Should Large Cell Neuroendocrine Lung Carcinoma be Classified and Treated as a Small Cell Lung Cancer or with Other Large Cell Carcinomas?

Multimodal AI framework for lung cancer diagnosis: Integrating CNN and ANN models for imaging and clinical data analysis

Lung cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, emphasizing the critical need for accurate and early diagnostic solutions. This study introduces a novel multimodal artificial intelligence (AI) framework that integrates Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) to improve lung cancer classification and severity assessment. The CNN model, trained on 1019 preprocessed CT images, classified lung tissue into four histological categories, adenocarcinoma, large cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and normal, with a weighted accuracy of 92 %. Interpretability is enhanced using Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM), which highlights the salient image regions influencing the model's predictions. In parallel, an ANN trained on clinical data from 999 patients-spanning 24 key features such as demographic, symptomatic, and genetic factors-achieves 99 % accuracy in predicting cancer severity (low, medium, high). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) are employed to provide both global and local interpretability of the ANN model, enabling transparent decision-making. Both models were rigorously validated using k-fold cross-validation to ensure robustness and reduce overfitting. This hybrid approach effectively combines spatial imaging data and structured clinical information, demonstrating strong predictive performance and offering an interpretable and comprehensive AI-based solution for lung cancer diagnosis and management.

Epidemiology and clinical course of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung: The Japanese lung cancer registry study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the characteristics and clinical courses of patients with pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and compare the differences across lung cancer types.

METHODS

This prospective study included 11,310 patients with LCNEC, small cell lung cancer (SCLC), squamous cell carcinoma, and adenocarcinoma from the Japanese Joint Committee of Lung Cancer Registry (JJCLCR) database. The registry was opened in January 2012, and the follow-up was completed in April 2016.

RESULTS

In total, 80 patients (0.7 %) were diagnosed with LCNEC. LCNEC shared similar patient characteristics with SCLC, characterized by a median age of 68 years and a high prevalence of men (93.8 %) and smokers (97.5 %). In stage IV patients, the best overall response and disease control rates for first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy were 34.8 % and 43.5 % for LCNEC but 60.6 % and 69.7 % for SCLC. Similarly, the overall response and disease control rates for first-line carboplatin-based chemotherapy in stage IV patients were 29.4 % and 41.2 % for LCNEC, but 56.1 % and 68.4 % for SCLC. The 3-year survival rates for LCNEC, SCLC, squamous cell carcinoma, and adenocarcinoma were 14.2 %, 15.9 %, 17.8 %, and 27.1 %, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves of overall survival showed similarity between LCNEC and SCLC, with no statistical significance in the Cox hazard analysis (hazard ratio 0.818, 95 % confidence interval 0.611-1.096, p = 0.178).

CONCLUSIONS

Although patient characteristics and survival curves were similar in LCNEC and SCLC, our data demonstrate that LCNEC had inferior overall response and disease control rates in response to first-line chemotherapy compared to SCLC.

SNAP25-induced MYC upregulation promotes high-grade neuroendocrine lung carcinoma progression

Background

This study investigated the expression and role of Synaptosome associated protein 25 (SNAP25) in high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma (HGNEC).

Methods

We used differentially expressed analysis and weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) to identify key genes and modules in HGNEC. KEGG and GO analyses helped understand these genes' roles, and ROC curves assessed their diagnostic value. We also studied SNAP25's relation to immune infiltration and confirmed findings with in vitro and vivo experiments and datasets.

Results

WGCNA identified 595 key genes related to pathways like MAPK signaling, GABAergic synapse, and cancer-related transcriptional misregulation. Top genes included SNAP25, MYC, NRXN1, GAD2, and SYT1. SNAP25 was notably associated with M2 macrophage infiltration. Dataset GSE40275 confirmed SNAP25's high expression and poor prognosis in HGNEC. qRT-PCR and WB analyses showed increased SNAP25 and c-MYC levels in HGNEC, promoting MEK/ERK pathway activity. Reducing SNAP25 decreased H1299 cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and levels of c-MYC, MEK, and ERK. Finally, in vivo experiments further confirmed that SNAP25 knockout can inhibit tumor growth.

Conclusion

SNAP25 regulates c-MYC activation by stimulating the MEK/ERK pathway, ultimately influencing the development of HGNEC.

Discovery of therapeutic targets in cancer using chromatin accessibility and transcriptomic data

Most cancer types lack targeted therapeutic options, and when first-line targeted therapies are available, treatment resistance is a huge challenge. Recent technological advances enable the use of assay for transposase-accessible chromatin with sequencing (ATAC-seq) and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) on patient tissue in a high-throughput manner. Here, we present a computational approach that leverages these datasets to identify drug targets based on tumor lineage. We constructed gene regulatory networks for 371 patients of 22 cancer types using machine learning approaches trained with three-dimensional genomic data for enhancer-to-promoter contacts. Next, we identified the key transcription factors (TFs) in these networks, which are used to find therapeutic vulnerabilities, by direct targeting of either TFs or the proteins that they interact with. We validated four candidates identified for neuroendocrine, liver, and renal cancers, which have a dismal prognosis with current therapeutic options.

Clinical and Pathologic Differences between Small-Cell Carcinoma and Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung

BACKGROUND

Both small-cell carcinoma (SCLC) and large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the lung are often clinically dealt with as being in the same category as neuroendocrine carcinoma, and their clinical differences have not been adequately assessed.

METHODS

The postoperative prognosis was retrospectively analyzed using the data of 196 patients who underwent resection for SCLC or LCNEC.

RESULTS

Of the patients included, 99 (50.5%) had SCLC and 97 (49.5%) had LCNEC. The median duration of follow-up was 39 months (interquartile range [IQR] 21-76) and 56 months (IQR 21-87) for SCLC and LCNEC, respectively. The estimated 5-year overall survival (OS) probabilities were 53.7% and 62.7% (p = 0.133) for patients with SCLC and LCNEC, respectively. In the SCLC group, a multivariate analysis showed that adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.30-0.99, p = 0.04) was the only factor that was significantly associated with OS. In the LCNEC group, univariate analyses demonstrated that pathologic stage I (p = 0.01) was the only factor that was associated with better OS after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

We found different clinical features in SCLC and LCNEC; in patients with SCLC, because OS could be expected to significantly improve with postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, patients with resected SCLC of any pathologic stage should receive adjuvant chemotherapy. For patients with LCNEC, because pathologic stage I LCNEC is related to better prognosis than any other stages, a thorough clinical staging, including invasive staging, according to present guidelines should be performed to identify clinical stage I LCNEC with the highest certainty.

Uncommon Metastasis of a Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma From the Lungs to the Buccal Palatal Region

The metastasis of a primary lung tumor to the mouth cavity is a rare occurrence. In addition, the occurrence of neuroendocrine bronchial carcinoma with large cells is uncommon. When metastases are not possible to surgically remove, the conventional treatment for large-cell neuroendocrine tumors (LCNET) is still used. The etiology of these metastases remains inadequately comprehended, rendering their administration very intricate. The oncologist at this institution must possess a comprehensive comprehension of how to effectively oversee the patient's quality of life to guarantee the uninterrupted progression of therapy. This paper is a case study of a 51-year-old male patient who was hospitalized due to a severe dry cough and dysphonia that began two months prior to seeking medical consultation. Gingival hyperplasia was diagnosed during a clinical examination. The diagnosis of LCNET (carcinoma of the lung) was determined after a thorough etiological investigation utilizing gingival samples and pulmonary tissue. The objective of this study was to provide a description of our case, conduct an analysis of the response to therapy, and make a contribution to the current body of research. The purpose was to encourage more investigation into this type of metastasis, aiming to get a deeper comprehension of the mechanisms behind the metastatic spread and assess its predictive significance in future instances.

Incidence, survival comparison, and novel prognostic evaluation approaches for stage iii-iv pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) are two types of high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas of the lung with poor prognosis. LCNEC has not been thoroughly studied due to its rarity, data are also lacking regarding the survival comparison and prognosis analysis of patients with locally advanced or metastatic LCNEC and SCLC.

METHODS

Data of patients with LCNEC, SCLC, and other NSCLC who were diagnosed from 1975 to 2019 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database to estimate incidence. Those in stage III-IV and being diagnosed from 2010 to 2015 were utilized further to investigate their clinical characteristics and prognosis. Propensity score matching (PSM) analyses at a ratio of 1:2 was used to compare their survival outcomes. Nomograms of LCNEC and SCLC were established with internal validation, and the nomogram of SCLC was externally validated by 349 patients diagnosed in Cancer hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2018.

RESULTS

The incidence of LCNEC has been increasing in recent decades, meanwhile that of SCLC and other types of NSCLC were decreasing. A total of 91,635 lung cancer patients, including 785 with LCNEC, 15,776 with SCLC, and 75,074 with other NSCLC were enrolled for further analysis. The survival of stage III-IV LCNEC resembles that of SCLC, and significantly worse than other types of NSCLC before and after PSM analysis. In pretreatment prognostic analysis, age, T stage, N stage, M stage, bone metastasis, liver metastasis, and brain metastasis were found to be associated with the survival of both LCNEC and SCLC, besides sex, bilaterality, and lung metastasis were additional prognostic factors for SCLC. Two nomograms and convenient online tools respectively for LCNEC and SCLC were established accordingly with favorable predicting accuracy of < 1-year, < 2-year, < 3-year survival probabilities. In external validation of the SCLC nomogram with a Chinese cohort, the AUCs of 1-year, 2-year and 3-year ROC were 0.652, 0.669, and 0.750, respectively. All the results of 1-, 2-, 3- year variable-dependent ROC curves verified the superior prognostic value of our nomograms for LCNEC and SCLC over the traditional T/N/M staging system.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on large sample-based cohort, we compared the epidemiological trends and survival outcomes between locally advanced or metastatic LCNEC, SCLC, and other NSCLC. Furthermore, two prognostic evaluation approaches respectively for LCNEC and SCLC might present as practical tools for clinicians to predict the survival outcome of these patients and facilitate risk stratification.

The prognosis analysis of organ metastatic patterns in lung large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: A population-based study

Lung large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare and highly aggressive malignancy with a dismal prognosis. This study was designed to depict patterns of distant organ metastatic and to analyze prognosis of LCNEC patients. We gathered data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2015. We conducted the Kaplan-Meier method to calculate overall survival (OS) and compare different variables. Cox proportional hazards regression models in univariate and multivariate analyses were employed to further explore prognostic factors. A total of 1335 LCNEC patients were eventually selected from the SEER database, of which 348 patients (26.0%) had single organ metastasis and 197 patients (14.8%) had multiple metastases. Our study indicates that patients with single organ metastasis generally have a poor prognosis, with a median OS of 8 months for both lung and brain metastasis with 1-year survival rates of 33% and 29% respectively. Patients with multiple metastases exhibited the worst prognosis, with a median OS of only 4 months and a 1-year OS of 8%. Multivariate analysis revealed that age, T stage, N stage, chemotherapy and radiation in metastatic patients were independently associated with OS. In conclusion, LCNEC exhibits a high metastatic rate when diagnosed. The most common metastatic organ is the brain in single-site metastatic patients. Patients with single or multiple metastases exhibit a significantly worse prognosis than those with non-organ metastases. In the group of single organ metastases, patients with brain and lung metastases had a better prognosis than those with bone and liver metastases.

Differential response in patients with large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung to initial therapy: A case series

BACKGROUND

Large cell neuroendocrine tumors of the lung (LCNEC) are rare. Chemotherapy with the small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) regimen is the most appropriate treatment for LCNEC. However, there is evidence that the non-small cell lung cancer regimen is also effective in some reported cases. Due to the differences in response to LCNEC treatment, a standard of care for LCNEC has not been established.

CASES

The clinical records of nine patients with LCNEC who were treated with anticancer drugs based on an SCLC regimen from March 2016 to March 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients who responded to treatment after one cycle of systemic chemotherapy were compared to those who did not respond. All patients in the responder group had a performance status (PS) of 0 or 1. However, 5 of the 6 patients in the non-responder group had a PS of 2 or 3, indicating that many patients were in poor general condition. Although patients with multiple metastases to more than one organ prior to treatment were not identified in the responder group, five of these patients were in the non-responder group. In the non-responder group, all patients discontinued treatment due to deterioration of general condition during first-line treatment. Thus, none of them were able to start the second-line treatment.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study may suggest that early diagnosis and initiation of treatment before multiple organ metastasis development and PS decline may have clinical implications that could lead to improved treatment response in patients with LCNEC.

Pulmonary Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare subtype of malignant pulmonary tumor. The incidence rate of LCNEC was reported to be 0.3%–3% in lung cancers. Although LCNEC is classified as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), it is more aggressive and malignant than other NSCLC, and its biological behavior is similar to that of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Most of the LCNEC patients are elderly smoking male and the clinical manifestations are not specific. The imaging manifestations of the tumors are often located in the periphery and the upper lobes, and the enlargement of mediastinal or hilar lymph nodes is common. The diagnosis is mainly based on pathology by the histological features and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Specific neuroendocrine markers such as chromogranin A (CgA), synaptophysin (Syn) and CD56 are usually diffusely positive in LCNEC, and found that insulinoma-associated protein (INSM1) and high rate of Ki-67 are helpful for diagnosis. More differential diagnoses also increase the difficulty of correctly diagnosing LCNEC. The rise of LCNEC molecular typing in recent years may be helpful for diagnosis and subsequent treatment. This review focuses on the epidemiological features, imaging studies, pathology, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of LCNEC.

Role of surgery in high-grade neuroendocrine tumors of the lung

Background

This study aims to evaluate the surgical results for high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas and to identify factors that influence prognosis.

Methods

Between January 2009 and December 2017, a total of 71 patients (58 males, 13 females; mean age: 62±9.6 years; range, 38 to 78 years) with a high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung were retrospectively analyzed. Overall survival and five-year overall survival rates were evaluated.

Results

The mean overall survival was 60.7±6.9 months with a five-year survival rate of 44.3%. The mean overall survival and five-year overall survival rates according to disease stage were as follows: Stage 1, 67±10.8 months (46%); Stage 2, 61.4±10.8 months (45%); and Stage 3, 33.2±8.6 months (32%) (p=0.02). The mean overall survival and five-year overall survival rate according to histological types were as follows: in large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, 59.4±9.2 months (45%); in small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, 68.6±12.2 months (43%); and in combined-type neuroendocrine carcinoma, 40.9±10.1 months (35%) (p=0.34).

Conclusion

Thoracic surgeons should be very selective in performing pulmonary resection in patients with Stage 3 high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas and combined cell subtype tumors.

The Role of Surgery in High-Grade Neuroendocrine Cancer: Indications for Clinical Practice

Pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors (pNET) represent a particular type of malignant lung cancers and can be divided into well-differentiated low-grade NET and poorly-differentiated high-grade NET. Typical and atypical carcinoids belong to the first group while large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNEC) and small-cell lung cancers (SCLC) belong to the second one. The aim of this mini-review is to focus on the role of surgical therapy for high grade neuroendocrine tumors. SCLC has the worst prognosis among all lung cancer neoplasms: in fact, the two-year survival rate is about 5% and median survival usually ranges between 15 and 20 months. The surgical treatment of SCLC has thus infrequently been judged as a valuable aspect of the therapeutic approach, the gold standard treatment being a combination of platinum-based chemotherapy and radiotherapy. As LCNEC are rare, there is a lack of extensive literature and randomized clinical trials, therefore the curative approach is still controversial. Current treatment guidelines suggest treating LCNEC by surgical resection in non-metastatic stages and recommend adjuvant chemotherapy according to SCLC protocol. Upfront surgery is suggested in early stages (from I to IIB), a multimodality approach is recommended in locally advanced stages (III) while surgery is not recommended in stage IV LCNEC. The rate of surgical resection is quite low, particularly for SCLC, ranging from 1 to 6% in limited diseases; lobectomy with radical lymphadenectomy is considered the gold standard surgical procedure in the case of limited disease SCLC and resectable LCNEC; pneumonectomy, although reported as an effective tool, should be avoided in the light of local and distant recurrence rates.

Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung: Current Understanding and Challenges

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung (LCNEC) is a rare and highly aggressive type of lung cancer, with a complex biology that shares similarities with both small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The prognosis of LCNEC is poor, with a median overall survival of 8-12 months. The diagnosis of LCNEC requires the identification of neuroendocrine morphology and the expression of at least one of the neuroendocrine markers (chromogranin A, synaptophysin or CD56). In the last few years, the introduction of next-generation sequencing allowed the identification of molecular subtypes of LCNEC, with prognostic and potential therapeutic implications: one subtype is similar to SCLC (SCLC-like), while the other is similar to NSCLC (NSCLC-like). Because of LCNEC rarity, most evidence comes from small retrospective studies and treatment strategies that are extrapolated from those adopted in patients with SCLC and NSCLC. Nevertheless, limited but promising data about targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with LCNEC are emerging. LCNEC clinical management is still controversial and standardized treatment strategies are currently lacking. The aim of this manuscript is to review clinical and molecular data about LCNEC to better understand the optimal management and the potential prognostic and therapeutic implications of molecular subtypes.

Combined large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx: A collision course of tumors

Combined large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the H&N are exceptionally rare. We present the case of combined p16 negative SCC and LCNEC of the oropharynx treated with combination chemotherapy. This is the third reported case of combined neuroendocrine carcinoma and SCC of the oropharynx.

Surgical Principles in the Management of Lung Neuroendocrine Tumors: Open Questions and Controversial Technical Issues

OPINION STATEMENT

Primary neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the lung represent a heterogeneous group of malignancies arising from the endocrine cells, involving different entities, from well differentiated to highly undifferentiated neoplasms. Because of the predominance of poorly differentiated tumors, advanced disease is observed at diagnosis in more than one third of patients making chemo- or chemoradiotherapy the only possible treatment. Complete surgical resection, as defined as anatomical resection plus systematic lymphadenectomy, becomes a reliable curative option only for that little percentage of patients presenting with stage I (N0) high-grade NETs. On the other hand, complete surgical resection is considered the mainstay treatment for localized low- and intermediate-grade NETs. Therefore, in the era of the mini-invasive surgery, their indolent behavior has suggested that parenchyma-sparing resections could be as adequate as the anatomical ones in terms of oncological outcomes, leading to discuss about the correct extent of resection and about the role of lymphadenectomy when dealing with highly differentiated NETs.

Clinical features and treatment outcomes of resected large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung

PURPOSE

Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a high-grade lung neuroendocrine tumor with a poor prognosis, similar to small cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, it remains unclear whether to treat LCNEC as non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or as SCLC. We reviewed our experiences to suggest appropriate treatment strategy for resected pulmonary LCNEC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-four patients were treated for pathologically diagnosed pulmonary LCNEC during 2005‒2018. We considered curative surgery first in early-stage or some locally advanced tumors, unless medically inoperable. Adjuvant treatments were decided considering patient's clinical and pathological features. After excluding two stage I tumors with radiotherapy alone and three stage III tumors with upfront chemotherapy, we analyzed 39 patients with stage I‒III pulmonary LCNEC, who underwent curative resection first.

RESULTS

Adjuvant chemotherapy (NSCLC-based 91%, SCLC-based 9%) was performed in 62%, and adjuvant radiotherapy was done in three patients for pN2 or positive margin. None received prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI). With a median follow-up of 30 months, the 2- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 68% and 51%, and the 2- and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were 49% and 43%, respectively. Aged ≥67 years and SCLC-mixed pathology were significant poor prognostic factors for OS or RFS (p < 0.05). Among 17 recurrences, regional failures were most common (n = 6), and there were five brain metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery and adjuvant treatment (without PCI) could achieve favorable outcomes in pulmonary LCNEC, which was more similar to NSCLC, although some factors worsened the prognosis. The importance of intensified adjuvant therapies with multidisciplinary approach remains high.

Comparative Study of Pulmonary Combined Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma and Combined Small-Cell Carcinoma in Surgically Resected High-Grade Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Lung

Objectives

Pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) are both classified as pure and combined subtypes. Due to the low incidence and difficult diagnosis of combined LCNEC (C-LCNEC) and combined SCLC (C-SCLC), few studies have compared their clinical features and prognosis.

Materials and Methods

We compared the clinical features, mutation status of driver genes (EGFR, ALK, ROS1, KRAS, and BRAF), and prognosis between C-LCNEC and C-SCLC. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were applied for survival analysis.

Results

We included a total of 116 patients with C-LCNEC and 76 patients with C-SCLC in the present study. There were significant differences in distribution of smoking history, tumor location, pT stage, pN stage, pTNM stage, visceral pleural invasion (VPI), and combined components between C-LCNEC and C-SCLC (P<0.05 for all). C-SCLC was more advanced at diagnosis as compared to C-LCNEC. The incidence of EGFR mutations in C-LCNEC patients was higher than C-SCLC patients (25.7 vs. 5%, P=0.004). We found that tumor size, pN stage, peripheral CEA level, and adjuvant chemotherapy were independently prognostic factors for DFS and OS in C-LCNEC patients, while peripheral NSE level, pT stage, pN stage, VPI and adjuvant chemotherapy were independently associated with DFS and OS for C-SCLC patients (P<0.05 for all). Propensity score matching with adjustment for the confounders confirmed a more favorable DFS (P=0.032) and OS (P=0.019) in patients with C-LCNEC in comparison with C-SCLC patients upon survival analysis.

Conclusions

The mutation landscape of driver genes seemed to act in different way between C-SCLC and C-LCNEC, likely by which result in clinical phenotype difference as well as better outcome in C-LCNEC.

Clinical-Pathologic Challenges in the Classification of Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Neoplasms and Targets on the Horizon for Future Clinical Practice

Diagnosing a pulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) may be difficult, challenging clinical decision making. In this review, the following key clinical and pathologic issues and informative molecular markers are being discussed: (1) What is the preferred outcome parameter for curatively resected low-grade NENs (carcinoid), for example, overall survival or recurrence-free interval? (2) Does the WHO classification combined with a Ki-67 proliferation index and molecular markers, such as OTP and CD44, offer improved prognostication in low-grade NENs? (3) What is the value of a typical versus atypical carcinoid diagnosis on a biopsy specimen in local and metastatic disease? Diagnosis is difficult in biopsy specimens and recent observations of an increased mitotic rate in metastatic carcinoid from typical to atypical and high-grade NEN can further complicate diagnosis. (4) What is the (ir)relevance of morphologically separating large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) SCLC and the value of molecular markers (RB1 gene and pRb protein or transcription factors NEUROD1, ASCL1, POU2F3, or YAP1 [NAPY]) to predict systemic treatment outcome? (5) Are additional diagnostic criteria required to accurately separate LCNEC from NSCLC in biopsy specimens? Neuroendocrine morphology can be absent owing to limited sample size leading to missed LCNEC diagnoses. Evaluation of genomic studies on LCNEC and marker studies have identified that a combination of napsin A and neuroendocrine markers could be helpful. Hence, to improve clinical practice, we should consider to adjust our NEN classification incorporating prognostic and predictive markers applicable on biopsy specimens to inform a treatment outcome-driven classification.

Role of Immunotherapy in Stage IV Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung

Background:

Despite approvals of immune checkpoint inhibitors in both small cell and non-small cell lung cancers, the role of immunotherapy in large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) in lung is undefined.

Methods:

Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), Stage IV lung LCNEC cases diagnosed from 2014 to 2016 were analyzed. Information regarding cancer treatment was limited to first course of therapy, including surgery for primary lesion, radiation, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazard model was used for multivariate analysis.

Results:

Among 661 eligible cases, 37 patients were treated with immunotherapy. No significant association between use of immunotherapy and clinical demographics was observed except for use of chemotherapy (p=0.0008). Chemotherapy was administered in 34 (92%) and 406 (65%) in immunotherapy and non-immunotherapy groups, respectively. Use of immunotherapy was associated with improved overall survival (Log-rank p=0.0018). Landmark analysis in the immunotherapy group showed 12 and 18-month survivals of 34.0% and 29.1%, respectively, whereas those in the non-immunotherapy group were 24.1% and 15.0%, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that female sex (HR=0.79, p=0.0063), liver metastases (HR=0.75, p=.0392), surgery (HR= 0.50, p<0.0001) use of chemotherapy (HR= 0.44, p<0.0001), and use of immunotherapy (HR=0.64, p=0.0164) had statistical significance. Propensity score matching in overall survival analysis showed a nonsignificant trend (p=0.0733) in favor of immunotherapy treatment.

Conclusion:

This retrospective study using NCDB suggests that use of immunotherapy may improve survival of LCNEC patients.

Outcomes of Patients with Pulmonary Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma in I-IV Stage

Background and Objectives: Large cell neuroendocrine cancer is characterised by poor prognosis. The standard of treatment is still not established. The aim of this study was to assess the predictive factors of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and combined LCNEC. Materials and Methods: All patients had confirmed pathology stage I-IV disease recorded between period 2002–2018. Survival curves were estimated by Kaplan–Meier method. Uni- and multivariable analysis was conducted using Cox-regression analysis. Results: A total of 132 patients with LCNEC and combined LCNEC were included. Half of them had clinical stage IIIB/C-IV. Patients were treated with radical (n = 67, including surgery alone; resection with neo-adjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy, radiochemotherapy, or adjuvant radiotherapy; patients treated with radiochemotherapy alone), palliative (n = 41) or symptomatic (n = 24) intention. Seventeen patients were treated with resection margin R1 or R2. Non-small cell carcinoma (NSCLC) chemotherapy (platinum-vinorelbine; PN schedule) and small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) chemotherapy approaches (platinum/carboplatinum-etoposide; PE/KE schedule) were administered in 20 and in 55 patients, respectively. The median (95% Confidence Interval (CI)) OS and PFS were 17 months (9.0–36.2 months) and 7 months (3.0–15.0 months), respectively. Patients treated with negative resection margin, with lower clinical stage, without lymph node metastasis, and with size of primary tumour ≤4 cm showed significantly better OS and PFS. The main risk factors with an adverse effect on survival were advanced CS and positive resection margin. Conclusions: Patients with LCNEC characterized poor prognosis. Independent prognostic factors influencing PFS were initial clinical stage and resection margin R0 vs. R1-2.

Surgery in Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Simple Summary

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for approximately 15% of all lung cancers and is one of the most aggressive tumors, with poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. This review summarizes the main results observed with surgery in SCLC, discussing the critical issues related to the use of this approach. Following two old randomized clinical trials showing no benefit with surgery, several prospective, retrospective, and population-based studies have demonstrated the feasibility of a multimodality approach including surgery in addition to chemotherapy and radiotherapy in patients with selected stage I SCLC. Currently, the International Guidelines recommend a surgical approach in selected stage I SCLC patients, after adequate staging within a multimodal approach and after a multidisciplinary evaluation.

Abstract

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is one of the most aggressive tumors, with a rapid growth and early metastases. Approximately 5% of SCLC patients present with early-stage disease (T1,2 N0M0): these patients have a better prognosis, with a 5-year survival up to 50%. Two randomized phase III studies conducted in the 1960s and the 1980s reported negative results with surgery in SCLC patients with early-stage disease and, thereafter, surgery has been largely discouraged. Instead, several subsequent prospective studies have demonstrated the feasibility of a multimodality approach including surgery before or after chemotherapy and followed in most studies by thoracic radiotherapy, with a 5-year survival probability of 36–63% for patients with completely resected stage I SCLC. These results were substantially confirmed by retrospective studies and by large, population-based studies, conducted in the last 40 years, showing the benefit of surgery, particularly lobectomy, in selected patients with early-stage SCLC. On these bases, the International Guidelines recommend a surgical approach in selected stage I SCLC patients, after adequate staging: in these cases, lobectomy with mediastinal lymphadenectomy is considered the standard approach. In all cases, surgery can be offered only as part of a multimodal treatment, which includes chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy and after a proper multidisciplinary evaluation.

Clinical Features and Outcomes Analysis of Surgical Resected Pulmonary Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma With Adjuvant Chemotherapy

Objective

Large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare subtype of pulmonary cancer with poor survival. Optimal adjuvant chemotherapy for resected LCNEC is controversial till now; clinical features together with the prognostic factors in LCNEC should be clarified better.

Methods

Clinicopathological characteristics, driven genes’ status (EGFR, ALK, and ROS1), adjuvant chemotherapy strategy for 94 surgical resected LCNECs were extracted from digital database, tumor relapse or progression, and survival were analyzed with clinical profiles.

Results

Driven gene mutants were scarce in LCNEC, 8.3% (4/48) samples harbored EGFR mutations, 5.8% (3/52) with ALK positive, and none of ROS1 positive. A total of 44 patients suffered tumor relapse or progression during follow-up. Tumor/lymph node (N) stage, serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level before surgery, different adjuvant chemotherapies were associated with tumor relapse (P < 0.05); poorer disease-free survival (DFS) appeared in N2/stage III, serum CEA positive and pemetrexed based chemotherapy (P < 0.05); for overall survival (OS) analysis, the T/tumor stage, serum positive CEA/neuron-specific enolase (NSE) at baseline were associated with worse OS (P < 0.05). Moreover, in the multivariate analysis, N stage still acted as prognostic for DFS (P = 0.019); OS differed significantly in different T stages, chemotherapy selection and serum CEA levels after adjustment (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Classical driven gene mutations were rare in LCNEC. Tumor N stage appeared as prognostic for DFS, while serum positive CEA, different adjuvant chemotherapy strategies, and T stage were independent prognostic factors for OS. Etoposide–platinum regime seemed to be a better choice which should be confirmed by further prospective investigations.

Outcomes for Surgery in Stage IA Large Cell Lung Neuroendocrine Compared With Other Types of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Study Based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database

Background

Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine cancer (LCNEC) is commonly classified as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Even for stage I disease, after surgery the survival is always poor, but clinical research on LCNEC is scant and always with unsatisfying sample sizes. Thus, we conduct the first study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to compare survival after surgery between stage I LCNEC and other types of NSCLC.

Methods

From 2004 to 2016, 473 patients with stage IA LCNEC, 17,669 patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LADC) and 8,475 patients with lung squamous cell cancer (LSCC), all treated with surgery were identified. In addition, 1:1 PSM was used, and overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) between groups were compared.

Results

The 5-year OS rates and CSS rates for LCNEC were 52.5% and 81.5%, respectively. Overall, both OS and CSS were significantly superior for stage IA LADC than LCNEC (for OS: HR 0.636, 95% CI 0.568-0.712; for CSS: HR 0.688, 95% CI 0.561–0.842, LCNEC as reference), while comparable for LSCC with LCNEC (for OS: HR 0.974, 95% CI 0.869–1.091; for CSS: HR 0.907, 95% CI 0.738–1.115). PSM generated 471 pairs when LCNEC was compared with LADC and both OS and CSS were significantly better in LADC than LCNEC (for OS: HR 0.580, 95% CI 0.491–0.686; for CSS: HR 0.602, 95% CI 0.446–0.814). Of note, for the subgroup of patients ≤ 65 years old, HRs for both OS and CSS were lower (for OS: HR 0.470; for CSS: HR 0.482). As for comparison between LCNEC and LSCC, PSM generated 470 pairs. Differently, only CSS was significantly superior in LSCC than LCNEC (HR 0.563, 95% CI 0.392–0.807), while OS was not. Further grouping by age showed only CSS between two groups for patients with age ≤ 65 years old was significantly different (P = 0.006).

Conclusions

We report the first survival comparison after surgery between stage IA LCNEC and other types of NSCLC by SEER database and PSM. Our results demonstrated after surgery, stage IA LCNEC was worse in survival, especially compared to LADC. Extra clinical care should be paid, especially for younger patients. More studies investigating adjuvant therapy are warranted.

Pulmonary Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: Therapeutic Challenges and Opportunities

Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (P-LCNEC) is a rare, poorly differentiated, non-small cell malignancy within the spectrum of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the lung. Despite sharing several similarities with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in their clinical, immunohistopathological, genomic, and prognostic features, it is a distinct and biologically heterogeneous entity with challenging diagnostic and therapeutic requirements. Given the lack of prospective, randomized data to guide management, it is common practice to pursue thoracic surgery for resectable tumors according to the guidelines for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and implement systemic chemotherapy as early as at stage I, similar to the treatment of SCLC. However, important issues, such as the optimal timing and combination of therapeutic modalities, the most effective type of chemotherapy for advanced-stage disease, and the benefit from prophylactic cranial irradiation, remain debated. Accumulating evidence from retrospective, molecular profiling studies supports the existence of at least two P-LCNEC subtypes, most notably a SCLC-like and a NSCLC-like phenotype, which presumably underlie the observed differential sensitivity to platinum-based regimens and warrant further validation as predictive biomarkers of efficacy. Furthermore, several potentially actionable, driver molecular alterations have been identified, offering implications for personalized treatment approaches, including targeted therapies and immunotherapy. The current review discusses open questions on the diagnosis and management of P-LCNEC, as well as recent advances in its genomic and transcriptomic characterization that create promising therapeutic opportunities.

The role of radiotherapy in pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: propensity score matching analysis

The aim of the study was to investigate the survival advantage of radiotherapy (RT) in patients with pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC). Patients with pulmonary LCNEC were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) dataset between January 2004 and December 2013. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis with 1:1 was used to ensure well-balanced characteristics of all comparison groups. A total of 1480 eligible cases were identified, with a median follow-up time of 11 months (0-131 months). After PSM, 980 patients were classified in no radiotherapy (No RT) and radiotherapy (RT) groups (n = 490 each). Patients in the RT group harbored significantly higher 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates compared to those in the No RT group (both P < 0.05). Furthermore, RT was an independent favorable prognostic factor of OS as well as CSS in multivariate analysis, both before [OS: hazard ratio (HR) 0.840, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.739-0.954, P = 0.007; CSS: HR 0.847, 95% CI 0.741-0.967, P = 0.014] and after (OS: HR 0.854, 95% CI 0.736-0.970, P = 0.016; CSS: HR 0.848, 95% CI 0.735-0.978, P = 0.023) PSM. In subgroup analysis, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage II and III, tumor size 5-10 cm, patients who underwent no surgery, or patients who received chemotherapy could significantly benefit from RT (all P < 0.05). To sum up, our findings suggested that RT could prolong the survival of patients with pulmonary LCNEC, especially those with stage II and III, tumor size 5-10 cm, those with no surgery, or those who received chemotherapy.

Multiple faces of pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: update with a focus on practical approach to diagnosis

Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare and aggressive malignancy that is strongly linked to smoking and notoriously difficult to diagnose and treat. Recent molecular data reveal that it represents a biologically heterogeneous group of tumors, characterized by morphologic and genomic diversity that straddles small cell and non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLCs), and in a minority of cases atypical carcinoids. This review provides an update on recent molecular and clinical developments in LCNEC with the main focus on practical approach to pathologic diagnosis using illustrative examples of the main differential diagnostic considerations.

The role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (PLCNEC)

PURPOSE

To assess the long-term survivals and related prognostic indicators of patients with pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (PLCNEC), and determine the prognostic value of post-operative radiotherapy in PLCNEC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients diagnosed with PLCNEC between 2004 and 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were included in our study. Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate the factors related to overall survival (OS). Propensity score matching analysis (PSM analysis) was used to balance the variables differences between postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) and non-PORT groups.

RESULTS

A total of 701 postoperative cases were identified, with the median follow-up time of 23 months. The 3- and 5-year OS were 50.7%, and 41.2%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that stage I (P<0.001), age <65 years old (P<0.001), chemotherapy (P<0.001) were independent favorable prognostic factors. There is no significant difference in survival between patients with or without postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) after PSM analysis (P=0.489). No survival benefit in favor of PORT were displayed, even when subgroups were deeply analyzed.

CONCLUSIONS

Age, stage, and chemotherapy were significantly associated with OS of patients with resected PLCNEC. However, PORT after resection did not improve long-term outcome of PLCNEC patients.

Prognostic markers in resected large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: a multicentre retrospective analysis

Background

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNEC) are rare pulmonary malignancies. Reported survival rates are heterogeneous and the optimal therapeutic strategy is still debated. The prognosis of LCNEC is generally inferior compared to other non-small lung cancers. In early stages, surgery is recommended but might not be sufficient alone.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive LCNEC patients operated at three institutions with curative intent between May 2005 and January 2017. Data retrieved from individual clinical databases were analyzed with the aim to identify prognostic parameters.

Results

A total of 251 patients with LCNEC underwent curative intent surgery during the observation period. The median age was 64 years, 156 patients (62.2%) were male and 88.4% were smokers. The pathologic AJCC stage was I in 136 patients, II in 77, III in 33, and IV in 5 patients. Median follow-up was 26 months. Lymphatic vessel invasion (P=0.031) was identified as significant prognostic factor by multivariable analysis. There was a trend towards decreased survival in patients with blood vessel invasion (P=0.067). Even in earlier tumor stages, adjuvant chemotherapy had a positive effect on survival. The overall 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 79.2%, 48.6% and 38.8% respectively.

Conclusions

Lymphatic invasion (L1) is an independent prognostic factor. Surgery in LCNEC is beneficial in early tumor stages and platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy may help in achieving better long-term outcomes resulting in most obvious survival differences in stage Ib.

A Semiquantitative Scoring System May Allow Biopsy Diagnosis of Pulmonary Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to devise reproducible biopsy criteria for distinguishing pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) from non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC).

METHODS

Tissue microarrays of LCNEC and NSCLC were generated from resection specimens and used as biopsy surrogates. They were stained for neuroendocrine markers, Ki-67, napsin-A, and p40, and independently analyzed by standardized morphologic criteria by four pathologists. Tumors were scored based on morphology, neuroendocrine marker expression, and Ki-67 proliferative index.

RESULTS

The average total score for LCNEC was significantly higher than for NSCLC (5.65 vs 0.51, P < .0001). Utilizing a cutoff score of 4 or higher showed 100% sensitivity and 99% specificity for LCNEC diagnosis, with an excellent agreement among four pathologists (98%).

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed semiquantitative approach based on a combination of specific morphologic and immunophenotypic features may be a useful tool for biopsy diagnosis of LCNEC.

Prognostic nomogram predicts overall survival in pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare and typically aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis. This study developed a nomogram model to predict the overall survival (OS) of patients with LCNEC.

METHODS

LCNEC patients were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2004-2014. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to determine demographic and clinicopathological features associated with OS. A nomogram model was generated to predict OS and its performance was assessed by Harrell's concordance index (C-index), calibration plots, and subgroup analysis by risk scores.

RESULTS

Of 3048 eligible patients with LCNEC, 2138 were randomly grouped into the training set and 910 into the validation set. Age at diagnosis, gender, tumor stage, N stage, tumor size, and surgery of primary site were independent prognostic factors of OS. C-index values of the nomogram were 0.75 (95% CI, 0.74-0.76) and 0.76 (95% CI, 0.74-0.77) in the training and validation sets, respectively. In both cohorts, the calibration plots showed good concordance between the predicted and observed OS at 3 and 5 years. Kaplan-Meier curves revealed significant differences in OS in patients stratified by nomogram-based risk score, and patients with a higher-than-median risk score had poorer OS.

CONCLUSION

This is the first nomogram developed and validated in a large population-based cohort for predicting OS in patients with LCNEC, and it shows favorable discrimination and calibration abilities. Use of this proposed nomogram has the potential to improve prediction of survival risk, and lead to individualized clinical decisions for LCNEC.

Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung: A Population-Based Study

INTRODUCTION

Large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) accounts for approximately 3% of lung malignancies. There are limited data on the epidemiology and best treatment practices for this malignancy. This study aimed to be the largest cohort with the most up-to-date analysis of the epidemiology of LCNEC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was queried to identify cases of LCNEC diagnosed from 2010 through 2015, reflecting years the American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition staging system was in use. Using these data, we compared the epidemiology, demographics, clinical characteristics, and survival times of LCNEC with small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) and non-SCLC (NSCLC). Trends in incidence and mortality were recorded from 2004 to 2015.

RESULTS

A total of 195,148 cases of lung cancer, including 1681 (0.9%) cases of LCNEC, were analyzed. LCNEC was more common among male subjects, and disease usually presented at stage IV (55%). Brain metastasis occurred more frequently in LCNEC (19.2%) than SCLC (16.7%, P < .001) or NSCLC (13%, P < .001). Incidence increased by 0.011 people per 100,000 per year, primarily of stage IV disease. Annual mortality from LCNEC doubled over the time period studied. Survival in patients with stage I-III LCNEC mirrored survival trends of patients with NSCLC, whereas stage IV LCNEC behaved similarly to SCLC.

CONCLUSION

LCNEC generally presents at more advanced stages than NSCLC but earlier than SCLC. Stage I-III LCNEC behaves similarly to NSCLC, whereas stage IV is more akin to SCLC. LCNEC incidence is increasing. Despite this, it remains poorly studied and did not demonstrate an improved prognosis in our cohort.

Comparative study of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and small cell lung carcinoma in high-grade neuroendocrine tumors of the lung: a large population-based study

Background: In 2015, large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) was removed from the large cell carcinoma group and classified with small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) constituting two members of the high-grade neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the lung. However, the difference between high-grade LCNEC and SCLC in terms of clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis has not been fully understood owing to the rarity of LCNEC.

Patients and methods: Patients with high-grade LCNEC and SCLC at initial diagnosis between 2001 and 2014 were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program database. Clinicopathological characteristics between high-grade LCNEC and SCLC were compared using the Pearson's chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test. Differences in overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were compared using the log-rank test, Cox models and propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.

Results: A total of 1223 patients with high-grade LCNEC and 18182 patients with high-grade SCLC were enrolled. To the best of our knowledge, this study involved the largest number of high-grade LCNEC patients to date, with respect to a comparison between high-grade LCNEC and high-grade SCLC patients. There were significant differences in age, sex, race, laterality, SEER stage, nodal status, surgery, radiation and chemotherapy, but not marital status, between high-grade LCNEC and SCLC patients. High-grade LCNEC patients had a better OS and CSS than high-grade SCLC patients. Subgroup analysis also confirmed the better prognosis of the high-grade LCNEC patients in the regional stage, distant stage and surgery subgroups. However, no significant difference in prognosis was observed between the two non-surgery subgroups, which was confirmed using PSM analysis. Furthermore, high-grade LCNEC patients showed different metastatic patterns to high-grade SCLC patients.

Conclusion: These results suggested that high-grade LCNEC and high-grade SCLC were different histological types, and that a detailed classification for high-grade NETs of the lung was needed.

Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma aged ≥65 years

Objective

The present study was designed to better characterize the clinicopathological features and prognosis in patients aged ≥65 years with pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC).

Methods

Eligible patients with pulmonary LCNEC were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between January 2004 and December 2013. The primary endpoints included cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

Data of 1,619 eligible patients with pulmonary LCNEC were collected. These patients were subsequently categorized into two groups: 890 patients in the older group (age ≥65 years), and 729 in the younger group (age <65 years). More patients were of white ethnicity, stage I, married, and with tumor size <5 cm in the older group in comparison to the younger group. However, there were a significantly lower proportion of patients undergoing surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy in the older group. The 5-year CSS rates of the younger group and older group were 23.94% and 17.94% (P = 0.00031), respectively, and the 5-year OS rates were 20.51% and 13.47% (P < 0.0001), respectively. Multivariate analyses indicated that older age (CSS: HR 1.20, 95% CI [1.07-1.36], P = 0.0024; OS: HR 1.26, 95% CI [1.12-1.41], P < 0.0001) was an independent risk factor for poor prognosis. The mortality risk of the elderly increased in almost every subgroup, especially in OS. Finally, significant predictors for better OS and CSS in patients over age 65 included tumor size <5 cm, lower stage, and receiving surgery, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy.

Conclusion

The prognosis of patients aged ≥65 years with pulmonary LCNEC was worse than that of younger patients. However, active and effective therapy could significantly improve the survival of older patients with pulmonary LCNEC.

Lung Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: An Analysis of Patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results (SEER) Database

Background

The aim of this study was to assess the incidence, clinicopathologic characteristics, prognostic factors, and treatment outcomes in lung large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC).

Material/Methods

Patients diagnosed with lung LCNEC between 2000 and 2013 were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results database. Kaplan–Meier methods and univariate and multivariate analyses were used for statistical analysis.

Results

A total of 2097 patients were identified. The total age-adjusted incidence rate of lung LCNEC was 0.3/100 000, with a rise in incidence over the study period. The 5-year lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) and overall survival (OS) were 20.7% and 16.7%, respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated that age ≥65 years, male sex, advanced tumor stage, advanced nodal stage, not undergoing surgery. and not undergoing chemotherapy were independent adverse indicators for survival outcomes. After stratification by tumor stage, undergoing surgery was associated with more favorable LCSS and OS compared with those without surgery, regardless of tumor stage.

Conclusions

LCNEC is a rare lung cancer subtype with a dismal prognosis. Primary surgical treatment has significant survival benefits, even for stage IV patients. The optimal treatment strategies for lung LCNEC require further investigation.

Strong Antitumor Activity of Bevacizumab and Aflibercept in Neuroendocrine Carcinomas: In-Depth Preclinical Study

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is a rare and very aggressive tumor. It has been greatly understudied, and very little is known about optimal treatment strategy for patients with this disease. The purpose of this study was to evaluate in vivo whether anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs could be a therapeutic alternative for these tumors with a poor prognosis.

METHODS

We have developed 2 xenograft models using either human cell line derived from lung (H460) or from colon (COLO320) NEC to assess the effect of 2 antiangiogenic drugs, aflibercept and bevacizumab, on tumor growth and their pathological characteristics. Additionally, tumors were subjected to immunohistochemistry staining and proteins were measured with Western blot and ELISA.

RESULTS

Both aflibercept and bevacizumab showed significant antitumor activity (p < 0.001). In the H460 model, aflibercept resulted in 94% tumor growth inhibition (TGI) and bevacizumab treatment resulted in 72.2% TGI. Similarly, in the COLO320 model, aflibercept and bevacizumab resulted in 89.3 and 84% TGI, respectively. Moreover, antitumor activity occurs early after treatment initiation. Using Tumor Control Index score, which address the kinetics of tumor growth in a way comparable to the methods used in human clinical studies, we confirmed that both drugs inhibit significantly tumor growth. When tumor stabilization was evaluated, aflibercept shows higher ability to stabilize NEC tumors than bevacizumab.

CONCLUSION

Results derived from this study strongly support anti-VEGF therapies, especially aflibercept, as a novel therapeutic option in NECs. Further studies are necessary, but our observations encourage the evaluation of antiangiogenics in clinical trials combined with standard chemotherapy.

Management of brain metastases from large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung: improved outcomes with radiosurgery

OBJECTIVES

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the lung is a rare pulmonary tumor, having similar natural history and management strategy as small cell lung cancer. Therefore, the management of brain metastases in these patients has mirrored that of SCLC through the use of whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). We used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to look at predictors of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and any potential differences in outcomes for patients with brain metastases from LCNEC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We queried the NCDB from 2004 to 2015 for patients with LCNEC of the lung with brain metastases that received brain radiation. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify factors predictive of SRS use and overall survival (OS). Propensity-adjusted Cox proportional hazard ratios for survival were used to account for indication bias.

RESULTS

Out of 9970 patients with LCNEC of the lung we identified 348 with brain metastases. Sixty-eight patients were treated with upfront SRS and 280 were treated with WBRT. Patients that were treated at an academic facility or received chemotherapy as part of upfront treatment were more likely to receive SRS. Univariable analysis revealed improved outcomes with SRS compared to WBRT, with a median OS of 11 months compared to 6 months, respectively (p = .007). Multivariable Cox regression with propensity score confirmed SRS to have improved survival (HR: 0.68, 95%CI: 0.51-0.91, p = .0093). Multivariable Cox regression with propensity score also identified younger age, receipt of chemotherapy, absence of extracranial disease and non-rural locations as additional predictors of improved OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of brain metastases from LCNEC of the lung with SRS was associated with improved survival. For the appropriate patients, upfront treatment of limited brain metastases with SRS may be appropriate.

Clinicopathological characteristics, treatment and survival of pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: a SEER population-based study

Background

This study was designed to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics, treatment and survival of patients with pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC).

Methods

The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database was utilized to identify patients diagnosed with pulmonary LCNEC between 2004 and 2013. Kaplan–Meier analysis was conducted to determine the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rate. Univariate survival analysis along with log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards model were employed to detect independent prognostic factors.

Results

Pulmonary LCNEC accounted for 0.58% (2972/510607) of the total number of lung and bronchus carcinoma. And a total of 1,530 eligible cases were identified, with the median follow-up time of 11 months. To be specific, the 3-, 5-year OS and CSS rates were 22.8%, 16.8% and 26.5%, 20.8% respectively. Generally, pulmonary LCNEC was commonly detected in the elderly (72.2%), males (55.9%), the upper lobe (62.0%) and advanced AJCC stage (65.5%). Multivariate analysis revealed that elderly [(≥60 and <80 years) HR:1.203, 95% CI [1.053–1.375], P = 0.007; (≥80 years) HR:1.530, 95% CI [1.238–1.891], P < 0.001] and advanced AJCC stage [(stage III) HR:2.606, 95% CI [2.083–3.260], P < 0.001; (stage IV) HR:4.881, 95% CI [3.923–6.072], P < 0.001] were independent unfavorable prognostic factors, and that female (HR:0.845, 95% CI [0.754–0.947], P = 0.004)), surgery [(Segmentectomy/wedge resection) HR:0.526, 95% CI [0.413–0.669], P < 0.001; (Lobectomy/Bilobectomy) HR:0.357, 95% CI [0.290–0.440], P < 0.001;(Pneumonectomy) HR:0.491, 95% CI [0.355–0.679], P < 0.001] , chemotherapy (HR:0.442, 95% CI [0.389–0.503], P < 0.001) and radiation (HR:0.837, 95% CI [0.738–0.949], P = 0.005) were independent favorable prognostic factors.

Conclusion

To sum up, age at diagnosis, sex, AJCC 8th edition stage, surgery, chemotherapy and radiation were significantly associated with OS of patients with pulmonary LCNEC.

Comparison of genomic landscapes of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, small cell lung carcinoma, and large cell carcinoma

Background

The classification of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) has generated considerable debate and has been revised since its recognition as a separate entity. Although it shares clinical features with small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) and was classified with SCLC in the 2015 World Health Organization classification system, numerous studies have revealed inferior treatment outcomes of LCNEC when it was treated as SCLC. Because the incidence of LCNEC is rare, its mutational landscape has not been comprehensively interrogated.

Methods

We performed capture‐based ultra‐deep targeted sequencing on tumor samples of LCNEC, large cell carcinoma (LCC), and SCLC to elucidate its biological relationship with these subtypes and to identify potentially targetable molecular alterations.

Results

Our data revealed a molecular signature, consisting of RUNX1, ERBB4, BRCA1, and EPHA3, that is distinctively mutated in LCNEC. A majority (60%) of LCNEC patients harbored copy number variations (CNVs). Interestingly, there were no common CNVs shared among the three subtypes: NFкBIA amplification was shared between LCNEC and LCC, while AKT2 amplification was shared between LCNEC and SCLC. Furthermore, genetic alterations in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway were enriched in all three subtypes.

Conclusion

Despite the histological and/or morphological similarities among LCNEC, LCC, and SCLC, our data revealed a molecular signature, consisting of RUNX1, ERBB4, BRCA1, and EPHA3, that is distinctively mutated in LCNEC, which has the potential to be used as a panel of biomarkers to distinguish LCNEC from a molecular perspective. Furthermore, the molecular distinction among the three subtypes can also be reflected from CNV events.

Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: A large population-based analysis

BACKGROUND

The study was conducted to compare the clinicopathological characteristics, survival outcomes, and metastatic patterns between pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and other non-small cell lung cancer (ONSCLC), and to identify the prognostic factors of LCNEC.

METHODS

Data of patients diagnosed with LCNEC and ONSCLC from 2004 to 2014 were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results dataset. Pearson's chi-square tests were used to compare differences in clinicopathological characteristics. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. A propensity score was used for matching and a Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate and subgroup analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 2368 LCNEC cases and 231 672 ONSCLC cases were identified. LCNEC incidence increased slightly over time. Except for marital status, LCNEC patients had obviously different biological features to ONSCLC patients. Survival analysis showed that LCNEC had poorer outcomes than ONSCLC. Multivariate analysis revealed that female gender, black race, surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy were protective factors for LCNEC. Matched subgroup analysis further demonstrated that most subgroup factors favored ONSCLC, especially in early stage. Early-stage LCNEC patients had a higher risk of lung cancer-specific death than early-stage ONSCLC patients. Moreover, metastatic patterns were different between LCNEC and ONSCLC. LCNEC patients with isolated liver metastasis or combined invasion to other organs had poorer survival rates.

CONCLUSIONS

LCNEC has totally different clinicopathological characteristics and metastatic patterns to ONSCLC. LCNEC also has poorer survival outcomes, primarily because of isolated liver metastasis or combined invasion to other organs. Most subgroup factors are adverse factors for LCNEC.

Gamma Knife radiosurgery for brain metastases from pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: a Japanese multi-institutional cooperative study (JLGK1401)

OBJECTIVE In 1999, the World Health Organization categorized large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the lung as a variant of large cell carcinoma, and LCNEC now accounts for 3% of all lung cancers. Although LCNEC is categorized among the non-small cell lung cancers, its biological behavior has recently been suggested to be very similar to that of a small cell pulmonary malignancy. The clinical outcome for patients with LCNEC is generally poor, and the optimal treatment for this malignancy has not yet been established. Little information is available regarding management of LCNEC patients with brain metastases (METs). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for patients with brain METs from LCNEC. METHODS The Japanese Leksell Gamma Knife Society planned this retrospective study in which 21 Gamma Knife centers in Japan participated. Data from 101 patients were reviewed for this study. Most of the patients with LCNEC were men (80%), and the mean age was 67 years (range 39-84 years). Primary lung tumors were reported as well controlled in one-third of the patients. More than half of the patients had extracranial METs. Brain metastasis and lung cancer had been detected simultaneously in 25% of the patients. Before GKRS, brain METs had manifested with neurological symptoms in 37 patients. Additionally, prior to GKRS, resection was performed in 17 patients and radiation therapy in 10. A small cell lung carcinoma-based chemotherapy regimen was chosen for 48 patients. The median lesion number was 3 (range 1-33). The median cumulative tumor volume was 3.5 cm³, and the median radiation dose was 20.0 Gy. For statistical analysis, the standard Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine post-GKRS survival. Competing risk analysis was applied to estimate GKRS cumulative incidences of maintenance of neurological function and death, local recurrence, appearance of new lesions, and complications. RESULTS The overall median survival time (MST) was 9.6 months. MSTs for patients classified according to the modified recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) system were 25.7, 11.0, and 5.9 months for Class 1+2a (20 patients), Class 2b (28), and Class 3 (46), respectively. At 12 months after GKRS, neurological death-free and deterioration-free survival rates were 93% and 87%, respectively. Follow-up imaging studies were available in 78 patients. The tumor control rate was 86% at 12 months after GKRS. CONCLUSIONS The present study suggests that GKRS is an effective treatment for LCNEC patients with brain METs, particularly in terms of maintaining neurological status.

Relapsed Myasthenia Gravis after Nivolumab Treatment

Nivolumab is a newly introduced promising therapy for treating lung cancer that restores the anti-tumor immunity by disrupting programmed cell death-1-mediated immuno-suppressive signaling. Although "new-onset" autoimmune diseases are well-known immune-related adverse events, whether or not nivolumab exacerbates "pre-existing" autoimmune disease remains unclear. We herein report a patient with "pre-existing" myasthenia gravis in whom nivolumab was administered that flared up after the treatment with nivolumab. Regardless of the disease stability, nivolumab has the potential to exacerbate an autoimmune disease, and we must pay close attention to each patient's medical history before administering this agent.

Treatment outcomes and incidence of brain metastases in pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare type of high-grade pulmonary neuroendocrine tumor. The study objective is to investigate its survival outcomes, incidence of brain metastases, and patterns of recurrence.

METHODS

This is a single center study of patients with pathologic diagnosis of pulmonary LCNEC. Patient data were collected retrospectively and analyzed, including survival, incidence of brain metastases, and patterns of recurrence.

RESULTS

Of 87 patients (stages I: 24, II: 14, III: 23, IV: 26), 52 were managed curatively and 35 palliatively. The median follow-up time was 17.3 months (range 0.6-89.5) for those treated with curative intent and 7.0 months (range 0.1-28.6) for those treated palliatively. The 2- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates are 48.4% and 25.5% for the curative group, with a median OS of 13.5 months. In the palliative group, the OS are 30.8% at 1 year and 6.8% at 2 years, with a median OS of 7.0 months. Thirty-eight of 52 (73%) patients treated with curative intent had disease relapse, with the common sites being regional lymph nodes (20), brain (18), bones (11), and liver (9). The incidence of brain recurrence among those managed curatively are 21.4% and 41.3%, respectively at 1 and 2 years. Of 18 patients experiencing brain metastases, 14 developed them as part of a first relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

LCNEC's survival outcomes are poor. The incidence of brain metastases is higher than what is observed for other types of nonsmall cell lung cancers. Prophylactic cranial irradiation should be investigated as a means of improving outcomes.

Perioperative chemotherapy with pemetrexed and cisplatin for pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: a case report and literature review

Background

Pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is associated with poor prognosis, and its treatment strategy is still controversial, especially regarding chemotherapy regimens.

Case report

We present the case of a 49-year-old Chinese male with primary pulmonary LCNEC treated with neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin plus pemetrexed. A suspected quasi-circular mass in the left lower pulmonary lobe and an enlarged mediastinal lymph node were found. The patient was diagnosed with adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation based on computerized tomography-guided percutaneous lung biopsy. An EGFR gene mutation test showed negative results. Cisplatin and pemetrexed were administered as the neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen. The primary lesion had reduced markedly, and the enlarged mediastinal lymph node had disappeared after two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A left lower lobectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection were performed. The lesion was confirmed as LCNEC based on postoperative histopathological analysis and immunohistochemical results. The patient underwent four cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and pemetrexed for a month postoperatively, followed by postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy. The patient was still alive after a follow-up of 24 months, with no evidence of tumor recurrence.

Conclusion

Cisplatin combined with pemetrexed is effective and safe for patients with pulmonary LCNEC.

The Role of Systemic Therapy in the Management of Stage I Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung

INTRODUCTION

The optimal treatment strategy for resected stage I large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung (LCNEC) remains unknown. In this analysis, we evaluate the impact of systemic chemotherapy on patients with stage I LCNEC who have undergone surgical resection.

METHODS

The study population included patients who underwent surgical resection for LCNEC and had pathologic stage I disease. We compared overall survival between patients who underwent surgical resection alone and those who underwent surgical resection plus chemotherapy. Overall survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and comparisons were analyzed by using multivariable Cox models and propensity score-matched analyses.

RESULTS

From 2004 to 2013, 1232 patients underwent surgical resection for stage I LCNEC in the National Cancer Database, including 957 patients (77.7%) who underwent surgical resection alone and 275 (22.3%) who received both surgery and systemic chemotherapy. Five-year survival was significantly improved in patients who received chemotherapy (64.5% versus 48.4% [hazard ratio =0.54, 95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.68, p < 0.001]). Multivariable Cox modeling confirmed the survival benefit from chemotherapy for patients with resected stage I LCNEC (hazard ratio = 0.54, 95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.68, p <0.0001). The survival benefit was further confirmed by propensity-matched analysis. In addition, older (age >70 years), comorbid white patients who underwent sublobar resections for tumors larger than 20 mm had worse survival outcomes.

CONCLUSION

In this largest-reported retrospective study of patients with resected stage I LCNEC, survival was improved in patients who received chemotherapy in both stage IA and stage IB LCNEC.

The role of surgery in high grade neuroendocrine tumours of the lung

High grade lung neuroendocrine tumours are a heterogeneous subtype of pulmonary cancers including small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC). LCNEC represents approximately 2-3% of lung cancers, whereas SCLC represents 15-20% of lung cancers. Patients with SCLC and LCNEC have a poor prognosis compared with patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). LCNEC is treated with primary surgical resection in stages I-II, which is similar to other NSCLCs. Neo-adjuvant treatment in stage III is similar to NSCLC but has not been well studied. LCNEC tumours have an unfavourable prognosis in higher stages but a more favourable prognosis in earlier stages. Surgery plays a minor role in treatment of SCLC because tumours are often locally advanced or have metastasized at the time of presentation and treatment relies on chemo- or chemoradiotherapy. However, patients with limited cancer may demonstrate better disease control upon surgical treatment. The resection rate of limited disease (LD) SCLC is low (1-6%), but 5-year survival rates of 31-42% after surgical resection are encouraging and are significantly higher than the survival rates of comparable patients that did not have surgery. Curing SCLC in stage I is reported in up to 66% of cases. Local treatment with either resection or radiotherapy alone is followed by high rates of locoregional and distant recurrences, so preoperative or adjuvant treatment is recommended. Here, we summarise the similarities and differences of SCLC and LCNEC and highlight the role of surgery in the treatment of SCLC and LCNEC and its effect on local recurrence prevention.

TRP53 Mutants Drive Neuroendocrine Lung Cancer Through Loss-of-Function Mechanisms with Gain-of-Function Effects on Chemotherapy Response

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) as the most aggressive subtype. Preferential occurrence of TP53 missense mutations rather than loss implicates a selective advantage for TP53-mutant expression in SCLC pathogenesis. We show that lung epithelial expression of R270H and R172H (R273H and R175H in humans), common TRP53 mutants in lung cancer, combined with RB1 loss selectively results in two subtypes of neuroendocrine carcinoma, SCLC and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC). Tumor initiation and progression occur in a remarkably consistent time frame with short latency and uniform progression to lethal metastatic disease by 7 months. R270H or R172H expression and TRP53 loss result in similar phenotypes demonstrating that TRP53 mutants promote lung carcinogenesis through loss-of-function and not gain-of-function mechanisms. Tumor responses to targeted and cytotoxic therapeutics were discordant in mice and corresponding tumor cell cultures demonstrating need to assess therapeutic response at the organismal level. Rapamycin did not have therapeutic efficacy in the mouse model despite inhibiting mTOR signaling and markedly suppressing tumor cell growth in culture. In contrast, cisplatin/etoposide treatment using a patient regimen prolonged survival with development of chemoresistance recapitulating human responses. R270H, but not R172H, expression conferred gain-of-function activity in attenuating chemotherapeutic efficacy. These data demonstrate a causative role for TRP53 mutants in development of chemoresistant lung cancer, and provide tractable preclinical models to test novel therapeutics for refractory disease. Mol Cancer Ther; 16(12); 2913-26. ©2017 AACR.

A case of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the bladder with prolonged spontaneous remission

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the urinary bladder are rare. We present a case of a 72-year-old man who presented with back pain and acute renal failure. Ultrasound showed a soft tissue mass in the base of the bladder causing bilateral ureteric obstruction. Subsequent biopsy of this mass demonstrated neuroendocrine carcinoma. He was commenced on neoadjuvant chemotherapy (carboplatin/etoposide) and proceeded to a radical cysto-prostatectomy. Histology revealed a LCNEC involving the bladder, T4a with invasion through to adipose tissue and posteriorly at perivesical resection margins. In addition, there was a Gleason score 9 prostatic adenocarcinoma, distinct from the neuroendocrine carcinoma. Following surgery, the patient developed gross local-regional recurrence and refused further systemic therapy. However, 1 year following referral to palliative care, a further CT-PET showed complete spontaneous remission of his disease. There are only few case reports of LCNEC of the urinary bladder therefore the pathogenesis and treatment protocol are still unclear. This case report highlights the unpredictable nature of this disease.

A selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometric assessment of biomarker candidates diagnosing large-cell neuroendocrine lung carcinoma by the scaling method using endogenous references

Selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometry (SRM-MS) -based semi-quantitation was performed to assess the validity of 46 selected candidate proteins for specifically diagnosing large-cell neuroendocrine lung carcinoma (LCNEC) and differentiating it from other lung cancer subtypes. The scaling method was applied in this study using specific SRM peak areas (AUCs) derived from the endogenous reference protein that normalizes all SRM AUCs obtained for the candidate proteins. In a screening verification study, we found that seven out of the 46 candidate proteins were statistically significant for the LCNEC phenotype, including 4F2hc cell surface antigen heavy chain (4F2hc/CD98) (p-ANOVA ≤ 0.0012), retinal dehydrogenase 1 (p-ANOVA ≤ 0.0029), apolipoprotein A-I (p-ANOVA ≤ 0.0004), β-enolase (p-ANOVA ≤ 0.0043), creatine kinase B-type (p-ANOVA ≤ 0.0070), and galectin-3-binding protein (p-ANOVA = 0.0080), and phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein 1 (p-ANOVA ≤ 0.0012). In addition, we also identified candidate proteins specific to the small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) subtype. These candidates include brain acid soluble protein 1 (p-ANOVA < 0.0001) and γ-enolase (p-ANOVA ≤ 0.0013). This new relative quantitation-based approach utilizing the scaling method can be applied to assess hundreds of protein candidates obtained from discovery proteomic studies as a first step of the verification phase in biomarker development processes.

Dermatomyositis Associated with Lung Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

Dermatomyositis is associated with various types of malignancy. However, the association of dermatomyositis with lung neuroendocrine carcinoma is rare. We herein report a case of dermatomyositis with lung neuroendocrine carcinoma.

[Lung neuroendocrine large-cell carcinoma in young women - An unusual presentation]

INTRODUCTION

Lung neuroendocrine large-cell carcinoma (LNELCC) is a rare tumour with a poor prognosis. There are very few guidelines for LNELCC treatment but a better knowledge of its biology could improve the treatment and prognosis of this malignancy.

OBSERVATIONS

We present the cases of 2 patients who presented initially with early stage carcinoid tumours treated with surgery. Both patients had further new neuroendocrine disease diagnosed because of intermittent carcinoid syndrome, predominantly occurring at the same time as menstruation. They were then diagnosed with metastatic LNELCC. They were treated with first-line cisplatin-etoposide and second-line octreotide based on the protocol used for treatment of gastro-intestinal neuroendocrine tumours. They both had a good prognosis with no disease progression to date.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical characteristics of these cases raise several questions about the pathophysiology of LNELCC and may suggest potential new treatment options. The unusual clinical presentation and good prognosis may be explained either by the second-line treatment choice or by potential molecular or hormonal biomarkers. There is a need to investigate these potential biomarkers further since they could be new therapeutic targets.