Re-visioning Academic Medicine Through a Constructionist Lens

Expanding the Scope of Narrative Medicine by Emphasizing Stories from Minoritized Communities: A Novel Facilitator Training Program

BACKGROUND

Narrative medicine (NM) emphasizes the vital role healthcare stories play in conveying patients' experiences and expanding health professionals' reflective capacity. Though predicated on inclusivity, social justice, and equality, NM programs do not tend to include communities with marginalized health narratives due to a paucity of trained facilitators.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of a novel virtual NM facilitator training intended to expand NM programming to minoritized communities.

DESIGN

Mixed methods analysis of surveys administered before (pre), after (post), and 6 months after (6mo follow-up) the training.

PARTICIPANTS

Healthcare professionals, scholars, caregivers, and patients self-identifying as a member of (n = 25/42, 60%) and/or working with (n = 36/42, 86%) minoritized community groups.

MAIN MEASURES

Perceived confidence and skills relating to NM and facilitating NM activities, and open-ended questions about the curriculum across three timepoints.

INTERVENTIONS

Training occurred over eight half-day sessions with large group plenaries, facilitated small groups, and art and humanities workshops.

KEY RESULTS

Response rates were n = 34/42 (81%), n = 29/42 (69%), and n = 21/42 (50%), respectively, for the three timepoints. Compared to pre-training, post- and 6mo follow-up surveys showed statistical improvements on six of seven items, including confidence and skill in facilitating NM activities (mean = 3.2 vs. 5.5 vs. 5.4), creating NM curricula (mean = 3.1 vs 5.2 vs. 5.2), defining narrative competence (mean = 4.2 vs. 5.5 vs. 5.3), engaging team members (mean = 4.7 vs. 5.7 vs. 5.5), identifying humanities materials (mean = 3.3 vs 5.0 vs. 5.1), and recognizing diverse perspectives (mean = 4.6 vs. 5.5 vs. 5.5). Pairwise comparisons showed post- and 6mo follow-up responses significantly increased (p ≤ 0.01) from pre-training. Participants reported facilitating more NM activities after training (mean = 1.5 vs. 1.9; p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

We successfully recruited and engaged participants from minoritized communities to facilitate NM sessions. Future efforts should focus on objective assessments of skills, and more in-depth research using focus groups, observation, and key informant interviews.

Narrative therapy and family therapy in genetic counseling: A scoping review

Genetic counseling facilitates psychological and social adaptation in clients and families. Two psychotherapeutic approaches, narrative and family therapy foster client adaptation to adverse situations and may enhance the genetic counseling process. This scoping review aimed to describe the applications of narrative therapy and family therapy in genetic counseling, and to document the actual and perceived value of these approaches in a genetic counseling setting. Nine original research articles and six commentary articles met the study inclusion criteria. Original articles reported on positive client attitudes when these approaches were applied to hereditary cancer and Huntington disease settings. Five studies applied either approach in group sessions, where safety was key to positive outcomes, including sharing lived experiences and coping strategies. Balanced utilization of structured and open elements in group sessions maximized a sense of control, while also allowing for opportunity to self-disclose. Narrative therapy interventions were time efficient and were reported to foster connection with others and shape a new adaptive narrative centered around strengths. Family therapy approaches, based on experiential family therapy, the intersystem model, object relations family therapy, and the social ecology model, required a greater time commitment, but promoted disclosure of complex feelings and diffused tension. Family therapy genogram tools were feasible in practice, easy to implement, and effective at identifying communication barriers. Commentary articles highlighted the alignment of both approaches with genetic counseling goals and their potential value in practice. Utilization of psychotherapeutic approaches can improve counselors' ability to shape sessions, enhance insight and optimize efficacy, and flexibility in moving between models can maximize impact. This review highlights the paucity of studies investigating the efficacy of these psychotherapeutic approaches in the genetic counseling context and the need for more outcomes-based research on the utilization of narrative or family therapy in genetic counseling practice.

Is "No News is Good News" Enough? A Thematic Analysis Exploring Clinical Reasoning Assessment in Pediatric Residency Programs

OBJECTIVE

Clinical reasoning (CR) includes numerous essential skills for clinicians, but how these skills are assessed in pediatric residency training is not well described. This study aimed to explore pediatric residency program leader perspectives on CR assessment and identification of trainee deficiencies in this area.

METHODS

Taking a social constructionist worldview, we conducted a thematic analysis of 20 semistructured interviews with pediatric residency program leaders. Interviews explored how pediatric residency programs assess CR and how deficiencies are identified. Recruitment and analysis continued iteratively until thematic sufficiency was reached. Member checking enhanced the trustworthiness of the results.

RESULTS

Participants noted a perceived lack of a shared mental model for CR assessment between program leaders and clinical supervisors. Four themes were generated to highlight CR assessment in pediatric residency programs: 1) Clinical supervisors escalate concerns about behaviors representing symptoms of CR deficits rather than diagnosing CR competency deficiencies and that CR assessment requires, 2) an outward display of autonomous decision-making, 3) psychologically safe environments for inquiry, and 4) longitudinal, individualized observation. Elements of pediatric residency programs that impede CR assessment were identified, including family-centered rounds and team-based clinical care.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified key components necessary for CR assessment and barriers that may lead to missed identification of deficiencies. While no single solution can create an ideal environment for CR assessment, this study identifies elements for enhancing assessment opportunities for early identification of deficiencies.

Development and evaluation of a 4M taxonomy from nursing home staff text messages using a fine-tuned generative language model

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore the utilization of a fine-tuned language model to extract expressions related to the Age-Friendly Health Systems 4M Framework (What Matters, Medication, Mentation, and Mobility) from nursing home worker text messages, deploy automated mapping of these expressions to a taxonomy, and explore the created expressions and relationships.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The dataset included 21 357 text messages from healthcare workers in 12 Missouri nursing homes. A sample of 860 messages was annotated by clinical experts to form a "Gold Standard" dataset. Model performance was evaluated using classification metrics including Cohen's Kappa (κ), with κ ≥ 0.60 as the performance threshold. The selected model was fine-tuned. Extractions were clustered, labeled, and arranged into a structured taxonomy for exploration.

RESULTS

The fine-tuned model demonstrated improved extraction of 4M content (κ = 0.73). Extractions were clustered and labeled, revealing large groups of expressions related to care preferences, medication adjustments, cognitive changes, and mobility issues.

DISCUSSION

The preliminary development of the 4M model and 4M taxonomy enables knowledge extraction from clinical text messages and aids future development of a 4M ontology. Results compliment themes and findings in other 4M research.

CONCLUSION

This research underscores the need for consensus building in ontology creation and the role of language models in developing ontologies, while acknowledging their limitations in logical reasoning and ontological commitments. Further development and context expansion with expert involvement of a 4M ontology are necessary.

Pediatric Emergency Medicine Physicians' Perspectives of Concussion in Young Children

OBJECTIVE

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) during early childhood (before 6 years) is prevalent, accounting for rising rates of emergency department visits. These injuries may lead to postconcussive symptoms, which may be subtle and difficult to diagnose in young children. Inadequate discharge counseling may lead to prolonged duration of symptoms and possible developmental delays. We aimed to explore pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians' perspectives on "concussion" terminology, diagnosis, and management, specifically in a young child with mild TBI.

METHODS

We conducted semistructured interviews using open-ended questions involving a hypothetical scenario. We recruited currently practicing PEM physicians by a snowball sampling method. A research team recorded, transcribed, and analyzed the interviews. Using social constructionism as the philosophical framework, we developed and refined codes and derived themes until reaching thematic saturation. Peer debriefing with an expert collaborator aided with revisions of themes.

RESULTS

A single PEM researcher interviewed 13 participants. Three primary themes emerged. Our first theme identified the role of guidelines and tools in the diagnostic workup. Most participants utilized a clinical prediction tool for neuroimaging but no clinical symptom scales. Our second theme described the difficulties and inconsistencies in the approach to diagnosis of concussion, largely due to young age, lack of verbal skills and unreliable examinations. Our last theme focused on the difficulty in providing clear discharge instructions to parents. Many participants described difficulty providing activity restrictions, instead allowing self-modulation, and lack of counseling for educational tasks.

CONCLUSIONS

Variability exists among PEM physicians in diagnosis and management of concussions in young children. Discomfort with lack of reliability of symptoms and underappreciation of typical early childhood characteristics may account for findings. Educational initiatives, age-appropriate clinical tools and treatment-guided outcomes research are needed to guide PEM physicians in the care of young children with head injuries.

Neuropsychiatric symptoms in systemic lupus erythematosus: mixed methods analysis of patient-derived attributional evidence in the international INSPIRE project

OBJECTIVE

Attribution of neuropsychiatric symptoms in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) relies heavily on clinician assessment. Limited clinic time, variable knowledge and symptom under-reporting contribute to discordance between clinician assessments and patient symptoms. We obtained attributional data directly from patients and clinicians in order to estimate and compare potential levels of direct attribution to SLE of multiple neuropsychiatric symptoms using different patient-derived measures.

METHODS

Quantitative and qualitative data analysed included: the prevalence and frequency of neuropsychiatric symptoms, response to corticosteroids and concurrence of neuropsychiatric symptoms with non-neuropsychiatric SLE disease activity. SLE patients were also compared with controls and inflammatory arthritis (IA) patients to explore the attributability of neuropsychiatric symptoms to the direct disease effects on the brain/nervous system.

RESULTS

We recruited 2817 participants, including 400 clinicians. SLE patients (n = 609) reported significantly higher prevalences of neuropsychiatric symptoms than controls (n = 463) and IA patients (n = 489). SLE and IA patients' quantitative data demonstrated multiple neuropsychiatric symptoms relapsing/remitting with other disease symptoms such as joint pain. Over 45% of SLE patients reported resolution/improvement of fatigue, positive sensory symptoms, severe headache, and cognitive dysfunction with corticosteroids. Evidence of direct attributability in SLE was highest for hallucinations and severe headache. SLE patients had greater reported improvement from corticosteroids (p= 0.008), and greater relapsing-remitting with disease activity (P < 0.001) in the comparisons with IA patients for severe headache. Clinicians and patients reported insufficient time to discuss patient-reported attributional evidence. Symptoms viewed as indirectly related/non-attributable were often less prioritized for discussion and treatment.

CONCLUSION

We found evidence indicating varying levels of direct attributability of both common and previously unexplored neuropsychiatric symptoms in SLE patients, with hallucinations and severe headache assessed as the most directly attributable. There may also be-currently under-estimated-direct effects on the nervous system in IA and other systemic rheumatological diseases.

Foundational Aspects of Neurology Education Research: Philosophy of Science as the Starting Point of Neurology Education Research

This article provides a discussion on foundational aspects of neurology education based on concepts from the philosophy of science: ontology, epistemology, and paradigms. Together, these concepts are the starting point of the education research process. We provide context for the application of these concepts by outlining how they are cornerstones of high-quality neurology education research and by describing the underlying differences between education research and biomedical research. We illustrate these concepts through 2 case scenarios and offer practical considerations for planning neurology education research.

A review of trends in health professions education research at the turn of three decades (2000, 2010, and 2020)

INTRODUCTION

Health professions education research has evolved as a discipline, yet chronological trends in topics and methodologies together have not been comprehensively explored previously. This study aimed to identify the trends in research topics and methodologies used in primary empirical studies published in reputable health professions education research journals at the turn of three decades (2000, 2010, and 2020).

METHODS

Underpinned by relativism and subjectivism, this review of trends included primary empirical studies published in five quartile 1 health professions education research journals, defined by Clarivate (Academic Medicine, Advances in Health Sciences Education, Medical Education, Medical Teacher, and Nurse Education Today) from three sample years at the start of three decades (2000, 2010, and 2020). Each study was coded for demographics (e.g., country of origin), topic area, and methodological approach, including philosophical positioning, study design, and methods. Data were analysed descriptively.

RESULTS

A total of 1126 empirical studies were published across the three time-points, with the majority from North American and European countries. More papers were published in recent years, with publications doubling in 2020 (n = 488) compared with 2000 (n = 223). Effective teaching methods were the most researched topic, whereas teaching and learning of Indigenous health received the least priority consistently across the three time-periods. Over half of the methodologies were quantitative, followed by qualitative, and mixed methods. The use of qualitative methodologies and the reporting of philosophical positioning (mostly in qualitative studies) have gradually increased over the three time-points. Many studies, however, still fail to report key markers of methodological quality.

DISCUSSION

Despite positive trends in health professions education research (more studies, multi-institutional research, and balanced methodological approaches), our review of trends identified notable issues (e.g., limited country diversity, missing criteria for methodological quality, and less-diverse research topics). We therefore encourage greater consideration of the role of journals in shaping the future, quality of output reporting, and gaps in the literature; thereby diversifying what and how we research health professions education.

Novice Experts: Exploring Fellows' Perspectives on the Transition from Residency to Fellowship

Introduction

Advanced training experiences are required in certain countries for subspecialization. In the United States, a decline in Milestones and in levels of supervision for Entrustable Professional Activities for incoming subspecialty fellows has been described and attributed to changes in context that fellows experience. We aimed to explore this transition to advanced training, and specifically to describe which contextual factors are salient to fellows at the residency to fellowship transition and the supports available for a smooth transition to fellowship.

Methods

Using contextual competence as a sensitizing concept, ten semi-structured interviews with first- and second-year pediatric subspecialty fellows from three subspecialties were performed at a large academic medical center in 2023, using thematic analysis informed by elements of constructivist grounded theory.

Results

Contextual factors that impacted the transition included changes in systems, necessary knowledge, and roles and responsibilities. At times, participants describe a tension between feeling like novices while simultaneously feeling like they should have more expertise than they had. Supports in navigating this tension, and in navigating the transition more generally, included formal orientations, fellow behaviors and perspective, and input from others.

Conclusions

The transition to advanced training is characterized, at times, by experiencing tension between feeling like a novice while feeling like one should have expertise, with fellows' own behaviors and the support of those around them being essential to fellows' smooth transition. While fellowship programs offer orientations, systems-level solutions for supporting fellows' navigation of the transition are underexplored.

Experiences of Deployed Physicians in Support of Operation Allies Refuge/Operation Allies Welcome: Lessons to Inform Improvements in Training

INTRODUCTION

Stability operations, including humanitarian assistance and disaster relief missions, are key functions of U.S. Military medicine and the Military Medical Humanitarian Assistance Course (MMHAC) is a 2-day course widely used to prepare military medical personnel for such missions. It focuses on caring for those most vulnerable in the wake of disasters, particularly children. The large-scale humanitarian deployment of military medical providers in support of Operation Allies Welcome/Operation Allies Refuge (OAW/OAR) presents an opportunity to evaluate the preparedness of these providers to care for the needs of the Afghan travelers, so we explored the experiences of military medical providers deployed in support of OAW/OAR to inform improvements in the MMHAC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a qualitative study of military medical providers who were deployed in support of OAW/OAR using a series of three virtual focus groups. Focus group questions were structured around the main topics covered in the MMHAC (patient care, ethical considerations, logistical concerns, and preventive and public health) and explicitly asked about adaptive leadership challenges faced and strategies used to overcome them. We analyzed transcripts using inductive thematic analysis within a constructivist paradigm, with adaptive leadership as a sensitizing concept. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Uniformed Services University.

RESULTS

We constructed 4 themes from participant responses, each addressing challenges that medical providers faced during their mission: (1) Medical providers navigated tension between medical and public health priorities and military mission priorities; (2) Chronic and complex care needs posed unique challenges for medical personnel; (3) Challenges in patient care were compounded by logistical and system-based barriers; and (4) Cultural barriers led to ethical dilemmas that physicians felt inadequately prepared to handle, most notably with respect to gender-related concerns. Within each theme, participants described which aspects of MMHAC training were most helpful and which areas were inadequate.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians found the OAR/OAW mission meaningful but also identified challenges related to medical care provision, public health, logistics, and ethical dilemmas that hindered their ability to carry out their medical mission. Lessons learned from OAW/OAR highlight several areas in which the MMHAC training could be augmented and improved to further mitigate these challenges.

Effective and Engaging Active Learning in the Medical School Classroom: Lessons from Case-Based Collaborative Learning

Large group collaborative teaching approaches are rapidly gaining popularity in undergraduate medical education. The case-based collaborative Learning (CBCL) pedagogy was instituted for pre-clerkship teaching at Harvard Medical School in 2015 with subsequent implementation at other medical schools. CBCL emphasizes inductive reasoning, integrates basic and clinical sciences, stimulates curiosity, and fosters teamwork. Given the ongoing educational evolution, guidance on designing and facilitating collaborative learning sessions, such as CBCL may benefit faculty in their instructional design efforts. This perspective article describes strategies to create effective collaborative sessions using CBCL as an example. We reviewed the literature and summarized ten years of experience in CBCL teaching through the lens of contemporary theories of teaching and learning. The recommendations are organized into three main domains: Instructional Design, Facilitation, and Professional Transformation, each aligned with the theoretical principles of CBCL. The recommendations provide a conceptual model to assist faculty in designing engaging and effective class materials and support students' professional transformation during collaborative learning sessions.

Students' perspectives from co-designed, lived experience eating disorders education: A qualitative inquiry

BACKGROUND

There is an intricate connection between eating disorders and trauma. Despite this, traditional eating disorders education for health professions has not taken a trauma-informed approach.

AIM

We aimed to explore the reflections of graduate entry dietetic and undergraduate nursing students who participated in a trauma-informed, co-designed education innovation that focussed on an individual's storied lived experience.

METHODS

We applied an interpretive lens in this qualitative inquiry-based study. Graduate entry dietetic and undergraduate nursing students participated in this study. The lived experience, co-designed workshops (n = 35) were embedded in the curricula with an optional follow-up discussion with the lived experience and academic educators. Students were asked to write their key reflections on a sticky note at the end of the workshop. Thematic analysis of the student reflections was completed by the research team including the lived experience educator and academics.

RESULTS

A total of 442 sticky notes were collected; 145 from the dietetic and 297 from the nursing students. Analysis of the dietetic and nursing students' reflections generated six themes: 1) Do no harm, 2) Seeing beyond the diagnosis, 3) Language matters, 4) Humanise the relationship, 5) Recovery in the context of healing, and 6) Significance of hope. There was consistency across the reflections for the two different disciplines.

CONCLUSIONS

Co-designed lived experience eating disorders education that honours the living experiences and complexities of eating disorders can deepen health profession students' understandings of how they can work with, rather than against, people living with and recovering from eating disorders through a trauma-informed approach.

Exploring the development of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) for health professions educators through faculty development

Research on how pedagogical content knowledge (PCK)-informed faculty development initiatives can support PCK development among health professions educators is limited. Given the positive impact of PCK on enhancing professional knowledge for effective teaching, this study investigates the learning process of health professions educators in developing their PCK through a faculty development initiative, supported by the Content Representation (CoRe) tool. Using a qualitative approach, grounded in social constructionism, the study engaged eight educators from diverse health disciplines at an Australian university. Participants collaborated in developing and refining PCK-infused lesson plans using the CoRe tool. Several workshops, writing sessions, feedback sharing, and an online community of practice facilitated PCK-related discussion, resource sharing, and networking. Data collection comprised two rounds of individual interviews, written reflections, and lesson planning artefacts. Data were analysed using team-based thematic framework analysis. Four themes were identified: 1) articulating teaching purposes, (2) understanding students' learning needs, (3) promoting reflection on teaching practice, and (4) challenges in adapting and implementing the CoRe tool. The findings highlight the critical role of faculty development programs and advocate for the use of the CoRe tool for articulating and scaffolding PCK for both experienced and novice educators. The collaborative environment facilitated peer feedback and knowledge sharing, thus fostering a collective understanding of PCK and affirming its relevance within the broader health professions education community.

"I Had No Idea This Happened": Electronic Feedback on Clinical Reasoning for Hospitalists

BACKGROUND

Feedback on the diagnostic process has been proposed as a method of improving clinical reasoning and reducing diagnostic errors. Barriers to the delivery and receipt of feedback include time constraints and negative reactions. Given the shift toward asynchronous, digital communication, it is possible that electronic feedback ("e-feedback") could overcome these barriers.

OBJECTIVES

We developed an e-feedback system for hospitalists around episodes of care escalation (transfers to ICU and rapid responses). The intervention was evaluated by measuring hospitalists' satisfaction with e-feedback and commitment to change.

DESIGN

A qualitative survey study conducted at one academic medical center from February to June 2023.

PARTICIPANTS

Hospitalists - physicians and advanced practice providers.

APPROACH

Two hospitalists, one internal medicine resident, and a nurse reviewed escalations of care on the hospitalist service each week using the Revised Safer Dx framework. Confidential feedback was emailed to the hospitalists involved in the patient's care. Hospitalists were asked to rate and explain their satisfaction with the e-feedback and whether they might modify their clinical practice based on the e-feedback. The open-ended text comments from the hospitalists were analyzed using a thematic analysis framework.

RESULTS

Forty-nine out of fifty-eight hospitalists agreed to participate. One hundred five out of one hundred twenty-four (85%) e-feedback surveys that were sent were returned by the hospitalists. Hospitalists were highly satisfied with 67% (n = 70) of the e-feedback reports, moderately satisfied with 23% (n = 24), and not satisfied with 10% (n = 11). Six themes were identified based on analysis of the comments. Themes related to satisfaction with the intervention included appreciation for learning about patient outcomes, general appreciation of feedback on clinical care, and importance of detailed and specific feedback. Themes related to changing clinical practice included reflection on clinical decision-making, value of new insights, and anticipated future behavior change.

CONCLUSIONS

E-feedback was well received by hospitalists. Their perspectives offer useful insights for enhancing electronic feedback interventions.

Medical students', residents', and nurses's feedback to clinical educators in Taiwan: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Feedback is a crucial element in learning. While studies in the field of healthcare professions education have highlighted the process of educators feeding back to learners, relatively little investigation exists on learners feeding back to educators in Asian cultures. Studies show that recipients of effective feedback develop educational skills and reflective practice, but the process of giving feedback seems to have been mainly studied through surveys and questionnaires. Such research offers little to no insights on feedback providers' and recipients' experiences of feedback. To fill the gap, in the context of multi-source feedback, we investigate medical students, residents, and nurses feedback giving to clinical educators (and their receiving of this) following a case presentation training course. We aim to understand the facilitators and inhibitors that encourage and/or prevent feedback provision alongside educators' uptake and reactions.

METHODS

We used semi-structured group interviews. Participants comprised five different categories of participants: year-4 medical students (n = 6); residents (n = 5); nurses (n = 4); junior clinical educators (n = 9); senior clinical educators (n = 3). We asked them about their experiences of providing feedback to educators and educators receiving of feedback on their teaching. Group interviews were conducted in the largest healthcare institution in Taiwan. Data were analysed using thematic Framework Analysis and managed in ATLAS.ti 8.0.

RESULTS

We identified two major themes with respective sub-themes: (1) Factors affecting feedback giving (including desire for improvement, feedback content, process of feedback, feedback fears, feedback prevention and medical hierarchy); and (2) Educators' reactions to receiving feedback (including validity of feedback, face-saving and emotional reactions to receiving feedback).

CONCLUSIONS

Feedback provision to educators on their teaching, and educators' receiving of this feedback in an Asian culture brings forth issues around medical hierarchy, in-person feedback and face-saving, which have important implications for effective and optimal delivery of feedback. Curricular developers should consider the context of feedback (e.g. anonymously online), facilitating students as active participants for the development of educational quality, and educators' mindful practice when engaging with student feedback.

To define or not to define: a commentary on 'The case for metacognitive reflection'

In this commentary, the authors comment on a recent paper that argued for clear definitions of metacognition, reflection, and metacognitive reflection. Challenging the notion that exclusive definitions are essential to the sciences of health professions education, the authors argue for approaches that define conceptual spaces in which different definitional positions can coexist and scholarship based on similarity rather than identity can be pursued.

Cross-neurotype communication from an autistic point of view: Insights on autistic Theory of Mind from a focus group study

BACKGROUND

The conceptualisation of autism as a disorder where Theory of Mind (ToM) and pragmatics are fundamentally impaired has prompted a wealth of research on autistic deficits, most of which is characterised by two main assumptions: first, that autistic people would display said deficits, if present, with any conversation partner and in any situation; second, that neurotypical people do not present these deficits, regardless of the conversation partner. However, this is not necessarily reflected in autistic accounts of the way they experience social cognition and pragmatics.

AIMS

The present paper aims to investigate the autistic experience of communication with both autistic and neurotypical people, with a particular focus on their perception of the ability of autistic and neurotypical people to understand their communicative intentions.

METHODS & PROCEDURES

Participants, 23 adult Italian autistic people without intellectual disability or language disorders, were recruited online. Two virtual focus groups of 2 hours each were conducted, transcribed and analysed through thematic analysis with a descriptive phenomenological approach by two independent researchers.

OUTCOMES & RESULTS

Six themes were developed from the analysis, the most relevant being Autistic-Autistic communication and Autistic ToM. The results, in line with the Double Empathy theory, suggest there seem to be important differences between neurotypical and autistic people's ToM. These appear to make it easier for autistic people to communicate with one another, as well as to create difficulties for neurotypical people to understand autistic people, not just the other way around.

CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS

These results seem to confirm that challenges in cross-neurotype communication are better interpreted as mutual miscomprehension and reciprocal differences in ToM rather than deficits on the autistic part. This calls for a reframing of ToM and/or the need for autistic ToM as a construct, of which neurotypical people seem to be lacking. Moreover, these insights should be taken into account for speech and language therapy and clinical practice in general, advocating for a neurodiversity-informed view of co-constructed communication as well as for a broader societal change in which therapists can play a crucial role, through participatory approaches or raising awareness in their daily practice.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

What is already known on the subject Autism is conceived as characterised by social cognition and communication difficulties, often linked to Theory of Mind (ToM) deficits. However, recent research suggested variations in ToM abilities within the autistic population and proposed alternative theories like the Double Empathy theory. Nevertheless, only a few studies examined how autistic individuals perceive communication across neurotypes. What this study adds Autistic individuals seem to find it easier to communicate with other autistic people, and they identify specific characteristics of neurotypical communication that hinder successful communication. Moreover, neurotypical people are perceived as having difficulties in autistic ToM, which seems to emerge as a relevant and needed construct in light of the Double Empathy problem. What are the clinical implications of this work? These findings can inform speech and language therapy and clinical practice about the potential gains of raising awareness on the Double Empathy problem and the higher communication ease inside the autistic community, alongside individualised support. Participatory approaches and closer collaboration with the autistic community also seem to be crucial for therapists to help improve communication experiences for autistic individuals.

'Humility, Concern, Respect': A Qualitative Study Exploring Parent Perspectives on a Pediatrician's Role in Addressing Racism

OBJECTIVE

To explore racially minoritized families' perceptions on how, and if, physicians should address children's racial identity and concepts of racism within clinical settings.

STUDY DESIGN

Parents of racially minoritized children, ages 5 through 18, were interviewed to explore experiences with racial identity formation, discrimination, and the extent to which they wanted pediatricians to address these topics. Children were included at the discretion of their parents. Interviews were transcribed, coded, and analyzed through a critical race theory lens based in constructivist grounded theory.

RESULTS

Parents encouraged their children to embrace their racial identities but also wanted to shield them from negative experiences of racism to preserve identity safety. Parents felt pediatricians should address racial issues in a manner specific to their child's situation. Thoughtful inclusion of race-related questions, whether in discussion or on questionnaires, is essential to prevent tension in a therapeutic relationship. There was no consensus on the use of preclinical screening. Instead, families highlighted the importance of embracing humility, trust, and respect.

CONCLUSIONS

Participant families have preferences for approaches to address the effects of racism on their children's health. Pediatricians should understand the importance of identity safety and approach their discussions with cultural humility, which includes self-reflection, empathy, active listening, and flexible negotiation. Above all, pediatricians need to create a safe environment for appropriate discussion of these issues.

Exploring the Meta-debrief: Developing a Toolbox for Debriefing the Debrief

SUMMARY STATEMENT

Otherwise known as debriefing the debrief, meta-debriefing describes the practice of debriefing simulation facilitators after they have facilitated, or observed, a debriefing. It is a vital component of enhancing debriefing skills, irrespective of where debriefers may be in terms of their professional development journey from novice to expert. We present the following 4 fundamental pillars, which underpin the creation of an impactful meta-debriefing strategy: theoretically driven, psychologically safe, context dependent, and formative in function. Furthermore, we describe various strategies that, underpinned by these 4 key pillars, contribute to a toolbox of techniques that enable meta-debriefers to develop proficiency and flexibility in their practice. We have synthesized and critically reviewed the current evidence base, derived mostly from the debriefing literature, and highlighted gaps to address in meta-debriefing contexts. We hope this article stimulates discussion among simulation practitioners, progresses the science and art of meta-debriefing, and prompts further research so that meta-debriefing can become an integral evidence-based component of our faculty development processes.

Facilitators of and barriers to buprenorphine initiation in the emergency department: a scoping review

Buprenorphine initiation in the Emergency Department (ED) has been hailed as an evidence-based strategy to mitigate the opioid overdose crisis, but its implementation has been limited. This scoping review synthesizes barriers and facilitators to buprenorphine initiation in the ED, and uses the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and a critical lens to analyze the literature. Results demonstrate an immense effort across the U.S. and Canada to implement ED-initiated buprenorphine. Facilitators include multidisciplinary addiction teams and co-located, low-barrier, harm reduction-informed services to support transitions. Barriers include a failure to address structural stigma, client complexity, and an increasingly toxic drug supply. The literature also misses the opportunity to include the perspectives of service users, health administrators, and learners. Increased coordination of implementation efforts, and a shift to equitable and inclusive opioid agonist therapy initiation pathways are needed across the U.S. and Canada.

"I could 100% see myself getting hurt if I did it wrong": a qualitative exploration of exercise perceptions in people with chronic low back pain

PURPOSE

Traditionally, a specific "core" exercise focus has been favoured for chronic low back pain (CLBP) which contrasts holistic exercise approaches. This study aims to explore the perceptions of exercise in people with CLBP and whether exercise itself can convey implicit messages regarding its use in CLBP management in the absence of a clinical narrative.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants were asked about their CLBP history, views of exercise for CLBP, and current exercise behaviours through online semi-structured interviews. Then, participants watched the interviewer perform the deadlift, Jefferson curl, and bird dog and were asked if they thought each individual exercise was beneficial for CLBP, and why. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis through a critical realism and social constructivism lens.

RESULTS

All participants (n = 16) viewed all exercises as beneficial for health and pain relief, but perceived efficacy varied. "Core" exercises were deemed crucial for CLBP relief, while spinal flexion and external load were often perceived as potentially injurious. Distrust towards healthcare practitioners also influenced exercise perceptions.

CONCLUSION

People with CLBP perceive different exercises to either relieve pain or improve health. Healthcare practitioners can influence these perceptions, highlighting the need for consideration of exercise perceptions in clinical contexts.

Signs, Sources, Coping Strategies, and Suggested Interventions for Burnout Among Preclerkship Students at a U.S. Medical School: A Qualitative Focus Group Study

PURPOSE

Research suggests that burnout can begin early in medical school, yet burnout among preclerkship students remains underexplored. This study aimed to characterize burnout signs, sources, coping strategies, and potential interventions among preclerkship students at one U.S. medical school.

METHOD

The authors conducted a qualitative study of preclerkship students at Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine (MCASOM) in June 2019. Participants completed 2 Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) items (measuring frequency of emotional exhaustion and depersonalization) and 2 free-text questions on burnout before participating in 1 of 3 semistructured focus groups. Focus group questions were derived from a literature review on medical student burnout with input from the MCASOM Student Life and Wellness Committee. Group discussions were recorded, transcribed, coded inductively, and analyzed iteratively (along with free-text comments) using a general inductive approach from a constructivist perspective.

RESULTS

Eighteen of 111 eligible students (16%) participated, with 5/18 (28%) reporting weekly emotional exhaustion and/or depersonalization on MBI items. Analysis of focus group transcripts showed that most students had experienced burnout symptoms during their first or second year, corresponding with school-related stressors and manifesting in cognitive-emotional, physical, and verbal-behavioral ways. Students identified systemic, institutional, and individual burnout drivers and discussed how these drivers interacted (e.g., high standards of excellence at the system level interacted with anxiety and maladaptive thinking at the individual level, creating pressure to always do more). Students used various coping strategies (e.g., self-care, peer support, reframing, and compartmentalization) but emphasized limitations of these strategies and recommended interventions directed toward systemic and institutional burnout drivers.

CONCLUSIONS

This study offers insights into burnout signs and sources among preclerkship medical students that can inform future large-scale studies. Results suggest that burnout emerges from dynamic interactions among systemic, institutional, and individual factors and may benefit from multipronged interventions.

The influence of supervisory support on clinical learning as experienced by Czech Nursing and health professional students in the context of patient safety events: A qualitative study

AIM

To explore the influence of supervisory and mentoring relationships on the clinical learning experiences of Czech Nursing and health professional students in the context of patient safety events BACKGROUND: Clinical experience is integral to healthcare education, shaping skills, behaviours, values and professional identity. During clinical placements, students may encounter memorable patient safety events and experience varied reactions from mentors/supervisors/others. Some research has highlighted challenges faced by students on clinical placement. Few studies involve multiple professions, most emanating from Western Europe, the UK, the USA and Australia with little relating to central European countries such as the Czech Republic.

DESIGN

Two stage interpretivist qualitative study based in social constructionism METHODS: Convenience sample across 13 undergraduate and 18 postgraduate health professions courses. Stage 1 (2022): using SLIPPS Learning Event Recording Tool translated into Czech. 20 students' (Midwifery=11, Nursing=1, Paramedic=1, Occupational therapy =7) submitted 21 patient safety learning event narratives. Stage 2 (2022): Focus group with 2 nursing and nine midwifery students. Phased thematic analysis involving multiple researchers.

RESULTS

Three themes illustrate the circumstances and impact of placement mentoring/supervision experiences, conceptualised as: 'Clinical and Emotional Companionship', 'Clinical and Emotional Abandonment' and 'Sense of agency - Professional and personal growth'. 'Companionship' reflected the students' feelings of being welcomed, respected, heard, trusted and supported. Conversely 'abandonment' emerged from feelings of being unheard, vulnerable, humiliated, afraid, leaving students feeling abandoned, lonely and 'useless'. Notwithstanding these conditions, students showed the ability to identify patient safety issues with agency evident in reactions such as stepping-in to try to ameliorate a situation, rather than speaking-up. Professional and personal growth was also apparent in their narratives and a conceptual diagram illustrates the students' learning journeys in a patient safety context.

CONCLUSION

The findings and new conceptualisations around abandonment and companionship emerging from this study expand the evidence base regarding the profound impact of clinical experience and mentorship/supervision on learning and students' emotional wellbeing. A sense of companionship appears to play a buffering role even in challenging circumstances of involvement in or witnessing compromised patients' safety. Allowing students a sense of belonging, to vent, grow, feel supported and safe to ask/learn - contributing to 'emotional safety for learning', promotes students' behaviour that may prevent/minimize hazards or ameliorate the aftermath. However, we must not simply blame mentors/supervisors, staff, or the students themselves- they are simply part of a much larger complex environment of professional education encompassing hidden curriculums, power dynamics and professional socialisation.

Navigating between two figured worlds: A constructivist grounded theory study on residents' workplace experiences with health care management tasks

INTRODUCTION

Medical residents may be required to handle health care management (HCM) tasks alongside their clinical duties, despite not having received training to perform them. However, little research has been done on how medical residents acquire HCM skills at the workplace and how these experiences impact their learning.

METHODS

We completed a qualitative research study using the Constructivist Grounded Theory approach inform by the Figured World theory. To gather data, we held focus groups and conducted semi-structured interviews with 22 medical residents from various disciplines and learning levels at Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. We utilised iterative data collection and analysis, constant comparison methods and theoretical sampling to construct our findings.

RESULTS

We constructed two different worlds to represent how residents acquire HCM skills: the non-managing physician and the physician-as-manager. The former was characterised by a discourse that underplayed the role of the HCM tasks as part of residents' training, was full of negative interactions with the health care team and limited residents' agency. In the latter, residents collaborated and learned from health care team members, had supervisors who modelled how to incorporate HCM tasks into daily activities and expanded residents' agency. Residents developed their professional identity according to the world they were introduced into.

DISCUSSION

Educational leaders must understand that the non-managing physician figured world gives residents a feeling of uprooting and discomfort when carrying out this type of tasks. To transform this world into the physician-as-manager, it is necessary to reconfigure some workplace hierarchies, consolidate interprofessional collaborations and change the discourse perpetuated by influential role models. Supervisors must also strengthen their knowledge of HCM and improve its integration into clinical practice. Any effort to train residents on HCM competencies could be lost if the workplace underscores their value in patient care.

How do validity experts conceptualise argumentation? It's a rhetorical question

INTRODUCTION

Health professions education (HPE) has adopted the conceptualization of validity as an argument. However, the theoretical and practical aspects of how validity arguments should be developed, used and evaluated in HPE have not been deeply explored. Articulating the argumentation theory undergirding validity and validation can help HPE better operationalise validity as an argument. To better understand this, the authors explored how HPE validity scholars conceptualise assessment validity arguments and argumentation, seeking to understand potential consequences of these views on validation practices.

METHODS

The authors used critical case sampling to identify HPE assessment validity experts in three ways: (1) participation in a prominent validity research group, (2) appearing in a bibliometric study of HPE validity publications and (3) authorship of recent HPE validity literature. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 experts in HPE assessment validity from four different countries. The authors used reflexive thematic analysis to develop themes relevant to their research question.

RESULTS

The authors developed three themes grounded in participants' responses: (1) In theory, HPE validity is a social and situated argument. (2) In practice, the absence of audience and evaluation stymies the social nature of HPE validity. (3) Lack of validity argumentation creates and maintains power differentials within HPE. Participants articulated that current HPE validation practices are rooted in post-positivist epistemology when they should be situated (i.e. context-dependent), audience-centric and inclusive.

DISCUSSION

When discussing validity argumentation in theory, participants' descriptions reflect an interpretivist lens for evaluation that is misaligned with real-world validity practices. This misalignment likely arises from HPE's adoption of "validity as an argument" as a slogan, without integrating theoretical and practical principles of argumentation theory.

An ecosystem of accepting life with chronic pain: A meta-ethnography

Background

Chronic pain is a highly prevalent long-term condition, experienced unequally, impacting both the individual living with pain, and wider society. 'Acceptance' of chronic pain is relevant to improved consultations in pain care, and navigating an approach towards evidence-based, long-term management and associated improvements in health. However, the concept proves difficult to measure, and primary qualitative studies of lived experiences show complexity related to our socio-cultural-political worlds, healthcare experiences, and difficulties with language and meaning. We framed acceptance of chronic pain as socially constructed and aimed to conceptualise the lived experiences of acceptance of chronic pain in adults.

Methods

We conducted a systematic search and screening process, followed by qualitative, interpretive, literature synthesis using Meta-ethnography. We included qualitative studies using chronic pain as the primary condition, where the study included an aim to research the acceptance concept. We conducted each stage of the synthesis with co-researchers of differing disciplinary backgrounds, and with lived experiences of chronic pain.

Findings

We included 10 qualitative studies from Canada, Sweden, The Netherlands, Ireland, UK, Australia and New Zealand. Our 'lines of argument' include a fluid and continuous journey with fluctuating states of acceptance; language and meaning of acceptance and chronic pain, a challenge to identity in a capitalist, ableist society and the limits to individualism; a caring, supportive and coherent system. The conceptual framework of the meta-ethnography is represented by a rosebush with interconnected branches, holding both roses and thorns, such is the nature of accepting life with chronic pain.

Conclusion

Our findings broaden conceptualisation of 'acceptance of chronic pain' beyond an individual factor, to a fluid and continuous journey, interconnected with our socio-cultural-political worlds; an ecosystem.

'I was uncertain, but I was acting on it': A longitudinal qualitative study of medical students' responses to uncertainty

PURPOSE

Uncertainty is ubiquitous within medical practice. Accordingly, how individuals respond to uncertainty, termed uncertainty tolerance (UT), is increasingly considered a medical graduate competency. Despite this, aspects of the UT construct are debated, which may relate to research focused on measuring UT, rather than understanding students' experiences. Therefore, we asked (1) how do medical students describe their responses to uncertainty, (2) how (if at all) do described responses change over time and (3) how do described responses contribute to understanding the UT construct.

METHODS

Engaging an interpretivist worldview, we conducted a longitudinal qualitative study throughout 2020 with 41 clinical medical students at an Australian medical school. Participants completed reflective diary entries across six in-semester time-points (n = 41, 40, 39, 38, 37 and 35) and semi-structured interviews at the end of both semesters (n = 20 per semester). We analysed data using framework analysis.

RESULTS

Although participants communicated accepting health care uncertainties, described cognitive appraisals of uncertainty ranged from threatening (e.g. challenging credibility) to opportunistic (e.g. for learning and growth). Emotions in response to uncertainty were predominately described in negative terms, including worry and anxiety. Participants described a range of maladaptive and adaptive behavioural responses, including avoiding versus actively engaging with uncertainty. Despite describing typically negative emotions across time, participants' cognitive and behavioural response descriptions shifted from self-doubt and avoidance, towards acceptance of, and engagement despite uncertainty.

CONCLUSIONS

Students' descriptions of responses to uncertainty suggest existing UT conceptualisations may not holistically reflect medical students' experiences of what it means to be uncertainty 'tolerant', especially pertaining to conceptualisations of 'tolerance' centred on emotions (e.g. stress) rather than how uncertainty is ultimately managed. Extending from this study, the field could consider redefining characteristics of uncertainty 'tolerance' to focus on adaptive cognitive and behavioural responses, rather than emotional responses as key indicators of 'tolerance'.

Neuropsychiatric prodromes and symptom timings in relation to disease onset and/or flares in SLE: results from the mixed methods international INSPIRE study

Background

Neuropsychiatric symptoms in SLE and other systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs) are challenging to diagnose, attribute and manage. We investigated the timings of onset of a broad range of neuropsychiatric (NP) symptoms in relation to timing of SLE onset. In addition, we explored whether NP symptoms may be a prodrome to SARD onset and to subsequent flares.

Methods

We collected patient reports of the timing of their first episode of 29 NP symptoms relative to SLE non-NP symptom onset. Surveys (n = 676 SLE patients and n = 400 clinicians) and interviews (n = 50 clinicians; and n = 69 SARD patients, including 27 SLE patients) were completed from 2022 to 2023, and analysed using mixed methods.

Findings

The majority of NP symptoms did not first present around the time of SLE onset, contrary to the prevailing view among many rheumatology participants and in the literature. For example, among patients who experienced hallucinations, 54% reported first presentation >1 year after disease onset. Patient interviews also revealed that a range of NP symptoms may be a prodrome to SLE/SARDs onset and later flares, including symptoms not represented in existing classification criteria. Evidence of a possible prodromal syndrome was elicited from those patients who experienced hallucinations. Of these, 61% (SLE) and 34% (other SARDs) reported increasingly disrupted dreaming sleep (usually nightmares) prior to their hallucinations. In-depth interviews revealed that progression of symptoms in flares showed a high degree of inter-patient variation, whilst symptom progression was often similar in individual patient's recurrent flares.

Interpretation

Neuropsychiatric symptoms can first present at any stage in the SLE disease course. Attributional decisions should evaluate timings of NP symptoms in relation to timing of SLE/SARD symptom onset rather than time of diagnosis due to frequent diagnostic delays. Greater recognition of prodromal/early NP symptoms indicating impending SLE flares (and potentially other SARD flares) could enable quicker flare identification and treatment.

Funding

The Lupus Trust.

Ownership of Patient Care: Medical Students' Expectations, Experiences, and Evolutions Across the Core Clerkship Curriculum

Phenomenon: Ownership of patient care is a key element of professional growth and professional identity formation, but its development among medical students is incompletely understood. Specifically, how attitudes surrounding ownership of patient care develop, what experiences are most influential in shaping them, and how educators can best support this growth are not well known. Therefore, we studied the longitudinal progression of ownership definitions and experiences in medical students across their core clerkship curriculum. Approach: We conducted a series of four longitudinal focus groups with the same cohort of medical students across their core clerkship curriculum. Using workplace learning theory as a sensitizing concept, we conducted semi-structured interviews to explore how definitions, experiences, and influencers of ownership developed and evolved. Results were analyzed inductively using thematic analysis. Findings: Fifteen students participated in four focus groups spanning their core clerkship curriculum. We constructed four themes from responses: (1) students' definitions of ownership of patient care evolved to include more central roles for themselves and more defined limitations; (2) student conceptions of patient care ownership became more relational and reciprocal over time as they ascribed a more active role to patients; (3) student assessment fostered ownership as an external motivator when it explicitly addressed ownership, but detracted from ownership if it removed students from patient care; and (4) structural and logistical factors impacted students' ability to display patient care ownership. Insights: Student conceptions of ownership evolved over their core clerkship curriculum to include more patient care responsibility and more meaningful relational connections with patients, including recognizing patients' agency in this relationship. This progression was contingent on interactions with real patients and students being afforded opportunities to play a meaningful role in their care. Rotation structures and assessment processes are key influencers of care ownership that merit further study, as well as the voice of patients themselves in these relationships.

Exploring Clinical Lessons Learned by Experienced Hospitalists from Diagnostic Errors and Successes

BACKGROUND

Diagnostic errors cause significant patient harm. The clinician's ultimate goal is to achieve diagnostic excellence in order to serve patients safely. This can be accomplished by learning from both errors and successes in patient care. However, the extent to which clinicians grow and navigate diagnostic errors and successes in patient care is poorly understood. Clinically experienced hospitalists, who have cared for numerous acutely ill patients, should have great insights from their successes and mistakes to inform others striving for excellence in patient care.

OBJECTIVE

To identify and characterize clinical lessons learned by experienced hospitalists from diagnostic errors and successes.

DESIGN

A semi-structured interview guide was used to collect qualitative data from hospitalists at five independently administered hospitals in the Mid-Atlantic area from February to June 2022.

PARTICIPANTS

12 academic and 12 community-based hospitalists with ≥ 5 years of clinical experience.

APPROACH

A constructivist qualitative approach was used and "reflexive thematic analysis" of interview transcripts was conducted to identify themes and patterns of meaning across the dataset.

RESULTS

Five themes were generated from the data based on clinical lessons learned by hospitalists from diagnostic errors and successes. The ideas included appreciating excellence in clinical reasoning as a core skill, connecting with patients and other members of the health care team to be able to tap into their insights, reflecting on the diagnostic process, committing to growth, and prioritizing self-care.

CONCLUSIONS

The study identifies key lessons learned from the errors and successes encountered in patient care by clinically experienced hospitalists. These findings may prove helpful for individuals and groups that are authentically committed to moving along the continuum from diagnostic competence towards excellence.

Prevalence and identification of neuropsychiatric symptoms in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases: an international mixed methods study

OBJECTIVE

A limited range of neuropsychiatric symptoms have been reported in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs), with varied symptom prevalence. This study aimed to investigate a wider range of potential symptoms than previous studies, compare patient self-reports with clinician estimates, and explore barriers to symptom identification.

METHODS

Mixed methods were used. Data from SARDs patients (n = 1853) were compared with controls (n = 463) and clinicians (n = 289). In-depth interviews (n = 113) were analysed thematically. Statistical tests compared means of survey items between patients and controls, 8 different SARD groups, and clinician specialities.

RESULTS

Self-reported lifetime prevalences of all 30 neuropsychiatric symptoms investigated (including cognitive, sensorimotor and psychiatric) were significantly higher in SARDs than controls. Validated instruments assessed 55% of SARDs patients as currently having depression and 57% anxiety. Barriers to identifying neuropsychiatric symptoms included: (i) limits to knowledge, guidelines, objective tests and inter-speciality cooperation; (ii) subjectivity, invisibility and believability of symptoms; and (iii) under-eliciting, under-reporting and under-documenting. A lower proportion of clinicians (4%) reported never/rarely asking patients about mental health symptoms than the 74% of patients who reported never/rarely being asked in clinic (P < 0.001). Over 50% of SARDs patients had never/rarely reported their mental health symptoms to clinicians, a proportion underestimated at <10% by clinicians (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Neuropsychiatric symptom self-reported prevalences are significantly higher in SARDs than controls, and are greatly underestimated by most clinicians. Research relying on medical records and current guidelines is unlikely to accurately reflect patients' experiences of neuropsychiatric symptoms. Improved inter-speciality communication and greater patient involvement is needed in SARD care and research.

Recreating the village: the patient experience with a hybrid model of Group Perinatal Care (GPPC) in an academic family health team

BACKGROUND

Group prenatal care (GPC) has been shown to have a positive impact on social support, patient knowledge and preparedness for birth. We developed an interprofessional hybrid model of care whereby the group perinatal care (GPPC) component was co-facilitated by midwives (MW) and family medicine residents (FMR) and alternating individual visits were provided by family physicians (FP's) within our academic family health team (FHT) In this qualitative study, we sought to explore the impact of this program and how it supports patients through pregnancy and the early newborn period.

METHODS

Qualitative study that was conducted using semi-structured telephone interviews with 18 participants who had completed GPPC in the Mount Sinai Academic Family Health Team in Toronto, Canada and delivered between November 2016 and October 2018. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was conducted by team members using grounded theory.

RESULTS

Four over-arching themes emerged from the data: (i) Participants highly valued information they received from multiple trusted sources, (ii) Participants felt well cared for by the collaborative and coordinated interprofessional team, (iii) The design of GPPC enabled a shared experience, allowing for increased support of the pregnant person, and (iv) GPPC facilitated a supportive transition into the community which positively impacted participants' emotional well- being.

CONCLUSIONS

The four constructs of social support (emotional, informational, instrumental and appraisal) were central to the value that participants found in GPPC. This support from the team of healthcare providers, peers and partners had a positive impact on participants' mental health and helped them face the challenges of their transition to parenthood.

Lessons Learned From Early Undergraduate Exposure to the Medical School Curriculum: A Qualitative Analysis

BACKGROUND

 Students considering the health profession as a career rarely have an opportunity to explore medical school experiences. Pathway programs and "mini-medical school" programs exist but rarely involve integrating participants into the medical school experience. A novel for-credit undergraduate course was developed to embed students into a clinical skills course for medical students beginning in 2013. To better understand the impact of these experiences, this study explored former students' perceptions and career trajectories.

METHODS

Participants were contacted via email to participate in a virtual, semi-structured interview. Virtual interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Three investigators analyzed 17 interview transcripts independently and developed a codebook. Investigators met to discuss common themes and outcomes.

RESULTS

Participants received early education on patient interviewing and physical examination skills, health policy, and ultrasound. They noted their course experience was a productive way to gain insight into medical school and often cited it when applying for their chosen professional school. Although not a formal part of the course curriculum, many received guidance on the medical school application process, and some obtained letters of recommendation from physician facilitators. Participants emphasized the sense of belonging within the medical school community and affirmation of pursuing a health professional degree.

CONCLUSION

Participants found their experience to be meaningful and cited it as an influential factor in deciding to pursue a health professional degree. The course could be adopted by other institutions to enhance the variety of pre-health experiences for future medical students or health profession students.

Professional Experiences and Career Trajectories of Mid- to Senior-Career Women Clinician-Scientists: A Qualitative Study

Importance

Despite increasing evidence and recognition of persistent gender disparities in academic medicine, qualitative data detailing the association of gender-based experiences with career progression remain sparse, particularly at the mid- to senior-career stage.

Objective

To investigate the role gender has played in everyday professional experiences of mid- to senior-career women clinician-scientists and their perceptions of gender-related barriers experienced across their careers.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this qualitative study, a total of 60 of 159 invited clinician-scientists who received National Institutes of Health K08 or K23 awards between 2006 and 2009 and responded to a survey in 2021 agreed to participate. Invitees were selected using random, purposive sampling to support sample heterogeneity. Semistructured in-depth interviews were conducted January to May 2022. For this study, interviews from 31 women were analyzed using the framework approach to thematic analysis. Data analyses were performed between August and October 2023.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Descriptive themes of participant experiences of gender and gender-based barriers in academic medicine.

Results

A total of 31 women clinician-scientists (8 identifying as Asian [25.8%], 14 identifying as White [45.2%], and 9 identifying as members of a minority group underrepresented in medicine [29.0%]; 14 aged 40-49 years [45.2%] and 14 aged 50-59 years [45.2%]) were included. Among them, 17 participants (54.8%) had children who required adult supervision or care, 7 participants (22.6%) had children who did not require supervision or care, and 6 participants (19.4%) did not have children. There were 4 dominant themes identified within participant experiences in academic medicine: the mental burden of gendered expectations at work and home, inequitable treatment of women in bureaucratic processes, subtle and less subtle professional exclusion of women, and value of communities built on shared identities, experiences, and solidarity.

Conclusions and Relevance

This study found that women perceived the institution of academic medicine as a male-centric system misaligned with the needs of women, with associated feelings of exclusion, disillusionment, and loss of trust in their institutions. Findings suggest that the confluence of domestic obligations and unaccommodating institutional environments may make it difficult for women clinician-scientists to achieve established timelines of career progression and productivity; these findings may have long-term implications for the well-being and retention of women in academic medicine.

Practical, Privacy and Ethical, and Philosophical Considerations for Using Big Data in Medical Education

ABSTRACT

In this issue of Academic Medicine , Thelen and colleagues present a thoughtful perspective on the emerging opportunity to use longitudinal educational data to improve graduate medical education and optimize the education of individual residents, and call for the accelerated development of large interinstitutional data sets for this purpose. Such applications of big data to medical education hold great promise in terms of informing the teaching of individuals, enhancing transitions between phases of training and between institutions, and permitting better longitudinal education research. At the same time, there is a tension between whose data they are and consequently how they ought to be used. This commentary proposes some practical, privacy and ethical, and philosophical considerations that need to be explored as early efforts to aggregate data across the medical education continuum mature and new efforts are undertaken.

Beyond mere respect: new perspectives on dignity for healthcare workplace learning

Introduction

Although dignity in workplace learning in healthcare is gathering interest, we know little about stakeholders' conceptualizations in this area across professional groups. Dignity breaches in workplace learning are common, often with serious and long-lasting consequences for the affected. Conceptualizations shape behaviours and experiences. To prevent dignity violations in students' learning, it is thus important to understand stakeholders' understandings of the topic. This study therefore explores the dignity conceptualizations around workplace learning that students, placement educators and university staff hold across seven allied health professional groups.

Methods

Using a social constructionist perspective, we conducted individual and group narrative interviews (n = 51) with students, placement educators and university workplace learning staff from seven allied health professional groups. We used the 5-step Framework Analysis to explore and develop themes, identifying differences and similarities across stakeholder groups.

Results

We identified eight distinct, yet interrelated, dimensions of dignity from participants' narratives: dignity as respect, dignity as self-x (the various relationships we have with ourselves), dignity as feeling safe, dignity as understanding otherness, dignity as supporting others, dignity as equality, dignity as professionalism, and dignity as belonging. Dignity as respect was identified across all participants, although mutual respect and a culture of respect were only present in academic participants' talk. The remaining seven dimensions all present important factors extending our understanding of the construct of dignity.

Discussion

In line with existing research, our study identifies the absence of an unambiguous, positive conceptualization of dignity in workplace learning among stakeholders. It adds novelty in two ways: by identifying dignity dimensions that require informed action beyond respecting others, and by revealing a tension between dignity as professionalism and dignity as equality. We suggest revising existing dignity concepts in workplace learning to address this tension and to reinforce that active care, team integration and skilled support are all non-negotiable elements of dignified behaviour within workplace learning.

Exploring in-person self-led debriefings for groups of learners in simulation-based education: an integrative review

BACKGROUND

Facilitator-led debriefings are well-established for debriefing groups of learners in immersive simulation-based education. However, there has been emerging interest in self-led debriefings whereby individuals or groups of learners conduct a debriefing themselves, without the presence of a facilitator. How and why self-led debriefings influence debriefing outcomes remains undetermined.

RESEARCH AIM

The aim of this study was to explore how and why in-person self-led debriefings influence debriefing outcomes for groups of learners in immersive simulation-based education.

METHODS

An integrative review was conducted, searching seven electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, ERIC, SCOPUS, CINAHL Plus, PsychINFO) for peer-reviewed empirical studies investigating in-person self-led debriefings for groups of learners. Data were extracted, synthesised, and underwent reflexive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Eighteen empirical studies identified through the search strategy were included in this review. There was significant heterogeneity in respect to study designs, aims, contexts, debriefing formats, learner characteristics, and data collection instruments. The synthesised findings of this review suggest that, across a range of debriefing outcome measures, in-person self-led debriefings for groups of learners following immersive simulation-based education are preferable to conducting no debriefing at all. In certain cultural and professional contexts, such as postgraduate learners and those with previous debriefing experience, self-led debriefings can support effective learning and may provide equivalent educational outcomes to facilitator-led debriefings or self-led and facilitator-led combination strategies. Furthermore, there is some evidence to suggest that self-led and facilitator-led combination approaches may optimise participant learning, with this approach warranting further research. Reflexive thematic analysis of the data revealed four themes, promoting self-reflective practice, experience and background of learners, challenges of conducting self-led debriefings and facilitation and leadership. Similar to facilitator-led debriefings, promoting self-reflective practice within groups of learners is fundamental to how and why self-led debriefings influence debriefing outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

In circumstances where simulation resources for facilitator-led debriefings are limited, self-led debriefings can provide an alternative opportunity to safeguard effective learning. However, their true value within the scope of immersive simulation-based education may lie as an adjunctive method alongside facilitator-led debriefings. Further research is needed to explore how to best enable the process of reflective practice within self-led debriefings to understand how, and in which contexts, self-led debriefings are best employed and thus maximise their potential use.

Striving to thrive or striving to survive: Professional identity constructions of medical trainees in clinical assessment activities

CONTEXT

Assessment plays a key role in competence development and the shaping of future professionals. Despite its presumed positive impacts on learning, unintended consequences of assessment have drawn increasing attention in the literature. Considering professional identities and how these can be dynamically constructed through social interactions, as in assessment contexts, our study sought to understand how assessment influences the construction of professional identities in medical trainees.

METHODS

Within social constructionism, we adopted a discursive, narrative approach to investigate the different positions trainees narrate for themselves and their assessors in clinical assessment contexts and the impact of these positions on their constructed identities. We purposively recruited 28 medical trainees (23 students and five postgraduate trainees), who took part in entry, follow-up and exit interviews of this study and submitted longitudinal audio/written diaries across nine-months of their training programs. Thematic framework and positioning analyses (focusing on how characters are linguistically positioned in narratives) were applied using an interdisciplinary teamwork approach.

RESULTS

We identified two key narrative plotlines, striving to thrive and striving to survive, across trainees' assessment narratives from 60 interviews and 133 diaries. Elements of growth, development, and improvement were identified as trainees narrated striving to thrive in assessment. Neglect, oppression and perfunctory narratives were elaborated as trainees narrated striving to survive from assessment. Nine main character tropes adopted by trainees with six key assessor character tropes were identified. Bringing these together we present our analysis of two exemplary narratives with elaboration of their wider social implications.

CONCLUSION

Adopting a discursive approach enabled us to better understand not only what identities are constructed by trainees in assessment contexts but also how they are constructed in relation to broader medical education discourses. The findings are informative for educators to reflect on, rectify and reconstruct assessment practices for better facilitating trainee identity construction.

Family dyads, emotional labor, and holding environments in the simulated encounter: co-constructive patient simulation as a reflective tool in child and adolescent psychiatry training

BACKGROUND

Patient simulation has been used in medical education to provide a safe and supportive learning environment for learners to practice clinical and interpersonal skills. However, simulation involving pediatric populations, particularly in child and adolescent psychiatry, is rare and generally does not reflect the child-caregiver dyad or the longitudinal aspects of this care, nor does it provide learners with an opportunity to engage with and reflect on these dynamics.

METHODS

We organized as an educational opportunity a series of seven observed patient simulation sessions with a cohort of a dozen child and adolescent psychiatrists (eight fellows approaching graduation and four senior educators). In these sessions, we utilized the co-constructive patient simulation model to create the simulation cases. We included the use of at least two patient actors in most sessions, and two of the case narratives were longitudinally followed across multiple simulation sessions. We approached the data collected during the simulations and their respective debriefings by using thematic analysis informed by a symbolic interactionist approach.

RESULTS

Based on data from the debriefing sessions and longitudinal narratives, we identified four overarching themes: (1) Reflecting on dyadic challenges: role reversal and individuation; (2) Centering the child, allying with the parent, and treating the family system; (3) Ambivalence in and about the parent-child dyad; and (4) Longitudinal narratives and ambivalence over time.

CONCLUSION

The emotional experience of the simulations, for interviewers and observers alike, provided an opportunity to reflect on personal and professional experiences and triggered meaningful insights and connections between participants. These simulated cases called for emotional labor, particularly in the form of creating holding environments; in this way, the simulated encounters and the debriefing sessions became dialogic experiences, in which the patient and provider, parent and child, and learner and instructor could co-construct meaning and foster professional development as reflective practitioners.

Intersectionality as a theoretical framework for researching health inequities in chronic pain

Chronic pain is experienced unequally by different population groups; we outline examples from the pain literature of inequities related to gender, ethnicity, socioeconomic and migration status. Health inequities are systematic, avoidable and unfair differences in health outcomes between groups of people, with the fundamental 'causes of causes' recognised as unequal distribution of income, power and wealth. Intersectionality can add further theory to health inequities literature; collective social identities including class/socioeconomic status, race/ethnicity, gender, migration status, age, sexuality and disabled status intersect in multiple interconnected systems of power leading to differing experiences of privilege and oppression which can be understood as axes of health inequities. The process of knowledge creation in pain research is shaped by these interconnected systems of power, and may perpetuate inequities in pain care as it is largely based on majority white, middle class, Eurocentric populations. Intersectionality can inform research epistemology (ways of knowing), priorities, methodology and methods. We give examples from the literature where intersectionality has informed a justice oriented approach across different research methods and we offer suggestions for further development. The use of a reductionist frame can force unachievable objectivity on to complex health concepts, and we note increasing realisation in the field of the need to understand the individuals within their social world, and recognise the fluid and contextual nature of this.

A Genetics-Focused Lens on Social Constructs in Pharmacy Education

OBJECTIVE

Incorporating diversity, equity, inclusion, and anti-racism principles into clinical and didactic education is essential because each influence cognitive and affective attitudes in pharmacy practice. Educators must learn from the past to enlighten the future. For example, race is a social construct, not a biological construct. However, it persistently acts as a surrogate for determining medical diagnoses and treatment.

FINDINGS

Precision medicine and pharmacogenomics can serve as a basis for deconstructing social constructs surrounding race and other social determinants of health.

SUMMARY

In this review, the authors highlight why using race in health education will lead to less-than-optimal clinical decisions and discuss best practices for incorporating diversity, equity, inclusion, and anti-racism into health education from a pharmacogenomic-based perspective.

"It Changed How I Think"-Impact of Programmatic Assessment Upon Practicing Physicians: A Qualitative Study

Programmatic assessment is a systematic approach used to document and assess learner performance. It offers learners frequent formative feedback from a variety of contexts and uses both high- and low-stakes assessments to determine student progress. Existing research has explored learner and faculty perceptions of programmatic assessment, reporting favorable impact on faculty understanding of the importance of assessment stakes and feedback to learners while students report the ability to establish and navigate towards goals and reflect on their performance. The Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine (CCLCM) of Case Western Reserve University adopted programmatic assessment methods at its inception. With more than 18 years' experience with programmatic assessment and a portfolio-based assessment system, CCLCM is well-positioned to explore its graduates' perceptions of their programmatic assessment experiences during and after medical school. In 2020, the investigators interviewed 26 of the 339 physician graduates. Participants were purposefully sampled to represent multiple class cohorts (2009-2019), clinical specialties, and practice locations. The investigators analyzed interview transcripts using thematic analysis informed by the frameworks of self-determination theory and professional identity formation. The authors identified themes and support each with participant quotes from the interviews. Based on findings, the investigators compiled a series of recommendations for other institutions who have already or plan to incorporate elements of programmatic assessment into their curricula. The authors concluded by discussing future directions for research and additional avenues of inquiry.

Enhancing Resident Education in Autism Diagnosis: Training on the Screening Tool for Autism in Toddlers

OBJECTIVE

Pediatricians feel inadequately prepared to diagnose and manage autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). We developed a curriculum that trains pediatric residents in the Screening Tool for Autism in Toddlers and Young Children (STAT), a tool used to diagnose ASD, and assessed its impact.

METHODS

Pediatric residents completed training in the STAT that included interactive video and practice-based elements. Residents completed pretraining and posttraining surveys assessing comfort with diagnosing and treating ASD, knowledge-based pretests and posttests, posttraining interviews, and follow-up assessments at 6 and 12 months after training.

RESULTS

Thirty-two residents completed the training. Posttest scores significantly increased [M (SD) 9.8 (2.4) vs 11.7 (2), p < 0.0001]. Knowledge gains were not maintained at 6-month follow-up. Residents reported increased comfort with several ASD management methods and an increased likelihood of using the STAT. More residents reported using the STAT at follow-up: 2 of 29 before training, 5 of 11 at 6 months, and 3 of 13 at 12 months. We identified 4 themes in interview responses: (1) increased sense of empowerment in managing patients with ASD but ongoing reluctance to make a formal diagnosis, (2) logistical barriers affected successful implementation of the STAT, (3) access to developmental pediatricians played an essential role in comfort levels, and (4) the main educational value of the STAT training came from interactive components.

CONCLUSION

An ASD curriculum including training in the STAT increased resident knowledge and comfort in diagnosing and managing ASD. Although logistical barriers continue to affect the ability of general pediatricians to diagnose ASD, use of this curriculum has potential to improve long-term outcomes.

Parent-Integrated Interventions to Improve Language Development in Children Born Very Preterm

Neurodevelopmental challenges in children born very preterm are common and not improving. This study tested the feasibility of using Evidence-based Practice to Improve Quality (EPIQ), a proven quality improvement technique that incorporates scientific evidence to target improving language abilities in very preterm populations in 10 Canadian neonatal follow-up programs. Feasibility was defined as at least 70% of sites completing four intervention cycles and 75% of cycles meeting targeted aims. Systematic reviews were reviewed and performed, an online quality improvement educational tool was developed, multidisciplinary teams that included parents were created and trained, and sites provided virtual support to implement and audit locally at least four intervention cycles of approximately 6 months in duration. Eight of ten sites implemented at least four intervention cycles. Of the 48 cycles completed, audits showed 41 (85%) met their aim. Though COVID-19 was a barrier, parent involvement, champions, and institutional support facilitated success. EPIQ is a feasible quality improvement methodology to implement family-integrated evidence-informed interventions to support language interventions in neonatal follow-up programs. Further studies are required to identify potential benefits of service outcomes, patients, and families and to evaluate sustainability.

Interrogation in clinical supervision sessions: Exploring the construction of clinical psychology trainees’ professional identities

BACKGROUND

Professional socialisation is a complex process through which learners become healthcare professionals. This process occurs in relational spaces: learners are exposed to norms and expectations of them in interactions during formal and informal learning activities. Research exploring socialisation into the healthcare professions is extensive yet inadequately captures details of the actual processes of socialisation and forming of professional identity. Our study offers a moment-by-moment examination of clinical psychology trainee supervision to provide a deeper exploration of novice healthcare professionals' identity development within formal educational interactions.

AIMS

We sought to explore how, and in what ways, supervision interactions impact clinical psychology trainees' professional identity development.

METHOD

Our data comprises 12 audio recordings of supervisor-trainee interactions in a clinical psychology training clinic. Initial data engagement identified 20 instances of interrogation instigated by supervisors (i.e., repetitive questioning, enquiry) as being key events in which identities are contested and re-negotiated. These sections were transcribed verbatim. Drawing on positioning, framing and impression management theories, we explored identity construction in interrogations using discourse analysis.

RESULTS

Supervisors approached interrogations of trainees from either a quality control or a reflective frame focusing on the client or trainee respectively. These frames influenced the positions being made available to trainees. Reflective frame interrogations often defaulted back to quality control. Trainees employed impression management tactics to manage perceived face-threat.

DISCUSSION

Findings highlight challenges with maintaining a reflective space in supervision during interrogations. Supervisors had authority to initiate interrogations that could be taken up, negotiated or resisted by trainees, ultimately maintaining certain professional knowledge and truths. We illuminate the ways in which socialisation processes at the interactional level during formal learning activities ultimately make available (and restrict) certain ways for trainees to think, feel and be.

Shifting the narrative and practice of assessing professionalism in dietetics education: An Australasian qualitative study

AIM

We aimed to explore current approaches to assessing professionalism in dietetics education in Australia and New Zealand, and asked the questions what is working well and what needs to improve?

METHOD

We employed a qualitative interpretive approach and conducted interviews with academic and practitioner (workplace-based) educators (total sample n = 78) with a key stake in dietetics education across Australia and New Zealand. Data were analysed using team-based, framework analysis.

RESULTS

Our findings suggest significant shifts in dietetics education in the area of professionalism assessment. Professionalism assessment is embedded in formal curricula of dietetics programs and is occurring in university and placement settings. In particular, advances have been demonstrated in those programs assessing professionalism as part of the programmatic assessment. Progress has been enabled by philosophical and curricula shifts; clearer articulation and shared understandings of professionalism standards; enhanced learner agency and reduced power distance; early identification and intervention of professionalism lapses; and increased confidence and capabilities of educators.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest there have been considerable advances in professionalism assessment in recent years with shifts in practice in approaching professionalism through a more interpretivist lens, holistically and more student-centred. Professionalism assessment in dietetics education is a shared responsibility and requires further development and transformation to more fully embed and strengthen curricula approaches across programs. Further work should investigate strategies to build safer learning cultures and capacity for professionalism conversations and in strengthening approaches to remediation.

"Preparing them for the profession": An interpretative phenomenological analysis of anatomy educators coping with complexity in the United Kingdom curriculum

Efforts to integrate the basic sciences into the ever-changing curriculum are a trending area of research in health professions education. Low-stakes, high-frequency assessment methods such as the progress test are now widely implemented in the United Kingdom and Northern Ireland as a means of furthering curricular integration toward contemporary goals of competency and professional identity formation. The anatomy educator's experience vis-à-vis these curricular changes is not well understood. This study aimed to explore how anatomy educators make sense of the shifting demands of their role. The interviews were semi-structured, particularly concerned with the phenomenon of teachers adapting to the complexity of their learning environment. The study used interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) to focus on the lived experiences of participants coping with the phenomena in question: how do anatomy educators make sense of the learning environment in the United Kingdom? Interviews were transcribed verbatim and interpreted inductively, identifying four key themes: confidence through connectedness, variations in appraisals of curricular integration, managing expectations to perform in paradoxical situations, and the emergence of innovative teaching. Results point to the learning environment as a complex system and highlight the importance of feeling support from and connection to colleagues, enabling individual educators to develop confidence, meet the top-down demands of changing curricula, and experience personal identity development and uncertainty tolerance within their role. This IPA study offers insight into the lived experiences of anatomy educators whose experiential interpretations of a complex and changing curriculum can uniquely inform stakeholders in health professions education.

One test to rule them all: A qualitative study of formal, informal, and hidden curricula as drivers of USMLE "exam mania"

High-stakes examinations are an integral part of medical education. To practice in the United States (U.S.), students must pass the U.S. Medical Licensing Examinations (USMLE). With the transition of USMLE Step 1 to pass/fail scoring on January 26, 2022, a worldwide debate regarding how residency program directors will view the Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) exam emerged. Here, the authors explore the role of formal, informal, and hidden curricula related to USMLE, with broader implications for high-stakes examinations. Six focus groups of fourth-year students who recently took Step 2 CK and a supplemental curricular content analysis were conducted to explore students' decision-making and emotions regarding the exam, including how the formal, informal, and hidden curricula influence their perspectives. Participants highlighted how informal and hidden curricula drive the belief that high-stakes examinations are the single most important factor in medical school. Prior experience with Step 1 drives behaviors and attitudes when preparing for Step 2 CK. Pressures from these examinations have unintended consequences on burnout, professional identity, specialty choice, and interpersonal interactions. Both interpersonal interactions within medical education as well as subconscious, unintended messaging can influence medical student approaches to and perspectives about high-stakes examinations. Within the context of U.S. medical training, with the transition to a new era of a pass/fail Step 1 examination, careful consideration to prevent shifting the current "Step 1 mania" to a "Step 2 CK mania" is warranted. More broadly, medical educators must examine the unintended yet potentially damaging pressures institutions generate in their medical trainees in relation to high-stakes examinations.