The Impact of Admission Diagnosis on Recurrent or Frequent Hospitalizations in 3 Dementia Subtypes: A Hospital-Based Cohort in Taiwan with 4 Years Longitudinal Follow-Ups

Insights into young-onset dementia hospitalizations: An 8-year nationwide study using administrative data

OBJECTIVE

To characterize all Portuguese public hospitalizations of patients aged < 65 years with a primary or secondary diagnosis of dementia, based on ICD-9-CM coding.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was conducted using a nationwide database encompassing all hospitalizations occurred in Portuguese mainland public hospitals with discharge from 2008 to 2015. Hospitalizations of patients aged 35-64 years with primary or secondary diagnoses of dementia were selected based on ICD-9-CM codes 290.1X-290.4X, 291.2, 292.82, 294.1X, 294.2X, 331.0, 331.1X, 331.82, 333.4 and 046.1, excluding diagnostic codes 317-319, 330.X, 343, 758.0-758.3 and 759.3. Information on age, sex, primary diagnosis, comorbidities (secondary diagnosis), type of admission, length of stay (LoS), in-hospital mortality, suicide attempts, discharge destination, readmissions and dementia etiology was collected.

RESULTS

From 7971 hospitalizations, for 5682 inpatients, the median age was 57.3 years (SD±6.5) and 61.8% were of male patients. Vascular dementia was the most prevalent etiology, followed by Alzheimer's disease. Most admissions were urgent and had a primary diagnosis of 'Delirium, dementia and other cognitive disorders', followed by pneumonia and alcohol-related disorders. Dementia, cerebrovascular disease and diabetes were the most common comorbidities. Overall, 55.4% of admissions were first-time admissions during the study period and the median LoS was 10.0 days (Q1;Q3: 5.0;20.0). Suicide attempts were recorded in 0.6% of the episodes. The in-hospital mortality rate was 9.2% and most patients were discharged home (80.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study describes the complexity and strain of young-onset dementia hospitalizations providing a detailed overview and recommendations for further research and tailored interventions.

The Impact of Comorbid Dementia and Diabetes Mellitus on Hospital Patients' Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Previous reviews have demonstrated that dementia and diabetes mellitus, separately, can worsen the hospital outcomes of patients. Unfortunately, there are no systematic evaluations regarding the hospital outcomes of patients with dementia and diabetes mellitus as a comorbidity. Therefore, our review aimed to determine any differences in hospital length of stay, hospital mortality, and hospital readmission between patients with the comorbidity and patients without.

METHODS

Searches were conducted of Medline, CINHAL, EMBASE, PsychINFO, Web of Science and Google Scholar for original studies. All studies were quality assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. Where possible, studies were pooled in a meta-analysis to generate odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Sixteen studies were included in this review. When comparing patients with the comorbidity to patients with dementia, the difference in length of stay was inconclusive, and there was no difference in the odds of hospital mortality (OR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.91-1.06). However, patients with the comorbidity had increased odds of 30-day readmission compared to patients with dementia alone (OR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.14-1.26). When comparing patients with the comorbidity to patients with diabetes, those with the comorbidity had a longer length of stay and but no difference in the odds of hospital mortality (OR = 1.48, 95% CI 0.84-2.62). Additionally, those with the comorbidity may have worse readmission outcomes than those with diabetes alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that patients with comorbid dementia and diabetes mellitus may have worse hospital outcomes. Therefore, we recommend further research to assess these patients' hospital outcomes to resolve the discrepancies found.

Determinants of hospital readmissions in older people with dementia: a narrative review

INTRODUCTION

Over 50% of hospitalised older people with dementia have multimorbidity, and are at an increased risk of hospital readmissions within 30 days of their discharge. Between 20-40% of these readmissions may be preventable. Current research focuses on the physical causes of hospital readmissions. However, older people with dementia have additional psychosocial factors that are likely to increase their risk of readmissions. This narrative review aimed to identify psychosocial determinants of hospital readmissions, within the context of known physical factors.

METHODS

Electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsychInfo were searched from inception until July 2022 and followed up in February 2024. Quantitative and qualitative studies in English including adults aged 65 years and over with dementia, their care workers and informal carers were considered if they investigated hospital readmissions. An inductive approach was adopted to map the determinants of readmissions. Identified themes were described as narrative categories.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies including 7,194,878 participants met our inclusion criteria from a total of 6369 articles. Sixteen quantitative studies included observational cohort and randomised controlled trial designs, and one study was qualitative. Ten studies were based in the USA, and one study each from Taiwan, Australia, Canada, Sweden, Japan, Denmark, and The Netherlands. Large hospital and insurance records provided data on over 2 million patients in one American study. Physical determinants included reduced mobility and accumulation of long-term conditions. Psychosocial determinants included inadequate hospital discharge planning, limited interdisciplinary collaboration, socioeconomic inequalities among ethnic minorities, and behavioural and psychological symptoms. Other important psychosocial factors such as loneliness, poverty and mental well-being, were not included in the studies.

CONCLUSION

Poorly defined roles and responsibilities of health and social care professionals and poor communication during care transitions, increase the risk of readmission in older people with dementia. These identified psychosocial determinants are likely to significantly contribute to readmissions. However, future research should focus on the understanding of the interaction between a host of psychosocial and physical determinants, and multidisciplinary interventions across care settings to reduce hospital readmissions.

Predictive Strategies to Reduce the Risk of Rehospitalization with a Focus on Frail Older Adults: A Narrative Review

Frailty is a geriatric syndrome that has physical, cognitive, psychological, social, and environmental components and is characterized by a decrease in physiological reserves. Frailty is associated with several adverse health outcomes such as an increase in rehospitalization rates, falls, delirium, incontinence, dependency on daily living activities, morbidity, and mortality. Older adults may become frailer with each hospitalization; thus, it is beneficial to develop and implement preventive strategies. The present review aims to highlight the epidemiological importance of frailty in rehospitalization and to compile predictive strategies and related interventions to prevent hospitalizations. Firstly, it is important to identify pre-frail and frail older adults using an instrument with high validity and reliability, which can be a practically applicable screening tool. Comprehensive geriatric assessment-based care is an important strategy known to reduce morbidity, mortality, and rehospitalization in older adults and aims to meet the needs of frail patients with a multidisciplinary approach and intervention that includes physiological, psychological, and social domains. Moreover, effective multimorbidity management, physical activity, nutritional support, preventing cognitive frailty, avoiding polypharmacy and anticholinergic drug burden, immunization, social support, and reducing the caregiver burden are other recommended predictive strategies to prevent post-discharge rehospitalization in frail older adults.

Neuropsychiatric Symptoms and Caregiver Stress in Parkinson's Disease with Cognitive Impairment, Alzheimer's Disease, and Frontotemporal Dementia

BACKGROUND

A better understanding of factors associated with caregiver burden might facilitate the construction of coping strategies to improve their clinical outcomes and the comprehensive care model for dementia.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the cognitive and neuropsychiatric domains that contribute to caregiver burden in three types of neurodegenerative disorders: Parkinson's disease (PD), Alzheimer's disease (AD), and frontotemporal disease (FTD).

METHODS

Eight hundred and fourteen patients and their caregivers were invited to participate; among them, 235 had PD with cognitive impairment; 429 had AD, and 150 had FTD. The evaluation protocol included the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), the Mini-Mental State Examination, the Chinese Version Verbal Learning Test, the modified Trail Making Test B, semantic fluency, and a geriatric depression score. Statistical comparisons of the cognitive tests, NPI total scores, and caregiver burden among the three diagnosed types of dementia, matched for a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) of 0.5 or 1, were performed, and multivariate linear regression models were used to evaluate the parameter significance.

RESULTS

Caregivers for patients with PD and FTD showed significant burden increments when the CDR scores changes from 0.5 to 1. For CDR = 0.5, the PD group had significantly lower caregiver burdens than the AD group, but the NPI total scores were significantly higher. Factors related to caregiver burden were the presence of delusion among all diagnosis groups, while the impact of NPI total scores related to caregiver burden was the highest in FTD, followed by AD and PD.

CONCLUSIONS

At the mild to moderate stages, our results suggested different degrees of significance in terms of the cognitive test scores or NPI subdomains for predicting caregiver stress among the three types of dementia.

Risk factors and machine learning model for predicting hospitalization outcomes in geriatric patients with dementia

Introduction

Geriatric patients with dementia incur higher healthcare costs and longer hospital stays than other geriatric patients. We aimed to identify risk factors for hospitalization outcomes that could be mitigated early to improve outcomes and impact overall quality of life.

Methods

We identified risk factors, that is, demographics, hospital complications, pre-admission, and post-admission risk factors including medical history and comorbidities, affecting hospitalization outcomes determined by hospital stays and discharge dispositions. Over 150 clinical and demographic factors of 15,678 encounters (8407 patients) were retrieved from our institution's data warehouse. We further narrowed them down to twenty factors through feature selection engineering by using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Glmnet. We developed an explainable machine-learning model to predict hospitalization outcomes among geriatric patients with dementia.

Results

Our model is based on stacking ensemble learning and achieved accuracy of 95.6% and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.757. It outperformed prevalent methods of risk assessment for encounters of patients with Alzheimer's disease dementia (ADD) (4993), vascular dementia (VD) (4173), Parkinson's disease with dementia (PDD) (3735), and other unspecified dementias (OUD) (2777). Top identified hospitalization outcome risk factors, mostly from medical history, include encephalopathy, number of medical problems at admission, pressure ulcers, urinary tract infections, falls, admission source, age, race, anemia, etc., with several overlaps in multi-dementia groups.

Discussion

Our model identified several predictive factors that can be modified or intervened so that efforts can be made to prevent recurrence or mitigate their adverse effects. Knowledge of the modifiable risk factors would help guide early interventions for patients at high risk for poor hospitalization outcome as defined by hospital stays longer than seven days, undesirable discharge disposition, or both. The interventions include starting specific protocols on modifiable risk factors like encephalopathy, falls, and infections, where non-existent or not routine, to improve hospitalization outcomes of geriatric patients with dementia.

Highlights

A total 15,678 encounters of Geriatrics with dementia with a final 20 risk factors.Developed a predictive model for hospitalization outcomes for multi-dementia types.Risk factors for each type were identified including those amenable to interventions.Top factors are encephalopathy, pressure ulcers, urinary tract infection (UTI), falls, and admission source.With accuracy of 95.6%, our ensemble predictive model outperforms other models.

A Scoping Review of Care Trajectories across Multiple Settings for Persons with Dementia

Multiple transitions across care settings can be disruptive for older adults with dementia and their care partners, and can lead to fragmented care with adverse outcomes. This scoping review was conducted to identify and classify care trajectories across multiple settings for people with dementia, and to understand the prevalence of multiple transitions and associated factors at the individual and organizational levels. Searches of three databases, limited to peer-reviewed studies published between 2007 and 2017, provided 33 articles for inclusion. We identified 26 distinct care trajectories. Common trajectories involved hospital readmission or discharge from hospital to long-term care. Factors associated with transitions were identified mainly at the level of demographic and medical characteristics. Findings suggest a need for investing in stronger community-based systems of care that may reduce transitions. Further research is recommended to address knowledge gaps about complex and longitudinal care trajectories and trajectories experienced by sub-populations of people living with dementia.

Characteristics and Outcome Determinants of Hospitalized Older Patients with Cognitive Dysfunction

Cognitive dysfunction commonly occurs among older patients during admission and is associated with adverse prognosis. This study evaluated clinical characteristics and outcome determinants in hospitalized older patients with cognitive disorders. The main outcomes were length of stay, readmission within 30 days, Barthel index (BI) score at discharge, BI score change (discharge BI score minus BI score), and proportion of positive BI score change to indicate change of activities of daily living (ADL) change during hospitalization. A total of 642 inpatients with a mean age of 79.47 years (76–103 years) were categorized into three groups according to the medical history of dementia, and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores at admission. Among them, 74 had dementia diagnosis (DD), 310 had cognitive impairment (CI), and 258 had normal MMSE scores. Patients with DD and CI generally had a higher risk of many geriatric syndromes, such as multimorbidities, polypharmacy, delirium, incontinence, visual and auditory impairment, fall history, physical frailty. They had less BI score, BI score change, and proportion of positive BI score change ADL at discharge. (DD 70.0%, CI 79.0%), suggesting less ADL change during hospitalization compared with those with normal MMSE scores (92.9%; p < 0.001). Using multiple regression analysis, we found that among patients with DD and CI, age (p = 0.008) and walking speed (p = 0.023) were predictors of discharge BI score. In addition, age (p = 0.047) and education level were associated with dichotomized BI score change (positive vs. non-positive) during hospitalization. Furthermore, the number and severity of comorbidities predicted LOS (p < 0.001) and readmission (p = 0.001) in patients with cognitive disorders. It is suggested that appropriate strategies are required to improve clinical outcomes in these patients.

Urgent care for patients with dementia: a scoping review of associated factors and stakeholder experiences

OBJECTIVES

People with dementia are more vulnerable to complications in urgent health situations due to older age, increased comorbidity, higher dependency on others and cognitive impairment. This review explored the factors associated with urgent care use in dementia and the experiences of people with dementia, informal carers and professionals.

DESIGN

Scoping review. The search strategy and data synthesis were informed by people with dementia and carers.

DATA SOURCES

Searches of CINAHL, Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, PubMed were conducted alongside handsearches of relevant journals and the grey literature through 15 January 2019.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Empirical studies including all research designs, and other published literature exploring factors associated with urgent care use in prehospital and emergency room settings for people with dementia were included. Two authors independently screened studies for inclusion.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data were extracted using charting techniques and findings were synthesised according to content and themes.

RESULTS

Of 2967 records identified, 54 studies were included in the review. Specific factors that influenced use of urgent care included: (1) common age-related conditions occurring alongside dementia, (2) dementia as a diagnosis increasing or decreasing urgent care use, (3) informal and professional carers, (4) patient characteristics such as older age or behavioural symptoms and (5) the presence or absence of community support services. Included studies reported three crucial components of urgent care situations: (1) knowledge of the patient and dementia as a condition, (2) inadequate non-emergency health and social care support and (3) informal carer education and stress.

CONCLUSIONS

The scoping review highlighted a wider variety of sometimes competing factors that were associated with urgent care situations. Improved and increased community support for non-urgent situations, such as integrated care, caregiver education and dementia specialists, will both mitigate avoidable urgent care use and improve the experience of those in crisis.

[Dementia-specific characteristics of patients with fall-related femur fractures : A case study based on routine hospital data of patients with unspecified dementia]

BACKGROUND

A fall-related femur fracture is one of the most frequent reasons for hospital admission of patients with dementia. The aim of the study was to identify dementia-specific characteristics of patients with fall-related femur fractures and additionally an unspecified dementia in order to gain further knowledge about this particular patient group.

METHODS

A descriptive explorative case study with a single case-embedded design based on routine hospital data from a university hospital was performed. A total number of 34 patient records from 2015 were analyzed. In the embedded unit of analysis I the data of selected items of the nursing assessment AcuteCare (ePA-AC©) were descriptively analyzed for the time of admission and discharge. In the embedded unit of analysis II a summarizing inductive content analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

The results of the embedded unit of analysis I showed that this patient group is characterized by a high need for care, changes of cognition and behavioral symptoms. The status of cognition, behavior and reciprocity as well as the self-care index stagnated or deteriorated in many patients from admission to discharge. The embedded unit of analysis II identified observable (social)behavior, (non)compliance and orientation as central dementia-specific characteristics.

CONCLUSION

The results reflect the complexity of the care situation of patients with unspecified dementia in acute care hospitals. The results showed that a higher awareness for this particular patient group is needed to improve outcomes.

Hospital readmission in persons with dementia: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Hospital readmission in persons with dementia is becoming a critical safety and cost issue. The purpose of this review is to systematically assess published evidence on hospital readmissions in persons with dementia, including rate, clinical reasons, risk factors, and prevention programs.

METHODS

A systematic review of relevant literature was conducted. Literature were searched in PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Embase as well as hand searching. Quality of reviewed studies were assessed independently by reviewers using quality assessment checklists.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed. In persons with dementia, all-cause 30-day readmission rate was most frequently reported and ranged from 7% to 35%. Compared with those without dementia, persons with dementia had significantly higher rate of readmission. Reported risk factors of readmission varied across studies from patient sociodemographic and clinical status, history of health care utilization, to family caregivers. Reasons for readmission were rarely documented. Programs of home-based individualized care and interdisciplinary team care were used for preventing readmissions. Findings from some of the studies were limited by small sample sizes, single data source, and other methodologic flaws.

CONCLUSIONS

Persons with dementia are at high risk for hospital readmission, but many of the readmissions are potentially preventable. Multiple strategies such like identifying high-risk individuals and the clinical reasons for index admission and readmission and implementing home-based individualized care by interdisciplinary team can reduce preventable hospital readmissions. Future studies should use multiple national data sources and advanced methodology to identify risk factors and clinical reasons of hospital readmissions.

Causes and outcomes of hospitalization in Lewy body dementia: A retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Understanding hospitalization in Lewy body dementia (LBD) is a known knowledge gap. We aimed to identify common causes, medication profiles, complications, and outcomes of hospitalization in LBD.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study investigated details of academic medical center hospitalizations over a two-year period for patients with LBD. Data collected included demographics, home medications, pre-hospital living status, reason for admission, admission service, inpatient medications, complications, and discharge status. Non-parametric statistics assessed associations between variables and length of stay. Odds of a change in living situation based on admission variables was calculated.

RESULTS

The study included 178 hospitalizations (117 individuals). Neuropsychiatric symptoms were the most common admission reason (40%), followed by falls (24%) and infection (23%). Patients were usually admitted to medicine services; neurology or psychiatric consultations occurred less than 40% of the time. Antipsychotics were administered during 38% of hospitalizations. Use of antipsychotics other than quetiapine or clozapine was associated with longer length of stay and increased odds of discharge to a higher level of care. One-third of hospitalizations resulted in transition to a higher level of care; 15% ended in hospice care or death.

CONCLUSION

The most common reasons for hospitalization in LBD are potentially modifiable. Opportunities for improved care include increased involvement of neurological and psychiatric services, delirium prevention strategies, and reduced antipsychotic use. Clinicians should counsel patients and families that hospitalizations in LBD can be associated with end of life. Research is needed to identify strategies to prevent hospitalization and optimal standards for inpatient care.

FUNDING

Lewy body dementia research at the University of Florida is supported by the University of Florida Dorothy Mangurian Headquarters for Lewy Body Dementia and the Raymond E. Kassar Research Fund for Lewy Body Dementia.

Hospital outcomes of older people with cognitive impairment: An integrative review

OBJECTIVES

To summarise existing knowledge of outcomes of older hospital patients with cognitive impairment, including the type and frequency of outcomes reported, and the additional risk experienced by this patient group.

METHODS

Integrative literature review. Health care literature databases, reports, and policy documents on key websites were systematically searched. Papers describing the outcomes of older people with cognitive impairment during hospitalisation and at discharge were analysed and summarised using integrative methods.

RESULTS

One hundred four articles were included. A range of outcomes were identified, including those occurring during hospitalisation and at discharge. Older people with a dementia diagnosis were at higher risk from death in hospital, nursing home admission, long lengths of stay, as well as intermediate outcomes such as delirium, falls, dehydration, reduction in nutritional status, decline in physical and cognitive function, and new infections in hospital. Fewer studies examined the relationship of all-cause cognitive impairment with outcomes. Patient and carer experiences of hospital admission were often poor. Few studies collected data relating to hospital environment, eg, ward type or staffing levels, and acuity of illness was rarely described.

CONCLUSIONS

Older people with cognitive impairment have a higher risk of a variety of negative outcomes in hospital. Prevalent intermediate outcomes suggest that changes in care processes are required to ensure maintenance of fundamental care provision and greater attention to patient safety in this vulnerable group. More research is required to understand the most appropriate ways of doing this and how changes in these care processes are best implemented to improve hospital outcomes.

Hospital admissions 2000-2014: A retrospective analysis of 288 096 events in patients with dementia

INTRODUCTION

Dementia is a leading cause of disability worldwide. It is associated with an increased risk of hospitalization, imposing a significant burden on healthcare systems. The evidence on the long-term evolution of this issue and broadly on healthcare systems is currently limited. This study aims to describe the hospitalizations of people who received a diagnosis of dementia admitted to public general hospitals in a western European country with universal health coverage, over more than a decade.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study analyzed all inpatient episodes from 2000 to 2014 with a primary or secondary diagnosis of dementia using a national hospitalization database from mainland Portuguese public hospitals.

RESULTS

A total of 288 096 hospital admissions were registered. Hospitalization rates increased 4.7 times throughout the study period. Pneumonia and urinary tract infections were the most frequent main diagnoses, while dementia itself was the cause of admission in a minority (6.8%) of cases. Cerebrovascular disease, diabetes without chronic complications, and congestive heart failure were the most prevalent comorbidities; 5.9% of patients with dementia admitted to hospital underwent a surgical procedure, orthopedic surgeries being the most frequent. The median length of hospital stay was 8.0 days, and in-hospital mortality rate was 16.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Dementia patients represent a significant amount of hospital admissions. Most leading causes of hospital admissions are preventable if timely diagnosed and could be effectively managed in the outpatient setting. These findings may be useful for healthcare resource planning and allocation. Further research should drive evidence-based reorganization of health care systems.

Hospital Admissions in People With Alzheimer's Disease or Senile Dementia According to Type 2 Diabetes Status: An Observational 10-Year Study

We aimed to describe admission rates and outcomes of hospitalized people with Alzheimer's disease (AD) or senile dementia stratified by type 2 diabetes (T2D) in Spain, 2004 to 2013 (N = 541 858, 143 501 [26.5%] of whom had T2D). We excluded alternative causes of dementia. Hospitalization rates were higher in people with T2D (130.5 vs 91.5 cases/105 people). People older than 84 years and comorbidity increased over time. Crude inhospital mortality (IHM) decreased over time both in people with and without T2D (all P values <.001). Time trend analyses, 2004 to 2013, showed an overall adjusted incidence rate ratio (95% confidence interval [95% CI]) of hospitalization of 1.41 (1.40-1.42) for T2D (men, 1.32 [1.30-1.33]; women, 1.46 [1.45-1.48]). In logistic regression analyses, IHM decreased over time (odds ratio, OR [95% CI] = 0.97 [0.96-0.98]) and T2D was not associated with a higher IHM (OR [95% CI] = 0.99 [0.98-1.01]). In conclusion, admission rates were higher in patients with T2D. Inhospital mortality decreased over time. Diabetes did not predict IHM in patients with AD or senile dementia.

Observational study of vascular dementia in the Spanish elderly population according to type 2 diabetes status: trends in incidence, characteristics and outcomes (2004-2013)

OBJECTIVES

To examine trends overtime in the incidence and in-hospital outcomes of vascular dementia (VaD) hospitalisations in patients aged 70 years or over suffering and not suffering from type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) between 2004 and 2013 in Spain.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Spain.

PARTICIPANTS

National hospital discharge data were used; patients aged ≥70, discharged from a hospital with VaD as a primary diagnosis, were selected.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Overall incidence, therapeutic and diagnostic procedures, comorbidities, infectious complications, duration of hospital stays and in-hospital mortality (IHM).

RESULTS

In total, 170 607 admissions for VaD (34.3% with T2DM) were identified. We found a significant upward linear trend in the incidence of VaD for men and women with and without diabetes between 2004 and 2013. The adjusted incidence was higher among people with T2DM over the study period. We found a higher incidence in men than women in all years under study. A positive association between T2DM and VaD hospitalisation was found among both men (IRR 2.14, 95% CI 2.11 to 2.16) and women (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 2.22; 95% CI 2.19 to 2.25). Pneumonia was significantly associated with a higher mortality (OR 2.59, 95% CI 2.52 to 2.67). We found that percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy was associated with lower IHM (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.45), while parenteral nutrition had the opposite effect (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.41). There was no association between diabetes and higher IHM (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.06). The time-trend analyses of the entire sample showed a significant reduction in mortality in patients with VaD (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97 to 0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

Incidence rates for VaD hospitalisations were twice as high in patients with diabetes compared with those without. Men had significantly higher incidence rates than women, regardless of diabetes status. In both groups studied, pneumonia and parenteral nutrition were associated with mortality while percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy was associated with survival. Having diabetes was not associated with higher IHM after hospitalisation with VaD.