Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction study of delavirdine and indinavir in healthy volunteers

CD4-gp120 interaction interface - a gateway for HIV-1 infection in human: molecular network, modeling and docking studies

The major causative agent for Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) is Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 (HIV-1). HIV-1 is a predominant subtype of HIV which counts on human cellular mechanism virtually in every aspect of its life cycle. Binding of viral envelope glycoprotein-gp120 with human cell surface CD4 receptor triggers the early infection stage of HIV-1. This study focuses on the interaction interface between these two proteins that play a crucial role for viral infectivity. The CD4-gp120 interaction interface has been studied through a comprehensive protein-protein interaction network (PPIN) analysis and highlighted as a useful step towards identifying potential therapeutic drug targets against HIV-1 infection. We prioritized gp41, Nef and Tat proteins of HIV-1 as valuable drug targets at early stage of viral infection. Lack of crystal structure has made it difficult to understand the biological implication of these proteins during disease progression. Here, computational protein modeling techniques and molecular dynamics simulations were performed to generate three-dimensional models of these targets. Besides, molecular docking was initiated to determine the desirability of these target proteins for already available HIV-1 specific drugs which indicates the usefulness of these protein structures to identify an effective drug combination therapy against AIDS.

Effect of Food on the Steady-State Pharmacokinetics of Delavirdine in Patients with HIV Infection

OBJECTIVE

In a prior single-dose study that examined the effect of food on delavirdine pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers, the absorption of delavirdine mesylate was delayed and the area under the curve was reduced by 26% in the presence of food. Since the complex, nonlinear pharmacokinetics of delavirdine do not permit a simple extrapolation of the results of a single-dose study to steady state, the present multiple-dose study was performed.

PATIENTS AND STUDY DESIGN

Thirteen stable patients with HIV-1 infection (two females, 11 males; CD4 count range 124-588 cells/mm(3)) completed a randomised, crossover study in which subjects received two 14-day treatments with delavirdine mesylate 400mg every 8 hours. In treatment A, all delavirdine doses were administered on an empty stomach and in treatment B were taken with food. A pharmacokinetic evaluation was performed on day 14 of each treatment period.

SETTING

An ambulatory AIDS research centre in an academic medical centre.

INTERVENTIONS

Administration of delavirdine with and without food.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pharmacokinetic parameters for delavirdine.

RESULTS

The maximum concentration (C(max)) [+/- standard deviation] in treatment A was 29.6 +/- 13.6muM and in treatment B it was 23.0 +/- 8.61muM (p = 0.037). The minimum concentrations (C(min)) were 9.45 +/- 6.7muM and 11.2 +/- 9.2muM, respectively (p > 0.05). The oral clearances (CL(oral)) were 17.8 +/- 41.6 L/h (treatment A) and 18.5 +/- 39.0 L/h (treatment B) [p > 0.05]. Similar patterns were observed for N-dealkylated delavirdine with a significant difference only in C(max) (4.13 vs 3.47muM [p = 0.022], treatment A vs B).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicated that, in contrast to the increased CL(oral) noted in a prior single-dose study, food did not have a significant effect at steady state on the area under the plasma concentration-time curve or C(min). Although C(max) was significantly lower when the drug was taken taken with food, the clinical relevance of this parameter as compared with the trough concentration is unclear since the current focus for antiretrovirals is on maintaining trough concentrations in excess of in vitro inhibitory concentrations.

Multiple-Dose Pharmacokinetics of Delavirdine Mesylate and Didanosine in HIV-Infected Patients

BACKGROUND

Delavirdine is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor with pH-dependent absorption characteristics that has received accelerated approval for the treatment of patients with HIV-1 infection. In a prior single-dose study concurrent administration of delavirdine mesylate and didanosine (buffered formulation) resulted in up to a 31% decrease in the area under the plasma delavirdine concentration versus time curve (AUC) compared with when both drugs were taken separately.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the interaction of these two agents at steady state.

STUDY DESIGN AND PATIENTS

A total of 11 HIV-infected subjects who were previously stabilised on didanosine were enrolled into a randomised, open-labelled crossover study. Nine subjects continued to receive their prescribed dose and schedule of didanosine, with each dose of didanosine taken either together with or 1 hour after delavirdine mesylate (400mg every 8 hours). Pharmacokinetic studies at baseline, day 14 and day 28 were conducted and the plasma concentrations of delavirdine and didanosine were determined.

RESULTS

A lower delavirdine maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) [22.4 +/- 11 vs 35.5 +/- 17muM; p = 0.045] was noted when delavirdine and didanosine were taken together. However, no significant difference was noted for delavirdine AUC (114 +/- 56 muM.h compared with 153 +/- 79 muM.h [p = 0.181]). In addition, no differences were noted for didanosine pharmacokinetic parameters between treatments.

CONCLUSION

These data indicate that patients receiving didanosine and delavirdine as part of a combination regimen during long-term therapy can be instructed to take them together in an attempt to enhance adherence to treatment with both antiretroviral agents.

Nucleoside Analogue-Sparing Strategy for the Treatment of Chronic HIV Infection: Potential Interest and Clinical Experience

Nucleoside analogue-sparing antiretroviral combinations may be interesting as first-line therapies as they spare a complete class of drugs that will remain fully active for later use and prevent the risk of mitochondrial toxicity related to exposure to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). This strategy is also used in patients failing NRTIs with cross-resistance to compounds in this class. Different combinations of antiretroviral drugs are theoretically available. Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) associated with protease inhibitor (PI) and boosted double-PI combinations have been studied through small, non-comparative clinical studies and preliminary results suggest that they are efficient and often well-tolerated. However, NNRTIs and PIs are extensively metabolized in the liver through cytochrome P450, leading to pharmacokinetic interactions; a good knowledge of the interactions between NNRTIs and PIs, or between PIs, is helpful in assisting physicians in clinical practice in choosing drugs and doses. Access to a therapeutic drug monitoring service to confirm that appropriate drug exposures are achieved is useful when using such regimens. Some negative kinetic interactions may lead to complicated combinations with a high pill burden that reduces their applicability. Gastrointestinal toxicity often remains a limiting factor in the use of boosted double-PI combinations. Non-comparative studies have allowed selection of NRTI-sparing options that now need to be compared with the current standard of care in comparative clinical trials before being considered as valuable options. Other NRTI-sparing therapeutic strategies are emerging: PI monotherapy with lopinavir/ritonavir has been evaluated in a small group of naive patients and appears promising. Drugs belonging to new classes currently under investigation, such as entry inhibitors, might be included early in the antiretroviral treatment of patients as soon as compounds with a convenient route of administration are available, increasing the number of therapeutic combinations without NRTIs.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Delavirdine and N-Delavirdine in HIV-Infected Individuals

OBJECTIVE

Delavirdine is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor used in combination regimens for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. Our objective was to characterise the population pharmacokinetics of delavirdine in HIV-infected patients who participated in the adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) 260 and 261 studies.

METHODS

ACTG 261 was a randomised, double-blind study of delavirdine 400mg three times daily, in various combination regimens; ACTG 260 was a concentration-targeted monotherapy study. Two hundred and thirty-four patients, and 1254 and 1251 plasma concentrations for delavirdine and N-delavirdine, respectively, were available for population pharmacokinetic analysis. The pharmacokinetic model (and initial parameters), based on previous studies, included two compartments for delavirdine (peripheral and central) and parallel clearance pathways (nonlinear conversion to N-delavirdine and first order clearance from the body). The model was one compartment for N-delavirdine with first order clearance. Diurnal variation of delavirdine and N-delavirdine oral clearance was modelled as a cosine function, with amplitude variation a fitted parameter. Pharmacokinetic parameter estimates were derived from iterative two-stage analysis; observed delavirdine and N-delavirdine concentrations fit with weighting by the inverse observation variance. Covariates were analysed by multiple general linear modelling.

RESULTS

The mean (percent coefficient of variation [%CV]) CD4 count was 315 (109) cells/mm(3), weight 76.9 (14.7) kg, age 37 (8.5) years, and 15% of the population were women. Mean (%CV) population pharmacokinetic parameter estimates for delavirdine were: volume of distribution at steady state 67.6 (100) L, intrinsic oral clearance 19.8 (64) L/h, concentration at half the maximum velocity of metabolism (V(max)) 6.3 (69) micromol/L and first order oral clearance 0.57 (86) L/h. For N-delavirdine, the mean (%CV) apparent volume of distribution was 24.7 (75) L and apparent clearance 29.7 (42) L/h. The mean V(max) was 1376 (68) mg/day. The final model for average intrinsic clearance of delavirdine included race, sex, weight and age as significant covariates (p < 0.05); however, these covariates do not explain a significant proportion of the overall variability in the population.

CONCLUSIONS

Delavirdine disposition exhibits nonlinear pharmacokinetics and large interpatient variability, and is significantly altered by time of day (impacting potential therapeutic drug monitoring and future pharmacokinetic study designs). Although race and sex appear to influence delavirdine pharmacokinetics, men and women and patients of different races should receive similar mg/kg dosage regimens. The presence of large interpatient variability supports the further investigation of the utility of therapeutic drug monitoring for delavirdine, if target drug concentrations can be better defined.

Pharmacokinetics of ritonavir and delavirdine in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients

To evaluate the pharmacokinetic effect of adding delavirdine mesylate to the antiretroviral regimens of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients stabilized on a full dosage of ritonavir (600 mg every 12 h), 12 HIV-1-infected subjects had delavirdine mesylate (400 mg every 8 h) added to their current antiretroviral regimens for 21 days. Ritonavir pharmacokinetics were evaluated before (day 7) and after (day 28) the addition of delavirdine, and delavirdine pharmacokinetics were evaluated on day 28. The mean values (+/- standard deviations) for the maximum concentration in serum (C(max)) of ritonavir, the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h (AUC(0-12)), and the minimum concentration in serum (C(min)) of ritonavir before the addition of delavirdine were 14.8 +/- 6.7 micro M, 94 +/- 36 micro M. h, and 3.6 +/- 2.1 micro M, respectively. These same parameters were increased to 24.6 +/- 13.9 micro M, 154 +/- 83 micro M. h, and 6.52 +/- 4.85 micro M, respectively, after the addition of delavirdine (P is <0.05 for all comparisons). Delavirdine pharmacokinetic parameters in the presence of ritonavir included a C(max) of 23 +/- 16 micro M, an AUC(0-8) of 114 +/- 75 micro M. h, and a C(min) of 9.1 +/- 7.5 micro M. Therefore, delavirdine increases systemic exposure to ritonavir by 50 to 80% when the drugs are coadministered.

Pharmacokinetic interaction between amprenavir and delavirdine after multiple-dose administration in healthy volunteers

AIMS

To evaluate the safety and the pharmacokinetic interaction between amprenavir and delavirdine after multiple dose administration in healthy volunteers.

METHODS

This was a prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled, two-sequence, two-period multiple dose study with 18 healthy subjects. Volunteers were randomly assigned to amprenavir, 600 mg twice a day, or delavirdine, 600 mg twice a day, for 10 days, followed by both drugs for another 10 days with pharmacokinetic evaluation on day 10 and day 20. Adverse events were recorded throughout the study.

RESULTS

Amprenavir decreased all the delavirdine pharmacokinetic parameters apart from tmax. Delavirdine C12h dropped from 7,916 to 933 ng ml-1 (median decrease 5,930 ng ml-1, 95% CI 3,013, 8,955 ng ml-1). A decrease in amprenavir t(1/2) was also seen leading to almost identical median amprenavir C24h values. No serious clinical adverse events were observed during the study. The most frequently reported effects were gastrointestinal symptoms, headache, fatigue and rash.

CONCLUSIONS

Amprenavir is an effective inducer of delavirdine metabolism, probably through its effect on hepatic CYP3A4. This could have consequences in other drug-drug interaction situations. Delavirdine is an inhibitor of amprenavir metabolism. The regimen of amprenavir 600 mg and delavirdine 600 mg twice a day is not recommended when an antiretroviral effect from delavirdine is required.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors

Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) are a diverse group of compounds that induce allosteric changes in the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase, thus rendering the enzyme incapable of converting viral RNA to DNA. Unlike nucleoside analogue inhibitors of reverse transcriptase, NNRTIs do not require sequential phosphorylation to elicit antiretroviral activity. There are currently 3 approved NNRTIs: nevirapine, delavirdine and efavirenz. Although possessing a common mechanism of action, these agents can be differentiated by both molecular and pharmacokinetic characteristics. Each of the NNRTIs is metabolised to some degree by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) system of enzymes, making them prone to clinically significant drug interactions. In addition, they elicit variable effects on other medications, acting as either inducers or inhibitors of drugs metabolised by CYP. These drug interactions are an important consideration in the clinical use of these agents as a part of combination antiretroviral therapy. Additional factors such as the influence of food and pH on oral absorption, and protein binding, must also be considered.

Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of GW420867X, a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, following single escalating doses in healthy male volunteers

The aim of the current study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics of GW420867X, a new nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, using a single escalating dose protocol in healthy volunteers. Four dose levels were investigated in sequential order: 300, 600, 900, and 1200 mg, with a ratio of 4:1 subjects receiving active or placebo treatment, respectively. Following single-dose administration, GW420867X was readily absorbed with a median time to peak concentration of 3 to 5 hours. GW420867X plasma exposure (AUC) was dose proportional but variable within the 300 to 1200 mg dose range. Less than dose-proportional increases were observed for Cmax. The terminal elimination t(1/2) was 50 hours, which supports once-daily dosing in future studies. Plasma trough concentrations of GW420867X at 24 hours after dosing were many fold greater than the in vitro IC50 HIV-1(HXB2) in MT4 cells. GW420867X was generally well tolerated following single-dose administration up to 900 mg; increased central nervous system-related adverse events were observed at higher doses. GW420867X had a favorable pharmacokinetic and safety profile that would enable this drug to be explored in future clinical studies with HIV-1 infected patients at doses that would provide appropriate safety and efficacy.

Delavirdine: clinical pharmacokinetics and drug interactions

Delavirdine, a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), is a potent and specific inhibitor of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase. The approved therapeutic regimen for delavirdine is 400mg 3 times daily in combination with appropriate antiretroviral agents; however, a dose of 600mg twice daily appears to provide similar systemic exposure. The steady-state pharmacokinetics of delavirdine are not appreciably affected by food. Delavirdine undergoes extensive metabolism by cytochrome P450 (CYP) with little urinary excretion of unchanged drug. Metabolic drug interactions between delavirdine and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors are unlikely as their metabolic pathways differ; delavirdine has no effect on the pharmacokinetics of zidovudine. Concomitant use of CYP inducers, such as rifampicin (rifampin), rifabutin, phenytoin, phenobarbital or carbamazepine, should be avoided since delavirdine plasma concentrations are significantly lowered. Reduction in gastric acidity (pH > 3) decreases the extent of delavirdine absorption, so administration of antacids and the buffered formulations of didanosine should be separated from that of delavirdine by at least 1 hour. Delavirdine, unlike other currently available NNRTI agents, is an inhibitor rather than an inducer of CYP isozymes. Consequently, the drug interaction profile and rationale for combining delavirdine with other antiretroviral agents is unique among the current NNRTI agents. Delavirdine inhibits the CYP3A4-mediated metabolism of HIV protease inhibitors and thereby increases systemic exposure to protease inhibitors. The ability of delavirdine to enhance the pharmacokinetic profiles of protease inhibitors may permit the use of simplified administration regimens. Combining delavirdine and indinavir removes the food restrictions during indinavir administration. Furthermore, the superior virological response observed in antiretroviral regimens containing delavirdine and protease inhibitors has been attributed to the favourable pharmacokinetic interactions and the introduction of a new drug class in NNRTI-naïve therapy-experienced patients. Pharmacokinetic drug interactions are an important consideration in selecting an HIV treatment regimen, due to the multiplicity of drugs that are coadministered and the varying direction and magnitude of interaction that can occur. Considerations for utilising delavirdine in a treatment regimen are different than for other NNRTI agents due to the unique drug interaction profile of delavirdine.

Combination therapy with indinavir, ritonavir, and delavirdine and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in patients with HIV/AIDS who have failed multiple antiretroviral combinations

PURPOSE

Ritonavir (RTV) and delavirdine (DLV) are inhibitors of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, the specific CYP that metabolizes indinavir (IDV). We hypothesized that patients who have failed multiple therapies containing protease inhibitors would still respond to IDV if high plasma concentrations were achieved. We retrospectively examined the antiviral efficacy of the combination of RTV, DLV, and IDV in heavily antiretroviral-experienced patients.

METHOD

A chart review of patients treated with IDV/RTV/DLV and two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) drugs was performed. Only patients who failed at least three highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens and remained on IDV/RTV/DLV therapy for at least 2 months were included. Plasma concentrations for IDV and RTV were obtained if patients were still on therapy.

RESULTS

Ten participants were identified who qualified for this study. The median plasma HIV RNA prior to initiating IDV/RTV/DLV was 359,300 copies/mL. Nine of the 10 patients had failed nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-containing regimens in the past. Eight out of 10 patients had at reduction in HIV RNA. Four of eight patients maintained the 1 log(10) reduction in HIV RNA past 6 months. Mean CD4 cell count increased from 142+/-99 to 273+/-126 cells/mm(3). Genotypic data available on six patients showed multiple protease gene mutations. Plasma concentration of IDV in three patients (two troughs and one 7 hours postdose) were >1,000 ng/mL.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggests that in heavily antiretroviral drug-treated patients, partial antiretroviral response to RTV/IDV/DLV can still be achieved. The use of IDV/RTV/DLV and two NRTIs as salvage therapy has merit in patients who have no viable treatment options. A prospective trial utilizing this drug combination is warranted.

Pharmacology and clinical experience with saquinavir

Saquinavir is a peptidomimetic inhibitor of HIV protease. Initially marketed as Invirasetrade mark, the effectiveness of saquinavir was greatly hindered by its nearly complete first pass metabolism by cytochrome P450 3A4. A new formulation, Fortovasetrade mark, appears to yield some six times the drug exposure and has been demonstrated to yield virological and immunological results similar to those of other protease inhibitors (PIs) when used in conjunction with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (nRTIs). Emerging data suggest it is safe to use twice daily. Co-administration of either formulation of saquinavir with nelfinavir and especially ritonavir yields greatly increased blood levels, with corresponding superior magnitude and durability of viral suppression in first line therapy, albeit with increased adverse effects. The combination of ritonavir and saquinavir has also yielded the most promising results published for second line therapy, after virological breakthrough on previous PI-containing therapy. In addition, preliminary data suggests the possibility of once daily dosing of ritonavir and saquinavir, which would be expected to increase compliance and allow for direct observed therapy.

Inhibition of human cytochrome P450 isoforms by nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors

The capacity of three clinically available nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) to inhibit the activity of human cytochromes P450 (CYPs) was studied in vitro using human liver microsomes. Delavirdine, nevirapine, and efavirenz produced negligible inhibition of phenacetin O-deethylation (CYP1A2) or dextromethorphan O-demethylation (CYP2D6). Nevirapine did not inhibit hydroxylation of tolbutamide (CYP2C9) or S-mephenytoin (CYP2C19), but these CYP isoforms were importantly inhibited by delavirdine and efavirenz. This indicates the likelihood of significantly impaired clearance of CYP2C substrate drugs (such as phenytoin, tolbutamide, and warfarin) upon initial exposure to these two NNRTIs. Delavirdine and efavirenz (but not nevirapine) also were strong inhibitors of CYP3A, consistent with clinical hazards of initial cotreatment with either of these drugs and substrates of CYP3A. The in vitro microsomal model provides relevant predictive data on probable drug interactions with NNRTIs when the mechanism is inhibition of CYP-mediated drug biotransformation. However, the model does not incorporate interactions attributable to enzyme induction.

Delavirdine: a review of its use in HIV infection

Delavirdine, a bisheteroarylpiperazine derivative, is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) that allosterically binds to HIV-1 reverse transcriptase, inhibiting both the RNA- and DNA-directed DNA polymerase functions of the enzyme. Delavirdine in combination with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) produced sustained reductions in plasma viral loads and improvements in immunological responses in large randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of 48 to 54 weeks' duration. In patients with advanced HIV infection, triple therapy with delavirdine, zidovudine and lamivudine, didanosine or zalcitabine for 1 year significantly prolonged the time to virological failure compared with dual therapy (delavirdine plus zidovudine or 2 NRTIs; p < 0.0001). After 50 weeks' treatment, plasma HIV RNA levels were below the limit of detection (LOD; <50 copies/ml) for 40% of patients receiving triple therapy but for only 6% of those receiving dual NRTI therapy. Preliminary results suggest that delavirdine also has beneficial effects on surrogate markers as a component of protease inhibitor-containing triple or quadruple regimens. At 16 to 48 weeks, the minimum mean reduction in plasma viral load from baseline was 2.5 log10 copies/ml and mean CD4+ counts increased by 100 to 313 cells/microl. The proportion of patients with plasma HIV RNAlevels below the LOD (usually 200 to 500 copies/ml) ranged from 48 to 100% after > or = 16 weeks. Delavirdine was also effective as a component of saquinavir soft gel capsule-containing salvage regimens. Since delavirdine shares a common metabolic pathway (cytochrome P450 3A pathway) with other NNRTIs, HIV protease inhibitors and several drugs used to treat opportunistic infections in patients infected with HIV, the drug is associated with a number of pharmacokinetic interactions. Some of these drug interactions are clinically significant, necessitating dosage adjustments or avoidance of co-administration. Delavirdine is not recommended for use with lovastatin, simvastatin, rifabutin, rifampicin, sildenafil, ergot derivatives, quinidine, midazolam, carbamazepine, phenobarbital or phenytoin. Importantly, the drug favourably increases the plasma concentration of several protease inhibitors. Delavirdine is generally well tolerated. Skin rash is the most frequently reported adverse effect, occurring in 18 to 50% of patients receiving delavirdine-containing combination therapy in clinical trials. Although a high proportion of patients developed a rash, it was typically mild to moderate in intensity, did not result in discontinuation or adjustment of treatment in most patients and resolved quickly. The occurrence of Stevens-Johnson syndrome was rare (1 case in 1,000 patients). A retrospective analysis of pooled clinical trial data indicated that there was no significant difference in the incidence of liver toxicity, liver failure or noninfectious hepatitis between delavirdine-containing and non-delavirdine-containing antiretroviral treatment groups. In addition, the incidence of lipodystrophy, metabolic lipid disorders, hyperglycaemia and hypertriglyceridaemia was not significantly different between these 2 treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In combination with NRTIs. delavirdine produces sustained improvements in surrogate markers of HIV disease and prolongs the time to virological failure in adult patients with HIV infection. Preliminary data of delavirdine as a component of protease inhibitor-containing triple or quadruple highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens indicate that patients achieve marked improvements in virological and immunological markers. The drug is generally well tolerated, with a transient skin rash, typically of mild to moderate intensity, being the most common adverse effect. Delavirdine is an effective component of recommended antiretroviral treatment strategies for adult patients with HIV infection and, in combination with 2 NRTIs as a first-line therapy, the drug has the advantage of sparing protease inhibitors for subsequent use. Since delavirdine favourably increases plasma concentrations of several protease inhibitors, the drug may also be beneficial as a component of salvage therapy in combination with protease inhibitors.

Continued lamivudine versus delavirdine in combination with indinavir and zidovudine or stavudine in lamivudine-experienced patients: results of Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group protocol 370

OBJECTIVE

To compare the virologic activity of continued lamivudine (3TC) versus a switch to delavirdine (DLV) when initiating protease inhibitor therapy in nucleoside-experienced patients.

DESIGN

Randomized, open-label, multi-center study.

SETTING

Adult AIDS clinical trials units.

PATIENTS

Protease and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-naive patients who had received 3TC plus zidovudine (ZDV), stavudine (d4T), or didanosine (ddl) for at least 24 weeks.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels > 500 copies/ml who previously received d4T + 3TC or ddI + 3TC were randomized to ZDV + 3TC + indinavir (IDV) or ZDV + DLV + IDV.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary endpoints were the proportion of patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels < or = 200 copies/ml at 24 weeks, and occurrence of serious adverse events. The proportion of patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels < or = 200 copies/ml at week 48 was a secondary endpoint.

RESULTS

At week 24, 58% of subjects in the ZDV + 3TC + IDV arm and 73% in the ZDV + DLV + IDV arm had plasma HIV-1 RNA levels < or = 200 copies/ml (P = 0.29). At week 48, plasma HIV-1 RNA levels were < or = 200 copies/ml in 48% and 83%, respectively (P = 0.007). Rash and hyperbilirubinemia occurred more frequently in the DLV arm than in the 3TC arm. Steady-state plasma IDV levels were higher among patients in the DLV arm as compared with the 3TC arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Substituting DLV for 3TC when adding IDV improved virologic outcome in nucleoside-experienced patients. This result might be explained, in part, by the positive effect of DLV on IDV pharmacokinetics.

Drug interactions with cisapride: clinical implications

Cisapride, a prokinetic agent, has been used for the treatment of a number of gastrointestinal disorders, particularly gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in adults and children. Since 1993, 341 cases of ventricular arrhythmias, including 80 deaths, have been reported to the US Food and Drug Administration. Marketing of the drug has now been discontinued in the US; however, it is still available under a limited-access protocol. Knowledge of the risk factors for cisapride-associated arrhythmias will be essential for its continued use in those patients who meet the eligibility criteria. This review summarises the published literature on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions of cisapride with concomitantly administered drugs, providing clinicians with practical recommendations for avoiding these potentially fatal events. Pharmacokinetic interactions with cisapride involve inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, the primary mode of elimination of cisapride, thereby increasing plasma concentrations of the drug. The macrolide antibacterials clarithromycin, erythromycin and troleandomycin are inhibitors of CYP3A4 and should not be used in conjunction with cisapride. Azithromycin is an alternative. Similarly, azole antifungal agents such as fluconazole, itraconazole and ketoconazole are CYP3A4 inhibitors and their concomitant use with cisapride should be avoided. Of the antidepressants nefazodone and fluvoxamine should be avoided with cisapride. Data with fluoxetine is controversial, we favour the avoidance of its use. Citalopram, paroxetine and sertraline are alternatives. The HIV protease inhibitors amprenavir, indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir and saquinavir inhibit CYP3A4. Clinical experience with cisapride is lacking but avoidance with all protease inhibitors is recommended, although saquinavir is thought to have clinically insignificant effects on CYP3A4. Delavirdine is also a CYP3A4 inhibitor and should be avoided with cisapride. We also recommend avoiding coadministration of cisapride with amiodarone, cimetidine (alternatives are famotidine, nizatidine, ranitidine or one of the proton pump inhibitors), diltiazem and verapamil (the dihydropyridine calcium antagonists are alternatives), grapefruit juice, isoniazid, metronidazole, quinine, quinupristin/dalfopristin and zileuton (montelukast is an alternative). Pharmacodynamic interactions with cisapride involve drugs that have the potential to have additive effects on the QT interval. We do not recommend use of cisapride with class Ia and III antiarrhythmic drugs or with adenosine, bepridil, cyclobenzaprine, droperidol, haloperidol, nifedipine (immediate release), phenothiazine antipsychotics, tricyclic and tetracyclic antidepressants or vasopressin. Vigilance is advised if anthracyclines, cotrimoxazole (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole), enflurane, halothane, isoflurane, pentamidine or probucol are used with cisapride. In addition, uncorrected electrolyte disturbances induced by diuretics may increase the risk of torsade de pointes. Patients receiving cisapride should be promptly treated for electrolyte disturbances.

Drug Interactions with Antiretrovirals

The rapid development of new antiretroviral drugs, along with the evolution in clinical practice toward the recommended use of three- to four-drug combination regimens for achieving optimal suppression of viral replication, has brought the relevance of drug-drug interactions to the forefront of care for HIV-infected individuals. However, the routine clinical interpretation of drug interactions is complicated by our expanding knowledge of the physiologic mechanisms underlying pharmacokinetic interactions, particularly as they relate to drug transport and distribution (eg, P-glycoprotein) and biotransformation (hepatic cytochrome p450 monooxygenase induction and inhibition).

Indinavir: a review of its use in the management of HIV infection

Indinavir is a protease inhibitor used in the treatment of patients with HIV infection. Combination antiretroviral therapy with indinavir plus 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) is associated with greater reductions in viral load, greater increases in CD4+ cell counts, and reduced morbidity and mortality when compared with 2 NRTIs alone. In the landmark clinical trial ACTG 320, the rate of progression to AIDS or death (primary end-point) among zidovudine-experienced patients treated with indinavir, zidovudine and lamivudine was approximately half that of patients who received only zidovudine plus lamivudine (6 vs 11%; p < 0.001). The durability of an indinavir-containing regimen was demonstrated in Merck protocol 035, an ongoing trial in which a significant proportion of patients had sustained viral suppression for up to 3 years. Merck protocol 039, also an ongoing trial, showed a greater effect on surrogate markers of HIV disease progression with indinavir-based triple therapy than with zidovudine plus lamivudine or indinavir monotherapy in patients with advanced disease (median baseline CD4+ count 15 cells/microL). Numerous additional clinical trials have established the beneficial antiviral and immunological effects of indinavir in both antiretroviral-naive and -experienced patients with HIV infection. Indinavir is associated with various drug class-related adverse events, including gastrointestinal disturbances (e.g. nausea, diarrhoea), headache and asthenia/fatigue. A lipodystrophy syndrome has been commonly reported with indinavir and other protease inhibitors combined with NRTIs, but it has also been reported in many protease inhibitor-naive patients, and a definitive causal link has not been established between the syndrome and protease inhibitors. Nephrolithiasis may develop in about 9% of patients receiving indinavir but does not appear to be associated with other protease inhibitors; <0.5% of patients receiving indinavir discontinue the drug because of nephrolithiasis, which may be the extreme end of a continuum of crystal-related renal syndromes. Additional renal problems (e.g. nephropathy) have been reported in small numbers of patients receiving indinavir. In summary, indinavir is a protease inhibitor with well documented efficacy when used as part of combined therapy in patients with HIV infection. Both US and UK treatment guidelines continue to recommend protease inhibitor-based regimens including indinavir as a first-line option. Indinavir is being studied as a twice daily and once daily regimen with a low dosage of ritonavir as a way to alleviate tolerability, drug interaction and patient compliance/adherence issues. Indinavir-containing triple therapy has demonstrated positive effects not only on surrogate markers of disease progression, but also on clinical end-points of mortality and morbidity in patients with HIV disease. Protease inhibitors are a significant advance in the care of patients with HIV infection, and, in an era of evidence-based medicine, indinavir represents an important component of antiretroviral treatment strategies.

Transport, metabolism and elimination mechanisms of anti-HIV agents

Currently available anti-HIV drugs can be classified into three categories: nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, and protease inhibitors. Knowledge of these anti-HIV drugs in various physiological or pharmacokinetic compartments is essential for design and development of drug delivery systems for the treatment of HIV infection. The input and output of anti-HIV drugs in the biological systems are described by their transport and metabolism/elimination in this review. Transport mechanisms of anti-HIV agents across various biological barriers, i.e., gastrointestinal wall, skin, mucosa, blood cerebrospinal barrier, blood-brain barrier, placenta, and cellular membranes, are discussed. Their fates during and after systemic absorption and their metabolism-related drug interactions are reviewed. Many anti-HIV drugs presently marketed in the US bear some significant drawbacks such as relatively short half-life, low bioavailability, poor penetration into the central nervous system, and undesirable side effects. Efforts have been made to design drug delivery systems for the anti-HIV agents to: (1) reduce the dosing frequency; (2) increase the bioavailability and decrease the degradation/metabolism in the gastrointestinal tract; (3) improve the CNS penetration and inhibit the CNS efflux; and (4) deliver them to target cells selectively with minimal side effects. We hope to stimulate further interests in the area of controlled delivery of anti-HIV agents by providing current status of transport and metabolism/elimination of these agents.

Altered pharmacokinetics of indinavir by a novel nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (HBY-097): a pharmacokinetic evaluation in HIV-positive patients

HBY-097 (HBY), an investigational nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), and indinavir (IDV) share a common metabolic pathway, cytochrome P4503A4 (CYP3A4), and may clinically be used together as well as with zidovudine (ZDV). Thus, the potential pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction between these drugs was evaluated. HBY (500 mg Q8H), IDV (800 mg Q8H), and ZDV (200 mg Q8H) were given to 8 HIV-infected subjects. Serial plasma samples were collected at baseline (ZDV and IDV alone) and day 11 (all 3 drugs) to determine PK parameters using noncompartmental analysis. PK parameters for ZDV in the presence and absence of HBY were not appreciably different. However, both the maximum (Cmax) and minimum (Cmin) concentrations of IDV were significantly reduced, from a mean of 7514 +/- 1636 and 146 +/- 81 mcg/L to 4725 +/- 2494 mcg/L and 54 +/- 24 mcg/L (p < .05) after addition of HBY. Furthermore, apparent clearance (CL/F) of IDV before and after 11 days of concomitant HBY administration was significantly higher, from 0.69 +/- 0.14 to 1.94 +/- 0.63 L/h/kg (p < .05) with an associated reduction in area under the curve (AUC0-8) from 16,034 +/- 4903 to 6134 +/- 2701 mg/L/h (p < .05). The increase in IDV CL/F is consistent with the observed metabolic induction effects of other NNRTIs. The results of this trial showed that HBY significantly alters the pharmacokinetic parameters of IDV at the dose studied.

Rapid quantification of delavirdine, a novel non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, in human plasma using isocratic reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection

Delavirdine is a novel non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor for the treatment of HIV-1-infected patients. A simple and rapid high-performance liquid chromatographic method for the quantification of delavirdine in human plasma suitable for drug monitoring in patients is described. Sample pretreatment consists of protein precipitation with acetonitrile and subsequent evaporation of the extract to concentrate the analyte. The drug is separated from endogenous compounds by isocratic reversed-phase, high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with fluorescence detection. The optimal excitation and emission wavelengths are 300 and 425 nm, respectively. The method has been validated over the range of 50-50 000 ng/ml using only 200 microl of plasma samples. The assay is linear over this concentration range as indicated by the F-test for lack of fit. Within- and between-day precisions are less than 4.4% for all quality control samples. The lower limit of quanititation is 50 ng/ml. Recovery of delavirdine from human plasma is 93.8%. Delavirdine is stable under various conditions, for example 1 h at 60 degrees C and one week at 4 degrees C. This validated assay is suited for use in pharmacokinetic studies with delavirdine and can readily be implemented in the setting of a hospital laboratory for the monitoring of delavirdine concentrations.

Kinetic and dynamic interaction study of zolpidem with ketoconazole, itraconazole, and fluconazole

BACKGROUND

Azole antifungal agents may impair hepatic clearance of drugs metabolized by cytochrome P450-3A isoforms. The imidazopyridine hypnotic agent zolpidem is metabolized in humans in part by P450-3A, as well as by a number of other cytochromes. Potential interactions of zolpidem with 3 commonly prescribed azole derivatives were evaluated in a controlled clinical study.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind, 5-way, crossover, clinical pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic study, 12 volunteers received (A) zolpidem placebo plus azole placebo, (B) 5 mg zolpidem plus azole placebo (C) zolpidem plus ketoconazole, (D) zolpidem plus itraconazole, and (E) zolpidem plus fluconazole.

RESULTS

Mean apparent oral clearance of zolpidem when given with placebo was 422 mL/min, and elimination half-life was 1.9 hours. Clearance was significantly reduced to 250 mL/min when zolpidem was given with ketoconazole, and half-life was prolonged to 2.4 hours. Coadministration of zolpidem with itraconazole or fluconazole also reduced clearance (320 and 338 mL/min), but differences compared to the zolpidem plus placebo treatment did not reach significance. Zolpidem-induced benzodiazepine agonist effects (increased electrocardiographic beta activity, digit-symbol substitution test impairment, and delayed recall) during the first 4 hours after dosage were enhanced by ketoconazole but not by itraconazole or fluconazole.

CONCLUSION

Coadministration of zolpidem with ketoconazole impairs zolpidem clearance and enhances its benzodiazepine-like agonist pharmacodynamic effects. Itraconazole and fluconazole had a small influence on zolpidem kinetics and dynamics. The findings are consistent with in vitro studies of differentially impaired zolpidem metabolism by azole derivatives.