Pain in persons who are marginalized by social conditions

A retrospective review of psychosocial correlates of chronic pain in cisgender, transgender, and gender-diverse youth receiving evaluation in interdisciplinary pediatric pain clinics

Background

Individuals who experience social marginalization, such as transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) youth, have increased risk for poor health outcomes, including chronic pain. A better understanding of the impact of chronic pain in these populations would improve treatment and aid in reducing health care disparities. Our retrospective review of clinical data examined psychosocial correlates of pain in TGD and cisgender youth with chronic pain.

Aims

The study aim was to explore differences in psychosocial variables between TGD and cisgender youth with chronic pain. In alignment with the minority stress model, we hypothesized worse pain and pain-related disability, poorer quality of life, and more internalizing symptoms in TGD patients. The secondary aim was to explore associations among psychosocial variables in TGD and cisgender youth.

Methods

Data were collected from 140 youth (48 TGD, 92 cisgender) evaluated in pediatric pain clinics. Independent samples t-tests examined group differences in pain intensity, functional disability, quality of life, pain catastrophizing, and internalizing symptoms. Bivariate correlations were conducted for each group, and differences in the strength of correlations were evaluated using Fisher r-to-z. Institutional review board (IRB) approval was obtained for all study procedures at each participating institution prior to extraction of retrospective clinical data (Indiana 240 University IRB Protocol No. 12506, The Ohio State University College of Medicine IRB Protocol No. 16-00937). Informed consent was not required or obtained due to the retrospective nature of the study.

Results

Cisgender patients reported worse pain intensity, whereas TGD patients reported lower quality of life and more internalizing symptoms. In the combined sample, pain intensity was correlated with worse functional disability, poorer quality of life, and more catastrophic thinking. No group differences in the strength of correlations were found.

Conclusions

Results suggest that for TGD youth with chronic pain, internalizing symptoms and quality of life are important targets for treatment and improvement.

The effect of online social support on experimental pain

Ample evidence shows that in-person social support can alleviate both acute and chronic pain complaints. However, less is known about the effectiveness of online social support. Disparities in availability of and access to in-person social support could make online social support a promising and cost-effective alternative. To this end we aimed to compare the effects of online versus in-person social support on pain induced with a cold-pressor task (CPT). Specifically, 62 pain-free female participants immersed their feet in cold water (1) alone, (2) in the physical presence of a supportive other, (3) while chatting with the supportive other online, and (4) while chatting online with a stranger, in a randomized order. We assessed self-reported pain intensity, pain unpleasantness, and threat value of pain, as well as pain tolerance (i.e. immersion time) and heart rate. Overall, pain intensity and unpleasantness ratings were higher in the alone condition compared to the other conditions. A similar pattern was found in pain tolerance, but the differences were not statistically significant. Heart rate increased during the CPT but was highest in the in-person support condition. Moreover, recovery after cold water immersion was slower in the alone condition compared to the other conditions. In sum, interaction with a supportive other or a stranger, be it online or in-person, led to a reduction in acute pain compared to being alone. This study presents initial evidence that online interaction with others might be an effective alternative to in-person social support in order to reduce acute pain in women. PERSPECTIVE: Online and in-person social support were equally effective in reducing acute experimental cold-pressor pain compared to being alone. There was no difference between social support from strangers or a supportive other.

Equity Using Interventions for Pain and Depression (EQUIPD): A pilot randomized trial

Despite increased calls for improved health equity, Black patients continue to experience worse pain and associated outcomes. Black patients are also offered fewer pain treatment options than White patients and report poorer quality communication with clinicians, including lower participation in shared decision-making. Comorbid depressive symptoms can impede effective pain management and participation in decision-making. The Equity Using Interventions for Pain and Depression (EQUIPD; NCT05695209) pilot study examined feasibility of a one-on-one coaching intervention, paired with a decision aid, to facilitate shared decision-making about evidence-based nonpharmacological pain treatments for Black patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain and symptoms of at least mild depression. We recruited and randomized 30 participants at a rate of 7.5 per month, with 90% retention at 3 months and 87% at 6 months. Intervention participation was high, with 94% of participants completing at least 3 of 4 coaching sessions. Fidelity was also high. Although not powered for effectiveness, most outcomes, including pain interference, depression, anxiety, patient engagement, and shared decision-making, improved, favoring the intervention, with effect sizes ranging from 0.30-0.75 at 3 months. Results indicate that EQUIPD holds promise as an intervention to support autonomy and shared decision-making for Black patients with chronic pain and elevated depressive symptoms. PERSPECTIVE: The EQUIPD intervention, which included one-on-one coaching combined with a decision aid to increase shared decision-making about nonpharmacological pain treatments, was feasible and shows promise in improving pain and related outcomes for Black patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain and depressive symptoms.

Disparities, Inequities, and Injustices in Populations With Pain: Nursing Recommendations Supporting ASPMN's 2024 Position Statement

The American Society for Pain Management Nursing (ASPMN) upholds the principle that all persons with pain have equal rights to evidence-based, high quality pain assessment, management, and treatment. This practice recommendation's goals are to 1) summarize known pain-related disparities, inequities, and injustices among commonly marginalized and at risk groups, 2) offer recommendations to ascertain that just and equitable pain care is provided to all people, and 3) outline a call to action for all nurses to embrace diversity, equity, inclusion, and a sense of belonging in order to mitigate pain-related disparities, inequities, and injustices within clinical environments and the nursing profession. This paper provides background and rationale for the 2024 ASPMN position statement on disparities, inequities and injustices in people with pain.

COVID-19 and chronic pain: Implications and lessons learned

The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly impacted people with chronic pain, affecting their access to pain management services and the social fabric of society. Here we review evidence indicating that during and since the pandemic (1) the overall prevalence and burden of chronic pain has increased, (2) social threats such as social isolation, abuse and neglect, and disparities in access to pain management, have increased, and these changes are associated with worsening pain and pain-related health outcomes, and (3) there has been a surge in research into telehealth interventions for chronic pain, with promising results. We conclude with a discussion of lessons that may guide future research and care for people with chronic pain in a post-COVID world.

The multi-dimensional stigma of chronic pain: A narrative review

Accumulating evidence suggests that stigma is a pervasive and pernicious psychosocial phenomenon that affects people living with chronic pain. In this narrative review, we describe the nature of stigma experienced by people with chronic pain and discuss its multifaceted determinants. These determinants include features of pain itself and intersectional factors, including comorbid conditions and social marginalization. We review the current state of the evidence on the association between stigma and chronic pain-related functioning, highlighting avenues for future research. Building on evidence from other health conditions, we identify multifaceted approaches to intervention that address all levels of the socio-ecological system which contribute to stigma and its negative impacts on people with pain.

Social Determinants of Chronic Pain Management for People Who Use Drugs: An Ethics of Care Approach

This study explored the social determinants of chronic pain management among people who use drugs, focusing on the ethical notions shaping care-giving and the social contexts in which they operate. It draws on qualitative data from interviews with people who were currently using drugs and had chronic pain, recruited in Uyo, Nigeria. Narratives show how pain-related disability adversely impacted participants' livelihoods by hampering their ability to perform daily tasks. They also show how care-giving, informed by the ethical duty of care in nursing/healthcare professions and traditions of informal care, shaped the experience and meanings of chronic pain and helped participants overcome barriers to healthcare. Care-giving was situationally undermined by the ethics of justice where chronic pain was seen as retribution for moral deviance and participants were deemed undeserving of care. The study contributes to the literature on chronic pain management among people who use drugs by showing how stigma undermines professional and informal care ethics through reframing chronic pain as retribution and care as something to be earned, rather than an ethical duty. It concludes by reflecting on the implications for nursing and healthcare practice and calling for interventions to tackle stigma and improve pain management for these persons.

Using intensive longitudinal assessment to study mechanisms of the Native American pain inequity among persons experiencing depression and/or anxiety: The role of interpersonal discrimination and stress

Native Americans (NA) experience higher rates of chronic pain than other U.S. racial/ethnic groups. Our research has indicated discrimination and stress play a role in chronic pain onset. However, chronic pain research has mostly relied on retrospective reports that may be impacted by recall bias. The current study was a secondary analysis of data from 208 NA, 206 Black, 202 Latinx, and 206 non-Hispanic White (NHW) participants from an efficacy trial of a mobile health intervention for depression and anxiety. Participants were prompted to complete 6 months of twice daily ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) that included stress and pain. Discrimination was assessed at baseline. Pain EMAs were used to reduce recall bias and estimate chronic pain prevalence. Dynamic structural equation modeling assessed the impact of race/ethnicity and discrimination on stress-pain relationships, as well as pain and stress dynamics. To assess chronic pain (pain ≥3-months), participants had to complete ≥3-months of consecutive EMAs, leaving 578 participants available for primary analyses (there were no racial/ethnic differences in EMA completion). Results showed NAs had the highest rate of chronic pain that was statistically significantly higher than NHW and Black participants. Controlling discrimination eliminated the NA-NHW, but not the NA-Black, pain inequity. Moreover, a reciprocal stress-pain relationship was found and was stronger in NAs than other groups. Discrimination did not exacerbate stress-pain relationships but was associated with higher rates of chronic pain and greater pain fluctuations, regardless of race/ethnicity. These findings indicate that targeting stress and discrimination could help reduce the NA pain inequity. PERSPECTIVE: Native Americans experienced a self-reinforcing stress-pain cycle in which stress predicted future pain and pain predicted future stress. This cycle was stronger than Black, Latinx, and non-Hispanic White groups. Discrimination was associated with chronic pain but not stronger stress-pain relationships. These findings have implications for treatment.

Understanding the Interplay of Interpersonal Violence, Smoking, and Alcohol Consumption in Brazilian Adults: Evidence from a National Health Survey

Interpersonal violence (IV) in adulthood seems to be related to alcoholism and smoking. However, whether it reflects differently by gender and the frequency of exposure to these outcomes remains largely unexplored, particularly in developing countries. This study aimed to evaluate associations of acute and chronic IV exposure (physical, psychological, and sexual) with binge drinking and smoking, separately for men and women adults. Cross-sectional study, enrolled 72.597 participants, aged 18 to 64, from the Brazilian National Health Survey (NHS). The explanatory variables of interest were physical, sexual, and psychological exposure to IV in the last 12 months, whether once or some/many times. The dependent variables were binge drinking and smoking. The magnitudes of associations and their confidence Interval of 95% between each exposure and outcome were estimated using Poisson regression with robust variance. Sequential adjustments were made for age, race/skin color, marital status and sexual orientation, education, and income. After adjustment for all covariates, men exposed to physical, psychological (both once or some/many times), and sexual violence (only once) were associated with binge drinking and smoking (p < .05). Further, women exposed to any form of violence, whether once or some/many times, were associated with binge drinking (p < .05). However, remained related to smoking women exposed to physical (both once or some/many times) and psychological violence (only some/many times) (p < .05). Interestingly, any frequency of sexual violence remained not associated with smoking. Women's higher exposure to violence is strongly linked to binge drinking, particularly in cases of physical and psychological violence. Men exposed to violence also exhibit significant associations with binge drinking and smoking. These findings emphasize the complex interplay of gender, violence, and public health challenges in Brazil.

IUDs and pain control for adolescents and young adults

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are safe and effective for most adolescents and young adults (AYA) for both contraception and menstrual management. However, multiple barriers exist to placement, including procedure-associated pain. There has been a recent call to action for healthcare providers to optimize pain management strategies for IUD insertion.

RECENT FINDINGS

Approach to pain management for IUD insertion varies significantly among providers, and there is no standardized approach to comfort optimization. Several methods of pain control for IUD insertion, both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic, have been studied, though many have variable results.

SUMMARY

Approaching IUD insertion counseling through a lens of patient autonomy and reproductive justice will likely improve the patient experience and help providers to work toward enhancing comfort during the procedure. Further research is needed to determine optimal pain control strategies for IUD insertion.

Underserved older adults' treatment preferences for a mind-body activity program for chronic pain delivered via shared medical visits in a community clinic

Older adults with chronic pain from underserved communities need evidence-based pain management programs. To meet this need, we interviewed patients and staff from an underserved community clinic to identify their treatment preferences and barriers and facilitators to participating in a mind-body activity program. We conducted nine qualitative interviews (two staff; seven patients) and six focus groups (three staff groups; three patient groups), transcribed them verbatim and then used inductive-deductive thematic analysis guided by two pre-specified superordinate domains: (1) treatment preferences and (2) barriers and facilitators to participation. Participants recommended flexible, group participation options (in person, remote) with a credible leader and with multi-cultural considerations. They generally reacted positively to the proposed content. Barriers included logistical barriers (e.g. transportation, finances), weather, and skepticism about novel treatments; facilitators centered on expanding access and increasing sense of community. Our findings highlight important considerations to facilitate the uptake of mind-body activity programs for underserved older adults with chronic pain.

Tracking ambivalence: an existential critique of datafication in the context of chronic pain

In recent years, data-driven approaches to chronic pain care have increased dramatically. However, people living with chronic pain are ambivalent about datafication practices. Drawing on in-depth interviews with individuals living with chronic pain, I discuss and analyze this ambivalence. On the one hand, participants imbibe the promissory rhetoric of data as that which may organize and control the body in pain. On the other hand, they dismiss and critique the type of data collected. This micro-level analysis of the pain tracking experience illuminates a tension between datafication and chronic pain. Datafication demands that the patient relay information about their body that is free of ambiguity. However, chronic pain is ambiguous and full of paradox. This article illuminates the emotional chasm between datafication enthusiasts and chronic pain patients who track their pain and suggests that such enthusiasm may lead to bad faith.

Navigating the light and shadow of scientific publishing faced with machine learning and generative AI

BACKGROUND

The public release of ChatGPT in November 2022 sparked a boom and public interest in generative artificial intelligence (AI) that has led to journals and journal families hastily releasing generative AI policies, ranging from asking authors for acknowledgement or declaration to the outright banning of use.

RESULTS

Here, we briefly discuss the basics of machine learning, generative AI, and how it will affect scientific publishing. We focus especially on potential risks and benefits to the scientific community as a whole and journals specifically.

CONCLUSION

While the concerns of editors, for example about manufactured studies, are valid, some recently implemented or suggested policies will not be sustainable in the long run. The quality of generated text and code is quickly becoming so high that it will not only be impossible to detect the use of generative AI but would also mean taking a powerful tool away from researchers that can make their life easier every day.

SIGNIFICANCE

We discuss the history and current state of AI and highlight its relevance for medical publishing and pain research. We provide guidance on how to act now to increase good scientific practice in the world of ChatGPT and call for a task force focusing on improving publishing pain research with use of generative AI.

The burden of chronic pain in transgender and gender diverse populations: Evidence from a large US clinical database

BACKGROUND

Chronic pain, affecting approximately 20% of the global population, is the leading cause of disability worldwide. Transgender individuals are disproportionately exposed to chronic pain risk factors compared with the cisgender population. This study compares the incidence of chronic pain between transgender and cisgender individuals and examines the impact of gender affirming hormone therapy, anxiety, and depression on chronic pain.

METHODS

The study analysed medical records data of 56,470 transgender men and 41,882 transgender women in the TrinetX database. Six cohorts were created: transgender women either receiving oestrogen or no intervention, transgender men receiving testosterone or no intervention and cohorts of cisgender males and females. Unmatched age-adjusted incidence rates were calculated. Then cohorts were matched on 22 chronic pain-associated covariates and the rate of new chronic pain diagnoses was compared between those receiving hormone therapy and those without.

RESULTS

We observed significantly higher rates of chronic pain among transgender individuals compared with cisgender counterparts. Transgender men on testosterone therapy and transgender women on oestrogen therapy exhibited an increased likelihood of chronic pain diagnoses compared with those not receiving hormone therapy. Individuals with anxiety and depression were more likely to be diagnosed with chronic pain.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates a significant burden of chronic pain in transgender individuals, with an increased risk among those receiving hormone therapy. Our study, the first to assess chronic pain in a large cohort of transgender patients, provides support for a potential association between hormone therapy and risk of chronic pain diagnosis. Further research is required to understand causal mechanisms and to develop improved screening and management of chronic pain in transgender populations.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

Our study, featuring the largest cohort of Transgender and Gender Diverse (TGD) individuals assembled to date, reveals critical disparities in chronic pain among TGD populations, notably those on hormone therapy, compared with the cisgender population. It highlights the urgent need for specialized screening and treatment for this vulnerable population, and research into hormone therapy's impact on pain. These insights aim to foster more effective, personalized healthcare, enhancing the well-being and quality of life for the TGD community.

Experiences of Gender-Diverse Youth Living With Chronic Pain

BACKGROUND

Although sex differences in pain are well documented, little is known regarding the relationship between gender and pain. Gender-diverse youth experience unique pain risk factors, including minority stress exposure, but are underrepresented in research.

OBJECTIVE

Elicit experiences of gender-diverse youth who live with chronic pain.

METHODS

Semistructured interviews were conducted with youth virtually using Zoom. Youth were recruited from a Canadian tertiary care pediatric hospital, community-based clinics, and the general population. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed with a patient partner using reflexive thematic analysis, integrating relevant existing theoretical and empirical models for understanding gender and pain, identity development, minority stress, and intersectionality.

RESULTS

The final sample included 19 youth who represented a variety of gender identities and pain conditions and reported accessing a range of types and levels of care. Three themes were identified through qualitative analysis: (1) the fight to legitimize both their pain and gender, (2) the tension between affirming gender and managing pain and the role of gender euphoria as a buffer against pain, and (3) the role of intersecting (eg, neurodiversity and race) identities in understanding gender-diverse youths' pain experiences.

CONCLUSIONS

In a diverse sample of gender-diverse youth who live with chronic pain, experiences of invalidation and difficulty managing pain were experienced in the context of unique stressors and sources of joy in living as a gender-diverse individual. These results point to the need for more intersectional and affirming pain research and integration of findings into clinical practice.

Overdose risk environment for people who use drugs in New Jersey: Imagining possible points of intervention for harm reduction practitioners

Background

The Risk Environment Framework is widely utilized theoretical framework for understanding the landscape of harm for people who use drugs (PWUD). This study sought to understand factors contributing to risk of overdose for PWUD in New Jersey. Understanding these factors can lead to improved policy interventions, programmatic targets, and a shared understanding that overdose risk is impacted by larger societal forces influencing PWUD.

Methods

Using a community based participatory design model, this study conducted 30 semi-structured, in-depth interviews with PWUD and naloxone distributors in New Brunswick and Newark, New Jersey from February to November of 2022. Thematic analysis was performed using a collaborative analytical approach.

Results

Risk factors for overdose fell into all four categories of Rhodes's Risk Environment Framework - physical, social, economic, and policy. Many factors overlapped in multiple categories, and most factors had elements existing at both the macro and micro levels.

Conclusions

Interventions supporting PWUD should see overdose risk as an environmental, structural consideration, and be constructed to address comprehensive risks, rather than directing themselves exclusively at the individual level. Factors contributing to risk at the macro level included systemic and institutional concerns and stigma toward PWUD. At the micro level, mental health, substance use behaviors, treatment and recovery, and trauma were cited as potential risk factors.

Feasibility of trancutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation in Black and Hispanic/Latino people with peripheral neuropathy

Introduction

Peripheral neuropathy (PN) is the most common neurodegenerative disorder, and the primary causes are chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) and diabetic neuropathy (DN). Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) is a promising non-pharmacological and non-invasive intervention that targets key pathways involved with PN. However, research is needed to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and effects of taVNS in people with PN. It is also critical that this research on taVNS include the perspectives of Black and Hispanic/Latino patients, who are often underrepresented in research.

Methods

This research was comprised of two consecutive studies: a survey and a pilot randomized sham-controlled trial (RCT). The survey assessed symptom burden, management strategies, and interest in taVNS among CIPN patients. The pilot RCT evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of taVNS in Black and Hispanic/Latino patients with CIPN or diabetic neuropathy. Participants were recruited from the University of Miami medical system, with culturally sensitive approaches to enhance minority participation.

Results

The survey included 62 respondents, 78% Black or Hispanic/Latino, revealing high symptom burden and significant interest in taVNS (82% expressed moderate to high interest). The pilot RCT enrolled 28 participants, achieving a 42% recruitment rate and 86% retention. taVNS was well tolerated, with no significant adverse effects. Preliminary data indicated a decrease in neuropathic symptoms and an increased heart rate variability (HRV) during active taVNS, suggesting autonomic modulation. Tingling sensation and pain decreased by median values of 2.0 and 1.5, respectively. Additionally, the median values for standard deviation of the RR interval increased from 34.9 (CI = 21.6-44.8) at baseline to 44.8 (CI = 26.5-50.3) during intervention. Exit interviews highlighted positive participant experiences and identified potential barriers, such as protocol length and distrust in medical research.

Conclusion

The findings underscore the need for novel CIPN treatments and demonstrate the feasibility of conducting taVNS research in historically underrepresented populations. High interest in taVNS and successful recruitment and retention rates suggest that culturally sensitive approaches can enhance minority participation in clinical trials. These findings will be used to develop a large clinical trial to determine the efficacy of repeated taVNS in a diverse cohort.

Clinical Trial Registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov, identifier (NCT05896202).

Development of a Research Program Focused on Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for Peripheral Neuropathy in Minoritized Communities

Black and Hispanic/Latino communities experience disproportionate chronic pain and are underrepresented in pain research. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are promising tools for pain management. Therefore, it is critical to ensure that research using these tools engages underrepresented communities to make research findings more generalizable and reach all who may benefit. Lack of diversity in the research workforce itself is a key barrier to improving Black and Hispanic/Latino representation in pain research, and video-enhanced recruitment and consenting may be a useful tool to better engage minoritized communities. Using community participatory research principles in an iterative process, we engaged key stakeholders, including neuromodulation researchers and minoritized community members, to create and test informational videos on taVNS and TMS. These videos were designed for Black English-speaking, Hispanic/Latino Spanish-speaking, and Haitian-Creole speaking people with chronic pain. Study 1 involved iterative feedback from stakeholders to develop test videos, which were then refined based on community member input. Study 2 was a pilot randomized controlled trial assessing the impact of these videos on participant expectations for pain relief with taVNS. Results indicated that the videos were well-received, and there was no significant difference in expectancy scores between those who viewed the videos and those who received traditional brochures. This suggests that while videos may improve engagement, they do not unduly influence expectations, potentially making them valuable tools for improving research participation in underrepresented populations. These videos will be freely available to help researchers to engage people from minority communities.

PERSPECTIVE

This article presents the process of developing culturally sensitive informational videos on taVNS and TMS, and provides the field with these videos in English, Spanish, and Haitian-Creole language. These videos could potentially help researchers to engage people from minority communities to enhance the diversity and reach of research using noninvasive brain stimulation for pain.

Enhancing the health and well-being of international students: insights from changes in their lifestyle post-COVID-19

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic's global impact has been profound, particularly for vulnerable populations, such as asylum seekers, refugees, and immigrants. Likewise, international students, who fall under the immigrant category umbrella, have faced considerable challenges throughout the pandemic. This study aimed to identify insights for enhancing Japanese international students' health and well-being by investigating how epidemic prevention policies implemented by schools and the government influenced changes in their lifestyles during the post-pandemic era.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews were conducted and inductive thematic analysis performed using NVivo software, to investigate the lifestyle changes of 20 (8 male and 12 female) international students (mean age: 31.5 years) at Hiroshima University, Japan, during the post-pandemic era.

Results

The analysis revealed alterations in lifestyle habits and interpersonal relationships in the aftermath of the pandemic, with most international students continuing to practice some of the epidemic prevention and health behaviors they had adopted during the pandemic, including handwashing (n = 10), mask-wearing (n = 12), and physical distancing (n = 4), as a matter of habit. However, some of these epidemic prevention and health behaviors have not persisted as habits after the pandemic. However, there has been an increased emphasis on maintaining family relationships (n = 5).

Discussion

Addressing language and information dissemination barriers that international students may encounter when accessing medical services, and providing them with employment guidance and support more suited to their current situation, are conducive to enhancing their health and well-being. Additionally, enhancing international students' public awareness is crucial for safeguarding their health and preparing them for potential future public health emergencies.

"Play!": Combatting Pathocentric Epistemic Injustice in Chronic Pain Care

Epistemic injustice is an analytical framework that is used to describe a wrong done to someone in their capacity as a knower. Epistemic injustice is well-documented across the healthcare spectrum, particularly in relation to the patient's capacity to understand, and thus derive meaning from, the experience of illness. This article contributes to the body of scholarship exploring how to achieve pathocentric epistemic justice by way of ethnographic case study. Findings draw on fieldwork conducted at a small, publicly funded chronic pain clinic. At MB clinic, pain care is delivered in a group setting. Patients and doctor exhibit a playful attitude: they lean into uncertainty, tell jokes, and eschew the concept of mastery. This produces an epistemic environment that departs from the kind critiqued in studies wherein epistemic injustice is present. By way of case study, this article provides support for the broad claim that there is a link between playfulness and epistemic well-being. Therefore, playfulness may be applied as a strategy to combat pathocentric epistemic injustice.

Using the Socioecological Model to Understand Medical Staff and Older Adult Patients' Experience with Chronic Pain: A Qualitative Study in an Underserved Community Setting

Purpose

Chronic pain is highly prevalent and disabling for older adults, particularly those from underserved communities. However, there is an absence of research on how contextual (eg, community/societal) factors interact with pain for these patients. Informed by the socio-ecological model, this study aimed to elucidate the individual, interpersonal, community, and societal factors associated with chronic pain from the perceptions of older adult patients and medical staff in a community clinic.

Patients and Methods

In this qualitative study, we conducted four focus groups and two interviews with medical staff (n=25) and three focus groups and seven individual interviews with older adult patients with chronic pain (n=18). Participants were recruited using purposive sampling from an ethnically and economically diverse primary care clinic in the greater Boston community. We transcribed assessments and thematically analyzed data using a hybrid deductive-inductive approach.

Results

At the individual level, we identified three themes: (1) older adults with complex care needs, (2) impact of pain (including on physical, emotional, work, and identity functioning), and (3) coping with pain. At the interpersonal level, complex relationships with (1) social supports and (2) medical staff emerged as themes. The need for (1) resources and (2) culturally informed care was identified at the community level, and socioeconomic status impacting the availability of resources for managing chronic pain emerged for the societal domain.

Conclusion

Findings underscore the intersection of factors contributing to the experience of pain among older adults from underserved communities. Our findings highlight the need to develop and implement treatments that fully address the experience of older adults with chronic pain at the individual, interpersonal, community, and societal levels.

Burden of chronic pain among adult pastoralists in Ethiopia: a cross-sectional household survey

ABSTRACT

Chronic pain is a major global health problem. Untreated pain causes particular suffering in marginalized communities. Most studies investigating chronic pain in sub-Saharan Africa stem from South Africa and Nigeria. Pastoralists are particularly underrepresented in pain research. The main objective of this study is to investigate the burden of chronic pain in adult pastoralists in the Somali Regional State of Ethiopia. We conducted a cross-sectional household survey among adult pastoralists (aged 18 years or older, N = 299) by face-to-face interviews. To randomly select households, we applied GPS-based household localization and recruitment. Chronic pain was self-reported by 17.0% (95% CI: 10.8-25.7) of male and 34.7% (95% CI: 28.4-41.5) of female adult pastoralists. The prevalence of chronic pain increased with age from 5.4% (95% CI: 0.8-30.1; 18-34 years) to 27.1% (95% CI: 15.1-43.7; 35-54 years) to 69.1% (95% CI: 53.7-81.1; 55 years and older). The body sites most commonly affected among those with chronic pain were knees (37.2%), followed by lower back (33.7%) and head (23.3%). The data for the first time provide insights into the burden of chronic pain among Somali pastoralists and reveal associated risk factors. The results support the planning of locally adapted health interventions for pastoralist-specific pain management considering the effects of chronic pain on pastoralists' daily lives.

Disparities Based on Demographic Features in the Intensity and Treatment of Chronic Pain in US Patients With Spinal Cord Injury

OBJECTIVE

Informed by Minority Stress Theory, to investigate disparities in pain intensity, interference, and care in patients with spinal cord injuries (SCI) based on demographic features.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey.

SETTING

Outpatient SCI clinics in 2 academic medical centers in the northwestern United States.

PARTICIPANTS

Sample of 242 SCI clinic patients who endorsed SCI-related pain, were ≥18-years-of-age, English-fluent, not diagnosed with bipolar or psychotic disorders, and able to make their own medical decisions. Participants were 74.8% men, an average of 48.5 years (range 18.1-89.8 years), 76.2% White, 31.9% privately insured, and 64.7% making <$50,000 per year.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Exploratory analyses of screening data from a randomized controlled trial for pain treatment. Primary outcomes included pain intensity, pain interference, and the patient report of recommended pain treatments by a medical provider, tried by the patient, or that the patient would be willing to try.

RESULTS

More treatments recommended was associated with younger age (ρ=-0.14, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.01 to -0.27, P=.03) and private insurance (ρ=-0.15, 95% CI: 0.02-0.27, P=.03), whereas more treatments tried was associated with private insurance alone (ρ=0.20, 95% CI: 0.07-0.32, P=.003). Number of treatments willing to be tried was associated with lower income (ρ=-0.15, 95% CI: -0.02 to -0.28, P=.03). SCI patients of color (PoC) reported higher pain intensity (Cohen's d=0.41, 95% CI: 0.11-0.71) and greater odds of receiving psychotherapy for pain (odds ratio: 7.12, 95% CI: 1.25-40.46) than their White peers.

CONCLUSIONS

These exploratory findings indicate differences in SCI-related pain intensity based on identifying as PoC, and differences in SCI-related pain treatment modalities based on identifying as PoC, age, insurance type, and income. Further work exploring differences in SCI-related pain care based on patient social identities is warranted.

Healthcare professionals' experiences of delivering pain science education to adults from ethnically minoritised groups

BACKGROUND

Pain Science Education (PSE) seeks to increase patients understanding of their pain, to improve clinical outcomes. It has been primarily developed and tested within western cultures. There is a lack of research exploring its use with people from ethnically minoritised groups.

OBJECTIVE

To explore Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) experiences of delivering PSE to people with persistent pain from ethnically minoritised groups.

METHODS

In this qualitative study semi-structured interviews were carried out with a convenience sample of 14 HCPs who routinely deliver PSE to patients from ethnically minoritised groups. The interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Three themes were identified: 1) Biomedical model or disengagement, 2) Pain is a taboo topic, and 3) The importance of cultural competence. Participants believed that people from ethnically minoritised groups disengaged with PSE sooner in comparison to non-ethnically minoritised groups and this was rooted in a strong biomedical understanding of pain and preference for biomedical treatments. Addressing patients' beliefs was deemed difficult as participants felt that pain was considered a taboo amongst some ethnically minoritised groups and HCPs lacked sufficient training in cultural competency to confidently address their pain-related misconceptions.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, HCPs found that many people from ethnically minoritised groups held strongly biomedical views and/or a cultural reluctance to discuss pain. These factors made pain discussions challenging leading to disengagement from PSE and a preference for passive care. Cultural competency training and access to culturally competent PSE resources may facilitate engagement with PSE for people from ethnically minoritised background.

Chronic pain and use of painkillers, healthcare services and long-term impairment among Syrian refugees: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

The global increase in forcibly displaced populations highlights the importance of understanding their health needs. Chronic pain is prevalent among refugees, poses significant personal and public health challenges, and complicates their integration into new home countries. Understanding refugees' pain post-migration and how it is being managed is crucial for ensuring adequate and timely interventions and fostering health equity. This paper explores the associations between pain levels and the use of painkillers, healthcare services, and long-term impairment among Syrian refugees with chronic pain, one year after their resettlement in Norway.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study is based on survey data collected from 353 quota refugees in 2018-19, one year after resettlement in Norway. The primary outcomes were the use of painkillers, the use of healthcare services, and long-term impairment, according to reported chronic pain levels. Associations between these outcomes and chronic pain levels were studied using Poisson regression, adjusted by sociodemographic variables and trauma experience.

RESULTS

Of the 353 adults included, 52% were women, and the median age was 36 years. A total of 5% reported very mild/mild, 10% moderate, and 12% strong/very strong chronic pain over the last four weeks. Significant associations were found between all chronic pain levels and use of non-prescription painkillers (adjusted relative risks (aRR) (95% CI)); mild (3.1 (2.0-4.7)), moderate (1.8 (1.1-2.8)), strong (1.7 (1.1-2.6)), and prescription painkillers; mild (4.6 (2.2-9.5)), moderate (5.6 (3.2-10.0)), strong (6.7 (3.9-11.3)), compared to those without chronic pain. Use of emergency rooms, specialist care, and hospitalization were significantly associated with strong chronic pain, with aRR (95% CI) of 2.0 (1.2-3.5), 3.9 (2.1-7.0) and 2.4 (1.3-4.4), respectively. Long-term impairment was strongly associated with chronic pain across all pain levels; mild (8.6 (5.6-13.49)), moderate (6.7 (4.3-10.5)) and strong (6.6 (4.3-10.4)).

CONCLUSION

Despite their young age, more than a quarter of the Syrian refugees in our study reported chronic pain one year after resettlement in Norway. High levels of pain were related to the use of medication, healthcare services, and long-term impairment. Understanding the dynamics of pain among refugees is crucial to ensure adequate and timely management.

Patient and staff perspectives on pain treatment experiences in a community clinic serving under-resourced older adults

AIMS

Chronic pain affects up to 37.8% of older adults with higher prevalence among those in under-resourced communities. While there are many treatments for chronic pain, there are complexities to treating under-resourced older adults in community clinics, including multimorbidity, barriers to treatment access, and varying degrees of openness to different treatment approaches. Understanding patient and clinic staff perceptions of treatment options for chronic pain is critical for implementing treatment approaches that will work sustainably in the community. This study aimed to understand clinic staff and patients' perspectives on chronic pain treatment experiences.

METHODS

Focus groups and individual interviews were analyzed using a hybrid inductive-deductive approach.

RESULTS

Themes are: (1) Limited patient and clinic resources and availability affecting pain treatment experiences (e.g., copays, transportation challenges, and conflicting responsibilities), (2) Discrepancies in patient and staff approaches to treatment and the importance of trialing different pain management techniques to alleviate pain (e.g., trialing multiple treatments with varied success), and (3) Conflict between patients' desire for pain elimination vs. staffs' focus on symptom reduction and function (e.g., patient-staff disconnect).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings are important for determining how treatments can best fit the needs of under-resourced older adults with chronic pain.

Social Determinants and Consequences of Pain: Toward Multilevel, Intersectional, and Life Course Perspectives

Despite wide endorsement of a biopsychosocial framework for pain, social aspects of pain remain rarely addressed in the context of pain prevention and management. In this review, we aim to 1) examine the broad scope of social determinants and consequences of pain and their interactions across multiple levels of organization, and 2) provide a framework synthesizing existing concepts and potential areas for future work on social aspects of pain, drawing upon socioecological, intersectional, and life course approaches. Integrating interdisciplinary theory and evidence, we outline pathways through which multilevel social factors and pain may affect each other over time. We also provide a brief summary of intrapersonal aspects of pain, which are thought to operate at the interface between individuals and the social context. Progressing from micro- to macrolevel factors, we illustrate how social determinants of pain can directly or indirectly contribute to pain experiences, expression, risk, prognosis, and impact across populations. We consider 1) at the interpersonal level, the roles of social comparison, social relatedness, social support, social exclusion, empathy, and interpersonal conflict; 2) at the group or community level, the roles of intimacy groups, task groups, social categories, and loose associations; and 3) at the societal level, the roles of political, economic, and cultural systems, as well as their policies and practices. We present examples of multilevel consequences of pain across these levels and discuss opportunities to reduce the burden and inequities of pain by expanding multilevel social approaches in pain research and practice. PERSPECTIVE: Despite wide endorsement of a biopsychosocial framework for pain, social aspects of pain are often unclearly defined, hindering their use in pain prevention, management, and research. We summarize the scope of social aspects of pain and provide a framework synthesizing existing concepts and potential areas for future work.

Examining the Relationship Between Chronic Pain and Mortality in U.S. Adults

Chronic pain (CP) significantly impacts quality of life and increases noncommunicable disease risk, with recent U.S. data showing a 6.3% incidence rate, surpassing diabetes, depression, and hypertension. International studies suggest higher mortality in CP populations, yet prior U.S. data are inconclusive. To investigate CP's mortality risk, we analyzed National Health Interview Survey and National Death Index data. We hypothesized that individuals with CP and high-impact CP (HICP [≥1 activity limitation]) would exhibit higher mortality rates. National Health Interview Survey provided demographics, pain reporting, lifestyle, and psychosocial data matched with National Death Index mortality records. Chi-square analyses explored the relationships between CP/HICP and demographics, lifestyle factors, psychosocial variables, and mortality. Cox proportional hazards models assessed mortality risk between groups. The weighted sample was 245,899,776; 20% reported CP and 8% HICP, both groups exhibiting higher mortality rates than pain-free individuals (CP: 5.55%, HICP: 8.79%, total: 2.82%). Hazard ratios indicated nearly double the mortality risk for CP and 2.5 times higher risk for HICP compared to those without these conditions. Adjusting for lifestyle and psychosocial factors reduced mortality risk but remained elevated compared with non-CP individuals. Heart disease, malignant neoplasms, and chronic lower respiratory diseases accounted for a higher percentage of deaths in CP cases. CP individuals showed higher rates of smoking, alcohol consumption, obesity, inactivity, depression, anxiety, emotional problems, and sleep disturbances. CP and HICP significantly influence mortality outcomes, leading to excess deaths compared with pain-free individuals. Given the relationship between pain, lifestyle, psychosocial variables, and mortality, further investigations are needed into CP causation and prevention strategies. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents evidence regarding the relationship between CP, HICP, and mortality. Additional findings are discussed regarding the impact of demographics, lifestyle, and psychosocial variables on mortality in those with versus without CP and HICP. These findings are crucial for informing future research, prevention, and healthcare management strategies.

Medical gendered racism and Black women's experiences of genito-pelvic pain/penetration disorder in the USA - A conceptual exploration

Medical gendered racism in the USA has been and continues to be a significant issue for Black women across various healthcare domains, including sexual and pelvic healthcare. The experiences of Black women with Genito-Pelvic Pain/Penetration Disorder, characterised by pain with sexual intercourse, are particularly understudied in relation to medical gendered racism. This paper advances existing research on Genito-Pelvic Pain/Penetration Disorder by employing Black feminist thought and intersectionality as theoretical frameworks. We seek to conceptualise how medical gendered racism impacts Black women's experiences with genito-pelvic pain and the quality of their healthcare. We offer a nuanced, culturally sensitive approach to doing so and to clinical practice, and provide actionable recommendations for healthcare professionals. This work aims to equip researchers and healthcare practitioners with the knowledge and tools to acknowledge, understand, and support effective treatment of genito-pelvic pain experienced by Black women in the USA.

Feasibility and acceptability of remote administration of the cold pressor test

Objective

Quantitative sensory testing is often used to investigate pain in the context of experimental and clinical research studies. However, many of the devices used for QST protocols are only available in resource rich environments, thereby inadvertently limiting the possible pool of participants. Development of remote protocols for appropriate QST measures has the potential to reduce barriers to participation in research.

Methods

Participants with insomnia and Crohn's disease were recruited as part of a clinical trial. We adapted a remote version of the cold pressor test for use during telehealth-based study assessments. Herein, we present data from the baseline assessments including an assessment of feasibility and acceptability of the task.

Results

100% of participants (N = 28) were able to complete the remote cold pressor test using a combination of materials from their homes and mailed by the study team. Temperature changes during the test were minimal and fairly evenly balanced between increases and decreases. Correlations between submersion time and both general and disease specific pain trended toward significance.

Conclusions

We demonstrated that a remote version of the cold pressor test is feasible and acceptable in a clinical population and provided a step-by-step protocol for administration to facilitate use in other studies.

Concepts and Approaches in the Management of Transgender and Gender-Diverse Patients

The terms transgender and gender diverse (TGD) describe persons whose gender is different from the sex assigned to them at birth. While TGD persons have experienced a rise in cultural and social visibility in recent decades, they continue to experience significant health inequities, including adverse health outcomes and multiple barriers to accessing medical care. Transgender and gender-diverse persons are at a higher risk for pain conditions than their cisgender counterparts, but research on chronic pain management for TGD persons is lacking. Clinicians from all disciplines must be informed of best practices for managing chronic pain in the TGD population. This includes all aspects of care including history, physical examination, diagnosis, treatment, and perioperative management. Many TGD persons report delaying or avoiding care because of negative interactions with medical practitioners who do not have sufficient training in navigating the specific health care needs of TGD patients. Furthermore, TGD persons who do seek care are often forced to educate their practitioners on their specific health care needs. This paper provides an overview of existing knowledge and recommendations for physicians to provide culturally and medically appropriate care for TGD persons.

Through the Lens of Movement-Evoked Pain: A Theoretical Framework of the "Pain-Movement Interface" to Guide Research and Clinical Care for Musculoskeletal Pain Conditions

Over 120 million Americans report experiencing pain in the past 3 months. Among these individuals, 50 million report chronic pain and 17 million report pain that limits daily life or work activities on most days (ie, high-impact chronic pain). Musculoskeletal pain conditions in particular are a major contributor to global disability, health care costs, and poor quality of life. Movement-evoked pain (MEP) is an important and distinct component of the musculoskeletal pain experience and represents an emerging area of study in pain and rehabilitation fields. This focus article proposes the "Pain-Movement Interface" as a theoretical framework of MEP that highlights the interface between MEP, pain interference, and activity engagement. The goal of the framework is to expand knowledge about MEP by guiding scientific inquiry into MEP-specific pathways to disability, high-risk clinical phenotypes, and underlying individual influences that may serve as treatment targets. This framework reinforces the dynamic nature of MEP within the context of activity engagement, participation in life and social roles, and the broader pain experience. Recommendations for MEP evaluation, encompassing the spectrum from high standardization to high patient specificity, and MEP-targeted treatments are provided. Overall, the proposed framework and recommendations reflect the current state of science in this emerging area of study and are intended to support future efforts to optimize musculoskeletal pain management and enhance patient outcomes. PERSPECTIVE: Movement-evoked pain (MEP) is a distinct component of the musculoskeletal pain experience and emerging research area. This article introduces the "Pain-Movement Interface" as a theoretical framework of MEP, highlighting the interface between MEP, pain interference, and activity engagement. Evaluating and treating MEP could improve rehabilitation approaches and enhance patient outcomes.

Health and illness beliefs regarding pain and pain management of New Zealand resident Sāmoan community leaders: A qualitative interpretive study based on Pasifika paradigms

ISSUE ADDRESSED

Ethnic disparities in chronic pain exist in Aotearoa New Zealand, including a greater impact of pain, less access to chronic pain services and less benefit from treatment for Pasifika people. This study investigated Sāmoan health perceptions and beliefs in relation to pain and how it is managed.

METHODS

An interpretive descriptive study was undertaken involving interviews with nine Sāmoan key informants from Aotearoa New Zealand. Interviews explored their beliefs in relation to interpretations of pain and experiences of and preferences for pain management. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Four main themes were constructed from the data. Pain is interpreted holistically described the attribution of pain to many causes, without limitation to physiological explanations. Stoicism is a character virtue described the predominant belief that pain should be endured without display or complaint. Strength in connectivity described the inherent pain coping strategies that are present within Sāmoan communities. To improve healthcare is to nurture vā described the disconnect Sāmoan people feel from healthcare services and the need to foster relationships to improve health delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

Sāmoan people have beliefs and perceptions about pain and its management that extend beyond traditional Western interpretations. While pain is often endured using traditional strengths within the 'āīga (family) and community, the Sāmoan community faces challenges in receiving healthcare from mainstream pain services. SO WHAT?: Clinicians need to foster stronger relationships with Sāmoan individuals and their 'āīga and appreciate the wider psychosocial context of pain, including spirituality.

Prevalence of Chronic Pain by Immigration Status and Latino Ethnicity

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to evaluate the Latino paradox and healthy migrant hypotheses by estimating the association between the prevalence of chronic pain, immigration status, and Latino ethnicity.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study analyzed pooled data from 85,395 adult participants of the 2019-2021 National Health Interview Survey. The dependent variables were any pain and chronic pain in the past 3 months. The independent variables were immigration status (US born, naturalized citizen, non-citizen) and Latino ethnicity.

RESULTS

Chronic pain was prevalent for nearly a quarter of US born non-Latino adults (24%) and non-citizen non-Latino adults had the lowest prevalence at 8%. In multivariable adjusted models, US born non-Latino immigration status and ethnicity was associated with a higher probability of reporting chronic pain in the last 3 months compared to US born Latino adults (-3.0%; 95% CI = -4.4%, -1.6%), naturalized citizen non-Latino adults (-4.7%; 95% CI = -5.9%, -3.4%), naturalized citizen Latino adults (-6.7%; 95% CI = -8.5%, -4.9%), non-citizen non-Latino adults (-3.1%; 95% CI = -4.7%, -1.5%), and non-citizen Latino adults (-8.9%; 95% CI = -10.8%, -7.0%).

CONCLUSION

US Born non-Latino adults reported the highest prevalence of chronic pain and non-citizen Latino adults reported the lowest prevalence of chronic pain providing support for the Latino paradox and healthy migrant effect hypotheses.

A systematic review of in-person versus remotely delivered interventions for youth with chronic pain

The COVID-19 pandemic prompted a rapid shift from in-person to virtually-delivered care. Many youth with chronic pain have the ability to access care virtually; however, little is known about the efficacy of pain care for youth with chronic pain delivered virtually when compared to in-person. Such evidence is essential to guide youth in making decisions about their care, but also to inform what options health professionals present to youth. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the efficacy of interventions that are delivered in-person versus virtually for youth with chronic pain. Five databases (i.e., CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, APA PsycINFO, and Web of Science) were searched in October 2022 to identify randomized controlled trials that compare single/multimodal interventions for pediatric chronic pain delivered in-person versus virtually. A total 3638 unique studies were identified through database and other searching, two of which satisfied established criteria for inclusion in this review. Both studies compared psychological interventions delivered virtually versus in-person for youth with chronic pain and showed comparable efficacy across modalities. The planned meta-analyses could not be conducted due to different outcomes within each study that could not be combined. This systematic review highlights a critical gap in the evidence regarding the efficacy of virtually delivered interventions for youth with chronic pain. This evidence is necessary to inform treatment decisions for youth, and further research is required to develop the evidence to inform clinical interventions, especially as virtual treatments continue to be offered.

Reframing pain: the power of individual and societal factors to enhance pain treatment

The effectiveness of analgesics can be increased if synergistic behavioural, psychological, and pharmacological interventions are provided within a supportive environment.

Patterns of Opioid Prescriptions in the Veterans Health Administration for Patients With Chronic Low-Back Pain After the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

The COVID-19 pandemic led to severe disruptions in health care and a relaxation of rules surrounding opioid prescribing-changes which led to concerns about increased reliance on opioids for chronic pain and a resurgence of opioid-related harms. Although some studies found that opioid prescriptions increased in the first 6 months of the pandemic, we know little about the longer-term effects of the pandemic on opioid prescriptions. Further, despite the prevalence of pain in veterans, we know little about patterns of opioid prescriptions in the Veterans Health Administration (VA) associated with the pandemic. Using a retrospective cohort of VA patients with chronic low-back pain, we examined the proportion of patients with an opioid prescription and mean morphine milligram equivalents over a 3-year period-1 year prior to and 2 years after the pandemic's onset. Analyses revealed that both measures fell during the entire observation period. The largest decrease in the odds of filling an opioid prescription occurred in the first quarter of the pandemic, but this downward trend continued throughout the observation period, albeit at a slower pace. Clinically meaningful differences in opioid prescriptions and dose over time did not emerge based on patient race or rurality; however, differences emerged between female and male veterans, with decreases in opioid prescriptions slowing more markedly for women after the pandemic onset. These findings suggest that the pandemic was not associated with short- or long-term increases in opioid prescriptions or doses in the VA. PERSPECTIVE: This article examines opioid prescribing over a 3-year period-1 year prior to and 2 years after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic-for VA patients with chronic low-back pain. Results indicate that, despite disruptions to health care, opioid prescriptions and doses decreased over the entire observation period.

Associations between social determinants of health and comorbidity and multimorbidity in people of black ethnicities with HIV

OBJECTIVE

Social determinants of health (SDH) are important determinants of long-term conditions and multimorbidity in the general population. The intersecting relationship between SDH and multimorbidity in people with HIV remains poorly studied.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study investigating the relationships between eight socio-economic parameters and prevalent comorbidities of clinical significance and multimorbidity in adults of African ancestry with HIV aged 18-65 years in South London, UK.

METHODS

Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate associations between SDH and comorbidities and multimorbidity.

RESULTS

Between September 2020 and January 2022, 398 participants (median age 52 years, 55% women) were enrolled; 85% reported at least one SDH and 72% had at least one comorbidity. There were no associations between SDH and diabetes mellitus or kidney disease, few associations between SDH (job and food insecurity) and cardiovascular or lung disease, and multiple associations between SDH (financial, food, housing and job insecurity, low educational level, social isolation, and discrimination) and poor mental health or chronic pain. Associations between SDH and multimorbidity mirrored those for constituent comorbidities.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate strong associations between SDH and poor mental health, chronic pain and multimorbidity in people of black ethnicities living with HIV in the UK. These findings highlight the likely impact of enduring socioeconomic hardship in these communities and underlines the importance of holistic health and social care for people with HIV to address these adverse psychosocial conditions.

Pain experiences of marginalized children in the emergency department: A scoping review protocol

INTRODUCTION

Pain affects all children, and in hospitals across North America, this pain is often undertreated. Children who visit the emergency department (ED) experience similar undertreatment, and they will often experience a painful procedure as part of their diagnostic journey. Further, children and their caregivers who experience social injustices through marginalization are more likely to experience healthcare disparities in their pain management. Still, most of our knowledge about children's pain management comes from research focused on well-educated, white children and caregivers from a middle- or upper-class background. The aim of this scoping review is to identify, map, and describe existing research on (a) how aspects of marginalization are documented in randomized controlled trials related to children's pain and (b) to understand the pain treatment and experiences of marginalized children and their caregivers in the ED setting.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The review will follow Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews using the Participant, Concept, Context (PCC) framework and key terms related to children, youth, pain, ED, and aspects of marginalization. We will search Medline, Embase, PsychInfo, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library Trials, iPortal, and Native Health Database for articles published in the last 10 years to identify records that meet our inclusion criteria. We will screen articles in a two-step process using two reviewers during the abstract and full-text screening stages. Data will be extracted using Covidence for data management and we will use a narrative approach to synthesize the data.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required for this review. Findings will be disseminated in academic manuscripts, at academic conferences, and with partners and knowledge users including funders of pain research and healthcare professionals. Results of this scoping review will inform subsequent quantitative and qualitative studies regarding pain experiences and treatment of marginalized children in the ED.

Moving pain management programmes into the digital age: development and evaluation of an online PMP for people with chronic pain

Introduction

In response to Coronovirus Disease (COVID-19) health care restrictions, the pain management programme delivered group treatment digitally (OPMP). We aimed to: 1) evaluate pain related outcomes of the OPMP, 2) evaluate patient satisfaction and qualitive feedback of the OPMP and 3) compare OPMP outcomes with the pre-pandemic face to face (F2F) PMP outcomes.

Methods

Age, gender, pain duration, occupational status, referral information and patient satisfaction data were collected. Pre- and post-treatment pain related outcomes were compared by calculating mean difference, benchmarking with effect size (Cohen's d) and determining clinically significant change (CSC) for OPMP and F2F PMP.

Results

Two-hundred and thirty-seven patients provided outcome data, with 60 completing the OPMP and 177 completing the F2F PMP. OPMP patients were 10 years younger than the F2F PMP (44.8 vs 53.3), more were female (6.5:1 vs 2.8:1), more were working (45% vs 27%) and fewer were retired (3% vs 17%). The OPMP showed improvements comparable to the F2F PMP. Large effect size was reported across all outcome domains including objective physical outcomes. Eighty-one percent of OPMP patients were 'extremely likely' to recommend the programme but just over 50% of patients felt F2F would provide greater clinical benefits.

Conclusion

The results support that OPMP is effective for carefully selected patients following a multidisciplinary team assessment however more complex cases still require F2F PMP.

Attending to Marginalization in The Chronic Pain Literature: A Scoping Review

Background

There has been a recent and, for many within the chronic pain space, long-overdue increase in literature that focuses on equity, diversity, inclusion, and decolonization (EDI-D) to understand chronic pain among people who are historically and structurally marginalized.

Aims

In light of this growing attention in chronic pain research, we undertook a scoping review of studies that focus on people living with chronic pain and marginalization to map how these studies were carried out, how marginalization was conceptualized and operationalized by researchers, and identify suggestions for moving forward with marginalization and EDI-D in mind to better support people living with chronic pain.

Methods

We conducted this scoping review using critical analysis in a manner that aligns with dominant scoping review frameworks and recent developments made to scoping review methodology as well as reporting guidelines.

Results

Drawing on 67 studies, we begin with a descriptive review of the literature followed by a critical review that aims to identify fissures within the field through the following themes: (1) varying considerations of sociopolitical and socioeconomic contexts, (2) conceptual conflations between sex and gender, and (3) differing approaches to how people living with chronic pain and marginalization are described.

Conclusion

By identifying strengths and limitations in the research literature, we aim to highlight opportunities for researchers to contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of marginalization in chronic pain experiences.

Identifying provider, patient and practice factors that shape long-term opioid prescribing for cancer pain: a qualitative study of American and Australian providers

INTRODUCTION

Prescribing long-term opioid therapy is a nuanced clinical decision requiring careful consideration of risks versus benefits. Our goal is to understand patient, provider and context factors that impact the decision to prescribe opioids in patients with cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a secondary analysis of the raw semistructured interview data gathered from 42 prescribers who participated in one of two aligned concurrent qualitative studies in the USA and Australia. We conducted a two-part analysis of the interview: first identifying all factors influencing long-term prescribing and second open coding-related content for themes.

RESULTS

Factors that influence long-term opioid prescribing for cancer-related pain clustered under three key domains (patient-related, provider-related and practice-related factors) each with several themes. Domain 1: Patient factors related to provider-patient continuity, patient personality, the patient's social context and patient characteristics including racial/ethnic identity, housing and socioeconomic status. Domain 2: Provider-related factors centred around provider 'personal experience and expertise', training and time availability. Domain 3: Practice-related factors included healthcare interventions to promote safer opioid practices and accessibility of quality alternative pain therapies.

CONCLUSION

Despite the differences in the contexts of the two countries, providers consider similar patient, provider and practice-related factors when long-term prescribing opioids for patients with cancer. Some of these factors may be categorised as cognitive biases that may intersect in an already disadvantaged patient and exacerbate disparities in the treatment of their pain. A more systematic understanding of these factors and how they impact the quality of care can inform appropriate interventions.

"IT's too much to do alone": A mixed-methods exploration of patient experiences implementing emergency department management plans for chronic pain

OBJECTIVES

To explore the experiences of socio-culturally diverse community members attempting to manage their chronic pain and enact evidence-based management plans following an index Emergency Department (ED) visit.

METHODS

A convergent parallel mixed-methods design with qualitative interviews and descriptive analysis was undertaken in two public hospitals in a multicultural region in Sydney, Australia. Consecutive adults were recruited from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD: n = 45) or Australian-born (n = 45) backgrounds, who presented to the ED for a chronic neuromusculoskeletal pain condition. Consenting participants were prescribed an individualised chronic pain management plan following examination by a physiotherapist, who collected standardised measures of pain and health literacy. Six months later, participants underwent a structured phone survey regarding their pain status and whether they had actioned management plans. Participants were invited to participate in a semi-structured interview.

RESULTS

Six-month data were available for 82 of 90 participants who attended the ED and consented to the baseline assessment (40 CALD and 42 Australian-born). Participants were 52% females, predominately middle-aged (mean age 54.7 years), with an overall mean symptom duration of 10 years (SD 9.0). At 6 months, there were nine representations by six CALD participants and 23 by nine Australian-born participants. Overall, 52% reported unchanged pain, 24% were worse and 23% improved, with similar action plan progress for CALD (58%) and Australian-born (53%) participants. Pain features and health literacy were similar, irrespective of progress with pain management plans. From 41 participants who consented to phone interviews, three themes emerged to explain their progress with recommendations: 'illness model', 'urgency' and 'control orientation'.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients presenting to the ED with chronic pain might be more likely to action discharge recommendations if primary care providers identify patient-specific and contextual barriers to implementation.

Perceived Neighborhood Characteristics and Later-Life Pain Outcomes: Evidence From the Health and Retirement Study

Objectives: This study examines whether perceived neighborhood characteristics relate to pain outcomes among middle-aged and older adults. Methods: Data were from the Health and Retirement Study (2006-2014; n = 18,814). Perceived neighborhood characteristics were physical disorder, social cohesion, safety, and social ties. We fitted adjusted generalized estimating equation models to evaluate prevalence, incidence, and recovery of moderate-to-severe limiting pain 2 years later. Results: The mean age of our sample was 65.3 years; 54.6% were female and 24.2% reported moderate-to-severe limiting pain at baseline. Positive neighborhood characteristics were associated with low prevalence (e.g., prevalence ratio [PR]: .71 for disorder) and reduced incidence (e.g., PR: .63 for disorder) of moderate-to-severe limiting pain. Positive neighborhood characteristics were associated with a high recovery rate from moderate-to-severe limiting pain (e.g., PR = 1.15 for safety), though the 95% CIs for disorder and cohesion crossed the null. Discussion: Neighborhood characteristics may be important determinants in predicting pain in later life.

Challenges with embedding an integrated sex and gender perspective into pain research: Recommendations and opportunities

The focus of this article, within this BBI horizons special issue, is on sex, gender, and pain. We summarise what is currently known about sex- and gender-related variations in pain, exploring intersectional biological and psychosocial mechanisms, and highlight gaps in knowledge and understanding. Five key challenges with the exploration of sex and gender in pain research are presented, relating to: conceptual imprecision, research bias, limitations with binary descriptions, integrating sex and gender, and timely adoption/implementation of good research practice. Guidance on how to overcome such challenges is provided. Despite clear evidence for sex and gender differences in pain, there are conceptual and methodological barriers to overcome. Innovation in methods and approach can help develop more effective and tailored treatment approaches for men, women, boys, girls, and gender-diverse people.

An exploration of low back pain beliefs held by health care professionals in Northern America

BACKGROUND

Prior research demonstrated that people in the United States and Canada (Northern America) hold predominantly biomedical beliefs about Low back pain (LBP); such beliefs were attributed to healthcare professionals (HCP). Further investigation is needed to understand HCP' LBP beliefs, preferred management strategies, and sources of beliefs.

METHODS

Participants were recruited via social media to complete a qualitative cross-sectional online survey. The survey was distributed to assess LBP beliefs in a U.S. and Canadian-based clinician population. Participants answered questions about the cause of LBP, reasons for recurrence or persistence, use of imaging, management strategies, and sources of beliefs. Responses were analysed using an inductive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty three participants were included, reporting multiple causes for LBP. However, many references were anchored to biological problems. When psychological variables were mentioned, it typically involved patient blaming. Like prior research studies, minimal attention was given to societal and environmental influences. Management strategies often aligned with guideline care except for the recommendation of inappropriate imaging and a reliance on passive interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings align with prior research studies on general population beliefs, demonstrating a preference for biological causes of LBP. Further updates are needed for clinical education, while future studies should seek to assess the translation of clinician beliefs into clinical practice and health system constraints.

Telehealth and Virtual Reality Technologies in Chronic Pain Management: A Narrative Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review provides medical practitioners with an overview of the present and emergent roles of telehealth and associated virtual reality (VR) applications in chronic pain (CP) management, particularly in the post-COVID-19 healthcare landscape.

RECENT FINDINGS

Accumulated evidence points to the efficacy of now well-established telehealth modalities, such as videoconferencing, short messaging service (SMS), and mobile health (mHealth) applications in complementing remote CP care. More recently, and although still in early phases of clinical implementation, a wide range of VR-based interventions have demonstrated potential for improving the asynchronous remote management of CP. Additionally, VR-associated technologies at the leading edge of science and engineering, such as VR-assisted biofeedback, haptic technology, high-definition three-dimensional (HD3D) conferencing, VR-enabled interactions in a Metaverse, and the use of wearable monitoring devices, herald a new era for remote, synchronous patient-physician interactions. These advancements hold the potential to facilitate remote physical examinations, personalized remote care, and innovative interventions such as ultra-realistic biofeedback. Despite the promise of VR-associated technologies, several limitations remain, including the paucity of robust long-term effectiveness data, heterogeneity of reported pain-related outcomes, challenges with scalability and insurance coverage, and demographic-specific barriers to patient acceptability. Future research efforts should be directed toward mitigating these limitations to facilitate the integration of telehealth-associated VR into the conventional management of CP. Despite ongoing barriers to widespread adoption, recent evidence suggests that VR-based interventions hold an increasing potential to complement and enhance the remote delivery of CP care.

Pilot RCT comparing low-dose naltrexone, gabapentin and placebo to reduce pain among people with HIV with alcohol problems

BACKGROUND

To estimate the effects on pain of two medications (low-dose naltrexone and gabapentin) compared to placebo among people with HIV (PWH) with heavy alcohol use and chronic pain.

METHODS

We conducted a pilot, randomized, double-blinded, 3-arm study of PWH with chronic pain and past-year heavy alcohol use in 2021. Participants were recruited in St. Petersburg, Russia, and randomized to receive daily low-dose naltrexone (4.5mg), gabapentin (up to 1800mg), or placebo. The two primary outcomes were change in self-reported pain severity and pain interference measured with the Brief Pain Inventory from baseline to 8 weeks.

RESULTS

Participants (N = 45, 15 in each arm) had the following baseline characteristics: 64% male; age 41 years (SD±7); mean 2 (SD±4) heavy drinking days in the past month and mean pain severity and interference were 3.2 (SD±1) and 3.0 (SD±2), respectively. Pain severity decreased for all three arms. Mean differences in change in pain severity for gabapentin vs. placebo, and naltrexone vs. placebo were -0.27 (95% confidence interval [CI] -1.76, 1.23; p = 0.73) and 0.88 (95% CI -0.7, 2.46; p = 0.55), respectively. Pain interference decreased for all three arms. Mean differences in change in pain interference for gabapentin vs. placebo, and naltrexone vs. placebo was 0.16 (95% CI -1.38, 1.71; p = 0.83) and 0.40 (95% CI -1.18, 1.99; p = 0.83), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Neither gabapentin nor low-dose naltrexone appeared to improve pain more than placebo among PWH with chronic pain and past-year heavy alcohol use.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT4052139).

Communication and Activation in Pain to Enhance Relationships and Treat Pain with Equity (COOPERATE): a Qualitative Analysis of a Tailored Coaching Program for Black Patients with Chronic Pain

BACKGROUND

Racial inequities in pain treatment are well-documented and persist despite national priorities focused on health equity. The COOPERATE (Communication and Activation in Pain to Enhance Relationships and Treat Pain with Equity) intervention was a patient-centered, tailored intervention aimed at improving health equity by targeting patient activation-the knowledge and confidence to manage one's health. COOPERATE led to significant and sustained increases in patient activation, significant short-term increases in communication self-efficacy (confidence to communicate with clinicians), and more intervention participants experienced clinically significant (≥ 30%) reductions in pain at 3 months than control group participants.

OBJECTIVE

To understand how participants experienced the intervention, including their perspectives on its effects on their health and healthcare experiences.

DESIGN

Semi-structured qualitative interviews.

PARTICIPANTS

Black veterans with chronic pain who participated in the COOPERATE intervention.

KEY RESULTS

Participants described acquiring new tools and cultivating skills to use in their clinic visits, including preparing for their visit (writing an agenda, listing questions); asking focused, effective questions; and expressing concerns and communicating goals, values, and preferences. Participants indicated that by putting these tools to use, they felt more confident and able to take ownership of their own pain care; for some, this led to better pain management and improved pain. Participants expressed mixed views of disparities in pain care, with some believing race and racism did not play a role in their care, while others valued being part of an intervention that helped equip them with tools to exercise autonomy over their healthcare.

CONCLUSIONS

Black patients with chronic pain described gaining greater confidence to self-manage and communicate with their clinicians after participating in the COOPERATE intervention. With its focus on empowering individuals, the COOPERATE intervention represents a promising approach to help advance equity in pain care.