A randomized phase II trial of veliparib, radiotherapy and temozolomide in patients with unmethylated MGMT glioblastoma: the VERTU study

Phase 2 trial of veliparib, local irradiation, and temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a Children's Oncology Group study

BACKGROUND

The outcome for pediatric patients with high-grade glioma (HGG) remains poor. Veliparib, a potent oral poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) 1/2 inhibitor, enhances the activity of radiotherapy and DNA-damaging chemotherapy.

METHODS

We conducted a single-arm, non-randomized phase 2 clinical trial to determine whether treatment with veliparib and radiotherapy, followed by veliparib and temozolomide, improves progression-free survival in pediatric patients with newly diagnosed HGG without H3 K27M or BRAF mutations, compared to patient-level data from historical cohorts with closely matching clinical and molecular features. Following surgical resection, newly diagnosed children with non-metastatic HGG were screened by rapid central pathology review and molecular testing. Eligible patients were enrolled on Stratum 1 (IDH wild-type) or Stratum 2 (IDH mutant).

RESULTS

Both strata were closed to accrual for futility after planned interim analyses. Among the 23 eligible patients who enrolled on Stratum 1 and received protocol therapy, the 1-year event-free survival (EFS) was 23% (standard error, SE = 9%) and the 1-year overall survival (OS) was 64% (SE = 10%). Among the 14 eligible patients who enrolled on Stratum 2 and received protocol therapy, the 1-year EFS was 57% (SE = 13%) and 1-year OS was 93% (SE = 0.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Rapid central pathology review and molecular testing for eligibility were feasible. The protocol therapy including radiation, veliparib, and temozolomide was well tolerated but failed to improve outcomes compared to clinically and molecularly matched historical control cohorts treated with higher doses of alkylator chemotherapy.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT03581292 (first posted: July 10, 2018).

Olaparib, Temozolomide, and Concomitant Radiotherapy for Partially Resected or Biopsy-Only Glioblastoma First-Line Treatment: Results from the OLA-TMZ-RTE-01 Phase I Study

PURPOSE

Radiochemotherapy remains the mainstay of glioblastoma (GBM) first-line treatment after extended surgery, but the prognosis is still poor. PARP inhibitors like olaparib may improve GBM outcomes. We implemented a phase I to IIa trial to assess the safety and efficacy of olaparib combined with standard radiochemotherapy as a first-line treatment in patients with unresected GBM. We herein present results of phase I.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Based on the Stupp regimen, two sequential dose escalations of olaparib were performed to distinguish the radiotherapy period and the maintenance period for assessing the MTD of olaparib separately for each treatment period. Dose escalations were performed by a Time-to-Event Continual Reassessment Method.

RESULTS

A total of 30 patients were enrolled: 20 (66.7%) men, median age 59 years (range, 25-70), and 12 patients (42.9%) with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0. Among them, 16 and 11 patients were assessable for determining MTD in each period. Hematologic dose-limiting toxicities were experienced by four and one patients in each sequential dose escalation, respectively. The MTD was olaparib 100 mg twice daily for 3 days a week in concomitant during both the radiochemotherapy and maintenance periods of the standard treatment. The median progression-free and overall survival were 6.2 and 19.8 months, respectively. The 2-year survival rate was 36.7% (22.9-58.7).

CONCLUSIONS

Intermittent dosing of olaparib at radiosensitizing concentrations in concomitant with the Stupp protocol has an acceptable safety profile with promising outcomes in patients with unresectable GBM. Further efficacy determination is ongoing in the phase IIa step.

Factors involved in maintaining Karnofsky Performance Status (≥ 50%) in glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype patients treated with temozolomide and radiotherapy

Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) is a widely used scale to assess performance status. KPS ≥ 50% implies that patients can live at home. Therefore, maintaining KPS ≥ 50% is important to improve the quality of life of patients with glioblastoma, whose median survival is less than 2 years. This study aimed to identify the factors associated with survival time with maintenance of KPS ≥ 50% (survival with KPS ≥ 50%) in patients with glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype. Ninety-eight patients with glioblastomas, IDH-wildtype, who were treated with concomitant radiotherapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) followed by maintenance TMZ therapy, and whose KPS at the start of RT was ≥ 50%, were included. The median survival with KPS ≥ 50% was 13.3 months. In univariate analysis, preoperative KPS (≥ 80%), KPS at the start of RT (≥ 80%), residual tumor size (< 2 cm3), methylated MGMT promotor, and implantation of BCNU wafer were associated with survival with KPS ≥ 50%. In multivariate analysis, KPS at the start of RT (≥ 80%), methylated MGMT promotor, and residual tumor size (< 2 cm3) were significantly associated with increased survival with KPS ≥ 50%. A strategy of maximum possible tumor resection without compromising KPS is desirable to prolong the survival time with KPS ≥ 50%.

Biomarkers and Prognostic Stratification of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity in Young Adults: How to Personalize Therapeutic Management?

Squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity in young adults represent a heterogeneous entity. New prognostic biomarkers are described in the literature. The aim of this review was to identify emerging biomarkers and prognostic stratification factors of young population. Clinical, biological, microbiological, histopathologic, and molecular markers statistically associated with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival and were validated in literature. Young adults <40 years of age who were nonsmokers showed a marginally worse prognosis, whereas those <30 years of age showed unfavorable prognosis compared with those with >30 years of age. The high rate of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio was associated with decreased 5-year disease-specific survival, PD-L1 expression correlated with improved OS and recurrence-free survival, and the presence of Fusobacterium and mutations in p53, cyclin D1, and VEGF were associated with reduced OS. Combining these markers in young adults with oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas should be used to adapt the intensification of therapy in addition to the tumor-node-metastasis classification and minor histoprognostic factors.

The Potential of PARP Inhibitors as Antitumor Drugs and the Perspective of Molecular Design

PARP (poly-ADP ribose polymerase) has received widespread attention in cancer treatment. Research has shown that PARP plays a crucial role in DNA damage repair and has become a popular target for drug design. Based on the mechanism of "synthetic lethality", multiple PARPis (PARP inhibitors) have been launched for the treatment of BRCA deficient tumors. For example, the approved PARPis have shown significant potential in cancer treatment, particularly in breast cancer and cancers associated with BRCA1/BRCA2 deficiencies. However, the clinical efficacy and safety of PARP inhibitors in different cancers remain issues that cannot be overlooked. The design of PARPis aims to eliminate their resistance and broaden their application scope. Designing selective PARP-1 inhibitors is also a potential strategy. PROTACs (Proteolysis Targeting Chimeras) to degrade PARP have become a potential novel cancer treatment strategy.

Current status of precision oncology in adult glioblastoma

The concept of precision oncology, the application of targeted drugs based on comprehensive molecular profiling, has revolutionized treatment strategies in oncology. This review summarizes the current status of precision oncology in glioblastoma (GBM), the most common and aggressive primary brain tumor in adults with a median survival below 2 years. Targeted treatments without prior target verification have consistently failed. Patients with BRAF V600E-mutated GBM benefit from BRAF/MEK-inhibition, whereas targeting EGFR alterations was unsuccessful due to poor tumor penetration, tumor cell heterogeneity, and pathway redundancies. Systematic screening for actionable molecular alterations resulted in low rates (< 10%) of targeted treatments. Efficacy was observed in one-third and currently appears to be limited to BRAF-, VEGFR-, and mTOR-directed treatments. Advancing precision oncology for GBM requires consideration of pathways instead of single alterations, new trial concepts enabling rapid and adaptive drug evaluation, a focus on drugs with sufficient bioavailability in the CNS, and the extension of target discovery and validation to the tumor microenvironment, tumor cell networks, and their interaction with immune cells and neurons.

PARP inhibitors in gliomas: Mechanisms of action, current trends and future perspectives

Gliomas are the most common primary malignant brain tumours in adults. Despite decades of research into novel therapeutic approaches, the prognosis remains poor. PARP1-2 are critical for DNA repair, cell survival and genomic stability and PARP inhibition (PARPi) may be a promising therapeutic approach for gliomas. Inhibition of PARP activity leads to homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), which, in combination with DNA damage, results in cell death. This review summarises the current knowledge and future perspectives of PARPi in glioma. The available literature was reviewed using PubMed, recent major international oncology congresses were consulted, and ongoing clinical trials were searched using ClinicalTrials.gov. In translational research, PARPi have demonstrated a strong scientific rationale for their use in the treatment of glioma. They have been evaluated both alone and in combination with radiotherapy, temozolomide, anti-angiogenic agents, immunotherapy and other new drugs in newly diagnosed or recurrent glioma. Most studies were open-label, non-randomised, dose-escalation phase I-II trials. Early results show promising anti-tumour activity, and key challenges include identifying predictive biomarkers, elucidating synergistic effects in combination therapies, addressing the development of resistance, and managing hematological toxicity. In conclusion, early phase studies have shown promising anti-tumour activity of PARPi that should be confirmed in larger prospective and randomised trials. In addition, the development of novel PARPi with improved blood brain barrier (BBB) penetration and PARP inhibitor activity with new synergistic treatment combinations seems promising and needs to be further explored.

Efficacy of Adding Veliparib to Temozolomide for Patients With MGMT-Methylated Glioblastoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

The prognosis for patients with glioblastoma is poor following standard therapy with surgical resection, radiation, temozolomide, and tumor-treating fields.

Objectives

To evaluate the combination of veliparib and temozolomide in glioblastoma based on preclinical data demonstrating significant chemosensitizing effects of the polyadenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase 1/2 inhibitor veliparib when combined with temozolomide.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with MGMT promoter hypermethylation who had completed concomitant radiation and temozolomide were enrolled between December 15, 2014, and December 15, 2018, in this Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology trial. The data for this analysis were locked on April 21, 2023.

Interventions

Patients were randomized and treated with standard adjuvant temozolomide (150-200 mg/m2 orally, days 1-5) combined with either placebo or veliparib (40 mg orally, twice daily, days 1-7) for 6 cycles.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point for the phase 3 portion of the trial was overall survival (OS).

Results

There were 322 patients randomized during the phase 2 accrual period and an additional 125 patients randomized to complete the phase 3 accrual, for a total of 447 patients in the final phase 3 analysis. The median (range) age for patients was 60 (20-85) years and 190 patients (42.5%) were female. The median OS was 24.8 months (90% CI, 22.6-27.7) for the placebo arm and 28.1 months (90% CI, 24.3-33.3) for the veliparib arm (P = .17). The difference in survival did not meet the prespecified efficacy end point. However, there was a separation of the survival curves that favored the veliparib arm over 24 to 48 months of follow-up. The experimental combination was well tolerated with an acceptable elevation in grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxic effects.

Conclusions and Relevance

This trial found that adding veliparib to adjuvant temozolomide did not significantly extend OS in patients with newly diagnosed, MGMT-hypermethylated glioblastoma.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02152982.

Clinical and translational advances in primary brain tumor therapy with a focus on glioblastoma-A comprehensive review of the literature

This comprehensive review paper examines the most updated state of research on glioblastoma, an aggressive brain tumor with limited treatment options. By analyzing 76 recent studies, from translational and basic sciences, to clinical trials, we highlight various aspects of glioblastoma and shed light on potential therapeutic strategies. The interplay between tumor cells, neural progenitor cells, and the tumor microenvironment is explored. Targeting the PI3K-Akt-mTOR pathway through extracellular-vesicle (EV)-mediated signaling emerges as a potential therapeutic strategy. Personalized modeling approaches utilizing patient-specific MRI data offer promise for optimizing treatment strategies. The response of glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs) to different treatment modalities is examined, emphasizing the need to inhibit the transformation of proneural (PN) GSCs into resistant mesenchymal (MES) GSCs. Metabolic therapy and combination therapies show potential in reversing treatment resistance and inhibiting both PN and MES GSCs. Immunotherapy, targeted approaches, and molecular dynamics in gliomas are discussed, providing insights into early-stage diagnosis and treatment. Additionally, the potential use of Zika virus as an oncolytic agent is explored. Analysis of phase 0 to 3 clinical trials reveal promising outcomes for various experimental treatments, highlighting the importance of combination therapies, predictive signatures, and patient selection strategies. Specific compounds demonstrate potential therapeutic benefits and tolerability. Phase 3 trials indicate the efficacy of DCVax-L in improving survival rates and depatux-m in prolonging progression-free survival. These findings emphasize the importance of personalized treatment approaches and continued exploration of targeted therapies, immunotherapies, and tumor biology understanding in shaping the future of glioblastoma treatment.

Neurological toxicities with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

We conducted this meta-analysis to investigate neurological toxicities with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) in cancer patients. Databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from 1 January 2000 to 1 November 2023. Forty-six RCTs and 9529 patients were included. PARPis could increase the risk of all-grade headache [risk ratio (RR), 1.22; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 1.14-1.30; P < 0.00001], dizziness (RR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.28-1.53; P < 0.00001), dysgeusia (RR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.44-2.60; P < 0.0001) and insomnia (RR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.09-1.60; P < 0.0001) in cancer patients. Headache was the most common neurological toxicity. Niraparib was associated with a higher risk of headache and insomnia, talazoparib with a higher risk of dizziness and rucaparib with a higher risk of dysgeusia. Breast cancer patients receiving PARPis have a higher risk of dysgeusia, while ovarian cancer patients are at an increased risk of insomnia. PARPis may increase the risk of mild to moderate neurological toxicities, but not severe ones.

DNA damage response in brain tumors: A Society for Neuro-Oncology consensus review on mechanisms and translational efforts in neuro-oncology

DNA damage response (DDR) mechanisms are critical to maintenance of overall genomic stability, and their dysfunction can contribute to oncogenesis. Significant advances in our understanding of DDR pathways have raised the possibility of developing therapies that exploit these processes. In this expert-driven consensus review, we examine mechanisms of response to DNA damage, progress in development of DDR inhibitors in IDH-wild-type glioblastoma and IDH-mutant gliomas, and other important considerations such as biomarker development, preclinical models, combination therapies, mechanisms of resistance and clinical trial design considerations.

Approaches in Adult Glioblastoma Treatment: A Systematic Review of Emerging Therapies

Glioblastoma (GB) is the most common and aggressive primary brain tumor in adults, characterized by complex genetic changes and a poor prognosis. Current standard therapies, including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, have limited effectiveness. Emerging therapeutic strategies aim to address the high recurrence rate and improve outcomes by targeting glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs), the blood-brain barrier, and utilizing advanced drug delivery systems. This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. An electronic search was conducted across several databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane, covering studies published from January 2019 to May 2024. The inclusion criteria encompassed primary research studies in English focusing on emerging therapies for treating GB in adults. Eligible studies included experimental and observational studies. Only peer-reviewed journal articles were considered. Exclusion criteria included non-human studies, pediatric studies, non-peer-reviewed articles, systematic reviews, case reports, conference abstracts, and editorials. The search identified 755 articles and, finally, 24 of them met the inclusion criteria. The key findings highlight various promising therapies. Despite advances in treatment approaches, the complexity and heterogeneity of GB necessitate ongoing research to optimize these innovative strategies. The study has limitations that should be considered. The inclusion of only English-language articles may introduce language bias, and the focus on peer-reviewed articles could exclude valuable data from non-peer-reviewed sources. Heterogeneity among studies, particularly in sample sizes and designs, complicates comparison and synthesis, while the reliance on preclinical models limits generalizability to clinical practice. Nonetheless, this review provides a comprehensive overview of the emerging therapies that hold promise for improving patient outcomes in GB treatment.

L-RNA aptamer-based CXCL12 inhibition combined with radiotherapy in newly-diagnosed glioblastoma: dose escalation of the phase I/II GLORIA trial

The chemokine CXCL12 promotes glioblastoma (GBM) recurrence after radiotherapy (RT) by facilitating vasculogenesis. Here we report outcomes of the dose-escalation part of GLORIA (NCT04121455), a phase I/II trial combining RT and the CXCL12-neutralizing aptamer olaptesed pegol (NOX-A12; 200/400/600 mg per week) in patients with incompletely resected, newly-diagnosed GBM lacking MGMT methylation. The primary endpoint was safety, secondary endpoints included maximum tolerable dose (MTD), recommended phase II dose (RP2D), NOX-A12 plasma levels, topography of recurrence, tumor vascularization, neurologic assessment in neuro-oncology (NANO), quality of life (QOL), median progression-free survival (PFS), 6-months PFS and overall survival (OS). Treatment was safe with no dose-limiting toxicities or treatment-related deaths. The MTD has not been reached and, thus, 600 mg per week of NOX-A12 was established as RP2D for the ongoing expansion part of the trial. With increasing NOX-A12 dose levels, a corresponding increase of NOX-A12 plasma levels was observed. Of ten patients enrolled, nine showed radiographic responses, four reached partial remission. All but one patient (90%) showed at best response reduced perfusion values in terms of relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV). The median PFS was 174 (range 58-260) days, 6-month PFS was 40.0% and the median OS 389 (144-562) days. In a post-hoc exploratory analysis of tumor tissue, higher frequency of CXCL12+ endothelial and glioma cells was significantly associated with longer PFS under NOX-A12. Our data imply safety of NOX-A12 and its efficacy signal warrants further investigation.

Novel Clinical Trials and Approaches in the Management of Glioblastoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to discuss a wide variety of novel therapies recently studied or actively undergoing study in patients with glioblastoma. This review also discusses current and future strategies for improving clinical trial design in patients with glioblastoma to maximize efficacy in discovering effective treatments.

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the years, there has been significant expansion in therapy modalities studied in patients with glioblastoma. These therapies include, but are not limited to, targeted molecular therapies, DNA repair pathway targeted therapies, immunotherapies, vaccine therapies, and surgically targeted radiotherapies. Glioblastoma is the most common malignant primary brain tumor in adults and unfortunately remains with poor overall survival following the current standard of care. Given the dismal prognosis, significant clinical and research efforts are ongoing with the goal of improving patient outcomes and enhancing quality and quantity of life utilizing a wide variety of novel therapies.

Multi-cohort comprehensive analysis unveiling the clinical value and therapeutic effect of GNAL in glioma

Clinical data indicates that glioma patients have poor treatment outcomes and clinical prognosis. The role of olfactory signaling pathway-related genes (OSPRGs) in glioma has not been fully elucidated. In this study, we aimed to investigate the role and relationship between OSPRGs and glioma. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to assess the relationship between OSPRGs and the overall survival of glioma based on public cohorts, and the target gene (G Protein Subunit Alpha L, GNAL) was screened. The association of GNAL expression with clinicopathological characteristics, gene mutation landscape, tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) methylation, and naris-occlusion controlled genes (NOCGs) was performed. Immunohistochemistry was used to evaluate GNAL level in glioma. Further analysis was conducted to evaluate the drug sensitivity, immunotherapy response, and functional enrichment of GNAL. GNAL was an independent prognostic factor, and patients with low GNAL expression have a poor prognosis. Expression of GNAL was closely associated with clinicopathological characteristics, DNA methylation, and several immune-related pathways. Immune infiltration analysis indicated that GNAL levels were negatively correlated with immune scores. GNAL low-expression group showed efficacy with anti-PD-1 therapy. Ten compounds with significantly different half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values between the GNAL high and low-expression groups were identified. Furthermore, its expression was associated with several immune cells, immune-related genes, and NOCGs. The expression of GNAL is closely associated with clinicopathological characteristics, TIME, and the response to therapeutic interventions, highlighting its potential as a prognostic biomarker for glioma.

Veliparib‑Induced Toxicity in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta‑Analysis

In this study, we investigate the veliparib‑induced toxicity in cancer patients. Databases were searched for RCTs treated with veliparib. We found veliparib could increase the risk of hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicities. Anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and nausea were the most common toxicities. Patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal tumors tend to have a higher risk of high-grade neutropenia; patients in the first-line setting tend to have a higher risk of high-grade anemia and neutropenia than those in the ≥ second line setting. Patients receiving higher dosage of veliparib tend to have a higher risk of all-grade anemia. Veliparib could also increase the risk of insomnia, myalgia, pneumonia, dyspnea, hyponatremia, and fatigue.

Preclinical Characterization of AZD9574, a Blood-Brain Barrier Penetrant Inhibitor of PARP1

PURPOSE

We evaluated the properties and activity of AZD9574, a blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetrant selective inhibitor of PARP1, and assessed its efficacy and safety alone and in combination with temozolomide (TMZ) in preclinical models.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

AZD9574 was interrogated in vitro for selectivity, PARylation inhibition, PARP-DNA trapping, the ability to cross the BBB, and the potential to inhibit cancer cell proliferation. In vivo efficacy was determined using subcutaneous as well as intracranial mouse xenograft models. Mouse, rat, and monkey were used to assess AZD9574 BBB penetration and rat models were used to evaluate potential hematotoxicity for AZD9574 monotherapy and the TMZ combination.

RESULTS

AZD9574 demonstrated PARP1-selectivity in fluorescence anisotropy, PARylation, and PARP-DNA trapping assays and in vivo experiments demonstrated BBB penetration. AZD9574 showed potent single agent efficacy in preclinical models with homologous recombination repair deficiency in vitro and in vivo. In an O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT)-methylated orthotopic glioma model, AZD9574 in combination with TMZ was superior in extending the survival of tumor-bearing mice compared with TMZ alone.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of three key features-PARP1 selectivity, PARP1 trapping profile, and high central nervous system penetration in a single molecule-supports the development of AZD9574 as the best-in-class PARP inhibitor for the treatment of primary and secondary brain tumors. As documented by in vitro and in vivo studies, AZD9574 shows robust anticancer efficacy as a single agent as well as in combination with TMZ. AZD9574 is currently in a phase I trial (NCT05417594). See related commentary by Lynce and Lin, p. 1217.

Glioblastoma Therapy: Past, Present and Future

Glioblastoma (GB) stands out as the most prevalent and lethal form of brain cancer. Although great efforts have been made by clinicians and researchers, no significant improvement in survival has been achieved since the Stupp protocol became the standard of care (SOC) in 2005. Despite multimodality treatments, recurrence is almost universal with survival rates under 2 years after diagnosis. Here, we discuss the recent progress in our understanding of GB pathophysiology, in particular, the importance of glioma stem cells (GSCs), the tumor microenvironment conditions, and epigenetic mechanisms involved in GB growth, aggressiveness and recurrence. The discussion on therapeutic strategies first covers the SOC treatment and targeted therapies that have been shown to interfere with different signaling pathways (pRB/CDK4/RB1/P16ink4, TP53/MDM2/P14arf, PI3k/Akt-PTEN, RAS/RAF/MEK, PARP) involved in GB tumorigenesis, pathophysiology, and treatment resistance acquisition. Below, we analyze several immunotherapeutic approaches (i.e., checkpoint inhibitors, vaccines, CAR-modified NK or T cells, oncolytic virotherapy) that have been used in an attempt to enhance the immune response against GB, and thereby avoid recidivism or increase survival of GB patients. Finally, we present treatment attempts made using nanotherapies (nanometric structures having active anti-GB agents such as antibodies, chemotherapeutic/anti-angiogenic drugs or sensitizers, radionuclides, and molecules that target GB cellular receptors or open the blood-brain barrier) and non-ionizing energies (laser interstitial thermal therapy, high/low intensity focused ultrasounds, photodynamic/sonodynamic therapies and electroporation). The aim of this review is to discuss the advances and limitations of the current therapies and to present novel approaches that are under development or following clinical trials.

Druggable genomic landscapes of high-grade gliomas

Background

Despite the putatively targetable genomic landscape of high-grade gliomas, the long-term survival benefit of genomically-tailored targeted therapies remains discouraging.

Methods

Using glioblastoma (GBM) as a representative example of high-grade gliomas, we evaluated the clonal architecture and distribution of hotspot mutations in 388 GBMs from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Mutations were matched with 54 targeted therapies, followed by a comprehensive evaluation of drug biochemical properties in reference to the drug's clinical efficacy in high-grade gliomas. We then assessed clinical outcomes of a cohort of patients with high-grade gliomas with targetable mutations reviewed at the Johns Hopkins Molecular Tumor Board (JH MTB; n = 50).

Results

Among 1,156 sequence alterations evaluated, 28.6% represented hotspots. While the frequency of hotspot mutations in GBM was comparable to cancer types with actionable hotspot alterations, GBMs harbored a higher fraction of subclonal mutations that affected hotspots (7.0%), compared to breast cancer (4.9%), lung cancer (4.4%), and melanoma (1.4%). In investigating the biochemical features of targeted therapies paired with recurring alterations, we identified a trend toward higher lipid solubility and lower IC50 in GBM cell lines among drugs with clinical efficacy. The drugs' half-life, molecular weight, surface area and binding to efflux transporters were not associated with clinical efficacy. Among the JH MTB cohort of patients with IDH1 wild-type high-grade gliomas who received targeted therapies, trametinib monotherapy or in combination with dabrafenib conferred radiographic partial response in 75% of patients harboring BRAF or NF1 actionable mutations. Cabozantinib conferred radiographic partial response in two patients harboring a MET and a PDGFRA/KDR amplification. Patients with IDH1 wild-type gliomas that harbored actionable alterations who received genotype-matched targeted therapy had longer progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS; 7.37 and 14.72 respectively) than patients whose actionable alterations were not targeted (2.83 and 4.2 months respectively).

Conclusion

While multiple host, tumor and drug-related features may limit the delivery and efficacy of targeted therapies for patients with high-grade gliomas, genotype-matched targeted therapies confer favorable clinical outcomes. Further studies are needed to generate more data on the impact of biochemical features of targeted therapies on their clinical efficacy for high-grade gliomas.

A multi-site phase I trial of Veliparib with standard radiation and temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM)

PURPOSE

A multi-site Phase I trial was conducted to determine the safety, maximum tolerated dose, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of Veliparib, a Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase [PARP] enzyme inhibitor, when administered with temozolomide (TMZ) alone and then with temozolomide and radiation (RT) in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

METHODS

Given the potential for myelosuppression when a PARP inhibitor is combined with chemotherapy, the first 6 patients accrued were given Veliparib 10 mg bid and TMZ 75 mg/m2/d daily for six weeks. If this was well tolerated, the same doses of Veliparib and TMZ would be tested along with standard radiation with plans to dose escalate the Veliparib in subsequent patient cohorts. Once a maximal tolerated dose was determined, a 78 patient phase II study was planned. Peripheral blood pharmacokinetics were assessed.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were enrolled. In the first 6 patients who received 6 weeks of TMZ with Veliparib only one dose limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred. The next 12 patients received 6 weeks of RT + TMZ + veliparib and 4/12 (33%) had dose limiting hematologic toxicities. As a result, Veliparib was reduced by 50% to 10 mg BID every other week, but again 3/3 patients had dose limiting hematologic toxicities. The trial was then terminated. The mean clearance (± SD) CL/F of Veliparib for the initial dose (27.0 ± 9.0 L/h, n = 16) and at steady-state for 10 mg BID (23.5 ± 10.4 L/h, n = 18) were similar. Accumulation for BID dosing was 56% (± 33%).

CONCLUSIONS

Although Veliparib 10 mg BID administered with TMZ 75 mg/m2 for six weeks was well tolerated, when this regimen was combined with standard partial brain irradiation it was severely myelosuppressive even when the dose was reduced by 50%. This study again highlights the potential of localized cranial radiotherapy to significantly increase hematologic toxicity of marginally myelosuppressive systemic therapies.

Intrathecal delivery of nanoparticle PARP inhibitor to the cerebrospinal fluid for the treatment of metastatic medulloblastoma

The morbidity associated with pediatric medulloblastoma, in particular in patients who develop leptomeningeal metastases, remains high in the absence of effective therapies. Administration of substances directly into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is one approach to circumvent the blood-brain barrier and focus delivery of drugs to the site of tumor. However, high rates of CSF turnover prevent adequate drug accumulation and lead to rapid systemic clearance and toxicity. Here, we show that PLA-HPG nanoparticles, made with a single-emulsion, solvent evaporation process, can encapsulate talazoparib, a PARP inhibitor (BMN-673). These degradable polymer nanoparticles improve the therapeutic index when delivered intrathecally and lead to sustained drug retention in the tumor as measured with PET imaging and fluorescence microscopy. We demonstrate that administration of these particles into the CSF, alone or in combination with systemically administered temozolomide, is a highly effective therapy for tumor regression and prevention of leptomeningeal spread in xenograft mouse models of medulloblastoma. These results provide a rationale for harnessing nanoparticles for the delivery of drugs limited by brain penetration and therapeutic index and demonstrate important advantages in tolerability and efficacy for encapsulated drugs delivered locoregionally.

PARP inhibitors combined with radiotherapy: are we ready?

PARP was an enzyme found in the nucleus of eukaryotic cells that played a crucial role in repairing damaged DNA. Recently, PARP inhibitors have demonstrated great potential in cancer treatment. Thus, the FDA has approved several small-molecule PARP inhibitors for cancer maintenance therapy. The combination of PARP inhibitors and radiotherapy relies on synthetic lethality, taking advantage of the flaws in DNA repair pathways to target cancer cells specifically. Studies conducted prior to clinical trials have suggested that the combination of PARP inhibitors and radiotherapy can enhance the sensitivity of cancer cells to radiation, intensify DNA damage, and trigger cell death. Combining radiotherapy with PARP inhibitors in clinical trials has enhanced the response rate and progression-free survival of diverse cancer patients. The theoretical foundation of PARP inhibitors combined with radiotherapy is explained in detail in this article, and the latest advances in preclinical and clinical research on these inhibitors for tumor radiotherapy are summarized. The problems in the current field are recognized in our research and potential therapeutic applications for tumors are suggested. Nevertheless, certain obstacles need to be tackled when implementing PARP inhibitors and radiotherapies in clinical settings. Factors to consider when using the combination therapy are the most suitable schedule and amount of medication, identifying advantageous candidates, and the probable adverse effects linked with the combination. The combination of radiotherapy and PARP inhibitors can greatly enhance the effectiveness of cancer treatment.

A Multi-Site Phase I Trial of Veliparib with Standard Radiation and Temozolomide in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM)

Purpose

A multi-site Phase I trial was conducted to determine the safety, maximum tolerated dose, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of Veliparib, a Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase [PARP] enzyme inhibitor, when administered with temozolomide (TMZ) alone and then with temozolomide and radiation (RT) in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Methods

Given the potential for myelosuppression when a PARP inhibitor is combined with chemotherapy, the first 6 patients accrued were given Veliparib 10 mg bid and TMZ 75 mg/m2/d daily for six weeks. If this was well tolerated, the same doses of Veliparib and TMZ would be tested along with standard radiation with plans to dose escalate the Veliparib in subsequent patient cohorts. Once a maximal tolerated dose was determined, a 78 patient phase II study was planned. Peripheral blood pharmacokinetics were assessed.

Results

Twenty-four patients were enrolled. In the first 6 patients who received 6 weeks of TMZ with Veliparib only one dose limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred. The next 12 patients received 6 weeks of RT + TMZ + veliparib and 4/12 (33%) had dose limiting hematologic toxicities. As a result, Veliparib was reduced by 50% to 10 mg BID every other week, but again 3/3 patients had dose limiting hematologic toxicities. The trial was then terminated. The mean clearance (± SD) CL/F of Veliparib for the initial dose (27.0 ± 9.0 L/h, n = 16) and at steady-state for 10 mg BID (23.5 ± 10.4 L/h, n = 18) were similar. Accumulation for BID dosing was 56% (± 33%).

Conclusions

Although Veliparib 10 mg BID administered with TMZ 75 mg/m2 for six weeks was well tolerated, when this regimen was combined with standard partial brain irradiation it was severely myelosuppressive even when the dose was reduced by 50%. This study again highlights the potential of localized cranial radiotherapy to significantly increase hematologic toxicity of marginally myelosuppressive systemic therapies.

PARP inhibitors: enhancing efficacy through rational combinations

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have significantly changed the treatment landscape for tumours harbouring defects in genes involved in homologous repair (HR) such as BRCA1 and BRCA2. Despite initial responsiveness to PARPi, tumours eventually develop resistance through a variety of mechanisms. Rational combination strategies involving PARPi have been explored and are in various stages of clinical development. PARPi combinations have the potential to enhance efficacy through synergistic activity, and also potentially sensitise innately PARPi-resistant tumours to PARPi. Initial combinations involving PARPi with chemotherapy were hindered by significant overlapping haematologic toxicity, but newer combinations with fewer toxicities and more targeted approaches are undergoing evaluation. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms of PARPi resistance and review the rationale and clinical evidence for various PARPi combinations including combinations with chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapies. We also highlight emerging PARPi combinations with promising preclinical evidence.

Radiosensitisation by olaparib through focused ultrasound delivery in a diffuse midline glioma model

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Diffuse midline glioma H3K27-altered (DMG) is an aggressive, inoperable, predominantly paediatric brain tumour. Treatment strategies are limited, resulting in a median survival of only 11 months. Currently, radiotherapy (RT), often combined with temozolomide, is considered the standard of care but remains palliative, highlighting the urgency for new therapies. Radiosensitisation by olaparib, an inhibitor of PARP1 and subsequently PAR-synthesis, is a promising treatment option. We assessed whether PARP1 inhibition enhances radiosensitivity in vitro and in vivo following focused ultrasound mediated blood-brain barrier opening (FUS-BBBO).

METHODS

Effects of PARP1 inhibition were evaluated in vitro using viability, clonogenic, and neurosphere assays. In vivo olaparib extravasation and pharmacokinetic profiling following FUS-BBBO was measured by LC-MS/MS. Survival benefit of FUS-BBBO combined with olaparib and RT was assessed using a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) DMG mouse model.

RESULTS

Treatment with olaparib in combination with radiation delayed tumour cell proliferation in vitro through the reduction of PAR. Prolonged exposure of low olaparib concentration was more efficient in delaying cell growth than short exposure of high concentration. FUS-BBBO increased olaparib bioavailability in the pons by 5.36-fold without observable adverse effects. A Cmax of 54.09 μM in blood and 1.39 μM in the pontine region was achieved following administration of 100 mg/kg olaparib. Although RT combined with FUS-BBBO mediated olaparib extravasation delayed local tumour growth, survival benefits were not observed in an in vivo DMG PDX model.

CONCLUSIONS

Olaparib effectively radiosensitises DMG cells in vitro and reduces primary tumour growth in vivo when combined with RT. Further studies are needed to investigate the therapeutic benefit of olaparib in suitable preclinical PDX models.

Major adverse cardiac events and cardiovascular toxicity with PARP inhibitors-based therapy for solid tumors: a systematic review and safety meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) provided significant antitumor activity in various tumors, mainly carrying deleterious mutations of BRCA1/BRCA2 genes. Only few data are available regarding the cardiac and vascular safety profile of this drug class. We carried out a meta-analysis for assessing the incidence and relative risk (RR) of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), hypertension, and thromboembolic events in patients with solid tumors treated with PARPi-based therapy.

METHODS

Prospective studies were identified by searching the Medline/PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ASCO Meeting abstracts. Data extraction was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Combined odds ratios (ORs), RRs, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using fixed- or random-effects methods, depending on studies heterogeneity. RevMan software for meta-analysis (v.5.2.3) was used to carry out statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Thirty-two studies were selected for the final analysis. The incidence of PARPi-related MACEs of any and high grade was 5.0% and 0.9%, respectively, compared with 3.6% and 0.9% in the control arms, corresponding to a significant increased risk of MACEs of any grade (Peto OR 1.62; P = 0.0009) but not of high grade (P = 0.49). The incidence of hypertension of any grade and high grade was 17.5% and 6.0% with PARPi, respectively, compared with 12.6% and 4.4% in the controls. Treatment with PARPi significantly increased the risk of hypertension of any grade (random-effects, RR = 1.53; P = 0.03) but not of high grade (random-effects, RR = 1.47; P = 0.09) compared with controls. Finally, PARPi-based therapies significantly increased the risk of thromboembolic events of any grade (Peto OR = 1.49, P = 0.004) and not of high grade (Peto OR = 1.31; P = 0.13) compared with controls.

CONCLUSIONS

PARPi-based therapy is associated with a significantly increased risk of MACEs, hypertension, and thromboembolic events of any grade compared with controls. The lack of a significant increased risk of high-grade events together with the absolute low incidence of these adverse events led not to consider routine cardiovascular monitoring as recommended in asymptomatic patients.

The efficacy of targeted therapy combined with radiotherapy and temozolomide-based chemotherapy in the treatment of glioma: A systemic review and meta-analysis of phase II/III randomized controlled trials

Background

Glioma is the most common intracranial tumor, accounting for about half of the primary intracranial tumors, with the characteristics of hidden onset and high mortality. Even after surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, the prognosis of glioma is not ideal. Targeted therapy has developed rapidly in the treatment of other malignant tumors, which is also an important direction in the research and development of new therapies for glioma. So far, targeting combined with radiotherapy and chemotherapy have been used as the treatment of glioma in many clinical trials, but the role of targeted combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy in the treatment of glioma is still controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of targeted therapy combined with radiotherapy and temozolomide (TMZ)-based chemotherapy in the treatment of glioma.

Methods

Phase II or phase III clinical trials involving targeted therapy combined with radiotherapy and chemotherapy and temozolomide-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for gliomas were searched using PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases, and a comprehensive meta-analysis was conducted. The primary outcome was overall survival time (OS) and progression-free survival time (PFS), and the secondary outcome was adverse reaction. The time-to-event data is summarized as hazard ratio (HR), and the binary results are summarized as odds ratio (OR). Two researchers conducted literature screening, data extraction and quality evaluation according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Stata16.0 software was used for analysis, random effect model was used for data merging, and forest map was used for display.

Results

A total of 11 eligible literatures and 12 prospective randomized controlled clinical trials of 1284 cases were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that compared with radiotherapy and chemotherapy alone, targeted drugs combined with temozolomide-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy could significantly improve OS in phase II trial, but there was no improvement in Phase III trial, and PFS of newly diagnosed glioma patients was improved (HR=0.82(0.71-0.94) 95%CI, p =0.005). The PFS of the third phase of the experiment also improved. Compared with radiotherapy and chemotherapy alone, there was no statistically significant increase in adverse events in targeted combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy group.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier CRD42022326012.

Recurrent Glioblastoma: Ongoing Clinical Challenges and Future Prospects

Virtually all glioblastomas treated in the first-line setting will recur in a short period of time, and the search for alternative effective treatments has so far been unsuccessful. Various obstacles remain unresolved, and no effective salvage therapy for recurrent glioblastoma can be envisaged in the short term. One of the main impediments to progress is the low incidence of the disease itself in comparison with other pathologies, which will be made even lower by the recent WHO classification of gliomas, which includes molecular alterations. This new classification helps refine patient prognosis but does not clarify the most appropriate treatment. Other impediments are related to clinical trials: glioblastoma patients are often excluded from trials due to their advanced age and limiting neurological symptoms; there is also the question of how best to measure treatment efficacy, which conditions the design of trials and can affect the acceptance of results by oncologists and medicine agencies. Other obstacles are related to the drugs themselves: most treatments cannot cross the blood-brain-barrier or the brain-to-tumor barrier to reach therapeutic drug levels in the tumor without producing toxicity; the drugs under study may have adverse metabolic interactions with those required for symptom control; identifying the target of the drug can be a complex issue. Additionally, the optimal method of treatment - local vs systemic therapy, the choice of chemotherapy, irradiation, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, or a combination thereof - is not yet clear in glioblastoma in comparison with other cancers. Finally, in addition to curing or stabilizing the disease, glioblastoma therapy should aim at maintaining the neurological status of the patients to enable them to return to their previous lifestyle. Here we review currently available treatments, obstacles in the search for new treatments, and novel lines of research that show promise for the future.

Glioblastoma and the search for non-hypothesis driven combination therapeutics in academia

Glioblastoma (GBM) remains a cancer of high unmet clinical need. Current standard of care for GBM, consisting of maximal surgical resection, followed by ionisation radiation (IR) plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ), provides less than 15-month survival benefit. Efforts by conventional drug discovery to improve overall survival have failed to overcome challenges presented by inherent tumor heterogeneity, therapeutic resistance attributed to GBM stem cells, and tumor niches supporting self-renewal. In this review we describe the steps academic researchers are taking to address these limitations in high throughput screening programs to identify novel GBM combinatorial targets. We detail how they are implementing more physiologically relevant phenotypic assays which better recapitulate key areas of disease biology coupled with more focussed libraries of small compounds, such as drug repurposing, target discovery, pharmacologically active and novel, more comprehensive anti-cancer target-annotated compound libraries. Herein, we discuss the rationale for current GBM combination trials and the need for more systematic and transparent strategies for identification, validation and prioritisation of combinations that lead to clinical trials. Finally, we make specific recommendations to the preclinical, small compound screening paradigm that could increase the likelihood of identifying tractable, combinatorial, small molecule inhibitors and better drug targets specific to GBM.

Combining Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase (PARP) Inhibitors with Chemotherapeutic Agents: Promise and Challenges

Better understanding of molecular drivers and dysregulated pathways has furthered the concept of precision oncology and rational drug development. The role of DNA damage response (DDR) pathways has been extensively studied in carcinogenesis and as potential therapeutic targets to improve response to chemotherapy or overcome resistance. Treatment with small molecule inhibitors of PARP has resulted in clinical response and conferred survival benefit to patients with ovarian cancer, BRCA-mutant breast cancer, HRD-deficient prostate cancer and BRCA-mutant pancreatic cancer, leading to US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals. However, the observed clinical benefit with single agent PARP inhibitors is limited to few tumor types within the relevant genetic context. Since DDR pathways are essential for repair of damage caused by cytotoxic agents, PARP inhibitors have been evaluated in combination with various chemotherapeutic agents to broaden the therapeutic application of this class of drugs. In this chapter, we discuss the combination of PARP inhibitors with different chemotherapeutics agents, clinical experience to date, lessons learnt, and future directions for this approach.

NUTMEG: A randomized phase II study of nivolumab and temozolomide versus temozolomide alone in newly diagnosed older patients with glioblastoma

Background

There is an immunologic rationale to evaluate immunotherapy in the older glioblastoma population, who have been underrepresented in prior trials. The NUTMEG study evaluated the combination of nivolumab and temozolomide in patients with glioblastoma aged 65 years and older.

Methods

NUTMEG was a multicenter 2:1 randomized phase II trial for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma aged 65 years and older. The experimental arm consisted of hypofractionated chemoradiation with temozolomide, then adjuvant nivolumab and temozolomide. The standard arm consisted of hypofractionated chemoradiation with temozolomide, then adjuvant temozolomide. The primary objective was to improve overall survival (OS) in the experimental arm.

Results

A total of 103 participants were randomized, with 69 in the experimental arm and 34 in the standard arm. The median (range) age was 73 (65-88) years. After 37 months of follow-up, the median OS was 11.6 months (95% CI, 9.7-13.4) in the experimental arm and 11.8 months (95% CI, 8.3-14.8) in the standard arm. For the experimental arm relative to the standard arm, the OS hazard ratio was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.54-1.33). In the experimental arm, there were three grade 3 immune-related adverse events which resolved, with no unexpected serious adverse events.

Conclusions

Due to insufficient evidence of benefit with nivolumab, the decision was made not to transition to a phase III trial. No new safety signals were identified with nivolumab. This complements the existing series of immunotherapy trials. Research is needed to identify biomarkers and new strategies including combinations.

Conventional and emerging treatments of astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas

PURPOSE

Astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas are mainly diffuse primary brain tumors harboring a diagnostic and prognostically favorable isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation. They are still incurable besides growing molecular knowledge and therapy options. Circumscribed astrocytomas are also discussed here, although they represent a separate entity despite similarities in the nomenclature.

METHODS

We reviewed clinical trials, preclinical approaches as well as guideline recommendations form the major scientific Neuro-Oncology organizations for astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas according to PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

After histopathological diagnosis and eventually a maximal safe resection, patients with good prognostic factors may be followed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). If further treatment is necessary, either after diagnosis or at progression, diffuse astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas are mainly treated with combined radiochemotherapy or maximal safe resection followed by combined radiochemotherapy according to current guidelines based on randomized trials. Circumscribed gliomas like pilocytic astrocytomas, CNS WHO grade 1, or pleomorphic xanthoastrocytomas, CNS WHO grade 2, are often treated with surgery alone. Current approaches for therapy optimization include decision of the best chemotherapy regimen. The IDH mutation presents a rational target for small molecule inhibition and immune therapy in diffuse astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas, while the BRAF pathway is frequently mutated and treatable in circumscribed gliomas.

CONCLUSION

Despite establishment of standard treatment approaches for gliomas that include resection, radio- and chemotherapy, there is a lack of effective treatments for progressive disease. Immune- and targeted therapies are currently investigated.

Neuro-oncology at the American Society for Clinical Oncology 2022 Annual Meeting

In the following brief report, we highlight the advances in the neuro-oncology space from the ASCO 2022 Annual Meeting. We put into context the phase 2 and 3 trials and how these may alter the standard of care going forward. In addition, we highlight some other earlier work that will lead to future and potentially practice-changing trials.

Epigenetic basis for PARP mutagenesis in glioblastoma: A review

Several modifications in the glioblastoma genes are caused by epigenetic modifications, which are crucial in appropriate developmental processes such as self-renewal and destiny determination of neural stem cells. Poly (ADP-ribose)polymerase (PARP) is an essential cofactor involved in DNA repair as well as several other cellular functions such as transcription and chromatin shape modification. Inhibiting PARP has evolved for triggering cell damage in cancerous cells when paired with certain other anticancer drugs including temozolomide (TMZ). PARP1 is involved with in base excision repair (BER) pathway, however its functionality differs across types of tumours. Epigenomics as well as chromosomal statistics have contributed to the growth of main subgroups of glioma, which serve as foundation for the categorization of central nervous system (CNS) tumours as well as a unique classification based only on DNA methylation information, which demonstrates extraordinary diagnostic accuracy. Unfortunately, not all patients respond to PARP inhibitors (PARPi), and there is no way to anticipate who will and who will not. In this field, PARPi are one of the innovative medicines currently being explored. As a result, cancer cells that also have a homologous recombination defect become fatal synthetically. As well as preparing the tumour microenvironment for immunotherapy, PARPi may enhance the lethal effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. This article analyzes the justification and clinical evidence for PARPi in glioma to offer potential therapeutic approaches. Despite the effectiveness of these targeted drugs, researchers have looked into a number of resistance mechanisms as well as the growing usage of PARPi in clinical practice for the treatment of various malignancies.

BMN673 Is a PARP Inhibitor with Unique Radiosensitizing Properties: Mechanisms and Potential in Radiation Therapy

BMN673 is a relatively new PARP inhibitor (PARPi) that exhibits superior efficacy in vitro compared to olaparib and other clinically relevant PARPi. BMN673, similar to most clinical PARPi, inhibits the catalytic activities of PARP-1 and PARP-2 and shows impressive anticancer potential as monotherapy in several pre-clinical and clinical studies. Tumor resistance to PARPi poses a significant challenge in the clinic. Thus, combining PARPi with other treatment modalities, such as radiotherapy (RT), is being actively pursued to overcome such resistance. However, the modest to intermediate radiosensitization exerted by olaparib, rucaparib, and veliparib, limits the rationale and the scope of such combinations. The recently reported strong radiosensitizing potential of BMN673 forecasts a paradigm shift on this front. Evidence accumulates that BMN673 may radiosensitize via unique mechanisms causing profound shifts in the balance among DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair pathways. According to one of the emerging models, BMN673 strongly inhibits classical non-homologous end-joining (c-NHEJ) and increases reciprocally and profoundly DSB end-resection, enhancing error-prone DSB processing that robustly potentiates cell killing. In this review, we outline and summarize the work that helped to formulate this model of BMN673 action on DSB repair, analyze the causes of radiosensitization and discuss its potential as a radiosensitizer in the clinic. Finally, we highlight strategies for combining BMN673 with other inhibitors of DNA damage response for further improvements.

The Role of PARP Inhibitors in Patients with Primary Malignant Central Nervous System Tumors

OPINION STATEMENT

Primary malignant central nervous (CNS) tumors are a devastating group of diseases with urgent need for improved treatment options. Surgery, radiation, and cytotoxic chemotherapy remain the primary standard treatment modalities, with molecularly targeted therapies having proven efficacy in only small subsets of cases. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, which have had immense success in the treatment of extracranial cancers with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), are emerging as a potential targeted treatment for various CNS tumors. Although few primary CNS tumors display canonical BRCA gene defects, preclinical evidence suggests that PARP inhibitors may benefit certain CNS tumors with functional HRD or elevated replication stress. In addition, other preclinical studies indicate that PARP inhibitors may synergize with standard therapies used for CNS tumors including radiation and alkylating agents and may prevent or overcome drug resistance. Thus far, initial clinical trials with early-generation PARP inhibitors, typically as monotherapy or in the absence of selective biomarkers, have shown limited efficacy. However, the scientific rationale remains promising, and many clinical trials are ongoing, including investigations of more CNS penetrant or more potent inhibitors and of combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Early phase trials are also critically focusing on determining active drug CNS penetration and identifying biomarkers of therapy response. In this review, we will discuss the preclinical evidence supporting use of PARP inhibitors in primary CNS tumors and clinical trial results to date, highlighting ongoing trials and future directions in the field that may yield important findings and potentially impact the treatment of these devastating malignancies in the coming years.

Outcomes of intracranial non-germinomatous germ cell tumors: a retrospective Asian multinational study on treatment strategies and prognostic factors

PURPOSE

Non-germinomatous germ cell tumors (NGGCTs) are rare pediatric conditions. This multicenter study using Asian multinational patient data investigated treatment outcomes and prognostic factors for NGGCTs.

METHODS

Medical records of 251 patients with NGGCTs treated from 1995 to 2015 were retrospectively analyzed from participating centers in Asian countries (Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, and Japan).

RESULTS

The median follow up was 8.5 years (95% CI 7.8-9.9). In the total cohort, 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 78.2% and 85.4%, respectively. In 17.9% of the patients, diagnosis was determined by tumor markers alone (alpha-fetoprotein ≥ 10 ng/mL (Korea) or > 25 ng/mL (Taiwan and Singapore), and/or β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) ≥ 50 mIU/mL). Patients with immature teratomas and mature teratomas comprised 12.0% and 8.4%, respectively. The 5-year EFS rate was higher in patients with histologically confirmed germinoma with elevated β-hCG (n = 28) than those in patients with malignant NGGCTs (n = 127). Among malignant NGGCTs, patients with choriocarcinoma showed the highest 5-year OS of 87.6%, while yolk sac tumors showed the lowest OS (68.8%). For malignant NGGCT subgroups, an increase in serum β-hCG levels by 100 mIU/mL was identified as a significant prognostic factor associated with the EFS and OS.

CONCLUSION

Our result shows excellent survival outcomes of overall CNS NGGCT. However, treatment outcome varied widely across the histopathologic subgroup of NGGCT. Hence, this study suggests the necessity for accurate diagnosis by surgical biopsy and further optimization of diagnosis and treatment according to the histopathology of NGGCTs. Future clinical trials should be designed for individualized treatments for different NGGCTs subsets.

DNA repair inhibitors and radiotherapy

Radiotherapy (RT) is one of the main cancer treatments and grows in importance due to improved techniques. DNA damage caused by ionizing radiation creates DNA strand breaks that trigger an intervention of DNA repair pathways involving numerous proteins and enzymes. In recent years, we have identified DNA repair inhibitors as targets for inhibiting cellular repair systems and thus causing cell death. Combining RT with these DNA repair inhibitors appears to be a new approach for cancer treatment, but safety and real efficiency of this combination in practice is unclear. Numerous trials are underway in various diseases and initial results are promising overall, yet remain controversial.

A novel defined risk signature of interferon response genes predicts the prognosis and correlates with immune infiltration in glioblastoma

BACKGROUND

Interferons (IFNs) have been implemented as anti-tumor immunity agents in clinical trials of glioma, but only a subset of glioblastoma (GBM) patients profits from it. The predictive role of IFNs stimulated genes in GBM needs further exploration to investigate the clinical role of IFNs.

METHODS

This study screened 526 GBM patients from three independent cohorts. The transcriptome data with matching clinical information were analyzed using R. Immunohistochemical staining data from the Human Protein Atlas and DNA methylation data from MethSurv were used for validation in protein and methylation level respectively.

RESULTS

We checked the survival effect of all 491 IFNs response genes, and found 54 genes characterized with significant hazard ratio in overall survival (OS). By protein-protein interaction analysis, 10 hub genes were selected out for subsequent study. And based on the expression of these 10 genes, GBM patients could be divided into two subgroups with significant difference in OS. Furthermore, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator cox regression model was utilized to construct a multigene risk signature, including STAT3, STAT2 and SOCS3, which could serve as an independent prognostic predictor for GBM. The risk model was validated in two independent GBM cohorts. The GBM patients with high risk scores mainly concentrated in the GBM Mesenchymal subtype. The higher risk group was enriched in hypoxia, angiogenesis, EMT, glycolysis and immune pathways, and had increased Macrophage M2 infiltration and high expression of immune checkpoint CD274 (namely PD-L1).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings revealed the three-gene risk model could be an independent prognostic predictor for GBM, and they were crucial participants in immunosuppressive microenvironment of GBM.

Radiotherapy-drug combinations in the treatment of glioblastoma: a brief review

Glioblastoma (GBM) accounts for over 50% of gliomas and carries the worst prognosis of all solid tumors. Owing to the limited local control afforded by surgery alone, efficacious adjuvant treatments such as radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy are fundamental in achieving durable disease control. The best clinical outcomes are achieved with tri-modality treatment consisting of surgery, RT and systemic therapy. While RT-chemotherapy combination regimens are well established in oncology, this approach was largely unsuccessful in GBM until the introduction of temozolomide. The success of this combination has stimulated the search for other candidate drugs for concomitant use with RT in GBM. This review seeks to collate the current evidence for these agents and synthesize possible future directions for the field.

A Novel Classification Model for Lower-Grade Glioma Patients Based on Pyroptosis-Related Genes

Recent studies demonstrated that pyroptosis plays a crucial role in shaping the tumor-immune microenvironment. However, the influence of pyroptosis on lower-grade glioma regarding immunotherapy and targeted therapy is still unknown. This study analyzed the variations of 33 pyroptosis-related genes in lower-grade glioma and normal tissues. Our study found considerable genetic and expression alterations in heterogeneity among lower-grade gliomas and normal brain tissues. There are two pyroptosis phenotypes in lower-grade glioma, and they exhibited differences in cell infiltration characteristics and clinical characters. Then, a PyroScore model using the lasso-cox method was constructed to measure the level of pyroptosis in each patient. PyroScore can refine the lower-grade glioma patients with a stratified prognosis and a distinct tumor immune microenvironment. Pyscore may also be an effective factor in predicting potential therapeutic benefits. In silico analysis showed that patients with a lower PyroScore are expected to be more sensitive to targeted therapy and immunotherapy. These findings may enhance our understanding of pyroptosis in lower-grade glioma and might help optimize risk stratification for the survival and personalized management of lower-grade glioma patients.

The use of radiosensitizing agents in the therapy of glioblastoma multiforme-a comprehensive review

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma is the most common malignant brain tumor in human adults. Despite several improvements in resective as well as adjuvant therapy over the last decades, its overall prognosis remains poor. As a means of improving patient outcome, the possibility of enhancing radiation response by using radiosensitizing agents has been tested in an array of studies.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of clinical trials involving radiation therapy in combination with radiosensitizing agents on patients diagnosed with glioblastoma was performed in the National Center for Biotechnology Information's PubMed database.

RESULTS

A total of 96 papers addressing this matter were published between 1976 and 2021, of which 63 matched the subject of this paper. All papers were reviewed, and their findings discussed in the context of their underlining mechanisms of radiosensitization.

CONCLUSION

In the history of glioblastoma treatment, several approaches of optimizing radiation-effectiveness using radiosensitizers have been made. Even though several different strategies and agents have been explored, clear evidence of improved patient outcome is still missing. Tissue-selectiveness and penetration of the blood-brain barrier seem to be major roadblocks; nevertheless, modern strategies try to circumvent these obstacles, using novel sensitizers based on preclinical data or alternative ways of delivery.

Blocking PARP activity with the inhibitor veliparib enhances radiotherapy sensitivity in endometrial carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Our study aimed to investigate the potential clinical utility of a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, veliparib (ABT-888), as a radiosensitizer in the medication of endometrial carcinoma (EC).

METHODS

Human Ishikawa endometrial adenocarcinoma cells were treated with veliparib, radiotherapy (RT), or combination treatment. The viabilities, radiosensitivity enhancement ratio (sensitizer enhancement ratio (SER), and apoptosis of Ishikawa cells were, respectively, evaluated by Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8), colony formation experiment, and flow cytometry. The tumor growth was assessed by xenograft mice models. Western blot assay investigated the expression of DNA damage and apoptosis-related proteins in vivo and in vitro.

RESULTS

Cell Counting Kit-8 revealed that the 10% inhibition concentration (IC₁₀ ) and 50% inhibition concentration (IC₅₀ ) values of veliparib-treated Ishikawa cells were 1.7 and 133.5 µM, respectively. The SER of veliparib combined with RT was 1.229 in vitro. Flow cytometry analysis results indicated that the apoptosis rate of the veliparib + RT group was markedly higher than that of the RT group in vitro (p < 0.05). Furthermore, in vivo data revealed that veliparib + RT treatment significantly decreased tumor growth compared with single treatments of veliparib or RT and with the control group (p < 0.05). Then western blot confirmed the levels of anti-phospho-histone (γH2AX), caspase-3, and B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) associated protein X (Bax) were significantly higher in the veliparib + RT group, while the level of Bcl-2 was lower compared with that of the RT group (p < 0.05), both in vivo and in vitro.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that veliparib in combination with RT markedly improved the therapeutic efficiency in human endometrial carcinoma.

Perspective on the Use of DNA Repair Inhibitors as a Tool for Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy of Glioblastoma

Simple Summary

The current routine treatment for glioblastoma (GB), the most lethal high-grade brain tumor in adults, aims to induce DNA damage in the tumor. However, the tumor cells might be able to repair that damage, which leads to therapy resistance. Fortunately, DNA repair defects are common in GB cells, and their survival is often based on a sole backup repair pathway. Hence, targeted drugs inhibiting essential proteins of the DNA damage response have gained momentum and are being introduced in the clinic. This review gives a perspective on the use of radiopharmaceuticals targeting DDR kinases for imaging in order to determine the DNA repair phenotype of GB, as well as for effective radionuclide therapy. Finally, four new promising radiopharmaceuticals are suggested with the potential to lead to a more personalized GB therapy.

Abstract

Despite numerous innovative treatment strategies, the treatment of glioblastoma (GB) remains challenging. With the current state-of-the-art therapy, most GB patients succumb after about a year. In the evolution of personalized medicine, targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) is gaining momentum, for example, to stratify patients based on specific biomarkers. One of these biomarkers is deficiencies in DNA damage repair (DDR), which give rise to genomic instability and cancer initiation. However, these deficiencies also provide targets to specifically kill cancer cells following the synthetic lethality principle. This led to the increased interest in targeted drugs that inhibit essential DDR kinases (DDRi), of which multiple are undergoing clinical validation. In this review, the current status of DDRi for the treatment of GB is given for selected targets: ATM/ATR, CHK1/2, DNA-PK, and PARP. Furthermore, this review provides a perspective on the use of radiopharmaceuticals targeting these DDR kinases to (1) evaluate the DNA repair phenotype of GB before treatment decisions are made and (2) induce DNA damage via TRT. Finally, by applying in-house selection criteria and analyzing the structural characteristics of the DDRi, four drugs with the potential to become new therapeutic GB radiopharmaceuticals are suggested.

Relapsing High—Grade Glioma from Peritumoral Zone: Critical Review of Radiotherapy Treatment Options

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive brain tumor in adults, with a median survival of about 15 months. After the prior treatment, GBM tends to relapse within the high dose radiation field, defined as the peritumoral brain zone (PTZ), needing a second treatment. In the present review, the primary role of ionizing radiation in recurrent GBM is discussed, and the current literature knowledge about the different radiation modalities, doses and fractionation options at our disposal is summarized. Therefore, the focus is on the necessity of tailoring the treatment approach to every single patient and using radiomics and PET/MRI imaging to have a relatively good outcome and avoid severe toxicity. The use of charged particle therapy and radiosensitizers to overcome GBM radioresistance is considered, even if further studies are necessary to evaluate the effectiveness in the setting of reirradiation.

PARP Inhibitors in Glioma: A Review of Therapeutic Opportunities

Gliomas are the most common malignant primary brain tumor in adults. Despite advances in multimodality therapy, incorporating surgery, radiotherapy, systemic therapy, tumor treating fields and supportive care, patient outcomes remain poor, especially in glioblastoma where median survival has remained static at around 15 months, for decades. Low-grade gliomas typically harbor isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations, grow more slowly and confer a better prognosis than glioblastoma. However, nearly all gliomas eventually recur and progress in a way similar to glioblastoma. One of the novel therapies being developed in this area are poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. PARP inhibitors belong to a class of drugs that target DNA damage repair pathways. This leads to synthetic lethality of cancer cells with coexisting homologous recombination deficiency. PARP inhibitors may also potentiate the cytotoxic effects of radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and prime the tumor microenvironment for immunotherapy. In this review, we examine the rationale and clinical evidence for PARP inhibitors in glioma and suggest therapeutic opportunities.

New Approaches to Glioblastoma

Faced with unique immunobiology and marked heterogeneity, treatment strategies for glioblastoma require therapeutic approaches that diverge from conventional oncological strategies. The selection and prioritization of targeted and immunotherapeutic strategies will need to carefully consider these features and companion biomarkers developed alongside treatment strategies to identify the appropriate patient populations. Novel clinical trial strategies that interrogate the tumor microenvironment for drug penetration and target engagement will inform go/no-go later-stage clinical studies. Innovative trial designs and analyses are needed to move effective agents toward regulatory approvals more rapidly.

Clinical strategies to manage adult glioblastoma patients without MGMT hypermethylation

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly malignant brain tumor with a dismal prognosis. Standard therapy for GBM comprises surgical resection, followed by radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) therapy. The methylation status of the O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter is one of the most essential predictive biomarkers for patients with GBM treated with TMZ. Patients with an unmethylated MGMT promoter (umMGMT), who comprise 60% of patients with GBM, present an even worse prognosis because of TMZ resistance. Radiotherapy with various fractionation, chemotherapy compensating for TMZ, targeted therapy against diverse oncogenic pathways, immunotherapy of vaccine or immune checkpoint inhibitor, and tumor treating fields have been studied in umMGMT GBM patients. However, most efforts have yielded negative results or merely minimal improvements. Therefore, effective patient subgroup selection concerning precision medicine has become the focus. By assigning different treatments to the corresponding patient subgroups, a better curative effect and subsequently prolonged survival can be achieved. In this review, we re-evaluate the value of standard TMZ therapy and summarize the new clinical strategies and attempts to treat patients with umMGMT, which yielded positive and negative results, to provide alternative treatment options and discuss future directions of umMGMT GBM treatment.