Disconnect between incidence of nonperforated and perforated appendicitis: implications for pathophysiology and management

Rate of Neoplasia in Patients with Complicated Acute Appendicitis Managed Nonoperatively: A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

Recent studies suggest the rate of neoplasia in patients with complicated acute appendicitis initially managed nonoperatively is higher than previously reported.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the incidence and predictors of neoplasia in patients with complicated appendicitis treated nonoperatively.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study of all patients who presented to a tertiary care center with acute appendicitis between 2019 and 2023. Patients with complicated appendicitis treated nonoperatively were included in the study cohort. Patient demographics, clinical course, radiological findings, and pathologic information were collected. The primary outcome was rate of neoplasia. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of appendiceal neoplasia.

RESULTS

In total, we identified 1166 patients with acute appendicitis, of whom 75 patients had complicated appendicitis treated nonoperatively (median age 51 years [interquartile range 38-68]; 36 [48%] were female). Fifty-four (72%) patients had their appendix removed due to failure of nonoperative management, recurrent symptoms, suspicion of neoplasia, or elective surgery. The neoplasia rate among patients with complicated appendicitis initially treated nonoperatively was 16.0% (12/75). Two patients with neoplasia were younger than 40 years of age. Suspicion of malignancy on initial imaging was associated with an increased risk of appendiceal neoplasia (odds ratio 8.13, 95% confidence interval 1.20-55.15; p = 0.03). Age, sex, and appendiceal diameter were not significantly associated with appendiceal neoplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

The high rate of appendiceal neoplasia in patients with complicated appendicitis treated nonoperatively should be a factor in decision making for interval appendectomy for patients of all ages.

The predictive value of neutrophil, C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, and chloride for acute complicated appendicitis in children: a multicenter retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to develop a diagnostic model utilizing clinical and laboratory data to identify complicated appendicitis in pediatric patients, improving acute appendicitis management.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of pediatric acute appendicitis cases (2018-2023) at two hospitals collected medical history, clinical criteria, and blood samples. Patients were divided into complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis groups for comparison. Significant variables were identified using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), and incorporated into a logistic regression model to construct a nomogram. The effectiveness of the model was assessed based on sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and comparison with existing scoring systems.

RESULTS

Among 323 patients, four variables (neutrophil (NEU), C-reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen (Fg), and chlorine (Cl)) were identified as significant. The recommended cutoff value of nomogram was 0.730, exceeding that of Alvarado and PAS, with higher sensitivity (81.7%), specificity (82.6%), and accuracy (82.0%), as well as better performance in both internal and external validations. Furthermore, it demonstrated excellent calibration and clinical utility.

CONCLUSIONS

NEU, CRP, Fg, and Cl are effective markers for diagnosing complicated appendicitis in children. The nomogram model can be considered to be incorporated into the diagnosis process of appendicitis as an auxiliary means of surgical intervention decision-making in complex appendicitis cases.

Circulating eosinophil cell-free DNA as a noninvasive biomarker for perforated appendicitis in pediatric patients-a proof-of-concept study

Appendicitis is the most common condition necessitating emergency abdominal surgery. While most cases are localized, 20% become complicated, resulting in perforation. The management of non-complicated appendicitis varies across medical centers, encompassing both surgical and non-surgical options, whereas complicated appendicitis is predominantly managed surgically. Differentiating them is clinically challenging, especially in pediatric patients, crucial for guiding appropriate treatment strategies. Therefore, there is an unmet need for biomarkers to distinguish the two entities. Here we examined the utility of epigenetic liquid biopsies in appendicitis. We used DNA methylation markers specific to immune and gastrointestinal epithelial cells to assess the tissue origins of plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in appendicitis patients. Appendix epithelium cfDNA was undetected in plasma samples from children with appendicitis relative to control groups. In contrast, neutrophil and regulatory T-cell cfDNA were elevated in appendicitis enhancing the specificity and sensitivity of appendicitis diagnosis beyond the information provided by neutrophil counts. Notably, eosinophil cfDNA was most significantly elevated in children with perforated compared with non-perforated appendicitis. This finding was cross-validated using a machine-learning approach. In conclusion, eosinophil cfDNA levels are elevated in children with a perforated appendix and may have potential as a non-invasive aid in diagnosing perforated appendicitis in the future.

Parasitic appendicitis, what do we know?-a literature review

Background and Objective

Acute appendicitis (AA) is a leading cause of emergency abdominal surgery worldwide, with surgical intervention as its mainstay of treatment. As a primarily clinical diagnosis, it is important for physicians to have ample information to diagnose cases accurately. Given the high rates of negative appendectomies, robust diagnostic workups are crucial to minimize unnecessary surgeries and consider adjunct therapy. Various etiologies, including parasitic infections, are associated with AA. In this review, we report that Schistosoma spp., Enterobius vermicularis (E. vermicularis), Taenia spp., and Ascaris lumbricoides (A. lumbricoides) contribute to or mimic AA. As globalization expands, areas once considered "safe zones" for parasites now face higher risks. It is therefore increasingly important for physicians in all countries to recognize the association between parasites and AA and include proper investigations for high-risk patients. Our findings aim to assist physicians on when to consider a parasitic infection and AA, potentially reducing the number of negative appendectomies, as some parasitic infections can be treated with medication alone.

Methods

To our knowledge, this narrative review incorporating three databases (PubMed, Ovid and Embase), is the first to synthesize research on the relationship between parasites and AA. Articles were screened using Covidence, and inclusion criteria required references to Schistosoma spp., E. vermicularis, Taenia spp., and A. lumbricoides. We limited results to English and French manuscripts published between 1949 and 2023. Two independent reviewers performed title and abstract screening, followed by full-text analysis, ultimately selecting 71 studies that met the inclusion criteria.

Key Content and Findings

Our analysis identifies four parasitic organisms strongly associated with AA-Schistosoma spp., E. vermicularis, Taenia spp., and A. lumbricoides-and highlights countries where these infections are most prevalent. Furthermore, it highlights the need for more research in this area as causal relationships are still yet to be made.

Conclusions

While strong associations exist between parasitic infections and AA, further research is needed to establish a causal relationship.

Abdominal drainage to prevent intraperitoneal abscess after appendectomy for complicated appendicitis

RATIONALE

This is the third update of a Cochrane review first published in 2015 and last updated in 2021. Appendectomy, the surgical removal of the appendix, is performed primarily for acute appendicitis. People who undergo appendectomy for complicated appendicitis, defined as gangrenous or perforated appendicitis, are more likely to suffer postoperative complications in comparison to uncomplicated appendicitis. The routine use of abdominal drainage to reduce postoperative complications after appendectomy for complicated appendicitis is controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of abdominal drainage in reducing intraperitoneal abscess after appendectomy (irrespective of open or laparoscopic) for complicated appendicitis; to compare the effects of different types of surgical drains; and to evaluate the optimal time for drain removal.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, two other databases, and five trials registers, together with reference checking, citation searching, and contact with study authors, to identify studies for inclusion in the review. The latest search date was 12 October 2023.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs in people with complicated appendicitis comparing (1) use of drain versus no drain, (2) open drain versus closed drain, or (3) different schedules for drain removal. We excluded studies in which not all participants received antibiotics after appendectomy.

OUTCOMES

Our critical outcome was intraperitoneal abscess. Important outcomes were wound infection, morbidity, mortality, and hospital stay.

RISK OF BIAS

We used the Cochrane RoB 1 tool to assess the risk of bias in RCTs and quasi-RCTs.

SYNTHESIS METHODS

We synthesised the results for each outcome in a meta-analysis using the random-effects model, except for the Peto odds ratio, which only has a fixed-effect model. We planned to use the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) approach to report studies when it was not possible to undertake a meta-analysis of effect estimates. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome.

INCLUDED STUDIES

We included eight studies (five RCTs and three quasi-RCTs) with a total of 739 paediatric and adult participants, of which 370 participants were randomised to the drainage group and 369 participants to the no-drainage group. The studies were conducted in North America, Asia, and Africa and published between 1973 and 2023. The majority of participants had perforated appendicitis with local or general peritonitis. All participants received antibiotic regimens after open or laparoscopic appendectomy. All studies were at overall high risk of bias.

SYNTHESIS OF RESULTS

Use of drain versus no drain We assessed the certainty of the evidence for 30-day mortality as moderate due to imprecision. We assessed the certainty of the evidence for all other outcomes as very low, downgraded mainly due to high risk of bias, inconsistency, and imprecision. The evidence is very uncertain regarding the effects of abdominal drainage versus no drainage on intraperitoneal abscess at 30 days (risk ratio (RR) 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55 to 2.12; 7 studies, 671 participants; very low-certainty evidence), wound infection at 30 days (RR 1.76, 95% CI 0.89 to 3.45; 7 studies, 696 participants), and morbidity at 30 days (RR 1.84, 95% CI 0.14 to 24.50; 2 studies, 124 participants) in paediatric and adult participants undergoing open or laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. Approximately 113 (57 to 221 participants) out of 1000 participants in the drainage group developed intraperitoneal abscess, compared with 104 out of 1000 participants in the no-drainage group. There were seven deaths in the drainage group (N = 291) compared with one in the no-drainage group (N = 290); abdominal drainage probably increases the risk of 30-day mortality (Peto odds ratio 4.88, 95% CI 1.18 to 20.09; 6 studies, 581 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) in paediatric and adult participants undergoing open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. Abdominal drainage may increase hospital stay by 1.58 days (95% CI 0.86 to 2.31; 5 studies, 516 participants; very low-certainty evidence) in paediatric and adult participants undergoing open or laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis, but the evidence is very uncertain. Open drain versus closed drain No studies compared open drain versus closed drain for complicated appendicitis. Early versus late drain removal No studies compared early versus late drain removal for complicated appendicitis.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence is very uncertain whether abdominal drainage prevents intraperitoneal abscess, wound infection, or morbidity in paediatric and adult participants undergoing open or laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. Abdominal drainage may increase hospital stay in paediatric and adult participants undergoing open or laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis, but the evidence is very uncertain. Consequently, there is no evidence for any clinical improvement with the use of abdominal drainage in people undergoing open or laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. The increased risk of mortality with drainage comes from eight deaths observed in paediatric and adult participants undergoing open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. Larger studies are needed to more reliably determine the effects of drainage on mortality outcomes.

FUNDING

This Cochrane review was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81701950, 82172135), Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (Grant No. CSTB2022NSCQ-MSX0058, cstc2021jcyj-msxmX0294), Medical Research Projects of Chongqing (Grant No. 2018MSXM132, 2023ZDXM003, 2024jstg028), and the Kuanren Talents Program of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University.

REGISTRATION

Registration: not available. Protocol and previous versions available via doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010168, doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010168.pub2, doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010168.pub3, and doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010168.pub4.

Appendiceal Tumor Prevalence in Patients With Periappendicular Abscess

Importance

There are no large prospective cohort studies validating the previously reported high appendiceal tumor rate in patients with periappendicular abscess.

Objective

To confirm the appendiceal neoplasm rate associated with periappendicular abscess.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The Peri-Appendicitis Acuta Tumor prospective multicenter cohort study was conducted at 12 hospitals in Finland. All consecutive adult patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis were included, focusing on patients with imaging confirmed periappendicular abscess undergoing interval appendectomy or emergency appendectomy with available histopathology from December 3, 2020, through December 2, 2022. These data were analyzed from May 2023 to September 2024.

Interventions

Recommended treatment was initial antibiotics and, if needed, drainage, followed by interval appendectomy at 3 months.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The main outcome was appendiceal tumor rate associated with periappendicular abscess. Secondary outcomes included tumor histology and prognostic factors for appendiceal tumor (age, sex, body mass index, duration of symptoms, C-reactive protein level, white blood cell count, computed tomography findings, and tumor markers).

Results

There were 6165 consecutive patients with acute appendicitis. Of these, 396 patients (6.4%) presented with periappendicular abscess, with 9 patients declining to participate and 17 patients without available appendiceal histopathology, leaving 370 patients for the analysis (181 female [48.8%] and 189 male [51.2%]; median age, 58 [range, 18-90] years). Appendiceal tumor rate in patients with periappendicular abscess was 14.3% (53 of 370; 95% CI, 10.8%-17.9%), which was higher compared with uncomplicated acute appendicitis (14.3% vs 1.5%; 48 of 3170; 95% CI, 1.1%-1.9%; P < .001) and complicated acute appendicitis without periappendicular abscess (14.3% vs 2.4%; 63 of 2599; 95% CI, 1.8%-3.0%; P < .001). Patient age (odds ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.04-1.09; P < .001) was the only factor associated with periappendicular abscess tumor prevalence. A cutoff point of age 35 years with high sensitivity was chosen (area under the curve, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.68-0.82) and only 1 patient below this threshold presented with an appendiceal tumor (sensitivity, 98.1%; 95% CI, 94.5-100). Of the 54 tumors on 53 patients, there were 21 low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms, 20 adenocarcinomas, 8 adenomas, and 5 neuroendocrine tumors. The complication rate of emergency appendectomy was higher than after interval appendectomy (31.3% [70 of 224] vs 4.8% [5 of 105], respectively [P < .001]).

Conclusions and Relevance

This large prospective cohort study confirmed a high appendiceal tumor rate associated with periappendicular abscess, especially in patients older than 35 years. At the least, all patients older than 35 years should undergo routine interval appendectomy.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04634448.

Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis with Machine Learning-Based Computer Tomography: Diagnostic Reliability and Role in Clinical Management

Purpose: Acute appendicitis (AA) is a common surgical emergency affecting 7-8% of the population. Timely diagnosis and treatment are crucial for preventing serious morbidity and mortality. Diagnosis typically involves physical examination, laboratory tests, ultrasonography, and computed tomography (CT). This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI) in analyzing CT images for the early diagnosis of AA and prevention of complications. Methods: CT images of patients who underwent surgery for AA at the General Surgery Clinic of Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Health Application and Research Center between January 1, 2019, and June 31, 2023, were analyzed. A total of 1200 CT images were evaluated using four different AI models. The model performance was assessed using a confusion matrix. Results: The median age of the patients was 28 years, with a similar sex distribution. No significant differences were observed in terms of age or sex (P = .168 and P = .881, respectively). Among the AI models, MobileNet v2 showed the highest accuracy (0.7908) and precision (0.8203), whereas Inception v3 had the highest F-score (0.7928). In the receiver operating characteristic analysis, MobileNet v2 achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.8767. Conclusion: AI's role in daily life is expanding. In the present study, the highest sensitivity and specificity were 77% and 86%, respectively. Supporting CT imaging with AI systems can enhance the accuracy of AA diagnoses.

Safety of in-hospital delay of appendectomy - a propensity score-matched analysis of 4900 consecutive patients undergoing surgery for suspected appendicitis

BACKGROUND

Historically, urgent surgery was advocated in patients with suspected appendicitis because of the risk of perforation and possible complications. Although recent studies have shown that it is safe to delay surgery under certain circumstances, many studies do not report adjusted data and exclude patients based on risk factors. Furthermore, it is unclear whether an ultrasound-based diagnostic workup is sufficient to safely delay surgery. This large retrospective study aimed to analyze the risk-adjusted association between delayed appendectomy and perforation and complication rates.

METHODS

Data from consecutive patients who underwent appendectomy for suspected appendicitis at a single institution were reviewed and analyzed. The investigated outcomes were perforation and complication rates. Propensity score (PS) matching was used to create equal groups regarding confounding factors, and multivariate analysis was performed to control for risk factors and to calculate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for in-hospital delay.

RESULTS

Between January 2008 and June 2023, 4900 patients underwent appendectomy for suspected appendicitis. Ultrasound imaging was performed in 4754 patients. Multivariate analysis of PS-matched data showed no association between a waiting time of >12 h and perforation rate (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.67-1.31; P =.69) or complication rate (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.62-1.30; P =.56). Similar results were obtained for a waiting time of 18 h and perforation rate (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.48-1.56; P =.88) or complication rate (adjusted OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.57-1.68; P =.93).

CONCLUSION

This large PS-matched analysis showed that it is safe to delay surgery by 12 and 18 h, even when the diagnostic workup is based on ultrasound. In patients with risk factors for complications, postponement of the procedure can be considered if it can improve overall conditions or allow the procedure to be performed with a higher level of expertise.

Clinical outcomes and optimal indications for nonoperative management of acute appendicitis in adult patients: a comprehensive literature review

Appendectomy as the standard treatment for acute appendicitis has been challenged by accumulating evidence supporting nonoperative management with antibiotics as a potential primary treatment. This review aimed to summarize the clinical outcomes and the optimal indications for nonoperative management of acute appendicitis in adults. Current evidence suggests that uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis have different pathophysiologies and should be treated differently. Nonoperative management for uncomplicated appendicitis was not inferior to appendectomy in terms of complications and length of stay, with less than a 30% failure rate at 1 year. The risk of perforation and postoperative complications did not increase even if nonoperative management failed. Complicated appendicitis with localized abscess or phlegmon could also be treated conservatively, with a success rate of more than 80%. An interval appendectomy following successful nonoperative management is recommended only for patients over the age of 40 years to exclude appendiceal malignancy. The presence of appendicoliths increased the risk of treatment failure and complications; thus, it may be an indication for appendectomy. Nonoperative management is a safe and feasible option for both uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis. Patients should be informed that nonoperative management may be a safe alternative to surgery, with the possibility of treatment failure.

Identification of predictors for complicated acute appendicitis: A retrospective cohort study from a high-volume hospital

BACKGROUND

Acute appendicitis (AA) is the most prevalent cause of acute abdominal pain, with an incidence rate ranging from 96.5 to 100 per 100,000 adults. The rapid and accurate identification of the type and risk level of AA continues to pose a significant challenge. We aimed to develop a model for preoperative differentiation between complicated and uncomplicated AA.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 1196 AA patients were selected. The preoperative and postoperative clinicopathological characteristics were analyzed retrospectively. Both univariate analysis and multivariate analyses were conducted using binary logistic regression to identify the predictive factor associated with complicated AA.

RESULTS

Among a total of 1196 AA patients, 465 (38.9 ​%) were identified as having complicated AA. Approximately 10 ​% of AA patients experienced postoperative complications. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that several factors were associated with an increased risk of complicated AA, including male (P ​< ​0.001, OR ​= ​2.178), age (P ​< ​0.001, OR ​= ​1.028), days of abdominal pain before operation ​= ​3 (P ​< ​0.001, OR ​= ​3.616), days of abdominal pain before operation ​= ​4 (P ​< ​0.001, OR ​= ​7.528), temperature (P ​< ​0.001, OR ​= ​2.121), abdominal tension (P ​< ​0.001, OR ​= ​2.242), neutrophil (P ​< ​0.001, OR ​= ​1.053), fluid accumulates around the appendix (P ​= ​0.002, OR ​= ​2.010), appendiceal fecalith (P ​< ​0.001, OR ​= ​2.122), and the diameter of the appendix (P ​= ​0.002, OR ​= ​1.083).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study significantly advance the understanding of preoperative differentiation between complicated and uncomplicated AA. The predictive nomogram offers a valuable tool for clinicians, enhancing decision-making and improving patient outcomes.

Development and validation of automated three-dimensional convolutional neural network model for acute appendicitis diagnosis

Rapid, accurate preoperative imaging diagnostics of appendicitis are critical in surgical decisions of emergency care. This study developed a fully automated diagnostic framework using a 3D convolutional neural network (CNN) to identify appendicitis and clinical information from patients with abdominal pain, including contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic computed tomography images. A deep learning model-Information of Appendix (IA)-was developed, and the volume of interest (VOI) region corresponding to the anatomical location of the appendix was automatically extracted. It was analysed using a two-stage binary algorithm with transfer learning. The algorithm predicted three categories: non-, simple, and complicated appendicitis. The 3D-CNN architecture incorporated ResNet, DenseNet, and EfficientNet. The IA model utilising DenseNet169 demonstrated 79.5% accuracy (76.4-82.6%), 70.1% sensitivity (64.7-75.0%), 87.6% specificity (83.7-90.7%), and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.865 (0.862-0.867), with a negative appendectomy rate of 12.4% in stage 1 classification identifying non-appendicitis versus. appendicitis. In stage 2, the IA model exhibited 76.1% accuracy (70.3-81.9%), 82.6% sensitivity (62.9-90.9%), 74.2% specificity (67.0-80.3%), and an AUC of 0.827 (0.820-0.833), differentiating simple and complicated appendicitis. This IA model can provide physicians with reliable diagnostic information on appendicitis with generality and reproducibility within the VOI.

Swedish national guidelines for diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis in adults and children

BACKGROUND

Acute appendicitis is one of the most common causes of acute abdominal pain. Differences in the management of this large group of patients has important consequences for the patients and the healthcare system. Controversies regarding the understanding of the natural course of the disease, the utility of new diagnostic methods, and alternative treatments have lead to large variations in practice patterns between centres. These national guidelines present evidence-based recommendations aiming at a uniform, safe and cost-efficient management of this large group of patients.

METHOD

A working group of six experts with broad clinical and research experience was formed. Additional expertise from outside was consulted during the process. A national survey revealed significant variations in the management of patients with suspicion of appendicitis. The evidence provided in published guidelines and reviews were extracted and systematically graded, according to the GRADE methodology. This was supplemented by additional more recent and more directed search of the literature. Patients treated for appendicitis were involved through interviews. The guidelines were reviewed by external experts before the final version was determined.

RESULTS

The guidelines cover an extensive number of issues: pathology, epidemiology, aetiology, natural history, clinical and laboratory diagnosis, diagnostic scoring systems, diagnostic imaging, treatment, nursing care, follow-up, quality registers and quality indicators, among others. Special considerations related to children and pregnant women are covered.

CONCLUSION

These national guidelines present an extensive and thorough review of the current knowledge base related to appendicitis, and provide up-to-date evidence-based recommendations for the management of this large group of patients.

Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibition as a Novel Therapy for Peritoneal Mucinous Carcinomatosis With GNAS Mutations

PURPOSE

Mucinous neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract are characterized by a propensity for metastasis to the peritoneum, resulting in peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis (PMC). A subset of these tumors, most often originating in the appendix, harbor mutations in the GNAS oncogene. While the natural history of GNAS-mutant PMC varies, patient outcomes are generally poor, as is response to cytotoxic chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of single-agent palbociclib, a cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6 inhibitor, in patients with GNAS-mutant PMC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We enrolled 16 patients with PMC in a single-arm personalized cancer therapy trial. For all patients, tumor tissue and/or circulating tumor DNA genomic profiling using next-generation sequencing and, when possible, PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden, and microsatellite instability status was assessed. Twelve of 16 patients had previous disease progression on at least one previous line of chemotherapy. The primary tumor was appendix in 13 patients, unknown in two patients, and pancreas in one patient. Eleven cases were classified as low grade, and five as high grade.

RESULTS

In 13 of 16 patients, we observed a decrease in carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and in six patients, the CEA declined by >50%. As measured by clinical and modified peritoneal RECIST criteria, 50% of evaluable patients had stable disease after 12 months of palbociclib. At a median follow-up of 17.6 months, median survival has not been reached. Clinical response to CDK4/6 inhibition was mirrored in tumors with GNAS mutation and mucinous histology using an ex vivo preclinical platform.

CONCLUSION

CDK4/6 inhibition with palbociclib had clinical activity in PMC characterized by mutations in GNAS that was superior to that previously reported with cytotoxic chemotherapy. CDK4/6 inhibition is a novel therapeutic strategy worthy of further evaluation in this subgroup of gastrointestinal neoplasms.

Feasibility of GPT-3.5 versus Machine Learning for Automated Surgical Decision-Making Determination: A Multicenter Study on Suspected Appendicitis

Background: Nonsurgical treatment of uncomplicated appendicitis is a reasonable option in many cases despite the sparsity of robust, easy access, externally validated, and multimodally informed clinical decision support systems (CDSSs). Developed by OpenAI, the Generative Pre-trained Transformer 3.5 model (GPT-3) may provide enhanced decision support for surgeons in less certain appendicitis cases or those posing a higher risk for (relative) operative contra-indications. Our objective was to determine whether GPT-3.5, when provided high-throughput clinical, laboratory, and radiological text-based information, will come to clinical decisions similar to those of a machine learning model and a board-certified surgeon (reference standard) in decision-making for appendectomy versus conservative treatment. Methods: In this cohort study, we randomly collected patients presenting at the emergency department (ED) of two German hospitals (GFO, Troisdorf, and University Hospital Cologne) with right abdominal pain between October 2022 and October 2023. Statistical analysis was performed using R, version 3.6.2, on RStudio, version 2023.03.0 + 386. Overall agreement between the GPT-3.5 output and the reference standard was assessed by means of inter-observer kappa values as well as accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values with the “Caret” and “irr” packages. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. Results: There was agreement between the surgeon’s decision and GPT-3.5 in 102 of 113 cases, and all cases where the surgeon decided upon conservative treatment were correctly classified by GPT-3.5. The estimated model training accuracy was 83.3% (95% CI: 74.0, 90.4), while the validation accuracy for the model was 87.0% (95% CI: 66.4, 97.2). This is in comparison to the GPT-3.5 accuracy of 90.3% (95% CI: 83.2, 95.0), which did not perform significantly better in comparison to the machine learning model (p = 0.21). Conclusions: This study, the first study of the “intended use” of GPT-3.5 for surgical treatment to our knowledge, comparing surgical decision-making versus an algorithm found a high degree of agreement between board-certified surgeons and GPT-3.5 for surgical decision-making in patients presenting to the emergency department with lower abdominal pain.

Hyponatremia as a predictor of complicated appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aim: To investigate the value of hyponatremia as a predictive marker for complicated appendicitis.Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus databases were searched for studies published up to 5 June 2024. Studies reporting serum sodium levels in patients with complicated and non-complicated appendicitis and studies reporting the association between baseline hyponatremia and complicated appendicitis were included. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed.Results: Twenty-two studies met the eligibility criteria. Serum sodium levels were measured at arrival or preoperatively in all included studies. Meta-analysis of data from 17 studies showed that preoperative sodium levels were significantly lower in patients with complicated appendicitis vs uncomplicated appendicitis [Mean Difference (MD): -2.58 95% confidence intervals (CI): -3.51, -1.66 I2 = 98%]. A pooled analysis of 18 studies demonstrated a statistically significant association between preoperative hyponatremia and complicated appendicitis [Odds Ratio (OR): 4.11 95% CI: 3.07, 5.51 I2 = 93%]. Results remained significant on subgroup analysis for adult and pediatric populations. However, the MD was higher and the OR was higher in the subgroup of pediatric patients.Conclusion: Hyponatremia was identified as a potential predictor for complicated appendicitis. The association between hyponatremia and complicated appendicitis seems to be stronger in pediatric patients as compared with adults.

Power Has Pitfalls: (In)accuracy of Administrative Data for Nonoperative Management of Appendicitis

INTRODUCTION

Nonoperative management (NOM) of uncomplicated appendicitis is increasingly common. Effectiveness of NOM has been studied by identifying patients via International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 9/ICD-10 codes for uncomplicated appendicitis and no code for appendectomy. We sought to assess the accuracy of such administrative definitions.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified patients with ICD-9/ICD-10 codes for appendicitis at five sites across the United States. Initial management plan and clinical severity were recorded by trained abstractors. We identified a gold standard cohort of patients with surgeon-diagnosed uncomplicated appendicitis and planned NOM. We defined two administrative cohorts with ICD-9/ICD-10 codes for uncomplicated appendicitis and either no surgery during initial admission (definition #1) or no surgery on day 0-1 of admission (definition #2). We compared each definition to the gold standard.

RESULTS

Among 1224 patients with uncomplicated appendicitis, 72 (5.9%) underwent planned NOM. NOM patients were older (median [Q1-Q3] of 37 [27-56] versus 32 [25-44] y) and less frequently male (51.4% versus 54.9%), White (54.1% versus 67.6%), and privately insured (38.9% versus 50.2%) than patients managed operatively. Definition #1 had sensitivity of 0.81 and positive predictive value of 0.87 for NOM of uncomplicated appendicitis. Definition #2 had sensitivity of 0.83 and positive predictive value of 0.72. The gold standard cohort had a true failure/recurrence rate of 23.6%, compared with apparent rates of 25.4% and 39.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Administrative definitions are prone to misclassification in identifying planned NOM of uncomplicated appendicitis. This likely impacts outcomes in studies using administrative databases. Investigators should disclose how misclassification may affect results and select an administrative definition that optimally balances sensitivity and specificity for their research question.

Single-cell sequencing of the vermiform appendix during development identifies transcriptional relationships with appendicitis in preschool children

BACKGROUND

The development of the human vermiform appendix at the cellular level, as well as its function, is not well understood. Appendicitis in preschool children, although uncommon, is associated with a high perforation rate and increased morbidity.

METHODS

We performed single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) on the human appendix during fetal and pediatric stages as well as preschool-age inflammatory appendices. Transcriptional features of each cell compartment were discussed in the developing appendix. Cellular interactions and differentiation trajectories were also investigated. We compared scRNA-seq profiles from preschool appendicitis to those of matched healthy controls to reveal disease-associated changes. Bulk transcriptomic data, immunohistochemistry, and real-time quantitative PCR were used to validate the findings.

RESULTS

Our analysis identified 76 cell types in total and described the cellular atlas of the developing appendix. We discovered the potential role of the BMP signaling pathway in appendiceal epithelium development and identified HOXC8 and PITX2 as the specific regulons of appendix goblet cells. Higher pericyte coverage, endothelial angiogenesis, and goblet mucus scores together with lower epithelial and endothelial tight junction scores were found in the preschool appendix, which possibly contribute to the clinical features of preschool appendicitis. Preschool appendicitis scRNA-seq profiles revealed that the interleukin-17 signaling pathway may participate in the inflammation process.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides new insights into the development of the appendix and deepens the understanding of appendicitis in preschool children.

Trends and levels of the global, regional, and national burden of appendicitis between 1990 and 2021: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021

BACKGROUND

Appendicitis is a common surgical emergency that poses a large clinical and economic burden. Understanding the global burden of appendicitis is crucial for evaluating unmet needs and implementing and scaling up intervention services to reduce adverse health outcomes. This study aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of the global, regional, and national burden of appendicitis, by age and sex, from 1990 to 2021.

METHODS

Vital registration and verbal autopsy data, the Cause of Death Ensemble model (CODEm), and demographic estimates from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) were used to estimate cause-specific mortality rates (CSMRs) for appendicitis. Incidence data were extracted from insurance claims and inpatient discharge sources and analysed with disease modelling meta-regression, version 2.1 (DisMod-MR 2.1). Years of life lost (YLLs) were estimated by combining death counts with standard life expectancy at the age of death. Years lived with disability (YLDs) were estimated by multiplying incidence estimates by an average disease duration of 2 weeks and a disability weight for abdominal pain. YLLs and YLDs were summed to estimate disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs).

FINDINGS

In 2021, the global age-standardised mortality rate of appendicitis was 0·358 (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 0·311-0·414) per 100 000. Mortality rates ranged from 1·01 (0·895-1·13) per 100 000 in central Latin America to 0·054 (0·0464-0·0617) per 100 000 in high-income Asia Pacific. The global age-standardised incidence rate of appendicitis in 2021 was 214 (174-274) per 100 000, corresponding to 17 million (13·8-21·6) new cases. The incidence rate was the highest in high-income Asia Pacific, at 364 (286-475) per 100 000 and the lowest in western sub-Saharan Africa, at 81·4 (63·9-109) per 100 000. The global age-standardised rates of mortality, incidence, YLLs, YLDs, and DALYs due to appendicitis decreased steadily between 1990 and 2021, with the largest reduction in mortality and YLL rates. The global annualised rate of decline in the DALY rate was greatest in children younger than the age of 10 years. Although mortality rates due to appendicitis decreased in all regions, there were large regional variations in the temporal trend in incidence. Although the global age-standardised incidence rate of appendicitis has steadily decreased between 1990 and 2021, almost half of GBD regions saw an increase of greater than 10% in their age-standardised incidence rates.

INTERPRETATION

Slow but promising progress has been observed in reducing the overall burden of appendicitis in all regions. However, there are important geographical variations in appendicitis incidence and mortality, and the relationship between these measures suggests that many people still do not have access to quality health care. As the incidence of appendicitis is rising in many parts of the world, countries should prepare their health-care infrastructure for timely, high-quality diagnosis and treatment. Given the risk that improved diagnosis may counterintuitively drive apparent rising trends in incidence, these efforts should be coupled with improved data collection, which will also be crucial for understanding trends and developing targeted interventions.

FUNDING

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Appendiceal adenocarcinoma associated with Amyand's hernia: a case report

We encountered a rare case of appendiceal carcinoma associated with Amyand's hernia, which was difficult to diagnose preoperatively. A 74-year-old man presented to our hospital with right lower abdominal pain. A hard mass was palpable in the right lower abdomen, and blood tests showed a slightly elevated inflammatory response. Computed tomography revealed a 7 × 5 cm mass with indistinct borders and heterogeneous internal density extending from the cecum to the right lower abdominal wall. We diagnosed appendiceal abscess, however, percutaneous biopsy which was performed for differential diagnosis with appendiceal carcinoma showed no malignancy. Thereafter, the patient was followed up. Two months later, a blood test showed insignificant changes in the inflammatory response and a high serum carcinoembryonic antigen level (48.6 ng/mL). An ultrasound showed a mass contiguous to the appendix, extending to the abdominal wall, with abundant blood flow signals. Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography showed a high accumulation of fluorodeoxyglucose in the mass. Four months after the initial visit, the patient had an open ileocecal resection combined with an abdominal wall resection based on the preoperative diagnosis of appendiceal carcinoma invading the abdominal wall. During laparotomy, an enlarged appendix tip extended from the internal inguinal ring outside the inferior epigastric artery to the abdominal wall. Histopathological examination of the appendiceal tumor revealed well-differentiated adenocarcinoma, T4b (abdominal wall), N0, Ly0, and V0. When a right lower abdominal mass extends from the cecum to the abdominal wall, appendiceal tumors associated with Amyand's hernia should be considered.

Hidden Appendicoliths and Their Impact on the Severity and Treatment of Acute Appendicitis

Background/Objectives: In patients diagnosed with uncomplicated acute appendicitis (UAA), the absence of calcified deposits or stones, called appendicoliths, often leads to consideration of non-operative treatment (NOT), despite the notable treatment failure rate associated with this approach. Previous research has indirectly estimated the prevalence of appendicoliths to range between 15% and 38% retrospectively by CT scan, intraoperative palpation, and pathology report, thereby potentially missing certain concrements. Our hypothesis proposes that this reported prevalence significantly underestimates the occurrence of appendicoliths, which could explain the high failure rate of 29% of patients with appendicitis observed with NOT. Methods: In our prospective study, conducted with a cohort of 56 adult patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis (AA), we employed intraoperative extracorporeal incisions of the vermiform appendix, in addition to standard diagnostic methods. Results: Our findings revealed 50% more appendicoliths by intraoperative incision (n = 36, p < 0.001) compared to preoperative imaging (n = 24). Appendicoliths were present in 71.4% (n = 40, p < 0.001) of AA patients. Conclusions: These results suggest that conventional diagnostic procedures plausibly underestimate the actual prevalence of appendicoliths, potentially elucidating the frequent treatment failures observed in NOT approaches applied to patients with UAA.

Immunohistochemical inflammation in histologically normal gallbladders containing gallstones

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to establish features of inflammation in histologically normal gallbladders with gallstones and compare the expression of inflammatory markers in acutely and chronically inflamed gallbladders.

METHODS

Immunohistochemistry was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded gallbladders for tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-2R, and substance p in three groups: Group I (n = 60) chronic cholecystitis, Group II (n = 57) acute cholecystitis and Group III (n = 45) histologically normal gallbladders with gallstones. Expression was quantified using the H-scoring system.

RESULTS

Median, interquartile range expression of mucosal IL-2R in Groups I (2.65, 0.87-7.97) and II (12.30, 6.15-25.55) was significantly increased compared with group III (0.40, 0.10-1.35, p < 0.05). Submucosal IL-2R expression in Groups I (2.0, 1.12-4.95) and II (10.0, 5.95-14.30) was also significantly increased compared with Group III (0.50, 0.15-1.05, p < 0.05). There was no difference in the lymphoid cell IL-6 expression between Groups I (5.95, 1.60-18.15), II (6.10, 1.1-36.15) and III (8.30, 2.60-26.35, p > 0.05). Epithelial IL-6 expression of Group III (8.3, 2.6-26.3) was significantly increased compared with group I (0.5, 0-10.2, p < 0.05) as was epithelial TNF-α expression in Group III (85.0, 70.50-92.0) compared with Groups I (72.50, 45.25.0-85.50, p < 0.05) and II (61.0, 30.0-92.0, p < 0.05). Lymphoid cell Substance P expression in Groups I (1.90, 1.32-2.65) and II (5.62, 2.50-20.8) was significantly increased compared with Group III (1.0,1.0-1.30, p < 0.05). Epithelial cell expression of Substance P in Group III (121.7, 94.6-167.8) was significantly increased compared with Groups I (75.7, 50.6-105.3, p < 0.05) and II (78.9, 43.5-118.5, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Histologically normal gallbladders with gallstones exhibited features of inflammation on immunohistochemistry.

Early versus delayed appendicectomy for appendiceal phlegmon or abscess

BACKGROUND

This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2017. Acute appendicitis (inflammation of the appendix) can be simple or complicated. Appendiceal phlegmon and appendiceal abscess are examples of complicated appendicitis. Appendiceal phlegmon is a diffuse inflammation in the bottom right of the appendix, while appendiceal abscess is a discrete inflamed mass in the abdomen that contains pus. Appendiceal phlegmon and abscess account for 2% to 10% of acute appendicitis. People with appendiceal phlegmon or abscess usually need an appendicectomy to relieve their symptoms (e.g. abdominal pain, loss of appetite, nausea, and vomiting) and avoid complications (e.g. peritonitis (infection of abdominal lining)). Surgery for people with appendiceal phlegmon or abscess may be early (immediately after hospital admission or within a few days of admission), or delayed (several weeks later in a subsequent hospital admission). The optimal timing of appendicectomy for appendiceal phlegmon or abscess is debated.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of early appendicectomy compared to delayed appendicectomy on overall morbidity and mortality in people with appendiceal phlegmon or abscess.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, two other databases, and five trials registers on 11 June 2023, together with reference checking to identify additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all individual and cluster-randomised controlled trials (RCTs), irrespective of language, publication status, or age of participants, comparing early versus delayed appendicectomy in people with appendiceal phlegmon or abscess.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.

MAIN RESULTS

We included eight RCTs that randomised 828 participants to early or delayed appendicectomy for appendiceal phlegmon (7 trials) or appendiceal abscess (1 trial). The studies were conducted in the USA, India, Nepal, and Pakistan. All RCTs were at high risk of bias because of lack of blinding and lack of published protocols. They were also unclear about methods of randomisation and length of follow-up. 1. Early versus delayed open or laparoscopic appendicectomy for appendiceal phlegmon We included seven trials involving 788 paediatric and adult participants with appendiceal phlegmon: 394 of the participants were randomised to the early appendicectomy group (open or laparoscopic appendicectomy as soon as the appendiceal mass resolved within the same admission), and 394 were randomised to the delayed appendicectomy group (initial conservative treatment followed by delayed open or laparoscopic appendicectomy several weeks later). There was no mortality in either group. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of early appendicectomy on overall morbidity (risk ratio (RR) 0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19 to 2.86; 3 trials, 146 participants; very low-certainty evidence), the proportion of participants who developed wound infections (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.48 to 2.02; 7 trials, 788 participants), and the proportion of participants who developed faecal fistulas (RR 1.75, 95% CI 0.36 to 8.49; 5 trials, 388 participants). Early appendicectomy may reduce the abdominal abscess rate (RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.80; 4 trials, 626 participants; very low-certainty evidence), reduce the total length of hospital stay by about two days (mean difference (MD) -2.02 days, 95% CI -3.13 to -0.91; 5 trials, 680 participants), and increase the time away from normal activities by about five days (MD 5.00 days; 95% CI 1.52 to 8.48; 1 trial, 40 participants), but the evidence is very uncertain. 2. Early versus delayed laparoscopic appendicectomy for appendiceal abscess We included one trial involving 40 paediatric participants with appendiceal abscess: 20 were randomised to the early appendicectomy group (emergent laparoscopic appendicectomy), and 20 were randomised to the delayed appendicectomy group (initial conservative treatment followed by delayed laparoscopic appendicectomy 10 weeks later). There was no mortality in either group. The trial did not report on overall morbidity, various complications, or time away from normal activities. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of early appendicectomy on the total length of hospital stay (MD -0.20 days, 95% CI -3.54 to 3.14; very low-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

For the comparison of early versus delayed open or laparoscopic appendicectomy for paediatric and adult participants with appendiceal phlegmon, very low-certainty evidence suggests that early appendicectomy may reduce the abdominal abscess rate. The evidence is very uncertain whether early appendicectomy prevents overall morbidity or other complications. Early appendicectomy may reduce the total length of hospital stay and increase the time away from normal activities, but the evidence is very uncertain. For the comparison of early versus delayed laparoscopic appendicectomy for paediatric participants with appendiceal abscess, data are sparse, and we cannot rule out significant benefits or harms of early versus delayed appendicectomy. Further trials on this topic are urgently needed and should specify a set of criteria for use of antibiotics, percutaneous drainage of the appendiceal abscess prior to surgery, and resolution of the appendiceal phlegmon or abscess. Future trials should include outcomes such as time away from normal activities and length of hospital stay.

Pathological Assessment of the Appendix in Appendectomies Performed in Children

BACKGROUND

Acute appendicitis is known as the most common diagnosis of acute abdomen leading to surgery. Therefore, timely diagnosis is of special importance. This study was conducted with the aim of pathological assessment of the appendix in appendectomies performed in children to determine the rate of negative appendectomies and the predictors of negative appendectomy and to evaluate the paraclinical tools used in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional descriptive study. All children who underwent appendectomy at Shahid Motahari Hospital in Urmia from March 2021 to March 2022 were examined. The required data including demographic, paraclinical, and final pathology characteristics were collected and recorded. The investigated cases were classified into positive and negative appendectomy categories for comparison.

RESULTS

Among 234 pathology samples of the appendix, 22 cases were related to accidental appendectomy. In addition, 11.3% of cases were negative appendectomy and 88.7% were positive appendectomy. The age range of 8 to 14 years and male gender were associated with a lower negative appendectomy rate (both P<0.001). Inflammatory (49.5%) and gangrenous appendicitis (30.2%) were the most commonly reported histopathologies. Sonography had a sensitivity of 84%, a specificity of 79%, and an overall diagnostic accuracy of 83%.

CONCLUSION

A relatively significant number of accidental and negative appendectomies are performed. More careful investigation and the use of expectant and medical treatment instead of surgery, especially in females and young children, can be effective in improving diagnostic accuracy and preventing negative appendectomies.

Sex Differences in Appendicitis: A Systematic Review

Appendicitis is one of the most common gastrointestinal conditions a person can develop. Throughout the years of assessing the different focuses of appendicitis, such as origin, symptoms, labs, diagnosis, treatment, and complications, there have been mere mentions of sex differences. One of the most known sex differences in appendicitis is the fact that males are significantly more likely to develop appendicitis compared to females. Another postulated difference is that males may be more likely to develop a perforated appendix. These differences significantly affect the various aspects of diagnosing and treating appendicitis and may even influence the outcome of appendicitis. Sex difference analysis of conditions has been widely researched over the last two decades, and sex can influence and impact conditions from initial presentation to the outcome of treatment. This paper evaluates the sex differences in appendicitis concerning incidence, risk factors, symptoms, diagnosis technique, treatment, and outcomes across ages. Following PRISMA guidelines, this systematic review reviewed PubMed, ScienceDirect, and ProQuest databases for articles pertaining to sex differences in appendicitis. The original article count was 21,121, which was narrowed down to 28 publications. It was found that, as previously described, males had a significantly higher rate of appendicitis, as well as were at significant risk of perforated appendicitis. No official risk factors were found to differ between the sexes, but males were more likely to complain of symptoms like right lower quadrant cramps/tenderness/pain and loss of appetite. Scores such as the pediatric appendicitis score (PAS) and Ohmann have been used to diagnose appendicitis, but the PAS was significantly more accurate for females, and the Ohmann resulted in significantly fewer negative appendectomies in females as well. Ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) are still the gold standards for diagnosis; however, while time to CT was significantly delayed in females, they were more likely to undergo extensive imaging, possibly to rule out other conditions. Males were more likely to undergo open appendectomies compared to females, who more frequently underwent laparoscopic appendectomy, yet females were more likely to experience complications. Further research should evaluate the influences that can predict postoperative outcomes following appendectomies between sexes and how to prevent/reduce their occurrence.

Impact of COVID-19 on acute appendicitis presentation, management and pathology findings in adult and paediatric populations

BACKGROUND

We investigated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on trends of presentation, management and pathology findings in patients who underwent an appendicectomy for suspected acute appendicitis.

METHOD

The retrospective study reviewed patients (n = 939 adults and n = 329 children) who had an appendicectomy performed for suspected acute appendicitis and histopathology assessment in the Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Northern Ireland. Pre-COVID-19 (March 2019 to February 2020) and COVID-19 Year 1 (March 2020 to February 2021) data were compared. Chi-squared tests were applied to compare timeframes.

RESULTS

513 adult appendicectomies were performed in the immediate year pre-COVID-19, compared to 426 in COVID-19 Year 1, representing a 17% reduction. No such reduction was seen within the paediatric population, likely related to a change in regional paediatric referral criteria during the pandemic. When comparing COVID-19 Year 1 with pre-pandemic, fewer patients presented with <24 hours of symptoms (45% v 53%, p = 0.005), and there was greater use of pre-operative computed tomography imaging in adults (63.2% v 48.7%, p<0.001). Fewer adult and paediatric cases of simple acute appendicitis and non-diagnostic specimens, with relative increased proportions of perforated acute appendicitis, were observed in COVID-19 Year 1 compared with pre-pandemic. No absolute increase in perforated acute appendicitis cases was observed in adults.

CONCLUSION

Year 1 of the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with delayed presentation of acute appendicitis in adults and children. In adults, an overall reduction in appendicectomy operations, increased use of pre-operative diagnostic imaging, and fewer specimens showing simple acute appendicitis or non-diagnostic features, collectively support appropriate restriction of surgery for those patients with a more certain acute appendicitis diagnosis.

Associations between Th1-related cytokines and complicated pediatric appendicitis

The pathogenesis of appendicitis is not understood fully, and the diagnosis can be challenging. Previous research has suggested an association between a T helper (Th) 1-dependent immune response and complicated appendicitis. This prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the association between serum concentrations of the Th1-associated cytokines interleukin (IL)-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6, IL-10, IL-17A and tumor necrosis factor beta (TNF-β) and the risk of complicated appendicitis in children. Appendicitis severity was determined through histopathological examination. A total of 137 children < 15 years with appendicitis were included with a median age of 10 years (IQR 8-12); 86 (63%) were boys, and 58 (42%) had complicated appendicitis. Children with complicated appendicitis had significantly higher concentrations of serum IL-6 and IL-10, and lower of TNF-β. After adjustment for age, symptom duration, and presence of appendicolith in a multivariable logistic regression, a higher concentration of IL-6 remained associated with an increased risk of complicated appendicitis (aOR 1.001 [95% CI 1.000-1.002], p = 0.02). Serum concentrations of IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-10, IL-17A and TNF-β were not significantly associated with the risk of complicated appendicitis. In conclusion, our results suggests that the systemic inflammatory response in complicated appendicitis is complex and not solely Th1-dependent.

Clinical efficacy and safety of endoscopic retrograde appendicitis treatment for acute appendicitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of endoscopic retrograde appendicitis treatment (ERAT) for acute appendicitis (AA) by conducting a meta-analysis of clinical randomized trials (RCTs).

METHODS

Eight electronic databases were searched. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. RevMan5.3 and STATA14 software were used to for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-six RCTs with 2236 subjects were analyzed. First, operative time, length of hospital stay and duration of bed rest were shorter in the ERAT groups than in the control groups, with the pooled MD and 95 % CI being -13.22(-20.09, -6.35)(p = 0.0002), -2.13 (-2.47, -1.80)(p < 0.00001) and -3.15 (-3.76, -2.53)(p < 0.00001), respectively. Second, patients in the ERAT groups had a lower incidence of complications than the control groups, with a pooled RR and 95 % CI of 0.25(0.18, 0.35)(p < 0.00001). Third, patients who received ERAT returned to normal temperature faster than the control groups, the pooled MD and 95 % CI was -3.39(-4.36, -2.42)(p<0.00001). Finally, the result showed that the recurrence rate in the ERAT groups was approximately twice that of control groups, with the pooled RR and 95 % CI being 2.10(1.02, 4.32)(p < 0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

ERAT results in fewer complications and shorter recovery time. And compared to appendectomy, ERAT reduces operative time and intraoperative bleeding. However, the recurrence of acute appendicitis after ERAT remains a concern. And more multicenter and large-scale RCTs are needed to confirm the benefits of ERAT.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

We have registered on the PROSPERO [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/], and the registration number is CRD42023420171.

Diagnosis and treatment of appendicitis: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal diagnosis and treatment of appendicitis remains controversial. This systematic review details the evidence and current best practices for the evaluation and management of uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis in adults and children.

METHODS

Eight questions regarding the diagnosis and management of appendicitis were formulated. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane and clinicaltrials.gov/NLM were queried for articles published from 2010 to 2022 with key words related to at least one question. Randomized and non-randomized studies were included. Two reviewers screened each publication for eligibility and then extracted data from eligible studies. Random effects meta-analyses were performed on all quantitative data. The quality of randomized and non-randomized studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 or Newcastle Ottawa Scale, respectively.

RESULTS

2792 studies were screened and 261 were included. Most had a high risk of bias. Computerized tomography scan yielded the highest sensitivity (> 80%) and specificity (> 93%) in the adult population, although high variability existed. In adults with uncomplicated appendicitis, non-operative management resulted in higher odds of readmission (OR 6.10) and need for operation (OR 20.09), but less time to return to work/school (SMD - 1.78). In pediatric patients with uncomplicated appendicitis, non-operative management also resulted in higher odds of need for operation (OR 38.31). In adult patients with complicated appendicitis, there were higher odds of need for operation following antibiotic treatment only (OR 29.00), while pediatric patients had higher odds of abscess formation (OR 2.23). In pediatric patients undergoing appendectomy for complicated appendicitis, higher risk of reoperation at any time point was observed in patients who had drains placed at the time of operation (RR 2.04).

CONCLUSIONS

This review demonstrates the diagnosis and treatment of appendicitis remains nuanced. A personalized approach and appropriate patient selection remain key to treatment success. Further research on controversies in treatment would be useful for optimal management.

The Diagnostic Accuracy of Hyperbilirubinemia in Predicting Appendicitis and Appendiceal Perforation

Background Every diagnostic tool that may assist in the identification of appendicitis is of great importance to emergency general surgeons. While recent research has indicated that hyperbilirubinemia can serve as a valuable predictor of appendiceal perforation, these studies have not specifically examined the role of bilirubin as an indicator for acute appendicitis. This study aimed to assess the role of hyperbilirubinemia as a diagnostic factor in detecting appendicitis and appendiceal perforation. Methodology This single-center retrospective study involved 333 patients with acute appendicitis who underwent an emergency appendectomy at a model three hospital between January 2021 and December 2022. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA/SE 18.0 for Windows (StataCorp., College Station, TX, USA) to compare bilirubin levels, white blood cell count (WCC), and C-reactive protein (CRP) among normal appendices, non-perforated appendicitis, and perforated appendicitis. Results Among 333 patients, 60.66% were male, and 39.34% were female, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.54:1. The average hospital stay was 3.27 ± 3.02 days. Hyperbilirubinemia was observed in 25.53% (85 individuals). Among the 51 cases of perforated appendicitis, 70.59% had elevated bilirubin levels of above 20 μmol/L. Significantly more patients with appendiceal perforation had hyperbilirubinemia than non-perforated appendicitis (70.59% vs. 19.03%, p < 0.001). Bilirubin had higher specificity (94.29%) for detecting non-perforated appendicitis than normal appendices (odds ratio = 3.88), while WCC and CRP showed higher sensitivities. WCC had a sensitivity of 73.28% and a specificity of 42.86%, and CRP had a sensitivity of 76.53% and a specificity of 60.00%. When comparing perforated appendicitis with non-perforated appendicitis, bilirubin showed a specificity of 80.97% and an odds ratio of 10.21. The likelihood of a patient with hyperbilirubinemia having perforated appendicitis was more than 10 times higher than those without appendiceal perforation, suggesting it to be a potential indicator for appendiceal perforation. WCC showed a specificity of 26.72% and an odds ratio of 4.28, while CRP had a specificity of 23.48% and an odds ratio of 4.91. Conclusions The significant association between bilirubin levels and appendicitis highlights its potential as a valuable marker for predicting appendicitis and appendiceal perforation. The simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and diagnostic value of bilirubin assessment support its routine use in suspected cases of acute appendicitis.

Predictors of in-hospital appendiceal perforation in patients with non- perforated acute appendicitis with appendicolithiasis at presentation

INTRODUCTION

Appendicolithiasis is a risk factor for perforated acute appendicitis. There is limited inpatient data on predictors of progression in appendicolithiasis-associated non-perforated acute appendicitis.

METHODS

We identified adults presenting with appendicolithiasis-associated non-perforated acute appendicitis (on computed tomography) who underwent appendectomy. Logistic regression was used to investigate predictors of in-hospital perforation (on histopathology).

RESULTS

296 patients with appendicolithiasis-associated non-perforated acute appendicitis were identified; 48 (16.2%) had perforation on histopathology. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 39 (14.9) years. The mean (SD) length of stay (LOS) was 1.5 (1.8) days. LOS was significantly longer with perforated (mean [SD]: 3.0 [3.1] days) vs. non-perforated (mean [SD]: 1.2 [1.2] days) appendicitis (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, in-hospital perforation was associated with age > 65 years (OR 5.4, 95% CI: 1.4- 22.2; p = 0.015), BMI > 30 kg/m2 (OR 3.5, 95% CI: 1.3-8.9; p = 0.011), hyponatremia (OR 3.6, 95% CI: 1.3-9.8; p = 0.012). There was no significant association with age 25-65 years, gender, race, steroids, time-to- surgery, neutrophil percentage, or leukocyte count.

CONCLUSION

Geriatric age, obesity, and hyponatremia are associated with progression to perforation in appendicolithiasis-associated non-perforated acute appendicitis.

The Development and Validation of Artificial Intelligence Pediatric Appendicitis Decision-Tree for Children 0 to 12 Years Old

INTRODUCTION

 Diagnosing appendicitis in young children (0-12 years) still poses a special difficulty despite the advent of radiological investigations. Few scoring models have evolved and been applied worldwide, but with significant fluctuations in accuracy upon validation.

AIM

 To utilize artificial intelligence (AI) techniques to develop and validate a diagnostic model based on clinical and laboratory parameters only (without imaging), in addition to prospective validation to confirm the findings.

METHODS

 In Stage-I, observational data of children (0-12 years), referred for acute appendicitis (March 1, 2016-February 28, 2019, n = 166), was used for model development and evaluation using 10-fold cross-validation (XV) technique to simulate a prospective validation. In Stage-II, prospective validation of the model and the XV estimates were performed (March 1, 2019-November 30, 2021, n = 139).

RESULTS

 The developed model, AI Pediatric Appendicitis Decision-tree (AiPAD), is both accurate and explainable, with an XV estimation of average accuracy to be 93.5% ± 5.8 (91.4% positive predictive value [PPV] and 94.8% negative predictive value [NPV]). Prospective validation revealed that the model was indeed accurate and close to the XV evaluations, with an overall accuracy of 97.1% (96.7% PPV and 97.4% NPV).

CONCLUSION

 The AiPAD is validated, highly accurate, easy to comprehend, and offers an invaluable tool to use in diagnosing appendicitis in children without the need for imaging. Ultimately, this would lead to significant practical benefits, improved outcomes, and reduced costs.

Reasons for Delayed Diagnosis of Pediatric Acute Appendicitis during the COVID-19 Era: A Narrative Review

Global pandemics cause health system disruptions. The inadvertent disruption in surgical emergency care during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been the topic of several published studies. Our aim was to summarize the reasons that led to the delayed diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis during the COVID-19 era. This systematic literature search evaluated studies containing pediatric appendicitis patient data regarding outcomes, times to hospital admission or times from symptom onset to emergency department visit. Studies elucidating reasons for delays in the management of pediatric appendicitis were also reviewed. Ultimately, 42 studies were included. Several reasons for delayed diagnosis are analyzed such as changes to public health measures, fear of exposure to COVID-19, increased use of telemedicine, COVID-19 infection with concurrent acute appendicitis, recurrence of appendicitis after non-operative management and increased time to intraoperative diagnosis. Time to hospital admission in conjunction with patient outcomes was extracted and analyzed as an indicative measure of delayed management. Delayed diagnosis of acute appendicitis has been documented in many studies with various effects on outcomes. Suspicion of pediatric acute appendicitis must always lead to prompt medical examination, regardless of pandemic status. Telemedicine can be valuable if properly applied. Data from this era can guide future health system policies.

Spontaneous Resolution of Uncomplicated Appendicitis may Explain Increase in Proportion of Complicated Appendicitis During Covid-19 Pandemic: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Reports of an increased proportion of complicated appendicitis during the Covid-19 pandemic suggest a worse outcome due to delay secondary to the restrained access to health care, but may be explained by a concomitant decrease in uncomplicated appendicitis. We analyze the impact of the pandemic on the incidences of complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis.

METHOD

We did a systematic literature search in the PubMed, Embase and Web Of Science databases on December 21, 2022 with the search terms (appendicitis OR appendectomy) AND ("COVID" OR SARS-Cov2 OR "coronavirus"). Studies reporting the number of complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis during identical calendar periods in 2020 and the pre-pandemic year(s) were included. Reports with indications suggesting a change in how the patients were diagnosed and managed between the two periods were excluded. No protocol was prepared in advance. We did random effects meta-analysis of the change in proportion of complicated appendicitis, expressed as the risk ratio (RR), and of the change in number of patients with complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis during the pandemic compared with pre-pandemic periods, expressed as the incidence ratio (IR). We did separate analyses for studies based on single- and multi-center and regional data, age-categories and prehospital delay.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis of 100,059 patients in 63 reports from 25 countries shows an increase in the proportion of complicated appendicitis during the pandemic period (RR 1.39, 95% confidence interval (95% CI 1.25, 1.53). This was mainly explained by a decreased incidence of uncomplicated appendicitis (incidence ratio (IR) 0.66, 95% CI 0.59, 0.73). No increase in complicated appendicitis was seen in multi-center and regional reports combined (IR 0.98, 95% CI 0.90, 1.07).

CONCLUSION

The increased proportion of complicated appendicitis during Covid-19 is explained by a decrease in the incidence of uncomplicated appendicitis, whereas the incidence of complicated appendicitis remained stable. This result is more evident in the multi-center and regional based reports. This suggests an increase in spontaneously resolving appendicitis due to the restrained access to health care. This has important principal implications for the management of patients with suspected appendicitis.

Adult appendicitis score versus Alvarado score: A comparative study in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis

Background

Acute Appendicitis (AA) is the most common abdominal surgical emergency. It requires proper management to decrease mortality and morbidity. Clinical scoring systems for diagnosing AA aimed to decrease the use of radiological scans and the rate of negative appendectomies (NA). We aim to assess the adult appendicitis score (AAS) in the diagnosis prediction of AA.

Method

A retrospective study with 1303 cases of AA is performed. We compared the correlation of AAS and Alvarado scores to postoperative histopathology. Specificity, sensitivity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) were assessed. ROC was used.

Results

AAS risk stratification was applied to the study population. Group I for a low probability, and groups II and III for an intermediate and high probability of AA. We found that 159 patients were matched in group I, 505, and 639 were in groups II and III of AAS, respectively. The correlation between Alvarado and AAS with HP was significant. AAS ≥ 16 presented sensitivity and specificity of 50 % and 75.47 %, respectively, with PPV of 97.96 % and NPV of 6.02 %, with an accuracy of 51.04 %. Regarding AAS ≥ 11, the sensitivity was 88.96 %, specificity was 39.62 %, PPV was 97.2 %, NPV was 13.21 %, and accuracy was 86.95 %.

Conclusion

AAS is relatively more accurate than Alvarado's score, especially in selecting a safe candidate for discharge from an emergency. In addition, AAS is found to decrease the need for radiological images and NA rate more than Alvarado.

Performance and diagnostic accuracy of scoring systems in adult patients with suspected appendicitis

BACKGROUND

This study aims to determine the most accurate appendicitis scoring system and optimal cut-off points for each scoring system.

METHODS

This single-centred prospective cohort study was conducted from January-to-June 2021, involving all patients admitted on suspicion of appendicitis. All patients were scored according to the Alvarado score, Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR) score, Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha (RIPASA) score and Adult Appendicitis score (AAS). The final diagnosis for each patient was recorded. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each system. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed for each scoring system, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Optimal cut-off scores were calculated using Youden's Index.

RESULTS

A total of 245 patients were recruited with 198 (80.8%) patients underwent surgery. RIPASA score had higher sensitivity and specificity than other scoring systems without being statistically significant (sensitivity 72.7%, specificity 62.3%, optimal score 8.5, AUC 0.724), followed by the AAS (sensitivity 60.2%, specificity 75.4%, optimal score 14, AUC 0.719), AIR score (sensitivity 76.7%, specificity 52.2%, optimal score 5, AUC 0.688) and Alvarado score (sensitivity 69.9%, specificity 62.3%, optimal score 5, AUC 0.681). Multiple logistic regression revealed anorexia (p-value 0.018), right iliac fossa tenderness (p-value 0.005) and guarding (p-value 0.047) as significant clinical factors independently associated with appendicitis.

CONCLUSION

Appendicitis scoring systems have shown moderate sensitivity and specificity in our population. The RIPASA scoring system has shown to be the most sensitive, specific and easy-to-use scoring system in the Malaysian population whereas the AAS is most accurate in excluding low-risk patients.

Relationship between IgE-mediated allergy and complicated appendicitis in children

PURPOSE

To investigate the relationship of IgE-mediated allergy and complicated appendicitis (CA) and overall prognosis.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a consecutive series of patients with acute appendicitis (AA) who received appendectomy at Beijing Children's Hospital between July 1, 2018 and June 30, 2020. Patients were classified into two groups, with or without IgE-mediated allergies. Logistic regression adjusting for age, duration of symptoms, WBC count, neutrophil count, C-reactive protein (CRP), Appendicolith and presence of allergy was used to evaluate the association between CA and IgE-mediated allergy.

RESULTS

In total, 1156 patients were included. 162 (14.0%) of the patients had IgE-mediated allergy while 994 (86.0%) did not. Children with allergies had a decreased chance of developing CA after adjustment for age, duration of symptoms, WBC count, Neutrophil count, CRP, and appendicolith present rate (adjusted OR = 0.582, 0.364-0.929, P = 0.023). There were no significant differences in operative time, length of hospital stay (LOS), readmission, or adhesive intestinal obstruction rate between allergy and non-allergy patients.

CONCLUSIONS

IgE-mediated allergy is related to a reduction risk of CA in the pediatric population and may not affect the prognosis of patients received appendectomy.

Pre-appendectomy hyponatremia is associated with increased rates of complicated appendicitis

Background

Acute appendicitis is one of the most common surgical emergencies worldwide. Preoperative assessment of the risk of complicated appendicitis may aid in treatment planning. We sought to investigate the association between pre-appendectomy hyponatremia and diagnosis of complicated appendicitis.

Methods

The TriNetX platform, a federated health research network that aggregates de-identified electronic health record data of over 90 million patients across the United States, was queried for patients who underwent appendectomy starting January 2019 and who had at least one sodium value from the preoperative period. The study population was stratified into three age groups: pediatric (age < 18), adult (age 18-64), and older adult (age ≥ 65). These groups were subdivided into patients with preoperative hyponatremia (<135 mmol/L) and normonatremia (135-145 mmol/L).

Results

Among the 61,245 patients who met inclusion criteria, 17,546 were included for analysis following propensity score matching. The odds of complicated appendicitis were highest in pediatric patients (age < 18) with pre-appendectomy hyponatremia (odds ratio [OR] = 2.91, 95 % CI [2.53, 3.35]). Patients age 18-64 and aged ≥ 65 with preoperative hyponatremia also demonstrated increased odds of a complicated appendicitis diagnosis, but to a lesser extent (OR = 2.11, 95 % CI [1.92, 2.32] (OR = 1.49, 95 % CI [1.25, 1.77], respectively).

Conclusions

In a large analysis of matched patients with acute appendicitis, we found an association between immediate preoperative hyponatremia and complicated appendicitis. Future studies are indicated to further evaluate the role of hyponatremia as a potential diagnostic marker for complicated appendicitis in all age groups.

Key message

This study suggests a role of hyponatremia as one of multiple variables to incorporate into future clinical decision tools for complicated acute appendicitis.

Acute Appendicitis: Epidemiological, Clinical, Surgical, and Post-surgical Characteristics in a Honduran General Hospital

BACKGROUND

Acute appendicitis is a common surgical emergency worldwide, yet data specific to Central America, including Honduras, are limited. This study aimed to investigate the epidemiological, clinical, surgical, and post-surgical characteristics of acute appendicitis in a Honduran general hospital.

METHODS

A descriptive, quantitative, non-experimental, cross-sectional study was conducted at the Mario Catarino Rivas Hospital in San Pedro Sula, Honduras. The study sample consisted of 100 patients admitted with acute appendicitis from January to April 2022. Data on demographic factors, surgical interventions, appendicitis phases, appendix location, and laboratory findings were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean age of the participants was 28.5 years, with a slight male predominance (52%). Timely surgical intervention was performed in 95% of cases within the first 12 hours. The gangrenous phase was observed in 30% of patients, followed by the perforated (24%), edematous (24%), and suppurative (22%). Retrocecal appendicitis accounted for the majority of cases (66%). Moderate leucocytosis (46%) and severe leucocytosis (39%) were associated with acute appendicitis severity. A higher neutrophil percentage was indicative of complicated appendicitis. Computed tomography was underutilized, with only one patient undergoing the examination.

CONCLUSION

This study provides valuable insights into Honduras' epidemiological, clinical, and surgical characteristics of acute appendicitis. Early surgical intervention and laboratory findings, such as leukocyte count and neutrophil percentage, can aid in assessing disease severity. Further research is warranted to understand the unique aspects of acute appendicitis in Central America and optimize patient management. This study highlights the need for multi-centre studies and long-term follow-up to enhance our understanding of appendicitis in similar populations.

Bacterial pathogens in pediatric appendicitis: a comprehensive retrospective study

Background

Appendicitis is a frequent condition, with peak incidences in the second decade of life. Its pathogenesis is under debate, but bacterial infections are crucial, and antibiotic treatment remains essential. Rare bacteria are accused of causing complications, and various calculated antibiotics are propagated, yet there is no comprehensive microbiological analysis of pediatric appendicitis. Here we review different pre-analytic pathways, identify rare and common bacterial pathogens and their antibiotic resistances, correlate clinical courses, and evaluate standard calculated antibiotics in a large pediatric cohort.

Method

We reviewed 579 patient records and microbiological results of intraoperative swabs in standard Amies agar media or fluid samples after appendectomies for appendicitis between May 2011 and April 2019. Bacteria were cultured and identified via VITEK 2 or MALDI-TOF MS. Minimal inhibitory concentrations were reevaluated according to EUCAST 2022. Results were correlated to clinical courses.

Results

Of 579 analyzed patients, in 372 patients we got 1330 bacterial growths with resistograms. 1259 times, bacteria could be identified to species level. 102 different bacteria could be cultivated. 49% of catarrhal and 52% of phlegmonous appendices resulted in bacterial growth. In gangrenous appendicitis, only 38% remained sterile, while this number reduced to 4% after perforation. Many fluid samples remained sterile even when unsterile swabs had been taken simultaneously. 40 common enteral genera were responsible for 76.5% of bacterial identifications in 96.8% of patients. However, 69 rare bacteria were found in 187 patients without specifically elevated risk for complications.

Conclusion

Amies agar gel swabs performed superior to fluid samples and should be a standard in appendectomies. Even catarrhal appendices were only sterile in 51%, which is interesting in view of a possible viral cause. According to our resistograms, the best in vitro antibiotic was imipenem with 88.4% susceptible strains, followed by piperacillin-tazobactam, cefuroxime with metronidazole, and ampicillin-sulbactam to which only 21.6% of bacteria were susceptible. Bacterial growths and higher resistances correlate to an elevated risk of complications. Rare bacteria are found in many patients, but there is no specific consequence regarding antibiotic susceptibility, clinical course, or complications. Prospective, comprehensive studies are needed to further elicit pediatric appendicitis microbiology and antibiotic treatment.

Clinical Outcomes of Daytime Versus Nighttime Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children

Aim of the study: To evaluate the clinical outcomes and complication rate of laparoscopic appendectomy in children operated on during the daytime versus nighttime. Methods: A total of 303 children who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis between 1 January 2020 and 31 December 2022 were enrolled in this retrospective study. The patients were divided into two study groups. The first group consisted of the patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy during the day shift from 07:00-21:00 (n = 171), while the patients in the second group underwent laparoscopic appendectomy during the night shift from 21:00-07:00 (n = 132). The groups were compared for baseline clinical and laboratory data, treatment outcomes, and complications. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare continuous variables, while the Chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables. A two-sided Fisher's exact test was used when the frequency of events in a certain cell was low. All p values less than 0.05 were considered significant. Results: The proportion of complicated appendicitis was almost the same in both patient groups (n = 63, 36.8% vs. n = 49, 37.1%, p = 0.960). Out of the total number of patients presenting during the daytime and nighttime, 11 (6.4%) and 10 (7.6%) developed a postoperative complication, respectively (p = 0.697). Additionally, rates of readmission (n = 5 (2.9%) vs. n = 2 (1.5%); p = 0.703), redo-surgery (n = 3 (1.7%) vs. n = 0; p = 0.260), conversion to open surgery (n = 0 vs. n = 1 (0.8%); p = 0.435) and length of hospital stay (n = 3 (IQR 1, 5) vs. n = 3 (IQR 2, 5); p = 0.368) did not differ significantly between daytime and nighttime appendectomies. The duration of the surgery was significantly shorter in patients presenting during the day than in those presenting at night (26 min (IQR 22, 40) vs. 37 min (31, 46); p < 0.001). Conclusions: Different shift times did not affect the treatment outcomes or complication rates for children receiving laparoscopic appendectomy.

Comparison Between Early Appendectomy vs. Conservative Management in Cases of Appendicular Mass

INTRODUCTION

At present, the treatment of choice for appendicular masses is unclear. Recent studies claimed that conservative management of appendicular masses was safe in terms of frequency of perforation. However, there is controversy in the existing literature.

OBJECTIVE

This research is designed to compare the results of early appendectomy versus conservative management of appendicular masses.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

It was a randomized controlled trial performed in the Combined Military Hospital, Lahore. The study lasted six months, from 01/03/2019 to 30/09/2019. It involved 60 patients of both genders aged between 16 and 70 years diagnosed with appendicular masses with an Alvarado score of 4-7. These patients were randomly divided into two treatment groups. In Group A patients, an early appendectomy was performed, while patients in Group B were managed conservatively. Outcome variables were the mean length of hospital stay and frequency of appendicular perforation.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 26.8±11.9 years. There were 33 (55.0%) male and 27 (45.0%) female patients, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.2:1. The mean length of hospital stay was significantly longer in patients managed conservatively as compared to those undergoing early appendectomy (2.80±1.54 vs. 1.83±0.83; p=0.004). However, the frequency of perforation was not significantly higher in the conservative group as compared to the early appendectomy group (16.7% vs. 10.0%; p=0.448).

CONCLUSION

Conservative management of patients with appendicular mass was associated with prolonged hospital stays, yet it was found equally safe in terms of frequency of appendicular perforation, which advocates conservative management of patients with appendicular mass, particularly in high-risk patients.

Diagnostic Utility of Serum Leucine-Rich α-2-Glycoprotein 1 for Acute Appendicitis in Children

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to assess the diagnostic utility of serum leucine-rich α-2-glycoprotein 1 (LRG1) in pediatric patients with acute abdominal pain, admitted to the emergency surgical unit, in order to make a prompt and accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Pediatric patients older than 5 years of age who presented to the emergency department from 15 October 2021 to 30 June 2022 with acute abdominal pain and suspected acute appendicitis were prospectively recruited in the study. Demographic and clinical data, as well as operative and postoperative data, were recorded. A total of 92 patients were equally distributed into two groups: children with acute appendicitis who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy and non-appendicitis patients, presenting with non-specific abdominal pain. LRG1 levels were determined using a commercially available LRG1 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit. Serum LRG1 levels, as well as other inflammatory markers (white blood cell count (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP) and absolute neutrophil count) were compared between groups.

RESULTS

The median level of LRG1 in serum was significantly higher in the group of children with pathohistologically confirmed acute appendicitis than in the control group, at 350.3 µg/mL (interquartile range (IQR) 165.2-560.3) and 25.7 µg/mL (IQR 14.7-36.8) (p < 0.001), respectively. Receiver operating characteristic area under the curve for LRG1 from serum was 1.0 (95% CI 0.96-1.00; p < 0.001) and the value of >69.1 µg/mL was found to perfectly separate acute appendicitis cases from controls. Additionally, as expected, each of the examined laboratory inflammatory markers provided a significantly higher values in the acute appendicitis group compared to the control group: WBC 14.6 × 109/L (IQR 12.7, 18.7) vs. 7.0 × 109/L (IQR 5.4, 9.0) (p < 0.001), CRP 16.3 mg/dL (IQR 6.9, 50.4) vs. 2.2 mg/dL (IQR 2, 2) (p < 0.001) and absolute neutrophil count 84.6% (IQR 79.5, 89.0) vs. 59.5% (IQR 51.5, 68.6) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

LRG1 in the serum was found to be a promising novel biomarker, with excellent differentiation of acute appendicitis from non-appendicitis cases in children presenting with non-specific abdominal pain.

Non-culture-based studies of the appendiceal microbiota: a systematic review

Aims: To review studies examining the appendiceal microbiota and microbial changes in acute appendicitis. Methods: After a systematic literature search, 11 studies examining the appendiceal microbiota (414 samples) using non-culture-based methods were included. Results: The appendiceal microbiota showed decreased α-diversity compared with fecal microbiota. Inflamed and uninflamed appendices showed differences in β-diversity, and there was an increased abundance of oral-associated bacteria in inflamed versus uninflamed appendices. Conclusion: The appendiceal microbiota exhibits lower α-diversity than the fecal microbiota, with an increased abundance of oral-associated bacteria. Compared with uninflamed appendices, the appendix microbiota in acute appendicitis also showed increased abundance of oral-associated bacteria, but no bacterial profile unique to either complicated or uncomplicated appendicitis was found.

Comparison of Alvarado score, appendicitis inflammatory response score (AIR) and Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha appendicitis (RIPASA) score in predicting acute appendicitis

Introduction

Acute Appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency encountered in emergency departments. To prevent the rate of negative appendectomies, different systems i.e. Alvarado score and Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Score (AIR) scores were used, but their diagnostic accuracy in Asian population is questionable. Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha (RIPASA) score has showed promising results in the recent literature. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of Alvarado, AIR and RIPASA scores in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Methods

Alvarado, AIR and RIPASA scores were prospectively applied to 132 included patients that were admitted with provisional diagnosis of acute appendicitis and then their surgery was performed in General Surgery Unit, Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar, Pakistan from 1st January 2022 to 31st July 2022. Final diagnosis was confirmed by histopathology report and scores were correlated with final report. Cut off value of score >7, >5 and >7.5 were set for Alvarado, AIR and RIPASA score, respectively according to previous literature. Statistics analysis was done for all 3 scoring systems on SPSS version 23.

Results

Of 132 patients, there were n = 79(59.8%) males and n = 53(40.2%) females. Mean age was 24 years (SD ± 11.6) with youngest patient of 9 years and oldest one was 70 years old. Negative Appendectomy rate was 8.3%(n = 11). RIPASA score was superior to AIR and Alvarado score in Sensitivity, NLR, Accuracy and Area under the Curve. AIR score performed better in specificity, NPV, PLR compared to RIPASA and Alvarado score.

Conclusion

RIPASA score is an overall better scoring system in diagnosing acute appendicitis in compared to Alvarado and AIR score.

Validity of Machine Learning in Detecting Complicated Appendicitis in a Resource-Limited Setting: Findings from Vietnam

Background

Complicated appendicitis, a potentially life-threatening condition, is common. However, the diagnosis of this condition is mainly based on physician's experiences and advanced diagnostic equipment. This study built and validated machine learning models to facilitate the detection of complicated appendicitis.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted based on medical charts of all patients undergoing a laparoscopic appendectomy at a city hospital during 2016-2020. The synthetic minority over-sampling technique (SMOTE) was used to adjust for the imbalance. Multiple classification approaches were used to train and validate models including support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), logistic regression (LR), artificial neural network (ANN), and gradient boosting (GB).

Results

Among 1,950 patients included in the data analysis, there were 483 patients identified as having complicated appendicitis (24.8%). Based on data without SMOTE adjustment for imbalance, the accuracy levels and AUCs were high in all models using different parameters, ranging from 0.687 to 0.815. After adjusting for imbalance data using SMOTE, AUC and accuracy levels in the models using imbalance adjusted data were higher. Of these, the GB had all AUC and accuracy values of approximately 0.8 or more in both adjusted and unadjusted data.

Conclusions

Machine learning approaches including SVM, DT, logistic, KNN, ANN, and GB have a high level of validity in classifying patients with complicated appendicitis and patients without complicated appendicitis. Among these, GB had the highest level of validity and should be used or further validated. Our study indicates the beneficial potentials of machine learning techniques in a clinical setting in general and in the diagnosis of complicated appendicitis in particular.

Acute appendicitis manifests as two microbiome state types with oral pathogens influencing severity

Mounting evidence suggests that acute appendicitis (AA) is not one but two diseases: complicated appendicitis, which is associated with necrosis leading to perforation or periappendicular abscess, and uncomplicated appendicitis, which does not necessarily result in perforation. Even though AA is the most frequent cause of surgery from abdominal pain, little is known about the origins and etiopathogenesis of this disease, much less regarding the different disease types. In this study, we investigated the microbiome (inter-domain amplicon and metagenome sequencing) of samples from the appendix, rectum and peritoneum of 60 children and adolescents with AA to assess the composition and potential function of bacteria, archaea and fungi. The analysis of the appendix microbial community revealed a shift depending on the severity of the AA. This shift was reflected by two major community state types that represented the complicated and uncomplicated cases. We could demonstrate that complicated, but not uncomplicated, appendicitis is associated with a significant local expansion of oral, bacterial pathogens in the appendix, most strongly influenced by necrotizing Fusobacterium spp., Porphyromonas and Parvimonas. Uncomplicated appendicitis, however, was characterized by gut-associated microbiomes. Our findings support the hypothesis that two disease types exist in AA, which cannot be distinguished beyond doubt using standard clinical characterization methods or by analysis of the patient's rectal microbiome. An advanced microbiome diagnosis, however, could improve non-surgical treatment of uncomplicated AA.

Acute Appendicitis in COVID-19-Positive Children: Report of 4 Cases from an Endemic Area in Northeastern Romania

Acute appendicitis (AA) is one of the most common surgical emergencies in children. Some reports have suggested that the COVID-19 pandemic was responsible for delays in the diagnostic and proper treatment of AA in pediatric patients. The aim of our study was to perform a retrospective study of cases of AA in children with SARS-CoV-2 infection treated in a highly endemic area for COVID-19 in Romania during a 2-year time interval. The SARS-CoV-2 infection had no unfavorable impact on children who presented with AA. Further data analysis should clarify the overall influence of COVID-19 on the management of surgical pediatric patients in such endemic areas.