1
|
Tamizh Selvan G, Venkatachalam P. Potentials of cytokinesis blocked micronucleus assay in radiation triage and biological dosimetry. J Genet Eng Biotechnol 2024; 22:100409. [PMID: 39674629 PMCID: PMC11381789 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgeb.2024.100409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 02/04/2024] [Accepted: 08/06/2024] [Indexed: 09/11/2024]
Abstract
The measurement of micronucleus (MN) in the cytokinesis-block arrested binucleated cells has been extensively used as a biomarker in many radiation biology applications in specific biodosimetry. Following radiation casualties, medical management of exposed individuals begins with triage and biological dosimetry. The cytokinesis blocked micronucleus (CBMN) assay is the alternate for the gold standard dicentric chromosome assay in radiation dose assessment. In recent years, the CBMN assay has become well-validated and emerged as a method of choice for evaluating occupational and accidental exposures scenario. It is feasible due to its cost-effective, simple, and rapid dose assessment rather than a conventional chromosome aberration assay. PubMed search tool was used with keywords of MN, biodosimetry, radiotherapy and restricted to human samples. Since Fenech and Morely developed the assay, it has undergone many technical and technological reforms as a biomarker of various applications. In this review, we have abridged recent developments of the CBMN assay in radiation triage and biodosimetry, focusing on (a) the influence of variables on dose estimation, (b) the importance of baseline frequency and reported dose-response coefficient values among different laboratories, (c) inter-laboratory comparison and (d) its limitations and means to overcome them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Tamizh Selvan
- Central Research Laboratory, K.S. Hegde Medical Academy, NITTE (Deemed to be University), Deralakatte, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
| | - P Venkatachalam
- Department of Human Genetics, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to be University), Chennai, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Repin M, Garty G, Garippa RJ, Brenner DJ. RABiT-III: an Automated Micronucleus Assay at a Non-Specialized Biodosimetry Facility. Radiat Res 2024; 201:567-571. [PMID: 38514936 PMCID: PMC11310857 DOI: 10.1667/rade-23-00120.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
Micronuclei, detected through the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay, are valuable indicators of ionizing radiation exposure, especially in short-term lymphocyte cultures. The peripheral human blood lymphocyte assay is recognized as a prime candidate for automated biodosimetry. In a prior project at the Columbia University Center for Radiological Research, we automated this assay using the 96-well ANSI/SLAS microplate standard format and relied on established biotech robotic systems named Rapid Automated Biodosimetry Tool (RABiT). In this study, we present the application of a similar automated biotech setup at an external high-throughput facility (RABiT-III) to implement the same automated cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay. Specifically, we employed the Agilent BRAVO liquid-handling system and GE IN Cell Analyzer 6000 imaging system in conjunction with the PerkinElmer Columbus image data storage and analysis system. Notably, this analysis system features an embedded PhenoLOGIC machine learning module, simplifying the creation of cell classification algorithms for CBMN assay image analysis and enabling the generation of radiation dose-response curves. This investigation underscores the adaptability of the RABiT-II CBMN protocol to diverse RABiT-III biotech robotic platforms in non-specialized biodosimetry centers. Furthermore, it highlights the advantages of machine learning in rapidly developing algorithms crucial for the high-throughput automated analysis of RABiT-III images.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikhail Repin
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Guy Garty
- Radiological Research Accelerator Facility, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Irvington, New York
| | - Ralph J. Garippa
- Gene Editing & Screening Core Laboratory, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - David J. Brenner
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gregoire E, Barquinero JF, Gruel G, Benadjaoud M, Martinez JS, Beinke C, Balajee A, Beukes P, Blakely WF, Dominguez I, Duy PN, Gil OM, Güçlü I, Guogyte K, Hadjidekova SP, Hadjidekova V, Hande P, Jang S, Lumniczky K, Meschini R, Milic M, Montoro A, Moquet J, Moreno M, Norton FN, Oestreicher U, Pajic J, Sabatier L, Sommer S, Testa A, Terzoudi G, Valente M, Venkatachalam P, Vral A, Wilkins RC, Wojcik A, Zafiropoulos D, Kulka U. RENEB Inter-Laboratory comparison 2017: limits and pitfalls of ILCs. Int J Radiat Biol 2021; 97:888-905. [PMID: 33970757 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2021.1928782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Revised: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In case of a mass-casualty radiological event, there would be a need for networking to overcome surge limitations and to quickly obtain homogeneous results (reported aberration frequencies or estimated doses) among biodosimetry laboratories. These results must be consistent within such network. Inter-laboratory comparisons (ILCs) are widely accepted to achieve this homogeneity. At the European level, a great effort has been made to harmonize biological dosimetry laboratories, notably during the MULTIBIODOSE and RENEB projects. In order to continue the harmonization efforts, the RENEB consortium launched this intercomparison which is larger than the RENEB network, as it involves 38 laboratories from 21 countries. In this ILC all steps of the process were monitored, from blood shipment to dose estimation. This exercise also aimed to evaluate the statistical tools used to compare laboratory performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS Blood samples were irradiated at three different doses, 1.8, 0.4 and 0 Gy (samples A, C and B) with 4-MV X-rays at 0.5 Gy min-1, and sent to the participant laboratories. Each laboratory was requested to blindly analyze 500 cells per sample and to report the observed frequency of dicentric chromosomes per metaphase and the corresponding estimated dose. RESULTS This ILC demonstrates that blood samples can be successfully distributed among laboratories worldwide to perform biological dosimetry in case of a mass casualty event. Having achieved a substantial harmonization in multiple areas among the RENEB laboratories issues were identified with the available statistical tools, which are not capable to advantageously exploit the richness of results of a large ILCs. Even though Z- and U-tests are accepted methods for biodosimetry ILCs, setting the number of analyzed metaphases to 500 and establishing a tests' common threshold for all studied doses is inappropriate for evaluating laboratory performance. Another problem highlighted by this ILC is the issue of the dose-effect curve diversity. It clearly appears that, despite the initial advantage of including the scoring specificities of each laboratory, the lack of defined criteria for assessing the robustness of each laboratory's curve is a disadvantage for the 'one curve per laboratory' model. CONCLUSIONS Based on our study, it seems relevant to develop tools better adapted to the collection and processing of results produced by the participant laboratories. We are confident that, after an initial harmonization phase reached by the RENEB laboratories, a new step toward a better optimization of the laboratory networks in biological dosimetry and associated ILC is on the way.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Gregoire
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | | | - Gaetan Gruel
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | | | - Juan S Martinez
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Christina Beinke
- Bundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology affiliated to the University of Ulm, Munich, Germany
| | - Adayabalam Balajee
- Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE), Oak Ridge, TN, USA
| | | | - William F Blakely
- Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute, Uniformed Service University of the Health, Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Pham Ngoc Duy
- Center of Biotechnology, Nuclear Research Institute, Dalat city, Vietnam
| | - Octávia Monteiro Gil
- Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias Nucleares, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Bobadela-LRS, Portugal
| | - Inci Güçlü
- Turkish Atomic Energy Authority, Cekmece Nuclear Research and Training Center, Radiobiology Unit Yarımburgaz, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | | | | | - Prakash Hande
- Department of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Katalin Lumniczky
- National Research Institute for Radiobiology & Radiohygiene, Budapest, Hungary
| | | | | | - Alegria Montoro
- Fundación para la Investigación del Hospital Universitario LA FE de la Comunidad Valenciana, Valencia, Spain
| | - Jayne Moquet
- Public Health England, Centre for Radiation Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Chilton, UK
| | - Mercedes Moreno
- Servicio Madrileño de Salud - Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Farrah N Norton
- Radiobiology & Health, Canadian Nuclear Laboratories, Chalk River, Canada
| | - Ursula Oestreicher
- Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS), Oberschleissheim, Germany
| | - Jelena Pajic
- Serbian Institute of Occupational Health, Radiation Protection Center, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Laure Sabatier
- PROCyTOX, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives, Fontenay aux-Roses, France and Université Paris-Saclay, France
| | - Sylwester Sommer
- Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology (INCT), Warsaw, Poland
| | - Antonella Testa
- Agenzia Nazionale per le Nuove Tecnologie, L´Energia e lo Sviluppo Economico Sostenibile, Rome, Italy
| | - Georgia Terzoudi
- National Center for Scientific Research "Demokritos", NCSR"D", Athens, Greece
| | | | | | - Anne Vral
- Radiobiology Research Unit, Gent University, Gent, Belgium
| | | | - Andrzej Wojcik
- Institute Molecular Biosciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Ulrike Kulka
- Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS), Oberschleissheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pan Y, Ruan J, Gao G, Wu L, Piao C, Liu J. Laboratory Intercomparison of Cytogenetic Dosimetry Among 38 Laboratories in China. Dose Response 2019; 17:1559325819833473. [PMID: 30890901 PMCID: PMC6416682 DOI: 10.1177/1559325819833473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
A nationwide intercomparison exercise for estimating the irradiated dose was
organized by the National Institute for Radiological Protection, Center for
Disease Control and Prevention of China. Thirty-eight laboratories participated
in this program. The main objective of this intercomparison exercise was to
compare the participants’ ability of operation and dose assessment basing on the
frequencies of dicentrics and centric rings. Whole blood samples were irradiated
with different dosages of 60Co γ-rays. Each laboratory collected 2
blind samples and prepared the slides independently. All participants presented
the estimated dose reports within 30 days. The doses assessed by the
participants were acceptable within the reference dose of ±20%. The mean
absolute difference of estimated dose relative to the reference dose was
calculated, which reflected the overall accuracy of dose estimates for each
laboratory. The overall estimation results of blind blood samples for
intercomparison showed a good agreement with the reference dose for each sample,
with nearly 75% of the participants producing acceptable results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Pan
- China CDC Key Laboratory of Radiological Protection and Nuclear Emergency, National Institute for Radiological Protection, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
| | - Jianlei Ruan
- China CDC Key Laboratory of Radiological Protection and Nuclear Emergency, National Institute for Radiological Protection, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
| | - Gang Gao
- China CDC Key Laboratory of Radiological Protection and Nuclear Emergency, National Institute for Radiological Protection, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
| | - Lina Wu
- China CDC Key Laboratory of Radiological Protection and Nuclear Emergency, National Institute for Radiological Protection, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
| | - Chunnan Piao
- China CDC Key Laboratory of Radiological Protection and Nuclear Emergency, National Institute for Radiological Protection, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
| | - Jianxiang Liu
- China CDC Key Laboratory of Radiological Protection and Nuclear Emergency, National Institute for Radiological Protection, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kulka U, Wojcik A, Di Giorgio M, Wilkins R, Suto Y, Jang S, Quing-Jie L, Jiaxiang L, Ainsbury E, Woda C, Roy L, Li C, Lloyd D, Carr Z. BIODOSIMETRY AND BIODOSIMETRY NETWORKS FOR MANAGING RADIATION EMERGENCY. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2018; 182:128-138. [PMID: 30423161 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncy137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Biological dosimetry enables individual dose reconstruction in the case of unclear or inconsistent radiation exposure situations, especially when a direct measurement of ionizing radiation is not or is no longer possible. To be prepared for large-scale radiological incidents, networking between well-trained laboratories has been identified as a useful approach for provision of the fast and trustworthy dose assessments needed in such circumstances. To this end, various biodosimetry laboratories worldwide have joined forces and set up regional and/or nationwide networks either on a formal or informal basis. Many of these laboratories are also a part of global networks such as those organized by World Health Organization, International Atomic Energy Agency or Global Health Security Initiative. In the present report, biodosimetry networks from different parts of the world are presented, and the partners, activities and cooperation actions are detailed. Moreover, guidance for situational application of tools used for individual dosimetry is given.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- U Kulka
- Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz, Salzgitter, Germany
| | - A Wojcik
- Stockholm University, Centre for Radiation Protection Research, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Di Giorgio
- Autoridad Regulatoria Nuclear, C1429BNP CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - R Wilkins
- Health Canada, Radiation Protection Bureau, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Y Suto
- National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - S Jang
- Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
| | - L Quing-Jie
- National Institute for Radiological Protection, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
| | - L Jiaxiang
- National Institute for Radiological Protection, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
| | - E Ainsbury
- Public Health England, Centre for Radiation Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Chilton, UK
| | - C Woda
- HelmholtzZentrum München, Institute of Radiation Protection, Oberschleissheim, Germany
| | - L Roy
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Surete Nucleaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - C Li
- Health Canada, Radiation Protection Bureau, Ottawa, Canada
| | - D Lloyd
- Public Health England, Centre for Radiation Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Chilton, UK
| | - Z Carr
- World Health Organization, Department of Public Health, Environmental and Social Determinants of Health, Geneva-27, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Romm H, Beinke C, Garcia O, Di Giorgio M, Gregoire E, Livingston G, Lloyd DC, Martìnez-Lopez W, Moquet JE, Sugarman SL, Wilkins RC, Ainsbury EA. A New Cytogenetic Biodosimetry Image Repository for the Dicentric Assay. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2016; 172:192-200. [PMID: 27412509 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncw158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
The BioDoseNet was founded by the World Health Organization as a global network of biodosimetry laboratories for building biodosimetry laboratory capacities in countries. The newly established BioDoseNet image repository is a databank of ~25 000 electronically captured images of metaphases from the dicentric assay, which have been previously analysed by international experts. The detailed scoring results and dose estimations have, in most cases, already been published. The compilation of these images into one image repository provides a valuable tool for training and research purposes in biological dosimetry. No special software is needed to view and score the image galleries. For those new to the dicentric assay, the BioDoseNet Image Repository provides an introduction to and training for the dicentric assay. It is an excellent instrument for intra-laboratory training purposes or inter-comparisons between laboratories, as recommended by the International Organization for Standardisation standards. In the event of a radiation accident, the repository can also increase the surge capacity and reduce the turnaround time for dose estimations. Finally, it provides a mechanism for the discussion of scoring discrepancies in difficult cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Horst Romm
- Bundesamt fuer Strahlenschutz, Neuherberg, Salzgitter, Germany
| | | | - Omar Garcia
- Centro de Protección e Higiene de las Radiaciones, Havana, Cuba
| | | | - Eric Gregoire
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sureté Nucléaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Blakely WF, Romanyukha A, Hayes SM, Reyes RA, Stewart HM, Hoefer MH, Williams A, Sharp T, Huff LA. U.S. Department of Defense Multiple-Parameter Biodosimetry Network. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2016; 172:58-71. [PMID: 27886989 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncw295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/12/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
The U.S. Department of Defense (USDOD) service members are at risk of exposure to ionizing radiation due to radiation accidents, terrorist attacks and national defense activities. The use of biodosimetry is a standard of care for the triage and treatment of radiation injuries. Resources and procedures need to be established to implement a multiple-parameter biodosimetry system coupled with expert medial guidance to provide an integrated radiation diagnostic system to meet USDOD requirements. Current USDOD biodosimetry capabilities were identified and recommendations to fill the identified gaps are provided. A USDOD Multi-parametric Biodosimetry Network, based on the expertise that resides at the Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute and the Naval Dosimetry Center, was designed. This network based on the use of multiple biodosimetry modalities would provide diagnostic and triage capabilities needed to meet USDOD requirements. These are not available with sufficient capacity elsewhere but could be needed urgently after a major radiological/nuclear event.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William F Blakely
- Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 8901 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20889-5603, USA
| | | | | | - Ricardo A Reyes
- Defense Health Agency, Walter Reed National Military Medical Command, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA
| | | | - Matthew H Hoefer
- Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 8901 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20889-5603, USA
| | | | - Thad Sharp
- Naval Dosimetry Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA
| | - L Andrew Huff
- Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 8901 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20889-5603, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Achel DG, Serafin AM, Akudugu JM. Flow cytometry-assisted quantification of γH2AX expression has potential as a rapid high-throughput biodosimetry tool. RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS 2016; 55:349-357. [PMID: 27262315 DOI: 10.1007/s00411-016-0654-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2015] [Accepted: 05/23/2016] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
Large-scale radiological events require immediate and accurate estimates of doses received by victims, and possibly the first responders, to assist in treatment decisions. Although there are numerous efforts worldwide to develop biodosimetric tools to adequately handle triage needs during radiological incidents, such endeavours do not seem to actively involve sub-Saharan Africa which currently has a significant level of nuclear-related activity. To initiate a similar interest in Africa, ex vivo radiation-induced γH2AX expression in peripheral blood lymphocytes from fourteen healthy donors was assessed using flow cytometry. While the technique shows potential for use as a rapid high-throughput biodosimetric tool for radiation absorbed doses up to 5 Gy, significant inter-individual differences in γH2AX expression emerged. Also, female donors exhibited higher levels of γH2AX expression than their male counterparts. To address these shortcomings, gender-based in-house dose-response curves for γH2AX induction in lymphocytes 2, 4, and 6 h after X-ray irradiation are proposed for the South African population. The obtained results show that γH2AX is a good candidate biomarker for biodosimetry, but might need some refinement and validation through further studies involving a larger cohort of donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel G Achel
- Division of Radiobiology, Department of Medical Imaging and Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, 7505, South Africa
- Applied Radiation Biology Centre, Radiological and Medical Sciences Research Institute, Ghana Atomic Energy Commission, P.O. Box LG 80, Legon, Accra, Ghana
| | - Antonio M Serafin
- Division of Radiobiology, Department of Medical Imaging and Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, 7505, South Africa
| | - John M Akudugu
- Division of Radiobiology, Department of Medical Imaging and Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, 7505, South Africa.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Perumal V, Sekaran TSG, Raavi V, Basheerudeen SAS, Kanagaraj K, Chowdhury AR, Paul SFD. Radiation signature on exposed cells: Relevance in dose estimation. World J Radiol 2015; 7:266-278. [PMID: 26435777 PMCID: PMC4585950 DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v7.i9.266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2015] [Revised: 07/03/2015] [Accepted: 08/03/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The radiation is considered as a double edged sword, as its beneficial and detrimental effects have been demonstrated. The potential benefits are being exploited to its maximum by adopting safe handling of radionuclide stipulated by the regulatory agencies. While the occupational workers are monitored by personnel monitoring devices, for general publics, it is not a regular practice. However, it can be achieved by using biomarkers with a potential for the radiation triage and medical management. An ideal biomarker to adopt in those situations should be rapid, specific, sensitive, reproducible, and able to categorize the nature of exposure and could provide a reliable dose estimation irrespective of the time of the exposures. Since cytogenetic markers shown to have many advantages relatively than other markers, the origins of various chromosomal abnormalities induced by ionizing radiations along with dose-response curves generated in the laboratory are presented. Current status of the gold standard dicentric chromosome assay, micronucleus assay, translocation measurement by fluorescence in-situ hybridization and an emerging protein marker the γ-H2AX assay are discussed with our laboratory data. With the wide choice of methods, an appropriate assay can be employed based on the net.
Collapse
|
10
|
Bhavani M, Tamizh Selvan G, Kaur H, Adhikari JS, Vijayalakshmi J, Venkatachalam P, Chaudhury NK. Dicentric chromosome aberration analysis using giemsa and centromere specific fluorescence in-situ hybridization for biological dosimetry: An inter- and intra-laboratory comparison in Indian laboratories. Appl Radiat Isot 2014; 92:85-90. [PMID: 25014548 DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2014.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2014] [Revised: 05/19/2014] [Accepted: 06/04/2014] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
To facilitate efficient handling of large samples, an attempt towards networking of laboratories in India for biological dosimetry was carried out. Human peripheral blood samples were exposed to (60)Co γ-radiation for ten different doses (0-5Gy) at a dose rate of 0.7 and 2Gy/min. The chromosomal aberrations (CA) were scored in Giemsa-stained and fluorescence in-situ hybridization with centromere-specific probes. No significant difference (p>0.05) was observed in the CA yield for given doses except 4 and 5Gy, between the laboratories, among the scorers and also staining methods adapted suggest the reliability and validates the inter-lab comparisons exercise for triage applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Bhavani
- Department of Human Genetics, College of Biomedical Sciences Technology and Research, Sri Ramachandra University, Porur, Chennai 600116, Tamil Nadu, India.
| | - G Tamizh Selvan
- Department of Human Genetics, College of Biomedical Sciences Technology and Research, Sri Ramachandra University, Porur, Chennai 600116, Tamil Nadu, India; Chemical Radioprotector and Radiation Dosimetry Research Group, Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Allied Sciences, Brig Mazumdar Road, DRDO, Timarpur, New Delhi 110054, India.
| | - Harpreet Kaur
- Department of Human Genetics, College of Biomedical Sciences Technology and Research, Sri Ramachandra University, Porur, Chennai 600116, Tamil Nadu, India.
| | - J S Adhikari
- Chemical Radioprotector and Radiation Dosimetry Research Group, Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Allied Sciences, Brig Mazumdar Road, DRDO, Timarpur, New Delhi 110054, India.
| | - J Vijayalakshmi
- Department of Human Genetics, College of Biomedical Sciences Technology and Research, Sri Ramachandra University, Porur, Chennai 600116, Tamil Nadu, India.
| | - P Venkatachalam
- Department of Human Genetics, College of Biomedical Sciences Technology and Research, Sri Ramachandra University, Porur, Chennai 600116, Tamil Nadu, India.
| | - N K Chaudhury
- Chemical Radioprotector and Radiation Dosimetry Research Group, Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Allied Sciences, Brig Mazumdar Road, DRDO, Timarpur, New Delhi 110054, India.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sugarman SL, Livingston GK, Stricklin DL, Abbott MG, Wilkins RC, Romm H, Oestreicher U, Yoshida MA, Miura T, Moquet JE, Di Giorgio M, Ferrarotto C, Gross GA, Christiansen ME, Hart CL, Christensen DM. The Internet's role in a biodosimetric response to a radiation mass casualty event. HEALTH PHYSICS 2014; 106:S65-S70. [PMID: 24667387 DOI: 10.1097/hp.0000000000000080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Response to a large-scale radiological incident could require timely medical interventions to minimize radiation casualties. Proper medical care requires knowing the victim's radiation dose. When physical dosimetry is absent, radiation-specific chromosome aberration analysis can serve to estimate the absorbed dose in order to assist physicians in the medical management of radiation injuries. A mock exercise scenario was presented to six participating biodosimetry laboratories as one individual acutely exposed to Co under conditions suggesting whole-body exposure. The individual was not wearing a dosimeter and within 2-3 h of the incident began vomiting. The individual also had other medical symptoms indicating likelihood of a significant dose. Physicians managing the patient requested a dose estimate in order to develop a treatment plan. Participating laboratories in North and South America, Europe, and Asia were asked to evaluate more than 800 electronic images of metaphase cells from the patient to determine the dicentric yield and calculate a dose estimate with 95% confidence limits. All participants were blind to the physical dose until after submitting their estimates based on the dicentric chromosome assay (DCA). The exercise was successful since the mean biological dose estimate was 1.89 Gy whereas the actual physical dose was 2 Gy. This is well within the requirements for guidance of medical management. The exercise demonstrated that the most labor-intensive step in the entire process (visual evaluation of images) can be accelerated by taking advantage of world-wide expertise available on the Internet.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S L Sugarman
- *Oak Ridge Associated Universities, REAC/TS, P.O. Box 117, Oak Ridge, TN, 37831; †Applied Research Associates, Arlington, VA, 22203; ‡Health Canada, Consumer and Clinical Radiation Protection Bureau, Ottawa, ON K1A 1C1, Canada; §Bundesamt fuer Strahlenschutz, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; **Institute of Radiation Emergency Medicine, Hirosaki University, 036-8564, Hirosaki, Japan; ††Public Health England, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Chilton, Didcot, Oxfordshire OX11 0RQ, UK; ‡‡Autoridad Regulatoria Nuclear (ARN), Av. Del Libertador 8250, C1429BNP, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Romm H, Barnard S, Boulay-Greene H, De Amicis A, De Sanctis S, Franco M, Herodin F, Jones A, Kulka U, Lista F, Martigne P, Moquet J, Oestreicher U, Rothkamm K, Thierens H, Valente M, Vandersickel V, Vral A, Braselmann H, Meineke V, Abend M, Beinke C. Laboratory Intercomparison of the Cytokinesis-Block Micronucleus Assay. Radiat Res 2013; 180:120-8. [DOI: 10.1667/rr3234.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
13
|
Beinke C, Barnard S, Boulay-Greene H, De Amicis A, De Sanctis S, Herodin F, Jones A, Kulka U, Lista F, Lloyd D, Martigne P, Moquet J, Oestreicher U, Romm H, Rothkamm K, Valente M, Meineke V, Braselmann H, Abend M. Laboratory Intercomparison of the Dicentric Chromosome Analysis Assay. Radiat Res 2013; 180:129-37. [DOI: 10.1667/rr3235.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
14
|
Coleman CN, Adams S, Adrianopoli C, Ansari A, Bader JL, Buddemeier B, Caro JJ, Casagrande R, Case C, Caspary K, Chang AS, Chang HF, Chao N, Cliffer KD, Confer D, Deitchman S, DeRenzo EG, Dobbs A, Dodgen D, Donnelly EH, Gorman S, Grace MB, Hatchett R, Hick JL, Hrdina C, Jones R, Kane E, Knebel A, Koerner JF, Laffan AM, Larson L, Livinski A, MacKinney J, Maidment BW, Manning R, Marinissen MJ, Martin C, Michael G, Miller CW, Murrain-Hill P, Nemhauser JB, Norwood AE, Nystrom S, Raheem M, Redlener I, Sheehan K, Simon SL, Taylor TP, Toner E, Wallace KS, Weinstock DM, Whitcomb RC, Wieder J, Wiley AL, Yeskey K. Medical Planning and Response for a Nuclear Detonation: A Practical Guide. Biosecur Bioterror 2012; 10:346-71. [DOI: 10.1089/bsp.2012.1025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
|
15
|
Kumagai A, Carr Z, Akira O, Christie D, Yamashita S. Survey of the WHO-REMPAN network's capability for strengthening preparedness for radiological and nuclear emergencies. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2012; 151:607-610. [PMID: 22972795 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncs155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
This paper investigates the capacity of the World Health Organization (WHO)-REMPAN network in responding to radiological incidents and nuclear emergencies. A survey developed by the WHO Secretariat and Nagasaki University was sent to all 40 WHO-REMPAN collaborating centres and liaison institutes in order to verify the current situation of the network, identify needs and collect suggestions for future improvements. Most of the responding institutions said they were satisfied with the current status of the network. However, several responses to the survey indicate that better internal communication is needed, as well as a position document to specify the roles, rights and responsibilities of the network members.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atsushi Kumagai
- Takashi Nagai Memorial International Hibakusha Medical Centre, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Maznyk NA, Wilkins RC, Carr Z, Lloyd DC. The capacity, capabilities and needs of the WHO BioDoseNet member laboratories. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2012; 151:611-620. [PMID: 22908357 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncs156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Biodosimetry is an essential tool for providing timely assessments of radiation exposure, particularly when physical dosimetry is unavailable or unreliable. For mass-casualty events involving public exposure to ionising radiation, it is paramount to rapidly provide this dose information for medical management of casualties. The dicentric chromosome assay is currently the most reliable accepted method for biodosimetry; however, in a mass-casualty scenario, the throughput of this assay will be challenged by its time-consuming nature and the specific expertise required. To address this limitation, many countries have established expertise in cytogenetic biodosimetry and started developing surge capabilities through setting up regional networks to deal with emergency situations. To capitalise on this growing expertise and organise it into an internationally coordinated laboratory network, the World Health Organization has created and launched a global biodosimetry network (BioDoseNet). In order to determine the existing capacity of BioDoseNet member laboratories, including their expertise and in vivo experience, involvement in national and international activities, problems, needs and prospects, an in-depth survey was conducted. These survey results provide significant information on the current state of emergency cytogenetic biodosimetry capabilities around the world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N A Maznyk
- Institute for Medical Radiology of the Academy of Medical Science of Ukraine, Pushkinskaya St. 82, Kharkiv 61024, Ukraine
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Arora R, Chawla R, Marwah R, Kumar V, Goel R, Arora P, Jaiswal S, Sharma RK. Medical radiation countermeasures for nuclear and radiological emergencies: Current status and future perspectives. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2011; 2:202-12. [PMID: 21829316 PMCID: PMC3148625 DOI: 10.4103/0975-7406.68502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2010] [Revised: 07/04/2010] [Accepted: 07/06/2010] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Nuclear and radiological emergencies (NREs) occurred globally and recent incidences in India are indicating toward the need for comprehensive medical preparedness required both at incident site and hospitals. The enhanced threat attributed toward insurgency is another causative factor of worry. The response capabilities and operational readiness of responders (both health and non-health service providers) in contaminated environment need to be supported by advancement in R & D and technological efforts to develop prophylactics and radiation mitigators. It is essential to develop phase 1 alternatives of such drugs for unseen threats as a part of initial preparedness. At the incident site and hospital level, external decontamination procedures need to be standardized and supported by protective clothing and Shudika kits developed by INMAS. The medical management of exposure requires systematic approach to perform triage, resuscitation and curative care. The internal contamination requires decorporation agents to be administered based on procedural diagnostics. Various key issues pertaining to policy decisions, R & D promotion, community awareness, specialized infrastructure for NREs preparedness has been discussed. The present review is an attempt to provide vital information about the current status of various radiation countermeasures and future perspective(s) ahead.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajesh Arora
- Division of CBRN Defence, Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Allied Sciences, Defence Research and Development Organization (DRDO), Brig. SK Mazumdar Road, Timarpur, Delhi - 110 054, India
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Flood AB, Nicolalde RJ, Demidenko E, Williams BB, Shapiro A, Wiley AL, Swartz HM. A Framework for Comparative Evaluation of Dosimetric Methods to Triage a Large Population Following a Radiological Event. RADIAT MEAS 2011; 46:916-922. [PMID: 21949481 PMCID: PMC3178340 DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2011.02.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To prepare for a possible major radiation disaster involving large numbers of potentially exposed people, it is important to be able to rapidly and accurately triage people for treatment or not, factoring in the likely conditions and available resources. To date, planners have had to create guidelines for triage based on methods for estimating dose that are clinically available and which use evidence extrapolated from unrelated conditions. Current guidelines consequently focus on measuring clinical symptoms (e.g., time-to-vomiting), which may not be subject to the same verification of standard methods and validation processes required for governmental approval processes of new and modified procedures. Biodosimeters under development have not yet been formally approved for this use. Neither set of methods has been tested in settings involving large-scale populations at risk for exposure. OBJECTIVE: To propose a framework for comparative evaluation of methods for such triage and to evaluate biodosimetric methods that are currently recommended and new methods as they are developed. METHODS: We adapt the NIH model of scientific evaluations and sciences needed for effective translational research to apply to biodosimetry for triaging very large populations following a radiation event. We detail criteria for translating basic science about dosimetry into effective multi-stage triage of large populations and illustrate it by analyzing 3 current guidelines and 3 advanced methods for biodosimetry. CONCLUSIONS: This framework for evaluating dosimetry in large populations is a useful technique to compare the strengths and weaknesses of different dosimetry methods. It can help policy-makers and planners not only to compare the methods' strengths and weaknesses for their intended use but also to develop an integrated approach to maximize their effectiveness. It also reveals weaknesses in methods that would benefit from further research and evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann Barry Flood
- Dartmouth Physically Based Biodosimetry Center for Medical Countermeasures Against Radiation (Dart-Dose CMCR), Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH 03768 USA
| | - Roberto J. Nicolalde
- Dartmouth Physically Based Biodosimetry Center for Medical Countermeasures Against Radiation (Dart-Dose CMCR), Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH 03768 USA
| | - Eugene Demidenko
- Dartmouth Physically Based Biodosimetry Center for Medical Countermeasures Against Radiation (Dart-Dose CMCR), Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH 03768 USA
| | - Benjamin B. Williams
- Dartmouth Physically Based Biodosimetry Center for Medical Countermeasures Against Radiation (Dart-Dose CMCR), Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH 03768 USA
| | - Alla Shapiro
- Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Rockville, MD USA
| | - Albert L. Wiley
- Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE), Oak Ridge, TN USA
| | - Harold M. Swartz
- Dartmouth Physically Based Biodosimetry Center for Medical Countermeasures Against Radiation (Dart-Dose CMCR), Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH 03768 USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Pilot website to support international collaboration for dose assessments in a radiation emergency. RADIAT MEAS 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2011.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
20
|
Swartz HM, Williams BB, Nicolalde RJ, Demidenko E, Flood AB. Overview of biodosimetry for management of unplanned exposures to ionizing radiation. RADIAT MEAS 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2011.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
|