Effects of the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist eplerenone in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis

There is growing evidence indicating that mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) expression influences a wide variety of functions in metabolic and immune response. The present study explored if antagonism of the MR reduces neuroinflammation in the spinal cord of mice with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). Eplerenone (EPLE) (100 mg/kg dissolved in 30% 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin) was administered intraperitoneally (i.p.) daily from EAE induction (day 0) until sacrificed on day 17 post-induction. The MR blocker (a) significantly decreased the inflammatory parameters TLR4, MYD88, IL-1β, and iNOS mRNAs; (b) attenuated HMGB1, NLRP3, TGF-β mRNAs, microglia, and aquaporin4 immunoreaction without modifying GFAP. Serum IL-1β was also decreased in the EAE+EPLE group. Moreover, EPLE treatment prevented demyelination and improved clinical signs of EAE mice. Interestingly, MR was decreased and GR remained unchanged in EAE mice while EPLE treatment restored MR expression, suggesting that a dysbalanced MR/GR was associated with the development of neuroinflammation. Our results indicated that MR blockage with EPLE attenuated inflammation-related spinal cord pathology in the EAE mouse model of Multiple Sclerosis, supporting a novel therapeutic approach for immune-related diseases.

Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonism by Eplerenone and Arterial Inflammation in HIV: The MIRABELLA HIV Study

Importance

The risk for atherosclerotic disease is increased 1.5- to 2.0-fold among persons with HIV (PWH). Increased activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system may contribute to increased arterial inflammation in this population.

Objective

To determine the effects of eplerenone on arterial inflammation among well-treated PWH without known cardiovascular disease (CVD).

Design, Setting, and Participants

Well-treated PWH who participated in the double-blinded, placebo-controlled, Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonism for Cardiovascular Health in HIV (MIRACLE HIV) study between February 2017 and March 2022 assessing the effects of eplerenone on myocardial perfusion were invited to participate in the Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonism By Eplerenone to Lower Arterial Inflammation in HIV (MIRABELLA) substudy if there was no current statin use. Participants were enrolled in the MIRABELLA study and underwent additional 18F-fludeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) imaging of the aorta and carotid arteries to assess arterial inflammation over 12 months of treatment with eplerenone vs placebo.

Interventions

Eplerenone, 50 mg, twice a day vs identical placebo.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was change in target to background ratio (TBR), a measure of arterial wall inflammation, in the index vessel after 12 months of treatment. The index vessel was defined as the vessel (aorta, left carotid artery, or right carotid artery) with the highest TBR at baseline in each participant.

Results

A total of 26 participants (mean [SD] age, 54 [7] years; 18 male [69%]) were enrolled in the study. Treatment groups (eplerenone, 13 vs placebo, 13) were of similar age, sex, and body mass index. Eplerenone was associated with a reduction in TBR of the primary end point, the index vessel (eplerenone vs placebo: model treatment effect, -0.31; 95% CI, -0.50 to -0.11; P = .006; percentage change, -12.4% [IQR, -21.9% to -2.6%] vs 5.1% [IQR, -1.6% to 11.0%]; P = .003). We further observed a significant reduction of the TBR of the most diseased segment (MDS) of the index vessel (eplerenone vs placebo: -19.1% [IQR, -27.0% to -11.9%] vs 6.8% [IQR, -9.1% to 12.1%]; P = .007). A similar result was seen assessing the index vessel of the carotids (eplerenone vs placebo: -10.0% [IQR, -21.8% to 3.6%] vs 9.7% [IQR, -9.8% to 15.9%]; P = .046). Reduction in the TBR of MDS of the index vessel on 18F-FDG PET/CT correlated with improvement in the stress myocardial blood flow on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (Spearman ρ = -0.67; P = .01).

Conclusion and Relevance

In this small randomized clinical trial, eplerenone was associated with reduction in arterial inflammation among well-treated PWH without known CVD. In addition, reductions in arterial inflammation as measured by 18F-FDG PET/CT were related to improvements in stress myocardial perfusion. Further larger studies should explore whether eplerenone is a potential treatment strategy for inflammatory-mediated CVD in PWH.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02740179.

Glomerular and tubular effects of dapagliflozin, eplerenone and their combination in patients with chronic kidney disease: A post-hoc analysis of the ROTATE-3 study

AIM

Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists reduce albuminuria and the risk of kidney failure. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of both agents alone and in combination on markers of the glomerular endothelial glycocalyx and tubular function.

METHODS

This post-hoc analysis utilized data of the ROTATE-3 study, a randomized cross-over study in 46 adults with chronic kidney disease and urinary albumin excretion ≥100 mg/24 h, who were treated for 4 weeks with dapagliflozin, eplerenone or its combination. The effects of dapagliflozin, eplerenone and the combination on outcome measures such as heparan sulphate, neuro-hormonal markers and tubular sodium handling were assessed with mixed repeated measures models.

RESULTS

The mean percentage change from baseline in heparan sulphate after 4 weeks treatment with dapagliflozin, eplerenone or dapagliflozin-eplerenone was -34.8% (95% CI -52.2, -10.9), -5.9% (95% CI -32.5, 31.3) and -28.1% (95% CI -48.4, 0.1) respectively. The mean percentage change from baseline in plasma aldosterone was larger with eplerenone [38.9% (95% CI 2.8, 87.7)] and dapagliflozin-eplerenone [32.2% (95% CI -1.5, 77.4)], compared with dapagliflozin [-12.5% (95% CI -35.0, 17.8)], respectively. Mean percentage change from baseline in copeptin with dapagliflozin, eplerenone or dapagliflozin-eplerenone was 28.4% (95% CI 10.7, 49.0), 4.2% (95% CI -10.6, 21.4) and 23.8% (95% CI 6.6, 43.9) respectively. Dapagliflozin decreased proximal absolute sodium reabsorption rate by 455.9 mmol/min (95% CI -879.2, -32.6), while eplerenone decreased distal absolute sodium reabsorption rate by 523.1 mmol/min (95% CI -926.1, -120.0). Dapagliflozin-eplerenone decreased proximal absolute sodium reabsorption [-971.0 mmol/min (95% CI -1411.0, -531.0)], but did not affect distal absolute sodium reabsorption [-9.2 mmol/min (95% CI -402.0, 383.6)].

CONCLUSIONS

Dapagliflozin and eplerenone exert different effects on markers of glomerular and tubular function supporting the hypothesis that different mechanistic pathways may account for their kidney protective effects.

Unilateral adrenalectomy for a drug-resistant bilateral primary aldosteronism with heart failure: pathophysiology and surgical indication

BACKGROUND

Patients with bilateral primary aldosteronism (PA) generally are treated with antihypertensive drugs, but optimal treatment for patients with complications due to refractory hypertension has not been established. In this report, we present a case with bilateral PA who presented with persistent hypertension, despite treatment with 6 drugs, and left-dominant heart failure, which was improved after unilateral adrenalectomy.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 61-year-old man was admitted to our hospital because of severe left-dominant heart failure. His heart rhythm was atrial fibrillation and the left ventricle was diffusely hypertrophic and hypokinetic. Coronary arteries were normal on coronary arteriogram. Primary aldosteronism was suspected based on severe hypokalemia (2.5 mEq/L) and plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC; 1,410 pg/mL). Although computed tomography (CT) showed a single left cortical nodule, adrenal vein sampling (AVS) indicated bilateral PA. Early in the case, heart failure and hyperkalemia in this patient were improved by treatment with a combination of 6 antihypertensive drugs (spironolactone 25 mg/day, eplerenone 100 mg/day, azosemide 60 mg/day, tolvaptan 7.5 mg/day, enalapril 5 mg/day, and bisoprolol fumarate 10 mg/day); however, heart failure relapsed after four months of treatment. We hypothesized that hypertension caused by excess aldosterone was inducing the patient's heart failure. In order to reduce aldosterone secretory tissue, a laparoscopic adrenalectomy was performed for the left adrenal gland, given the higher level of aldosterone from the left gland compared to the right. Following surgery, the patient's heart failure was successfully controlled despite the persistence of high PAC. Treatment with anti-hypertensive medications was reduced to two drugs (eplerenone 100 mg/day and bisoprolol fumarate 10 mg/day). In order to elucidate the mechanism of drug resistance, immunohistochemistry (IHC) and real time-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays were performed to assess the expression of steroidogenic factor 1 (SF-1), a regulator of steroid synthesis in adrenal tissue. IHC and RT-PCR demonstrated that the expression of SF-1 in this patient (at both the protein and mRNA levels) was higher than that observed in unilateral PA cases that showed good responsivity to drug treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Unilateral adrenalectomy to reduce aldosterone secretory tissue may be useful for patients with drug-refractory, bilateral PA. Elevated expression of SF-1 may be involved in drug resistance in PA.

Randomized controlled trials in central serous chorioretinopathy: A review

Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR), a common chorioretinal disease, presents with a myriad of manifestations. Acute CSCR presents with localized neurosensory detachment whereas chronic CSCR may show widespread retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) changes, chronic shallow subretinal fluid, and choroidal neovascularization (CNV) suggestive of a variable natural history leading to suboptimal visual outcomes. Even though multiple treatment options including laser photocoagulation, photodynamic therapy, micropulse laser, anti-vascular endothelial growth factors, and systemic drugs (spironolactone, eplerenone, melatonin, mifepristone) are available, there is an absence of any standardized treatment protocol or gold standard treatment modality. Moreover, their performance compared to observation especially in acute CSCR is still debatable. Compared to other chorioretinal diseases such as age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, diabetic macular oedema, and retinal vein occlusion, there is a relative dearth of randomized controlled trials in CSCR. Multiple inconsistencies including reliance on history of disease duration, variable inclusion criteria/disease descriptors/study endpoints, and availability of multiple treatment modalities lead to difficulties in designing RCTs. A consensus-based treatment protocol, therefore, is still elusive. We reviewed the literature and compiled the list of papers published to date, wherein we analyse and compare the inclusion criteria, imaging modalities, study endpoints, study duration, and study results. Correcting these discrepancies and deficiencies will help standardize future study designs, facilitating a next step toward a standardized treatment protocol.

Agoraphobia and panic attacks complicated by primary aldosteronism improved by treatment with eplerenone: a case report

BACKGROUND

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is an adrenal gland disease, that induces increased secretion of the mineralocorticoid, aldosterone, resulting in symptoms such as hypertension. This study reports a patient with agoraphobia and panic attacks, associated with PA. This patient's psychiatric symptoms improved after treatment with eplerenone, a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist.

CASE PRESENTATION

The patient was a 40-year-old female with agoraphobia, which refers to the irrational fear of situations that may cause anxiety, and panic attacks characterized by profuse sweating, palpitations, and generalized weakness. She was diagnosed with hypertension from PA. Subsequently, she received treatment with eplerenone, which improved her agoraphobia and panic attacks.

CONCLUSIONS

There have been no previous reports on PA associated with agoraphobia and panic attacks that improved with pharmacotherapy. Patients with agoraphobia and panic attacks should be evaluated for PA. In patients with PA, pharmacotherapy with eplerenone should be considered.

Underutilization of Mineralocorticoid Antagonists in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

BACKGROUND

It is unknown how the efficacy and safety of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists vary according to duration of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of eplerenone according to duration of HFrEF.

METHODS

In the EMPHASIS-HF trial, 3 patient groups were created according to HFrEF duration: <1 year, 1 to <5 years, and ≥5 years. The primary outcome was the composite of heart failure (HF) hospitalization or cardiovascular death. Outcomes were adjusted for prespecified prognostic variables and examined with the use of Cox regression models.

RESULTS

The numbers of patients in each group were: 975, <1 year; 769, 1 to <5 years; and 988, ≥5 years. Patients with longer-standing HF were older and more frequently had cardiovascular and noncardiovascular comorbidities. The rate of the primary outcome (per 100 person-years) increased with HFrEF duration: 9.8 (95% CI: 8.4-11.4) for <1 year, 13.5 (95% CI: 11.6-15.7) for 1 to <5 years, and 17.6 (95% CI: 15.6-19.8) for ≥5 years. The benefits of eplerenone were consistent across HF duration: HRs for the primary outcome were 0.57 (95% CI: 0.42-0.79) for <1 year, 0.81 (95% CI: 0.60-1.10) for 1 to <5 years, and 0.61 (95% CI: 0.48-0.78) for ≥5 years; Pinteraction = 0.24. The absolute benefit was greatest in the longest-duration group: the number needed to treat for the primary outcome was 14 for <1 year, 13 for 1 to <5 years, and 10 for ≥5 years duration.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with longer-standing HFrEF had worse clinical status and a higher rate of events, but the benefit of eplerenone was consistent regardless of HFrEF duration. (A Comparison of Outcomes in Patients in NYHA Class II Heart Failure When Treated With Eplerenone or Placebo in Addition to Standard Heart Failure Medicines [EMPHASIS-HF]; NCT00232180).

Long-term effect of eplerenone treatment in children with chronic allograft nephropathy

BACKGROUND

Literature supports the protective role of mineralocorticoid antagonist (MRA) against the renal injury induced by aldosterone in kidney transplant recipients. However, there is limited data available regarding the safety and efficacy of MRAs in pediatric renal transplant patients. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effect of long-term eplerenone administration in children with chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN).

METHODS

Twenty-six renal transplant children with biopsy-proven CAN, an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR ) > 40 mL/min per 1.73 m2 and with a significant proteinuria were included. Selected patients were randomly divided into two groups as follows; Group 1 (n = 10) patients received 25 mg/day eplerenone and Group 2 (n = 16) patients did not receive eplerenone for 36 months. Patients were examined in the renal transplant outpatient clinic biweekly for the first month and once a month thereafter. The primary outcome of the patients was compared.

RESULTS

Mean eGFR stayed stable in group 1 patients, but significantly decreased in group 2 at 36 months (57.53 ± 7.53 vs. 44.94 ± 8.04 mL/min per 1.73 m2 , p = .001). Similarly, spot protein-creatinine ratio was significantly lower in group 1 compared to group 2 patients at 36 months (1.02 ± 7.53 vs. 3.61 ± 0.53, p < .001). Eplerenone associated hyperkalemia was not observed in group 1 patients (4.6 ± 0.2 vs. 4.56 ± 0.3, p = .713).

CONCLUSION

The long-term eplerenone administration blunted the chronic allograft nephropathy by maintaining a stable eGFR levels and decreasing urine protein-creatinine ratio. Eplerenone associated hyperkalemia was not observed in our study.

Time to clinical benefit of eplerenone among patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: A subgroups analysis from the EMPHASIS-HF trial

AIM

Eplerenone reduces the risk of cardiovascular death or first hospitalization for heart failure (HF) in patients with HF and a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but it is still frequently underused in routine practice. We evaluated the time course of benefits of eplerenone after its initiation in HFrEF patients from the EMPHASIS-HF trial.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The EMPHASIS-HF trial was a double-blind randomized clinical trial assessing the effect of eplerenone in patients (n = 2737, mean age 68.6 ± 7.6 years, 22.3% women) with HFrEF and mild symptoms. The time trajectories for the effect of eplerenone versus placebo on the primary composite endpoint (cardiovascular death or first hospitalization for HF) were investigated using Cox proportional hazards models with truncated data at each day post-randomization. A significant reduction in the primary composite endpoint was observed 26 days after randomization (hazard ratio 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-1.00, p = 0.049). Eplerenone was first associated with a significant reduction in the primary endpoint in 35 days or less in most subgroups, including patients with HF history ≥18 months (day 24), estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min (day 12), ischaemic HF aetiology (day 28), age ≥65 years (day 28), narrow QRS (day 30), higher MAGGIC score (day 35), lower potassium (day 30), left ventricular ejection fraction ≥30% (day 28) or already treated with beta-blockers (day 25).

CONCLUSIONS

Eplerenone provides statistically significant and clinically meaningful benefits shortly after treatment initiation in most patients, irrespective of clinical profile. This result reinforces the need for an early initiation of eplerenone in HFrEF, as part of rapidly instituting guideline-directed medical therapy.

Choroidal modifications assessed by means of choroidal vascularity index after oral eplerenone treatment in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy

BACKGROUND

To investigate choroidal vascularity index (CVI) changes after oral eplerenone treatment in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (cCSC) using the Spectral-domain (SD)-Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) with enhanced depth imaging (EDI) mode.

METHODS

Thirty-six eyes of 18 patients suffering from cCSC with monolateral foveal subretinal fluid (FSRF) successfully treated with oral eplerenone treatment and 18 age-matched healthy subjects were enroled in this retrospective study. EDI-OCT images obtained using Heidelberg Spectralis OCT device in patients with cCSC and FSRF (group 1); fellow eye (group 2) or healthy patients (healthy) were exported and then imported into image analysis ImageJ software for subsequent quantitative analysis. The main outcome measures were luminal area (LA) and CVI.

RESULTS

A higher value of CVI was detected in group 1 compared to healthy eyes (p = 0.006). LA and CVI significantly reduced during follow up in group 1 and group 2. LA at 120 days was significantly lower compared to all previous time points both in group 1 and group 2 (p < 0.001). Median and [1st -3rd quartile] CVI values were 0.8 [0.7; 1.1] at baseline, 0.8 [0.7; 0.9] at 30 days; 0.7 [0.6; 0.9] at 60 and 90 days and 0.6 [0.5; 0.8] at 120 days in group 1 (p = 0.007) and 0.7 [0.6; 0.9] at baseline, 0.7 [0.7; 0.8] at 30 days; 0.7 [0.6; 0.7] at 60 and 90 days and 0.6 [0.6; 0.7] at 120 days in group 2 (p = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

Choroidal vascularity index reduced in cCSC patients after oral eplerenone treatment during follow up both in eyes with SRF and fellow eyes thus demonstrating the effectiveness of mineral corticoid receptor antagonists in recovering choroidal morphology.

The Effectiveness of Eplerenone vs Spironolactone on Left Ventricular Systolic Function, Hospitalization and Cardiovascular Death in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure-HFrEF

Background

Heart failure remains one of the most prevalent clinical syndromes associated with significant morbidity and mortality. According to current guidelines, the prescription of a MRA is recommended to reduce the risk of HF hospitalization and death in all patients with symptomatic heart failure and no contraindications for this therapy.

Objective

The aim of our study was to determine the efficacy of eplerenone vs. spironolactone on left ventricular systolic function by measuring left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with chronic heart failure, especially their effect on preventing hospitalization, reducing mortality, and improving clinical status among patients with chronic HF.

Methods

From June 2021 to June 2022, the study was a randomized, prospective clinical trial single blind study. A total of 142 patients of chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction were selected by random sampling. Each patient was randomly allocated into either of the two groups and was continued receiving treatment with either spironolactone (Spiron-HF group) or eplerenone (Epler-HF group). Patients in Epler-HF group were compared with an arm of the same size and matched by age and gender patients in Spiron-HF group for management of chronic HFrEF. Each patient was evaluated clinically, biochemically, and echocardiographically at the beginning of treatment (baseline) after 6 months and at the end of 12th month. Echocardiography was performed to find out change in left ventricular systolic function.

Results

After 12 months of treatment, significant improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction was observed in eplerenone treated arm (37.9 ± 3.8 ± 4.6 in Spiron-HF group versus 40.1 ± 5.7 in Epler-HF group; P < 0.05). A significant reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume (6.3 ± 2.5ml in Spiron-HF versus 17.8± 4.4ml in Epler-HF group; P < 0.05) and left ventricular systolic diameter volume (2.7 ± 0.5ml in Spiron-HF versus 6.7 ± 0.2ml in Epler-HF group; P < 0.05), occurred after 12 months of treatment. Left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV GLS) was significantly improved in Epler-HF group compared with Spiron-HF group (0.6 ± 0.4 versus 3.4 ± 0.9; P < 0.05). There were no significant differences observed in reduction of left ventricular end-diastolic volume (2.2 ± 0.5 ml versus 4.7 ± 1.1ml; P =0.103) and left ventricular diastolic diameter (1.2 ± 0.6 versus 1.7 ± 0.3; P=0.082) in both arms. The effects of both MRA agents spironolactone and eplerenone on the primary composite outcome, each of the individual mortality and hospital admission outcomes are shown in Figure 1 and 2. Patients of the Epler-HF group showed statistically significant lower cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.34-0.82; p= 0.007) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.44-0.93; p= 0.022) than patients of the Spiron-HF group. The statistical analysis did not show a statistically significant difference between Epler -HF and Spiron-HF study groups regarding the risk of the primary composite outcome; cardiovascular death or hospitalization due to HF (Hazard Ratio (HR) eplerenone vs. spironolactone = 0.95; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.73- 1.27; p= 0.675).

Conclusion

Our study has demonstrated favorable effects of eplerenone on cardiac remodeling parameters and reduction of cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality compared with spironolactone in the treatment of HFrEF. The ability of eplerenone to effectively block the mineralocorticoid receptor while minimizing side effects and a significant reduction in the risk of hospitalization and cardiovascular death confirms its key role in the treatment of patients with chronic HFrEF.

Hyperkalemia by eplerenone or esaxerenone in the presence or absence of clarithromycin in hypertensive patients: a retrospective observational cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), eplerenone and esaxerenone, cause hyperkalemia dose-dependently. We investigated the cytochrome P450 3A4-mediated drug-drug interaction between the MRAs and clarithromycin.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study included adult hypertensive patients with MRA plus clarithromycin or MRA alone with a propensity score matching (1:1). The difference in serum potassium level (ΔK, maximum level - baseline level) between groups was compared using the Mann-Whitney U -test. Linear regression analysis was used to detect variables that correlated with ΔK in patients with MRA plus clarithromycin.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching (each nine patients), serum potassium level was elevated after treatment with MRA plus clarithromycin [4.3 (3.5 to 5.1) meq/l to 4.9 (4.0 to 5.5) meq/l, P  = 0.0234] and MRA alone [4.3 (4.0 to 4.7) meq/l to 4.6 (4.4 to 5.2) meq/l, P  = 0.0469]. Although there was no significant difference in ΔK between groups [MRA plus clarithromycin: 0.5 (0.1 to 1.1) meq/l vs. MRA alone: 0.3 (0.1 to 1.2) meq/l, P  = 0.7231], ΔK was significantly higher in esaxerenone plus clarithromycin than in esaxerenone alone [0.6 (0.5 to 1.1) meq/l vs. 0.1 (0.1 to 0.2) meq/l, P  = 0.0495]. Conversely, clarithromycin did not show a significant effect on ΔK in patients with eplerenone [0.4 (-0.2 to 1.2) meq/l vs. 0.8 (0.1 to 1.3) meq/l, P  = 0.5745]. A positive correlation was found between ΔK and age in patients with MRA plus clarithromycin ( y  = 0.03 ×  x - 1.38, r  = 0.71, P  = 0.0336).

CONCLUSION

The drug-drug interaction between MRAs and clarithromycin was evident, particularly in esaxerenone. Serum potassium levels should be closely monitored in older patients.

Evaluating the clinical and mechanistic effects of eplerenone and amiloride monotherapy, and combination therapy with cinacalcet, in primary hyperparathyroidism: A placebo-controlled randomized trial

OBJECTIVES

Human physiology and epidemiology studies have demonstrated complex interactions between the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, parathyroid hormone and calcium homeostasis. Several of these studies have suggested that aldosterone inhibition may lower parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of 4 weeks of maximally tolerated mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist therapy with eplerenone on PTH levels in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (P-HPT) when compared to amiloride and placebo. We also investigated the synergistic effect of these interventions when combined with cinacalcet for an additional 2 weeks.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blinded, three parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial.

PATIENTS

Patients with P-HPT.

RESULTS

Most patients were women (83%) and White (76%). Maximally tolerated doses of eplerenone and amiloride induced significant reductions in blood pressure and increases in renin and aldosterone production; however, despite these physiologic changes, neither intervention induced significant changes in PTH or calcium levels when compared to the placebo. Both eplerenone and amiloride therapy induced significant reductions in procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide levels when compared to placebo. When cinacalcet therapy was added, PTH and calcium levels were markedly reduced in all groups; however, there was no significant difference in PTH or serum calcium reductions between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although maximally tolerated therapy with eplerenone and amiloride induced expected changes in renin, aldosterone and blood pressure, there were no meaningful changes in PTH or serum calcium levels in P-HPT patients. These results suggest that inhibition of aldosterone action does not have a clinically meaningful role in medical therapy for P-HPT.

Role of eplerenone in the threatment of cardiovascular diseases

Eplerenone is a selective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. Its approved for the therapy of patients with chronic heart failure with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and for the patients after myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction. It´s also recommended for the therapy of primary hyperaldosteronism and the treatment of drug resistant hypertension.

Primary aldosteronism in pregnancy

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most common form of secondary hypertension. Although hypertensive disorders seem to affect around 5-10% of pregnancies worldwide, literature counts less than 80 cases of PA diagnosed during the peri-partum period. In this review we discuss about current knowledge on pathophysiology, natural history, diagnosis and treatment of PA in pregnancy. Because of the physiologic changes in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) and the contraindication to both confirmatory test and subtype differentiation, diagnosis of PA during pregnancy is challenging and relies mostly on detection of low/suppressed renin and high aldosterone levels. The course of pregnancy in patients with PA is highly variable, ranging from progesterone-induced amelioration of blood pressure (BP) control to severe and resistant hypertension with potential maternal and fetal complications. Mineralcorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) are the recommended and most effective drugs for treatment of PA. As the anti-androgenic effect of spironolactone can potentially interfere with sexual development, their prescription is not recommended during pregnancy. On the other side, eplerenone, has proven to be safe and effective in 6 pregnant women and may be added to conventional first line drug regimen in presence of resistant hypertension or persistent hypokalemia. Ideally, patients with unilateral forms of PA should undergo adrenalectomy prior to conception, however, when PA is diagnosed during pregnancy and medical therapy fails to adequately control hypertension or its complications, adrenalectomy can be considered during the second trimester in case of unilateral adrenal mass at MRI-scan.

Yiqi Huoxue Tongluo recipe regulates NR4A1 to improve renal mitochondrial function in unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO) rats

CONTEXT

Yiqi Huoxue Tongluo recipe (YHTR) is a traditional Chinese medicine for the treatment of chronic kidney disease, but its exact mechanism is not clear.

OBJECTIVES

To monitor the potential improvement of renal mitochondrial function in unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO) rats by regulating NR4A1 using the YHTR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Wistar rats were randomly divided into four groups: sham, UUO (left ureteral ligation for 14 days), eplerenone (EPL) (UUO + EPL), and YHTR (UUO + YHTR). UUO rats were established and intragastrically administered EPL (100 mg/day/kg) or YHTR (11.7 g/day/kg) for 14 days. The expression of related proteins in kidneys was detected by immunohistochemistry, western blot, RT-PCR, and chemical colorimetric assay, respectively.

RESULTS

In vivo, YHTR treatment reduced the levels of BUN and Scr (by 17.9% and 23.5%) in UUO rats. Moreover, YHTR improved the renal mitochondrial function via increasing key enzymes of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle (p < 0.05) and activity of the mitochondrial complex (I-V) (by 30.8%, 29.1%, 19.7%, 35.9%, and 22.4%) in UUO rats. Compared with the UUO group, the expression of NR4A1 and Bcl-2 were significantly increased (p < 0.05), the expression of caspase-3 and caspase-9 were significantly decreased (p < 0.05) in the YHTR group. YHTR could upregulate key enzymes of the TCA cycle via promoting NR4A1 expression in HK2 cells, leading to inhibition of TGF-β1 induced cell apoptosis.

CONCLUSIONS

YHTR significantly improved the development of CKD; this study may provide new ideas for the pathogenesis of CKD and new strategies for the development of new drugs against CKD.

Steroidal MRA Across the Spectrum of Renal Function: A Pooled Analysis of RCTs

BACKGROUND

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are underused in patients with kidney dysfunction, and their efficacy among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to analyze the efficacy and safety of steroidal MRAs across the spectrum of estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) in randomized controlled trials. The study included patients with heart failure (HF) or myocardial infarction and advanced CKD who participated in the RALES (Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study), EMPHASIS-HF (Eplerenone in Mild Patients Hospitalization and Survival Study in Heart Failure), TOPCAT (Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist) in the Americas, and EPHESUS (Eplerenone Post-AMI Heart Failure Efficacy and Survival Study) trials.

METHODS

This study used individual patient data meta-analysis using Cox models stratified by trial with treatment-by-eGFR interaction terms. eGFR was recalculated by using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration creatinine formula.

RESULTS

A total of 12,700 patients were included, of whom 331 (2.6%) had an eGFR ≤30 mL/min/1.73 m² (mean eGFR: 26.8 ± 3.2 mL/min/1.73 m²). Patients with advanced CKD had higher annualized event rates for all studied outcomes: placebo event rate for the composite of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization was ∼3-fold higher in patients with eGFR ≤30 compared with those with eGFR >90 mL/min/1.73 m²: 41.6 vs 14.6 events per 100 person-years. MRAs (vs placebo) reduced the composite of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization, but the effect was attenuated as eGFR decreased: the corresponding HRs by eGFR categories were: HR for >90 mL/min/1.73 m²: 0.62 (95% CI: 0.49-0.78); HR for 61-90 mL/min/1.73 m²: 0.69 (95% CI: 0.61-0.77); HR for 46-60 mL/min/1.73 m²: 0.84 (95% CI: 0.74-0.95); HR for 31-45 mL/min/1.73 m²: 0.79 (95% CI: 0.68-0.91); and HR for ≤30 mL/min/1.73 m²: 0.96 (95% CI: 0.70-1.32) (treatment-by-eGFR interaction P for trend = 0.033). Investigator-reported hyperkalemia and worsening renal function were more frequent (2- to 3-fold) among MRA users, and hyperkalemia was more frequent as eGFR decreased (treatment-by-eGFR interaction P for trend = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Steroidal MRAs reduced HF hospitalizations and mortality across a wide range of eGFR. However, declining benefit and worsening safety may limit their use in patients with lower eGFR, particularly those with levels ≤30 mL/min/1.73 m².

Finerenone in diabetic kidney disease: A systematic review and critical appraisal

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Finerenone is a novel non-steroidal mineralocorticoid antagonist (MRA) recently approved for the treatment of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). We aim to conduct a systematic review of finerenone to know the efficacy and safety of finerenone in CKD with or without T2D.

METHODS

A systematic search in the electronic database of PubMed and Google Scholar was made from inception until September 09, 2022, using several MeSH keywords related to finerenone. Ongoing trials were additionally searched from ClinicalTrials.Gov.

RESULTS

Five phase 2 and three phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo- or active-controlled studies of finerenone have been published to date and several other randomized and real-world studies of finerenone are currently undergoing.

CONCLUSIONS

In short-term studies in patients with CKD and reduced ejection heart failure, with or without T2D, finerenone 20 mg appears to have a better renal outcome compared with spironolactone and a better mortality outcome compared with eplerenone, with significantly lesser hyperkalemia compared to both spironolactone and finerenone. In long-term studies in patients with CKD and T2D, finerenone 10/20 mg significantly reduces the progression of renal disease and reduced CV endpoints (especially heart failure hospitalization) compared to placebo. Finerenone has no effect on HbA1c, body weight, and sexual side effects including gynecomastia, and has only a modest effect on blood pressure. However, hyperkalemia leading to drug withdrawal was significantly higher with finerenone compared to placebo. Safety data in real-world settings is a pressing priority.

[Multidisciplinary expert consensus for clinical application of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in China]

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) inhibit the overactivation of mineralocorticoid receptors (MRs), resulting in potassium retention and diuresis, and are widely used in clinical practice. They were classified into steroidal MRAs (such as spironolactone and eplerenone) and new nonsteroidal MRAs (such as finerenone) according to the molecular structure. Three most commonly used MRs are clinically available at present, spironolactone, eplerenone and finerenone. The efficacy and safety of the three drugs differ from each in the treatment of chronic kidney disease, heart failure, hypertension and other diseases. It is, thus, of great necessary to reach a multidisciplinary expert consensus on the clinical practice of MRAs to improve the understanding of medical workers in China on steroidal and nonsteroidal MRAs, and help them with rational administration of the drugs.

Efficacy and safety of eplerenone treatment for patients with diabetic nephropathy: A meta-analysis

Diabetic nephropathy (DN), which is correlated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, significantly elevates the morbidity and mortality of patients with diabetes. Recently, the benefits of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in chronic kidney disease (CKD), such as their anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic properties, have been discovered. Thus, the present meta-analysis aimed to systematically assess the efficacy and safety of eplerenone treatment in patients with DN. Six electronic databases—PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), and CBM(Chinese BioMedical Literature Database)—were searched to retrieve randomized controlled trials that assessed eplerenone treatment in patients with DN and were published up to July 31, 2021. Eight randomized controlled trials involving 838 patients were included. Between the eplerenone treatment groups and controls, significant differences were identified in 24-h urine protein levels (mean difference [MD], −19.63 [95% CI, −23.73 to −15.53], P < 0.00001), microalbuminuria (MD, -7.75 [95% CI, -9.75 to -5.75], P < 0.00001), urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (MD, -48.29 [95% CI, -64.45 to -32.14], P < 0.00001), systolic blood pressure (SBP) (MD, -2.49 [95% CI, -4.48 to -0.50], P = 0.01), serum potassium levels (MD, 0.19 [95% CI, 0.13 to 0.24], P < 0.00001), and levels of the renal fibrosis indicator laminin (MD, -8.84 [95% CI, -11.93 to -5.75], P < 0.00001). However, for the effect of estimated glomerular filtration rate (MD, 1.74 [95% CI, -0.87 to 4.35], P = 0.19) and diastolic blood pressure (MD, -0.51 [95% CI, -1.58 to 0.57], P = 0.36), the differences between the two groups were not significant. In addition, no noticeable difference was identified in the adverse events of hyperkalemia and cough between them. These findings suggest that eplerenone exerts beneficial effects on DN by significantly reducing urinary albumin or protein excretion, SBP, and laminin levels, without increasing the incidence of hyperkalemia and other adverse events.

Real world comparison of spironolactone and eplerenone in patients with heart failure

AIMS

In the absence of previous direct comparative studies, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of spironolactone and eplerenone in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in a real-world clinical setting.

METHODS

Using Fine-Gray´s competing risk regression, we compared the clinical outcomes of 293 patients with chronic HF and left ventricular ejection fraction <40% treated with eplerenone and 293 propensity-score matched individuals treated with spironolactone. Study subjects were selected from a prospective cohort of 1404 ambulatory patients with HFrEF seen since 2010 to 2019 in a single specialized HF clinic, among which 992 received a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist at baseline. Median follow-up was 3.95 years.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences between patients treated with eplerenone versus spironolactone were observed with regard to the risk of the primary composite end-point cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization (HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.73-1.23; p= 0.677). However, eplerenone use was associated to lower cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.35-0.85; p= 0.008) and lower all-cause mortality (HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.47-0.95; p= 0.027). The incidence of drug suspension due to side effects (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.40-0.85; p= 0.005) and drug suspension due to any reason (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.51-0.97; p= 0.033) were lower among patients treated with eplerenone.

CONCLUSIONS

In this observational, real-world, propensity-score matched study of patients with HFrEF, eplerenone was associated to lower cardiovascular mortality and lower all-cause mortality than spironolactone.

Eight weeks of mineralocorticoid blockade does not improve insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetes

Individuals with type 2 diabetes have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. A correlation between plasma aldosterone and hyperinsulinemia has been demonstrated in vivo, and hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance are independently associated with the development of cardiovascular complications. We investigated if mineralocorticoid blockade (Eplerenone) improves insulin sensitivity in individuals with type 2 diabetes compared to healthy controls. We included 13 participants with type 2 diabetes (<5 years; male/female, Caucasians) and 10 healthy control participants (male/female, Caucasians). On 2 experimental days, before and at the end of the 8 weeks of treatment with mineralocorticoid blockade, a two-stage hyperinsulinemic-isoglycemic clamp (20 and 50 mU∙m-2 min-1 ) was performed for the determination of insulin sensitivity. No change in insulin sensitivity was detected at the end of the mineralocorticoid blockade in the individuals with type 2 diabetes or the healthy controls. Both before and at the end of the treatment with mineralocorticoid blockade, the individuals with type 2 diabetes had a lower insulin sensitivity compared to healthy controls. In conclusion, mineralocorticoid receptor blockade does not appear to improve insulin sensitivity in individuals with type 2 diabetes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03017703. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03017703.

Effect of the Nonsteroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Blocker, Esaxerenone, on Nocturnal Hypertension: A Post Hoc Analysis of the ESAX-HTN Study

BACKGROUND

Nocturnal hypertension is an important phenotype of abnormal diurnal blood pressure (BP) variability and a known risk marker for target organ damage and cardiovascular events. This study aimed to assess the differential BP-lowering effects of esaxerenone vs. eplerenone on nocturnal BP in hypertensive patients with different nocturnal dipping patterns.

METHODS

This was a post hoc analysis of the "Esaxerenone (CS-3150) Compared to Eplerenone in Patients with Essential Hypertension" study (NCT02890173), which was a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blind, parallel-group clinical study conducted in Japan. Ambulatory BP monitoring data were collected.

RESULTS

Patients (n = 1,001) were randomized to esaxerenone 2.5 mg/day (n = 331) or 5 mg/day (n = 338), or eplerenone 50 mg/day (n = 332). Reductions in nighttime systolic BP (95% confidence interval) were significantly greater with 2.5 and 5 mg/day esaxerenone vs. eplerenone (-2.6 [-5.0, -0.2] and -6.4 mm Hg [-8.8, -4.0], respectively). Esaxerenone significantly reduced nighttime BP from baseline compared with eplerenone in non-dippers with previously uncontrolled BP. In addition, esaxerenone did not markedly alter nighttime BP in extreme dipper patients. In the esaxerenone 5 mg/day group, esaxerenone-induced decreases in nighttime BP were greater than eplerenone-induced decreases in older patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Esaxerenone may be an effective treatment option for nocturnal hypertension, especially in older patients and those with a non-dipper pattern of nocturnal BP.

New Horizons: Does Mineralocorticoid Receptor Activation by Cortisol Cause ATP Release and COVID-19 Complications?

This paper attempts to explain how the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus causes the complications that make coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) a serious disease in specific patient subgroups. It suggests that cortisol-associated activation of the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) in epithelial and endothelial cells infected with the virus stimulates the release of adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP), which then acts back on purinergic receptors. In the lung this could produce the nonproductive cough via purinergic P2X3 receptors on vagal afferent nerves. In endothelial cells it could stimulate exocytosis of Weibel-Palade bodies (WPBs) that contain angiopoietin-2, which is important in the pathogenesis of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) by increasing capillary permeability and von Willebrand factor (VWF), which mediates platelet adhesion to the endothelium and hence clotting. Angiopoietin-2 and VWF levels both are markedly elevated in COVID-19-associated ARDS. This paper offers an explanation for the sex differences in SARS-CoV-2 complications and also for why these are strongly associated with age, race, diabetes, and body mass index. It also explains why individuals with blood group A have a higher risk of severe infection than those with blood group O. Dexamethasone has been shown to be of benefit in coronavirus ARDS patients and has been thought to act as an anti-inflammatory drug. This paper suggests that a major part of its effect may be due to suppression of cortisol secretion. There is an urgent need to trial the combination of dexamethasone and an MR antagonist such as spironolactone to more effectively block the MR and hence the exocytosis of WPBs.

Aldosterone antagonists for people with chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis

BACKGROUND

People with chronic kidney disease (CKD) requiring dialysis are at a particularly high risk of cardiovascular death and morbidity. Several clinical studies suggested that aldosterone antagonists would be a promising treatment option for people undergoing dialysis. However, the clinical efficacy and potential harm of aldosterone antagonists for people with CKD on dialysis has yet to be determined.

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to evaluate the benefits and harms of aldosterone antagonists, both non-selective (spironolactone) and selective (eplerenone), in comparison to control (placebo or standard care) in people with CKD requiring haemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 5 August 2020 using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included parallel randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cross-over RCTs, and quasi-RCTs (where group allocation is by a method that is not truly random, such as alternation, assignment based on alternate medical records, date of birth, case record number, or other predictable methods) that compared aldosterone antagonists with placebo or standard care in people with CKD requiring dialysis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias for included studies. We used a random-effects model meta-analysis to perform a quantitative synthesis of the data. We used the I² statistic to measure heterogeneity among the studies in each analysis. We indicated summary estimates as a risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes, mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes, or standardised mean differences (SMD) if different scales were used, with their 95% confidence interval (CI). We assessed the certainty of the evidence for each of the main outcomes using the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 16 studies (14 parallel RCTs and two cross-over RCTs) involving a total of 1446 participants. Thirteen studies compared spironolactone to placebo or standard care and one study compared eplerenone to a placebo. Most included studies had an unclear or high risk of bias. Compared to control, aldosterone antagonists probably reduced the risk of death (any cause) for people with CKD requiring dialysis (9 studies, 1119 participants: RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.67; I² = 0%; moderate certainty of evidence). Aldosterone antagonist probably decreased the risk of death due to cardiovascular disease (6 studies, 908 participants: RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.64; I² = 0%; moderate certainty of evidence) and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular morbidity (3 studies, 328 participants: RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.76; I² = 0%; moderate certainty of evidence). While aldosterone antagonists probably increased risk of gynaecomastia compared with control (4 studies, 768 participants: RR 5.95, 95% CI 1.93 to 18.3; I² = 0%; moderate certainty of evidence), aldosterone antagonists may make little or no difference to the risk of hyperkalaemia (9 studies, 981 participants: RR 1.41, 95% CI 0.72 to 2.78; I² = 47%; low certainty of evidence). Aldosterone antagonists had a marginal effect on left ventricular mass among participants undergoing dialysis (8 studies, 633 participants: SMD -0.42, 95% CI -0.78 to 0.05; I² = 77%). In people with CKD requiring dialysis received aldosterone antagonists compared to control, there were 72 fewer deaths from all causes per 1000 participants (95% CI 47 to 98) with a number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) of 14 (95% CI 10 to 21) and for gynaecomastia were 26 events per 1000 participants (95% CI 15 to 39) with a number need to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) of 38 (95% CI 26 to 68).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on moderate certainty of the evidence, aldosterone antagonists probably reduces the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular death and probably reduces morbidity due to cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease in people with CKD requiring dialysis. For the adverse effect of gynaecomastia, the risk was increased compared to control. For this outcome, the absolute risk was lower than the absolute risk of death. It is hoped the three large ongoing studies will provide better certainty of evidence.

The Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Eplerenone Suppresses Interstitial Fibrosis in Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

Activation of the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) may promote dysfunctional adipose tissue in patients with type 2 diabetes, where increased pericellular fibrosis has emerged as a major contributor. The knowledge of the association among the MR, fibrosis, and the effects of an MR antagonist (MRA) in human adipocytes remains very limited. The present substudy, including 30 participants, was prespecified as part of the Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist in Type 2 Diabetes (MIRAD) trial, which randomized patients to either high-dose eplerenone or placebo for 26 weeks. In adipose tissue biopsies, changes in fibrosis were evaluated by immunohistological examination and by the expression of mRNA and protein markers of fibrosis. Treatment with an MRA reduced pericellular fibrosis, synthesis of the major subunits of collagen types I and VI, and the profibrotic factor α-smooth muscle actin compared with placebo in subcutaneous adipose tissue. Furthermore, we found decreased expression of the MR and downstream molecules neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, galectin-3, and lipocalin-like prostaglandin D2 synthase with an MRA. In conclusion, we present original data demonstrating reduced fibrosis in adipose tissue with inhibition of the MR, which could be a potential therapeutic approach to prevent the extracellular matrix remodeling of adipose tissue in type 2 diabetes.

Sex Differences in Renal Outcomes After Medical Treatment for Bilateral Primary Aldosteronism

A higher incidence of bilateral primary aldosteronism in women is reported. Treatment of bilateral primary aldosteronism usually involves mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. However, the impact of sex on renal outcomes is unknown. We compared renal outcomes between the sexes after mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist initiation by analyzing data obtained from 415 female and 313 male patients with bilateral primary aldosteronism who were treated with spironolactone or eplerenone in the JPAS (Japan Primary Aldosteronism Study). Over the course of 5 years, the temporal reduction in the estimated glomerular filtration rate was greater in women than in men (P<0.001). Systolic blood pressure levels were equal between the sexes, despite higher doses of antihypertensive drugs in men. The mean of the annual decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate during what we termed the late phase, or 6 to 60 months after mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist initiation, was larger in women than in men after adjusting for patient characteristics (-1.33 mL/min per 1.73 m² per year versus -1.04 mL/min per 1.73 m² per year, P<0.01). Female sex was a significant predictor of greater annual decline during the late phase in patients taking spironolactone but not in those taking eplerenone. Spironolactone use and diabetes were independent predictors of a greater annual decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate during the late phase in women. These findings suggest that female sex is associated with poorer renal outcomes in patients receiving mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist for bilateral primary aldosteronism.

A Comparison of Adrenalectomy and Eplerenone on Vascular Function in Patients with Aldosterone-producing Adenoma

CONTEXT

It remains unclear whether adrenalectomy has more beneficial effects than treatment with a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist on vascular function in patients with aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of adrenalectomy and treatment with eplerenone on vascular function in patients with APA.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS

Flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD), as an index of endothelium-dependent vasodilation, and nitroglycerine-induced vasodilation (NID), as an index of endothelium-independent vasodilation, were measured to assess vascular function before and after a 3-month treatment with eplerenone and at 3 months after adrenalectomy in 23 patients with APA.

RESULTS

Flow-mediated vasodilation and NID after adrenalectomy were significantly higher than those before treatment with eplerenone (5.4 ± 2.6% vs 2.7 ± 1.9% and 14.8 ± 4.7% vs 9.6 ± 4.6%, P < 0.01, respectively) and those after treatment with eplerenone (5.4 ± 2.6% vs 3.1 ± 2.3% and 14.8 ± 4.7% vs 11.0 ± 5.3%, P < 0.01 and P = 0.03, respectively), while treatment with eplerenone did not alter FMD and NID compared with those before treatment with eplerenone. After adrenalectomy, the increase in FMD and NID were significantly correlated with a decrease in plasma aldosterone concentration and a decrease in the aldosterone-renin ratio. There were no significant relationships between FMD and changes in other parameters or between NID and changes in other parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Adrenalectomy, but not treatment with eplerenone, improved vascular function in patients with APA. Adrenalectomy may be more effective than treatment with eplerenone for reducing the incidence of future cardiovascular events in patients with APA. Clinical Trial Information: URL for the clinical trial: http://UMIN; Registration Number for the clinical trial: UMIN000003409.

Aldosterone antagonists in addition to renin angiotensin system antagonists for preventing the progression of chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) is used to reduce proteinuria and retard the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, resolution of proteinuria may be incomplete with these therapies and the addition of an aldosterone antagonist may be added to further prevent progression of CKD. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2009 and updated in 2014.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of aldosterone antagonists (selective (eplerenone), non-selective (spironolactone or canrenone), or non-steroidal mineralocorticoid antagonists (finerenone)) in adults who have CKD with proteinuria (nephrotic and non-nephrotic range) on: patient-centred endpoints including kidney failure (previously know as end-stage kidney disease (ESKD)), major cardiovascular events, and death (any cause); kidney function (proteinuria, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and doubling of serum creatinine); blood pressure; and adverse events (including hyperkalaemia, acute kidney injury, and gynaecomastia).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 13 January 2020 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that compared aldosterone antagonists in combination with ACEi or ARB (or both) to other anti-hypertensive strategies or placebo in participants with proteinuric CKD.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed study quality and extracted data. Data were summarised using random effects meta-analysis. We expressed summary treatment estimates as a risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes, or standardised mean difference (SMD) when different scales were used together with their 95% confidence interval (CI). Risk of bias were assessed using the Cochrane tool. Evidence certainty was evaluated using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

Forty-four studies (5745 participants) were included. Risk of bias in the evaluated methodological domains were unclear or high risk in most studies. Adequate random sequence generation was present in 12 studies, allocation concealment in five studies, blinding of participant and investigators in 18 studies, blinding of outcome assessment in 15 studies, and complete outcome reporting in 24 studies. All studies comparing aldosterone antagonists to placebo or standard care were used in addition to an ACEi or ARB (or both). None of the studies were powered to detect differences in patient-level outcomes including kidney failure, major cardiovascular events or death. Aldosterone antagonists had uncertain effects on kidney failure (2 studies, 84 participants: RR 3.00, 95% CI 0.33 to 27.65, I² = 0%; very low certainty evidence), death (3 studies, 421 participants: RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.10 to 3.50, I² = 0%; low certainty evidence), and cardiovascular events (3 studies, 1067 participants: RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.26 to 3.56; I² = 42%; low certainty evidence) compared to placebo or standard care. Aldosterone antagonists may reduce protein excretion (14 studies, 1193 participants: SMD -0.51, 95% CI -0.82 to -0.20, I² = 82%; very low certainty evidence), eGFR (13 studies, 1165 participants, MD -3.00 mL/min/1.73 m², 95% CI -5.51 to -0.49, I² = 0%, low certainty evidence) and systolic blood pressure (14 studies, 911 participants: MD -4.98 mmHg, 95% CI -8.22 to -1.75, I² = 87%; very low certainty evidence) compared to placebo or standard care. Aldosterone antagonists probably increase the risk of hyperkalaemia (17 studies, 3001 participants: RR 2.17, 95% CI 1.47 to 3.22, I² = 0%; moderate certainty evidence), acute kidney injury (5 studies, 1446 participants: RR 2.04, 95% CI 1.05 to 3.97, I² = 0%; moderate certainty evidence), and gynaecomastia (4 studies, 281 participants: RR 5.14, 95% CI 1.14 to 23.23, I² = 0%; moderate certainty evidence) compared to placebo or standard care. Non-selective aldosterone antagonists plus ACEi or ARB had uncertain effects on protein excretion (2 studies, 139 participants: SMD -1.59, 95% CI -3.80 to 0.62, I² = 93%; very low certainty evidence) but may increase serum potassium (2 studies, 121 participants: MD 0.31 mEq/L, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.45, I² = 0%; low certainty evidence) compared to diuretics plus ACEi or ARB. Selective aldosterone antagonists may increase the risk of hyperkalaemia (2 studies, 500 participants: RR 1.62, 95% CI 0.66 to 3.95, I² = 0%; low certainty evidence) compared ACEi or ARB (or both). There were insufficient studies to perform meta-analyses for the comparison between non-selective aldosterone antagonists and calcium channel blockers, selective aldosterone antagonists plus ACEi or ARB (or both) and nitrate plus ACEi or ARB (or both), and non-steroidal mineralocorticoid antagonists and selective aldosterone antagonists.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The effects of aldosterone antagonists when added to ACEi or ARB (or both) on the risks of death, major cardiovascular events, and kidney failure in people with proteinuric CKD are uncertain. Aldosterone antagonists may reduce proteinuria, eGFR, and systolic blood pressure in adults who have mild to moderate CKD but may increase the risk of hyperkalaemia, acute kidney injury and gynaecomastia when added to ACEi and/or ARB.

The phospholamban p.(Arg14del) pathogenic variant leads to cardiomyopathy with heart failure and is unreponsive to standard heart failure therapy

Phospholamban (PLN) plays a role in cardiomyocyte calcium handling as primary inhibitor of sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA). The p.(Arg14del) pathogenic variant in the PLN gene results in a high risk of developing dilated or arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy with heart failure. There is no established treatment other than standard heart failure therapy or heart transplantation. In this study, we generated a novel mouse model with the PLN-R14del pathogenic variant, performed detailed phenotyping, and tested the efficacy of established heart failure therapies eplerenone or metoprolol. Heterozygous PLN-R14del mice demonstrated increased susceptibility to ex vivo induced arrhythmias, and cardiomyopathy at 18 months of age, which was not accelerated by isoproterenol infusion. Homozygous PLN-R14del mice exhibited an accelerated phenotype including cardiac dilatation, contractile dysfunction, decreased ECG potentials, high susceptibility to ex vivo induced arrhythmias, myocardial fibrosis, PLN protein aggregation, and early mortality. Neither eplerenone nor metoprolol administration improved cardiac function or survival. In conclusion, our novel PLN-R14del mouse model exhibits most features of human disease. Administration of standard heart failure therapy did not rescue the phenotype, underscoring the need for better understanding of the pathophysiology of PLN-R14del-associated cardiomyopathy. This model provides a great opportunity to study the pathophysiology, and to screen for potential therapeutic treatments.

Oral medications for central serous chorioretinopathy: a literature review

Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) is characterised by acute or chronic neurosensory detachments of the retina, usually in the posterior pole, with or without associated detachments of retinal pigment epithelium. Although the condition often resolves spontaneously, chronic and recurrent cases can lead to significant visual loss in the working population and it is thus increasingly recognised as an important public health issue. The uncertainty regarding the underlying cause of CSCR has led to a wide range of therapies being tried for this condition including photodynamic therapy, laser photocoagulation, anti-VEGF injections and a multitude of oral agents. This article aims to review the current evidence for oral agents that have been used for treatment of CSCR. A systematic literature search was conducted for articles published between 1980 to July 2018. A total of 73 articles were included. These studied the following oral medications: eplerenone, spironolactone, beta blockers, H. pylori agents, omeprazole, rifampicin, methotrexate, aspirin, acetazolamide, mifepristone, melatonin, finasteride, ketoconazole, antioxidants and curcumin phospholipid. Although none of the studies showed robust evidence of efficacy, the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, particularly eplerenone, appear to demonstrate the highest quality evidence for use in this condition. The review aims to give the reader an overview of the current available evidence for oral medications used in the treatment of CSCR in order to provide an evidence-based discussion with the patient and guide through possible options for treatment.

Eplerenone for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy in patients with active, previously untreated disease for more than 4 months (VICI): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

In chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR), fluid accumulates in the subretinal space. CSCR is a common visually disabling condition that develops in individuals up to 60 years of age, and there is no definitive treatment. Previous research suggests the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, eplerenone, is effective for treating CSCR; however, this drug is not licensed for the treatment of patients with CSCR. We aimed to evaluate whether eplerenone was superior to placebo in terms of improving visual acuity in patients with chronic CSCR.

METHODS

This randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre placebo-controlled trial was done at 22 hospitals in the UK. Participants were eligible if they were aged 18-60 years and had had treatment-naive CSCR for 4 months or more. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the eplerenone or the placebo group by a trial statistician through a password-protected system online. Allocation was stratified by best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and hospital. Patients were given either oral eplerenone (25 mg/day for 1 week, increasing to 50 mg/day for up to 12 months) plus usual care or placebo plus usual care for up to 12 months. All participants, care teams, outcome assessors, pharmacists, and members of the trial management group were masked to the treatment allocation. The primary outcome was BCVA, measured as letters read, at 12 months. All outcomes apart from safety were analysed on a modified intention-to-treat basis (participants who withdrew consent without contributing a post-randomisation BCVA measurement were excluded from the primary analysis population and from most secondary analysis populations). The trial is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN92746680, and is completed.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 11, 2017, and Feb 22, 2018, we enrolled and randomly assigned 114 patients to receive either eplerenone (n=57) or placebo (n=57). Three participants in the placebo group withdrew consent without contributing a post-randomisation BCVA measurement and were excluded from the primary outcome analysis population. All patients from the eplerenone group and 54 patients from the placebo group were included in the primary outcome. Modelled mean BCVA at 12 months was 79·5 letters (SD 4·5) in the placebo group and 80·4 letters (4·6) in the eplerenone group, with an adjusted estimated mean difference of 1·73 letters (95% CI -1·12 to 4·57; p=0·24) at 12 months. Hyperkalaemia occurred in eight (14%) patients in each group. No serious adverse events were reported in the eplerenone group and three unrelated serious adverse events were reported in the placebo group (myocardial infarction [anticipated], diverticulitis [unanticipated], and metabolic surgery [unanticipated]).

INTERPRETATION

Eplerenone was not superior to placebo for improving BCVA in people with chronic CSCR after 12 months of treatment. Ophthalmologists who currently prescribe eplerenone for CSCR should discontinue this practice.

FUNDING

Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Programme, and National Institute for Health Research and Social Care.

Effect of the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist eplerenone on liver fat and metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (MIRAD trial)

AIM

To investigate whether the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist eplerenone has beneficial effects on liver fat and metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist in type 2 diabetes (MIRAD) trial.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this 26-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we enrolled 140 patients with T2D and high risk of cardiovascular disease. Patients were randomized 1:1 to either eplerenone with a target dose of 200 mg/day for patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 60 mL/min per 1.73 m² or more and 100 mg/day for patients with eGFR between 41 and 59 mL/min per 1.73 m² or placebo. The primary outcome measure was change in liver fat by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy at week 26 from baseline; secondary outcomes were changes in metabolism, and safety by incident hyperkalaemia.

RESULTS

No changes in liver fat in the eplerenone group 0.91% (95% CI -0.57 to 2.39) or the placebo group -1.01% (-2.23 to 0.21) were found. The estimated absolute treatment difference was 1.92% (-3.81 to 0.01; P = 0.049). There was no beneficial impact on supporting secondary outcome variables of metabolism as fat mass distribution, lipid metabolism or insulin resistance. Despite a high dosage of eplerenone 164 versus 175 mg in patients treated with placebo (P = 0.228), the number of patients with incident hyperkalaemia (≥5.5 mmol/L) was low, with six in the eplerenone versus two in the placebo group (P = 0.276).

CONCLUSION

The addition of high doses of eplerenone to background antidiabetic and antihypertensive therapy does not show beneficial effects on liver fat and metabolism in patients with T2D.

[Antifibrotic renal role of mineralcorticoid receptor antagonists]

Cardiovascular and renal diseases are one of the main health problems in all industrialized countries. Their incidence is constantly increasing due to the aging of the population and the greater prevalence of obesity and type 2 diabetes. Clinical evidence suggests that aldosterone and the activation of mineralocorticoid receptors (MR) have a role in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular and renal diseases. Moreover, clinical studies demonstrate the benefits of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) on mortality and progression of heart and kidney disease. In addition to renal effects on body fluid homeostasis, aldosterone has multiple extrarenal effects including the induction of inflammation, vascular rigidity, collagen formation and stimulation of fibrosis. Given the fundamental role of MR activation in renal and cardiac fibrosis, effective and selective blocking of the signal with MRAs can be used in the clinical practice to prevent or slow down the progression of heart and kidney diseases. The aim of the present work is to review the role of MRAs in light of the new evidence as well as its potential use as an antifibrotic in chronic kidney disease (CKD). The initial clinical results suggest that MRAs are potentially useful in treating patients with chronic kidney disease, particularly in cases of diabetic nephropathy. We don't yet have efficacy and safety data on the progression of kidney disease up to the end stage (ESRD) and filling this gap represents an important target for future trials.

Effects of eplerenone on blood pressure and glucose metabolism in Japanese hypertensives with overweight or obesity

OBJECTIVE

The impact of aldosterone blockade using eplerenone on hypertensives with obesity has not been clarified. We compared the efficacy and safety between eplerenone and trichlormethiazide in hypertensives with overweight or obesity.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, open-labeled, blinded-endpoint design, multicenter trial enrolled 204 hypertension-treated outpatients with obesity [body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m] evaluated by ambulatory blood pressure (BP) measurement. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 50 mg of eplerenone (n = 102) or 1 mg of trichlormethiazide (n = 102), each of which were administered once every morning. Primary efficacy endpoints were systolic and diastolic BPs and biomarkers of glucose metabolism after 6 months of treatment.

RESULTS

At baseline, BPs were comparable between the two groups. Systolic/diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP) were reduced from 153.9 ± 12.6/84.6 ± 11.8 to 129.8 ± 14.2/73.7 ± 12.2 mm Hg by eplerenone therapy and from 152.2 ± 12.5/85.2 ± 10.9 to 133.8 ± 12.6/76.1 ± 8.6 mm Hg by trichlormethiazide therapy (all; P < .001). The efficacy of SBP reduction after adjustment for age, sex, and BMI was significantly greater in the eplerenone group than the trichlormethiazide (P = .034), although the efficacy of DBP reduction was marginally significant (P = .072). Especially, the efficacy of BP reduction was more effective for aged over 65 years than less than 65 years. However, biomarkers of glucose metabolism were not significantly different between these 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

The eplerenone therapy was more effective in BP lowering in hypertensives with overweight or obesity than the trichlormethiazide therapy, especially in the elderly.

Interventions for preventing and treating cardiac complications in Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy and X-linked dilated cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

The dystrophinopathies include Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD), and X-linked dilated cardiomyopathy (XLDCM). In recent years, co-ordinated multidisciplinary management for these diseases has improved the quality of care, with early corticosteroid use prolonging independent ambulation, and the routine use of non-invasive ventilation signficantly increasing survival. The next target to improve outcomes is optimising treatments to delay the onset or slow the progression of cardiac involvement and so prolong survival further.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of interventions for preventing or treating cardiac involvement in DMD, BMD, and XLDCM, using measures of change in cardiac function over six months.

SEARCH METHODS

On 16 October 2017 we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase, and on 12 December 2017, we searched two clinical trials registries. We also searched conference proceedings and bibliographies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered only randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs and randomised cross-over trials for inclusion. In the Discussion, we reviewed open studies, longitudinal observational studies and individual case reports but only discussed studies that adequately described the diagnosis, intervention, pretreatment, and post-treatment states and in which follow-up lasted for at least six months.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently reviewed the titles and abstracts identified from the search and performed data extraction. All three authors assessed risk of bias independently, compared results, and decided which trials met the inclusion criteria. They assessed the certainty of evidence using GRADE criteria.

MAIN RESULTS

We included five studies (N = 205) in the review; four studies included participants with DMD only, and one study included participants with DMD or BMD. All studied different interventions, and meta-analysis was not possible. We found no studies for XLDCM. None of the trials reported cardiac function as improved or stable cardiac versus deteriorated.The randomised first part of a two-part study of perindopril (N = 28) versus placebo (N = 27) in boys with DMD with normal heart function at baseline showed no difference in the number of participants with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF%) of less than 45% after three years of therapy (n = 1 in each group; risk ratio (RR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07 to 15.77). This result is uncertain because of study limitations, indirectness and imprecision. In a non-randomised follow-up study, after 10 years, more participants who had received placebo from the beginning had reduced LVEF% (less than 45%). Adverse event rates were similar between the placebo and treatment groups (low-certainty evidence).A study comparing treatment with lisinopril versus losartan in 23 boys newly diagnosed with Duchenne cardiomyopathy showed that after 12 months, both were equally effective in preserving or improving LVEF% (lisinopril 54.6% (standard deviation (SD) 5.19), losartan 55.2% (SD 7.19); mean difference (MD) -0.60% CI -6.67 to 5.47: N = 16). The certainty of evidence was very low because of very serious imprecision and study limitations (risk of bias). Two participants in the losartan group were withdrawn due to adverse events: one participant developed an allergic reaction, and a second exceeded the safety standard with a fall in ejection fraction greater than 10%. Authors reported no other adverse events related to the medication (N = 22; very low-certainty evidence).A study comparing idebenone versus placebo in 21 boys with DMD showed little or no difference in mean change in cardiac function between the two groups from baseline to 12 months; for fractional shortening the mean change was 1.4% (SD 4.1) in the idebenone group and 1.6% (SD 2.6) in the placebo group (MD -0.20%, 95% CI -3.07 to 2.67, N = 21), and for ejection fraction the mean change was -1.9% (SD 9.8) in the idebenone group and 0.4% (SD 5.5) in the placebo group (MD -2.30%, 95% CI -9.18 to 4.58, N = 21). The certainty of evidence was very low because of study limitations and very serious imprecision. Reported adverse events were similar between the treatment and placebo groups (low-certainty evidence).A multicentre controlled study added eplerenone or placebo to 42 patients with DMD with early cardiomyopathy but preserved left ventricular function already established on ACEI or ARB therapy. Results showed that eplerenone slowed the rate of decline of magnetic resonance (MR)-assessed left ventricular circumferential strain at 12 months (eplerenone group median 1.0%, interquartile range (IQR) 0.3 to -2.2; placebo group median 2.2%, IQR 1.3 to -3.1%; P = 0.020). The median decline in LVEF over the same period was also less in the eplerenone group (-1.8%, IQR -2.9 to 6.0) than in the placebo group (-3.7%, IQR -10.8 to 1.0; P = 0.032). We downgraded the certainty of evidence to very low for study limitations and serious imprecision. Serious adverse events were reported in two patients given placebo but none in the treatment group (very low-certainty evidence).A randomised placebo-controlled study of subcutaneous growth hormone in 16 participants with DMD or BMD showed an increase in left ventricular mass after three months' treatment but no significant improvement in cardiac function. The evidence was of very low certainty due to imprecision, indirectness, and study limitations. There were no clinically significant adverse events (very low-certainty evidence).Some studies were at risk of bias, and all were small. Therefore, although there is some evidence from non-randomised data to support the prophylactic use of perindopril for cardioprotection ahead of detectable cardiomyopathy, and for lisinopril or losartan plus eplerenone once cardiomyopathy is detectable, this must be considered of very low certainty. Findings from non-randomised studies, some of which have been long term, have led to the use of these drugs in daily clinical practice.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on the available evidence from RCTs, early treatment with ACE inhibitors or ARBs may be comparably beneficial for people with a dystrophinopathy; however, the certainty of evidence is very low. Very low-certainty evidence indicates that adding eplerenone might give additional benefit when early cardiomyopathy is detected. No clinically meaningful effect was seen for growth hormone or idebenone, although the certainty of the evidence is also very low.

A comparison of the effects of selective and non-selective mineralocorticoid antagonism on glucose homeostasis of heart failure patients with glucose intolerance or type II diabetes: A randomized controlled double-blind trial

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) decrease morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure (HF). However, spironolactone, a non-selective MRA, has been shown to exert a harmful effect on glucose homeostasis. The objective of this multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blind trial was to compare the effects of spironolactone to those of the selective MRA eplerenone on glucose homeostasis among 62 HF patients with glucose intolerance or type II diabetes. Trial registration number:NCT01586442.

Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Evaluate Effects of Eplerenone on Metabolic and Inflammatory Indices in HIV

CONTEXT

HIV-infected individuals demonstrate increased renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activation in association with visceral adiposity, insulin resistance, and inflammation. A physiologically based treatment approach targeting mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) blockade may improve metabolic and inflammatory indices in HIV.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate effects of eplerenone on insulin sensitivity, inflammatory indices, and other metabolic parameters in HIV.

DESIGN

Six-month, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

SETTING

Academic clinical research center.

PARTICIPANTS

HIV-infected individuals with increased waist circumference and abnormal glucose homeostasis.

INTERVENTION

Eplerenone 50 mg or placebo daily.

OUTCOME

The primary end point was change in insulin sensitivity measured by the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp technique. Secondary end points included change in body composition and inflammatory markers.

RESULTS

Forty-six individuals were randomized to eplerenone (n = 25) vs placebo (n = 21). Eplerenone did not improve insulin sensitivity [0.48 (-1.28 to 1.48) vs 0.43 (-1.95 to 2.55) mg/min/μIU/mL insulin; P = 0.71, eplerenone vs placebo] when measured by the gold standard euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp technique. Intramyocellular lipids (P = 0.04), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (P = 0.04), and high-density lipoprotein (P = 0.04) improved among those randomized to eplerenone vs placebo. Trends toward decreases in interleukin-6 (P = 0.10) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (P = 0.10) were also seen with eplerenone vs placebo. Plasma renin activity and aldosterone levels increased in the eplerenone vs placebo-treated group, demonstrating expected physiology. MR antagonism with eplerenone was well tolerated among the HIV population, with no considerable changes in blood pressure or potassium.

CONCLUSION

MR blockade may improve selected metabolic and inflammatory indices in HIV-infected individuals. Further studies are necessary to understand the clinical potential of MR antagonism in HIV.