Value of immunohistochemical detection of DNA mismatch repair proteins in predicting germline mutation in hereditary colorectal neoplasms

Gynaecological cancer surveillance for women with Lynch syndrome: systematic review and cost-effectiveness evaluation

Background

Lynch syndrome is an inherited condition which leads to an increased risk of colorectal, endometrial and ovarian cancer. Risk-reducing surgery is generally recommended to manage the risk of gynaecological cancer once childbearing is completed. The value of gynaecological colonoscopic surveillance as an interim measure or instead of risk-reducing surgery is uncertain. We aimed to determine whether gynaecological surveillance was effective and cost-effective in Lynch syndrome.

Methods

We conducted systematic reviews of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of gynaecological cancer surveillance in Lynch syndrome, as well as a systematic review of health utility values relating to cancer and gynaecological risk reduction. Study identification included bibliographic database searching and citation chasing (searches updated 3 August 2021). Screening and assessment of eligibility for inclusion were conducted by independent researchers. Outcomes were prespecified and were informed by clinical experts and patient involvement. Data extraction and quality appraisal were conducted and results were synthesised narratively. We also developed a whole-disease economic model for Lynch syndrome using discrete event simulation methodology, including natural history components for colorectal, endometrial and ovarian cancer, and we used this model to conduct a cost-utility analysis of gynaecological risk management strategies, including surveillance, risk-reducing surgery and doing nothing.

Results

We found 30 studies in the review of clinical effectiveness, of which 20 were non-comparative (single-arm) studies. There were no high-quality studies providing precise outcome estimates at low risk of bias. There is some evidence that mortality rate is higher for surveillance than for risk-reducing surgery but mortality is also higher for no surveillance than for surveillance. Some asymptomatic cancers were detected through surveillance but some cancers were also missed. There was a wide range of pain experiences, including some individuals feeling no pain and some feeling severe pain. The use of pain relief (e.g. ibuprofen) was common, and some women underwent general anaesthetic for surveillance. Existing economic evaluations clearly found that risk-reducing surgery leads to the best lifetime health (measured using quality-adjusted life-years) and is cost-effective, while surveillance is not cost-effective in comparison. Our economic evaluation found that a strategy of surveillance alone or offering surveillance and risk-reducing surgery was cost-effective, except for path_PMS2 Lynch syndrome. Offering only risk-reducing surgery was less effective than offering surveillance with or without surgery.

Limitations

Firm conclusions about clinical effectiveness could not be reached because of the lack of high-quality research. We did not assume that women would immediately take up risk-reducing surgery if offered, and it is possible that risk-reducing surgery would be more effective and cost-effective if it was taken up when offered.

Conclusions

There is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against gynaecological cancer surveillance in Lynch syndrome on clinical grounds, but modelling suggests that surveillance could be cost-effective. Further research is needed but it must be rigorously designed and well reported to be of benefit.

Study registration

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42020171098.

Funding

This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR129713) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 41. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

SOMATIC DEFICIENT MISMATCH REPAIR ASSESSED BY IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY AND CLINICAL FEATURES IN BRAZILIAN GLIOBLASTOMA PATIENTS

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most frequent primary malignant CNS tumor. Deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) is associated with better prognosis and is a biomarker for immunotherapy. Evaluation of MMR by immunohistochemistry (IHC) is accessible, cost effective, sensitive, and specific.

AIM

Our objective was to investigate MMR proteins in adult GBM patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 68 GBM samples to evaluate the proficiency of MMR genes expression assessed by IHC. Clinicopathologic and molecular features were compared in proficient (pMMR) or dMMR.

RESULTS

10 (14.7%) samples showed dMMR, and the most frequent was MSH6 (100%) followed by MSH2, PMS2, and MLH1. We observed heterogeneous expression of dMMR in 5 GBMs. The median overall survival did not differ between pMMR (19.8 months; 0.2-30) and dMMR (16.9 months; 6.4-27.5) (p = 0.31). We observed a significantly higher overall survival associated with gross total resection compared to subtotal resection or biopsy (30.7 vs. 13.6 months, p = 0.02) and MGMT methylated status (29.6 vs. 19.8 months, p = 0.049). At the analysis time, 10 patients were still alive, all in the pMMR group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrated dMMR phenotype assessed by IHC in an expressive portion of GBM patients, however without significant impact on overall survival.

Mismatch Repair system protein deficiency as a resistance factor for locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma patients receiving neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Available data on Mismatch Repair system (MMR) deficiency are conflicting and derived from small studies. Our study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic implications of MMR status in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from 318 patients affected by LARC treated in Italy at the Medical Oncology Units of the University Hospital of Cagliari, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori Milan, and AOU Ospedali Riuniti Ancona. All patients underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The primary objective was major TRG while secondary objectives were pathological complete response, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

One hundred sixty patients (148 pMMR and 12 dMMR) were included in the exploratory cohort and 158 (146 pMMR and 12 dMMR) were included in the validation cohort. A major TRG has been shown in 42.6% and 43.1% patients with pMMR in exploratory and validation cohort, respectively; while no major TRG have been shown in dMMR patients in both cohorts. Exploratory and validation cohorts showed a statistically significant higher mDFS in pMMR patients compared to dMMR: NR vs. 14 months and NR vs. 17 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicated an association between dMMR and poor response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy and they represent a hypothesis-generating data for new neoadjuvant strategies.

The Importance of Immunohistochemical Heterogeneous Expression of MMR Protein in Patients with Colorectal Cancer in Stage II and III of the Disease

Background and objectives: In patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), heterogeneous expression of Mismatch repair (MMR) proteins can manifest itself in several different forms and is not such a rare phenomenon. Therefore, it is very important to recognize the nuclear expression of MMR proteins of different MMR status in order to avoid false positive or false negative results. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and distribution of heterogeneous expression of MMR proteins in patients with stages II and III of the disease as well as its association with clinical, demographic and pathological characteristics of CRC in relation to proficient and deficient expression of MMR proteins. Material and Methods: The study included 104 cases of colorectal cancer obtained from surgical colectomy material in stages II and III of the disease. Results: From a total of 104 patients with colorectal cancer, immunohistochemical analysis of the expression of all four MMR proteins showed that heterogeneous expression of MMR proteins (as well as deficient immunoreactivity of tumor cells) was present in 12 cases, while proficient expression of MMR proteins was detected in 80 tumors. Conclusions: Our study showed that the only independent predictors of the loss of MMR protein expression were younger patient age and right-sided anatomical location of the tumor. The study also established the existence of heterogeneous expression of MMR proteins in a non-negligible percentage of CRCs (11.5%), where heterogeneous nuclear expression of MMR proteins was described in several different forms.

Histopathological Predictors of Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Cancer-a Tertiary Care Center Experience

Microsatellite instability (MSI) has a therapeutic and prognostic implication in colorectal carcinomas (CRCs). It can be detected either by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or molecular studies. In developing countries, a significant proportion of the patients experience financial constraints limiting the utilization of healthcare facilities. We aimed to identify the possible clinicopathological variables which can be used as predictors of microsatellite instability in such patients. CRC cases received for MSI detection by IHC (for 1 and 1/2 years) were included. A panel of four IHC markers (anti-MLH1, anti-PMS2, anti-MSH2, and anti-MSH6) was used. Confirmation by the molecular study was recommended in all the IHC-proven MSI cases. Various clinicopathological parameters were evaluated as predictors of MSI. Microsatellite instability was detected in 40.6% (30/74) cases with MLH1 and PMS2 dual loss in 27% cases, MSH2 and MSH6 dual loss in 6.8%, loss of all four MMR proteins in 2.7%, and isolated PMS2 loss in 4.1%. MSI-H expression was shown by 36.5% cases with only 4.1% cases showing MSI-L expression. The age cut-off value to differentiate both the study groups (MSI vs MSS) was 63 years with a sensitivity of 47.7% and specificity of 86.7%. ROC curve showed an area under the curve of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.515-0.776; p-value = 0.03). On univariate analysis, age < 63 years, colon site, and absence of nodal metastasis were significantly higher in the MSI group. However, on multivariate analysis, only the age < 63 years was found to be significantly higher in the MSI group. Confirmation was molecular study could only be obtained in 12 cases and was completely concordant with MSI detection by IHC. MSI detection can be performed either by IHC or by molecular study. In this study, no histological parameter appeared to be the independent predictor of MSI status. The age < 63 years might predict the microsatellite instability, yet larger studies are needed for its validation. Thus, we recommend that IHC testing should be performed in all CRC cases.

Relative Risk of Bladder and Kidney Cancer in Lynch Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The association between Lynch syndrome (LS) and a higher risk of upper tract urothelial carcinoma is well established, but its effect on the risk of bladder and kidney cancers remains controversial. This review aimed to compare the relative risk (RR) of bladder and kidney cancer in confirmed LS germline mutation carriers compared to the general population. Methods: Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central, and Google Scholar were searched on 14 July 2022 for studies published in English that reported on the rates of urological cancer in adults with confirmed LS germline mutation. The quality of included studies was assessed using Cochrane’s tool to evaluate risk of bias in cohort studies. Random effects meta-analysis estimated the pooled relative risk of bladder and kidney cancer in LS carriers compared to the general population. The quality of the overall evidence was evaluated using GRADE. Results: Of the 1839 records identified, 5 studies involving 7120 participants from 3 continents were included. Overall, LS carriers had a statistically significantly higher RR of developing bladder cancer (RR: 7.48, 95% CI: 3.70, 15.13) and kidney cancer (RR: 3.97, 95% CI: 1.23, 12.81) compared to unaffected participants (p < 0.01). The quality of the evidence was assessed as “low” due to the inclusion of cohort studies, the substantial heterogeneity, and moderate-to-high risk of bias. Conclusion: Lynch syndrome is associated with a significant increase in the relative risk of kidney and bladder cancer. Clinicians should adopt a lower threshold for germline mutation genetic testing in individuals who present with bladder cancer. Further studies evaluating the role and cost-effectiveness of novel urine-based laboratory tests are needed. High-quality studies in histologically proven renal cell carcinoma and their underlying germline mutations are necessary to strengthen the association with LS.

Molecular mechanisms and differences in lynch syndrome developing into colorectal cancer and endometrial cancer based on gene expression, methylation, and mutation analysis

Purpose

The aim of this study was to screen biomarkers specific to Lynch syndrome (LS) with colorectal cancer (CRC) or endometrial cancer (EC) to explore the mechanisms by which LS develops into CRC and EC and their differences.

Methods

Differentially expressed or differentially methylated genes and differential mutations were identified in 10 LS, 50 CRC, and 50 EC patients from TCGA, and genes overlapping between LS and CRC or EC (named SGs-LCs and SGs-LEs, respectively) were identified. Afterward, we annotated the enriched GO terms and pathways and constructed a protein–protein interaction (PPI) network. Finally, samples from 10 clinical cases with MSI-H/MSS CRC and EC were collected to verify the mutations and their correlations with five LS pathogenic genes in the SGs-LCs and SGs-LEs.

Results

A total of 494 SGs-LCs and 104 SGs-LEs were identified and enriched in 106 and 14 GO terms, respectively. There were great differences in the gene count and enriched terms between SGs-LCs and SGs-LEs. In the PPI network, SST, GCG, SNAP25, and NPY had the highest degree of connection among the SGs-LCs, and KIF20A and NUF2 had the highest degree of connection among the SGs-LE. In the SGs-LCs and SGs-LEs, the genes whose expression levels affected the survival of LS, CRC or EC patients were quite different.

Conclusions

COL11A1 was found to be mutated in MSS CRC patients, similar to the mutations of MSH6. SST, GCG, SNAP25, and NPY may be biomarkers for the development of LS into CRC, and KIF20A and NUF2 may be markers of LS developing into EC.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10552-021-01543-w.

Low prevalence of biliary tract cancer with defective mismatch repair genes in a Japanese hospital-based population

Recent studies have reported that immune checkpoint inhibitors are effective against various defective mismatch repair (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) cancers. A limited number of reports are available on the frequency of dMMR/MSI-H carcinoma in biliary tract cancer (BTC), describing its clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis. The latter carcinoma is also associated with Lynch syndrome (LS). The present study was performed to investigate the frequency of patients with dMMR/MSI-H in BTC and the clinical characteristics of BTC with dMMR/MSI-H in a single institution in Japan. A total of 116 patients with BTC who underwent curative surgical resection at Kagawa University Hospital between January 2008 and December 2017 were included. The protein expression levels of the mismatch repair (MMR) genes [mutL homolog 1 (MLH1), mismatch repair endonuclease PMS2 (PMS2), MutS homolog (MSH)2 and MSH6] were assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue specimens. Subsequently, MSI testing was performed on patients who exhibited loss of MMR protein expression. Loss of expression of one or more proteins was detected in five cases (4.3%). Loss of MLH1/PMS2 expression was observed in one case of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, whereas loss of PMS2 expression was noted in one case of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Loss of MSH2/MSH6 and MSH6 expression was noted in two cases of distal cholangiocarcinoma and loss of PMS2 expression in one case of ampullary carcinoma. Out of the five patients, two demonstrated MSI-H. Microsatellite stability was observed in two cases and for one case, no data were available. Two MSI-H cases were patients with loss of expression of MLH1/PMS2 and MSH2/MSH6. None of the five patients exhibited a past medical history or family history of suspected LS. The frequency of dMMR in BTC was ~5%, which was similar to that reported by similar studies performed in other countries. In the present study, IHC appeared to be more useful than MSI testing for detecting MMR abnormalities with regards to the detection rate. Furthermore, there may only be a limited number of patients with BTCs who are likely to benefit from the therapeutic effects of treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Sensitive detection of microsatellite instability in tissues and liquid biopsies: Recent developments and updates

Microsatellite instability (MSI), a phenotype displayed as deletions/insertions of repetitive genomic sequences, has drawn great attention due to its application in cancer including diagnosis, prognosis and immunotherapy response prediction. Several methods have been developed for the detection of MSI, facilitating the MSI classification of cancer patients. In view of recent interest in minimally-invasive detection of MSI via liquid biopsy samples, which requires methods with high sensitivity to identify small fractions of altered DNA in the presence of large amount of wild type copies, sensitive MSI detection approaches are emerging. Here we review the available MSI detection methods and their detection limits and focus on recently developed next-generation-sequencing based approaches and bioinformatics algorithms available for MSI analysis in various cancer types.

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Mismatch Repair Gene Proteins in Early Gastric Cancer Based on Microsatellite Status

BACKGROUND

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a major pathway involved in gastric carcinogenesis and is observed in 10-20% of early gastric cancers (EGCs). Early detection of EGCs with an MSI-high phenotype would be useful for elucidating the mechanisms of gastric carcinogenesis and improving outcomes in patients with GC.

OBJECTIVE

We explored the usefulness of immunohistochemical expression of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, including MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6 in EGC.

METHODS

We examined the expression of 4 MMR proteins using immunohistochemistry in 119 patients with EGC based on MS status, as determined by polymerase chain reaction-microsatellite analysis. In addition, methylation of the MLH1 gene was quantified by pyrosequencing.

RESULTS

EGCs were classified into 46 MSI-high phenotypes and 73 microsatellite stable (MSS) phenotypes. Although loss of MLH1 expression was associated with loss of PMS2 expression in the MSI-high phenotype, discordant cases of loss of expression between MLH1 and PMS2 were found (MLH1 [-]/PMS2 [+], 3 cases). Loss of MLH1/PMS2 expression was observed in 2 of 73 MSS phenotypes. Loss of MSH2/MSH6 expression was found in 4 of 46 MSI-high phenotypes, whereas loss of MSH2/MSH6 expression was not detected in the MSS phenotype. In addition, loss of MLH1 expression was correlated with methylation of MLH1. However, there were discordant cases in which loss of MLH1 expression was not accompanied by methylation of MLH1.

CONCLUSION

Although immunostaining of MMR proteins could help predict MSI in EGCs, immunostaining did not have the same value as genetic testing for determination of MSI.

Prevalence of Mismatch Repair-Deficient Colorectal Adenoma/Polyp in Early-Onset, Advanced Cases: a Cross-Sectional Study Based on Iranian Hereditary Colorectal Cancer Registry

BACKGROUND

Lynch syndrome (LS) increases the risk of many types of cancer, mainly colorectal cancer (CRC). The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency in patients under the age of 50 with advanced adenomatous polyps, aiming at an early diagnosis of LS.

METHODS

This retrospective, cross-sectional study included eligible patients with advanced adenomas diagnosed ≤ 50 years of age registered between April 2014 and February 2017 at three pathology centers in Mashhad. Pathological records were reviewed, and colon tissue specimens were analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining to identify proteins which serve as markers for LS as they are related to loss of MMR gene (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2) expression.

RESULTS

Of 862 consecutive patients, a total of 50 adenomas (54% males, 46% females of mean age 41.24 ± 6.5) met the eligibility criteria. Of the adenomas examined, 20 (40%) had a tubulovillous component, 34 (68%) had high-grade dysplasia, and 30 (60%) had were larger than 10 mm protrusions. None of the patients had loss of MMR protein expression.

CONCLUSION

No individual with MMR genetic disorder was identified by IHC screening of early-onset advanced colorectal adenomas. This strategy is therefore not an effective strategy for detecting MMR mutation carriers.

Predictive and prognostic biomarkers with therapeutic targets in colorectal cancer: A 2021 update on current development, evidence, and recommendation

Although therapeutically actionable molecular alterations are widely distributed across many cancer types, only a handful of them show evidence of clinical utility and are recommended for routine clinical practice in the management of cancers of colon and rectum (CRC). This 2021 update aims to provide a succinct summary on the use of prognostic and/or predictive biomarkers (expanded RAS, BRAF, microsatellite-high [MSI-H] or deficient mismatch repair [dMMR], neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase [NTRK] fusion genes, and human epidermal growth factor receptor type II [HER2] gene amplification) associated with CRC. Therapeutic implications of each relevant predictive or prognostic biomarker for patients with CRC are described, along with discussion on new developments on (1) biomarker-driven therapies such as testing of BRAF, MLH1 promoter methylation and MMR germline genes in differentiating sporadic CRC or hereditary conditions such as Lynch syndrome; (2) first-line use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic CRC; (3) risk stratification and therapy selection based on primary tumor location (left-sided vs. right-sided colon cancer); (3) atypical BRAF mutations; (4) use of EGFR directed therapy in the perioperative oligometastatic disease setting; (5) re-challenge of EGFR directed therapy and (6) personalizing therapy of fluoropyrimidine and irinotecan based on new evidence in pharmacogenomic testing. Data are collected and analyzed from available systematic reviews and meta-analyses of treatments with known therapeutic targets in CRC, which may be associated with predictive and/or prognostic biomarkers. Discussions are presented in an application-based format, with goal to empower pharmacists or other clinicians to gain awareness and understanding in biomarker-driven cancer therapy issues.

Diagnosis of Lynch Syndrome and Strategies to Distinguish Lynch-Related Tumors from Sporadic MSI/dMMR Tumors

Simple Summary

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a hallmark of Lynch syndrome (LS)-related tumors but is not specific, as most of MSI/mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) tumors are sporadic. Therefore, the identification of MSI/dMMR requires additional diagnostic tools to identify LS. In this review, we address the hallmarks of LS and present recent advances in diagnostic and screening strategies to identify LS patients. We also discuss the pitfalls associated with current strategies, which should be taken into account in order to improve the diagnosis of LS.

Abstract

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a hallmark of Lynch syndrome (LS)-related tumors but is not specific to it, as approximately 80% of MSI/mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) tumors are sporadic. Methods leading to the diagnosis of LS have considerably evolved in recent years and so have tumoral tests for LS screening and for the discrimination of LS-related to MSI-sporadic tumors. In this review, we address the hallmarks of LS, including the clinical, histopathological, and molecular features. We present recent advances in diagnostic and screening strategies to identify LS patients. We also discuss the pitfalls associated with the current strategies, which should be taken into account to improve the diagnosis of LS and avoid inappropriate clinical management.

The clinical utility of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer

Microsatellite instability (MSI) became the spotlight after the US FDA' s approval of MSI as an indication of immunotherapy for cancer patients. Immunohistochemical detection of loss of MMR proteins and PCR amplification of specific microsatellite repeats are widely used in clinical practice. Next-generation sequencing is a promising tool for identifying MSI patients. Circulating tumour DNA provides a convenient alternative when tumour tissue is unavailable. MSI detection is an effective tool to screen for Lynch syndrome. Early-stage CRC patients with MSI generally have a better prognosis and a reduced response to chemotherapy; instead, they are more likely to respond to immunotherapy. In this review, we aimed to assess the clinical utility of MSI as a biomarker in CRC. We will provide an overview of the available methods for evaluation of the analytical validity of MSI detection and elaborate the evidence on the clinical validity of MSI in the management of CRC patients.

Evaluation of 3 molecular-based assays for microsatellite instability detection in formalin-fixed tissues of patients with endometrial and colorectal cancers

Microsatellite instability (MSI) status is routinely assessed in patients with colorectal and endometrial cancers as it contributes to Lynch syndrome initial screening, tumour prognosis and selecting patients for immunotherapy. Currently, standard reference methods recommended for MSI/dMMR (deficient MisMatch Repair) testing consist of immunohistochemistry and pentaplex PCR-based assays, however, novel molecular-based techniques are emerging. Here, we aimed to evaluate the performance of a custom capture-based NGS method and the Bio-Rad ddPCR and Idylla approaches for the determination of MSI status for theranostic purposes in 30 formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue samples from patients with endometrial (n = 15) and colorectal (n = 15) cancers. All samples were previously characterised using IHC and Promega MSI Analysis System and these assays set as golden standard. Overall agreement, sensitivity and specificity of our custom-built NGS panel were 93.30%, 93.75% and 92.86% respectively. Overall agreement, sensitivity and specificity were 100% with the Idylla MSI system. The Bio-Rad ddPCR MSI assay showed a 100% concordance, sensitivity and specificity. The custom capture-based NGS, Bio-Rad ddPCR and Idylla approaches represent viable and complementary options to IHC and Promega MSI Analysis System for the detection of MSI. Bio-Rad ddPCR and Idylla MSI assays accounts for easy and fast screening assays while the NGS approach offers the advantages to simultaneously detect MSI and clinically relevant genomic alterations.

Pathological features, immunoprofile and mismatch repair protein expression status in uterine endometrioid carcinoma: focus on MELF pattern of myoinvasion

AIMS

Microcystic, elongated, and fragmented (MELF) pattern of myoinvasion has been related with increased risk of lympho-vascular space invasion (LVSI) and lymph node metastasis. We analysed a cohort of endometrioid endometrial carcinomas (EECs) to examine the relationships between the MELF pattern of invasion and the clinico-pathological and immunohistochemical features of EEC.

METHODS AND RESULTS

129 EECs were evaluated for the presence of MELF pattern and immunohistochemically tested for Mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, p16, p53 and beta-catenin. We observed 28 MELF + EECs and 101 MELF- EECs. LVSI was observed in 20 MELF + cases and in MELF- tumors. Lymph-node metastases were observed in 7 MELF + cases (2 macrometastases, 3 micrometastases and 2 ITCs). None of the MELF- cases showed micrometastases or ITCs, 18 cases had macrometastatic lymph-nodes. Statistical analysis showed that MELF + tumors carry an increased risk of developing nodal metastasis independent of tumor dimension and LVSI. Loss of MMR proteins expression was observed in 11 MELF + cases and 45 MELF- cases, respectively. Our data showed a higher frequency of immunohistochemical MLH1-PMS2 loss in MELF- pattern of invasion (32.67% of MELF- cases vs 21.43% of MELF + cases) but a higher prevalence of MSH2-MSH6 loss in MELF + pattern (7.14% in MELF + population vs 3.96% of MELF- population) CONCLUSIONS: The morphological recognition of MELF pattern is more reliable than immunohistochemical and molecular signatures of EEC in predicting the risk of nodal involvement. The observed higher prevalence of MSH2-MSH6 loss in MELF + group and MLH1-PMS2 loss in MELF- group may suggest a different molecular signature.

Predictive Value of ERCC1, ERCC2, and XRCC Expression for Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant mFOLFOX-4 Chemotherapy

The dismal outcome in patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer (GC) highlights the need for effective systemic neoadjuvant chemotherapy to improve clinical results. This study evaluated the correlation between the expression of three DNA repair genes, namely the excision repair cross-complementing group 1 (ERCC1), excision repair cross-complementing group 2 (ERCC2), and X-ray repair cross-complementing protein 1 (XRCC1) and the clinical outcome of patients with locally advanced or metastatic GC treated with mFOLFOX-4 neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Fifty-eight patients with histologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic GC following neoadjuvant mFOLFOX-4 chemotherapy were enrolled between January 2009 and January 2018. We analyzed clinicopathological features and ERCC1, ERCC2, and XRCC1 expression to identify potential predictors of clinical response. Among the 58 patients, 16 (27.6%) were categorized into the response group (partial response) and 42 into the nonresponse group (stable disease in 24 patients and progressive disease in 18 patients). A multivariate analysis showed that ERCC1 overexpression (P = 0.003), ERCC2 overexpression (P = 0.049), and either ERCC1 or ERCC2 overexpression (P = 0.002) were independent predictors of response following mFOLFOX-4 neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Additionally, ERCC1 and ERCC2 overexpression did not only predict the response but also progression-free survival (both P < 0.05) and overall survival (both P < 0.05). ERCC1 and ERCC2 overexpression are promising predictive biomarkers for patients with locally advanced or metastatic GC receiving neoadjuvant mFOLFOX-4 chemotherapy and the potential clinical implication is mandatory for further investigation.

Microsatellite instability screening in colorectal adenomas to detect Lynch syndrome patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis

The colorectal cancer spectrum has changed due to population screening programs, with a shift toward adenomas and early cancers. Whether it would be a feasible option to test these adenomas for detection of Lynch syndrome (LS) patients is unclear. Through meta-analysis and systematic review, risk factors for DNA mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) and microsatellite instability (MSI) in adenomas were identified in LS and unselected patient cohorts. Data were extracted for patient age and MMR variant together with adenoma type, grade, size, and location. A total of 41 studies were included, and contained more than 519 LS patients and 1698 unselected patients with 1142 and 2213 adenomas respectively. dMMR/MSI was present in 69.5% of conventional adenomas in LS patients, compared with 2.8% in unselected patients. In the LS cohort, dMMR/MSI was more frequently present in patients older than 60 years (82% versus 54%). dMMR/MSI was also more common in villous adenomas (84%), adenomas over 1 cm (81%), and adenomas with high grade dysplasia (88%). No significant differences were observed for dMMR/MSI in relation to MMR variants and location of adenomas. In the context of screening, we conclude that detection of dMMR/MSI in conventional adenomas of unselected patients is uncommon and might be considered as indication for LS testing. Within the LS cohort, 69.5% of LS patients could have been detected through dMMR/MSI screening of their conventional adenomas.

Tumor Budding in Colorectal Carcinoma Showing a Paradoxical Mitotic Index (Via PHH3) With Possible Association to the Tumor Stromal Microenvironment

BACKGROUND

Colorectal carcinomas (CC) are one of the most commonly diagnosed malignancies. Tumor budding (the histologic process of dissociation that occurs at the invasive margin of colorectal cancer), has significant prognostic implications, in that higher tumor budding is associated with adverse histopathologic and clinical outcomes. Because of this prognostic significance, more research is needed to further understand the pathologic and immunohistochemical (IHC) associations pertaining to this important prognostic variable. In this study, we will further evaluate selective clinopathologic and IHC variables with possible association to tumor budding.

DESIGN

A total of 234 cases of CC diagnosed in our health system were retrospectively reviewed and routine hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides of these cases were collected. A representative slide for tumor budding was selected per case and selective IHC staining was performed. Clinicopathologic data were collected for each case and analyzed in relation to tumor budding scores. In exploratory analyses, tumor budding scores per individual investigator and consensus tumor budding scores were compared with selected IHC stains (MLH1, PMS2, and PHH3) as well as numerous clinicopathologic variables.

RESULTS

We found a paradoxical association between tumor budding and mitosis score using PHH3 immunostaining in univariate and multivariable analysis. Furthermore, patients with intact nuclear expression for MLH1 and/or PMS2 are more likely to have higher tumor budding compared with patients with lost expression. For multivariable analysis, the following covariates were significantly associated with higher tumor budding: the presence of lymphovascular invasion, higher pathologic tumor stage, and finally infiltrating border was more likely to be associated with higher tumor budding compared with cases with a pushing border. Regarding nonmucinous versus mucinous CC, nonmucinous adenocarcinoma (MCA) was more likely to be associated with higher tumor budding compared with MCA.

CONCLUSION

Numerous clinicopathologic variables were found to be associated with tumor budding including lymphovascular invasion, tumor stage, infiltrating tumor border, non-MCA was more likely to be associated with higher tumor budding compared with MCA, possibly related to MUC-2 and MSI. Furthermore, regarding the paradoxical association between tumor budding and mitosis score using a PHH3 immunostaining (high tumor budding having lower mitosis), this is possibly related to the tumoral stomal microenvironment and cancer associated fibroblasts. An idea for a future study would be to look at the maturity of cancer-associated fibroblasts (immature vs. mature) and the tumoral stroma microenvironment, with regards to markers of tumor aggressiveness such as mitosis. In addition, we found that patients with intact nuclear expression for MLH1 and/or PMS2 were more likely to have higher tumor budding compared with patients with lost expression, possibly related to mismatch repair CC's not being as reliant on tumor budding. Future research will hopefully concede further insight into the variables that affect tumor budding, especially regarding the tumoral microenvironment and variations between different patient populations, inclusive of patients lacking activity of the mismatch repair. Ultimately, this will allow for better prognostic information, and more precise treatment modalities.

MMR deficient undifferentiated/dedifferentiated endometrial carcinomas showing significant programmed death ligand-1 expression (sp 142) with potential therapeutic implications

BACKGROUND

Uterine undifferentiated (UEAC)/dedifferentiated (DEAC) carcinomas are rare malignant neoplasms. They appear to pursue an aggressive clinical course with an advanced stage at presentation. Recently, it was discovered that the use of immunotherapeutic drugs targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1)/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) was associated with improved survival in several types of cancer (especially in patients with mismatch-repair (MMR) deficient patients). Whether these findings can be applied to UEAC/DEAC remains a question. Herein, the aim of this study is to evaluate the expression of PD-L1/PD-1 in UEAC/DEAC and its relationship to MMR status. This could offer useful therapeutic information.

DESIGN

Review of endometrial carcinoma (EC) diagnosed over the period of 2011 to 2017 in our institution identified 14 UEAC/DEAC cases (n=14). All cases had immunohistochemistry performed for MMR (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2 and MSH6), PD-L1 and PD-1. The protein expression was examined and in DEAC cases both the undifferentiated component and the low grade component were recorded separately. The expression of PD-L1 and PD-1 was scored in both the tumor and the peritumoral lymphocyte infiltration.

RESULTS

Overall variable degrees of tumoral or immune stromal PD-L1 staining (from 1% to 5%), was present in 50.0% (7/14) of UC/DEACs. Seven cases (50%) were PD-1 positive (immune stromal). Five cases (35.7%) showed co-expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 (Figure 1). Worth noting is that PD-1 staining was exclusively present in peritumoral immune cells. Following this the 14 cases were further divided into MMR deficient and MMR proficient groups (Table 1). A total of 8 cases had MMR deficiency (57.1%). There was a statistically significant association for PD-L1 positivity in the MMR deficiency group (p=0.05). However there was no statistically significant differences regarding PD-1 positivity between MMR groups.

CONCLUSIONS

PD-L1 and PD-1 were expressed in majority of MMR-deficient UEAC /DEAC cases. PD-L1 was not expressed in MMR-proficient carcinomas. These findings might help support potential immunotherapy trials in MMR-deficient UEAC /DEAC.

Screening for Lynch Syndrome by Immunohistochemistry of Mismatch Repair Proteins: Significance of Indeterminate Result and Correlation With Mutational Studies

CONTEXT.—

Immunohistochemical expression of mismatch repair (MMR) protein is a well-accepted method for routine screening for Lynch syndrome with relatively high sensitivity and specificity. Occasionally, however, immunohistochemistry (IHC) can yield an equivocal result with poor reproducibility and the potential for misdiagnosis.

OBJECTIVE.—

To determine the frequency and significance of indeterminate MMR IHC expression in patients routinely screened for Lynch syndrome and correlation with germline mutation studies.

DESIGN.—

Semiquantitative scoring of MMR IHC was performed by image analysis in 479 cases, of which 380 were colorectal and 99 endometrial cancer. Scores of 10% or more, less than 10%, and 0% were used as cutoffs for retained, indeterminate, and loss of expression, respectively. Negative and indeterminate IHC results were confirmed by mutational studies.

RESULTS.—

Four hundred eighteen of 479 cases (87.2%) were reported as retained expression, 45 (9.3%) as loss of expression, and 16 (3.3%) as indeterminate expression. Fifteen of 45 (33.3%) and 8 of 16 (50%) with loss and indeterminate expression, respectively, were found to have Lynch syndrome by germline studies. The overall frequency of Lynch syndrome in our patient population was 4.8% (23 of 479), and 34.7% of these (8 of 23) were associated with indeterminate IHC expression. In the indeterminate group, MLH1 germline mutation was the most frequent (6 of 13; 46.2%), followed by MSH6 (4 of 13; 30.7%).

CONCLUSIONS.—

Our findings provide further evidence that indeterminate IHC should be further investigated for possible MMR germline mutation. Guidelines for interpretation of MMR IHC and the establishment of more objective criteria for defining indeterminate results are important to improve the sensitivity and specificity of the IHC assay.

Prevalence estimation of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancers using tissue microarray based methods - A tertiary care center experience

Aim

Microsatellite instability (MSI) pathway is known to be implicated in carcinogenesis of 15% colorectal carcinomas (CRC), including 2%-3% of cases of Lynch syndrome, as per western literature. MSI status has important prognostic and therapeutic implications. The prevalence of MSI in Indian CRC patients is unknown. We aimed to determine the prevalence by studying 231 consecutive unselected cases of CRC.

Methods

Tissue microarrays using duplicate cores per case for 141 cases, and whole tissue sections for 90 cases, were used. Immunohistochemistry with four mismatch repair (MMR) markers - MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 was performed. Molecular analysis for MSI status was performed in 18 randomly selected cases. Correlation with various clinical and histopathological features was done using univariate and multivariate analysis.

Results

Loss of MMR immunohistochemical (IHC) was seen in 53/231 cases, i.e. 22.94% (95% confidence interval 17.52%-28.36%). MLH1-PMS2 dual loss comprised 13.9%, MSH2-MSH6 7.4%, and isolated PMS2 loss in 1.73% of cases. Univariate analysis showed significant association with age (<60 years), right-sided tumor location, histologic type, high grade, the presence of severe intratumoral lymphocytic (ITL) and peri-tumoral lymphocytic response, and N0 nodal stage. On multivariate analysis, independent variables were age < 60 years, right-sided location, and severe ITL. Molecular testing for MSI corroborated with the IHC results.

Conclusion

The study results show a slightly higher prevalence of MSI-H phenotype, compared to Western literature, stressing the need for more widespread testing for better clinical management and identification of possible hereditary colon cancer syndrome.

Microsatellite instability in metaplasia-dysplasia-adenocarcinoma sequence of Barrett esophagus: a retrospective study

AIM

To analyze the loss of mismatch repair (MMR) system protein expression in metaplasia-dysplasia-adenocarcinoma sequence of Barrett esophagus (BE).

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed the data from 70 patients with pathohistological diagnosis of BE or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) treated at the Clinical Department of Pathology and Cytology, University Hospital Center Zagreb, from January 2009 to January 2011. Patients were divided into three groups: BE without dysplasia (22 patients), BE with dysplasia (37 patients), and EAC (11 patients). Immunohistochemical expression of MutL homologue 1 (MLH1), MutS homologue 2 (MSH2), postmeiotic segregation increased 2 (PMS2), and MutS homologue 6 (MSH6) of DNA MMR system was measured and compared with tumor protein p53 expression.

RESULTS

A total of 81.8% and 81.8% patients with EAC, 32.4% and 35.1% patients with dysplasia, and 50% and 54.5% patients without dysplasia had loss of MLH1 and PMS2 expression, respectively. Patients with EAC and patients with dysplasia did not have loss of MSH2 and MSH6 expression, and 18.2% patients without dysplasia had loss of MSH2 and MSH6 expression. There was a strong positive correlation between MLH1 and PMS2 expression (Spearman ρ 0.97; P<0.001) and between MSH2 and MSH6 expression (Spearman ρ 0.90, P<0.001) in the entire sample and in all BE groups. No significant correlations of MLH1 and PMS2 with p53 expression were found, except in dysplasia group (φ 0.402, P=0.030 for MSH1; φ 0.371, P=0.042 for PMS2).

CONCLUSION

Although we demonstrated considerable loss of MLH1 and PMS2 expression in BE-associated carcinoma sequence, due to the retrospective study design and low number of patients we cannot conclude that MLH1 and PMS2 can be used as biomarkers for patient surveillance and therapy-making decisions. Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine level of evidence: 3.

Molecular testing for Lynch syndrome in people with colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation

BACKGROUND

Inherited mutations in deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) mismatch repair (MMR) genes lead to an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC), gynaecological cancers and other cancers, known as Lynch syndrome (LS). Risk-reducing interventions can be offered to individuals with known LS-causing mutations. The mutations can be identified by comprehensive testing of the MMR genes, but this would be prohibitively expensive in the general population. Tumour-based tests - microsatellite instability (MSI) and MMR immunohistochemistry (IHC) - are used in CRC patients to identify individuals at high risk of LS for genetic testing. MLH1 (MutL homologue 1) promoter methylation and BRAF V600E testing can be conducted on tumour material to rule out certain sporadic cancers.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether testing for LS in CRC patients using MSI or IHC (with or without MLH1 promoter methylation testing and BRAF V600E testing) is clinically effective (in terms of identifying Lynch syndrome and improving outcomes for patients) and represents a cost-effective use of NHS resources.

REVIEW METHODS

Systematic reviews were conducted of the published literature on diagnostic test accuracy studies of MSI and/or IHC testing for LS, end-to-end studies of screening for LS in CRC patients and economic evaluations of screening for LS in CRC patients. A model-based economic evaluation was conducted to extrapolate long-term outcomes from the results of the diagnostic test accuracy review. The model was extended from a model previously developed by the authors.

RESULTS

Ten studies were identified that evaluated the diagnostic test accuracy of MSI and/or IHC testing for identifying LS in CRC patients. For MSI testing, sensitivity ranged from 66.7% to 100.0% and specificity ranged from 61.1% to 92.5%. For IHC, sensitivity ranged from 80.8% to 100.0% and specificity ranged from 80.5% to 91.9%. When tumours showing low levels of MSI were treated as a positive result, the sensitivity of MSI testing increased but specificity fell. No end-to-end studies of screening for LS in CRC patients were identified. Nine economic evaluations of screening for LS in CRC were identified. None of the included studies fully matched the decision problem and hence a new economic evaluation was required. The base-case results in the economic evaluation suggest that screening for LS in CRC patients using IHC, BRAF V600E and MLH1 promoter methylation testing would be cost-effective at a threshold of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for this strategy was £11,008 per QALY compared with no screening. Screening without tumour tests is not predicted to be cost-effective.

LIMITATIONS

Most of the diagnostic test accuracy studies identified were rated as having a risk of bias or were conducted in unrepresentative samples. There was no direct evidence that screening improves long-term outcomes. No probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted.

CONCLUSIONS

Systematic review evidence suggests that MSI- and IHC-based testing can be used to identify LS in CRC patients, although there was heterogeneity in the methods used in the studies identified and the results of the studies. There was no high-quality empirical evidence that screening improves long-term outcomes and so an evidence linkage approach using modelling was necessary. Key determinants of whether or not screening is cost-effective are the accuracy of tumour-based tests, CRC risk without surveillance, the number of relatives identified for cascade testing, colonoscopic surveillance effectiveness and the acceptance of genetic testing. Future work should investigate screening for more causes of hereditary CRC and screening for LS in endometrial cancer patients.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42016033879.

FUNDING

The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Rectal cancer and the pathologist

Examination of the rectum by pathologists is instrumental in the management of patients affected by rectal carcinoma. That role includes evaluation of multiple gross and microscopic features that convey prognostic implications. The analysis is based on the authors' experience handling rectal specimens along with review of the pertinent literature in these areas: margins of excision, quality of the mesorectum, diligence and techniques to sample lymph nodes, tumor budding, grading of residual amount of carcinoma after preoperative therapy, vascular/perineural invasion, and staging the tumor. Pathologists must communicate the findings in a clear manner. Evaluation of margins and completeness of mesorectum are markers of the quality of surgical excision. The number of lymph nodes obtained and examined is dependent in great part on the diligence of the pathologist finding them in the mesenteric adipose tissue. There are grades for budding and response to prior chemoradiation therapy. The location of vascular invasion (extramural vs. intramural) may predict aggressive behavior. Pathologists proactively are to choose sections of tumor for molecular testing. Meticulous macro- and microscopic evaluation of specimens for rectal carcinoma by pathologist is needed to determine an accurate assessment of staging and other prognostic factors. The modern pathologists play a pivotal part in the care and management of patients suffering from rectal adenocarcinoma. That role goes from the initial histological diagnosis to the gross and microscopic examination of the excised specimens. Based on that examination pathologists issue statements that not only evaluate the quality of the surgical procedure, but also through the application of molecular tests they give light on prognostic factors and information for therapeutic purposes.

Relationship between mismatch repair immunophenotype and long-term survival in patients with resected periampullary adenocarcinoma

Background

Periampullary adenocarcinomas, including pancreatic cancer, are a heterogeneous group of tumors with poor prognosis, where classification into intestinal type (I-type) or pancreatobiliary type (PB-type) is a relevant prognostic factor. The clinical significance of deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) in periampullary adenocarcinoma is comparatively unexplored. Herein, we examined the associations of MMR immunophenotype with long-term survival in patients with resected periampullary adenocarcinoma, with particular reference to morphology and adjuvant treatment response.

Methods

MMR protein expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays with primary tumors from a retrospective cohort of 175 patients with periampullary adenocarcinoma treated with pancreaticoduodenectomy during 2001–2011 in Malmö and Lund University Hospitals, Sweden. Cox proportional hazards models were applied to calculate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results

After a mean follow-up of 46.5 (1.9–185.1) months, 35 patients (20.3%) were alive, 24 with I-type and 11 with PB-type tumors. MMR protein expression could be evaluated in 172 cases, in which dMMR was denoted in 20 (11.6%) cases, 13/63 (20.6%) in I-type and 7/109 (6.4%) in PB-type tumors. dMMR was associated with a significantly prolonged overall survival in the entire cohort (HR = 0.28, 95% CI 0.13–0.57), and in I-type tumors (HR = 0.20, 95% CI 0.06–0.68), however not independent of conventional prognostic factors. In PB-type tumors, dMMR was not prognostic, but there was a significant negative interaction between dMMR and adjuvant treatment (p_interaction = 0.015).

Conclusions

dMMR is more frequent in I-type compared to PB-type periampullary adenocarcinoma, and is a prognostic factor for long-term survival only in the former. The finding of the small number of PB-type tumors with dMMR potentially lacking benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy is however noteworthy and merits further validation.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12967-018-1444-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

N_LyST: a simple and rapid screening test for Lynch syndrome

Aims

We sought to use PCR followed by high-resolution melting analysis to develop a single closed-tube screening panel to screen for Lynch syndrome. This comprises tests for microsatellite instability (MSI), MLH1 methylation promoter and BRAF mutation.

Methods

For MSI testing, five mononucleotide markers (BAT25, BAT26, BCAT25, MYB, EWSR1) were developed. In addition, primers were designed to interrogate Region C of the MLH1 promoter for methylation (using bisulphite-modified DNA) and to test for mutations in codon 600 of BRAF. Two separate cohorts from Nottingham (n=99, 46 with MSI, 53 being microsatellite stable (MSS)) and Edinburgh (n=88, 45 MSI, 43 MSS) were tested.

Results

All the cases (n=187) were blind tested for MSI and all were correctly characterised by our panel. The MLH1 promoter and BRAF were tested only in the Nottingham cohort. Successful blinded analysis was performed on the MLH1 promoter in 97 cases. All MSS cases showed a pattern of non-methylation while 41/44 cases with MSI showed full methylation. The three cases with MSI and a non-methylated pattern had aberrations in MSH2 and MSH6 expression. BRAF mutation was detected in 61% of MSI cases and 11% of MSS cases.

Finally, 12 cases were blind screened by using the whole panel as a single test. Of these, five were identified as MSS, four as MSI/non-LS and three as MSI/possible LS. These results were concordant with the previous data.

Conclusion

We describe the Nottingham Lynch Syndrome Test (N_LyST). This is a quick, simple and cheap method for screening for Lynch syndrome.

Same MSH2 Gene Mutation But Variable Phenotypes in 2 Families With Lynch Syndrome: Two Case Reports and Review of Genotype-Phenotype Correlation

Lynch syndrome is an autosomal dominant syndrome that can be subdivided into Lynch syndrome I, or site-specific colonic cancer, and Lynch syndrome II, or extracolonic cancers, particularly carcinomas of the stomach, endometrium, biliary and pancreatic systems, and urinary tract. Lynch syndrome is associated with point mutations and large rearrangements in DNA MisMatch Repair (MMR) genes. This syndrome shows a variable phenotypic expression in people who carry pathogenetic mutations. So far, a correlation in genotype-phenotype has not been definitely established. In this study, we describe 2 Lynch syndrome cases presenting with the same genotype but different phenotypes and discuss possible reasons for this.

Gynaecological neoplasms in common familial syndromes (Lynch and HBOC)

Recognising hereditary predisposition in a cancer patient has implications both for the patient and the patient's kindred. For the latter, cascade germline testing can reassure those not-at-risk family members while carriers can be enrolled in cancer screening and prevention programs that are medically effective and economically sustainable for health care systems. Furthermore, in many of these syndromes, ramifications of molecular phenotypes are increasing, and it is now emerging that, in addition, they convey prognostic and predictive information. Although cancer predisposition syndromes are rare, these molecular phenotypes also occur as somatic events in sporadic cancer settings. The information obtained from these molecular phenotypes, regardless of germline or somatic origin, is being incorporated into clinical management in view of their manifold significance. Thus, increasingly, bespoke management of cancer patients involves testing for both germline and somatic mutations in tumours. Lynch syndrome and BRCA-1 and BRCA-2-associated hereditary breast and ovarian cancer are hereditary cancer syndromes frequently involving the gynaecological tract but tumours associated with similar molecular alterations may also occur sporadically. Thus, the molecular phenotype of mismatch repair deficiency, microsatellite instability or hypermutator phenotype may be attributable to germline or somatic events. Similarly, homologous recombination deficiency or 'BRCAness' in ovarian cancers may be syndromic or sporadic. While hereditary syndromes are well recognised, the prognostic and predictive implications of these molecular phenotypes have only recently been elucidated and these aspects will finally ensure that molecular screening may become standard of care. Thus, nowadays pathologists are asked to designate the molecular phenotype of these cancers and then determine whether it is due to hereditary or sporadic causes.

First-decade patient with colorectal cancer carrying both germline and somatic mutations in APC gene

BACKGROUND

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is one of the most common causes of cancer-related deaths. The mean age of patients with CRC ranges from 49 to 60 years. Pediatric CRC is unusual, which often escapes early diagnosis because of a lack of awareness of its occurrence in children. The association between the mutation of APC and the occurrence of CRC in the first decade of life remains unknown.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a 10-year-old child with CRC; he was diagnosed with stage IIIB advanced transverse colon cancer without distal metastases. We detected a heterozygous germline mutation at c.5465 T > A in both blood and tissue samples and a heterozygous somatic mutation at c.7397C > T in the tissue sample. Both of these mutations can cause CRC tumorigenesis in the first decade of life.

CONCLUSIONS

The rare genetic features of this 10-year-old patient might be the predisposing cause of pediatric CRC. Therefore, screening patients with early-onset CRC through clinical and genetic characterizations is suggested.

A systematic review of test accuracy studies evaluating molecular micro-satellite instability testing for the detection of individuals with lynch syndrome

BACKGROUND

A systematic review was conducted to assess the diagnostic test accuracy of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based microsatellite instability (MSI) testing for identifying Lynch syndrome in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Unlike previous reviews, this was based on assessing MSI testing against best practice for the reference standard, and included CRC populations that were unselected, age-limited or high-risk for Lynch syndrome.

METHODS

Single- and two-gate diagnostic test accuracy studies, or similar, were identified, assessed for inclusion, data extracted and quality appraised by two reviewers according to a pre-specified protocol. Sensitivity of MSI testing was estimated for all included studies. Specificity, likelihood ratios and predictive values were estimated for studies that were not based on high-risk samples. Narrative synthesis was conducted.

RESULTS

Nine study samples were included. When MSI-Low results were considered to be negative, sensitivity estimates ranged from 67% (95% CI 47, 83) to 100% (95% CI 94, 100). Three studies contributed to estimates of both sensitivity and specificity, with specificity ranging from 61% (95% CI 57, 65), to 93% (95% CI 89, 95). Good sensitivity was achieved at the expense of specificity. When MSI-L was considered to be positive (effectively lowering the threshold for a positive index test result) sensitivity increased and specificity decreased. Between-study heterogeneity in both the MSI and reference standard testing, combined with the low number of studies contributing to both sensitivity and specificity estimates, precluded pooling by meta-analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

MSI testing is an effective screening test for Lynch syndrome. However, there is significant uncertainty surrounding what balance of sensitivity and specificity will be achieved in clinical practice and how this relates to specific characteristics of the test (such as the panel of markers used or the thresholds used to denote a positive test).

Lynch syndrome-related small intestinal adenocarcinomas

Lynch syndrome is an autosomal-dominant disorder caused by defective DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes and is associated with increased risk of malignancies in multiple organs. Small-intestinal adenocarcinomas are common initial manifestations of Lynch syndrome. To define the incidence and characteristics of Lynch syndrome-related small-intestinal adenocarcinomas, meticulous familial and clinical histories were obtained from 195 patients with small-intestinal adenocarcinoma, and MMR protein immunohistochemistry, microsatellite instability, MLH1 methylation, and germline mutational analyses were performed. Lynch syndrome was confirmed in eight patients (4%), all of whom had synchronous/metachronous malignancies without noticeable familial histories. Small-intestinal adenocarcinomas were the first clinical manifestation in 37% (3/8) of Lynch syndrome patients, and second malignancies developed within 5 years in 63% (5/8). The patients with accompanying Lynch syndrome were younger (≤50 years; P=0.04) and more likely to have mucinous adenocarcinomas (P=0.003), and tended to survive longer (P=0.11) than those with sporadic cases. A meticulous patient history taking, MMR protein immunolabeling, and germline MMR gene mutational analysis are important for the diagnosis of Lynch syndrome-related small-intestinal adenocarcinomas. Identifying Lynch syndrome in patients with small-intestinal adenocarcinoma can be beneficial for the early detection and treatment of additional Lynch syndrome-related cancers, especially in patients who are young or have mucinous adenocarcinomas.

Performance of Lynch syndrome predictive models in quantifying the likelihood of germline mutations in patients with abnormal MLH1 immunoexpression

Lynch syndrome (LS) accounts for up to 4 % of all colorectal cancers (CRC). Detection of a pathogenic germline mutation in one of the mismatch repair genes is the definitive criterion for LS diagnosis, but it is time-consuming and expensive. Immunohistochemistry is the most sensitive prescreening test and its predictive value is very high for loss of expression of MSH2, MSH6, and (isolated) PMS2, but not for MLH1. We evaluated if LS predictive models have a role to improve the molecular testing algorithm in this specific setting by studying 38 individuals referred for molecular testing and who were subsequently shown to have loss of MLH1 immunoexpression in their tumors. For each proband we calculated a risk score, which represents the probability that the patient with CRC carries a pathogenic MLH1 germline mutation, using the PREMM_1,2,6 and MMRpro predictive models. Of the 38 individuals, 18.4 % had a pathogenic MLH1 germline mutation. MMRpro performed better for the purpose of this study, presenting a AUC of 0.83 (95 % CI 0.67-0.9; P < 0.001) compared with a AUC of 0.68 (95 % CI 0.51-0.82, P = 0.09) for PREMM_1,2,6. Considering a threshold of 5 %, MMRpro would eliminate unnecessary germline mutation analysis in a significant proportion of cases while keeping very high sensitivity. We conclude that MMRpro is useful to correctly predict who should be screened for a germline MLH1 gene mutation and propose an algorithm to improve the cost-effectiveness of LS diagnosis.

Isolated Loss of PMS2 Immunohistochemical Expression is Frequently Caused by Heterogenous MLH1 Promoter Hypermethylation in Lynch Syndrome Screening for Endometrial Cancer Patients

Lynch syndrome (LS) is an autosomal-dominant inherited disorder mainly caused by a germline mutation in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2) and is associated with increased risk for various cancers, particularly colorectal cancer and endometrial cancer (EC). Women with LS account for 2% to 6% of EC patients; it is clinically important to identify LS in such individuals for predicting and/or preventing additional LS-associated cancers. PMS2 germline mutation (PMS2-LS) is the rarest contribution to LS etiology among the 4 LS-associated MMR germline mutations, and its detection is complicated. Therefore, prudent screening for PMS2-LS is important as it leads to an efficient LS identification strategy. Immunohistochemistry is recommended as a screening method for LS in EC. Isolated loss of PMS2 (IL-PMS2) expression is caused not only by PMS2-LS but also by MLH1 germline mutation or MLH1 promoter hypermethylation (MLH-PHM). This study aimed to determine the association between MLH1-PHM and IL-PMS2 to avoid inappropriate genetic analysis. We performed MLH1 methylation analysis and MLH1/PMS2 germline mutation testing on the IL-PMS2 cases. By performing MMR-immunohistochemistry on 360 unselected ECs, we could select 8 (2.2%) cases as IL-PMS2. Heterogenous MLH1 staining and MLH1-PHM were detected in 4 of 8 (50%) IL-PMS2 tumors. Of the 5 IL-PMS2 patients who underwent genetic analysis, 1 had PMS2 germline mutation with normal MLH1 expression (without MLH1-PHM), and no MLH1 germline mutation was detected. We suggest that MLH1 promoter methylation analysis for IL-PMS2 EC should be performed to exclude sporadic cases before further PMS2 genetic testing.

Comparison of the Mismatch Repair System between Primary and Metastatic Colorectal Cancers Using Immunohistochemistry

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. Approximately 10%–15% of the CRC cases have defective DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Although the high level of microsatellite instability status is a predictor of favorable outcome in primary CRC, little is known about its frequency and importance in secondary CRC. Immunohistochemical staining (IHC) for MMR proteins (e.g., MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2) has emerged as a useful technique to complement polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analyses.

Methods

In this study, comparison between the MMR system of primary CRCs and paired liver and lung metastatic lesions was done using IHC and the correlation with clinical outcomes was also examined.

Results

Based on IHC, 7/61 primary tumors (11.4%) showed deficient MMR systems, while 13/61 secondary tumors (21.3%) showed deficiencies. In total, 44 cases showed proficient expression in both the primary and metastatic lesions. Three cases showed deficiencies in both the primary and paired metastatic lesions. In 10 cases, proficient expression was found only in the primary lesions, and not in the corresponding metastatic lesions. In four cases, proficient expression was detected in the secondary tumor, but not in the primary tumor.

Conclusions

Although each IHC result and the likely defective genes were not exactly matched between the primary and the metastatic tumors, identical results for primary and metastatic lesions were obtained in 77% of the cases (47/61). These data are in agreement with the previous microsatellite detection studies that used PCR and IHC.

Colorectal cancer in the very young: a comparative study of tumor markers, pathology and survival in early onset and adult onset patients

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosed before age 30 years is a fatal disease whose biology remains poorly understood. To understand its pathogenesis, we compared molecular and clinical data in surgically treated early-age onset and adult onset patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical data and tumor tissue were collected retrospectively for 94 patients with early-age onset CRC (age ≤30 years) and compared to 275 adult CRC patients (age ≥50 years). Tumor morphology, microsatellite instability (MSI) and stability (MSS), KRAS and BRAF mutations, and mismatch repair (MMR) expression (MSH2, MLH1, MSH6, PMS2) were assessed.

RESULTS

Early-age CRC was distinguished from adult CRC by advanced stage presentation (P<0.001), frequent high grade cancers (P<0.001), and poor prognosis (P<0.001). MSI was associated with favorable survival and MMR loss in both groups. Compared to adults, MSI in early-onset CRC was more prevalent (P<0.01), not tightly linked to MLH1/PMS2 loss, and never associated with BRAFV600E mutations (P<0.01). MSS/BRAFV600E genotype had poor prognosis and was more prevalent in early-age CRC (9% vs. 3%).

DISCUSSION

Specific genetic subtypes are found at different frequencies in early-age onset and adult onset CRC. Complete absence of the indolent MSI/BRAFV600E genotype and enrichment in the unfavorable MSS/BRAFV600E genotype help explain the poor prognosis of early onset CRC.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Different Genetic Testing Strategies for Lynch Syndrome in Taiwan

Patients with Lynch syndrome (LS) have a significantly increased risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC) and other cancers. Genetic screening for LS among patients with newly diagnosed CRC aims to identify mutations in the disease-causing genes (i.e., the DNA mismatch repair genes) in the patients, to offer genetic testing for relatives of the patients with the mutations, and then to provide early prevention for the relatives with the mutations. Several genetic tests are available for LS, such as DNA sequencing for MMR genes and tumor testing using microsatellite instability and immunohistochemical analyses. Cost-effectiveness analyses of different genetic testing strategies for LS have been performed in several studies from different countries such as the US and Germany. However, a cost-effectiveness analysis for the testing has not yet been performed in Taiwan. In this study, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of four genetic testing strategies for LS described in previous studies, while population-specific parameters, such as the mutation rates of the DNA mismatch repair genes and treatment costs for CRC in Taiwan, were used. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios based on discounted life years gained due to genetic screening were calculated for the strategies relative to no screening and to the previous strategy. Using the World Health Organization standard, which was defined based on Taiwan’s Gross Domestic Product per capita, the strategy based on immunohistochemistry as a genetic test followed by BRAF mutation testing was considered to be highly cost-effective relative to no screening. Our probabilistic sensitivity analysis results also suggest that the strategy has a probability of 0.939 of being cost-effective relative to no screening based on the commonly used threshold of $50,000 to determine cost-effectiveness. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first cost-effectiveness analysis for evaluating different genetic testing strategies for LS in Taiwan. The results will be informative for the government when considering offering screening for LS in patients newly diagnosed with CRC.

Clinicopathologic Features of Colorectal Carcinoma in HIV-Positive Patients

BACKGROUND

Emerging evidence suggests differences in colorectal cancer in HIV-infected patients (HIV(+)) compared with HIV(-) patients. Microsatellite instability (MSI), occurring in a subset of colorectal cancer, is present at a higher rate in certain cancers in HIV(+) patients. Colorectal cancer with MSI share some characteristics with those reported for HIV(+) colorectal cancer. On this premise, we studied clinical and pathologic features of HIV(+) colorectal cancer and evaluated for MSI using matched HIV(-) colorectal cancer controls.

METHODS

Two nested, matched cohorts were identified from a hospital-based cohort of colorectal cancer patients. HIV(+) colorectal cancers were identified and random control patients were matched for selected characteristics. Mismatch repair protein (MMR) IHC was performed as the detection method for MSI. Variables were compared between cases and controls using fixed-effects logit modeling to account for matching.

RESULTS

We included 184 colorectal cancer samples (38 HIV(+), 146 HIV(-) control). Median patient age at colorectal cancer onset was 55. When compared with HIV(-) colorectal cancer, HIV(+) patients were more likely to have smoked (P = 0.001), have right-sided colorectal cancer (37% vs. 14%; P = 0.003), and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) above 50/10 high-power fields (21% vs. 7%). There was no difference in MMR protein expression (P = 0.6). HIV(+) colorectal cancer patients had reduced overall survival (P = 0.02) but no difference in progression-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

HIV(+) patients developed colorectal cancer at a lower median age than population estimates, had a higher frequency of right-sided disease, and increased TILs, suggesting potential biologic differences compared with uninfected patients.

IMPACT

Clinicopathologic differences in colorectal cancer of HIV(+) persons may have implications for tumor pathogenesis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(7); 1098-104. ©2016 AACR.

[Molecular pathology of colorectal cancer]

In recent years, several predictive and prognostic biomarkers have been established in colorectal cancer (CRC). The RAS-mutation status is widely applied in the daily routine diagnostic as predictive biomarker for treatment with EGFR-inhibitors. A BRAF- mutation has no predictive value in this context. The detection of high-grade microsatellite instability (MSI-H) is a predictive biomarker for response to 5-Fluoruracil-monotherapy. Prognostic biomarkers in CRC are the MSI-status and the mutational status of BRAF. According to the current WHO classification poorly and undifferentiated CRC and MSI-associated special morphological subtypes are molecular graded depending on their MSI-status. The detection of a BRAF-mutation in the context of microsatellite stability (MSS) is associated with a very poor prognosis and thus represents the most aggressive molecular subtype of CRC. In patients with positive Bethesda criteria a stepwise immunohistochemical and molecular diagnostic scheme is proposed.

Loss of Mismatch Repair Protein Expression in Unselected Endometrial Adenocarcinoma Precursor Lesions

OBJECTIVE

The benefit of evaluating the precursor of endometrial carcinoma, endometrial hyperplasia (intraepithelial neoplasia [EIN]), for loss of mismatch repair (MMR) protein expression and Lynch syndrome has yet to be determined. The present study aims to establish the incidence and type of loss of MMR protein expression in unselected premalignant lesions of endometrial adenocarcinoma, as well as the agreement of immunohistochemical staining in pretreatment endometrial biopsy (EMB) specimens with subsequent uterine resections.

METHODS

A retrospective review identified 112 endometrial biopsies meeting criteria for endometrial EIN. Slides made from tissue microarray blocks were evaluated using antibodies against MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6. Cases with a deficit in MLH1 were evaluated for gene promoter hypermethylation by polymerase chain reaction analysis. Fifty-four subsequent hysterectomy specimens were retrieved and assessed for MMR protein expression.

RESULTS

Of the 112 endometrial biopsies with EIN, 4.5% (5/112) exhibited loss of MMR protein expression. The majority (4/5) demonstrated a deficit of MLH1, of which all exhibited inactivation via promoter hypermethylation. A single case displayed an absence of MSH6. Age was not significantly associated with MMR deficiency. There was no significant association between MMR status in the EMB and a subsequent diagnosis of cancer. Immunohistochemical staining in all successive hysterectomy cases was concordant with the pattern observed in the EMB specimen.

CONCLUSIONS

Sporadic hypermethylation of MLH1 seems to be the primary mechanism underlying defective MMR protein expression in EIN. Among our cohort, only 1 patient (<1%) had a mutation suggestive of a hereditary inheritance. Hence, the utility of evaluating EIN for MMR protein expression as a screen for Lynch syndrome is limited, regardless of age.

Biologic and molecular markers for staging colon carcinoma

Biomarkers in the field of pathology and oncology may allow for the detection of disease, assessment of prognosis or to predict response to certain therapy. Molecular abnormalities in colorectal cancer genesis may occur due to chromosome instability, microsatellite instability and DNA methylation (CpG island methylator phenotype). These alterations are associated in some cases to sporadic carcinomas whereas in others are seen in syndrome-related tumors and are the basis for the use of different biomarkers in the clinical setting. These may include mismatched repair gene/proteins, RAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, which help to determine tumor prognosis and predict response to certain drugs.

Improved Detection of Microsatellite Instability in Early Colorectal Lesions

Microsatellite instability (MSI) occurs in over 90% of Lynch syndrome cancers and is considered a hallmark of the disease. MSI is an early event in colon tumor development, but screening polyps for MSI remains controversial because of reduced sensitivity compared to more advanced neoplasms. To increase sensitivity, we investigated the use of a novel type of marker consisting of long mononucleotide repeat (LMR) tracts. Adenomas from 160 patients, ranging in age from 29–55 years old, were screened for MSI using the new markers and compared with current marker panels and immunohistochemistry standards. Overall, 15 tumors were scored as MSI-High using the LMRs compared to 9 for the NCI panel and 8 for the MSI Analysis System (Promega). This difference represents at least a 1.7-fold increase in detection of MSI-High lesions over currently available markers. Moreover, the number of MSI-positive markers per sample and the size of allelic changes were significantly greater with the LMRs (p = 0.001), which increased confidence in MSI classification. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the LMR panel for detection of mismatch repair deficient lesions were 100% and 96%, respectively. In comparison, the sensitivity and specificity of the MSI Analysis System were 67% and 100%; and for the NCI panel, 75% and 97%. The difference in sensitivity between the LMR panel and the other panels was statistically significant (p<0.001). The increased sensitivity for detection of MSI-High phenotype in early colorectal lesions with the new LMR markers indicates that MSI screening for the early detection of Lynch syndrome might be feasible.

A systematic review and economic evaluation of diagnostic strategies for Lynch syndrome

BACKGROUND

Lynch syndrome (LS) is an inherited autosomal dominant disorder characterised by an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and other cancers, and caused by mutations in the deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) mismatch repair genes.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accuracy and cost-effectiveness of strategies to identify LS in newly diagnosed early-onset CRC patients (aged < 50 years). Cascade testing of relatives is employed in all strategies for individuals in whom LS is identified.

DATA SOURCES AND METHODS

Systematic reviews were conducted of the test accuracy of microsatellite instability (MSI) testing or immunohistochemistry (IHC) in individuals with CRC at risk of LS, and of economic evidence relating to diagnostic strategies for LS. Reviews were carried out in April 2012 (test accuracy); and in February 2012, repeated in February 2013 (economic evaluations). Databases searched included MEDLINE (1946 to April week 3, 2012), EMBASE (1980 to week 17, 2012) and Web of Science (inception to 30 April 2012), and risk of bias for test accuracy was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) quality appraisal tool. A de novo economic model of diagnostic strategies for LS was developed.

RESULTS

Inconsistencies in study designs precluded pooling of diagnostic test accuracy results from a previous systematic review and nine subsequent primary studies. These were of mixed quality, with significant methodological concerns identified for most. IHC and MSI can both play a part in diagnosing LS but neither is gold standard. No UK studies evaluated the cost-effectiveness of diagnosing and managing LS, although studies from other countries generally found some strategies to be cost-effective compared with no testing. The de novo model demonstrated that all strategies were cost-effective compared with no testing at a threshold of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), with the most cost-effective strategy utilising MSI and BRAF testing [incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) = £5491 per QALY]. The maximum health benefit to the population of interest would be obtained using universal germline testing, but this would not be a cost-effective use of NHS resources compared with the next best strategy. When the age limit was raised from 50 to 60 and 70 years, the ICERs compared with no testing increased but remained below £20,000 per QALY (except for universal germline testing with an age limit of 70 years). The total net health benefit increased with the age limit as more individuals with LS were identified. Uncertainty was evaluated through univariate sensitivity analyses, which suggested that the parameters substantially affecting cost-effectiveness: were the risk of CRC for individuals with LS; the average number of relatives identified per index patient; the effectiveness of colonoscopy in preventing metachronous CRC; the cost of colonoscopy; the duration of the psychological impact of genetic testing on health-related quality of life (HRQoL); and the impact of prophylactic hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy on HRQoL (this had the potential to make all testing strategies more expensive and less effective than no testing).

LIMITATIONS

The absence of high-quality data for the impact of prophylactic gynaecological surgery and the psychological impact of genetic testing on HRQoL is an acknowledged limitation.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest that reflex testing for LS in newly diagnosed CRC patients aged < 50 years is cost-effective. Such testing may also be cost-effective in newly diagnosed CRC patients aged < 60 or < 70 years. Results are subject to uncertainty due to a number of parameters, for some of which good estimates were not identified. We recommend future research to estimate the cost-effectiveness of testing for LS in individuals with newly diagnosed endometrial or ovarian cancer, and the inclusion of aspirin chemoprevention. Further research is required to accurately estimate the impact of interventions on HRQoL.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42012002436.

FUNDING

The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Randomized phase III clinical trial comparing the combination of capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) with the combination of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and oxaliplatin (modified FOLFOX6) as adjuvant therapy in patients with operated high-risk stage II or stage III colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of the trial was to compare two active adjuvant chemotherapy regimens in patients with early stage colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

Patients were assigned to oxaliplatin, leucovorin and 5-FU for 12 cycles (group A, FOLFOX6) or oxaliplatin and capecitabine for eight cycles (group B, CAPOX). Primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). Tumors were classified as mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) or deficient (dMMR) according to MLH1, PMS2, MSH2 and MSH6 protein expression. KRAS exon two and BRAF V600E mutational status were also assessed.

RESULTS

Between 2005 and 2008, 441 patients were enrolled, with 408 patients being eligible. After a median follow-up of 74.7 months, 3-year DFS was 79.8 % (95 % CI 76.5-83.4) in the FOLFOX group and 79.5 % (95 % CI 75.9-83.1) in the CAPOX group (p = 0.78). Three-year OS was 87.2 % (95 % CI 84.1-91.1) in the FOLFOX and 86.9 % (95 % CI 83.4-89.9) in the CAPOX group (p = 0.84). Among 306 available tumors, 11.0 % were dMMR, 34.0 % KRAS mutant and 4.9 % BRAF mutant. Multivariate analysis showed that primary site in the left colon, earlier TNM stage and the presence of anemia at diagnosis were associated with better DFS and overall survival (OS), while grade one-two tumors were associated with better OS. Finally, a statistically significant interaction was detected between the primary site and MMR status (p = 0.010), while KRAS mutated tumors were associated with shorter DFS. However, the sample was too small for safe conclusions.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant differences were observed in the efficacy of FOLFOX versus CAPOX as adjuvant treatment in high-risk stage II or stage III CRC patients, but definitive conclusions cannot be drawn because of the small sample size.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ANZCTR 12610000509066 . Date of Registration: June 21, 2010.

AKT1 E17K in Colorectal Carcinoma Is Associated with BRAF V600E but Not MSI-H Status: A Clinicopathologic Comparison to PIK3CA Helical and Kinase Domain Mutants

The PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is activated through multiple mechanisms in colorectal carcinoma. Here, the clinicopathologic and molecular features of AKT1 E17K-mutated colorectal carcinoma in comparison with PIK3CA-mutated colorectal carcinoma are described in detail. Interestingly, in comparison with PIK3CA mutants, AKT1 E17K was significantly associated with mucinous morphology and concurrent BRAF V600E mutation. Among PIK3CA mutants, exon 21 mutations were significantly associated with BRAF V600E mutation, MSI-H status, and poor differentiation, while exon 10 mutations were associated with KRAS/NRAS mutations. Three of four AKT1 mutants with data from both primary and metastatic lesions had concordant AKT1 mutation status in both. Both AKT1- and PIK3CA-mutant colorectal carcinoma demonstrated frequent loss of PTEN expression (38% and 34%, respectively) and similar rates of p-PRAS 40 expression (63% and 50%, respectively). Both patients with AKT1 E17K alone had primary resistance to cetuximab, whereas 7 of 8 patients with PIK3CA mutation alone experienced tumor shrinkage or stability with anti-EGFR therapy. These results demonstrate that AKT1 E17K mutation in advanced colorectal carcinoma is associated with mucinous morphology, PIK3CA wild-type status, and concurrent RAS/RAF mutations with similar pattern to PIK3CA exon 21 mutants. Thus, AKT1 E17K mutations contribute to primary resistance to cetuximab and serve as an actionable alteration.

IMPLICATIONS

This first systematic study of AKT1 and PIK3CA hotspot mutations and their association with cetuximab resistance and BRAF V600E mutation has important ramifications for the development of personalized medicine, particularly in identifying patient candidates for PI3K or AKT inhibitors.

Microsatellite instability in gallbladder carcinoma

The genetic abnormalities involved in the pathogenesis of gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) remain unclear. Microsatellite instability (MSI) has been described in many carcinomas, but little is known about the significance of mismatch repair in gallbladder carcinogenesis. Additionally, methylation status of long interspersed element-1 (LINE-1), a surrogate marker of global DNA methylation, has defined distinct subsets of other cancer types but has not been explored in GBC. Immunohistochemical expression of MSH2, MSH6, MLH1, and PMS2 and LINE-1 mRNA in situ hybridization was evaluated in 67 primary and 15 metastatic GBCs from 77 patients. Amplification of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) was evaluated by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Genotyping for 24 genes involved in carcinogenesis was performed using a multiplex PCR-based platform. MSI was present in 6 of 77 GBCs (7.8 %). Loss of MSH2/MSH6 was detected in five cases and loss of MLH1/PMS2 in one case. MSI status was not associated with Lynch syndrome, tumor grade, extracellular mucin, or tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. There was no significant difference in mean overall survival of patients with and without MSI. Strong LINE-1 staining was identified in none of the GBC with MSI and in 36 of 69 (52 %) of those without MSI (p = 0.005), suggesting that LINE-1 in the former cohort was hypermethylated. All MSI tumors were negative for HER2 amplification, and TP53 and NRAS mutations were only found in GBC without MSI. MSI was identified in a minority of GBC cases. The strong correlation between global DNA methylation as measured by LINE-1 and loss of mismatch repair proteins suggests that methylation may account for the loss of these proteins. These hypermethylated tumors appear to represent a genetically unique cohort of gallbladder neoplasms, and the data suggests that demethylating agents may have a therapeutic value in this class of tumors.