Ethical issues in cystic fibrosis newborn screening: from data to public health policy

Newborn screening and the obstetrician

Newborn screening is the largest genetic screening program in the United States with approximately four million newborns screened yearly. It has been available and in continuous development for more than 50 years. Each state manages, funds, and maintains its own individual program, which encompasses newborn screening as well as the diagnosis and coordination of care for affected infants and children. The ideal disorder for screening is one in which newborn intervention prevents later disabilities or death for infants who may appear normal at birth. There are 31 core conditions that are currently recommended for incorporation into state screening programs. To obtain a sample, several drops of blood are collected from the newborn's heel and applied to filter paper. Although testing for core disorders is fairly standardized, more extensive screening varies by state and the rigorous evaluation of new disorders for inclusion in state screening panels is ongoing. As genomic medicine becomes more accessible, screening newborns for chronic diseases that may affect their long-term health will need to be addressed as well as the use of the residual blood spots for research. Obstetric providers should, at some time during pregnancy, review the basic process of newborn screening with parents to prepare them for this testing in the neonatal period. This information can be reviewed as it best suits incorporation in an individual's practice; verbal discussion and the distribution of written materials with resources for further information are encouraged.

Initial evaluation of a biochemical cystic fibrosis newborn screening by sequential analysis of immunoreactive trypsinogen and pancreatitis-associated protein (IRT/PAP) as a strategy that does not involve DNA testing in a Northern European population

BACKGROUND

Ethical concerns and disadvantages of newborn screening (NBS) for cystic fibrosis (CF) related to genetic testing have raised controversies and impeded implementation of CF NBS in some countries. In the present study, we used a prospective and sequential immunoreactive trypsinogene (IRT)/pancreatitis-associated protein (PAP) strategy, with IRT as first and PAP as second tier, and validated this biochemical approach against the widely used IRT/DNA protocol in a population-based NBS study in southwest Germany.

METHODS

Prospective quantitation of PAP and genetic analysis for the presence of four mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene most prevalent in southwest Germany (F508del, R553X, G551D, G542X) were performed in all newborns with IRT > 99.0th percentile. NBS was rated positive when either PAP was ≥1.0 ng/mL and/or at least one CFTR mutation was detected. In addition, IRT > 99.9th percentile was also considered a positive rating. Positive rating led to referral to a CF centre for testing of sweat Cl(-) concentration.

FINDINGS

Out of 73,759 newborns tested, 98 (0.13%) were positive with IRT/PAP and 56 (0.08%) with IRT/DNA. After sweat testing of 135 CF NBS-positive infants, 13 were diagnosed with CF. Detection rates were similar for both IRT/PAP and IRT/DNA. One of the 13 diagnosed CF newborns had a PAP concentration <1.0 ng/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

Sequential measurement of IRT/PAP provides good sensitivity and specificity and allows reliable and cost-effective CF NBS which circumvents the necessity of genetic testing with its inherent ethical problems.

Questioning the consensus: managing carrier status results generated by newborn screening

An apparent consensus governs the management of carrier status information generated incidentally through newborn screening: results cannot be withheld from parents. This normative stance encodes the focus on autonomy and distaste for paternalism that characterize the principles of clinical bioethics. However, newborn screening is a classic public health intervention in which paternalism may trump autonomy and through which parents are-in effect-required to receive carrier information. In truth, the disposition of carrier results generates competing moral infringements: to withhold information or require its possession. Resolving this dilemma demands consideration of a distinctive body of public health ethics to highlight the moral imperatives associated with the exercise of collective authority in the pursuit of public health benefits.

Incidence of cystic fibrosis in five different states of Brazil as determined by screening of p.F508del, mutation at the CFTR gene in newborns and patients

Cystic Fibrosis (CF) is one of the most common single-gene defects in European descent populations with an incidence of about 1 in every 2500 live births and carrier frequency of approximately 1 in 25. The most common mutation at the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene is a deletion (p.F508del) of the phenylalanine codon 508; its frequency, however, is not the same throughout the world. The purpose of this paper is to document an application of a two-tier survey design in different states of Brazil, from which regional differences of the incidence of CF and frequency of CF-causing mutation(s) carriers can be for the first time estimated. We present data on genotype distributions in reference to p.F508del mutation in samples of newborns, adult controls and CF patients from five Brazilian states, in which a total of 2683 newborns born to Brazilian white parents and 500 African-Brazilians adult controls were screened, as well as 300 CF patients (262 European descents and 38 African descents) were genotyped. Our results suggest that the CF-incidence in different parts of Brazil may differ by almost 20-fold. For the five different states as a whole, nearly 48% of the CF-alleles carry the p.F508del mutation, which places the estimates of disease incidence and carrier frequencies for the Brazilian European descents as 1 in 7576 live births and 2.3%, respectively. The implications for prevention of CF and other rare Mendelian diseases through such surveys of mutation screening are discussed.

Changing their minds with time: a comparison of hypothetical and actual reproductive behaviors in parents of children with cystic fibrosis

OBJECTIVE

Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis, with appropriate counseling, enables carrier parents to be informed early about future reproductive choices. Previous studies have assessed attitudes toward reproductive decisions in a hypothetical pregnancy or have measured reproductive behaviors. We aimed to measure parent attitudes to reproductive technologies and to compare prospectively these attitudes with later reproductive behaviors.

METHODS

Parents of children who had cystic fibrosis and were aged 2 to 7 years were surveyed at baseline using a written questionnaire that explored attitudes to prenatal testing and termination of pregnancy in a hypothetical pregnancy. Parent knowledge and access to genetic counseling services also were assessed. Five years later, we compared attitudes with actual reproductive behaviors.

RESULTS

Fifty-six mothers participated at baseline, and 43 were resurveyed 5 years later. Parent knowledge of cystic fibrosis and genetics was very good. A total of 93% had met a genetic counselor at the time of diagnosis, and more than half had on at least 1 subsequent occasion. At baseline, 82% reported that they would be likely to have prenatal diagnosis in a subsequent pregnancy, and 56% reported that they would be likely to terminate an affected pregnancy. Twenty-seven mothers since had been pregnant, with prenatal diagnosis used in 33 of the 55 pregnancies. In 67%, the hypothetically reported behavior regarding use of prenatal testing was the same as their actual behavior. Five of the 33 tested pregnancies were affected; all ended in termination. Reproductive choices in relationship to the number of children wanted, together with attitudes toward prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy, were dynamic over time, with decisions having changed in both directions.

CONCLUSIONS

This cohort of parents has actively used reproductive technologies since the birth of a child who has cystic fibrosis that was diagnosed by newborn screening. The dynamic aspect of reproductive choices highlights the importance of ongoing access to genetic counseling beyond the initial period of diagnosis and education, regardless of whether parents report that they expect to use reproductive technologies.

Cystic fibrosis newborn screening: a pilot study to maximize carrier screening

Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis (CF) is expanding because early diagnosis has been shown to result in improved nutrition and growth. Most newborns identified by a mutation panel have a single detected mutation and require sweat testing to exclude an additional undetected mutation. The resulting identification of CF carrier newborns, although not the primary purpose of screening, has three potential benefits, (1) the detection of trait-trait couples, (2) presymptomatic testing of these couples' previously born children who may have undetected CF, and (3) a carrier parent alerting his/her extended family members to the chance of also being a CF carrier. Reaping each benefit requires genetic counseling of parents and their accepting carrier testing. The purpose of this study was to utilize the sweat testing visit to educate parents about the value of carrier testing for themselves and their blood relatives. We compared special care (genetic counseling after explaining the sweat test result and offering of parental DNA testing, all on the sweat test visit) versus standard care (sweat test result reported by phone to the parents the next day by the newborn's physician, ideally with the recommendation to arrange genetic counseling and parental carrier testing). In the first year of New York State CF screening, 64 newborns with one detected mutation were reported in the nine-county region that includes Rochester. Of these, parents of 39 agreed to participate in the study and to be randomized to special or standard care. Sixty-one parents completed both the initial and 1-year follow-up questionnaires (30 couples and one mother). Of the 61 parents, 23 had carrier testing after the birth of the baby. The frequency of such parental testing was significantly higher in the special care group (17/34 or 50%) than in the standard care group (6/27 or 22%) (p < 0.05). This is the first evidence from a randomized trial that genetic counseling and offering carrier testing to parents on the sweat test visit increases identification of carrier parents. Such identification detects trait-trait parents and facilitates carrier testing among relatives.

Balancing benefits and risks for cystic fibrosis newborn screening: implications for policy decisions

Policy decisions for newborn screening (NBS) are particularly challenging when the balance of benefits and risks is not tipped dramatically in 1 direction. When this is the case, as with cystic fibrosis (CF), the traditional approach of mandatory testing of all newborns in all states may not be appropriate. Alternative approaches may produce a substantial reduction in psychosocial risks, at the cost of a small reduction in medical benefits, and thus improve the benefit/risk balance. At the provider level, this could include greater engagement and discussion with parents before testing. At the program implementation level, specific decisions about tradeoffs between sensitivity and specificity that could result in not identifying all infants with CF may be appropriate. At the policy decision level, deciding whether to implement CF NBS in a particular state could involve consideration of the availability of the financial resources, clinical services, and systems for assessing outcomes. Although CF NBS can be justified in settings in which the specific approach has a favorable benefit/risk balance, an inadequately designed screening program has the potential for being less favorable than the current approach of diagnosis on the basis of clinical criteria or family history.

Policy issues for expanding newborn screening programs: the cystic fibrosis newborn screening experience in the United States

OBJECTIVE

To describe the screening approaches and implementation strategies for cystic fibrosis newborn screening in the 12 programs that were offered in 11 states in 2002.

STUDY DESIGN

Telephone interviews conducted in the spring of 2003 with program representatives in the 11 states. Screening approaches were defined in four overlapping categories: state mandated screening, state-wide offering, hospital based screening, and screening with informed consent.

RESULTS

Screening was state mandated in seven states but was routinely offered to most infants in nine states. The primary care provider or hospital determined if screening was done in three states (four programs). Informed consent was explicitly documented in two states. In five programs, immunoreactive trypsinogen exclusively was used to identify at-risk infants. In seven programs, a second tier DNA test was also used, but these programs each had distinct strategies. In only two programs where DNA testing was performed and normal sweat tests indicated carrier status, were results routinely provided to parents "in person" at a CF center.

CONCLUSION

The diversity of approaches for screening approaches and strategies has advantages for future policy decisions, provided that data about the clinical and psychosocial impact of screening from these programs are collected and disseminated. As additional states determine that the resources are available, programs can be designed with a more favorable benefit/risk balance as a result of the successes and challenges faced by other states.

Update on newborn screening for cystic fibrosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is the most common lethal genetic disorder in the United States to be identified in childhood. In November 2003 the US Cystic Fibrosis Foundation and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention convened an expert panel to review the indications for CF newborn screening. In this review we discuss the information during the year leading up to this meeting as well as publications since the meeting.

RECENT FINDINGS

During the past several years an increasing number of CF patients have been diagnosed with newborn screening. These patients have demonstrated several benefits to screening while also uncovering new challenges. Health benefits have included improved nutrition persisting for many years and the avoidance of nutritional complications. Early identification has also meant that these often clinically healthy infants are being followed in CF centers for care. This has added to the need for avoiding infection risks to which these patients might not have otherwise been exposed. Psychosocial benefits include the avoidance of stress due to delayed diagnosis as well as assistance with family planning. Psychosocial challenges include carrier identification and detection of patients with mild disease or without a clear diagnosis.

SUMMARY

Although no study has definitively shown reduced lung disease or prolonged survival in CF patients detected by newborn screening, the general consensus is that improved nutrition and cognitive potential, in addition to the reduced costs for hospitalization and intensive therapies, support the benefits of screening.

What follows newborn screening? An evaluation of a residential education program for parents of infants with newly diagnosed cystic fibrosis

OBJECTIVE

The diagnosis of a severe life-limiting condition, such as cystic fibrosis (CF), is generally followed by assessment and treatment of the child and education and counseling for parents. The introduction of newborn screening for CF provides an opportunity for standardized assessment and education. The aim of this study was to evaluate a 5-day residential assessment and education program for parents of infants who receive a diagnosis of CF after newborn screening.

METHODS

Eligible parents had a 6- to 30-month-old infant with CF diagnosed by newborn screening. Parents were interviewed by telephone using a structured questionnaire that addressed 3 main themes: 1) initial communication of the diagnosis of CF, 2) the perceived value of the 5-day assessment and education program, and 3) the perceived advantages and disadvantages of the residential component (Care-By-Parent unit) of the program.

RESULTS

Fifteen of 17 eligible families took part in the 5-day assessment and education program, 12 of whom used the residential Care-By-Parent unit. At the end of the program, parents believed that they had the knowledge and skills required to manage their child's CF at home. One hundred percent endorsed the timing of the assessment and education program immediately after the child's diagnosis and would recommend it to other families in the same situation. Perceived advantages of the residential program were not having to travel (89%), being able to concentrate on CF (50%), and the benefit of a "home base" at the hospital (39%). Twenty-two percent reported that financial costs related to participation (paternal time off work) were a disadvantage, 17% reported additional strain on family members caring for siblings, and 17% mentioned lack of comfort within the unit.

CONCLUSIONS

This time-intensive residential program was evaluated positively by parents of children with newly diagnosed CF. It provides a model for education programs after the diagnosis of CF by newborn screening, as well as for other pediatric conditions that require intensive parent education.

Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis

Early diagnosis of cystic fibrosis (CF) provides an opportunity to improve disease control and prevent early complications. Of patients with CF in the United States, 10% are identified early through newborn screening (including infants born in Colorado, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Wisconsin, Wyoming, and parts of California, Connecticut, Pennsylvania, and Montana). Successful screening programs in these states have stimulated other states to consider adding CF screening to their newborn programs. Additionally, new technology permits expanded screening for numerous genetic conditions. Genetic screening, such as that used most frequently for CF, creates new challenges for the clinician, including atypical disease presentations and carrier detection. In this review, we examine the many advances in CF newborn screening and early care that were reported during the last few years.