Comparative efficacy and safety of oral antidiabetic drugs and insulin in treating gestational diabetes mellitus: An updated PRISMA-compliant network meta-analysis

Efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatments for gestational diabetes: a systematic review comparing metformin with glibenclamide and insulin

AIM

Gestational diabetes, characterized by impaired glucose tolerance occurring or diagnosed during pregnancy, is a significant public health concern. When lifestyle and dietary measures fail (30 % of women), insulin is the standard treatment. Oral antidiabetic agents, such as metformin (Glucophage) and glibenclamide, could provide a promising alternative. The aim here was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of these treatments in gestational diabetes.

METHODS

This study is based on a systematic literature review. A keyword search for "metformin (Glucophage)," "glibenclamide," "pregnancy," and "gestational diabetes" was conducted in the PubMed and Google Scholar databases from 2013 to 2023.

RESULTS

A total of 45 studies were selected and analyzed. metformin (Glucophage) appears to offer a combination of effectiveness in glycemic control and maternal and neonatal safety. Compared to insulin, it reduces maternal weight gain, lowers maternal hypoglycemia rates, and shows a tendency to reduce gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Additionally, infants born to mothers on metformin (Glucophage) are less likely to be macrosomic, experience fewer neonatal hypoglycemic episodes, and require fewer admissions to intensive care units. On the other hand, glibenclamide seems effective in glycemic control but is associated with higher rates of macrosomia and neonatal hypoglycemia.

CONCLUSION

Metformin (Glucophage) appears to be a promising alternative to insulin for treating gestational diabetes, while uncertainties remain regarding the safety of glibenclamide.

Metformin in gestational diabetes: physiological actions and clinical applications

Metformin is an effective oral hypoglycaemic agent used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus; however, its use in pregnancy for the treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) remains controversial owing to concerns around safety and efficacy. This comprehensive review outlines the physiological metabolic functions of metformin and synthesizes existing literature and key knowledge gaps pertaining to the use of metformin in pregnancy across various end points in women with GDM. On the basis of current evidence, metformin reduces gestational weight gain, neonatal hypoglycaemia and macrosomia and increases insulin sensitivity. However, considerable heterogeneity between existing studies and the grouping of aggregate and often inharmonious data within meta-analyses has led to disparate findings regarding the efficacy of metformin in treating hyperglycaemia in GDM. Innovative analytical approaches with stratification by individual-level characteristics (for example, obesity, ethnicity, GDM severity and so on) and treatment regimens (diagnostic criteria, treatment timing and follow-up duration) are needed to establish efficacy across a range of end points and to identify which, if any, subgroups might benefit from metformin treatment during pregnancy.

Earlier detection of gestational diabetes impacts on medication requirements, neonatal and maternal outcomes

AIM

Gestational diabetes (GD) is a global health concern with significant implications for maternal and neonatal outcomes. This study investigates the association between early GD (eGD) diagnosis (<24 weeks), pharmacotherapy requirements and adverse neonatal outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cohort of 369 pregnant women underwent a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test. Maternal variables, pharmacotherapy prescriptions and neonatal outcomes were analysed employing t-tests, χ2 tests, and logistic regression. A p < .05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Early GD increased the odds of neonatal hypoglycaemia [odds ratio (OR): 18.57, p = .013] and respiratory distress syndrome (OR: 4.75, p = .034). Nutritional therapy prescription by an accredited nutritionist was the most common treatment in women diagnosed after 24 weeks, but those with eGD required more frequently specialized nutritional consulting + metformin to achieve glycaemic control (p = .027). eGD was associated with a higher requirement of nutritional therapy prescription + metformin (OR: 2.26, 95% confidence interval: 1.25-4.09, p = .007) and with maternal hyperglycaemia during the post-partum period at 2 h of the oral glucose tolerance test (OR: 1.03, 95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.13, p = .024).

CONCLUSION

Timely diagnosis and personalized treatment of GD are desirable because an earlier presentation is related to a higher risk of adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes.

Epidemiology and management of gestational diabetes

Gestational diabetes is defined as hyperglycaemia first detected during pregnancy at glucose concentrations that are less than those of overt diabetes. Around 14% of pregnancies globally are affected by gestational diabetes; its prevalence varies with differences in risk factors and approaches to screening and diagnosis; and it is increasing in parallel with obesity and type 2 diabetes. Gestational diabetes direct costs are US$1·6 billion in the USA alone, largely due to complications including hypertensive disorders, preterm delivery, and neonatal metabolic and respiratory consequences. Between 30% and 70% of gestational diabetes is diagnosed in early pregnancy (ie, early gestational diabetes defined by hyperglycaemia before 20 weeks of gestation). Early gestational diabetes is associated with worse pregnancy outcomes compared with women diagnosed with late gestational diabetes (hyperglycaemia from 24 weeks to 28 weeks of gestation). Randomised controlled trials show benefits of treating gestational diabetes from 24 weeks to 28 weeks of gestation. The WHO 2013 recommendations for diagnosing gestational diabetes (one-step 75 gm 2-h oral glucose tolerance test at 24-28 weeks of gestation) are largely based on the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes Study, which confirmed the linear association between pregnancy complications and late-pregnancy maternal glycaemia: a phenomenon that has now also been shown in early pregnancy. Recently, the Treatment of Booking Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (TOBOGM) trial showed benefit in diagnosis and treatment of early gestational diabetes for women with risk factors. Given the diabesity epidemic, evidence for gestational diabetes heterogeneity by timing and subtype, and advances in technology, a life course precision medicine approach is urgently needed, using evidence-based prevention, diagnostic, and treatment strategies.

Insulin Use During Gestational and Pre-existing Diabetes in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Study Design

INTRODUCTION

Insulin is the first-line pharmacologic therapy for women with diabetes in pregnancy. However, conducting well-designed randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and achieving recommended glycemic targets remains a challenge for this unique population. This systematic literature review (SLR) aimed to understand the evidence for insulin use in pregnancy and the outcome metrics most often used to characterize its effect on glycemic, maternal and fetal outcomes in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and in pregnant women with diabetes.

METHODS

An SLR was conducted using electronic databases in Medline, EMBASE via Ovid platform, evidence-based medicine reviews (2010-2020) and conference proceedings (2018-2019). Studies were included if they assessed the effect of insulin treatment on glycemic, maternal or fetal outcomes in women with diabetes in pregnancy. Studies on any type of diabetes other than gestational or pre-existing diabetes as well as non-human studies were excluded.

RESULTS

In women diagnosed with GDM or pre-existing diabetes, most studies compared treatment of insulin with metformin (n = 35) followed by diet along with lifestyle intervention (n = 24) and glibenclamide (n = 12). Most studies reporting on glycemic outcomes compared insulin with metformin (n = 22) and glibenclamide (n = 4). Fasting blood glucose was the most reported clinical outcome of interest. Among the studies reporting maternal outcomes, method of delivery and delivery complications were most commonly reported. Large for gestational age, stillbirth and perinatal mortality were the most common fetal outcomes reported.

CONCLUSION

This SLR included a total of 108 clinical trials and observational studies with diverse populations and treatment arms. Outcomes varied across the studies, and a lack of consistent outcome measures to manage diabetes in pregnant women was observed. This elucidates a need for global consensus on study design and standardized clinical, maternal and fetal outcomes metrics.

Maternal ethnicity and gestational age at birth predict hypoglycaemia among neonates of mothers with gestational diabetes

AIM

Hypoglycaemia is common in neonates born to mothers with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). We aimed to determine predictors of hypoglycaemia among neonates of women with GDM and association with short-term outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a secondary cohort analysis of data from a multi-centre randomised trial (the TARGET trial) conducted across ten maternity hospitals in New Zealand between May 2015 and November 2017. Data were analysed using univariate analysis and multivariable forward stepwise logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 1085 neonates, those born to Asian mothers had reduced odds of hypoglycaemia (OR [95% CI]: 0.54 [0.38, 0.75], p = 0.001), as did those born at higher gestational ages (0.76 [0.68, 0.85], p < 0.001). Neonates born to Pacific mothers had increased odds of hypoglycaemia (OR [95% CI]: 1.57 [1.04, 2.39], p = 0.034). Neonates who experienced hypoglycaemia were more likely to experience neonatal intensive care unit admission (8.3% vs. 2.1%; p ≤ 0.001), hyperbilirubinaemia (8.6% vs. 3.3%; p ≤ 0.001) and receive respiratory support (11.4% vs. 4.8%; p ≤ 0.001) and less likely to be breastfed at discharge (92.4% vs. 96.2%; p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

Among neonates of women with GDM, maternal ethnicity and gestation at birth are independent predictors of hypoglycaemia, and hypoglycaemia is associated with short-term comorbidities. Additional surveillance may be appropriate for neonates in these high-risk groups.

Effects of oral glibenclamide versus subcutaneous insulin on perinatal outcome of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus: A randomized clinical trial

Background

The first-line treatment for gestational diabetes mellitus remains insulin, but oral hypoglycemic agents are easier and cheaper to use. The aim of the current study was to compare the efficacy and safety of oral glibenclamide and subcutaneous insulin on the serum glucose control and perinatal outcome of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus.

Materials and methods

This randomized clinical trial was conducted during a 2-year period from 2017 to 2019 in two tertiary healthcare centers in Shiraz, Iran. We included 84 singleton pregnancies between 24 and 34 weeks of gestation diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus. Patients were randomly assigned to oral glibenclamide (n = 44) or subcutaneous insulin (n = 40) according to a standard protocol and followed until delivery. The primary endpoint was to compare the glycemic level of patients, and the secondary outcomes included pregnancy adverse events and neonatal complications such as preeclampsia, preterm and premature rupture of membranes, preterm labor, placental abruption, maternal hypoglycemia, birth weight, neonatal hypoglycemia, hyperbilirubinemia, respiratory distress syndrome, and neonatal intensive care unit admission.

Results

The two study groups had comparable baseline characteristics. After treatment, the two study groups were comparable regarding fasting blood glucose (p = 0.398) and 2 h postprandial glucose (p = 0.085). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the rate of preeclampsia (p = 0.250), preterm rupture of membranes (p = 0.998), preterm labor (p = 0.495), hypoglycemia (p = 0.476), and abruption (p = 0.815). There was no significant difference between the two study groups in birth weight (p = 0.863) and the Apgar score at 1 (p = 0.190) and 5 min (p = 0.055). The rates of neonatal adverse events including hypoglycemia (p = 0.999), hyperbilirubinemia (p = 0.160), neonatal intensive care unit admission (p = 0.852), and respiratory distress syndrome (p = 0.665) were comparable between the two groups.

Conclusion

The results of the current study demonstrate that oral glibenclamide is as effective and safe as subcutaneous insulin in glycemic control and maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Thus, it could be used as first-line treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus.

Metformin impairs trophoblast metabolism and differentiation in a dose-dependent manner

Metformin is a widely prescribed medication whose mechanism of action is not completely defined and whose role in gestational diabetes management remains controversial. In addition to increasing the risk of fetal growth abnormalities and preeclampsia, gestational diabetes is associated with abnormalities in placental development including impairments in trophoblast differentiation. Given that metformin impacts cellular differentiation events in other systems, we assessed metformin's impact on trophoblast metabolism and differentiation. Using established cell culture models of trophoblast differentiation, oxygen consumption rates and relative metabolite abundance were determined following 200 µM (therapeutic range) and 2000 µM (supra-therapeutic range) metformin treatment using Seahorse and mass-spectrometry approaches. While no differences in oxygen consumption rates or relative metabolite abundance were detected between vehicle and 200 µM metformin-treated cells, 2000 µM metformin impaired oxidative metabolism and increased the abundance of lactate and TCA cycle intermediates, α-ketoglutarate, succinate, and malate. Examining differentiation, treatment with 2000 μM, but not 200 µM metformin, impaired HCG production and expression of multiple trophoblast differentiation markers. Overall, this work suggests that supra-therapeutic concentrations of metformin impair trophoblast metabolism and differentiation whereas metformin concentrations in the therapeutic range do not strongly impact these processes.

Medications for Managing Preexisting and Gestational Diabetes in Pregnancy

Persons with gestational and pregestational diabetes during pregnancy may require pharmacologic agents to achieve pregnancy glycemic targets, and the available medications for use in pregnancy are limited. Insulin is the only FDA-approved medication for use in pregnancy and has the greatest evidence for safety and efficacy. Metformin and glyburide are the most commonly used oral agents in pregnancy. Understanding each medication's unique pharmacokinetics, potential side effects, fetal or childhood risks, gestational age of medication initiation and patient's diabetes care barriers are important aspects of shared decision-making and choosing a regimen that will achieve glycemic and pregnancy goals.

Metformin impairs trophoblast metabolism and differentiation in dose dependent manner

Metformin is a widely prescribed medication whose mechanism of action is not completely defined and whose role in gestational diabetes management remains controversial. In addition to increasing risks of fetal growth abnormalities and preeclampsia, gestational diabetes is associated with abnormalities in placental development including impairments in trophoblast differentiation. Given that metformin impacts cellular differentiation events in other systems, we assessed metformin's impact on trophoblast metabolism and differentiation. Using established cell culture models of trophoblast differentiation, oxygen consumption rates and relative metabolite abundance were determined following 200 μM (therapeutic range) and 2000 μM (supra-therapeutic range) metformin treatment using Seahorse and mass-spectrometry approaches. While no differences in oxygen consumption rates or relative metabolite abundance were detected between vehicle and 200 μM metformin treated cells, 2000 μM metformin impaired oxidative metabolism and increased abundance of lactate and TCA cycle intermediates, α-ketoglutarate, succinate, and malate. Examining differentiation, treatment with 2000 μM, but not 200 μM metformin, impaired HCG production and expression of multiple trophoblast differentiation markers. Overall, this work suggests that supra-therapeutic concentrations of metformin impairs trophoblast metabolism and differentiation whereas metformin concentrations in the therapeutic range do not strongly impact these processes.

Efficacy and safety of hypoglycemic agents on gestational diabetes mellitus in women: A Bayesian network analysis of randomized controlled trials

Objective

To compare the efficacy and safety of metformin, glyburide, and insulin for GDM, we conducted a subgroup analysis of outcomes for women with GDM according to the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) diagnostic criteria.

Methods

We searched the NCBI, Embase, and Web of Science databases from inception to March 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the outcomes of hypoglycemic agents in women with GDM were included. Bayesian network analysis was employed.

Results

A total of 29 RCTs were included. Metformin was estimated to lead to a slight improvement in total gestational weight gain (WMD - 1.24 kg, 95% CI -2.38, -0.09), a risk of unmet treatment target in the sensitivity analysis (OR 34.50, 95% CI 1.18-791.37) than insulin. The estimated effect of metformin showed improvements in birth weight than insulin (WMD - 102.58 g, 95% CI -180.45 to -25.49) and glyburide (WMD - 137.84 g, 95% CI -255.31 to -25.45), for hypoglycemia within 1 h of birth than insulin (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.84). The improvement in the estimated effect of metformin for hypoglycemia within 1 h of birth still existed when compared with glyburide (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.66), whether in the IADPSG group (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.92) or not (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.98).

Conclusion

Metformin is beneficial for GDM women to control total GWG compared with insulin, regulate fetal birth weight more than insulin and glyburide, and increase the risk of unmet treatment targets compared with insulin. Compared to metformin, glyburide is associated with neonatal hypoglycemia.

A Review on the Use of Metformin in Pregnancy and Its Associated Fetal Outcomes

A commonly used first-line anti-diabetic medication, metformin, has been used in pregnancy. The drug is known to have specific effects on different organs around the body. One of these organs includes the ovaries. Therefore, for more than 40 years, it has often been prescribed for maternal obesity along with gestational diabetes mellitus. Untreated pregnancies like these frequently result in complications for both the mother and the fetus, like macrosomia, pregnancy-induced hypertension, obstructed labor, stillbirths, and perinatal deaths. In addition, there is also evidence that these mothers tend to develop type II diabetes mellitus during their pregnancy and even a few years post-delivery. These complications can be controlled or even reduced with the help of metformin, sometimes combining it with insulin or clomiphene citrate if required. There is still a need to cautiously prescribe the drug by outweighing its benefits against the risk associated with it. The current research on the subject leans more towards the benefits offered to the mother during pregnancy. Only a few randomized, controlled trials have been conducted on the fetal condition after the mother has been administered metformin.

Furthermore, these studies lack the appropriate sample size and long-term follow-up on these metformin-exposed offspring. As a result, there are no reliable data available to clinicians and physicians about the drug. Owing to its benefits in certain pregnancies, it is less likely that the drug will cease to be prescribed. Therefore, it becomes increasingly imperative to conduct more research on this topic to ensure the drug is safe for the mother and the offspring.

The Use of Oral Hypoglycemic Agents during Pregnancy: An Alternative to Insulin?

OBJECTIVE

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM2) are metabolic disorders characterized by increased insulin resistance. Although insulin is the treatment of choice in pregnant patients with DM, the prescription of oral hypoglycemic agents (OHA) has been increasing among practitioners. This study aimed to evaluate the maternal and neonatal outcomes when oral hypoglycemic agents were used in diabetic pregnant women.

METHODS

Medical records from the Maternal-Infant Care Unit Clinics SoM-UPR (n=149) were reviewed. Patients that were treated with metformin, sulfonylurea or insulin were included. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Patient's mean age was 28 ± 6 years. The majority had GDM (91%). The most common comorbidity was hypertension (9.9%). Lifestyle modification was used as treatment in 77% of patients during the second trimester, but its use decreased to 33% during the third trimester. Insulin was the treatment of choice. Among the OHA, sulfonylurea was preferred. Postprandial glucose levels were lower in patients who used insulin as compared to those without medications.

CONCLUSION

No significant differences were found in maternal outcomes such as C-section, induction of labor, episiotomy or preterm labor, or neonatal outcomes such as macrosomia, neonatal hypoglycemia or congenital abnormalities among treatment groups. OHA can be considered as an alternative to insulin for the treatment of DM during pregnancy in selected cases.

Effectiveness of antidiabetic agents for treatment of gestational diabetes: A methodological quality assessment of meta-analyses and network meta-analysis

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

Despite there being several meta-analyses on the effects of antidiabetic agents in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus, the reliability of their findings is a concern, mainly due to undetermined methodological quality of these studies. This study aimed to assess the methodological quality of available meta-analyses and provide a summary estimation of the effectiveness of treatments modalities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases were comprehensively searched for retrieving relevant meta-analyses published in English up to May 2020. A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR-2) was applied to evaluate methodological quality of eligible meta-analyses. A network meta-analysis was used to calculate the pooled odds ratio of maternal and neonatal outcomes in gestational diabetes mellitus patients treated with metformin or glyburide compared with those treated with insulin. The rank network analysis was carried out for ranking of the treatments and reporting the most efficient treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 27 and 17 studies were included for qualitative and quantitative syntheses, respectively; of these, just four studies were classified as high quality. The results showed that metformin had the highest probability of being the best treatment, compared with insulin and glyburide, for the majority of adverse neonatal outcomes, whereas glyburide was the best treatment in reducing the risk of adverse maternal outcomes. The results were not significantly changed after excluding low-quality studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This review study of available literature shows that metformin can be a superior option in most neonatal and maternal adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus; the results need to be further updated by including future more qualified studies.

Effects of Different Glucose-Lowering Measures on Maternal and Infant Outcomes in Pregnant Women with Gestational Diabetes: A Network Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

A network meta-analysis was conducted to compare and rank the effects of different glucose-lowering measures on maternal and infant outcomes in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, CNKI, Embase, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, and Weipu databases for relevant studies published between database establishment and June 2021. Study retrieval involved subject-heading and keyword searches. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with different glucose-lowering treatments for GDM patients were included. The Cochrane tool was used to assess bias risk. Pairwise and network meta-analyses were used to compare and rank the effects of different hypoglycemic measures on maternal and infant outcomes in pregnant women with GDM.

RESULTS

We included 41 RCTs involving 6245 pregnant women with GDM. Patients treated with insulin had a higher incidence of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) occupancy (1.3, 95% CI 1.0-1.7) than those treated with metformin. The insulin (1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.1 and 1.8, 95% CI 1.0-3.3) and glyburide (2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.2 and 2.5, 95% CI 1.1-8.4) groups exhibited higher incidences of neonatal hypoglycemia and large for gestational age (LGA) newborns than the metformin group. The glyburide group exhibited a lower probability of cesarean section than the metformin (0.76, 95% CI 0.55-1.0) and insulin (0.71, 95% CI 0.52-0.96) groups. Preeclampsia incidence in the diet and exercise groups was significantly lower than in the metformin (0.19, 95% CI 0.043-0.72) and insulin (0.15, 95% CI 0.032-0.52) groups. No intervention significantly reduced the incidences of macrosomia, preterm birth, gestational hypertension, or respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). The ranking results showed that the metformin group had the lowest rates of neonatal hypoglycemia, macrosomia, LGA, and NICU occupancy. The glyburide group had the lowest NICU occupancy and cesarean section rates and the highest neonatal hypoglycemia, LGA, preeclampsia, and gestational hypertension rates. The diet and exercise group had the lowest preterm delivery and preeclampsia rates and the highest NICU occupancy rate.

CONCLUSION

Metformin is a potentially superior choice for GDM treatment because it is associated with minimal incidences of multiple adverse pregnancy outcome indicators and does not lead to high values of certain adverse outcome indices. Other hypoglycemic agent or diet groups exhibit high incidences of certain adverse outcomes. Therefore, when selecting a GDM treatment strategy, the efficacies and risks of different treatment programs should be evaluated according to the scenario in hand.

Metformin combined with insulin in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: a propensity score-matched study

AIM

Metformin use in gestational diabetes (GDM) is a common practice. Although its use in combination with insulin might be advantageous, it was never formally tested. We studied whether combined treatment was associated with better obstetric or neonatal outcomes compared to insulin alone.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study, using the Portuguese National Registry of GDM (2012-2017), of women treated with insulin ± metformin. Primary endpoints were obstetric and neonatal complications. Secondary endpoints were gestational weight gain (GWG) and insulin dose. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed to balance the distribution of age, BMI, insulin treatment duration, HbA1c, first trimester diagnosis of GDM and previous GDM or macrosomia. Women treated with metformin plus insulin and insulin only were then compared.

RESULTS

A total of 4034 women were treated with insulin or insulin plus metformin (10.2%). After propensity score matching, we studied two groups of 386 patients. Obstetric and neonatal complications were similar. Women treated with metformin plus insulin had 201 (52.1%) obstetric complications versus 184 (47.7%) in insulin-only group, p = 0.22; and 112 (29.0%) neonatal complications versus 96 (24.9%), p = 0.19. Patients treated with metformin plus insulin had similar GWG, excessive weight gain and insulin dose compared to the insulin-only group.

CONCLUSIONS

Women with GDM treated with insulin plus metformin had similar obstetric and neonatal complications, weight gained and insulin dose compared to those only treated with insulin.

Hypoglycemic effect of Taraxacum officinale root extract and its synergism with Radix Astragali extract

Taraxacum officinale (dandelion) and Radix Astragali are traditional medicinal and edible plants with high nutritional value. In this study, the synergistic hypoglycemic effect of DRE and Radix Astragali extract (RAE) was evaluated. Our results showed that water extract of dandelion (DRE-w), mainly containing polysaccharides (63.92 ± 1.82 mg/g), total flavonoid (2.57 ± 0.06 mg/g), total phenolic compounds (8.93 ± 0.34 mg/g), and saponins (0.54 ± 0.05 mg/g), exhibited significantly inhibitory effect on α-glucosidase and α-amylase. DRE-w and RAE had synergistic hypoglycemic effect; we found that DRE-w and its combination with RAE could relieve the state of insulin resistance in IR-HepG2 cells. The combination could more significantly increase the glucose consumption and intracellular glycogen content, and improve the activity of hexokinase and pyruvate kinase in IR-HepG2 cells. In summary, DRE and its combination with RAE can be developed as the drugs or functional foods for diabetes prevention and treatment.

Metformin is comparable to insulin for pharmacotherapy in gestational diabetes mellitus: A network meta-analysis evaluating 6046 women

CONTEXT

The comparative efficacy of gestational diabetes (GDM) treatments lack conclusive evidence for choice of first-line treatment.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of metformin and glibenclamide to insulin using a core outcome set (COS) to unify outcomes across trials investigating the treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus.

STUDY DESIGN

A network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted.

DATA-SOURCE

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials were searched from inception to January 2020.

STUDY SELECTION

RCTs that enrolled pregnant women who were diagnosed with GDM and that compared the efficacy of different pharmacological interventions for the treatment of GDM were included.

META-ANALYSIS

A generalized pairwise modelling framework was employed.

RESULTS

A total of 38 RCTs with 6046 participants were included in the network meta-analysis. Compared to insulin, the estimated effect of metformin indicated improvements for weight gain (WMD -2·39 kg; 95% CI -3·31 to -1·46), maternal hypoglycemia (OR 0.34; 95% CI 0.12 to 0·97) and LGA (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.38 to 0·98). There were also improvements in estimated effects for neonatal hypoglycemia (OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.19 to 1·25), pregnancy induced hypertension (OR 0.63; 95% CI 0.37 to 1·06), and preeclampsia (OR 0.74; 95% CI 0.538 to 1·04), though with limited evidence against our model hypothesis of equivalence with insulin for these outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Metformin is, at least, comparable to insulin for the treatment of GDM. Glibenclamide appears less favorable, in comparison to insulin, than metformin.

Improvement Effect of Metformin on Female and Male Reproduction in Endocrine Pathologies and Its Mechanisms

Metformin (MF), a first-line drug to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), alone and in combination with other drugs, restores the ovarian function in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and improves fetal development, pregnancy outcomes and offspring health in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and T2DM. MF treatment is demonstrated to improve the efficiency of in vitro fertilization and is considered a supplementary drug in assisted reproductive technologies. MF administration shows positive effect on steroidogenesis and spermatogenesis in men with metabolic disorders, thus MF treatment indicates prospective use for improvement of male reproductive functions and fertility. MF lacks teratogenic effects and has positive health effect in newborns. The review is focused on use of MF therapy for restoration of female and male reproductive functions and improvement of pregnancy outcomes in metabolic and endocrine disorders. The mechanisms of MF action are discussed, including normalization of metabolic and hormonal status in PCOS, GDM, T2DM and metabolic syndrome and restoration of functional activity and hormonal regulation of the gonadal axis.

Comparison of Fetomaternal Outcomes in Patients With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Treated With Insulin Versus Acarbose: Results of a Prospective, Open Label, Controlled Study

Objective

To evaluate fetomaternal outcomes in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) treated with insulin versus acarbose.

Material and methods

In this prospective, open label, controlled study, GDM patients treated with insulin or acarbose were observed till six weeks after delivery. Maternal outcomes, fetal outcomes and glycemic control were compared between two groups. 

Results

Fifty patients in each group (insulin group-mean age 28.52 years; acarbose group-mean age 26.26 years; p=0.020) were included. There was no difference in body mass index (p=0.157), family history of diabetes (p=0.648), history of GDM (p=0.50) or mean gestational age at diagnosis (p=0.245) between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the incidence of recurrent infections (p=0.64), pre-eclampsia (p=0.64) or premature rupture of membranes (p=0.40) between the two groups. Mean duration of gestational weeks at the time of delivery in the insulin and acarbose group was 36.93 and 38.36 weeks respectively (p=0.002). There was no difference in the modes of delivery, mean post-operative random blood glucose (p=0.96), fasting blood glucose level at day seven (p=0.15) and after six weeks (p=0.83) between the insulin and acarbose groups. There was no difference in reduction in the postprandial blood glucose level at day seven (p=0.48) and after six weeks (p=0.23). There was no significant difference in the mean birth weight of babies born to mothers treated with the two drugs (p=0.21). There was no difference in the incidence of neonatal complications between the two groups.

Conclusion

Acarbose can be an effective and well tolerated option for treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus.

What is known and what remains unresolved regarding gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM)

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) has become a major public health issue and one of the most discussed topics in contemporary obstetrics. Due to rising prevalence of GDM worldwide impact and importance of this medical condition in good quality antenatal care is growing. GDM is associated with serious adverse perinatal outcomes and unfavorable long-term health consequences for both, mother and her child. Despite a great amount of knowledge accumulated regarding GDM, medical community remains indecisive and still debates the most appropriate diagnostic strategy, screening policy, and treatment options for pregnancies complicated with GDM. These unresolved issues generate controversies, motivate further research and contribute to the growing interest surrounding GDM. In this review we will discuss and try to explain some of them.

Method for evaluating the human bioequivalence of acarbose based on pharmacodynamic parameters

Objective

To explore a method for evaluating the bioequivalence of acarbose based on pharmacodynamic parameters using a single-dose, randomized-sequence, three-way crossover study of acarbose test (T) and reference (R) formulations.

Methods

Baseline-adjusted, pre-dose value deduction, and direct comparison methods were used to evaluate the geometric T/R ratios and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the ln-transformed pharmacodynamic parameters to identify the most suitable evaluation system. Twelve participants were randomly divided into three groups to receive treatment in the following sequences: TRR, RTR, and RRT, each including a 7-day washout period between treatment periods. The serum glucose concentration (baseline) was determined. Pharmacodynamic parameters, including the maximum reduction in serum glucose concentrations (ΔC_SG,max) and difference of the AUC of glucose between before and after acarbose exposure (ΔAUEC), were tested.

Results

Using the direct comparison method, the geometric mean ratios of C_SG,max, AUEC_(0-2h), and AUEC_(0-4h) were 94.13%, 97.82% and 99.76%, respectively. The 90% CIs of the geometric T/R ratios for C_SG,max, AUEC_(0-2h), and AUEC_(0-4h) all fell between 80% and 125%. Conversely, ΔC_SG,max and ΔAUEC_(0-4h) were less reliable measures of acarbose bioequivalence.

Conclusions

Pre-dose value deduction and direct comparison methods can be initially considered suitable for assessing acarbose bioequivalence.

Interventions to prevent women from developing gestational diabetes mellitus: an overview of Cochrane Reviews

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is increasing, with approximately 15% of pregnant women affected worldwide, varying by country, ethnicity and diagnostic thresholds. There are associated short- and long-term health risks for women and their babies.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to summarise the evidence from Cochrane systematic reviews on the effects of interventions for preventing GDM.

METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (6 August 2019) with key words 'gestational diabetes' OR 'GDM' to identify reviews pre-specifying GDM as an outcome. We included reviews of interventions in women who were pregnant or planning a pregnancy, irrespective of their GDM risk status. Two overview authors independently assessed eligibility, extracted data and assessed quality of evidence using ROBIS and GRADE tools. We assigned interventions to categories with graphic icons to classify the effectiveness of interventions as: clear evidence of benefit or harm (GRADE moderate- or high-quality evidence with a confidence interval (CI) that did not cross the line of no effect); clear evidence of no effect or equivalence (GRADE moderate- or high-quality evidence with a narrow CI crossing the line of no effect); possible benefit or harm (low-quality evidence with a CI that did not cross the line of no effect or GRADE moderate- or high-quality evidence with a wide CI); or unknown benefit or harm (GRADE low-quality evidence with a wide CI or very low-quality evidence).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 11 Cochrane Reviews (71 trials, 23,154 women) with data on GDM. Nine additional reviews pre-specified GDM as an outcome, but did not identify GDM data in included trials. Ten of the 11 reviews were judged to be at low risk of bias and one review at unclear risk of bias. Interventions assessed included diet, exercise, a combination of diet and exercise, dietary supplements, pharmaceuticals, and management of other health problems in pregnancy. The quality of evidence ranged from high to very low. Diet Unknown benefit or harm: there was unknown benefit or harm of dietary advice versus standard care, on the risk of GDM: risk ratio (RR) 0.60, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.04; 5 trials; 1279 women; very low-quality evidence. There was unknown benefit or harm of a low glycaemic index diet versus a moderate-high glycaemic index diet on the risk of GDM: RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.31; 4 trials; 912 women; low-quality evidence. Exercise Unknown benefit or harm: there was unknown benefit or harm for exercise interventions versus standard antenatal care on the risk of GDM: RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.84; 3 trials; 826 women; low-quality evidence. Diet and exercise combined Possible benefit: combined diet and exercise interventions during pregnancy versus standard care possibly reduced the risk of GDM: RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.01; 19 trials; 6633 women; moderate-quality evidence. Dietary supplements Clear evidence of no effect: omega-3 fatty acid supplementation versus none in pregnancy had no effect on the risk of GDM: RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.26; 12 trials; 5235 women; high-quality evidence. Possible benefit: myo-inositol supplementation during pregnancy versus control possibly reduced the risk of GDM: RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.64; 3 trials; 502 women; low-quality evidence. Possible benefit: vitamin D supplementation versus placebo or control in pregnancy possibly reduced the risk of GDM: RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.97; 4 trials; 446 women; low-quality evidence. Unknown benefit or harm: there was unknown benefit or harm of probiotic with dietary intervention versus placebo with dietary intervention (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.89; 1 trial; 114 women; very low-quality evidence), or probiotic with dietary intervention versus control (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.92; 1 trial; 111 women; very low-quality evidence) on the risk of GDM. There was unknown benefit or harm of vitamin D + calcium supplementation versus placebo (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01 to 7.84; 1 trial; 54 women; very low-quality evidence) or vitamin D + calcium + other minerals versus calcium + other minerals (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.10 to 1.73; 1 trial; 1298 women; very low-quality evidence) on the risk of GDM. Pharmaceutical Possible benefit: metformin versus placebo given to obese pregnant women possibly reduced the risk of GDM: RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.19; 3 trials; 892 women; moderate-quality evidence. Unknown benefit or harm:eight small trials with low- to very low-quality evidence showed unknown benefit or harm for heparin, aspirin, leukocyte immunisation or IgG given to women with a previous stillbirth on the risk of GDM. Management of other health issues Clear evidence of no effect: universal versus risk based screening of pregnant women for thyroid dysfunction had no effect on the risk of GDM: RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.25; 1 trial; 4516 women; moderate-quality evidence. Unknown benefit or harm: there was unknown benefit or harm of using fractional exhaled nitrogen oxide versus a clinical algorithm to adjust asthma therapy on the risk of GDM: RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.77; 1 trial; 210 women; low-quality evidence. There was unknown benefit or harm of pharmacist led multidisciplinary approach to management of maternal asthma versus standard care on the risk of GDM: RR 5.00, 95% CI 0.25 to 99.82; 1 trial; 58 women; low-quality evidence.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

No interventions to prevent GDM in 11 systematic reviews were of clear benefit or harm. A combination of exercise and diet, supplementation with myo-inositol, supplementation with vitamin D and metformin were of possible benefit in reducing the risk of GDM, but further high-quality evidence is needed. Omega-3-fatty acid supplementation and universal screening for thyroid dysfunction did not alter the risk of GDM. There was insufficient high-quality evidence to establish the effect on the risk of GDM of diet or exercise alone, probiotics, vitamin D with calcium or other vitamins and minerals, interventions in pregnancy after a previous stillbirth, and different asthma management strategies in pregnancy. There is a lack of trials investigating the effect of interventions prior to or between pregnancies on risk of GDM.

Metformin in Pregnancy Study (MiPS): protocol for a systematic review with individual patient data meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common disorder of pregnancy and contributes to adverse pregnancy outcomes. Metformin is often used for the prevention and management of GDM; however, its use in pregnancy continues to be debated. The Metformin in Pregnancy Study aims to use individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis to clarify the efficacy and safety of metformin use in pregnancy and to identify relevant knowledge gaps.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

MEDLINE, EMBASE and all Evidence-Based Medicine will be systematically searched for randomised controlled trials (RCT) testing the efficacy of metformin compared with placebo, usual care or other interventions in pregnant women. Two independent reviewers will assess eligibility using prespecified criteria and will conduct data extraction and quality appraisal of eligible studies. Authors of included trials will be contacted and asked to contribute IPD. Primary outcomes include maternal glycaemic parameters and GDM, as well as neonatal hypoglycaemia, anthropometry and gestational age at delivery. Other adverse maternal, birth and neonatal outcomes will be assessed as secondary outcomes. IPD from these RCTs will be harmonised and a two-step meta-analytic approach will be used to determine the efficacy and safety of metformin in pregnancy, with a priori adjustment for covariates and subgroups to examine effect moderators of treatment outcomes. Sensitivity analyses will assess heterogeneity, risk of bias and the impact of trials which have not provided IPD.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

All IPD will be deidentified and studies contributing IPD will have ethical approval from their respective local ethics committees. This study will provide robust evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of metformin use in pregnancy, and may identify subgroups of patients who may benefit most from this treatment modality. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated at scientific meetings, providing much needed evidence to inform clinical and public health actions in this area.

Pharmacodynamics of Glyburide, Metformin, and Glyburide/Metformin Combination Therapy in the Treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

In gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), women are unable to compensate for the increased insulin resistance during pregnancy. Data are limited regarding the pharmacodynamic effects of metformin and glyburide during pregnancy. This study characterized insulin sensitivity (SI), β-cell responsivity, and disposition index (DI) in women with GDM utilizing a mixed-meal tolerance test (MMTT) before and during treatment with glyburide monotherapy (GLY, n = 38), metformin monotherapy (MET, n = 34), or GLY and MET combination therapy (COMBO; n = 36). GLY significantly decreased dynamic β-cell responsivity (31%). MET and COMBO significantly increased SI (121% and 83%, respectively). Whereas GLY, MET, and COMBO improved DI, metformin (MET and COMBO) demonstrated a larger increase in DI (P = 0.05) and a larger decrease in MMTT peak glucose concentrations (P = 0.03) than subjects taking only GLY. Maximizing SI with MET followed by increasing β-cell responsivity with GLY or supplementing with insulin might be a more optimal strategy for GDM management than monotherapy.

Metformin in overweight and obese women with gestational diabetes: a propensity score-matched study

PURPOSE

Obesity and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) have an independent negative impact in pregnancy outcomes. Excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) represents an additional high-risk condition for adverse outcomes. The aims of this study were to evaluate the potential effect of metformin in GWG in overweight or obese women with GDM, to report our experience and to assess metformin's safety in this population.

METHODS

Retrospective observational cohort study involving pregnant women with GDM and pregestational overweight or obesity. Demographic, anthropometric, glycemic control data, obstetric, fetal and neonatal outcomes were evaluated. The sample was divided into two groups according to metformin treatment. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed using age, initial body mass index (BMI), trimester at GDM diagnosis and previous history of GDM or macrosomia as covariates.

RESULTS

Of the 457 enrolled in the study, 177 (38.7%) were treated with metformin. Two groups of 130 well matched patients were balanced regarding baseline characteristics. Women in metformin group had significantly less excessive GWG (29.23% vs. 42.31%, OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.34-0.94, p = 0.028) and more adequate GWG (36.92% vs. 23.08%, OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.14-3.35, p = 0.015). No significant differences were found between both groups regarding glycemic control, rate of insulinization, and obstetric, fetal, and neonatal outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights metformin as an important and safe tool to prevent excessive GWG and promote adequate GWG in overweight or obese women with GDM, regardless of age, BMI, timing of GDM diagnosis, previous history of GDM or macrosomia.

Research Gaps in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Executive Summary of a National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Workshop

The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases convened a workshop on research gaps in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) with a focus on 1) early pregnancy diagnosis and treatment and 2) pharmacologic treatment strategies. This article summarizes the proceedings of the workshop. In early pregnancy, the appropriate diagnostic criteria for the diagnosis of GDM remain poorly defined, and an effect of early diagnosis and treatment on the risk of adverse outcomes has not been demonstrated. Despite many small randomized controlled trials of glucose-lowering medication treatment in GDM, our understanding of medication management of GDM is incomplete as evidenced by discrepancies among professional society treatment guidelines. The comparative effectiveness of insulin, metformin, and glyburide remains uncertain, particularly with respect to long-term outcomes. Additional topics in need of further research identified by workshop participants included phenotypic heterogeneity in GDM and novel and individualized treatment approaches. Further research on these topics is likely to improve our understanding of the pathophysiology and treatment of GDM to improve both short- and long-term outcomes for mothers and their children.

Interventions to prevent women developing gestational diabetes mellitus: an overview of Cochrane Reviews

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Overview). The objectives are as follows:

To summarise the evidence from Cochrane systematic reviews regarding the effects of interventions to prevent women developing gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

Anti-inflammatory Action of Metformin with Respect to CX3CL1/CX3CR1 Signaling in Human Placental Circulation in Normal-Glucose Versus High-Glucose Environments

Upregulation of chemokine CX3CL1 and its receptor CX3CR1 occurs in the diabetic human placenta. Metformin, an insulin-sensitizing biguanide, is used in the therapy of diabetic pregnancy. By preventing the activation of NF-κB, metformin exhibits anti-inflammatory properties. We examined the influence of hyperglycemia (25 mmol/L glucose; HG group; N = 36) on metformin-mediated effects on CX3CL1 and TNF-α production by placental lobules perfused extracorporeally. Additionally, CX3CR1 expression and contents of CX3CR1, TNF-α receptor 1 (TNFR1), and NF-κB proteins in the placental tissue were evaluated. Placentae perfused under normoglycemia (5 mmol/L glucose; NG group; N = 36) served as the control. Metformin (2.5 and 5.0 mg/L; subgroups B and C) lowered the production of CX3CL1 and TNF-α in a dose-dependent and time-dependent manner. Hyperglycemia did not weaken the strength of these metformin effects. Moreover, CX3CL1 levels after perfusion with 5.0 mg/L metformin were reduced by 33.28 and 33.83% (at 120 and 150 min, respectively) in the HG-C subgroup versus 24.98 and 23.66% in the NG-C subgroup, which indicated an augmentation of the metformin action over time in hyperglycemia. CX3CR1 expression was significantly higher in the HG-B and HG-C subgroups compared to that in the NG-B and NG-C subgroups. Increased CX3CR1 protein content in the placental lysates was observed in subgroups B and C. The two higher metformin concentrations significantly decreased the levels of NF-κBp65 protein content in both groups. However, the decrease was significantly stronger in hyperglycemia. TNFR1 upregulation in the HG group was not affected by metformin. Further studies on metformin therapy during pregnancy are needed, including safety issues.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Metformin, Glyburide, and Insulin in Treating Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis

To compare the efficacy and safety of metformin, glyburide, and insulin in treating gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library to November 13, 2018, were searched for RCT adjusted estimates of the efficacy and safety of metformin, glyburide, and insulin treatments in GDM patients. There were 41 studies involving 7703 GDM patients which were included in this meta-analysis; 12 primary outcomes and 24 secondary outcomes were detected and analyzed. Compared with metformin, insulin had a significant increase in the risk of preeclampsia (RR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.72; P < 0.001), NICU admission (RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.87; P < 0.001), neonatal hypoglycemia (RR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.66; P < 0.001), and macrosomia (RR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.86; P < 0.05). To the outcomes of birth weight and gestational age at delivery, insulin had a significant increase when compared with metformin (MD, 114.48; 95% CI, 37.32 to 191.64; P < 0.01; MD, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.34; P < 0.001; respectively). Of the two groups between glyburide and metformin, metformin had lower gestational weight gain compared with glyburide (MD, 1.67; 95% CI, 0.26 to 3.07; P < 0.05). Glyburide had a higher risk of neonatal hypoglycemia compared with insulin (RR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.32 to 2.36; P < 0.001). This meta-analysis found that metformin could be a safe and effective treatment for GDM. However, clinicians should pay attention on the long-term offspring outcomes of the relative data with GDM patients treated with metformin. Compared with insulin, glyburide had a higher increase of neonatal hypoglycemia. The use of glyburide in pregnancy for GDM women appears to be unclear.

Pharmacotherapy for hyperglycemia in pregnancy - Do oral agents have a place?

Diabetes is a frequent condition in pregnancy and achieving adequate glycemic control is of paramount importance. Insulin treatment is the gold standard, oral agents are more attractive, but their safety and efficiency should be a prerequisite for their use. We have more information regarding treatment of women with gestational diabetes mellitus where glyburide can induce a picture of fetal hyperinsulinism (higher birthweight and more neonatal hypoglycemia) whereas metformin requires supplemental insulin in a larger proportion of women but achieves satisfactory perinatal outcomes with the exception of preterm birth. Information in patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus is much more limited but also favors metformin. Combinations provide additional possibilities. However, as to long-term outcomes, we have no information on the impact of exposure to glyburide and it is still unclear if in utero exposure to metformin will have any effect on the offspring and the direction of this effect. Women prefer oral agents, indicating the need of additional studies.

Gestational diabetes mellitus: Multi-disciplinary treatment approaches

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is the most common metabolic disease of pregnancy, associated with several perinatal complications. Adequate glycemic control has been proved to decrease risk of GDM-related complications. Several studies have shown the beneficial effect of exercise and medical nutrition treatment on glycemic and weight control in GDM-affected women. Moreover, pharmacological agents, such as insulin and specific oral anti-diabetic agents can be prescribed safely during pregnancy, decreasing maternal blood glucose and, thus, perinatal adverse outcomes. Multi-disciplinary treatment approaches that include both lifestyle modifications (medical nutritional therapy and daily physical exercise) and pharmacological treatment, in cases of failure of the former, constitute the most effective approach. Insulin is the gold standard pharmacological agent for GDM treatment. Metformin and glyburide are two oral anti-diabetic agents that could serve as alternative, although not equal in terms of effectiveness and safety, treatment for GDM. As studies on short-term safety of metformin are reassuring, in some countries it is considered as first-line treatment for GDM management. More studies are needed to investigate the long-term effects on offspring. As safety issues have been raised on the use of glyburide during pregnancy, it must be used only when benefits surpass possible risks.

Metformin in the management of diabetes during pregnancy and lactation

This review explores the current place of metformin in the management of gestational diabetes (GDM) and type 2 diabetes during pregnancy and lactation. The rationale and basic pharmacology of metformin usage in pregnancy is discussed along with the evidence from observational and randomized controlled trials in women with GDM or overt diabetes. There seems to be adequate evidence of efficacy and short-term safety of metformin in relation to maternal and neonatal outcomes in GDM, with possible benefits related to lower maternal weight gain and lower risk of neonatal hypoglycemia and macrosomia. Additionally, metformin offers the advantages of oral administration, convenience, less cost and greater acceptability. Metformin may, therefore, be considered in milder forms of GDM where glycemic goals are not attained by lifestyle modification. However, failure rate is likely to be higher in those with an earlier diagnosis of GDM, higher blood glucose, higher body mass index (BMI) or previous history of GDM, and insulin remains the cornerstone of pharmacological treatment in such cases. The use of metformin in type 2 diabetes has been assessed in observational and small randomized trials. Metformin monotherapy in women with overt diabetes is highly unlikely to achieve glycemic targets. Hence, the use should be restricted as adjunct to insulin and may be considered in women with high insulin dose requirements or rapid weight gain. There is clearly a need for more clinical trials to assess the effect of combined insulin plus metformin therapy in pregnancy with type 2 diabetes. Additionally, there is a paucity of data on long-term effects in offspring exposed to metformin in utero. It is imperative to further explore its impact on offspring as metformin has significant transplacental transfer and has the potential to impact the programming of the epigenome. Therefore, caution must be exercised when prescribing metformin in pregnant women. More research is clearly needed before metformin can be considered as standard of care in the management of diabetes during pregnancy.

A retrospective study of supplemental iron intake in singleton pregnancy women with risk of developing gestational diabetes mellitus

This study investigated the effect of supplemental iron intake (SII) in early singleton pregnancy women with the risk of developing gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) among Chinese population.This study included 259 singleton pregnancy participants. Of those, 135 women underwent SII and were assigned to an intervention group, while 124 participants received no SII and were assigned to a control group. The outcome measurements consisted of the number of patients with GDM development, the levels of hemoglobin (Hb) and ferritin, and the outcomes of infant at delivery.No significant difference in the number of patients with GDM development was found between 2 groups at delivery. However, when compared with control group, subjects in the intervention group showed greater efficacy in delivery mode choice of vaginal delivery (P = .04), and cesarean section (P = .01), as well as the birthweight of infants (P < .01). Moreover, Hb and ferritin levels were also significantly higher in the intervention group than those in the control group (P < .01).The results of this retrospective study showed that SII may not increase risk of developing GDM in singleton pregnancy women; and also may benefit both pregnancy women and infants among Chinese population.