A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO-CONTROL PILOT STUDY OF EPLERENONE FOR THE TREATMENT OF CENTRAL SEROUS CHORIORETINOPATHY (ECSELSIOR)

Central serous chorioretinopathy: An evidence-based treatment guideline

Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) is a relatively common disease that causes vision loss due to macular subretinal fluid leakage and it is often associated with reduced vision-related quality of life. In CSC, the leakage of subretinal fluid through defects in the retinal pigment epithelial layer's outer blood-retina barrier appears to occur secondary to choroidal abnormalities and dysfunction. The treatment of CSC is currently the subject of controversy, although recent data obtained from several large randomized controlled trials provide a wealth of new information that can be used to establish a treatment algorithm. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of our current understanding regarding the pathogenesis of CSC, current therapeutic strategies, and an evidence-based treatment guideline for CSC. In acute CSC, treatment can often be deferred for up to 3-4 months after diagnosis; however, early treatment with either half-dose or half-fluence photodynamic therapy (PDT) with the photosensitive dye verteporfin may be beneficial in selected cases. In chronic CSC, half-dose or half-fluence PDT, which targets the abnormal choroid, should be considered the preferred treatment. If PDT is unavailable, chronic CSC with focal, non-central leakage on angiography may be treated using conventional laser photocoagulation. CSC with concurrent macular neovascularization should be treated with half-dose/half-fluence PDT and/or intravitreal injections of an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor compound. Given the current shortage of verteporfin and the paucity of evidence supporting the efficacy of other treatment options, future studies-ideally, well-designed randomized controlled trials-are needed in order to evaluate new treatment options for CSC.

Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Positive Predictors of Eplerenone Therapy in Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: A Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate optical coherence tomography (OCT) biomarkers as potential predictors of treatment response in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

It was a retrospective cohort study that included 42 patients with chronic CSCR. After complete ocular and hematological examinations, all patients received 50 mg/day of oral eplerenone for three months and were followed for at least six months. All participants were divided into two groups: Group 1 participants with a positive response to treatment (complete resolution of subretinal fluid (SRF) at six months) and Group 2 poor responders (moderate or less than 50% reduction in SRF from baseline). The primary outcome measure was the resolution of SRF, and various OCT biomarkers like central macular thickness (CMT), pigment epithelial detachments (PED), double-layer sign, elongation of the photoreceptor's outer segment, the integrity of the external limiting membrane, the integrity of the ellipsoid zone, hyperreflective foci in the outer segment, and subretinal deposits in the SRF were assessed.

RESULTS

The mean age was 41.33 ± 10.75 years, and 34 participants were male. Thirty-seven (88.1%) of the participants had good responses to eplerenone, with the mean height of SRF decreasing significantly from a maximum of 269.74 µm to a minimum of 21.86 µm at six months (p<0.001). The mean CMT decreased from the first visit time point to the third visit time (p<0.001). Logistic regression analysis assessed the absence of PED and double-layer signs associated with a good response.

CONCLUSION

The eplerenone therapy seems to be efficient for chronic CSCR, and OCT can be an invaluable aid to the treating physician.

Randomized controlled trials in central serous chorioretinopathy: A review

Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR), a common chorioretinal disease, presents with a myriad of manifestations. Acute CSCR presents with localized neurosensory detachment whereas chronic CSCR may show widespread retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) changes, chronic shallow subretinal fluid, and choroidal neovascularization (CNV) suggestive of a variable natural history leading to suboptimal visual outcomes. Even though multiple treatment options including laser photocoagulation, photodynamic therapy, micropulse laser, anti-vascular endothelial growth factors, and systemic drugs (spironolactone, eplerenone, melatonin, mifepristone) are available, there is an absence of any standardized treatment protocol or gold standard treatment modality. Moreover, their performance compared to observation especially in acute CSCR is still debatable. Compared to other chorioretinal diseases such as age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, diabetic macular oedema, and retinal vein occlusion, there is a relative dearth of randomized controlled trials in CSCR. Multiple inconsistencies including reliance on history of disease duration, variable inclusion criteria/disease descriptors/study endpoints, and availability of multiple treatment modalities lead to difficulties in designing RCTs. A consensus-based treatment protocol, therefore, is still elusive. We reviewed the literature and compiled the list of papers published to date, wherein we analyse and compare the inclusion criteria, imaging modalities, study endpoints, study duration, and study results. Correcting these discrepancies and deficiencies will help standardize future study designs, facilitating a next step toward a standardized treatment protocol.

Real-world practice patterns of eplerenone use for central serous chorioretinopathy

PURPOSE

To report eplerenone use by retina specialists worldwide for central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR).

METHODS

A self-reporting questionnaire was distributed to retina specialists worldwide to gather clinicians' perspectives on CSCR cases treated, eplerenone dosage and duration, reasons to use it, and side effects.

RESULTS

The survey included 241 retina specialists (122 Indian and 119 international) with an average experience of 15.69 ± 9.59 years. Oral eplerenone was used to treat CSCR by 149 (62%) participants. Only 6% (n = 9) had easy access to verteporfin dye and photodynamic therapy. 30 (20%) of the 149 respondents changed their treatment with eplerenone after VICI trial results. Eplerenone was prescribed mostly for chronic CSCR (n = 86, 58%), regardless of involvement laterality. 62% (n = 92) had fewer than 25% CSCR cases treated with eplerenone. 85 (57%) respondents used eplerenone only when other treatments failed, while 36 (24%) used it as first-line treatment. 73 (49%) respondents, prescribed eplerenone at a 50 mg daily dose and 137 (92%) retina specialists used eplerenone for 0-3 months. The drug's efficacy dissatisfied 21 (14%) study participants. 124 (83%) study participants did not encounter any ocular or systemic side effects with eplerenone use. Eplerenone related kidney and electrolyte issues were noted by 11 (7%) study participants.

CONCLUSION

The treatment of CSCR varies around the world and is primarily influenced by the photodynamic therapy availability and the findings of VICI trial. Despite the limited benefit of eplerenone reported by the VICI trial, it is still used as evidenced by real-world experience.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Not applicable.

Eplerenone for the Treatment of Chronic Recurrent Chorioretinopathy Centralis Serosa

BACKGROUND

Chorioretinopathy centralis serosa (CCS) is a common disease that leads to the loss of retinal ion/fluid homeostasis due to decompensation of the retinal pigment epithelium, resulting in fluid accumulation with detachment of the neurosensory retina and/or retinal pigment epithelium. We investigated the effect of eplerenone, a mineralocorticoid receptor inhibitor, on chronic recurrent CCS (cr-CCS).

METHODS

A retrospective study with data analysis of 17 eyes (12 patients) between 2014 - 2021 with cr-CCS in whom other methods were not effective, not applicable, or not desired, was performed. Duration of CCS was at least 12 months with at least one recurrence. Each patient received 25 mg (1st week) and 50 mg (from the 2nd week) for at least 3 months. In each case, best-corrected visual acuity and central and peripheral retinal thickness were measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Side effects were rated by the patients as "none", "mild" (noticeable but not affecting), "tolerable" (affecting but acceptable because of good effect), and "not tolerable" (then discontinuation of therapy).

RESULTS

There was no significant reduction in central or peripheral retinal thickness. A complete reduction of subretinal fluid was achieved in 5 of 17 eyes (29.4%). In 12 eyes, no effect of eplerenone could be detected, so other therapies were required. Visual acuity change was mainly dependent on the duration of CCS and the degree of photoreceptor damage. Side effects were reported by 11 patients as "none" and 1 patient as "mild" (arterial hypotension). No other side effects were observed.

CONCLUSION

The response rates of therapy with eplerenone were relatively low, and no significant effect could be demonstrated. Eplerenone should not (no longer) be routinely used in the therapy of cr-CCS.

Comparing treatment outcomes in randomized controlled trials of central serous chorioretinopathy

PURPOSE

To perform a qualitative analysis of outcomes published from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) from 1979 to 2022.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

All RCTs (including both therapeutic and non-therapeutic interventions) on CSCR available online till July 2022 were included after an electronic search in multiple databases such as PubMed, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, Scopus, and Cochrane database. We analyzed and compared the inclusion criteria, imaging modalities, study endpoints, duration, and the results of the study.

RESULTS

The literature search yielded 498 potential publications. After excluding duplicate studies and studies that met clear exclusion criteria, 64 were screened for further evaluation, of which 7 were removed due to a lack of necessary inclusion criteria. A total of 57 eligible studies are described in this review.

CONCLUSION

This review provides a comparative overview of key outcomes reported between RCTs investigating CSCR. We describe the current landscape of treatment modalities for CSCR and note the discrepancies between results in these published studies. Challenges arise when attempting to compare similar study designs without comparable outcome measures (i.e., clinical vs. structural) which may limit the overall evidence presented. To mitigate this issue, we present the collected data from each study in tables detailing the measures that are and are not assessed in each publication.

Two Cases of Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy Successfully Treated with Systemic Interferon Alpha

Chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) is a sight threatening disease that can lead to legal blindness. Verteporfin photodynamic therapy is the main treatment for chronic CSCR, however, there has been a critical worldwide shortage of verteporfin. Other medical treatments have been attempted with variable efficacy. Interferons have shown efficacy in treating uveitis and associated macular edema. We report 2 cases of treatment refractory chronic CSCR successfully treated with subcutaneous injection of interferon alpha with significant anatomical and functional improvement. To our knowledge, this is the first report observing the therapeutic potential of systemic interferon alpha in the treatment of chronic CSCR. A large randomized controlled clinical trial would help to better evaluate the safety and efficacy of systemic PEG-IFNα2a in treating chronic CSCR, and further define the optimal dose, treatment interval and duration.

Management of Atypical Central Serous Chorioretinopathy Mimicking Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada Disease

Purpose: To report a case of multifocal central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) mimicking Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) disease. Methods: A 42-year-old man was evaluated for an exudative retinal detachment (RD) with a presumptive diagnosis of VKH while being treated with corticosteroids. The examination showed subretinal fibrin deposition with a bullous, exudative, macula-involved RD in the left eye and a progressive decline in visual acuity (VA) to hand motions. Multimodal imaging showed multifocal hyperfluorescent leaks bilaterally by angiography, highly suggestive of CSCR exacerbated by corticosteroids. Results: After the multifocal CSCR diagnosis, the systemic corticosteroids were tapered and eventually discontinued. The patient was then managed with focal laser photocoagulation, photodynamic therapy, and acetazolamide. The VA improved to 20/30 with complete resolution of the bullous RD at the 12-month follow-up. Conclusions: Extensive bullous RD with subretinal fibrin deposition is an infrequent manifestation of CSCR commonly associated with corticosteroid use that can mimic VKH. Thus, it is important to distinguish CSCR from VKH and the potential of combination therapy in managing chronic multifocal CSCR with a bullous RD.

Comparing interventions for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: A network meta-analysis

We compare efficacy of treatments for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) > 3 months. Four treatment classes were considered: photodynamic therapy (PDT), subthreshold laser therapies (SLT), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents. Pairwise and network meta-analyses of the primary outcomes (complete resolution of subretinal fluid (SRF), mean change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (logMAR) and mean change in SRF) and secondary outcomes (mean change in central retinal thickness, and central choroidal thickness (μm), recurrence of SRF, and adverse events) at 3, 6 and 12 months were compared. Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) informed the certainty of NMA evidence. Eleven RCTs of 458 eyes (450 patients) were included. NMA at 3 months showed that both PDT and SLT were superior to control for resolution of SRF (OR 4.83; 95% CI 1.72 to 13.55 and 2.27; 1.14 to 4.49, respectively) and SLT was superior to control for improving BCVA (MD -0.10; -0.17 to -0.04). PDT was superior to SLT for improving CRT (MD-42.88; -75.27 to -10.50). On probability ranking, PDT and SLT were consistently the best-ranked treatments for each outcome at 3 months, but low confidence of evidence and paucity of studies preclude definitive conclusions.

Comparative efficacy of treatments for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: A systematic review with network meta-analyses

Treatment of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (cCSC) remains a topic of controversy. As cCSC is a disease that can wax and wane, treatment efficacy is difficult to assess especially when trials compare active treatments without any placebo/control group. In this study, we systematically reviewed short-term efficacies of any cCSC treatment tested in randomized controlled trials (RCT) and employed network meta-analyses to compare to non-treatment controls. We searched 11 literature databases on 20 March 2022 for RCTs of treatment of cCSC. We identified 17 RCTs including a total of 1172 eyes. Treatments included conventional laser (44 eyes), half-dose or half-fluence photodynamic therapy (PDT) (298 eyes), ranibizumab (16 eyes), antioxidants (50 eyes), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (187 eyes), rifampicin (91 eyes), selective retina therapy (SRT) (67 eyes) and subthreshold micropulse laser (192 eyes). Compared with controls, significant benefit on complete subretinal fluid resolution was only obtained from half-dose or half-fluence PDT (OR: 20.6; 95% CI: 6.3-66.7; p < 0.0001) and conventional laser (OR: 36.4; 95% CI: 2.0-655.7; p = 0.015), and at an order of magnitude lower degree from SRT (OR: 3.4; 95% CI: 1.7-6.8; p = 0.00075). Compared with controls and after sensitivity analyses, significant benefit in the change in best-corrected visual acuity was only obtained by half-dose/-fluence PDT (-0.13 logMAR; 95% CI: -0.20 to -0.06 logMAR; p = 0.00021). In conclusion, three treatment options provide significant improvement over no treatment: half-dose/-fluence PDT, conventional laser and to a much lesser degree SRT. Considering that conventional laser can only be applied for extrafoveal leaks, and the long-term data available for PDT-based treatments finding persisting treatment results, half-dose or half-fluence PDT is the only viable treatment option for patients with cCSC. Shortage issues with verteporfin should not lead to employment of ineffective treatment modalities, as they put patients at unnecessary risk of adverse events.

OCT-A in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy treated with oral eplerenone and half-fluence photodynamic therapy: A comparative study

PURPOSE

To evaluate retinal and choriocapillary vessel density (VD) changes in patients with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) treated with half-fluence verteporfin photodynamic therapy (vPDT) or eplerenone, using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA).

METHODS

Patients affected by CSC and treated with vPDT and eplerenone were retrospectively studied. At baseline and 3 months after each treatment, all patients underwent a complete ophthalmological examination, including an evaluation of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), slit-lamp biomicroscopy, fundus examination, fluorescein angiography (FA), indocyanine green angiography (ICGA), spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and OCTA.

RESULTS

Forty-eight eyes of patients with CSC were analysed. Twenty-four eyes were placed in the vPDT group, and 24 eyes formed the eplerenone group. In both groups, OCTA showed a significant improvement in the VD of deep capillary plexus (DCP) and choriocapillaris (CC) after treatments with respect to baseline (p < 0.001), whereas the VD of superficial capillary plexus (SCP) did not show significant differences (p > 0.05). The PDT group demonstrated a statistically significant increase in the VD of DCP and CC with respect to the eplerenone group (DCP p = 0.012; CC p = 0.004). A statistically significant reduction with respect to baseline in subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) (p = 0.001 for vPDT group; p = 0.001 for eplerenone group) and in central foveal thickness (CFT) (p = 0.001 for vPDT group; p = 0.001 for eplerenone group) was also found. The SFCT was significantly thinnest in the PDT group with respect to the eplerenone group (p = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

OCTA allowed us to study retinal and choriocapillary vascular changes in patients with CSC treated with vPDT and eplerenone.

Comparison of two protocols of subthreshold micropulse yellow laser treatment for non-resolving central serous chorioretinopathy

Purpose:

To study the effect of subthreshold micropulse yellow laser treatment on central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) and to compare two laser protocols. As per our knowledge, there are no studies comparing the two protocols of subthreshold laser.

Methods:

Twenty-three patients with non-resolving CSC of at least three months duration were treated with subthreshold laser (577 nm). Ten patients were treated with 5% duty cycle (group A) and 13 patients with 10% duty cycle (group B). At one month, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), subretinal fluid (SRF), choroidal thickness (CT) and choroidal vascularity index (CVI) were evaluated.

Results:

In group A, BCVA improved from 0.508 ± 504 to 0.174 ± 0.171 (P = 0.0058), CMT improved from 349.8 ± 168.9 micrometers (µm) to 183.3 ± 70.312 µm (P = 0.0093) and SRF reduced from 202.4 ± 158.024 to 43.8 ± 46.599 µm (P = 0.0069). In group B, BCVA improved from 0.437 ± 0.426 to 0.289 ± 0.470 (P = 0.0026), CMT improved from 280.846 ± 72.668 to 196.769 ± 72.62 µm (P = 0.0002) and SRF reduced from 110.385 ± 57.687 µm to 52.538 ± 52.111 µm (P = 0.0064). No significant difference was found in BCVA and CMT between the groups (P = 0.8716 and P = 0.8523, respectively). CSC completely resolved in 50% of cases in group A and in 69.2% of cases in group B. This difference was not statistically significant (0.423); however, the odds ratio of resolution was 2.25 times more with 10% duty cycle. No change was observed on fundus autofluorescence (FAF) following laser.

Conclusion:

Subthreshold micropulse laser can lead to resolution of SRF in 60.87% of cases (groups A and B combined). Ten per cent duty cycle had higher odds of resolution without causing any RPE damage.

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: systematic review and meta-analyses

BACKGROUND

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are widely used for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (cCSCR), but their effectiveness remains unclear. This research was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of this drugs for cCSCR.

METHODS

This is a review of randomized clinical trials (RCT) comparing MRAs to placebo in adults with cCSCR, using the effects of MRAs on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and adverse events as primary outcomes and the effects of MRAs on anatomical parameters as secondary outcomes: central subfield thickness (CST), subretinal fluid height (SFH) and central choroidal thickness (CCT). Our all-language online search included Medline (via PubMed), Central, Embase, Lilacs, Ibecs, and RCT registers platforms, as late as May 2021. We used the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (version 2) to assess the methodological quality of each study and synthesized the results in meta-analyses using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

The search identified 302 records, five of which were eligible, totaling 225 cCSCR patients (aged 45-62 years; M/F ratio 3.1:1) treated for 1 to 12 months with spironolactone (50 mg/day) or eplerenone (50 mg/day) vs. placebo. Moderate-certainty evidence suggests MRAs result in little to no improvement in BCVA compared to placebo (SMD 0.22; 95% CI - 0.04 to 0.48; studies = 5; comparisons = 6; participants = 218; I2 = 0%). Very low-certainty evidence suggests that, when compared to placebo, MRAs have a very uncertain impact on adverse effects (no meta-analysis was performed), and CST (MD 18.1; 95% CI - 113.04 to 76.84; participants = 145; studies = 2; I2 = 68%). MRAs also result in little to no difference in SFH (SMD - 0.35; 95% CI - 0.95 to 0.26; studies = 5; comparisons = 6; participants = 221; I2 = 76%; moderate certainty) and CCT (MD - 21.23; 95% CI - 64.69 to 22.24; participants = 206; studies = 4; comparisons = 5; I2 = 85%; low certainty).

CONCLUSION

MRAs have little to no effect on BCVA. Evidence for adverse events and CST is very uncertain. MRAs also have little to no effect on SFH and CCT. These findings should be considered when prescribing MRAs for cCSCR. This research was previous registration in the PROSPERO platform (CRD42020182601).

Therapeutic Efficacy of Spironolactone for Central Serous Chorioretinopathy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the therapeutic effects and safety of oral spironolactone (SPRL) in patients with central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The medical records and imaging data of patients diagnosed with CSC and treated with SPRL were retrospectively reviewed. Central macular thickness (CMT), subretinal fluid (SRF) height, subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at baseline, at 1, 3, and 6 months, and at the last visit after the treatment were analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 103 patients with 107 eyes were included. The mean age of the patients was 51.5±9.3 years, and 77 (72.0%) were male. The mean follow-up duration was 48.6±40.2 weeks. The mean duration of oral SPRL therapy was 15.5±13.4 weeks. CMT, SRF height, and SFCT improved significantly at 1, 3, and 6 months after SPRL therapy and at the last follow-up. BCVA, however, showed no significant change at any time point. The rate of complete resolution of SRF at 1 month was higher in those with chronic CSC than in those with acute CSC (21.1% vs. 6.0%, respectively). Recurrence occurred in 14 (13.1%) eyes after the complete resolution of SRF. Older age (p=0.001), a greater number of previous intravitreal bevacizumab injections (p=0.006), and poor initial visual acuity (p=0.048) were associated with recurrence. No permanent adverse effects were observed.

CONCLUSION

Oral SPRL showed therapeutic benefits in patients with CSC in terms of SRF resolution, but relatively frequent recurrence was observed, especially in older patients.

Eplerenone repurposing in management of chorioretinopathy: Mechanism, nanomedicine-based delivery applications and future trends

Chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) is an ocular threatening disease, a common cause of central vision loss, affecting the posterior pole of the eye. Eplerenone (EPL) is a selective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist that used primarily to treat hypertension. Recently, it has shown many benefits in modifying the physio-pathological processes occurring upon stimulation of renin-angiotensin aldosterone system at the ocular level. In CSCR treatment, several clinical studies and case reports prove the efficacy and safety of EPL. However, some setbacks for such studies as a relatively small number of participants and short follow-up periods. This review article is intended to describe theories about the nature and classification of CSCR and recapitulate EPL therapeutic benefits as selective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist in the treatment of CSCR. Furthermore, a literature survey on clinical studies discussing the results of use of EPL in treatment of CSCR. In addition, EPL therapeutic formulations that were developed up to date, and the future potential delivery systems will be suggested.

Half-Dose Photodynamic Therapy Versus Eplerenone in Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy (SPECTRA): A Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and safety between half-dose photodynamic therapy (PDT) and eplerenone therapy for treating chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (cCSC).

DESIGN

This was a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

This investigator-initiated trial was conducted in 3 academic medical centers in the Netherlands. Eligible patients were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to receive either indocyanine green angiography-guided half-dose PDT or oral eplerenone for 12 weeks. Both anatomical and functional outcomes were evaluated at 3 months after the start of treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 107 patients were randomly assigned to receive either half-dose PDT (n = 53) or eplerenone treatment (n = 54). Thirteen patients (3 in the PDT group and 10 in the eplerenone group) did not adhere to the study protocol. At the 3-month evaluation visit, 78% of patients in the PDT group had complete resolution of subretinal fluid accumulation compared to only 17% of patients in the eplerenone group (P < .001). Mean best-corrected visual acuity in Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters at the 3-month evaluation visit was 83.7 ± 10.8 and 82.8 ± 9.0 in the PDT and eplerenone groups, respectively (P = .555). In addition, mean retinal sensitivity on microperimetry was 25.4 ± 3.4 dB and 23.9 ± 4.0 dB in the PDT and eplerenone groups, respectively (P = .041). Finally, mean vision-related quality of life scores were 87.2 ± 8.5 and 83.8 ± 12.1 in the PDT and eplerenone groups, respectively (P = .094). Three patients (6%) in the PDT group experienced adverse events during the study compared to 18 patients (33%) in the eplerenone group.

CONCLUSIONS

Half-dose PDT is superior to oral eplerenone for cCSC with respect to both short-term safety and efficacy outcomes.

Eplerenone Treatment in Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy

Background

The study examined the efficacy of eplerenone in the management of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) with the aim of short-term observations. The study also aimed at observing changes in optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters and visual acuity.

Methodology

This retrospective study was conducted at Layton Rahmatulla Benevolent Trust (LRBT) Eye Hospital from September 2019 to October 2020. A thorough ocular examination, color fundus photographs, fluorescein angiography, and macular OCT were performed on all patients. We administered one tablet of 50 mg eplerenone on day one and further advised the use of the same dose for 30 days. After the administration of the tablet, the patients were further analyzed on weeks one, two, and four. On every visit, we examined ophthalmic conditions by visual acuity, slit lamp, and dilated fundus examinations along with macular OCT and measured blood pressure. At follow-up, we measured the levels of serum creatinine at weeks one and four. Student's t-test and chi-square test were used for normal distribution and nominal variables. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant in all the analyses.

Results

A total of 15 patients were selected for this research, but unfortunately, two of them withdrew amid the study. For the remaining 13 patients, the mean duration of observing symptoms was three months and three weeks. At one-month follow-up, the mean subretinal fluid (SRF) height (94.18 μm) decreased, but we did not find any statistical significance between the SRF height at one-month follow-up and baseline (113.15 μm). In four patients, the SRF height increased up to 3-30 μm after four months of treatment. In our study, we found some negative consequences of eplerenone therapy in terms of hypertension, cramps, nausea, and migraine.

Conclusion

We concluded that short-term eplerenone treatment assists in the reduction of the choroidal thickness (CT) and central macular thickness (CMT) among patients with central serous chorioretinopathy. However, eplerenone treatment failed to decrease subretinal fluid height and does not bring any significant improvement in the visual acuity of patients. Some mild adverse effects of the treatment include hypertension, abdominal cramps, nausea, and migraine.

Central Serous Chorioretinopathy - an Overview

Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) is characterised by retinal serous detachment usually localised in the macular region. CSCR predominantly affects men between 30 and 50 years of age. Traditional classification differentiates between acute (duration shorter than 4 to 6 months) and chronic disease (duration longer than 4 to 6 months). The pathogenesis is multifactorial and current thinking assumes the presence of localised choroidal hyperpermeability with subsequent secondary changes in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). The symptoms of acute CSCR include central blurred vision, often with deterioration in visual acuity. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) reveals subretinal fluid (SRF) and/or single retinal pigment epithelial detachments. Fluorescein angiography (FA) usually shows a leaking point with absent or only minor RPE changes in the acute phase and indocyanine green angiography (ICG) highlights circumscribed areas of thickened and hyperpermeable choroid. Acute cases may show spontaneous resolution of SRF, but may also recur and/or become chronic. After the initial diagnosis, spontaneous remission is seen in about 70 to 80% of cases, with a recurrence rate of about 50%. Due to the favourable spontaneous course, it is recommended to wait for 4 to 6 months after the first symptoms manifest. Steroid therapy is considered as a major risk factor. Chronic cases are characterised by slow deterioration in visual acuity with reduced contrast and colour perception. There are extensive RPE changes, with secondary degenerative changes of the photoreceptors. The disease can by complicated by choroidal neovascularisation (CNV), especially in elderly patients. The literature lists a number of treatments: The leakage point (visible in the FA) can be treated by focal laser therapy, either micropulse laser or, if sufficiently distant from the fovea, by argon laser coagulation. Randomised trials in chronic CSCR demonstrated good outcomes with photodynamic therapy. With observation periods ranging from 3 to 6 months, several case series reports found improvement after systemic administration of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. In the presence of secondary CNV, anti-VEGF treatment should be initiated. It is unclear whether the combination with PDT might be useful.

Should We Stop Treating Patients With Eplerenone for Chronic CSCR? Commentary on the VICI Trial

The VICI trial reported by Lotery et al. is a recent placebo-controlled, randomized trial that examined the efficacy of eplerenone treatment for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) in 104 patients. The study found no significant difference in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) between the eplerenone-treated and placebo groups, prompting the VICI investigators to conclude that eplerenone should not be prescribed to treat CSCR. Limitations of the study include the patients' high baseline BCVA, use of a functional outcome like BCVA as the primary endpoint instead of an anatomical outcome, failure to account for rebound effect, and measuring subretinal fluid (SRF) thickness instead of the more informative SRF volume. Based on these reasons and evidence from multiple case series and prospective studies over the past 7 years, it is the opinion of the authors of this editorial that the VICI investigators' conclusion to stop prescribing eplerenone for CSCR is too severe. Future clinical trials should continue to explore the potential for eplerenone as long-term maintenance treatment in chronic CSCR. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2021;52:308-310.].

Routine Clinical Practice Treatment Outcomes of Eplerenone in Acute and Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy

Purpose: To evaluate efficacy of eplerenone therapy vs. observation on resolution of subretinal fluid (SRF) in patients with acute and chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) in routine clinical practice.

Methods: Retrospective comparative case series of eyes diagnosed with CSCR treated with eplerenone or observation. Primary outcome measure was maximum height of SRF at 12 months. Secondary outcome was percentage of eyes with complete resolution of SRF, percentage of eyes with reduction of SRF ≥50%, and best corrected visual acuity (VA) at 12 months. Separate analysis was conducted for eyes with acute and chronic CSCR.

Results: Sixty-eight eyes of 60 patients (82% male) were included. Eleven of the 38 eyes with acute CSCR, and seven of the 30 eyes with chronic CSCR, received eplerenone. Subretinal fluid decreased from baseline to 12 months in acute (287 ± 221 to 31 ± 63 µm) and chronic (148 ± 134 to 40 ± 42 µm) CSCR. Kaplan-Meier curves were similar for treated and observed eyes and COX regression analysis did not show a significant difference in SRF resolution in treated vs. observed eyes (p = 0.6 for acute, p = 0.2 for chronic CSCR).

Conclusion: This routine clinical practice outcome study did not show evidence of efficacy of eplerenone on resolution of SRF in acute nor chronic CSCR.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of subthreshold micropulse laser with photodynamic therapy for the treatment of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis was conducted to compare the therapeutic effect and safety of subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) vs photodynamic therapy (PDT) in treatment of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (cCSC).

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for all relevant studies published up to August 17, 2020. Data of interest were analyzed by STATA (version 14.0) software.

RESULTS

Four randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and 5 retrospective studies with 790 eyes were included in this meta-analysis after study selection. The results showed that SML significantly improved the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) compared with PDT at 6 to 8 weeks, 6 months, and 7 to 8 months in patients with cCSC (weighted mean difference (WMD) = -0.15, 95% confidence intervals (CI): -0.23 to -0.07, P < .01; WMD = -2.83, 95% CI: -4.79 to -0.87, P < .01; and WMD = -2.61, 95% CI: -4.23 to -1.24, P = .026, respectively). There was also a statistically significant difference between SML and PDT groups in the differences in the complete resolution of subretinal fluid (SRF) (risk radios = 0.388, 95% CI: 0.307 to 0.491, P < .01). There were no significant differences between the SML and PDT in the overall effect with central macular thickness (CMT), adverse events, complete resolution of SRF and treatment response.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the available evidence, this meta-analysis demonstrated that SML may be considered as a competitive alternative to PDT for treating cCSC, and as the first-line treatment of cCSC.

Long-term outcomes of half-fluence photodynamic therapy and eplerenone in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: A comparative study

AIMS

To compare the long-term outcomes in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (cCSC) following half-fluence photodynamic therapy (HF-PDT) and oral eplerenone treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective comparative study included consecutive patients of cCSC treated with either HF-PDT or eplerenone. The treatment outcomes of the two groups were analyzed at 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month post-treatment.

RESULTS

This study included 20 eyes (20 patients) in HF-PDT group, and 18 eyes (18 patients) in eplerenone group. All baseline parameters in HF-PDT and eplerenone groups were comparable including neurosensory detachment height (217.05 ± 140.25 µm vs 178.05 ± 164.24 µm respectively, p = 0.09), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (logMAR 0.24 ± 0.13 vs logMAR 0.46 ± 0.37 respectively, p = 0.1), and subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) [427.4 ± 117.4 µm vs 456.38 ± 119.25 µm respectively, p = 0.45]. HF-PDT resulted in complete resolution of neurosensory detachment in higher proportion of eyes compared to eplerenone at each follow-up visits (3 months: 90% vs 27.7%, p = 0; 6 months: 100% vs 61.1%, p = 0.003; and 12 months: 100% vs 70%, p = 0.03) with a significantly shorter duration to resolution (3.3 ± 0.9 months vs 5.8 ± 3.3 months respectively, p = 0.02). Intergroup comparison showed no significant difference between mean BCVA (p = 0.38 at 3 months, p = 0.14 at 6 months, and p = 0.19 at 12 months). Mean SFCT at 12 months of the two groups differed significantly (p = 0.003) due to increased choroidal thickness of eplerenone group.

CONCLUSION

HF-PDT has a superior efficacy to achieve faster, greater and long-lasting resolution of subretinal fluid in cCSC compared to eplerenone therapy.

Efficacy and safety of the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist treatment for central serous chorioretinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) treatment for central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC).

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant clinical studies published prior to March 2020. The primary outcome was change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and the secondary outcomes included the subretinal fluid (SRF), subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), and central macular thickness (CMT).

RESULTS

Five randomized controlled trials (RCT) and four cohort studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of 352 eyes. The MRA treatment was not superior to placebo in BCVA at 1 month (WMD = -0.06, 95% CI -0.15-0.02, P = 0.15, I² = 86%), 3 months (WMD = -0.04, 95% CI -0.14-0.06, P = 0.44, I² = 77%) and 6 months (WMD = -0, 95% CI -0.05-0.05, P = 0.92, I² = 0%). The MRA treatment resulted in significant reduction than the placebo in the SRF (WMD = -60.64, 95% CI -97.91 to -23.37, P = 0.001, I² = 49%), SFCT (WMD = -39.15, 95% CI -52.58 to -25.72, P < 0.001, I² = 0%), and CMT (WMD = -60.75, 95% CI -97.85 to -23.65, P = 0.01, I² = 53%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis shows that the MRA treatment can improve anatomical structure in CSC patients, but it is not effective for achieving BCVA gain. The applicant of the MRA is safe and have no severe effect.

Efficacy of Topical Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors in Reducing Duration of Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy

Purpose

Topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (CAIs) can influence retinal fluid distribution, but their role in treating central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) has not been studied. We examined the efficacy of a topical CAI (dorzolamide) in treating chronic CSCR.

Methods

Prospective, nonrandomized, controlled intervention study of patients with chronic CSCR of at least 3 months duration. Observed controls (n = 15) were recruited consecutively from 2016 to 2017; treated cases (n = 18) were recruited from 2018 to 2019. Controls were observed without active intervention, whereas treated cases were treated with topical dorzolamide for 3 months. The study end points were change in central macular thickness (CMT), change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and proportion of eyes achieving complete resolution of subretinal fluid (SRF). All end points were at 3 months.

Results

Treated patients who received topical CAI had greater reduction in CMT (−145.6 µm, 95% confidence interval [CI] −170.5 to −120.7) compared to observed controls (−45.1 µm, 95% CI −65.3 to −25.1) at the main study end point of 3 months (P = 0.015). A higher proportion of treated patients achieved complete resolution of SRF compared to observed controls (77.8% vs. 40.0%, P = 0.04) at 3 months. However, change in BCVA at 3 months was similar in both groups (P = 0.12).

Conclusions

Topical CAI resulted in more rapid reduction of CMT compared to observation. These results, if confirmed in other studies, suggest topical CAI may be a viable treatment option for patients with chronic CSCR.

Translational Relevance

Topical CAI is used to treat a number of retinal disorders, and may be a novel treatment option for chronic CSCR.

Central serous chorioretinopathy: An update on risk factors, pathophysiology and imaging modalities

Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) is a common form of vision loss, typically seen in working-age men. The pathophysiology behind CSC still eludes us, however significant advances have been made in understanding this disease over the last decade using information from genetic and cell-based studies and imaging modalities. This review aims to give an overview of the current pathophysiology hypotheses surrounding CSC in addition to future directions in cellular work from human induced pluripotent stem cell derived choroidal endothelial cells from CSC patients. Furthermore, this review will provide the reader with an update on the clinical aspects of CSC including risk factors, diagnostic challenges and findings from multimodal imaging.

Update on the management of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy

Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) is one of the main causes of impaired visual acuity in patients younger than 60 years. Its pathophysiology remains partially unknown, although it has been postulated that choroidal hyper-permeability may be involved. This typically produces a neurosensory retinal detachment and/or a detachment of the retinal pigment epithelium in the posterior pole. Although acute CSC generally does not require treatment, when chronic it must be treated to avoid visual impairment. With the development of new imaging techniques, there has been an improvement in diagnosis, and different therapeutic strategies have been proposed. Various treatments for the management of chronic CSC have currently been shown to be useful to improve or stabilise visual acuity, the resolution of subretinal fluid, and to prevent recurrences. The most commonly used treatments today are photodynamic therapy, micropulse subthreshold laser, mineralocorticoid antagonists, or anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs. There are also other proposals and new treatments being developed, with promising results. This review aims to provide the reader with an overview of the current scientific evidence of the different treatment options available for CSC in order to help decision-making in clinical practice.

Eplerenone for treatment of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy

PURPOSE

To assess the morphological and functional outcome of oral eplerenone for treatment of patients with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) in a real life experience.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, we reviewed the clinical files of 30 patients with chronic CSC. All patients were treated with eplerenone for a period of 6 weeks or 3 months depending on the clinical response. Main outcome measures included: best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT) and height of the subretinal fluid (SRF). Comparisons between responders and non-responders were performed to identify factors that were predictive of the treatment response.

RESULTS

All patients were treated with eplerenone 18 ± 20 weeks after onset of the first symptoms. BCVA (LogMAR) improved from 0.2 ± 0.2 to 0.13 ± 0.18 at 6 weeks (p = 0.01) and to 0.09 ± 0.15 at 3 months (p = 0.01). Mean CMT decreased from 409 ± 136 to 323 ± 87 µm at 6 weeks (p = 0.001) and to 298 ± 98 µm at 3 months (p = 0.01). Mean height of SRF decreased from 153 ± 126 to 73 ± 79 µm at 6 weeks (p = 0.001) and to 49 ± 88 µm at 3 months (p = 0.005). Complete resolution of SRF was achieved in 20 patients after 3 months (67%). Reported stress in the medical history was the only statistical significant predictive factor associated with a positive treatment response.

CONCLUSION

This study showed a statistically significant improvement of the best corrected visual acuity and a significant reduction of macular thickness and subretinal fluid in patients with chronic CSC treated with oral eplerenone, especially in patients under stress.

Subthreshold Micro-Pulse Yellow Laser and Eplerenone Drug Therapy in Chronic Central Serous Chorio-Retinopathy Patients: A Comparative Study

PURPOSE

To study the outcomes of subthreshold micropulse yellow laser (SML) and eplerenone (EP) therapy in central serous chorio-retinopathy (cCSCR).

METHODS

Retrospective study of 28 eyes of 27 patients undergoing SML and 20 eyes of 19 patients undergoing EP therapy.

RESULTS

Median duration of follow-up was 8 months for SML and 4.5 months for EP group. Complete SRF resolution was seen in 12/28 (42.8%) eyes in SML and 4/20 (20%) in EP group. Six eyes in SML group and two eyes in EP group needed additional SML. No EP patients demonstrated hyperkalemia warranting stopping of therapy. Baseline visual acuity (VA) was correlated positively with final VA in both groups. Presence/absence of focal leaks had differing outcomes in both treatment groups in terms of anatomical resolution.

CONCLUSION

Both treatment modalities were effective in the management of cCSCR showing comparable favorable anatomical outcomes, but visual outcomes were not significant, probably due to chronicity of the pathology.

Oral Eplerenone Versus Observation in the Management of Acute Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: A Prospective, Randomized Comparative Study

In this prospective, interventional case-control study, 58 patients with unilateral acute central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) were recruited. Patients ≥ 18 years age, presenting with first episodes of acute CSCR, were included. Acute CSCR was defined by the presence of subretinal fluid (SRF) and symptoms for <12 weeks duration with no clinical or imaging features of chronicity. Patients were alternately divided into treatment (Table Eplerenone 50 mg/day for minimum 1 month) and observation groups. Vision, SRF height and subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) were checked at 1-, 2- and 3-months in both eyes of each group. Each group had 29 eyes. Mean age was 40.4 ± 7.1 and 43.3 ± 8.34 years in treatment and observation group, respectively. Mean symptom duration was 6.46 ± 1.45 and 5.87 ± 2.09 weeks, respectively. Vision improvement to 6/6 was seen in 92%, 100% and 100% cases in treatment group and 74%, 86% and 100% in control group at each visit, respectively. Complete SRF resolution in the treatment group was noted in 45%, 55% and 62% cases at each respective monthly visit. In the observation group, complete SRF resolution was noted in 10%, 21% and 31% at 1-, 2- and 3-month visits, respectively. SRF (p < 0.001) and SFCT (p < 0.001) reduction was noted in the affected eye of both groups. SFCT was reduced in the fellow eye after treatment (p = 0.005) compared to the observation group (p = 0.276). In conclusion, oral eplerenone achieves faster SRF resolution and vision improvement in acute CSCR. Additionally, it shows beneficial effects on the fellow eye.

Efficacy of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist for central serous chorioretinopathy: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) for patients with central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR).

METHODS

The Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were comprehensively searched up to February 2020, to identify the studies comparing the efficacy of MRA with placebo/observation or photodynamic therapy (PDT) for CSCR. The primary outcomes were maximal subretinal fluid height and central macular thickness (CMT). The secondary outcomes included subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Data of interest were extracted and analyzed by R version 3.6.0. The weighted mean difference and their 95% confidence intervals were used to assess the strength of the association.

RESULTS

Ten studies including 284 affected eyes were involved, with 168 undergoing MRA treatment, 60 taking placebo/observation, and 56 receiving PDT. The pooling results showed that MRA was significantly more effective in resolving maximal subretinal fluid height (P < 0.01) and diminishing CMT (P < 0.01) than placebo/observation, while PDT could achieve significantly better CMT reduction than MRA (P = 0.03). For BCVA improvement and SFCT reduction, no statistical difference was detected among the groups of MRA, observation, placebo, or PDT (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

MRA is an effective therapy for the management of CSCR, which is only slightly inferior to PDT in terms of CMT reduction. For patients who could not afford PDT, MRA could function as an alternative treatment with acceptable efficacy and safety.

Minoxidil induced central serous Chorioretinopathy treated with oral Eplerenone - a case report

Background

Minoxidil solution has routinely been used for decades for the treatment of androgenic alopecia. Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) is a rare side-effect noted following prolonged topical minoxidil therapy for androgenic alopecia. In this report, we describe a case of a 41-year-old young man who developed CSCR following prolonged therapy with topical Minoxidil solution and was treated with oral eplerenone.

Case presentation

A 41-year-old male presented to the retina clinic with complaints of seeing a black spot, blurred vision and metamorphopsia involving the right eye for the past 4 months. He was on treatment for androgenic alopecia with topical 5% Minoxidil application on scalp two times a day. He noticed the symptoms 8 months after starting the treatment and had stopped the medication since the past 2 months. On examination, best-corrected visual acuity was 20/20 in both eyes. Fundoscopic examination of the right eye with +78D lens on slit lamp revealed the presence of subretinal fluid and few focal spots of retinal pigment epithelial alterations. Optical coherence tomography scan evaluation showed the presence of subretinal fluid (SRF) and pachychoroid supporting the diagnosis of CSCR. Indocyanine green angiography revealed dilated hyperpermeable choroidal vasculature on the nasal side of the fovea in the early and later phases of the angiogram. The patient was diagnosed with CSCR as a possible consequence of the topical minoxidil solution. Patient was asked to avoid future use of Minoxidil and was started on oral eplerenone therapy 50 mg/day for 4 consecutive weeks. One month later, there was complete resolution of his symptoms and SRF. At the final follow-up visit, 2 months after starting the therapy, there was no recurrence of SRF.

Conclusion

CSCR is a rare side-effect noted following prolonged topical minoxidil therapy for androgenic alopecia. While we found oral eplerenone to be safe and effective, further studies would be required before it can be routinely used in the population.

Oral medications for central serous chorioretinopathy: a literature review

Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) is characterised by acute or chronic neurosensory detachments of the retina, usually in the posterior pole, with or without associated detachments of retinal pigment epithelium. Although the condition often resolves spontaneously, chronic and recurrent cases can lead to significant visual loss in the working population and it is thus increasingly recognised as an important public health issue. The uncertainty regarding the underlying cause of CSCR has led to a wide range of therapies being tried for this condition including photodynamic therapy, laser photocoagulation, anti-VEGF injections and a multitude of oral agents. This article aims to review the current evidence for oral agents that have been used for treatment of CSCR. A systematic literature search was conducted for articles published between 1980 to July 2018. A total of 73 articles were included. These studied the following oral medications: eplerenone, spironolactone, beta blockers, H. pylori agents, omeprazole, rifampicin, methotrexate, aspirin, acetazolamide, mifepristone, melatonin, finasteride, ketoconazole, antioxidants and curcumin phospholipid. Although none of the studies showed robust evidence of efficacy, the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, particularly eplerenone, appear to demonstrate the highest quality evidence for use in this condition. The review aims to give the reader an overview of the current available evidence for oral medications used in the treatment of CSCR in order to provide an evidence-based discussion with the patient and guide through possible options for treatment.

Eplerenone for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy in patients with active, previously untreated disease for more than 4 months (VICI): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

In chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR), fluid accumulates in the subretinal space. CSCR is a common visually disabling condition that develops in individuals up to 60 years of age, and there is no definitive treatment. Previous research suggests the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, eplerenone, is effective for treating CSCR; however, this drug is not licensed for the treatment of patients with CSCR. We aimed to evaluate whether eplerenone was superior to placebo in terms of improving visual acuity in patients with chronic CSCR.

METHODS

This randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre placebo-controlled trial was done at 22 hospitals in the UK. Participants were eligible if they were aged 18-60 years and had had treatment-naive CSCR for 4 months or more. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the eplerenone or the placebo group by a trial statistician through a password-protected system online. Allocation was stratified by best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and hospital. Patients were given either oral eplerenone (25 mg/day for 1 week, increasing to 50 mg/day for up to 12 months) plus usual care or placebo plus usual care for up to 12 months. All participants, care teams, outcome assessors, pharmacists, and members of the trial management group were masked to the treatment allocation. The primary outcome was BCVA, measured as letters read, at 12 months. All outcomes apart from safety were analysed on a modified intention-to-treat basis (participants who withdrew consent without contributing a post-randomisation BCVA measurement were excluded from the primary analysis population and from most secondary analysis populations). The trial is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN92746680, and is completed.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 11, 2017, and Feb 22, 2018, we enrolled and randomly assigned 114 patients to receive either eplerenone (n=57) or placebo (n=57). Three participants in the placebo group withdrew consent without contributing a post-randomisation BCVA measurement and were excluded from the primary outcome analysis population. All patients from the eplerenone group and 54 patients from the placebo group were included in the primary outcome. Modelled mean BCVA at 12 months was 79·5 letters (SD 4·5) in the placebo group and 80·4 letters (4·6) in the eplerenone group, with an adjusted estimated mean difference of 1·73 letters (95% CI -1·12 to 4·57; p=0·24) at 12 months. Hyperkalaemia occurred in eight (14%) patients in each group. No serious adverse events were reported in the eplerenone group and three unrelated serious adverse events were reported in the placebo group (myocardial infarction [anticipated], diverticulitis [unanticipated], and metabolic surgery [unanticipated]).

INTERPRETATION

Eplerenone was not superior to placebo for improving BCVA in people with chronic CSCR after 12 months of treatment. Ophthalmologists who currently prescribe eplerenone for CSCR should discontinue this practice.

FUNDING

Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Programme, and National Institute for Health Research and Social Care.

Effect of oral eplerenone in anatomical and functional improvement in patients with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy

Objective:

To determine the efficacy of oral eplerenone in anatomical and functional improvement in patients with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR).

Methods:

This quasi experimental study was performed at PNS Shifa Hospital Karachi from September 2018 to February 2019. Study included 23 patients. Patients were included using consecutive sampling technique and informed consent was taken from all patients before staring treatment. 50 mg of oral eplerenone per day was given for three months. Subretinal fluid (SRF) height and visual acuity (VA) were noted at baseline, one month and three month follow-up. Structured Study performa was used for data collection. Data was analysed and assessed with SPSS version 23. P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results:

Mean age of patients was 40.7±7 years and mean duration of disease before treatment was 3.7±0.76 months. Mean baseline BCVA and SRF height was 0.39±0.02 logMAR and 123±12.5 µm respectively. Sixty-five percent patients responded at one month and 80% at three months with reduction in SRF height. Improvement in visual acuity was also statistically significant at 3 months (p<0.05).

Conclusion:

Use of eplerenone in chronic CSCR resulted in significant improvement in vision and decrease in mean SRF height.

Pharmacotherapy of Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: A Review of the Current Treatments

BACKGROUND

Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) is the fourth most frequent retinal disorder in terms of prevalence. It typically occurs in young subjects and affects men more often than women. CSC is characterized by serous retinal detachment (SRD) involving mainly the macular area. The clinical course is usually selflimited, with spontaneous resolution within 3 months. The persistence of SRD or multiple relapse may result in a chronic form of CSC distinguished by permanent retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and photoreceptor damage. As the pathogenetic mechanism of CSC primarily involves RPE and choroidal vascularization, the current therapeutic approaches aim to restore the normal functions of RPE and normal choroidal vascular permeability. In this review, the authors aim to summarize the current therapeutic approach to CSC.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted in PubMed by searching for relevant studies on the current therapeutic options for CSC, including simple observation, conventional laser treatment, subthreshold laser treatment (SLT), photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin, treatment with mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonists and treatment with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs.

RESULTS

Since most cases resolve spontaneously, the most common initial CSC treatment is observation. Current evidence suggests that PDT and SLT are valuable in improving visual acuity, reducing subretinal fluid and maintaining long-term effectiveness. No clear evidence of efficacy has been achieved for anti-VEGF. MR antagonists might be a viable choice for the treatment of chronic CSC.

CONCLUSION

The pathophysiology of CSC remains poorly understood and as a consequence, the gold standard of care for CSC is yet to be defined. To date, PDT and SLT continue to offer good clinical outcomes. Positive preliminary results seem to emerge from the studies of MR antagonists.

Central serous chorioretinopathy: Towards an evidence-based treatment guideline

Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) is a common cause of central vision loss, primarily affecting men 20-60 years of age. To date, no consensus has been reached regarding the classification of CSC, and a wide variety of interventions have been proposed, reflecting the controversy associated with treating this disease. The recent publication of appropriately powered randomised controlled trials such as the PLACE trial, as well as large retrospective, non-randomised treatment studies regarding the treatment of CSC suggest the feasibility of a more evidence-based approach when considering treatment options. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the current rationale and evidence with respect to the variety of interventions available for treating CSC, including pharmacology, laser treatment, and photodynamic therapy. In addition, we describe the complexity of CSC, the challenges associated with treating CSC, and currently ongoing studies. Many treatment strategies such as photodynamic therapy using verteporfin, oral mineralocorticoid antagonists, and micropulse laser treatment have been reported as being effective. Currently, however, the available evidence suggests that half-dose (or half-fluence) photodynamic therapy should be the treatment of choice in chronic CSC, whereas observation may be the preferred approach in acute CSC. Nevertheless, exceptions can be considered based upon patient-specific characteristics.

[Nanosecond Laser Treatment in Chorioretinopathia Centralis Serosa without RPE Defects: A Retrospective Case Series]

BACKGROUND

Chorioretinopathia centralis serosa (CCS) is a uni- or bilateral disease of the macula which is characterized by detachment of the neuro-sensory retina. The spontaneous resolution rate is 68% after four months and 84% after six months.

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy of subthreshold nanopulse laser treatment for central serous chorioretinopathy (CCS) in the absence of any atrophy in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE).

METHODS

This retrospective study comprised 23 eyes of 23 patients without previous treatment. Patients were followed up to 12 months. Laser treatment was performed with the 2RT^® nanolaser using a grid stimulation. Changes in corrected visual acuity (VA), microperimetry and subretinal fluid height in optical coherence tomographic images were measured. Saliences in autofluorescence images and angiographic images were observed. All results were documented 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the first treatment. Patients did not receive any supplementary treatment.

RESULTS

Two months after the first treatment, 74% of the patients showed complete SRF resolution and 91% of the patients within 6 months had complete resorption of the SRF. Central visual acuity and macula sensitivity significantly improved from 0.18 ± 0.16 logMAR to 0.09 ± 0.17 logMAR and 24.19 ± 3.96 dB to 27.59 ± 2.89 dB. The SRF decreased within one month significantly. No CNV was documented during the observation time. The baseline subretinal fluid height is a predictive factor of faster resolution.

CONCLUSION

The evaluation of our treatment results shows that the therapy is a safe and promising method. Patients with a CCS without existing RPE defects benefit from the treatment with the 2RT^® nanolaser, which is associated with an improvement of the macula function.

Vascular mineralocorticoid receptor activation and disease

Mineralocorticoid receptor activation in endothelial and smooth muscle cells can promote vascular disease by increasing oxidative stress, promoting inflammation, accelerating vascular stiffness, remodeling, and calcification, altering vessel responsiveness to various vasoactive factors, thus altering vascular tone and blood pressure, and by altering angiogenesis. Here, we review the recent evidence highlighting the impact of vascular mineralocorticoid receptor activation in pathological situations, including kidney injury, vascular injury associated with metabolic diseases, atherosclerosis, cerebral vascular injury during hypertension, vascular stiffening and aging, pulmonary hypertension, vascular calcification, cardiac remodeling, wound healing, inflammation, thrombosis, and disorders related to angiogenic defects in the eye. The possible mechanisms implicating mineralocorticoid receptor activation in various vascular disorders are discussed. Altogether, recent evidence points towards pharmacological mineralocorticoid receptor inhibition as a strategy to treat diseases in which overactivation of the mineralocorticoid receptor in endothelial and/or smooth muscle cells may play a pivotal role.

Short-term eplerenone for treatment of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy; a prospective study

Background

Increased mineralocorticoid activity is one of the plausible causes of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) and mineralocorticoid inhibitors such as eplerenone have been investigated as its potential therapy. This study investigates the short-term safety and efficacy of oral eplerenone in patients with chronic CSCR.

Patients and methods

Prospective study of 13 eyes of 13 patients with the diagnosis of chronic CSCR. All patients received eplerenone 50 mg/day for 4 weeks. Enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography (OCT) was obtained. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and OCT parameters including sub retinal fluid (SRF), choroidal thickness (CT) and central macular thickness (CMT), were measured manually.

Results

The mean SRF height decreased slightly at 1-month follow-up as compared to baseline, but the change was not statistically significant (94.18 ± 17.53 vs. 113.15 ± 18.69; p = 0.08). Subfoveal CT and CMT was significantly reduced as compared to baseline (6.6% [p = 0.002] and 7.05% [p = 0.04], respectively). The BCVA did not change significantly (20/28 vs. 20/30 [p = 0.16]).

Conclusion

This study suggests that oral eplerenone may be used as a safe and potentially effective treatment in chronic CSCR, however there are minimal short-term effects on subretinal fluid or visual acuity therefore therapeutic trials longer than one month are necessary to test its benefits.Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov identification number: NCT01822561. Registered 3/25/13, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT01822561.

Transfoveal Micropulse Laser Treatment of Central Serous Chorioretinopathy within Six Months of Disease Onset

Background: It has been recommended that any invasive treatment performed in patients with central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) not be initiated earlier than four months after disease onset due to the potential for spontaneous remission of symptoms. The goal of this study was to examine the outcome of transfoveal subthreshold micropulse laser treatment (SMPLT) of CSCR performed at six months or less after disease onset. Materials and methods: The study included 32 cases of CSCR lasting between three weeks and six months (mean: 3.4 ± 2.3 months). All patients had transfoveal SMPLT applied and were followed for at least three months after each session of SMPLT. Two sessions of SMPLT in total were planned in case of an insufficient response to the first instance of treatment. Evaluation parameters included any change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and retinal morphology. Results: Total resolution of subretinal fluid (SRF) was noted in 26 cases (81.25%). Final BCVA improved significantly from 0.37 ± 0.22 logMAR to 0.22 ± 0.20 logMAR after treatment. Overall, early SMPLT correlated with better final BCVA (p = 0.0005, Spearman rank correlation). For eyes achieving a total resolution of SRF, BCVA improved from 0.33 ± 0.21 logMAR to 0.17 ± 0.14 logMAR (p = 0.004, Spearman rank correlation). The analysis of SMPLT nonresponders revealed a tendency for poorer baseline visual acuity. Conclusions: Patients with CSCR lasting six months or less treated with transfoveal SMPLT achieve better functional results with early application of this procedure. As baseline BCVA predicts final visual acuity, earlier treatment, permitted by the safety of SMPLT, may improve final visual outcomes.

Risk Factors for Persistent or Recurrent Central Serous Chorioretinopathy

Purpose

To investigate the risk factors for persistent or recurrent central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC).

Materials and Methods

Consecutive treatment-naïve CSC patients were included from January 2017 to October 2018. All patients were asked to complete questionnaires, addressing previously described risk factors for the development of CSC. Patients were divided into two groups: those with acute CSC, who were in the first episode, with spontaneous resolution of subretinal fluid within 3 months, and with no recurrence within 1 year; and those with persistent or recurrent CSC, the remaining patients.

Results

In total, 138 patients were enrolled: 20 (14.5%) with acute CSC and 118 (85.5%) with persistent or recurrent CSC. Using multivariate analysis, male sex (odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval: 5.63 [1.02–31.02]; p=0.047), older age (OR: 1.14 [1.03–1.25]; p=0.008), and higher Insomnia Severity Index score (OR: 1.30 [1.05–1.60]; p=0.015) were found to be independently associated with persistent or recurrent CSC.

Conclusions

Male sex, age, and sleep disorders are risk factors for persistent or recurrent CSC in the natural history. These patients may require early photodynamic therapy. Treatment for sleep disorders is strongly recommended. All CSC patients may require careful and periodic follow-up.

[Treatment of central serous chorioretinopathy with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists]

BACKGROUND

Over 3 years have passed since the last publication on the therapeutic principle "Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists as treatment option for acute and chronic central serous chorioretinopathy" by Maier et al., and numerous new studies have been published on the topic. The aim of this work is to provide an update on the current literature and reevaluate the role of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in the treatment of central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC).

METHODS AND RESULTS

A computer-based literature search in PubMed yielded a total of 20 relevant articles published from 2013 to 2017, which were evaluated in terms of the effect of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in CSC treatment. Due to study protocol variability with different primary endpoints and follow-up periods, an in-depth comparison of the selected studies could not be performed. Moreover, the small study populations further limit their validity in this per se heterogeneous disease spectrum. Despite these limitations, current data indicate that aldosterone antagonists are effective in decreasing subretinal fluid and improving visual acuity in patients with CSC. The selective aldosterone antagonist eplerenone with a low side effect profile is a treatment option in patients with non-resolving CSC.

CONCLUSION

Prospective, randomized studies with uniform disease definition and study criteria are necessary to validate the therapeutic effect and to determine the ideal time of intervention and treatment duration.