Beneficial effect of plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin on renal allograft survival of patients with acute humoral rejection

Interferon-γ and its response are determinants of antibody-mediated rejection and clinical outcomes in patients after renal transplantation

Interferon-γ (IFN-γ) is an important cytokine in tissue homeostasis and immune response, while studies about it in antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) are very limited. This study aims to comprehensively elucidate the role of IFN-γ in ABMR after renal transplantation. In six renal transplantation cohorts, the IFN-γ responses (IFNGR) biological process was consistently top up-regulated in ABMR compared to stable renal function or even T cell-mediated rejection in both allografts and peripheral blood. According to single-cell analysis, IFNGR levels were found to be broadly elevated in most cell types in allografts and peripheral blood with ABMR. In allografts with ABMR, M1 macrophages had the highest IFNGR levels and were heavily infiltrated, while kidney resident M2 macrophages were nearly absent. In peripheral blood, CD14+ monocytes had the top IFNGR level and were significantly increased in ABMR. Immunofluorescence assay showed that levels of IFN-γ and M1 macrophages were sharply elevated in allografts with ABMR than non-rejection. Importantly, the IFNGR level in allografts was identified as a strong risk factor for long-term renal graft survival. Together, this study systematically analyzed multi-omics from thirteen independent cohorts and identified IFN-γ and IFNGR as determinants of ABMR and clinical outcomes in patients after renal transplantation.

De Novo Donor-Specific Antibodies after Heart Transplantation: A Comprehensive Guide for Clinicians

Antibodies directed against donor-specific human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) can be detected de novo after heart transplantation and play a key role in long-term survival. De novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSAs) have been associated with cardiac allograft vasculopathy, antibody-mediated rejection, and mortality. Advances in detection methods and international guideline recommendations have encouraged the adoption of screening protocols among heart transplant units. However, there is still a lack of consensus about the correct course of action after dnDSA detection. Treatment is usually started when antibody-mediated rejection is present; however, some dnDSAs appear years before graft failure is detected, and at this point, damage may be irreversible. In particular, class II, anti-HLA-DQ, complement binding, and persistent dnDSAs have been associated with worse outcomes. Growing evidence points towards a more aggressive management of dnDSA. For that purpose, better diagnostic tools are needed in order to identify subclinical graft injury. Cardiac magnetic resonance, strain techniques, or coronary physiology parameters could provide valuable information to identify patients at risk. Treatment of dnDSA usually involves plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin, immunoadsorption, and ritxumab, but the benefit of these therapies is still controversial. Future efforts should focus on establishing effective treatment protocols in order to improve long-term survival of heart transplant recipients.

Treatment of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies-mediated rejection after liver transplantation: A French nationwide retrospective study

The deleterious effect of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) after liver transplantation (LT) has been increasingly recognized during the past decade. Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) represents a rare but severe complication in the presence of DSA. However, little is known concerning the treatment of AMR after LT. The nationwide French study aimed to describe LT recipients who received specific treatment of AMR. We performed a multicenter retrospective study on 44 patients who were treated with B-cell targeting agents from January 2008 to December 2020. Median patient age at the time of AMR treatment was 51.6 years (range: 17.9-68.0). AMR was classified as acute (n = 19) or chronic (n = 25). The diagnosis of AMR was made after a median time of 16.8 months (range: 0.4-274.2) after LT. The main therapeutic combination was plasma exchange/rituximab/IVIG (n = 25, 56.8%). The median follow-up after the treatment of AMR was 32 months (range: 1-115). After the treatment, 1-, 5- and 10-year patient and graft survivals were 77%, 55.9%, and 55.9%, and 69.5%, 47.0%, and 47.0%, respectively. Initial total bilirubin (Q1-Q3 vs. Q4) was significantly associated with patient survival (log-rank test, p = 0.005) and graft survival (log-rank test, p = 0.002). After a median follow-up of 21 months (range: 12-107), DSA became undetectable in 15/38 patients (39.5%) with available DSA monitoring. In conclusion, specific treatment of AMR in LT recipients has slowly emerged in France during the past decade and has probably been considered in the most severe patients; this explains the global poor outcome, even if the outcome was favorable in some cases.

Mechanism and treatment for chronic antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients

Chronic antibody-mediated rejection of kidney transplantation is a major cause of late-stage graft loss. Donor-specific antibodies are the main cause of antibody-mediated rejection; in particular, de novo donor-specific antibodies are a risk factor for chronic active antibody-mediated rejection. The level of de novo donor-specific antibodies tends to increase with time throughout long-term graft survival. Donor-specific antibodies induce humoral rejection through complement activation, which results in tissue injury and coagulation. Additionally, complement activation promotes the migration of inflammatory cells through the innate immune response, causing endothelial injury. This inflammatory response may cause persistent glomerulitis and peritubular capillaritis, leading to fixed pathological lesions that impair graft function. No treatment has been established for chronic antibody-mediated rejection, a condition in which antibody-mediated rejection becomes irreversible. Thus, antibody-mediated rejection must be detected and treated while it is still reversible. In this review, we discuss the development of de novo donor-specific antibodies and the mechanisms leading to chronic antibody-mediated rejection and summarize the current treatment options and the latest biomarkers for detecting chronic antibody-mediated rejection at an earlier stage.

New immunosuppressive agents in transplantation

Immunosuppressive agents have enabled the development of allogenic transplantation during the last 40 years, allowing considerable improvement in graft survival. However, several issues remain such as the nephrotoxicity of calcineurin inhibitors, the cornerstone of immunosuppressive regimens and/or the higher risk of opportunistic infections and cancers. Most immunosuppressive agents target T cell activation and may not be efficient enough to prevent allo-immunization in the long term. Finally, antibody mediated rejection due to donor specific antibodies strongly affects allograft survival. Many drugs have been tested in the last decades, but very few have come to clinical use. The most recent one is CTLA4-Ig (belatacept), a costimulation blockade molecule that targets the second signal of T cell activation and is associated with a better long term kidney function than calcineurin inhibitors, despite an increased risk of acute cellular rejection. The research of new maintenance long-term immunosuppressive agents focuses on costimulation blockade. Agents inhibiting CD40-CD40 ligand interaction may enable a good control of both T cells and B cells responses. Anti-CD28 antibodies may promote regulatory T cells. Agents targeting this costimulation pathways are currently evaluated in clinical trials. Immunosuppressive agents for ABMR treatment are scarce since anti-CD20 agent rituximab and proteasome inhibitor bortezomib have failed to demonstrate an interest in ABMR. New drugs focusing on antibodies removal (imlifidase), B cell and plasmablasts (anti-IL-6/IL-6R, anti-CD38…) and complement inhibition are in the pipeline, with the challenge of their evaluation in such a heterogeneous pathology.

The natural history of de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies after kidney transplantation

Background

De novo donor-specific HLA antibodies (dnDSA) are key factors in the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and related to graft loss.

Methods

This retrospective study was designed to evaluate the natural course of dnDSA in graft function and kidney allograft survival and to assess the impact of mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) evolution as detected by annual Luminex^® screening. All 400 kidney transplant recipients with 731 dnDSA against the last graft (01/03/2000-31/05/2021) were included.

Results

During 8.3 years of follow-up, ABMR occurred in 24.8% and graft loss in 33.3% of the cases, especially in patients with class I and II dnDSA, and those with multiple dnDSA. We observed frequent changes in MFI with 5-year allograft survivals post-dnDSA of 74.0% in patients with MFI reduction ≥ 50%, 62.4% with fluctuating MFI (MFI reduction ≥ 50% and doubling), and 52.7% with doubling MFI (log-rank p < 0.001). Interestingly, dnDSA in 168 (24.3%) cases became negative at some point during follow-up, and 38/400 (9.5%) patients became stable negative, which was associated with better graft survival. Multivariable analysis revealed the importance of MFI evolution and rejection, while class and number of dnDSA were not contributors in this model.

Conclusion

In summary, we provide an in-depth analysis of the natural course of dnDSA after kidney transplantation, first evidence for the impact of MFI evolution on graft outcomes, and describe a relevant number of patients with a stable disappearance of dnDSA, related to better allograft survival.

Chronic Kidney Allograft Disease: New Concepts and Opportunities

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasing in most countries and kidney transplantation is the best option for those patients requiring renal replacement therapy. Therefore, there is a significant number of patients living with a functioning kidney allograft. However, progressive kidney allograft functional deterioration remains unchanged despite of major advances in the field. After the first post-transplant year, it has been estimated that this chronic allograft damage may cause a 5% graft loss per year. Most studies focused on mechanisms of kidney graft damage, especially on ischemia-reperfusion injury, alloimmunity, nephrotoxicity, infection and disease recurrence. Thus, therapeutic interventions focus on those modifiable factors associated with chronic kidney allograft disease (CKaD). There are strategies to reduce ischemia-reperfusion injury, to improve the immunologic risk stratification and monitoring, to reduce calcineurin-inhibitor exposure and to identify recurrence of primary renal disease early. On the other hand, control of risk factors for chronic disease progression are particularly relevant as kidney transplantation is inherently associated with renal mass reduction. However, despite progress in pathophysiology and interventions, clinical advances in terms of long-term kidney allograft survival have been subtle. New approaches are needed and probably a holistic view can help. Chronic kidney allograft deterioration is probably the consequence of damage from various etiologies but can be attenuated by kidney repair mechanisms. Thus, besides immunological and other mechanisms of damage, the intrinsic repair kidney graft capacity should be considered to generate new hypothesis and potential therapeutic targets. In this review, the critical risk factors that define CKaD will be discussed but also how the renal mechanisms of regeneration could contribute to a change chronic kidney allograft disease paradigm.

Emerging New Approaches in Desensitization: Targeted Therapies for HLA Sensitization

There is an urgent need for therapeutic interventions for desensitization and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in sensitized patients with preformed or de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA). The risk of AMR and allograft loss in sensitized patients is increased due to preformed DSA detected at time of transplant or the reactivation of HLA memory after transplantation, causing acute and chronic AMR. Alternatively, de novo DSA that develops post-transplant due to inadequate immunosuppression and again may lead to acute and chronic AMR or even allograft loss. Circulating antibody, the final product of the humoral immune response, has been the primary target of desensitization and AMR treatment. However, in many cases these protocols fail to achieve efficient removal of all DSA and long-term outcomes of patients with persistent DSA are far worse when compared to non-sensitized patients. We believe that targeting multiple components of humoral immunity will lead to improved outcomes for such patients. In this review, we will briefly discuss conventional desensitization methods targeting antibody or B cell removal and then present a mechanistically designed desensitization regimen targeting plasma cells and the humoral response.

Novel strategies to target the humoral alloimmune response

Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) represents a major cause of late allograft loss in solid organ transplantation worldwide. This process is driven by donor-specific antibodies (DSA), which develop either de-novo or, in sensitized patients, are preformed at the time of transplantation. Effective targeting of ABMR has been hampered by a lack of robust randomized controlled trials (RCT), required for the regulatory approval of new therapeutics. In this review, we discuss the evidence behind the present "standard" of care and recent progress in the development of novel strategies targeting different aspects of the alloimmune humoral response, including naïve and memory B-cell activation, the germinal centre reaction, plasma cell survival and antibody effector functions. In particular, we focus on co-stimulation blockade and its combination with next-generation proteasome inhibitors, new depleting monoclonal antibodies (anti-CD19, anti-BCMA, anti-CD38, anti-CD138), interleukin-6 blockade, complement inhibition and DSA degradation. These treatment modalities, when used in the appropriate clinical context and combination, have the potential to finally improve long-term allograft survival.

Efficacy of plasmapheresis and semi-selective immunoadsorption for removal of anti-HLA antibodies

BACKGROUND

In organ transplantation, apheresis is frequently used for removal of anti-HLA antibodies. However, it is unclear whether plasmapheresis (PP) or semi-selective immunoadsorption (IA) should be employed, and the optimal number of apheresis sessions required to reach post-treatment objectives is also unknown.

METHODS

We enrolled 43 patients from Bordeaux University Hospital who were treated with PP (n = 29) or IA (n = 14) for antibody-mediated rejection or pre-transplant desensitization. Using Luminex single-antigen flow beads, we assessed the initial mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of 1416 positive beads with MFIs obtained after 7 to 8 apheresis sessions (extended protocol) and, if a serum was available, after the first four sessions (short protocol).

RESULTS

MFI reduction after extended apheresis protocol was stronger with IA [87% (61%-100%)] than with PP [73% (22%-100%)] (P < .001). Indeed, 59% of the beads had a final MFI < 2000 with IA, whereas only 38% with PP (P < .001). The efficacy of removal depended on initial MFI but not on HLA specificity. A short protocol of apheresis showed excellent results without superiority of IA over PP for antibodies with an initial MFI < 3000. For antibodies showing MFI ≥2000 after four sessions, the residual MFI predicted the effectiveness of four additional sessions.

CONCLUSION

Monitoring the MFI of anti-HLA antibodies before and during apheresis protocol can guide physicians in the selection of apheresis technique and the number of sessions to be performed.

Recommended Treatment for Antibody-mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation: The 2019 Expert Consensus From the Transplantion Society Working Group

With the development of modern solid-phase assays to detect anti-HLA antibodies and a more precise histological classification, the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has become more common and is a major cause of kidney graft loss. Currently, there are no approved therapies and treatment guidelines are based on low-level evidence. The number of prospective randomized trials for the treatment of AMR is small, and the lack of an accepted common standard for care has been an impediment to the development of new therapies. To help alleviate this, The Transplantation Society convened a meeting of international experts to develop a consensus as to what is appropriate treatment for active and chronic active AMR. The aim was to reach a consensus for standard of care treatment against which new therapies could be evaluated. At the meeting, the underlying biology of AMR, the criteria for diagnosis, the clinical phenotypes, and outcomes were discussed. The evidence for different treatments was reviewed, and a consensus for what is acceptable standard of care for the treatment of active and chronic active AMR was presented. While it was agreed that the aims of treatment are to preserve renal function, reduce histological injury, and reduce the titer of donor-specific antibody, there was no conclusive evidence to support any specific therapy. As a result, the treatment recommendations are largely based on expert opinion. It is acknowledged that properly conducted and powered clinical trials of biologically plausible agents are urgently needed to improve patient outcomes.

Immune reaction and regulation in transplantation based on pluripotent stem cell technology

The development of pluripotent stem cell (PSC)-based technologies provides us a new therapeutic approach that generates grafts for transplantation. In order to minimize the risk of immune reaction, the banking of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) from donors with homozygous human leukocyte antigen (HLA) haplotype is planned in Japan. Even though pre-stocked and safety validated HLA-homozygous iPSCs are selected, immunological rejection may potentially occur because the causes of rejection are not always due to HLA mismatches. A couple of studies concerning such immunological issues have reported that genetic ablation of HLA molecules from PSC combined with gene transduction of several immunoregulatory molecules may be effective in avoiding immunological rejection. Also, our research group has recently proposed a concept that attempts to regulate recipient immune system by PSC-derived immunoregulatory cells, which results in prolonged survival of the same PSC-derived allografts. PSC-based technologies enable us to choose a new therapeutic option; however, considering its safety from an immunological point of view should be of great importance for safe clinical translation of this technology.

The PI3Kδ selective inhibitor AS2541019 suppresses donor-specific antibody production in rat cardiac and non-human primate renal allotransplant models

Long-term graft survival after organ transplantation is difficult to achieve because of the development of chronic rejection. One cause of chronic rejection arises from antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), which is dependent on the production of donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Current immunosuppression in organ transplantation is effective in preventing acute T cell-mediated rejection, but the risk of DSA production and graft loss due to AMR remains unchanged. Phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase p110δ (PI3Kδ), a member of the family of PI3K lipid kinases, is a key mediator of B cell activation, proliferation and antibody production. AS2541019 is a novel PI3Kδ selective inhibitor that prevents antibody production by inhibiting B cell immunity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the inhibitory effect of AS2541019 on DSA production in preclinical rodent and non-human primate allotransplant models. Concomitant administration of AS2541019 with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) inhibited de novo DSA production in an ACI-to-Lewis rat cardiac allotransplant model. To predict the efficacy of AS2541019 in clinical practice, we evaluated its effects in cynomolgus monkeys. AS2541019 inhibited B cell proliferation and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II expression on B cells in cynomolgus monkeys. Oral administration of AS2541019 inhibited MHC class II expression on peripheral B cells and anti-tetanus toxoid antibody production. In cynomolgus monkey renal allotransplant model, concomitant administration of AS2541019 with tacrolimus and MMF significantly inhibited de novo DSA production. Together, our findings indicate that the PI3Kδ selective inhibitor AS2541019 is a potential candidate for preventing AMR development by inhibiting DSA production.

Donor-Specific Antibodies in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Donor-specific antibodies have become an established biomarker predicting antibody-mediated rejection. Antibody-mediated rejection is the leading cause of graft loss after kidney transplant. There are several phenotypes of antibody-mediated rejection along post-transplant course that are determined by the timing and extent of humoral response and the various characteristics of donor-specific antibodies, such as antigen classes, specificity, antibody strength, IgG subclasses, and complement binding capacity. Preformed donor-specific antibodies in sensitized patients can trigger hyperacute rejection, accelerated acute rejection, and early acute antibody-mediated rejection. De novo donor-specific antibodies are associated with late acute antibody-mediated rejection, chronic antibody-mediated rejection, and transplant glomerulopathy. The pathogeneses of antibody-mediated rejection include not only complement-dependent cytotoxicity, but also complement-independent pathways of antibody-mediated cellular cytotoxicity and direct endothelial activation and proliferation. The novel assay for complement binding capacity has improved our ability to predict antibody-mediated rejection phenotypes. C1q binding donor-specific antibodies are closely associated with acute antibody-mediated rejection, more severe graft injuries, and early graft failure, whereas C1q nonbinding donor-specific antibodies correlate with subclinical or chronic antibody-mediated rejection and late graft loss. IgG subclasses have various abilities to activate complement and recruit effector cells through the Fc receptor. Complement binding IgG3 donor-specific antibodies are frequently associated with acute antibody-mediated rejection and severe graft injury, whereas noncomplement binding IgG4 donor-specific antibodies are more correlated with subclinical or chronic antibody-mediated rejection and transplant glomerulopathy. Our in-depth knowledge of complex characteristics of donor-specific antibodies can stratify the patient's immunologic risk, can predict distinct phenotypes of antibody-mediated rejection, and hopefully, will guide our clinical practice to improve the transplant outcomes.

Rabbit anti-human thymocyte immunoglobulin for the rescue treatment of chronic antibody-mediated rejection after pediatric kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Chronic antibody-mediated rejection (cAMR) is the leading cause of late kidney graft loss, but current therapies are often ineffective. Rabbit anti-human thymocyte immunoglobulin (rATG) may be helpful, but its use is virtually undocumented.

METHODS

Data were analyzed retrospectively from nine pediatric kidney transplant patients with cAMR were treated with rATG (1.5 mg/kg × 5 days) at our center after non-response to pulsed prednisolone, intravenous immunoglobulin, rituximab, and increased immunosuppressive intensity (including switching to belatacept in some cases), with or without bortezomib.

RESULTS

The median time from diagnosis to cAMR was 179 days. rATG was started 5-741 days after diagnosis. Median estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) increased from 40 mL/min/1.73 m² when rATG was started to 62 mL/min/1.73 m² 9 months later (p = 0.039). Four patients showed substantially higher eGFR after 9 months and 2 patients showed a small improvement; eGFR continued to decline in 3 patients after starting rATG. No grafts were lost during follow-up. At last follow-up, donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) were no longer detectable in 4 out of 8 patients for whom data were available, median fluorescence intensity had decreased substantially in 1 out of 8 patients; anti-HLA DQ DSAs persisted in 2 out of 8 patients. No adverse events with a suspected relation to rATG, including allergic reactions, leukocytopenia or infections, were observed in any of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In this small series of patients, rATG appears a promising treatment for unresponsive cAMR. Further evaluation, including earlier introduction of rATG, is warranted.

Reason and Resolution of High Negative Control Beads in Solid-Phase Immunoassay

OBJECTIVES

The Luminex technology is the most sensitive diagnostic method for HLA antibody detection and identification. However, the interpretation of immunoassays is commonly affected by the artifact, and non-specific background. Sera from some patients show high negative control bead (NC) value, which makes assessing and interpretation of HLA antibodies difficult. In this study, we evaluated the effect of Adsorb Out reagent, dithiothreitol (DTT), and Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) on the NC median fluorescence intensity value by comparing treated versus untreated patient sera. In addition, we wanted to identify whether kidney disease and administered medication influenced high NC median fluorescence intensity values by comparing patient versus control results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

HLA antibody screening was performed on 3500 serum samples. Sera were analyzed using the standard protocol for Luminex antibody screening. Sera with high NC values were preincubated with Adsorb Out, DTT, and EDTA. Screening of these sera was then performed.

RESULTS

We found that 4% of samples showed high NC values. Adsorb Out, DTT, and EDTA decreased the NC values at 723.5 (299.25-1443) versus 85 (34-218; P < .001), at 723.5 (299.25-1443) versus 184 (106-597; P < .001), and at 723.5 (299.25-1443) versus 455 (131-1177; P = .004). These succeeded in bringing back NC values to normal range in 69.2%, 43%, and 30% of treated sera, respectively. In addition, the differences of corticoids, immunosuppressive, and heparin drugs between patients and controls were statistically significant (P < .001, < .001, and = .043). However, presence of kidney disease was not significant between these groups.

CONCLUSIONS

All pretreatments had an important effect in decreasing negative control values, with Adsorb Out having highest efficiency. Serum-specific components could contribute to high negative control bead median fluorescence intensity values. Further studies are needed to determine the adequate pretreatment of patient sera.

The effect of histopathologic and clinical features on allograft survival in renal transplant patients with antibody-mediated rejection

Background: Antibody-mediated rejection is a frequent cause of graft failure; however, prognostic indications of this complication have not been well defined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of histopathological and clinical features and to determine the effect of these findings on allograft survival in patients with AMR.

Methods: Fifty-two patients suffered from AMR (30 male; mean age 39 ± 11 years) were included in the study. Data were investigated retrospectively and graft survival was analyzed. All transplant biopsies were evaluated according to Banff 2009 classification.

Results: Of the 52 cases, 45 were transplanted from living-donors. Twenty-one patients were diagnosed in the first 3-months after transplantation. Graft survival was 65% at 12 months and 54% at 36 months. Mean serum creatinine at time of biopsy was 3.8 ± 3.6 mg/dL. Thirty-five of the 52 cases showed diffuse C4d positivity, 12 cases showed focal and 5 remained C4d negative. One of the patients died, 13 experienced graft loss and 38 survived with functioning grafts. Serum creatinine levels at time of biopsy were correlated with graft survival (p = .021: OR = 1.10: 95 % CI = 1.015–1.199). In terms of the impact of pathological findings; tubulitis (p=.007: OR = 2.62: 95 % CI = 1.301–5.276), intimal arteritis (p=.017: OR = 2.85: 95% CI = 1.205–6.744) and interstitial infiltration (p=.004: OR = 3.37: 95% CI = 1.465–7.752) were associated with graft survival.

Conclusions: Serum creatinine at time of biopsy, tubulitis, intimal arteritis and interstitial infiltration were significantly associated with graft survival. Antibody-mediated rejection is associated with reduced long-term graft survival.

Successful Salvage Treatment of Resistant Acute Antibody-Mediated Kidney Transplant Rejection with Eculizumab

Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) jeopardises short- and long-term transplant survival and remains a challenge in the field of organ transplantation. We report the first use of the anticomplement agent eculizumab in Oman in the treatment of a 61-year-old female patient with ABMR following a living unrelated kidney transplant. The patient was admitted to the Sultan Qaboos University Hospital in Muscat, Oman, in 2013 on the eighth day post-transplantation with serum creatinine (Cr) levels of 400 µmol/L which continued to rise, necessitating haemodialysis. A biopsy indicated ABMR with acute cellular rejection. No improvement was observed following standard ABMR treatment and she continued to require dialysis. Five doses of eculizumab were administered over six weeks with a subsequent dramatic improvement in renal function. The patient became dialysis-free with serum Cr levels of 119 µmol/L within four months. This case report indicates that eculizumab is a promising agent in the treatment of ABMR.

Therapy Modalities for Antibody Mediated Rejection in Renal Transplant Patients

INTRODUCTION

The aim of our study was to determine the effectiveness of immunoglobulin, rituximab and plasmapheresis in renal transplant patients with antibody mediated rejection (AMR).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fourteen renal transplant patients with AMR were included in this study. The mean age of the patients was 33.9 ± 10.3 years and 10 (71.4%) of them were male. Lymphocyte cross match was negative for all patients and 10 (71.4%) of them were living donor transplants. Six patients were administered tacrolimus, three patients cyclosporine, two patients everolimus, and three patients sirolimus for immunosuppression. The patients with AMR were administered IVIG, rituximab and plasmapheresis.

RESULTS

Patient survival rate was 100%, graft survival rate after AMR was 50% in the first year and 33% in the 2nd and third years. AMR developed 31.9 ± 25.9 months after transplantation. Seven (50%) patients lost their grafts. Delayed graft function was observed in 28.6%, chronic allograft dysfunction in 78.5%, diabetes after transplantation in 14.3%, and cytomegalovirus infection in 7.1% of the patients. At the last follow-up, the mean blood creatinine was 3.1 ± 1.4, the mean proteinuria was 2300 (1300-3300) mg/day and the mean GFR was 34.5 ± 17.6 ml/min. C4d was positive in peritubullar capillaries in all patients, while neutrophil accumulation in peritubular and glomerular capillaries was observed in 8 patients. Chronic allograft vasculopathy was observed in 12 patients.

CONCLUSION

AMR leads to progressive loss of renal function and has low graft survival. More effective treatment alternatives are needed for this clinical issue.

Human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells abrogate plasmablast formation and induce regulatory B cells independently of T helper cells

Mesenchymal or stromal stem cells (MSC) interact with cells of the immune system in multiple ways. Modulation of the immune system by MSC is believed to be a therapeutic option for autoimmune disease and transplant rejection. In recent years, B cells have moved into the focus of the attention as targets for the treatment of immune disorders. Current B-cell targeting treatment is based on the indiscriminate depletion of B cells. The aim of this study was to examine whether human adipose tissue-derived MSC (ASC) interact with B cells to affect their proliferation, differentiation, and immune function. ASC supported the survival of quiescent B cells predominantly via contact-dependent mechanisms. Coculture of B cells with activated T helper cells led to proliferation and differentiation of B cells into CD19(+) CD27(high) CD38(high) antibody-producing plasmablasts. ASC inhibited the proliferation of B cells and this effect was dependent on the presence of T cells. In contrast, ASC directly targeted B-cell differentiation, independently of T cells. In the presence of ASC, plasmablast formation was reduced and IL-10-producing CD19(+) CD24(high) CD38(high) B cells, known as regulatory B cells, were induced. These results demonstrate that ASC affect B cell biology in vitro, suggesting that they can be a tool for the modulation of the B-cell response in immune disease.

Successful treatment of severe acute antibody-mediated rejection of renal allografts with bortezomib--a report of two pediatric cases

aAMR in renal allografts is uncommon and remains a challenge as it is often refractory to treatment modalities. Aggressive therapy is essential to reverse the rejection as it results in renal allograft loss in approximately 27-40% of cases. There are anecdotal case reports of use of bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor in the treatment of resistant AMR cases in solid organ transplant recipients; however, the experience is limited. We herein report successful reversal of resistant aAMR in two pediatric patients with bortezomib. Patients were initially treated with IV methylprednisolone pulse therapy with IVIG and PP three times weekly for a total of 10 treatments. After the standard therapy used at our institution persistence of DSA associated with graft dysfunction prompted the use of bortezomib to further treat the rejection. We did not have any neurologic side effects, but one patient did experience significant infections after bortezomib infusions requiring prolonged antimicrobial therapy. The long-term outcome of both children was excellent with preservation of normal renal function and persistent reduction in DSA titers.

New insights in antibody-mediated rejection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In the present review, we aim to describe the state of knowledge concerning antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) spectrum and diagnosis criteria before analyzing the present and future promising leads regarding ABMR prognosis markers and treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies regarding complement-binding donor-specific antibodies and the molecular approach highlighted the unmet need for stratification tools for prognosis and treatment inside ABMR disease.

SUMMARY

ABMR is the leading cause of kidney allograft failure. The recent expansion of its spectrum is related to the paradigm of a continuous process, leading insidiously to a chronic form of ABMR and to the progressive acknowledgement of new entities (such as vascular ABMR, subclinical ABMR, C4d-negative ABMR). Considering the global picture of ABMR, the Banff classification gradually refined the diagnosis criteria so that it now describes a clinically relevant and coherent entity. Nevertheless, if the diagnosis mainly relies on conventional assessment, such as histological findings and circulating donor-specific antibodies, these criteria face serious limitations in terms of stratification of patients at risk of graft loss inside ABMR disease. Recently, new promising tools have emerged in order to identify long-term outcomes at the time of the diagnosis of rejection. In this regard, donor-specific antibodies' complement-fixing ability and the molecular approach contributed significantly. Currently, however, no clinically relevant surrogate marker of treatment efficiency is currently available.

Review of bortezomib treatment of antibody-mediated rejection in renal transplantation

SIGNIFICANCE

Development of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) after kidney transplantation is associated with reduced allograft survival. A few strategies have been tested in controlled clinical trials for the treatment of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), and no therapies are approved by regulatory authorities. Thus development of antihumoral therapies that provide prompt elimination of DSA and improve allograft survival is an important goal.

RECENT ADVANCES

Proteasome inhibitor (PI)-based regimens provide a promising new approach for treating AMR. To date, experiences have been limited to off-label bortezomib use in AMR. Key findings with PI-based therapy are that they provide effective primary and rescue therapy for AMR by prompt reduction in immunodominant DSA and improvements in histologic and renal function. Early and late AMR differ immunologically and in response to PI therapy. Bortezomib-related toxicities in renal transplant recipients are similar to those observed in the multiple myeloma population.

CRITICAL ISSUES

Although preliminary evidence with PI therapy for AMR is encouraging, the evidence is limited. Larger, prospective, randomized controlled trials with long-term follow up are needed. Advancement in endpoints of clinical trial designs and rigorous clinical trials with more standardized adjunct therapies are also required to explore the risks and benefits of AMR treatment modalities.

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

In the next few years, new PIs are likely to be introduced and new approaches would be developed for achieving synergy with PIs. The ultimate goal will be to develop a regimen that delivers reliable, rapid, complete, and durable elimination of DSA with an acceptable safety profile.

Suppression of allo-human leucocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies secreted by B memory cells in vitro: intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) versus a monoclonal anti-HLA-E IgG that mimics HLA-I reactivities of IVIg

B memory cells remain in circulation and secrete alloantibodies without antigen exposure > 20 years after alloimmunization postpartum or by transplantation. These long-lived B cells are resistant to cytostatic drugs. Therapeutically, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is administered to reduce allo-human leucocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies pre- and post-transplantation, but the mechanism of reduction remains unclear. Recently, we reported that IVIg reacts with several HLA-I alleles and the HLA reactivity of IVIg is lost after its HLA-E reactivity is adsorbed out. Therefore, we have generated an anti-HLA-E monoclonal antibody that mimics the HLA-reactivity of IVIg to investigate whether this antibody suppresses IgG secretion, as does IVIg. B cells were purified from the blood of a woman in whose blood the B memory cells remained without antigen exposure > 20 years after postpartum alloimmunization. The B cells were stimulated with cytokines using a well-defined culture system. The anti-HLA-E monoclonal antibody (mAb) significantly suppressed the allo-HLA class-II IgG produced by the B cells, and that this suppression was far superior to that by IVIg. These findings were confirmed with HLA-I antibody secreted by the immortalized B cell line, developed from the blood of another alloimmunized woman. The binding affinity of the anti-HLA-E mAb for peptide sequences shared (i.e. shared epitopes) between HLA-E and other β2-microglobulin-free HLA heavy chains (open conformers) on the cell surface of B cells may act as a ligand and signal suppression of IgG production of activated B memory cells. We propose that anti-HLA-E monoclonal antibody may also be useful to suppress allo-HLA IgG production in vivo.

Therapeutic plasma exchange for the treatment of pediatric renal diseases in 2013

Therapeutic plasma exchange is an extracorporeal treatment modality that removes systemic circulating pathologic factors or replaces absent plasma components and plays a role in many nephrologic conditions. It presents a number of technical challenges in the pediatric population but has become an increasingly common practice in pediatric nephrology over the past several decades. While prospective evidence is often lacking, our increased understanding of the molecular pathogenesis underlying many pediatric renal diseases provides sound reasoning for the use of plasma exchange in treating these conditions. This review will present the currently accepted indications for plasma exchange in children, the technical aspects of the procedure and its potential complications.

Late kidney dysfunction in a kidney transplant recipient

Late kidney transplant dysfunction may be a harbinger of graft failure. For many years, calcineurin inhibitor toxicity was felt to be the main cause for graft dysfunction with fibrosis and transplant loss. Recently this idea has come into question. With the observation that peritubular capillary C4d staining in kidney allografts may indicate antibody-mediated injury in conjunction with biopsy study findings, an appreciation for antibody-mediated rejection as a major cause of late graft dysfunction and loss has emerged. Twenty percent to 30% of patients develop de novo donor-specific antibodies after kidney transplantation. There are no US Food and Drug Administration-approved treatments for antibody-mediated rejection, nor have any randomized controlled trials assessed efficacy. Off-label treatment strategies include some combination of plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin, and rituximab. Other approaches, including splenectomy, bortezomib, and eculizumab, have also been tried.

Novel immunosuppressive agents in kidney transplantation

Excellent outcomes have been achieved in the field of renal transplantation. A significant reduction in acute rejection has been attained at many renal transplant centers using contemporary immunosuppressive, consisting of an induction agent, a calcineurin inhibitor, an antiproliferative agent plus or minus a corticosteroid. Despite improvements with these regimens, chronic allograft injury and adverse events still persist. The perfect immunosuppressive regimen would limit or eliminate calcineurin inhibitors and/or corticosteroid toxicity while providing enhanced allograft outcomes. Potential improvements to the calcineurin inhibitor class include a prolonged release tacrolimus formulation and voclosporin, a cyclosporine analog. Belatacept has shown promise as an agent to replace calcineurin inhibitors. A novel, fully-human anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody, ASKP1240, is currently enrolling patients in phase 2 trials with calcineurin minimization and avoidance regimens. Another future goal of transplant immunosuppression is effective and safe treatment of allograft rejection. Novel treatments for antibody mediated rejection include bortezomib and eculizumab. Several investigational agents are no longer being pursed in transplantation including the induction agents, efalizumab and alefacept, and maintenance agents, sotrastaurin and tofacitinib. The purpose of this review is to consolidate the published evidence of the effectiveness and safety of investigational immunosuppressive agents in renal transplant recipients.

Management of antibody-mediated rejection in transplantation

Despite intensive traditional immunosuppressive therapy, rates of graft loss have approximated 15% to 20% at 1 year following antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in solid organ transplant recipients. Therefore, the development of antihumoral therapies that provide prompt elimination of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies and improve allograft survival is an important goal. Traditional treatment modalities for AMR deplete B-cell populations but not the cell at the source of antibody production, the mature plasma cell. Plasma cell-targeted therapies using proteasome inhibition is a novel approach to treating AMR. This review discusses current and emerging treatment modalities used for AMR.

Failure of bortezomib to cure acute antibody-mediated rejection in a non-compliant renal transplant patient

Bortezomib has appeared recently as a potential active treatment for acute AMR for few years. We reported a patient who received two courses of bortezomib for the treatment of an acute AMR associated with de novo HLA DSA that occurred 18 months after renal transplantation because of non-compliance. Graft biopsy revealed features of acute humoral rejection with plasmocyte infiltration and C4d staining. Bortezomib was associated with corticosteroid pulses, IVIgs, and PP. Despite this rapid management, the patient lost his graft and carried on dialysis. Bortezomib therapy in addition to current therapy of AMR is not always effective in the treatment for late acute AMR in renal transplantation. We discuss on the place of such a treatment and other therapeutic strategies in this indication.

Antibody-mediated vascular rejection of kidney allografts: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

Rejection of allografts has always been the major obstacle to transplantation success. We aimed to improve characterisation of different kidney-allograft rejection phenotypes, identify how each one is associated with anti-HLA antibodies, and investigate their distinct prognoses.

METHODS

Patients who underwent ABO-compatible kidney transplantations in Necker Hospital and Saint-Louis Hospital (Paris, France) between Jan 1, 1998, and Dec 31, 2008, were included in our population-based study. We assessed patients who provided biopsy samples for acute allograft rejection, which was defined as the association of deterioration in function and histopathological lesions. The main outcome was kidney allograft loss-ie, return to dialysis. To investigate distinct rejection patterns, we retrospectively assessed rejection episodes with review of graft histology, C4d in allograft biopsies, and donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies.

FINDINGS

2079 patients were included in the main analyses, of whom 302 (15%) had acute biopsy-proven rejection. We identified four distinct patterns of kidney allograft rejection: T cell-mediated vascular rejection (26 patients [9%]), antibody-mediated vascular rejection (64 [21%]), T cell-mediated rejection without vasculitis (139 [46%]), and antibody-mediated rejection without vasculitis (73 [24%]). Risk of graft loss was 9·07 times (95 CI 3·62-19·7) higher in antibody-mediated vascular rejection than in T cell-mediated rejection without vasculitis (p<0·0001), compared with an increase of 2·93 times (1·1-7·9; P=0·0237) in antibody-mediated rejection without vasculitis and no significant rise in T cell-mediated vascular rejection (hazard ratio [HR] 1·5, 95% CI 0·33-7·6; p=0·60).

INTERPRETATION

We have identified a type of kidney rejection not presently included in classifications: antibody-mediated vascular rejection. Recognition of this distinct phenotype could lead to the development of new treatment strategies that could salvage many kidney allografts.

FUNDING

None.

Current state of renal transplant immunosuppression: Present and future

For kidney transplant recipients, immunosuppression commonly consists of combination treatment with a calcineurin inhibitor, an antiproliferative agent and a corticosteroid. Many medical centers use a sequential immunosuppression regimen where an induction agent, either an anti-thymocyte globulin or interleukin-2 receptor antibody, is given at the time of transplantation to prevent early acute rejection which is then followed by a triple immunosuppressive maintenance regimen. Very low rejection rates have been achieved at many transplant centers using combinations of these agents in a variety of protocols. Yet, a large number of recipients suffer chronic allograft injury and adverse events associated with drug therapy. Regimens designed to limit or eliminate calcineurin inhibitors and/or corticosteroid use are actively being pursued. An ideal immunosuppressive regimen limits toxicity and prolongs the functional life of the graft. This article contains a critical analysis of clinical data on currently available immunosuppressive strategies and an overview of therapeutic moieties in development.

Immunomodulatory effect of mesenchymal stem cells on B cells

The research on T cell immunosuppression therapies has attracted most of the attention in clinical transplantation. However, B cells and humoral immune responses are increasingly acknowledged as crucial mediators of chronic allograft rejection. Indeed, humoral immune responses can lead to renal allograft rejection even in patients whose cell-mediated immune responses are well controlled. On the other hand, newly studied B cell subsets with regulatory effects have been linked to tolerance achievement in transplantation. Better understanding of the regulatory and effector B cell responses may therefore lead to new therapeutic approaches. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) are arising as a potent therapeutic tool in transplantation due to their regenerative and immunomodulatory properties. The research on MSCs has mainly focused on their effects on T cells and although data regarding the modulatory effects of MSCs on alloantigen-specific humoral response in humans is scarce, it has been demonstrated that MSCs significantly affect B cell functioning. In the present review we will analyze and discuss the results in this field.

Antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation: a review

Antibody mediated rejection (AMR) poses a significant and continued challenge for long term graft survival in kidney transplantation. However, in the recent years, there has emerged an increased understanding of the varied manifestations of the antibody mediated processes in kidney transplantation. In this article, we briefly discuss the various histopathological and clinical manifestations of AMRs, along with describing the techniques and methods which have made it easier to define and diagnose these rejections. We also review the emerging issues of C4d negative AMR, its significance in long term allograft survival and provide a brief summary of the current management strategies for managing AMRs in kidney transplantation.

Antibody-mediated rejection: an evolving entity in heart transplantation

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is gaining increasing recognition as a major complication after heart transplantation, posing a significant risk for allograft failure, cardiac allograft vasculopathy, and poor survival. AMR results from activation of the humoral immune arm and the production of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) that bind to the cardiac allograft causing myocardial injury predominantly through complement activation. The diagnosis of AMR has evolved from a clinical diagnosis involving allograft dysfunction and the presence of DSA to a primarily pathologic diagnosis based on histopathology and immunopathology. Treatment for AMR is multifaceted, targeting inhibition of the humoral immune system at different levels with emerging agents including proteasome and complement inhibitors showing particular promise. While there have been significant advances in our current understanding of the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of AMR, further research is required to determine optimal diagnostic tools, therapeutic agents, and timing of treatment.

Successful rescue of refractory acute antibody-mediated renal allograft rejection with splenectomy--a case report

Highly sensitized patients receive fewer kidney transplants and have a high risk for severe rejection with increased rates of graft loss. We present a highly sensitized child who after desensitization protocol received a kidney transplant and developed refractory acute antibody-mediated rejection. He failed to respond to standard therapy and needed an urgent splenectomy as rescue therapy. Our patient, an 18-yr-old AA male with ESRD due to obstructive uropathy received a second DD transplant. The allograft functioned immediately with SCr 1.4 mg/dL on day #5. On day #8, he was re-admitted with fever, oligoanuria, and renal failure. He was started on methylprednisolone pulse, thymoglobulin, intravenous immunoglobulin, and PP. The transplant kidney biopsy revealed features suggestive of acute AMR. On day #14, the patient remained dialysis dependent with no response to therapy. He underwent an urgent splenectomy and a slow increase in urine output and GFR was noted. The SCr one month post-splenectomy was 1.1 mg/dL. At one yr post-txp, his GFR remained stable with SCr 0.9 mg/dL on tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone. Urgent splenectomy successfully reversed refractory acute AMR, in our highly sensitized patient with second renal transplant.

Therapeutic apheresis for renal disorders

This review summarizes the clinical evidence and practical details for the use of plasmapheresis and other apheresis modalities for each indication in nephrology. Updated information on the molecular biology and immunology of each renal disease is discussed in relation to the rationale for apheresis therapy and its place amid other available treatments. Autoantibody-mediated diseases, such as anti-GBM (anti-glomerular basement membrane) glomerulonephritis (GN), ANCA (antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody)-related GN and the antibody-mediated type of TTP (thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura), and alloantibody-mediated diseases such as kidney transplant sensitization and humoral rejection, can be treated by various plasmapheresis methods. These include standard plasmapheresis with a replacement volume, or plasmapheresis with online plasma purification using adsorption columns or secondary filtration. However, it should be noted that the pathogenic molecules implicated in FSGS (focal segmental glomerulosclerosis), myeloma cast nephropathy, and perhaps other diseases are too small to be removed by most online purification methods. A great majority of controlled trials and series on which evidence-based treatment recommendations are made were performed using centrifugal plasmapheresis; it is presumed that membrane-separation plasmapheresis is equally efficacious. For some rarer diseases, such as MPGN (membranoproliferative GN) type 2 with factor H abnormalities or C3Nef (C3 nephritic factor) autoantibodies, there are only a few case reports, but enough scientific understanding to warrant a trial of plasmapheresis in severe cases. Photopheresis, which is effective for cell-mediated rejection in heart and lung transplantation, has not yet found a place in the routine treatment of kidney transplant rejection.

Plasmapheresis in immunologic renal disease

Plasmapheresis has been used in the management of immunologic renal disease for the last 40 years. The rationale behind this approach is to remove pathogenic immune mediators, such as autoantibodies and immune complexes, from the circulation. There may also be benefit in depleting proinflammatory molecules, such as complement components and coagulation factors. Initial experience was gained in Goodpasture's disease, in which antiglomerular basement membrane antibodies were known to be pathogenic. More recently, a role for autoantibodies has become clear in small-vessel systemic vasculitis and some cases of hemolytic uremic syndrome/thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Removal of immune complexes is thought to be important in cryoglobulinemia and systemic lupus erythematosus. Plasmapheresis is used in renal transplantation for the treatment of acute antibody-mediated rejection, and for desensitization of patients with preformed anti-HLA antibodies or those receiving an ABO-incompatible transplant. Although many of the early studies were uncontrolled, there has been an increasing number of randomized controlled trials in recent years. The aim of this article is to summarize current indications for the use of plasmapheresis in immunologic renal disease.