Earl HM, Eccles DM, Eliassen AH, Ellberg C, Evans DG, Fasching PA, Figueroa J, Flyger H, Gago-Dominguez M, Gapstur SM, García-Closas M, García-Sáenz JA, Gaudet MM, George A, Giles GG, Goldgar DE, González-Neira A, Grip M, Guénel P, Guo Q, Haiman CA, Håkansson N, Hamann U, Harrington PA, Hiller L, Hooning MJ, Hopper JL, Howell A, Huang CS, Huang G, Hunter DJ, Jakubowska A, John EM, Kaaks R, Kapoor PM, Keeman R, Kitahara CM, Koppert LB, Kraft P, Kristensen VN, Lambrechts D, Le Marchand L, Lejbkowicz F, Lindblom A, Lubiński J, Mannermaa A, Manoochehri M, Manoukian S, Margolin S, Martinez ME, Maurer T, Mavroudis D, Meindl A, Milne RL, Mulligan AM, Neuhausen SL, Nevanlinna H, Newman WG, Olshan AF, Olson JE, Olsson H, Orr N, Peterlongo P, Petridis C, Prentice RL, Presneau N, Punie K, Ramachandran D, Rennert G, Romero A, Sachchithananthan M, Saloustros E, Sawyer EJ, Schmutzler RK, Schwentner L, Scott C, Simard J, Sohn C, Southey MC, Swerdlow AJ, Tamimi RM, Tapper WJ, Teixeira MR, Terry MB, Thorne H, Tollenaar RAEM, Tomlinson I, Troester MA, Truong T, Turnbull C, Vachon CM, van der Kolk LE, Wang Q, Winqvist R, Wolk A, Yang XR, Ziogas A, Pharoah PDP, Hall P, Wessels LFA, Chenevix-Trench G, Bader GD, Dörk T, Easton DF, Canisius S, Schmidt MK. A network analysis to identify mediators of germline-driven differences in breast cancer prognosis. Nat Commun 2020; 11:312. [PMID: 31949161 PMCID: PMC6965101 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-14100-6] [Show More Authors] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2019] [Accepted: 12/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Identifying the underlying genetic drivers of the heritability of breast cancer prognosis remains elusive. We adapt a network-based approach to handle underpowered complex datasets to provide new insights into the potential function of germline variants in breast cancer prognosis. This network-based analysis studies ~7.3 million variants in 84,457 breast cancer patients in relation to breast cancer survival and confirms the results on 12,381 independent patients. Aggregating the prognostic effects of genetic variants across multiple genes, we identify four gene modules associated with survival in estrogen receptor (ER)-negative and one in ER-positive disease. The modules show biological enrichment for cancer-related processes such as G-alpha signaling, circadian clock, angiogenesis, and Rho-GTPases in apoptosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Escala-Garcia
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jean Abraham
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Cambridge Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Cambridge, UK
- Cambridge Breast Unit and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge NHS Foundation Hospitals, Cambridge, UK
| | - Irene L Andrulis
- Fred A. Litwin Center for Cancer Genetics, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute of Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Hoda Anton-Culver
- Department of Epidemiology, Genetic Epidemiology Research Institute, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Volker Arndt
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alan Ashworth
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Paul L Auer
- Cancer Prevention Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Zilber School of Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Päivi Auvinen
- Cancer Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Oncology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Translational Cancer Research Area, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center ER-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Jonathan Beesley
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Sabine Behrens
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Javier Benitez
- Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
- Biomedical Network on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain
| | - Marina Bermisheva
- Institute of Biochemistry and Genetics, Ufa Scientific Center of Russian Academy of Sciences, Ufa, Russia
| | - Carl Blomqvist
- Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Oncology, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden
| | - William Blot
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
- International Epidemiology Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Natalia V Bogdanova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- N.N. Alexandrov Research Institute of Oncology and Medical Radiology, Minsk, Belarus
| | - Stig E Bojesen
- Copenhagen General Population Study, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Manjeet K Bolla
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hiltrud Brauch
- Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany
- iFIT-Cluster of Excellence, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sara Y Brucker
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Barbara Burwinkel
- Molecular Epidemiology Group, C080, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Molecular Biology of Breast Cancer, University Womens Clinic Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carlos Caldas
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Department of Oncology, Li Ka Shing Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Breast Cancer Programme, CRUK Cambridge Cancer Centre and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Federico Canzian
- Genomic Epidemiology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Cancer Epidemiology Group, University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stephen J Chanock
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Department of Health and Human Services, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Suet-Feung Chin
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Christine L Clarke
- Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Fergus J Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Angela Cox
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, Sheffield Institute for Nucleic Acids (SInFoNiA), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Simon S Cross
- Academic Unit of Pathology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Kamila Czene
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mary B Daly
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Joe Dennis
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Peter Devilee
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Janet A Dunn
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Alison M Dunning
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Miriam Dwek
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Westminster, London, UK
| | - Helena M Earl
- Cambridge Breast Unit and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge NHS Foundation Hospitals, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Diana M Eccles
- Cancer Sciences Academic Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - A Heather Eliassen
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Carolina Ellberg
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center ER-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jonine Figueroa
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Department of Health and Human Services, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh Medical School, Edinburgh, UK
- Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Henrik Flyger
- Department of Breast Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Manuela Gago-Dominguez
- Genomic Medicine Group, Galician Foundation of Genomic Medicine, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, SERGAS, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Susan M Gapstur
- Epidemiology Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Montserrat García-Closas
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Department of Health and Human Services, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - José A García-Sáenz
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos (IdISSC), Centro Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Mia M Gaudet
- Epidemiology Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Angela George
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Graham G Giles
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - David E Goldgar
- Department of Dermatology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Anna González-Neira
- Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
| | - Mervi Grip
- Department of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Pascal Guénel
- Cancer & Environment Group, Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), University Paris-Saclay, INSERM, University Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France
| | - Qi Guo
- Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Christopher A Haiman
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Niclas Håkansson
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ute Hamann
- Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Patricia A Harrington
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Louise Hiller
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Maartje J Hooning
- Department of Medical Oncology, Family Cancer Clinic, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - John L Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Anthony Howell
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Chiun-Sheng Huang
- Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Guanmengqian Huang
- Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David J Hunter
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Program in Genetic Epidemiology and Statistical Genetics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
- Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic Diagnostics, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Esther M John
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Rudolf Kaaks
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pooja Middha Kapoor
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Renske Keeman
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cari M Kitahara
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Linetta B Koppert
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Family Cancer Clinic, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Kraft
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Program in Genetic Epidemiology and Statistical Genetics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Vessela N Kristensen
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Diether Lambrechts
- VIB, VIB Center for Cancer Biology, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory for Translational Genetics, Department of Human Genetics, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Loic Le Marchand
- Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Flavio Lejbkowicz
- Carmel Medical Center and Technion Faculty of Medicine, Clalit National Cancer Control Center, Haifa, Israel
| | - Annika Lindblom
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jan Lubiński
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Arto Mannermaa
- Translational Cancer Research Area, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Imaging Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Mehdi Manoochehri
- Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Siranoush Manoukian
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano (INT), Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Margolin
- Department of Oncology, Sšdersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Sšdersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Maria Elena Martinez
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Tabea Maurer
- Cancer Epidemiology Group, University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Dimitrios Mavroudis
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Alfons Meindl
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Roger L Milne
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Anna Marie Mulligan
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Susan L Neuhausen
- Department of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Heli Nevanlinna
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - William G Newman
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Andrew F Olshan
- Department of Epidemiology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Janet E Olson
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Håkan Olsson
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Nick Orr
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Ireland, UK
| | - Paolo Peterlongo
- Genome Diagnostics Program, IFOM - the FIRC (Italian Foundation for Cancer Research) Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Christos Petridis
- Research Oncology, Guy's Hospital, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Ross L Prentice
- Cancer Prevention Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Nadege Presneau
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Westminster, London, UK
| | - Kevin Punie
- Department of Oncology, Leuven Multidisciplinary Breast Center, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Gad Rennert
- Carmel Medical Center and Technion Faculty of Medicine, Clalit National Cancer Control Center, Haifa, Israel
| | - Atocha Romero
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Elinor J Sawyer
- Research Oncology, Guy's Hospital, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Rita K Schmutzler
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Lukas Schwentner
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Christopher Scott
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jacques Simard
- Genomics Center, Research Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec - Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada
| | - Christof Sohn
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Melissa C Southey
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
- Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Anthony J Swerdlow
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Division of Breast Cancer Research, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Rulla M Tamimi
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Program in Genetic Epidemiology and Statistical Genetics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Manuel R Teixeira
- Department of Genetics, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Porto, Portugal
- Biomedical Sciences Institute (ICBAS), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Mary Beth Terry
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Heather Thorne
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Rob A E M Tollenaar
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Ian Tomlinson
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics and Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Melissa A Troester
- Department of Epidemiology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Thérèse Truong
- Cancer & Environment Group, Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), University Paris-Saclay, INSERM, University Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France
| | - Clare Turnbull
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Celine M Vachon
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Lizet E van der Kolk
- Family Cancer Clinic, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Qin Wang
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Robert Winqvist
- Biocenter Oulu, Cancer and Translational Medicine Research Unit, Laboratory of Cancer Genetics and Tumor Biology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
- Laboratory of Cancer Genetics and Tumor Biology, Northern Finland Laboratory Centre Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Alicja Wolk
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Xiaohong R Yang
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Department of Health and Human Services, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Argyrios Ziogas
- Department of Epidemiology, Genetic Epidemiology Research Institute, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Paul D P Pharoah
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Per Hall
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Sšdersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lodewyk F A Wessels
- Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Faculty of EEMCS, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Georgia Chenevix-Trench
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Gary D Bader
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- The Donnelly Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Thilo Dörk
- Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sander Canisius
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Marjanka K Schmidt
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Casey MC, Prakash A, Holian E, McGuire A, Kalinina O, Shalaby A, Curran C, Webber M, Callagy G, Bourke E, Kerin MJ, Brown JA. Quantifying Argonaute 2 (Ago2) expression to stratify breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:712. [PMID: 31324173 PMCID: PMC6642579 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5884-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2018] [Accepted: 06/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Argonaute-2 (Ago2) is an essential component of microRNA biogenesis implicated in tumourigenesis. However Ago2 expression and localisation in breast cancer remains undetermined. The aim was to define Ago2 expression (mRNA and protein) and localisation in breast cancer, and investigate associations with clinicopathological details. METHODS Ago2 protein was stained in breast cancer cell lines and tissue microarrays (TMAs), with intensity and localization assessed. Staining intensity was correlated with clinicopathological details. Using independent databases, Ago2 mRNA expression and gene alterations in breast cancer were investigated. RESULTS In the breast cancer TMAs, 4 distinct staining intensities were observed (Negative, Weak, Moderate, Strong), with 64.2% of samples stained weak or negatively for Ago2 protein. An association was found between strong Ago2 staining and, the Her2 positive or basal subtypes, and between Ago2 intensity and receptor status (Estrogen or Progesterone). In tumours Ago2 mRNA expression correlated with reduced relapse free survival. Conversely, Ago2 mRNA was expressed significantly lower in SK-BR-3 (HER2 positive) and BT-20 (Basal/Triple negative) cell lines. Interestingly, high levels of Ago2 gene amplification (10-27%) were observed in breast cancer across multiple patient datasets. Importantly, knowledge of Ago2 expression improves predictions of breast cancer subtype by 20%, ER status by 15.7% and PR status by 17.5%. CONCLUSIONS Quantification of Ago2 improves the stratification of breast cancer and suggests a differential role for Ago2 in breast cancer subtypes, based on levels and cellular localisation. Further investigation of the mechanisms affecting Ago2 dysregulation will reveal insights into the molecular differences underpinning breast cancer subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M C Casey
- Discipline of Surgery, School of Medicine, Lambe institute for Translational Research, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - A Prakash
- Discipline of Pathology, School of Medicine, Lambe Institute for Translational Research, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - E Holian
- School of Mathematics, Statistics and Applied Mathematics, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - A McGuire
- Discipline of Surgery, School of Medicine, Lambe institute for Translational Research, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - O Kalinina
- School of Mathematics, Statistics and Applied Mathematics, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - A Shalaby
- Discipline of Pathology, School of Medicine, Lambe Institute for Translational Research, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - C Curran
- Discipline of Surgery, School of Medicine, Lambe institute for Translational Research, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - M Webber
- Discipline of Pathology, School of Medicine, Lambe Institute for Translational Research, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - G Callagy
- Discipline of Pathology, School of Medicine, Lambe Institute for Translational Research, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - E Bourke
- Discipline of Pathology, School of Medicine, Lambe Institute for Translational Research, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - M J Kerin
- Discipline of Surgery, School of Medicine, Lambe institute for Translational Research, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - J A Brown
- Discipline of Surgery, School of Medicine, Lambe institute for Translational Research, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Zahnd WE, Sherman RL, Klonoff-Cohen H, McLafferty SL, Farner S, Rosenblatt KA. Disparities in breast cancer subtypes among women in the lower Mississippi Delta Region states. Cancer Causes Control 2019; 30:591-601. [DOI: 10.1007/s10552-019-01168-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2018] [Accepted: 04/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
15
|
Voith von Voithenberg L, Crocetti E, Martos C, Dimitrova N, Giusti F, Randi G, Rooney R, Dyba T, Bettio M, Negrão Carvalho R. Cancer registries - guardians of breast cancer biomarker information: A systematic review. Int J Biol Markers 2019; 34:194-199. [PMID: 30968746 DOI: 10.1177/1724600819836097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer is the most common cancer and the leading cause of cancer-related death in females, with a large societal and economic impact. Decisions regarding its treatment are largely affected by the categorization into different subtypes with hormone receptor status and HER2 status being the most important predictive factors. Other biological markers play an important role for prognostic and predictive reasons. The data collection and harmonization of cancer cases are performed by cancer registries whose collection of parameters largely differs, partially including results from biomarker testing. METHODS This systematic literature review consisting of a total of 729 reports determined whether information about biomarker testing in breast cancer cases is collected and published by cancer registries worldwide. RESULTS The number of publications using breast cancer biomarker data from registries steeply rose with the beginning of the 21st century and some hospital-based and population-based cancer registries reacted with immediate collection of biomarker data following the recommendation of clinical guidelines. For female breast cancer, biomarkers have achieved an essential clinical value and this review points to a steady increase in the collection of biomarker data by cancer registries during the last decade. CONCLUSIONS In the future, recommendations for biomarker data collection and coding by cancer registries may be required to ensure harmonization and comparability of the data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Carmen Martos
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy
| | - Nadya Dimitrova
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy
| | | | - Giorgia Randi
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy
| | - Roisin Rooney
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy
| | - Tadeusz Dyba
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy
| | - Manola Bettio
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Nakasuji T, Kawai K, Ishikawa T, Teraoka K, Takeuchi S, Miyagawa T, Nara K, Kidera N, Harada T, Miyasaka N. Random-start ovarian stimulation with aromatase inhibitor for fertility preservation in women with Japanese breast cancer. Reprod Med Biol 2019; 18:167-172. [PMID: 30996680 PMCID: PMC6452013 DOI: 10.1002/rmb2.12263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2018] [Revised: 11/05/2018] [Accepted: 12/09/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Fertility preservation is an important issue for young cancer patients. Random-start controlled ovarian stimulation and double ovarian stimulation have been proposed for efficient oocyte retrieval within the limited time before cancer therapy. We aimed to clarify the efficacy of these new protocols within the Japanese population. METHODS We performed a retrospective observational study at a multicenter from February 2012 to August 2017. The study entailed 50 cycles with 34 patients who underwent fertility preservation due to breast cancer. Follicular phase or luteal phase ovarian stimulation with aromatase inhibitor was performed. A second ovarian stimulation was started with or without waiting until the next menstruation. We measured the number of retrieved oocytes and cryopreserved oocytes/embryos, the ratio of mature oocytes, and the fertilization rate. RESULTS The numbers of retrieved oocytes and frozen oocytes/embryos were not significantly different between follicular phase and luteal phase ovarian stimulation. The number of retrieved oocytes was not reduced at the second ovum pick up compared to the first ovum pick up in the double ovarian stimulation. CONCLUSIONS Random-start controlled ovarian stimulation and double ovarian stimulation with aromatase inhibitor for breast cancer patients were effective protocols for retrieving a greater number of oocytes within the limited time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Nakasuji
- Comprehensive Reproductive Medicine, Graduate SchoolTokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU)TokyoJapan
| | - Kiyotaka Kawai
- Reproductive MedicineKameda Medical CenterChibaJapan
- Reproductive MedicineKameda IVF Clinic MakuhariChibaJapan
| | - Tomonori Ishikawa
- Pediatrics, Perinatal and Maternal Medicine (Ibaraki), Graduate SchoolTokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU)TokyoJapan
| | - Kaori Teraoka
- Reproductive MedicineKameda Medical CenterChibaJapan
| | - Shiho Takeuchi
- Comprehensive Reproductive Medicine, Graduate SchoolTokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU)TokyoJapan
| | | | - Kazuko Nara
- Reproductive MedicineKameda Medical CenterChibaJapan
| | - Nobuyuki Kidera
- Comprehensive Reproductive Medicine, Graduate SchoolTokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU)TokyoJapan
| | - Tatsuya Harada
- Reproductive MedicineKameda IVF Clinic MakuhariChibaJapan
| | - Naoyuki Miyasaka
- Comprehensive Reproductive Medicine, Graduate SchoolTokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU)TokyoJapan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Shao N, Shi Y, Yu L, Ye R, Shan Z, Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Lin Y. Prospect for Application of PARP Inhibitor in Patients with HER2 Negative Breast Cancer. Int J Biol Sci 2019; 15:962-972. [PMID: 31182917 PMCID: PMC6535782 DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.30721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2018] [Accepted: 12/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) negative metastatic breast cancer (BC) accounts for 73% of BC. The molecular analysis of this disease is essential for potential options for targeted therapy. Several promising clinical strategies are being evaluated which includes endocrine therapy, modified chemotherapy, angiogenesis inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and anti-androgens. New therapeutic approaches are being developed that target BC patients with germline mutations in either BRCA1, BRCA2 as well as BRCAness, a condition in which tumors have molecular similarity to BRCA-mutated tumors. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) which are effective therapy in germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, are also observed to be effective in somatic mutations. Germline mutations in the homologous recombination pathway genes could also contribute to PARPi sensitivity. PARPi act as chemo- and radio-sensitizers by limiting the DNA-damage response and potentiating the activity of chemo- and radio-therapy when used alone or in combination with chemotherapy. Apart from PARPi as monotherapy, additional researches are ongoing in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapeutics and targeted agents in HER2 negative BC. This review aims at the most recent developments in the targeted therapy, summarizes the recent clinical trials outcomes, along with the overview of ongoing clinical trials in HER2 negative patients with BRCA1/2 mutations and sporadic tumors with BRCAness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ying Lin
- Breast Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 58, ZhongShan Er Lu, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Syed AK, Woodall R, Whisenant JG, Yankeelov TE, Sorace AG. Characterizing Trastuzumab-Induced Alterations in Intratumoral Heterogeneity with Quantitative Imaging and Immunohistochemistry in HER2+ Breast Cancer. Neoplasia 2019; 21:17-29. [PMID: 30472501 PMCID: PMC6260456 DOI: 10.1016/j.neo.2018.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2018] [Revised: 10/24/2018] [Accepted: 10/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate imaging and histology-based measurements of intratumoral heterogeneity to evaluate early treatment response to targeted therapy in a murine model of HER2+ breast cancer. BT474 tumor-bearing mice (N = 30) were treated with trastuzumab or saline and imaged longitudinally with either dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or 18F-fluoromisonidazole (FMISO) positron emission tomography (PET). At the imaging study end point (day 4 for MRI or 7 for PET), each tumor was excised for immunohistochemistry analysis. Voxel-based histogram analysis was performed on imaging-derived parametric maps (i.e., Ktrans and ve from DCE-MRI, SUV from 18F-FMISO-PET) of the tumor region of interest to measure heterogeneity. Image processing and histogram analysis of whole tumor slice immunohistochemistry data were performed to validate the in vivo imaging findings. Trastuzumab-treated tumors had increased heterogeneity in quantitative imaging measures of cellularity (ve), with a mean Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) distance of 0.32 (P = .05) between baseline and end point distributions. Trastuzumab-treated tumors had increased vascular heterogeneity (Ktrans) and decreased hypoxic heterogeneity (SUV), with a mean K-S distance of 0.42 (P < .01) and 0.46 (P = .047), respectively, between baseline and study end points. These observations were validated by whole-slice immunohistochemistry analysis with mean interquartile range of CD31 distributions of 1.72 for treated and 0.95 for control groups (P = .02). Quantitative longitudinal changes in tumor cellular and vascular heterogeneity in response to therapy may provide evidence for early prediction of response and guide therapy for patients with HER2+ breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anum K Syed
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712
| | - Ryan Woodall
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712
| | - Jennifer G Whisenant
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232
| | - Thomas E Yankeelov
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712; Department of Diagnostic Medicine, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712; Department of Oncology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712; Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712; Livestrong Cancer Institutes, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712
| | - Anna G Sorace
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712; Department of Diagnostic Medicine, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712; Department of Oncology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712; Livestrong Cancer Institutes, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wang WJ, Zhang T. Integration of traditional Chinese medicine and Western medicine in the era of precision medicine. JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE-JIM 2018; 15:1-7. [PMID: 28088253 DOI: 10.1016/s2095-4964(17)60314-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Precision medicine has received growing recognition from clinicians, health systems, and the pharmaceutical industry, as well as patients and policymakers, which will leave a major impact on the practice of medicine. Interestingly, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) provides personalized medical treatment based on the theory of TCM characterized by holistic concept and pattern differentiation. This, to some extent, is similar to the personalized medical treatment of precision medicine. In China, TCM as well as Western medicine (WM) plays an important role in healthcare. In this article, the authors summarized the influence of precision medicine on current medical directions, the advantages of TCM in disease treatment, further development of precision medicine and the strategies for integration of TCM and WM under this new treatment approach. In addition, the authors discuss the perspective of precise medical diagnosis and treatment, precise prevention, and the complementary advantages of the integration of TCM and WM. Finally, the authors give their perspectives on the challenges and opportunities presented by precision medicine, in the context of further research toward the integration of TCM and WM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen-Jian Wang
- Institute of Integrative Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.,Clinical Research Institute of Chinese Integrative Medicine, Shanghai Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 200437, China
| | - Teng Zhang
- Clinical Research Institute of Chinese Integrative Medicine, Shanghai Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 200437, China.,Yueyang Hospital of Chinese Integrative Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 200437, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Nicolini A, Ferrari P, Duffy MJ. Prognostic and predictive biomarkers in breast cancer: Past, present and future. Semin Cancer Biol 2018; 52:56-73. [DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2017.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 209] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2017] [Revised: 08/14/2017] [Accepted: 08/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
21
|
Howlader N, Cronin KA, Kurian AW, Andridge R. Differences in Breast Cancer Survival by Molecular Subtypes in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2018; 27:619-626. [PMID: 29593010 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-17-0627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 361] [Impact Index Per Article: 51.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2017] [Revised: 08/30/2017] [Accepted: 03/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
UNLABELLED Background: Although incidence rates of breast cancer molecular subtypes are well documented, effects of molecular subtypes on breast cancer-specific survival using the largest population coverage to date are unknown in the U.S. POPULATION Methods: Using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results cancer registry data, we assessed survival after breast cancer diagnosis among women diagnosed during 2010 to 2013 and followed through December 31, 2014. Breast cancer molecular subtypes defined by joint hormone receptor [HR, estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR)] and HER2 status were assessed. Multiple imputation was used to fill in missing receptor status. Four-year breast cancer-specific survival per molecular subtypes and clinical/demographic factors were calculated. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate survival while controlling for clinical and demographic factors.Results: The best survival pattern was observed among women with HR+/HER2- subtype (survival rate of 92.5% at 4 years), followed by HR+/HER2+ (90.3%), HR-/HER2+ (82.7%), and finally worst survival for triple-negative subtype (77.0%). Notably, failing to impute cases with missing receptor status leads to overestimation of survival because those with missing receptor status tend to have worse prognostic features. Survival differed substantially by stage at diagnosis. Among de novo stage IV disease, women with HR+/HER2+ subtype experienced better survival than those with HR+/HER2- subtype (45.5% vs. 35.9%), even after controlling for other factors.Conclusions: Divergence of survival curves in stage IV HR+/HER2+ versus HR+/HER2- subtype is likely attributable to major advances in HER2-targeted treatment.Impact: Contrary to conventional thought, HR+/HER2+ subtype experienced better survival than HR+/HER2- in advanced-stage disease. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 27(6); 619-26. ©2018 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Howlader
- Surveillance Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
| | - Kathleen A Cronin
- Surveillance Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | - Rebecca Andridge
- The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Gao JJ, Swain SM. Luminal A Breast Cancer and Molecular Assays: A Review. Oncologist 2018; 23:556-565. [PMID: 29472313 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 137] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2017] [Accepted: 12/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Chemotherapy has been the historical mainstay of treatment for patients with breast cancer, with immunohistochemical markers and tumor characteristics driving treatment decisions. The discovery of different intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer has advanced the understanding of breast cancer, with gene-based assays shedding further light on tumor behavior and response to treatment. DESIGN This review focuses on the landscape of the luminal A subtype, its definition based on immunohistochemistry (IHC) and gene assays, the prognostic and predictive value of these assays, guideline recommendations, and treatment implications. RESULTS Clinical studies of the prognostic value of gene-based and IHC-based assays in patients with luminal A-subtype breast cancers suggest a better prognosis for these patients compared with those with breast cancers of other subtypes. CONCLUSION In today's era of precision medicine, the best treatment regimen for patients with luminal A-subtype tumors is still undetermined, but available data raise the question whether chemotherapy can be omitted and endocrine therapy alone is sufficient for this patient population. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Immunohistochemical markers have traditionally guided treatment decisions in breast cancer. However, advances in gene-expression profiling and availability of gene-based assays have launched these newer tests into everyday clinical practice. Luminal A-subtype tumors are a unique subset that may have favorable tumor biology. Properly defining this tumor subtype is important and may identify a subset of patients for whom endocrine therapy alone is sufficient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer J Gao
- Medical Oncology Service, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Sandra M Swain
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, D.C., USA
- MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, D.C., USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Cortet M, Bertaut A, Molinié F, Bara S, Beltjens F, Coutant C, Arveux P. Trends in molecular subtypes of breast cancer: description of incidence rates between 2007 and 2012 from three French registries. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:161. [PMID: 29415671 PMCID: PMC5804056 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4080-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2017] [Accepted: 01/29/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The incidence and incidence trends of breast cancer according to molecular subtype are unknown at a population level in France. The registry data enables this study and may give this information, that is crucial to describe and understand breast cancer epidemiology. Methods We estimated the incidence rates of breast cancer for each molecular subtype using data from three cancer registries in France for the period from 2007 to 2012. Molecular subtypes were defined with immunohistochemical data. Poisson models were estimated to modelize the course of breast cancer incidence and to test the trends. Results The study included 12,040 patients diagnosed between 2007 and 2012 in the three administrative areas covered by the registries. There was no significant trends in the proportion of each molecular subtype year by year. The age distribution of incident cases was different depending on the molecular subtypes (p < 0.001). The course of incidence between 2007 and 2012 was also different depending on molecular subtype according to the multivariate Poisson model (p < 0.001). Conclusion The description of incident cases of breast cancer according to molecular subtype at a population level showed differences in trends. The trends in incidence differed according to molecular subtype, and this should improve our understanding of overall changes in incidence. This analysis is important to plan screening and treatment resources at a population level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marion Cortet
- Département d'oncologie chirurgicale, Georges-François Leclerc Cancer Centre, UNICANCER, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, 21000, Dijon, France. .,Breast and Gynaecologic Cancer Registry of Côte d'Or, Georges-François Leclerc Cancer Centre, UNICANCER, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, 21000, Dijon, France.
| | - Aurélie Bertaut
- Breast and Gynaecologic Cancer Registry of Côte d'Or, Georges-François Leclerc Cancer Centre, UNICANCER, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, 21000, Dijon, France
| | - Florence Molinié
- Registre des Cancers de Loire-Atlantique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, 50 route de Saint Sébastien, 44093, Nantes, France
| | - Simona Bara
- Registre des Cancers de la Manche, Centre Hospitalier du Cotentin, 46 rue du Val de Saire, 50102, Cherbourg, France
| | - Françoise Beltjens
- Département de pathologie, Georges-François Leclerc Cancer Centre, UNICANCER, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, 21000, Dijon, France
| | - Charles Coutant
- Département d'oncologie chirurgicale, Georges-François Leclerc Cancer Centre, UNICANCER, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, 21000, Dijon, France.,Breast and Gynaecologic Cancer Registry of Côte d'Or, Georges-François Leclerc Cancer Centre, UNICANCER, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, 21000, Dijon, France
| | - Patrick Arveux
- Breast and Gynaecologic Cancer Registry of Côte d'Or, Georges-François Leclerc Cancer Centre, UNICANCER, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, 21000, Dijon, France.,Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), "Health across Generations" Team, Gustave Roussy, Inserm U1018, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Narrandes S, Huang S, Murphy L, Xu W. The exploration of contrasting pathways in Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC). BMC Cancer 2018; 18:22. [PMID: 29301506 PMCID: PMC5753474 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3939-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2016] [Accepted: 12/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Triple Negative Breast Cancers (TNBCs) lack the appropriate targets for currently used breast cancer therapies, conferring an aggressive phenotype, more frequent relapse and poorer survival rates. The biological heterogeneity of TNBC complicates the clinical treatment further. We have explored and compared the biological pathways in TNBC and other subtypes of breast cancers, using an in silico approach and the hypothesis that two opposing effects (Yin and Yang) pathways in cancer cells determine the fate of cancer cells. Identifying breast subgroup specific components of these opposing pathways may aid in selecting potential therapeutic targets as well as further classifying the heterogeneous TNBC subtype. Methods Gene expression and patient clinical data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (METABRIC) were used for this study. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) was used to identify the more active pathways in cancer (Yin) than in normal and the more active pathways in normal (Yang) than in cancer. The clustering analysis was performed to compare pathways of TNBC with other types of breast cancers. The association of pathway classified TNBC sub-groups to clinical outcomes was tested using Cox regression model. Results Among 4729 curated canonical pathways in GSEA database, 133 Yin pathways (FDR < 0.05) and 71 Yang pathways (p-value <0.05) were discovered in TNBC. The FOXM1 is the top Yin pathway while PPARα is the top Yang pathway in TNBC. The TNBC and other types of breast cancers showed different pathways enrichment significance profiles. Using top Yin and Yang pathways as classifier, the TNBC can be further subtyped into six sub-groups each having different clinical outcomes. Conclusion We first reported that the FOMX1 pathway is the most upregulated and the PPARα pathway is the most downregulated pathway in TNBC. These two pathways could be simultaneously targeted in further studies. Also the pathway classifier we performed in this study provided insight into the TNBC heterogeneity. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-017-3939-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shavira Narrandes
- Research Institute of Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba & University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Shujun Huang
- Research Institute of Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba & University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.,College of Pharmacy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Leigh Murphy
- Department of Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.,College of Pharmacy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Wayne Xu
- Research Institute of Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba & University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada. .,Department of Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada. .,College of Pharmacy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Mullooly M, Murphy J, Gierach GL, Walsh PM, Deady S, Barron TI, Sherman ME, Rosenberg PS, Anderson WF. Divergent oestrogen receptor-specific breast cancer trends in Ireland (2004-2013): Amassing data from independent Western populations provide etiologic clues. Eur J Cancer 2017; 86:326-333. [PMID: 29073583 PMCID: PMC5841549 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.08.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2017] [Revised: 08/21/2017] [Accepted: 08/25/2017] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
The aetiology and clinical behaviour of breast cancers vary by oestrogen receptor (ER) expression, HER2 expression and over time. Data from the United States and Denmark show rising incidence rates for ER+ and falling incidence rates for ER- breast cancers. Given that Ireland is a somewhat similar Western population but with distinctive risk exposures (especially for lactation), we analysed breast cancer trends by ER status; and for the first time, by the joint expression of ER±/HER2±. We assessed invasive breast cancers (n = 24,845; 2004-2013) within the population-based National Cancer Registry of Ireland. The population at risk was obtained from the Irish Central Statistics Office (n = 10,401,986). After accounting for missing ER and HER2 data, we assessed receptor-specific secular trends in age-standardised incidence rates (ASRs) with the estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Age-period-cohort models were also fitted to further characterise trends accounting for age, calendar-period and birth-cohort interactions. ASRs increased for ER+ (EAPC: 2.2% per year [95% CI: 0.97, 3.45%/year]) and decreased for ER- cancers (EAPC: -3.43% per year [95% CI: -5.05, -1.78%/year]), as well as for specific age groups at diagnosis (<30-49, 50-64 and ≥65 years). ER+/HER2- cancers rose, ER+/HER2+ cancers were statistically flat and ER-/HER± cancers declined. Secular trends for ER± cancers in Ireland were like those previously observed. Stratification by HER2± expression did not substantively alter ER± trends. The divergence of ER± incidence rates among independent Western populations likely reflects calendar-period and/or risk factor changes with differential effects for ER+ and ER- breast cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maeve Mullooly
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA; Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | - Jeanne Murphy
- George Washington University School of Nursing, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Gretchen L Gierach
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Paul M Walsh
- National Cancer Registry Ireland, Cork Airport Business Park, Cork, Ireland
| | - Sandra Deady
- National Cancer Registry Ireland, Cork Airport Business Park, Cork, Ireland
| | - Thomas I Barron
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Philip S Rosenberg
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - William F Anderson
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
The influence of stage at diagnosis and molecular subtype on breast cancer patient survival: a hospital-based multi-center study. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CANCER 2017; 36:84. [PMID: 29070080 PMCID: PMC5657106 DOI: 10.1186/s40880-017-0250-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2017] [Accepted: 07/16/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background Stage at diagnosis and molecular subtype are important clinical factors associated with breast cancer patient survival. However, subgroup survival data from a large study sample are limited in China. To estimate the survival differences among patients with different stages and various subtypes of breast cancer, we conducted a hospital-based multi-center study on breast cancer in Beijing, China. Methods All resident patients diagnosed with primary, invasive breast cancer between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2010 from four selected hospitals in Beijing were included and followed up until December 31, 2015. Hospital-based data of stage at diagnosis, hormone receptor status, and selected clinical characteristics, including body mass index (BMI), menopausal status, histological grade, and histological type, were collected from the medical records of the study subjects. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated. Cox proportional hazards models were employed to evaluate the associations of stage at diagnosis and molecular subtype with patient survival. Results The 5-year OS and CSS rates for all patients were 89.4% and 90.3%. Survival varied by stage and molecular subtype. The 5-year OS rates for patients with stage I, II, III, and IV diseases were 96.5%, 91.6%, 74.8%, and 40.7%, respectively, and the corresponding estimates of 5-year CSS rates were 97.1%, 92.6%, 75.6%, and 42.7%, respectively. The 5-year OS rates for patients with luminal A, luminal B, HER2, and triple-negative subtypes of breast cancer were 92.6%, 88.4%, 83.6%, and 82.9%, respectively, and the corresponding estimates of 5-year CSS rates were 93.2%, 89.1%, 85.4%, and 83.5%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that stage at diagnosis and molecular subtype were important prognostic factors for breast cancer. Conclusions Survival of breast cancer patients varied significantly by stage and molecular subtype. Cancer screening is encouraged for the early detection and early diagnosis of breast cancer. More advanced therapies and health care policies are needed on HER2 and triple-negative subtypes.
Collapse
|
27
|
Zhao H, Orhan YC, Zha X, Esencan E, Chatterton RT, Bulun SE. AMP-activated protein kinase and energy balance in breast cancer. Am J Transl Res 2017; 9:197-213. [PMID: 28337254 PMCID: PMC5340661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2016] [Accepted: 11/08/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Cancer growth and metastasis depends on the availability of energy. Energy-sensing systems are critical in maintaining a balance between the energy supply and utilization of energy for tumor growth. A central regulator in this process is AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). In times of energy deficit, AMPK is allosterically modified by the binding of increased levels of AMP and ADP, making it a target of specific AMPK kinases (AMPKKs). AMPK signaling prompts cells to produce energy at the expense of growth and motility, opposing the actions of insulin and growth factors. Increasing AMPK activity may thus prevent the proliferation and metastasis of tumor cells. Activated AMPK also suppresses aromatase, which lowers estrogen formation and prevents breast cancer growth. Biguanides can be used to activate AMPK, but AMPK activity is modified by many different interacting factors; understanding these factors is important in order to control the abnormal growth processes that lead to breast cancer neoplasia. Fatty acids, estrogens, androgens, adipokines, and another energy sensor, sirtuin-1, alter the phosphorylation and activation of AMPK. Isoforms of AMPK differ among tissues and may serve specific functions. Targeting AMPK regulatory processes at points other than the upstream AMPKKs may provide additional approaches for prevention of breast cancer neoplasia, growth, and metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Zhao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern UniversityChicago, IL, USA
| | - Yelda C Orhan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern UniversityChicago, IL, USA
| | - Xiaoming Zha
- Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical SchoolNanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Ecem Esencan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern UniversityChicago, IL, USA
| | - Robert T Chatterton
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern UniversityChicago, IL, USA
- Department of Physiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern UniversityChicago, IL, USA
- Department of Pathology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern UniversityChicago, IL, USA
| | - Serdar E Bulun
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern UniversityChicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Zhao H, Zhou L, Shangguan AJ, Bulun SE. Aromatase expression and regulation in breast and endometrial cancer. J Mol Endocrinol 2016; 57:R19-33. [PMID: 27067638 PMCID: PMC5519084 DOI: 10.1530/jme-15-0310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 138] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2016] [Accepted: 04/11/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Long-term exposure to excess estrogen increases the risk of breast cancer and type 1 endometrial cancer. Most of the estrogen in premenopausal women is synthesized by the ovaries, while extraovarian subcutaneous adipose tissue is the predominant tissue source of estrogen after menopause. Estrogen and its metabolites can cause hyperproliferation and neoplastic transformation of breast and endometrial cells via increased proliferation and DNA damage. Several genetically modified mouse models have been generated to help understand the physiological and pathophysiological roles of aromatase and estrogen in the normal breast and in the development of breast cancers. Aromatase, the key enzyme for estrogen production, is comprised of at least ten partially tissue-selective and alternatively used promoters. These promoters are regulated by distinct signaling pathways to control aromatase expression and estrogen formation via recruitment of various transcription factors to their cis-regulatory elements. A shift in aromatase promoter use from I.4 to I.3/II is responsible for the excess estrogen production seen in fibroblasts surrounding malignant epithelial cells in breast cancers. Targeting these distinct pathways and/or transcription factors to modify aromatase activity may lead to the development of novel therapeutic remedies that inhibit estrogen production in a tissue-specific manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Zhao
- Division of Reproductive Science in MedicineDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Ling Zhou
- Division of Reproductive Science in MedicineDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Anna Junjie Shangguan
- Division of Reproductive Science in MedicineDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Serdar E Bulun
- Division of Reproductive Science in MedicineDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
DeSantis CE, Fedewa SA, Goding Sauer A, Kramer JL, Smith RA, Jemal A. Breast cancer statistics, 2015: Convergence of incidence rates between black and white women. CA Cancer J Clin 2016; 66:31-42. [PMID: 26513636 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 891] [Impact Index Per Article: 99.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2015] [Accepted: 08/21/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
In this article, the American Cancer Society provides an overview of female breast cancer statistics in the United States, including data on incidence, mortality, survival, and screening. Approximately 231,840 new cases of invasive breast cancer and 40,290 breast cancer deaths are expected to occur among US women in 2015. Breast cancer incidence rates increased among non-Hispanic black (black) and Asian/Pacific Islander women and were stable among non-Hispanic white (white), Hispanic, and American Indian/Alaska Native women from 2008 to 2012. Although white women have historically had higher incidence rates than black women, in 2012, the rates converged. Notably, during 2008 through 2012, incidence rates were significantly higher in black women compared with white women in 7 states, primarily located in the South. From 1989 to 2012, breast cancer death rates decreased by 36%, which translates to 249,000 breast cancer deaths averted in the United States over this period. This decrease in death rates was evident in all racial/ethnic groups except American Indians/Alaska Natives. However, the mortality disparity between black and white women nationwide has continued to widen; and, by 2012, death rates were 42% higher in black women than in white women. During 2003 through 2012, breast cancer death rates declined for white women in all 50 states; but, for black women, declines occurred in 27 of 30 states that had sufficient data to analyze trends. In 3 states (Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin), breast cancer death rates in black women were stable during 2003 through 2012. Widening racial disparities in breast cancer mortality are likely to continue, at least in the short term, in view of the increasing trends in breast cancer incidence rates in black women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carol E DeSantis
- Senior Epidemiologist, Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Stacey A Fedewa
- Director, Risk Factor Screening and Surveillance, Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Ann Goding Sauer
- Epidemiologist, Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Joan L Kramer
- Assistant Professor of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Robert A Smith
- Vice President, Cancer Screening, Cancer Control Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Ahmedin Jemal
- Vice President, Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
The Influence of Socioeconomic Status on Racial/Ethnic Disparities among the ER/PR/HER2 Breast Cancer Subtypes. J Cancer Epidemiol 2015; 2015:813456. [PMID: 26339244 PMCID: PMC4539118 DOI: 10.1155/2015/813456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2015] [Revised: 06/30/2015] [Accepted: 07/08/2015] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background. The eight ER/PR/HER2 breast cancer subtypes vary widely in demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics and survival. This study assesses the contribution of SES to the risk of mortality for blacks, Hispanics, Asian/Pacific Islanders, and American Indians when compared with white women for each ER/PR/HER2 subtype. Methods. We identified 143,184 cases of first primary female invasive breast cancer from the California Cancer Registry between 2000 and 2012. The risk of mortality was computed for each race/ethnicity within each ER/PR/HER2 subtype. Models were adjusted for tumor grade, year of diagnosis, and age. SES was added to a second set of models. Analyses were conducted separately for each stage. Results. Race/ethnicity did not contribute to the risk of mortality for any subtype in stage 1 when adjusted for SES. In stages 2, 3, and 4, race/ethnicity was associated with risk of mortality and adjustment for SES changed the risk only in some subtypes. SES reduced the risk of mortality by over 45% for American Indians with stage 2 ER+/PR+/HER2− cancer, but it decreased the risk of mortality for blacks with stage 2 triple negative cancer by less than 4%. Conclusions. Racial/ethnic disparities do not exist in all ER/PR/HER2 subtypes and, in general, SES modestly alters these disparities.
Collapse
|
31
|
Kohler BA, Sherman RL, Howlader N, Jemal A, Ryerson AB, Henry KA, Boscoe FP, Cronin KA, Lake A, Noone AM, Henley SJ, Eheman CR, Anderson RN, Penberthy L. Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975-2011, Featuring Incidence of Breast Cancer Subtypes by Race/Ethnicity, Poverty, and State. J Natl Cancer Inst 2015; 107:djv048. [PMID: 25825511 PMCID: PMC4603551 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djv048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 653] [Impact Index Per Article: 65.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2014] [Revised: 01/21/2015] [Accepted: 02/10/2015] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The American Cancer Society (ACS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Cancer Institute (NCI), and North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR) collaborate annually to produce updated, national cancer statistics. This Annual Report includes a focus on breast cancer incidence by subtype using new, national-level data. METHODS Population-based cancer trends and breast cancer incidence by molecular subtype were calculated. Breast cancer subtypes were classified using tumor biomarkers for hormone receptor (HR) and human growth factor-neu receptor (HER2) expression. RESULTS Overall cancer incidence decreased for men by 1.8% annually from 2007 to 2011 [corrected]. Rates for women were stable from 1998 to 2011. Within these trends there was racial/ethnic variation, and some sites have increasing rates. Among children, incidence rates continued to increase by 0.8% per year over the past decade while, like adults, mortality declined. HR+/HER2- breast cancers, the subtype with the best prognosis, were the most common for all races/ethnicities with highest rates among non-Hispanic white women, local stage cases, and low poverty areas (92.7, 63.51, and 98.69 per 100000 non-Hispanic white women, respectively). HR+/HER2- breast cancer incidence rates were strongly, positively correlated with mammography use, particularly for non-Hispanic white women (Pearson 0.57, two-sided P < .001). Triple-negative breast cancers, the subtype with the worst prognosis, were highest among non-Hispanic black women (27.2 per 100000 non-Hispanic black women), which is reflected in high rates in southeastern states. CONCLUSIONS Progress continues in reducing the burden of cancer in the United States. There are unique racial/ethnic-specific incidence patterns for breast cancer subtypes; likely because of both biologic and social risk factors, including variation in mammography use. Breast cancer subtype analysis confirms the capacity of cancer registries to adjust national collection standards to produce clinically relevant data based on evolving medical knowledge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Betsy A Kohler
- North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Springfield, IL (BAK, RLS, KAH, FPB); National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NH, KAC, AMN, LP); American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA (AJ); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (ABR, SJH, CRE); Temple University Department of Geography, Philadelphia, PA (KAH); New York State Cancer Registry, NY (FPB); Information Management Services, Inc., Rockville, MD (AL); National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD (RNA).
| | - Recinda L Sherman
- North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Springfield, IL (BAK, RLS, KAH, FPB); National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NH, KAC, AMN, LP); American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA (AJ); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (ABR, SJH, CRE); Temple University Department of Geography, Philadelphia, PA (KAH); New York State Cancer Registry, NY (FPB); Information Management Services, Inc., Rockville, MD (AL); National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD (RNA)
| | - Nadia Howlader
- North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Springfield, IL (BAK, RLS, KAH, FPB); National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NH, KAC, AMN, LP); American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA (AJ); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (ABR, SJH, CRE); Temple University Department of Geography, Philadelphia, PA (KAH); New York State Cancer Registry, NY (FPB); Information Management Services, Inc., Rockville, MD (AL); National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD (RNA)
| | - Ahmedin Jemal
- North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Springfield, IL (BAK, RLS, KAH, FPB); National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NH, KAC, AMN, LP); American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA (AJ); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (ABR, SJH, CRE); Temple University Department of Geography, Philadelphia, PA (KAH); New York State Cancer Registry, NY (FPB); Information Management Services, Inc., Rockville, MD (AL); National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD (RNA)
| | - A Blythe Ryerson
- North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Springfield, IL (BAK, RLS, KAH, FPB); National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NH, KAC, AMN, LP); American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA (AJ); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (ABR, SJH, CRE); Temple University Department of Geography, Philadelphia, PA (KAH); New York State Cancer Registry, NY (FPB); Information Management Services, Inc., Rockville, MD (AL); National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD (RNA)
| | - Kevin A Henry
- North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Springfield, IL (BAK, RLS, KAH, FPB); National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NH, KAC, AMN, LP); American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA (AJ); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (ABR, SJH, CRE); Temple University Department of Geography, Philadelphia, PA (KAH); New York State Cancer Registry, NY (FPB); Information Management Services, Inc., Rockville, MD (AL); National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD (RNA)
| | - Francis P Boscoe
- North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Springfield, IL (BAK, RLS, KAH, FPB); National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NH, KAC, AMN, LP); American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA (AJ); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (ABR, SJH, CRE); Temple University Department of Geography, Philadelphia, PA (KAH); New York State Cancer Registry, NY (FPB); Information Management Services, Inc., Rockville, MD (AL); National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD (RNA)
| | - Kathleen A Cronin
- North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Springfield, IL (BAK, RLS, KAH, FPB); National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NH, KAC, AMN, LP); American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA (AJ); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (ABR, SJH, CRE); Temple University Department of Geography, Philadelphia, PA (KAH); New York State Cancer Registry, NY (FPB); Information Management Services, Inc., Rockville, MD (AL); National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD (RNA)
| | - Andrew Lake
- North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Springfield, IL (BAK, RLS, KAH, FPB); National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NH, KAC, AMN, LP); American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA (AJ); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (ABR, SJH, CRE); Temple University Department of Geography, Philadelphia, PA (KAH); New York State Cancer Registry, NY (FPB); Information Management Services, Inc., Rockville, MD (AL); National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD (RNA)
| | - Anne-Michelle Noone
- North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Springfield, IL (BAK, RLS, KAH, FPB); National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NH, KAC, AMN, LP); American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA (AJ); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (ABR, SJH, CRE); Temple University Department of Geography, Philadelphia, PA (KAH); New York State Cancer Registry, NY (FPB); Information Management Services, Inc., Rockville, MD (AL); National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD (RNA)
| | - S Jane Henley
- North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Springfield, IL (BAK, RLS, KAH, FPB); National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NH, KAC, AMN, LP); American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA (AJ); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (ABR, SJH, CRE); Temple University Department of Geography, Philadelphia, PA (KAH); New York State Cancer Registry, NY (FPB); Information Management Services, Inc., Rockville, MD (AL); National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD (RNA)
| | - Christie R Eheman
- North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Springfield, IL (BAK, RLS, KAH, FPB); National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NH, KAC, AMN, LP); American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA (AJ); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (ABR, SJH, CRE); Temple University Department of Geography, Philadelphia, PA (KAH); New York State Cancer Registry, NY (FPB); Information Management Services, Inc., Rockville, MD (AL); National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD (RNA)
| | - Robert N Anderson
- North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Springfield, IL (BAK, RLS, KAH, FPB); National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NH, KAC, AMN, LP); American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA (AJ); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (ABR, SJH, CRE); Temple University Department of Geography, Philadelphia, PA (KAH); New York State Cancer Registry, NY (FPB); Information Management Services, Inc., Rockville, MD (AL); National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD (RNA)
| | - Lynne Penberthy
- North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Springfield, IL (BAK, RLS, KAH, FPB); National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NH, KAC, AMN, LP); American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA (AJ); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (ABR, SJH, CRE); Temple University Department of Geography, Philadelphia, PA (KAH); New York State Cancer Registry, NY (FPB); Information Management Services, Inc., Rockville, MD (AL); National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD (RNA)
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abraham J. PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway inhibitors: the ideal combination partners for breast cancer therapies? Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2014; 15:51-68. [PMID: 25306975 DOI: 10.1586/14737140.2015.961429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mTOR pathway is common in breast cancer. PI3K pathway activation has been associated with tumor growth and progression, and thus is a promising target for breast cancer therapy. Agents targeting the PI3K pathway can restore sensitivity to standard breast cancer therapies, including endocrine, HER2-targeted agents and chemotherapy, by suppressing PI3K pathway activation, which is central to the development of therapeutic resistance. The combination of endocrine therapy and PI3K pathway (mTOR) inhibition has proven clinical benefit, and novel combination strategies involving PI3K pathway inhibitors and other investigational targeted therapies are now being explored clinically in patients with breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jame Abraham
- Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Institute, 9500 Euclid Ave, R-35, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| |
Collapse
|