1
|
Nakatani T, Schauer T, Pal M, Ettinger A, Altamirano-Pacheco L, Zorn J, Gilbert DM, Torres-Padilla ME. RIF1 controls replication timing in early mouse embryos independently of lamina-associated nuclear organization. Dev Cell 2025:S1534-5807(25)00179-0. [PMID: 40262611 DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2025.03.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2024] [Revised: 08/18/2024] [Accepted: 03/31/2025] [Indexed: 04/24/2025]
Abstract
Cells must duplicate their genome before they divide to ensure equal transmission of genetic information. The genome is replicated with a defined temporal order, replication timing (RT), which is cell-type specific and linked to 3D-genome organization. During mammalian development, RT is initially not well defined and becomes progressively consolidated from the 4-cell stage. However, the molecular regulators are unknown. Here, by combining loss-of-function analysis with genome-wide investigation of RT in mouse embryos, we identify Rap1 interacting factor 1 (RIF1) as a regulator of the progressive consolidation of RT. Embryos without RIF1 show DNA replication features of an early, more totipotent state. RIF1 regulates the progressive stratification of RT values and its depletion leads to global RT changes and a more heterogeneous RT program. Developmental RT changes are disentangled from changes in transcription and nuclear organization, specifically nuclear lamina association. Our work provides molecular understanding of replication and genome organization at the beginning of mammalian development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsunetoshi Nakatani
- Institute of Epigenetics and Stem Cells (IES), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 81377 München, Germany
| | - Tamas Schauer
- Institute of Epigenetics and Stem Cells (IES), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 81377 München, Germany
| | - Mrinmoy Pal
- Institute of Epigenetics and Stem Cells (IES), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 81377 München, Germany
| | - Andreas Ettinger
- Institute of Epigenetics and Stem Cells (IES), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 81377 München, Germany
| | - Luis Altamirano-Pacheco
- Institute of Epigenetics and Stem Cells (IES), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 81377 München, Germany
| | - Julia Zorn
- Core Facility Laboratory Animal Services, Helmholtz Zentrum München, 81377 München, Germany
| | - David M Gilbert
- Laboratory of Chromosome Replication and Epigenome Regulation, San Diego Biomedical Research Institute, San Diego, CA 92121, USA
| | - Maria-Elena Torres-Padilla
- Institute of Epigenetics and Stem Cells (IES), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 81377 München, Germany; Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität, München, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Korsak S, Banecki KH, Buka K, Górski PJ, Plewczynski D. Chromatin as a Coevolutionary Graph: Modeling the Interplay of Replication with Chromatin Dynamics. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2025:2025.03.31.646315. [PMID: 40236036 PMCID: PMC11996380 DOI: 10.1101/2025.03.31.646315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/17/2025]
Abstract
Modeling DNA replication poses significant challenges due to the intricate interplay of biophysical processes and the need for precise parameter optimization. In this study, we explore the interactions among three key biophysical factors that influence chromatin folding: replication, loop extrusion, and compartmentalization. Replication forks, known to act as barriers to the motion of loop extrusion factors, also correlate with the phase separation of chromatin into A and B compartments. Our approach integrates three components: (1) a numerical model that takes into advantage single-cell replication timing data to simulate replication fork propagation; (2) a stochastic Monte Carlo simulation that captures the interplay between the biophysical factors, with loop extrusion factors binding, unbinding, and extruding dynamically, while CTCF barriers and replication forks act as static and moving barriers, and a Potts Hamiltonian governs the spreading of epigenetic states driving chromatin compartmentalization; and (3) a 3D OpenMM simulation that reconstructs the chromatin's 3D structure based on the states generated by the stochastic model. To our knowledge, this is the first framework to dynamically integrate and simulate these three biophysical factors, enabling insights into chromatin behavior during replication. Furthermore, we investigate how replication stress alters these dynamics and affects chromatin structure.
Collapse
|
3
|
Gökbuget D, Goehring L, Boileau RM, Lenshoek K, Huang TT, Blelloch R. KMT2C/KMT2D-dependent H3K4me1 mediates changes in DNA replication timing and origin activity during a cell fate transition. Cell Rep 2025; 44:115272. [PMID: 39908143 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2025.115272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2024] [Accepted: 01/15/2025] [Indexed: 02/07/2025] Open
Abstract
Mammalian genomes replicate in a cell-type-specific order during the S phase, correlated to transcriptional activity, histone modifications, and chromatin structure. The causal relationships between these features and DNA replication timing (RT), especially during cell fate changes, are largely unknown. Using machine learning, we quantify 21 chromatin features predicting local RT and RT changes during differentiation in embryonic stem cells (ESCs). About one-third of the genome shows RT changes during differentiation. Chromatin features accurately predict both steady-state RT and RT changes. Histone H3 lysine 4 monomethylation (H3K4me1), catalyzed by KMT2C and KMT2D (KMT2C/D), emerges as a top predictor. Loss of KMT2C/D or their enzymatic activities impairs RT changes during differentiation. This correlates with local H3K4me1 loss and reduced replication origin firing, while transcription remains largely unaffected. Our findings reveal KMT2C/D-dependent H3K4me1 as a key regulator of RT and replication initiation, a role that likely impacts diseases associated with KMT2C/D mutations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deniz Gökbuget
- The Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, Center for Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Liana Goehring
- Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Pharmacology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ryan M Boileau
- The Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, Center for Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Kayla Lenshoek
- The Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, Center for Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Tony T Huang
- Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Pharmacology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robert Blelloch
- The Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, Center for Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Damasceno JD, Briggs EM, Krasilnikova M, Marques CA, Lapsley C, McCulloch R. R-loops acted on by RNase H1 influence DNA replication timing and genome stability in Leishmania. Nat Commun 2025; 16:1470. [PMID: 39922816 PMCID: PMC11807225 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-56785-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2025] [Indexed: 02/10/2025] Open
Abstract
Genomes in eukaryotes normally undergo DNA replication in a choreographed temporal order, resulting in early and late replicating chromosome compartments. Leishmania, a human protozoan parasite, displays an unconventional DNA replication program in which the timing of DNA replication completion is chromosome size-dependent: larger chromosomes complete replication later then smaller ones. Here we show that both R-loops and RNase H1, a ribonuclease that resolves RNA-DNA hybrids, accumulate in Leishmania major chromosomes in a pattern that reflects their replication timing. Furthermore, we demonstrate that such differential organisation of R-loops, RNase H1 and DNA replication timing across the parasite's chromosomes correlates with size-dependent differences in chromatin accessibility, G quadruplex distribution and sequence content. Using conditional gene excision, we show that loss of RNase H1 leads to transient growth perturbation and permanently abrogates the differences in DNA replication timing across chromosomes, as well as altering levels of aneuploidy and increasing chromosome instability in a size-dependent manner. This work provides a link between R-loop homeostasis and DNA replication timing in a eukaryotic parasite and demonstrates that orchestration of DNA replication dictates levels of genome plasticity in Leishmania.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeziel D Damasceno
- The University of Glasgow Centre for Parasitology, The Wellcome Centre for Integrative Parasitology, University of Glasgow, School of Infection and Immunity, Sir Graeme Davies Building, 120 University Place, Glasgow, G12 8TA, UK.
| | - Emma M Briggs
- University of Edinburgh, Institute for Immunology and Infection Research, School of Biological Sciences, Edinburgh, UK
- Biosciences Institute, Cookson Building, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK
| | - Marija Krasilnikova
- The University of Glasgow Centre for Parasitology, The Wellcome Centre for Integrative Parasitology, University of Glasgow, School of Infection and Immunity, Sir Graeme Davies Building, 120 University Place, Glasgow, G12 8TA, UK
| | - Catarina A Marques
- The University of Glasgow Centre for Parasitology, The Wellcome Centre for Integrative Parasitology, University of Glasgow, School of Infection and Immunity, Sir Graeme Davies Building, 120 University Place, Glasgow, G12 8TA, UK
| | - Craig Lapsley
- The University of Glasgow Centre for Parasitology, The Wellcome Centre for Integrative Parasitology, University of Glasgow, School of Infection and Immunity, Sir Graeme Davies Building, 120 University Place, Glasgow, G12 8TA, UK
| | - Richard McCulloch
- The University of Glasgow Centre for Parasitology, The Wellcome Centre for Integrative Parasitology, University of Glasgow, School of Infection and Immunity, Sir Graeme Davies Building, 120 University Place, Glasgow, G12 8TA, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Halliwell JA, Martin-Gonzalez J, Hashim A, Dahl JA, Hoffmann ER, Lerdrup M. Sex-specific DNA-replication in the early mammalian embryo. Nat Commun 2024; 15:6323. [PMID: 39060312 PMCID: PMC11282264 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-50727-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
The timing of DNA replication in mammals is crucial for minimizing errors and influenced by genome usage and chromatin states. Replication timing in the newly formed mammalian embryo remains poorly understood. Here, we have investigated replication timing in mouse zygotes and 2-cell embryos, revealing that zygotes lack a conventional replication timing program, which then emerges in 2-cell embryos. This program differs from embryonic stem cells and generally correlates with transcription and genome compartmentalization of both parental genomes. However, consistent and systematic differences existed between the replication timing of the two parental genomes, including considerably later replication of maternal pericentromeric regions compared to paternal counterparts. Moreover, maternal chromatin modified by Polycomb Repressive Complexes in the oocyte, undergoes early replication, despite belonging to the typically late-replicating B-compartment of the genome. This atypical and asynchronous replication of the two parental genomes may advance our understanding of replication stress in early human embryos and trigger strategies to reduce errors and aneuploidies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Alexander Halliwell
- DNRF Center for Chromosome Stability, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Javier Martin-Gonzalez
- Core Facility for Transgenic Mice, Department of Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Adnan Hashim
- Department of Microbiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Embryology and Healthy Development, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - John Arne Dahl
- Department of Microbiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Embryology and Healthy Development, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eva R Hoffmann
- DNRF Center for Chromosome Stability, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Mads Lerdrup
- DNRF Center for Chromosome Stability, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
- Centre for Embryology and Healthy Development, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Corazzi L, Ionasz VS, Andrejev S, Wang LC, Vouzas A, Giaisi M, Di Muzio G, Ding B, Marx AJM, Henkenjohann J, Allers MM, Gilbert DM, Wei PC. Linear interaction between replication and transcription shapes DNA break dynamics at recurrent DNA break Clusters. Nat Commun 2024; 15:3594. [PMID: 38678011 PMCID: PMC11055891 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-47934-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Recurrent DNA break clusters (RDCs) are replication-transcription collision hotspots; many are unique to neural progenitor cells. Through high-resolution replication sequencing and a capture-ligation assay in mouse neural progenitor cells experiencing replication stress, we unravel the replication features dictating RDC location and orientation. Most RDCs occur at the replication forks traversing timing transition regions (TTRs), where sparse replication origins connect unidirectional forks. Leftward-moving forks generate telomere-connected DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), while rightward-moving forks lead to centromere-connected DSBs. Strand-specific mapping for DNA-bound RNA reveals co-transcriptional dual-strand DNA:RNA hybrids present at a higher density in RDC than in other actively transcribed long genes. In addition, mapping RNA polymerase activity uncovers that head-to-head interactions between replication and transcription machinery result in 60% DSB contribution to the head-on compared to 40% for co-directional. Taken together we reveal TTR as a fragile class and show how the linear interaction between transcription and replication impacts genome stability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Corazzi
- German Cancer Research Center, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Bioscience, Ruprecht-Karl-University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Vivien S Ionasz
- German Cancer Research Center, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Bioscience, Ruprecht-Karl-University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Li-Chin Wang
- German Cancer Research Center, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Athanasios Vouzas
- Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, 32306, USA
- San Diego Biomedical Research Institute, San Diego, CA, 92121, USA
| | - Marco Giaisi
- German Cancer Research Center, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Giulia Di Muzio
- German Cancer Research Center, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Bioscience, Ruprecht-Karl-University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Interdisciplinary Center for Neurosciences, Ruprecht-Karl-University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Boyu Ding
- German Cancer Research Center, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Bioscience, Ruprecht-Karl-University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine, Ruprecht-Karl-University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anna J M Marx
- German Cancer Research Center, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Bioscience, Ruprecht-Karl-University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Interdisciplinary Center for Neurosciences, Ruprecht-Karl-University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jonas Henkenjohann
- German Cancer Research Center, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Bioscience, Ruprecht-Karl-University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Interdisciplinary Center for Neurosciences, Ruprecht-Karl-University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael M Allers
- German Cancer Research Center, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine, Ruprecht-Karl-University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David M Gilbert
- San Diego Biomedical Research Institute, San Diego, CA, 92121, USA
| | - Pei-Chi Wei
- German Cancer Research Center, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Faculty of Bioscience, Ruprecht-Karl-University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Interdisciplinary Center for Neurosciences, Ruprecht-Karl-University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gökbuget D, Boileau RM, Lenshoek K, Blelloch R. MLL3/MLL4 enzymatic activity shapes DNA replication timing. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.12.07.569680. [PMID: 38106216 PMCID: PMC10723431 DOI: 10.1101/2023.12.07.569680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
Mammalian genomes are replicated in a precise order during S phase, which is cell-type-specific1-3 and correlates with local transcriptional activity2,4-8, chromatin modifications9 and chromatin architecture1,10,11,12. However, the causal relationships between these features and the key regulators of DNA replication timing (RT) are largely unknown. Here, machine learning was applied to quantify chromatin features, including epigenetic marks, histone variants and chromatin architectural factors, best predicting local RT under steady-state and RT changes during early embryonic stem (ES) cell differentiation. About one-third of genome exhibited RT changes during the differentiation. Combined, chromatin features predicted steady-state RT and RT changes with high accuracy. Of these features, histone H3 lysine 4 monomethylation (H3K4me1) catalyzed by MLL3/4 (also known as KMT2C/D) emerged as a top predictor. Loss of Mll3/4 (but not Mll3 alone) or their enzymatic activity resulted in erasure of genome-wide RT dynamics during ES cell differentiation. Sites that normally gain H3K4me1 in a MLL3/4-dependent fashion during the transition failed to transition towards earlier RT, often with transcriptional activation unaffected. Further analysis revealed a requirement for MLL3/4 in promoting DNA replication initiation zones through MCM2 recruitment, providing a direct link for its role in regulating RT. Our results uncover MLL3/4-dependent H3K4me1 as a functional regulator of RT and highlight a causal relationship between the epigenome and RT that is largely uncoupled from transcription. These findings uncover a previously unknown role for MLL3/4-dependent chromatin functions which is likely relevant to the numerous diseases associated with MLL3/4 mutations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deniz Gökbuget
- The Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, Center for Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ryan M. Boileau
- The Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, Center for Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Present address: Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kayla Lenshoek
- The Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, Center for Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Robert Blelloch
- The Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, Center for Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chen N, Buonomo SCB. Three-dimensional nuclear organisation and the DNA replication timing program. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2023; 83:102704. [PMID: 37741142 DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/25/2023]
Abstract
In eukaryotic cells, genome duplication is temporally organised according to a program referred to as the replication-timing (RT) program. The RT of individual genomic domains strikingly parallels the three-dimensional architecture of their chromatin contacts and subnuclear distribution. However, it is unclear whether this correspondence is coincidental or whether it indicates a causal and regulatory relationship. In either case, the nature of the molecular mechanisms ensuring this spatio-temporal coordination is still unknown. Here, we review recent evidence that begins to uncover the existence of a shared molecular machinery at the core of the spatio-temporal co-regulation of DNA replication and genome architecture. Finally, we discuss the outstanding, key question of the biological role of their coordination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naiming Chen
- Institute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Roger Land Building, Alexander Crum Brown Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3FF, UK
| | - Sara C B Buonomo
- Institute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Roger Land Building, Alexander Crum Brown Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3FF, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kenter AL, Priyadarshi S, Drake EB. Locus architecture and RAG scanning determine antibody diversity. Trends Immunol 2023; 44:119-128. [PMID: 36706738 PMCID: PMC10128066 DOI: 10.1016/j.it.2022.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Diverse mammalian antibody repertoires are produced via distant genomic contacts involving immunoglobulin Igh variable (V), diversity (D), and joining (J) gene segments and result in V(D)J recombination. How such interactions determine V gene usage remains unclear. The recombination-activating gene (RAG) chromatin scanning model posits that RAG recombinase bound to the recombination center (RC) linearly tracks along chromatin by means of cohesin-mediated loop extrusion; a proposition supported by cohesin depletion studies. A mechanistic role for chromatin loop extrusion has also been implicated for Igh locus contraction. In this opinion, we provide perspective on how loop extrusion interfaces with the 3D conformation of the Igh locus and newly identified enhancers that regionally regulate VH gene usage during V(D)J recombination, shaping the preselected repertoire.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy L Kenter
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60612-7344, USA.
| | - Saurabh Priyadarshi
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60612-7344, USA
| | - Ellen B Drake
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60612-7344, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rivera-Mulia JC, Trevilla-Garcia C, Martinez-Cifuentes S. Optimized Repli-seq: improved DNA replication timing analysis by next-generation sequencing. Chromosome Res 2022; 30:401-414. [PMID: 35781769 PMCID: PMC10124313 DOI: 10.1007/s10577-022-09703-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Revised: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The human genome is divided into functional units that replicate at specific times during S-phase. This temporal program is known as replication timing (RT) and is coordinated with the spatial organization of the genome and transcriptional activity. RT is also cell type-specific, dynamically regulated during development, and alterations in RT are observed in multiple diseases. Thus, the precise measure of RT is critical to understand the role of RT in gene function regulation. Distinct methods for assaying the RT program exist; however, conventional methods require thousands of cells as input, prohibiting its applicability to samples with limited cell numbers such as those from disease patients or from early developing embryos. Although single-cell RT analyses have been developed, these methods are low throughput, require generation of numerous libraries, increased sequencing costs, and produce low resolution data. Here, we developed an improved method to measure RT genome-wide that enables high-resolution analysis of low input samples. This method incorporates direct cell sorting into lysis buffer, as well as DNA fragmentation and library preparation in a single tube, resulting in higher yields, increased quality, and reproducibility with decreased costs. We also performed a systematic data processing analysis to provide standardized parameters for RT measurement. This optimized method facilitates RT analysis and will enable its application to a broad range of studies investigating the role of RT in gene expression, nuclear architecture, and disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Carlos Rivera-Mulia
- Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
- Stem Cell Institute, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
| | - Claudia Trevilla-Garcia
- Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Santiago Martinez-Cifuentes
- Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
The role of chromatin loop extrusion in antibody diversification. Nat Rev Immunol 2022; 22:550-566. [PMID: 35169260 PMCID: PMC9376198 DOI: 10.1038/s41577-022-00679-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Cohesin mediates chromatin loop formation across the genome by extruding chromatin between convergently oriented CTCF-binding elements. Recent studies indicate that cohesin-mediated loop extrusion in developing B cells presents immunoglobulin heavy chain (Igh) variable (V), diversity (D) and joining (J) gene segments to RAG endonuclease through a process referred to as RAG chromatin scanning. RAG initiates V(D)J recombinational joining of these gene segments to generate the large number of different Igh variable region exons that are required for immune responses to diverse pathogens. Antigen-activated mature B cells also use chromatin loop extrusion to mediate the synapsis, breakage and end joining of switch regions flanking Igh constant region exons during class-switch recombination, which allows for the expression of different antibody constant region isotypes that optimize the functions of antigen-specific antibodies to eliminate pathogens. Here, we review recent advances in our understanding of chromatin loop extrusion during V(D)J recombination and class-switch recombination at the Igh locus.
Collapse
|
12
|
Saayman X, Esashi F. Breaking the paradigm: early insights from mammalian DNA breakomes. FEBS J 2022; 289:2409-2428. [PMID: 33792193 PMCID: PMC9451923 DOI: 10.1111/febs.15849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Revised: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) can result from both exogenous and endogenous sources and are potentially toxic lesions to the human genome. If improperly repaired, DSBs can threaten genome integrity and contribute to premature ageing, neurodegenerative disorders and carcinogenesis. Through decades of work on genome stability, it has become evident that certain regions of the genome are inherently more prone to breakage than others, known as genome instability hotspots. Recent advancements in sequencing-based technologies now enable the profiling of genome-wide distributions of DSBs, also known as breakomes, to systematically map these instability hotspots. Here, we review the application of these technologies and their implications for our current understanding of the genomic regions most likely to drive genome instability. These breakomes ultimately highlight both new and established breakage hotspots including actively transcribed regions, loop boundaries and early-replicating regions of the genome. Further, these breakomes challenge the paradigm that DNA breakage primarily occurs in hard-to-replicate regions. With these advancements, we begin to gain insights into the biological mechanisms both invoking and protecting against genome instability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xanita Saayman
- Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Fumiko Esashi
- Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Marchal C, Singh N, Corso-Díaz X, Swaroop A. HiCRes: a computational method to estimate and predict the genomic resolution of Hi-C libraries. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 50:e35. [PMID: 34928367 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab1235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Revised: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 12/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) conformation of the chromatin is crucial to stringently regulate gene expression patterns and DNA replication in a cell-type specific manner. Hi-C is a key technique for measuring 3D chromatin interactions genome wide. Estimating and predicting the resolution of a library is an essential step in any Hi-C experimental design. Here, we present the mathematical concepts to estimate the resolution of a dataset and predict whether deeper sequencing would enhance the resolution. We have developed HiCRes, a docker pipeline, by applying these concepts to several Hi-C libraries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Marchal
- Neurobiology, Neurodegeneration & Repair Laboratory, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, MSC0610, 6 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.,In silichrom Ltd, First Floor, Angel Court, 81 St Clements St, Oxford OX4 1AW, UK
| | - Nivedita Singh
- Neurobiology, Neurodegeneration & Repair Laboratory, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, MSC0610, 6 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Ximena Corso-Díaz
- Neurobiology, Neurodegeneration & Repair Laboratory, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, MSC0610, 6 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Anand Swaroop
- Neurobiology, Neurodegeneration & Repair Laboratory, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, MSC0610, 6 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Alavi S, Ghadiri H, Dabirmanesh B, Moriyama K, Khajeh K, Masai H. G-quadruplex binding protein Rif1, a key regulator of replication timing. J Biochem 2021; 169:1-14. [PMID: 33169133 DOI: 10.1093/jb/mvaa128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 10/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
DNA replication is spatially and temporally regulated during S phase to execute efficient and coordinated duplication of entire genome. Various epigenomic mechanisms operate to regulate the timing and locations of replication. Among them, Rif1 plays a major role to shape the 'replication domains' that dictate which segments of the genome are replicated when and where in the nuclei. Rif1 achieves this task by generating higher-order chromatin architecture near nuclear membrane and by recruiting a protein phosphatase. Rif1 is a G4 binding protein, and G4 binding activity of Rif1 is essential for replication timing regulation in fission yeast. In this article, we first summarize strategies by which cells regulate their replication timing and then describe how Rif1 and its interaction with G4 contribute to regulation of chromatin architecture and replication timing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hamed Ghadiri
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Bahareh Dabirmanesh
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Kenji Moriyama
- Genome Dynamics Project, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, 2-1-6 Kamikitazawa, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Khosro Khajeh
- Department of Nanobiotechnology.,Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hisao Masai
- Genome Dynamics Project, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, 2-1-6 Kamikitazawa, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Peters JM. How DNA loop extrusion mediated by cohesin enables V(D)J recombination. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2021; 70:75-83. [PMID: 33422934 DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2020.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 11/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
'Structural maintenance of chromosomes' (SMC) complexes are required for the folding of genomic DNA into loops. Theoretical considerations and single-molecule experiments performed with the SMC complexes cohesin and condensin indicate that DNA folding occurs via loop extrusion. Recent work indicates that this process is essential for the assembly of antigen receptor genes by V(D)J recombination in developing B and T cells of the vertebrate immune system. Here, I review how recent studies of the mouse immunoglobulin heavy chain locus Igh have provided evidence for this hypothesis and how the formation of chromatin loops by cohesin and regulation of this process by CTCF and Wapl might ensure that all variable gene segments in this locus (VH segments) participate in recombination with a re-arranged DJH segment, to ensure generation of a maximally diverse repertoire of B-cell receptors and antibodies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan-Michael Peters
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gnan S, Flyamer IM, Klein KN, Castelli E, Rapp A, Maiser A, Chen N, Weber P, Enervald E, Cardoso MC, Bickmore WA, Gilbert DM, Buonomo SCB. Nuclear organisation and replication timing are coupled through RIF1-PP1 interaction. Nat Commun 2021; 12:2910. [PMID: 34006872 PMCID: PMC8131703 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-22899-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Three-dimensional genome organisation and replication timing are known to be correlated, however, it remains unknown whether nuclear architecture overall plays an instructive role in the replication-timing programme and, if so, how. Here we demonstrate that RIF1 is a molecular hub that co-regulates both processes. Both nuclear organisation and replication timing depend upon the interaction between RIF1 and PP1. However, whereas nuclear architecture requires the full complement of RIF1 and its interaction with PP1, replication timing is not sensitive to RIF1 dosage. The role of RIF1 in replication timing also extends beyond its interaction with PP1. Availing of this separation-of-function approach, we have therefore identified in RIF1 dual function the molecular bases of the co-dependency of the replication-timing programme and nuclear architecture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Gnan
- grid.418924.20000 0004 0627 3632Epigenetics & Neurobiology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL Rome), Monterotondo, Italy ,grid.4305.20000 0004 1936 7988Institute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK ,grid.462584.90000 0004 0367 1475Present Address: Institut Curie, Université PSL, Sorbonne Université, CNRS UMR3244, Dynamics of Genetic Information, Paris, France
| | - Ilya M. Flyamer
- grid.4305.20000 0004 1936 7988MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Kyle N. Klein
- grid.255986.50000 0004 0472 0419Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL USA
| | - Eleonora Castelli
- grid.4305.20000 0004 1936 7988Institute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK ,grid.482245.d0000 0001 2110 3787Present Address: Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Alexander Rapp
- grid.6546.10000 0001 0940 1669Cell Biology and Epigenetics, Department of Biology, Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Andreas Maiser
- grid.5252.00000 0004 1936 973XDepartment of Biology II, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Naiming Chen
- grid.4305.20000 0004 1936 7988Institute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Patrick Weber
- grid.6546.10000 0001 0940 1669Cell Biology and Epigenetics, Department of Biology, Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Elin Enervald
- grid.418924.20000 0004 0627 3632Epigenetics & Neurobiology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL Rome), Monterotondo, Italy ,grid.4305.20000 0004 1936 7988Institute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK ,grid.10548.380000 0004 1936 9377Present Address: Department of Molecular Biosciences, The Wenner-Gren Institute, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M. Cristina Cardoso
- grid.6546.10000 0001 0940 1669Cell Biology and Epigenetics, Department of Biology, Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Wendy A. Bickmore
- grid.4305.20000 0004 1936 7988MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - David M. Gilbert
- grid.255986.50000 0004 0472 0419Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL USA
| | - Sara C. B. Buonomo
- grid.418924.20000 0004 0627 3632Epigenetics & Neurobiology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL Rome), Monterotondo, Italy ,grid.4305.20000 0004 1936 7988Institute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Courtot L, Bournique E, Maric C, Guitton-Sert L, Madrid-Mencía M, Pancaldi V, Cadoret JC, Hoffmann JS, Bergoglio V. Low Replicative Stress Triggers Cell-Type Specific Inheritable Advanced Replication Timing. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms22094959. [PMID: 34066960 PMCID: PMC8125030 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22094959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Revised: 04/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
DNA replication timing (RT), reflecting the temporal order of origin activation, is known as a robust and conserved cell-type specific process. Upon low replication stress, the slowing of replication forks induces well-documented RT delays associated to genetic instability, but it can also generate RT advances that are still uncharacterized. In order to characterize these advanced initiation events, we monitored the whole genome RT from six independent human cell lines treated with low doses of aphidicolin. We report that RT advances are cell-type-specific and involve large heterochromatin domains. Importantly, we found that some major late to early RT advances can be inherited by the unstressed next-cellular generation, which is a unique process that correlates with enhanced chromatin accessibility, as well as modified replication origin landscape and gene expression in daughter cells. Collectively, this work highlights how low replication stress may impact cellular identity by RT advances events at a subset of chromosomal domains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lilas Courtot
- Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse (CRCT), UMR1037 Inserm, University Paul Sabatier III, ERL5294 CNRS, 2 Avenue Hubert Curien, 31037 Toulouse, France; (L.C.); (E.B.); (L.G.-S.); (M.M.-M.); (V.P.)
| | - Elodie Bournique
- Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse (CRCT), UMR1037 Inserm, University Paul Sabatier III, ERL5294 CNRS, 2 Avenue Hubert Curien, 31037 Toulouse, France; (L.C.); (E.B.); (L.G.-S.); (M.M.-M.); (V.P.)
| | - Chrystelle Maric
- Université de Paris, CNRS, Institut Jacques Monod, DNA Replication Pathologies Team, F-75006 Paris, France;
| | - Laure Guitton-Sert
- Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse (CRCT), UMR1037 Inserm, University Paul Sabatier III, ERL5294 CNRS, 2 Avenue Hubert Curien, 31037 Toulouse, France; (L.C.); (E.B.); (L.G.-S.); (M.M.-M.); (V.P.)
| | - Miguel Madrid-Mencía
- Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse (CRCT), UMR1037 Inserm, University Paul Sabatier III, ERL5294 CNRS, 2 Avenue Hubert Curien, 31037 Toulouse, France; (L.C.); (E.B.); (L.G.-S.); (M.M.-M.); (V.P.)
| | - Vera Pancaldi
- Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse (CRCT), UMR1037 Inserm, University Paul Sabatier III, ERL5294 CNRS, 2 Avenue Hubert Curien, 31037 Toulouse, France; (L.C.); (E.B.); (L.G.-S.); (M.M.-M.); (V.P.)
- Barcelona Supercomputing Center, 08034 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jean-Charles Cadoret
- Université de Paris, CNRS, Institut Jacques Monod, DNA Replication Pathologies Team, F-75006 Paris, France;
- Correspondence: (J.-C.C.); (J.-S.H.); (V.B.)
| | - Jean-Sébastien Hoffmann
- Laboratoire de pathologie, Laboratoire d’excellence Toulouse Cancer, Institut Universitaire du Cancer-Toulouse, Oncopole, 1 Avenue Irène-Joliot-Curie, CEDEX, 31059 Toulouse, France
- Correspondence: (J.-C.C.); (J.-S.H.); (V.B.)
| | - Valérie Bergoglio
- Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse (CRCT), UMR1037 Inserm, University Paul Sabatier III, ERL5294 CNRS, 2 Avenue Hubert Curien, 31037 Toulouse, France; (L.C.); (E.B.); (L.G.-S.); (M.M.-M.); (V.P.)
- Correspondence: (J.-C.C.); (J.-S.H.); (V.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Cremer M, Brandstetter K, Maiser A, Rao SSP, Schmid VJ, Guirao-Ortiz M, Mitra N, Mamberti S, Klein KN, Gilbert DM, Leonhardt H, Cardoso MC, Aiden EL, Harz H, Cremer T. Cohesin depleted cells rebuild functional nuclear compartments after endomitosis. Nat Commun 2020; 11:6146. [PMID: 33262376 PMCID: PMC7708632 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-19876-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2019] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Cohesin plays an essential role in chromatin loop extrusion, but its impact on a compartmentalized nuclear architecture, linked to nuclear functions, is less well understood. Using live-cell and super-resolved 3D microscopy, here we find that cohesin depletion in a human colon cancer derived cell line results in endomitosis and a single multilobulated nucleus with chromosome territories pervaded by interchromatin channels. Chromosome territories contain chromatin domain clusters with a zonal organization of repressed chromatin domains in the interior and transcriptionally competent domains located at the periphery. These clusters form microscopically defined, active and inactive compartments, which likely correspond to A/B compartments, which are detected with ensemble Hi-C. Splicing speckles are observed nearby within the lining channel system. We further observe that the multilobulated nuclei, despite continuous absence of cohesin, pass through S-phase with typical spatio-temporal patterns of replication domains. Evidence for structural changes of these domains compared to controls suggests that cohesin is required for their full integrity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marion Cremer
- Anthropology and Human Genomics, Department Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany.
| | - Katharina Brandstetter
- Human Biology & BioImaging, Center for Molecular Biosystems, Department Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Andreas Maiser
- Human Biology & BioImaging, Center for Molecular Biosystems, Department Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Suhas S P Rao
- Center for Genome Architecture, Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, California, USA
| | - Volker J Schmid
- Bayesian Imaging and Spatial Statistics Group, Department of Statistics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Miguel Guirao-Ortiz
- Human Biology & BioImaging, Center for Molecular Biosystems, Department Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Namita Mitra
- Center for Genome Architecture, Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Stefania Mamberti
- Cell Biology and Epigenetics, Department of Biology, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Kyle N Klein
- Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA
| | - David M Gilbert
- Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA
| | - Heinrich Leonhardt
- Human Biology & BioImaging, Center for Molecular Biosystems, Department Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany
| | - M Cristina Cardoso
- Cell Biology and Epigenetics, Department of Biology, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Erez Lieberman Aiden
- Center for Genome Architecture, Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Center for Theoretical Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA
- Broad Institute of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Departments of Computer Science and Computational and Applied Mathematics, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hartmann Harz
- Human Biology & BioImaging, Center for Molecular Biosystems, Department Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany.
| | - Thomas Cremer
- Anthropology and Human Genomics, Department Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zhao PA, Sasaki T, Gilbert DM. High-resolution Repli-Seq defines the temporal choreography of initiation, elongation and termination of replication in mammalian cells. Genome Biol 2020; 21:76. [PMID: 32209126 PMCID: PMC7092589 DOI: 10.1186/s13059-020-01983-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Accepted: 03/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND DNA replication in mammalian cells occurs in a defined temporal order during S phase, known as the replication timing (RT) programme. Replication timing is developmentally regulated and correlated with chromatin conformation and local transcriptional potential. Here, we present RT profiles of unprecedented temporal resolution in two human embryonic stem cell lines, human colon carcinoma line HCT116, and mouse embryonic stem cells and their neural progenitor derivatives. RESULTS Fine temporal windows revealed a remarkable degree of cell-to-cell conservation in RT, particularly at the very beginning and ends of S phase, and identified 5 temporal patterns of replication in all cell types, consistent with varying degrees of initiation efficiency. Zones of replication initiation (IZs) were detected throughout S phase and interacted in 3D space preferentially with other IZs of similar firing time. Temporal transition regions were resolved into segments of uni-directional replication punctuated at specific sites by small, inefficient IZs. Sites of convergent replication were divided into sites of termination or large constant timing regions consisting of many synchronous IZs in tandem. Developmental transitions in RT occured mainly by activating or inactivating individual IZs or occasionally by altering IZ firing time, demonstrating that IZs, rather than individual origins, are the units of developmental regulation. Finally, haplotype phasing revealed numerous regions of allele-specific and allele-independent asynchronous replication. Allele-independent asynchronous replication was correlated with the presence of previously mapped common fragile sites. CONCLUSIONS Altogether, these data provide a detailed temporal choreography of DNA replication in mammalian cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peiyao A Zhao
- Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, 319 Stadium Drive, Tallahassee, FL, 32306, USA
| | - Takayo Sasaki
- Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, 319 Stadium Drive, Tallahassee, FL, 32306, USA
| | - David M Gilbert
- Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, 319 Stadium Drive, Tallahassee, FL, 32306, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Marchal C, Sima J, Gilbert DM. Control of DNA replication timing in the 3D genome. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2019; 20:721-737. [PMID: 31477886 PMCID: PMC11567694 DOI: 10.1038/s41580-019-0162-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 167] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
The 3D organization of mammalian chromatin was described more than 30 years ago by visualizing sites of DNA synthesis at different times during the S phase of the cell cycle. These early cytogenetic studies revealed structurally stable chromosome domains organized into subnuclear compartments. Active-gene-rich domains in the nuclear interior replicate early, whereas more condensed chromatin domains that are largely at the nuclear and nucleolar periphery replicate later. During the past decade, this spatiotemporal DNA replication programme has been mapped along the genome and found to correlate with epigenetic marks, transcriptional activity and features of 3D genome architecture such as chromosome compartments and topologically associated domains. But the causal relationship between these features and DNA replication timing and the regulatory mechanisms involved have remained an enigma. The recent identification of cis-acting elements regulating the replication time and 3D architecture of individual replication domains and of long non-coding RNAs that coordinate whole chromosome replication provide insights into such mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Marchal
- Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA
| | - Jiao Sima
- Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA
| | - David M Gilbert
- Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Sauerwald N, Singhal A, Kingsford C. Analysis of the structural variability of topologically associated domains as revealed by Hi-C. NAR Genom Bioinform 2019; 2. [PMID: 31687663 PMCID: PMC6824515 DOI: 10.1093/nargab/lqz008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Three-dimensional chromosome structure plays an integral role in gene expression and regulation, replication timing, and other cellular processes. Topologically associated domains (TADs), building blocks of chromosome structure, are genomic regions with higher contact frequencies within the region than outside the region. A central question is the degree to which TADs are conserved or vary between conditions. We analyze 137 Hi-C samples from 9 studies under 3 measures to quantify the effects of various sources of biological and experimental variation. We observe significant variation in TAD sets between both non-replicate and replicate samples, and provide initial evidence that this variability does not come from genetic sequence differences. The effects of experimental protocol differences are also measured, demonstrating that samples can have protocol-specific structural changes, but that TADs are generally robust to lab-specific differences. This study represents a systematic quantification of key factors influencing comparisons of chromosome structure, suggesting significant variability and the potential for cell-type-specific structural features, which has previously not been systematically explored. The lack of observed influence of heredity and genetic differences on chromosome structure suggests that factors other than the genetic sequence are driving this structure, which plays an important role in human disease and cellular functioning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Sauerwald
- Computational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | - Akshat Singhal
- Department of Computer Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11790, USA
| | - Carl Kingsford
- Computational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Sauerwald N, Kingsford C. Quantifying the similarity of topological domains across normal and cancer human cell types. Bioinformatics 2019; 34:i475-i483. [PMID: 29949963 PMCID: PMC6022623 DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Motivation Three-dimensional chromosome structure has been increasingly shown to influence various levels of cellular and genomic functions. Through Hi-C data, which maps contact frequency on chromosomes, it has been found that structural elements termed topologically associating domains (TADs) are involved in many regulatory mechanisms. However, we have little understanding of the level of similarity or variability of chromosome structure across cell types and disease states. In this study, we present a method to quantify resemblance and identify structurally similar regions between any two sets of TADs. Results We present an analysis of 23 human Hi-C samples representing various tissue types in normal and cancer cell lines. We quantify global and chromosome-level structural similarity, and compare the relative similarity between cancer and non-cancer cells. We find that cancer cells show higher structural variability around commonly mutated pan-cancer genes than normal cells at these same locations. Availability and implementation Software for the methods and analysis can be found at https://github.com/Kingsford-Group/localtadsim
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Sauerwald
- Computational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Carl Kingsford
- Computational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- To whom correspondence should be addressed.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Single-cell approaches to understand genome organisation throughout the cell cycle. Essays Biochem 2019; 63:209-216. [PMID: 31092688 DOI: 10.1042/ebc20180043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2019] [Revised: 05/01/2019] [Accepted: 05/03/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Mammalian genomes are ordered at several scales, ranging from nucleosomes (beads on a string), to topologically associated domains (TADs), laminar associated domains (LADs), and chromosome territories. These are described briefly below and we refer the reader to some recent comprehensive reviews on genome architecture summarising the current state of knowledge of the organisational principles of the nucleus [1,2]. Biological observations from populations of millions of individual cells can reveal consensus behaviour. New methods to study and interpret biological data at the single-cell level have recently been instrumental in revealing new understanding of cell-to-cell variation and novel biology. Here we will summarise the recent advances in single-cell technology that have provided insights into the behaviour of the mammalian genome during a cell cycle. We will focus on the interphase domain structure of chromosomes, including TADs and LADs, and how chromosome architecture changes during the cell cycle. The role of genome architecture relating to gene expression has been reviewed elsewhere [3].
Collapse
|
24
|
Hiratani I, Takahashi S. DNA Replication Timing Enters the Single-Cell Era. Genes (Basel) 2019; 10:genes10030221. [PMID: 30884743 PMCID: PMC6470765 DOI: 10.3390/genes10030221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2019] [Revised: 03/12/2019] [Accepted: 03/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
In mammalian cells, DNA replication timing is controlled at the level of megabase (Mb)-sized chromosomal domains and correlates well with transcription, chromatin structure, and three-dimensional (3D) genome organization. Because of these properties, DNA replication timing is an excellent entry point to explore genome regulation at various levels and a variety of studies have been carried out over the years. However, DNA replication timing studies traditionally required at least tens of thousands of cells, and it was unclear whether the replication domains detected by cell population analyses were preserved at the single-cell level. Recently, single-cell DNA replication profiling methods became available, which revealed that the Mb-sized replication domains detected by cell population analyses were actually well preserved in individual cells. In this article, we provide a brief overview of our current knowledge on DNA replication timing regulation in mammals based on cell population studies, outline the findings from single-cell DNA replication profiling, and discuss future directions and challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ichiro Hiratani
- Laboratory for Developmental Epigenetics, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research (BDR), Kobe, Hyogo 650-0047, Japan.
| | - Saori Takahashi
- Laboratory for Developmental Epigenetics, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research (BDR), Kobe, Hyogo 650-0047, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Oldach P, Nieduszynski CA. Cohesin-Mediated Genome Architecture Does Not Define DNA Replication Timing Domains. Genes (Basel) 2019; 10:genes10030196. [PMID: 30836708 PMCID: PMC6471042 DOI: 10.3390/genes10030196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2019] [Revised: 02/07/2019] [Accepted: 02/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
3D genome organization is strongly predictive of DNA replication timing in mammalian cells. This work tested the extent to which loop-based genome architecture acts as a regulatory unit of replication timing by using an auxin-inducible system for acute cohesin ablation. Cohesin ablation in a population of cells in asynchronous culture was shown not to disrupt patterns of replication timing as assayed by replication sequencing (RepliSeq) or BrdU-focus microscopy. Furthermore, cohesin ablation prior to S phase entry in synchronized cells was similarly shown to not impact replication timing patterns. These results suggest that cohesin-mediated genome architecture is not required for the execution of replication timing patterns in S phase, nor for the establishment of replication timing domains in G1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phoebe Oldach
- Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3RE, UK.
| | - Conrad A Nieduszynski
- Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3RE, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Arbona JM, Goldar A, Hyrien O, Arneodo A, Audit B. The eukaryotic bell-shaped temporal rate of DNA replication origin firing emanates from a balance between origin activation and passivation. eLife 2018; 7:35192. [PMID: 29856315 PMCID: PMC6033540 DOI: 10.7554/elife.35192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2018] [Accepted: 05/31/2018] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
The time-dependent rate I(t) of origin firing per length of unreplicated DNA presents a universal bell shape in eukaryotes that has been interpreted as the result of a complex time-evolving interaction between origins and limiting firing factors. Here, we show that a normal diffusion of replication fork components towards localized potential replication origins (p-oris) can more simply account for the I(t) universal bell shape, as a consequence of a competition between the origin firing time and the time needed to replicate DNA separating two neighboring p-oris. We predict the I(t) maximal value to be the product of the replication fork speed with the squared p-ori density. We show that this relation is robustly observed in simulations and in experimental data for several eukaryotes. Our work underlines that fork-component recycling and potential origins localization are sufficient spatial ingredients to explain the universality of DNA replication kinetics. Before a cell can divide, it must duplicate its DNA. In eukaryotes – organisms such as animals and fungi, which store their DNA in the cell’s nucleus – DNA replication starts at specific sites in the genome called replication origins. At each origin sits a protein complex that will activate when it randomly captures an activating protein that diffuses within the nucleus. Once a replication origin activates or “fires”, the complex then splits into two new complexes that move away from each other as they duplicate the DNA. If an active complex collides with an inactive one at another origin, the latter is inactivated – a phenomenon known as origin passivation. When two active complexes meet, they release the activating proteins, which diffuse away and eventually activate other origins in unreplicated DNA. The number of origins that activate each minute divided by the length of unreplicated DNA is referred to as the “rate of origin firing”. In all eukaryotes, this rate – also known as I(t) – follows the same pattern. First, it increases until more than half of the DNA is duplicated. Then it decreases until everything is duplicated. This means that, if plotted out, the graph of origin firing rate would always be a bell-shaped curve, even for organisms with genomes of different sizes that have different numbers of origins. The reason for this universal shape remained unclear. Scientists had tried to create numerical simulations that model the rate of origin firing. However, for these simulations to reproduce the bell-shape curve, a number of untested assumptions had to be made about how DNA replication takes place. In addition, these models ignored the fact that it takes time to replicate the DNA between origins. To take this time into account, Arbona et al. instead decided to model the replication origins as discrete and distinct entities. This way of building the mathematical model succeeded in reproducing the universal bell curve shape without additional assumptions. With this simulation, the balance between origin activation and passivation is enough to achieve the observed pattern. The new model also predicts that the maximum rate of origin firing is determined by the speed of DNA replication and the density of origins in the genome. Arbona et al. verified this prediction in yeast, fly, frog and human cells – organisms with different sized genomes that take between 20 minutes and 8 hours to replicate their DNA. Lastly, the prediction also held true in yeast treated with hydroxyurea, an anticancer drug that slows DNA replication. A better understanding of DNA replication can help scientists to understand how this process is perturbed in cancers and how drugs that target DNA replication can treat these diseases. Future work will explore how the 3D organization of the genome affects the diffusion of activating proteins within the cell nucleus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Michel Arbona
- Laboratoire de Physique, Université de Lyon, Ens de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, Lyon, France
| | | | - Olivier Hyrien
- Institut de Biologie de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure, Ecole Normale Supérieure, CNRS, INSERM, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Alain Arneodo
- LOMA, Univ de Bordeaux, CNRS, UMR 5798, Talence, France
| | - Benjamin Audit
- Laboratoire de Physique, Université de Lyon, Ens de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Fu H, Baris A, Aladjem MI. Replication timing and nuclear structure. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2018; 52:43-50. [PMID: 29414592 PMCID: PMC5988923 DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2018.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2017] [Revised: 01/05/2018] [Accepted: 01/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
DNA replication proceeds along spatially and temporally coordinated patterns within the nucleus, thus protecting the genome during the synthesis of new genetic material. While we have been able to visualize replication patterns on DNA fibers for 50 years, recent developments and discoveries have provided a greater insight into how DNA replication is controlled. In this review, we highlight many of these discoveries. Of great interest are the physiological role of the replication timing program, cis and trans-acting factors that modulate replication timing and the effects of chromatin structure on the replication timing program. We also discuss future directions in the study of replication timing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haiqing Fu
- Developmental Therapeutics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, 37 Convent Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, United States
| | - Adrian Baris
- Developmental Therapeutics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, 37 Convent Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, United States
| | - Mirit I Aladjem
- Developmental Therapeutics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, 37 Convent Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Rivera-Mulia JC, Dimond A, Vera D, Trevilla-Garcia C, Sasaki T, Zimmerman J, Dupont C, Gribnau J, Fraser P, Gilbert DM. Allele-specific control of replication timing and genome organization during development. Genome Res 2018; 28:800-811. [PMID: 29735606 PMCID: PMC5991511 DOI: 10.1101/gr.232561.117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2017] [Accepted: 04/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
DNA replication occurs in a defined temporal order known as the replication-timing (RT) program. RT is regulated during development in discrete chromosomal units, coordinated with transcriptional activity and 3D genome organization. Here, we derived distinct cell types from F1 hybrid musculus × castaneus mouse crosses and exploited the high single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) density to characterize allelic differences in RT (Repli-seq), genome organization (Hi-C and promoter-capture Hi-C), gene expression (total nuclear RNA-seq), and chromatin accessibility (ATAC-seq). We also present HARP, a new computational tool for sorting SNPs in phased genomes to efficiently measure allele-specific genome-wide data. Analysis of six different hybrid mESC clones with different genomes (C57BL/6, 129/sv, and CAST/Ei), parental configurations, and gender revealed significant RT asynchrony between alleles across ∼12% of the autosomal genome linked to subspecies genomes but not to parental origin, growth conditions, or gender. RT asynchrony in mESCs strongly correlated with changes in Hi-C compartments between alleles but not as strongly with SNP density, gene expression, imprinting, or chromatin accessibility. We then tracked mESC RT asynchronous regions during development by analyzing differentiated cell types, including extraembryonic endoderm stem (XEN) cells, four male and female primary mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs), and neural precursor cells (NPCs) differentiated in vitro from mESCs with opposite parental configurations. We found that RT asynchrony and allelic discordance in Hi-C compartments seen in mESCs were largely lost in all differentiated cell types, accompanied by novel sites of allelic asynchrony at a considerably smaller proportion of the genome, suggesting that genome organization of homologs converges to similar folding patterns during cell fate commitment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Carlos Rivera-Mulia
- Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-4295, USA
| | - Andrew Dimond
- The Babraham Institute, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge CB22 3AT, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Vera
- Center for Genomics and Personalized Medicine, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306, USA
| | - Claudia Trevilla-Garcia
- Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-4295, USA
| | - Takayo Sasaki
- Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-4295, USA
| | - Jared Zimmerman
- Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-4295, USA
| | - Catherine Dupont
- Department of Reproduction and Development, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, 3015GE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joost Gribnau
- Department of Reproduction and Development, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, 3015GE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Fraser
- Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-4295, USA
- The Babraham Institute, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge CB22 3AT, United Kingdom
- Center for Genomics and Personalized Medicine, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306, USA
| | - David M Gilbert
- Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-4295, USA
- Center for Genomics and Personalized Medicine, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Razin SV, Gavrilov AA. Structural–Functional Domains of the Eukaryotic Genome. BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) 2018; 83:302-312. [DOI: 10.1134/s0006297918040028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2017] [Revised: 11/27/2017] [Indexed: 08/30/2023]
|
30
|
Xiang W, Roberti MJ, Hériché JK, Huet S, Alexander S, Ellenberg J. Correlative live and super-resolution imaging reveals the dynamic structure of replication domains. J Cell Biol 2018; 217:1973-1984. [PMID: 29572382 PMCID: PMC5987722 DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201709074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2017] [Revised: 01/19/2018] [Accepted: 03/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Combining fluorescence labeling with live-cell confocal and correlative super-resolution microscopy, Xiang et al. characterize biophysical parameters defining the internal organization, spacing, and mechanical coupling of replication domains. Chromosome organization in higher eukaryotes controls gene expression, DNA replication, and DNA repair. Genome mapping has revealed the functional units of chromatin at the submegabase scale as self-interacting regions called topologically associating domains (TADs) and showed they correspond to replication domains (RDs). A quantitative structural and dynamic description of RD behavior in the nucleus is, however, missing because visualization of dynamic subdiffraction-sized RDs remains challenging. Using fluorescence labeling of RDs combined with correlative live and super-resolution microscopy in situ, we determined biophysical parameters to characterize the internal organization, spacing, and mechanical coupling of RDs. We found that RDs are typically 150 nm in size and contain four co-replicating regions spaced 60 nm apart. Spatially neighboring RDs are spaced 300 nm apart and connected by highly flexible linker regions that couple their motion only <550 nm. Our pipeline allows a robust quantitative characterization of chromosome structure in situ and provides important biophysical parameters to understand general principles of chromatin organization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wanqing Xiang
- Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M Julia Roberti
- Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jean-Karim Hériché
- Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sébastien Huet
- Université de Rennes 1, Structure fédérative de recherche Biosit, Rennes, France.,Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UMR 6290, Institut Génétique et Développement de Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Stephanie Alexander
- Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jan Ellenberg
- Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Zhao PA, Rivera-Mulia JC, Gilbert DM. Replication Domains: Genome Compartmentalization into Functional Replication Units. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2018; 1042:229-257. [DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-6955-0_11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
32
|
Zhang Q, Bassetti F, Gherardi M, Lagomarsino MC. Cell-to-cell variability and robustness in S-phase duration from genome replication kinetics. Nucleic Acids Res 2017; 45:8190-8198. [PMID: 28854733 PMCID: PMC5737480 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2017] [Accepted: 06/19/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Genome replication, a key process for a cell, relies on stochastic initiation by replication origins, causing a variability of replication timing from cell to cell. While stochastic models of eukaryotic replication are widely available, the link between the key parameters and overall replication timing has not been addressed systematically. We use a combined analytical and computational approach to calculate how positions and strength of many origins lead to a given cell-to-cell variability of total duration of the replication of a large region, a chromosome or the entire genome. Specifically, the total replication timing can be framed as an extreme-value problem, since it is due to the last region that replicates in each cell. Our calculations identify two regimes based on the spread between characteristic completion times of all inter-origin regions of a genome. For widely different completion times, timing is set by the single specific region that is typically the last to replicate in all cells. Conversely, when the completion time of all regions are comparable, an extreme-value estimate shows that the cell-to-cell variability of genome replication timing has universal properties. Comparison with available data shows that the replication program of three yeast species falls in this extreme-value regime.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qing Zhang
- Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR 7238, Computational and Quantitative Biology, 4 Place Jussieu, Paris, France
| | | | - Marco Gherardi
- Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR 7238, Computational and Quantitative Biology, 4 Place Jussieu, Paris, France.,IFOM, FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Cosentino Lagomarsino
- Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR 7238, Computational and Quantitative Biology, 4 Place Jussieu, Paris, France.,IFOM, FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy.,CNRS, UMR 7238, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Razin SV, Ulianov SV. Gene functioning and storage within a folded genome. Cell Mol Biol Lett 2017; 22:18. [PMID: 28861108 PMCID: PMC5575855 DOI: 10.1186/s11658-017-0050-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2017] [Accepted: 08/24/2017] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
In mammals, genomic DNA that is roughly 2 m long is folded to fit the size of the cell nucleus that has a diameter of about 10 μm. The folding of genomic DNA is mediated via assembly of DNA-protein complex, chromatin. In addition to the reduction of genomic DNA linear dimensions, the assembly of chromatin allows to discriminate and to mark active (transcribed) and repressed (non-transcribed) genes. Consequently, epigenetic regulation of gene expression occurs at the level of DNA packaging in chromatin. Taking into account the increasing attention of scientific community toward epigenetic systems of gene regulation, it is very important to understand how DNA folding in chromatin is related to gene activity. For many years the hierarchical model of DNA folding was the most popular. It was assumed that nucleosome fiber (10-nm fiber) is folded into 30-nm fiber and further on into chromatin loops attached to a nuclear/chromosome scaffold. Recent studies have demonstrated that there is much less regularity in chromatin folding within the cell nucleus. The very existence of 30-nm chromatin fibers in living cells was questioned. On the other hand, it was found that chromosomes are partitioned into self-interacting spatial domains that restrict the area of enhancers action. Thus, TADs can be considered as structural-functional domains of the chromosomes. Here we discuss the modern view of DNA packaging within the cell nucleus in relation to the regulation of gene expression. Special attention is paid to the possible mechanisms of the chromatin fiber self-assembly into TADs. We discuss the model postulating that partitioning of the chromosome into TADs is determined by the distribution of active and inactive chromatin segments along the chromosome. This article was specially invited by the editors and represents work by leading researchers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergey V Razin
- Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilov Street 34/5, 119334 Moscow, Russia.,Lomonosov Moscow State University, Biological Faculty, Leninskie Gory 1, building 12, 119192 Moscow, Russia
| | - Sergey V Ulianov
- Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilov Street 34/5, 119334 Moscow, Russia.,Lomonosov Moscow State University, Biological Faculty, Leninskie Gory 1, building 12, 119192 Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Boulos RE, Tremblay N, Arneodo A, Borgnat P, Audit B. Multi-scale structural community organisation of the human genome. BMC Bioinformatics 2017; 18:209. [PMID: 28399820 PMCID: PMC5387268 DOI: 10.1186/s12859-017-1616-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2016] [Accepted: 03/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Structural interaction frequency matrices between all genome loci are now experimentally achievable thanks to high-throughput chromosome conformation capture technologies. This ensues a new methodological challenge for computational biology which consists in objectively extracting from these data the structural motifs characteristic of genome organisation. RESULTS We deployed the fast multi-scale community mining algorithm based on spectral graph wavelets to characterise the networks of intra-chromosomal interactions in human cell lines. We observed that there exist structural domains of all sizes up to chromosome length and demonstrated that the set of structural communities forms a hierarchy of chromosome segments. Hence, at all scales, chromosome folding predominantly involves interactions between neighbouring sites rather than the formation of links between distant loci. CONCLUSIONS Multi-scale structural decomposition of human chromosomes provides an original framework to question structural organisation and its relationship to functional regulation across the scales. By construction the proposed methodology is independent of the precise assembly of the reference genome and is thus directly applicable to genomes whose assembly is not fully determined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rasha E Boulos
- Univ Lyon, Ens de Lyon, Univ Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, Laboratoire de Physique, F-69342, Lyon, France.,Present address: Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), Montpellier Cancer Research Institute (IRCM) Inserm U1194, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Nicolas Tremblay
- Univ Lyon, Ens de Lyon, Univ Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, Laboratoire de Physique, F-69342, Lyon, France.,Present address: CNRS, GIPSA-lab, Grenoble, France
| | - Alain Arneodo
- Univ Lyon, Ens de Lyon, Univ Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, Laboratoire de Physique, F-69342, Lyon, France.,Present address: LOMA, Université de Bordeaux, CNRS, UMR 5798, 51 Cours de le Libération, Talence, 33405, France
| | - Pierre Borgnat
- Univ Lyon, Ens de Lyon, Univ Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, Laboratoire de Physique, F-69342, Lyon, France
| | - Benjamin Audit
- Univ Lyon, Ens de Lyon, Univ Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, Laboratoire de Physique, F-69342, Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Form and function of topologically associating genomic domains in budding yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017; 114:E3061-E3070. [PMID: 28348222 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1612256114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The genome of metazoan cells is organized into topologically associating domains (TADs) that have similar histone modifications, transcription level, and DNA replication timing. Although similar structures appear to be conserved in fission yeast, computational modeling and analysis of high-throughput chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C) data have been used to argue that the small, highly constrained budding yeast chromosomes could not have these structures. In contrast, herein we analyze Hi-C data for budding yeast and identify 200-kb scale TADs, whose boundaries are enriched for transcriptional activity. Furthermore, these boundaries separate regions of similarly timed replication origins connecting the long-known effect of genomic context on replication timing to genome architecture. To investigate the molecular basis of TAD formation, we performed Hi-C experiments on cells depleted for the Forkhead transcription factors, Fkh1 and Fkh2, previously associated with replication timing. Forkhead factors do not regulate TAD formation, but do promote longer-range genomic interactions and control interactions between origins near the centromere. Thus, our work defines spatial organization within the budding yeast nucleus, demonstrates the conserved role of genome architecture in regulating DNA replication, and identifies a molecular mechanism specifically regulating interactions between pericentric origins.
Collapse
|
36
|
Marks AB, Fu H, Aladjem MI. Regulation of Replication Origins. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2017; 1042:43-59. [PMID: 29357052 DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-6955-0_2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
In eukaryotes, genome duplication starts concomitantly at many replication initiation sites termed replication origins. The replication initiation program is spatially and temporally coordinated to ensure accurate, efficient DNA synthesis that duplicates the entire genome while maintaining other chromatin-dependent functions. Unlike in prokaryotes, not all potential replication origins in eukaryotes are needed for complete genome duplication during each cell cycle. Instead, eukaryotic cells vary the use of initiation sites so that only a fraction of potential replication origins initiate replication each cell cycle. Flexibility in origin choice allows each eukaryotic cell type to utilize different initiation sites, corresponding to unique nuclear DNA packaging patterns. These patterns coordinate replication with gene expression and chromatin condensation. Budding yeast replication origins share a consensus sequence that marks potential initiation sites. Metazoan origins, on the other hand, lack a consensus sequence. Rather, they are associated with a collection of structural features, chromatin packaging features, histone modifications, transcription, and DNA-DNA/DNA-protein interactions. These features confer cell type-specific replication and expression and play an essential role in maintaining genomic stability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna B Marks
- Developmental Therapeutics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Haiqing Fu
- Developmental Therapeutics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Mirit I Aladjem
- Developmental Therapeutics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kenigsberg E, Yehuda Y, Marjavaara L, Keszthelyi A, Chabes A, Tanay A, Simon I. The mutation spectrum in genomic late replication domains shapes mammalian GC content. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:4222-32. [PMID: 27085808 PMCID: PMC4872117 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2015] [Revised: 03/10/2016] [Accepted: 03/30/2016] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Genome sequence compositions and epigenetic organizations are correlated extensively across multiple length scales. Replication dynamics, in particular, is highly correlated with GC content. We combine genome-wide time of replication (ToR) data, topological domains maps and detailed functional epigenetic annotations to study the correlations between replication timing and GC content at multiple scales. We find that the decrease in genomic GC content at large scale late replicating regions can be explained by mutation bias favoring A/T nucleotide, without selection or biased gene conversion. Quantification of the free dNTP pool during the cell cycle is consistent with a mechanism involving replication-coupled mutation spectrum that favors AT nucleotides at late S-phase. We suggest that mammalian GC content composition is shaped by independent forces, globally modulating mutation bias and locally selecting on functional element. Deconvoluting these forces and analyzing them on their native scales is important for proper characterization of complex genomic correlations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ephraim Kenigsberg
- Department of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Yishai Yehuda
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, IMRIC, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Lisette Marjavaara
- Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Andrea Keszthelyi
- Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Andrei Chabes
- Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Amos Tanay
- Department of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Itamar Simon
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, IMRIC, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Rivera-Mulia JC, Gilbert DM. Replication timing and transcriptional control: beyond cause and effect-part III. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2016; 40:168-178. [PMID: 27115331 DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2016.03.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2015] [Revised: 03/24/2016] [Accepted: 03/29/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
DNA replication is essential for faithful transmission of genetic information and is intimately tied to chromosome structure and function. Genome duplication occurs in a defined temporal order known as the replication-timing (RT) program, which is regulated during the cell cycle and development in discrete units referred to as replication domains (RDs). RDs correspond to topologically-associating domains (TADs) and are spatio-temporally compartmentalized in the nucleus. While improvements in experimental tools have begun to reveal glimpses of causality, they have also unveiled complex context-dependent relationships that challenge long recognized correlations of RT to chromatin organization and gene regulation. In particular, RDs/TADs that switch RT during development march to the beat of a different drummer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David M Gilbert
- Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4295, USA; Center for Genomics and Personalized Medicine, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Marks AB, Smith OK, Aladjem MI. Replication origins: determinants or consequences of nuclear organization? Curr Opin Genet Dev 2016; 37:67-75. [PMID: 26845042 PMCID: PMC4914405 DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2015.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2015] [Revised: 11/24/2015] [Accepted: 11/25/2015] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Chromosome replication, gene expression and chromatin assembly all occur on the same template, necessitating a tight spatial and temporal coordination to maintain genomic stability. The distribution of replication initiation events is responsive to local and global changes in chromatin structure and is affected by transcriptional activity. Concomitantly, replication origin sequences, which determine the locations of replication initiation events, can affect chromatin structure and modulate transcriptional efficiency. The flexibility observed in the replication initiation landscape might help achieve complete and accurate genome duplication while coordinating the DNA replication program with transcription and other nuclear processes in a cell-type specific manner. This review discusses the relationships among replication origin distribution, local and global chromatin structures and concomitant nuclear metabolic processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna B Marks
- Developmental Therapeutics Branch, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Owen K Smith
- Developmental Therapeutics Branch, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Mirit I Aladjem
- Developmental Therapeutics Branch, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Dileep V, Rivera-Mulia JC, Sima J, Gilbert DM. Large-Scale Chromatin Structure-Function Relationships during the Cell Cycle and Development: Insights from Replication Timing. COLD SPRING HARBOR SYMPOSIA ON QUANTITATIVE BIOLOGY 2015; 80:53-63. [PMID: 26590169 DOI: 10.1101/sqb.2015.80.027284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Chromosome architecture has received a lot of attention since the recent development of genome-scale methods to measure chromatin interactions (Hi-C), enabling the first sequence-based models of chromosome tertiary structure. A view has emerged of chromosomes as a string of structural units (topologically associating domains; TADs) whose boundaries persist through the cell cycle and development. TADs with similar chromatin states tend to aggregate, forming spatially segregated chromatin compartments. However, high-resolution Hi-C has revealed substructure within TADs (subTADs) that poses a challenge for models that attribute significance to structural units at any given scale. More than 20 years ago, the DNA replication field independently identified stable structural (and functional) units of chromosomes (replication foci) as well as spatially segregated chromatin compartments (early and late foci), but lacked the means to link these units to genomic map units. Genome-wide studies of replication timing (RT) have now merged these two disciplines by identifying individual units of replication regulation (replication domains; RDs) that correspond to TADs and are arranged in 3D to form spatiotemporally segregated subnuclear compartments. Furthermore, classifying RDs/TADs by their constitutive versus developmentally regulated RT has revealed distinct classes of chromatin organization, providing unexpected insight into the relationship between large-scale chromosome structure and function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vishnu Dileep
- Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-4295
| | | | - Jiao Sima
- Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-4295
| | - David M Gilbert
- Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-4295 Center for Genomics and Personalized Medicine, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-4295
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Dileep V, Ay F, Sima J, Vera DL, Noble WS, Gilbert DM. Topologically associating domains and their long-range contacts are established during early G1 coincident with the establishment of the replication-timing program. Genome Res 2015; 25:1104-13. [PMID: 25995270 PMCID: PMC4509995 DOI: 10.1101/gr.183699.114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 114] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2014] [Accepted: 05/18/2015] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Mammalian genomes are partitioned into domains that replicate in a defined temporal order. These domains can replicate at similar times in all cell types (constitutive) or at cell type-specific times (developmental). Genome-wide chromatin conformation capture (Hi-C) has revealed sub-megabase topologically associating domains (TADs), which are the structural counterparts of replication domains. Hi-C also segregates inter-TAD contacts into defined 3D spatial compartments that align precisely to genome-wide replication timing profiles. Determinants of the replication-timing program are re-established during early G1 phase of each cell cycle and lost in G2 phase, but it is not known when TAD structure and inter-TAD contacts are re-established after their elimination during mitosis. Here, we use multiplexed 4C-seq to study dynamic changes in chromatin organization during early G1. We find that both establishment of TADs and their compartmentalization occur during early G1, within the same time frame as establishment of the replication-timing program. Once established, this 3D organization is preserved either after withdrawal into quiescence or for the remainder of interphase including G2 phase, implying 3D structure is not sufficient to maintain replication timing. Finally, we find that developmental domains are less well compartmentalized than constitutive domains and display chromatin properties that distinguish them from early and late constitutive domains. Overall, this study uncovers a strong connection between chromatin re-organization during G1, establishment of replication timing, and its developmental control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vishnu Dileep
- Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306, USA
| | - Ferhat Ay
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
| | - Jiao Sima
- Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306, USA
| | - Daniel L Vera
- Center for Genomics and Personalized Medicine, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306, USA
| | - William S Noble
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
| | - David M Gilbert
- Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306, USA; Center for Genomics and Personalized Medicine, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Rivera-Mulia JC, Buckley Q, Sasaki T, Zimmerman J, Didier RA, Nazor K, Loring JF, Lian Z, Weissman S, Robins AJ, Schulz TC, Menendez L, Kulik MJ, Dalton S, Gabr H, Kahveci T, Gilbert DM. Dynamic changes in replication timing and gene expression during lineage specification of human pluripotent stem cells. Genome Res 2015; 25:1091-103. [PMID: 26055160 PMCID: PMC4509994 DOI: 10.1101/gr.187989.114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 116] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2014] [Accepted: 06/05/2015] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Duplication of the genome in mammalian cells occurs in a defined temporal order referred to as its replication-timing (RT) program. RT changes dynamically during development, regulated in units of 400-800 kb referred to as replication domains (RDs). Changes in RT are generally coordinated with transcriptional competence and changes in subnuclear position. We generated genome-wide RT profiles for 26 distinct human cell types, including embryonic stem cell (hESC)-derived, primary cells and established cell lines representing intermediate stages of endoderm, mesoderm, ectoderm, and neural crest (NC) development. We identified clusters of RDs that replicate at unique times in each stage (RT signatures) and confirmed global consolidation of the genome into larger synchronously replicating segments during differentiation. Surprisingly, transcriptome data revealed that the well-accepted correlation between early replication and transcriptional activity was restricted to RT-constitutive genes, whereas two-thirds of the genes that switched RT during differentiation were strongly expressed when late replicating in one or more cell types. Closer inspection revealed that transcription of this class of genes was frequently restricted to the lineage in which the RT switch occurred, but was induced prior to a late-to-early RT switch and/or down-regulated after an early-to-late RT switch. Analysis of transcriptional regulatory networks showed that this class of genes contains strong regulators of genes that were only expressed when early replicating. These results provide intriguing new insight into the complex relationship between transcription and RT regulation during human development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Carlos Rivera-Mulia
- Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-4295, USA
| | - Quinton Buckley
- Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-4295, USA
| | - Takayo Sasaki
- Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-4295, USA
| | - Jared Zimmerman
- Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-4295, USA
| | - Ruth A Didier
- College of Medicine, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-4295, USA
| | - Kristopher Nazor
- Center for Regenerative Medicine, Department of Chemical Physiology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, USA
| | - Jeanne F Loring
- Center for Regenerative Medicine, Department of Chemical Physiology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, USA
| | - Zheng Lian
- Department of Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06519, USA
| | - Sherman Weissman
- Department of Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06519, USA
| | | | | | - Laura Menendez
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA
| | - Michael J Kulik
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA
| | - Stephen Dalton
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA
| | - Haitham Gabr
- Department of Computer and Information Sciences and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA
| | - Tamer Kahveci
- Department of Computer and Information Sciences and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA
| | - David M Gilbert
- Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-4295, USA; Center for Genomics and Personalized Medicine, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Boulos RE, Drillon G, Argoul F, Arneodo A, Audit B. Structural organization of human replication timing domains. FEBS Lett 2015; 589:2944-57. [PMID: 25912651 DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2015.04.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2015] [Revised: 04/09/2015] [Accepted: 04/10/2015] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Recent analysis of genome-wide epigenetic modification data, mean replication timing (MRT) profiles and chromosome conformation data in mammals have provided increasing evidence that flexibility in replication origin usage is regulated locally by the epigenetic landscape and over larger genomic distances by the 3D chromatin architecture. Here, we review the recent results establishing some link between replication domains and chromatin structural domains in pluripotent and various differentiated cell types in human. We reconcile the originally proposed dichotomic picture of early and late constant timing regions that replicate by multiple rather synchronous origins in separated nuclear compartments of open and closed chromatins, with the U-shaped MRT domains bordered by "master" replication origins specified by a localized (∼200-300 kb) zone of open and transcriptionally active chromatin from which a replication wave likely initiates and propagates toward the domain center via a cascade of origin firing. We discuss the relationships between these MRT domains, topologically associated domains and lamina-associated domains. This review sheds a new light on the epigenetically regulated global chromatin reorganization that underlies the loss of pluripotency and the determination of differentiation properties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rasha E Boulos
- Université de Lyon, F-69000 Lyon, France; Laboratoire de Physique, CNRS UMR5672, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, F-69007 Lyon, France
| | - Guénola Drillon
- Université de Lyon, F-69000 Lyon, France; Laboratoire de Physique, CNRS UMR5672, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, F-69007 Lyon, France
| | - Françoise Argoul
- Université de Lyon, F-69000 Lyon, France; Laboratoire de Physique, CNRS UMR5672, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, F-69007 Lyon, France
| | - Alain Arneodo
- Université de Lyon, F-69000 Lyon, France; Laboratoire de Physique, CNRS UMR5672, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, F-69007 Lyon, France
| | - Benjamin Audit
- Université de Lyon, F-69000 Lyon, France; Laboratoire de Physique, CNRS UMR5672, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, F-69007 Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Kara N, Hossain M, Prasanth SG, Stillman B. Orc1 Binding to Mitotic Chromosomes Precedes Spatial Patterning during G1 Phase and Assembly of the Origin Recognition Complex in Human Cells. J Biol Chem 2015; 290:12355-69. [PMID: 25784553 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m114.625012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2014] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Replication of eukaryotic chromosomes occurs once every cell division cycle in normal cells and is a tightly controlled process that ensures complete genome duplication. The origin recognition complex (ORC) plays a key role during the initiation of DNA replication. In human cells, the level of Orc1, the largest subunit of ORC, is regulated during the cell division cycle, and thus ORC is a dynamic complex. Upon S phase entry, Orc1 is ubiquitinated and targeted for destruction, with subsequent dissociation of ORC from chromosomes. Time lapse and live cell images of human cells expressing fluorescently tagged Orc1 show that Orc1 re-localizes to condensing chromatin during early mitosis and then displays different nuclear localization patterns at different times during G1 phase, remaining associated with late replicating regions of the genome in late G1 phase. The initial binding of Orc1 to mitotic chromosomes requires C-terminal amino acid sequences that are similar to mitotic chromosome-binding sequences in the transcriptional pioneer protein FOXA1. Depletion of Orc1 causes concomitant loss of the mini-chromosome maintenance (Mcm2-7) helicase proteins on chromatin. The data suggest that Orc1 acts as a nucleating center for ORC assembly and then pre-replication complex assembly by binding to mitotic chromosomes, followed by gradual removal from chromatin during the G1 phase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nihan Kara
- From the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York 11724, the Graduate Program in Molecular and Cellular Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11779, and
| | - Manzar Hossain
- From the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York 11724
| | - Supriya G Prasanth
- From the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York 11724, the Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois 61801
| | - Bruce Stillman
- From the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York 11724,
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Drillon G, Audit B, Argoul F, Arneodo A. Ubiquitous human 'master' origins of replication are encoded in the DNA sequence via a local enrichment in nucleosome excluding energy barriers. JOURNAL OF PHYSICS. CONDENSED MATTER : AN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS JOURNAL 2015; 27:064102. [PMID: 25563930 DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/27/6/064102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
As the elementary building block of eukaryotic chromatin, the nucleosome is at the heart of the compromise between the necessity of compacting DNA in the cell nucleus and the required accessibility to regulatory proteins. The recent availability of genome-wide experimental maps of nucleosome positions for many different organisms and cell types has provided an unprecedented opportunity to elucidate to what extent the DNA sequence conditions the primary structure of chromatin and in turn participates in the chromatin-mediated regulation of nuclear functions, such as gene expression and DNA replication. In this study, we use in vivo and in vitro genome-wide nucleosome occupancy data together with the set of nucleosome-free regions (NFRs) predicted by a physical model of nucleosome formation based on sequence-dependent bending properties of the DNA double-helix, to investigate the role of intrinsic nucleosome occupancy in the regulation of the replication spatio-temporal programme in human. We focus our analysis on the so-called replication U/N-domains that were shown to cover about half of the human genome in the germline (skew-N domains) as well as in embryonic stem cells, somatic and HeLa cells (mean replication timing U-domains). The 'master' origins of replication (MaOris) that border these megabase-sized U/N-domains were found to be specified by a few hundred kb wide regions that are hyper-sensitive to DNase I cleavage, hypomethylated, and enriched in epigenetic marks involved in transcription regulation, the hallmarks of localized open chromatin structures. Here we show that replication U/N-domain borders that are conserved in all considered cell lines have an environment highly enriched in nucleosome-excluding-energy barriers, suggesting that these ubiquitous MaOris have been selected during evolution. In contrast, MaOris that are cell-type-specific are mainly regulated epigenetically and are no longer favoured by a local abundance of intrinsic NFRs encoded in the DNA sequence. At the smaller few hundred bp scale of gene promoters, CpG-rich promoters of housekeeping genes found nearby ubiquitous MaOris as well as CpG-poor promoters of tissue-specific genes found nearby cell-type-specific MaOris, both correspond to in vivo NFRs that are not coded as nucleosome-excluding-energy barriers. Whereas the former promoters are likely to correspond to high occupancy transcription factor binding regions, the latter are an illustration that gene regulation in human is typically cell-type-specific.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guénola Drillon
- Université de Lyon, F-69000 Lyon, France. Laboratoire de Physique, CNRS UMR 5672, École Normale Supérieure de Lyon, F-69007 Lyon, France
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Embryonic stem cell specific "master" replication origins at the heart of the loss of pluripotency. PLoS Comput Biol 2015; 11:e1003969. [PMID: 25658386 PMCID: PMC4319821 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2014] [Accepted: 10/06/2014] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Epigenetic regulation of the replication program during mammalian cell differentiation remains poorly understood. We performed an integrative analysis of eleven genome-wide epigenetic profiles at 100 kb resolution of Mean Replication Timing (MRT) data in six human cell lines. Compared to the organization in four chromatin states shared by the five somatic cell lines, embryonic stem cell (ESC) line H1 displays (i) a gene-poor but highly dynamic chromatin state (EC4) associated to histone variant H2AZ rather than a HP1-associated heterochromatin state (C4) and (ii) a mid-S accessible chromatin state with bivalent gene marks instead of a polycomb-repressed heterochromatin state. Plastic MRT regions (≲ 20% of the genome) are predominantly localized at the borders of U-shaped timing domains. Whereas somatic-specific U-domain borders are gene-dense GC-rich regions, 31.6% of H1-specific U-domain borders are early EC4 regions enriched in pluripotency transcription factors NANOG and OCT4 despite being GC poor and gene deserts. Silencing of these ESC-specific “master” replication initiation zones during differentiation corresponds to a loss of H2AZ and an enrichment in H3K9me3 mark characteristic of late replicating C4 heterochromatin. These results shed a new light on the epigenetically regulated global chromatin reorganization that underlies the loss of pluripotency and lineage commitment. During development, embryonic stem cell (ESC) enter a program of cell differentiation eventually leading to all the necessary differentiated cell types. Understanding the mechanisms responsible for the underlying modifications of the gene expression program is of fundamental importance, as it will likely have strong impact on the development of regenerative medicine. We show that besides some epigenetic regulation, ubiquitous master replication origins at replication timing U-domain borders shared by 6 human cell types are transcriptionally active open chromatin regions specified by a local enrichment in nucleosome free regions encoded in the DNA sequence suggesting that they have been selected during evolution. In contrast, ESC specific master replication origins bear a unique epigenetic signature (enrichment in CTCF, H2AZ, NANOG, OCT4, …) likely contributing to maintain ESC chromatin in a highly dynamic and accessible state that is refractory to polycomb and HP1 heterochromatin spreading. These ESC specific master origins thus appear as key genomic regions where epigenetic control of chromatin organization is at play to maintain pluripotency of stem cell lineages and to guide lineage commitment to somatic cell types.
Collapse
|
47
|
Yue F, Cheng Y, Breschi A, Vierstra J, Wu W, Ryba T, Sandstrom R, Ma Z, Davis C, Pope BD, Shen Y, Pervouchine DD, Djebali S, Thurman RE, Kaul R, Rynes E, Kirilusha A, Marinov GK, Williams BA, Trout D, Amrhein H, Fisher-Aylor K, Antoshechkin I, DeSalvo G, See LH, Fastuca M, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Dobin A, Prieto P, Lagarde J, Bussotti G, Tanzer A, Denas O, Li K, Bender MA, Zhang M, Byron R, Groudine MT, McCleary D, Pham L, Ye Z, Kuan S, Edsall L, Wu YC, Rasmussen MD, Bansal MS, Kellis M, Keller CA, Morrissey CS, Mishra T, Jain D, Dogan N, Harris RS, Cayting P, Kawli T, Boyle AP, Euskirchen G, Kundaje A, Lin S, Lin Y, Jansen C, Malladi VS, Cline MS, Erickson DT, Kirkup VM, Learned K, Sloan CA, Rosenbloom KR, Lacerda de Sousa B, Beal K, Pignatelli M, Flicek P, Lian J, Kahveci T, Lee D, Kent WJ, Ramalho Santos M, Herrero J, Notredame C, Johnson A, Vong S, Lee K, Bates D, Neri F, Diegel M, Canfield T, Sabo PJ, Wilken MS, Reh TA, Giste E, Shafer A, Kutyavin T, Haugen E, Dunn D, Reynolds AP, Neph S, Humbert R, Hansen RS, De Bruijn M, et alYue F, Cheng Y, Breschi A, Vierstra J, Wu W, Ryba T, Sandstrom R, Ma Z, Davis C, Pope BD, Shen Y, Pervouchine DD, Djebali S, Thurman RE, Kaul R, Rynes E, Kirilusha A, Marinov GK, Williams BA, Trout D, Amrhein H, Fisher-Aylor K, Antoshechkin I, DeSalvo G, See LH, Fastuca M, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Dobin A, Prieto P, Lagarde J, Bussotti G, Tanzer A, Denas O, Li K, Bender MA, Zhang M, Byron R, Groudine MT, McCleary D, Pham L, Ye Z, Kuan S, Edsall L, Wu YC, Rasmussen MD, Bansal MS, Kellis M, Keller CA, Morrissey CS, Mishra T, Jain D, Dogan N, Harris RS, Cayting P, Kawli T, Boyle AP, Euskirchen G, Kundaje A, Lin S, Lin Y, Jansen C, Malladi VS, Cline MS, Erickson DT, Kirkup VM, Learned K, Sloan CA, Rosenbloom KR, Lacerda de Sousa B, Beal K, Pignatelli M, Flicek P, Lian J, Kahveci T, Lee D, Kent WJ, Ramalho Santos M, Herrero J, Notredame C, Johnson A, Vong S, Lee K, Bates D, Neri F, Diegel M, Canfield T, Sabo PJ, Wilken MS, Reh TA, Giste E, Shafer A, Kutyavin T, Haugen E, Dunn D, Reynolds AP, Neph S, Humbert R, Hansen RS, De Bruijn M, Selleri L, Rudensky A, Josefowicz S, Samstein R, Eichler EE, Orkin SH, Levasseur D, Papayannopoulou T, Chang KH, Skoultchi A, Gosh S, Disteche C, Treuting P, Wang Y, Weiss MJ, Blobel GA, Cao X, Zhong S, Wang T, Good PJ, Lowdon RF, Adams LB, Zhou XQ, Pazin MJ, Feingold EA, Wold B, Taylor J, Mortazavi A, Weissman SM, Stamatoyannopoulos JA, Snyder MP, Guigo R, Gingeras TR, Gilbert DM, Hardison RC, Beer MA, Ren B. A comparative encyclopedia of DNA elements in the mouse genome. Nature 2015; 515:355-64. [PMID: 25409824 PMCID: PMC4266106 DOI: 10.1038/nature13992] [Show More Authors] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1244] [Impact Index Per Article: 124.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2014] [Accepted: 10/24/2014] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The laboratory mouse shares the majority of its protein-coding genes with humans, making it the premier model organism in biomedical research, yet the two mammals differ in significant ways. To gain greater insights into both shared and species-specific transcriptional and cellular regulatory programs in the mouse, the Mouse ENCODE Consortium has mapped transcription, DNase I hypersensitivity, transcription factor binding, chromatin modifications and replication domains throughout the mouse genome in diverse cell and tissue types. By comparing with the human genome, we not only confirm substantial conservation in the newly annotated potential functional sequences, but also find a large degree of divergence of sequences involved in transcriptional regulation, chromatin state and higher order chromatin organization. Our results illuminate the wide range of evolutionary forces acting on genes and their regulatory regions, and provide a general resource for research into mammalian biology and mechanisms of human diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Yue
- 1] Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research and University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093, USA. [2] Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033, USA
| | - Yong Cheng
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, MC-5477 Stanford, California 94305, USA
| | - Alessandra Breschi
- Bioinformatics and Genomics, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG) and UPF, Doctor Aiguader, 88, 08003 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Jeff Vierstra
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
| | - Weisheng Wu
- Center for Comparative Genomics and Bioinformatics, Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
| | - Tyrone Ryba
- Department of Biological Science, 319 Stadium Drive, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-4295, USA
| | - Richard Sandstrom
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
| | - Zhihai Ma
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, MC-5477 Stanford, California 94305, USA
| | - Carrie Davis
- Functional Genomics, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Bungtown Road, Cold Spring Harbor, New York 11724, USA
| | - Benjamin D Pope
- Department of Biological Science, 319 Stadium Drive, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-4295, USA
| | - Yin Shen
- Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research and University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093, USA
| | - Dmitri D Pervouchine
- Bioinformatics and Genomics, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG) and UPF, Doctor Aiguader, 88, 08003 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Sarah Djebali
- Bioinformatics and Genomics, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG) and UPF, Doctor Aiguader, 88, 08003 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Robert E Thurman
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
| | - Rajinder Kaul
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
| | - Eric Rynes
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
| | - Anthony Kirilusha
- Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA
| | - Georgi K Marinov
- Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA
| | - Brian A Williams
- Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA
| | - Diane Trout
- Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA
| | - Henry Amrhein
- Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA
| | - Katherine Fisher-Aylor
- Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA
| | - Igor Antoshechkin
- Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA
| | - Gilberto DeSalvo
- Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA
| | - Lei-Hoon See
- Functional Genomics, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Bungtown Road, Cold Spring Harbor, New York 11724, USA
| | - Meagan Fastuca
- Functional Genomics, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Bungtown Road, Cold Spring Harbor, New York 11724, USA
| | - Jorg Drenkow
- Functional Genomics, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Bungtown Road, Cold Spring Harbor, New York 11724, USA
| | - Chris Zaleski
- Functional Genomics, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Bungtown Road, Cold Spring Harbor, New York 11724, USA
| | - Alex Dobin
- Functional Genomics, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Bungtown Road, Cold Spring Harbor, New York 11724, USA
| | - Pablo Prieto
- Bioinformatics and Genomics, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG) and UPF, Doctor Aiguader, 88, 08003 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Julien Lagarde
- Bioinformatics and Genomics, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG) and UPF, Doctor Aiguader, 88, 08003 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Giovanni Bussotti
- Bioinformatics and Genomics, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG) and UPF, Doctor Aiguader, 88, 08003 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Andrea Tanzer
- 1] Bioinformatics and Genomics, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG) and UPF, Doctor Aiguader, 88, 08003 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. [2] Department of Theoretical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna, Waehringerstrasse 17/3/303, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Olgert Denas
- Departments of Biology and Mathematics and Computer Science, Emory University, O. Wayne Rollins Research Center, 1510 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA
| | - Kanwei Li
- Departments of Biology and Mathematics and Computer Science, Emory University, O. Wayne Rollins Research Center, 1510 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA
| | - M A Bender
- 1] Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA. [2] Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA
| | - Miaohua Zhang
- Basic Science Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA
| | - Rachel Byron
- Basic Science Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA
| | - Mark T Groudine
- 1] Basic Science Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA. [2] Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
| | - David McCleary
- Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research and University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093, USA
| | - Long Pham
- Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research and University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093, USA
| | - Zhen Ye
- Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research and University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093, USA
| | - Samantha Kuan
- Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research and University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093, USA
| | - Lee Edsall
- Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research and University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093, USA
| | - Yi-Chieh Wu
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| | - Matthew D Rasmussen
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| | - Mukul S Bansal
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| | - Manolis Kellis
- 1] Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA. [2] Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA
| | - Cheryl A Keller
- Center for Comparative Genomics and Bioinformatics, Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
| | - Christapher S Morrissey
- Center for Comparative Genomics and Bioinformatics, Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
| | - Tejaswini Mishra
- Center for Comparative Genomics and Bioinformatics, Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
| | - Deepti Jain
- Center for Comparative Genomics and Bioinformatics, Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
| | - Nergiz Dogan
- Center for Comparative Genomics and Bioinformatics, Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
| | - Robert S Harris
- Center for Comparative Genomics and Bioinformatics, Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
| | - Philip Cayting
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, MC-5477 Stanford, California 94305, USA
| | - Trupti Kawli
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, MC-5477 Stanford, California 94305, USA
| | - Alan P Boyle
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, MC-5477 Stanford, California 94305, USA
| | - Ghia Euskirchen
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, MC-5477 Stanford, California 94305, USA
| | - Anshul Kundaje
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, MC-5477 Stanford, California 94305, USA
| | - Shin Lin
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, MC-5477 Stanford, California 94305, USA
| | - Yiing Lin
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, MC-5477 Stanford, California 94305, USA
| | - Camden Jansen
- Department of Developmental and Cell Biology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, USA
| | - Venkat S Malladi
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, MC-5477 Stanford, California 94305, USA
| | - Melissa S Cline
- Center for Biomolecular Science and Engineering, School of Engineering, University of California Santa Cruz (UCSC), Santa Cruz, California 95064, USA
| | - Drew T Erickson
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, MC-5477 Stanford, California 94305, USA
| | - Vanessa M Kirkup
- Center for Biomolecular Science and Engineering, School of Engineering, University of California Santa Cruz (UCSC), Santa Cruz, California 95064, USA
| | - Katrina Learned
- Center for Biomolecular Science and Engineering, School of Engineering, University of California Santa Cruz (UCSC), Santa Cruz, California 95064, USA
| | - Cricket A Sloan
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, MC-5477 Stanford, California 94305, USA
| | - Kate R Rosenbloom
- Center for Biomolecular Science and Engineering, School of Engineering, University of California Santa Cruz (UCSC), Santa Cruz, California 95064, USA
| | - Beatriz Lacerda de Sousa
- Departments of Obstetrics/Gynecology and Pathology, and Center for Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143, USA
| | - Kathryn Beal
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD, UK
| | - Miguel Pignatelli
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD, UK
| | - Paul Flicek
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD, UK
| | - Jin Lian
- Yale University, Department of Genetics, PO Box 208005, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8005, USA
| | - Tamer Kahveci
- Computer &Information Sciences &Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA
| | - Dongwon Lee
- McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, 733 N. Broadway, BRB 573 Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA
| | - W James Kent
- Center for Biomolecular Science and Engineering, School of Engineering, University of California Santa Cruz (UCSC), Santa Cruz, California 95064, USA
| | - Miguel Ramalho Santos
- Departments of Obstetrics/Gynecology and Pathology, and Center for Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143, USA
| | - Javier Herrero
- 1] European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD, UK. [2] Bill Lyons Informatics Centre, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London WC1E 6DD, UK
| | - Cedric Notredame
- Bioinformatics and Genomics, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG) and UPF, Doctor Aiguader, 88, 08003 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Audra Johnson
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
| | - Shinny Vong
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
| | - Kristen Lee
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
| | - Daniel Bates
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
| | - Fidencio Neri
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
| | - Morgan Diegel
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
| | - Theresa Canfield
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
| | - Peter J Sabo
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
| | - Matthew S Wilken
- Department of Biological Structure, University of Washington, HSB I-516, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
| | - Thomas A Reh
- Department of Biological Structure, University of Washington, HSB I-516, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
| | - Erika Giste
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
| | - Anthony Shafer
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
| | - Tanya Kutyavin
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
| | - Eric Haugen
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
| | - Douglas Dunn
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
| | - Alex P Reynolds
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
| | - Shane Neph
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
| | - Richard Humbert
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
| | - R Scott Hansen
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
| | - Marella De Bruijn
- MRC Molecular Haemotology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DS, UK
| | - Licia Selleri
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York 10065, USA
| | - Alexander Rudensky
- HHMI and Ludwig Center at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Immunology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Canter, New York, New York 10065, USA
| | - Steven Josefowicz
- HHMI and Ludwig Center at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Immunology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Canter, New York, New York 10065, USA
| | - Robert Samstein
- HHMI and Ludwig Center at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Immunology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Canter, New York, New York 10065, USA
| | - Evan E Eichler
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
| | - Stuart H Orkin
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA
| | - Dana Levasseur
- University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA
| | - Thalia Papayannopoulou
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
| | - Kai-Hsin Chang
- University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA
| | - Arthur Skoultchi
- Department of Cell Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461, USA
| | - Srikanta Gosh
- Department of Cell Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461, USA
| | - Christine Disteche
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
| | - Piper Treuting
- Department of Comparative Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
| | - Yanli Wang
- Bioinformatics and Genomics program, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
| | - Mitchell J Weiss
- Department of Hematology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38105, USA
| | - Gerd A Blobel
- 1] Division of Hematology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. [2] Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
| | - Xiaoyi Cao
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093, USA
| | - Sheng Zhong
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093, USA
| | - Ting Wang
- Department of Genetics, Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63108, USA
| | - Peter J Good
- NHGRI, National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-9307, USA
| | - Rebecca F Lowdon
- NHGRI, National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-9307, USA
| | - Leslie B Adams
- NHGRI, National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-9307, USA
| | - Xiao-Qiao Zhou
- NHGRI, National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-9307, USA
| | - Michael J Pazin
- NHGRI, National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-9307, USA
| | - Elise A Feingold
- NHGRI, National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-9307, USA
| | - Barbara Wold
- Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA
| | - James Taylor
- Departments of Biology and Mathematics and Computer Science, Emory University, O. Wayne Rollins Research Center, 1510 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA
| | - Ali Mortazavi
- Department of Developmental and Cell Biology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, USA
| | - Sherman M Weissman
- Yale University, Department of Genetics, PO Box 208005, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8005, USA
| | | | - Michael P Snyder
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, MC-5477 Stanford, California 94305, USA
| | - Roderic Guigo
- Bioinformatics and Genomics, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG) and UPF, Doctor Aiguader, 88, 08003 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Thomas R Gingeras
- Functional Genomics, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Bungtown Road, Cold Spring Harbor, New York 11724, USA
| | - David M Gilbert
- Department of Biological Science, 319 Stadium Drive, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-4295, USA
| | - Ross C Hardison
- Center for Comparative Genomics and Bioinformatics, Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
| | - Michael A Beer
- McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, 733 N. Broadway, BRB 573 Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA
| | - Bing Ren
- Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research and University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Tark-Dame M, Jerabek H, Manders EMM, Heermann DW, van Driel R. Depletion of the chromatin looping proteins CTCF and cohesin causes chromatin compaction: insight into chromatin folding by polymer modelling. PLoS Comput Biol 2014; 10:e1003877. [PMID: 25299688 PMCID: PMC4191888 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2014] [Accepted: 08/18/2014] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Folding of the chromosomal fibre in interphase nuclei is an important element in the regulation of gene expression. For instance, physical contacts between promoters and enhancers are a key element in cell-type-specific transcription. We know remarkably little about the principles that control chromosome folding. Here we explore the view that intrachromosomal interactions, forming a complex pattern of loops, are a key element in chromosome folding. CTCF and cohesin are two abundant looping proteins of interphase chromosomes of higher eukaryotes. To investigate the role of looping in large-scale (supra Mb) folding of human chromosomes, we knocked down the gene that codes for CTCF and the one coding for Rad21, an essential subunit of cohesin. We measured the effect on chromosome folding using systematic 3D fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Results show that chromatin becomes more compact after reducing the concentration of these two looping proteins. The molecular basis for this counter-intuitive behaviour is explored by polymer modelling usingy the Dynamic Loop model (Bohn M, Heermann DW (2010) Diffusion-driven looping provides a consistent framework for chromatin organization. PLoS ONE 5: e12218.). We show that compaction can be explained by selectively decreasing the number of short-range loops, leaving long-range looping unchanged. In support of this model prediction it has recently been shown by others that CTCF and cohesin indeed are responsible primarily for short-range looping. Our results suggest that the local and the overall changes in of chromosome structure are controlled by a delicate balance between short-range and long-range loops, allowing easy switching between, for instance, open and more compact chromatin states.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariliis Tark-Dame
- Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hansjoerg Jerabek
- Institute for Theoretical Physics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Erik M. M. Manders
- Van Leeuwenhoek Centre for Advanced Microscopy, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department for Molecular Biotechnology, University of Gent, Gent, Belgium
| | - Dieter W. Heermann
- Institute for Theoretical Physics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Roel van Driel
- Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Barlow JH, Nussenzweig A. Replication initiation and genome instability: a crossroads for DNA and RNA synthesis. Cell Mol Life Sci 2014; 71:4545-59. [PMID: 25238783 DOI: 10.1007/s00018-014-1721-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2014] [Accepted: 08/28/2014] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Nuclear DNA replication requires the concerted action of hundreds of proteins to efficiently unwind and duplicate the entire genome while also retaining epigenetic regulatory information. Initiation of DNA replication is tightly regulated, rapidly firing thousands of origins once the conditions to promote rapid and faithful replication are in place, and defects in replication initiation lead to proliferation defects, genome instability, and a range of developmental abnormalities. Interestingly, DNA replication in metazoans initiates in actively transcribed DNA, meaning that replication initiation occurs in DNA that is co-occupied with tens of thousands of poised and active RNA polymerase complexes. Active transcription can induce genome instability, particularly during DNA replication, as RNA polymerases can induce torsional stress, formation of secondary structures, and act as a physical barrier to other enzymes involved in DNA metabolism. Here we discuss the challenges facing mammalian DNA replication, their impact on genome instability, and the development of cancer.
Collapse
|
50
|
Zaghloul L, Drillon G, Boulos RE, Argoul F, Thermes C, Arneodo A, Audit B. Large replication skew domains delimit GC-poor gene deserts in human. Comput Biol Chem 2014; 53 Pt A:153-65. [PMID: 25224847 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2014.08.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/11/2014] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Besides their large-scale organization in isochores, mammalian genomes display megabase-sized regions, spanning both genes and intergenes, where the strand nucleotide composition asymmetry decreases linearly, possibly due to replication activity. These so-called skew-N domains cover about a third of the human genome and are bordered by two skew upward jumps that were hypothesized to compose a subset of "master" replication origins active in the germline. Skew-N domains were shown to exhibit a particular gene organization. Genes with CpG-rich promoters likely expressed in the germline are over represented near the master replication origins, with large genes being co-oriented with replication fork progression, which suggests some coordination of replication and transcription. In this study, we describe another skew structure that covers ∼13% of the human genome and that is bordered by putative master replication origins similar to the ones flanking skew-N domains. These skew-split-N domains have a shape reminiscent of a N, but split in half, leaving in the center a region of null skew whose length increases with domain size. These central regions (median size ∼860 kb) have a homogeneous composition, i.e. both a null and constant skew and a constant and low GC content. They correspond to heterochromatin gene deserts found in low-GC isochores with an average gene density of 0.81 promoters/Mb as compared to 7.73 promoters/Mb genome wide. The analysis of epigenetic marks and replication timing data confirms that, in these late replicating heterochomatic regions, the initiation of replication is likely to be random. This contrasts with the transcriptionally active euchromatin state found around the bordering well positioned master replication origins. Altogether skew-N domains and skew-split-N domains cover about 50% of the human genome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lamia Zaghloul
- Université de Lyon, F-69000 Lyon, France; Laboratoire de Physique, CNRS UMR 5672, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, F-69007 Lyon, France
| | - Guénola Drillon
- Université de Lyon, F-69000 Lyon, France; Laboratoire de Physique, CNRS UMR 5672, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, F-69007 Lyon, France
| | - Rasha E Boulos
- Université de Lyon, F-69000 Lyon, France; Laboratoire de Physique, CNRS UMR 5672, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, F-69007 Lyon, France
| | - Françoise Argoul
- Université de Lyon, F-69000 Lyon, France; Laboratoire de Physique, CNRS UMR 5672, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, F-69007 Lyon, France
| | - Claude Thermes
- Centre de Génétique Moléculaire, CNRS UPR 3404, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Alain Arneodo
- Université de Lyon, F-69000 Lyon, France; Laboratoire de Physique, CNRS UMR 5672, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, F-69007 Lyon, France
| | - Benjamin Audit
- Université de Lyon, F-69000 Lyon, France; Laboratoire de Physique, CNRS UMR 5672, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, F-69007 Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|