Liver transplantation in adults coinfected with HIV

Similar survival but higher and delayed hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence in HIV-positive compared to negative cirrhotics undergoing liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation (LT) represents the best therapeutic option for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and end-stage liver disease (ESLD). Although HIV infection does not seem to lower survival rates, HCV and HCC recurrence appear more harmful.

AIMS

To compare the overall survival after LT; evaluate the impact of anti-HCV direct-acting agents (DAA); assess the rate of HCC recurrence in HIV-positive and negative patients.

METHODS

Subjects with HCV/HBV infection who underwent LT for HCC or ESLD from 2012 to 2019 were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

Study population included 299 individuals, 31 (10.4%) were HIV-positive. Overall mortality was similar (16.1% versus 19.0%, p = 0.695). HCC recurrence was observed in 6 HIV-positive (19.4%) and in 17 negative subjects (6.3%, p = 0.022). Time to relapse was 831 days in HIV-positive and 315 days in negative patients (p = 0.046). Cox model found a significant role for HIV in univariate analysis but, after adjusting for variables, extra-hepatic tumor was the only factor associated to recurrence (aHR 56.379, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Post-LT survival improved after DAA availability and HIV has no impact on mortality. A higher and delayed rate of HCC recurrence was observed in co-infected individuals: surveillance protocols should be strengthened along time in this population.

Solid Organ Transplantation in HIV-Infected Recipients: History, Progress, and Frontiers

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

End-stage organ disease prevalence is increasing among HIV-infected (HIV+) individuals. Trial and registry data confirm that solid organ transplantation (SOT) is efficacious in this population. Optimizing access to transplant and decreasing complications represent active frontiers.

RECENT FINDINGS

HIV+ recipients historically experienced 2-4-fold higher rejection. Integrase strand transferase inhibitors (INSTIs) minimize drug interactions and may reduce rejection along with lymphodepleting induction immunosuppression. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection has been associated with inferior outcomes, yet direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) may mitigate this. Experience in South Africa and the US HIV Organ Policy Equity (HOPE) Act support HIV+ donor to HIV+ recipient (HIV D+/R+) transplantation. SOT is the optimal treatment for end-stage organ disease in HIV+ individuals. Recent advances include use of INSTIs and DAAs in transplant recipients; however, strategies to improve access to transplant are needed. HIV D+/R+ transplantation is under investigation and may improve access and provide insights for HIV cure and pathogenesis research.

Do the epidemiology, physiological mechanisms and characteristics of hepatocellular carcinoma in HIV-infected patients justify specific screening policies?

Reducing the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in HIV-infected patients has become a serious problem when managing these patients. There are many explanations for this disease evolution, which notably include their longer survival under effective antiviral therapy and also the more rapid evolution of chronic liver disease. Despite recent advances in the management of hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C (HCV) viral diseases, which will probably increase the number of patients achieving a virological response, HIV-infected patients with cirrhosis are still at risk of the onset of HCC. This evolution to HCC is also correlated to other comorbidities such as excessive alcohol consumption and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). HCC thus remains a public health issue in this population. The poor prognosis and aggressiveness of HCC have been fully demonstrated, but the mechanisms underlying this aggressiveness are not yet well defined. As well as underlying mechanisms that contribute to accelerating hepatocarcinogenesis in HIV-infected patients, there are other reasons why HIV-infected patients should be considered a higher risk population. This review discusses the principal epidemiological determinants; the mechanisms of pathogenesis; and the treatment of HCC in HIV/HBV and HIV/HCV coinfected patients. It also discusses the probable need to develop a specific screening policy for HCC in this population in order to prevent the rapid development and to make them more amenable to a curative treatment.

Solid organ transplants in HIV-infected patients

There is a growing need for kidney and liver transplants in persons living with HIV. Fortunately, with the significant advances in antiretroviral therapy and management of opportunistic infections, HIV infection is no longer an absolute contraindication for solid organ transplantation. Data from several large prospective multi-center cohort studies have shown that solid organ transplantation in carefully selected HIV-infected individuals is safe. However, significant challenges have been identified including prevention of acute rejection, management of drug-drug interactions and treatment of recurrent viral hepatitis. This article reviews the selection criteria, outcomes, and special management considerations for HIV-infected patients undergoing liver or kidney transplantation.

Liver transplantation for HIV/HCV coinfection: where is the controversy?

Liver transplantation (LT) is an accepted mode of treatment for patients with chronic liver disease. Historically, patients with HIV were excluded from LT programs, but with the introduction of highly effective antiretroviral regimens, HIV is no longer a contraindication. LT outcomes for some liver diseases in HIV-positive patients are equivalent to those observed in non-HIV-positive patients. This is not the case for patients coinfected with HIV and HCV, however, where results at 5 years have led to suggestions that LT for coinfection should be abandoned. This article examines the role of LT for HIV/HCV and identifies groups of patients where transplantation is associated with good outcomes. We believe that the application of existing knowledge to patient selection and organ allocation could improve outcomes further, and with the advent of directly acting antivirals for HCV, LT for HIV/HCV coinfection will no longer be controversial.

Perspectives on liver and kidney transplantation in the human immunodeficiency virus-infected patient

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is no longer an absolute contraindication for transplantation for patients with advanced kidney and liver failure. This article reviews the outcome data in the solid organ transplantation of HIV-infected patients that led to a change in thinking by the transplant community. Several emerging issues are also reviewed, such as eligibility criteria, selection of optimal immunosuppression agents and antiretroviral therapy in this population, and management of coinfection with hepatitis B and hepatitis C after transplant.

Long-term outcomes of liver transplant patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection and end-stage-liver-disease: single center experience

Objective

Orthotopic-liver-transplantation (OLT) in patients with Human-Immunodeficiency-Virus infection (HIV) and end-stage-liver-disease (ESDL) is rarely reported. The purpose of this study is to describe our institutional experience on OLT for HIV positive patients.

Material and methods

This is a retrospective study of all HIV-infected patients who underwent OLT at the University Hospital of Essen, from January 1996 to December 2009. Age, sex, HIV transmission-way, CDC-stage, etiology of ESDL, concomitant liver disease, last CD4cell count and HIV-viral load prior to OLT were collected and analysed. Standard calcineurin-inhibitors-based immunosuppression was applied. All patients received anti-fungal and anti-pneumocystis carinii pneumonia prophylaxis post-OLT.

Results

Eight transplanted HIV-infected patients with a median age of 46 years (range 35-61 years) were included. OLT indications were HCV (n = 5), HBV (n = 2), HCV/HBV/HDV-related cirrhosis (n = 1) and acute liver-failure (n = 1). At OLT, CD4 cell-counts ranged from 113-621 cells/μl, and HIV viral-loads from < 50-175,000 copies/ml. Seven of eight patients were exposed to HAART before OLT. Patients were followed-up between 1-145 months. Five died 1, 3, 10, 31 and 34 months after OLT due to sepsis and graftfailure respectively. Graft-failure causes were recurrent hepatic-artery thrombosis, HCV-associated hepatitis, and chemotherapy-induced liver damage due to Hodgkin-disease. One survivor is relisted for OLT due to recurrent chronic HCV-disease but non-progredient HIV-infection 145 months post-OLT. Two other survivors show stable liver function and non-progredient HIV-disease under HAART 21 and 58 months post-OLT.

Conclusions

OLT in HIV-infected patients and ESLD is an acceptable therapeutic option in selected patients. Long-term survival can be achieved without HIV disease-progression under antiretroviral therapy and management of the viral hepatitis co-infection.

The advent of successful organ transplantation in the Irish HIV positive cohort

BACKGROUND

Liver disease is an increasing cause of morbidity and mortality in Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive patients.

AIM

To describe the first cases of organ transplantation in HIV positive patients in Ireland.

METHOD

We report the Irish patients with HIV who received liver transplantation and performed a chart review.

RESULT

Two patients received liver transplantation for end stage liver disease caused by Hepatitis C, with survival at 2 years of 100%.

CONCLUSION

Liver transplantation is a feasible treatment for patients with HIV and end stage liver disease. The success of transplantation in the HIV positive population should encourage the provision of other medical and surgical interventions previously not offered to patients with HIV.

Liver transplantation in human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients

With the successful introduction of combined antiretroviral therapy (cART), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is now regarded as a chronic illness with excellent long-term outcomes. However, chronic exposure to viral etiologies (ie, chronic hepatitis B and hepatitis C) and drug-induced toxicity secondary to cART have resulted in increasing rates of mortality and morbidity due to end-stage liver disease. HIV disease is no longer considered an absolute contraindication to liver transplantation (LT) by most transplant centers worldwide. Because the burden of liver disease in this cohort is likely to increase, this review addresses the key etiologies and the management strategies available for HIV-positive patients undergoing LT.

Liver transplant outcomes in HIV-infected patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis with synthetic cohort

OBJECTIVES

The relative success of liver transplantation in those with HIV compared to HIV-uninfected individuals remains a point of intense debate. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of liver transplantation in HIV-hepatitis co-infected patients using a meta-analysis and individual patient data meta-analysis as a synthetic cohort.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, AIDSLINE (inception to 2010), AMED, CINAHL, TOXNET, Development and Reproductive Toxicology, Hazardous Substances Databank, Psych-info and relevant conferences. We included cohort studies and individual case-reports evaluating survival of co-infected transplant patients. We abstracted data on cohort and case demographics and outcomes. We pooled cohorts using a random-effects analysis and created a synthetic cohort of cases using individual patient data. We confirmed this with the pooled cohort analysis.

RESULTS

We included 15 cohort studies and 49 case series with individual patient data. At 12 months, 84.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 81.1-87.8%] of patients had survived. Within the HIV-infected population evaluated, HIV-hepatitis B virus (HBV) co-infection was associated with optimal survival. In an adjusted model, individuals positive for HBV were 8.28 (95% CI 2.26-30.33) times more likely to survive when compared to those without HBV. Further, individuals with an undetectable HIV viral load at the time of transplantation were 2.89 (95% CI 1.41-5.91) times more likely to survive when compared to those with detectable HIV viremia. Hepatitis C virus was not a predictor of patient survival when adjusted for by other key predictors [0.54 (95% CI 0.17-1.80)].

Liver transplantation in HCV/HIV positive patients

Since the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in 1996 for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients, the incidence of liver diseases secondary to co-infection with hepatitis C has increased. Although data on the outcome of liver transplantation in HIV-infected recipients is limited, the overall results to date seem to be comparable to that in non-HIV-infected recipients. Liver transplant centers are now accepting HIV-infected individuals as organ recipients. Post-transplantation HIV replication is controlled by HAART. Hepatitis C re-infection of the liver graft, however, remains an important problem because cirrhotic changes of the liver graft may be more rapid in HIV-infected recipients. Interactions between the HAART components and immunosuppressive drugs influence drug metabolism and therefore meticulous monitoring of drug blood level concentrations is required. The risk of opportunistic infection in HIV-positive transplant patients seems to be similar to that in HIV-negative transplant recipients.

Liver transplant in patients with HIV: infection risk associated with HIV and post-transplant immunosuppression

Before the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy, HIV-infected patients who underwent liver transplantation (LT) had poor survival, mainly because of a rapid progression to AIDS and its infectious complications during the post-LT immunosuppression phase. However, in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy, under some specific and well-determined conditions, LT might be as safe and efficacious in HIV patients as it is in non-HIV-infected patients. End-stage liver failure as caused by hepatitis B virus, cirrhosis, and hepatotoxicity should be considered indications for LT in every transplant center. Because of the almost universal hepatitis C virus reinfection and its accelerated course post-LT, LT in hepatitis C virus-coinfected patients deserves more caution and more extended follow-up before it is accepted as a standard indication for LT in HIV-infected patients.

Liver transplantation in HIV-positive patients

Death from end-stage liver disease (ESLD) because of chronic hepatitis B and C has become an increasing problem in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients in the last years. This is mainly because of the dramatic decrease of HIV-related morbidity and mortality since the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Although the data on the outcome of liver transplantation in HIV-infected recipients with ESLD is limited, overall results seem comparable to non-HIV-infected recipients. Therefore, liver transplant centres around the world are increasingly accepting HIV-infected individuals as organ recipients. Post-transplantation control of HIV replication is achieved by continuing HAART. As in non-HIV-infected patients, hepatitis B virus recurrence is efficiently prevented by hepatitis B immunoglobulin and antiviral therapy. Re-infection of the allograft with hepatitis C virus, however, remains an important problem, and progress to allograft cirrhosis may even be more rapid than in HIV-negative patients. Interactions in drug metabolism between the HAART components and the immunosuppressive drugs are difficult to predict and require close monitoring of drug levels and dose adjustments. The complexity in this setting makes close cooperation between transplant surgeons, hepatologists, HIV-clinicians and pharmacologists mandatory. As experience on liver transplantation in HIV-infected individuals is still limited, to date results from large prospective trials addressing key issues are needed.

HCV Recurrence in HIV-Infected Patients After Liver Transplant

Patients coinfected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and HIV undergoing liver transplantation (LT) are at risk of early, aggressive HCV recurrence. This study investigates the use of frequent protocol-driven biopsies to identify HCV recurrence post LT in coinfected patients. Five consecutive HIV/HCV-coinfected patients underwent LT. Liver biopsies were obtained post LT at 1 hour; days 7, 120, and 365; then annually; and as clinically indicated. Stage 2 (Ishak) or higher fibrosis occurred in 4 of the 5 patients by 60, 120, 270, and 365 days. Two patients died of HCV recurrence and liver failure at 6 and 35 months post LT. Three patients survived more than 4 years after LT, 2 having sustained virologic responses to anti-HCV treatment. Another has histologic recurrence not responding to treatment. Hepatitis C virus recurrence can be rapid and aggressive after LT in HIV-coinfected patients. Serial biopsies identify recurrence early, allowing for prompt initiation of treatment.

Solid organ transplantation in HIV-infected individuals: an update

In the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), the survival of patients with HIV has improved. Increasing morbidity and mortality are now related to chronic liver and kidney disease. Transplantation in HIV patients has been reported for nearly two decades and outcomes have generally improved in the HAART era. This review summarises the published experiences with liver and kidney transplantation in HIV patients.

Human immunodeficiency virus and liver transplantation: our point of view

INTRODUCTION

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has been able to improve the immune system function and survival of HIV patients with a consequent increase in the number of HIV patients affected by end-stage liver disease (ESLD). Between June 2003 and October 2006, 10 HIV-positive patients underwent liver transplantations in our center.

METHODS

All patients were treated with HAART before transplantation; treatment was interrupted on transplantation day and was restarted once the patients' conditions stabilized. Five patients were hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive, 3 were hepatitis B virus (HBV)-positive, and 2 were HBV-HCV coinfected. HIV viral load before transplantation was <50 copies/mL in all cases. CD4+ cell count before transplantation ranged between 144 and 530 c/microL. Immunosuppression was based on Cyclosporine (CyA) and steroid weaning for 8 patients, and on Tacrolimus and steroid weaning for 2 patients.

RESULTS

Five patients were cytomegalovirus (CMV)-positive pp65 antigenemia posttransplantation, and 1 patient was EBV-positive; 2 patients had a coinfection with HHV6. Four patients suffered from a cholestatic HCV recurrent hepatitis treated with antiviral therapy (peginterferon and Ribavirin). Three patients died after transplantation.

DISCUSSION

The outcome of liver transplantation in HIV patients was influenced by infections (HCV, CMV, and EBV) and Kaposi's Sarcoma. HCV recurrence was more aggressive, showing a faster progression in this patient population. Drug interaction between HAART and immunosuppressants occurs; longer follow-up and better experience may improve the management of these drug interactions.

Inflammation and repair in viral hepatitis C

Hepatitis C viral infection (HCV) results in liver damage leading to inflammation and fibrosis of the liver and increasing rates of hepatic decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the host's immune response and viral determinants of liver disease progression are poorly understood. This review will address the determinants of liver injury in chronic HCV infection and the risk factors leading to rapid disease progression. We aim to better understand the factors that distinguish a relatively benign course of HCV from one with progression to cirrhosis. We will accomplish this task by discussion of three topics: (1) the role of cytokines in the adaptive immune response against the HCV infection; (2) the progression of fibrosis; and (3) the risk factors of co-morbidity with alcohol and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in HCV-infected individuals. Despite recent improvements in treating HCV infection using pegylated interferon alpha (PEGIFN-alpha) and ribavirin, about half of individuals infected with some genotypes, for example genotypes 1 and 4, will not respond to treatment or cannot be treated because of contraindications. This review will also aim to describe the importance of IFN-alpha-based therapies in HCV infection, ways of monitoring them, and associated complications.

Ethical and scientific issues surrounding solid organ transplantation in HIV-positive patients: Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence

End-stage liver disease is emerging as a leading cause of death among HIV-positive patients. Historically, an HIV diagnosis was a contraindication for a liver transplant; however, because of the efficacy of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), HIV-positive patients have one-year, two-year, and three-year post-transplantation survival rates similar to that of HIV-negative patients. Based on this evidence, HIV-positive patients are now considered eligible for transplantation. However, newly emerging guidelines include the stipulation that HIV-positive patients must be on HAART to be placed on a waiting list for transplantation. The purpose of the present paper is to evaluate the scientific and ethical probity of requiring HIV-positive patients to be on HAART as a condition for being on a liver transplant waiting list. It is argued that the emphasis should be placed on the probability of post-transplantation HAART tolerance, and that concerns about pretransplantation HAART tolerance are of secondary importance.

Long-term follow-up of a heart transplant recipient with documented seroconversion to HIV-positive status 1 year after transplant

Whether human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) should be an absolute contraindication to heart transplantation has been a topic of recent discussion. There is a paucity of data regarding the expected outcome of heart transplantation in a recipient who is HIV positive. Herein, we report the case and long-term follow-up of a woman who was found to have seroconverted to HIV positive status 1 year after transplant.

Impact of human immunodeficiency virus on survival after liver transplantation: analysis of United Network for Organ Sharing database

BACKGROUND

The outcome of liver transplantation (LT) in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) has been a matter of controversy.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed to assess the impact of HIV on LT survival by using United Network for Organ Sharing registry Standard Transplant Analysis and Research files.

RESULTS

A total of 138 HIV(+) and 30,520 HIV(-) patients who were > or =18 years old and underwent LT during the highly active antiretroviral therapy era (starting January 1, 1997) in the United States were included. Among all HIV(+) patients, the estimated 2-year survival probability was lower (70%) than among non-HIV patients (81%). This excess risk appeared entirely among those with coinfections, that is, HIV with hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus (HCV), as none of the 24 HIV-infected patients who did not have hepatitis B virus or HCV died during an average of 1.2 years of follow-up per person. Among HCV(+) patients, those with HIV coinfection had significantly lower survival rates than patients without HIV (P=0.006). Controlling for age, coinfection, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores, and other potential confounders in a proportional hazards regression analysis, HIV(+) patients had a hazard ratio of 1.41 (P=0.14, 95% confidence interval: 0.90-2.22) for mortality after LT.

CONCLUSION

HIV(+) patients without HCV coinfection seemed to have good prognosis, whereas patients who had HIV/HCV coinfection had poor outcomes, which were significantly worse than that seen in those with HCV alone.

Hepatocellular carcinoma, human immunodeficiency virus and viral hepatitis in the HAART era

The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is rising. HCC in HIV almost invariably occurs in the context of hepatitis C virus (HCV) or hepatitis B virus (HBV) co-infection and, on account of shared modes of transmission, this occurs in more than 33% and 10% of patients with HIV worldwide respectively. It has yet to be clearly established whether HIV directly accelerates HCC pathogenesis or whether the rising incidence is an epiphenomenon of the highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) era, wherein the increased longevity of patients with HIV allows long-term complications of viral hepatitis and cirrhosis to develop. Answering this question will have implications for HCC surveillance and the timing of HCV/HBV therapy, which in HIV co-infection presents unique challenges. Once HCC develops, there is growing evidence that HIV co-infection should not preclude conventional therapeutic strategies, including liver transplantation.

Liver transplantation in HIV-positive patients

This article reviews the worldwide evolution of liver transplantation as a therapeutic intervention in HIV-infected patients. Since the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), liver disease secondary to viral hepatitis has become a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among HIV-positive individuals. The authors contrast survival data from pilot studies in the pre-HAART era to those data emerging from more recent trials. Particular emphasis is placed on current selection criteria for HIV-positive transplant candidates. Additional consideration is given to the effect of prolonged transplant waiting time on survival outcome. The complexity of the post-transplant medication regime, including drug interactions, optimal immunosuppression and most appropriate HAART regimes, are discussed in detail. Postoperative challenges including optimal management of hepatitis B virus and recurrent hepatitis C virus post-transplant are reviewed separately. The ethical and practical arguments relating to the use of a scarce and valuable resource in this population are debated. The authors conclude with several recommendations to assist pretransplant assessment and postoperative management of such complex patients and speculate on the direction and evolution of this field in the coming years.

Survival and recurrence of hepatitis C after liver transplantation in patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus

Liver transplantation in patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a recent indication. In a single center, we have compared the survival and severity of recurrent HCV infection after liver transplantation in HIV-HCV-coinfected and HCV-monoinfected patients. Seventy-nine patients receiving a first liver graft for HCV-related liver disease between 1999 and 2005 were included. Among them, 35 had highly active antiretroviral therapy-controlled HIV infection. All patients were monitored for HCV viral load and liver histology during the posttransplantation course. Coinfected patients were younger (43 +/- 6 versus 55 +/- 8 years, P < 0.0001) and had a higher Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score (18.8 +/- 7.4 versus 14.8 +/- 4.7; P = 0.008). The 2-year and 5-year survival rates were 73% and 51% and 91% and 81% in coinfected patients and monoinfected patients, respectively (log-rank P = 0.004). Under multivariate Cox analysis, survival was related only to the MELD score (P = 0.03; risk ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.01, 1.15). Using the Kaplan-Meier method, the progression to fibrosis >or= F2 was significantly higher in the coinfected group (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The results of liver transplantation in HIV-HCV-coinfected patients were satisfactory in terms of survival benefit. Earlier referral of these patients to a liver transplant unit, the use of new drugs effective against HCV, and an avoidance of drug toxicity are mandatory if we are to improve the results of this challenging indication for liver transplantation.

[Liver transplantation for patients infected with both HIV and HCV or HIV and HBV]

Human immunodeficiency virus infection (HIV) has been considered until recently as a contraindication for liver transplantation. This was due to the poor spontaneous prognosis of HIV infection. The advent of highly active antiretroviral drugs (HAART) was a therapeutic breakthrough, and the prognosis has been dramatically improved. 30 % and 10 % of HIV infected patients are coinfected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and with hepatitis B virus (HBV), respectively. The progression of chronic hepatitis B and C seems more rapid in coinfected patients, and a high number of patients will develop life-threatening liver cirrhosis. There are numerous potential problems raised by liver transplantation in HIV infected patients: (1) the potential risk of needlestick injury during this type of hemorrhagic surgery at high risk of bleeding; (2) the timing for liver transplantation; (3) the risk of interference between HAART and calcineurin inhibitors; (4) The risk of HBV and HCV recurrence post-transplant. Since 1999, a program of liver transplantation has been started in patients coinfected with HIV and HBV or HCV with the support of the Agence Nationale de Recherche contre le Sida et les Hépatites virales (ANRS). The first results showed that liver transplantation in HIV-HCV and HIV-HBV infected patients is feasible, achieving 2-year survival of 70 % and 100 %, respectively. There was no acceleration of HIV disease after transplantation. HBV recurrence was well prevented by the combination of anti-HBs immunoglobulins plus nucleoside and nucleotide analogues effective against HBV. The main problem is HCV recurrence, which is more rapid and more severe in HIV coinfected patients than in HCV monoinfected patients. Understanding HCV recurrence mechanisms, and preventing and treating of HCV recurrence are major future challenges.

Outcomes after orthotopic liver transplantation in 15 HIV-infected patients

BACKGROUND

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has been associated with poor outcomes after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has led to an increasing number of successful OLTs. The aim of this study was to examine survival and cause-specific mortality in HIV-infected patients after OLT at our institution.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all HIV patients that underwent OLT was compared to all non-HIV patients undergoing OLT during the same period. Cumulative patient and cause-specific survival were calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods; the log-rank test was used to compare the two cohorts. Fifteen HIV-infected patients and 857 non-HIV patients underwent OLT between June 1, 1999 and May 1, 2006.

RESULTS

The actuarial 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates posttransplant (+/-standard error) were 73.3% (+/-11.4%) for the HIV group (unchanged from 1 to 3 years) versus 86.9% (+/-1.2%), 82.0% (+/-1.4%), and 79.4% (+/-1.5%) for the non-HIV group. Cumulative survival among HIV-infected recipients was not different from the non-HIV population (P=0.20). A difference was observed between the two groups in mortality rates due to infectious causes: the percentage of HIV patients dying from infection was 26.7% (4 of 15) vs. 8.2% (70 of 857) in the non-HIV group (P=0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

PostOLT survival was comparable in HIV and non-HIV recipients; however, HIV patients had significantly higher mortality from infectious complications. This difference occurred despite adequate control of HIV postOLT. These findings suggest that OLT can be safely performed for HIV-infected patients; however, these patients are at higher risk of mortality from infectious complications.

Evolving clinical strategies for transplantation in the HIV-positive recipient

The transplant community has been slow to recognize the efficacy of highly active antiretroviral therapy in changing the course of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection to a chronic condition. People infected with HIV are dying less often from progression of HIV to acquired immune deficiency syndrome. Unfortunately, there is an increasing rate of morbidity and mortality from comorbidities resulting in end-stage liver and kidney disease, prompting some transplant centers to eliminate HIV infection as a contraindication to transplantation. This overview will describe the evolving clinical strategies that have resulted in good outcomes after solid organ transplantation in the HIV-positive recipient.

Antiviral therapy for hepatitis C virus recurrence after liver transplantation in HIV-infected patients: outcome in the Bonn cohort

Recurrent hepatitis C is a major cause of mortality in HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV)-co-infected patients after orthotopic liver transplantation. We report sustained viral clearance in all four transplanted HIV/HCV-positive patients treated with pegylated interferon/ribavirin. Early therapy after HCV recurrence, tailoring treatment duration to the individual decline in HCV-RNA and the management of side effects are key factors for improved efficacy. At experienced centres interferon treatment is a valuable option for recurrent hepatitis C in HIV-positive patients.

Barriers preventing liver transplantation in Canadians with HIV-infection--perceptions of HIV specialists

Liver transplantation is a life-saving procedure with demonstrated utility. There are accumulating data indicating that this procedure is helpful in HIV-infected patients as well. Liver transplantation is currently largely unavailable to those living with HIV in Canada. Understanding the obstacles to this procedure is the first step to increasing access. Between August 2005 and November 2005, HIV physicians, one from each Canadian HIV Trials Network site, were asked to complete a quantitative questionnaire on adult liver transplant access and need. Forty-six per cent (16 of 35) of sites responded. A median 20% of the nearly 12,700 HIV patients followed at these sites had concurrent liver disease (20% caused by hepatitis C virus, 5% caused by hepatitis B virus and 5% were alcohol-related). On average, two patients per site were thought to be appropriate candidates for liver transplant evaluation. Eighty per cent of respondents anticipated increased need for liver transplantation over the next five years. Organ supply was universally identified as the chief obstacle to transplantation in patients with HIV. Other key issues included risk of hepatitis C virus reinfection and transplant surgical team willingness. Based on these data, it is believed that these issues should be the focus of efforts designed to increase access to transplantation in Canadians with end-stage liver disease and concurrent HIV.

Liver transplantation in HIV-HCV coinfected patients: a case-control study

Liver transplantation (LT) for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-associated cirrhosis in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients was compared with non-HIV patients. Nine patients with HIV-HCV coinfection were compared with patients transplanted before and after each HIV patient (control group). Immunosuppression consisted in tacrolimus with steroids or mycophenolate mofetil. Acute cellular rejection and three-year actuarial patient survival were respectively 44% and 87.5% in HIV group and 22% and 93.7% in the control group (P=NS). Acute hepatitis C virus occurred earlier (2.3 vs. 4.3 months) and was more cholestatic (mean bilirubin: 10.8 vs. 1.6 mg/dL) in the HIV group. Eight (100%) HIV and nine (64.3%) control patients received antiviral treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin. One patient (11.1%) of the control group and one patient (20%) of the HIV group presented a sustained virologic response (P=NS). Short- to midterm results of LT in HIV-HCV co-infected patients were excellent and similar to non-HIV patients.

Hepatitis C in HIV-positive patients--treatment and liver disease outcomes

Many human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infected persons are coinfected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and with the use of highly active antiretroviral therapy, liver disease from HCV has become an important cause of morbidity and mortality. The current guidelines recommend that human immunodeficiency virus and HCV coinfected patients be evaluated and treated for HCV if there are no major contraindications to treatment. Coinfected patients treated with pegylated interferon-a and ribavirin have sustained virologic responses (SVRs) of 27% to 40% which for a variety of reasons are lower than those reported in HCV mono-infected patients. Understanding that most patients will not achieve SVRs, strategies to evaluate for the role of maintenance interferon in delaying complications of liver disease are being evaluated. In patients who have failed prior treatment, cannot tolerate treatment, or who have contraindications to HCV treatment, the use of highly active antiretroviral therapy with careful monitoring for hepatotoxicity and aggressive counseling on alcohol and substance abuse may slow down fibrosis progression. As the data on liver transplantation in coinfected patients accumulate, patients with end stage liver disease should be referred early for evaluation in a transplant center. As new drugs for HCV are being developed, it will be of utmost importance to include coinfected patients earlier in the process on new drug trials and therapeutic strategies.

Survival of liver transplant patients coinfected with HIV and HCV is adversely impacted by recurrent hepatitis C

Although liver transplantation (LTx) in HIV-positive patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has been successful, some have reported poorer outcomes in patients coinfected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). Here we discuss the impact of recurrent HCV on 27 HIV-positive patients who underwent LTx. HIV infection was well controlled post-transplantation. Survival in HIV-positive/HCV-positive patients was shorter compared to a cohort of HIV-negative/HCV-positive patients matched in age, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, and time of transplant, with cumulative 1-, 3- and 5-year patient survival of 66.7%, 55.6% and 33.3% versus 75.7%, 71.6% and 71.6%, respectively, although not significantly (p = 0.07), and there was a higher likelihood of developing cirrhosis or dying from an HCV-related complication in coinfected subjects (RR = 2.6, 95% CI, 1.06-6.35; p = 0.03). Risk factors for poor survival included African-American race (p = 0.02), MELD score > 20 (p = 0.05), HAART intolerance postLTx (p = 0.01), and postLTx HCV RNA > 30000000 IU/mL (p = 0.00). Recurrent HCV in 18 patients was associated with eight deaths, including three from fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis. Among surviving coinfected recipients, five are alive at least 3 years after LTx, and of 15 patients treated with interferon-alpha/ribavirin, six (40%) are HCV RNA negative, including four with sustained virological response. Hepatitis C is a major cause of graft loss and patient mortality in coinfected patients undergoing LTx.

Early Antiviral Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus Recurrence after Liver Transplantation in HIV-Infected Patients

Objective

To investigate the efficacy of early antiviral treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients undergoing liver transplantation for end-stage liver disease.

Methods

Open prospective trial of early treatment of HCV recurrence in consecutive HIV/HCV-coinfected patients transplanted at a tertiary hospital in Barcelona between 2002 and 2004. All patients had indication for liver transplantation, no previous CDC class C HIV-associated opportunistic events, a CD4+ T-cell count >100 cells/fxl, and undetectable plasma HIV RNA on highly active antiretroviral therapy. Treatment with pegylated interferon-a2b (1.5 μg/kg/week) and ribavirin (800–1000 mg/day) was given for 24 to 48 weeks, as soon as HCV recurrence was histologically documented.

Results

Of six patients who underwent transplant, five patients surviving the early post-transplantation period developed HCV recurrence, presenting as severe cholestatic hepatitis in three, and were started on antiviral treatment a median of 12 weeks (range: 5–31) after transplantation. After a median follow-up of 24 months all treated patients were alive. Biochemical response was achieved in all patients, although only one achieved a sustained virological response. Mild rejection before HCV recurrence occurred in two cases. Treatment was well tolerated with no episodes of rejection or mitochondrial toxicity. No patient required modification of the antiretroviral regimen. Liver biopsies performed in patients without virological response, 12–34 months after transplantation, showed cirrhosis in two and moderate chronic active hepatitis in the remainder.

Conclusions

Despite early antiviral treatment, severe HCV recurrence after liver transplantation may compromise long-term survival in HIV-infected patients. Improved treatment strategies for these patients are urgently required.

Complete weaning off immunosuppression in HCV liver transplant recipients is feasible and favourably impacts on the progression of disease recurrence

BACKGROUND/AIMS

HCV-related disease recurrence progresses rapidly after liver transplantation. We hypothesised that withdrawal of immunosuppression might favourably impact on disease progression.

METHODS

Weaning off immunosuppression was attempted in 34 HCV-RNA positive patients (mean age 62+/-6.4 years) transplanted 63.5+/-20.1 months earlier, under cyclosporine A monotherapy. Patients were followed for 3 years including yearly protocol liver biopsies. Primary endpoints were feasibility of weaning off immunosuppression and its impact on disease progression. Secondary endpoint was to identify predictors of an immunosuppression-free state and fibrosis progression.

RESULTS

Complete and permanent immunosuppression withdrawal was achieved in 8 patients (23.4%), whereas 14 (41.2%) developed rejection within eight months despite an initial response and 12 (35.2%) rejected during tapering. After a mean follow-up 45.5+/-5.8 months weaned patients showed stabilisation/improvement of histological fibrosis (P<0.01), lower necro-inflammation (P<0.02) and improved liver function (P<0.05) compared to weaning-intolerants. Multiple logistic regression identified low blood cyclosporine A trough levels during the first post-transplant week (P=0.004) and initial steroid-free immunosuppression (P<0.008) as independent predictors of sustained weaning. Achievement of immunosoppression freedom (P=0.02) and baseline staging score (P<0.0001) were independently associated with stabilisation/improvement of histological fibrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Reconstitution of immune-competence in the host improves the natural history of HCV recurrence in the graft.

Orthotopic liver transplantation in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients: outcome of 7 patients from the Bonn cohort

The outcome and clinical features of 7 HIV-positive patients who were liver transplanted at Bonn University in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) between 1997 and 2004, analyzed by retrospective chart review, are reported. Reasons for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) were end-stage liver disease due to chronic hepatitis C (n = 4) or hepatitis B (n = 1) or acute liver failure due to fulminant hepatitis B (n = 2). Immunosuppression was based on cyclosporine A and prednisone. HAART was reinitiated 1 month after transplantation, and immunosuppression was carefully adapted to account for drug-drug interactions between cyclosporine A and protease inihibitors. Prednisone was withdrawn 5 months (median) after OLT when immunosuppression had been reliably established in the presence of HAART. One patient died 95 days after OLT due intrathoracic hemorrhage, whereas 6 patients were alive at a median of 24 months. A single episode of acute rejection was observed. The spectrum of postoperative complications was no different from HIV-negative patients apart from Kaposi's sarcoma and multicentric Castleman's disease in a single patient. Recurrent hepatitis B infection was efficiently prevented, whereas hepatitis C reinfection occurred in all 4 patients who had preexisting hepatitis C. Earlier reports on fatal courses of recurrent hepatitis C infection, high rates of organ rejection, and HAART-related liver toxicity were not observed in our patients. In conclusion, even though preliminary, our data suggest that outcomes after liver transplantation of HIV-infected patients can be improved.

[GESIDA/GESITRA-SEIMC, PNS and ONT consensus document on solid organ transplant (SOT) in HIV-infected patients in Spain (March, 2005)]

Solid organ transplant may be the only therapeutic alternative in some HIV-infected patients. Experience in North America and Europe during the last five years shows that survival at three years after an organ transplant is similar to that observed in HIV-negative patients. The criteria agreed upon to select HIV patients for transplant are: no opportunistic infections (except tuberculosis, oesophageal candidiasis or P. jiroveci -previously carinii- pneumonia), CD4 lymphocyte count above 200 cells/.L (100 cells/.L in the case of liver transplant) and an HIV viral load which is undetectable or suppressible with antiretroviral therapy. Another criterion is a two-year abstinence from heroin and cocaine, although the patient may be in a methadone programme. The main problems in the post-transplant period are pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between antiretorivirals and immunosuppressors, rejection and the management of relapse of HCV infection, which is one of the main causes of post-liver transplant mortality. Up to now, experience with pegylated interferon and ribavirin is scarce in this population. The English version of the manuscript is available at http://www.gesidaseimc.com.

Outcomes among Patients with End-Stage Liver Disease Who Are Coinfected with HIV and Hepatitis C Virus

In at-risk populations, shared routes of transmission lead to high rates of concordance between infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 and hepatitis C virus (HCV). In the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), end-stage liver disease (ESLD) has emerged as a leading cause of mortality in coinfected patients. HAART-related toxicities have been implicated, especially when given to patients with viral hepatitis. Rates of response to treatment for HCV infection in coinfected patients continue to lag behind those in monoinfected patients, even with the advent of pegylated interferons. Liver transplantation has been approached with caution in this population because of concern about the sequelae of immunosuppression and HAART-related hepatotoxicity, and results have been conflicting. Clinical and serological markers of ESLD in coinfected patients, management of cirrhosis, and the appropriateness of transplantation are discussed.

Determinants of transplant surgeons' willingness to provide organs to patients infected with HBV, HCV or HIV

The common provision of organs to patients infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV), but not to those infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), has been attributed to perceived or real differences in transplantation efficacy among these populations. However, other explanations remain possible. We surveyed all active U.S. transplant surgeons to identify determinants of their views of the propriety of transplantation among HBV-, HCV-, and HIV-infected patients. The 347 surgeons (56.1%) returning completed questionnaires believed that HCV- and HIV-infected patients have similar post-transplant survival (p = 0.9), but that both groups fare worse than HBV-infected patients (p < 0.00001 for both comparisons). Most transplant surgeons considered HBV- and HCV-infected patients to be appropriate transplantation candidates (p = 1.0 for this comparison), whereas one-third considered HIV-infected patients to be appropriate candidates (p < 0.00001 when compared with HBV- or HCV-infected patients). That surgeons are generally willing to transplant HCV-infected patients but not HIV-infected patients, and yet believe these groups will have similar post-transplant survival, suggests that survival estimates alone do not explain surgeons' choices. HIV-infected patients should have equal access to organs unless or until evidence emerges that they fare substantially worse than other potential recipients.

The clinical characteristics of HIV-infected patients receiving dialysis in France between 1997 and 2002

BACKGROUND

In 1997, 0.38% of dialysis patients in France were infected by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). No prevalence data were available in France since the widespread introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional epidemiologic survey. A questionnaire was sent to all French dialysis centers in July 2002. The centers that did not respond were sent 3 additional mailing reminders. Finally, the nonresponding centers were called early in 2004.

RESULTS

Of the 27,577 patients on hemodialysis and 587 patients on peritoneal dialysis, 190 patients (0.67%) were infected by HIV. HIV-associated nephropathy was the cause of renal failure in 39.8% patients. Mean age was 44.6 +/- 10.9 years, the mean duration of dialysis was 4.9 +/- 5.9 years, the mean known duration of HIV infection was 8.9 +/- 5.6 years. Eighty-two percent of patients received antiretroviral therapy (ART). Fifty-eight percent of ART-treated patients had an undetectable HIV plasma viral load with a median CD4+ T-cell count 303/mm(3).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of HIV infection among French dialysis patients was 0.67% in late 2002, a 79% increase since 1997. Possible reasons for this large increase include increased access to dialysis, better general status of HIV dialysis patients, and increasing proportion of patients originating from Africa and the Caribbean. The current efficacy of ART makes renal transplantation a realistic option for these young patients.

Hepatitis C virus viral recurrence and liver mitochondrial damage after liver transplantation in HIV-HCV co-infected patients

BACKGROUND/AIMS

As life expectancy in HIV-HCV co-infected patients improves, end stage liver disease requiring liver transplantation (LT) may become an emerging problem. We report the Paul Brousse Hospital experience of transplantation for end stage cirrhosis in HIV-HCV co-infected patients.

METHODS

Seven consecutive HIV-HCV co-infected patients were transplanted between December 1999 and December 2002 for end stage liver disease due to HCV. All patients were treated by highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), HIV plasma viral load was <400 copies/ml and median CD4 lymphocyte count was 306 cells/mm3 (range, 103-510) before LT. At the time of evaluation (March 2003), the median follow-up was 21 months (range, 4-40).

RESULTS

Two patients died, 4 and 22 months, respectively after LT. At the last biopsy, METAVIR score was staged F4 in two patients, F3 in two, and F1 in one. Microvesicular steatosis was noted in nearly all patients. The ratio of mitochondrial to nuclear DNA was low in three of four patients examined as compared with the amount of liver mtDNA found in eight HIV-negative, HCV-infected controls (P=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

A significant defect in the activity of the respiratory chain complex IV was noted in all five patients studied. Mitochondrial hepatotoxicity and severe HCV recurrence occur in HIV-HCV co-infected patients after LT.

Outcome after orthotopic liver transplantation in five HIV-infected patients with virus hepatitis-induced cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

We report on our experiences with orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in HIV-infected patients. Between July 1998 and October 2001, five HIV-infected patients underwent OLT because of virus-induced liver cirrhosis. One patient suffered from hepatitis B virus (HBV)-, three patients from hepatitis C virus (HCV)- and one patient from HCV/HBV/HDV-related cirrhosis (HDV, hepatitis D virus). The mean duration of HIV infection was 15 years. Patients were prospectively followed up with a mean duration of 25.6 months.

RESULTS

Three patients died 3, 10 and 31 months after OLT, respectively, due to graft failure. The causes of graft failure were: recurrent thrombosis of the hepatic artery, HCV-associated cholestatic hepatitis and chemotherapy-induced liver damage due to Hodgkin's disease, which was diagnosed 17 months after OLT, in addition to chronic HCV disease. The two survivors show a stable liver function and non-progredient HIV infection under antiretroviral therapy 61 and 23 months after OLT, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A medium- or even long-term survival after OLT can be achieved in HIV-infected patients without progression of HIV disease under antiretroviral therapy. However, in our study three out of five patients died due to graft failure. Therefore, prognostic criteria have to be defined for the selection of HIV-infected patients, who may benefit from OLT.

Transplantation hépatique chez l’adulte

Liver transplantation allows to treat patients with end-stage cirrhosis as well as some liver malignancies (small size hepatocellular carcinoma) with a life expectancy exceeding 70 and 60 % at 5 years, respectively. Current immunosuppressive agents make it possible to prevent chronic rejection in more than 90 % of the patients and to preserve an excellent quality of life in most cases. The principal limiting factor for liver transplantation is represented by the scarcity of brain-dead donors. Indeed, despite the selection of those candidates who have the best chance of surviving after transplantation, several months are usually necessary for obtaining a graft and the mortality on the waiting list may reach 10 to 15 %. Organ shortage incited to develop alternatives to conventional transplantation, the most important of which are living donor transplantation and split liver transplantation. Living donor transplantation can be applied to about 20 to 30 % of candidates. Thought initially smaller, the partial graft regenerates and its volume is restored within a few weeks. The results of living donor transplantation in terms of survival are comparable to those of cadaveric transplantation. The risk for the donor has to be lower than 1 % which makes that selection must be especially cautious. Donors must be direct relatives or spouses. Split liver transplantation technique, based on the separation of a cadaveric graft into two functional parts transplanted in two distinct recipients, although attractive, is applicable to less than 25 % of the donors. Education for organ donation in the general population still remains a priority.